The Vergecast - Introducing Land of the Giants: The Netflix Effect
Episode Date: June 30, 2020This week we’re sharing an episode of Land of the Giants, a podcast from our friends at Recode and the Vox Media Podcast Network that examines the most powerful tech companies of our time. The secon...d season is called The Netflix Effect, and it’s hosted by Recode editors Rani Molla and Peter Kafka. The Netflix Effect explores how a company that began as a small DVD-by-mail service ultimately upended Hollywood and completely changed the way we watch TV. It’s a fascinating look at what really goes on behind the scenes at Netflix, one of the few companies that’s actually growing during the pandemic, and how they’re continuing to transform entertainment for you and me. New episodes are released every Tuesday morning. listen and subscribe to Land of the Giants: The Netflix Effect wherever you get The Vergecast. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for the show comes from Retool.
Too many companies run critical operations on duct taped spreadsheets,
Slack workflows, and whatever else they could cobble together.
Not because they want to, but because building internal tools
means weeks of waiting on someone else's backlog.
That's where Retool comes in.
Build custom internal tools just by describing what you need.
Prompts something like,
Build Me a Revenue Dashboard on our Salesforce data.
And Retool actually builds it on your company's data,
in your cloud with enterprise security built in.
Go to retool.com slash Verchcast.
We all need to retool how we build software.
What's up, y'all. I'm Skyler Diggins, seven-time WMBA All-Star, Olympic gold medalist, and mom.
And I'm Cassidy Hubbard, host and reporter for nearly 20 years covering the biggest names and stories in sports and mom.
And this is Am Mom, a community for athletes, game changers, and moms of all kinds.
dropping May 14th
Tap in with us
Hey everybody
Sam from the Vergecast
We're taking a break
from the interview show
this week
It's holiday week
But we got a little treat for you
We're going to share an episode
of the show Land of the Giants
From our friends at Recode
and the Vox Media Podcast Network
Land of the Giants
Examines the Most Powerful Tech
Companies of our time
Last season was all about Amazon
But this new season
It's all about Netflix
It's called The Netflix Effect
And it's hosted by Recode
Editor's Ronnie Mola
And Peter Kafka
The Netflix Effect
Explores how a company that began
as a small DVD by mail service, ultimately upended Hollywood and completely changed the way we
watch TV. This episode that we're going to run right now is all about how Netflix disrupted
Blockbuster, the video store chain, and how a company so big and dominant loss to a tiny tech
startup. You can listen and subscribe to Land of the Giants, The Netflix effect, and your preferred
podcast player every Tuesday. This show is really fun. Peter has been covering Netflix
since the very beginning. Ronnie's a great reporter. Just check it out. I think you're really
going to like it. It's Land of the Giants, The Netflix Effect.
One of the analysts asked John Antioca, the CEO of Blockbuster, what do you think of Netflix?
And he was furious.
He's like, do not ask me about that stupid little company.
They're a net, they're nothing, they're nobody, and people are never going to give up their video stores.
It's almost impossible to imagine now.
But not very long ago, if you wanted to watch a movie at home, you had to leave your house to go rent a movie from Blockbuster.
Ridiculous, right?
Reed Hastings thought so too.
So he created Netflix, which lets you sit at home, hit a button, and have a movie delivered to your living room.
We all know what happened eventually.
Hastings was right, Netflix 1, and Blockbuster went away.
But it sure didn't seem obvious back then.
Blockbuster was the giant that owned video rentals.
It should have squashed Netflix.
Just ask Hastings.
There was 20 times larger than us, which is not a good place to be.
Okay, so in many, that's why I feel like so randomly lucky to have survived.
They were the dominant firm in video rental.
And we were this tiny little upskirts.
And normally as you grow, there's lots of ways to get beaten.
I'm Peter Kafka.
And I'm Ronnie Mola.
And this is Land of the Giants, the Netflix effect, the podcast about how Netflix disrupted Hollywood,
changed the way we watched TV and movies, and how it should have been squashed by a giant competitor.
But it ended up turning the tables and killing the video store.
Okay, Peter, let's go back in time.
long before we had Netflix and chill, we had Blockbuster nights.
Remember those?
Tonight, make it a Blockbuster Night.
In the 90s and early aughts, Blockbuster was the world's largest video rental chain.
It was a huge part of American culture.
At its peak, it was bringing in $6 billion a year in revenue
and had more than 9,000 stores around the globe.
It was the place to rent movies.
It was a social place, like teens would meet there, you know,
people, you know, because that was one of the few things that you could always do as a high school
student was, you know, you could get together with your friends and rent a movie and go to the
cool parents' house and watch it.
I remember there's a copy of The Wiz that I would like hide in a corner at Blockbuster
because I always wanted it to be there when I would come back for it.
And we would go in her car and then go into Blockbuster and we pick out a movie and then we get a little
treat, you know, I don't know, we pick two, two, three movies, a scary one, a funny one,
and then an action one.
Hey, if it's on video, Blockbuster probably has it.
I mean, we have over 10,000 videos.
Five, six o'clock on a Friday night, phones are ringing off the hook.
It's never what do you have that's good.
It's always what do you have that's new.
That last voice is Jason Bailey.
Nowadays, he writes about movies for places like Vulture and the New York Times.
But years ago, he used to work at a bunch of video stores, including Blockbuster,
which he says wasn't as great as we might remember.
I have much more nostalgia for the video store than I do for Blockbuster in particular,
which really in a lot of ways killed the video store.
flattening it into the sort of McDonald's version of the video store.
Right.
That's what I remember about Blockbuster.
It killed my local video store and it replaced it with Blockbuster, which I did not like.
Blockbusters were everywhere and everyone rented from there, but that didn't mean it was a great customer experience.
One of the big things that you always hear people who don't remember Blockbuster through a golden glow of nostalgia to talk about were the late fees or as they tried to rebrand them additional day fees or additional rent.
They were outrageous.
Blockbuster made a ton of money on late fees.
Those are additional day fees, Ronnie.
At one point, late fees made up 70% of Blockbuster's profit.
And along with those high late fees, there were a long list of other problems.
Limited new releases, long lines, shitty customer service.
All which was lousy for customers, which also made it lousy for employees.
I got cursed out a fair amount.
Again, just trying to doing what I was told to do by corporate.
But yes, I would be told that, you know, that you know,
that we were monsters, that we were bloodsuckers.
I had that effing thing back on time.
I saw you take it out of the box.
I was like, I got called out like that.
I had people tell him, I saw you in here when I dropped it off.
You tell me you didn't check it in on time?
I'm not paying that.
It got heated.
But this was all factored into Blockbuster's business model.
The company even had a term for it, managed dissatisfaction.
Managed Disatisfaction is a term that John Antioco, the CEO of Blockbuster, explained to me.
And that is, as long as you give a consumer,
enough of what they want,
they will ignore the fact
that they're not always getting
what they want.
This is Gina Keating.
She's a journalist
who covered Netflix for Reuters.
She also wrote a book
and made a documentary
about Netflix's history.
Blockbuster understood
that only 20%
of customers
who came in
would get the movie
that they wanted
and they would have to
get something else
the other 80% of the time.
They weren't happy
but they weren't horribly
angry.
Managed dissatisfaction is one of the great corporate euphemisms for Screw You,
give us your money that you are ever going to hear.
And if you can't remember what it was like to go to Blockbuster,
a current analogy would be like an airplane?
You know what airplanes are like?
It sucks in every way.
And if you want to improve it in any way, you have to pay additional fees for everything.
That is Blockbuster in a nutshell in the 90s.
Yeah, customers felt trapped.
And with all the smaller mom and pop stores being squeezed out,
they didn't really have a better alternative.
And then all of a sudden, they did.
Again, you got to remember,
that Netflix emerged in the late 90s when the internet still felt pretty new.
Amazon was just becoming really successful selling books online.
They were doing it cheaper than the competition and they didn't have to operate stores.
So Reed Hastings and Mark Randolph, two tech guys in the Bay Area, are surveying the landscape
and they thought, hey, we could be the Amazon of something else.
There's a better way to rent movies.
As many as you want.
Go to Netflix.com.
Make a list of the movies you want to see.
And in about one business day, you'll get three DVDs.
Keep them as long as you want.
without late fees.
DVDs had just come out, and suddenly there was this new way to watch movies that didn't involve
these bulky VHS tapes.
DVDs were smaller, more durable, and you could ship them for the price of a postage stamp.
So Hastings and Randolph thought, hey, we could be the Amazon of movies.
This may seem obvious now, but at the time this was a big deal, suddenly, instead of having
to go to the store and deal with a crummy customer experience, you could stay home, you
could hit a button, and someone somewhere sent you the DVD you wanted.
instead of the one you had to settle for,
which Netflix customers loved, by the way.
They tended to order the kind of movies
that Blockbuster didn't feature or even carry it all.
They had all the indie movies and older movies,
and Blockbuster was focused on what was new.
And Netflix had another big advantage.
While Blockbuster's business model was based on late fees,
the things customers hated,
Netflix didn't have any late fees.
This was a huge part of Netflix's marketing pitch.
Hastings even made a part of the Netflix origin story.
Here he is on Charlie Rose.
Frankly, I got a big,
late fee, a $40 late fee.
And it was no one's fault but my own.
And why I remember it so clearly as I paid it and was going home, and I remember I
didn't want to tell my wife about it.
And I thought, oh, great.
Now I'm kind of compromised in the integrity of my marriage over this late fee.
In the year 2000, Netflix was growing.
It had a small but loyal customer base.
But keep in mind, this was also right around the time in the dot-com bubble bursting.
And Netflix was going up against Blockbuster, which was gigantic.
In tech, anytime a new startup shows up, they have to explain why the big guys who are already there, the ones they're supposed to disrupt, aren't going to crush them instead.
And Netflix got asked this all the time.
This wasn't a dumb question, by the way.
Turns out Netflix was making contingency plans for this very scenario.
Hastings and his co-founder, Mark Randolph, spent months trying to get a meeting with Blockbuster's top executives so they can make this pitch.
They would sell their company to Blockbuster for $50 million.
Then Blockbuster would keep running its stores, and Netflix would run Blockbuster.com.
They basically got laughed out of the building.
And keep in mind, Blockbuster is a $6 billion company at the time.
This is what it would call a tuck-in, right?
$50 million means nothing to Blockbuster.
It's a rounding error.
So it easily could have bought Netflix if it wanted to, and it still ignored it.
Blockbuster was acting totally unconcerned about Netflix.
But Netflix did have some reasons to be optimistic.
It was the first to do online rentals, and it was growing really fast.
And Blockbuster was underestimating it.
Patty McCord, Netflix's former head of HR,
remembers hearing Blockbuster executives talk about Netflix on an earnings call.
Actually, she remembers hearing them refused to talk about Netflix on an earnings call.
One of the analysts asked John Antioca, the CEO of Blockbuster, what do you think of Netflix?
And he was furious.
He's like, do not ask me about that stupid little company.
They're a net.
They're nothing.
They're nobody.
And people are never going to give up their video stores.
So stop asking me about them.
Back at the Netflix office, McCord was thrilled.
I'm looking at my CMO and behind her head are our subscriber numbers on a whiteboard.
And, you know, I mean, in that graph, it's just like up and to the ride.
But we looked at each other and went, they don't know.
They don't know.
And we got all the people in the company together where we're like, seriously, don't brag.
As far as our concern, we're nobody.
Lay low, lay low, lay low.
The thing is, Blockbuster CEO, John Antioco, did want to build this business
beyond the physical stores.
And despite telling Netflix no, he did want to get online.
He wanted to build his own DVD-by-mail company, just like Netflix.
So he tells Wall Street, stop asking about Netflix.
And then in 2004, he turns to his company and says,
let's make a Netflix, but don't tell anyone.
To do this, he did what a lot of older companies do when they need a tech fix.
He found the youngest person in the room, and he gave him the job.
Hey, you, over there, you can turn on a computer.
Make me a Netflix.
That person was Shane Evangelist.
At the time, he was working on strategy for Blockbuster, and he wasn't even 30 years old.
I mean, the reality is there wasn't a lot of skilled resources at Blockbuster at the time that knew much about the internet.
I like to say that I could spell it, so I got to go ahead to run it.
And so basically, John said, it's yours.
Go get it up and operational.
Shane was young, but he was also really smart, and he really looked up to Blockbuster's CEO.
And he loved the idea of bringing Blockbuster into the future.
And because Blockbuster was behind, it needed to get online fast.
The quickest way to do that was to straight up copy Netflix.
We looked exactly what they were doing.
We re-engineered it and we built it.
Blockbuster copied everything about Netflix, from the way it mailed DVDs across the country, down to its website.
Everything but the colors.
Instead of Netflix red, the color scheme was Blockbuster's signature blue and yellow.
They even sent people to Netflix warehouses pretending to be customers to figure out how they sorted and shipped DVDs.
I still could not believe they sent them.
Spies.
Yeah.
To the warehouse.
Posing as fans.
The door opens up.
The warehouse person or manager is there, and they say, look, we're Netflix subscribers.
We'd love your service.
We'd love to see it.
And they invited us in.
And not only did they invite us in, they let us take pictures.
It's like Mission Impossible, Blockbuster.
Eventually Netflix figured out what they were doing.
Who are these Netflix fans hanging out in our warehouse and taking notes about our delivery
system?
And why are they so interested in distribution systems?
Netflix was a smaller business, but it was better at the internet.
It had been working on sending DVDs by mail for years at this point.
Blockbuster, in a way, was acting like it was the startup.
And what we did a very good job on the online team is painted them as Goliath and we were David.
They were pretty belittling of us at the time.
They believed that Blockbuster had no chance to compete with them.
Evangelist and his team launched Blockbuster Online in 2004, four years after Netflix had tried to sell itself to Blockbuster.
It was basically Netflix, except.
it had more titles was cheaper, and it had the Blockbuster name.
It got off to a strong start.
Blockbuster Online, priced the service at $15 a month, which is cheaper than Netflix
at the time.
And Blockbuster was good at marketing.
They had a great ad in the Super Bowl.
I'm going to pick a movie from Blockbuster.
Okay, drive safely.
So in the ad, a guy tells his wife he's going to get a movie.
He gets in his car.
He backs down the driveway.
He opens the mailbox.
He pulls out a Blockbuster DVD.
Now Blockbuster is as close as your mailbox.
Introducing Blockbuster Online.
Choose your movies online.
Receive and return them by mail.
I remember when we launched the Super Bowl commercial
the first time out of the gate
and the numbers went crazy.
McNam throws.
Touchdown, Philadelphia.
This is the 2005 Super Bowl
when Tom Brady and the Patriots
beat the Eagles by three points.
And the New England Patriots
will be the first dynasty
of the 21st century.
It was a great game,
which was really good for Blockbuster
because it meant a gazillion people
saw the ad.
You know, 40,000 people that signed up in a day
in the first year we went from zero to a million people in nine months,
and that was the fastest growing subscription business that the market had seen at the time.
Netflix took five years to get to a million subscribers.
It took Blockbuster less than a year.
This was a huge win for Blockbuster.
It was successfully fighting back, landing this big punch,
and then they landed another one.
Blockbuster got rid of its late fees.
Which was the main reason everyone hated Blockbuster,
and the whole reason Netflix could exist, it did not have late fees.
And now Blockbuster said, yeah, we don't have them either.
So you see, Blockbuster was doing the thing that the established company is supposed to do when a challenger comes for it.
They were responding correctly.
They were doing the right thing.
Right.
It was acting like Blockbuster was the nimble startup.
This big giant company was willing to say, okay, we were wrong and we're going to turn this giant ship around.
So the big guys are starting to scare the little guys.
And while Blockbuster CEO didn't want to talk about Netflix on investor calls,
blockbuster sort of became the only thing Netflix was talking about on its calls.
It would have been the Q1 earnings call for 2005.
This is Steve Swayze.
He had just started as Netflix's head of PR at the time.
I literally went through the transcript the next day and highlighted Blockbuster versus Netflix.
We used the word Blockbuster, I think, three times more than we used the word Netflix.
We were fixated on Blockbuster.
I mean, obviously, it's a competitor.
We've got to acknowledge them.
But let's not talk about Blockbuster.
Let's talk about how much Netflix is improved.
But in 2006, Blockbuster did something that everyone at Netflix had to talk about.
It made its strongest power play yet and launched a new service, Total Access.
Blockbuster Total Access, Netflix.
Essentially, they work the same way.
You order movies online.
They come right to your mailbox.
You watch them.
They mail them back in a prepaid envelope.
But what if you're thinking?
Let's watch another movie right away.
With Netflix, you mail them back and wait.
But only Blockbuster gives you the option of bringing them back to the store and exchanging them.
No extra charge.
Here's your new movie, sir.
So Total Access was Blockbuster's.
Netflix killer. Married Blockbuster online, their Netflix clone, with Blockbuster's huge base
of stores. So if you're a Blockbuster customer, you get two services for the price of one.
That is a very, very strong deal. Again, Steve Swayze.
Blockbuster did everything. And one of the earnings calls, Reid said,
Blockbuster's throwing everything at us except the kitchen sink. And John Anyaako, the CEO of
Blockbuster at the time, had a sense of humor because a couple of days later in UPS arrives a kitchen sink,
a huge box and you open it up and there was a kitchen sink.
So they literally threw a kitchen sink at us as well.
You don't normally think of CEOs of giant companies having a sense of humor.
You don't, but Anniakko could afford to crack jokes because Total Access was working.
For the first time ever, Netflix lost subscribers and its stock plummeted.
Most new online DVD subscribers were going to Blockbuster.
So just a couple of years after launching online, it was well on its way to catching up to Netflix.
Blockbuster was doing everything right.
It was pivoting quickly.
It was defending itself from a startup that was trying to eat its lunch.
It was making moves that would keep it from becoming obsolete as everything moved online.
And this was all beginning to work.
It looked like nothing could stop Blockbuster.
Except for one major problem that threatened everything Blockbuster had accomplished.
Or more accurately, one angry investor.
That's after the break.
Support for the show comes from Framer.
Framer is an enterprise-grade, no-code website builder used by teams at companies like perplexity
and Muro to move faster.
With real-time collaboration
and a robust CMS,
with everything you need for great SEO,
not to mention advanced analytics
that include integrated AB testing,
your designers and marketers
are empowered to build
and maximize your dot com from day one.
So whether you want to launch a new site,
test a few landing pages,
or migrate your full.com,
Framer has programs for startups,
scale-ups, and large enterprises
to make going from idea,
to live site as easy and fast as possible.
Learn how you can get more out of your dot com from a Framer specialist
or get started building for free today at framer.com slash verge for 30% off
a Framer pro annual plan.
That's framer.com slash verge for 30% off.
Framer.com slash verge.
Rules and restrictions may apply.
Support for the show comes from Upwork.
The days of doing it all, all by yourself, are over.
There's no romance in burning out while you're trying to scale.
Instead, you can check out Upwork.
Upwork helps grow your business by giving you fast access to specialized talent
across more than 125 categories so you can fill skill gaps,
launch projects faster, and scale without committing to full-time headcount.
And finding the right talent is easy.
You can browse profiles, review past work, and get help scoping
the role so you can get started quickly. Seriously, you could connect with the right freelancer
in just a few hours, especially when you sign up with Business Plus. Their AI powered shortlisting
pairs you with the top 1% of talent in under six hours. No endless searcher required. You can visit
upwork.com right now to post your job for free. That's upwork.com to connect with top talent
ready to help your business grow. That's UPWRK.
Upwork.com. Okay, we're back. So in 2006, Blockbuster had just launched Total Access. It's new service
that combined renting DVDs online with renting DVDs in stores. It's Netflix plus Blockbuster.
And it's cheaper and Blockbuster got rid of its late fees, the thing people hated most about Blockbuster,
even though those late fees were hugely profitable for them. So again, if we're studying this
in business school, we say, good job, Blockbuster. You are doing everything right. This is how you stamp out
a challenger. Right. It's working out. Netflix was losing subscribers and its stock could take it a
beating. All these new subscribers were going to Blockbuster, but the big problem was that it's just
really expensive to start an online business. It's something Blockbuster would have to lose
money on until it reached a certain number of subscribers. Meanwhile, Blockbuster had another problem.
It had a billion dollars in debt, which at the time was a huge number. Blockbuster used to be
owned by Viacom, which at the time was this giant and powerful cable company, but Viacom spun it out
and turned Blockbuster into its own publicly traded company.
And as a going away, President Viacom said,
here's an extra billion dollars of debt.
Good luck to you.
They were owned by Viacom,
and Viacom was managing them for short-term profits.
Again, this is Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings.
So they set the company up as weak.
And if they hadn't put that debt on them,
Blockbuster may well have had enough to overwhelm us.
Which meant that Blockbuster had to pay down this debt,
at the same time it was spending money,
investing in a thing that's supposed to stomp out Netflix.
While all this was happening, Netflix tried a bunch of different tactics, dabbling in in-store kiosks where you rent and return movies, ads on its website, even Facebook-style sharing where you could tell your friends what you were watching. None of it worked. But luckily for Netflix, that wasn't what customers cared about.
What they really cared about was 97% delivery rate instead of 95, okay? And so we got us to realize, oh, we should really focus on probably now by 0607 on just like manic focus on the core and have confidence.
Yes, focus. This is the Keep It Simple, stupid version of corporate strategy, and it worked.
Netflix knew how expensive it was to run a DVD by mail service.
Steve Swayze, Netflix's former head of PR, says the company knew Blockbuster, with all that debt,
couldn't afford to keep losing money with total access.
Here he is talking about Barry McCarthy, Netflix's chief financial officer.
Barry had a team that just analyzed the daylights out of Blockbuster,
and we knew they couldn't continue at that pace.
It's unit economics.
You can't spend $130 and make $100.
We fundamentally knew that they couldn't continue providing all these services and make money to stay viable.
So we just, we hunkered down.
The Netflix folks say they had figured out that Blockbuster could not win, and if Netflix could just hang on, it could tire them out.
But Gina Keating remembers it a little bit differently.
She says Netflix was working really hard, maybe a little too hard to convince outsiders like her that its strategy made sense and that Blockbuster,
was going to fail and that Wall Street shouldn't give Blockbuster any money.
The funny thing was in the middle of all this stuff, when they started losing subscribers,
I went into Barry McCarthy's office in Los Gatos, and he sat there with a whiteboard for about
an hour and showed me how there was no way in hell that Blockbuster was ever going to be able
to survive this long term because they were running, I think it was two bucks they were losing
for every in-store exchange on total access.
You know, it's kind of funny now when I look back at it, but they were super desperate to call a journalist in and spend all this time explaining why Blockbuster should not be able to access the capital markets anymore because it wasn't going to work.
But remember, the reason Blockbuster needed more money from Wall Street was because it was losing money trying to beat Netflix.
So they can say that all they want.
And in hindsight, that is correct that all they had to do was wait.
But they were scared.
And it wasn't a done deal.
If Blockbuster had continued to get financing and stolen all of Netflix's subscribers, they would have been dead.
And Blockbuster also had another really big problem, activist investor, Carl Icon.
So today we call someone like Carl Icon an activist investor.
In the old days, when Carl Icon started out, we called them green mailers.
This is someone who buys a big position in a company's stock so we can have influence over the company.
And then he wants the company to make changes so the stock goes up and he makes.
makes more money.
And the reason I made so much money over the years is that you hold these people accountable.
He'll say a bunch of stuff about how the company's mismanaged and they should do this and
that and that and follow his strategy.
And none of that really matters.
All that matters that he bought the stock at X and he wants it to go up to Y so he can make
money.
He does not really care how it gets there.
Carl Eichon has been great at this over his career.
He's a billionaire many times over, but it doesn't always work.
Just as Blockbuster got its online business off the ground,
Carl Icon came in and bought a bunch of shares of Blockbuster and got several seats on its board.
So he just busts in Kool-Aid man style and goes, I'm here.
Now you got to deal with me because I own part of your company.
Listen to me on Carl Icon.
Right, and it's bad news when Carl Icon comes a knocking.
It is not cool when Carl shows up.
Oof.
Through his shares and board seats,
Icon was able to gain a lot of influence over the company.
And true to the activist investor playbook,
he started picking a bunch of different fights with Blockbuster's leadership team.
He said they screwed up an attempted acquisition of Hollywood.
video. He said they shouldn't have ended late fees. He said they were spending too much money on
Blockbuster online. You're doing it all wrong. I want my stock to go up and I'm going to tell you
how to do it. Icon wreaked havoc at Blockbuster, which was an incredible break for Netflix and
Reed Hastings. They were attacking us and the shareholders decided to elect Carl Icon to the board.
And it was like so great for us and so bad for them. He had these board members who were
completely clueless and who were saying stuff like, oh, we need to put
jeans in the stores, you know, to make people come in.
Again, Gina Keating.
They just had no understanding of what was going on at Blockbuster and the technology
changed that they were right in the middle of.
So, you know, John Antiochco is fighting those guys.
So Antiochco is fighting with Netflix on the outside.
And then on the inside, he has Carl Icon.
An icon was really difficult to work with.
At one point, he refused to attend board meetings.
So Blockbuster was headquartered in Texas.
an ICON would only call in.
And when he did, he's really disruptive.
He'd, like, talk over people
and just generally be a pain in the ass.
Eventually, to appease him,
Blockbuster moved its board meetings
to ICON's office in New York City.
Oh, man. Can you imagine that?
It's an incredible power move,
and it sort of shows who's bossing him around.
This went on for a while,
Icon second-guessing everything Antioco did.
Things eventually came to a head
during a phone call over Antioco's bonus.
He was supposed to get $8 million
dollars that year, but Icon didn't want to pay him.
We know this from Antioch's retelling of the event in an article for the Harvard Business
Review.
Icon argued that Blockbuster stock was struggling and shareholders had lost money, so you don't
deserve this.
And Anniakos saying, no, no, this is what we agreed on.
I hit my numbers.
At some point in this phone call, Aniaco realized that this was never going to end, and he
decided to quit.
They agreed on a severance package and a smaller version of this bonus, which, by the way,
he donated entirely to charity.
So it's not about the money.
the principal. Right. We reached out to both Antioch and Icon for the story, neither chose to
participate. After Antioco quit, he sold all his Blockbuster stock, and you'll never guess what he
invested in next. I'm going to guess. He bought Netflix stock. Correct. So this time it was about the
money. Right. So after all that, in 2007, Icon brought in James Keys to be Blockbuster's new CEO.
Before that, Keyes was running 7-Eleven. And Chain Evangelist, who's running Blockbuster's successful
online business was pissed.
So here's a guy who had never done anything digitally previously.
It's certainly difficult to deliver a slurpy through a digital connection.
He decides that we're not going to go online any longer, that the mail order business is
too expensive.
He said, we're going to shift our focus back to the stores.
We're not going to focus online any longer.
He pulled all of the marketing out of that business.
Evangelist thought that defunding the online business would be the death of total access.
and maybe even for all of Blockbuster.
So when Keyes decided to strip down the business
that evangelist had worked so hard on,
evangelist felt like he was left with no other choice.
So he quit.
And I just started crying.
It was three years of a lot of work,
felt like we finally had them,
felt like we were truly going to pivot this business,
and it was effectively dismantled
by the new guy that came in.
And really what was dismantled by a bonus structure
that Carl wouldn't pay.
From evangelist's perspective, it wasn't just that the project was shut down.
It was when his project got shut down.
Right when it was about to work.
Netflix basically went from having a gun to its head to as much wind behind your back as you could possibly imagine.
When former 7-Eleven head James Keyes came in as CEO, he was focused on two things, the physical stores and the debt.
This is Keyes.
When we were dealing with over a billion dollars of debt at that time, I don't think Netflix had much of any debt.
The challenge with a company with debt is you have to pay it back.
And we had a payback due in 2009.
The difference is that when you're trying to manage a public company, you have responsibility
to all the shareholders and to protect the integrity of that equity in that shareholder base
and your debt holders.
We were growing the online business.
Yes, we were competing with Netflix, but we were competing in a very different way
with a very different balance sheet.
So I'm going to translate that.
We had to grow the company and make Carl O'Conn happy, and we also had to pay down this debt.
We had to do two things at once.
And Netflix didn't have this problem.
It didn't have debt.
It just had investors that wanted their stock to go up.
So even though we are the much bigger company, we're not really in a fair fight.
That is what James Keyes is saying.
If we had continued investing in the online business the way we had, it would have forced us to restructure the company.
One more thing.
While all of this was going on, there was a huge recession.
This was 2008. Financial institutions like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns went under.
Wall Street guys lost their jobs. They were sobbing on the trading floor.
The U.S. government had to bail out Wall Street and the auto industry at the same time.
It was suddenly the worst time to have debt.
The banks were virtually shut down, not lending any new debt.
It was the timing of the payback that was required, which then forced us to have to refinance that debt in extreme conditions.
So in other words, if you didn't meet certain performance criteria, the bank had the right to force you into bankruptcy or to take back that debt.
And by 2010, the biggest video store in the world, Netflix's biggest competitor, hit rock bottom.
Blockbuster's business is a flop, so to speak.
The movie rental chain is getting ready to file for bankruptcy as early as next month.
This really is the end of an era.
Yeah, this was a tough day for James Keyes.
who remember had only been CEO of this company for a couple of years.
I remember one day waking up and seeing my full-color picture with a Pinocchio nose in the New York Post.
You haven't lived until you've been, until you see your own image with a Pinocchio nose on the New York Post.
And I think the big headline was block busted.
The same year Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy, Netflix hit 20 million subscribers.
It also started expanding outside the U.S.
So Netflix's plan to wait Blockbuster out, worked.
Well, they had a little help.
It was so lucky.
I mean, so lucky.
And I think that they need to thank Carl Icon every single day because that right there is the number one reason why Blockbuster lost.
There are two things that Blockbuster could have done differently.
First of all, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix for a mere $50 million back in 2000.
End of story.
Or it could have refinanced its debt long before 2009 when no one would lend the company money.
A nerdy note about debt here, but an important one.
This whole story is about how Blockbuster was just crushed by a billion dollars of debt in 2009.
Today, as we're recording this in 2020, Netflix has about $15 billion in debt.
It runs the entire company on debt.
Wall Street seems totally cool with it.
Different companies, different times, but I know it upsets the Blockbuster guys to hear about it even now.
But this also didn't happen in a vacuum.
There was a lot of stuff going on in the economy and the culture that really shaped how this panned out.
The way people consumed media and everything was changing.
So think about what was happening in 2009 and 2010.
A lot of things were really changing in a significant way.
The Internet had gone from novelty to ubiquity.
Broadband was coming to most people's homes.
Lots of folks now had cell phones.
They've got iPhones where you can hit a button.
You can watch something on a screen immediately.
Physical stores were starting to go away because you didn't need to get in a car or go on a subway to get something.
You could have that thing delivered to you because you were using the Internet.
Netflix got its timing right and it got out of a near-death experience.
It also figured out, eventually, that it had to stick to what it did best,
getting people videos to watch.
Here's Hastings again.
And that lesson got seared into us.
And then since then, you know, we're like crazy manic.
We're going to do the best movies, the best series, you know, global, internet.
Why haven't we acquired 15 companies like everybody else?
Why haven't we gone into video gaming and news and sports and advertising, you know?
And so it's this maniac focus of let's have the self-confidence to believe in the size of the opportunity and that we're going to really help consumers if we focus on doing the thing we do better and better as opposed to a little bit of everything.
This is a standard business lesson and it's a standard business lesson that people always overlook.
If you want to do something well, do that one thing.
But that one thing almost wasn't enough.
Not long after Shane Evangelist, the former head of Blockbuster Online,
left the company, he ended up at a dinner party with his former arch-nemesis, Netflix CEO, Reid Hastings.
And we're sitting across from the table this first time I've met Reed.
And it's pretty cordial for the first hour.
And then it's, what were you thinking when?
And we went back and forth and back and forth.
And it was a fascinating evening to hear their logic behind what they were doing, for him to hear our logic behind what we were doing.
Evangelist said Hastings told him that when Blockbuster combined its online service with its brick-and-mortar stores,
it almost tanked Netflix.
The thing that was satisfying for me is he said,
you had us in Checkmate.
We had no response to the value proposition.
Blockbuster had a chance to be that retailer
who truly pivoted and moved online
and could have been the Harvard Business Case Review
story of how you succeed in what would be very difficult headwinds
instead of being how you get run over by Netflix.
In other words, Netflix didn't kill Blockbuster.
Blockbuster killed Blockbuster.
So, Peter, Blockbuster's not actually completely dead.
There's still a little trace element left?
Yeah, at the end of the last year, I went to a Blockbuster pop-up shop in Lower Manhattan.
Okay, this sounds like you're describing a fake Blockbuster store. Is that right?
Yeah, it's a store that's around for one week only that's dedicated to selling Blockbuster memorabilia.
Whoa.
We have a 14-foot wall that is 5,000 VHS take.
We have the shelves made to look exactly like the shelves used to in the early 90s.
It even smells like a blockbuster in here.
Like I guess it's the popcorn, but it's like something else to you.
I don't think it's just the popcorn.
It's like you guys got everything like the movies are right, like the look.
Before this podcast I hadn't really thought about Blockbuster in years.
But customers at this pop-up shop were full of fond memories of it.
Blockbuster videos like my Friday nights.
So it immediately brought me back to like 92.
You missed the feeling of just going there like on a Friday night.
and then just like picking out movies.
I'm here because I used to go to Blockbuster
every Friday with my family and with my brother,
and so I was trying to figure out a Christmas gift to get him,
and this seemed like the perfect gift
because we used to do this all the time.
Wait, what are people doing here?
Are they renting movies?
You can't actually rent movies there.
They're buying Blockbuster swag.
I just bought a Blockbuster shirt.
It's like the LA Rams color, like maize in blue, I guess.
So, yeah.
And it has a little Blockbuster logo in the middle.
So it shows, you know, that you're repping, Blockbuster.
And then they gave me a membership card, too.
Wow.
True nostalgia.
It's kind of crazy how this one's huge company and cultural institution
has dissolved into nothing but nostalgia.
All that remains are a few sweaters and tote bags and a membership card you can't use.
Ronnie, your trip down memory lane sounds fun, but I am not going to miss the late fees.
Peter, their additional day fees.
Ronnie, we are done.
That's a wrap.
But come back next week because we are.
going to talk about the Netflix algorithm and how it helps you figure out in an endlessly
of content, just what the hell to watch.
And we're also trying to figure out if Netflix recommends shows you want to watch or just shows
it owns.
The analogy I use is we are a matchmaking service, but instead trying to introduce the perfect
love story between two people, we're making the perfect love story between a person and a piece
of content.
This podcast is a production of Recode by Vox and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
This episode was produced by Bridget Armstrong and Zach Mack.
Our editor is Charlie Herman.
Gotham Shrikeshin engineered and scored this episode and composed our theme.
Zach Mack is our showrunner and Shott Kerwa is the executive producer.
Quick disclosure, Vox.com and Vox Media make shows for Netflix.
None of the people working on this season, The Land of the Giants, are involved in productions of those shows.
Land of the Giants is a production of Recode by Vox and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
I'm Peter Kofka.
And I'm Ronnie Mola.
Thanks for listening.
