The Trish Regan Show - JUST IN: Trump Announces “Dividend Checks” for All Americans--for A LOT Of Money! | The Trish Regan Show
Episode Date: October 6, 2025A Trump Dividend Check?! 💰 Trish Regan breaks down how much it could be — and the real likelihood of it happening. Plus:📊 A new poll shows major gains for the GOP — and specifically, Donald... Trump.🏙️ Chaos in Chicago! Mayor Brandon Johnson is LIVID as President Trump sends in the National Guard.🎭 And… The View has completely lost it — now acting like a wing of the Democrat Party. No wonder Gallup finds record-low trust in the media! Join Trish LIVE for all that and more — only on The Trish Regan Show. 👉 SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW:🎧 Spotify: Trish Regan Show📺 YouTube: Trish Regan Channel💼 Support independent journalism — become a Team Member:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBlMo25WDUKJNQ7G8sAk4Zw/join 💰 For Trish’s financial insights, subscribe to The 76 Report at 76research.com — use CODE: DOLLAR today. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
When Donald Trump said he wanted to look out for the people, he really wasn't kidding.
You guys, we're talking about some potential dividend checks.
This thing is getting real.
I have a lot to add to that as discussions about maybe one, two, three, $3,000, possibly?
Could it happen?
We'll get into it today.
Plus, National Guard comes to Chicago, and let me just tell you, the Dems are freaking out.
You got Pritzker totally freaking out.
You got Brandon Johnson, not too happy.
I mean, my gosh, what was he going to do?
start some kind of civil war with this whole thing.
For goodness sakes, they're just asking for a little
cooperation from ICE and you can't
even give it. We're going to get into all of that.
Meanwhile, oh, is Kamala
still out and about? Yeah, she is,
believe it or not. And boy, this is what
you would call delusional.
Delusional Kamala.
I mean, she's not that smart to begin with,
but now she's just spout and lies.
That is quite unprecedented.
And
it was the tightest,
closest presidential election.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
It wasn't actually.
In fact, Kamala, if you had half a brain,
maybe you'd recall the whole hanging Chad thing back in 2000,
or I don't know, the 2020 race,
which is a whole lot closer than anything we saw in 2024.
But you keep telling yourself that that's what she's trying to,
you know, they just lie.
No wonder.
Nobody trusts the media because the media has been going along with the lies.
We're going to get to all of it,
including Brennan Johnson's comments out of Chicago today,
plus news that the views really and truly.
I mean, I don't know how this show is still on TV.
It is just effectively a wing of the Democrat Party.
All of it.
Today, live on the Trish Rican show, make sure you subscribe.
We begin today with the dividend check from Donald Trump
that may be in the mail.
You see, we talked about this a little bit last week, just briefly.
And so many of you reached out and you're like, wait a second,
is this new sound?
And I heard that question over and over and over again
throughout the weekend. So I was like, okay, we need to do a deep dive on this so that people really
understand what's going on. Don't forget, he put in the tariffs, right, effectively like 10%
across the board. And so he's anticipating income that could be anywhere from, you know, I think
the estimates are somewhere between 300, shall we say, $300 billion and maybe trillions of dollars.
We're not entirely sure, but they're looking for at least $300 billion here in that.
So could you really have a dividend check, maybe $1,000, $3,000?
This is what people are talking about.
Well, I want to assure you that the sound we played last week on Friday, actually, yeah, it was new.
He had just said this on Thursday or Friday of last week.
And, you know, it's not the first time he's talked about it, which is why I think it's worth putting some thought into what's really going on here.
I think he's actually pretty serious.
This is something he'd very much like to do.
Here he is sitting down with one American News Network, O-A-N,
to give his view on not just what we need to do
with all the money coming in from the tariffs
in terms of paying down debt,
but anything left over,
he'd really like to do what he's calling a dividend check.
Watch.
Your tariffs are going to be over a trillion dollars a year, in my opinion.
We're going to do something.
We're looking at something.
where number one, we're paying down debt because people have allowed the debt to go crazy.
But, you know, with growth, with the kind of growth we have now, the debt is very little,
rather than speaking, you grow yourself out of that debt.
It's not a question of paying it.
You grow yourself out.
And the numbers are so much bigger than they ever were.
The numbers we have now are bigger than they ever were.
So when you have $36 trillion in debt a year ago or two years ago and you have a lot less revenue coming in,
And then you have 37 or 38.
It's not 38 yet, but it will be.
And the numbers are so much bigger, all of a sudden, 38, you're under levered, whereas for 36, you were highly levered.
We're not highly levered anymore.
Now, with that being said, we'll pay back debt.
But we also might make a distribution to the people, almost like a dividend to the people of America.
How much are you thinking for that, sir?
Well, we're thinking maybe $1,000 to $2,000.
Be great.
another wow wow okay so by the way the numbers i was just quoting were what it would cost to give
one to two thousand dollars to each and every american but in terms of what's estimated here i mean
we've seen various estimates um the hope is that you could at least get right 300 billion dollars
uh i think they've collected around 215 billion dollars so far in tariffs but this thing could
grow as we move forward of course assuming should
always say, assuming that you are, in fact, getting all of the economic activity that you would
anticipate, right? So you still have to have a vibrant economy because you need all those countries
to be paying the tariffs. So assuming that holds, you might actually have enough money coming in
where if you can pay down some of the debt, one of the things he referenced was, you know,
like we're a huge economy. So what's your debt to GDP ratio, you know, historically in the last
10, 15 years has not been very good. So you want to bring that down. And if you're able to bring that
down, does that then turn into this so-called dividend check? This is the second time he's brought
this up. I want to go back to a few months ago where he was outside the White House and someone
asked him about this and he was like, ha ha ha, you know, and I'm telling you, knowing him as I do,
one, I guarantee it's something he wants to do. Can he do it? We're going to get into that
in a little bit more depth. But I'll tell you, he's going to try. He's going to try. He's going to try.
Second time it's come up. Listen.
Of a rebate to the American public in terms of all of that money.
We're thinking about that, actually.
We have so much money coming in.
We're thinking about a little rebate,
but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,
but we're thinking about a rebate.
That's the first.
We just made a lot of news.
We're thinking about a rebate because we have so much money coming in
from tariffs that a tariff,
that a little rebate for people of a certain income level might be very nice.
So that's something you should pay attention to.
Okay, now granted, yes, I agree.
We got to pay down the debt.
But he really doesn't like taxes.
He's a big believer.
And, okay, we're going to get back to the people who's trying to get the Fed to kind of loosen
things up so that we can get, you know, mortgages flowing.
He had a plan that he revealed on true social today saying we need to build.
I'm going to call it build, baby build, right?
Forget drill, baby, Joe.
Well, that's important too.
But it's build, baby, build.
He wants to build and build and build more houses for Americans.
He wants Fannie and Freddie to be hospitable to giving more Americans mortgages.
He wants mortgage rates lower.
And he's come up with the idea that maybe we could be giving out these so-called dividend checks.
Well, what would that look like?
Has it ever been done before?
You know, there's a lot of countries around the world that have these sovereign wealth funds.
And in these sovereign wealth funds, like you see in the UAE, for example,
I believe Norway has one.
If you look at, for example, even Singapore, they all have these, right?
And they make a lot of money off of these sovereign wealth funds.
Don't forget, he's taking a stake in Intel as well.
The U.S. government is taking a stake in Intel.
So there's a lot of opportunities maybe to be bringing some money in.
So then what do you do with that money?
If you go around the globe, all of these sovereign wealth funds tend to reinvest it
in social programs for the country.
They don't actually give it out as like a direct handout or a direct check like you'd
see on some of the Native American reservations, right?
Like sometimes that happens like with the gambling thing.
And, you know, if you put up a casino and then everybody on the reservation gets a
certain amount of money.
Or, for example, in Alaska where they actually get a cut of the oil reserves.
So he's talking about giving everyday Americans a kind of dividend.
In other words, if the U.S. economy is doing well, treat it like a stock, treat it like a company,
and you're going to get something out of it.
In terms of how realistic it is, I think it is.
I mean, I was just crunching some numbers.
I wouldn't have thought this normally, but, you know, let's split it down the middle.
Okay, so he's talking about $1 to $2,000 per adult.
You've got about $180 million, American adults, here in this country.
So it looks like it might run around $270 billion.
the problem with it right now is that we're not bringing enough in. So if we only bring in $300 billion
in tariff revenue this year, it wouldn't quite be enough to get you there. So I think his goal is to
bring in much more revenue on the tariff front. And, you know, $300 billion is sort of the lower-end
estimate. And I think that they can do better than that. And they probably will do better than that.
If you have a thriving global economy and people are buying all our stuff and we're taking 10% of it,
then yeah, you could be in a situation where very likely you might have the luxurious position of
being able to say, okay, we're going to give out one to $2,000 to each and every American.
Will every American get it? I don't know. I mean, I would not be surprised if there's, of course,
an income cutoff for this because he's trying desperately to help the middle class.
So it may go directly to middle class Americans.
Knowing him, he'd like it to go to everyone, of course.
Even the billionaires, right? Because his feeling would be what's fair is fair.
and nobody should be overpaying in taxes, et cetera, but he may come up against some realities.
I find this really fascinating right now because don't forget what's going on in New York City
with Mamdami. He's promising free this, free that, free housing, free grocery stores, I mean,
free buses, you name it. And it's almost like this sort of universal basic income and free stuff
is just taking over the left wing of the Democrat Party. And yet here you have Donald Trump.
think about this and how interesting this is.
In the background, guys, from the GOP saying,
hey, maybe we just make more money and we give some of it back.
It's like a capitalist approach to what Mamdani and the communist socialist is trying to do.
So once again, he's beating them at their own game.
I mean, fascinating really to think about.
So again, he's spoken about it at least twice from what I can see.
He may have sent some stuff out on truth social as well about it.
Dividend in checks, I'm not ruling him out.
I think that they absolutely could happen, whether they happen this year.
Again, like anything's possible.
He would have to get congressional approval, of course,
but Congress is on his side,
and this might actually come to fruition.
So you'll wonder why the guy is just climbing and climbing and climbing and climbing in the polls.
Again, I think he's hitting on a nerve that is so central to the American public right now,
and that is the livelihood and success of the middle class.
So calling for, for example, more housing, build baby, build over the weekend, calling for the need for a dividend check.
Meanwhile, you look at these poll numbers, it's amazing, right?
These poll numbers are huge for 18 to 39.
That is a giant jump.
This insider advantage just came out with a new poll, and I'm blown away by that.
So who would have ever thought the youth in America would vote conservative?
I mean, Charlie, of course, had a big hand in that.
Don't forget that.
And I think that with his passing, people, especially the youth, are like tuning in more and more and more.
How many times have I seen someone over the last couple of weeks on TikTok or Twitter or wherever say,
gosh, you know what? I've just, I've woken up. I never realized everything that was being spoonfed to me in such a way that,
you know, I really didn't have a way to think about this. And so Donald Trump now climbing in these polls,
we saw the Kinnapiaq one the other day, right? And you see the favorable ratings, 30% for the Democrat Party.
That is just unbelievably bad, unfavorable ratings, 54%.
In other words, everybody in the middle doesn't like them right now.
And they don't like them because of a variety of things.
You've got, well, oh, I don't know.
The Sombril means probably don't help because it really topcast them right about now
is looking out for everybody except for the Americans that are toiling away,
trying to earn an honest living in this country.
So, yes, what's happened?
Even the poll from the New York Times has the libs taken the blame
for the shutdown, something that, like, Chuck Schumer can't believe.
But I can't believe Chuck Schumer because Chuck Schumer is now calling out the New York Times
saying it's totally biased in favor of Trump.
What world are we living in now, Chuckie?
Listen to this.
I mean, he says it, and then he starts to laugh.
And then everybody on Capitol Hill starts to laugh because it's so, frankly, preposterous.
A poll that says that Democrats will be blamed for the shutdown.
There are many more polls that show Republicans are blamed.
The question in that poll is biased.
Biased in the New York Times, but it's biased.
If you turn the question, that's true.
I don't always believe the New York Times.
You can be sure of that.
Neither do you.
Okay.
Oh, Chuckie.
You know, I mean, when you're trying to say that the New York Times is biased towards Donald Trump,
you've really, really kind of jumped the shark.
We know that you just have nothing, nothing, nothing to compete against him with because he's locked up your entire category.
I mean, remember the day when the Democrats used to talk about how we can't have anybody coming here illegally, Diane Feinstein,
Senator from California saying, we can't be the welfare system for Mexico.
Well, apparently now we're the welfare system from Mexico.
And they don't want to admit this right now.
I mean, this was the best.
This was the best takedown ever.
So last week, Jeannie Sheen, she is the senator from New Hampshire.
She went on to Fox.
Okay, I give her credit.
She went on to Fox.
Not an easy thing to do.
I know.
But, you know, if you're going to go on to Fox or any conservative program,
please don't sit there and lie to our faces.
As she did, love Lawrence for this one,
class act the way he handled it.
But look at the question he asked her.
Look at what she says.
And then look at what's coming.
And we will try that again, shall we?
He's saying that illegal immigrants should get access to the health insurance marketplace.
I'm so glad you said that actually I have some tape of your Democratic Party members saying this on the debate stage.
So they've all said, and let's play the clip.
A lot of you have been talking tonight about these government health care plans that you've proposed in one form or another.
This is a show of hands question and hold them up for a moment so people can see.
Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants.
Senator, that's literally every member of your party.
from moderate to more progressive that have said that in the past.
Okay.
So you can't lie.
So whether it's, okay, we want, we want health care for illegals.
We want free stuff for illegals.
We want free, free, free, free.
Forget about Americans, right?
We showed you the tape last year of kids getting kicked out of school in New York City.
They couldn't go to school because it was a snowstorm and they had to house all the migrants.
Like, I mean, these are hard realities, right?
I'm not saying that you want to leave people outside in the cold.
But you can imagine how angry the parents were that said,
wait a second, my kid has to go to school.
And why is it that these people are being prioritized who are non-American citizens,
all in the name of this humanitarian aid?
I mean, you just can't actually bring that many people in
if you don't have systems to account for them.
And that is what Donald Trump is fighting back against right now,
and the GOP is fighting back against,
because we don't have the money.
Oh, well, they'll say, what about those, what about the rebate checks?
If you're going to give $2,000, right, to every American, 180 adult Americans,
well, then really shouldn't you be giving that to the migrants?
And I think voters would tell you, very simply, no, no, because these are the people that are paying the taxes,
these are the people that are paying into the system, and we need to be rewarding them first.
I'll tell you, it's like they just can't figure this out.
And so every time I look at these polls, I keep seeing him gaining and gaining and gaining.
And it's because people feel like they have been deserted by the Democrat Party.
I've showed you guys this before, this woman who phrased it.
I was going to say so eloquently, but not necessarily eloquently, because there's a whole
lot of F-bombs in there.
We cleaned them up, okay?
But it's not necessarily eloquent.
but she gets her point across passionately.
Hello, listen to this lady.
The Democrats want to give away $1.4 billion of free motherfucked money
to the immigrants for health care.
And if not, if the other side don't agree with it,
they're talking about shutting down the motherfuck government.
Why the fuck do you fight so hard for everybody but your own motherfuck
people?
What about us?
What about us?
That's what everybody's asking.
That's what your polls keep tanking.
Boom, right?
I mean, that's the reality of it, you guys.
It's like, what about us?
What about everyday Americans that are toiling away
and they don't get the $300 worth of ethnically appropriate food
like they were given out in New York City?
They don't get daily-made service at the Roosevelt Hotel
wants a four-five-star hotel in New York City.
They don't get any of that.
They get taxed because they have to pay for it all.
Why are they doing this?
Like, it just doesn't make any, I'll tell you, it doesn't make any economic sense,
and it doesn't make any political sense.
Well, it doesn't make any political sense provided you don't have Democrats that are winning
and therefore forcing through legislation that would enable people who are here illegally
in the country to be able to vote.
I think that was the big dream.
They were trying to get there.
And suddenly Donald Trump, and more than half the country,
country came along and said, nope, not happening.
Chicago today, whoa.
They're trying to do this in Chicago, right?
Like they care more about everybody else in Chicago, apparently.
They're fighting ice every chance they get.
They're being asked in one particular case over the weekend to come and aid some ice
officers, and the police wouldn't even respond.
They're not allowed to.
They're not allowed to.
Think about that, you guys.
I mean, because Brandon Johnson, the mayor of Chicago, I don't know what he's trying to do.
trying to ignite some kind of real divide between federal and state.
I mean, the kind like, you know, you go back to the days of Lincoln.
This is not good.
Or shall I say, go back to the days of 1963, Alabama and George Wallace,
when you had to send the National Guard in to make sure the kids could go to school together
because George Wallace wanted to fight that.
But guess what?
There's this little thing called the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution
that means the federal government, when Bush comes to shove, they're the ones in charge.
And in this particular case, Congress has been charged constitutionally with making sure that we have Americans here.
And if people are here illegally in the country committing crimes, they have to get out.
So it's kind of simple, Brandon Johnson, if you think about it for two seconds.
But we get it.
You get your point of view.
Let's listen in.
Executive order aimed at reigning in this out-of-control amendment.
administration, the order establishes ice-free zones. That means that city property and
unwilling private businesses will no longer serve as staging grounds for these raids.
So ice-free zones. I mean, wasn't it supposed to be a sanctuary city anyway, so now
they're not going to allow ice? So this is now bordering on basically obstruction. Okay, so this
actually hands the courts a very promising argument for the federal government. If you think about,
you know, if you sat back and said, we're just not going to help, we're just, we're just not
going to help at all, you could say that that wasn't actually getting in the way of. You're just not,
you're just standing by the sidelines, right? But if you actually say, okay, we're not
going to allow ICE in here. It's the same, sorry, guys, as George Wallace standing in front of the
school saying, I'm not going to let you in.
because of the color of your skin.
You can't do that, Brandon Johnson.
That's when you're starting to take things to a whole other level.
And I know where the Supreme Court is going to come out on this,
and you're not going to win.
So what is the actual goal here?
I want to go through what Tim Lyons, the acting director of ICE, is saying.
He's like, they won't even help us.
But by the way, it's going beyond they won't even help us now,
because you heard there from Brandon Johnson himself,
who made it very clear,
they're establishing these ice-free zones.
So what are they going to do?
So you're not allowed to come here.
If ice tries to come in, what are they going to do?
Seriously, is this going to be like a physical altercation against ice?
Didn't La Monica?
I know you love it when I say that.
I love saying it.
La Monica.
Didn't she actually figure that out the hard way?
Because now she's been indicted and she's looking at 17 years in the slammer
because she decided to,
allegedly, you know, give somebody the right hook outside the Delancey Hall in Newark, New Jersey,
the ICE detention center because she decided to take on federal officers. You can't do that,
even as a member of Congress. So Brandon, before you go on and on about these ice-free zones,
I would highly recommend you spend a little time with your lawyers, because your lawyers are going to
tell you this is like kind of civil war type stuff, right? You can't do it. You just can't do it. It's one thing.
and it's bad enough to say you won't help.
It's another thing to say we're going to wall this off.
Tim Lyons, acting director of ICE saying,
you know, this is just despicable.
This is not what you expect.
When officers are in need and our ICE officers were in need
over the weekend in Chicago, guess what?
The police wouldn't answer the call.
You get a call on the radio, 1033.
An officer assist call, you show up.
What do you make of not only the audio evidence,
but also the real-life experience of your federal agents of them not showing up to the call.
Hey, Lawrence, yeah, it's sad because seriously, all law enforcement will respond to any other brother or sister in law enforcement that's in need.
And that's what didn't happen here in Chicago.
You know, you have 30 Border Patrol agents that are being swarmed, pinned in, attacked.
You have a firearm in the vehicle.
They have to return fire.
Yet the officers of Chicago, PD, are told to stand down.
It just shows where we're at right now.
with the sad state of law enforcement going on in Illinois,
is the fact that you had other federal officers under attack,
yet because of politics and because of the way some people feel about immigration enforcement,
they did not come to the aid of federal law enforcement officers.
You also have bounties now, according to the Secretary of Homeland Security,
against some of your officers as well?
We are, yeah.
Can't really get into it because of criminal intelligence in some of the cases working,
but we've seen the uptick in actual bounties, photos of agents and, you know, agency leadership as being targets of attack by gangs and cartels.
It really just has to stop.
And again, all the men and women of ICE are doing are going out there and enacting the laws that Congress has written.
It's a law enforcement mission.
We do it every day.
We've been doing it for decades.
Yet right now, the men and women of ICE are in the crosshairs.
It's unacceptable.
Apple did take down, by the way, some of these ice tracking apps.
So that was a good thing. The DOJ had a bit of a win there, but the fact that they're trying to, I mean, they're, they're trying to dehumanize these ICE officers. And they're saying, oh, well, you know, the ICE officers are dehumanizing migrants. The ICE officers, they're there to actually do the job that Congress has requested they do. There are laws on the books that don't allow you to come to this country illegally, certainly not come to this country and commit a crime and be here illegally. So one of the things that happened over the weekend was,
there was a raid on an apartment building because they were trying to Agua gang members inside.
And when they do one of these raids, as Tim Lyons also explained, they have to actually get
everybody out and find everybody. And look, it's not pleasant, but for goodness sakes, you get
criminals in the building, you've got to get them out. And I don't really know if there's
another way to do this, guys. Maybe if the Chicago police would help, it might be going a little
bit more smoothly, but you know that's not happening because of this guy, BJ.
The moment that we are in, Chicago was built for this moment.
Immigrants from around the world, descendants of slaves have come to this city to make it
the global capital of the world. And now we stand in a moment that is testing our very
humanity and the city of Chicago will stand the test of time.
Okay, so I guess he's not going to help. No, he's not going to help. And you know who's
not too pleased about it. The head of Homeland Security 1. Christine Nome, let's look at her
speaking on Fox just this morning. There has a less than 6% approval rating in Chicago. So the people
who live there, less than 6% think he might be doing somewhat of a good job. Overwhelmingly,
that man is a failure. He's a failure for his people and hasn't stood up for the victims of
the crimes that have happened in his city. So we're going to keep doing our work. Every day when we're
They are doing our operations when I'm there with them.
People on the streets are clapping as we do our work.
They're clapping as these officers are arresting these bad criminals.
And out of the 12 that we arrested during the short period of time I was there,
six of them had criminal records in their backgrounds that the state had arrested them
and just turned them loose on the street again for assault, for weapons possession, for robbery.
Those individuals now are off the streets, thanks to President Trump,
not thanks to that mayor who's delusional at best.
She's right. I mean, he's completely delusional. I think he's just completely political,
but delusional in the sense that, I mean, at some point, give it up, buddy.
You got 6% approval rating. We were just talking about the Democrats being in the,
you know what, given that they only got a 30% approval rating.
You only have, forgive me, was that a 34 or 50, yeah, 34, 54, 54 disapproval, 30%
and you go to Chicago and Brandon Johnson's get a lousy 6%.
It's over, okay? It's over.
And why is it over?
Because you can't keep your kids safe.
You can't keep families safe.
How do you think you feel trying to get to and from school on the south side of Chicago?
You got enough going on.
You got to learn how to read.
You've got to learn how to write.
You've got to learn math if you're going to have a chance of anything in this world.
And you know what?
You can't have your physical safety guaranteed because you got numbskills like this guy.
They just want to take more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more money.
and use it for, oh, I don't know.
Didn't he say he wants housing programs?
You know, we're going to worry about housing
before we're going to worry about the police.
I mean, it actually got a little bit heated
on Morning Joe the other day
because Joe Scarborough, who's, you know,
talking out of both sides of his mouth,
the ultimate survivor, if you would,
going down to Mar-a-Lago day after the election.
Yeah, well, he decided he would take on Brandon Johnson.
And he gave him five different,
chances to say, hey, yeah, I think that I would be welcome to taking some help. I mean, hey,
you guys want money all the time. Here's the federal government saying, we're going to help you
control crime in your city and you don't want that. I don't think that's a really good look.
No, it's definitely not a good look. And now on top of that, you're doing things that are frankly
illegal with the, okay, we're going to prevent ICE from being here, period. This guy has made it
clear from the beginning, he would be of no help to ICE. Listen.
Our local police department will not ever cooperate with ICE, whatever their constitutional authority is.
We will not cooperate with whatever their constitutional authority is.
Did we hear that right? So he doesn't care about the Constitution at all.
Constitution doesn't matter.
We don't care about the supremacy clause.
We don't care about any of it.
We are going to take you on.
Our local police department
will not ever
cooperate
with ice.
Whatever
their constitutional authority is.
Okay, so
this is a problem.
Okay, he wants to
obstruct ice.
He is out there
putting these no ice
zones. So, you know, in the beginning, you could say, okay, he's declining to assist. He's not
going to assist at all federal law. So, you know, you could kind of classify that. I mean, I don't
give him a pass at all, but you could classify that as constitutional non-cooperation. And that,
you know, he's got some state rights and, you know, he wants to respect the state rights. Well,
now he's actually saying, you can't come here. And I guess the question is, if they go there,
then what happens is he going to, like, physically confront them? Because it's really turning into
George Wallace, 1963, Alabama, where you actually have obstruction, right?
Because George Wallace was out there trying to bar kids from going into the school and then
trying to bar the National Guard from going into the school.
And, you know, it kind of is like, oh, I don't know, a little like La Monica out there, you know,
with the, what do we call it, the right red hook?
She's like, don't mess with me.
Don't mess with her.
Oh, I mean, whoa, whoa. Oh, you saw that, right? Okay, so now she's actually just a little bit of an aside. She's trying to argue that she does not, should not be indicted because of some new body cam that came out. I guess the body cam shows the officers giving instructions on what to do because they needed to get instructions. And the DOJ, I guess gave them instructions. Listen, if people are out there,
And they're still trying to barge in and they're still trying to, you know, be problematic.
Don't forget, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, got arrested.
And he had the clearance to get arrested from none other than Pampondi.
And for some crazy reason, again, nobody said these people were smart.
She's arguing that this actually excuses her.
It absolutely makes no sense at all.
But it's worthwhile to see the body cam footage, right, of what was going down.
Because I would argue that this is what should happen.
Well, thanks to body cam footage released by a federal court,
just this afternoon, we now know that the mayor of Newark was right when he said that that
arrest did not arise organically from anything that happened on the ground at that ice facility.
He said at the time that his arrest appeared to have been ordered specifically by top Trump officials
in Washington. Well, now today we can see with our own eyes that that appears to be true.
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to make you sit through Rachel.
No, no, I got it. We're taking them right now.
Let me just, let me just talk.
You've been waiting an hour right now.
Okay.
Yep, nope.
I'm gonna take him right now.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay, even though we stepped out, I'm gonna, what are we called?
You can look for over an hour.
And we have the right to be there.
Guys, listen to me, we're gonna walk out the gate.
I'm gonna place the mayor in handcuffs.
Okay, we are arresting the mayor right now.
Or the deputy of the United States.
Anyone that gets it away, I need you guys to
give me a perimeter so I could help him and get them on there.
If you have body cams, turn them off.
Okay?
We advise his security.
And we have a, uh, is on and went for his weapon while we were engaged.
So please let's, let's take it in the case.
Okay.
Okay.
So they're all talking.
Okay.
We're going to place him under arrest.
Come on.
All right.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Let's do one.
I'll bring it.
Okay.
So they were placing him under arrest.
because the Attorney General, forgive me, yes, the Attorney General, head of the DOJ,
Pam Bondi, said yes, if they're not cooperating, if they won't leave the premises,
you have the right to place them under arrest, which is then, you know, the chaos had ensued.
And LaMonica, for some reason, figures that she's entitled to get kind of, you know, tough,
allegedly.
But I'm looking at that.
You're looking at that.
I think we're looking at that, shall we?
just say, yeah, that's some fisticuffs, if you would.
So she's saying that this somehow gets her off the hook.
So I'm bringing this back to Chicago, guys,
because as we look at what's going on in Chicago right now,
and we know that the mayor of Chicago is saying,
hey, we're going to have areas that are sort of no-go zones for ice,
and we're going to have ice-free zones.
I'm not sure how that's going to work.
Okay, Brandon, you can't have an ice-free zone.
free zone and then have something like that happen. And I'm afraid something like that will happen.
And it's almost like the Democrats are like ratcheting up, ratcheting up, ratcheting up. I mean,
for goodness, did you guys see Kamala Harris over the weekend? Oh, somebody's been coaching her and
they're like, we need some passion, Kamala. You know, just call him out, pretend that, you know,
pretend he didn't win. Why not, right? You know, that's what Hillary did. Take a look at Kamala Harris
trying to undercut the mandate.
And it was a mandate.
For goodness sakes, he won big time.
It was a landslide.
He won everything, including the popular vote, Kamala Harris.
I hate to remind you.
I know you're not much of a student of history.
You're a student of anything, for that matter.
But, you know, if you go back in time,
I suspect Hillary might not have appreciated what you said
because I would imagine maybe her election
with Donald Trump was even closer than yours.
But there was also what?
Oh, I don't know, 2020 between Biden and Trump.
Those were close elections, and there was a very close election back in 2000.
Remember those things called hanging chads, but it's not stopping her.
Watch the nonsense as she tries to undercut what Donald Trump is doing,
whether it be in Portland, Oregon or in Chicago, Illinois.
Take a peek.
That is quite unprecedented.
Watch standing up.
It's a mandate.
Okay, sorry. Kamala, it was not the closest election in the 21st century. Oh my goodness. Like really and truly,
I was a young reporter at Bloomberg Television. I remember that night so well with the hanging chads
and then the weeks that went on and on and on. And, you know, when it was all said and done,
gosh, that election was really tight. I mean, it came down to what? Like 500 or some on votes in
the state of Florida. Wow, that was amazing, right? But don't try to.
tell us that. I realize that, you know, you're ganging up with your friends in California and your
friends in Chicago and you want to try and say, this is not what the country wants. Believe me,
it is what the country wants. And we've seen this over and over and over again from people.
And, you know, again, I go back to this is why nobody trusts the media. Nobody trusts the media
right now because you get people over on, oh, what's that show called? Who even watches that,
honestly? Like, I feel like the only time we watch this together is when I pull clips for you.
so you can see how insane they are.
But they got a little off the reservation today on the show
because they started talking about how bad bunny, you know,
is just fantastic.
Clearly, they don't speak Spanish because I've listened to the lyrics.
And they're bad.
Hence the name, I guess.
No, but they're really actually just so unbelievably bad.
I was going to actually show them, parts of them, in English on the show.
I created some graphics and stuff,
and I was like, oh, I can't do that.
I really can't do that.
But anyway, they don't get it.
This is a guy who has made it very clear.
He does not want to be in the U.S.
He's Puerto Rican, therefore he has U.S. citizenship,
but he does not want to do his tour in the U.S.
because of ICE.
Hey, Bad Bunny, are you still going to perform at the Super Bowl?
I mean, you did say that you wouldn't perform anywhere where ICE was, right?
And I got news.
Ice is going to be there.
Yeah, we'll be all over that place.
And I can't.
We're going to enforce the law.
So I think people should not be coming to the Super Bowl.
unless they're law-abiding Americans who love this country.
So Bad Bunny, take your own advice.
Cancel.
No, one wants to watch you anyway.
No, no one does.
I mean, you know, basically we're all going to leave during the halftime report.
If, in fact, he gets to do this thing.
I mean, I just don't know why he doesn't cancel.
New York Times is so excited.
They're, oh, bad bunny, bad bunny, right?
Because they're thinking a big showdown with ICE.
Well, you know, he's made it very clear.
I mean, this is a very political pick, by the way, by the NFL and Roger Goodell,
strategic in that they're trying to really expand the NFL franchise internationally,
big business opportunity, right? They can get all the Hispanics down in South and Latin America
to buy into football. I'm not so sure that's going to happen, but that's the goal. They were just over
in Dublin a couple weekends ago playing a game there. I think it was the Steelers, right? Who else was there?
I can't remember, but the point being, they're trying to go global with football. And
part of that is let's bring in the Hispanic community and they think by having Bad Bunny there,
they can do that. The problem, I guess, is again, that Bad Bunny has said repeatedly,
that he doesn't want to be in the U.S.
right. Like there are so many reasons
I didn't show up in the U.S. for my tour.
None of them are out of hate.
All these shows have been successful.
We were talking,
and they were very concerned about the malito ice,
as he calls them, the bad ice could be outside of a concert.
So that's why he decided not to come.
You know, and it's, by the way,
just a bizarre move from a business standpoint
because the NFL does actually need to get its deal
approved by the DOJ, the FCC, and the FTC,
all controlled by Donald Trump.
If they want to actually buy or have an interest in,
because ESPN is buying them,
that deal to combine ESPN, right, and the NFL,
NFL is going to get a 10% stake in ESPN.
That's an ABC company.
And so watch what the ABC host, Joy Behar,
says on that atrocious show
that is really one that should be off of TV soon today.
Go to the Super Bowl when Bad Bunny is there
and round up all these people that are illegal immigrants.
Do you think that she would go if it was Garth Brooks or Eminem or Taylor Swift or any other white person?
Let me understand what you're saying because she's going to go to the Super Bowl and round up.
How's she going to know who's who?
Because the Supreme Court has given permission to question anyone who has a Spanish accent who has a dark skin.
Yeah.
That's why.
Here's the thing.
Everybody.
get a little cogo butter,
send in the sun.
That's the first thing.
And this is the only time
you can probably ever do this.
Give yourself a Latin accent.
You know, whoopey, that is such a good idea.
And seeing if she can tell who's who.
Our thanks to Media Research Center
for pulling that clip,
it was just a bad, bad, bad, bad, bad choice.
but I think that they want to be in the news cycle this way for whatever reason.
Don't ask me.
Don't ask me why they would do this.
Otherwise, you know, Joy Behar is saying, you know, why would she do this?
Why would she do this?
Well, this is a guy who's made it very clear who his followers are.
Who listens to him?
He said it here.
Listen.
U.S. again.
I'm scared, scared that ice my raid the venue outside my show.
And honestly, I can risk the safety of my fans like that.
mainland America just doesn't feel necessary to me anymore.
Okay.
Then you know what?
We don't really need you then, do we?
I mean, Disney, if you were smart, you wouldn't be suggesting to Roger Goodell that he
did this.
By the way, NBC, if you were smart, you wouldn't be putting this guy on either because,
you know what, those FCC violations on network television, they can pile up whether
they're in English or Spanish.
Okay?
So if there's a bunch of swears and a bunch of inappropriate content in Spanish, it counts
against you just like it would in English.
Thank you very much.
And they're already on thin ice. In fact, the president was sending out two social posts about
Rev Sharpton. It was actually really funny. He's like showing Rev and like all his glory. And I mean
all his glory back in the day when Rev was woo-hoo, the rep, right? Talking about just what a terrible,
terrible person he is and what a political hack he is. I mean, isn't he the guy that took like
$500,000 for the Kamala interview on MSNBC for his charity? Oh yeah, right before he sat down
with her lovely. No wonder nobody trusts the media. A brand new poll out today showing from Gallup that
the media has reached an all-time low. I could have told you that. I mean, look at what we're doing
over here. This is amazing, right? I think so many people have come over to this platform because they're
looking for an alternative for the mainstream media because you can't trust it, aren't the thing
the mainstream media says. I mean, one of the guys on that particular picture, they're all just
awful. I mean, one of them had to pay, his network had to pay $16 million because he said something
It was so libelous against the now president.
Another decided to write a book on the very thing that he was involved in covering up.
That would be Joe Biden's mental decline.
Remember how he went out to Lara Trump?
How dare you, Lara, insult the president's stutter.
It's just a stutter and you're actually being really mean to little kids everywhere who have a stutter.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Jakey.
That was a whole lot more than a stutter.
As she tried to explain to him, but then he yelled at her and she was off the air.
Okay, now he comes out with a book.
what a piece of you know what, okay?
I'm sorry.
We're not buying that.
Then you get this other woman.
Yes, she kind of surprises you now and then.
She hosts a show that really should be called the Scott Jennings show,
because he's the only conservative on there,
and basically it's Scott versus this army of liberals.
She's not great either, but occasionally she'll surprise you
with a little bit of a truth bomb.
I think I have an example of that from her.
The guy in the mill is a total disaster, humpty, dumpy, or whatever they call him.
What do they call him? Potato Head? I can't remember.
Is Hannity always had a name for him?
Anyway, Gary, good to see you back here.
We have so many people watching 2,961 comments and likes.
Wow, this is fantastic.
Guys, we're going to make it to 3,000, I think, today.
I think you want those dividend checks, don't you?
Anyway, Steve, I like that.
Jake Crapper.
Yeah, apparently, over the weekend, he very proudly touted an exclusive interview
with the President of the United States, turned out to be a couple of text messages.
He's such a fraud.
Oh, my goodness.
You know, I feel bad for my profession because I'm just like these people are so, I'm so happy over here.
Because this is so much more authentic and it's so much more real and I don't have anybody
telling me what to do or what to say or any prompter.
Thank you very much that I have to read.
I never liked that.
I was good at it.
Yeah, I could read a prompter.
I also wrote all of my own copy, always.
But it's much nicer doing it this way.
Look at this.
Okay, trust in media at new low of 28% in the U.S.
Gosh, darn it.
I mean, the media is doing worse than the Democrats.
Yeah, the Quinn of Biak poll had approval for Democrats at 30%.
The media, trust in the media, is at 28%.
The mainstream media is done.
It's over.
Finito.
Okay?
Like, it's not happening anymore.
because, you know, you can only lie to people so much.
They see through all of it.
Take a look at this.
They did a whole look back, 1972 through 2025.
And it's just been like, ooh, right?
Straight down.
Because people don't trust mass media.
They know that it's big money and big interests and lots of lobbyists.
And for whatever reason, the whole left captured the entire mainstream media
from the New York Times to CNN, to Politico,
political. Oh, yes, they got some of that USAID money, remember? And they were the ones that
chose to publish that letter that was orchestrated courtesy of, oh, the guy who then became
our secretary of state, right? Blinken and Brennan and Comey and Mike Morrell. I mean, the whole
gang, they decided to put a letter together to say, oh, no, there's nothing to see here.
The Hunter Biden laptop, that's just misinformation. If you talk about that, we can actually
shut down your accounts. And then they, sure enough, they shut down the New York Post's oldest
newspaper in America, Twitter account at the time. Thank goodness Elon Musk got in there. I'll tell you.
Donald Trump and the rest of us have, we owe Elon Musk a lot. But when you look at this lack of trust
in mass media and then you see the new polls that show Donald Trump, which is gaining and gaining and gaining
with younger Americans, you know, there's a reason why. Because when you have ladies like we just saw on the
views spouting their nonsense, completely ignoring the fact that bad bunny said, oh yeah, I'm not coming
to the U.S. ever because of ICE. And then ICE says, well, hey, you know what? We might as well go,
we might as well go find you. We might as well go see you. And they don't actually bother
to play that whole side of thing? Oh, they're biased. And now everybody knows it. It gets exposed
and I keep exposing it every day. All more reason. Make sure you subscribe, share,
like, all that good stuff. Right here on this show.
it's really important. Meanwhile, as I discussed, I mean, that one, there's like one host on
the view that occasionally surprises you, and maybe she surprises herself. So it's always worth
noting when a CNN host actually admits the truth. Don't forget, lots of good things
going on right now. It looks like we might get some kind of peace deal, possibly the hostages
coming out of Gaza. I mean, it's very exciting stuff for President Trump and for the family
members there and for Israel. So this came up on the program the other night that she hosts.
And what's amazing to me, it's not amazing, but it's disheartening and it's sad. One of the guests
who's a, you know, Democrat staffer type, who had run some campaigns or had some involvement
in some campaigns, starts to say that she really doesn't want to see this happen if it's Donald Trump
doing it. That's how perverted this is, you guys. Let's watch together.
This is a major, it's a major victory for him.
Look, it is challenging to actually hear that piece of, you know,
Trump being, potentially being the one to get the ceasefire deal.
What?
It's challenging for you?
You don't want that?
Don't you want a ceasefire?
For goodness sakes, I mean, this is how embedded they are with their politics.
Look at Scott's face.
I think where we are, what we are seeing now is that a lot of people are tired of the devastation.
happening to the Palestinian people.
And so how do we figure out a way, a path forward?
And so I would be interested to understand President Trump's interest in this because he has said
some things that are very harmful to the Palestinian people.
I don't know, you know, what his motivations are.
He wants the war to end.
She's right.
Okay, so this is why we're calling this CNN host, caught admitting the truth.
He wants the war to end.
And I can guarantee you that.
I can guarantee you that he does not want people dying, period.
He wants it over.
Hey, a Nobel Peace Prize.
Yeah, sure, that would be great, right?
You can collect one of those along the way.
But I guarantee you his number one goal, and this is his frustration right now with Putin, by the way, in terms of Ukraine, right?
He does not understand why you would be costing lives like this.
These are human lives.
Let's continue.
He wants that's what he wants.
He wants the war to end for a lot of reasons.
Some of them are crucial reasons.
reasons. He wants that noble peace prize. Some of them are that I do think that whatever you think of
Trump, he does not like the idea of all the death and destruction. But it's true, okay? Like,
again, I know him well enough to know he really, really does not like the death and destruction.
He's like, wait a second. You know, like you get some good beachfront property here. He could put up
some nice condos. Like everybody will have a nice life, makes money. Like, why are we fighting?
Why are we fighting? Why are the Democrats fighting him and the GOP in Chicago?
When all he's trying to do is say, hey, let me make this a little bit safer for you.
You guys can't get it under control. I'll send it the National Guard. I'll help.
Why do we have to fight? You know, why can't we have peace in the Middle East? Why can't we have peace between Ukraine and Russia?
He's a realist who looks at it through, you could call it a simplistic lens, but he's like, hey, you know,
you make money, they make money, everybody lives happily ever after. You have a nicer life for
your kids and, you know, isn't that what it's about? He's bringing the American dream, shall we say,
global. But not everyone can get there, including, unfortunately, too many Democrats and
members of the media right here back at home. So they're occasionally calling them out. It's almost
like they got wind of things, right? They knew that they were really sinking in the polls. Well,
they know they're sinking in the ratings over there at, at C,
CNN, and I do think that one anchor, Jake Krap or somebody called him, he's like, I mean,
he's just, it's scummy. Like, guys, that was a scumb bag move to write that book after being
part of the system. It basically told people like me, we were wrong. How dare we? How dare we?
How dare we suggest mental decline that somehow that was nothing but a bunch of cheap fix? I'm like,
No, no, I'm showing you the raw footage here.
You guys make your own decision.
That pretty much sums it up.
The guy is suffering from some kind of mental decline.
Anyway, then after the fact he comes out and he writes a book about it,
trying to pretend like he wasn't part of the system.
So he's a scumbag.
The media is filled, filled with scumbags.
Just saying.
Okay?
I've been around.
I've seen it.
This is what my career has been.
I've been disillusioned.
many, many, many times.
But again, credit where credit is due,
finally he called out Hakeem Jeffries.
Hakeem didn't know what to do
because it turns out, oh, yeah,
the health care spending that we're fighting over
here for the shutdown, the $1.5 trillion,
it actually would go to illegals watch.
Donald Trump blessed it as well.
So let me ask you about a provision
that the Republicans are talking about quite a bit.
I know you want to talk about
and Democrats want to talk about
extending the Obamacare subsidies,
which expire at the end of 2025.
But they talk about the provisions,
and it's right here, subtitle E,
and this has to do with the repeal of health care subtitle changes,
and specifically what it is.
How they characterize it is,
you want to give health insurance to undocumented immigrants.
I understand that's not really an accurate depiction,
but what it does do is...
It's a lie.
It's a lie, but what your support does bring back funding
for emergency Medicaid
paid to hospitals, some of which does pay for undocumented immigrants and people who don't have health insurance.
And also, there is this provision, and it's not about undocumented immigrants.
It's about people with asylum seekers and people with temporary protected status, et cetera, et cetera,
but about their ability to get Medicaid.
So they're non-citizens.
They're not undocumented.
They're not illegal.
Why even include that in a bill, knowing that they're going to seize right upon that and use that to message?
I understand that.
Why do that?
Oh, we're going to get to Greta.
Little Greta.
She's been deported out of Israel.
What do you know?
But you see where he's going with this.
I mean, you get the Grim Reaper, right?
Coming to New York City, taking all the money away from the likes of Leticia James and Kathy Holkel.
They're losing $18 billion worth of infrastructure spending because of the shutdown.
So this is like Mana from heaven, right?
Like you got Ross Vaughan out there who's like, oh, ha, I've been working on this one,
project 2025 for years. And this is his dream come true. So now he has the opportunity to actually
really slim down government in a pretty meaningful way. And the Democrats, it's like they can't see
the forest for the trees. And so they're going to continue with this line of thinking, no, we just
want to stand up for everybody. And everybody's like, well, what about us? What about us? Don't you care
about us? Aren't you going to stand up for us? And I think the short answer to all of that,
guys, if you haven't figured it out by now, is no. Because they have their priorities.
You know what they did in California.
Last year, the Golden State spent nearly $6.5 billion on health insurance for migrants.
And through a Medicaid loophole has shifted most of the cost to the federal government.
Here to react to Fox and Friends Weekend, co-host, Charlie Hurting, Griff Jenkins.
Part of that, Charlie, is that the Medicaid is reimbursed 50% by the federal government.
And when you go to a hospital, you have to be treated.
When an illegal immigrant shows up, there's a pile of money for them to be.
be treated. Yeah, and of course, this is not a fluke either. This is not just some one random thing
happening in one state, like a crazy state like California. This has been a central plank of the
Democrat Party for years now. Everybody now remembers that in 2020, during the Democrat primary,
they were asked, who here supports giving free health care to illegal aliens? And every single
Democrat running for the nomination put up his hand and said that they support that. And of course,
this also comes after we went through COVID, where Democrats led the efforts in all of these
big cities, including New York City, spending billions of dollars, billions of taxpayers' dollars
on free housing for illegals.
So this is not some random thing.
This is actually part of their intended, intentional policies.
And the GOP is not going to have it.
And Donald Trump's certainly not going to have it.
And so that's where we are right now.
So, yeah, Letitia, ha-ha, Kathy Holkle, you're losing funding as we speak.
Hey, Gavin Newsom, you're losing funding as we speak.
He actually went on to the Michael Savage show and tried to, like, justify this somehow,
as Michael was like, but this makes no sense.
I want to show you this clip.
I plan to show you this clip.
Let me try again.
Into an emergency room when I pay more taxes than any 10,000 of them do.
You know what?
That's why we do preventative care.
why we have a different approach because we have sick care in the emergency room that's universal
across this country.
Well, I told you.
You have access all across the country.
You know, unfortunately, I can't show you.
It's got music in it, believe it or not.
And music is kind of a touchy thing on YouTube.
So we'll let that one go.
I'll just paraphrase it.
He's basically like, well, you don't need to go to an emergency room, Michael.
You don't need to because you've got, you've got preventative care.
And it's like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
So now you're telling everyday Americans they can't go to an emergency room.
You know what?
I've gone to an emergency room a lot. A lot, like without, you know, sharing too much information,
but, you know, I had to have my appendix out once. That was an emergency room that told me that.
My daughter cut her hand and had to have surgery. That was an emergency room that we went to,
okay? These are emergency rooms that you go to in case of emergency, Gavin Newsome. So no,
you can't be spending all the money from the emergency room on a group of people that should not
be in the country and that the president and ICE and the DHS are trying to get out.
Okay? Like the emergency rooms actually need to exist for everyday Americans. I mean,
is that terrible to say? Am I such a terrible person to say that? I mean, listen, we all want
to help everyone, right? But it's out of control and it's gotten out of control.
because they chose to do that.
And this is why, in case you haven't seen it yet,
this becomes a little bit funny
because every news network has now played it,
thereby ensuring that all the old people
that watch those news networks,
I'm sorry, I know I have a lot of older people watching this too,
but I was looking at that Gallup study,
and the Gallup study into the media said it was basically
older Americans that still trust the mainstream media.
And I'm like, no, no, no, please tell me,
don't trust them because they're a bunch of you know what and at least they're playing this
me.
Cote it.
Nobody likes Democrats anymore.
We have no voters left because of all of our woke trans, but not even black people want to
vote for us anymore.
Even Latinos hate us.
So we need new voters.
And if we give all these illegal aliens free health care, we might be able to get them on our
side so they can vote for us.
They can't even speak English.
so they won't realize we're just a bunch of woke pieces of shit, you know, at least for a while
until they learn English and they realize they hate us too.
Oh my goodness.
Oh, my goodness.
It's just funny, okay?
It's just really, really funny.
But anyway, things are changing, things are changing fast.
And that is what the left cannot manage.
I mean, he has outsmarted them at every single turn.
You're looking at now major, massive budget cuts in blue states.
you are looking at the possibility of one to two K for each and every American in the form of a
dividend check thanks to the tariffs.
I mean, and we got a market that's been on fire.
It's really just like a very, very sweet spot, a very incredible sweet spot.
And you know what?
We have someone to thank.
Well, we have ourselves to thank, right?
Because we made the right decision.
Can you imagine where we would be, ladies and gentlemen, if that Kamala Harris was actually in there?
We would be nowhere.
In fact, I can tell you, the market would be down.
Everybody would be pessimistic.
It would feel like a worst version of Jimmy Carter 2.0, which was what the Biden years were.
And we'd be nowhere.
But guess what?
Things are looking up.
Looking up, looking up.
You know, if you see, I got a new sticker from my computer, which is a good thing.
good thing because I think some of you guys had pointed out I was advertising Apple and they don't
pay me to advertise. I'll advertise my own company instead. I want you to go to 76 research
and sign up for my newsletter. If you have a moment, use code word dollar. Then you can get the
research for a dollar a month for the first two months and it goes to $9.95. So go check that out.
If you get a moment today, we do have a lot of great ideas on how to invest for the future there for
you. Listen, this is a good time, right?
are happening in this country and I have tremendous faith in magonomics. Okay, I have ever since I ran
his, I ran through his tax plan. I didn't just run through it. I actually read through the
entire thing. I read through tax plans in my spare time. What can I say? You know, it's just a,
kind of a core part of who I am. And I remember reading this in 2016 and saying, wow, this is good.
It was really good. It was better than cruises in my estimation.
Cruz had a good one, but he had a VAT tax in there or the hidden tax that you weren't going to see.
This one was good.
And so, congratulations to him and to us for being back in office.
I mean, I'm thinking that Trump 2.0 is kind of interesting.
Trump 2.0 is kind of fun.
And if you're a Democrat, I get it.
Trump 2.0 is scary.
Make sure you subscribe.
Make sure you hit the bell.
Oh, guys, I'm over on Spotify too.
Make sure that you go.
I've got the link in the show notes right there.
I love it because you know what?
I don't have a whole lot of followers.
We're doing well.
you're on YouTube. We've got more than a million, but I need some help over on Spotify. So if you would,
it's free. Just go there, follow the show, watch one show. Leave a nice review, please, five stars only.
Thank you so much for being here. I appreciate everything you guys do. I'll see you right back here
tomorrow.
