The Vergecast - Can Matter save the smart home?

Episode Date: December 14, 2021

In our final Vergecast Spec-tacular of the year, Dieter Bohn dives into Matter, the new tech standard that smart home gadgets will use to communicate with each other, making compatibility between gadgets significantly easier. Guests include: Verge smart home reviewer Jennifer Pattison Tuohy Michelle Mindala-Freeman, Head of Marketing for the Connectivity Standards Alliance. Tim Both, brand manager and product manager for Eve Samantha Fein, VP of Marketing and Business Development at Samsung SmartThings Further reading: Matter's plan to save the smart home What matters about Matter, the new smart home standard Matter could bring universal casting that actual works Smart home company Eve plans to use Matter to move beyond Apple’s HomeKit Amazon confirms its support for Matter Google shares its commitment to Matter, promises future interoperability between smart home platforms  Samsung promises Matter support for SmartThings hubs, Galaxy devices, TVs, and fridges Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

I would like to play a game with you. Playing a game on a podcast is a little tricky, so we're going to keep it simple. I'm just going to list a bunch of terms related to the smart home, and I want you to keep track of how many you recognize. Then when we're done, we might have like a one question bonus round. Okay, are you ready? Here we go. Zigby, Z-W-W-P-A-N, 6-W-P-A-N, Thread, weave, Bluetooth, Bluetooth, low-energy, Wi-Fi, Bridge, Smart Things, Alexa, Home. assistant Google Home and HomeKit. Okay, did you keep track there? Do you got your score? Feel free to jump back and listen again if you need to. Now, here's the bonus around question.

Do you think the number of smart home terms that you need to know is going to get bigger or smaller in the future? If there's any single category of technology that has been absolutely awash in too many different standards, protocols, radios, and software stacks, it is the smart home. 10 years ago having smart switches or bulbs in your house was a domain of the very rich or the very nerdy, the kind of people who would get Crestron systems installed in their house by professionals. But now, thanks in large part to the echo and the smart speakers that followed, there has been a huge explosion in smart home gadgets and it's gotten way easier to install and use them. But all that smart home passed brought a lot of baggage into our smart home present. And so the question is how much of that are we going to have to come?

carry into our smart home future. Weirdly enough, there might be an actual answer to that question. It's another standard to add to that list of terms, but this time it might mean that you can forget about all of the rest of them. Instead of your number getting bigger, it could get smaller, maybe even down to just one term that you need to know when you buy a smart home gadget. I'm Dieter Bone, and this week on our special run of Tuesday Vergecast topic-specific episodes, it's time to talk about matter, the new smart home standard that may finally make this whole ecosystem less complicated.

Support for the show comes from Retool. Too many companies run critical operations on duct taped spreadsheets, Slack workflows, and whatever else they could cobble together. Not because they want to, but because building internal tools means weeks of waiting on someone else's backlog. That's where Retool comes in. Build custom internal tools just by describing what you need. Prompt something like, build me a revenue dashboard on our Salesforce data. And Retool actually builds it on your company's data and your cloud with Enterprise Security built in. Go to Retool.com slash Verchcast.

We all need to retool how we build software. What's up, y'all. I'm Skyler Diggins, seven-time WMBA All-Star, Olympic gold medalist, and mom. And I'm Cassidy Hubbard, host and reporter for nearly 20 years, covering the biggest names and stories in sports. and mom. And this is Am Mom, a community for athletes,

game changers, and moms of all kinds. Dropping May 14th. Tap in with us. Okay, so what is Matter? Well, we asked a bunch of experts, starting with the Connective Standards Alliance, or CSA,

or you might know them as the Standards Body formerly known as the Zigby Alliance, or, you know, all you really need to know is that it is the group that's in charge of the new Matter standard. My name is Michelle. Mandela Freeman, and I am the head of marketing for the Connectivity Standards Alliance.

Matter is a breakthrough standards-based protocol that will transform the Internet of things. We also talk to Eve, a company that makes smart home gadgets with a special focus on compatibility with Apple's HomeKit. I'm Tim Byrd from Eve, brand manager and product manager. Matter is basically the unifying standard that will really take the smart home mainstream and get rid of all the fragmentation and problems that have plagued the smart home industry for the past decades. Okay, there's one more answer to go from Samsung's Smart Things, but I bet you're starting to see a theme here. I'm Samantha Fine, and I'm VP of Marketing and Business Development

at Samsung Smart Things. I would say matter is the open and universal connected home protocol that makes life easier for developers and consumers. That is a lot of positivity and hype, isn't it? But I bet you're not surprised to hear so much positivity and hype from the people that are in charge of the new standard. One of the things that none of those answers actually do, though, is tell you what matter actually is. So let's give that a shot. Matter is the language that smart home gadgets are going to use to communicate with each other, so you don't have to worry about whether or not the thing that you buy will be compatible with the other stuff in your house. See, when you have a smart home gadget, there's a few things that need to happen.

Here's how it used to work. You need the gadget itself. It needs a radio to communicate like Wi-Fi or Zigby, and sometimes that means it also needs a custom bridge, like, say, for hugh lights or something. You need a language to communicate with, like the HomeKit SDK or the Alexa SDK, and you need to control it all with something like Siri or Alexa or a Google Home.

Now, if you look at that system of things that you need to make a smart home gadget work, there are just too many places where things might not be compatible. What Matter does is standardize the language between all of these different parts of the system. It's agnostic with regard to the kinds of radios you're using, so it'll support Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Bluetooth, Low Energy, or thread. It means that no matter what kind of controller you use, the steps for connecting and communicating with your gadgets are the same. And eventually, it might mean that you won't need any more custom radio bridges. Plus, matter helps define what things are, so the language knows the difference between a light bulb and a smart lock.

Matter is going to be released in the middle of 2022 if everything goes to plan, and it'll include a spec that developers can use, plus there should be a whole bunch of new devices that officially support it released around the same time. So that's hopefully a not too inaccurate description of matter, but to check my work, I wanted to check with our resident smart home guru. That would be Jennifer Patterson-2E, the smart home reviewer at the verge. I figured that we should actually talk to somebody who could tell us just how real this hype actually is. All right.

I'm going to go really short and sweet here. All right. Matter means you can buy what you want for your smart home. You can plug it in and it will work with everything else in your home. Okay. You don't believe me, do you? No, I know. Well, so this is everyone, everyone has basically the same, like, everything's going to be wonderful and perfect in the future with matter.

Thing, like, the hype is very real with this thing. So the second question I'm asking everybody is, like, one of the. odds expressed as a percentage that this will actually work. Yes, well, that's a good follow-up question because the odds are still, to me, up in the air, I'm not a betting girl, so can I say like 80% chance? I would say there's an 80% chance now. When I first started reporting on matter, I was thinking this is like a 40 to 50% chance, but I have been steadily increasing my confidence as I've covered this space because, you know, the key here is we've got all the big players on board. And as one executives explained it to me, it's a lot like the beginning of the

internet. You know, when we had to choose between AOL and CompuServe and Minespring, I don't actually remember all of that, thankfully, but it's like that. But now we got them all talking. So we don't need to choose. We're getting them to work together. And then that will provide us a strong platform to move forward from. The thing that has struck me in, you know, talking to a bunch of people about matter is just how hyped it is, just how much everybody seems to believe. that's involved in it, of course. Normally when there's a standards group, it's, well, we'll see, we're working together.

We have high hopes, whatever. But this one is like, we're going to fix it. It's going to be great. And I'm wondering if you could just, you've been reporting on smart home stuff for a very long time. You understand the fragmentation better than anybody. Can you put in context how bad the state of smart home is now and why we need something like matter next year?

Yes, I think this is the key to why this could be successful, because this isn't really designed for the consumer. Matter is really for the developer. Because I think all of the big companies in the space who have platforms and ecosystems are getting, you know, bombarded by developers and manufacturers saying, we can't develop seven different things, seven different specs. It's really hard to develop for Alexa and to develop for Siri and to develop for HomeKit and to develop for Google and to develop for Samsung and choose whether we should do Zigby or Z-Wave and whether we have a bridge or a hub. And this means we're spending all our time on those things and not on actually developing

our core product and get making better features. And so I think that's why these companies have really come together because they need products for their platforms. Very few of them actually make a lot of products for their platforms. They need developers and they need these products. And that's where I think the promise of matter is, is helping it make it easier for manufacturers to make these things, as well as being useful for the end user too, not having to choose between platforms. One of those developers is Tim Boot from Eve.

Now, Eve makes smart home gadgets, and as I mentioned earlier when I introduced him, they mostly focus on working with HomeKit. But when Matter launches, suddenly Eve is going to have a lot more potential customers, so you can see why Tim likes it. Like initially with a smart home, there wasn't really any standards to work on and any common platforms. So what companies started to do is just build their own ecosystem and build their own little island of things. And then very quickly, it became apparent that having little islands everywhere didn't work out. So you would have this awesome new startup with a new product and it

wouldn't work with your specific island. And all of that changed about five or six years ago when the big players came into the field. So you now have a very dominant landscape of a few big ecosystem providers. But still, if as a normal customer you walk into a store, you can't be certain the stuff works together in the fashion you wanted to. And if you're invested in one ecosystem that maybe doesn't have a smart display, but you really want to have a smart display in your kitchen, it's a pain to get that working together.

And what all of that led to is that people just don't like buying these kinds of things because they just don't want to have the pain. And I think the next big step is just removing all of that pain. And then an average consumer can actually go into a store and buy and be confident. Now, that all sounds nice, doesn't it? But how does all of this actually work? Let's get back to my conversation with Jennifer. Here's a question that is harder to answer.

Is it good? Will it work? Is it like the right solution? Is it a good from a technical perspective? Well, do you think Wi-Fi is good? I mean, it depends on where I am in my house. Yeah, so, I mean, it is matter works on Wi-Fi and thread. The important thing to remember is this is a technology.

This is not a platform or an ecosystem. Right. So how well it works on an infrastructure level, I think we can feel quite confident that it is good because it's been developed and tested over a long period of time. We're using two very well-known protocols. Wi-Fi, much more well-known, and thread, which has actually been around for a very long time, even if it hasn't been out in the wild for that long, or the broader smart home. So, you know, these are tried and tested protocols.

They're not something brand new. They haven't reinvented a wheel here. So, yes, I feel like the actual underlying technology is going to be reliable and work well. It is going to rely somewhat on mesh, and, you know, hence I mentioned Wi-Fi. Mesh can be unstable depending on how well you've got your setup. That's why you're going to need these thread border routers, which will help extend your mesh network if you have a larger home. But the great thing about thread border routers is they're not white boxes you have to stick around your house. They're lighting, their TVs, their smart speakers, they're things you're probably already going to have in your home.

So you're not going to have a single point of failure for your smart home, which often is the case now. Like someone unplugs your Apple TV by mistake and none of your home kit automations work anymore. Right. You know, those types of things are frustrating, and that should go away with matter. I want to zero in on the point Jennifer just made there. The potential end of having to use extra hubs to connect up your smart home gadgets. I am very excited to ditch my hubs and hopefully have them be replaced with things that are more than just smart home hubs. So my router or my Echo or my Apple TV could work as a Matter hub.

But it's actually going to be more than that. Jennifer mentioned thread border routers. Basically, every device on the network can be a redundant node in the mesh network. That all sounds really technical, but the result is that you shouldn't have to think about it, because just as you start to collect new things in your smart home, they're going to quietly improve your smart home network without you having to do anything. Samsung's Smart Things seems to be invested in this idea. About 18 months ago, we announced that Smart Things would no longer be making first-party hardware,

with a real vision of where could hardware be. I think the life of having simply the device itself is a hub, and we've moved beyond that. We just announced it SDC a couple of weeks ago that Smart Things Hub capability would be going in some of our televisions and appliances as well. So you're starting to see that actualize. Now, one reason that Matter has the chance to obviate hubs

is that a lot of Matter devices are going to use this radio standard called Thread, which you've heard come up a bunch already. thread has a long history. We actually talked about it on this podcast a couple of weeks ago in our interview with ERO CEO Nick Weaver. Now, Matter can work over Bluetooth to set devices up and it can use Wi-Fi to communicate if they need to, but both of those radios aren't as good for smart home gadget communications as Thread is. Thread and Matter are different, but they're complementary parts of the whole picture here. I asked Michelle at the Connective Standards Alliance how Thread fits into this entire vision. I do think that some of the reasons we've gone with the core radios that we have, both for Wi-Fi and for thread and Bluetooth for commissioning, is because they are particularly common and prevalent. I would say Wi-Fi, first and foremost, is, dare I say, virtually ubiquitous these days in terms of being able to support that connectivity.

Bluetooth, from a commissioning and provisioning perspective, is something that's fairly ubiquitous. And I think what Thread brings is that kind of in-home mesh networking technology, IP-based mesh networking that really helps with those types of connected in the home situations. So we believe that this, I guess, starter kit of physical layers is a good package of physical layers for our members and consumers to get the most out of what matter can bring. Thread is one of those things, and actually Matter too, where I have this split in my brain of it seems like it's taking too long, that it's taken forever, especially with Thread.

But a little bit with matter, I think the original promises from Chip were a little bit sooner than what we're going to be getting here. So I've got that side of my brain. Why is it taking so long? And then the other side of my brain understands how standards processes usually go. And it seems like it's moving a lightning quick. From your perspective, do you have that same split or do you see it on one side or the other? I like that part of your brain. That's right. I mean, it is hard work, right? Let's not make bones about that. It is difficult to bring together hundreds of companies and thousands of engineers across more than one standards body, by the way. So the CSA is the home for matter and thread group and the Wi-Fi Alliance are the organizations who manage those kind of physical and networking areas. So it is a complex solution to deliver. So in one sense of the word, it's easy to see how a complex situation like that can take a long time. The thing that I always come back to is the fact that we are building something that's quite breakthrough. And I do believe that in the grand scheme of things, we are moving at a very rapid pace relative to what many other standards organizations and standards of the past have done. And even more so, the thing to remember about whether you think we're going slow or not or going fast is we're not just delivering a paper. respect. And that, I think, is part of what makes this work particularly different.

Let's get back to my conversation with Jennifer, the Verges Smart Home Reviewer, because she actually tell us a little bit more about where Thread came from in the first place. Okay, so Thread came from Nest. Thread came from Nest pre-Google. So the good Nest, the Nest when it made stuff that worked. Everybody liked that. Okay, yeah. So I spoke with Tony Fidel, the founder of Nest, about this, and he explained, you know, originally when they first put out the first Nest learning thermostat, it had a Zigby radio in because they envisioned this future where thermostat would need to talk to more devices in the home. And after a while, they started to realize that Zigby didn't really have what they needed.

And so they started to work with Silicon Labs, which is, who is very much involved in matter, to develop something more powerful on top of the Zigby radio. So it is a Zigby radio, but it has this software layer on top, which is throw. Right. And then Matter, which now, matter is on top of that. When Nest worked on it, they actually had Weave, which, if you can recall way back when, Weave was what Nest came out with when they introduced thread. They introduced Thread and they introduced Weave and the entire smart home world went,

huh? It's just like, too many metaphors, too many puns. Why would we, like, trust you? Yeah, yeah, yeah. What is this even doing? Why do we care? Why do we need another protocol? You know, we've already got.

17 that don't work properly and why we got one more. Right. So I think it was an uphill climb. And Tony mentioned that he had a lot of people pretty much laugh in his face and say, this is ridiculous. You shouldn't even bother. Why are you doing this? And I asked him, why is it now?

Why now has thread taken off? And he said his theory is because all of the other smart home companies or ecosystems like Amazon and Apple went out and started to try and make products themselves or make systems themselves for consumers and they started to get all the feedback that Ness had been getting that these things aren't working. We need this, we need that. So they realized, oh, actually, we do need something like this. We need this universal protocol that is going to work. Communication is the key in the smart home. Everything needs to talk to everything else. And none of the existing protocols were specifically designed for smart home devices to talk to each other. They all had

failure points that made it difficult. And thread fixes all of those. The companies that make smart home gadgets are also excited about thread because it makes their job simpler. They can just pick the radio that they know works with everything instead of having to bet on an ecosystem like ZigB or Z wave or whatever. Here's Tim from Eve. Thread removes all of the problems you get with using technologies that are not made for smart devices. We as a company, we are sort of the minority with having lots of Bluetooth-enabled products because you can't. and use Wi-Fi for like a door and window sensor. That would just drain the battery much quicker than anyone would like.

So the alternative is to use some other protocol and have a bridge. And we never wanted that. So for us, thread really is a no-brainer because you can just use it for everything. It's low power. It creates a mesh network, but a unified mesh network that works across different manufacturers. So you can have an eave door and window sensor at your door and very far away a HomePot Mini. And in between, let's say, a nanoleaf bulb. And they just extend their network automatically and work together to just create this seamless networking stuff.

And I think it aligns perfectly with Matter now because with this IP-based world, you now really have the complete story on the transport level, on the language level, application layer, that everything just works and is made with IoT in mind. All right, stepping back a moment, I just have to tell you that right now, I personally am feeling a little bit off-kilter. Usually, when we talk about messy technologies and the standards that are supposed to fix them, we end up talking about the problems. But maybe because Matter hasn't launched yet, everybody still seems really excited and

there aren't a whole lot of problems to talk about yet. Plus, it is very, very strange to think that Apple and Google and Samsung and Amazon are all working together. I asked Michelle at the CSA about it. It is a challenge, right, to get such a diverse group of companies and players with prospective interests together to create this kind of momentum and change. But I genuinely believe kind of the impetus is, one, a commitment to consumers and creating consumer value. two, the notion that, you know, there has to be some tradeoffs along the way. At a point, each of these small individual enclaves or each of these unique or individual experiences

are going to hit a bit of a market wall, the wall of the wall of garden, as it were, right? You know, okay, I'm not going to grow anymore. I'm not going to be able to expand beyond these walls. And it could be an ecosystem provider who thinks about that. It could be a device manufacturer who've tried their reins to one of the ecosystems and realized, you know, if I really want to change, the market, if I really want to grow to the market, if I really want to get to that next step or that next level, I have to look at places where I collaborate in different ways. I have to find those places where collaboration actually allows the market to grow or the pie to expand or the walled garden to be knocked down. And then everyone will benefit. So as a manufacturer

or an ecosystem provider or a chip set vendor, you have to look at the tradeoff and say, is growing the market and increasing value, more important than keeping my small piece of the pie whole. And I think that's what enlightening companies are doing and why they're participating in matter. You really don't need to read between the lines much there, do you? The walled garden strategy of keeping everybody in separate ecosystems has limited growth for each of these individual companies. I asked Jennifer about this weird friendliness too. It's consumerism. I mean, They want to sell more products. Yeah.

And the smart home has stagnated. There is a lot of early adoption from early adopters like us. But for the masses, the larger consumer market, it's still just too confusing and too complicated. And, you know, we go into a Home Depot or a Lowe's and you buy something and you bring it home and it doesn't work with what you thought it was going to work with. And there was too much confusion. And in order for the market to push forward, I think the big players realized we have to fix

this basic issue of what talks to what in the home and how our home, you know, we used to be able to go buy a light bulb and screw it in and it worked. We need to get back to that stage. We need to be able to buy a light bulb, screw it in and it should just work with a smart home because that's the future of our homes. Everything is smart now. Our phones, our cars, our TVs, our homes are going to be smart whether you want them to be or not, honestly. So ultimately it's because they're going to sell more products if they fix this problem. Right. There is still going to be plenty of competition because matter is just the communication level. Features on top of that and ecosystems and how things work, not how they work together, but how they work, are still

going to be differentiating factors in the smart home that are going to make you choose to buy from one company over the other company. Okay, we're going to take a break, but when we come back, we're going to finish out the rest of our conversation with Jennifer to find out if matter is really going to work and to find out what we can expect from matter. when it comes to security and privacy. Support for this show comes from Shopify. Every thriving, successful business has to start somewhere. A good place to start is a relatively simple question.

What if, given the right tools, I've really put my all into this. One tool that can help grow your sprouting business to new heights is Shopify. Millions of businesses around the world rely on Shopify for e-commerce. They offer a host of helpful tools you can take advantage of, from payment processing to analytics to website design. Their design studio includes hundreds of templates to help you create the exact website you've been envisioning for your business. If you're wondering, what if I need help? Then no worries, because you're never left to fend for yourself.

Shopify's award-winning customer support is available 24-7. It's time to turn those what-ifs into a thriving business with Shopify today. Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify. Go to Shopify.com slash vergecast. That's Shopify.com slash vergecast. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. If you're a small business owner, you know that every hire counts, but time and resources are limited. Finding, connecting with, and screening the right candidates takes up valuable time you could be giving to your customers. That's where LinkedIn Hiring Pro comes in. It's built to be your hiring partner,

helping you find the right candidates faster. That way you can hire with confidence without turning it into another full-time job. Hiring Pro streamlines the entire process from drafting your job to shortlisting candidates and conducting AI-powered interviews for initial screenings. Its updated conversational interface lets you describe what you need in plain language.

Nearly 60% of hires find a candidate to interview within a week. With hiring pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent. And instead of getting buried in resumes, you get a focus shortlist that actually moves your hiring forward. Join the 2.7 million small businesses using LinkedIn to hire. Get started by posting your job for free at LinkedIn.com slash track. terms and conditions apply. Support for this show comes from What Not. Whether you're selling online or out of a storefront, you already know the challenge.

You're simply hoping for people to find your listing or waiting for them to walk in. But What Not flips that. They say they're the live shopping marketplace where you can shop, sell, and connect around the things you love. On What Not, you go live and sell directly to people in real time. They see what you've got, ask questions, and buy. And they keep coming back. Whether it's beauty, collectibles, electronics, luxury fashion, and yes, even cookies, sellers are building real thriving businesses. And for a limited time, What Not says they'll match your first $150 sold in the first month.

You can visit Whatnot.com slash sell to start selling. That's W-H-A-T-N-O-T dot com slash sell. Whatnot.com slash sell. Support for the show comes from MongoDB. If you're tired of database limitations and architectures that break when you scale, it's time to think outside of rows and columns. Because let's be honest, you didn't get into tech to babysit a broken database. You got into it to actually build.

something. MongoDB lets you do that. It's flexible, developer first, asset compliant, enterprise ready, and built for the AI era. Say goodbye to bottlenecks and legacy code. Start innovating with MongoDB. There's a reason it's trusted by so many of the Fortune 500, and that's because it's a platform built by developers for developers. MongoDB, it's a great freaking database. start building at MongoDB.com slash build. We are back with our Vergecast Tuesday topic-specific episode focused on Matter, the new smart home standard.

Even though everything with Matter seems great, there are still a bunch of unanswered questions and technical details that could gum up the works. So let's get to some of those with Jennifer Patterson-Tooey, the smart home reviewer at the Verge. So my understanding is that there's like a base, layer of functionality that matter sets. It's like we define what the thing is. It's a light bulb. It's a door lock. It's a, you know, whatever it is. And there are certain features that you

have to standardize on, turning it on and off, knowing whether it's on and off, knowing what, I don't know, the temperature is or something. There's like a set of things like door lock has these components to it and matter. You have to do that the matter way. But then beyond those features, if you want to do extra stuff, that will still be a thing where different companies are going to be competing on, like, extra stuff that their ecosystems or gadgets can do. Is that, is that right? That's the plan right now. I mean, that could change. But yes, the software level, like, that's really where companies are going to be able to differentiate is in software. Because ultimately, you're still going to control your home using one or other of these ecosystems.

So you're going to pick HomeKit or Alexa or Google Home or Samsung smart things or another one. So they're going to compete on that level from the control side of things. But then also from the hardware side of things, there are going to be different features. For example, with locks right now, it's just lock and unlock in matter. Right. But if you want like the auto unlock that's a big feature for some devices, that's not part of matter. It may come. There is something called an access control working group in matter that is looking at developing

those types of things. But right now it's just going to be a very simple lock and unlock. lock with a matter controller. So there's still going to be different experiences. It's not like suddenly the smart home is just going to be homogenous. It's just that things can communicate with each other. That's really what this is all about. So let's talk about another device type. And you've actually broken some news on this casting. So I did not realize that the idea that you would be able to get content playing on a television was going to be part of the spec. So how does this work? And can I never have to try and make airplay work again?

Yeah, so this is kind of exciting. When they announced that televisions were going to be in the first Matter spec, originally I think everyone just assumed they would be as a controller or a border router, which they still can be. But also, and this is sort of spearheaded by Amazon, most likely because they're the ones that don't have a handheld device that you use every day. Right. But also because Fire TV and Amazon Alexa's sort of prime video platform is such a core part

their business. The concept here is that assuming you have a matter controller like your smartphone or a smart speaker and you have a matter enabled app on your TV, you'll be able to cast. And that's a basic matter spec. So you will be able to send any content from whatever controller you have to your TV. Right. You won't need any special casting setup like Chromecast or Apple TV Airplay or I don't know what Samsung's is called. But yes, so you won't have to worry about that anymore. Everything should just go from one space to the other seamlessly. And that has been a really an area of friction, I think, in the home entertainment right now. It's been really difficult to do that well. I know my kids with their Oculus are so upset that we can't watch them on TV because we can

never get it to work properly. So yes, but it will depend on individual apps and manufacturers allowing it and being matter enabled. So this sounds a lot more like the Google Cast model where instead of like, you can do some direct stuff with Cast now, but like AirPlay for a long time up until AirPlay 2 was it takes the thing on your screen and directly sends it wirelessly to the local thing to play. But this is more like you've got a controller, you tell the Matter app on the TV, play this URL. And so that's that's much more how Google Cast works. It's sort of handing off URLs for streams than it is directly streaming from the device to the thing. Well, you know, I don't know the exact technical details. I do know that you will be able to control more than just casting.

So you'll be able to control volume. You'll be able to control inputs. Right. You'll be able to control, you know, pausing and fast forwarding. And it will be based on your streaming device too. So it can either, it can work with a smart TV or a smart streaming device. So in theory, you won't need to like use Google Chrome on your phone to cast to a Chromecast if you're using an iPhone. Which would be, ha, amazing.

Yes, it would basically making everything easier. That's the ultimate idea here. Well, so this discussion is a perfect example of how I feel about matter is like very exciting, very hyped. Everyone's like, yep, everything's just going to work. It's going to be great. But then you like stop and you're like, but hang on. There are some technical questions here that I don't fully know the answer to. And so I feel unsettled because I kind of believe the hype right now.

And that's not a normal thing for me to do. with tech. Help me work through my emotions about maybe actually thinking that some of this stuff is actually going to work. I know. I know. I'm right there with you. I want to be deeply skeptical, but I also want my smart home to work. So I'm excited about that. I think we should be confident and excited about the basic technology. I don't think we should suddenly think everyone is going to be, that's all Kumbaya and the whole smart home is this great space. There's still a lot of big questions. The biggest questions in my mind are cameras because that's such a big space in the smart home and that's still a ways off. Smart security systems too. We're not really seen. That

space hasn't really come into matter. There's a lot of areas that are key to our homes that are not here. And I'm also a bit worried about companies hedging their bets slightly here. Amazon's just released four or five new products and didn't mention matter at all. Now their argument here is well, it's very hard to build a product for a spec that does not exist, which is a fair point. Sure, but I mean, this working group has been around since 2019. They're deeply involved. They know what the spec is going to be. Like, devices are getting tested right now for it, right?

Well, but this is the other problem. And this is something that, so Mitch Klein of the Z-Wave Alliance said, you know, protocol politics have existed since the smart home began. And the Zigby Alliance, which is now CSA, is all about making people talk to each other. But just because you get people into a room to talk to each other does not mean you end up with an agreement. So we've still got that barrier to move through for each different part of the smart home that goes through the matter specs. And right now we've got like 10 different devices, but we've got many more that we have to work through. And it could take a while. This is not something that's going to happen overnight.

As we can see, because it's already been delayed substantially. So basically, like, the more complicated data privacy-wise or politically product category is, the longer it might take. So cameras are a perfect example. You mentioned that, like, Ring seems to be MIA with regard to matter in the CSA. So I'm sure that Ring has a completely different philosophy of what to do with your video data than Apple does with HomeKit where they want everything local and they don't even want to know it exists in the first place. So should we just, like, we should be assuming that things that, like, are more complicated are going to take longer? or maybe become fragmented again with matter? I think things that involve revenue streams are going to be more complicated.

It may not be that the technology is an issue, but figuring out how all of the, you know, how that's going to work in terms of the connection with the consumer and the revenue model. You know, we saw it slightly with the HomeKit Secure Video and some companies kind of half adopting it because they didn't really want to give up that control. like Arlo, you can have your HomeKit videos.

You can stream through HomeKit, but you can't have the HomeKit secure video portion because Arlo still wants you to pay them. I think when it comes to revenue streams, that's where we're going to start seeing some hiccups and that, yes, we may still see some fragmentation there. But hopefully they can figure it out. Yeah.

The other hypey things that I might want to pierce, there's security. So part of matter is issuing security updates, but you mentioned the Z Wave Alliance. It sounds like they're the one group that's like, I don't know. And they pointed out one possible security concern here. Can you talk about that a little bit?

Yeah. And I've reached out to Matter for a little bit more clarification on this, or CSA group for more clarification on this. But because Matter is an IP-based standard and the thread and Wi-Fi are IP-based protocols, in theory, each device has an open connection to the internet, which gives you much more, I mean, immediately you're like, ah, hackers, malware. Well, I'm thinking of my printer. Like, you know, like it's like, nope, doom.

That's bad. Okay. Yeah. So, but that, you know, and with Z wave, it's the opposite. That's why you have a hub because everything goes through this one hub and that hub and that hub is tightly locked down and secure. And that's how most security systems are built. And that's why this, we may have an issue with porting that. The CSA said to me that actually, you know, we're trying really hard here to work with IP is the future.

IP-based is going to give us so much more flexibility. We can constantly update, we can constantly provide patches, just like we have with our smartphone. You know, you get a patch every week. I have a feeling that will be the case with a matter smart home. You will be doing a lot of updates. Well, you won't have to do it. It should automatically do it. But yes, security is a big concern.

Security is going to be a concern going forward. But if you want devices to talk to each other, you have to open those channels. And if you lock it down, you're going to lose the communication. So that's the sort of payoff here. Right. The security versus convenience. Well, and if they are genuinely like issuing security updates and it is genuinely part of the spec, maybe it'll be fine. But that's like definitely a thing to keep an eye on.

The other thing for me, though, is that when I asked Michelle from the CSA or Samantha from Smart Things about privacy, their answers were about security. So here's Michelle's response. The emphasis is on building those incredibly strong security foundations, making sure every device that tries to join the network can be attested and authenticated. that every message that goes across that home network, you know, using Matter is encrypted, that we do support the ability to continue to patch and upgrade, you know, as vulnerabilities are found and resolved, which they will be. That is the world of security, that we're able to enable that through standards for our members. And here's Samantha's response. One of the fundamental charters of matter is privacy and security. It is considered pinnacle.

and one of the core charters of the protocol, something that is not only discussed, but a commitment from each of these leading companies to ensure that we fulfill that promise to the consumer. So you can see there, there are like security is at the core what we do. And I'm like, okay, but privacy in my data, they're like, yep, we're very secure. And it's like there's an elision there that has me trouble,

that the matter has nothing to say about what happens with the actual data, other than it can do local control, but that's not a guarantee that it won't. get out somehow? Yeah. No. So because really privacy isn't their remit, the privacy will still be down to your relationship with the vendor. Right. The privacy is going to be if you're in an Alexa home, you know, with your relationship with Amazon. If you're in a home kit home, your relationship with Apple, if you buy a device from a no-name brand in China, your relationship with that company. You know, matter doesn't deal with the software level, which is where the data and the privacy

relationship really is going to sit in the smart home. It just deals with the hardware level, really. Great, wonderful. That's where they never answer the question. Yeah, well, and it's also like... Because they don't know. Well, they don't know, and then, yeah, there's no way they could ever get these companies to agree on something like that.

It's hard enough to get them to agree on just like basic networking. Right. And also, it depends where you live, too. So there's going to be very different rules and regulations based on which country you're in. Although matter is global. It's not just U.S. I mean, it's in every country, which almost.

Okay. So this thing is supposed to launch next year, but next year is next year, and this year is holiday season, and I want to buy some smart home gadgets. Should I or should I wait? So, Matt, and CSA will say, go ahead and buy everything. It's all going to be fine. Everything's going to upgrade. Because they don't want everyone to stop buying stuff right now. Right.

To an extent, I think they're right. I mean, enough of these companies have gotten on board and said, we are going to upgrade these things. to matter. So, you know, Amazon said all it's Alexa speakers will be matter enabled. We know that there are thread radios in the HomePob minis, and there are many devices you can feel comfortable with. There are a few categories I would hold off on, as we've already discussed, if you're thinking matter is the way you want to go with your smart home. Cameras and security systems, for one. Anything you already have, you know, that you've had for a long time and you're thinking about upgrading, I'd wait. Because there's a chance what you have may still, may be upgradable. And if it's

not, then wait and buy the new one once you know for sure what's going to work. Got it. It is a difficult time to be making big decisions. But if you're talking like smart speakers, sensors, you know, the things that are in the main, the first sort of rollout, you should feel pretty comfortable about buying new devices this Christmas. Okay. I completely disagree.

I think never like, no, I say every time it comes up, never buy hardware today based on the promise of a software update tomorrow. If you want to buy something because you know it works today and it does what you want today that probably won't break once matter comes out. It might not work with the beautiful matter system in the future, but don't, don't. Just only buy it if it works today. Oh yeah, definitely I mean, if you want something, if you have a need right now, buy what's going to work for you today. I totally agree with that. Okay, so this thing is launching sometime mid-2020. What do you think this launch is going to look like? Is it going to be like a press release saying the spec exists,

developers can make stuff and there's a nano leaf you can buy? Or is it going to be, here are 6,000 smart home gadgets that all work together in a beautiful Kumbia future. Bam, go to Best Buy, get in line. Like, on that spectrum, where do you think we're going to get? It'll be like Apple iPhone 5 sale day. We'll be queuing outside Best Buy. For smart light bulbs.

I think it will be a slow rollout. I spoke with Eve, you spoke with, and they have, you know, they have a plan. Like, they already have thread radios and all their devices, and they're, you know, staggering the rollout. So I think you'll see, as of the initial, the devices that are in the initial spec, those will come out pretty quickly. But they've already got hundreds of devices that are being tested and going through the process, even though they don't have a spec, which confuses me slightly. Yeah. But, you know, I think it's they just don't have the final spec, so they're still tweaking things. But yeah, I think it'll be a slow process, starting probably around summer.

Okay. So sort of looking like early June will be when we'll see that the new, most of the new ones starting to appear. And every couple of months, I think, will be seeing new devices come onto the market as the spec gets updated. Yeah. Next Black Friday is going to be huge. Yeah, for sure. I suspect that Apple and Google in particular are eager to have some sort of official launch around or right before their standard developer conferences. Yes.

Because I guarantee you they both want at WWDC and Google I.O. to be like, and by the way, the smart home doesn't suck now. So I'm sure that that's something to look forward to. Yeah, and, you know, to your point, the smart home isn't about, it shouldn't be about building one smart home all in one go. I mean, as things stop working in your home and you need something, you have to fill a need, it's always worth considering the smart version. I know you're deeply skeptical, but anything that you buy today from a trusted brand who has committed to matter, if matter goes forward, I do think you're going to find that it will work in that future. Except for the Amazon division of Ring. At rest of Amazon, cool, but ring, we don't know yet. We don't know about ring.

Yeah. Okay. Well, the other thing to look forward to is watching you have to review the hundreds of Sparkop gadgets that are coming out next year. Enjoy, have fun. I will, I'll pitch in every now. I'll pitch in on door locks. That's the one thing that where my life sucks right now.

We will find you a good door lock, I'm sure. No, it's going to be fun. There's lots to look forward to. All right, cool. Well, thanks so much for chatting. Great. Thanks. So that is Matter. And next year, we should see that big splashy launch that I'm actually optimistic about.

Look at that. A discussion about tech standards that ends with hope. Also, with a million things for Jennifer to review. Sorry, Jennifer. But thank you to her for coming on the Vergecast and explaining it all to us. Thanks also to Michelle Mandala Freeman from the CSA, Samantha Fine from Smart Things, and Tim Boot from Eve for speaking with us. The Vergecast is produced by myself, Andrew Marino, and Liam James. This is the last of our run of Tuesday topic-specific episodes,

but we'd really like to know what you think, and if you'd like us to bring them back next year, you can tweet at me, I'm at Backlon, and my email is Deeter at theverge.com. We'll be back on Friday with the regular Vergecast chat show, and then after that, you know, I bet you can expect to see a bunch more battered news at CES in January, which is happening, again, to all of us together.

Thank you.