The Tucker Carlson Show - Tucker Carlson and Michael Shellenberger Break Down the California Fires
Episode Date: January 14, 2025Michael Shellenberger may be the best reporter in America. Here’s what he’s learned about the fires in Los Angeles — and about UFOs. (00:00) How Many Fires Are There? Where Did They Come From? ...(03:03) Are Meth Heads Lighting the Fires? (14:56) DEI Fire Departments (38:44) Leftists Blame Climate Change Yet Again (40:47) Gavin Newsom Is Too Busy Hating Trump to Fight the Fires (52:30) The Golden Age of Journalism Paid partnerships with: Eight Sleep: Get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra at https://EightSleep.com/Tucker Policygenius: Get your free life insurance quotes today at https://Policygenius.com/Tucker PureTalk: Get 50% off first month at https://PureTalk.com/Tucker Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
So I guess the first question is, thank you for doing this.
Are we rolling?
We're rolling.
Okay.
Let's roll, shall we?
Good to be with you, Chuck.
Nice to see you.
Good to be with you.
As I've said to you privately, and I mean it, I think you're maybe the best reporter working.
I know you don't even think of yourself as a reporter, but a gatherer of facts and an explainer of what they mean, I think you're the best.
Welcome to the Tucker Carlson Show.
We bring you stories that have not been showcased anywhere else.
And they're not censored, of course, because we're not gatekeepers.
We are honest brokers here to tell you what we think you need to know and do it honestly.
Check out all of our content at tuckercarlson.com.
Here's the episode.
So where do these fires,
first of all, how many fires are there and where do they come from?
I believe there's five active fires right now.
And these are ignition-driven fires,
meaning that this is all shopper all
or scrubland, brush area.
So, this is different than the Sierra forests.
Right. These are not forest fires.
Yeah, these are not forest fires.
And that doesn't mean that you're doomed to them, but it's not the same problem that we get in the Sierras.
So, they're ignition-driven and they're obviously wind-driven, but there's nothing unusual. I just interviewed a climate scientist about this,
or rather an environmental forest scientist about this.
There's nothing unusual about this.
I mean, it is somewhat unusual to get, you know, you have a dry period,
and then the Santa Ana winds in January, but it's not like that never happens.
I'm working my way there.
Of course.
I mean, the important thing to know is that the National Weather Service put out a fire warning on January 2nd and a local weatherman actually forecasted on January 1st.
They said we're headed towards a super dangerous moment.
The next day, the National Weather Service Los Angeles held a briefing to underscore that point.
The day after that, the mayor flew to Ghana.
I mean, it's crazy.
These were public press conferences.
Yeah, these were.
Oh, I mean, it's absolutely public and it goes to the politicians first, but it's all said publicly.
It's the National Weather Service.
So that was like literally on the first or second, the governor should have called out the National Guard.
He should have called all of our neighboring states.
He should have called Canada and Mexico, asked for all their backup help.
They should have started circling C-130s that are especially retrofitted that can dump the fire retardant or water.
They should have had helicopters circling to see where the fires were.
It should have been immediate mobilization.
Pardon my ignorance.
First of all, I didn't see that news when it happened,
but I didn't know that. So, it was really clear to the people who run the city and the state that you had this combination of dry conditions and heavy winds, high winds.
Yeah. And because there's so many ignitions, because of really these two factors, mostly the electrical wires,
brushing up against vegetation and triggering a fire.
That's kind of one of the main ones.
The other one is homeless people starting fires all over LA.
Half of all fires put out by the LA Fire Department are started by homeless people.
It's been that way for years.
Why do homeless people start fires?
Well, it turns out meth heads love to start fires. You know, there's just every drug
has its kind of weird element to it. But meth heads love starting fires. They love destroying
things. Like meth is like the drug of nihilism. So it's like perfect drug for LA and California
at the moment.
So it's not, these are not cooking fires.
They could be cooking fires.
But starting fires to destroy things.
Yeah.
Oh, for sure.
Oh yeah, for sure.
But it's not evil or anything.
No, totally fine.
Yeah.
What could go wrong?
But isn't classically starting fires and torturing animals, aren't those like signs of sociopathic behavior?
Yeah.
I mean, for sure.
I mean, look, meth makes you psych mean, look, meth makes you psychopathic.
It makes you psychotic.
It's meth-induced psychosis.
But I mean, yeah, and all the crazy,
I mean, people behave,
I mean, things that people do on meth,
I mean, it is like,
it's like they behave with like superhuman crazy powers,
the levels of violence, the assaults,
the, I mean, you just,
when you interview people,
particularly people in recovery that describe being on meth i mean they're just awake for like weeks at a time like it's not even
clear how they get any sleep at all so that's just that madness has continued and you know and mayor
bass who's the so just to isolate what you're saying and just to pause to kind of it's really
important point,
fires, at least half of fires in L.A. County are started by homeless people.
Yeah.
And you believe that's driven by their use of a specific drug, meth.
Not totally.
I mean, I think homeless people are going to often start fires for a lot of different reasons.
I mean, drugs can start fires, but the meth heads are like into fire.
Like it's a big part of meth culture
it's just starting things on fire no one sees this in theological terms it's like this i know
it's amazing well it is amazing yeah no it's satanic i mean you kind of go it's totally
seems about as obvious as it could be yeah it's awful um so but you know you kind of go
i mean so first of all that problem should have been dealt with, obviously, years ago.
It should never have been allowed.
So, but that they knew on January 1st, January 2nd, that the fires were coming.
Like, it was inevitable that there would be fires.
Like, there was, like, zero doubt among anybody that knows anything about fire in Los Angeles that the fires were coming.
The fires were coming.
So, like, the governor should have been there.
The mayor should have been there. You should just, like, the governor should have been there, the mayor should have been there.
You should just, like, literally, it's all about,
and it's all about prevention,
in part because by the time the fire trucks
are having to weave their way up those little hills of,
you know, the Pacific Palisades, it's over.
I mean, so the other thing to keep in mind is that,
okay, well, so that's the first thing,
is that they just have to mobilize in advance.
So, that's a feature for people who aren't aware of the geography of LA.
Oh, it's just incredible.
It's why it's so beautiful.
Beautiful places are dangerous.
Exactly right.
So that's like the main event.
So, I mean, because I knew I did.
My first thing I did is I was like, look, they're going to come out and say it was inevitable.
And that's just a total lie.
Because of global warming.
Yeah, because of global warming.
And I mean, anyway, we can get so,
there's so many places to go here,
but just on the most practical sense,
they knew the fires were coming
and they didn't do anything.
The mayor leaves the country.
She flies to Ghana after having promised
not to leave the country, by the way, as mayor.
She's traveled at least six times out of the country
and she promised not to travel.
Why is it important the mayor be there? Because, hey, well, aren't there other people in charge?
Because it's a command, it's an emergency command situation. She has to be able to issue orders and
to, you know, waive regulations and make things happen. The governor has to be doing that.
They didn't do that. They should have had, by the way, they should get the fire trucks up into the fiery areas right away.
They can also start, you know, they can start clearing brush.
They can start, you know, but literally they could just be in those neighborhoods just sitting there for days at a time waiting for the fires to happen.
Put them out as soon as they happen.
I'm not saying that they would have been able to prevent all the fires from happening. But you remember like the big fire in 1993,
I think it was Laguna Beach or maybe it was Malibu as well, but it was like 700 homes.
We're at 10,000 structures at this point, homes and buildings gone, 200,000 people evacuated. I
mean, it's madness. It never needed to get to that level that level okay so that's the first thing they just needed to
have been there before the fire started and they didn't do that because the politicians are just
they're focused on themselves they're focused on the next political office they want to get
so that's the first thing the second thing is the water runs out right so everybody so that was the
and you hear people go oh well there's nothing you can do because like once the once the homes are burned down, like, the water lines, you can see the
pictures, you know, the water, like, will be spilling out, you know, of the homes. And so,
that lowered the water pressure. That was a total lie. There is something called the Santa
Ines Water Reservoir, which is the potable water, meaning the drinking water that also goes into the
fire hydrant system because the fire hydrant, you know, the fire hydrant system is the drinking water system. It's the same thing.
There's the exact same system. That reservoir was empty, and it was the second largest of the 10
potable water reservoirs that serve LA County. Let me make one distinction here, because there's
actually two kinds of reservoirs. There's the reservoir with the snow melt water, these really big lakes, basically.
And then there's the, and that's the unpurified water.
And then those, and then they purify it and then they feed into these reservoirs where they store the water for all sorts of reasons for emergencies.
So, that is an absolute crime that that Santa Ynez Reservoir.
Why?
Because, first of all, it's right next to the Pacific Palisades.
So for people that don't know, Pacific Palisades, of course, is like right near, it's on your way to Malibu.
It's like the last big neighborhood before you get to the-
And they're palisades.
They're over the water.
That's right.
And so they have a reservoir.
You look at the Google Maps and you look at where the Santa Ynez Reservoir is.
It's right next to like a few thousand feet from Pacific Palades, and it's above, it's really high up. And so,
if you had had water coming from that, the firefighters would have had plenty of water.
It would not have, they would have had the water pressure, even if you had lost some homes and had
the water out. So, I mean, so two major failures. The first was the failure to aggressively respond days in advance, even though they had very clear warnings. The second was the reservoir was empty. One reporter has reported that the firefighters had not been warned by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power that that reservoir was empty if that's true that's just additionally scandalous
but um one of the one of the things that we think probably happened is that they um had been
required to build have a cover for the clean for the for the santinese reservoir which is the
potable water the cover to prevent the water from being contaminated in the old days like the 50s
and 60s,
you know, birds would poop in those reservoirs and they would just put a bunch of chlorine in them.
And then we decided, well, the water was still,
had a lot of, you know, it still was not particularly clean,
so we wanted to be cleaner.
So you can just put a cover over it,
which is a kind of plastic or rubber lining.
It appears that there was a tear in that.
They had to repair it. They should not
have removed that water ever during a fire season. If you need to make that repair, you do need to
drain right before you do the repair, but you would make that drain. The people that I interviewed
said, look, it would take days, if not a couple of weeks to repair it, it was empty for at least a year.
So, it was sitting there for a year. And the person I interviewed who works as a senior
executive at a different water utility in California said, if we had any of our reservoirs
empty, we would be like super nervous the entire time. And you would also then have backup water
systems. So, it's like any catastrophe you
know you just have multiple errors occurring in advance and at the moment um and then the fires
and then the actual ignitions you can't completely prevent ignitions uh but you can significantly
reduce them one would be to not allow people to camp outside all over Los Angeles, Los Angeles County with somewhere around,
I think it's 40 to 60,000 homeless people in the whole county. Madness. And then the other is the
electrical wires that brush up against the vegetation and create fire. With that, you want
to clear the vegetation from around the wires. That's obvious then and then you can also just stop i mean
this is a not great solution but you could certainly do it in a pinch if you need to you
just stop the electricity from going into those homes for some period i mean it's a drag we haven't
i live in the berkeley hills which is also a dangerous fire zone and when the winds are really
strong they'll just cut off power as a precaution so that to prevent
an ignition. So, I think the thing that, the reason I wanted to come on your show, even though
I'm in the midst of a huge book deadline, is because I'm really concerned about this nihilistic
discourse that there's literally nothing that could be done. I mean, that is exactly where
the politicians want to go. I worry that, you know, ordinary people have that idea. The problem is, I mean, it's absurd. I mean,
this idea that you couldn't live in Los Angeles, right? And it's like, you can say it about
anywhere. You'd be like, oh, there's snowfalls in this place during winter, you know, or hurricanes.
I mean, we're in an area that's Hurricane Valley, right? Like, huge amounts of hurricanes.
That's not how humans roll. Like, we're capable of living in many different environments including with extreme
weather conditions and it's like saying i can't stop my kids from dying of tetanus right starving
to death right i mean what yes right so there's no nihilistic agency no that's so nihilistic
and you trace it back i mean the the best, the most articulate advocate of that view is a Marxist named Mike Davis, who wrote this book called City of Courts.
It's a crazy, nihilistic book, but he had an essay and also a chapter in that book called Let Malibu Burn.
I mean, it's classic kind of radical left politics. It's classic sort of envy or sour grapes. I mean, you know, you have an ideology of Marxism
that is based on resentment and envy.
And so then you go, well, yeah,
all those rich houses should go up in flames.
It's a fantasy.
I mean, it's a left-wing, I should know.
I was on the radical left.
Like the fantasy, you hate the rich people
because you want their wealth
and you admire them in some level,
but you know you can't get it. So, I mean, this is how envy works. So, you end up constructing
this whole political ideology. I mean, this is what Marx has done. And it's infected like the
citizenry. I mean, it's infected the politicians. And so, there's this, I think that even though
it's not consciously, the politicians aren't consciously saying, oh, let's let Malibu burn.
That is the behaviors they have taken have had that impact.
So, I think that what you're seeing in real time in these fires in Los Angeles, these destruction fires, is the manifestation of a nihilistic ideology.
It's an emergent quality.
It happens through a million small steps.
But this heavy focus on left-wing ideology,
whether it's DEI or ESG or climate apocalypse
or just class resentment,
manifests itself in the most spectacular,
beautiful neighborhoods
just being turned into ashes and cinders.
It's also on a more prosaic level
a violation of like the most basic agreement
there is between citizens and their government,
which is I send you more than half of what I own,
but you keep my house from burning down
and methods from scaring my children or whatever.
Like you provide public safety, fire protection,
you know, water, sewer, electricity,
like just the basic stuff seems to be
totally ignored. Absolutely. So, why is anyone paying taxes? Why isn't there a revolution?
There should be. Well, because of course, they're all trapped by this ideology. I mean,
these are the neighborhoods that voted overwhelmingly for Kamala, that voted
overwhelmingly for Gavin Newsom, that voted overwhelmingly for Karen Bass. I mean, Tucker, I saw focus groups in 2022,
two Latinos, men and women separated,
Latino group and a white group.
And the Latinos were great.
I mean, they were just like,
when they started talking about the mayoral race,
they were like, well, what are their positions?
And like, what are their policies?
And what do they want to do?
And whatever.
And they were very rational about it. They're very, as you would hope, they were self-interested. They were like, what are their positions and like what are their policies and what do they want to do and whatever they're very rational about they're very as you would hope you
they were self-interested they were yeah what do i get out of this what do i get out of these care
fair question the white the whites i mean it was amazing like they first of all they every focus
group when the the moderator would just be like oh hey you know just how's it going around here
they don't even try to lead the conversation anywhere and everybody just starts talking
about the homeless situation and the crime,
you know, which is basically continuous with homelessness.
And then they would be like, oh, yeah, okay, well, about the remedies.
Oh, there's a mayoral race coming up.
I think it was in the, it was like in the summer, you know,
that these focus groups were held.
Caruso versus Bass.
Caruso versus Bass.
And they hadn't really been thinking a ton about it,
but there's a moment there where you see it dawns on the white focus group participants
and they were not like recruiting like leftists or democrats or anything it was just supposed to
be a mixed group of swing voters and they just as soon as it dawned on them that there was a black
woman running they were like oh well i mean that's i mean gotta vote for the black woman like it was
the most racist like you would think like in it was the most racist, like you would think
like in the, in the most racist moments in American history, you know, um, the stereotypes
that we would have, you know, about the South or whatever, you know, reconstruction or something
like people would not be as open and honest about it, but they were just like openly like,
well, we have to vote for the black woman. And then in the rest of the focus group,
a lot of them knew who Caruso was
because he's famous for these really spectacular
housing developments.
And also they're kind of calling them malls
is a kind of beautiful outdoor shopping centers
with lawns and you can get fantastic restaurants
and you can have the kids can play freely on these lawns. you can get like a fantastic restaurants and you can
like have the kids can play freely on these lawns i mean it's sort of tragic because of course it's
all private it's not public spaces but nonetheless you feel safe you go in there it's amazing place
so they didn't do it for that i want these white participants i was watching them through basically
over like the next hour hour and a half explaining why caruso was a bad guy for just running against this black woman.
Like, it was just outrageous. And what is he trying to do? He's trying to make money. I mean,
which is just crazy because, of course, he's just, you know, like, I think he's like a billionaire.
I mean, he's self-made and extraordinarily successful person. And clearly running for
mayor is an altruistic act so it was just appalling so of
course i mean i have to say you know what is that i mean i've been to every big white country in the
last year australia canada uk us obviously and that very specific brand of self-hatred nihilism
that brain disease is everywhere it's not just here it's it's throughout the anglosphere
yeah what and it's history changing and its effects like what is that why is the white world
determined to kill itself do you have any idea it's really noticeable yeah i mean there's so
much in that i mean it seems like there's like multiple levels i mean at one superficial level
or at least a kind of psychological sociological level they're all competing with each other to show who's a better person
yeah the more i the more hatred i express towards white people the better i am as a human being
destroying your own kids is like the measure of virtue oh yeah the nihilism um obviously this is
a very old story about decadence and of you you know, comfort and you start to kind of believe, I mean, there's something really checked out from reality about the whole thing.
I mean, it, first of all, it's, um, the stories that get told are just, you know, like absurd, like 1619 being the founding of America.
That's just obviously wrong.
The country was founded,
you know, our Constitution is 1789, Declaration of Independence is 1776, and not only that,
but like slavery was never at the heart of the United States. It was always, it was a whole
place committed to, it was English Americans or the American English, as they were referred to,
wanting to create a country the first time that was just founded on the Enlightenment ideals of freedom and of free expression.
I mean, so important.
They put us the First Amendment.
They insist on a Bill of Rights.
So, you just get this completely twisted, you know, disinformation story about the United States that gets embraced.
But, yeah, it's nihilism.
I mean –
But embraced by whites.
Yeah.
That's what it's aimed.
So, it is a – I mean, leaving aside the fact that it's aimed so it is a i mean leaving us in fact
that it's false but you know a lot of creation myths are false but this one is false in a
specific way which is like you suck and you should die and all the way it's like yeah you're right i
should right what it's i mean it's end of civilization sort of ideology isn't it that's
it it's like i don't i've never seen anything like it no i mean when you read the old it is
the whites, too.
Oh, yeah.
No, because the Latinos, I mean, they're-
Oh, they don't, they're like, what?
Yeah, they're, for sure.
They're like working, they're like more working class.
They're more Christian.
They're more, they love America more.
They remember where they came from more.
So, yeah, I mean, it's also, yeah.
So, it's just, in some ways, it's an old story of a civilization just at its end.
I mean, including all the transgenderism.
I mean, that's, you know, that's the Camille Polly is famous, writing about how that shows up at the end of civilizations.
And so, you know, if you read Toynbee, it's like one of the characteristics is when the elites stop, the creative class of elites, which is, I mean, Los Angeles, they stop identifying
with their own working class and they start to identify with, you know, with outsiders,
basically with people from foreigners from outside the country. That's another sign of
a civilization at its end. So, we were in a meeting here at TCN the other day and I looked
around the room and every other person had a kind of ruddy
vitality, sort of pink cheeks, alertness, bright eyes, full mental acuity, and a cheerfulness you
could almost smell. And I asked, why does everyone look so good? And part of the answer, of course,
is they like what we do for a living. It's really interesting. We think it's important.
But another reason everyone looks so good is because they'd all had a great night sleep.
I'm not making this up.
Almost everybody here uses a new sleep technology from a company called 8Sleep.
They sent it to us and everyone here loves it.
It's called the Pod. It's a high-tech
mattress cover effectively that you add to your existing bed. You don't need a new bed or anything
like that. You just throw this over what you have. What it does is adjust the temperature
of your bed, warmer or cooler, depending on what you want. And it maintains an ideal sleeping
environment all night long. So I didn't know this, but as you progress through different phases of sleep,
your body's needs change.
And eight sleep automatically keeps things exactly where they should be
in the sweet spot through the entire night.
It's been proven to increase the quality of your sleep,
the amount you sleep every night.
It improves your recovery time from physical exertion, and it may even improve your cognitive performance and enhance your overall health.
It seems to be doing that in our office. So it learns and adapts to your sleep patterns over
time and automatically adjusts temperatures throughout the night through each phase of
sleep. And it does this independently for each sleeper on either side of the bed.
That's pretty cool.
So you can sleep well and feel much better and be more effective the next morning as we are here.
Try it for yourself.
Go to 8sleep.com slash Tucker.
Use the promo code Tucker to get an extra $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra.
You can try it with zero obligation for a month. And if you don't like it, just send it back. Again, that's 8sleep.com slash Tucker.
Better sleep today and look great in your morning meetings as our guys do.
At Desjardins Insurance, we know that when you're a building contractor,
your company's foundation needs to be strong.
That's why our agents go the extra mile to understand your business
and provide tailored solutions for all its unique needs.
You put your heart into your company, so we put our heart into making sure it's protected.
Get insurance that's really big on care.
Find an agent today at Desjardins.com slash business coverage.
Whether it's a family member, friend or furry companion joining your summer road trip,
enjoy the peace of mind that comes with Volvo's legendary safety.
During Volvo Discover Days, enjoy limited time savings as you make plans to cruise through Muskoka or down Toronto's bustling streets.
From now until June 30th, lease a 2025 Volvo XC60 from 1.74% and save up to $4,000.
Conditions apply. Visit your GTA Volvo retailer or go to volvocars.ca for full details. you alluded a minute ago to its cause being affluence just generational affluence seems
like it does it feels that way to me too i'm not an expert i mean there's i mean it's a cliche but
like a lot of cliches got truth to it is it, is the good times make soft men and soft men make bad times.
So, I mean, there's obviously been a huge correction in the United States, which is, you know, welcome, which is a sort of re-embrace of the ideals of the United States.
I mean, let's hope that this has been a wake-up call for the people
of Los Angeles. I mean, they are reaping what they sowed, and the people of California are
reaping what we sowed. And, you know, that is, you know, I mean, it's really quite symbolic.
You know, it's like the neighborhoods of the elites in Los Angeles that are really,
that really got the most effective that are having to flee. And, but again, I mean, part of the
reason I wanted to come on, I've been writing about it every day and trying to surface the
stories of the utility, the water utility executives. And I've got a story coming out
later today from a firefighter who, you know, like basically just described, I mean,
the firefighters, of course, the men and women on
the ground doing the hard work, they're blameless. But I mean, the destruction, there's 29 fire
departments in Los Angeles, including LA County Fire Department. You know, there's 88 cities,
and people don't realize, like Los Angeles is a city, but then there's a much larger county around
it with 88 cities in it.
And there's and not all of them have fire departments.
Like most of them don't. Right. So the ones that don't have their own fire departments, they depend on L.A. County Fire Department.
But, you know, and it's been this way for a long time.
So it's not like it can't work, but it definitely introduces a level of complexity into it.
I mean, the priorities of these fire departments, it's not just like a social media meme.
I mean, the it of these fire departments, it's not just like a social media meme. I mean, it really has been DEI. Like, it really has been the priority of these fire
departments. The first priority of the fire departments should be to put out fires and
keep people safe and save lives. But the first priority has been DEI. I mean, that is clearly...
Is there evidence? Do we have social science that shows that lesbians are better firemen than
non-lesbians?
I mean, what are the chances, right?
That like all three of these executives are, I mean, you know, it's like, it's also sort of like, I mean, it's funny because the way that the defenders of it sort of talk about it is as though they're imposing equality.
Actually, they're demanding that it not be based on merit.
I mean, first of all, there was never any evidence
that the fire departments were like systematically
or structurally excluding qualified people.
I mean, that's not to say that never happened.
There wasn't some racism.
I mean, of course there is, but it's like,
they got into a situation where people are getting promoted
who were not as qualified as other people on basis of race.
I mean, that is anathema to the American system.
And by the way, the people of California have now twice rejected racial preferences.
One of them in 1996, I believe, and then the other, again, in 20, was it 2018?
They also rejected gay marriage, but they're not allowed to get what they want, actually, it turns out.
Because whatever you think of gay marriage or racial preferences or whatever, if you believe in Bell's analysis of it,
you know, it's liberty, it's laissez-faire, it's individualism, and it's egalitarianism.
That's the state I grew up in. It was the most American of all states.
That's right. It's not equity. It's equality of opportunity. That's what egalitarianism is.
It doesn't matter who your family was. We used to say when I was a kid,
no one in California used his last name. Now, why would that be? You know, you go back East as we called it. We go in the summertime. I'd be like, hi, I'm Michael
Schellenberger in California. It's like, I'm Mike. Well, my father would always say,
that's because in California, it's not about the legacy of your family. It's not about caste.
It's about you. Can you do it or not? That seemed like a great system to me.
It's great. I mean, that's what I love. I mean, it's the part I love about California is like,
I lived on the East Coast for like a year.
It was a traumatic experience.
You'd go to parties and someone would be like, oh, what school did you go to?
Oh, totally.
And then they'd be kind of looking over your shoulder.
And you're like, well, what?
Like, who cares what school I went to?
Like, you know, who am I?
Exactly.
What are my passions?
Exactly.
So that was like, I was like, wow, that is great.
Like, that is weird.
You know, in California, it's like, what's your jam, dude?
You know, it's like really like, what are you into? You know, it's like really like, what are you into?
You know, that's like the best of it.
Who are you as a person?
Yeah, who are you as a person?
It's the human, you know, it's like, obviously, you can get culty and whatever.
But I mean, it is the best of that human potential.
Well, you're not held responsible for the sins of people you're related to.
And, you know, I come from a a complicated family so i always love that idea
you know whatever it's like yeah you're judged on you yes choices that you make in the character
that you have right your decency which is actually radical individual responsibility that's what i
always thought yeah i mean that was always for me it was like uh you know victor frankl who wrote
man's search for meaning yes it's incredibly a holocaust survivor the whole thing was
was like you know being in a death camp
shouldn't control how I think about the world.
I mean, that's about as radical of an individual mentality point of view.
And now, of course, that's viewed as very right-wing
and very unsympathetic and whatever.
But Viktor Frankl was just loved by the existentialist California left in the 60s.
I mean, he would sell out these huge
auditorium in Berkeley and they would, you know, they'd go to Esalen. And so, I mean, you go from
that to basically nobody taking responsibility. I mean, it's incredible. And everyone living under
the crushing burden of history, most of it misconstrued in a lie anyway, but still the
idea that the past is determining the present and the future.
That's like the least Californian, least American idea ever.
That's so well-spoken.
No, no, it's totally brilliantly well-spoken.
Absolutely.
Yeah, I mean, it's like we, in our next book, we're working on this idea of these singularities, meaning like these just awful events in the past, the Holocaust, slavery, indigenous genocide.
And they become like gods
for secular people. They become like super present. Like, you know, there's, it's just
everything that we do is affected by slavery and, you know, everything that this is indigenous land.
I mean, I was going through the, I was just going through the, all of like the various documents
over the years of like water and fire and disaster in Los Angeles. And they all open with land acknowledgments.
You're just like, well, yeah.
Literally, you think that white people don't belong here.
That is literally what you're saying in those land acknowledgments.
You're saying, we don't belong here.
And you may have seen, there's a clip that went viral on social media with the deputy police the deputy fire chief of los angeles
where she's sort of saying oh yeah people ask me you know can you carry my husband out of a house
you know in danger and she's like well you know your husband got himself in a place that he
shouldn't have been that was her response it was like was that i saw that video and my first thought
was that can't be was it was that? I know. It looks like a parody.
It's crazy.
You're like, yeah, that's literally your job is to be able to carry someone.
Can you imagine like someone being like, oh, yeah, your father, your elderly father, you know, we couldn't carry him out of the house and he shouldn't have been in that house when it was burned down.
Or your daughter gets raped walking to school.
Well, she shouldn't have been wearing a skirt.
Right.
Yeah.
Which was all.
That's like the left campaign. Like when I was in in college like that was the whole don't blame the victim that
was the whole thing of course they're all which i would kind of agree with by the way i mean you
should be able to look attractive and not get raped of course you should be allowed to be old
and immobile and not die in a fire like what are we even saying that's civilization it's civilization
yeah exactly yeah what's the point of? The point of civilization is to protect the vulnerable.
Right.
To make it possible for people to reproduce and continue.
Right.
To make it possible for you to have kids and your kids to have kids.
Like, there's no reason to have it other than that.
At the most basic level.
Yes.
And so, I don't understand, like, how could she say something like that and not get fired or arrested?
She should have been fired as soon as that came out.
I mean, and Gavin Newsom should have called for her to be fired. The mayor should have called for her to
be fired. She's still in that job. I mean, that's dangerous. Like, it's a violation of firefighter
ethics. That person is a danger. In other words, she's going around suggesting to all of her
people that work for her that they're not responsible for saving. But I think it reflects
the mentality, which is a
nihilistic mentality, which is that we don't belong here. You know, we stole this land.
And so, and this is this, you know, let Malibu burn. I mean, it is definitionally nihilism. I
mean, it's anti-civilization nihilism. You know, There's sort of two forms of nihilism. One of them is basically anti-civilization, anti-human, anti-modern life.
And it stems from this earlier nihilism, which is that life has no meaning.
We're just like animals in the famous Russian novel Fathers and Sons by Turgerev.
The nihilistic character dissects a frog and says, we're just like this frog, you know, we're just matter, you know, we're just dead matter,
just this assemblage. So, it's a very dark nihilistic story that then leads to
this just, yeah, nihilistic anti-civilization ideology, which became very fashionable. I mean,
City of Quartz, the Mike Davis book, I mean, it was a very fashionable book to read in places like Pacific
Palisades and Hollywood and Santa Monica and Venice. So, yeah, I think it's, you know,
I hope it's a wake-up call. I don't know if it will be, but it is a completely preventable
disaster. Fires are definitely not completely preventable,
but that level of destruction absolutely is. And anybody who says that it is not preventable
should be as far away from power as possible. Like, anybody who believes that it was inevitable
to lose 10,000 homes and buildings in Los Angeles over a week, they should be very far away from political power.
They should not be in charge of any fire department because it ends up becoming a
self-fulfilling prophecy. So, I've taken you right to 50,000 feet, the future of the whites and all
this stuff, which I'm grateful that you addressed. But just back to the, and I'm sorry for digressing
so much, back to the first question, how did this start?
You gave a great explanation.
Did climate change play a role?
Was this caused by climate change?
No, it's not caused by climate change.
I mean, certainly warmer weathers, all else being equal, makes the wood drier.
But there is no change in precipitation since 1877. They've kept very good records of
rainfall, annual rainfall in the Los Angeles basin, and it's unchanged.
Really?
I know. It's incredible. There's wet years and dry years. You look at it. I just posted it on X.
It's just people can go look at it. It's from the Almanac. No change in precipitation at all in Los Angeles. There have been Santa Ana winds
in January many times in the past. There have been, you know, and by the way, like, this is a
dry year now, but the last two years were very heavy rains.
Too heavy.
Yeah.
Mudslide heavy.
Yeah. And so, you know, it's extremes. I mean, it's what, you know, that's why California's so beautiful. It's a place of extremes. And so, we, you know, we're it's extremes i mean it's what you know that's why california's
so beautiful it's a place of extremes and so we you know we adapt to that i mean you know like
but there's been no in the aggregate change in rainfall in 140 years no absolutely not
not not yeah no why are they it's actually a remarkably stable climate well it isn I mean, anyone who's lived there can tell you that's its appeal.
Yeah.
It is a pretty stable climate, actually.
Yeah.
I mean, it's stable climate with these amazing extremes.
So, like, you know, you'll just get these, I mean, the best, I mean, for my favorite weather is, like, after, like, you know, three days of just intense rains.
And you're just, like, trying to make sure that your house isn't flooded.
And, you know, the mud's everywhere.
It's just the dogs are bringing in mud.
And then the sun comes out and it's just heaven on earth.
I mean, that's why we're in California, right?
You're just like, ah.
So we love those.
We love those extremes.
Yeah.
I mean, I think that's part of the, I mean, it's so funny because it's like the reversion back to these, people are cursing the weather.
They're blaming the weather.
That's why we do human sacrifice.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Well, another one was literally just before I got here,
the legislature got to its very important work
of passing a bill just now
that sets aside $50 million for California to sue Trump.
Like literally, and they were in a special session that they kept going. They were in a special session to figure out how to sue Trump
while LA is burning. And meanwhile, Gavin's going out there all the time being like, oh,
well, boy, it'd be really terrible if Trump withheld disaster aid or heaven forbid you know required that we
you know get our shit together i'm not sure i'm allowed to say in your podcast get our things
together um and and then like literally he's like we're gonna sue him for implementing the agenda
he was elected on by a majority of the american so it's just an msnbc agenda it's just a silly
rich white liberal agenda and i will, I've thought for 20 years
that California will only be saved
by like Naeem Bukele type figures.
Some authoritarian Latino in a cape
is going to show up
and just impose order on the state.
And I'm not being,
I am white.
I'm not against whites.
I love whites.
My children are white.
But the fact is,
they can't do it in that state.
Gavin Newsom can't do it.
The burden of guilt
and self-hatred is too heavy.
And you're going to get some guy from Oaxaca
who's smart and is going to be like,
we're not putting up any of this bullshit at all.
And no, you can't camp in LA.
No, you can't do meth in LA.
And yes, we are going to have like full reservoir.
I mean, do you know what I mean?
It would be amazing.
It would be amazing if we had that.
I mean, there was sort of an idea
that Karen Bass, because she was black and because she came from the left, would be able to do things that a white guy wouldn't be able to do.
That was part of the reasoning for her.
She didn't do it.
I mean, look, people have to remember, she's very radical.
And I get it.
I mean, I was there.
I left it.
But, you know, she went to Cuba a bunch of times.
Oh, for sure.
And, you know, like admired Castro.
And you kind of thought, well, maybe that was behind her, but it's not.
You know, it really isn't.
I mean, the thing where like you're like literally get a warning that the whole city is going to go up in flames.
And you're like, oh, I really got to be in Ghana for the inauguration of the new president.
I mean, look at where your head's at.
I mean, she talks about it.
She just loves going to Africa all the time.
I love going to Africa.
I do too.
But you're like the mayor of like. It's just's just silly and selfish really it's really narcissistic it's
it's really vapid so it's not good to have people kiss your ass your whole life and tell you i mean
that is just bad as it if it ever when it happens to me it's bad for me yeah it's bad for anybody
and if some people are always being like you've got black girl magic like after a while it no i'm
serious because it's there is no black girl magic. Like after a while, it corrodes. No, I'm serious. Because there is no black girl magic.
There's no white man magic.
It's all bullshit, actually.
But if you start to believe it,
having people kiss your ass,
having had many people kiss my ass,
I know corrodes your soul and makes you into a bad leader.
And I really think that's part of it.
We're seeing it, not just in LA,
but like the black girl magic thing
has been bad for a lot of people.
You know what I mean?
Oh, yeah.
As the white man magic would be too. Yeah, of course mean then she gets i mean they so the other thing was she did
cut the fire department budget okay she just cut it i mean she just it just happened and then
literally denying it i know so she literally goes up at a press conference and it was word salad i
mean it was quite impressive i mean she was sort of like, you were like, what did she just say?
I mean, she goes, well, that was, you know, it would kind of be like, well, that was different because we just approved this other money.
And she would basically just, it was a non sequitur.
I mean, she's describing a totally different salary negotiation.
They cut $17.5 million from the budget.
And not only that, but then they had this internal memo that leaked that said that they were looking
to cut another $48.8 million,
another $49.1 million.
From the fire department.
From the fire department,
which was already decimated.
I mean, there's a whole story on this.
It's like famous for fires.
No, it's crazy.
So they do that.
And of course,
the LA Times and Politico
and I can't remember other people, they all come out and they go, they go, did she cut the budget?
You know, it's complicated, you know.
I mean, it's amazing.
You know, it's complicated, which is like, yeah, yeah, she did cut.
She did cut the budget.
But nobody, the media was not being honest with people about what was really going on until the fire chief the lesbians la
county fire chief to her credit um she was being actually she was being grilled by a local fox
television reporter who was just doing a great job actually i mean just to be handed the local tv
actually some of the best reporting still and she's only in la la has always had
great local television i don't know why.
No, I think I agree with you. Yeah. It's fallen off in the Bay Area. They did a little bit better
in Oakland when things get really crazy. But she just kept going after her. She just kept asking
her over and over again about the budget cuts. And she was kind of having a high, finally,
she was just like, yeah, yeah, she did. She cut that money. And she's like, and did it matter?
Yeah, yeah, it mattered. She had sent a letter.
I mean, there was a letter from, I think it was December 4th that the fire chief had sent,
which said specifically, this is going to reduce our ability to deal with wildfires.
She said it twice.
Yes.
She said it twice in the letter.
So it was a little bit like, okay, you were on the record saying it was going to hurt
your ability.
So, but then she was like, yes, yes yes it did hurt our ability um to deal with it then she just was like i think at that point the fire chief she
was just like all right you know like um the gloves are off so she goes on cbs and on cnn
and reiterates it and with very strong language ice was able to get into this piece that will come
out um shortly i was able to get into the weeds a little bit on it.
But basically, there's 100 fire trucks that are currently in the maintenance shop that just need to be fixed.
There's 100 fire trucks missing.
The person I interviewed was like, we could have bought for $100 million, we could have bought, you know, like 100 or 200, you know, kind of used fire trucks or whatever, just get fire trucks from wherever, maintain them, and just put them in different points all around the city.
You wouldn't necessarily have the staff to deal with them, but you could then, as soon as you get that fire warning, again, on January 1st or Januaryuary 2nd you can just fly in firefighters from around the country from around the world you just be like
look we're just going to bring everybody in we don't know what's going to happen and then they
can just go he was this person was like you know we could put like 30 of them at dodger stadium
you know you could just like put these fire trucks that are well maintained you know but so she was
like because i didn't quite understand it either because she was like we didn't have the money for
the mechanics and you're like well why do you like, because I didn't quite understand it either, because she was like, we didn't have the money for the mechanics.
And you're like, well, why do you like, what do you need the mechanics for?
Well, you need the mechanics to maintain the fire engines.
Right.
So, I mean, this is what, you know, it's like when civilization breaks down, it breaks down in like just a million small ways, you know.
So, you know, is there some DEI part of it?
Yeah, there was, they were promoting people not based on merit.
Is there budget DEI part of it? Yeah, there was, they were promoting people not based on merit. Is there budget cuts?
Absolutely.
I mean, they didn't, you know, and what goes wrong when you don't have those budget cuts?
Everything.
You know, I mean, the other complaint I've heard, you know, is just that, it's just the
advanced thinking.
It's just getting people that can kind of be thinking in advance.
That's where their focus is.
That's where their priority is.
The problem with the DEI is that when you're just orienting an entire organizational culture towards racial and sex quotas rather than towards, okay, you know, what about the Santa Ana winds and the fire risk and whatever.
It's just we all know that, like, it's not just time in the day.
It's also mind time.
It's like, what do you think about when you take a shower?
What do you think about when you're putting on your shoes?
Like, where is your head at? Their head has been in the clouds around, you know, DEI, the larger society,
ESG, climate, homelessness. I mean, I mean, the list goes on and on. But the, you know, it was
on homelessness. We now know because the state audit came out, $24 billion on homelessness since Gavin took office in 2019. Tucker, homelessness in California
increased by 40% under Gavin. Can you believe that? I mean, 40%. So, because everyone goes,
it's such a curious mystery as to we spent all this money on homelessness, and yet,
it just increased. It's like, well, yeah, because you spent money on homelessness and yet it just increased it's like well yeah because you spent
money incentivizing and subsidizing homelessness you spent all this money to attract people from
all over the united states i mean i interview people in california that are on the streets and
it's like nobody's from california i mean they come in the only reason i feel like i have any
understanding what homelessness is is because the interviews that you did several years ago, which are the most unbelievable, I'd never heard of you before
I saw these interviews. And you did, and I would recommend to our listeners to go find them because
they're on YouTube. You did the thing that nobody, I've never seen anybody do it before. Others have
followed since you did it, but you just went and you interviewed the homeless and like, what are
you doing here? Tell me your story. And they were remarkably honest. Oh, they're, they want to be,
they see the thing is like homeless people, they always lonely you know and so they they're um obviously these are people
in a really bad way and they're eager to tell their story they have a lot to say they're not
most of them are not dumb some of them are not dumb at all oh no oh no and they do lie like at
the beginning so i mean you have to um the secret to all great interviews as you know more than anybody
is is you need to have a long time yes because people tell the they lie at first and then the
truth comes out so like you'll interview people and you'll be like you're like where you're from
brother and they'll be like oh i was raised here and you get like 30 minutes in the interview
they're like oh i'm from arkansas you know i'm from texas or whatever so yeah i mean um so yeah
they're from all over they came here they come come, you know, the most famous one I did was with James Church.
He had tattoos on his face and he was just incredible.
I just love that interview so much.
I think it was like, it's not like an hour, hour and a half with him, just holding my iPhone up to him while he's talking.
But he was the one who was like, you know, if I'm being honest, you know, they pay people to be homeless here. And I was like, what do you mean
by that? And he's like, well, he's like, I get 650 bucks a month in cash welfare to be homeless
here, plus a couple of hundred bucks more in food stamps. It's a great deal. And he was like,
I got Netflix on my phone. I watch Amazon Prime TV on my phone. You know, I still, Electric City from the light pole right here.
That video, I will say, is very satisfying.
I do think that played a pretty big role in the voters of San Francisco voting to get rid of cash welfare for homeless people.
Make 2025 the year you check life insurance off your list and protect your family's future with Policy Genius.
It is hard to find life insurance. It's a hassle. Who wants to think about it? PolicyGenius makes
it super easy. And when you do that, you ensure that your loved ones have a safety net to cover
all the debts or expenses should something happen to you. And things do happen when you don't expect
them to. So with PolicyGenius, it's really easy. You find life insurance policies that start at just $292 per year
for a million dollars of coverage.
Some options are 100% online
and you don't even need unnecessary medical exams,
which is another hurdle to go through
to get life insurance.
You don't want to sit through that stuff.
They've got licensed support teams
to help you get what you need fast
so you can get on with your life
and check life insurance off the list.
They answer questions. They handle paperwork. they advocate for you throughout the process. They make it
super easy. Life insurance is a form of financial planning. Obviously, Policy Genius is the country's
leading online insurance marketplace. Even if you already have life insurance through work,
it may not protect your family in the way you want them to be protected if something were to happen to you. PolicyGenius can fix that. So head to policygenius.com slash
Tucker or click the link in the description to get your life insurance quotes for free
and see how much you could save. No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your
door from No Frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC optimum points on your first five orders shop now at no frails
dot CA introducing TurboTax business,
a brand new way to file your own T2 return all while getting help from an
expert who actually knows small businesses got a tattoo studio toy store,
tiny, but mighty taco stand.
We've got someone who gets small business taxes inside and out.
Experts are standing by to help and review while you file,
so you know your return's done right.
Intuit TurboTax Business.
New from TurboTax Canada.
Some regional exclusions apply.
Learn more at TurboTax.ca slash business tax. But why did it, I know I've asked you this before, but why did it fall to you
to do that? It's, well, it's because, well, we know why. I mean, because it's-
Because you weren't a reporter. You weren't working for a newspaper or a tv station no i mean look it's for me this is the golden age of
journalism it is so much fun like i'm because like basically i can go into um every story
and you discover that people aren't really doing reporting you know i showed up at the guy i showed
up at the house that the guy lived in the guy that assaulted nancy pelosi's husband yes just to give you a sense of where journalism is at and i show up and i'm like
i'm just happy to be there and there's all these journalists there it's like a bunch of like local
tv news and like the local print whatever and i was like i just kind of like oh hey what's the
he lived out in berkeley right yeah he's in berkeley yeah um black lives matter flag and
you know um uh you know abandoned school bus um they were really it was really
terrible environment but um and i was like oh i was like so i was like if you guys already i was
kind of like worried i was like i got here late i was like so you guys already like knocked on all
the doors the neighbors and they were just like looked at me and they were like no we're like not
we're i can't remember one of them said he's like all we don't want to be like rude or something or
that would be like inappropriate i was like i was like and at said. He was like, oh, we don't want to be like rude or something, or that would be like inappropriate. I was like, and at that moment I was like, oh God, this is going to be great.
And I just like went and knocked on all the doors and like get all the information.
Like, oh yeah, they would around naked out there and they would be on drugs all the time.
And yeah, they were like all left wing.
And it was like, you know, I was like, oh, this is amazing.
Like there's no competition.
Like it's, you know, I got on the i got on the white house
briefing just recently um the white house briefing on uaps which you and i um are both interested in
on the drones um and it was just like you can kind of go into these stories you just start talking to
people and you just realize journalists aren't really they're not really journalists they're
more like kind of the people that would run for like class president or something they're kind of goody two-shoes they're ass kissers yeah they're actually very author i mean they're more like kind of the people that would run for like class president or
something they're kind of goody two-shoes they're ass kissers yeah they're actually very author i
mean they're the ones that wanted all the censorship of course so they're not that old
picture of journalists like this kind of cantankerous and like you know crabby and
they got rid of all those people anti-authoritarian anti-authoritarian um yeah difficult people i'm
the son of one of those.
Yeah.
Yeah, I grew up around this.
Classic, right.
That's like the greatest.
I mean, there's like, and you realize it's essential to the functioning of civilization to have a bunch of disagreeable people running around asking impertinent questions.
So, with this one, it was like, yeah.
So, I mean, you basically get, like, when you just look at the coverage of the fires, I mean, it was like the reporters that are are going out and doing it it's like their whole thing is like oh we've got to make sure that
the right wing doesn't take advantage of this situation to push their like literally that's
how they think about it so they're out there running cover for the poll i mean it's amazing
you know somebody did like a little meme on it but it's like that thing where it's like
yeah it used to be that the reporter would like be holding the microphone up to the politicians and being like, answer my questions.
And now they're like demanding that the people defend themselves for their terrible votes.
You know, it's like a complete reversal.
It's so true.
Well, they're the Praetorian Guard for the powerful.
Yeah.
Yeah. from your interviews with the homeless, which I just cannot recommend strongly enough as a primary source of information,
actual information,
is the degree to which the narcotics
fuel homelessness.
So you can't really disaggregate
homelessness from drug addiction.
No, of course.
I mean, it's really-
I mean, you say of course, but like-
No, I know.
Well, no, I know.
I wrote San Francisco
because it was literally like,
because I knew drugs.
Like, you know, I know drugs.
You know, I made three friends from high school.
I became homeless addicts.
Two are dead.
It's like, you know, I'm, you know, I happily avoided personally all the hard ones.
But you saw your friends, like, you know, you leave, you're like, wow, you guys are doing meth. I had the same experience.
You know, it's like, meth's bad, guys.
What town did you go to high school in?
Greeley, Colorado.
Yep.
You know.
So, you know, my parents are psychologists.
I remember just being around, my aunt had schizophrenia, you know.
I've told this story a million times, so I don't want to bore you.
But basically, it was like, it was just kind of like, so wait, everyone just thinks that this is like a housing problem.
Like, that's just crazy.
So, you know, you sort of needed to, I needed to go do all those interviews. But I mean, really the first homelessness epidemic, the first time that we're modern homelessness was in the early 80s.
And it was just, it was basically all it was, was a combination of the emptying, the final closure of all the mental hospitals where they literally, literally dumped people on the streets.
Like I thought that that was, that sounded like an exaggeration when I first started.
They literally were putting, you know, schizophrenics and stuff on the streets. Like, I thought that that was, that sounded like an exaggeration when I first started.
They literally were putting, you know, schizophrenics and stuff on the streets.
And then the crack epidemic.
Like, that's all it was.
It was just those two things.
And then, of course, then, you know, left-wing mayor of San Francisco and others are like, oh, well, we can't, like, we can't, like, require that people not camp outside.
They're poor.
The left, in reaction to Reagan, then took up homelessness as something that they claimed was caused by Reagan. Like, I mean, he'd been in office for like, whatever, two or three
years, and they would just make ridiculous claims, you know, the Reagan budget, you know, that's why
everybody's on the street. So, it really gets used, so it becomes viewed by the left early on
as a political propaganda tool. I also blame the comics, by the way. I mean,
and just I'll name them, Robin Williams, Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg. They did this whole
thing. You may remember Comic Relief, where they framed the whole thing as a problem of poverty,
which is just, you know, it's just such a disservice to the people on the street who
need an intervention. There's a natural, like for addicts, there's a natural progression where you, you know,
whether from trauma or just because you enjoyed getting high, your addiction gets in the way
of your job and you stop going to work.
And you often, you know, live at home with your parents or with friends.
You lie, steal, and cheat from them repeatedly.
They give you multiple warnings.
They finally kick you out. That's often the route to homelessness. You end up on the street.
That's the moment where the society, the family and friends were not able to impose an intervention.
So, the way it should work is that you end up, you go out camp on the street and the cop goes,
hey, you can't camp here. It's illegal to camp here. And they go, what am I supposed to do?
And they're like, well, we're going to take you to jail
or you can go to rehab. Like those are your two choices, two choices. A natural intervention is
imposed in that situation. What progressives and Democrats did for 40 years is they just removed
the intervention in the name of compassion. The most compassionate thing is to impose the
intervention. I mean, the thing that's most common, I'll even find this with like harm reduction workers. I was
just with some harm reduction workers in Skid Row, and one of them was telling me the whole usual
thing, oh, you can't make somebody get clean, they have to hit their own bottom, like whatever.
And I was like, and they were like, I used to run around here, you know, on meth. It was an Asian American woman who was doing this. And I was like, oh, wow. I was like, I used to run around here on meth. It was an Asian-American woman who was doing this.
And I was like, oh, wow.
I was like, what did it finally take you for you to get clean?
She was like, well, I went to prison.
It's like, well, right.
I have a really close friend who's lived that same trajectory.
I have a couple friends, but I have a legit close friend
who's totally out of control on drugs and lost kids
and all the things that happen when you're addicted
and got sober in prison and rebuilt a life. Totally out of control on drugs and lost kids and all the things that happen when you're addicted.
And got sober in prison and rebuilt a life.
A wonderful life, yes.
But, yeah.
And they're like the best.
By the way, recovering addicts are like the greatest people.
They're my favorite people.
They're the funniest, most honest people.
They have an equanimity about them. I go to AA meetings when I can, not because I'm in danger of partying again.
I'm not after 22 years, but because I like the people
because they're so honest.
And they're honest about the one thing
no one's ever honest about, which is themselves.
It's super easy to be honest about you.
I don't like your sweater, Mike.
That's disgusting.
Like, that's not hard.
You've gained weight.
That's not hard.
I've gained weight.
I'm wearing an ugly sweater.
Those are hard.
And you find among those people, that's not hard yeah i've gained weight i'm wearing an ugly sweater those are hard yeah and
you find among those people the recovered people like a true honesty about themselves it's right
it's like the greatest church service there is right because they're all born again in an
important sense they've all died in some way yeah no i so that's the but to deprive people of that
yes to encourage them to continue to use drugs and alcohol is like, I mean, don't even, whatever, it's an interview of you, not me, but I just feel like sobriety has to be the goal, not just for the individual, but for the society.
I really believe that.
So sobriety is the greatest gift.
A. B. Use of drugs and alcohol causes mental illness, which nobody ever says out loud.
I've seen it
to some extent experienced it i know you can cause severe mental illness sure by using drugs
and alcohol like right is that even controversial it shouldn't be no that's right i mean you've done
more on this than i have much more but it's sort of coming back a little bit people talk about
meth induced psychosis now yes more but um yeah it's uh it's really
psychosis oh yeah and the weed now it's just so potent and dangerous and yeah so but you as a
someone who still lives in california does anybody do you ever hear people say that like why are we
paying people to use drugs like should it surprise us that things are falling apart i mean i do think
i do think that the the conversation has changed a bit.
I'll take some credit for it with San Francisco
and the videos in particular.
But yeah, it's just still that thing
where it's like they kind of go,
but yeah, but there's a black woman running for mayor.
And it's like the singularity.
It's like when I always say that,
it's like it's just hovering over people.
It's a race thing.
Yeah, it's really about race in a in
a in a really important sense um and then the guilt the dealers are all immigrants from central
america we can't do anything about it right oh sanctuary state sanctuary city that's part of
what they're going to sue on um yeah i mean i think that it's just um yeah it's a big trap i
mean i think that it's funny because you you know, we're a guilt culture.
And so, you know, like, you know, Japan's a shame culture.
Yes.
And, you know, guilt is this incredibly important part of the Christian tradition.
Yes.
Well, you stop believing in original sin and you stop believing in Christianity.
You still, apparently, there's still this deep desire to feel that guilt and to sort of show it as well in other words it is a
social part of it people wanted to see in that focus they wanted other people to see in that
focus group that they they felt guilty you know it's very important but what's interesting is so
in you know traditional christianity and other religions you know the guilty person atone repents
atones dons ashes or sackcloth and covers himself in ashes as a way of saying, you know, I am worthy of the degradation.
Yes.
But we've kind of transferred that.
It's almost like the homeless are in sackcloth and ashes.
Do you know what I mean?
Like, I live in the Palisades.
I produce music videos.
I'm doing pretty well, but I still feel guilt.
But, like, seeing somebody like you
know writhing on the sidewalk i'm like displacing my atonement it's really interesting yeah he's
well then they talk about it that way even when you talk to the activists that justify it
they're like well that's a you know those people are are suffering because of capitalism exactly
and you know slavery and but the whole point of Christianity is, no, no, no, you suffer. You, like, confess your sin.
You don't, like, put it off on some junkie.
Right.
Well, it's the part of it that's just really satanic.
I mean, not to be theological about it, but it's just a complete reversal of the traditional Christian process.
It's just, yeah, it's exactly, it's making other people.
Atone for your sins.
Yeah, it's crazy.
It's unbelievable. It's so bad.... Atone for your sins. Yeah, it's crazy. It's unbelievable.
It's so bad. And they're sort of on display.
You know, it's really, if you kind of read it,
I mean, it's like they want it to be on display.
They want to sort of show it.
And that's why they insist that they not be arrested
or mandated treatment.
It's wild. It is like is like you know like you go to
skid row and it's still like a hieronymus bach is it yes you know it's just like you just can't
you still can't believe it i mean you still can't believe there's a person lying there
um you know sweating profusely passed out you can't tell if they're alive or dead you don't know
like do i do an intervention and it's just it's it's really
breaking down these are human beings i don't know that's and i'm not a particularly compassionate
or kind person i'm kind of a dick actually but even i like whenever i see that i feel such deep
sadness oh yeah person it's like oh yeah breaking like of course don't allow if that was my child
would i allow it now for one second i would take that child and chain him to the fucking
radiator until he got better. I would not allow that. My child. It's a healthy response, by the
way. Absolutely. It is. Absolutely. Those are the people that end up getting off the street.
You raise the bottom instead of lowering the bottom. If you're still using Verizon, AT&T,
or T-Mobile, obviously our condolences, but you're going to want to hear this.
Our cell phone company, Pure Talk,
gives us the exact same service
you're currently getting from those big companies,
but for half the cost.
Not a joke.
There's no reason to spend $85 or $100 per month,
per person on your wireless bill.
Now we can get unlimited talk, text,
and 15 gigs of data with mobile hotspots
for just $35 a month.
You don't have to be a math major.
The average family of four
saves about $1,000 a year with Pure Talk.
You enjoy America's most dependable 5G network,
support small businesses.
We would know that because they are now powering TCN.
It can probably save you money too.
So cut the fat out of your wireless bill.
Switch to Pure Talk by going to puretalk.com slash Tucker.
You'll save an additional 50% off your first month PureTalk, America's wireless company. order, whether that's in person with Square Kiosk or online. Instant access to your sales,
plus the funding you need to go even bigger. And real-time insights so you know what's working,
what's not, and what's next. Because when you're doing big things, your tools should too.
Visit square.ca to get started. This episode is brought to you by DAZN. For the first time ever,
the 32 best soccer clubs from across the world
are coming together to decide who the undisputed champions of the world are
in the FIFA Club World Cup.
The world's best players, Messi, Haaland, Kane, and more are all taking part.
And you can watch every match for free on DAZN,
starting on June 14th and running until July 13th.
Sign up now at DAZN.com slash FIFA.
That's D-A-Z-N.com slash FIFA.
God, we're so far afield from the box.
Okay, so there are in L.A. County, 78?
How many fire departments?
Well, there's 88 cities and there's 29 fire departments in counting the county.
No, no, no, it's fine.
But yeah, so like literally, like once the fire starts,
I didn't even understand this until I started investigating it.
The county fire chief has to call all these cities and be like,
hey, can you send a couple of trucks? We're putting together a strike team. You know, can you send some engines
or whatever? And they have to call around and they're like, okay, we're all going to meet.
The fire's like blazing away. And they're like, okay, well, we're all going to meet,
you know, wherever, you know, Sepulveda or whatever the streets are in LA. You know,
we'll meet in this place and we'll all get together and we'll sync the radios and we'll
develop a plan i mean this is all happening like while the city's burning i mean it's it's madness
right the other thing is that it's i mean there's like so they didn't have any preparation for this
there's nothing man i mean there might have been something that we but obviously if there was it
wasn't enough right i mean it's a little bit like when they go when the people that are like when
the nihilists are defending what happened they're like well there was nothing else we could
have done or we did everything we could have it's like well no obviously you didn't like it doesn't
matter what it is it obviously was there's only one right answer which is that you didn't do enough
you know the the the fatalism you know it's a um it's a way to disavow responsibility on the one hand.
Again, I think it expresses that nihilism.
But I think it's like people just have been out of practice.
But you have to – this is part of the journalism too.
You know, it's that you kind of – it has to be like, no, no, we're not accepting that as an answer.
Like, the right attitude for the journalist is to basically be
no excuses of course it makes for like i mean maybe the journalists are being too much of a
hard ass and too much of a dick about it maybe they need to be a little bit whatever that's fine
that's their role it's like your role is to be the prosecutor against the the on the case of the
failure your role is to be the investigator public defender yeah the public the public defender of
the prosecutor of the policy you know but your point role is to be the investigator. You're the public defender. Yeah, the public defender or the prosecutor or the politician,
you know, but your point is to be like,
oh, no, that can't be right.
So, because when they go,
well, we ran out of water.
Well, why did you run out of water?
Well, there wasn't enough water.
No, well, why wasn't it?
Well, because I actually turned out
one of the reservoirs
and didn't have any water in it.
Isn't it your job to make sure
there's enough water?
You know, I mean,
and this is what they do
when they go after Trump and stuff
is that like,
because Trump will often be like
directionally correct.
Right.
You know, like, oh, but Trump was referring
to the wrong kind of reservoir.
You know, the other reservoirs were full.
It's like, okay, fine.
But the reservoir right next to the Pacific Palisades
was empty.
So, you know, the basic intuition,
which is, I think, I often talk about the importance of,
you know, like if you're defending civilization,
it's a physical thing, right? So always thinking myself as like like there's a physicalism in my worldview which is like okay that's a that's a person that's a body you you
need to they need to they're in somewhere they shouldn't be they need to be somewhere else so
we can have a debate about how to move them somewhere else that's a totally reasonable
debate to have but they can't be there they can't be there because. So, we can have a debate about how to move them somewhere else. That's a totally reasonable debate to have, but they can't be there. They can't be there because
they're creating fires, they're breaking the law, they're hurting themselves and others.
Similarly, there wasn't water there. There needed to be more water. And if you go, okay, well,
we actually, let's say that they had all the reservoirs, the potable water reservoirs,
let's say they had all been full and they'd still run out of water well then there was some other problem you needed to solve you maybe you needed
more reservoirs or maybe you needed right you know you needed the preparation there so you just have
to have i mean you know the boukelli type that we that you'd want to see or somebody you just have
to touch something that's just like literally you know excuses all the way down the line say there's
if i i feel like you're on something super important if you could flesh it out you say there's a – I feel like you're on something super important. If you could flesh it out, you say there's a physicalism to your worldview.
Yeah.
Contrast that with the worldview currently in power.
Oh, well, this is – yeah, this is exactly – it's like – first of all, it's like – I mean, it's just so symbolic.
It's the city of angels, you know?
So, it's like we're up here and you want – like the wealthier you get in L.A.
And I guess with some exceptions like Venice Beach, but mostly you're getting up higher oh yeah you're moving up up up up um you're trying to get away
to the cliffs of malibu yeah and you end up in the heavens and people talk about i live in a little
tree house i mean i get it i love it it's like i live in the burga hills i'm not like you know
but it's like i'm you know i'm above all that i'm away from all that like i'm connected to nature
up here but also you know away from all the you know the plebes
and so you actually i think they do it's that whole thing we talk about people being a bubble
you know i mean it's like the most bubbly place in the world except for that it's not and you're
in a massive fire zone that must be constantly managed there's consequences of living in these
spectacular places but you've got people that are it's there it's the
the whole industry is a fantasy industry i mean it's just exists to construct a fantasy reality
and yeah you would hope that that people would be able to compartmentalize yeah my day job is
constructing fantasies that we charge you know twenty dollars to stream but i know that when i
go home that like all the brush
has to be cleared around my house
and I have to vote for candidates
that are physicalists.
I mean, look at-
Physicalists?
Yeah, I mean, I don't know
if that's the right word.
I just feel like you're-
There's something there, right?
You're onto something so important.
They're fantasists.
I mean, they're other people.
I mean, I don't want to use
the word idealist
because there's too many
other connotations to it. But it's just a difference between being your heads, your heads up in the clouds and also, and then as opposed to just being really, you need the firefighter view of the world.
You need the cop view of the world.
Frankly, you need the homeless guys.
The homeless people like live in a, I mean, they're high a lot, so they're switching in and out, but they have to get their physical needs met you know there's just a yeah so it's um when we first had kids
i remember my wife being and i had much lower standards but insisting on the house being
clean and orderly and i remember saying like it doesn't you know the point of having kids is to
instill values in them she was yeah but one of the values is like order and cleanliness and like they will feel like things are out of control if the house isn't clean and orderly and she's
really insistent on that and we've lived that way our whole lives and i it's a version of what
you're saying it's like you can tell your kids about honesty and decency and compassion and
high achievement or whatever but like someone has to make the bed and vacuum the floor if there's dog shit in the kitchen like it has to be cleaned up right
like that's she understood that right and has imposed it to great effect i would say i'm sure
no i think that's right and also like parents we all i did it too so i'm not like judging
but like we talk too much to the kids talk talk talk talk talk talk talk talk and you see like
new parents talking to their kid the kid's what? It's like the peanuts is right.
Like what they hear is the wah, wah, wah, wah.
It's so true.
As opposed to like, could you set the table?
You know?
Could you, you know, like the kids like, I mean, the kids like to have a job.
They want to have a chore.
Chores are super, like kids love that, you know?
And so, you know and you're you're
teaching the kids to clean the classroom every morning yes i mean the problem is the specialization
and the wealth they sort of get disconnected from it talk too much to the kids that you know what i
mean though yeah that's why i'm laughing and dogs too people deal with their dogs you ever see people
with like they're like you know whatever i live in the burkley hills it's like you know older ladies
and their dogs and the you know they're just like just like blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, just said you're a physicalist i i want that to become a i want intercom and usage because i think
it's that is like really really important yeah i think it's because it's like people say things
like practical which is good and pragmatic but some pragmatic got started to mean things like
making shitty political compromises you know what i mean or it's an american linguistic tradition
or philosophical tradition but yeah physicalist it's like yeah somebody's got to clean up all the, you know, if you have all the homeless people, you're going to have to spend millions of dollars on cleaning up crap.
Right.
All the time.
And, you know, the homeless, one of the things you probably have observed is that I think it's like probably a compensating mechanism.
But they're just, they're obsessed with collecting tons and tons of garbage, basically.
Yes, yes.
So, they'll, you know, you'll clean up these homeless encampments and you'll be like oh wow like they're not minimalists no no they're not
living the zen lifestyle banging olfsen life right it's like very much no no it's very cluttered
yeah you know and so they're probably over but so yeah i mean they need you need to we need to
reimpose some limits you know there's a i'm also i just became really obsessed with the scholar
i just discovered who wrote a trilogy on nationalism named leah greenfeld highly
recommend her books her first book is called nationalism second book is called spirit of
capitalism and the third book is called mind madness and modernity and these books are just
incredible but basically le a it's actually l i a h and then greenfeld um common
spelling yeah l i a h l i a h yeah she's a russian i think she's a russian jew who went to israel
lived in israel for a long time and then her and then her and then her mentor was edward shills
the sociologist um so she's sociologist but the nationalism book is beautiful
i mean it's like the the famous book on nationalism is a guy by it's called imaginary communities by
benedict anderson and it's he's a marxist and so it's all the whole thing is like him trying to
explain how nationalism why it's so powerful when marx thought it should wither away and but she
describes now so she defines nationalism the picture that people have
of nationalism is completely wrong yes she describes nationalism as a sovereign community
of fundamentally equal individuals who have a shared identity and so she's like nationalism
is fundamentally democratic now you might have some systems that are nationalist but they don't
have proper democracy but really the basic
idea is that egalitarian idea that we're americans we live here we have the same solidarity i've also
was um i've also become i'll come back to the greenfield but i've also been obsessed with
hannah arendt who i had never read until recently and she i don't think you're allowed to read her
anymore and well i know well she was canceled i know i discovered she was canceled i love hannah
arendt so i but i didn't realize just like Freud, who was also a huge figure in my childhood, everyone talked about Freud, alluded to Freud, and then he just kind of disappeared one day. And Hannah Arendt, same thing.
Oh, yeah. Totally canceled, but it's brilliant.
She's too honest. Well, yeah, yeah. She was very, well, it's really in, there's, I read her two books. One is the Antitalitarianism book and the other one is Eichmann in Jerusalem. Eichmann in Jerusalem, it's rough because she describes how the Jewish council participated with the conversation. I mean, self-confession, because I should have been reading nationalism starting in 2016.
Oh, I know.
But, you know, I finally was reading on it and it was like, she was like, nationalism is a barrier
to totalitarianism because totalitarianism is attempting to destroy all relationships between
people other than the relationship with the state.
And so, religion, nationalism, you know, the classic de Tocqueville associative ties.
Exactly.
You know, all of that is a threat to totalitarianism.
Yeah.
And so, that really struck me.
And Leah Greenfield kind of, she has a, I just interviewed her, so she has like a difference
of opinion with Arendt on this issue.
But nonetheless, I was just struck by how,
I don't know what the right, I must like,
like for me, like nationalism,
because I come from the left, you know,
from the radical left,
and we would code our socialist yearnings
as the public interest.
You know, Ralph Nader kind of took all of the Chomsky
and left-wing views of the
early 60s and packaged them for moderate he kind of made it all seem very reasonable you know um
and the environmentalists did the same thing so so the brilliance of the left in general but the
radical left in particular was of just cross-dressing as mainstream issues exactly so um so so it became
so really what is the socialist movement became a consumer rights public interest.
The women's rights movement.
Yep.
And you get these really radical ideologies.
I mean, I'm just obsessed with this, the ways in which like, so Marxism, look back on it.
I was like, wow, I can't believe the things I believed in. Marxism has this idea that the capitalists, like what's distinct about them is that they're just super greedy and they're
thieves and that they're stealing from their workers. And there's really no difference between
the entrepreneur, the capitalist entrepreneur, like Elon Musk or Thomas Edison or Henry Ford
and their workers. They're just meaner and they steal from them. And it's like, it's just an amazingly
audacious lie
because whenever you go
and actually study
an entrepreneur,
what's incredible
is that it's not just
that they are doing,
it's not like they're the best
at what they're doing.
They're the best
at like 12 different things.
You may remember
when Trump and Elon
were beginning their bromance,
Trump goes,
he goes,
you know,
I asked Elon,
I was like,
what is it that you're really good at? You know I was like, I was like, what is that you're
really good at?
You know, you can see it was like probably a question that Trump is used to asking people
that he interviews for a job or something.
And he goes, turned out it was a lot of different things, you know?
And it's like, well, yeah, like, I mean, because of course, like with Thomas Edison, people
go, oh, we invent the light bulb.
He didn't invent the light bulb.
He improved it.
He invented a viable economic model for electricity production.
I mean, he invented the electrical grid.
He found the customers.
I mean, one of the things that impresses me so much with Elon is, like, I'll see him.
You'll see him out there, and he'll be selling, you know, which is kind of, I mean, selling is sort of the worst part of our jobs in some ways.
I mean, you can do it with pleasure, and you can do it with Verve and stuff.
But, you know, you're kind of like, and I do it. I mean, I'm always like, subscribe now, you
know, and you're like, you have to do it. Like, it's part of the work, but I'm always like, wow,
Elon is still, he's the richest man in the world. He's probably, he may be the greatest innovator
in American history, certainly top three. And he's still out there having to hawk his products
and, but, and he does it great. He's an amazing job of it.
One of the innovations was he just become the biggest user of Twitter rather than buying paid ads.
But so this gigantic lie from Marx, which is that, first of all, the entrepreneur, the capitalist, is just a meaner version of the worker as opposed to this gene you know this schumpeterian genius
um and schumpeter comes along and then his the other thing the big lie and then schumpeter
points it out is that the owner of the company and the workers have the same fundamental interest in
other words elon musk's employees and elon have the same interest they want to expand their markets
and expand their products um so to put them opposed is just so it's just it's so dishonest and it's so reminiscent of of what
you can say feminism or radical feminism but this idea that the interests of women are opposed by
men that the that women and men have different interests and of course you trace it back
it goes it all goes back to Simone de Beauvoir,
who's a Marxist,
writing in the post-war period,
I guess it was like the 40s,
her book came out, The Second Sex.
But she's just taking this totally idiotic Marxist framework
and applying it to women and men.
Well, it's the biggest lie,
because it ignores the very obvious symbiosis.
It's just, it's not possible for them to exist apart.
And it's not possible to continue the species.'s like so dumb that they they need each other that actually power is
exerted in very subtle but powerful ways within a relationship between a man and a woman that are
not at all described or even acknowledged right it's the basis of life itself of course so it is
like really you trace back like the emergence of nihilism.
It really is in Marxism.
It's in feminism.
And then they successfully cross-dress for decades and they get so good at it.
This is the famous long march through institutions or what they call cultural Marxism.
But they basically dress themselves up as, I mean, civil, you know, basically civil rights.
I mean, because once you get equal rights, the work is done.
Same thing with gays and lesbians.
But then the radical left activists then go and grab all those trappings.
Because we started the conversation, this may seem like a digression, but it's important, I think, for normies and everybody to understand that.
I mean, it took a long time for me to get it, but it was like, oh, right. Like, the people that call themselves environmentalists are actually just radical leftists, slightly different from Marx because they're actually into Malthus, this totally dystopian anti-human view.
But the genius of the left is that they are so successful at masking their real agenda behind something else.
You know, we just want equality for people of color.
We just want to create equal opportunity for migrants.
No, their agenda is the destruction of civilization.
I know, and you see, on the environmental-
And it's working in LA.
Well, it is working.
And I always thought on the environmental movement,
there was a woman called Julia Butterfly Hill
who spent more than a year in a redwood.
And, you know, I always thought, you know,
if you were sincere about environmentalism,
like she would be,
like whatever happened to her, nobody knows.
And that was to your point about physicalism.
Like I like redwoods and like,
if there's a reason to cut them down, okay.
But like, maybe don't because they're just so beautiful.
That's my personal view.
I always have felt that way. So like here was someone who was she saved a tree that's got to be the highest
level of what they claim they're trying to do but they totally ignored her they don't give a shit
about her at all she died in the tree probably better for them what they really wanted to do
was disconnect people from nature it was the opposite. So why is it that every single person I know who
really spends a lot of time outdoors, who's into the sporting life or whatever, lives in a rural
area, man, their goals are the opposite of those of the Environmental Defense Fund and the Sierra
Club. Do you know what I mean? Well, and also, I think the physicalist distinction works on that
as well. I mean, here you have, I did an interview with a terrific scientist I mentioned, and he's just like, you know, when you're dealing with fires, the main event is what is happening on the ground.
Exactly.
And the climate extremists are out there basically saying, no, no, no, ignore this whole physical reality.
We just need to reorganize the entire global economy.
Exactly. Exactly.
Like, we can't stop these fires, let Malibu burn, but give us control over the driver of the economy.
I mean, it's such madness.
Exactly. And it's the opposite, and they don't care.
I mean, what's the pollution generated by these fires?
Oh, it's so much. I mean, I don't know the numbers off the top of my head, but it's massive. And dangerous, right? Well, yeah. I mean, oh my gosh, the air
in LA now. I mean, it is. My daughter's in college there. I'm worried about her. I mean,
it is absolutely toxic air. I mean, of course it is. And you have a lot of electric cars and you
have a lot of batteries going up. We don't know what that stuff is putting out in terms of particulate matter.
So, no, it's awful.
I mean, you know, ostensibly you'll get, you know, tree growth and the carbon will be, you know, reabsorbed and it's supposed to be reabsorbed.
But, yeah, no, I mean, it is. I'm not talking about carbon.
I mean, like, poison in the air and water.
Oh, for sure.
I mean, think of all the houses with all the plastic and electricity burning.
It's terrible.
No, for sure. I mean, yeah, it's terrible no for sure i mean yeah we
it's a chance to get regrounded i think a chance to i mean you know it is also an interesting
moment right because hollywood it's just producing garbage it is just it is incredible how bad the
cultural production is just at a straight like any of you're someone that just loves pop culture
like you just love steven spielberg we're not getting that level of quality.
I mean, we tried to watch something on Netflix.
It's just awful.
And it's because they're all trying to fit it in.
Artistry and creativity is transgressive.
It's supposed to be.
Of course.
It's supposed to be break.
I mean, that's actually where you want your.
I want my transgression in my art.
Yes.
Not in my civilization.
I want a really boring civilization and really transgressive art, but it's become the opposite.
The art has become boring and conformist and authoritarian, and the civilization has gotten completely transgressive.
So people are not where they need to be.
The laws are not being enforced.
So, I mean, part of you go, God, I do hope it is a wake-up call.
It was five years ago this month
that people started to drop dead
in the central Chinese city of Wuhan.
Five years since the beginning of COVID.
Tens of millions dead.
Societies reordered completely.
Economies destroyed.
And yet, for some reason,
we still don't know answers
to the most basic questions.
Where did this virus come from?
How did it get here?
Why did the government tell us to do things they knew wouldn't work?
None of those questions have been adequately answered.
And one man knows those answers.
His name is Dr. Tony Fauci.
Until now, nobody has really pressed.
And now, a documentary filmmaker called Jenner First is out with a new film explaining exactly what happened.
The film is called Thank You, Dr. Fauci.
Jenner First spent years trying to get answers.
And in that time, as he awaited Dr. Fauci's response, he went through tens of thousands of pages of documents and pieced together the story, which is shocking.
We are proud to host that documentary here on TCN from December 20th to January 19th.
You will see it exclusively here on TCN.
Again, it's called Thank You, Dr. Fauci,
and it's worth it.
Mom, Mom, did you see my race?
Of course I did, darling.
Look, you did your best.
You tried.
The thing is, it's not about winning.
It's about taking part.
Next year, you might do better.
But I did win, Mom.
You did?
When it's sunny, make sure you can still see.
At Specsavers, get two pairs of glasses from $149.
And one can be prescription sunglasses.
Hey, the sun won't wait.
Visit Specsavers.ca for details. Conditions apply.
It's one of the saddest things about this country.
The country's getting sicker despite all of our wealth and technology.
Americans aren't doing well overall.
Obesity, heart disease, autoimmune conditions, all kinds of horrible chronic illnesses, weird cancers are all on the rise.
Probably a lot of reasons for this, but one of them definitely is Americans don't eat very well anymore.
They don't eat real food.
Instead, they eat industrial substitutes, and it's not good.
It's time for something new, and that's where masa chips come in.
Masas decide to revive real food by creating snacks how they used to be made,
how they're supposed to be made.
A masa chip has just three simple ingredients, not 117.
Three.
No seed oils, no artificial additives, just real delicious food.
And I know this because we eat a ton of them in my house.
And by the way, I feel great.
So you can still continue to snack, but you can do it in a healthy way with chips without feeling guilty about it.
Masa chips are delicious.
They taste how a tortilla chip is supposed to taste.
But the thing is, you can hit them really, really hard, and I have, and not feel bloated or sluggish after.
You feel like you've done something decent
for your body. You don't feel like you got a head injury or you don't feel filled with guilt. You
feel light and energetic. It's the kind of snack your grandparents ate. Worth bringing back. So
you can go to massachips.com, Massa's M-A-S-A, by the way, massachips.com slash Tucker to start
snacking. Get 25% off. We enjoy them. You will too.
So what, speaking of the laws not being enforced,
tell us what you know about looting.
Oh, I mean, that's kind of the standard. That's like the norm in Los Angeles, isn't it? I mean, even when there's not a fire
burning. No, of course, it's terrible. I mean, I don't know if you saw the arrest. I guess they
had a couple of guys. They found a couple of guys looting Kamala's house, and then they let them go.
Of course, of course. They got the guy,
they found the guy that set one of the fires, the homeless
guy that set one of the fires, and they let him go.
I mean, it is
it's amazing.
I mean, the comedians like all their best materials
just, you know, in the news already.
How could they let,
you're stealing from people in the middle
of a profound disaster, the city's burning down, and you're stealing, people are dying, – you're stealing from people in the middle of a profound disaster.
The city's burning down and you're stealing.
People are dying and you're stealing.
Aren't you – you're like a true villain, I think.
Oh, yeah, for sure.
And then they let them go and then that became widely publicized.
Well, guess what?
This is the thing that people have to understand.
Criminals, they read the news.
Criminals are very online.
It's not like criminals don't know what's going on.
I mean, we have these amazing, there's these amazing, like, I think it was like phone calls between people in the Oakland jails and their friends.
And they're like, basically, Auntie Pam, the name of the DA, they're like, Auntie Pam's going to make sure we, you know, get off.
You know, they all know where the laws are not being enforced.
What's their job?
Of course.
Yeah.
They're rational actors.
You know, the irrational ones are the rest of us.
They're the ones trying to, you know, live there.
So if you're Gavin Newsom or Karen Bass, like you're all in on the climate change explanation, right?
That's that's all you've got at this point.
I mean, they did.
I think they are backing off a little bit from it. I think that they're a little trapped, which is great, which is that on the one hand, they can't accept responsibility because they know that if they accept responsibility, then their political futures are doomed.
On the other hand, by not accepting responsibility and passing the buck, that also obvious to people so you know they should all go i mean remember like you know new orleans like that mayor
was out of there i mean like rain agan yeah i was there for that yeah so that should be what
happens but new orleans has that just accelerated the decline of the city yeah i mean it's i was
there for katrina i covered that and i thought at, 20 years, I guess it was 20 years ago, incredibly, 2005.
I thought, well, you know, it's obviously tragic, but Bush is sending over a billion dollars to rebuild it.
I'm sure the city will be better.
And it's been much worse ever since.
That's depressing.
But LA is not New Orleans.
It's our second biggest city.
It's, in a lot of ways, the greatest city we've ever built.
And in my opinion,
and like,
so what happens to it now?
Well, there's no vision for it at all,
you know,
and we don't have anybody
visionary in there.
You know,
and they do,
I mean,
I think we had this guy,
Rick Caruso,
as you were mentioning,
who ran for mayor.
I mean,
someone found,
you know,
there is a video of him
calling for increasing
the fire department budget.
I mean,
kind of like that.
What else do you need to know at this point? that overcome the i do think that the woke trance was broken i mean trump
broke you i do for sure and look at that i mean look at the catastrophe that the news media is in
and the success that people like you and i are having and joe rogan being the most influential
yeah he's like the new walter cronkite yeah he's where somebody was
observing he's where mark zuckerberg goes to confess his sins so it's a different world i do
have some hope for it i mean the the thing about the united states that's so different from europe
is just that literally they i'm becoming like an old man because i'm talking about how great
the founding fathers were but but it's like literally they created this incredible system that if you have free speech
if you can if you if you can protect your free speech which we've i think succeeded in doing
you bake it in you remind people of its importance you then are i think going to be able to self
correct in ways that places that allow higher levels of censorship are simply not going to
be able to do i, just look at this impact
that Elon is having right now.
It's incredible.
I was on some social media chat group
and somebody was like,
how come we're all talking about
the British grooming gangs?
It's like, because Elon decided
that that was an issue,
the AFD in Germany may end up,
you know, be, I mean,
I think they're going to come in
at least second in the elections next month
because Elon has mainstreamed them.
Of course.
So, that gives me a lot of hope.
You've got a platform now that is still just the – I mean, we always knew that the media had that agenda-setting power.
Yes.
But it's amazing to sort of see it so dramatically.
You only can really see it when it shifts from the mainstream news media.
We were writing last summer about how
the sovereign in the United States,
meaning like the true power center in the United States
was the news media.
That is now, in my view, clearly shifted to X.
It's just, I think you said something recently.
I think I saw a clip of you saying the same thing.
I mean, it's just clear, like that is where-
It dominates everything. It's just everything, you know? And like I think I saw a clip of you saying the same thing. I mean, it's just clear, like, that is where... It dominates everything.
It's just everything, you know?
And, like, Blue Sky gave it a shot, but nobody can go on there.
It's too mad.
It's too insane.
So, I think it could be very, very positive.
You know, I always compare Acts to, you know, it's like when the printing press first shows up in the end of the 15th century for like about a hundred years,
the Catholic church was like,
the printing press is great.
You know, we can print Bibles and give them out to all the priests.
It's very cheap.
The Catholic church loved the printing press.
And then Martin Luther got ahold of the printing press.
And it was just, for the next, you know,
five centuries, it was game over.
I mean, the best history of the printing press,
she goes back, I think it's
an Oxford history, she goes back and just looks at its impact and she comes back and she's just like,
you know, a few years of study or whatever, and she's like, oh, we knew it was a big deal,
but it was a much bigger deal than we thought. It's not just the Protestant Reformation, it is that
it's also the scientific revolution, it's the industrial revolution, it's nationalism,
and it's democracy. I mean,
so you get a huge epical change with this shift of communication technologies and social media.
We knew, I mean, we, you know, Martin Gurry famously wrote this book, Revolt to the Public,
about the game-changing aspects of social media just on the Arab Spring, you know, which is now
14 years ago. But in some senses, it really just didn't get its power
until Elon came in, bought it,
and held strong against people calling him
a racist anti-Semite for two years.
I mean, it was just crazy.
It was like two years of the media
just making him out to be the devil incarnate,
and he held strong,
and he ended up breaking the news media.
I mean, they're just not getting the traffic.
They're done.
It's over.
Yeah.
It's over.
So where does, I mean, so if I-
And it couldn't have happened to a worse group of people.
They, I spent my whole life among them.
I can tell you that's absolutely true.
And they're, you know, they're terrified.
I was watching John Carl on CBS, who I've known.
Someone sent me a clip this morning.
John Carl, I've known him for over 30 someone sent me a clip this morning John Carl I've known
him for over 30 years nice guy you know reasonable guy and um and then Trump comes the business
starts to collapse and he realizes I'm speaking for him but he realizes oh shit you know I'm a
middle-aged white guy I better go along and he becomes just this cheerleader for every stupid
woke idea ever it was you feel sorry for him He's a nice guy actually and not a stupid guy.
Someone just sent me
a clip of John Curl
like basically defending Trump.
Wow.
And it's just like,
I mean,
again,
I'm not a,
I'm not a,
the weather,
the wind moved.
The wind moved.
Then you realize
that most people
just kind of,
you know,
they,
they're easy to,
easy to control.
You just tell them what the program is and they go along with it.
Well, yeah.
It's Kent Brockman.
No, you're totally right.
I welcome our new alien overlords.
You know what I mean?
They're the first.
They're the first ones to shift.
No, you're right.
Right?
You're right.
Yeah, because they're covering the news.
They're the first ones to know when the winds are coming.
The principle plays no role.
Most people just kind of go along with what they think
the marching orders are
it's amazing
it really reveals
doesn't it
the herd animals
so
yeah
and did I say CBS
I think he said ABC
whatever
they're all the same
and they're all going away
yeah
but if your true
entrenched power
which does exist
particularly in the
intel agencies
I mean that's where
it really resides
as far as I can tell
I don't know
it's like pretty
you've just lost
there's been a massive
movement in power from the news media which you control that's a fact i would say in effect
control news media is controlled by the intel agencies in fact to something you can't control
so that's a huge loss of power for you so like how can you let this continue well yeah i mean
how can they stop it though i mean i don't know i'm just feeling a little
paranoid right now no no i am this is too much freedom no i know no i totally do too you're like
where's like when's the penny gonna drop yeah kind of um well yeah and i also kind of go are
they really going to disclose all the stuff that they have i mean we were going down we just did a
actually i don't know if we published it yet but we're just going down the list of all the all the
files that we want exactly because you know people are like oh can we have a twitter files for the
government you're like yes um so what i mean there's so much
in there right so russiagate you know the russia collusion hoax um covid origins covid vaccines
um hunter biden laptop yeah um i mean i'm assuming there's just a bunch of stuff on russia ukraine
that's there i mean remember because they keep leaking, they go, there's no bio labs
in Ukraine. They're like, well, there were some, we were doing some help with the bio.
Well, not only are there bio labs in Ukraine, there are a lot of bio labs in Ukraine,
which are working on biological weapons. That's what they're not there for livestock vaccines,
sorry. And the thing that people don't in this country understand is that the Ukrainian military
is selling about half of the arms they get from the United States into international black markets.
And they're winding up, in some cases, with drug cartels in Latin America.
That's a fact.
Okay, it's a fact.
And you can buy them.
And I spoke to someone who did buy some, actually.
So I know this is a fact.
And they're bragging about it.
So they're selling conventional weapons, including weapon systems that are very dangerous and very destabilizing that would make commercial air travel impossible, for example. And so what
are they doing with the pathogens in those biolabs? And does the Biden administration have
a manifest? Do they know exactly what's in those labs? And will they turn it over to the Trump
administration so we can keep track of these things? And the answer is no, actually. The
answer is no, I know this wow so that's like
the scariest thing that's ever happened and and so like what you know like i think the ukraine war
has the potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime
just because of the scale of the weapon systems and biological agents uh involved in the most corrupt country in the West,
which is Ukraine.
I'm not attacking Ukraine.
I feel sorry for Ukraine.
But what the hell?
Yeah.
And so we could use some,
we could use,
that's why I'm saying this right now,
because I hope this is widely disseminated,
because I think it's like the scariest thing I've heard in a long,
long time.
That is scary.
But it's all flowered in secrecy.
That's the point yeah the only reason
this stuff has happened like this end of the world stuff has happened is because there's no
disclosure at all everything is right oh it's so much pent-up stuff so much i mean we're supposed
yeah we have the jfk files the ufo files uap files i was just to say yeah so i spoke to someone about
the uap thing now we're so far afield but i do think it's all connected no it is all connected though it's like none of this stuff
happens except in secrecy and this i said let's stop playing like you've been i've been talking
to these people for years now and the answer was the public is not ready for this information
because it's you know it's just too it's too much and what's your view of that
and this is someone who's pushing disclosure by the way this is not i know i don't know yeah i'm
worried that it's bad news well that's the point it's bad yeah i'm worried it's bad really bad
news yeah do you think that's true well i don't know no i'm not even saying it because i don't
know if it's true and it is bad it's super's super bad. I mean, it seems like the dominant two theories are now that it's non-human intelligence or that we or our adversaries have mastered anti-gravity technology.
The other scenarios of, you know, some kind of new plasma or, you know, it's just kind of – the phenomenon doesn't seem to be showing up in that way well the core
idea seems to be that it's that there is non-human intelligence whether all these manifestations of
it are that or whether they're government programs or chinese or whatever it's probably
a pastiche of all of them but the core idea seems to be that there is non-human intelligence which
is plausible and that it's been in interaction with the U.S. government for quite some time and that it plays a role in our-
What role is it playing?
I mean, well, there are all these things that I don't know if what is true or what's not true.
Do you think any of that is true?
I know you've done work on this.
Yeah, I mean, you know, and it's hard.
I mean, you know, I covered the New Jersey drone situation.
I went to Jersey and interviewed a bunch of people.
I mean, for me, the weirdest moment
is where you have John Kirby,
the Defense Department spokesperson at Mayorkas,
basically on the same day or the same 48 hours,
just when they were asked about it,
they just came out affirmatively and they were like,
well, we're definitely not getting any drones
over the military bases or other sensitive sites.
And you're like i was like
why would you lie about that i couldn't i couldn't because of course you know all else being equal i
think that they don't people don't want to lie politicians don't want to lie because it just
creates more work or hassle for your life complicates your life honesty is the best policy
so why would they lie about that especially because the wall street journal had like
they did this huge piece about all of the drone, so-called, by the way, unidentified anomalous drone flyovers over
the military bases and sensitive sites, which includes nuclear plants. I mean, part of my
interest in this was always, you know, I was trying to save Diablo Canyon in California.
They kept getting drone flyovers. Also Palo Verde, which is our biggest nuclear plant,
three beautiful reactors there in Arizona, like a lot of drone flyovers. palo verde which is our biggest nuclear plant three beautiful reactors there in
arizona like a lot of drone flyovers i'm also from northeast colorado which is where you know
the icbms are a lot of the whole they had this exact same drone situation i believe it was
december i want to say december 2019 um and they had this whole interagency task force and they
were like they were like oh we're gonna put a plane up and they kind of put a plane up
and you're watching them.
You're like,
you're like,
well, why are they not scrambling jets?
Like, what are we like?
What are we doing here?
Like, this is really bizarre.
It doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't.
I can't figure it out
because I think the other issue
is that they may not know.
I mean, okay.
Well, so to finish that story.
So then drone and microchips do that.
I go out and I'm just like,
like that's the
weirdest lie because like it was just it's been heavily reported i mean the drones i mean the
drones over sensitive military bases is really well reported and some of the best reporting was
by a uh publication called the war zone which is highly recommend um very good serious investigative
reporting they don't believe it's aliens at all like they're just openly like anti-alien they're like this is and i think it's well anyway for whatever reason
they're just like this is chinese or russian or whatever they're not taking it seriously but they
do some of the best reporting because they're kind of because they can't figure out why the
military is being so weird about it so then trump comes out and he goes they know what it is i don't
know why they're not telling anybody.
And I'm going to tell everybody on the 20th.
I mean, first of all, I'm really happy that they're going to disclose. And I want to raise
expectations about what the Trump administration is going to do. We want the data. And I mean,
someone was criticizing me because they were like, oh, because I came out. I said,
I'm confident the Trump administration is going to share the data. And they're like,
that just shows that Schellenberger is, you know, it's like pro-Trump and whatever.
And I was like, no, I'm just like pro-disclosure.
I want the expectations to be high because they should be high.
There is so much information they're not releasing.
So, you know, they were over Bedminster.
And he's talked about it twice now, by the way.
So, look.
He's distressed about it, obviously.
He's worried about it.
So, we're either headed for a pretty epic moment of disclosure.
There's another part of me that worries.
Okay, so it seems like, yeah, they could do disclosure and we could find out what it is.
There could be aliens.
If it's aliens, that's just a whole can of worms.
And then you have to be like, do we talk to them?
And if so, who's doing that?
Do you think we have i i genuinely don't know
i genuinely don't know i mean there's um there's this guy named i can't remember his first name
stringfield he wrote uh this incredible thick book of um uap crashes crash retrievals and it's and he
started doing it i want want to say, 50s
or 60s, and I think he went for like multiple
decades, and you just sit down with that book, and
it is like,
it's impressive. I mean, if it's a
hoax, it's just
one of the greatest hoaxes of all times.
You know, like other hoaxes,
you know, like the Protocols of the Elders
of Zion or whatever, they're really
bad. Like, they're really, you're just like, this is like the dumbest hoax ever. Like, most hoaxes are not
that sophisticated with all these details and all these people were interviewed. Of course,
Roswell is the big case, but it's only apparently one of them. There's others.
So, there is this incredible, you know, gray literature never published by any academic press,
by any really, a little bit of commercial non-fiction um obviously you have david grush and lou elizondo i testified in front of congress on
this in i guess i was in december or november and um you know two people the two guys from the
military when we when we were asked what are they two guys said non-human intelligence and then me
and the nasa guy said we don't know um because i
just don't i mean i just um what do you think the jones robert and jersey were i mean look here's
let me tell let's just let's just let's just let's just look at the possibility that they're human
um they didn't get a single one of them they didn't down a single one of them not a single
one of them crashed and there was a lot of them and there was a lot of look there's a lot of mistaken sightings um you know
it is easy to mistake things it's totally natural but but there was also i mean i interviewed mayors
two mayors were like one of them it was like i had an suv size drone flying over my house another
one said he was going to a fox news interview in new york the car came from he walks out his door and there's one hovering right over him and he said
that you know felt like it was watching him like it was there monitoring him i mean that's weird
stuff um so we can't get a single drone down there are over military bases they can't seem to get any
of them um you know do i think the chinese could be behind or the, the, those are the Chinese.
I mean, when the Chinese decide to like encroach and you in like in the South China Sea, when they decide, you know, how to like, they'll like warn the United States occasionally, but you're flying over our airspace.
It's all super calculated.
And like, you know, like they're making their, their, it's like a performance.
The Chinese are like, we're messing with you like
you all kind of know and they're doing it in ways where they don't want it to escalate but they want
to get a little bit more of that space it's all super calculated now there was the balloon you
know are there chinese balloons yeah but i mean to be buzzing air our military bases it's just so
aggressive now i've when i've said that before i've had other people point out they go well they're aggressive with the cyber attacks i guess that's true it as a physicalist
i guess i kind of go flying your drones over u.s military bases and nuclear plants that is just a
level of aggression that just doesn't seem characteristic of the chinese unless you were
well of course i agree with you an intel Intel person told me that this person believed that they were in fact Chinese and that a Chinese satellite went down, was visible to the naked eye. There were news stories about it. It evaporated, it burned up. And that this person told me that was taken down by the US government. That was a command and control satellite for these drones.
Oh, wow.S. government. That was a command and control satellite for these drones.
And the belief was the Chinese government was sending the following message.
We're moving on Taiwan and maybe other things.
You can't do anything about it.
So, you know, I have no idea if that's true or not.
Zero.
Yeah.
I mean, I don't know.
That just doesn't, it just, I just got to say it's just so aggressive.
And also – but the other thing is that like – It seems reckless actually.
It seems really reckless.
And the Chinese have not been seeking confrontations like that for the most part.
Now, Jesse Michaels, who is doing some of the best reporting on this issue of UAPs, he's doing YouTube videos.
He just did a documentary that was incredible. I think it's like a couple of hours.
Highly recommended.
That goes through the very long history of unidentified anomalous phenomena over U.S. military bases, including all these cases of, you know, several cases of them shutting down missile systems.
Like a 65-year-long history.
Yeah.
Yeah. um a missile system like a 65 year long history yeah yeah and there was this famous uh
press conference with like missileers and others from military bases in in washington dc i want to
say in the 90s maybe maybe 80s um so you know like that predates any of the chinese stuff by far it
predates all the drones so that was going on for a really long time i mean if you just kind of if you step back and you look at it it looks like a very like what
is it communicating on a very basic level it's definitely communicating dominance you know it's
it's you can read in a lot of different ways and that's similar to what the the navy pilot said
around the tic-tac um interactions off both coasts is that these were um phenomena
or you know or objects whatever you call them or craft that were just demonstrating dominance over
our craft they were able to do things that our craft weren't doing so yeah i mean and that was
from their perspective the point of the behavior was to say, we can do things that you can't.
Yeah.
And so then the question would be, so if it is NHI, then the question is, are they communicating something?
And if they are communicating something, why would they only be doing it in that way?
Like, if you're trying to demonstrate your strength in an adversary or something, you're trying to send some message, message why would you just do that because there's nothing that we can do with that information
so then you have to wonder okay if it is nhi and it's behaving in that way intelligence yeah
non-human intelligence then is there some is there actually some other communication going on right
that we don't know about and of course there's just a long history and there's all these crazy stories
of you know presidents i mean going back to eisenhower so just just to bottom line your view after reporting on the lights over new jersey in pennsylvania new york mid-atlantic drone
hysteria do you think they were human-made drones i i genuinely don't know i mean i will be i'll be
i might be more shocked if they were human-made because of their behaviors and they never were
able to get one i did have somebody tell me recently that they had heard i mean again it's
always second hand it's so untrustworthy but somebody told me that that the military got one
of the the orbs the famous orbs and and opened it up, and it was Chinese.
I mean, if that's the case, then somebody has mastered anti-gravity. And that's almost harder
for me to believe than that it's NHI, because, I mean, it's just, I mean, I don't know. I mean,
look, we have a, I mean, here's the, I literally go back and forth, you can see me doing it in
the same conversation, but we have these huge black budgets in the military. I mean, just gigantic. And they've been there for decades. So is it possible to cover up something like that? I think it might be. I mean, I'm much more after having covered the Hunter Biden laptop and I mean, Russiagate too, but really the Hunter Biden laptop. I was just impressed by how many people were involved in the conspiracy to cover it up.
I mean, you had the FBI getting it, covering it up, basically working with Aspen Institute to run a disinformation campaign aimed at persuading journalists in advance of the release
of the Hunter Biden laptop that it was a Russian information operation. Garrett Graff is the guy
that goes and does the big UFO book. So, these things all, I mean, this was very weird. So,
he comes out with a big book on UFOs, I think it was last year, it's called UFO, Garrett Graff.
This is somebody that is famously close with the intelligence community.
His other books were on Watergate and on 9-11.
The book –
And both of which were totally legitimate.
No, for sure.
And I'm sure the official story is everything we need to know.
So, you know, you sort of go –
And what was his conclusion on UFOs?
Well, it was very – the um the narrative is that they
don't know what they are so he doesn't fully he's not like a debunker like these guys who are like
oh we can explain everything so he's much more sophisticated than that but it's basically a
debunking it's basically that it's basically that it's it's just all the you know typical
explanations um and then maybe some U.S. military programs.
But he also just says that he just argues that the U.S. military doesn't know what it is.
I don't believe Garrett Graff.
And the reason I don't believe Garrett Graff is because I saw him participate in a disinformation campaign on Hunter Biden laptop.
And I know for a fact there's something else going on at that aspen institute program and aspen institute of course is a massive u.s government
funded ngo that cosplays as a kind of you know bourgeois gab fest so there i mean so i'm like
that was for me that was all came out on the twitter files i discovered that in the twitter
files and for me it was like pulling back the curtain and you actually have, as a journalist, like you, we have the emails, you know, like you have the
documents, you have the tabletop exercise where they're brainwashing journalists into believing
a lie about the Hunter Biden laptop. That was so sophisticated of that because they basically go
and brainwash journalists before the story comes out because they know they're listening to Giuliani.
You know, they're FBI tap on Giuliani.
They're listening to Giuliani.
They know we got to go brainwash the journalists.
They go get all the journalists from all the major outlets
plus the social media platforms in these seminars where they program them.
I mean, that was like, for me, it was like, wow, there's like a secret government.
Like, it was like there's some, there's like a whole, there's like a whole, it's a very, and it was very just sophisticated. I don't know how else to describe it. Like, it was very, everything seemed very careful. Also, with all the censorship stuff, you see these limited hangouts, right? a covert operation of like a covert propaganda operation where like after they get caught they
can be like oh no we were totally honest about what we were doing we were talking about it but
they do these weird limited hangouts you'll see these people that clearly look like either
directly intelligence community or their intermediaries having these conversations
they put on youtube and like they're like but it's like you know a couple hundred views like
they're not promoting them in any way and so you just kind of go wow there's like, you know, a couple hundred views. Like, they're not promoting them in any way.
And so, you just kind of go, wow, there's like a whole creepy, like, world of disinformation.
And what you realize is that the covert operations are really not covert.
Like, all the information's out there, actually.
Right.
But it's just discredited or unnoticed or no one colates it.
Have you noticed that?
Yeah.
No, I know. noticed or no one colates it have you noticed that yeah no i know and then and you only can
understand it um when you see the whole big picture because there's there's no smoking guns
ever so there's never something you can i mean hunter buying a laptop got us about as close to
as a smoking gun as you can get and it helped because it was what helped to expose it was that
you it was partisan and so it was a particular partisan weaponization.
My concern with the UAPs, I mean, it's now, I guess, a strength and a weakness is that it's become bipartisan in terms of the desire. I mean, it was really, I mean, Tucker, the weirdest
experience I've had, I've testified now like 12 times or 13 times in front of Congress in the last
few years. The weirdest experience I've had was on UAPs, seeing the Democrats and Republicans
basically being aligned in wanting to get to the bottom of the UAP thing.
I mean, it's beautiful.
I've never seen it.
I was like, I've never heard of bipartisanship.
Never thought I would see it in the wild.
So that is exciting.
On the other hand, I suspect that there is also some bipartisan group that's trying to prevent that information from getting out for some reason.
There's no doubt about that.
So, I mean, look, I mean, it is, I mean group that's trying to prevent that information for no doubt about some reason so i mean look i mean it is uh i mean what is going to happen i mean i mean part
of me is you know maybe it's my defensive pessimism on it because i like everybody else i want the
information part of me is like there's just no way they're going to let that information out
it's just something is too there's something about the uap thing like the jfk thing where there's some secret
there that they are really there is some group of people that really don't want us to know
so you know that's a that's a fact yes bumped up against that personally several times on both of
those issues which appear to be related yes but i don't know the answer well it's it's almost like seeing something in
photographic negative all i know for a fact confirmed is that they are willing to go to
extreme lengths to keep it secret and so that's just to tell that it's there's something profound
there it's not just a bureaucracy covering its own ass it's more than that i mean how about the
clip where pompeo is being interviewed about the jK files? And then he like literally mid-sentence goes, but I mean, I've also seen the UFO files.
And it was like, well, why did you just switch from like what made you think of the UFO files on the JFK files?
I don't know.
I mean, so anyway, is there a secret?
Have we developed anti-gravity? Have we developed, I mean, we know that in the fifties there were like, there was a,
there's a whole book on it.
It's very fascinating, but there was like, there was an anti-gravity program in the U.S.
military with our defense contractors.
It made the cover of one of the aerospace magazines.
It was like, there's like a cover of it.
And then it just disappeared.
And so you can kind of go i mean the official
experience go yeah we tried that and it didn't work it's like well how that's never stopped you
before right um like it not working like that's like um you know like like you would keep working
on it if you can do anti-gravity so the other possibility is that it just went dark and they
just they kept doing it well i, I wonder though about the possibility
that there is or has been technology transfer
from some other realm to this realm.
Because there are, you know, just in the study of history,
there's really no understanding
at a bunch of different points in human societal evolution.
Like, where did that technology come from?
And you see that
on a bunch of different technologies so but nuclear anti-gravity that kind of stuff like
are you open to the possibility that that there's been like a transfer of that technology from some
other i mean that is definitely there's definitely that is that is what a lot of people talk about
yeah i mean the problem with this issue is, it's very frustrating because it's just all secondhand.
Of course it is.
And so, like, the 100-billion laptop is not secondhand.
Like, it's firsthand, and I have the documents.
Now, there are a bunch of really fascinating, you know, alleged U.S., secret U.S. government documents on UFOs, on alleged
alien spacecraft crashes. They're called the, you know, Majestic Documents or the MJ-12 documents.
And so, the story is that, you know, that one or two of these craft crashed in 1947 near Roswell,
New Mexico. And that sort of begins in you know and
there's a whole cast of characters that allegedly you know um including oppenheimer were involved
in that program you know the why would oppenheimer be involved well why i mean because he was the man
you know like he was like he was our greatest scientist obviously the father of the atomic bomb. And Roswell is where we launched the flights to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
So, it's very symbolic in that sense.
Maybe more than symbolic.
Yeah, maybe more than symbolic.
I mean, they keep flying over nuclear.
As my wife says, she's like, your aliens really don't like the nuclear.
Because I love nuclear.
And I'm kind of like i'm like well
yeah i mean like and also the most ridiculous thing is when people are like all yeah they want
us to give give up our you know the people that believe in them they go the aliens are here and
they want us to give up our nuclear weapons it's like doesn't sound like a good idea to me
the foreign space invaders would like you to give up your most powerful weapons
um but those documents i spent a bunch of time on them and I couldn't figure out how to report anything on it
because of course, of course, FBI was like,
these are all debunked, they're all frauds.
But there are, first of all, there's a lot more of them.
You go to majestictodocuments.com
and you can look at them.
They're amazing.
I mean, if they are, and I've also had the other,
and they're, by the way, in the Garrett Graff book,
they're in that book.
They're also in another debunking book
called by Mark Pilkington, I i'm playing on the name right now um but they they
they all all the people that are the debunkers deal with these documents and their story is not
that they were all hoaxes their story is that they were what's called counterintelligence passage
material documents that were created by the u.s government but leaked to people
to ostensibly be able to smoke out double agents or people like you would see them i guess it would
trace these documents right like putting dye in the water to find the leak yeah yeah exactly so
i mean but the thing is i mean it is like there's like one of them is a handbook of crash retrieval
like for like to like that that the soldiers would
ostensibly read to retrieve these crash i mean it's they the if they're hoaxes they're incredible
i mean like they have like they have like they have like the people like they have i forgot what
it's called but like basically like a manifest where they show who's checked it out and read it
they have all these different names and they've checked those names and those were like real
people at those air bases that had these documents so um and then you know there was one
document in particular where it was a memo from jfk to the cia director dolus where he says i want
to see you on this particular day it was like july 62 or 63 i can't remember which and now again
everyone's like oh that's a forgery it's part of the mj12 documents or whatever it's not real
but then they released the jfk files and then sure enough, we see the Dulles calendar and he had met with JFK twice that day. And nobody had known that they had had those meetings until we had that JFK memo to Dulles, or whoever forged it knew that he had
met with Dulles that day and nobody else had known that. So, you know, you'd be sort of like,
I guess you could still put it in the, this is why, this is the problem with this issue is you
can still, there's still plausible deniability for a lot, for all these things. You know,
you can make up a reason for why these documents are all counterintelligence passage material um i don't know that's why i just have to kind of go i don't
know i mean i talked to a lot of people and um yeah it's just a lot of secondhand information
and the documents are secondhand so you kind of go there's like my world of like the hunter biden
laptop which still a bunch of my progressive and democrat friends and family don't believe you know they still they still think the russians
were somehow involved um but like i actually have the documents and we can prove what happened there
on the uap stuff it's just still just surrounded in but the incoming president has said he just
said i'm gonna tell you what those drones were about he was very relaxed about it too i mean i
was struck that when they when he did she said it twice he said it again recently like last week
right and but then he said it in december he goes i don't know why they're buying like i don't know
why they're not telling people what they are they know what they are and i was like i was like i
mean it was a really um he made it sound like it's no big deal like we should just tell people what
it is but if trump knew what it is and if he if it's nhi and trump knows that he seemed very relaxed about that
because of course the i mean the the main the dominant the conventional wisdom among people
that follow this who think it's nhi is that um it's bad news that it's not a great that it's not a great story.
That if it were good news
and that they were just friendly space brothers
offering us advanced tech,
and they'd be like,
and there's no strings attached or whatever,
that would be a much easier story to sell.
But if there's some bad news in that story,
then that might explain why they're so secretive.
Well, clearly there's some bad news.
My theory is that the reason that permanent Washington or deep state or whatever,
people who administer the system hate Trump is not because of any of his policies,
which is probably agnostic on, but because they fear that he will disclose information.
I think it's, everything's about disclosure.
If you look at the federal government, what's its defining quality is secrecy, right?
Yes.
Billion classified documents. Why is that? Right. It's not good. It's never is secrecy, right? Yes. A billion classified documents.
Why is that?
Right.
It's not good.
It's never good.
Your kids behave like that.
It's not good.
No.
They're using drugs or whatever.
You know what I mean?
Right.
They're having sex they shouldn't be having.
There's never a good reason for that kind of secrecy.
It's not privacy.
It's secrecy.
Right.
Yes.
And there's something about Trump that makes everybody nervous
that he might say more of what he knows than he should.
Well, they don't control
him that's right so that's that's very nerve-wracking i mean how much do you think that
they're just worried that he's going to pull out of nato how much of it is that that's i mean i
of course that's that's in my daily prayers that he would do that i don't think he's in danger
doing that um i hope certainly hope so but i think it's even more fundamental it's like this guy could say
the truth because trump is not much of a liar actually by washington standards he's an exaggerator
of course but actually his defining quality is like saying the truth he's being honest about
it yeah issues the big issues so what do you um so you think he knows what it is?
The OAP stuff?
Yeah.
I do think that, yes.
And you think it's an NHI?
You know, he hasn't told me, but yeah, I do think he knows.
I'm pretty sure, pretty sure he knows.
And I'm pretty sure that everybody I've ever spoken to who I think knows a lot more than I do, I mean, what does it mean to know?
Like, do we really know anything?
I don't know.
I'm not sure anybody fully understands this or even partially understands it,
but the people who I'm confident
have a lot more information than I have
to a person are very, very uncomfortable about it.
Yeah.
Not in public, in private,
which is another tell.
I just don't, I mean, you've talked to a lot of people.
I mean, yeah, no, I mean, it's very, yeah. it which is another tell that i'm just not i mean you've talked to a lot of people i mean
yeah no i mean it's there it's very um yeah i mean i say my prayers i'm still christian
i mean um you know it's interesting joe when i was on joe rogan's podcast last time i mean here
you know joe was like i think that they're extraterrestrials you know he's openly saying
that yeah it's not so you kind of not the case well okay or nh i guess nh i yeah um but i mean here you and joe are like the two big most influential
podcasters in the country and you both think that it's not just a government secret tech or
it's not just plasmas and joe's very close with elon loves elon you know like me and i think
probably like you believes that Elon
deserves a huge amount
of credit for saving
free speech
in this country
Elon says
there's nothing there
never sees anything
and they've got
an amazing rocket system
that sees a lot of things
I'm not sure
I've talked to Elon
about this a number of times
and I'm not sure
he said that
okay I thought he did say that
no
I thought he said
if I see
if there's any aliens
he jokes about it which is a tell.
Trump does too.
And they joke in the same way.
I mean, of course, I love them both, obviously.
And I feel like, you know, I feel like they both have really been great for this country.
You know, net-net, as they say.
But, no, they joke about it in the same way that a lot of people
joke about they're like no there are no flying saucers from mars right of course they're not
from mars they're not from another planet they're from here they've always been here these are
spiritual entities this is my view and i sincerely believe it can't prove it but since you asked so
he is i've never heard elon say that's not true. Be dismissive. That there's nothing there.
He just said, like, we monitor space.
That's what they do, right?
And this is self-evident.
If there were, there have been so many sightings
in this country and around the world
that if they were from another galaxy far, far away,
there would be some satellite evidence of that.
They'd be picked up coming into our atmosphere.
And of course, that's not, as far as I know, true.
Well, we do have some photos.
I mean, there's that one photo of the one,
I can't remember, it's like,
it's in the James Fox documentary.
So there are some of those, apparently.
Coming through space in here.
And certainly, I've been told there's a lot more
of those photos and images.
But yeah, I mean, there's also-
It would not surprise me, though.
I mean, it's clear that these things reside,
you know, deep in the earth, under the water, and in the atmosphere.
And why the elusiveness, then?
Why the secrecy?
Well, that's the question.
That is the question.
I mean, why is everybody—again, I don't know what anybody really knows.
I don't know anything.
I just want to start every sentence by admitting I don't know anything.
I don't know what happens when you die. I don't know how the brain works. I don't know anything. I don't know what happens when you die.
I don't know how the brain works.
I don't know anything.
I don't know what sleep is for.
None of us do.
That's a really interesting one.
That's a surprisingly interesting one, actually.
But it's so revealing of the limits of human knowledge.
It's like, oh, science has solved this.
Really?
What's sleep for?
Tell me how that benefits us.
Sleep?
Really?
But anyway, so i just always want to
say and remind myself of the limits of my knowledge which are profound so i don't know anything
but once again every person i've talked to who i believe has deeper knowledge on this question
than i have has seemed burdened by it have you noticed this yeah yeah and these are not people
who are making money from it no these are not people who are making money from it
no these are not people trying to get famous from it these are people who just seem to have
this knowledge and they're they're bothered by it so that's and i don't think it's i don't think
it's to cover up a secret weapons program i mean in other words like i don't think that's how you
would do it it's so like yeah i don't believe it a secret weapons program yeah sorry it's much
deeper like weapons programs come and go right weapons that
we thought were fearsome when i was a child are a joke now we're watching weapons technology change
so fast in the ukraine war that people can't even get their brains around and you wouldn't need this
elaborate and also like if you're doing passage material like just to go back to those cases like
why would it be that and why would there be so much of it? Why wouldn't it be something... Anyway, it's a very curiously large body of passage material
on this particular topic.
Well, that's right.
Well, that's what I was saying.
Like, I do think all the puzzle pieces are sort of in plain sight.
Did you ask Putin about it?
I did not ask Putin about it.
I would never have done it on air because I did ask him a bunch of questions off camera about, you know, he has access to, of course, he controls the Soviet archives, which, and the Soviets are great archivists.
And we know that from the, you know, couple of, I'm interested in Soviet leadership and government and all that stuff.
There have been a couple amazing books written um the court of the red czar being i think the greatest of them about stalin for example and one thing you learn from reading
the book is they kept records on everything almost like the nazis like crazy level records
and you know most of them have never been as close so i had i did have some questions for
putin about that about rudolph has specifically It's one of the great stories in history that doesn't make any sense at all.
The number two guy in Nazi Germany flying into Scotland in a plane by himself and bailing out, you know, right before the U.S. entry into the war and had all these things to say that were wild.
And one of the things he apparently said in his debriefs was he believed that Hitler was being influenced by demonic
spirits that he had summoned through the occult. Huh? That's not worth knowing more about?
There's a lot of stuff on that.
There's a lot. There's a lot. But Hess said that. So I immediately asked Putin about that
off camera. I don't want to seem like a wacko having unauthorized questions, but I did ask
him about that. He did not get a satisfactory answer, but I did not ask him about UFOs.
Well, I thought also that, you know, you may have seen Mark Andreessen recently said that when he met with White House officials who said that they wanted to take control over all AI,
that they said to him something like, we've declassified whole areas of science since the 1950s.
And I was like, that just seemed like a reference to this stuff.
At least to the anti-gravity, if not to some of the UAP stuff.
I think the modern Western mind, the post-1945 Western mind,
is incapable of understanding some of the stuff because we lack the language of metaphysics.
And I think that's just been a feature of human thinking
from the cave period until we dropped the atom bomb,
in which case it just turned off and we're like,
oh, only the material world is real.
But no one else has ever thought that because that's not true.
Well, like for 100 years, right?
Really from Darwin, 150 years or so.
Yeah, but I don't think, I mean, even before the war, before dropping those bombs, which really were, I mean, I do think that's like the pivot point in history more than anything else.
But yeah, there've been secular movements, you know, rich people always think they're God.
And so they want to eliminate any rivals from the public from the conversation.
But those bombs, man, everything changed you don't think
well it sure seemed like it i mean there's a really positive side of it though which is that
we haven't had these awful wars yes brutal i mean when you look at the death toll that was going up
from up and up and up from wars all throughout the 19th and 20th centuries it's awful so we've
they've spared us that but it took something
apocalyptic well it's been 80 years we'll see yeah so last question sorry i've got
can you imagine sitting next to me at dinner like
and you're i think one of the most knowledgeable people in the country on like all the most
interesting topics so two kinds no it's well it's just it's just a fact in fact if there's anything this conversation i think is like provoked in people
it's a desire to hear more michael schellenberger so oh thank you um do you think it's possible that
what we're seeing in la which does feel like the destruction of our second biggest city
um from which maybe there's no recovery i don't know i hope but do you think it's
an act of war in some sense?
You mean from a foreign power?
I do.
Oh.
Like, what's the evidence for that?
It happened.
And it happened between Trump's election and his inauguration.
And it's just crazy. Yeah.
The second Trump got elected, I had this instinct like,
oh man,
I bet a lot there's going to be bad,
bad stuff that happens.
I mean,
I was more struck by that on the UAP,
on the drone.
Yeah.
Well,
exactly.
It's of a piece.
Yeah.
Bizarre Tesla explosion in Las Vegas.
Very weird.
Mass shooting.
Like there's just,
yeah.
If there's a two month period in my whole life,
55 years where more,
more weird shit's been packed into two months, I can't think of it.
Yeah.
Can you?
No, it's freaking me out a little bit.
Me too.
Honestly.
I mean, I spent a bunch of time on the Livels burger.
That's the guy that killed himself in the Tesla in Las Vegas.
I mean, you definitely have cases of PTSD causing people to do things, and people are surprised by suicides. But yeah, it was a weird one, you know, and I was skeptical of his emails because, you know, he sent these emails to Sean Ryan. It's another excellent podcast. And I think you've had him on or you've been on there. him an honest oh no i did ryan is an honest man no no for sure cia operative oh shut up no no no
i was like i i was like injured because because i believe in sean and and i didn't i'm sure he did
not fake that so you know and then they and then the fbi did confirm that those emails were real
on the other hand you know that was a weird one too because it felt like he was like oh the the
chinese those were chinese drones they've mastered gravedick it just felt like he was like oh the the chinese those were chinese drones they've mastered gravedic
it just felt like he didn't really know what he's talking about either so there's just a lot of
a lot of people talking the word gravedic before i mean i've i thought it was anti-gravity is what
i've heard but i'd never well you're a writer you're a word person i'd never heard that word
or no word i think i felt like he was using it wrong. That was my thought too. I looked it up. Yeah.
No, I mean, I guess I look at it. I just think Nietzsche really nailed it, which is that when people stop believing in traditional religions, they unconsciously develop a new sense of guilt, a new vision of the apocalypse.
They invent a new soul.
I mean, people think that there's this thing called gender, which is separate from your
body.
It's kind of like a soul.
My friend Abigail Schreier pointed that out.
And so, we just end up recreating Christianity, but in a deformed and deranged way.
And the emergent quality of it is this destructive fire.
Like, you don't,
it's actually more powerful
because nobody got out there
and said, you know,
let's let, I mean,
somebody did say,
let's let Malibu burn.
But that was never like
the explicit policy
of the government of LA.
It's just something that emerges
after years of budget cuts,
after years of self-hating ideologies
like DEI, like climate apocalypse, like the homeless apocalypse.
It just emerges kind of deep from deep within us, from some self-destructive part of us.
So, for me, if there's a foreign invasion, it came through the human psyche, not from outside of it.
Michael Schellenberger, how can people find you?
Public.news and at Schellenberger on X.
The best.
Thanks for having me, Tucker.
Thank you very much.
Yeah.
Thanks for listening to Tucker Carlson Show.
If you enjoyed it,
you can go to TuckerCarlson.com
to see everything that we have made,
the complete library. TuckerCarlson.com to see everything that we have made. The complete library.