The Vergecast - Samsung's next-generation foldables are here | The Vergecast Livestream
Episode Date: July 22, 2026Samsung just kicked off phone season with the new Galaxy Z Fold 8, Fold 8 Ultra, and Z Flip 8, along with two new watches and a look at its smart glasses. David and Nilay talk through all the new devi...ces, Samsung's overall case for foldable phones, and what it'll take for Samsung — or anyone — to convince people to spend $2,000 on a phone. Further reading: Samsung’s wider Z Fold 8 feels just right Samsung’s newest foldable finally feels Ultra I almost forgot Samsung’s Z Flip 8 was a foldable Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 9 and Ultra 2 bet big on battery Samsung and Google’s smart glasses get two new designs Subscribe to The Verge for unlimited access to theverge.com, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and our ad-free podcast feed.We love hearing from you! Email your questions and thoughts to vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for the show comes from MongoDB.
AI-assisted and agentic coding is helping you build faster than ever.
But if your data layer is still a bottleneck, what's the point?
Instead of wrestling with rigid schemas or translating data formats,
MongoDB's native data model mirrors the language LLMs already speak.
It ships at the speed of AI is acid-compliant
and scales to handle massive Fortune 500 workloads.
Developers have a word for that kind of reliability.
Actually, five words.
It's a great fricking database.
Start building at MongoDB.com slash AI.
How many third-party vendors does your company use?
20, 200.
Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week.
And your security lead has no idea.
Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up.
Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor,
automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it.
AI on, risk off.
Vanta.com slash TPRM.
Hello and welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of titanium.
All kinds of titanium.
Very thin titanium, very thick titanium.
Titanium technology.
Lots of titanium.
I'm your friend David Pierce.
Neil Appell is here.
Hello, sir.
That's good.
We just got finished watching Samsung's unpacked event.
Um, there's a lot to talk about here.
We got some new phones.
We got foldables.
We got flippables.
We got watches.
We got all kinds of stuff.
This, I just want to preface, Nilai, was maybe the most impressive product introduction I have
seen in 2026.
And I'm very excited to tell you why.
Um, but first I want to know.
Wait, wait, was it because Spider-Man was there?
It was favorite part of the whole thing.
There was a brief moment where I thought, oh, good.
We're not going to get that deeply awkward.
moment at every Samsung event where something weird happens and no one knows what to do about it.
Honestly, the reason I agreed to do this live stream with you was because Samsung can't help
itself. Like, I know Samsung can't help itself. And watching you go through it is very important
to me. I really appreciate that. Yeah, one of the great moments was that they brought on,
um, what's his name? Jacob somebody. No, no. Yes, Jacob Battalon who plays Ned in the Spider-Man
movies. He did what I would call
like a reasonably normal product
integration. He explained why his character would
use a galaxy device
which sure, fine.
And then for like to eight seconds, just
there was Spider-Man.
And then they went right back to it.
We were going to play the clip, but no one needs
to live through that ever again.
But I do want to talk about these
phones, Eli, because I think the
reason I am so compelled by
this particular event
is that I think Samsung did a thing I have been waiting
for it to do for years, which is explain why you would want any of these devices, why you would
want a device that folds, why you would want a device that's a different size that folds, why you
would want a phone that flips. It actually like attempted to make a case for these kinds of
devices. And I want to talk about it. But first, sure, I need you to do something very important
for me. Yeah. I need you to rank the folding types. We have, we have wide, we have tall,
and we have flip. Those are the three phones. We're going to get into them. But I want to do
Do them in the order in which you are excited about the size and shape.
So we have tall foldable, the TV remote, we have wide foldable, the passport, and we have flip phone.
Which do you first?
I'm going ranking best to worst.
Yes.
My personal best to worst.
Everyone else can make up their minds.
I got to go wide, flip, tall.
And there's probably a novelty bias here because wide is the newest.
And maybe it will make my heart sing in new and exciting ways.
although Dom Preston from our team wrote up.
He saw it.
He's held it in person.
He's used it.
Obviously, he's used some of the Chinese white foldables that came out first.
And he's like, this thing is way better in person than in any of the photos.
And I get it.
And I'm kind of excited about the squatter form factor when it's folded when you use it that way.
And then like the big decision to open it up.
You know, and be like, I'm going to watch a video sideways, whatever that thing is.
Yeah, that's my ranking.
But I'm assuming there's some novelty bias here.
My ranking is the same.
I also think it's possible that there is some novelty bias.
But that thing that Dom described in his piece for us,
which is looking at the thing,
it feels kind of short and kind of fat.
And you think, well, this probably won't be as comfortable to hold in my hand
as a longer, skinnier phone might be.
And then you pick it up and it feels normal and natural.
That reaction seems to have been everyone's reaction.
I've been reading stories.
I've been watching some of the videos.
Like, this is a phone that was made available to a lot of people in the last couple of weeks.
Almost everybody seems to have had the reaction of picking it up and being like,
oh, this is actually maybe the exact right shape for this.
Because it's a little shorter, I can reach it with, I can reach most of the screen with my thumb,
which turns out kind of important on a phone.
It makes it, it's 1610 on the outside.
So it's a little squatter than normal.
And it opens up to a four by three screen on the end.
inside. Both of those in a way, if you're just going to say, I have one screen for everything,
right, that feels roughly correct to me. And this is the thing Samsung spent a long time
trying to make the case for, that you open it up and you can watch movies with less letterboxing.
You can play giant Fortnite, which they really like held for an applause moment that did not come,
which I thought was very funny. But there's this sense of, I think, everybody has spent the last
are trying to figure out the right middle ground for foldables. You want something that is
phone-ish on the outside, but a properly usable phone on the inside as well. And this just seems
like the right, or at least the most right answer we have had so far. Even though, again,
like looking in a picture right now, it does look a little squat and a little fat. But I'm
trusting everyone who has used it. Neither of us have used it. But I am trusting everyone who has,
who says this thing seems to feel right in your hand very quickly.
It is a remarkable consensus of vibes.
Right.
Obviously, everyone's got to get the phone.
We've got to review them.
We're going to do all that.
But the early vibes are, oh, this was the right size and shape.
I will give credit to Samsung for retconning its way into an explanation for why it's
the right size and shape.
The Chinese makers have been doing this.
There's lots of rumors that Apple's about to do this.
Samsung's like, have you ever thought about making it a little?
little shorter and then opening up to four by three.
And it's like you could have done this any time in the past several years.
You waited until the market told you what to do.
And then you did it in classic Samsung fashion.
Yes, very much so.
So I actually, I wrote down the sequence of events that they imagine will transpire on this phone.
Samsung is very determined to tell you how you use your phone in these events,
which I was get a kick out of.
But again, genuine kudos for going way out of their way to be like,
Here is the purpose of this device in this specific way.
And the wide fold, which is the Z fold eight, and we're going to get into the names because, as ever, Samsung's naming systems make me angry and they don't make any sense.
But here we are.
So this is the Z Fold 8.
And the way that they described it is basically purely as a content device.
And the beginning of the flow is you're on the outside screen and you're watching Instagram Reels or YouTube shorts.
That was like, this is what everyone does on their phone all of the time.
We're just going to start there.
So you watch it and you watch it normally.
It looks more or less like a normal phone.
That's actually a little bit complicated because these companies are going to have to do a little bit of work to adapt to this screen in a way that makes sense.
They did immediately announce that Instagram has partnered with them on adapting the Instagram app, which is not a thing Apple will be able to do in a few months time.
I think that is correct.
So that's great and that's fine.
That's going to work.
And then the idea is you open it up to dive in for.
further is essentially the idea. And on the one hand, you can, you can see it bigger. On the other hand,
you can see video on the left, comments on the right. And she said something along the lines of,
because half the fun of the video is seeing if everyone agrees with your reaction, which, sure, fine.
You can, you can then expand it to fill more of the screen. And then you can, you can start to
dive in and make stuff yourself. And then they go through the whole creation flow, right? And that's
side-by-side editing so you can see the changes you're making in real time as you make them.
Like, again, this is a real argument about how a person might actually use their phone
that makes some sense to me. I don't know if this is the one user flow that justifies buying
a $1,900 phone, which is what this costs. But it's like, I kind of get it. I get why this
is appealing and why it would be useful to have more screen available to me when I open the phone.
But isn't the same argument as the tall foldable?
So yes and no.
Well, and this is what I mean by Samsung doing a good job explaining the difference.
The way Samsung seems to see it is that the tall foldable is for using two apps side by side.
Foundationally, that is the thing.
It is a productivity device.
I think that's fine, right?
And they explain well why this might be useful, what you might use it for.
All of the things were like work related.
They imagined the tall foldable as extremely productivity focused.
and then the wide foldable is the more casual content-based one.
And again, all of this is like made up nonsense about phones,
and the reality is everything is everyone is to all the time.
But at least they're starting to draw a distinction that makes a little bit of sense to me.
You would not want to use two apps side by side on the Z-fold eight
because they would both be squat and there's not quite enough space.
but the idea of being able to sort of move in and out of this like side by side experience into there's a little more screen.
It's a little more immersive.
Like there's something here for me.
I don't know.
Yeah.
I like that you're so taken with that there's a little more screen to watch video in one hat bigger.
Right?
Like there's something to that.
It's a very normal use case.
I was more struck by how they, you know, in the way that everybody has to do it now, they talked a lot about AI.
And then at the end of the event, you know, Rick Oslo was out to talk about Google Gemini Task Automation, which is yet another horrible name.
And my, because it's launching for real now.
Yeah.
Right?
On these phones, you can just say, hey, Gemini, do a thing.
And it'll bop around your phone and do stuff for you.
However slowly or quickly, it can actually do those things.
And it just struck me that the smaller screen, the more squat size of the Z-Fold 8 is, might be the AI device.
everyone wants, like you have a little phone.
It's littler, and you can just tell it what to do.
And maybe it will do that stuff.
And then when you want a phone, you open it up, and it's a phone.
And like, there's something about that particular size and shape where I'm like, oh, maybe
it would drive me to just ask the phone to do things.
And it's not really about opening it up to see the comments on TikTok, although I will
certainly end up doing that because I think they're right that I do want to see the comments
on TikTok.
But that's their argument for the flip.
And this is where it's possible they're solving a two device problem with three devices.
That actually what we need is two form factors and not three.
But the big part of the argument for the flip is this is a phone you can put away.
Right.
Like they spent a lot of time talking about it as a way to just ask your agents to go do stuff on your behalf and go about your life.
That's a lot of trust in agents.
Like I'm not there.
I need a little more screen.
You know what I mean?
Yeah.
I also think it was very funny.
one of the notes I wrote down in the middle of this is Samsung has developed a very good argument for the hardware here and why you need these different things and what they might accomplish in your life.
No one knows what AI is for.
And even still, it's like they ran the same two tropes that everybody runs out every time, right?
It's for planning trips and buying tickets to things, which is, A, not a, like, particularly complicated multi-step activity to buy concert tickets.
It's like you just buy the concert tickets.
Well, it depends if you're like, robot, go fight with the scalper and the cues.
Like, sure.
Like maybe that's the future.
Yeah.
But I think, but even in general, you know, Rick Osterlo gets up and he's like, we have 40 new apps for making all of your AI stuff work.
And then he, I think the list was retail, reservations, travel event tickets, which if you think about it is buying stuff, buying stuff, buying stuff and buying stuff.
Every Google demo ends in a transaction.
They can't not do it.
They have to point out.
All of that data center investment is going to pay off because they will take tiny slices of your transactions.
We will automate your shopping cart process is essentially the limit of agentic AI at this point.
Right, but that's what is that.
Ticketmaster, Uber, DoorDash, Resi.
Expedia.
Yeah.
Expedia.
Right?
And it's like, all right, well, those, I'm sure those apps are going to have something to say,
but fine.
If that's the limit of what agent I can do today, fine.
But I don't think, I don't trust it on a flip phone.
Like, every time I use a flip, I'm like, this is so cool.
If only I had the discipline to use this tiny cover screen, right, to check stuff.
Because that's kind of their vibe, right?
is there's the new AI power summary and the cards and the like the little widget that tells you to drink more water.
Yeah.
Because they're doing a lot of work to get you sort of in and out of your phone more quickly.
Yeah.
And but the whole app ecosystem has to participate or you have to fully participate in the galaxy health ecosystem.
Right.
Which I just don't want to do.
I'm sorry.
I just don't want to do that.
And all of that is it, it's gesturing in a future that isn't here yet where all of the AI can read all the databases.
and present you with these neat and tidy summaries on a tiny little screen.
And I just, I don't think that's here yet.
I think that might be a vision of the future.
That might come one day, but it's not here yet.
And so this middle size where it's a phone, but like an uncomfortable phone to use,
will, like, usher some of that discipline in while the rest of it comes up.
And then when you need a phone, you can open it and just, like, use a phone.
And there's something about that size and shape that I wish the industry had coalesced on earlier.
Yeah.
And I'm quite excited to see what happens, both with the Z-foldate, which we should point out is very expensive at $1900.
And obviously in a few months, Apple is going to attack the same form factor.
And whether or not this is the form factor that lets AI become more of a primary interface, I think is a good and interesting open question.
Because certainly this will be the form factor that most people at the high end of the Android ecosystem encounter Gemini.
And certainly it will be the form factor that most people at the high end of the Apple ecosystem,
and encounter whatever, Siri AI.
And that looks like the battle to me.
Yeah, I think that's right.
And I think we're also likely to see Google make its own move in this space.
I think it would almost be more enticing.
I would almost be more optimistic if Samsung had more aggressively picked a single form factor, right?
Because the eternal problem with Android is that everybody is supporting too many phones with
too many chipsets with too many versions of Android and too many ideas about how everything is
supposed to work.
And so if you're a developer, you end up either having to pick and choose your spots or you just say, screw it, I'm going to make one app plug into the built-in ideas about how to scale it and move on.
And I think what Samsung showed here is that if you make real effort to make this stuff make sense on the specific devices and specific form factors, you can do some really interesting stuff.
The problem is almost no one is incentivized to do that other than Samsung until we agree.
on a form factor, right? And I think
the candy bar phone has been the phone
for a very long time, in part
because I think it was the right middle ground
for a very long time, but also in part because it was just
one thing. It just became easier
to have one idea about phones for everyone
for a very long time. And
I sort of wish Samsung had come out more
aggressively and said, we think
the Z-fold 8 is the thing. This
is the new shape of foldables and
really pushed after it.
You think they should have killed the Z-Fold
Ultra 8? I do.
I do. I think the 8 Ultra is actually sort of a fascinating device in that it is finally the thing we have been waiting for Samsung to do, which is make a foldable phone without very many compromises, right? This thing has, it has the camera setup you'd want. It has three cameras, including a 200 megapixel main camera, the 10 megapixel telephoto, I think. And the 50 megapixel ultra wide. It has big battery life. It has a lot of the camera feature.
that you want. It has the new silicon carbon battery stuff, which I think is very cool.
We have to talk about that at length, by the way. Let's get to that in one second. But I think
this is, this is the first, David Amel wrote for us that this is the first actually ultra-feeling
Samsung foldable, which is a big deal. It is Samsung's most expensive phone. And every time
Samsung has shipped one of these, we've been like, isn't it weird that it doesn't have all
of the best features that Samsung is actually able to ship of these phones? And to take that,
and say, okay, this thing is $2,000 and you have to make a bunch of compromises in the name of
less durability and more screen isn't worth it. This one still vastly more expensive, but at least
makes you make many fewer sacrifices. So in that sense, I'm very excited about it. I still think
it's just the wrong shape for a phone. And I think Samsung agrees. Like, I really do think
Samsung agrees. Well, I mean, they're hiding some price increases here, right, in the same way that
everyone is going to have to hide price increases. They're calling this one ultra because it is, what, $2,100
I mean, this one is bananas.
And so you can't have copyrights at 20.
They're calling it Ultra in order to make it less obvious that it is less,
or that it's more expensive than the last model.
So that now that they have the one that's less expensive than the last model,
which they're calling the successor to the last model,
even though it's all very shady.
And again, the names don't make any sense.
And even several people on stage from Samsung could not properly say the names of these choices.
And if you, an executive at the company, can't remember the name every time, you have a naming problem.
But anyway, should we talk about this battery?
Should we just briefly divert?
It might be the most interesting thing about these phones in a real way.
Make the case.
Well, I think we all know that lithium ion batteries have had pretty intense ceilings, right?
We've made them slightly better, but there hasn't been a big jump in battery chemistry that would unlock more battery life.
faster charging speeds. Like, we've done a lot around the edges to make lithium ion chemistry work.
We haven't really seen new chemistries at scale. These are silicon carbon batteries. We have seen
some of them in China, but this is the big new chemistry. Samsung spent a lot of time talking
about how they are managing this chemistry and making it safe because, if you will recall,
Samsung has had pretty enormous problems with their phones lighting on fire.
Yeah. One of the funniest things going in our comments of the stories we've been doing about
this has been, there's one set of people who is like, I'm never ever going to trust Samsung with
the battery again, do you remember the Note 7? And another set of people who are like, yeah,
you know who else remembers the Note 7 is Samsung. And you know who definitely has built a hell
of a lot of infrastructure to make sure that never happens again? Samsung.
We'll see. I have a friend who at the time of the Note 7, I was like, this phone rules. I'm
never sending it back. You can't stop me. I respect that. But this is, you know, the first
sort of mainstream U.S. phone with a new battery chemistry.
and if it is the vanguard of longer life,
lower power, more efficient, smaller size,
that is incredible.
Yeah.
Straightforwardly incredible.
And I would like to see more battery chemistry development
for enormous number of reasons,
not just phones, like EVs.
Like there's a bunch of stuff
where new battery chemistries are maybe the most exciting thing
that will happen in tech.
And here we have some phones
that are using new battery chemistries.
I think in a very conservative way,
right?
going all the way in. There is a pretty conservative application of the new technology,
but it is fascinating to see that Samsung has decided to make the leap. I agree. And I think,
I think they're actually doing this in roughly the right way for exactly the reason you just described.
There are other silicon carbon batteries out there with more capacity in roughly the same size
or even smaller devices. And Samsung has been very straightforward about like, we could have pushed
this harder. We could have been more aggressive in how we wanted to think about the
actual stated battery capacity on this thing. But it is also true that silicon is more volatile.
It expands more. It can wear more over time. And I think Samsung is right to say this is still
relatively new technology. We should we should do this more carefully. It'll be really interesting
to me to see whether this comes to the next set of Galaxy S devices, which is very much the
mainstream phone, right? These are not phones. None of the phones today are phones. Are phones.
most people will buy or even consider buying.
I think a lot of people should buy the flip.
We can get to that.
Yay, flip phones.
But like the Z-Fold 8 Ultra is a $2,100 phone.
Like you said, most people are not going to buy this.
So it is a useful science project for Samsung.
Its actual confidence will come when it puts it in the GalaxyS device.
How do you feel about a $2,000 phone,
whose battery might wear down faster
than a traditional battery.
Bad, Nilai.
Real, real, real bad.
I don't know.
If you buy like a Ferrari,
you're like,
if I run it real hard,
it'll explode.
I mean,
this is the thing, right?
Like,
there is no case for someone
who is price shopping a phone
to price shop your way up to this,
right?
Like in the way that Apple is very good
at sort of talking you up the chain of its phones,
there is no way that chain.
In the same way,
that that chain never gets you to,
I should spend the money for the iPhone error.
Ned from Spider-Man vibe-coded an app.
Didn't you see that?
They literally introduced him as the actor
who plays Ned from Spider-Man.
I know.
That poor guy.
I mean, money solves all problems.
But I'm just pointing it out.
I mean, that was like one of those moments
where they're trying to make the argument
for the form factors.
And I can vibe code an app
or my fictional character can vibe code an app.
I think these marketing departments
get themselves so twilight.
To your point, like people are going to do everything all the time.
Yeah.
And like a neat little narrative about these phones, it just doesn't exist.
Like everyone just sort of opens the phones and does whatever they want.
The only thing anyone really cares about is longer battery life.
And they were able to address that kind of at length with silicon carbon.
Yep.
But I think the other dimension of battery life is, will you be down to 80% capacity in two years on your $2,100 phone?
And if we don't pay off this bet on silicon carbon, will there be replacement
parts that fit into this case once that happens.
And all of that is wide open.
It's like worth noting if you spend the money,
you're at the bleeding edge of technology here in a very specific way.
Yeah.
But it is true that this is generally believed to be a huge leap forward in consumer
electronic batteries.
And I think like almost everyone is betting on this idea in some way.
So I'm very confident that it will work.
I do think you're taking a, you're taking a risk.
on the first version of it.
I mean, I'll make the comparison.
It's different.
It's definitely different, and the risks were different.
But when all the charging blocks shifted from silicon to GAN, Ganyam and I tried,
we actually ran a big story on this back in the day.
Like, Anchor was the first.
They had an exclusive on it.
And everything got smaller at first.
And then everything got a little overpowered.
And then a bunch of sort of like irresponsible alphabet suit, Amazon vendors,
started making ones that would be on fire.
But now everything is GAN and everything is small.
Right. And that was a big shift in sort of material science and charging technology and power density, all this stuff. And it just took a while for it to become the standard in a real way. I think we're on the same kind of journey here. It's just, will it light on fire on an airplane is a different question.
Yeah. I mean, yeah, who knows? That's one of our review tests will be to take it on an airplane and just see just see. Just go on several planes. Who knows?
We're going to rent a Cessna and then like panic for an hour.
Can I ask you how you feel about the word nightography, which I had a real...
I felt bad about that nightnitography for years.
Okay.
It's just every time I see that word, it really, it just gives me like a visceral yuck face.
I will say Samsung spent less time in this event doing weird camera things than it has in the past.
There was a really bizarre ad with obviously AI generated gerbils.
I think they were gerbils that I didn't super love.
but whether it was just this event or not,
there was much less focus on here's all the weird,
creepy, uncanny valley stuff you can do with your phone.
But they did say the phrase,
focus on the moment and let Galaxy take care of capturing it.
And I was just like, oh, this is when Eli just throws his computer into the sea.
What if the future of photography is you don't even take pictures?
You just tell the AI it's capturing everything around you.
You think, gosh, it would be great to have a picture.
And it takes it and it does it.
That'd be so fun.
I mean, that is where the camera companies have wanted to go for some time.
Yep.
Right?
As you just push this shutter button and it will decide what the best photo is and it will make that photo for you.
And they've gotten there.
I think my argument is like, what's left for Samsung to do inside of their camera app?
Right.
We're already just rendering the moon out of nothing.
We're already moving people around on park benches.
Like we've announced all of the AI stuff short of there isn't a lens on this camera that you can reasonably announce.
Right.
And so I kind of get where they're backing it off.
Also, the backlash is real.
Yes.
It's just real everywhere.
The idea that, you know, AI pictures of food and restaurant windows are a thing that you should vandalize is just a thing that is on the local news now.
This is a real story in San Francisco.
And I don't know if Samsung wants to run right into it while they're also promoting agentic AI and they're wide foldable.
Fair.
So I think, like, it's a good camera as like all they really need to say at this point.
And the
Gen Z, Gen Y camera culture
is about point shoot cameras with flashes right now.
So what are you going to do?
Like, you can't compete with that.
Yes, that's very true.
There was one of them,
I think it was the regular fold,
the wide fold,
where they said when you hold it up to take a photo,
it will feel nostalgic
like you're shooting with an old digital camera.
And I was just like, no, it won't.
Like, what on earth are you talking?
talking about. It's going to feel like a phone. It's fine. I watched three different TikTok videos
over the past week of people adjusting the settings on their cannon point and shoots by like
rotating the dials and going through those men because they're incomprehensible. And I was like,
something is happening here that one, I love and two, all of these companies should pay more attention to.
Like they don't, people don't want this other thing. They're chasing this other look, which is good.
Yes. And I, yeah, and I think to some extent there was evidence in this event that Samsung gets
that. And I think that's part of why they talked so much about the hardware and about the way
that you use it and about playing games and consuming content. And you get the sense it's like
there's a there's an investor mandated number of times you have to say agentic AI in a 90 minute
presentation or else your stock price just starts to tank. But in general, they spent a lot more
time talking about here's why this is a good phone that you will like in your life and much less
on here is all the wacky L.L.
stuff we've enabled you to do. And I think that's the right thing to do, right? Like,
in this particular case, especially for Samsung to say, here is our bleeding edge set of phones,
here is this stuff that we are demonstrably better at than all of our competitors in this space.
They made a big meal out of how they're winning at foldables and they are. Like, it's true. The question is,
is this going to continue to be the sort of mainstreaming moment for these foldables? And if it is,
can Samsung still win? Right now it's winning a game. No one else is really.
playing in the same way. At least in this country. Yeah. But to, right, but to say, here is what we think
this is for and why we think you should use it just felt good to me. Right. Like, they just, they make a
case for what you are supposed to do with your phone. And a few times made the case that actually what
you should do is not look at your phone, which is not a thing we hear from phone companies very often.
But you start to see these companies are starting to understand the way the winds are changing, right?
that there is real energy for people to not want to use their phone so much and to want it to fit
more naturally into their life and not be completely subsumed by it all the time. Is this the thing
they're actually after? Of course not. They all want you to use their phones more and ruin your
life. But they see the cultural change happening. And that's the thing that convinces me
increasingly that that cultural change is happening is that these companies are now having to
respond to it in a real way. We've spent 15 years watching everybody just power
through the idea that people are mad about privacy
and mad about the incursion on their lives
and mad about the algorithmic stuff.
And like everybody...
You're not using the screen time controls in your phone?
Yeah.
They would just, they would throw you a bone
every once in a while, but mostly would just assume
that eventually they'll win and you'll give in.
And they are now starting to move.
And I think that to me is the clearest sign
that there is real change happening.
But you don't agree with me.
You're making sense.
I agree with you in the sense that
there's a lot of cultural pushback
on the dominance of phones.
particularly social media, and we see it all over the place.
They're age-gating laws all over the Internet in various countries and states.
Sure.
We see the pushback against data centers.
I'm much, just to balance it out, AI is a technology that is really, really good at summarizing things.
And a lot of what you're describing is like, what if the cover screen summarized more things for you?
Sure.
Do you know what I mean?
And so they're using the technology they have to make a feature that connects to a cultural thing, which is what they should do.
I'm not even disagreeing with you.
I just don't think that,
I think that they're backing into an answer
as opposed to being like,
we see the cultural winds are changing.
We ought to make a product.
They're like, we have a summarization machine.
Can we point it at this problem?
And like, well, you know,
the next turn is like the agentic stuff,
which will maybe point at the problem even more.
And that I don't know that they've connected,
the AI will make you use your phone less to,
there's backlash against technology as directly as,
as maybe you would hope.
maybe not that that's it's it's very possible that that is the case um also i would point out that it's
called the cover screen it's called the flex window um and that's that's two words cam or it's one
word camel case and it's very important to me and to them that you get that right the hinge is called
the armor hinge yes and it's and it's all part of one ui nine on the samsung galaxy z flip eight
i hate these names it's too many words i can't do it anymore where where i there's a little more
say, but I feel like I have to ask this now because you mentioned Samsung making and space for
winning. Actually, before you do, we have an ad to play. Oh, my God. So brief cliffhanger,
we have an ad before I forget to do this and we get to the end of the show and I get yelled at.
Here's an ad. We'll be back in 60 seconds. Support for the show comes from MongoDB.
AI assisted and agentic coding can help you build faster than ever. But if your data layer is a
bottleneck, what's the point? MongoDB actually gets out of your way.
MongoDB is a unified AI-ready data platform that empowers you to build scalable generative AI applications.
It eliminates the need for separate, specialized vector databases by combining a flexible document model
natively with semantic vector search, full-text search, and real-time operational data.
Instead of wrestling with rigid schemas or translating data formats,
MongoDB's native data model mirrors the language LLMs already speak.
Plus, MongoDB gives you the flexibility to ship at the speed of AI.
The acid compliance lets you sleep soundly at night and scales to handle massive Fortune 500 workloads.
Developers have a word for that kind of reliability.
Actually, five words.
It's a great freaking database.
Start building at MongoDB.com slash AI.
How many third-party vendors does your company use?
20, 200.
Thanks to AI.
Someone on your team probably added three more this week.
And your security lead has no idea.
Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up.
Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it.
AI on, risk off.
Vanta.com slash TPRM.
How many third-party vendors does your company use?
20, 200.
Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week.
And your security lead has no idea.
Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up.
Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically,
so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it.
AI on, risk off.
Vanta.com slash TPRM.
Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for MintMobil.
Are you looking for a beach read this summer?
may I suggest your big wireless bill?
It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat, emotional arc, and a shocking twist where you realize
you've been overpaying the entire time.
Fortunately, though, Mint's story is better.
Every plan, $15 a month, even unlimited.
That's it.
Happy ending, zero tiers.
Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.
Upround payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12-month plan required,
$15 per month equivalent.
Taxes and fees extra.
Initial term only greater than 50 gigabytes, may slow when network is busy.
C terms.
All right, we're back.
Nealai, you were saying.
Here's my wrap-up questions on the phones.
Hit me.
We got to talk about the watches and everything else.
All right.
We've talked a lot about how Samsung has made its case for foldables.
We've avoided thus far.
But presumably in September, Apple's going to put out an iPhone that folds in exactly the same way.
I'm going to ask you a question that my friend Casey knew and asks us all the time.
Did Samsung show anything here that would make one person buy a Samsung phone instead of the iPhone that they already have?
Yes. Okay.
A, they showed that you can scan a QR code to switch from your iPhone to a Samsung phone,
which as somebody who has switched a lot of phones in the last year, boy, is that exciting.
Quick share coming across devices, big exciting thing.
Everybody seems to have just hacked Airdrop and Apple seems to have just waved the white flag and is like whatever.
Right, Apple's like, we need to fight with the EU about AI.
You can have stupid Airdrop.
Yeah, pretty much.
but I think in general
Gemini is vastly better than Siri
even what we've seen from
Siri AI so far
the
what do they call it now nudge
all of these little things that appear
in the
sort of in the course of using your phone
where you're like we need to put that on the calendar
and it'll just pop up a thing being like add the calendar
again Siri AI is
trying to do the same thing
that's going to be a big part of the
competitive landscape over the next couple of years is the actual sort of minute to minute
proactive experience of using your phone. Gemini is just a mile ahead at this moment in time.
So if you think that that is a core part of how you use your phone, this is a big part of it.
I also think there's a shot that the iPhone Ultra or whatever it ends up being called is going
to be even more expensive than these. I mean, and this is really the thing it all boils down to,
right? Like I look at all of these and I think Samsung got a lot of things right here and I will
almost certainly never recommend any of these phones to anybody.
Because they're just too expensive.
Like fundamentally these things are just science projects.
And until they are cheaper, they don't return what they need to in order.
I have a hard time imagining what it would take for me to tell you to spend twice as much on your next phone.
I don't think the iPhone Ultra is going to get there.
I don't think these phones get there.
I'm a little more compelled by the Z flip just because it's only $1,200.
It is some of this stuff in a vastly cheaper form factor.
So that's all very exciting.
But to me, this thing that they have where in a strange way Google has allowed Samsung
to be the bleeding edge of its own AI stuff, odd, but is really good for Samsung in the sense
that it gets a lot of that stuff actually going on.
They're starting to build better other devices.
If you're a believer in smart glasses, there's going to be a real reason to use Android
phones. I think Samsung is getting there. I think the switching costs between iOS and Android might
just be prohibitively high for everybody, but I think at the very least, Samsung has made it
much harder for people to leave and go to the iPhone, right? Which is that, that's the thing
Samsung needs more than anything, is to not lose whatever market share this is to iPhone people,
people who want the
the best and wildest technology
the fact that I think a bunch of people
will look at these and be happy with it
and not feel like they have to go immediately by the iPhone
because it's so obviously the best foldable
Samsung did a relatively good job of that today.
I mean that my prediction that I was basically wrong about
was that foldables would be a form factor shift
that led to people switching.
I don't think that happened in any meaningful way.
It's just the price, man.
I think you would have been right
if they had figured out a way to stop selling them for $1,800 and more.
And the iPhone also is going to cost that too.
And like, it turns out price matters, right?
Like, not a lot of people bought the Vision Pro because it's $3,500.
Like, most people, especially with this device, are not looking for the wildest thing at all possible costs.
Like even the iPhone error, which I think has had a funny sort of resurgence in a lot of people's mind that, like, there are a lot of people who thought it was dumb and they,
use it for a while and they're like, oh, this fund's actually kind of lovely.
Doesn't matter, right?
Like, people are price sensitive.
People are going to buy the things that are more stable and more familiar and in many
cases cheaper.
These things are just going to lose until they can compete on price.
And you can maybe talk me into like $100 or $200 more.
Like if you had the base at 800, the pro at $1,000 and the foldable at $1,200, you start
to be somewhere.
But doubling the price, you're nowhere.
I just don't think it's ever going to happen.
at that price. Yeah. I'm very curious to see how Apple prices its phones, but I think the
idea that Samsung made a big case for how people use these phones just a few months before
Apple puts out similar phones and makes a similar case with their ability to market. It's going
to frustrate a lot of people who know that Samsung has been shipping folding phones for a long time.
Apple is going to pretend that it invented foldable phones. And I just want everyone watching and
listening to know that we know it didn't. We know. We believe you. We're here. We're here.
We've talked about it.
I also really like this comment that just says,
if I could replace the screen,
if they break for less than the price of a mid-range phone,
then I'd consider them.
Fabulous point.
That is exactly the problem.
Should we talk about the watches?
We should quickly talk about the watches, yeah.
You are a noted Apple Watch Ultra believer.
Are you wearing yours right now?
I am, but the Apple, you know, in 27, this thing is gone.
So you've got to get a new one.
So I'm in the market.
Although ecosystem lock-in is going to drive me
exactly to one option.
That is the problem.
So Samsung launch 2.
There's the Galaxy Watch 9 and the Galaxy Watch Ultra
2. The Watch 9 is basically a chip bump and a battery bump.
Fine. Easy, easy upgrade from one of the other.
The Ultra 2, I think, is more interesting, again,
in terms of who Samsung imagined this for.
They made a bunch of noise about divers.
It has a spec for diving accessories that it adheres to.
It does nitrogen absorption monitoring.
they have a partnership with a well-known company that makes a diving app.
They have sort of carved out this is for divers in the way that Apple has really tried to carve out.
This is for outdoor adventurers for the watch Ultra.
It has a bigger battery.
This I actually thought was sort of fascinating.
V-Song on our team wrote a story about this.
It has a 35% bigger battery than the last model, despite being actually a little thinner on the Ultra.
and they say it gets 60 hours on a charge,
but V got 70 hours on a charge from the last Ultra,
which means there's a world in which the battery on this thing is like three or days plus,
three or four days,
which I think would be a big deal.
I don't think this watch is particularly attractive.
It's kind of big and blocky and undesigned in a certain way to my eyes.
But I don't know.
What do you make of this thing?
I agree with you on the design.
fine piece, right? Like, the idea that watches are for tasks is challenging. Sure. When they are
as powerful as these watches, like this watch, the Apple Watch Ultra, the sort of big smart
watches are little computers that can do little computer things. And then you kind of run into
the fashion problem. I think there's a reason whoop bands are really popular and everyone's making one
because they're unobtrusive. I think the Google one, you can, you can just hide on like a regular
watch strap on the back. So people are finding ways to like hide the sensors. If all
All you want is the health tracking features.
Right.
And take the display away.
And then you have these products, which are gigantic.
And it feels like they're only going to keep getting bigger in very specific ways and getting more powerful.
And then you're like, what am I doing with this giant computer on my wrist?
And maybe the answer is like having a great time.
I know a lot of people want a giant computer on the wrist.
I just keep looking at these pictures.
And it's one of our commentsers just described it as circle and squircle, which I think is right.
And this to me just, it keeps looking like a.
prototype that they forgot to take the outer case off of, right? Like, that the thing inside should
be the watch and somebody forgot to remove the outer casing before they shipped it. It just doesn't,
there's something about this that just doesn't look finished to me. Yeah, I mean, they've,
they've got to handle all the ventilation. You can see, it's more, it's form follows function
here in a very specific way. Yeah. Which is fine. The thing that it gets me about all these watches
is, again, the thing that most people love about their smart watches is, is that,
health and fitness features, and there's just a lot of competition in form factor there.
Yeah.
Like, there just is.
And there's been this recent push towards no screen at all for some of that stuff,
that actually what I want is just a device that collects everything and then I will do all
of the management of that on my phone.
Yeah.
Here's the whoop in.
There's a reason.
I mean, I find this thing bananas, but the CEO of Whoop is coming on to Coder soon
and we're going to talk about.
Nice.
But you can see that there's that, right?
if what Apple figured out in the sort of Apple Watch journey was this is a health device and they
really, really focused on it, they've maybe lost that plot a little bit.
Yeah, I think I agree with that.
And these screenless devices are coming up to take it over.
And then it's like, okay, what is the smartwatch for?
And we should put a big processor in it.
We have all this stuff.
And you just kind of, you get to, oh, we're going to reboot this a little bit.
And it's going to get even bigger and even crazier.
And we're going to need air pocket ventilation, like all this stuff that you need.
I'm excited for it because I think it's going to be a new turn in these watches
because their core feature, health and fitness, is going in a different direction,
is going in different form factors.
We'll see.
The thing that makes me sad about all of this, it's the same with headphones.
Once you buy a phone, you're in an ecosystem, and that ecosystem traps you into this device.
So does this thing actually compete with the Apple Watch?
No, it doesn't.
Not in any way.
It competes with keeping the money in your pocket.
I mean, that's what it is.
I will say, I think, again,
Samsung has spent a lot of years making a lot of noise
about the overall galaxy ecosystem,
and I think has not really delivered a ton on that.
But there were some interesting demos today
in that they were talking about how you might use the watch
to control your glasses and the sort of interplay
between those different form factors,
watch glasses phone.
I think both of our feelings about glasses are,
well-established. And ironically, boy, did they not make a compelling case for smart glasses
in this entire thing. There was a whole long thing about all of these other devices and why you
might want them and what they're for and why they're worth having in this particular shape.
And then they're like glasses. He's just like, well, you could take pictures. Do you like that?
Well, okay, so no one knows what smart glasses are for it. But they do. They had this thing where it's like,
okay, you can use your watch to control your glasses so that you don't have to be, you know,
touching your face all the time.
And there are, again, these little pieces of the ecosystem that are starting to come together.
And it's a real shame that no one else is going to be able to do these things.
Apple is more locked in than anybody.
Android is a little more open.
It will have some more hooks into this stuff that will be interesting to see how Google enables that stuff
across the ecosystem.
But it is true that if you are going to buy one of these phones, you are almost certainly
going to buy a Galaxy watch next to it if you buy a smart watch because you don't really have
any other.
Look, you tuned into a Vergecast live stream about Samsung products.
You're going to get some literal galaxy brain takes.
So here's mine.
All of these ideas where you're going to buy a Samsung watch to control the Google AI and your Samsung glasses designed by gentle monster, whatever nonsense.
Fine.
Whatever.
They're all going to run into the same problem, which is the history of user interface is more and more direct manipulation.
Right?
We had, you held a mouse in your hand and you would move the arrow and like literally click on the thing you want and there's like a very direct manipulation of what's happening.
We got to touch screens.
You're literally pushing on the pixels to change what you want.
All of these devices are indirect manipulation where whatever your hand is doing off in space has almost nothing to do with what you're seeing and controlling.
And that stuff is a dead end.
It is true on the meta glasses with the neural band.
It, it's just like ever, it just unwires people.
people's brains in a way that's like, can I just use my phone? I just use my phone, right?
And until you get to like literally reaching out and pointing and clicking, which runs into all
kinds of other problems, Steve Jobs just called gorilla arms. Whatever, man. The industry is chasing
the stuff and it is willfully forgetting the things it knows about user interface paradigms.
Yeah, I think that's right. And I mean, we're back to like buttons in cars again, right? People
like buttons and knobs. And I think I think we probably do for a lot of that. Yeah, exactly.
And it turns out that is worth pushing back towards, in this case, too.
There's so many interesting, I encourage everybody to go, like, look up Brett Victor
and all of the work that he's done on how do we make a projector see the room and react
as you literally move physical things around as a computer.
Wild, exciting stuff out there that I actually think has much more bearing on how reality
should work than pinchy pinch in front of my face as I use something.
But was there anything in the watch all?
that you thought was particularly cool.
Are you psyched about 5,000 nits of brightness?
They made a big deal out of 5,000 nits of brightness.
No, but, you know, I'm not, I'm not like climbing Everest.
That's 2,000 more nits, Neil.
I'm good, man.
Like, I'm turning down the brightness.
I'm I watch all the time.
I have a baby, you understand?
Like, the baby's like, do you want me to sleep or do you want me to pot this watch?
Like, those are our choices.
Yeah, that's fair.
I do think some of the preventative health stuff is interesting.
Samsung is resolutely trying to,
boil everything that it collects about you into a series of scores that it can give you on your
watch, which I would say I am kind of constitutionally against. There's nothing I hate more
than waking up tired in the morning and having it be like, you get a 59 for last night. I'm like,
well, I hate you. We are not friends. You and me. Right now it's Google Health that I'm furious at.
Every morning I wake up and it's like, gosh, you didn't sleep very well last night. And I'm like,
pouring coffee on my face. I'm like, I'm aware. Thank you, Google Health.
But again, they're deep downness, can this be not just a fitness device, but an actual like capital H health device?
And I think that that's the direction Apple is pushing too.
That's the direction Samsung is going.
And again, the question of how big is the total addressable market for a device like that for people who want things like that remains unclear to me.
But it is interesting to see Samsung really dive after this in the same way.
I mean, there is a certain amount of just doing what Apple's doing here.
Like, they launched a Galaxy card.
I don't know what I mean?
Oh, wait, by the way.
It's a card of stable coins in it now.
Come on.
That was the funniest part of the whole thing where, again, the moment where he said stable coins are now in the Samsung wallet and literally paused for applause and got nothing.
I mean, like, dead air in the room.
And then one person goes, woo.
And he's like, yeah.
Stable coins.
That's very good.
This is terrific.
Look, health and fitness-wise, everyone is chasing loop.
Like, I don't, they can't be clear about that.
Like, that's, they have emerged as a particular kind of market leader in a particular kind of way.
And you have a lot of feelings about that.
And particularly about whether or not AI is a good or stable or healthy health companion,
which he talks about all the time.
Literally today, like this morning, Open AI got sued for giving incorrect health advice to somebody.
And like, that's just going to be a big lawsuit.
So whether or not these metrics and gamifying your health is actually effective in the way that people want it to be effective, I don't know.
But I know what everyone's chasing is that number go up is a compelling thing to put on a stat sheet and in marketing materials.
And now Samsung can be like, Samsung Health AI is going to do it for you.
Whether or they are the best one or it feels irrelevant to the reality of they're all kind of the same.
They all tell you to go to bed at 11 p.m. and get nine hours asleep.
and they all tell you not to drink so much
and eat a little bit less than you move
and like I just told you that
will you pay me the subscription fee?
And the fact that they're all essentially
identical products at this point is completely
irrelevant because of the ecosystem thing right?
Like it's not you're not actually choosing
between a bunch of hard to pick between products
you're picking the one that works at the phone that you have.
And that's the long and short of it.
And so great.
I think every one of these good features
should immediately be copied by every single one of these
competitors because it doesn't matter.
Like, they're not competitors.
Yeah.
I mean, this is going to be the, this is the fight that maybe AI overcomes.
Maybe.
I don't know, man.
If Gemini, it becomes the ecosystem unto itself, we get into a really interesting place.
I don't think that's happening anytime soon.
It does not seem like it's happening anytime soon.
All right, we should get out of here.
But I will say, I think the reviews for these devices are going to be really fascinating.
in an sort of unusual way for a phone in 2026,
there are a lot of ways these could go.
They've made a lot of noise about durability.
They've made a lot of noise about whether these devices have creases in the screens.
Again, we're back to titanium technology that supposedly makes them stronger,
but also cleaner and crisper.
There was a very cool video of how they laid out the screen so that it's much more uniform now.
This is the kind of stuff that Samsung should be good at now,
after all of these years of making foldables
and theoretically potentially way ahead of everybody else,
even the Googles and apples of the world.
But is the battery going to expand and or explode?
Are the cameras good enough
that you're not going to mind some of the tradeoffs
on the other devices?
Does the actual expansion of size on the fold in particular make sense?
Like these feel like unknown phones to me.
for in sort of an unusual way,
particularly the wide fold.
Like to actually live with that thing for a while,
I think is going to be really telling.
Yeah.
I kind of have no idea how it'll land.
I mean,
this is why I ranked it first.
It's novel in a very particular way,
especially if you think,
if you believe in your heart
that talking to Gemini to do agent stuff
is a way that we will use phones.
Maybe it's this,
I don't, I'm not even selling it, man.
Yeah.
So these funds are shipping August 7th.
I think everything that was announced today is shipping August 7th.
Historically speaking, I would say reviews from everybody will land somewhere between here and there.
We will have lots more to talk about, so we'll get back to here.
But for now, we should get out of here.
Eli, it's been a pleasure seeing you.
We don't talk about gadgets enough.
We should talk about gadgets more.
Now the actor who plays Spider-Man.
And now we sit silently while Spider-Man.
sits up there for a while.
All right. Thank you to Travis and Eric, who are here producing.
Thank you to our whole team for making all of this happen.
Thank you to all of you for being here watching and listening and commenting.
That's it. That's the Vergecast.
Eli.
Rock and roll.
Recently, our company's softball team lost the big game by one run.
Then Dale tried to console us with the quote,
winning isn't everything.
Well, Dale and I are very different.
I get early payout from Bed 365.
If my team goes up big, I get paid out.
instantly, even if they blow the lead
later. Sound familiar, Dale?
Thanks, Beth365.
Must be 19 or older Ontario only. Please play
responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling
or the gambling of someone close to you, please go to connectsuntario.
C-A-T and C-Supply.
If you want a $3,000
a month payday for life, what would
you feel free to do? Maybe take a long
weekend, every weekend, or try
a bunch of new hobbies? Would you feel free
to upgrade and listen, ad-free?
Don't worry, we get it. Every $20
ticket could win you $3,000.
a month for life and supports life-saving cancer research at the Princess Margaret.
Feel free to buy your Payday for Life ticket today.
Raffle number 155-2194. Please play responsibly.
