The Tucker Carlson Show - Leaked Police Interrogation Footage of Netanyahu, and How He Cowers Behind War to Keep Power

Episode Date: March 27, 2026

Alex Gibney received 1,000 hours of secret police interrogation videos of Benjamin Netanyahu. Here’s what he found. Paid partnerships with: Cowboy Colostrum: Get 25% off your entire order with code TUCKER at https://cowboycolostrum.com Good Ranchers: Use code TUCKER to get an additional $25 off your first order at https://go.goodranchers.com/tucker Charity Mobile: A pro-life company serving pro-life customers and supporting pro-life causes for 30 years. Use promo code TUCKER to get a free phone with free activation, free shipping, and a free gift with every new line of service at https://charitymobile.com/Tucker Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Uh, where are my gloves? Come on, heat. Any day now? Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at voila.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store.

Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary. Alex Gibney, thank you very much for doing this. So for all the years that Benjamin Netanyahu has been in the American media, I think there's very little sense in the U.S. about his domestic troubles in Israel. We keep hearing he's been charged and the President of the United States keeps saying he needs to be pardoned. You've made this documentary that explains what is at the core of this controversy. Like what are the charges? What is he accused of doing?

Did he do it? So I'm going to stand back and just let you, if you would, outline what Benjamin Enjiau has been accused of doing. Well, roughly speaking, you'd say it was bribery or you'd say it was corruption. I mean, and I can detail the charges. This is a film that I produced and was directed by Alexis Bloom. And back in 2023, I got a strange message on Signal from somebody who said that they had all of the police interrogation videos. from the Benjamin Netanyahu investigation.

And they had been investigating Netanyahu since 2016 for charges of corruption. That is to say, trading on his position as prime minister to get money in all sorts of favors, jewelry, for his wife, very expensive Cuban cigars, hundreds of millions of dollars in forgiveness of certain, of certain loans in order to be able to get favorable coverage on a news website called Walla. So it was a pretty interesting case, and it went from the very small, meaning very expensive

Cuban cigars from a rather famous movie producer named Arnon Milchan, to something very big, which is effectively a $250 million financial arrangement in exchange for coverage. good coverage for Netanyahu. So it was a pretty big deal. What did the, so you got the tapes. Let me just ask, to the extent you can say, where did they come from? I can't say where they came from. I can't say anything about the source. But what I can say is we got over a thousand hours of tapes. And these were interviews with Netanyahu himself by the police, also Netanyahu's wife, Sarah, his son, Yair. Also with a number of key people close to Netanyahu. example, near Hefetz, his former head of communications, Sheldon Adelson, who we know in this country as a billionaire now deceased, his wife, Miriam Adelson, Arnon Milchan, a famous Israeli businessman

arms dealer, who also became a very famous motion picture producer. So it was a kind of an extraordinary array of evidence. And while some of this evidence had been published in Israel in written form. Nobody had seen the tapes, and the tapes are very revealing, particularly for Netanyahu, because Netanyahu tries to cultivate this image of the grand vizier, the great statesman of Israel. Here you see a rather petty, corrupt man desperately lying to save his skin, and his wife, who is a deeply entitled woman, you know, trying to claim that, so what if we got stuff? I mean, we deserve it, because we were doing so much for the nation and for the world. And his son, Yaiyar, who is also extremely entitled,

screaming at the police yelling, you know, you're like the Stasi. So it was an illuminating look at the actual character behind the facade, sort of like that moment in the Wizard of Oz, where, you know, Toto pulls back the curtain. And the wizard says, please, pay no attention. And it was really revealing. If you can, and I think people watch, this will watch the film.

But I'm interested in your take, having watched a thousand hours of this. What is it, can you go more deeply into what do you think it reveals about the prime minister and his character? Well, I think it reveals, I think, a kind of deep-seated corruption, a willingness to do almost anything to save his skin.

I think that he became possessed after the election in 2015 of a sense of enormous arrogance, that he was now the man. because he came back from what seemed to be a defeat to an enormous victory. And now he had this sense of entitlement. Interestingly, then he began to cash in on that entitlement, and he was caught. But what happened then was that rather, you know,

as he heard the sound of the possibility of the jail door slamming shut on him, He began to start to do things that really took Israel in a very dark direction. The first thing he tried to do was to essentially fix the Department of Justice. He tried to engage in a series of – this is before October 7th. He tried to engage in a series of reforms of the judicial system, which would weaken the power of the judiciary in in Israel, most likely because that would undermine the case against him. That's the most direct likely outcome. But the other thing was that by this time, he had formed a government with an extremely right-wing

coalition with a guy named Ben-Gavir, who is head of national security and a guy named Smotrick, who is head of finance. They are extremely right-wing, extremely anti-Palestinian. and their designs were to expand illegal settlements in the West Bank. And in some cases, well, it was already a dire situation for Palestinians on the West Bank. Nevertheless, there would be judicial orders, which would sometimes get in the way of that. That was another aspect of this. Well, when Netanyahu tried to fix the judiciary, the country rose up.

And it was in a huge uproar over these changes, which were. fundamentally undermining Israel's democracy. Not too long after, of course, there was the terrible attack by Hamas on October 7th, which shocked Israel. What people began to learn was that for years, Netanyahu, again, I think as part of the way he sees the world and as part of a kind of more generalized sense of corruption, had been trying to modulate the relationship with Hamas, and indeed had been allowing millions and millions of dollars to flow to Hamas from Qatar, sometimes in bags of cash traveling through Israel. And the reason he was doing that was to undermine the Palestinian authority on the West Bank in order to be able to allow for his right-wing

coalition to get more and more territory via settlement. So, All sorts of strange, corrupt deals were happening. But then I think that post 10-7, which was a terrible moment, I don't want to minimize it in any way. It was a horrific attack. And we show some of that attack in the film. But he then launched an attack on Gaza, which was so beyond any sense of proportionality. Now we have at least over 75,000 people dead. Of course, now we have an Iran war and a Lebanon war and so forth and so on.

But one of the goals, I'm convinced, and not me, but all of the witnesses who are, you know, very reputable members of the security establishment in Israel in the film indicate that part of the enduring ferocity, savagery of the war was due to becoming a wartime president who could then, not be prosecuted or successfully prosecuted for the crimes he had committed. The trial, not only the investigation, but now there's been a trial, the trial is still ongoing. This is 10 years after the investigation started. So, so long as he's the commander in chief and he's waging war, how dare you attack the president? So in a way, this kind of venal personal corruption that starts with cigars and pink champagne for which they had code names, you know, and then evolves into corrupt deals relating to the media becomes a mechanism by which slowly but surely the corruption got greater and greater

until it became a moral corruption in which the world is now engulfed. We've got a new partner. It's a company called Cowboy Colostrum. It's a brand that is serious about actual health, and the product is designed to work with your body, not against your body. It is a pure and simple product, all natural. Unlike other brands, Cowboy Clostrum is never diluted. It always comes directly from American grass-fed cows.

There's no filler. There's no junk. It's all good. It tastes good, believe it or not. So before you reach for more pills for every problem that pills can't solve, we recommend you give this product, Cowboy Clostrum, a try. It's got everything your body needs to heal and thrive. It's like the original superfood, loaded with nutrients,

antibodies, proteins help build a strong immune system, stronger hair, skin, and nails. I threw my wig away and right back to my natural hair after using this product. You just take a scoop of it every morning in your beverage, coffee or a smoothie, and you will feel the difference every time. For a limited time, people listen to our show, get 25% off the entire order. So go to cowboy colostrum.com, use the code Tucker at checkout. 25% off when you use that code, Tucker at cowboyclostrum.com. Remember you mentioned.

You heard it here. One plus one equals more of the greatest stories. Hulu on Disney Plus. Stories about survivors. The most dangerous planet. Family. Retribution. Murder.

Prophecy. Beer and propane. Bobby Diller. The ultimate soldier. Chicago, all right? The best of the best stories now with even more from Hulu. Amazing. Have it all with Dulu on Disney Plus.

When West Jeffers took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion. Inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board. Here's to Westjetting since 96. Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years. Your first. There were people in Israel in public right after October 7th, which clearly was committed by Hamas. and was clearly terrible. I agree with that. I want to be clear. But there were a bunch of people, including people I knew,

who said, wait a second, you know, this couldn't have happened if the government of Israel had really tried to prevent it. Okay, so there's something very strange about the ability of Hamas fighters on motorbikes and gliders and on foot coming across

the most heavily guarded border in the world and the delay in the response of the IDF to this. Like, what is this? And it's almost forbidden to say that, as you know, in the United States. But tell me what people you spoke to in Israel now believe about that attack. I should point out that when you say I spoke to, I mean, the person who directed the film was Alexis Bloom. I got the footage. Of course.

I'm asking you to speak for the film. Sure, sure, sure. No problem. In any event, I think there were a lot of people who felt that a proper investigation into what Netanyahu knew. about the possible impending attack by Hamas should be commenced. However, that got rolled under their carpet because of the fact that he's now in a war with Hamas. I mean, Hamas doesn't really have an Air Force. You can't properly call it a war.

But I think there was a lot of talk about how much and what advanced warning Netanyahu may have had about the October 7 attacks. I've never seen, you know, prima facie evidence of that fact, but there's certainly a lot of talk about it in Israel. Okay, so it's not just crazy people on the internet who think it's possible or likely that Benjamin Netanyahu knew this was coming, had some sense it was coming, didn't do his best to prevent the damage within Israel because he was in this politically tough spot and the ensuing war would take the attention off him and allow him a pass on the charges. Is that a fix summation? I personally think it may be a bit too cynical to think that that he literally engendered an attack in order to be able to counterattack. But I do think that he had deluded himself in part because he thought of the world as a series of deals. He had diluted himself into the idea that he had manipulated Hamas and all the money that was flowing to Hamas, you know, wasn't going to go to weapons and preparing an attack. I mean, he kept saying, what was the phrase?

It's in the film that he could control the height of the flames by the introduction of money. He also puts the godfather when he's talking to the police. He says, keep your friends close and your enemies closer as if he was the Don and sort of able to manipulate events, but he clearly was not able to. That seems like a smart interpretation to me. And, of course, I don't know. but that sounds plausible, entirely plausible. So then October 7th happens, I think most Israelis are genuinely shocked that it happened

and they're horrified, and a lot of the world is genuinely shocked and horrified, including me. But then this war begins in Gaza or this leveling of Gaza, this mass murder in Gaza, and then it expands to a lot of the region in a Levant and now into Iran. Is it too cynical,

to think that one of the motives there from the prime minister is to just keep moving forward because if he stops, he gets arrested. Well, it may be a little bit too cynical. I mean, maybe Netanyahu's wanted to attack Iran for years. For sure. They did another film about that subject called Zero Days. But I do think that once the momentum of war began, and I would say also that to some extent, momentum of war began to have a certain popular impact among the populace in Israel, too,

that now there was an opportunity to go after more enemies. And it had the byproduct, of course, as long as there's war, as long as there's permanent war, Netanyahu will never be held to account. So once again, I think it may be a bit too cynical to say he attacked Iran so we wouldn't go to jail, but I think it had been a longstanding desire for Netanyahu. to want to really go after Iran. And now both once he'd started the war in Gaza, but also I think with the Trump administration coming to power in 2004,

suddenly he had an opportunity. Yeah, that sounds right to me. So how is he regarded the prime minister in Israel? It's hard to know if you're not there. What's your view? I agree. I think it's fair to say. that there is a robust group of people who are vehemently anti-Natinehu and believe he's destroying

Israel and destroying democracy in Israel, and indeed making the country a pariah worldwide. I would agree with that point of view. However, I would also say that war has a peculiar effect on people and can engender a sense of nationalism. which I believe is rising, not only a sense of nationalism, but that nationalism undergirded by the undertow of victimhood. So Netanyahu is very much using that,

and I think it would be a mistake to think that he's unpopular. We'll find out very soon, you know, when elections happen. But I think that as long as you're waging war, people tend to rally around the commander-in-chief, which I think is both, cynical ploy by Netanyahu and also a longstanding goal of his to be able to wage war across the Levant and expand Israel's power and influence. Did you get a sense of his religious views?

I think if Netanyahu is, well, honestly, he's pretty American and Western and secular, but in his, I mean, the first statement he gave after when Iran began, he began with today's Torah portion, and he's been saying things like that a lot. Do you have an opinion on what he thinks, what his spiritual views are? It's hard for me to say. I mean, I think that to some extent, I see him more as a politician. Now, I don't have access to what his real views are, but when you hear politicians quoting scripture, in effect, it tends to be for the reason that they're trying to undergird their policies with the force of God. It's an old script, and I think Netanyahu knows very well that it's an effective one.

That would be my gut. I really don't know or have any insight into what he believes when he's alone in a room, what his relationship is with God. Yeah, well, we can't know, but it does seem like the country is, changing fast. That's my perception as a visitor. It's not a good thing. And we can also see that this hard right wing faction has wreaked havoc on the West Bank. And, you know, settlements are expanding a pace in a really reprehensible way. There's lots of, you know, it's sort of out of the public eye. But that, I think, was the one of the goals from the beginning.

in it, you know, with reckoning with Hamas and all of this stuff, but also, you know, because Netanyahu, in order to stay in power, another corrupt deal, he makes a deal with the hard right and then goes very hard right. It's not like he was ever a peacenik, but now he goes very, very, very hard right. And at the great expense of the lives and livelihoods of many Palestinians. Yeah. I don't know if it's right or not. I'm on the right and I hate this. I violence and there were reports this morning of in the Israeli press of mass rapes of Palestinians by settlers in the West Bank. So like, I think that's just a degree of violence by by by by settlers on Palestinians in the West Bank is rapacious. I mean, it's and it goes on day after day after day,

after day. Ranchers built America feeding our country for over 250 years through droughts and wars and recessions and pandemics and anything else that happened didn't matter to them because they had to come through and they did. That legacy is the one that our partners at Good Ranchers continue and represent. Good Ranchers is a meat company. It's 100% committed to this country. Not just in words, but in practice, every cut they offer is raised on United States, farms and ranches. Their entire packaging and fulfillment operations are right here in the U.S. same with customer support. Imagine Americans on the other end of the line. Plus, Good Ranchers donates a portion of all profits go to veteran organizations. We use Good Ranchers,

ourselves. We love it. The subscriber experience is super easy. Order requires just a few clicks, simple, flexible, and built around your schedule. So you can support a company that sells an amazing product that honors Americans, past, present, and future. Visit good ranchers.com today. When you start your plan, you'll get to pick a free meat that'll be included in every order for life, or you get $25 off your first order by using the code Tucker. Tucker is the code for 25 bucks off. Good Ranchers.com American Meats. delivered. So the new year is here, but that does not mean you've got to overhaul your whole life, despite claims to the contrary. You don't have to take drastic measures. Make a few changes here and

there, and you'll be a lot better off. And you can start with the snacks in your pantry. Now, products from standard American chip brands are, let's be honest, pretty repulsive, filled with chemicals that make you feel heavy and bloated. They don't even taste that good. They're not good for you. We recommend an upgrade with Masa chips. Masta is the easiest way to eat clean without feeling like you're on a diet. The chips contain three ingredients. That's it. Organic corn, sea salt, 100% grass-fed beef towel, and that is it. No seed oils, no mystery chemicals, just food, actual food. And they're amazing, and you feel great after. You don't feel weighed down. We particularly enjoyed the Cobenero flavor lately, but they're all great. You want to

give them a try? Visit masa-chips.com, M-A-chips.com slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker for 25% off your first order, or you can click the link in the video description, or you can scan the QR code to claim this outstanding offer. And if you don't feel like ordering online, you can buy them nationwide at your local Sprout supermarket. Stop by and pick up a couple of bags before somebody else does. So since you're the producer of this film, do you mind if I ask you about your experience? So you come into possession of a thousand hours of tape, which is not public. You're not saying understandably exactly how you got it, but it's real. I mean, probably a lot of people don't want you to make that into a documentary and air it. So what was your experience of that?

That's fair to say. And indeed, we tried to produce the film in secret. I had some able helpers. I mean, not only was Alexis Bloom, an extraordinary talented woman directing it, but in Israel, you know, we were aided by a guy named Revive Drucker. who was a noted journalist in Israel, helped us to contextualize some of this stuff. But we had a sense that we had to keep it secret while we were making it. And then we sort of launched an event at the Toronto Film Festival in 2024.

It was a work in progress because we felt at that moment this kind of thing needed to be seen. Now, Netanyahu himself went to court in Israel to try to stop the premiere of the film at Toronto. He was utterly unsuccessful. But I should note also that the American media played a kind of unseemly role in the sense that we were, we went to NBC first, and we're going to do a rather big piece in advance of the premiere in Toronto. And then we were told at the last minute that, oh, NBC has decided that, that, you know, NBC has decided that, that we're not going to do the story because it would probably upset Netanyahu,

and that would limit our access to the prime minister. They said that? Yes, they said that to me. That's correct. Why? Not what I would regard as a deeply courageous move by a journalistic organization. Yeah, I mean, I think journalistic is probably too strong. But, wow, I'm just, I mean, I've worked at that company.

I'm just surprised that they were as blunt as they were to you. What did you say? I was just shocked. I mean, because I was ready to, I was ready to an interview, I believe was Andrew Mitchell. You know, I was shocked. And, you know, part of the reckoning was it was both, both Craven and bad journalistically, but also sort of corrupt in the sense that they suggested that they

might have gone with it if they themselves had discovered. the police interrogation videos. But they weren't going to risk their capital with Netanyahu for something that they themselves didn't discover. The idea of the public good or the public reckoning didn't seem to be part of the equation. It was a very disappointing moment. Probably not that surprising. I mean, in general, the coverage of what happens there is, well, non-existent or, not consistent with reality in the United States.

But did you pause at all before embarking on this once you got the tapes? Did you think maybe it's not a good idea long term for me to get involved in something like this? No. I felt it was really important because those tapes, once I was able to verify them and to understand them better, I felt they shed a really important light on a vital figure in world politics. And that's in Yahoo. And so it seemed to me that that's my job. And when I find out important information about public figures that shed light on wars

and how we reckon with the world, that it's my job to get that story out. So I actually didn't pause, but it took a while to figure out, because I'm not a network. You know, I'm an independent filmmaker. And it took a while to figure out how to raise the money, how to, and also to do it in secrets so that nobody would subpoena the tapes or, you know, prevent me from getting to the end. So, you know, Alexis and I had to proceed, you know, for some time in secret. you know, it was, I felt it was really important material and really important to get it out. Good for you. How hard was it to raise the money?

It was hard, but not as it turns out impossible. So, and there were a number of people who also, once they were able to, to see a little bit of what we had, came forward and, and, and, and, and, and helped. So, so, yeah, we were able to do it. I mean, it was, but it was, it was, it was, it was, it. It was mining a different source. It wasn't the traditional way where you go to your bureau chief and you say, please give me the resources of the corporation and let's go get this story. It definitely isn't. So we've tried for the beginning just to advertise businesses that have like-minded values,

businesses that make things or provide services that we actually use, that seem like decent people that don't hate us or you. and that's one of the reasons that we have aligned with Charity Mobile. So when you make the switch, Charity Mobile sends 5% of your monthly plan price to the pro-life, pro-family charity of your choice. That's millions of dollars and counting sent to pro-family philanthropy. So that sounds great, but Charity Mobile must be really expensive to be doing that. Well, no, they're not.

They've literally never raised their mobile plan prices, and no plan exceeds $50 a month. So it's a good company with good service and it's got good prices. If you switch today, you keep your number with a compatible phone, no compromise on quality, and you support a company that's actually doing good things. Use promo code Tucker to get a free phone with free activation, free shipping, and a free gift with every new line of service. Visit charitymobile.com slash Tucker. Do you expect any consequences going forward? I mean, presumably you hope to make other films.

Will this make it harder? I don't know. I think that we live in a moment where people all over the world, including in this country, are making it difficult for independent voices to be heard. So, yeah, I reckon with that. But I feel like even though, and I'm glad, you know, TCN is showing BB files on its network. And it has had, you know, pretty good international distribution.

The distribution here has been somewhat handicapped. but can you tell us about that what i mean it seems like even if i disagreed with your views which i i don't know that i do i don't think i do but i would just stop at you have relevant information that's real about one of the key players in global politics so like that alone justifies this in my opinion and so the idea that you would have distribution problems in the united states is a little scary and I'd love to know more about what those problems are. I think one of the problems is that the market in general is controversy averse. You know, you have a number of streamers who don't want upset their viewers.

You have news organizations, which in this case, as I've documented, you know, also didn't want to be on the wrong side of an issue that might upset people. I mean, it seems to me that the job, you know, because I, because I, I do think that four years ago, roughly speaking, you know, if I had gone out into the marketplace with the BB files, there would have been a bidding war. But now it's kind of just the opposite. It's like we don't want to do anything that might upset people because then they won't buy sneakers or they won't buy iPads. You know, so that's part of it. And I think part of it is that controversy has become problematic and also powerful political figures are exerting influence

on broadcasting outlets to tell the line. And sometimes if you're not, you know, you don't have a regular show, you don't get a hearing. So it's a problem. It's a really big problem. I think the, you know, while I'm critical of the mainstream press, particularly in this, in this, in this instance, you know, I believe strongly in the idea of a free press and, and, and, and, I'm deeply upset about the way not only Netanyahu did it in Israel, but the way the Trump administration is trying to suppress a free press in this country. So it's, it's a dark time for this. How long have you been doing this kind of thing? Well, that's a good question. You know, I guess I've been doing it. I've been an independent, a freelance, since, um, geez, since the 1980s.

So somehow, some way I've been, you know, managing to scrape by. Um, and I've never really worked for an organization, except for the small company that is Chigsaw Productions, which is my company. Have you ever seen an environment this difficult for someone who wants to present newsworthy, the inherently newsworthy material like the tapes in this documentary? Not really. There was another period in the late 90s in this country. I remember trying to do a film about, it was critical of Henry Kissinger.

And I had an easy, the BBC was actually heroic in that instance, but I could find no finders here. And it was only by going to, I think we played at the film forum for something like three months, that finally it allowed, because it was that entertainment, it allowed a broadcaster to show it. It was difficult then, but it's much more fraught now. I think it's very, very, very hard to get independent voices hurt. It's really unprecedented in my experience at this moment. Yeah. Well, thank you.

That's certainly my feeling, but I don't have the 40-year perspective that you do. so but I admire your dedication to a free press, your bravery in doing this and your willingness to explain it to us and to air it on TCS. So thank you very much, Alex Gibney. Thank you, Tucker.