The Vergecast - Liquid Glass, Spotlight, and the rest of WWDC 2025
Episode Date: June 10, 2025Apple spent 90 minutes talking about the future of its software, and we're pretty sure only said the word "Siri" once. Nilay and David are joined by The Verge's Victoria Song and Allison Johnson, both... of whom were with Nilay at the keynote, to talk about all the news of the day. They talk about the Liquid Glass design language, and why Apple decided to redesign all its software. They talk about Spotlight on the Mac, the new multitasking features on the iPad, the typing indicators on the iPhone, Workout Buddy on the Watch, personas on the Vision Pro, and everything else that Apple announced — or, in a few cases, pointedly didn't announce — on stage. We're just starting to try out some of this software, and it's all likely to change a lot before it hits your devices this fall. And we'll have lots of thoughts along the way. Further reading: Apple renames its operating systems Apple’s new design language is Liquid Glass Apple’s Liquid Glass redesign doesn’t look like much Apple’s ChatGPT integration makes it easier to search for more context on images and shop for things they see. Apple Intelligence takes on language barriers in messages and phone calls. Apple announces macOS Tahoe 26 with new design and revamped search features Apple’s Spotlight upgrades in macOS Tahoe have power users in mind Apple launches iPadOS 26 with a new look and way better multitasking Apple announces watchOS 26 with a wrist flick gesture and AI ‘Workout Buddy’ Apple’s visionOS 26 adds PSVR2 controller support and spatial widgets Apple’s AirPods update adds camera controls and more Apple’s new Games app lets you challenge your friends Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for the show comes from Retool.
Too many companies run critical operations on duct taped spreadsheets,
Slack workflows, and whatever else they could cobble together.
Not because they want to, but because building internal tools
means weeks of waiting on someone else's backlog.
That's where Retool comes in.
Build custom internal tools just by describing what you need.
Prompts something like,
Build Me a Revenue Dashboard on our Salesforce data.
And Retool actually builds it on your company's data,
in your cloud with enterprise security built in.
Go to retool.com slash Verchcast.
We all need to retool how we build software.
What's up, y'all. I'm Skyler Diggins, seven-time WMBA All-Star, Olympic gold medalist, and mom.
And I'm Cassidy Hubbard, host and reporter for nearly 20 years covering the biggest names and stories in sports and mom.
And this is Am Mom, a community for athletes, game changers, and moms of all kinds.
dropping May 14th.
Tap in with us.
Do you ever wonder what's in your lotion?
If you look at the back of the bottle,
it could contain more than a dozen ingredients.
And they may not all be regulated.
The threshold is so high that only 11 cosmetic ingredients
have been restricted by the FDA since 1938.
This week on Explain It to Me,
the chemicals lurking in your cosmetics.
New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of liquid glass.
And you have to say it like that every single time.
I'm a friend David Pierce.
Nelai Patel is here. Hi, Nelai.
Hello, here I am.
Nil's doing great, everybody.
We're having a day.
Allison Johnson's also here.
Hi, Allison.
Hello.
You guys are in Cupertino for WWDC.
Keno is today.
V-Song, who was also there, is going to join us in a little bit.
She's still at some meeting, but it's going to show up.
But it was, today was WU.
I found myself sadder not to be there than I expected.
So just give me the vibe check in.
How's the day, Ben?
How do you guys feel?
Are you alive?
Are we okay?
We're alive.
It was a loose day.
There was like not a lot going on.
Right.
Like the number of new ideas that we have been forced to contend with are fairly limited.
There's a lot of new future ideas and a lot of stuff to talk about.
But there's no grand big thing that we all have to be like.
let me wrap my head around this.
There's a menu bar on the iPad, David.
So A, I would argue that is very much a big thing.
But last year, that thing was Apple Intelligence, right?
They were like, this is the grand new way of thinking about technology that is going to change everything forever.
This year, there wasn't even all that much Apple Intelligence this year, which we should talk about.
Allison, how did you feel?
What were the vibes like in the room?
The vibes are kind of like, there was a lot of curiosity, I think, about how Apple would handle or like address any of the Siri Apple intelligence stuff, which was, it was interesting.
They didn't shy away from saying Apple intelligence, which was a little surprising to me.
Yeah, they kind of sprinkled it in throughout rather than the big, like, it's an Apple intelligence show.
But we did not hear Siri's name, I don't think, a single time.
Correct me if I'm wrong?
I think the answer is once.
Maybe, yeah, okay.
I would not swear to this, but I think, ironically, right at the beginning, basically explaining why they weren't going to talk about Siri more.
I think Craig Federigi said Siri once.
Yeah.
At the very beginning, they said it, you know, all of our plans will come true.
In the coming year.
Here's what I can tell you, just based on vibes on the ground.
They are furious that people think that last year.
They showed a fake Siri.
Oh, interesting.
So they want people to know that they're going to do it.
It's coming.
And like what they showed was real and they just weren't happy with it.
And so it's coming.
But it's actually, I feel like it's worse if it worked, right?
Because it's one thing to be like, here's a cool concept video we think we can make.
It's another to be like, here is the product.
It's done.
We've made it.
And then at some point, somebody's like, never mind, actually it sucks.
Like, that's, that it all, it's, it's weird either way.
I don't, like, again, the vibes, right?
What are the vibes?
The vibes are everyone knows that this is the elephant in the room that last year they announced
this thing that they didn't ship.
They were going to talk about Apple intelligence is here.
You know, Apple is the royal family.
Never complain.
Never explain.
Like, that's just how they roll.
And so they confidently muscled their way through their, their presentation.
They showed off liquid glass, all the stuff they're going to show off.
They showed off a bunch of artificial intelligence features that are expanding.
And the fact that they didn't ship Siri, they are willing to own up to.
But the answer is it wasn't good enough.
And we only ship things that are good enough.
And what I would connect that to is the fact that no products that have made the same promises
about being able to do stuff on your phone for you are good enough.
we haven't seen the smart assistant be good enough anywhere in the industry.
Right.
And whether or not you think that connects to whether AI as we understand it today can actually do it
or whether you think everyone is just kind of dumb.
There's a little bit of column A and a little bit of column B at work here.
But like they want you to know that their goal is making great products and that's what
they're going to do.
And that I saw some, you know, some folks.
impressed just like milling around and like there's some quiet tension and uncertainty here because
no one knows how they're going to address it and then they just muscled through their thing.
I mean, I was, I will say I was sort of impressed that they at least like half acknowledged it at the
beginning.
The like we're still working on it.
It's taking longer than we thought in the coming year is like even that is more than I expected Apple to do.
Like traditionally Apple would just memory whole, the whole idea that it had ever spoken the word Siri allowed in history.
and just keep going.
And we'd all be like,
do you know that Siri exists?
Well, you know, they walked right,
I'm sure we're going to talk about this,
but they walked right up to the line
of all the things they said Syria would be able to do,
but in like other formats.
So if you look at Spotlight Search
and what it can and can't do now,
you're like, oh, why wouldn't I just talk to this?
That's the Siri one.
And they're, it's not, they have it,
they just didn't connect the dots.
Yeah.
Or they're like, take a screenshot
and add something to your account.
I'm like, that's, that's Siri, right?
We're just calling it something else.
Or it feels like they were a little bit hesitant to kind of be like, look, look at this intelligence.
They were sort of like sprinkling it throughout rather than making such a big show of it this time.
Maybe just they felt burned by how everything went last year.
It is fair to say they feel burned.
I could feel that from 3,000 miles away.
But also, Allison, I was thinking about you all day today because you and I have been arguing about AI devices for like two years.
And you keep being like, I don't care about any of the rest of it because phones exist.
And phones are good at doing phone things and phones exist.
And it's fine.
If you want to do AI stuff, do it on your phone.
And there was so much of that energy today.
To that point, like you're talking about Apple was like we didn't, everybody else is out here being like, we've invented a new paradigm for everything.
Johnny Ivan, Sam Altman, like, own San Francisco together now.
And Apple's just like, do you know it's cool as your iPhone?
What if your iPhone could do more stuff?
Have you heard of the iPhone?
And there's like, it's like, guys, where was this energy last year?
Like, the iPhone also existed then.
But it's like this was, it was sort of a very Appley way of thinking about this stuff again
after such a weird diversion last year.
I think like the, not to jump the gun, but like the screenshot kind of visual intelligence things is like,
really telling to me. So their new thing with visual intelligence is it can see what's on your
screen and you just summon it by taking a screenshot. You already know how to take a screenshot
with your phone. Like it's a thing you do. And then they kind of go from there and that's where you
can add something to your calendar or whatever. That just feels like that's where these things
should kind of live and belong. And I think that's how AI, you know, as a tool on our phone,
makes sense to me.
I do think it's going to beat, you know, whatever pendant, screenless thing is coming next, but who knows?
Well, a lot of the features they announced today are features that got approximately zero people to switch to an Android phone over the past five years.
Sure.
Like, just straightforwardly, these are features that exist on Android phones.
Circle the Search exists on Android phone.
Like, we've covered the Android can now look at what's on your screen and do a Google search based on it.
Like so often that my joke is that Dieter wrote about it in hieroglyphics.
Yeah, was in Google now like 2012?
Yeah.
I was like, this idea is, has been around.
We've been doing this.
So, yeah, I mean, just a lot of these features are old Google ideas,
but new ways to kick off searches and, like, see what's on your screen and take action on it,
and which are cool and which are useful.
But, you know, when they announced Apple and Tornadoff,
intelligence that I think what the reason people were focused on the Siri part of it is because
that's what looks like the platform shift, however you want to define that, where instead of like
touching a screen or using a mouse, you just talk to the computer and it does stuff. And there's still
nowhere. They're a little bit closer to you type to the computer and it does stuff. Yeah. Okay. So I want to
get to all the sort of individual platform stuff. But I feel like there were a couple of kind of bigger,
broader ideas Apple had here that we should start with. And the first one is obviously liquid glass,
which every time I say it is a phrase I hate a little more. I'm realizing this now as I say it out
loud. I just don't enjoy saying that phrase. I don't like it. Alison, can you, you were, you were
sitting there taking pictures of this thing. Can you explain what liquid glass is and looks like
having seen it in person? Yeah. Well, imagine everything on your phone screen is like kind of transparent.
I think the idea is like, you know, you pull down a notification shade or the control center
and instead of like a blank slate that sort of launches you into somewhere else on your phone,
it's transparent glass now and you can still see what was behind there.
So we saw all kinds of little like menu bar things popping up and you can still see the apps
and the home screen behind them.
I'm mixed feelings about how that all looks.
You know, it's all in like early beta right now.
But it's clearly something Apple is like pushing into full force.
And it's coming to the iPhone, whether anybody wants it or not.
You like it or not.
Nilai, you, like, if I remember the timing correctly,
the iOS 7 launch was like a seminal verge moment in the early days.
Did liquid glass feel like that all over again?
Were you like, we're so back, we're doing this again?
Everything's better.
I think the answer is no.
iOS 7, remember, they went from skeuomorphism and texture to nothing,
to like, what if your phone was indecipherable?
Like, if you look at our coverage of iOS 7 when we came out, it's harsh, but time has judged it to be fair.
Because I walked it all back over the course of the next year and then, you know, to where we are now.
There's a lot more texture and dimension to iOS.
Like, they've just added it back.
They've let people figure out what they're looking at on their screens.
And I get what they're trying to do with liquid glass, which is reset it once again.
Not for no reason.
Right.
A lot of their arguments, a lot of their arguments,
or even the iPad stuff is we have so much more processing power now.
So I get where they're coming from.
We have a lot more processing power.
We can rethink this interface.
We don't have to throw everything out.
We're not going from felt textures
and literally like wooden,
like that wooden texture you get in like 1970s rec rooms,
which was part of iOS for a minute.
The Notes app was a literal torn off legal pad.
Like that's what we were doing before iOS 7.
And there were, you know, there's some arguments there for why that was good at that time.
But iOS 7 was supposed to be a clean break,
like digital interfaces are here now,
this is the primary way.
We should not be stuck in the past.
Liquid glass has nothing to do with not being stuck in the past.
In many ways,
it's very much a reflection of the past in like Windows Vista.
Yeah.
Like this thing has been tried before in this way.
I suspect there's a ton of refinement to come between now and September,
and Apple sort of purposefully announces the most extreme version of the idea.
and what they announced today was the most extreme version of the yet.
Like, everything is so transparent.
It's almost unreadable.
Yeah.
And all the effects are totally overdone.
And control center looks at bananas.
Like, there's no way they're launching this version of liquid glass.
The thing I don't understand is, like, what is the point of it?
Right.
What is this for?
Other than looks different.
They did not make a case for why it looks different.
No.
And there are, so it was funny, I went back and was reading a bunch of our old Vista coverage.
And the thesis then was the same as the thesis now for Apple, which is basically like, you do this kind of translucency stuff in part to sort of anchor people where they are in a space, right?
Like when you can see the things behind and you get these sort of live updating previews and like it just puts you in a place that is a little more understandable, you can kind of figure out where you are.
And like a lot of this, they said this, this is all coming from the Vision Pro, right?
Which is a device with a very specific need, which is to...
Yeah, but why?
Well, yeah, I mean, I wrote this in a piece today.
Like, I think it is truly wild to be like, we made a Vision Pro.
No one bought it.
It's way too expensive.
Let's reorient our entire design system around it, which is insanity.
But like, if you are Apple and you're betting that the next decade is smart glasses or whatever, then sure.
It does not make sense to me to do this on an iPhone.
But again, on a Vision Pro, the idea of like, okay, I need to both show you digital information in the real world,
but not obscure the real world for the digital information.
So I have to do this kind of glassy, translucent thing that feels a little more physical, right?
Like, we've talked about this bunch.
Everybody's doing this in some direction or another.
Spaceshipy glass is what Apple has chosen.
Fine.
The way all of this stuff is implemented is just bonkers.
Like you mentioned the control center and stuff,
and there have been all these screenshots going around of the dev beta,
which everyone immediately installed and started playing with.
It's just, imagine if you just took the icons from the control center
and just shoved them onto your home screen.
Like, that's all it is.
There's nothing, there's no design.
There used to be like the blur behind it, it would blur your home screen.
None of that.
It's just like, here's some icons.
It looks awful.
It's so bad.
And I'm sure you're right.
And I'm sure they will frost the glass and everything will be fine.
But even some of these ideas where, like, you pull, you know, as you're scrolling, the URL bar down at the bottom will sort of, the scroll will go underneath it.
So it will actually, like, reflect the light underneath it.
All it does in all of the videos that Apple showed is make that bar completely unreadable.
Yeah.
So the argument for skeomorphism is that by making things reflect real world objects and textures, you assign those things, those same qualities.
So you open the notes app, it looks like a legal pad.
You assigned it the same quality.
all of these is a legal pad to your mind.
You open the games app and it's on a felt background and you think,
I should smoke a cigar.
Like, whatever those things mean to you,
the weird thing about this approach is that it breaks all those conventions
and it literally posits a world in which everything is made of class.
To the point where in the video, they were showing the designers in the studio.
And if you believe Apple's video, Apple's designers in their studios printed out,
like giant lucite blocks and put the icons in them to see how they would reflect in the real world.
That is, I didn't even track that as weird watching that video.
And it's like, well, this is very backwards.
Like you reverse geomorphism to the world.
Like, you're manufacturing lusite blocks of icons.
Like, don't do that.
Because in the real world, not everything is translucent.
And you get depth and texture by putting things over each other all the time.
And you're like, this is on top of that.
And it will remain the same color no matter what happens.
And on the new iPhone, it's like everything is changing color all the time.
Because everything is over everything else, but still transparent or translucent.
And there's just something wrong about that.
Like your brain doesn't accept that.
The example I'll give you, which is like ancient history, but I think very like funny
and appropriate ancient history.
When Steve Jobs first announced MacOS 10, the interface back then was called Aqua.
And his joke was that it looked so good, it was lickable.
and all the buttons were like pulsing blue
and like kind of watery.
And all of these people on the internet
made themes for the old version of macOS
to look like OS 10.
So you could like buy these like theme packs
for your like 90s Mac.
And I ran them and every single one of them
had a blue menu bar.
Because they hadn't realized
that when he was showing it,
the menu bar is transparent
and he just had a blue background.
Interesting.
So for like a year, we were all running these themes with this blue menu bar.
And then we actually got OS10.
Like the first public beta is OS10.
We installed our things.
And we thought, oh, shit, the menu bar is translucent.
And then Apple realized this was a bad idea.
And now the menu bar is translucent again.
And you just go back and forth between these like themes and design.
And one of the reasons you make things not translucent is to give them weight in the design.
It's to say this is always going to stay the same.
And this is an anchor for your eyes.
And you can just see with liquid glass.
Like, that's just out the window.
And they're going to have to put it back.
They're going to have to give you some places to anchor your eyes just to get around the phone.
Well, that's the thing, right?
Because they're, I think, like, you were talking about with iOS 7, the idea was, like,
digital interfaces are now interfaces.
I wonder if part of the theory here is, like, you already know how to do everything.
Your muscle memory is so good that we don't even have to remind.
you where the URL bar goes because your thumb is there.
So actually, we're going to hide all of the interface as best we can in order for you to just see the beauty of the web page that you're looking at.
And boy, is that a bad theory, if that is, in fact, the theory.
But that is a theory that would lead you to make something like liquid glass.
I think just being at Apple Park today, too, kind of remind you that Apple is just so committed to a look sometimes.
where it's like, is a giant circle made of glass,
is that the most practical way to organize an office building?
No.
You can see into all parts of it from the outside.
That's kind of weird, but they're just like, that's their look and they love it.
You didn't enjoy your 15-minute golf cart ride from the front door to the place you were going?
But golf cart today had party speakers.
The woofers under the seats
and the woofers had LEDs and the rims
And the first thing Alex Heath said was
Look, party speakers
I'll actually
Allison, I will extend your metaphor
Because it is 100% on the nose
They built Apple Park
And then a little bit later
They had to put stickers on all the windows
Because people kept walking into them
And this is like a main thing of Apple Park
Now you're like to see all these little dots
That they're going to have to do this with liquid glass
They're going to have to put stickers on the windows
So you know where they are in space
Control center is just going to have some stickers behind it so we don't run into it.
People are just being balking in control center for about a year.
And they're like, Johnny, put the stickers on the thing.
And it's going to be fine.
But like, that's where we are.
And I do think they announce them is in a state that's a little bit more extreme than they understand where they're going to have to go.
I think Apple wants to be in that position where they want people to react to like an extreme version of it.
So then when they walk it back, one, they want.
get the big reaction in the beginning, but then it seems like they're taking the feedback into account.
It's like, what do they say, the thing you say to your kids where it's like, oh, no, your mom's dead.
And they're like, just kidding, but we are getting divorced. And it's like you soften the blow that way.
David, I'm worried you.
What are you talking about?
I haven't heard that. I've met your parents. They're very happy. They're lovely people.
Yeah, they're doing great. That's just that's a story I've heard, you know, secondhand.
But no, I think it's an interesting theory, and I have wondered about it a lot, whether
this was deliberately too much.
Because I do think with a lot of this stuff,
you just can't look at control center
and be like, yes, that's correct.
And so there's some of it that is maybe just like,
well, this is as far as we got.
We have to ship the developer beta
because WWDC is when it is.
But there's also something like,
I keep going through the thing trying to find
sort of what is the thing here.
And the only one I've landed on is,
I think the way that they've re-architected
the menus where like when you tap something
to open a menu rather than like opening up a new page, it just sort of opens in place.
It like radiates out and then you tap it again and it goes back in.
That I think is very cool and is like in service of like anchoring you in place and sort of
keeping you where you are without suddenly dropping you into another menu that looks different
only to have to go back.
That makes a lot of sense to me.
That is the only thing about liquid glass so far that feels like thoughtful and good to me.
Oh, I have a totally different opinion than you.
No, you don't like them?
I saw this in your piece when I was like on my way back to the hotel to record.
this and I was like, I'm going to disagree with David about this.
Okay.
That's just dynamic user interface.
Sure.
This is another dream that this industry has been chasing for years, that everything
will happen in context, right?
Like, all the buttons will be there when you need them and I'll go away when you,
when you don't want them or don't need them.
And the reality is fundamentally that always confuses everyone.
So you have this like idealistic user interface designer who's like, I hate, I hate that
I've cluttered up the screen with all this UI.
Microsoft Word has too many menus and buttons in the toolbar.
We're going to get rid of all of them.
And then we will intelligently discover what you need exactly when you need it.
And you'll push the button.
It'll be right there.
And you'll think, I'm a genius.
Whoever the user.
Me, Steve, user interface designer is a genius.
And then the reality is you try to do this.
And you always guess wrong.
And then there's no anchors.
So people don't know where to find the thing unless the object
that usually triggers the context is on the screen,
which gets people all turned around.
Not having used like a glass,
I don't know that this will be the problem,
but I was watching the demo,
and I was like, oh, we're doing the thing.
Every user interface company walks down this path
where they're like, it'll just happen in content.
You'll push the button, and all the right menus will be there,
and then the button will go away when you don't need it.
And, you know, on a desktop computer,
this problem is a long solve.
Like, just have a menu bar,
and we'll just get over the toolbar,
and we won't try this anymore.
And I think on mobile, because you have the constrained screen size,
the temptation is too great.
Like, can we make everything disappear?
If you really look at what Apple is saying about liquid glass,
if what Google is saying about expressive material explosion
or whatever it's called,
material expressive material three.
Listen, I was going to leave you with material explosion,
but it is material three expressive, yes.
There you go.
See, I knew all the, I had most of the phenoms right at the very least.
ingredients were there.
If you look at all of it, what they're trying to do is get rid of the interface because the
screen is so small compared to everything else.
So get rid of these elements, we'll bring them back when you need them.
And I understand the temptation.
And I, again, not having used to it, the thing that always confuses everyone in the end is that
the tools go away unless a certain object is on screen.
And that thing is not, never guaranteed be on the screen.
Yeah.
No, I agree.
I mean, and I think, again, it goes back to this question of like, does Apple just
think we all know how to do everything because like I even think about the camera app in a bunch of
these and we were going to get to this later but we can just talk about this for a minute now the
super sparse new iPhone camera app that is just like a photo button and a video button and then
they're like oh do you want all the other stuff that's somewhere else I'm like where I would
like those things I don't know Allison how did what did you think of that thing I welcome it I think
that the camera app is confusing as hell lately. So maybe it was time to kind of reset. And maybe it is
a thing of like, we'll take it one step too far and then kind of like relent a little bit.
But is it less confusing now or is it just fewer buttons? I, you know, I think it will
be one of those things you have to try out. Like the thing I'm definitely on board with is the kind
of like toggle between still photo capture and video capture. So you're not like,
like scrolling around trying to switch to a video mode,
I think that makes a ton of sense.
The thing that irritates me is that sometimes the setting I'm looking for
is in the settings menu under camera and it's, you know,
the like HDR and 4K or whatever option.
And sometimes the setting I'm looking for is in the camera app,
in one of those weird, like, tap up here on this little arrow kind of deals.
So I don't know if they address that in this redesign camera app,
but I think it is due for a shakeup.
It just turns into a never-ending kind of like sideways scrolling list of modes
if you just let it, you know, go year after year.
Apple's in a really unique place with the camera app, like industry-wide,
because one of the ways the Android side of the house tries to,
the lower the switching cost from iPhone to Android is by just ruthlessly copying the camera.
Because if you pick up a new phone and you can't use the camera, you're done.
And they know it.
Sam Bifert actually wrote a great piece for us ages ago about the ruthless copying of the camera app on Chinese Android phones in particular.
And the reason is we've seen this, I think, was celebrities taking selfie.
I can't remember who it was.
But there's like some video of a celebrity trying to take a selfie with a fan.
She can't figure out the Android camera.
Yeah, I remember this.
Oh, yeah.
Who was?
And all the Android manufacturers know what's going on.
They know that if you pick up a new phone and the camera app is too different and you can't
just figure it out.
Like, you're done.
You're not even, like, thinking about buying that phone for one more second.
So they've all ruthlessly copied the camera app.
Apple doesn't have this problem.
They can ruin the camera app and you're not going to leave the iPhone, right?
Like, they've got to ruin 10 more things on top of it for you to consider switching it.
So I think this is them taking advantage of their sort of market position.
and saying, oh, okay, we can clean up this app
in some ways that make sense.
And really, I think most people think about it
is video and photo. And then they have added
the formats back to the top, which I think is
tremendously useful.
Yeah. But again, you've got more,
you know, when they announce it, they're like,
and to go to these other modes, it's just like one tap away.
And it's like, oh, so one more tap? Are you suggesting
it's one more tap? Right. We'll see.
I hope they kind of offer a simple mode and a pro mode,
but that's a dream.
Who knows?
Yeah, I mean, I wonder with all of this stuff, like, how much the design sort of accrues back to, like, attach rates.
Like, should I just assume that the fact that there's photo and video and nothing else means that almost nobody touches anything other than photo and video?
And I think intuitively, that's probably true.
And so there is something to, like, let's just put the two buttons everybody touches in front of them.
And people who want to find other buttons will find ways to find other buttons.
Yeah.
Like you can make your picture a portrait mode photo after the fact.
So you don't need to go looking for that.
They'll just, you know, you can decide what your photo is after you take it.
It's the dream.
I like default to shooting in portrait because I forget that all the time.
And that's a useful tip that I should remember.
What did you guys hear from folks about liquid glass?
I would say the internet's reaction was kind of all over the place.
Some people who were like,
this is the most beautiful thing Apple has ever done.
Look at this water droplet.
And other people who were like, liquid ass was a phrase a lot of people using that I very much enjoyed.
What was it like in the room?
Like, was this a stand up and cheer liquid glass moment?
Like, what did it feel like?
To me, it kind of felt like, well, this is what we're doing, you know?
There's a little bit.
I don't think I got a sense of like, you know, wild appreciation for it or like dislike of it.
It just, it feels like a reality of like Apple is going to show you how you're going to redesign your app and you're going to find a way to do it.
That was just my read on the room today.
There was just a lot more general sarcasm from the developers I talked to at Dubdub this time.
You know what Apple?
That is not the normal vibe at Dubdub.
Dubdu's a very like earnest place.
Although I did, yeah, I was texting back and forth briefly with Walt Mossberg.
Mostly he was like, what was that song at the end, which we should talk about.
But I was like, there's some, you know, they're not 100% app here.
And he was like, in my long experience covering Apple, the developers are never 100% app-a-py.
So take it for odds to me.
That's my shout-out.
But like Apple didn't talk about app store rates.
They didn't talk about coming off of 30 or 15%.
They didn't talk about web links.
there's a whole universe of stuff
that developers aren't happy about
that they did not hear about.
Apple talked about running models
locally on the phone.
Developers are happy about that
because that's faster, right?
There's lower latency
if you're doing the AI stuff on the phone.
It's free,
which is cool.
They like that.
But now everything has to look different.
They're like,
well, no, no, we're kind of building everything
and React on the web,
like, shipping them in wrappers
and, like, get over it.
And, like, there's just some real questions
over whether this stuff comes for free
or whether you have to redesign your entire situation
from the ground up for a set of iOS customers
in a design language that they may not like very much
while 80% of the world has Android phones.
Right.
And that's a bigger set of question marks than, oh, on iOS,
like we can just run some of the stuff on that local AI models for free,
which is just a different set of incentives.
Right.
Yeah, it seems like the upside, if you're a developer,
is in a liquid glass world, everything runs everywhere.
right, which is very clearly what Apple's trying to do here, right?
Like, they talked about this over and over and over.
That, like, this is a broad, system-wide redesign to bring all this stuff together and all
this stuff.
And, like, fine.
All of that makes sense.
So you can ship an iPhone app and it'll work on TVOS and look more or less, right?
Is something great?
How long is the TVOS section of this conversation in your notes, David?
Is it more than two seconds?
Would you like to hear all of the notes that I wrote for TVOS?
We can do this part right now.
You're ready?
Yeah.
More notifications, new screensavers connect to a speaker.
That's all I wrote.
That's all I got for you.
But the flip side then is I think as far as I can tell and from the little bit I've talked to folks today, this actually is going to ask a lot of people because it's not just like new animation styles or how you move from place to place.
It's like you have to move where the buttons are in your app.
And that's like a real meaningful thing.
And they're going to look different.
And the way that people navigate them is going to be different.
And you're going to look at the way that something scrolls under your button and you're
not going to like it.
And you're going to have to change where the menus go.
And I think this is like, to users, it's going to feel really sort of like a coat of paint.
But for developers to do it properly, I think is going to actually take kind of a lot of
sort of architectural work, unless Apple has done a really good job of building this stuff into
its development kits in a way that you use.
kind of get it for free. And I have not heard a ton of optimism that that is the case.
Yeah, especially because you know they're going to change it over the next six months.
Like if you're designing your app and you're like, well, everything is clear now. So I need to make
this make sense. And then Apple makes everything slightly more frosted over the next six months.
Like, right. I think we're in for a long period of wait and see here. Yeah. Did you guys see
the home screen mockups with the clear icons? Not a fan. Not a fan. Yeah. I don't want that.
To actually more directly answer your question, I think the vibe online was much meaner than the vibe there.
In the way that everything online is always meaner and you show up in person, everyone was like, well, it turns out I'm a bit of a coward.
That's the nature of every online bully that is forced to contend with the real world.
It's what we do.
It turns out I'm going to wist right out.
I mean, you're in Apple's house.
Everyone's like sort of happy.
They're playing new age music all over the place.
It's very odd.
Yeah.
And the people who are there, the people want to be there.
But then I went online.
I was like, oh, people are tearing this to shreds.
And so I think we're just in for a period of cooling off.
And I do think they just have to change it.
If they don't change it, we can rerun this podcast and I will eat my words.
There's no way they're not going to change it.
Yeah.
No, I think that's right.
And one of the things I've enjoyed is there's an accessibility feature in the developer
beta that I think it's just called high contrast mode.
and it just undoes all of it and looks a thousand times better.
It's like, it just frosts the glass.
And it's like, guys, just frosts the glass.
It's like, it's fine.
What if there was a little bit of color, but it didn't put the words behind the words
so that I couldn't read any of the words anymore?
Like, wouldn't that be great?
What we need is a slider.
How much frost in the glass?
I like that idea.
Or like a clicker you can use to frost and unfrost the glass.
Oh, that'd be great.
Like a privacy screen.
Yeah, exactly.
Like those windows they have.
Yeah. This is what I'm saying. This is a good idea.
So, okay, before we get into the specific platform stuff, Nilai, you made a face at me earlier when I said they didn't even talk all that much about Apple intelligence.
What's your sort of overall read on like how much today was an AI day? Like, did it feel like an AI day to you?
Maybe in the way that it should have the first time. Okay.
Right. So everything they announced had some little component of machine learning smarts built into it.
Right. So much of what they announced across the board and their operating systems are like the phone app is a lot smarter now.
You know, like, and these are, again, these are Android features. But like it'll wait on hold for you. And then when a person on the other end picks up, it'll say like, I'm coming and like ring you. You just need some AI-ish features to pull that off, right? To detect the old music and wait and like do the thing. There's just so much of that throughout the operating system now. You're like, oh, this is, this is, these are.
table stakes AI features for a phone operating system at this point.
What they didn't announce was Apple Intelligence, the part where you just talk to Siri and it
does stuff for you.
Which I'm just going to keep hammering this point home.
That's what people want AI to be.
They're talking and chat GPT all day long and thinking it's alive.
So you're like, we did AI too.
And it's like, what is it?
And it's like, well, you can screenshot a web page and then buy a lamp.
And it's like, well, that's not what we were thinking about.
Right. Gen Moji is not digital god.
What was the one today with the two?
They're like, we combined a sloth with a light bulb.
Sloth of the light bulbs.
To indicate that I was slow to get the joke.
Yeah.
Guys, like, first of all, this is a great PhD thesis in modern communication.
This is a trillion-dollar company.
It's one, it, depending on the stock price, it is the richest company in the history of the world.
Like, on any given day.
And you're like, we did a sloth and a light bulb to indicate.
that I was a lot from to get a joke. What is going on? Like, stop it. Like, no. Don't do this.
What people want is to talk to the computer in a natural language interface and have it talk
back to them and do stuff for them. That's the only thing that can ever deliver on the promise
of something called Apple Intelligence. Like, it just is. And so all this other stuff, it is AI.
You look down the list of features. Right. AI features through and through. Their machine learning
features through and through. So the reason I made the face is, one, every time you speak,
I make a face and I often have to hold myself back from revealing it.
But I'm quite tired today.
So it just cannot.
That's the tracks.
But they screwed up last year by by just sort of like mashing up like text generators and writing tools with like, you know, super Siri.
And this year they just talked, they didn't talk about that at all.
And they gave you a sloth with a light bulb and like AI is here.
And it's like, we have to get ourselves straight.
there's exactly one big thing that it is going to do
and no company has shipped it yet at scale in a way that works
and we're all just going to keep working on it and that's fine or whatever
you can have whatever feelings you want about it.
In the meantime, all of this other stuff is actually quite useful.
And it's kind of like unfair to punish it with this isn't digital con.
But it is genuinely useful that the phone can detect more scams in messages
and in the phone app and like shunt those people off.
into like a waiting, like, you can't be too mad at that stuff, especially when it's happening
locally on the phone. So I think you see more and more of that happening on the phone. They're
finding more and more places to use the tools. They're just the only real way you can deliver
on something called Apple Intelligence is by letting you talk to Siri and having a talk back to you.
Right. Yeah, I mean, I think I was thinking about this a lot with all the translation stuff,
which kept showing up across a bunch of these platforms where they're doing like real-time on-device
cross-app translation stuff, whether it's like,
you know,
translation of lyrics in Apple Music,
I think was a neat one,
or translation on calls.
It's like,
that's pure AI.
Like,
for that stuff to work is pure AI.
That is the stuff.
And it's like,
I think,
I like the phrase we shouldn't punish it for not being God.
It's like,
it's true.
That stuff is like,
but it is just,
it's just software.
Like,
before chat GPT,
we would have just called this software,
right?
And it's like,
machine learning's been around for a long time.
We've been doing this for a long time.
this stuff is cool and interesting and useful
and it is better because these large language models exist.
That stuff has been like a leap in a lot of that technology,
but it's not God.
And so I think you're right that Apple should have talked about
a lot of this stuff this way last year.
And I think the vibe probably would have been really different.
But instead you promise God.
How do you, like you can't walk back from promising God.
Yeah, you're going to talk to Siri
and it's going to remember who you had a meeting with
while you're like cowering in the antechamber of the coffee shop.
Yeah.
That's the ad that they had to pull, right?
And remember, that's a lot.
There's a lot of steps between here and there to pull that off.
And that has nothing to do with whether you can incrementally improve the experience of using the phone today.
But that's what everybody wants.
And when I say that's what everybody wants, what I mean is chat Shep is one of the most popular consumer apps ever.
Like maybe the most popular consumer app ever.
People just want to talk to their phone in that way.
And Apple's argument is, well,
it, great, they're doing it on the iPhone today.
They're downloading the chat GPT app,
and when you subscribe to it, we take
30% of that, and we're good.
Like, what more do you want from us?
And the pressure is, everybody understands,
well, maybe I can get you to buy a different device
if that actually occurs.
Google very much is like, maybe you'll just
say stuff to Google, and we'll go
and do everything for you, and that's the platform
of the future. Apple has to make
the turn, and they haven't expressed
how they're going to make the turn. Right.
Yeah, if they had kind of set up
the Siri remembers who you talk to at a party stuff is like a future, you know, this is kind of
the North Star where we're headed. I think that would have been one thing, but they literally
presented it. Like, it's here. It can, it's going to do this, you know, any minute now. And that's
why it just feels weird to kind of go back into like, oh, these are machine learning updates.
You know, it was like, okay, you had us going all the way to like, series.
fixes your social life to like, we're back at square one now.
Like if it had all kind of built in a more linear fashion, I think it would have made sense,
but it's a little like whiplashy right now.
Well, so that's, I mean, we'll probably come to this one, I guess, the Mac,
but if you look at what they were showing off in Spotlight, it's right there.
Mm-hmm.
Right?
You can just search across your Mac.
You can type in shortcuts to get it to send emails.
free, like all this stuff you can do where the puzzle pieces are very clearly in place.
But they just haven't been put together.
And in the new spotlight, you can sort of put them together yourself.
I don't know if that's going to work either.
Yeah.
Let's start talking about the platforms.
We should get into all of that.
But first, let's take a break.
We're going to go summon V-Song.
We're going to take a break.
And then we're going to talk, Nelai, because I love you, we'll talk about the Mac first.
We'll be right back.
Support for this show comes from Shopify.
Every thriving, successful business has to start somewhere.
A good place to start is a relatively simple question.
What if, given the right tools, I really put my all into this.
One tool that can help grow your sprouting business to new heights is Shopify.
Millions of businesses around the world rely on Shopify for e-commerce.
They offer a host of helpful tools you can take advantage of, from payment processing to analytics to website design.
Their design studio includes hundreds of templates to help you create the exact website you've been envisioning for your business.
If you're wondering, what if I need help, then no worries, because you're never left to fend for yourself.
Shopify's award-winning customer support is available 24-7.
It's time to turn those what-ifs into a thriving business with Shopify today.
Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash vergecast.
Go to Shopify.com slash vergecast.
That's Shopify.com slash vergecast.
Support for the show comes from Upwork.
The days of doing it all, all by yourself, are over.
There's no romance and burning out while you're trying to scale.
Instead, you can check out Upwork.
Upwork helps grow your business by giving you fast access
to specialize talent across more than 125 categories,
so you can fill skill gaps, launch projects faster, and scale without committing to full-time headcount.
And finding the right talent is easy.
You can browse profiles, review past work, and get help scoping the role so you can get started quickly.
Seriously, you could connect with the right freelancer in just a few hours, especially when you sign up with Business Plus.
Their AI-powered shortlisting pairs you with the top 1% of talent in under six hours.
No endless searcher required.
You can visit upwork.com right now to post your job for free.
That's upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow.
That's upw-w-rk.com.
Upwork.com.
Support for the show comes from LinkedIn.
If you're a small business owner, you know that every hire counts,
but time and resources are limited.
Finding, connecting with, and screening the right candidates
takes up valuable time you could be giving to your customers.
That's where LinkedIn Hiring Pro comes in.
It's built to be your hiring partner,
helping you find the right candidates faster.
That way you can hire with confidence
without turning it into another full-time job.
Hiring Pro streamlines the entire process
from drafting your job to shortlisting candidates
and conducting AI-powered interviews for initial screenings.
It's updated conversational interface
lets you describe what you need in plain language.
Nearly 60% of hirers find a candidate to interview within a week.
With Hiring Pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent.
And instead of getting buried in resumes, you get a focus shortlist that actually moves your hiring forward.
Join the 2.7 million small businesses using LinkedIn to hire.
Get started by posting your job for free at LinkedIn.com slash track.
Terms and conditions apply.
All right, we're back.
V song is here.
Hi, V.
Welcome.
Hi.
You made it out of Apple Park.
We're very happier here.
In one piece.
It's not a small task sometimes.
Wait, can I tell a story about being at Apple Events with V when you're live logging?
Oh, my God.
Okay.
Sure.
Normally, everyone's like, you know, busy.
They're focused.
We're looking down.
V is like a mystery science theater, 3,000, but of size and moans.
just like, oh,
and especially in like the fitness segments
where they're like a personalized health coach
we're like walk you through all of the data
we've been scanning from your body
and he's just like,
whar, like the whole time.
It's very entertaining.
It's true.
Well, at least it's entertaining.
I am not aware that I'm making those noises half the time.
No, that much is also very clear at everyone
involuntary full body reactions to what is happening.
See is like the real-time audience reaction meter like from one to ten at all time.
It's very good.
Again, if you have the means, I highly recommend it.
You know, I think someone reached out to me on Blue Sky and I was like,
it's been an honor of watching you live blog.
And I was like, oh my God, what?
That's terrifying.
My experience of what it looks like to watch someone live blog is they just sit there until they sunburn
typing on their computer in Apple Park.
And that's the live on.
Oh, no.
I had three bottles of sunscreen,
and I was making several pale white men who did not bring sunscreen,
put sunscreen on their face today.
I can confirm.
Both Allison and V said it was their mission to get people who are sunscreen today.
Yeah, and we did it.
I'm very proud of both of you.
Yeah.
All right, let's talk about platforms.
So we've talked about the big picture stuff.
V, you missed us having a lot of feelings about liquid glass.
I suspect there will be ample times.
to have more feelings about liquid glass,
which again, I hate more every single time I say it out loud.
Let's talk about the Mac first.
I have this in rough order of how interested I am in it personally.
But Neli, for you, I switched one and two
because you are just dying to talk about Spotlight.
So the big news, MacOS 26, it's called Tahoe.
It has the new design.
It has all the liquid glass stuff.
But the big new feature,
and I would say potentially the most universally
exciting thing at all of WWDC was
new spotlight. Do you want to explain what new spotlight is and why you're
excited about it? Yeah. Although I think it's a tie. I think it's new spotlight
and the iPad stuff. Those are the things that I heard about. That was going to be my number one.
We were going to do that first, but for you, we're doing spotlight. I think we can move
through the new spotlight pretty quickly. So Spotlight is when you hold down command space on a Mac.
It initially just started as like a search of all your files. And then they started
adding more features to it. And I could sort of like search the web.
and now they're just adding the capabilities
to take actions across your computer to it
in weird ways
like you can launch shortcuts from it
which implies that you have a library of shortcuts
which implies that David has to talk about shortcuts
which implies that David is going to receive hate mail
from many dozens of shortcuts fans that exist in this world
just know that I hear you and that you're wrong
and that's okay
and then you know
they've added stuff they should have had from the beginning
like all of the menu items
and whatever app you're using are now available on Spotlight.
So you can just start typing a menu command and issue a menu command.
And then there's, you know, because shortcuts are more powerful and have access to some amount of AI,
you can start to take more complicated commands that feel more natural language.
And you're just inching towards what I keep describing as like a magic command line on your computer
where you can just open it and type it and tell it what to do.
And then it goes off and does something.
And that is so close to just saying what you want to Siri.
to the point where like the,
the technology mechanisms
behind the new Spotlight are the same
is what they talked about with Super Siri
last year. It's the App Intense
Framework where Spotlight is just talking
to apps through this new framework
that eventually Siri will use
to talk to apps. And so they're
inching towards a place
where you have like
a command line that is not just a
like a take properly
formatted commands command line,
but just you open it up and you start
typing and stuff starts happening. And that's awesome. Whether any of this will work or
any of developers will support app intents or, importantly, whether anyone is using applications
on a Mac that aren't just web apps and a web browser, all of this remains seen. David,
I'm very curious for your take on this because apps like Raycast have existed forever. Like,
there's a universe of apps that take over command space to do stuff in the productivity world.
And I can't tell if all of them just got Sherlocked or none of them feel competitive at
or what the overlap really is.
They will tell you things like,
we're so glad the space is expanding
and we think this really validates our thesis.
The last thing you see before you die.
That's right.
We're so glad that others are,
you know,
really believing in this thing that we've been,
they are all going to be petrified
because this is the thing
that is now good enough
that people might not switch to Raycast or Alfred.
Right.
So like, based on what we've seen,
these other apps specifically,
Raycast and Alfred, which are like the two biggest ones in this space and have been around for a long time
and are like enormously powerful, right? They have these huge extension libraries that let you
essentially like plug them into all kinds of other apps and all kinds of other uses. And you can
essentially do anything on your computer through one of these apps if you program it correctly
enough. And now Raycast in particular is also like deep into AI stuff so you can interact with
AI models just right through Raycast that way. But it's a lot of
of that is predicated on the fact that Spotlight is really, really bad. And it's, like,
Spotlight is pretty bad. It's a useful, like, meh search engine for the stuff on your computer.
That's, like, as good as it has been for a very long time. And now it's going to be much
better than that if this stuff works to the point where, A, it might teach people that this is a
thing you can do. I don't know if you all have this experience, but, like, on my phone, I use Spotlight
all the time to, like, find and open apps. But most of the other people in my life when they take my
phone don't just like instinctively pull down and search for Spotify. They go like hunting for the
Spotify logo. And I'm just like, this is just not a, this is just not an ingrained use case.
Like, Spotlight is not a mainstream tool on any of these platforms. And I think, I think this might
be the turn that helps it start to get there. And I just think that's super interesting. Like,
forget what people actually use it for. The idea that this is now, like a text box becomes the way
I interact with my computer. It's the first time that's been true. And 40,
years. And I think that's really fascinating. Like, V, are you a spotlight person? I am, and I was a
really big Alfred person for a long time. And then I just stopped one day. I don't really know why I
did, but I just did. So, yeah, to your point, I use spotlight nonstop on my phone. And it's
because I have too many freaking apps. So, like, I, we were talking about how bad my eyesight is
I'll have time to look at my giant iPhone screen to find a tiny little app.
on the whatever page. So yeah, I'm a big spotlight user. So I mean, it does suck.
Alfred is better. I'm sure I haven't used Radcaster, but I'm sure that's also better.
So yeah, I'm kind of excited to see how it works. I'm just super skeptical that it will work
the way I want because I just feel like any time they say it's going to make your life better.
I'm like, yeah, I can't wait. This isn't what I wanted. Close, but so I'm reserving judgment.
But this is the peril of the magic command line, right?
Right.
To make it work in a way that makes it useful, you have to be able to type anything you want into it.
This is why like Windows and Mice and graphical user interfaces took over from old school command lines.
Because you like show a blinking cursor to people that could only accept certain commands.
Like that just made computers inaccessible.
You're like, here's some pictures.
You can move them around.
Like, okay, everybody can use this.
You want to bring it back.
It has to be able to take whatever you put in.
into it, which is where LLMs and all this AI stuff should shine. And like, that's the gap.
And that's why I keep saying, like, they talked about that stuff and they showed you how it would
work. And then they didn't connect it to Siri because they can't make that promise again.
Because that's also how Siri should work where you just say whatever you want that like figures
it out. I think it's partly that I also think I'm realizing more the more we talk that like
the Siri reputational hole is so deep for all of this stuff.
for Apple that if it
were to have connected that to Siri
and it was like, oh, you know,
Spotlight is going to let you through
Siri so everybody would have immediately been like,
oh, this will never work. There's no chance.
Tomatoes thrown at the screen.
Yeah, exactly.
But so I think, I think, like,
I'm starting to realize maybe Apple is going out of its way
to not connect this stuff back to Siri
in order to maybe convince you that it can actually still work
because the brand hole that Siri has just like,
burned through Apple is pretty nuts.
And Siri just went off two times while I was saying that.
So I'm sorry to everyone watching and listening.
This is what we do here.
But no, I think I think you're right that Spotlight could, like, it could feel that way now.
And there's nothing sort of technically impossible about a lot of the stuff Apple is trying to do here.
Like the app intense thing is very smart.
If developers get on board, the commands it was doing are mostly pretty easy.
Like what was the example he gave?
He typed SM to send a message.
Like, that's solved technology.
This stuff works.
It's important to kind of pull this apart.
There's SM to send a message was they had made like a short, like a quick key shortcut,
which you can do right now.
It's like a text expander.
But they had mapped it to a shortcut and then the shortcut could do stuff.
So this is like there are layers of automation in the Mac that they're like, look at what
you can do as a Mac power user.
So that was hitting Spotlight and shortcuts.
I was thinking that was just a like a system level thing.
Okay, that makes me like...
Well, so the system level thing,
this is where I think it got particularly confusing,
the demo on their website, right now.
If you go on Apple.com slash OS slash MacOS,
you know, scroll that,
and you can look at this thing.
They open Spotlight.
It's as biggest spotlight ever,
and here's the graphic that's animating on a screen.
And it types send,
and that brings up a list of commands.
And so one of them is send in messages,
and you click that,
and then you type,
let's meet at the studio,
and you click two,
and then it has a list of,
like,
your contacts.
So you see,
like,
it's prompting you
to issue a command
that looks an awful lot
like a shortcut.
This is a lot of,
like,
puzzle pieces,
right?
And so what you,
what they're getting at is,
okay,
all the apps in your system
will tell spotlight,
all of the things they can do.
And you'll start typing
some stuff you want done
and we'll,
like,
auto-complete the actions you want
taken the data you want taken and like the recipients of your message which is another data in
another field and then we'll like send that command to messages which will then send this thing off
and that is just like a hop away from making a shortcut which is itself a hop away from having a
quick key assigned to it like and so oh we're just stacking all of these capabilities and we're
making the interface spotlight and eventually you're going to be able to just say out loud
send this to whoever at what time and like we'll just
we'll just parse it all and do it correctly.
And there's like a little turn in there that's the natural language turn.
But in the meantime, it's type, as you start typing it, like, pre-populates all the commands
and prompts you for what you want to put, like what variables you want to pass through.
This is all very smart.
It's very clever.
If they announced this stuff five years ago, they'd be like, this is the future of computers.
Here in 2025, Johnny I and Sam Altman are like, what we're doing is we're going to put Jesus in a necklace.
And it's like, you're just in a whole different.
You're just in a whole different context.
And I think it's very clever.
The idea that all the commands that are available
from all the applications of their computer
are sort of just available
in a command line that is universally accessible
is wild shit.
Yeah.
But all those application developers have to do it
and then people have to use it.
And the thing that's staring them in the face
is literally chat GPT being like,
what would say anything?
And I'll lie to you until you're happy.
Yeah.
That's just a radically different context to be in.
So I will say, by the way, what you just described is pure Raycast.
Like, you just described Raycast.
And the thing that Raycast did that was so smart is like you can build extensions that plug into other apps.
And when you do that, it sort of declares a bunch of specific actions you can do and things that you can look for.
And you can map those things to keyboard shortcuts.
And it is it is both very complicated and also kind of very simple at its core.
Right.
Like what you, none of what you just described requires groundbreaking advances in artificial intelligence.
That's just computer stuff.
Yeah.
Right.
It's just here.
And there's another thing Spotlight can do where when you're in an app, you can invoke Spotlight to search the menu inside of that app, which like every Photoshop user is going to be thrilled about, right?
Because suddenly, instead of navigating through six trees of menus, I can just search for the menu item I want to click and press enter and click.
Right.
But the problem with that is every Photoshop user also.
now largely a Figma user.
And Figma is an app
is expressed inside of a web browser
that has no idea
that any of this shit is happening.
Right.
And every electron app,
which is like a cheap and dirty way
of getting web apps to look native
on a Mac or PC,
and I know the electron don't.
There's some very good electron apps out there.
There's some very bad electron app.
They're not going to know about this stuff.
They're not going to do this stuff.
And so you really just,
Apple's betting on developers,
particularly in the Mac,
participating in an ecosystem
that right now they have no incentive to participate in.
Right. This whole thing makes
way more sense to me on an iPhone, honestly,
as both as like a way I want
to use it and as
a place you can actually do it
because they don't, that same problem does not
exist in the same way on the iPhone.
Because Apple has militant control
over its platform. Look,
you feel that it however you want, but the facts
on the ground are it's all native apps.
And like, to V's point, I have a million
apps, I don't know where any of them are, I would actually like to not have to organize them.
And I would like to not have to go to them and open them and look for them.
I would like to just pull down and say, play the song, and it'll play the damn song.
That's how it should work on my phone.
I firmly believe that.
It kind of works that way in your phone today.
Are you, you play, you can just say play a song.
Play the song.
I've got to test this now, too.
It wants me to play the, it just started playing play that.
song by train on Spotify.
So, tushay.
Oh, I'm sorry about that.
The computers work today.
That one might have been a bad example.
But if you want to play any song other than play that song.
This is why we need to build digital God.
Can I have one trillion dollars, please?
I'm sort of reminded of like the Google search bar and how that kind of changed over the years where it was, you know, you would just type things to it and search Google.
but then we all learned eventually like, oh, it'll do a math equation for you, or you can just convert currency.
And it's sort of like the scope of what the search bar became changed.
I don't know.
I can see that happening with Spotlight.
Like I had to train myself to use it.
I just had the muscle memory of like looking for my apps.
And then once you use it, it was like, no, this is better.
And other things pop up too.
And if it's going to start prompting me to, like, do the thing I was, I was trying to take three steps to do, and it'll do it in one tap.
Like, yeah, I'll come back to that.
So what I actually use Spotlight for most on my Mac is doing equations.
So there's that.
There you go.
Yeah.
I don't want to open a calculator app.
I don't want to type it into another thing.
I'm just going to write my little equation while calculating various debts in Spotlight.
It's my little calculator friend.
Yeah.
That works.
And that's like, yeah, and again, there's so much stuff you can plug into this if you can get people, A, to put their apps into it and be to use it.
And I think like the reason I'm so interested in this is this feels like the biggest bet on Spotlight as an interface in kind of that I can ever remember from Apple.
Spotlight has just like been there for a long time.
And it's just like, what if what if there was a plan for this?
And this feels like a plan, which I think is very cool.
other Mac stuff before we move on.
Stop me if any of this is interesting to any of you.
Shortcuts, automations,
which means you can run or you consider a shortcut to run at a time
or when an event happens on your computer.
All my shortcuts nerds get excited.
Sorry to everyone else because you'll never learn how to build shortcuts.
The journal app coming to the Mac.
People excited about that.
Wait, can I say one thing about shortcuts?
Please.
There are new shortcuts that are like LLN based.
Yeah.
So really interesting idea.
is. Like, if an image matching this description shows up in this folder, take this action,
requires the computer. Be able to look at an image and, like, decide whether it has a tree
in it or whatever you've specified. Fascinating. Then you can be like, take my notes from the
notes app and look at the text and then transcribe it if it matches whatever. And then summarize
that. Like, just interesting shortcuts that require you to have access to an LN in specific
ways are now just like there. Whether or not they will be useful or
function on time, right?
Which is a major criticism
of shortcuts that some people have
and some people do not, apparently,
remains to be seen.
But that kind of stuff is pretty interesting.
Like image-based workflows
that require the computer
to understand the contents of the image,
that's a whole universe of new things
that people will be able to build.
I think my problem with like the shortcut stuff
is that it's still not smart enough for me
because you still have to be
the person putting all of the components together. You have to be the one defining what things are
going to be used. And then, of course, you can prompt the shortcut. But then you have to be, you just
have to use too much of your brain to make the shortcut work, which is the current problem that I think
a lot of people who don't have functional developer brains and are like good at coding or these like
different logic trees have with shortcuts, because you just don't know what you can do with it. You don't know
how to think in that way, which has been my problem with shortcuts this entire time. I want to use shortcuts. I love it. Like when you go into the little gallery and you're like, ooh, I could, I could do this. This is a little fun. There's no, like, you know, I asked Apple and I was just like, hey, so can the Apple intelligence just see the things that I do and what I'm doing on like a bit regular basis and make that suggestion for me? Is that what we're having here? And they're like, no. You still got to use your little brain and then have the AI help you. It's supplement. It's supplement. It's supplement. It's supplement.
And I was like, but that's, that's, that's, that's not what I want. I want to turn my brain off and have the short cut happen. Yeah, you want the thing that's like every time you download a picture of this, you put it over there. Do you want me to just start doing that for you? Like, that's, that's just sitting right there. That's just super clippy. I mean, that's where we're, that's where we've been going. That's what I want. That's what we're doing. No. It's what we want. And you still have to make the super clippy. You can't just like offload the making of the super clippy. So I think that's the most disappointing thing about it. So.
far. It's a step in the right direction. It's just not where I want it to be yet. Well, you know,
I agree that like either you have automation brain or you don't, right? Like, when I get home,
turn on all the lights is you can just say it out loud and then actually programming any smart
home platform to make that happen requires you to like understand if then statements in a way that
some people are like, I'm just never going to do this. And some people are like, that's my whole
personality. Right. And it's one or the other from what I can tell. And the job. And the
dream is that, you know, even when you talk to the Alexa people or whoever, that the smart
home platforms will start to do that for you. It's still not the case. And even if you look at
sort of where the cutting edge of AI agent stuff is and kind of these new look platforms like
N8N, which I'm a little bit obsessed with, it's not you don't have logic gate automation brain.
It's that the stuff you can put like the legal blocks of the if then statements are vastly
more powerful than they were before. And you have all these.
kids making TikToks using N&N to like create agents doing all kinds of wild stuff because the
tools even given are more powerful, not the tool to author the automation. And I want like that
dynamic I think will always exist. And here I think you're just seeing it play out in shortcuts where
they haven't figured out the technology problem of making the people who don't have automation
brain like find this to be a rewarding experience. And maybe they never will. But they're giving
more and more powerful tools to people who are like, I love this. And some,
that has to come together. Because it does feel like
the future of all computing
is just telling
computers what to do and assuming that they will do it.
And that requires the back end to work
in this way. But in the meantime,
they're just like, here's some more powerful Legos.
Like, go build whatever weird Lego structure you want
out of if-end statements. Right.
And then two-thirds of the world looks at those
and goes, what is, why do I have all these
Legos in front of me? I'm going to leave. And then
one third of those people sends David angry
emails about shortcuts. And I welcome
them. I will. I will
as I like to do, show you the opening screen of a new shortcut,
and you can tell me what to do about it.
The first word is scripting, and we're done.
All right, let's talk with the iPad,
which I think was the other kind of big hit moment
and is also the thing I have been playing with
for the last couple of hours and have a lot of feelings about it already.
iPad OS 26, the same thing, liquid glass, lots of new apps.
But, like, V, they kind of just made this thing a Mac.
Did they just kind of make this thing a Mac?
They did.
They made it a Mac.
I haven't, you know, like we've been talking for years about just let me use macOS on the iPad.
And they were like, no, but kind of.
So, you know, I was watching that through the live blog and I was like David Pierce is like screeching at this moment somewhere in the U.S.
Is it a happy screech or is it an angry screech?
I don't know, but it's a screech.
The screech is happening.
I've just been burned so many times, feed, do you know what I mean?
Every time Apple is like, we've invented a new way to move windows around.
And I keep being like, what if you, we already invented the only one that needs to exist.
And it's just put them wherever you want.
So I don't know, whatever you invented, I like it less.
But they did it better this time.
By the way, I have an answer from some, you know, on the ground conversations about why they tried everything else first.
You're not going to like it, but this is the answer I was told.
Because they hate me personally.
Yes, they're like, we've run out of ways to torture David Pierce.
No, the iPad is a touch device.
and they were never, ever, ever going to trade away
against the zero lag responsiveness of the touchscreen on the iPad.
And so they were like,
it would be too hard to allow full Mac like multitasking
and multi-windowing and apps all running at once
because we can trade away against the latency
of the Mac's interface.
Like you can, this happens.
You can click on stuff on a Mac and like nothing happens.
They're like, huh, that's weird.
If you touch a screen and nothing happens,
like this thing's dead.
Right?
Like you can see the mouse.
pointer always moves on a Mac.
When the mouse pointer stops moving, you're like, my Mac is dead.
The mouse pointer moves and you click on stuff and nothing happens.
They're like, oh, this thing's being slow.
You touch an iPad screen, nothing happens.
It's dead. And there's no other indication that's still alive.
So their argument was we needed this much horsepower on the latest blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah.
So that we could finally allow you to do full window multitasking in this way.
I didn't say you were going to like it.
And I can already see David's face.
But I'm telling you, this is a thing that a few people there told me.
I buy the premise.
I don't buy that the technology did not exist before today.
Do you know what I mean?
I'm just like short.
But so the new multitasking system is like it's almost free form multitasking.
It is not exactly.
There are a couple of rules you have to follow.
And it also a lot of it as ever depends on the actual design of the apps themselves.
I installed the beta and I've been playing around with it.
And if you want to just pull.
12 apps in and have them all sitting on top of each other, you can. And it's awesome. And no one should do it because it breaks immediately and doesn't make any sense. I was going to ask, like, what is the maximum window count that you can have on an iPad? I believe I've had eight at once on the screen so far, which is already like three or four more than makes any plausible sense to have. But I did it and it was there and it was working. And that is something.
It's a little confusing now because there are, so the framework is basically you have,
you have your home screen with the app icons.
And then the sort of mental model is there is now just like a screen over here that you put apps on.
You can either open an app full screen or you can, you tap the little bar in the corner
and drag it to whatever size you want it to be.
And then it sits there.
You can drag another one on top of it.
You can change the size depending on how they've laid the app out.
Some of them will only do like iPad size, smaller iPad size and iPhone size.
Some will only do one.
Some you can like free form move around as you want to.
But they all just kind of live on this one screen together, right, all the apps.
And then if you if you tap on the new little menu, it gives you the red, yellow, green buttons.
You hit the green one, it full screens it.
If you hit the yellow one, it minimizes it.
And if you hit the red one, it closes it.
And if you were to say, David, what's the difference between minimizing an app on an iPad and closing an app on an iPad?
I absolutely could not tell you.
No idea.
In both cases, it's just like animated retreats back into the icon.
And then when you tap it, it opens again.
And I don't know what the difference is.
I will say Apple has never, from the beginning of the three,
the stoplight metaphor for the windows,
they've never really known what the other two buttons are for.
No.
Like they've always known what red is for.
Yes.
And the other ones are like, well, we have the stoplight.
stuff there for stuff
it's like when I
you know how you have
there's clean clothes in your house
there's a dirty clothes and then there's the like
you know I'm I might not be done with this
that's like the yellow light one
that's just a little pile on the dresser
of like maybe I'll use that a little bit
smell and you're like I can get away with it
yeah you're like yeah this is still okay
the green button in particular
for a long time on the Mac was just like a
whatever we think this time.
Yeah, didn't it just sort of,
my memory of it is it just randomly changed
the size of the app to whatever it felt like.
Yeah, that's what it was.
It's just like,
green means go.
You know what I mean?
Like,
whatever you think go means in this context,
it's,
that's what might happen.
Yeah.
And I think on the iPad,
you have the same between red and yellow.
It's fine.
It's fine.
Sure.
It's whatever.
But there are a bunch of things about it
that I think are pretty clever.
Like it has a little,
they demoed this,
the sort of little flick gesture that you can do
to anchor it to one
side of the screen or the other.
That works well, but like a lot of Apple things, you have to, like, really learn how to do it.
It's like a, you have to do kind of a half flick to, like, the middle of the side.
If you flick it too hard, it just, like, bounces off and comes back.
Wait, do you, are you flicking with your finger or using the mouse?
So you can do it with the mouse, but I've just mostly been doing it with my thumbs.
So you've been, like, steam deck and apps all over here.
Yeah, me.
Absolutely.
But now, to your point about the mouse, there is now, like, an honest to God.
pointer, which makes such a bigger difference than I realized.
Like, there's Ben, you could move a cursor around, but it was a little, little circular thing.
Yeah.
Now it feels like you have a mouse on the computer and you can click small things now.
And it really, like, those two things, plus there's now a preview app, which is just for PDFs, which, speaking of like a whole industry that just immediately got Sherlocked, like, sorry to everybody who built the $10 app for editing PDFs because you're out of business.
You're fine.
You deserve to die and you know it.
That's fair.
I don't feel that bad.
Your weird subscription,
NFT PDF viewer,
like,
you should have been dead
a long time ago.
Yeah,
all the free trials
I have signed up for
to get Acrobat for one day
to be able to edit a PDF
I no longer feel bad.
You're not seen in the first
Batman movie,
the 89 Batman
where the Joker says,
I'm glad you're dead
and starts cackling.
I want you to picture my face.
Do an AI of my face doing that.
A PDF.
Love that for you.
So yeah,
put those things together,
and then there's a bunch of changes
to the files app
where now there's a list view.
they made a big deal out of a list view.
Once a year, there is a thing at WWDC where they're like,
we've invented a computer feature from the 70s.
Can I say they did a whole screen that was just files in the dock,
like just in bold, like beautiful print.
And I was like, oh, well, that's going in the live blog because it's so silly.
Yeah.
And then they're like, oh, we're going to explain to you how it works.
And how it works is exactly like it does on the Mac.
You tap on it and it opens up and shows.
do the files and then you can click the files and drag them somewhere.
Like, Neely, what was the, what was the thing last year where they were, they were showing
some kind of multitasking thing? And Craig Fiderigi was like, he dragged something from one
screen to another on, it was like the external display thing. And he like, it was just,
his mind was blown that you could have something on one display and then you could have it on
the other display. And then it was just like, we're just doing this again.
Most of the iPad features where they just made the iPad of Mac were, I think targeted specifically
me and my complaints about the iPad over the years.
They're like, let's talk about files.
And it's like, yeah, dude.
I told you do this a decade ago.
But they ended it all in like a very self-deprecating way.
They're like, can you imagine a pointer in a menu bar and windows?
Who would have thought of these ideas?
That's true.
They know.
They know what they're doing.
But, you know, the opportunity with the iPad is you get to have these ideas from a fresh start
because every year you can change them apparently, you know.
And like the thing that's holding me,
the iPad back is not the multi-window model, it's that iPad apps are bad.
Yes.
And until they open up the App Store in some way to solve that problem, well, the iPad apps
are still going to be bad.
And you can have as many, you know, sort of like cut-down versions of real apps as you want
in your iPad and as many windows as you want.
But that's your problem.
And they didn't, nothing to address that.
No, I mean, that has forever been the thing Apple just can't figure out how to do for some
reason is convince anyone other than like a very specific set of creative tools.
Like you can get honest to God like professional class creative tools on the iPad.
They're very good.
And you can, if you are a creative person, you want to do your job.
Ironically, it is easier to do your like fancy 3D modeling job on your on the iPad than
it is to send emails all day on the iPad.
Like it's crazy.
This is where we are.
But I think I think you're right.
But I also think to the extent that what maybe has been gating people from doing that is the sense of like, I can do a lot of stuff at once and move quickly between things and sort of feel powerful on an iPad, the way I feel powerful on a Mac.
This theoretically, at least, we'll see how it all actually works.
But like, this kind of solves all of my problems in a way that I have not experienced before with an iPad.
I look forward to the years worth of I try to use an iPad to replace my Mac coverage to come.
I suspect everyone's going to end up right back on their Macs.
But yeah, yeah.
I inevitably I am going to write that story in the next three months.
So I shouldn't really give anybody any crap.
I had a second kid and decided to go all in on an iPad.
It's like a thing that's coming for me.
Let's see.
Other stuff in the iPad, there again also got a phone app.
Is it weird that there's just now a phone app everywhere?
I've been having a lot of like galaxy brain.
feelings about this, but maybe it doesn't matter.
Just make phone calls. Who cares?
Yeah, I think Apple realizes messaging is like a core use case of every kind of computer now.
And it's weird to only tie their ecosystem to the like cell voice network that exists on the phone.
Because they also have messages and FaceTime and all the stuff.
And they control your phone.
They can just pass like real phone audio to it.
Like no one else limits themselves in this way.
But can you imagine the phone app going off on all of your Apple devices at the
same time because it's there. That happens today. Yeah, it already does. Do you not,
does 10 things not ring when you get a phone call? I know, but like even more.
Yeah, by the way, what the thing that didn't solve anywhere is like notifications or prioritizing
which devices get notifications. Like the main problem in their ecosystem, as expressed,
V, to your point, like the phone app goes off everywhere without any sense of what you are,
like, where you are or what you're doing. It would be nice if they were like, also, we've made it
so that notifications consistently show up where they need to be.
No mention of that.
The other thing was local video and audio capture.
They made like a real outreach to podcasters in this one.
They're like if you're,
if you want to record all your stuff locally while you're on video calls,
now you can.
I think this is like this is a main complaint of creators who use iPads a lot from what,
from what I gather.
That's true.
Because app, like,
we're recording this in this app called Riverside.
And like that just is not a choice on an iPad, right?
you running a local recording while you're doing that.
It's interesting that they didn't express some API to let two apps pull audio and video and record them themselves, which is what every Mac in the world can do.
But they're like, we'll do it for you.
And then they made a big demo, they made a big deal out of like, and then you can share your local files.
And it's like, yeah, that's what you would, if you recorded my local files, you'd let me share them.
That makes no sense.
But, you know, what they did is they came after platforms like Riverside with that.
That is the thing that a Riverside would do.
There's a bunch of other ones there.
But that's what a lot of creators have asked for in the iPad.
This is a great mobile podcasting setup.
But for the fact that I can't actually record locally,
well, they've solved a problem.
Right.
And yeah, there's a real, like, do any creators actually use iPads road?
We could go down right now, but let's avoid that.
Alison, you are a creator who uses an iPad for everything, right?
This is like, I, you did not seem as excited as I was about multitask.
asking. So like let's just, how do you feel about the iPad? You know what? I, so many, many years ago,
uh, I was between jobs and I had to like give away my work computer and didn't have a computer
for a while and, uh, went to Best Buy. I was like, iPad and a keyboard. This is computer, right? It was like,
all the pieces are here. I like bought it all and went back home and I was like, oh, no. This is not
computer. This doesn't let you do the thing you need to do. It's just like, it's so funny,
like, how many ways Apple will give you this and give you that. And they're like, well, you can
record locally because you're a creator who's traveling with an iPad so you can do this
computer thing on your iPad or will give you the red, green, and yellow buttons. But, you know,
won't go up to the line of this is a full computer. It's just, it isn't very interesting.
kind of dance, I think, to see them do.
Somebody once described the difference to me, and this is years ago, but I think it's still true, is when you buy a Mac, you buy a computer, and when you buy an iPad, you buy a list of things you're allowed to do.
And I think about that all the time.
And I think it's so true that it's like, and the list is getting longer.
And to Apple's credit, the list is more sort of power user friendly than ever, but it is still a list of things you can do.
And it is not a computer in that same way.
Let's talk about iOS, which is shockingly third on the list for me.
And I went through this list and was like, iOS is kind of not that excited.
Like, to me, the messages app is the most interesting thing happening in iOS 26.
Well, you don't think the dynamic clock on the lock screen is worth five minutes of keynote time.
Long clock.
Get ready for long clock.
Long clock.
Yeah.
I mean, it's right.
The clock gets dynamically less long.
get notifications
dynamically
dynamically less long
is as a
that's a
that's a
bad day
that's what that is
oh no
now we're going to
make that shirt
I love that
dynamically
less long
2026
vote vote the verge
well first of all
shout out to
Joanna Stern
who was on
this podcast
on Friday
demanding
typing indicators
and group chats
and she got
that's chaotic
yeah
okay
You said this in the live blog, and I assumed everyone would be happy about this feature. Why are you not happy about this feature?
Do you not have group chat drama happening all the time? Have you seen this TikTok series of this woman who just she is acting out nine people in a group chat and just like the social dynamics that happen in this group chat typing indicators? What's going to happen is you're going to have the group chat and the side chat's going on.
And everyone's going to be ganging up on let's call her big.
Betty. And Betty is just going to put a little question in, and then she's going to see 5,000 different people doing the typing indicator, stopping, typing, stopping, typing, stopping. Betty's going to have an anxiety attack breakdown. And then, you know, the group chat's going to implode. And someone is going to just, friendships will end over typing indicators, as will family relationships, because you're just going to see someone typing for a really long time. And two family members are going to go, oh, my God, what she's she's typing forever? What's she's going to say?
something and then they're going to put it in the wrong group chat.
Friendships and families will end.
I'm telling you right now, typing indicators are dangerous.
I've never been happier to be an old dad.
Yeah, my group chats are not that dramatic.
You know what?
I love this for you.
I think that's blessed.
My group chats are cursed.
We're going to find out if we can turn them off or somehow make them bigger and louder.
Because I think you want to go in one of two directions.
I think four dots for view.
is group chats. I think that the angrier your message, the bigger the indicator gets, it can be
really chaotic. I think just like, where are we safe from typing indicators? Like, they've crept
into so many messaging apps. It's like, everybody's got to know when I'm typing a message in
Slack and I change my mind. Like, I have to consider that. Now, now it's going to be in the group
chat and you have to think about that dynamic. Yeah, I think I side with V on this. That's, that's
Exactly it. You know, when you're in Slack and then someone says something and then you just see several people are typing.
You're bringing up to the group chat on your phone now. It's going to be something. Someone's going to say something controversial and then several people typing indicators are happening. And then it's just, I.
But that's that's Nelai's dream. Just drop a bomb in the group chat and cause a several people are typing. And he's just like, I did it everything.
Wait, real quick poll of the group here. Are y'all read receipts people? Do you read receipts on or off?
No, thank you.
No. No. I had one instance where I didn't realize they were on, and I left someone on red, and they crashed out so hard. And let me tell you, this was not someone I was seeing. This was not a friend. This was my, like, father's friend. And I just didn't have an answer for her, and I'll be like, I'll answer this later. She crashed out and sent me so many screenshots going, like, I see that you wreck my message. You didn't say anything. And I was like, after that, I've never had read receipts on because I was just like, there are some people who don't need this. No.
No, my dad was dead. So this was after his funeral, which made it even more insane. So it was just like some people, they don't need to know what you're doing. Yeah, I think they don't need to know. That's how you would turn off read receipts forever, I think is the just walking through that situation mentally. Yeah, that's, you would turn that off. Yeah. Yeah, I just don't want people to know. I prefer to operate with an air of history. Yeah, I see it accomplished. I think it accomplishes nothing. I cannot think of one good thing that would happen in my life.
because of read receipts.
And I, it's, but I, most people,
anecdotally, based on, like, what I see texting with people,
most people have them on.
And I can't tell if that's just like,
you don't see your own read receipts,
so people probably don't know or think about it.
Or lots of people that are, like, choosing to do it.
Allison, you're the only one who hasn't answered yet,
suspiciously quiet about readers.
I have them on.
And I think, I don't know.
I feel like I've kind of tuned them out.
I sort of appreciate the Android, like, a little checkmark.
It's like, it feels friendlier, I think, to have the little checkmark of like, yes, you sent this message.
And yes, they received it and looked at it.
I'm like, okay, let's leave it at that.
We don't need to get involved in like, who read what, you know.
Z and Allison are a real like inside of us all.
There are two wolves kind of situation right now.
No, what I'm telling you is that tech billionaires have taught a generation of Americans to be surveilled and to surveil one another and you can fight back.
I agree.
You don't need to know if I read the message because you can just send another one.
You don't need to know when I read something.
You don't need to know how bad my ADHD is.
Some things should just be private.
Also, sometimes I just want to clear the little red notification badge.
And I've just like, that's just what I want to do.
I'm not sliding you.
People just read too much and to read receipts.
Yeah, I agree.
All right.
We need to take one more break and then we're going to come back and we're going to do what I'm calling the all the rest of the stuff.
It's going to be great.
Stick around. We'll be right back.
Support for the show comes from Anthropic.
Not every question has an easy answer.
And the ones that are really worth asking usually come with a healthy mix of inspiration and backpedaling,
aha moments, and quiet meditation.
When you're working through one of those problems, you want a partner to bounce ideas off of
and figure out where the deeper issue lies.
That's where Claude can help.
Claude is the AI for minds that don't stop.
good enough. It's the collaborator that actually understands your entire workflow and thinks with you,
whether you're debugging code at midnight or strategizing your next business move. Claude extends
your thinking to tackle the problems that matter. Plus, Claude's research capabilities go deeper
than basic search. It can have comprehensive, reliable analysis with proper citations,
turning hours of research into minutes. Ready to tackle bigger problems? Get started with
Claude today at clod.AI slash vergecast.
That's Claude.AI slash Vergecast and check out Claude Pro, which includes access to all the features
mentioned in today's episode.
Claude.aI. slash vergecast.
Support for the show comes from LinkedIn.
If you're a small business owner, you know that every hire counts, but time and resources
are limited.
Finding, connecting with, and screening the right candidates takes up very
valuable time you could be giving to your customers. That's where LinkedIn Hiring Pro comes in.
It's built to be your hiring partner, helping you find the right candidates faster. That way,
you can hire with confidence without turning it into another full-time job. Hiring Pro
streamlines the entire process from drafting your job to shortlisting candidates and conducting
AI-powered interviews for initial screenings. Its updated conversational interface lets you describe what you need
and plain language.
Nearly 60% of hires find a candidate to interview within a week.
With hiring pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent.
And instead of getting buried in resumes, you get a focus shortlist that actually moves
your hiring forward.
Join the 2.7 million small businesses using LinkedIn to hire.
Get started by posting your job for free at LinkedIn.com slash track.
Terms and conditions apply.
Complex and unprecedented, the Spanish authorities are calling it.
Asimbarque, asymptomatikas.
Passengers who'd been stuck aboard the Hanta or maybe Hanta virus-stricken Dutch cruise ship
disembarked in the Canary Islands this weekend,
prompting the highest stakes game of where are they now since maybe COVID?
Some of the evacuees, American and French, have since tested positive for the virus.
And yet public health officials seem remarkably calm.
We do have one individual who was,
taken to the biocontainment unit early, early this morning.
And we assessed that individual.
They are doing well.
Possibly because this is not the one to freak out over.
Today, Explain drops every weekday afternoon.
All right, we're back.
Let's talk watchOS.
And V, this, we're just, the floor is yours here.
Would you like to talk about workout, buddy, for no more than 72 minutes?
I just, again, I just want, Alice and I experience sitting next to.
TV in real time while this was being announced.
It was like literally like another show was taking place.
It was very good.
It was a roller coaster.
So watchOS 26.
Same new design.
Liquid glass.
Lots of stuff going on.
Gets a bunch of stuff from other ones.
And then there is workout, buddy.
V.
How do you feel?
Uh, that's how I feel about it.
Like, yeah, I don't know if you've ever seen Bob's Burgers and Tina in Bob's burgers.
How she just like sits there sometimes and just makes a low grade home like, uh.
That was me. That was what was happening while workout buddy was. So like, okay, you hear the size now. So it makes sense that workout buddy is happening just because if you look at any major fitness app, the AI is there. It is there and it is there to tell you how you're doing based on your data because the thing about fitness tracking is that it generates a lot of data. But no one knows what to do with that data without the context. And so everyone,
It's just for years now struggling how to give context to your fitness data and help you interpret it.
So this is like the latest take about shoving AI into fitness tech.
Garmin just introduced a subscription and shoved AI summaries in there.
Anyone who has been using Strava has been like roasting Strava's implementation of AI summaries in that platform.
So, you know, Woop has an AI coach.
ORA has an AI advisor.
There's just AI buddies everywhere in the fitness tech world.
It is very annoying because most of it is just capped in obvious insights.
So it's just like, you didn't run.
Okay, cool, great.
Love that for me.
Specifically was the demo with the War Guy, Buddy.
We spent minutes of its developer's keynote making us watch a video of a woman running while a voice was like, you're doing great.
That was the whole, that was the expression of the product that we all watched.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So that's workout buddy, kind of.
But so what I was told is basically that at the beginning of your workout, it's going to give you some motivational pep talk at the end of the workout.
It's going to give you a summary of what happened, which you're going to have in your workout app anyway.
I don't understand why we need to have these audio cues.
But if anything significant happens in the workout,
itself, like if you reach a milestone or something, you get the little workout buddy going like,
hey, great, you did a PR or something like that. It's meant to be motivational and positive,
which was a question I asked because I was like, like, you know, different people respond to
different types of training and workout motivations. I, for example, bristle at every single
workout instructor who has had the drill sergeant thing going like, come on, pick it up. You can do it
faster. I will go slower because I'm like, F you, you don't get to tell me how this run is going
go. This is my run, buddy. I'm imagining what works for you is just someone just very quietly being
like, you're the worst. Just give up. Who even cares? Why are you even trying? Just go home and you're
like, shut up. I'm going to run 70 miles. Wait, is there a workout buddy that just like gently
necks you the whole time? Oh, no. There is not. Does work up?
Does everybody have personalities or is it always just like chipper or Apple Fitness Instructor?
I think it's the concept is based around different types of Apple Fitness instructor personalities.
So that, like 50 shades of gentle motivation is what I think the concept is there.
Because, you know, anytime when we talk about Apple's approach to fitness, it is meant to be inclusive.
It is meant to be, they don't really go into the drill sergeant.
Come on, run faster, buddy, like kind of motivation.
which personally I appreciate because that's rude.
I'm just sort of like when I'm running and I'm in the zone,
when I'm listening to my stray kids talking about God's menu and do, do, do, do, doing,
I don't want to hear, hey, you did a PR.
Yeah, that's a later insight.
I don't need that while I'm running, but, you know, I'll give it a try.
I'll see maybe, maybe I will change my mind.
I have changed my mind before.
But what's the connection to like, hey,
you did a PR or like, here's your time to a mile, run a little bit faster.
Like that's, that's just a combination of like doing some math and then having a text
to speech model.
I haven't, what's the connection to like, we're collecting a bunch of data about you?
Right.
Like, that's what I hear what you're saying.
Like, fitness tracking generates a bunch of data that no one knows what to do with.
Isn't that where you would have an AI being like, here are some patterns.
Do some stuff.
Like, ostensibly.
Don't only run downhill, Nealai.
Like, you know, like stuff.
But it depends on your goals, right?
Because maybe if your goal is to run a half marathon and the half marathon is really hilly,
yeah, maybe you want an AI saying like, hey, so I see that you are avoiding hell intervals.
Maybe don't do that if you want to have a good time on your run.
Yeah, ostensibly, that could be something that you want.
But if the goal is to just be active, do you really need that?
Do you really need to chase PRs?
because I can tell you from a lot of people, you are going to get injured if you do any sport for any
period of time. And if you're only chasing PRs, if you're only chasing these goalposts, you will
burn out and you will feel terrible about yourself because you will fall off at a certain point in time.
It's a very delicate balance about what actually motivates people. And like, it's sort of also just like
taking your historical data into context being like, congratulations, you ran three times and this route.
and this is the second best thing that you've done on this segment of this rap.
Do you really meet?
Is that really something that you want to hear during your run slash walk slash cycling segment?
There are some psychos out there who do love this kind of granular data.
I will also say, I think, a thing that we are quickly learning about AI interactions in general is that
that kind of stuff is more meaningful to more people than I expected.
And I say that with as little judgment as possible that like having a fake voice in your ear telling you that you're doing a good job,
actually means a lot to a lot of people.
And I am still trying to figure out what to make of that as like a person.
But I think it's true.
And I think there's something to it.
And I also really like the idea of something that would be like just gently rude to me the whole time.
Like what would really work for me is if my workout buddy was just like sort of sarcastically be like, oh, great job, David.
What a good workout you just did.
You ran so fast.
That for David Zadvick.
I try to use my iPad as a real computer feature.
we're going to run, I fell in love with my workout buddy.
Oh no.
Workout buddy tries to convince David Pierce to leave wife and family.
It's okay.
My wife is already successfully mean to me all the time.
No, I know you're tight.
Which is why you suggested that a robot
to run faster in that exact personality.
I became worried for you.
I said, I am who I am.
We'll see.
I asked if you could calibrate the workout buddy.
I didn't really get a clear answer there,
but I think if you could calibrate your workout buddy
to be your ideal companion while you do a workout, sure,
that might help a bunch of people.
Because I don't know, exercise is one of those things.
Is it for all the workouts?
No, no, it's for walks.
It's walking, you can have it.
I believe you can do it with cycling.
So it's multiple different workout types.
So all done feet exercises.
Yes, all done feet cardio exercises.
Which, because it makes sense.
These are generally solitary activities.
You can turn it on and off.
It's not like mandatory.
Can you be like workout, buddy?
I want to get jacked.
And then, so just, just cardio.
Just foot-based cardio.
I think it's just cardio.
Like, what I will say is that no, very few apps actually do strength training well.
Because it's, it's just one of those things that is repetitive and boring if you're doing it well.
And also very different depending on.
everyone's needs and equipment issues.
So no, I think maybe exactly one app does it well, and that's latter.
But yeah, I don't think strength training is, I don't even know what a strength training
workout buddy would be like because what you would want from an AI buddy is prompt cues,
or like form check prompt cues.
So how does it know what you're doing?
Just be like, yo, bro, you need a spot?
Yeah.
That's not that.
Before we move on, anything else in WatchOS 26, do you think is interesting?
You know, the one thing that stood out to me with the smart stack
because it's just like a really funny paradoxical thing
because they're saying that the smart stack is going to get even smarter with Apple intelligence
so that when you look at the stack, it'll surface the things that are most useful to you
at any given one point in time.
and that's such a hard thing to judge because if it's doing its job really well, you will never notice it.
So that's just like a, I was sitting there going like, how am I going to test if this is actually useful to me?
I have no idea how I would even notice it, but maybe that's just how I know it'll be doing its job.
So smart stack.
Let's see.
What was the like flippy thing?
They were like, and now you can flip your...
Oh, it's a new gesture.
Okay.
Yeah.
It's a new gesture.
wrist flick.
We got to workshop a new name
for this gesture because
double tap is pinchy pinch.
Flipy flip flip.
Yeah.
Okay.
So in the live blog I was like twisty twist,
twist, but I think I like flippy flip better.
Pinch you pinch and flippy flip.
Pinchy flip.
That's good.
There we go.
I love it.
All right.
Well, problem solved.
All right.
Now, TVOS we already did.
I will remind you.
More notifications, new screensavers.
Connect to a speaker.
The end.
That's it.
That's all I got for you.
Fully out of it.
ideas. No one has any more ideas for TVUIs. Literally, they like, they do the bento boxes at the end
of everyone that just has a bunch of the features and like half of them were just shows on Apple TV
Plus. Like, what are we doing? VisionOS is the last platform we should talk about. The big thing here,
I think, is widgets. Oh, I was going to say, connect to a speaker?
Connect to a speaker? Question mark. V, I would like you to just briefly convince me as probably the person
among the four of us who have spent the most time in a Vision Pro.
Yes.
What an honor.
That widgets is cool and good.
I will allow you 11 seconds.
Okay.
I guess,
so I guess the one thing is that every single time you have a,
you know what,
I can't do it.
All right, cool.
I guess the widget wall clock.
Yay.
Clock.
The widgets are a little like augmented reality-ish.
Like they're not augmented reality.
You know, that's a new term I just made up.
Augmented reality-ish.
Yeah, like they look like they're on the wall,
but they're not actually augmented reality.
They're just like, you know what I mean?
They're just like pictures.
They don't.
Yeah.
Do you remember that?
They're not interacting with reality.
They're just stuck up there, you know?
Do you remember that Facebook event a bunch of years ago where Mark Zuckerberg was like,
the future is you're not going to have a TV on your wall?
You're going to have an AR TV that you look at through your glasses that you're going to
like buy for a dollar in the app store and you'll put that on the wall.
Yeah.
I saw this.
And I was like, oh my God, was Mark Zuckerberg right?
Like, is the future of WallClock's widgets in my Vision Pro?
This is what we're doing here?
There's one big Vision OS feature that we should talk about for just like half a second.
And it is actually the feature they needed to launch with, which is guest access and like shared support.
So now you can like let someone else set up the Vision OS device for themselves.
All of those settings that saved to their phone.
And then if they go to any other Vision OS device running what is now called Vision OS device.
OS 26. We just get 24, 24 different vision OSs straight to Vision 26. They can say,
I've got one and send the data from their phone to the headset and it will just be ready
for them. And they should have had this from the beginning. And what's amazing about this is that
they announced this feature in the context of enterprise use because it's enterprises who want this
feature. Businesses who are like, we have lots of shared headsets that go out in the field. People
need to switch between them all the time. We're not, we're not buying one for everybody.
But it's also for consumers. I made sure that it's also for consumers. But you can see where
the action is on the Vision Pro. It's in the Enterprise. It's like fancy architecture firms, I assume.
That that's what I think of what I think of the Vision Pro. This is so funny because I literally
just got a text message from our dearly departed, West Davis, who is a Vision Pro owner with his own
money and he said the widgets are good. So there you go. Think of all the money he's saving on
wall clocks. You know what I mean? Yeah. The wall clocks are. That's how you pay for the Vision Pro.
If you buy, you can buy now buy up to 350 fewer wall clocks. I mean, to be fair, one of the
issues that I've had with the Vision Pro is like, let's say I have all my big screens in the room
that I want and in the perfect allocation. I have to kind of re-put them up every single time I put
the headset on, which is annoying and the fact that it can remember where things are supposed to go now.
I do think for the Vision Pro Power users is a good thing. But what I am actually most excited about
are the persona updates because I really just want to see how cursed or how much more or less
cursed the new personas are that got a huge round of applause from the audience during the keynote.
But I really just, as soon as I got home and I get that headset, I'm going to call Wes and I'm just going to be like, is your mustache finally capable of moving?
Is it free?
Because is it finally capable of moving?
Can your mouth now move without your mustache being a static, weird thing?
I'm excited.
The folks on the ground, they're very excited about the percent updates.
I don't know how good to see them, but people are very excited about them.
I think even if they're like better, they're worse in a way.
Like, I don't know.
What they showed us was like rendered better.
It looked more like a person, but it was also creepier.
Oh, they're deep in the uncanny valley.
Also, the demo was two people sitting next to each other on a couch, wearing headsets watching a show together and interacting with their personas, which is just full dystopia.
Yeah, that sucks, man.
It's so weird.
I'm out on that.
That's some real alone together.
We have widget wall clocks and then a persona of your partner that you can look at instead of looking at their own face.
So, okay.
Every part of the Vision Pro from the very beginning has required Apple to take itself deadly seriously in a way that is incompatible with reality of people wearing headsets with external battery packs connected with a water to them.
Like in one of my first.
briefings with them when they were like talking about it.
I was like, have you guys ever like talked to each other both wearing headsets with the eyes on?
Was it funny?
And they're like, we don't laugh at each other's work.
And I was like, I don't know, people laugh at my work all the time.
It's a workplace.
Like, have you seen the office?
The culture of laughing at each other at work is like, well, it's like.
But like the Vision Pro rejects that as a product because it is so inherently silly,
Apple has to take it deadly seriously and be like,
Yes. Two people will sit together on a couch wearing the vision pros, watching a show together, and conducting business and their personas. And you're like, good luck.
Sure.
Oh, my God. Wes just tried to FaceTime me from his Vision Pro. Oh, God. He's so excited. Anyway.
You're going to have to report back. This is going to be great. All right. A bunch more things than we're going to get out of here.
We talked a little bit about the AirPods camera control thing.
I missed this part of the keynote.
Did we get a sense of how you take the picture with your AirPods?
No, nothing.
No, I missed it.
This is more creator stuff where it's like you can start the capture by clicking your
AirPods and then immediately begin talking to camera.
So I think we, when we were talking about it last, we were thinking about it because
we're old dads about like taking the group photo at the Grand Canyon.
And what they were talking about is a bunch of zoomers who are like, hey guys.
How to start the TikTok video.
Yeah.
Okay.
It also, they introduced studio quality recording for the AirPods, which I will just say, as someone who makes a podcast on which we use AirPods, you're lying, and I don't believe you.
The claim there wasn't even what you would expect the claim to be.
Because if they had just been like, here's what we're going to do, we're going to take your AirPods audio, we're going to AI the shit out of them and make them sound good.
You're like, all right, that's going to be weird.
There might be some artifacts or whatever.
We'll, like, check it out.
But they were just like, no, we've just made AirPods, studio quality.
it's like, how?
Did you just turn up the bass slider?
Like, what did you do?
Yeah, they just magically sound better.
They got one of those like 1980s, like 24 band parametric EQs
and just like turned up out of the whole right side.
Like, how?
Not unclear.
Don't believe you.
All right, next one.
There's the new games app, which they kind of skimmed past in a way.
I was a little surprised by.
We expected there to be a lot of noise about, like, Apple's, you know, annual huge play into gaming.
And this kind of was that.
But I don't know.
I didn't get the sense that this was a huge new initiative from Apple to try and make gaming work so much as it is just like a place to find all the games you haven't saw.
So there's a John Gruber posted his read on this, which lightly tracks with mine, which is they are making the games app, like a separate app store and app experience.
So that eventually when the regulators come for app store fees,
they can be like,
we're going to treat games differently and all the other apps differently.
And they'll win because they compete with Xbox and PlayStation and, yeah.
And those all the same fees.
And they made this tiny distinction in the keynote that went by in a flash,
but they made a distinction between App Store games and Apple Arcade games.
Oh, interesting.
So like, even games from the App Store versus Apple Arcade games.
And it's like, oh, you think about these differently,
which kind of makes sense because Apple Arcade games.
because Apple Arcade games are another subscription
and all this other stuff,
but there's just the first hints
that they're peeling things apart.
Yeah, interesting.
Okay.
The tabs came back to the Photos app.
Joy in the streets of the internet.
Craig Fennery was like,
many of you enjoyed tabs in the old friends.
I'm just the Satan Elmo Giff
where he's just like the fires behind him
and the arms are up.
That's just, I really hated how they changed.
the photos app. So thank God. Yes. Many people enjoy tabs. I am one of them and I'm happy,
happy. We'll see. I think I'll be happy with it. So yay. We enjoyed knowing how to look for the
thing we're looking for. Yes. Man, I don't, this this whole backlash has made me absolutely
convinced that I'm using photos wrong because I opened the app. It showed me all my photos and that was
fine. Now I open the app
and it shows me all my photos and it's still
fine. So like I'm doing it
wrong and we'll figure this out together
I think. But I'm lost.
All right. We're almost
done here. Apple Maps
will now learn the routes
you take on your commute and such
and will try to automatically
help you with them when like if you're going to hit
traffic you don't know about even if you don't plug in the directions
it will try to alert
you to take a different route. I think that's very
cool. I also don't use Apple Maps for anything.
ever. So here we are.
The one place Apple Maps is
absolutely superior to Google Maps
is the state of New Jersey.
And if they could just get Apple Intelligence
to force me to use Apple Maps
when I travel to New Jersey,
that's all it's for.
I live in New Jersey
I'm sorry. Against my will.
But I don't think that
Apple Maps is good in New Jersey.
No, it's good in one specific way.
I'm just putting this out there. It's good in one specific way.
Google could catch up tomorrow.
driving New Jersey is a series of like non-stop events right you're like merge on this highway
immediately change five lanes to merge on another highway then another highway then a 15th highway
we've named this place the garden state for some unbelievable reason but this is the experience
of being here and google naps just does not acknowledge that every action will be followed by a series
of 45 other actions two seconds later yeah google is always like turn in 100 feet and then you turn
And then it's like, oh, 75 feet ago you were supposed to turn again.
Yeah.
And so at least Apple Maps is like some things are going to happen to you
and you're going to get through them together as a family.
And it's like, this still sucks.
I still hate it either.
Sorry.
Every time I've ever driven New Jersey, my wife and I've gotten a new to a fight
and Apple Maps has reduced the fights like by 10%.
This is fascinating data because obviously my spouse and I drive in New Jersey all the time.
and they switch between Apple Maps and Google Maps.
And it's a lot.
The only thing I think actually Apple Maps has over Google Maps
is that if you have an Apple Watch,
it'll like if you have to cues for when you're supposed
to take the next action.
So yes, in that sense, it is superior,
especially in Jersey,
where there is a right lane exit every five seconds
and you have to know the difference between this right,
land exit versus the one right before you.
Driving in Jersey is just a shit show.
Do you see what I'm saying?
And so if Apple could use its trillions of dollars
and its data centers and its intelligence
to somehow improve this,
I think they would take massive share
in one state in the union from Google.
It's all I'm saying.
I have a very V-specific question.
When it's doing that haptic thing on your wrist
and it's like tapping you,
is there different taps for the direction
you're supposed to turn?
It freaks me out a little bit.
I'm like, ah, is this supposed to be telling me, like, turn left or turn right?
Like, I don't use Apple Maps when I drive.
The spouse does because they swear it will reduce the number of times that they miss the exit, which, you know, this is getting too much into my marriage.
But I think if they just turned on the audio cues, they would miss 20% fewer turns.
Well, you're right.
They insist.
They insist.
You are also in my marriage.
And every time you get the turn, right, it's like you did great.
You're so great.
Yes.
Yeah, you know what?
It's a personal record.
We need a driving buddy specifically from marriages in Jersey.
Just anybody in a marriage in Jersey trying to get somewhere on time, you need driving buddy.
I can feel David, like knowing that this podcast needs to wrap up because V and I are just complaining about New Jersey now.
But that's the kind of day at once.
It's like a half hour ago.
Yeah.
No, it's, I, this is, this is, I'm learning a lot about why I need to just switch to Waze is the thing that I'm taking away from all of this.
Ways just has me drive through neighborhoods and everything goes fine.
There was some new stuff for like digital IDs in Apple Wallet, which I bring up only so that Nelai can remind people.
Never, never hand your phone to a cop.
Don't do it.
There you go.
That's a good one.
I also have another one for our good friend, Nelai Patel.
We got some carplay updates.
Are you so excited about car play?
Eli Patel, America's number one lover of car play.
Do you have any thoughts?
I've asked Apple to, you know, send me home with an Aston Martin for journalism.
So far they haven't said no.
I would not say that they have said yes.
But we're in a liminal place where, you know, hope is alive.
Stradinger's Aston Martin.
CarPlay Ultra is its own beast.
And I don't know what's going to happen there.
By the way, Jeep, Stalantis, the company owns Jeep, broke its software relationship with Amazon a couple weeks ago.
And of all of the companies, it should just, like, screw it.
Like, just glue an iPhone to your dashboard, call it a day.
Like, they should just do it.
Most of the other car companies are still, like, a real wait and see.
But the car play updates, they're fine.
They're good.
You get tap back emoji.
It's like mostly what you should send as a response to text message while you're driving is a thumbs up.
Yes.
If they made that easier, that's great, right?
To just emoji respond to texts.
So you're not like talking and, you know, screen on a serial, all that stuff.
But it's, it's never been more clear that CarPlay is just a second monitor for your phone than looking at the set of updates.
Because they're just like, we changed how the phone looks.
So CarPlay looks different now.
Like, we've made some widgets move around and added some features.
Like, oh, this is just a second monitor for your iPhone running on your car display.
And like, that's what it is and it's what it should be.
and I think people are generally happy with that.
But the fact that CarPlay Ultra is over there,
and it's like we've added the climate controls to it,
has never seemed less important.
Like, it just doesn't matter.
Like, what you want is a second monitor
for your phone running in your car display.
And now it is more of that than it has ever been before.
I'm hoping to go home with Naston Martin.
And Apple, if you want to convince me otherwise,
I'm, you know, black is great.
I will accept silver.
We've been looking for a reason to do a Vergecast Road,
trip, and I'm just saying that the Asden Martin with CarPlay Ultra is the solution to all our
problems.
We have an ethics policy.
I can't actually accept the Aston Martin.
You understand what is.
It's a joke.
We can't have it forever.
But you can long-term loans exist.
There are review units of cars, so.
That's true.
I know that people, I know that the review, there's like a review warehouse in the northeast.
I'm friendly with him.
But if you think about it, like, you have to drive it long enough that you're no longer
amazed by the novelty of an Aston.
and that's like at least a year
before you can even really properly review CarPlay Ultra
as software divorced from the existence of the Ascent.
So it's going to be fine.
We're going to make this work for you.
All right, we need to get out of here.
But I do just want to just check in one last time.
Y'all were there.
Y'all have been through all this.
We've talked through a lot of the news.
There was a lot of stuff.
My sort of overall takeaway is that like if it wasn't in the shadow of last year
and it wasn't in the shadow of sort of everything else that's been going on,
with Apple that like from a pure here's the new stuff coming to your devices world this was like a
fine WWBC.
Yeah.
Not the greatest we've ever seen.
Not bad.
And what makes all of it weird is all of the other stuff happening around Apple, which is really
unusual for Apple, which is a company that has like lived in its own bubble for as long as
we've all been doing this.
Was that your read too?
Like good, not great.
Your phone's probably going to be fine once they walk back.
all the liquid glass witness.
Yeah.
Like a,
like an off year
where you are just going,
you're following up Vision Pro,
you're following up Apple Intelligence,
and now it's this stuff.
That's just kind of how it felt.
Like.
The big three.
Yeah.
Vision Pro,
bad Siri, Windows Vista is the true legacy of Apple.
Moist Vista.
Moist vista.
Oh, no.
Moist vista is not a great.
I feel,
I don't know.
We will not be making that t-shirt.
I can tell you that.
Really unhappy up, actually, the more I think about it.
I don't think you can ignore the other stuff.
The rest of this industry is chasing an uncertain technology that might not be the future.
It just might not be, but which has a lot of capabilities towards an entire new model of applications.
That's just a thing that's happening out there.
Like Sundar Pichai coming under Coder, I mean, like the web is a series of databases,
and like my agents can just go ping the databases.
And Kevin Scott from Microsoft coming on and being like MCP is the future
and I can rearchitect the open web based on these new protocols
and the kids on TikTok using NAN to make new automations out of all these tools.
Like there's something actually happening there.
Like some big thing is actually happening there.
And all of the action and like app development right now is happening with those kinds of tools
on the web.
in like really weird ways.
It might come to nothing.
And I think Apple's point of view is like,
we don't do comes to nothing.
Like they're like,
we make great products when they're finished.
We ship them.
Except for the fact that like,
for, you know,
over a decade now,
all of the hottest apps have launched on the phone.
And that at a developer's conference,
what you want is lots of new reasons
to make cool apps on the phone.
And yeah,
I don't know.
there's just a gap there that is like worth thinking about longer than it was just like yeah they
rubbed all the stuff here's all the stuff they worked on for the last year here it is the last year they're
like Siri will be your best friend right and they haven't shipped it yet and meanwhile like you know
coming off of i.o you're like here's google being like here's all these new ways to think about using
your computer all like and it's a bunch of google stuff some of it will just come to nothing
Project Mariner where they run Chrome in the cloud and click around the web for you.
Like, I don't know, man.
But like, there's just all these shots at what are new ways of using computers that are taking place, including Johnny I've going to go work on new devices at Open AI.
Like, all that stuff is happening.
People see a way around the next turn.
I don't know, like, I don't know if LMs are the way through it.
I really don't.
But Apple just being like, yeah, we're taking a beat.
It's just kind of off.
Like, there's something there that I don't know how anybody makes the next great device.
But everyone else is taking shots at it.
And Apple's like, no, no, the phone will win.
Yeah, it's weird.
Like, this, this, part of the reason I ask this question is that Apple is sort of, it felt like a return to, like, pre-pendemic Apple WWDCs.
And Apple is the only company left on this particular island.
Like, it is so unlike every other conversation we're having about tech.
technology. Allison, what was your read?
I just kind of like, I understand why Apple had to jump head first in AI last year and like make the big Apple intelligence announcement.
But it does feel backwards now that I think about it. If this had been our kind of first step into like, you know, it's not just machine learning. It's intelligence and it's going to do these things for you. And you're going to take a screenshot and it's going to put it on your calendar.
I'd be like, great, I'm on board, you know, and then work up to the series your best friend stuff.
It couldn't be that way, you know, and Google has shipped a ton of stuff that is in the Gemini as your best friend track.
So it's just a weird, kind of a no-win position for Apple, I guess.
but some interesting stuff.
I'm excited to play with, I think.
Yeah, like, the idea that Gemini is going to win the race to be your best friend is a deeply terrified state of affairs.
But you might not be wrong.
All right, you guys have been sitting here with me long enough.
You need to go do other things in Cooper Tino.
I think you're going to see the F1 movie.
This is the thing that's going to happen.
It's the rumor.
It's not today.
This is what they say.
All right. Thank you all for being here. Safe Travels Home. We will have lots more to talk about.
Hit us up on the hotline. Tell us all the stuff that we missed, all the weird, tiny, bizarre features on all of these platforms.
Tell David how much you love shortcuts. Tell me all of your favorite shortcuts. Send me links so that I can click them and add them to my own shortcuts and use them every single day.
Until then, that's it. That's Vergecast. Rock them.
