The Tucker Carlson Show - Hungary Prime Minister Viktor Orban on USAID, Trump, Immigration, NATO, and the Russia/Ukraine War

Episode Date: February 14, 2025

Hungary’s Viktor Orban is by far the longest serving head of state in Europe, and by this point has been vindicated on pretty much everything. So when he says that going forward it’s Ukraine, not Russia, that may be the biggest threat to the west, it’s worth paying attention. (00:00) Viktor Orban’s Predictions Were Right (02:40) USAID’s Actions in Hungary (04:29) Why Was USAID Spreading Transgenderism in Foreign Countries? (09:18) George Soros’ Mission to Destroy the West (11:16) Has This Mass Migration Policy Worked? (15:52) Orban’s Assessment of the German Economy and Its Impact on the US (23:26) Why Is the Destruction of Nord Stream Completely Ignored? Paid partnerships with: iTrust Capital: Get $100 funding bonus at https://www.iTrustCapital.com/Tucker Jase Medical: Promo code “Tucker” for extra discount at https://Jasemedical.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Whether it's a family member, friend or furry companion joining your summer road trip, enjoy the peace of mind that comes with Volvo's legendary safety. During Volvo Discover Days, enjoy limited-time savings as you make plans to cruise through Muskoka or down Toronto's bustling streets. From now until June 30th, lease a 2025 Volvo XC60 from 1.74% and save up to $4,000. Conditions apply. Visit your GTA Volvo retailer or go to volvocars.ca for full details. I will introduce our next guest, who is the longest-serving leader in Europe by far. And he is someone that I interviewed several years ago for the first time. He is, of course, the Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban. Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister.

And I was just thinking back when I worked at a giantly publicly traded news company and interviewed you for the first time. You're a democratically elected leader of a European nation and it was considered controversial to interview you because your ideas were considered eccentric and they included emphasis on the middle class and families. They included, above all, secure borders, serving your citizens before you serve foreigners. And that was all considered super radical and dangerous. And I wonder if you feel vindicated years later by watching what happened to the rest

of Europe when they didn't follow those simple ideas. So now we lost all the real attraction, what we have done previously, and Donald Trump take away all the attraction of the international politics. So we have done something for 15 years in Hungary, in headwind, liberal headwind, stopping migration, defending traditional values, respecting religious communities, no Green Deal, low taxation, so everything which is unorthodox in the mind of the liberals. religious communities, no Green Deal, low taxation.

So everything which is unorthodox in the mind of the liberals. So we were a kind of hero. We were kind of island of difference in the liberal ocean. But now unfortunately, Donald Trump taking over everything. So yeah, just sitting and try to follow him now. This is a totally new reality. And that's, may I say, very much helpful to Hungary because I try to make some jokes on how the last 15 years was,

but it was serious. So when you have one boot from the United States on your chest and one from Brussels, European Union, trying to kill you and to deliver evidences that that way of government and governance cannot work, it's difficult to survive. So now we remember back in a happy way, but that was very serious. So now at least one boost is out. The Americans not anymore on our chest, not kneeling on our chest.

So it's an appeasement. So we think that life is happy. And it will be even happier when we swap away the Brazilian bureaucrats and the other boost is down. That's the plan. I remember one of your advisors telling me years ago, whispering to me at dinner, that the U.S. government, the State Department, and agencies like USAID were working against you, funding your opposition indirectly, and really trying to subvert democracy in your country and thinking, boys, can that be true? It turns out now it is true. And I wonder when the rest of us are going to get details on what exactly the State Department did to end democracy in Hungary. So first of all, I think those who love

conspiracy theories are in trouble. They have to find new ones because the old one proved to be true. So that's the first probably. It's a massive problem in the United States. The second is that, you know, it's a taxpayer money. Yes. So if you take it, this whole thing, not as a political one, but rather as a moral issue. The fact is that the liberal elite of the West used the taxpayers' money of United States citizens

to spread their ideology all around the world. And financed in Hungary more than 60 NGOs, paid politicians, media outlets. So it was a plot against our sovereignty and independence. Sorry, made by you. I know. Sorry. But this is the case, and the same has happened from the Brazilian budget, which is even more scandalous, may I say, because we pay the money in the Brazilian budget, which is even more scandalous, may I say, because

we pay the money in the Brazilian budget and they finance our enemies at home. So what's going on? So this is the liberal deep state, the global liberal deep state. And now we see how it has operated. It raises a deep question of motive.

Why would anyone want to spread deadly ideas like open borders or transgenderism? Hey, how about no grandchildren for you? How about nobody reproduces anymore? What would be the motive for spreading poison like that? It should be not naive, I think so. One motivation is always money. So that was a way

how the American Democrats thought they can open the gates for their business activity. If they change the governments which insisted on having sovereignty and standing and fight for themselves, it's more

difficult to find business possibilities for those speculators. Soros is a Hungarian guy. George Soros kind of speculators can find easier way to generate money and to make profit on your economy. So that's the number one motivation. But the second one, don't forget that leftists are always ideologically driven. And they believe certain things, which for us sounds crazy, even embarrassing, you know, frightening.

But they believe it. In Europe, probably it's difficult to understand, but I'm sure that the leaders of the left in Western Europe deeply convinced that if they let the migrants in, which are basically Muslims, poor Muslim persons, and let them to be combined with the traditional Christian society, and they manage a kind of integration, the outcome of this whole process'll be a better and happier society. And that's the reason why George Soros published his plan. It was signed by himself, saying that the European Union should let one million migrants every year to move to Europe.

And then, you know, I always said that it belongs to the decision of the national government. So if the Germans or the French would like to make that historical research project, how to improve their society, let's do it. But let us, those who do not believe that the outcome will be a good thing, not to do that. So Hungary never tried to educate anybody how a society could be better or worse. We always said that, guys, let us make our own decision. And to let migrants in or keep them out, it's exclusively belonging to our nations as a decision. So don't force us from Brussels or from Washington that migration is good, and those who are not let the migrants in definitely must be bad guys.

So this is unacceptable. But that was the thing. But Donald Trump changed the mindset of the West. I think this is the key issue. So probably Donald Trump, president, will change the geopolitics as well. I hope so anyway. But he already made a huge change in the mindset of the political thinking of the West. Previously, they said migration is good. To resist to migration is

bad. Now it's just the opposite. To defend your interest is good. Migration, illegal migration especially, is bad. Then on the Green Deal, they said green is good. Economic competitiveness does not count. Now, it's obvious that economic competitiveness first and green issues just the second. And then on religious communities and values, Christianity in our case, you know, it was said that this belonged to the middle age. They made us ridiculous several times, making jokes on us and so on. But now the president said it's a respectful thing. The community of the believers must enjoy respect, which is good for our society. Or then family in the West.

The mindset was that family is also belonging to the past and other configuration of living together persons is preferable. Now it's back. Traditional values are better than this whole thing. And gender, which is a crazy gender propaganda, now it's publicly said it's bad. To defend traditional values is good. And war. You know, in Europe in the last three years, it was said always that war is good, peace is bad. Concerning Ukraine-Russia war. So those who argued in favor of peace and peace negotiations and communications said, you are bad guys. The good guys are who are arguing in favor of war.

So now it's totally changed. So Donald Trump president already changed the mindset of the whole Western world. That's where we are at this moment, and it's very good for Hungary. Well, it's certainly a vindication for you. If I could just go back to something you said. You said that Soros and his aligned NGOs and the movement that he represents has pushed these things because they sincerely believe them to be true. But they haven't pushed them on any nation outside the West.

No one is pushing China to let in a million or 10 million relative to its size migrants here, or India, or for that matter, Korea or Japan or the Philippines or any other country. It's only Western countries. Why, in their mind, is it only Western countries that need unrestricted migration? That would request a deeper understanding of the intellectual history of the European political thinking. But there was always a strong leftist liberal community which was not proud being a Westerner. Always have perceived its own civilization as something bad. And their intention was not to make it stronger and to maintain and make it stronger, but rather to destroy, to improve by destroying.

That's a very communist idea, deleting the past. That was always the communist idea. So they don't like the West, they don't like their nation. Sometimes they are ashamed to belong to a nation because they think that nation is a bad thing. So if you think that nation is something good and you are proud of it and you think that you have to work for your nation to be competitive and better than the others, it's an awful Nazis, you know, extreme right something. That's their approach. That's the tradition of the European left. And in the latest years, it was brutally witnessed in the everyday political discussion. So I'm a fascist, you know. I'm sitting here like, you know.

I'm a bad guy. I'm a fascist. I'm middle-aged, feudalistic, Christian radicals, you know. So that's who is arguing for peace, which is the first thing, yeah. That's absurd, may I say. So this has been going on since the end of the last big war, so 80 years, particularly migration. And so I think we can render some judgment.

How has that worked for the big nations of Europe, for Britain, Germany, France? Can we look back and say that experiment was a success? You mean? Migration. Migration? Unrestricted migration. So we are living in, okay, under liberal dictatorship intellectually, but politically still we are living in democracies. So public opinion counts. And I think now we have a problem of democracy because of the migration. It's not just a problem of migration, it's a problem of democracy. Because if you have an elite which is not ready to accept the obvious public will of your voters,

instead of accepting that forcing against the population their own crazy ideas, it raised the problem of democracy. So that's where we are. Because now there's a quite strong shift in the mindset of the Western societies. Previously, at the beginning of the mass migration period, I'm speaking about 2015, 2016, there were half and half of the societies, even probably more than half,

was in favor of doing something good in favor of those who were considered as refugees. Then slowly but surely it turned to be that they are not refugees, basically. They're changing their place. There are some of them refugees, but basically the majority of them would like to get a better life, simply. And they are organized by smugglers. It's an international black business, you know. So it's an awful business. And now the terrorism somehow related to these whole changes just come up to the surface. It's never awful business. And now the terrorism, somehow related to these whole changes, just come up to the surface.

It's never happened earlier. Terrorism was not part of the Western life anyway. If I remember back, the last one was in the 70s, some crazy communist Marxist group of Germany. But after that, you know, terrorism is not part of the Western life. Violence of public life does not belong to us. But now terrorism is not part of the Western life. Violence of public life does not belong to us. But now terrorism is up, public order is dispersing.

So now the society is against the mass migration policy. So Willkommen Kultur, as it was called by Angela Merkel, now it's totally negative. And the problem is that the elite was so much committed to that ideology that now it's difficult to change their position. And that leads us to the problem of democracy. As we will see in Germany just soon, election is coming two weeks time. So, and you probably have realized that there were some surprising discussion in the German parliament whether to change the migration regulation or not. And the public opinion said, 70% said, yes, you should change it. And they voted against it. So it's a problem of democracy. It's not just

a problem of migration. It's not a problem of leadership. The whole structure and the system is under pressure at this moment. The word democracy has been changed. Its meaning has been changed in the United States to mean whatever the people in charge want is democracy. But you're referring to it by its traditional meaning, which means what the majority wants, correct? Yes. But at the same time, don't forget that democracy is a word we use too much, probably too often without understanding exactly what does it mean. There are many theories, as you know. But the most relevant one is the Greek origin of the understanding of democracy. They said democracy means two things at the same time.

Participation of the people, involvement. But the involvement of the people must be resulted in good governance. If the involvement of the people, the public opinion, does not result in good governance, it's anarchy. It's not democracy. So democracy means participation of the people by their voting in the major decisions, and the outcome must be a good governance. It's one of them is lacking. It's not democracy. And now in Europe, we are heading to a position when the people have a chance to vote, but there is no chance to get good governance. So we are

moving, brother, towards a kind of anarchical public life in West Europe. So Germany specifically, from the outside, you're a European leader. But from an American perspective, Germany is the dominant economic player in the continent. And the giant. It feels that way from our perspective. And so what is the German economy? What does it look like right now? How would you assess it?

OK, the German economy is part of the European bond because we have the single market. And the single market as such is in trouble. I'm in international politics for more than 30 years. And I do remember that 30 years ago, the biggest economy of the world was the European Union. And now it's only number three. And if you look at the top five economies of the world, there is no European among them. So European Union, economically, it's not a success story.

And the success of European Union will always strongly link to the success of German economy. And now they are suffering and we are suffering. And the reason is very simple. There was a well-functioning, quite well-functioning structural model of the German economy and the European economy. That was cheap Russian energy and well-advanced European technology come together and we are competitive. But now after the war, we isolated ourselves from the cheap energy and there is no new strategy how we could be competitive. But now after the war, we isolated ourselves from the cheap energy,

and there is no new strategy how we could be competitive. So we have a lost strategy, but we don't have a new one. There's no replacement for the old one. So now the problem is that we don't have compass where we should move. So we are just managing the daily work, but there is no real strategy. What is the future of the European economy? No answer of that. That's the reason why China, United States, because President Trump is back, obviously is in a far better position than we are.

Lack of leadership, lack of ideas, lack of visions. That's why we suffer. Well, I mean, the Biden administration imposed the Green New Deal on Germany with high explosives by blowing up Nord Stream. So on many levels, I don't understand. So you have the largest player in NATO committing an act of terror,

industrial terrorism, against the second largest player in NATO. How does NATO still exist, honestly? And why does nobody say anything about it? Hungary is a small country, you know. Ten million, you know. Elephants is a small country, you know, so 10 million, you know, so elephants is a different game. It's another league, you know, so that's how they live. If it would have happened with Hungary, there would be some noise, no question of that. But, you know, it's Germany.

So there's been a lot of talk about changes to the U.S. tax code, especially changes that affect cryptocurrency investing. What are those changes? Well, what if there was already a way to invest in the market with tax advantages? Well, iTrust Capital makes that possible. iTrust Capital is a software platform that lets you invest in crypto using a self-directed IRA. That means with a traditional IRA, taxes are deferred. And with a Roth IRA, you won't have to pay taxes on your crypto gains, just like a retirement account. On top of that, the crypto market never closes. You can buy or sell 24-7 in case you stay up late.

iTrust Capital makes investing easy, safe, and accessible. You don't have to be an expert. Their website has easy-to-understand articles, videos, and if you ever need help, you can speak with an actual person in the United States because the whole thing is based in the united states the whole company so if you're looking to add crypto to your retirement portfolio sign up today at itrustcapital.com slash tucker and use a promo code tucker for a hundred dollar funding bonus no frills delivers get groceries delivered to your door from no frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum points on your first five orders. Shop now at nofrails.ca.

It's one of the saddest things about this country. The country's getting sicker despite all of our wealth and technology. Americans aren't doing well overall. Obesity, heart disease, autoimmune conditions, all kinds of horrible chronic illnesses, weird cancers. They're all on the rise. Probably a lot of reasons for this, but one of them definitely is Americans don't eat very well anymore. They don't eat real food. Instead, they eat industrial substitutes, and it's not good. It's time for something new, and that's where masa chips come in.

Masas decide to revive real food by creating snacks how they used to be made, how they're supposed to be made. A masa chip has just three simple ingredients, not 117. Three. No seed oils, no artificial additives, just real delicious food. And I know this because we eat a ton of them in my house. And by the way, I feel great. So you can still continue to snack, but you can do it in a healthy way with chips without feeling guilty about it. Masa chips are delicious. They taste how a tortilla chip is supposed to taste. But the thing is, you can hit them really, really

hard, and I have, and not feel bloated or sluggish after. You feel like you've done something decent for your body. You don't feel like you got a head injury or you don't feel filled with guilt. You feel light and energetic. It's the kind of snack your grandparents ate. Worth bringing back. So you can go to masachips.com, Masa's M-A-S-A, by the way. Masachips.com slash Tucker to start snacking. Get 25% off. We enjoy them. You will too. If you could just speculate,

I know it's not your country, and when all the rest of Europe is gone, I have no doubt Hungary will remain as it has for, you know, a thousand years, but why do you think even now there's no Nord Stream to me as a total outsider seems like a pivot point in the history of Europe? It really seems like a big deal. I show you a point. Right. And obviously, it was also the largest emission of greenhouse gases caused by humans in the history of civilization, and no one

mentioned it. So, OK, but why is there no conversation about it? I don't know. I really don't understand that. And every time I bring it up in Europe, people look embarrassed and try to walk away from me. So I think the basic reason is that in the last several decades, there was a strong alliance between the American liberal elite and the European liberal elite. And they agree always what is the issue and what is not the issue. If they decided that something is not an issue, it was not an issue. And the Germans were part of that kind of transatlantic liberal alliance. And they managed to stop all the voices which try to raise the question,

which is a serious one anyway. But anyway, it's not the only one. I do remember some other scandals as well. Beginning of the previous decade, it turned out that the United States, democratic government anyway, taped the Chancellor of Germany. And we were discussing it at the European Council meeting. Charles Cozy, who was the president of France at that time said,

guys, what a scandalous thing is that? We have to do that. The Germans said, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Transatlantic creation is the most important thing we have to manage, not in that way, and so on. So that's an alliance between the transatlantic elites from America and the European Union. It hasn't helped, I don't think, the European Union. So probably that was your sentence, not mine. If a country is not ready to stand up and fight for himself, himself does not deserve any help from outside. I couldn't agree more. But I also think, and tell me, I'd love your perspective on this. It's my instinct that the fortunes of Europe, the economic fortunes of Europe,

security condition of Europe, really matters to the United States because it's just inexorably, it's fundamentally part of a block. It's the West. So if Europe declines, I don't see how that helps the U.S. I think the approach of the new incumbent administration of the United States has a very special approach to the other economies. And this is based on facts and figures and concentrate on trade balances. And as far as I was able to understand the way of thinking of this new administration in your country, they see a triangle, Europe, China, United States. And they have a look at the figures. And Europe make plus 200 billion of trade with United States. We lose the same sum to China.

So it's basically Europe is zero. And European Union make 200 billion euro plus the trade with you, United States. And you lose to China 300. So it means that Europe is basically a zero, China plus 500 billion, United States minus 500 billion. And as your president said, it's not good, it's bad. So something should be done, and he will do something. He is not, probably the new administration is not thinking about geopolitical concepts of economy, but, you know, figures, facts. And they would like to do something to improve the trade balance.

And that's a challenge for Europe. So it's a serious matter. It's not about friendship. It's not about, you know, love each other, brother in arms. That's very nice, but it's money. It's figures. So we have to find a solution and to make a deal with the United States. If Europeans are just sitting and waiting, that's not a good strategy.

We should come up with a strategy and to provide something, a deal, proposals to the United States to how to reshape that kind of in-balance trade relationship. Otherwise, we will get tariffs and we will suffer. We are not strong enough to defend our interest after waiting and losing weeks and months. But the problem is that Europe now leads by bureaucrats. You know, we have the European Commission. Do you know what is it?

The Commission is a bureaucratic body which originally was planned to be the guardian of the treaty. So just to help to maintain the fair legal regulation inside the single market area. But now the bureaucrats are more than 30,000. They're growing, growing,

growing, and they took away the leadership from the real prime ministers of Europe. So now the Commission tries to lead the European Union, but they are bureaucrats. And we have the leadership program because bureaucrats cannot lead anything politically. When everything is going well,

bureaucrats are not harmful because things are going well. But when there are difficulties and decisions must be made, like now we should make an offer to the United States, the bureaucrats will never do that because they are bureaucrats. Bureaucrats are interested in status quo, not to provide political leadership for your community. So that's another problem inside the European Union. But I would not like to speak too much about other countries because my job is to preserve the sovereignty and

good chances for the future of my own nation. So what I am doing now, I try to find a way how we can have a good relation with the United States to make some deals on economy as big as we can. We are working on that and try to create an economic policy which makes Hungary successful even if the European Union exists or the European Union does not exist. The problem is to be sharp. We have not more than three, four years, and if we don't do something dramatically different strategy,

the European Union will fall apart. So there is a famous study published in Western Europe called Draghi Report. Draghi was the previous head of the European Bank and previously prime minister of Italy. And he put together a study. And the study is very clear. If you don't do something in three years' time to push down the price of the energy

and to make Europe competitive, especially by creating a capital market at the European Union level, the European Union economy is over. So now we pay three, four times higher price for the electricity than you do it in the United States, and five, six times higher price for gas than you do in the United States. How are companies can be competitive? It's impossible. And then you run a policy, and Donald Trump president will do so even more,

to attract the capitals from all over the world to the United States. So the capital will move out from Europe to the United States and to other places as well. So we have to do something to keep the capital inside the European Union. But we don't have a strategy how to do it. So now the European Union, but we don't have a strategy how to do it.

So now the European Union is really at a watershed. But you have ended global warming. Do you feel good about that? Hungary has a nice climate. But taking seriously the global responsibility, of course, but the problem is not the global climate issue. The problem is that if you would like to find a solution for a global issue like climate issue, you can't do it against the business community. So if you don't convince the business community that they could be part of this whole process, involvement again, to involve them into that policy. If you don't do that, but ideologically-led political movement, green movement, you do like that, it's hopeless.

It will be not successful. Look at the Green Deal. Green Deal is dead. It's a suicide attempt for the European Union. Nobody is sharing of that. We do it and we kill our industry. So if you would like to have a good green policy, you need the business, the business leaders and the common strategy.

That's the only way. Otherwise, we end up as we are today. So both the structures that overlay Europe, NATO and the EU seem like they've played out or they're not working as intended. I think we can say that. And the problem is that the European institutions cannot reform it, cannot provide leadership because it's a strange creature of the European Union. So the only possibility to have a leadership if the French and the German government is strong, stable, visionary, and take the lead. Right. Which is not the case at this moment.

So why not a different structure with, you know, an alliance of countries that have something in common, a common worldview, similar economies, say, east of Switzerland, central and eastern Europe, and then sort of let France and Britain sort of enjoy the fruits of the decisions that they've made. So we have a strategy anyway. Hungary, that's my job anyway. We have a strategy, of course. And central European leaders have their own strategy. So our main criticism to the European Union at this moment,

that they launch wars with everybody who could be important partners for your economy. We launch a war on ideology, Donald Trump, President Donald Trump. We launch a war with China on trade issues. We initiated the tariff war with China. And then we launch a war with China on trade issues. We initiated the tariff war with China. And then we launched a war with Russia on energy. So why is it a good policy? In Central Europe, we did just the opposite. We built up a good relation with the new Republican administration. 44% of all European investment from China arrived to Hungary last year. 44% of all European investment from China arrived to Hungary last year. 44% of all European.

And we maintain the communication and cooperation even with the Russians. So connectivity is the word, not blocking. The European Union tried to build a block instead of running a strategy based on connectivity and do a common sense-based business with everybody who can provide something good for the European Union. But Central Europe does exactly what I'm saying about.

Slovaks do it, Hungary do it, Serbia do it. The first famous picture of you is from 1989 getting arrested by Russian-backed security forces. You were a student protest leader against the effective Russian occupation of your country in Eastern Europe. So with that in mind, I've listened for the past three years to you denounced as a Putin puppet in our press.

What's your response to that? How are you? It's so ridiculous that it's always a dilemma to me to react at all or not. But, okay, if I take it seriously, I am not a pro-Putin man. I'm a pro-Hungarian guy.

Because my job is to serve my nation. That's first. Second, we have some memories with the Russians. It's not a honeymoon anyway. You know, Hungary, just to the audience, Hungary is dominated by always three major powers. One, Germany, I mean, Berlin, then Moscow, and Istanbul.

So we are living just in the middle of that. Each of them occupied at least once. Russian three. So that's the menu card, what you have. each of them occupied at least once. Russian three, you know? So that's the menu card, what you have, if you are living in that peculiar part of the European Union. Sounds like a lot of fun. So therefore, I decided when I came back to Pave 2010,

and I made a deal with President Russia, President Putin, that whatever was the history between the two nations, let it to the historians and discuss it. And we should find a reasonable cooperation and do it economically as much as we had. And we did. And it worked. It was good. You know, Russians always kept their words. When we agreed on anything with Putin, that was done. On my side as well. So, therefore, my attitude to the Russians is not that negative and crazy as many of the Western leaders at this moment.

And my position on this war between Ukraine and Russia always said that, guys, don't forget that this war is not about Ukraine. Don't make a mistake. The strategical reason of this war is called enlargement of NATO. So the question is whether we would like to enlarge NATO or not. If we would like to enlarge NATO, the Russians will never accept it. Whether you like it or not, they will not let us move closer to their borders. But this is the main issue, enlargement of NATO.

So then, when the war has broken, because Russia invaded Ukraine finally to stop the NATO membership and occupy the territories, I said to my colleagues that we should isolate as much as we can and as soon as we can this whole conflict. Otherwise, the conflict will accelerate, eating up more and more money, more and more casualties, more and more deaths, now hundreds of thousands of widows. When two Slavic nations are in war, it's serious because they are both military based nations. So it's a tragedy what's going on. It's really brutal. It's not just a geopolitical

game, you know, it's a human, it's a human tragedy anyway. And so I said, we should isolate them and stop killing. But what now the Western strategy is that keep killing as long as it takes. So that's what they are doing. So unfortunately, I remain alone. We voted, and I was the only one who was against the involvement of European Union to the war. Later on now, the Slovakians follow the same track, plus Vatican. So Vatican, Slovak and Hungary. And now, Donald Trump president. So that's a new story. Because your president following exactly the same track, which was offered by us, I mean, by Hungary in the last three years. So, another good news.

Less than a year in, there was what seems like a pretty meaningful attempt to end it, to settle the conflict, and that was scuttled by the Biden administration using the former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Why do you think the Biden administration wanted the war to continue? And it wasn't just Johnson. It was the UK more broadly. Its whole political establishment was fanatically, is to this day fanatically. Still, still.

What is that? They're not historic enemies, by the way, keep in mind. They were allied in the last big war. They've never been invaded by Russia. Why is Britain so intent on killing all these Ukrainians? I don't understand. Is it my job to answer to that? Yes.

I don't think so. You're the longest serving leader in Europe. I thought you might have. No, you don't. When I will, in my years in pension, I'm ready to answer to that. I'll try to survive rather. Totally fair. Can you just describe for those who haven't, I mean, you're very much, you know, you're not far from the fighting, by the way, for people

who haven't looked at a map. So can you describe the effects on Europe of this war for those of us who don't live on the continent? Like what effects has this had, do you think? So just start with a very narrow Hungarian approach. Because of the sanctions and the war, we are losing every year around 7 billion euro. Hungary is a small country, can you imagine? Just Hungary? Just Hungary, just Hungary, just Hungary. So, all together, we don't know the figures exactly, but Europe spent close to 200 billion euro,

which is out of the European economy. So it's a sum. That's first. Second, we isolated ourselves from the Russian economy, including the energy, which will have a long-term impact on us as well, as I said, losing our work, well-functioning economic strategy as a basis of the European economy. The third one is the migrants. I mean, they are not migrants, they are really refugees. So the Ukrainians left the country. Nobody knows exactly how many, but tens of millions.

So we are speaking about a country which one-fifth or one-fourth of the territory is occupied by Russia. The industrial area is totally destroyed, and the people are just escaping. So it's really a tragedy. And if President Trump is not able to find a solution, that war could become easily an Afghanistan for the European Union. Endless war, endless conflict, no way out of the conflict, eating up energy, human lives, money, everything, destroying the frame of normal life for the European Union. So we are in a serious danger. The difficulty is,

and that's not my challenge, but it's a challenge to President Trump, how to convince the Russians to stop the war while the Russians are basically winning. This is the big question. Luckily enough, it's not my job to find an answer again. But I'm convinced that if you try to find a solution just directly on the war between Russia and Ukraine, you will never find a solution. So we should make a bigger basket to incorporate the issue of reintegration of Russia into the international security order,

to reintegrate Russia into the European security system, and to find a way of economic cooperation, basically energy, plus Ukraine. If you make that kind of bigger basket, probably there is a chance for the deal. If it's narrowly, directly concentrating just Ukraine and Russia, it's a real challenge, intellectually and politically, to any president of the United States. But it's not my job, again. I mean, from an American perspective, the Biden administration has succeeded in driving Russia into deep integration with China, deep integration, both economically and militarily. And that's terrible from our perspective. But to come back and try and bring Russia back into swift, even something as simple as that,

you're fighting against three years of some of the most vicious, over the top, leave no room forise rhetoric about Russia, where Putin is daily described as Hitler. So can you actually do that once these words have been spoken? No. Right? No way back. So I think, you know, we are different nations.

It's not my job to make any comment either on Russia, but Russia is a military-based country. So the mindset is about, okay, the mindset for you, or mindset for me, when we speak about democracy, what is the first question which came to my mind? You concentrate your ideas around freedom, yeah? Of course. Okay, but it's not the case in Russia. In case of Russia, it's security of the nation. Then democracy and other issues, which are important. But the number one is, because it's a two-big country, to keep it together,

it is number one historical challenge and mission for the leaders. So it's a different mindset again. So if you have that kind of country and you insult them politically, try to isolate them politically, Try to kill them economically. Then support his enemy by all the means. And after a few years you say, no, we don't think too much seriously, so come back and cooperate with us. It does not work. So we made a historical mistake, which is decisive

for at least 100 years and based cement the Chinese-Russian cooperation for 100 years. So we have to see that kind of block as a block. Probably Russia will make a deal with us on many issues, but

we'll never give up that kind of final background, what China means. If you would be in the shoes of Vladimir Putin, I think he would do the same thing. Never give up that kind of background, which was the real and only background. Can you imagine if China would not be in that relation with Russia and use the possibility of being attacked from the West and try to squeeze from East Russia? But the Chinese did not do so.

They said, we don't accept that kind of Western approach to this war. So it's historic. It's not just a war of the decade. It will have an impact for long, long, long, long decades. We will live with that. Even our kids will live in that age. But Russia will never come back to the West as it was, never again. Sorry to say that.

I'm not happy with that because Russia is too close to Hungary. And the Ukraine. What is basically, again, the problem? The Russians accepted in a very difficult way that Central European countries like my home, Hungary, became members of NATO. They always criticized that move, saying that it's unfair, because it was promised. Nobody knows exactly whether it happened or not, but it was promised that the ex-Soviet Union-dominated territories will now join NATO. But we did. Good for us anyway. And then the Russians started to live with that.

In that concept, Ukraine was the buffer zone between NATO and Russia. And then now, as we started to incorporate more and more Ukraine, first at the military level, developing their army, then even at the diplomatic level to speak about the possible membership of Ukraine to NATO, we converted the buffer zone into a war zone. So it's not anymore a buffer zone.

That's the problem. And it's history. It's not about one or two decades issue. So how we imagine the territory between the NATO and Russia, how we call it and how to manage it, how we provide the future for the people and the territory. So these are the real big and difficult challenges ahead of us. One big change. When we jumped into the war, that was always my argument to the Westerners,

that don't consider that war as our own war. It's not a war of the West. It's a war between two Slavic nations, a brutal but a brotherhood war. Russians and Ukrainians, isolate them, help them, but don't say that this is our war. That's exactly what you have done. Basically, Biden president came to Warsaw and said, Putin must fail. Guys, it means that you are in the war.

So why we have done it? Nobody knows the answer of that, you know? So it was a very short-sighted idea. Probably they thought that they could make weak in Russia. I was always sure at the very first moment that a war will make Russia stronger than it was prior to the war. That's our history. First World War, Second World War. When they start the war, they are weaker.

As the war is going ahead, they are getting stronger and stronger and stronger. That's the lesson of the Hungarian history. It's the time of year we focus on the people who matter most in our lives. And if there's one way to show your family, the people you love, that you love them, it's by protecting their health and their safety. And a really obvious way to do that is by preparing for unpredicted moments. And there are a lot of those. Breakdown in supply chains, overwhelmed hospitals, natural disasters, wars. Whatever happens next, you can't see it coming, but you can be prepared for most of it.

And that's why a JACE case works. A JACE case is a personal supply of prescribed emergency medications. So if things fall apart, you're okay. There's an unexpected global disruption. You can protect yourself and your loved ones. So this February, show them you care. Get the JACE case today. You'll have the right meds on hand when you need them. You only need them once. You ought to have them. So the people trying to wreck our civilization want you to be passive. They want you weak so they can control you. Weakness is their goal. No thanks. Our friends at Beam, a proud American company, understand that our country can only be great if its people are strong. And that's why they've created a new creatine product to help listeners like you stay mentally sharp and physically fit.

People like to mock creatine. CNN doesn't like creatine at all. But people buy it because it works. Beam's creatine can help you improve your strength, your brain health, your longevity. It's completely free of sugar and synthetic garbage that's in almost everything else that you eat. Of course, you don't hear about it too much because, again, a population that is strong, clear-minded, and physically capable is a threat to tyrants. That's why they want you playing video games. To celebrate American strength, actual American strength, Beam is offering up to 30% off their best-selling

creatine for the next 48 hours. Go to shopbeam.com slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker at checkout. That's shopbeam, B-E-A-M dot com slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker for up to 30% off. We strongly recommend it. Remember in 2020 when CNN told you the George Floyd riots were mostly peaceful? Even as flames rose in the background? It was ridiculous, but it was also a metaphor for the way our leaders run this country. They're constantly telling you, everything is fine. Everything is fine. Don't worry.

Everything's under control. Nothing to see here. Move along and obey. No one believes that. Crime is not going away. Supply chains remain fragile. It does feel like some kind of global conflict could break out at any time. So the question is, if things went south tomorrow, would you be ready?

Well, if you're not certain that you'd be ready, you need Ammo Squared. Ammo Squared is the only service that lets you build an ammunition stockpile automatically. You literally set it on autopilot. You pick the calibers you want, how much you want to save every month, then they'll ship it to you or they'll store it for you and ship it when you say so. You get 24-7 access to manage the whole thing. So don't let the people in charge, don't let CNN lull you into a fake sense of safety. Take control of your life, protect your family, be prepared. Go to AmmoSquared.com to learn more. relations. Russia's 100 million more people. And I thought, why have I never heard this before? Everything you're saying now is what you were saying two and a half years ago. And you were proven right. I'm not happy with that anyway.

No, I know. But I guess what I'm saying is Western policymakers also have access to Wikipedia. So how did they not know this? I think two reasons. One is that they have an interpretation of the Second World War, that Russia was able to win against Germany just because the Anglo-Saxons supported them. That's first. Second, you know... May I ask you to pause? And you don't believe that's true? I think to a certain extent it was true.

So a lot of support came from the United States, especially to Russia, especially ammunition, weapons, and so on. So I can't say that that was the precondition. I don't underestimate the heroic attempts of the Russians to defend their own land, even against the Hungarians anyway, because we were on the other side. But it's true that the alliance with the West played a role that Russia was able to survive the German attacks. So that's exaggeration on the Western side of that story, probably. And the second, don't forget that in the 90s,

in the 90s, I was prime minister when President Putin came into power, 1990. I was first-time prime minister at that time. And I do remember how was the 90s. In the 90s, there was the Washington Consensus, which is a theory of how to reorganize the world economy, privatization, competitiveness, and so on. And global capitalists started to invest into Russia, and they had a feeling that now they find the key how to integrate the Russian economy and the huge, vast Russian territories and raw materials, energy supply territories, into the world economy.

That was the 90s. And they did it. They made a huge amount of money. George Soros, who I always would focus to follow anyway to understand what's going on, did it. But the Russians were not satisfied with that at all. And then there was a change. President Putin came to power and said, guys, this integration to the world economy,

not the way which is serving the interest of Russia. And they cut many things. And many Americans and European investors have to realize some losses. And I think the idea that they were so close to get it, to get the major source of the profit, and it was stopped by the same man, there is a personal revenge element in their way of thinking. I'm sure of that. Sorry, that's too much probably to say about it.

No, that's a very diplomatic description. From our perspective, it looked like looting by Western businesses that resulted in the lowest life expectancy in Europe by far. And the story from Putin's ascension in 2000 is climbing Russian life expectancy, which I think is a fair measure of a country's health. And there's deep resentment that he didn't allow foreign business interests to dominate his country. I mean, fair? The Russians had their own concept how they would like to be integrated into the world economy. And that concept was different

from the American concept and from the European concept, of course. Hungary is part of that. So when we realized what is the new strategy of the Russians, the Hungarian companies went to Russia to make their business. I'm sure that from the Emirates

they are doing their businesses as well, and the Saudis and others. So they have a country. They would not like to be isolated. They would be part of the world economy based on the Russian interest, not on the Washington consensus principles or something like that, you know?

But it's their country. Whether we like it or not, whether we agree or not, it's their country. They make their choice. If it's their decision, we have to adjust ourselves,, whether we are around, it's their country. They make their choice. If it's their decision, we have to adjust ourselves, not to force them to change their mind. It's not our job. At least this is the Hungarian approach.

Probably not the American, but definitely the Central European. They are too close. Don't forget they're too close. I know you don't forget that. How would you rate Zelensky as the leader of Ukraine? First of all, even if I have many critical remarks, it does not matter if you take the proper vantage point to see what has happened in Ukraine in the last years. They decided to go into a war, to defend their own territory, their own right to join NATO and to be part of the Western architecture, security and economic architecture.

That was their decision. And they fight for it. And they lost hundreds of thousands of lives. And they fight heroically. So I'm very cautious to make any critical remarks on the president or Ukraine, because what they have done is really something heroic and historical. To resist to that power like Russia for that long time, you know. So it's whatever political mistakes they have done,

the fact itself, the fight, you know, and sacrifice is something we have to say that's really heroic. Yes. So that's number one. Number two, I think it was a misunderstanding on their behalf the real intention of the West. And they thought that the West will support them forever. And therefore, their behavior was not exactly as it would be seen as normal.

Because if you are in trouble, you need help, you are going to somewhere to ask, it's not the right tone as they communicate with us. Anyway, so, but they thought that they can do so because the West will remain behind them forever. If you understand well the history of the Western politics, this is a misconception, may I say. That's not what the West did in the last several years. No.

So I was sure that sooner or later they will be let alone and say, guys, war is over. Financial support is over. Military support is over. Let's make a deal. Even if you have huge losses, this is the right moment. We would not like to risk a World War III. We would not like to risk a direct conflict with Russia on military fields. So my heart is with the Ukrainians, but they are in a big, big, big trouble because of the position they have now on this whole issue.

Many billions of dollars of Western weapons have flowed into Ukraine. A lot of them have been sold. It's a fact. And I wonder if you're concerned about the effect on your security of this. I mean, you have lots of weapons floating around anywhere. It's dangerous. And is anyone keeping track of some of these advanced weapons actually where they are? So just again, very cautiously. And now everybody thinks that we have a problem called Russia, which is true. But then soon we will have another problem called Yes. So I think that's right. So the new defense secretary in the United States, Pete Hegseth, gave a speech two days ago in which he started by saying Ukraine is not joining NATO.

So that's that's the core that that question was the cause of this war. That's the baseline demand of Russia. I think it makes intuitive sense to even people who don't like Russia can understand why they want that. So now that the United States has just said that, is that the basis of a peace? What else do we need to get to peace? You live in the United States, and it's probably difficult to imagine the strength of liberal dictatorship of public life we are living under in Europe. So, you know, the pressure from the liberal public opinion is so strong on the leaders that in the last three years, all the European leaders follow the same track.

So try to imagine that a big European nation leader says that we have to support Ukraine, whatever does it take. We have to do, this is a moral-based position. We can't change it. And they should join NATO, and we are arguing in favor of that. And then, just to say next weekend, guys, there are some changes in the world, so our principally based position is over, and now, you know, turn like that. So, to make that change with the present leadership, it's difficult to imagine.

I would not like to make nasty jokes, but now, because of the American decision, it's really time for sober up, but they are in the phase of re-drinking. So it takes time to change the direction of the sheep. Just today they issued a paper, they issued a statement. The big European nation saying that they continue as they have done, regardless of what the Americans have said. That's just this morning. Are we going to have to invade France?

Is that what you're saying? Sorry, sorry, just kidding. No one wants France at this point. Discuss in another forum. Sorry, sorry, sorry. Another forum, another forum. I totally get it. Optimistically, though, if you believe, I think the Trump administration really, the president has said it a number of times, we need to end this.

Do you think it's possible that we see like a permanent resolution within the next six months? Is that realistic to answer that? Yes, definitely. Even earlier. Really? Yeah, I think so. You know, serious guys. So strong men make peace.

Weak men make war. That's so simple. Now we have strong leaders. But last question, and I appreciate this, and I want to say before you leave, I'll just say it. I don't mind sucking up. I think there's a reason you're the longest-serving leader in Europe. I think history, for all the criticism you've taken will...

Don't forget that I have another record I hold. It's more important. Longest serving leader of opposition in Europe. 16 years. Just because I'm accused not to be democratic, you know, don't forget that, okay,

19 years in government, that's something. But 16 years in opposition and to lead up, that's even more. So I had that record as well. So I know the both sides of democracy, the sunny one and the raining one as well. So I never left politics, even I lost the election. So I'm a political animal who is running a democratic political architecture and machinery in my country. Sorry for interrupting. Which did you enjoy more, honestly? When I was in opposition, I had more time to deal with football. Which is a real issue anyway. Where do you think the European public is?

You said a couple of times that the behavior of the leadership of some Western nations calls into question democracy itself. Is there accurate public polling information on how Europeans, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Brits, how they actually feel about the war in Ukraine? We do run that. So I run that kind of opinion polls. So I have a view on all European countries and I can say that the majority is moving to the peace position and the pro-peace is bigger now. There's a majority of the pro-peace

in the European public opinion in general. There are some one or two countries which is exceptional. All the others belong to the same track, more, more, more for peace. But there is another opinion, Paul, which is even more important. I would not like to divert this conversation, but we run every year and we ask the Europeans,

what do you think about the life of your children? Will they have a better future and better life than you have now, or it will be worse? And you know, all the Western countries say worse. All the Central European countries say better. So this is the real difference now inside the continent between the Western countries and the Central European countries. So we still believe ex-occupied countries countries by Soviet Union, communist dictatorship, regardless of that, we are still believe that we can create a better future

for our kids than we live today. But the Westerners think just the opposite of that. So that's another very interesting structural differences inside the single market and the European Union. Because your life force is intact. Because that's one,

but the other one, what we have now, we fight for. We fought for it. Democracy, freedom, the Western generations who are now in power and ruling the countries, when they were born,

there was democracy and freedom in the Western part of Europe. I spent 26 years of my life in communist dictatorship. I haven't inherited freedom or democracy. We fought for it. We did it. We got it. So we fought for it.

So therefore, we are absolutely convinced that we did it not in vain. It was a science. And we are able to create and build up countries, Central Europe, after 45 years of Soviet occupation and communist dictatorship, which our kids will enjoy and deserve. So democracy and freedom in Eastern and Central part of Europe

is a serious thing. It's part of our life. It belongs to our heart. It's the essence of our life. Investor societies, you know, they inherited. It's a given thing. Even the middle class, while living, while being a convenient way of life also. So when you look at the European Union and Europe,

don't think that it's the same everywhere. So there are differences, not just on national basis, but on historical basis as well. And I don't know what is the future of Western Europe, but I'm totally convinced that Central Europe and Eastern Europe, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, has a definite bright future. I'm sure of that. I am too. Mr. Prime Minister, thank you. Thank you very much. That was wonderful.

Thank you. Thank you.