The Trish Regan Show - LIVE: NBC Forced to PAY UP! Settles $30MIL Defamation Bombshell--Thanks to Rachel Maddow!

Episode Date: April 14, 2025

NBC News just payed up bigtime in a defamation case against the network after Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes and other hosts on the network were accused of defaming a Georgia doctor. Trish Regan has full coverage and perscpective on what it means for the struggling network as well as other legacy media companies.Meanwhile, as President Bukele of El Savador visits President Donald Trump in the White House, the legacy media is apolplectic over news of an alleged wrongful deportation. But, the White House is standing firm — hear the President’s policy chief Stephen Miller on the issue as fireworks break out on Fox News. The President is calling for greater oversight of the media - including a specific demand regarding CBS News.. and, the markets remain in focus. Despite continued volatility, exemption news for semi conductors and electronics, combined with the promise of a $500 billion investment by Nvidia, is helping sentiment. SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL: https://Youtube.com/TrishReganChannel Become a TEAM MEMBER to get special access and perks:▶️ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBlMo25WDUKJNQ7G8sAk4Zw/join🟢For independent views on the market - sign up for my financial newsletter The 76report at:▶️ https://76research.com with CODE: DOLLAR today. Today’s show is sponsored by: 🟢https://TrishLovesGold.com — American Hartford Gold — go to: ▶️ Https://TrishLovesGold.com or TEXT TRISH to 65532 to receive up to $15,000 in free silver with American Hartford Gold or go to https://TrishLovesGold.com. You can also use Trish's name when calling 1-844-495-1115. 🟢 Go to ▶️ https://balanceofnature.com and use CODE: TRISH for 35% off and FREE SHIPPING Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Happy Monday, everyone. We get a lot going on. For starters, MSNBC has just been forced to settle a $30 million defamation lawsuit. This one's pretty wild. They were accusing a doctor of robbing uteruses. We're going to get into all the gory details on that one. Plus, oh my gosh, Donald Trump sitting down with the president of El Salvador. And just moments before they spoke, you had Stephen Miller really coming out hard against Fox News. I hate to do it, Bill, but I got to correct you on every single thing that you said, because it was all wrong. So we're going to get into all of that. It's pretty good. I promise you that. Meanwhile, meanwhile, meanwhile, we also are seeing this media uproar over one Muhammad Khalil. You remember the student that got the visa to come here and then ignited all these protests all over college campuses, including on Columbia University, my alma mater. It became a tall. total mess. They had to actually shut down classes and graduation. And there are those on the left and in the media that are defending him and defending him and defending him. And like, everybody's like, I'm sorry. Like, he's here as a guest. Trey Gowdy said it well. So for someone who had the privilege of living and studying in this country to support a group that doesn't believe in any due process or any appeals for innocent victims, it's just a little too rich for me. Yeah, a little too

rich for me too. And good news. We've got the market turning higher. Look, volatility is still here, plenty of it in the weeks ahead to come. But a little glimmer of hope coming out of invidia. Gigantic commitment of a half a trillion dollars. If we don't have those chips, Nvidia's in all the missiles, call. Did some checking on this. All the missiles are that are driven by invidia chips. So those invidia chips matter. Semiconductors matter. Is there a to Donald Trump's madness. We will get into all of it. Welcome to the program. Make sure you subscribe, shared like. I'm watching you in the live comments. This is live, baby. We're off to the races on this Monday. Subscribe. Here we are. Beginning with MSNBC, totally busted here. There's a 30 million

dollar defamation lawsuit filed against the network. And the reason it was filed against the network is because they went out and called a doctor, an individual, who was apparently treating some of the The migrants that were coming into a Georgia facility, including women, they were calling him a uterus robber. Apparently, he had performed a couple. I believe his lawyer says two hysterectomies that were needed on people that were there. And suddenly, according to Rachel Maddow now, he's doing all kinds of weird stuff. Here's her on with a guest talking about this very story. Lawyers alleged abuse of migrant women by a gynaecologist for Georgia ICE detention center.

She's interviewing, not the doctor there, but somebody, gosh, who looks a little bit. bit like her. Why is it that everybody on MSNBC kind of looks like Rachel? She's like cloning herself. Anyway, the lawyer like came out and cited her as one of the big, big problems in this case. But let's go back in time to September of 2020. Here's Chris Hayes, who also picked up on this story. Let's listen to what he was saying. Tonight, we can report there are three women who say they had procedures they either did not consent to ahead of time or felt coerced into consenting to. Tonight we can bring you part of an exclusive interview with one of those women detained at that very facility who says she felt pressured into a full abdominal hysterectomy by this doctor. The woman is in immigration proceedings and fears for her status, so we are calling her B and not showing her face.

She was in the Irwin County Detention Center during the Trump administration. We've reviewed medical records that corroborate that she had this procedure. She went to this doctor, who NBC News has identified as Dr. Mahendra Amin, and OBGYN in nearby Douglas, Georgia. We are aware of the whistleblower's allegations as they relate to Dr. Amin, and Dr. Amin has issued a statement saying we are aware of the whistleblowers

statements as they relate to Dr. Amin, and he vehemently denies them. We look forward to all the facts coming out and are confident that once they do, Dr. Amin will be cleared of any wrongdoing. Here is how B described her experience with that doctor at the facility. I feel like I had no right to say anything.

They just, he just, Dr. Amanda, just told me, listen, you're going to get hysterectomy done. And schedule an appointment for that. And then. I had no, I had nothing, no saying this. And then you, you did go and you did, he did perform a full hysterectomy on you. He said to remove the cancerous tissue. Yes. That's what he, I was told.

Hmm. Like, maybe he actually saved her life, right? You saw how they put his picture up. and, well, the whole uterus robbery started on Twitter, et cetera, and there were lots of allegations made. Now, this guy's an individual citizen, and he's trying to defend himself in all of this. It turns out that the whole thing was bogus, and the judge had decided that because it was all bogus, it could, in fact, go to trial, so it could have been much more than $30 million in defamation that they would have been wound up in terms of needing to settle and pay. So, granted, they took

their jail out of, get out of jail free card. But just to go back to what was being alleged, and how this relates, by the way, I'm going to get into Smartmatic and Fox, because in this case, they're believing this whistleblower who's a nurse. And, you know, I don't know. Like, what do you, you know, on the one hand, on the one hand, there's got to be space for whistleblowers, but on the other hand, what is it? Like, anybody can say anything and can just go out and libel somebody? In this case, an attorney who's being accused of stealing, women's uterces? I mean, that is, that's pretty bad, right? Like, you don't want to run with a story like that unless you're really, really solid on your facts. But Rachel ran it. You had

Chris running it, like you just saw, and then that other woman that's on at four o'clock that always looks so miserable running it here. Take a listen to this interview with the so-called whistleblower, a woman named Don Wooten. In the complaint, a hearing from women who are detained there, talking about a specific doctor performing hysterectomies, referring to him as a uterus collector. Tell us about how you heard about this doctor and what women said about their experiences with him. You have detained women. I had several detained women on numerous occasions that would come to me and say, Ms. Wooten, I had hysterectomy.

Why? I had no answers as to why they had those procedures. And one lady walked up to me here this last time around between October of 19 until July the 2nd. And she said, what is he? Is he the uterus collector? Does he collect uteruses? And I asked her, what does she mean? And she says, everybody that I talked to has had a hysterectomy.

And you just don't know what to say. I mean, I don't have a answer for. or why that they would come to me and they would say, it's it a uterus collector. Would you describe, how would you describe the standard of care, the general sort of medical environment in which these migrants were detained? The standard of care was, it wasn't timely all the time.

they would have a procedure to where they would fill out forms to be seen. Those forms would be shredded. They would be told in area instances that, you know, there's nothing going on with them just on numerous occasions. And as a human, you just don't treat people inhumane. I have a title as a licensed practical nurse, and I protect my title with dignity to where I was raised by you, treat people as you want to be treated. The sanitation, especially during COVID, the sanitation was horrible. So you see where this is going, right? So they've got the whistleblower, comes on and makes all these allegations. How much information she had, it's not really clear.

But again, the onus is sort of on the reporter, right, to make sure that that story is pretty button up before you just run wild with it, because it is somebody's reputation. But in this case, because it was Donald Trump's ICE, right, agenda that may have been going out and sealing uteruses from migrants' wombs. Well, you know, it was just too good for Rachel and Chris and the other one to resist. Here's a look at the other one, the blondeie. Julia, can you widen the lens on the medical care that is standard for female detainees? It just sounds like a whole lot of gynecological care when we read about the complete and abject neglect around COVID.

Yeah, you're hitting it. These are the conversations I've been having all day, Nicole. I mean, I've been talking to lawyers who say, look, I have clients in detention who have diabetes and couldn't get their medication. Yet they were told to go back for a pap smear and then to go again when that seemed irregular. It seems like they were getting way too much care from a gynecologist and perhaps doing very unnecessary procedures and not enough of what you would need in a short-term detention situation.

We know that they aren't supposed to stay longer than six months. Why were they getting so much care on this one area? And I will also point out that this doctor was part of a civil settlement with the Justice Department in 2015 where he and other doctors had to pay over $500,000 and a fine for fraudulent claims to Medicaid. So that means that we're already looking at a doctor who has at least been, you know, alleged to have tried to inflate his claims in order to get more money. And that, I think, is the allegation here. Why was he doing so much work as it seems a lot of these procedures were not necessary?

And I should also mention very tragic. One of the lawyers described a woman of childbearing age who was now had a hysterectomy that perhaps she did not need. Yeah, or perhaps she did need, and maybe it actually saved her life. But God forbid, we actually think about that because, hey, we're MSNBC, and this is Donald Trump's ICE people going after migrants, and that's just too good a story for us to resist. Listen, in this case, the judge actually made the decision that MSNBC had hosts on, meaning Rachel and the 4 o'clock, four o'clock, she's on in the afternoon, help me.

She used to be a Republican, Nicole, Nicole Walls, okay, so that one. And Chris Hayes, they were all out there making what the judge said was, quote, verifiably false statements about Dr. Amin, including claims of mass hysterectomies leading to the cancellation of the scheduled trial. Okay, so I don't think MSNBC really wanted this thing to come to trial because it would have then shown that they had a whole bunch of fake news anchors there. Stacey Evans was the attorney that was representing none other than Dr. Amin, and she was the one that filed the suit for $30 million against NBC Universal over MSNBC's coverage of her client, that Georgia doctor. And apparently she's a Democrat, and she was blown away by what these people did, specifically Rachel Maddow.

So this is, you see on the left, Stacey Evans, who is a Democrat, who was just astonished, astonished by the falsehoods that were being told on one MSNBC, specifically by somebody that she used to watch, Rachel Maddow. Here we go. I'll read this to you. This is in town hall, and a rare rebuke from within her own political ranks. You had Democrat attorney Stacey Evans slamming MSNBC's coverage of her client, the Georgia gynaecologist, Dr. Amin calling the network's host Rachel Maddo's reporting on the so-called, quote, uterus collector

case preposterous, quote, and disappointing. Evans, who says she regularly tunes into the left-leaning network, spoke out to NBC Universal, and she agreed there to the $30 million settlement with Dr. Amin, whose reputation was dragged through the mud following widely circulated and now discredited claims that he performed unnecessary hysterectomies on ICE detainees. I mean, what a thing to say about somebody, right? This is pretty bad. Pretty bad stuff. So this is a network, which I think we have seen over and over and over again, rewards sensationalism. In fact, I don't need to say this. This is what the lawyer is saying. The lawyer for Dr. Amin said that, you know, this is pretty obviously disappointing to think that any media outlook could be so reckless as to, quote,

have a classic example of chasing sensationalism over facts. Well, I think that, We all know pretty darn well that that is a specialty, shall we say, of MSNBCs. It seems like they're always chasing, chasing sensationalism. I mean, that is what this network has been about. And we're still seeing it today in so many different ways. But in this case, it is an individual. So it makes it especially hurtful. You've got those three anchors, three of them right there.

You know, we are pleased that Dr. Amin is able to move forward from his years-long litigation, said his attorney, Stacey Evans. I mean, years long. This has been going on since September 2020 when they were first making these statements. Quote, it is unfortunate that he had to get sued, that they had to sue to get confirmation of what we knew all along, that he did not perform mass hysterectomies on women detained

at Irwin County Detention Center. We are glad that the judge found those statements false as a matter of law, because, in fact, Dr. Amin performed only two hysterectomies, both of which were medically necessary and consented to by the patients. So he's out there trying to do a good thing, trying to help people. But, you know, the way MSNBC twists all of this, it's somehow Trump trying to rob migrant women of their uteruses. Okay?

That's where we are today, guys. And you know what? Good. I hope that, you know what? They should have paid more. They should pay through the nose because when you are just so blatantly false and misleading, it is dangerous to public psychology, right? Because then people are like, oh my gosh, Donald Trump's ICE department is putting in doctors to take these uteruses out of people. So everybody's like,

oh my gosh. So that's, frankly, I mean, that in and of itself, when you start just perpetuating these falsehoods, it's very damaging to public psyche. But it's also enormously dangerous to the individual involved in this one case, Dr. Amin, unbelievable. right? Unbelievable. I mean, MSNBC should be absolutely appalled. We can compare and contrast this with Smartmatic because, look, you don't want to say anything unfair about anyone, but here they are with this, you know, nurse who doesn't seem to quite have all her facts lined up, and they're running with her comments, and they put her on and they say they got this big whistleblower. I mean, at least in the case of Fox with Smartmatic, you can kind of understand. I mean, heck, you had the president's own lawyers, right? The president of the

United States, lawyers saying things, so it's a little bit different. We're going to get to that in a second, but first, you know we're fully independent here on the Trish Riegan show, and we love being independent. You know what? I got to tell you. Life is good on the other side. I tell everyone that leaves networks, trust me, it's the right thing. It's the right thing for you. The other thing that I tell you, and I've told you for quite some time, is to think about yourself, put yourself first, to think about how you sleep best at night. For me, part of that is investing in gold. One of our sponsors here on the Trish Regan Show, American Heart for Gold. You can find out more, including how you may get up to $15,000 with special offers there, up to $15,000 in free silver. And of course,

silver has been moving right along with gold lately. Gold trading down just a touch. I actually added to my position today because it's one of those things that, you know, you just want to make sure you have in the case of Armageddon. Hopefully we're not getting towards any Armageddon, but even if you think everything's just fine and everything's going to move along, all these countries out there. Their central banks are also getting nervous. So what are they doing? They're buying gold. It's one of the reasons why gold has appreciated more than $3,200 an ounce. I think I was telling you when I started this show, buy it when it was like at $1,400,500. Anyway, I was right. I was right. You know, not that I always have to be right, but generally I am on these things. So go check them out.

Trish lovesgold.com. Text Trish to get 6-255-3-2 to learn more about how to get up to 15,000 in free silver, or call them at 1-844-495-1-1-1-1-1-1. five. So as we think about what's going on with MSNBC, look over to Fox for a moment because the judge just ruled something rather negative for Fox. They can't go ahead and interview Reed Hoffman. Reed Hoffman is the tech entrepreneur that started LinkedIn. I'm over on LinkedIn. I have like 400,000 followers over on LinkedIn, but it's kind of hard to get the word out. Maybe it's because Reed is running it. I don't know. But Reed Hoffman is not exactly what you would call middle of the road. No, he's the one that bankrolled that woman who accused Donald Trump of rape.

Remember her, the woman with all the cats? He banked wrote her lawsuit. And so he also bankrolled Smart Maddox lawsuit. Now, look, I mean, it happens, right? And it's part of freedom of speech. You can kind of put your money wherever you want. And there are plenty of people that have helped to defend, say, Donald Trump or Rudy Giuliani or others, right? They have funds that go for their legal defense.

So, again, you're putting your money where you want. And so it's not necessarily illegal or improper. I mean, maybe it looks a little bad that the tech entrepreneur is donating $25 million to Smart Maddox lawsuit. But at the same time, it's sort of a matter of free speech. I remember when Peter Thiel, right, helped with Hulk Hogan when he was trying to take down Gocker. So these things happen.

But it was something that understandably, I think Fox wanted to explore and learn more about when they were trying to determine the financial liability that they may have for SmartMatic, because Smartmatic is suing Fox News for $2.7 billion. That's a lot of money. I mean, I'm not going to make excuses for Fox. I think they made a lot of mistakes, and I was not there then, but, but they paid $800 billion, nearly $800 billion. To me, that's a big, big mistake, and it's bad for journalism to pay $800 billion to Dominion. And then, hey, you still got that Smartmatic thing hanging. out there for $2.7 billion. Well, that's not exactly good precedent. If you already paid $800 billion, now, is it? To Dominion, I think you're going to be on the hook for something. Anyway, they want to know

how much they're really on the hook for. And so they had asked that they'd be able to depose and interview him and get his deposition. And the judge said, nope, nope, not happening. You can't do that. Now, getting into this, this comes from court news, a blog that covered this, because this didn't get a lot of attention. I think it's a rather relevant and important story. They wanted to interview Reid Hoffman because, one, he was investing $25 million into the case, and two, they wanted to get a sense of how much they really thought the company was worth. In other words, what is his payout on the other side? Was he an early investor in the company, et cetera?

He had a guy that was handling his investments. And that guy said to the Washington Post back in 2024 that he thought that the company basically could be worth $400 million. dollars right now. Okay, if Smartmatic were worth $400 million today, if it hadn't been for the reputational damage that allegedly Fox News did to it and others, then why would they have to pay out $2.7 billion? I think Fox wanted to try and understand that $400 billion valuation. And so if Reed is investing his money, it makes sense that they would try and probe that, right? Why Reed were you trying to, what were you getting out of this? Well, it turns out the judge said, you can't interview Hoffman, but you can. So this is a little bit, you know, a little bit of a reward of some sorts,

if you look at it that way. They can interview the guy who was running this Melhorn that was running the investments. He's the guy that told the Washington Post, forgive me, it's Barr, Jeremy Barr, who told them, whoops, Melhorn, told Jeremy Barr. Jeremy Barr is the reporter, forgive me, in 2024, they could be a $400 million company right now had it not been for the slander. So in light of that, and in terms of trying to understand the valuation, if Fox is saying $2.7 billion is grossly inflated, there's no way that this company would be worth that, then they want to be able to understand the financial insight. Maybe this Melhorn can help get them there. And the judge is saying, you know what, you can go ahead and you can interview Melhorn to get his financial insight.

You can interview Hoffman though. So it's a little bit of a setback, but I'd say it comes with the silver lining, right, that they can go ahead and at least look more into this valuation. I think the problem is anytime you malign someone or a company, you're putting yourself at risk, especially if, in fact, your management team felt otherwise. So we saw in the Dominion lawsuit, do we not, that Rupert Murdoch and his sons did not actually believe, his son specifically, Loughlin, that there was any malpractice that had gone on or any problems with the voting machines, et cetera, and yet they allowed for the information to go on the air.

So why didn't they get in front of, say, my friend Lou? Well, I get it. Like, Lou is a lot to handle. Lou has a big personality in a mind of his own and may even had some, may have had some editorial rights over his show. However, Fox still owned the airtime. So that gets back to management and what kinds of decision management was making. Don't forget Tucker was sitting there going, I don't get this, Sidney Powell. I don't understand what she's doing. And yet, they took Tucker off the air. I mean, I think that had to do with other things like J6 and pressure from Schumer,

etc. But it all kind of happened around this time with Dominion and Smartmatic. About a day after the Smartmatic thing happened, they took Lou Dobbs off the air. They left Maria on. Listen, Maria is great. And I don't think that they're doing this with such bad intentions. I don't think that Maria or Lou or anybody that was reporting on this thought that, oh, we're going to go take Smartmatic down just for the heck of it, just for the heck of it, because we won an excuse for the election. They actually believed in the reporting that they were doing. And when you have the president's lawyers out there saying things, it's actually somewhat relevant. Is it not news? Now, you know, Smartmatic is going to say, well, you ruined us over it. But maybe it's not actually

the messenger's fault in this case. Could it actually have been Cindy Powell's or the lawyers that were saying this? I mean, why are you going to go after the messengers? That's what's sort of complicated, because as a journalist, you've got to be free to report on things. Now, I don't mean like MSNBC going after some poor doctor, and they can't figure out that he only performed two hysterectomies, and they're going on and on about the uterus robber. I mean, that's a little bit different. But in this particular case, you actually have the president's lawyers. And so Smartmatic has a thing on their website right now. saying that they're taking serious steps to defend their reputation and their attacks

by actors trying to further their agendas and profits. These attacks don't just hurt Smartmatic. They damage the credibility and integrity of all elections and disparage the hard work of election officials, administrators, and poll workers. You know, again, this is a tough one. I remember when I was a young correspondent at CBS, this would have been in the year 2000, and I guess the other side was in, so it was perfectly fine. to do things on voting machines, maybe when the other side was in. I actually did a story on

Deboldt voting machines, and I interviewed some software experts who said, yeah, that these things could be vulnerable, and you needed to do everything you could to secure them. So it got us back to, like, well, why don't we just have paper ballots? Wouldn't that be the most secure way where people have receipts, et cetera? And I think that the reality is you can't just say, we're not going to talk about this at all. You want to actually make sure that everything is safe, and everything is on the up and up. Tulsi Gabbard addressed this head on just the other day, and I think it's an important soundbite to run because she was in the cabinet meeting and she said something that it's like no-go territory. I get it right now. But again, I go back to me

reporting on this in the year 2000. This sort of concern about software and voting machines has been around for a long time. And so this didn't just come out of nowhere, and I can understand why some reporters were in fact putting people on like a Sidney Powell or like a Rudy Giuliani. Perhaps the real issue, however, is why is it? Why is it that Fox itself, Fox itself, if it didn't believe this to be true, would continue to allow the reporters to do that. Like at some point, right, as business, you need to take an editorial stand. Nonetheless, here's Tulsi. I think it's worth just hearing. We're investigating. We have the best of the best going after this.

election integrity being one of them. We have evidence of how these electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a very long time and vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the results of the votes being cast, which further drives forward your mandate to bring about paper ballots across the country so that voters can have faith in the integrity of our elections. I mean, is it that controversial to say we want to make sure that the soft is totally, totally, totally safe. We're not pointing out anyone in this particular case. She's just saying something that's been around for a long time. And she's not wrong. It has been around for a long time. I did the story for the CBS weekend evening news in the year

2000. So we've always been concerned about this. We shouldn't act like it's different just because it's Donald Trump. We should make sure that they're as secure as possible, that the entire process is as secure as possible. In fact, that's what this voter idea is about. Is it not? I mean, that's what we're talking about when you've got the administration saying, hey, you know, what, we're going to make sure that everybody who is voting in these elections, they can vote, that they have the proper identification, if you would, to vote. I mean, with Elon Musk finding that there were, what, $152 billion that he found in fraud, waste, and abuse, and that millions of Social Security numbers were being given out, you can understand.

that that causes some concern. And then the left is all mad about the voter ID Safe Act. I don't get it. Like, why wouldn't you want that? If nothing else, just to make everybody feel better about this entire process, you can't hide these things. Hillary Clinton, I told you about this last week, coming out with this wild tweet that she even had to shut down comments on because it was so nuts, basically telling married women, if you changed your name, you may not be able to vote. Gaslighting, gaslighting, gaslighting, fear mongers. just like we saw at the top of the show, with back in 2020, MSNBC trying to suggest that Donald Trump's administration was robbing migrant women of their wombs. I mean, it's bonkers to me that

they get away with this. Who's going to sue her, by the way? Who's going to go after Hillary Clinton for her misinformation in misrepresenting things? That's pretty bad. I mean, the White House had to come out with a response saying, no, no, no, no, no. You know what? The SAVE Act is not about. that. The SAVE Act is just there because you need an ID like anything else. You know what? You get a passport. You get a real ID. You get the license. Anything. I mean, I guess if you were just married yesterday, you might need to come in with your birth certificate to prove because your name change hadn't gone through. But for Hillary to suggest this, and let me read it to you, are you a woman who changed your name when you got married? Congress is considering a bill that would make it much harder for you

to vote. Call your rep. This is not a drill. And then update the House just passed. The Republican voter suppression measure. That's what she's calling it, that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don't match their birth certificates. I mean, this is bonkers stuff, ladies and gentlemen. Again, unless you were just married, like a few hours ago, you probably have an updated ID. You know, Rob, my partner at 76 Research, his wife and he, they're in Japan, and he's doing a ton of work for us, by the way, over there. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful piece out just last night. But, you know, Japan, you know, Japan, They own a lot of U.S. treasuries. So 76 research there on the ground in Japan. Rob's working hard.

His wife traveled with him. Guess what? She has the same last name. She has the same last. So it's on her passport. It's on her passport. It's on her license. And yes, she can vote under it. So this is the kind of fire drill that they're putting America through. And it's highly, highly, highly irresponsible. But this is what they do in general, right? 76 research, by the way. This market's crazy. We'll get back to the market. in a short time, but if you're concerned about how to invest amidst all this volatility, I encourage you to go to 76 research. Use my code word dollar. You can get it for a dollar a month for the first two months, and it goes to $9.95, but there's a lot of helpful advice in there. And you know what? You want to take care of yourself. You want to be able to make money.

You want to have some income at some point in your retirement. So with all that in mind, go get the basic newsletter. And for those of you that really want to roll up your sleeves, get the model portfolios. I can't stress that enough. Trump is livid at this moment. with CBS News, and understandably so, because the coverage is so freaking bias. It's night after night after night after night. And he's kind of had it up to here, right? Well, guess what? He's in control of the FCC.

And he's now calling on Brendan Carr to not just look at ABC as Brendan is doing and NBC as Brendan is doing, but also to take a good hard look at CBS News. This story being reported in one of the trades known as mediaites, they're saying in a social post on Sunday, Trump raged it to 16 Minutes reports, one featuring an interview with Ukrainian President Zelensky, during which Scott Pelly, who's the correspondent, said that Trump, quote, rewrote history saying falsely that Ukraine had started the war. So this was the voiceover narrative. It showed a clip of Trump calling Zelensky a dictator without elections. So that could actually be interpreted in different ways.

And I'm sure Pelly has his interpretation. The problem is, you know, he's 60 News. He's supposed to be this big old voice of authority. We know he's old. As for how big he is, you know, I don't know. I don't know what their audience size really is anymore. But a lot of people still watch. And another segment, you had some other correspondent I've never heard of,

talk to residents of Greenland who opposed the Trump administration's idea of joining the country and joining the U.S., including the prime minister. So Trump's response was this on true social. He wrote almost every week 60 minutes, which does air on Sundays, which is being sued for billions of dollars for the fraud they committed in the 2024 presidential election. Don't forget, Donald Trump is accusing them of fraud. They have not been proven to have had fraud, but they are being accused, and they are being sued for billions by none other than the president.

He did get $16 million. Don't forget out of ABC News. For their interview of failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris, mentions the name Trump in a derogatory and defamatory way for this weekend's quote broadcast, and this broadcast tops them all, he writes. They did not one, but two major stories on Trump. One having to do with Ukraine, which I say is a war that would never have happened in the 2020 election. Oh, if it had not been, well, in his view, it was totally stolen from him, right? So he's getting into that rig stuff.

In other words, if I were president, the other story was having to do with Greenland, casting our country as led by me falsely, inaccurately and fraudulently. I am so honored to be suing 60 minutes, he writes, CBS fake news and Paramount over their fraudulent, beyond recognition, reporting. They did everything possible to illegally, he said, elect Kamala, including completely and corruptly changing major answers to the interview questions, but it just didn't work for them. I'm going to get to that in a second just to jog your memory. They did everything, he writes, possible to illegally elect Kamla.

As I said, it just didn't work for them. They are not a news show, he says, but a dishonest political operative, simply disguised as news and must be responsible for what they have done and what they are doing. They should lose their license, he writes. That's a big deal. He wants them to lose their license. And guess what? He's got the FCC.

Hopefully the FCC as headed, but by its highly respected chairman, Brendan Carr will impose the maximum fines and punishment, which is substantial for their lawful and illegal behavior. CBS is out of control at levels never seen before, and they should pay a big price for this, make America great again. All right. This is the particular segment he is referencing.

I'm going to show it to you. This was Kamala Harris being interviewed on 60 Minutes, and what we learned was that there was a lot of dressing up of her answer. They asked her a question. she couldn't quite answer it. We know this because they mistakenly aired it on Margaret Brennan's face of the nation and then cleaned it up by the time it aired again on 60 minutes that evening. Let's go to the before and after, the sort of redo job that made her look so much better

that he's arguing was a form of election interference. But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening. Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region. But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening. We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for. for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end. All right. So very, very different answers, as you well remember.

So Donald Trump is sort of saying, you know what, I'm sick and tired of it. And, you know, Media Research Center, they have done a lot of investigating in this particular area in terms of bias. And what they have discovered is that overwhelmingly, like 98% of the time on the network news shows, you have very negative news on Donald Trump, and then 99% of the time you have very positive news, say, on Biden or it would have been Kamala. And you've got to start to ask yourself, I mean, maybe he's right in the sense that they're trying to interfere. I mean, the good news is it didn't work, right? The good news is the American people saw through a lot of that. They remembered,

for example, the 51x spooks. They remembered, oh, no, no, couldn't have possibly come from the Wuhan lab in China. No, that virus, that was from the wet market. All of these things, right, started to add up Russia, Russia, Russia. We had to have the whole Mueller investigation. That thing, by the way, is taken on new turns, as we've discussed over the last couple of weeks. The reality is this. Americans no longer believe these institutional news services, and that's actually kind of disturbing and sad in and of itself. And that's where Brennan Carr actually has a leg to stand on. As he wrote to Bob Iger, remember in the letter in December, he said, hey Bob, who runs ABC News vis-a-vis Disney, Americans no longer like you guys,

no longer actually respect you or trust you. And the fact that you had to pay out $16 million because Georgie Poo decided he was going to libel the president on his show after your guys told him not to proves that Americans no longer actually respect or value you. And that's a problem because we've got to give out the FCC license, and maybe we shouldn't be giving it to all these affiliates all around the country. Maybe they shouldn't be carrying Whoopi Goldberg and George Stephanopoulos. And now the same thing is going to happen, you see, to CBS News.

I would not be surprised if in the coming days you see a letter going from one Brendan Carr to CBS News saying, guys, you know, you got to clean it up. You have to have both sides. In my estimation, I think Donald Trump is probably right that you may not have seen an escalation in the war in Ukraine had he been president because he would have found some kind of diplomatic solution. I mean, I think that there were opportunities and there were missed opportunities. And whether or not he's able to get there or not now, I don't know.

It's unclear, right? It wasn't very good to see what happened over the weekend there with the bombing, etc. And I don't think Donald Trump is one bit happy about any of it. But we are where we are right now. And for everyone in the media to have only one position and only one viewpoint, it's actually weird. I've never seen anything like it. I mean, I mean, Grant, and I used to work at CBS.

Heck, I'm the one that did the story back in 2000, right? On how these voting machines could be in jeopardy. That was back in a day when they were willing to talk about these things. It's so biased right now that I think whether you're talking about CBS, ABC, NBC, I've worked for all of them. There is so much animosity and fury and frustration with this president and his administration that they can't even see straight. And when you can't see straight, you can't actually be a decent reporter anymore.

You're so clouded by your judgment, and that's where we are. Stephen Miller getting into this here today on Fox News, because Stephen Miller, who's the policy advisor to the president, is like, this is crazy. Why is the entire media so worked up over the guy from Maryland that was sent to the El Salvador prison? Now, granted, maybe they shouldn't have sent him to the prison, but they had every right to send him back to El Salvador. And he's making the point that not only did they have every right to send him, the Supreme Court decided that they had every right to send him back to El Salvador. And really, at this point,

it's not the U.S.'s problem anymore. He defended this argument and kind of a blowup, if you would, on Fox News. I want to show you this. But before I do, keep in mind what's going on in the background, you get a judge saying, I want updates, I want updates, what's going on with the people that we sent to El Salvador? You know, we've got to get them back. We've got to get them back. And Miller's like, you know, I'm sick of the media trying to say this and spin this narrative. Why are they taking sides like this? The Supreme Court already made its decision. I'll let you see this here. He kind of goes right after Bill Hemmer in a show just this morning moments ago. Number one, DOJ said a federal court cannot compel the executive branch to engage in any mandated

act of diplomacy or incursion upon the sovereignty of another nation. So your argument is that you You don't have to bring him back home, but will you? So I want to correct. I hate to do it, Bill, but I got to correct you on every single thing that you said, because it was all wrong. First, we won the Supreme Court case. Clearly, 9-0. A district court judge said unconscionably that the president and his administration

have to go into El Salvador and extradite one of their citizens, an El Salvadorian citizen. So that would be kidnapping. that we have to kidnap an El Salvadorian citizen against the will of his government and fly him back to America, which would be an unimaginable act and an invasion of El Salvador's sovereignty. So we appealed to the Supreme Court, and it said clearly no district court can compel the president to exercise his Article 2 foreign powers in any way whatsoever. DOJ called me after that Supreme Court ruling and they said, this is amazing. We won this case, 9-0. We are an excellent standing here.

So this has been portrayed wrong for 72 hours in the media. They said the most a court could ever compel you to do would be to facilitate return, which would basically mean if El Salvador voluntarily sends him back, we wouldn't block him at the airport. We would put him back into iced detention, and then he would be deported either back to El Salvador or somewhere else. The Supreme Court said that is the most the government can be expected to do. So we won the case handily.

The misreporting on this has been atrocious. Secondly, he was not, no, Bill is important. He was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador. So do you still believe he is a member of MS. Hold on this is important. In 2019, he was ordered deported. He is a final removal order from the United States. These are things that no one disputes.

Where is he from? El Salvador. Where is he a resident and citizen of? Al Salvador. Is he here illegally? Yes. Does he have a deportation order? Yes.

A DOJ lawyer who has since been relieved of leave of duty, a saboteur, a Democrat, put into a filing incorrectly that this was a mistaken removal. It was not. This was the right person sent to the right place. Now, some have said, well, but he had a thing called a withholding order. So a withholding order means you've been ordered deported, but an immigration judge is saying you cannot go back to a particular country. Here's the thing. If you are a member of a foreign terrorist organization, you cannot have a withholding order. Since he's in MS-13, there is no withholding order. Furthermore, the gang that he is accused of being persecuted by doesn't exist anymore in El Salvador.

The 18th Street gang is gone. So you have any illegal alien from El Salvador? Bill, where are we supposed to send the illegal alien from El Salvador? To what country? You haven't even allowed me to ask you a question. Are you convinced he is still a member of MS-13? That was your original charge. Yes.

But here's the thing, Bill. yes, but not only am I convinced of it, not only is El Salvador convinced of it. Bill, he's an illegal alien from El Salvador with the deportation order. So his only options in life, Bill, his only options in life are to be deported to El Salvador

or to be deported to some other country. That's it. He has a deportation order. So, Bill, you tell me, what country should we deport him to? Tell me, please, tell me. So Marco Rubio, on Sunday morning, said this. On Saturday night, another 10 criminals from that.

Bill's like, I'm going to turn. I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to rubio. Because I got no answer for you that on that one, Miller. But Miller's point is, look, you come here illegally. You're part of a gang. We know that you're part of this gang. And somehow you get shipped back to El Salvador, your home base. We can't actually jump in then and say, hey, we're going to, we're going to work this out and take you back. I mean, he's been deported to his home country. So Miller's point is, now it's in Buckelay's hands, and Buckele will do what he thinks is appropriate at that point in time. Now, maybe if he's not been convicted of any kind of crime in El Salvador, he doesn't

belong in prison in El Salvador, in which case he gets out. But isn't that El Salvador's problem at this point? Here is Trump, just moments ago with Bucle, speaking there in the Oval Office and pointing out, you know, that we've had a few problems along the way with all these people coming in. Lots of them illegally. Why so many? Well, we had a terrible thing happen. We had an administration that allowed people to come in freely into our country from not only South America, but from all over the world, many from the Congo and Africa, Asia, all over the world, Europe, rough parts of Europe. And they came from prisons and they came from mental institutions. and they came from gangs and the gangs of Venezuela and other places.

And hundreds of thousands and even millions of them came. 21 million people altogether, but many of the people that came, just a tremendous percentage of them, were criminals in some cases of island criminals. We had 11,088 known murderers, half of them murdered more than one person. This was allowed by a man who what he did to our country is just unbelievable. So we're straightening it out. We're getting them out. But what they did and what that party did to our country, open borders,

anybody could come in. Since I heard that, I said every prison is going to be emptied out into our country. That's what happened. And we're straightening it out. And we just had numbers. We had the highest recruiting numbers in the history of our country going into police departments. And a year ago, we had the lowest number. You couldn't hire a business.

Nobody's ever seen. And the military now, Marines, the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, every slot is, I mean, we have the best numbers we've ever had. We could recruitment, recruitment numbers. And we've never had anything like it. We had records on every single, at every single level. But very important, the policemen, the policemen are joining forces now that we really have. we really were having a hard time with police. Okay, so Donald Trump making the point that, you know what,

if you're on the side of the police, then the police are on the side of you. And don't forget, we did have a horrible time. Because who the heck, and they're right in mind wanting to be a police officer if you didn't have the backing of the governor or the president, for that matter? And it's very clear that you didn't. Remember this, I've showed you this. This is a graphic here of the number of people that were crossing into this country,

since the year 2000, and you see how much it spiked up, like wildly so. After 2000, massively going all the way to 250,000 people coming in. These are the people just being apprehended at the border every single month. And since Donald Trump has come in, we are down 96%. So that's pretty darn massive. It's all coming as, of course, the Supreme Court also rules that those students that are here on visas, people like Mahuma Khalil, who caused a ruckus on campus in my alma mater. You know, I went there when it wasn't so nuts and so it wasn't so crazy. Columbia University, pretty shameful what we've seen out of Columbia. They've lost $400 million as a result. Harvard University is about to lose billions. You get UPenn. Everybody's kind of in a similar

spot, right? They're losing their funding, their federal funding, their taxpayer funding, because the Trump administration is like, for good it's sake, people can't even keep your kids safe. that are on this campus. Well, Khalil came to Colombia and decided to create this whole movement to be pro Hamas. The only problem is Hamas is a known terror organization. So how do you do that? Well, the court now says, guess what? He can be deported. The Louisiana court can send him back. Now, his lawyers are jumping in and saying, not so fast, not so fast. Trey Gowdy on Fox saying, yeah, you know what, I don't have a lot of sympathy for this guy, because he can go back there or he can go back to Gaza. He can do anything he wants. You know,

They're not going to actually offer him any kind of human rights in these places. He's not here, keep in mind on some kind of refugee application. He's here on a student visa. And Marco Rubio has made it really clear. You know what? You're here as a guest. So you don't go trying to start protests on university campuses. It's kind of a no-no.

Sliding scale. So American citizens get this much due process. People who are here unlawfully get this much due process. So the phrase due process doesn't really tell us a lot. This is sliding scale. But it's not lost on me that Khalil supports a group. Do you think they gave a jury trial to the Jews before they beheaded them? You think there are appeals for the hostages being held in Gaza right now?

So for someone who had the privilege of living and studying in this country to support a group that doesn't believe in any due process or any appeals for innocent victims, It's just a little too rich for me. Marco has the power to say you are undermining our foreign policy. And guess what? You don't have a fundamental right to stay in this country. So we don't care whether you go back to Syria or Algeria. You can go to Gaza, what's left of it, but you're not staying here.

Wow. So that kind of lays it out. And don't forget. And I've showed you this what Marco has said on it. By the way, Rodney, making the point that the Trump administration should, and thank you for your job. generosity. She just tell them to all pound sand. And I think that's kind of what's going on here. They're like, you know what? You're here illegally. You're in a gang. You get deported. Like,

sorry, buddy, that's on you. You know what? We're not going to, we're not going to interfere with El Salvador at this point. That's kind of on you. And maybe that actually serves in a weird way, kind of like a warning to people. Like, don't come here. Because you run certain risks, if you would. Like, you're not going to get any kind of protection from the U.S. government. Meanwhile, as far as the kid on the student visa kid, forgive me, he's 30 years old. He's about to be a father, and he's going to be deported. Trump has said, gosh, you should have some thought of these things, including his family beforehand. But anyway, this is Marco Rubio on how he has every right to revoke this guy's visa,

as well as the Turkish girl, who's there at Tufts University, writing opeds trying to stir the pot, too. We revoked her visa. It's an F1 visa, I believe. We revoked it and here's why. And I'll say it again. I said it everywhere. Let me be abundantly clear. If you go apply for a visa right now, anywhere in the world,

let me just send this message up. If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student and you tell us that the reason why you're coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds, but because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus. We're not going to give you a visa.

if you lie to us and get a visa and then enter the United States and with that visa participate in that sort of activity, we're going to take away your visa. And once you've lost your visa, you're no longer legally in the United States, and we have a right like every country in the world has a right to remove you from our country. So it's just that simple. I think it's crazy.

I think it's stupid. For any country in the world to welcome people into their country, they're going to go to your universities as visitors. They're visitors. And say, I'm going to your universities to start a riot. I'm going to your universities to take over a library and harass people. I don't care what movement you're involved in. Why would any country in the world allow people to come and disrupt?

We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses. And if we've given you a visa and then you decide to do that, we're going to take it away. I encourage every country to do that, by the way, because I think it's crazy to invite students into your country that are coming onto your campus and destabilizing it. We're just not going to have it. So we'll revoke your visa, and once your visa is revoked, you're illegally in the country and you have to leave.

Every country in the world has a right to decide who comes in as a visitor and who doesn't. If you invite me into your home because you say, I want to come to your house for dinner, and I go to your house and I start putting mud on your couch and spray painting your kitchen, I bet you're going to kick me out. Well, we're going to do the same thing if you come into the United States as a visitor and create a ruckus for us. We don't want it. We don't want it in our country. Go back and do it in your country, but you're not going to do it in our country.

Yeah. and they have the law on their side for this one. 1952. Section 237A. I keep citing this, but I'm going to cite it again because this is an important clause. Quote, any alien who is engaged in or is engaged in or at any time after admission engages in, any activity that the Secretary of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.

So you know what? There you have it. That is the law. So why are we twisting the law to make room for people that support a known terror organization, whether it's a known terror organization or whether it's MS-13 for that matter? Getting back to the guy that Stephen Miller was so concerned about that he went after the Fox host for. And then he wasn't done.

He had more to say to the media. Let me see if I can share this with you. You may have to turn it up just a touch because the audio is rather faint. It was outside and kind of a gaggle. and he made the same point. Like, listen, we're not going to bend the rules for these guys. They're here illegally. They're part of a gang.

We ship them back to El Salvador, whether or not they wind up in the El Salvador prison. That's not our problem. The wrong person was sent somewhere. He's an illegal alien from El Salvador. Where was he sent to El Salvador? To prison in El Salvador. It's different.

It's different from sending someone home and sending them into a prison that they could remain. It is up to El Salvador how to handle the process for their own. citizens. Again, what you seem to be asking us to do is to change the government and the laws of El Salvador. So if we deport somebody back to, for example, Syria, should we be closely involved on a day-to-day basis of the Syrian government detailing that person's life and future, if we deport, say, 100,000 people back to Haiti, should we open a case file on each of those 100,000

people, and ask every day, what's their housing situation, what's their healthcare situation, what might they need, what might they want? Once someone's out of our country, that becomes the problem of their host country, not our country. These people chose to invade us. So there's a lot of concern from the corporate media about the invaders, but they chose to invade us. It's our responsibility to return them back to it. And again, he's not wrong. And he has the law on his side. As for what Buckele in El Salvador is going to do with the guy, he's like, look, he's a gang member. And yes, El Salvador has some pretty harsh consequences for gang members, as we all well know. Let's take a listen to what he just told President Trump.

Ask President Beirrele. What is your, can President Buckele weigh in on this? Do you plan to return him? Well, I guess, I'm supposed to have suggested that I smuggle a terrorist into the United States, right? It's always how can I smuggle, how can I return him to the United States? It's like I smuggle him into the United States or whether I do it, of course, I'm not going to do it.

It's like, I mean, the question is preposterous. How can I smuggle a terrorist to the United States? I don't have the power to return him to the United States. But you could release him inside of the United States. Yeah, but I'm not releasing, I mean, we're not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. I mean, we just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country of the Western Hemisphere, and you want us to go back into the releasing criminals so we can go back to being the murder capital of the world. That's not going to happen.

Well, they'd love to have a criminal, you know, released into it. I mean, I mean, there's a fascination. They would love it. Yeah. They're sick. These are sick people. Whoa, whoa. Okay, so that is, that's something. So you heard what Donald Trump just did. He just really slammed the media. He is after the media in a, in a massive way right now. You consider

what happened, you consider what happened there with 60 minutes and his frustration, his frustration with the media over the 60 minutes piece and what they were saying about him there. And then his frustration with the media saying, hey, we got to do something, we got to make sure that, you know, these criminals that are here illegally and are known members of gangs like MS-13, we cannot be sending them back to El Salvador. And his sort of reaction to that is that that's just sick, right? These are sick people that want to keep these people here. I go back to just sort of my my shock and my dismay at a media that no matter what Trump does, they hate it, right? No matter, no matter.

So the market turns around to get to the stock market, and we're going to do this later in the show. And all of a sudden the media is like accusing him of insider trading because he put out a tweet or rather a true social saying, hey, you know, buy it. It's low. And they're accusing him. It's like, what, did you guys just want it to go down, down, down, down, down? I think they did. They want the market to go down. They want the bottom to fall out from under. They want bad things to happen because they want to be proven right. And that in and of itself

just kind of showcases how frustrating it is to actually deal with the media in any way, shape or form. As we led this show, right, you have MSNBC getting fined $30 million in that defamation case. And the reason, the reason why is because, you know what, they can't see the force for the trees. This guy apparently had done two hysterectomies to help save people's lives, but somehow it turns into he's a uterus robber because he's doing this on behalf of ice. You see how it's being so convoluted and so messed up, and that is a huge problem with the media today. We have so much to get to, including Alina Hava and new comments that she's making on the governor of New Jersey. But first, remember, we're fully independent here. Balance of Nature is one of our

proud sponsors on this program. I take their fruits and veggies every single day. My vitamins. I'm like, you know, when I was a kid, I took the Flintstone vitamins and now I take my balance of nature. They send them to my house. You can get these as well, 35% off right now. I take the fruits and veggies. They're gummies, they're gluten-free, and I love them. They're really tasty, but they have lots of different things for your health there on the website. I encourage you to go there. You get 35% off everything. If you use my code word Trish, T-R-I-S-8, go. to balance in nature.com today. Alina Haba, you know Alina, the beautiful attorney for Donald Trump. Alina Haba is now the U.S. District Attorney there, at least interim, in New Jersey.

And she's been coming out warning people in New Jersey, the governor specifically, the AG specifically, that you know what? You can't do this with this sanctuary city stuff. It's just not going to fly. So she issued this warning and said, you know, you get in the way and you're going to pay the consequences, because it's just not allowed, it's not appropriate, you can't do this, you are interfering with federal law enforcement. And again, I've said this, I'm going to say it again, I'll tell you every single day, if there's one power that the federal government has, it is to go after people who are here illegally. They have every right to do this, even if you're a sanctuary state, because why they have jurisdiction. It is why when Governor Abbott wanted to put the wall back up down

in Texas that the Biden administration was tearing down, he didn't have the legal ability to do that because unless he wanted to secede from the United States of America, the federal government, in that case, Biden had every right to say, nope, we're going to tear this thing down. As frustrating as it was, but that proves to you just exactly the kind of power that the federal government has when it comes to the border. So Alina Haba is putting these guys on notice. Listen to her. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has ordered local police in the state to stop cooperating

with immigration officials. Now, we did reach out to the governor's office for comment, but shockingly, we've yet to hear back. Now, the U.S. attorney for the district of New Jersey, Alina Hava is here with more. Is that true? Do you have proof of that? Have you heard that to be true? Let me give you a very brief summary of what we do know. We know that the governor has on his website currently dues and don'ts for his local state of law enforcement. Those dues and don't instruct them not to cooperate with illegal immigrants who have administrative warrants that have been issued by the court after due process saying that they are no longer welcome here. They have gone through the court system. They are to be deported. It is instructing them to

go against our federal rules, our executive orders. And I am unfortunately going to announce on your show tonight, Sean, and I want it to be a warning for everybody that I have instructed my office today to open an investigation into Governor Murphy, to open an investigation into Attorney General Plattkin, who has also instructed the state police not to assist any of our federal, and they list our federal agencies that are under my direction, the FBI, the DEA, all these individuals that are trying to clean up our streets in New Jersey not to cooperate. That will no longer stand. Pam Bondi has made it clear and so has our president that we are to take all criminal, violent criminals and criminals out of this country and to completely enforce

federal law. And anybody who does get in that way, in the way of what we are doing, which is not political, it is simply against crime, will be charged in the state of New Jersey for obstruction, for concealment, and I will come after them hard. Including the governor. Those investigations will start immediately. The governor and the attorney general. Wow. So they're on notice, and you know what, she's not wrong, okay? As much as the mainstream media wants to flip out over this and say that this is some kind of authoritarian measure, again, I get back

to the basics here, that the federal government has the constitutional power to patrol the borders. And if you, as the attorney general or as governor of a state, are getting in the way of that process, it goes back to what Holman's been saying all along, that you're then jeopardizing the, the lives of law enforcement for the federal government. And you're going to find yourself in a hole, you know what load of trouble. Here's Holman just the other day. Sanctuary state governors, Tim Walts, J.B. Pritzker, Kathy Hochel, they've been called to testify in front of Congress that they're investigating,

sanctuary status for these places. When will we see an end to sanctuary status? Can't be soon enough. Because sanctuary cities are sanctuary for criminals. Here's what people need to understand. Every time they reach a public safety threat, illegal aiming public safety threat back in the community, it puts the community at great risk of crime.

They like to say, well, we do this because we want victims and witnesses of a crime to feel safe to come to law enforcement without the feel we're working with ICE. That's just a bunch of malarkey. Because the victim and witness of crime don't want the bad guy back in their neighborhood either. So help us make these communities safer. For instance, Chicago, when I went to Chicago, within two days we arrested, I think it was nine members of TDA, turned to Iowa. We arrested seven child sexual predators.

We arrested two illegal aliens who committed murder. So we are trying to make the community safer, and sanctuary cities should be helping make their communities safer. We're not asking you be an immigration officers. We're asking to do the job you're supposed to do. Your number of responsibilities protect your communities. Help ICE protect your communities. Yeah, I mean, right?

This shouldn't be that hard. Again, this is why he was elected. You had no common sense from the left, no respect for the communities that are actually here in America now that want to be kept safe, that want to have their own chance of survival, economic and, frankly, just, you know, day to day.

Because when you're dealing with the kind of lawlessness, frankly, that we dealt with during the Biden times, there's going to be pushback. If the Democrats knew what was good for them, they would actually not be doing things like what I'm showing you here on the screen that Elon Musk reported. And thanks to our friends over at Fox Business for this graphic here, unbelievable. You look at 270,000 people being admitted and being given social security numbers that had come here illegally in the year 2021. That thing ballooned all the way to over 2 million in the year 2024.

And we know why. Okay, we know why. New York is a good example of it. They had 800,000 people that were non-citizens that they wanted. wanted to vote in the election. It had to get shut down by the upper court there in New York. Thank goodness, but does it happen next time? Like, what happens next time around? What was the intention here? It's pretty darn disturbing, really and truly, when you look at what was actually going on. Meanwhile, we've got a little bit of upside now here. I say this, you know, holding my

breath to a certain extent, but I have told you all along, have I not, that you want to be smart about this market? The market is recovering. As we speak, we've got an S&P. up 1% over 1%, NASDAQ trading up 1% and the Dow Jones Industrial average up 1.1% here amid sort of hopes that things are going to temper themselves vis-a-vis what we're seeing with tariffs. You had the president out over the weekend saying he was going to exempt tech companies like Apple, electronics, from those various tariffs as well as anything that was semiconductor-related. And then today we had Invidia actually coming out with huge news saying that they

were going to make a huge investment here in the U.S. And this is important, guys. This is really, really important because those semiconductors, we need them. They got them in Taiwan. Taiwan's semiconductor company, they've got them, but we need them here in the U.S. of A. And this might be lighting a fire, dare I say, in the tech community. Donald Trump's threat of tariffs and the promise of tariffs has basically reinforced

everybody that they need to make sure that they have a distribution mechanism and chain right here in the good old U.S. of A. important for us, for our national and economic safety, and also important for our prosperity in that these are high-tech manufacturing jobs that would be great to have here in the U.S. Right. Also, I don't know if you saw the notes about NVIDIA to manufacture America-made AI supercomputer for the first time. Yes.

Gigantic commitment of a half a trillion dollars. Interestingly enough, that's the same amount that Apple committed, but people are a little suspicious of the White House about Apple. No one's suspicious of Invidian because if we don't have the $1,000, those chips. NVIDIA's in all the missiles, Carl. Did some checking on this. All the missiles are that are driven by Nvidia chips. They are? Really? Already? I got this. Yeah. They're already incorporating the latest chips in things that were put on the drawing board many years ago. Really? You know, Jim, I agree with you. Well, I like to question you before I

agree with you. You know what, David? You know how you see these ads about people who like do some work, the phones. I'm aware of how hard you work. I just want to make sure that that was an accurate people who put in that was an accurate statement. I had dinner with people who put in video chips in the missiles, okay? I have dinner with people who put invidia chips in their dinner. They eat those invidia chips. They're so smart. I eat weeaties. We should point out when they say supercomputer, that's what they're really referring to now. They're chips as supercomputers. I don't want people to get confused that they're somehow building something new. Yeah. So anyway, it's a big deal, right? So you want to have as much of that production onshore as possible.

And Donald Trump, in his own way, just scared the heck out of the tech community. And they're now like, yeah, we better do this. We better do this fast. Well, it's got to happen sooner rather than later, right? And I think Donald Trump's thinking sooner, sooner, sooner, rather than later. Again, what did we say, stay the course, be smart about these things. You want to, but the goal is to buy low and sell high, right? I don't really sell a lot. I mean, at times, I do. At times, I do. At times, in our portfolios, and we're very transparent about that if we think that, for example, one thing has seen enough upside that we are looking to maybe buy something else that has gotten beaten down. We tell you about that. Go to 76 research if you're interested in investing,

interested in just getting started here. Sign up for the 76 research report. Use my code word dollar. This is my company. I started it with my friend Rob. He's in Japan right now, reporting for us on the ground there in Japan. We may get a chance to talk to him a little bit later this evening. But it's good news here that we've got a market that is recovering. But don't tell that to the Dems, right? It's almost like they don't want the market to recover. I'm a little amused by this and a little disturbed. I think some of these people in the House of Representatives are just, well, morons. And so they're looking at what Donald Trump sent out on true social the other day in which he said, hey, you know what? It's a good time to buy. He was trying to calm the

markets a little bit, but gosh darn it, you're not allowed to do that if you're Donald Trump. You're not allowed to do anything if you're Donald Trump. And so now they're trying to say, well, this was insider trading. You know what? His billionaire friends, they made all the money. Well, he was actually pretty public about it. Thank you very much, guys. If you guys were on true social, maybe you would have bought and made some money too. Here we go. On the possible insider trading and market manipulation, you are one of the people who have been calling for an investigation into the president, those around him. Where do you see evidence to warrant an investigation? Do you think that,

there will be one. Well, to be clear, market manipulation is fraud. It is a felony. And when you look at the facts, and that is why I am joining with my colleague, Representative Terry Sewell, who is the ranking member of the Oversight Committee for Ways and Means, along with 131 House Democrats, calling for a full investigation. An investigation that wants to look at how, Donald Trump tanked the market with tariffs, then spiked it with the pause, but only after he gave notice to his billionaire France. And the proof is there, $300 billion of additional increases for billionaires and their investments, while Americans whose retirements, whose health savings accounts were put at risk. that is why we are calling for a full investigation, and those who were involved should be held

responsible. Congressman, thanks for much for your time. It's just, it's moronic, okay? Like, they don't know what they're talking about. They don't understand markets. Look, and I get frustrated, too, with Donald Trump's team and Peter Navarro, and sometimes, you know, it feels like a little lack of, Scott Besson is amazing, but, you know, Peter's and he's had a viewpoint pretty consistently for 20-some-od.

years. And while I agree with parts of it, and we do need to protect some American jobs, NAFTA was not the panacea that they thought it was going to be. It also is, you know, sort of misguided to say, we're going to cut off the entire world from trading, right? And I think Scott Besson gets that. Hopefully Howard gets that. But this guy doesn't get it. I mean, this guy doesn't understand a goddamn, forgive me, I don't want to use the Lord's name in vain, but this guy does not understand a thing, right? because he's a complete moron. He thinks that somehow this is insider trading because the president was telling people,

yeah, it's a good buying opportunity. I told you it was a good buying opportunity, too. Did I not? I did. I did. And I'll continue telling you when I think it's a good buying opportunity. When the bottom falls out from under, when you get the VIX, you know, just at 60,

as it was the other day, I mean, I think the highest it ever was was actually during March of 2020 when you're up around 80. Well, you know what? Unless you want to bet against America, And I get that the Dems do. You probably are going to see that as a buying opportunity. What else has been a buying opportunity actually for months now has been gold,

and we're looking at gold at upwards of 3200 an ounce. I don't sell my gold. I just buy my gold and I hold it. You can do this too. Go to Trish lovesgold.com. Trish lovesgold.com, you know, one of our sponsors, being American Heart for Gold, you can text my name Trish to 655-3-2 or call them at 1844-495 today to get more information on all of that. But listen, I mean, this is a wild market. This is an exciting market for

traders. I get one friend who's told me he's just having the time of his life, right? Because he likes the ball. He likes the volatility. I know if Don's watching in this show today, Don loves this too. He's a former options trader. I don't trade in and out as much. I dollar cost average in, and I sure like dollar cost averaging in when things are bad. Okay, we have a big announcement, guys. This is coming from the DOJ right now, the gentleman that has been believed to be responsible for those arson attacks on Tesla showroom, as well as the Republican headquarters in New Mexico seems to have been charged. I want to get to that momentarily, but first, we're talking serious space cadets, right? This is Gail King. She's the one of its best friends

with Oprah Winfrey and Katie Perry, the singer. as well as Jeff Bezos's girlfriend. They're all going up with Blue Origin to touch space. They are going up into space and they're turning it into a giant marketing event. Here's Gail King speaking about the very issue. Let's listen in. To me it's such a reminder about how we need to do better, be better. Do better, be better human beings. And what do you mean by that? Well, it's so nasty and so bitriolic nowadays.

And I mean, if everybody could experience that peace that we had up there. and the kindness and what it takes to do what we did. All the people that it took to get us up there and get us back safely, I'll never, ever, ever forget. So kind of a standard line. Somehow going up into space is supposed to make us realize that we're all just awful here on Earth. So again, living up to the terminology, Space Cadet, if you would. They've got cute costumes.

They're going off into space. And Katie Perry is weighing in on it as well. take a list and I did this actually in one of my shorts the other day so we can watch that. Here if you're not looking at the short feed I need you to do that as well. We got lots of interesting information you probably are but nonetheless take a peek. Jeff Bezos is trying to prove how great his blue origin space thing is by sending his soon-to-be wife, Oprah's best friend Gail King and one Katie Perry up into space. You know the jokes keep coming.

This is exciting. So many little girls are going to see themselves in one of us. one of us, hopefully, couldn't think of a better crew. One thing I want to do when I reach weightlessness is just be present. Look up, look down, look out, taking the moment. I'm doing a lot of inner space work to go to outer space. Hmm, yay. So I'm just saying they may already be in a little bit outer space.

Just going out on a limb. Anyway, look, I'm all for technology improvements. It's all good stuff. We want to do more of that, right? Getting back to the news just coming in, you know, Elon Musk has been under a lot of fire. They do not like that he's been finding this Doge savings. And so, of course, he has seen his brand Tesla very much under fire. We are just learning right now the DOJ is charging a man in arson attacks at the Tesla showroom.

They promised that this is a they promised that this would happen, right? This was Pam Bondi saying we're going to find you and we're going to hold you accountable. And so now the DOJ is coming forward with the news they are charging. The DOJ is charging a man in the arson attacks on a Tesla showroom as well as Republican headquarters in New Mexico. And so again, this has just come forward. His name is Wagner, James Mag. age 40, Albuquerque resident, faces two counts of federal. They said they were going to push federal charges. So remember when Pam came out and was very clear, I think she went on Hannity's

show, she may have gone on a few shows, faces two federal charges of charges of malicious damage or destruction. And they said they would have no mercy on these guys, because this was a form in their estimation of a kind of domestic terror in that you were trying to really do some serious damage. I just want to put the story up here so that we can all see it in this moment. Again, the DOJ coming out now and announcing that it is charging this particular person that had vandalized these Tesla cars in the showroom as well as apparently Republican headquarters in Mexico. So that's a big deal. Again, if you recall, they've been making it quite clear over and over again that they were not going to put up with this, that this was something that was

not tolerable under any circumstances, and that really there was a new sort of representation of law and order in the White House. And it's important to know that they are following through on their word. I'm just seeing if I can find Pam Bondi here for you, because Pam Bondi made it very clear from the beginning that this was not to be tolerated. She's got a lot on her plate. I will say that. I think it's helpful that Alina Hava, for example, is there able to do some of the work there in New Jersey because I'll tell you, between Epstein, between Diddy, between what's going on with Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, and now all of that information coming out, it is clear that there's a lot that she has to do. She made the comment to Fox recently that she did not believe that this was happening in a vacuum.

Her concern was that this was organized. These attacks are taking place throughout our country. We have charged multiple people, get ready, more coming. One we charged in Oregon is facing five to 20 years in prison. We filed in Colorado. We filed in South Carolina. There are more coming. And yes, the funding is one thing we are looking at, among many others.

I was personally in a meeting about it this morning. We are coming after you. We believe these are organized. These are not individuals out there. throughout the country doing this on their own. They're targeting Tesla owners. They're targeting Tesla dealerships. They're targeting Elon Musk who is out there trying to save our country,

and it will not be tolerated. We are coming after you. We will find you. And if you are an organized group who is funding this, we're going to find you too. You better look out and you better stop it. So it's very clear that they're not going to give up on this. So I just want to change our lower here.

Tesla attacker charged. because this is a big deal. And don't forget Jasmine Crockett's role in all of this, right? I mean, she was the one who was actually calling for much of this. And we can go back just as recently as a couple of weeks ago. She was coming up on her birthday. And she went on to a podcast and said, you know, the one thing you can do for me is this. And then we saw this violence ensue. And that in and of itself is really, really, really, really. Thank you so much, Annie. And I won't hold y'all because I know how much people love to listen to politicians. So I'll make sure that I keep it short.

But I am truly here for very selfish reasons. Starting with on March 29th, it's my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down. Yes. Well, she certainly, she could go up in space too, right? She should go up with the rest of them. up in space as one of the space cadets and more. I mean, it's just not appropriate. And there's been a whole series of things with her. And I don't know if it's to get attention. There was that moment.

There was the, you know, going after Ted Cruz moment. There was the pick and cotton moment. You name it. She's got a lot of moments almost seemingly every day. We're having a moment here with the market turning around. Let's hope this stays. Remember to go check out 76 research. Again, so many familiar faces in this show today. appreciate you being here. If you're new, please make sure you subscribe, that you share, you like. We're growing, growing, growing. Guys, we're going to be at 700,000 soon. And keep in mind, this is with no marketing. This is not even, this is with nothing. This is just you and me here. Every day doing this show. And it shows you the power of truth and the power of fairness.

I think, if anything, the one thing I try and always be on this show is fair. And there's no sort of pomp and circumstance. We've got a few graphics here and there, but this is nothing like what you see, right, in the mainstream media. And yet the mainstream media is the one out there going after an individual like that Dr. Amin that now they're going to have to pay for because you just can't make stuff up about people. I think that that sort of says it all because they're so willing, right? Why? Why? Why? I know you hate Trump, but why? Because you're worried. You're worried. he's going to shut you down? Is it because you're being paid? Remember, Obama changed the propaganda rules in 2013, all of a sudden, all this money that was just going overseas to news organizations

could suddenly be redirected back here at home? So is this like USAID money that has, it prompted them to be so wildly out of step with everyone? I don't know the answer to that. But I'm really troubled by all of this. I'm really, really troubled, and I think it's high time that Americans do, I mean, I mean, you guys have done it. You've found it. You found your news, fortunately. You found me and you found others. And I think truth matters. We're not like, you know, NPR. We're like, you don't have to actually even have a concept of truth because truth is only, you know, whatever you want it to be. No, no, no. There's right and wrong in this world, okay? And there are consequences. And that's what we believe in, and that's sort of our foundation. You have to have law in order. You have to have a rule

of law. You have to have rules. Or you can't really have a country. I love that you're here. Thank you so much. We've got a lot more content coming your way and I'm going to be back live again tomorrow afternoon. I'll see you here on the Trish Regan Show. Until then, have a good one.