The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart - Kentucky on Track? with Gov. Andy Beshear
Episode Date: May 1, 2025In a political landscape defined by polarization, Jon is joined by Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear to discuss his success as a Democrat in a deeply conservative state. Together, they explore his approa...ch to revitalizing Kentucky communities, examine his blueprint for winning in Trump country, and consider how he plans to lead his state through a second Trump administration while staying true to his values. Plus, hear from a surprise guest (woof!) Follow The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart on social media for more: > YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@weeklyshowpodcast > Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/weeklyshowpodcast> TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@weeklyshowpodcast > X: https://x.com/weeklyshowpod > BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/theweeklyshowpodcast.com Host/Executive Producer – Jon Stewart Executive Producer – James Dixon Executive Producer – Chris McShane Executive Producer – Caity Gray Lead Producer – Lauren Walker Producer – Brittany Mehmedovic Video Editor & Engineer – Rob Vitolo Audio Editor & Engineer – Nicole Boyce Researcher & Associate Producer – Gillian Spear Music by Hansdle Hsu This podcast is brought to you by: Ground News Go to https://groundnews.com/stewart to see how any news story is being framed by news outlets around the world and across the political spectrum. Use this link to get 40% off unlimited access with the Vantage Subscription. Zbiotics Go to https://zbiotics.com/TWS and use TWS at checkout for 15% off any first time orders of ZBiotics probiotics. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello everybody. My name is Jon Stewart. This is the weekly show podcast taping it Wednesday,
April 30th, year of our Lord 2025. It is, I'm still hung over from the hundred day celebrations that have been sweeping the country.
Oh, oh, to celebrate the first hundred days of this gloriously competent and
patriotic B12 shot in the ass to America.
That is, oh wait, that's not what's happening at all.
We're a shit show.
The economy actually contracted, uh, which president Trump immediately
blamed on the Biden overhang.
Apparently, uh, Biden forcing Trump to levy, uh, ridiculous and whimsical
tariffs is,
it was Biden's fault.
Damn him, damn him for doing that.
As part of the celebration,
I don't know if you saw how the president
was celebrating the 100 days.
He declared he'd be a good pope.
What else did he say?
Taunted Canada on the eve of their election,
causing them to elect the liberal government over what
was going to be a slam dunk.
But I think my favorite moment of the 100 day Jubilee that is the Trump presidency of
the celebration was his interview with Terry Moran of ABC, which is so instructive about the dynamic that Trump would prefer.
It was one of those Terry Moran comes in and starts asking him questions and Trump immediately
is just like, well, what are you doing? You coming in here every time. Fucking question this, question
that. Whatever happened to thank you, your grace, whatever happened to thank you,
your grace, whatever happened to your honor,
you have made our lives so brilliantly wonderful.
How do you do it?
You know, he's so accustomed to the just incessant
ball polishing, even his cabinet meetings are not even cabinet meetings,
they are just opportunities for flattery.
And when he is presented with anything other
than the simplest flattery,
the simplest question is then seen as interrogation
and the Spanish Inquisition,
because it is so against the tongue bath as interrogation and the Spanish Inquisition
because it is so against the tongue bath
that he is accustomed to, and not only accustomed to,
demands and deserves.
How dare you, a reporter, come into my office
and not immediately flate?
How could you?
And there was an exchange,
there was the Photoshopped picture of Trump holding,
I guess it was a picture of the gentleman that they,
Garcia Abrego, that they had Photoshopped.
It literally said MS-13 on it.
And Terry Moran brings it up and Trump says,
well, it said MS-13 and Terry Moran says,
well, that was obviously Photoshopped.
No, it wasn't.
And then he tries to move on.
Terry Moran, he's going like, anyway, about Ukraine.
No, no, no, let's go, let's go back.
Why can't you just say I'm right?
That to me is the most, it is the epitome
of the attitude of this president.
Why can't you just walk in here and say I'm fucking right,
even when I am so objectively wrong
that there is photographic evidence of my wrongness?
Why can't you just ignore that and blow me?
Why?
And he has no idea, zero,
about the true effects on the ground for regular people
of the absurdity of his actions
and the lack of preparation for his trade war
and the uncertainty.
And he's got Scott Besson out there saying,
well, it's a strategic uncertainty.
It keeps our opponents off balance.
And you're like, actually,
it's keeping your allies off balance.
And today, actually, I'm excited for this episode.
We're gonna get a view from the ground from a governor
who is trying very hard to stimulate economic activity
in his state to make sure that his people
as these Medicaid cuts come down
are still being taken care of.
And I think it'll be a really interesting look
at what the true effects are of the madness
of King Donald on the state level.
So let's just, we're gonna get to our guests now.
Very excited.
So let's just, we're gonna get to our guests now. Very excited.
All right, we're delighted today.
We are joined by the governor of the great state
of Kentucky, Governor Andy Beshear is joined.
Governor, how are you, sir?
I'm great, thrilled to be on.
It's Derby Week in the Commonwealth.
So an exciting time.
That is an exciting time in the Commonwealth.
I love the idea of the Commonwealth.
There's all, you know, I'm from New Jersey.
Do you have any idea what we would give to label ourselves a Commonwealth?
We never get that kind of respect.
You know, I'd like to think there's some good ones, you know, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts.
But I like to think Kentucky is the premier
Commonwealth. Wow, you're the Governor of Kentucky. I think you pretty much have to say that.
Only governors would know how many commonwealths there are. I don't know what Jersey is classified
as. Provincial, well, I was going to curse, but you're a governor, so I'm going to lay off of that.
Well, I was going to curse, but you're a governor, so I'm going to lay off of that.
Governor, I want to ask you, I don't, to be perfectly frank,
know that much about Kentucky.
I played a couple of gigs in Lexington a few years back.
Had a great time.
It was beautiful down there.
But I am confused.
So Trump vans, they win Kentucky by 30 points, points something along those lines 30 points you win, Kentucky
Democrat by five points
This is a 35 point
swing you both your senators are
Republicans, but very different kinds of Republicans Rand Paul obviously more a kind of classic
libertarian-style politician.
Mitch McConnell couldn't be a more insider,
horse-trading kind of a...
Do you have a sense of what is it about Kentucky
that allows for this giant ideological swings
in statewide offices.
Well, I think what the people of Kentucky want is what the people of America want.
They want a better life.
And if you can convince them that you are working
your hardest to create that better life,
then they'll give you that opportunity.
I won in 2019 by 0.1%. It was a close election against a sitting
incumbent. But I got to spend the next four years earning the faith and the trust of the
people of Kentucky. We had two of the best years of economic development in our history.
We brought in more private sector investment. We're building the two biggest battery plants on planet earth.
We created jobs that have some of the highest wages
in our history.
And so while we complicate politics and government a lot,
it's supposed to be about creating a better life
for all Kentuckians, for all Americans.
And I think when people see that,
you can break through regardless of your party.
So let's dig into that, because that's very interesting to me.
So you build these plans, why in your mind do you think you were
credited with that, which and I don't mean that in a way of like,
why did you get the credit for that? I mean it in the way of
Biden administration, Kamala Harris, what was it about their
investment in Kentucky
or lack thereof, or maybe the CHIPS Act
or any of those other things that did not break through
in any way with Kentuckians?
Would Kentuckians be the correct?
Kentuckians.
Kentuckians, okay.
I don't want to say like Kentucky Landers or whatever.
I don't want to make the wrong,
but why is it that they responded
to those positive things economically that you had done,
definitely had gotten accomplished,
but the Democratic administration in Washington
got absolutely no grace on that.
And what you have to do is get dirt on your boots,
meaning you got to get out there and show your work.
Well, they didn't even have boots, Governor.
I'm pretty sure they were wearing hush puppies.
They're not even wearing boots.
We could have found them some boots.
All right.
But you've got to show your work
so that people can see, feel, and touch it.
Like the signing in the Rose Garden
is no longer real to people.
One job hasn't been created at the time of the signing.
And so what we found is,
when I was running for reelection in
2023, again, we'd had our two best years ever for our economy. We were booming, biggest rainy day
fund, biggest revenues upgraded by all the bond rating agencies. But I only started up on my
opponent on the economy by about three to five points. And he'd only worked in the private sector
one year and actually worked for my law firm
during that year. Wait, your opponent worked at your law firm? Yes, and actually did assignments. I bet he don't work there no more. No, and it actually did assignments for me. It's a very small
world. Yeah. But what we found was that people needed to be reminded. Like we did a focus group
and we said, well, what about the battery plants? What about the new paper mill?
What about this record number of jobs?
And so we got out there to prove it.
We made sure the message we were sending
when we started that campaign was one of more opportunity.
You can't take for granted that you
passed three or four really good measures for the economy.
You've got to show people how it happened.
And then I think a challenge for the Biden administration was if you overregulate the
programs you put into place, they take so long to create the jobs or get the internet
out there that people don't feel it by the next election.
Did you have rural broadband programs that were supposed to come to Kentucky that ended
up not coming
to Kentucky?
Well, the ARPA funds when they came out were really flexible.
And we put those into hard infrastructure, including expansion of broadband.
And it was incredible to see how fast we could do it and how effective it was.
So part of the B program when it was passed was based on Kentucky.
But what we had to do was write about three encyclopedia Britannicas to the regulators
who had never instituted one of these programs, which we had.
So instead of sending the money and then auditing what we did, watching what we did, overseeing
what we did, we had to plan and double plan and triple plan.
And because of that, there's not one inch of fiber from the BEAD program that's out there yet.
So we as Democrats, we've got to be honest
with the American people about our failings.
I think that the BEAD legislation was amazing
and transformational, but we've got to be practical
and say our first job is to get things done.
And we've got to set up a way of administering a program that does that.
So let's talk a little bit about the things that are the bottlenecks to getting things
done in.
Because certainly the federal bureaucracy is a very different animal than a state level
bureaucracy.
And I'm not sure how that bureaucracy works in the state of Kentucky.
In New Jersey, I can tell you, it is just a series of small mob social clubs.
It's all we are number one in corruption now, I think, 212 years running. But in Kentucky,
were you able to do these battery plants and these other things through legislation? Was it more executive fiat? Are these block grants that you're redirecting
into certain areas? What were the ways that you were able to execute, you know, these
varieties of economic stimulus? Everybody's going to stimulate the economy somehow. How
did you end up doing it?
Well, sometimes you need some legislation, but most of the time it's your effectiveness.
When people are looking at locating a huge investment, you got to have the site, you
got to have the power, you got to have the water, you got to have the infrastructure,
but then you've got to be able to convince them and give them comfort.
When you say them, you mean the?
The company.
The company, okay.
That you can get it done.
On our major projects, every single cabinet that has a part
reports to me every two weeks, because my job is to get those
built as fast as we can, and we sell speed to market to all
these companies, that if you come to Kentucky, we'll get you
up and running faster than anywhere.
So we brought everybody in as a team, the environmental
permitters sit down with companies ahead of of time because these companies want to do right
by the environment and we work together to see how fast we can do it
and where the best placement of this or that would be
to meet the goals and to protect the environment.
Our building inspectors are ready ahead of time and are there.
It's just about making things work
and understanding that when we make it easier for
people to build that facility, then the jobs come to our people that much faster. Okay,
we're going to take a quick break. We shall be back. Guys, I don't know if you guys are aware
of this, but getting through the news is, well, what's what I'm looking for. It sucks. Terrible.
It's really hard to figure out.
But I got to tell you about Ground News, website and app dedicated to helping readers navigate
today's headlines with these words, I don't know, with critical thinking, media literacy,
getting through the headlines with critical thinking.
Think of it.
Ground News pulls together thousands of news stories from around the world every day.
Each story organized with very clear visual breakdowns
of what the political bias, the ownership,
the reporting differences, it helps you better understand
not just the story, what you're reading,
but why you're seeing it presented in the way that it is.
And it's built around transparency.
Ground News doesn't run ads, doesn't run ads.
Podcasts don't even do that.
What are they thinking?
They don't use algorithms to customize your news feed.
How dare they not try and manipulate you?
Their bias ratings come from the averages of three different independent organizations,
and it gives you a more balanced and comprehensive view.
When you're using Ground News, you can see how many outlets have covered a story,
how the coverage is distributed across political spectrums.
You can scroll through the headlines
with the bias labels attached.
You don't even have to leave the app.
I know you don't wanna leave the app and you don't have to.
You can even directly compare
how different outlets report the same story.
The blind spot feed highlights stories
that are being under reported
by either sides of the political spectrum, any side,
it gives you a broader, fuller view.
All you got to do to explore everything Ground News offers, groundnews.com slash Stuart.
Subscribers get 40% off the vantage plan, unlocking all the features.
That's groundnews.com slash Stuart.
When you subscribe, you are supporting an independent platform committed to making news more transparent
and empowering readers to make informed decisions,
which, oh, those are the best kinds of decisions.
And we are now back.
Can I ask you in terms of, you know,
when you're talking about,
you're talking to different corporations.
So let's, you know, I don't know if it's the battery
or it's car makers or things along those lines.
Do you need to, there's sort of this idea, globalization was a
disaster for deindustrializing the United States.
Uh, companies looked at, Oh man, I'd only have to pay these dudes
$200 a month versus a union job where I've got to provide all these things or,
you know, so they all offshore, they all move things out. But even within the
United States, that same dynamic also takes place. You know, a union state like
Michigan or someplace else may not be competitive with Kentucky. Do you find
that that dynamic comes into play in your negotiations?
Like will you say to them, we don't have the level of regulation and unionization that they have in, let's say,
Michigan.
So if you come here, you won't have to deal with that.
We don't end up having that specific conversation because even with all the laws the legislature's passed,
union membership has gone up in Kentucky each of the last three years.
They're booming, especially in the construction,
in the building trades, and they're building
all these facilities, getting them done on time
and on budget.
What we end up talking about the most is both getting
their facility constructed on time, but then also workforce.
While other states looked down on manufacturing
for a long time, we never did.
We believe in work.
We believe that we need to make in the United States
what the United States needs.
And so we were reshoring manufacturing
before the second Trump administration.
And the ironic thing is it has slowed down
the pace of reshoring.
That these tariffs that are supposed to encourage companies
to build in the United States,
those companies were already planning
on building in the United States.
They'd done too much with China.
They were trying to hedge in the United States.
Our growth was bigger than just about any other country.
But it takes three to five years
and the tariffs will hit them right now.
And even when they build their facility, they will need to import certain materials or parts
for a long time.
And so these tariffs are actually stopping the aim that the Trump administration claims
that it has.
And everybody's seeing it.
Everybody's seeing pause projects, cancel projects, and now we're even seeing layoffs.
This is the single most damaging economic policy
I've seen from a president in my lifetime.
And the fascinating thing to me is more than anything
I've ever seen in politics, it's attributable to one person
and one person alone.
Joe Biden, you're right, sir.
Joe Biden, sleepy Joe.
No, you're dead on, although he is saying,
he came out today, the GDP results came out today,
and they said it's a little funky
because so many people tried to jump the orders
because they were afraid of the tariffs,
but that we shrunk GDP for the first time in three years.
So Trump came out with a huge announcement,
I believe it might've been all caps,
saying, this is not my fault.
This is the overhang from Joe Biden's, I guess, growth economy.
But how does that, so let's talk about that.
You say two big battery plants, right?
So I'm assuming, not knowing a whole lot about battery production, to be quite honest.
But that has a rare earth metal component, I would guess.
It does.
And making batteries in the United States right now takes foreign direct investment.
So this is a joint venture between Ford that has a huge Kentucky presence and SK, which
is a South Korean company.
And so when you look at these tariffs, it not only makes the operations and the cost of operations
that much more difficult because we do have to import right now materials, and we're going to
have to until we build out this industry, which is going to take time, but what's happening before
this tariff policy. But you also are insulting and or attacking the countries where these companies are in.
I mean, I never thought a president could push Japan and South Korea towards China.
Right.
That's bad for foreign direct investment.
That's bad for global security.
I'll give you another example.
The biggest Toyota plant in the world is in Kentucky.
It's in Georgetown.
The biggest one in the world is in Kentucky. It's in Georgetown. The biggest one in the world is in Kentucky?
In the world.
Yeah.
We make the Camry.
We also make some Lexuses.
Right.
But when you push away countries that invest and their companies invest so much in us,
it creates some significant concerns.
I mean, you look at what's going on in Canada right now, where they rightfully feel attacked by this administration.
Sure.
Well, it's about time.
The free ride for Canada is long overdue.
That's over, those bastards.
I always liken that to, you know, attacking Canada.
It's like, you know, when they have those prison stories
where somebody goes into the prison yard
and they walk up to the one guy, you know,
the whole theory is you walk up to the one guy, you know, the whole theory is you walk up to the one guy
that apparently wasn't a problem at all and punch him.
Like that's what it seemed like with Canada
and the same with Mexico.
Or it's that guy that has walked with you
everywhere you've gone, has tried to protect you,
and then you turn on him.
Right.
Governor, we are discussing now how globalization, as much as it may have industrialized
us, there is a reality. China's real. They do manufacturing dumps. Targeted tariffs, I think
most people would agree, have some utility, but the way that they are being deployed on a whim,
and some people are getting
exempted, you know, they're now talking about in the automobile industry, they'll exempt
steel and aluminum maybe. How do the projects that are happening in Kentucky, how are they affected
by that? Are they pulling back from them? Are those able to go forward still?
Well, thankfully, we've got a really good pipeline of projects, and I think our economy
will continue to be hot, but we're seeing a slowdown all over the country.
In fact, this Derby week, Churchill Downs just canceled a $900 million project, or at
least Paulista, that would have added hundreds, if not thousands, of construction jobs over
the next year.
And their president talked about it being because of tariffs, the uncertainty of what hundreds if not thousands of construction jobs over the next year and and their
President talked about it being because of tariffs the uncertainty of what things will cost and as you know, john It's not just the current tariff policy. It's that it changes every day
Sure, it's the uncertainty of it right or two or three times a day and what it also suggests is they just don't know
What they're doing
How dare you, sir.
You are, look, you're in a state that is a Trump ride or die state.
I don't think there's any question about that.
Does that news permeate or do they still is there a cognitive dissonance?
Is there a willingness to just say, well, we have to take our medicine
because Kentucky was suffering
and these tariffs will re-industrialize us?
How do they digest all this information?
It permeates.
It permeates with that small business owner
that was expanding and is now looking at laying people off.
Small business are the first to hire, the last to fire,
because when they fire someone,
they know them.
They might go to church with them.
They'll see them in the grocery store
and know the impact on their lives.
And so sadly, people are feeling pain,
pain and paying their bills, pain and running their company.
And so that certainly permeates.
But I'll tell you what I hear about just as much.
And it's the potential cuts to Medicaid.
Really?
What it would do, first of all, for healthcare generally,
I mean, Medicaid covers the people we love the most,
our parents and our kids.
50% of Kentucky's kids have some Medicaid coverage.
70% of our long-term care costs are covered by Medicaid,
and rural healthcare is supported
and cannot exist without Medicaid and at its
current level without expanded Medicaid.
So imagine if you live in rural America and they do these cuts, your hospital system,
which is your number two employer behind the public school shuts down, all those jobs are
lost, it hits your economy, but then you, whether you have private insurance or Medicaid,
have to drive an hour or two for your appointment, for your parents' appointments, for your kids'
appointments to see the same doctor who lost their job in your town in a bigger city.
How quickly are these changes affecting these areas right now? Is this anticipatory or are
you seeing this play out with rapidity?
Well, on the tariff side, we're seeing it right now.
UPS just announced 20,000 layoffs, which is startling.
What?
Yes, our bourbon industry has been hit.
We've seen a bottling plant shut down.
Well, they're targeting, I mean, bourbon,
you talk about Canada, boy, you know,
the first thing they did was go, all right, that's
it.
We're not getting drunk anymore.
We're done.
Well, the last thing anyone should ever be deprived of is Kentucky bourbon.
Sure.
Because 95% of the world's bourbon is made here.
The other 5% is counterfeit.
And the whole world should be able to enjoy because with all this craziness going around,
it can be helpful.
But, you know, that does show how hurt Canada is,
how it's not just these tariffs,
it's the talk of the 51st state.
And John, by the way,
they'd have the most electoral votes
out of any state if that happened.
I don't understand how you make that giant area.
Oh, it'd just be one state.
You'll get two senators, you'll be fine.
You'll be the same as Wyoming.
Why not?
But so hurt that they're pushing back.
Yeah, what does this do though to the state budget?
How much is this a sort of a bomb
that's dropped in the middle of,
I know that states always struggle to balance services
that were provided from the federal.
When those get pulled back, somebody's got to pick that up.
What is this gonna do to Kentucky's budget?
It's going to be a challenge.
We have about a $17 billion annual budget.
I've got about 30,000 employees that
do important work from repairing our roads
to doing different claims for health care
to ensuring our communities are safe.
Government performs a lot of important functions.
The federal government is doing a couple things right now
that make it that much harder.
First, they're trying to cancel programs
and cancel programs that are enshrined in law
that have had Congress appropriate to it
and that we have a contract with them.
And we've probably already expended the funds.
Which are the contracts that will be,
that they're trying to cut?
Is this a Doge situation or is this,
was this something else?
It can be from Doge.
It can also come down from the cabinets themselves.
We saw that with a lot of the FEMA funding
that they were trying to pause or to cancel the,
what they call the COVID funding,
which is really about stopping a future
pandemic, money for addiction treatment. They're taking the money for future planning of disasters
away from you. And look at the cuts. The other part is not just freezing the money or bringing
it back and we're going to court and we're winning on that. So I'm able to bring those dollars back
in because I've got a contract. The government gave me their word.
They even passed a law and I'm going to stand up for my people.
But then the other thing they're doing is that they're firing so many federal employees
that the employees that are there don't know how the programs work.
Some of our cabinets are on their fifth contact in a hundred days.
And so it might be that the group is even trying in the federal government,
but they're
brand new or they've never done this part.
And that comes down and hurts the American people.
Think about that senior on Social Security in Eastern Kentucky, and they close the office
where they're at.
So now on a fixed income, they've got to drive a couple of hours.
Have they closed those regional offices?
So the regional offices have started to close? They've announced the closure and hazard and a couple of hours. Have they closed those regional offices? So the regional offices have started to close?
They've announced the closure and hazard
and a couple other areas.
And you can tell they just looked at a map
and that they don't know how long it takes
driving in Appalachia to get somewhere.
But then they shut down the call center.
So what they are trying to make happen
is that senior who in my state
probably voted for Donald Trump,
drives two hours and then doesn't have the documents that he or she needs,
and thus don't get the next check that they paid into the system
and that they should get.
What about the flood?
Kentucky obviously faced really tough flooding recently.
Have you seen a pullback from FEMA on helping to rebuild those areas,
helping to make them more resilient to the flooding? Have you seen those effects as well?
This is an area where if you are going to speak out against the Trump administration when they do
wrong, you've got to give them credit when they're doing right. FEMA in response to especially our
February flooding is doing some of the best I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot, 14 federally declared disasters since I became governor. Well, that's making news, man, because
that's not, you know, everything we're hearing is they're trying to cut FEMA funding. Which is
ironic, because again, it's operating well. I think the Biden administration made a lot of these
changes, but the current administrator came in, made commitments to us that he kept. Secretary Noem pushed through our request for individual assistance
because the president signed off on it.
A number of people in Kentucky are getting help.
So I think it's important, even when you're a Democratic governor,
that we have the credibility to say good job when administration does well.
But then we stand up and speak out and sometimes file suit when they're doing wrong.
All right, we have to take a quick break
and then we shall be back.
I don't know if you guys know this,
but when you drink alcohol,
and I used to drink quite a bit of it,
your body kind of breaks down the alcohol
in the toxic byproduct that may contribute
to feeling a little slow,
a little sluggish the next day. Z-Biotics, the world's first genetically engineered probiotic
that is designed to help with exactly this. Z-Biotics, pre-alcohol probiotic, specifically
formulate, specifically to help your body process the byproduct of alcohol. Now, for me,
the byproduct was generally
a sense of shame and embarrassment.
But I think they're talking about
more biological byproducts.
The Z-biotics supports your body's natural function
and help you feel better the next day.
It's certainly not magic.
Oh, but wouldn't that be nice?
Just a wand.
It's not a cure-all,
but it's smart science-backed preparation.
Drink Z-biotics before you start consuming alcohol.
Works while you're enjoying your evening.
Helps the body address the effects of alcohol at the source of it, whether you got work,
family, or fitness plans the next day.
Z-Biotics helps you be better prepared.
The company stands behind their product.
It's 100% money-back guarantee. You're not satisfied, they'll refund
you. There's no questions asked. What more do you want? What do you want? 200% money back guarantee.
That's just, now you're just being silly. To try Zbiotics for yourself, go to zbiotics.com
slash TWS. Use code TWS. That's in capitals, by the way. 15% off your first order, zbiotics.com slash TWS,
code TWS, prepare yourself properly, support your body.
Zbiotics can help.
We are back.
Now you mentioned Appalachia before,
it's such an interesting area because,
and I wonder what your thoughts on this,
it's been so resistant to the inroads
of alleviating that entrenched poverty.
And what is it about that area?
Because Trump will say like,
well, we got to bring back coal mining
and all those sorts of things, and that will revitalize it.
But those areas have had an entrenched poverty issue
for so long in this country.
What do you think is about that?
Because the thing about Kentucky is,
you can revitalize certain urban areas
or you can bring back that battery manufacturing.
But that one area, boy, that's a tough one to solve.
What do you think it is about that
that makes it so difficult? Well, we're making a lot of progress that I want to solve. What do you think it is about that that makes it so difficult?
Well, we're making a lot of progress that I want to discuss. But let me start by saying
Eastern Kentuckians and Appalachians helped build this country. They mined the coal that
powered the Industrial Revolution. They powered us through two world wars. Yet when the energy
economy started to change, the new jobs didn't go where the
old jobs were.
The idea of environmental justice came along a lot earlier than economic justice.
And so you have an area that rightfully feels that the country that they helped build has
turned its back on them and not invested what's needed.
And the biggest challenge is infrastructure.
You know, you're in the mountains
because that's where the coal was.
Well, to build an extra lane on a road,
many places may cost a couple million dollars.
It costs a billion dollars
if you're cutting into the side of a mountain.
So take our mountain parkway project,
which I believe is transformational.
We're building the first four lane highway into the heart of Appalachia in Kentucky history. Four lanes are important
because a factory won't locate unless there are four lanes because they've got to be able to bring
the trucks in and out. So you're helping to bring the infrastructure. You can't get investment
into that area unless they feel like they're going to be able to have the transportation
necessary. They're going to be able to have the transportation necessary,
they're gonna be able to have the broadband necessary.
You wouldn't be able to bring them in.
And the water and sewer,
but we've been using these federal dollars
and other investments really targeted
to move the needle in exciting ways.
And now is the right time,
because for the first time I can remember,
business is coming to people,
instead of expecting people to drive a couple hours
to business.
Right, to relocate.
Yeah, they're looking at the available workforce.
So this is an exciting time
where we can really change things.
At the same time, we're building
what are called high ground communities.
We're taking people who live in the floodplain
who've been hit over and over and over.
We're building entire neighborhoods on in the floodplain, who've been hit over and over and over. We're building entire neighborhoods
on top of abandoned coal mines.
It's the toughest, but I think the most innovative rebuild
in the history of the United States.
But we're gonna have thousands of people
that will never have to worry about flooding again.
Are they willing to relocate?
It ain't easy to get people to relocate
from areas that they wanna be in.
Well, everybody loves the dirt they're from,
the property that their family has owned.
But when your house has been swept away
and when you've been holding on to your children
to keep them from being swept away,
we love our families a lot more
than we'll ever love any piece of property.
So we've got a huge amount of interest,
and we're addressing affordable housing in the area
at the same time.
But I will say, it was outside the box, you know, to try to,
for government to come in.
Were you able to streamline regulation to get that?
Is that something that you had to go after?
Changing the environmental regulation,
changing different things to get that done quickly?
Well, what we were able to do is,
is the state ran the project.
And we of course are the regulators up until the point
where we were ready to build the houses. And that's when we bring in nonprofit and other partners. So you can actually get past
a lot of the zoning and the regulatory burden. If you look at it in that way. And it's no different
than what we do in economic development, where we say we've got this great piece of land, let's make
sure we got all the utilities that need to go to it. So it's doing the work. And again, it's
remembering that the most important things
that we do for our people aren't political at all.
It's creating good jobs.
It's making sure they can get to their next
doctor's appointment.
It's safe roads and bridges,
good education for our kids and public safety.
No, that's been, listen, that's been, I think,
the difficulty that certainly the Democratic Party has had,
which is getting the federal government. And that's why I think think, the difficulty that certainly the Democratic Party has had, which is getting
the federal government.
And that's why I think this is such an interesting discussion
between what the federal government looks at
and what state governments look at,
because the needs are so different.
For instance, in Kentucky, you mentioned, well,
we moved away from those extraction jobs, fossil fuels,
and the things that, you're right,
fueled the Industrial Revolution, fueled the standard of living that's happening
in this country. And then there was the idea of, well, we're going to end all that,
but we're going to teach you how to code. We're going to teach all the,
the people that did all those extraction jobs. Those don't exist anymore.
You don't get to live there anymore. you're just going to learn how to,
you know, build Facebook. Did people take to that or was that considered, they didn't know what to
do with it? So here's where real investment and treating people with dignity comes in. Now,
coal mining was about an 85, $95,000 job. They were jobs that people were supporting two or three families with.
How many coal miners, and I apologize for jumping in,
what was the extent of that?
How big an employment factor?
Because it's not just the coal mine,
it's everything around it that is supporting
those things.
I mean, it's in Kentucky at one point,
you know, 100,000 plus jobs,
if you look at the mining
and then the hauling of the coal and the utilities.
And all the small businesses that pop up around that support all of that.
Absolutely.
Fixing the trucks.
Because there's more small business if there's more economic activity that is in the area.
So you take an 85 or a $95,000 job, the energy economy dries them up, you don't see any real
federal or outside investment, and then someone comes in and says, well, I'll teach you to
code for $35,000 a year.
That's hard.
That's hard.
And so as we look at changing economies that continue, to me it's really important to make sure
that Kentucky gets the next part of that economy.
So when I was looking at the automotive industry,
we have Ford, we have GM, we have Toyota,
we have Rivian now, and so many others.
I wanted to make sure that we didn't get hit twice.
We didn't see the same thing happen.
And so that's why I went out there
and made sure we were getting those battery factories
so that we never got left behind again.
Right.
What's going on?
Are you having, what the heck is?
I think you're hearing my dog.
Winnie wanted to be a part.
Who's, what's your dog's name?
Winnie, Winnie is six years old and three days, I think.
She's my Labradoodle.
This is a 65 pound dog that everybody loves.
All right, yeah, listen, they're very lovable.
So we're discussing right now with the governor
sort of how the economics of creating growth
and prosperity in your state differ from the federal level.
Now you have just been elected, I think,
what the head of the Governor's Association for Democrats?
I am the vice chair this year and the chair next year when we have 36 races.
36 races. Yeah, just a little pressure. That are going to be going on for the governorships. Yes.
So when you look at 2026, it's not just Congress, which everybody is rightfully focused on.
It's how many Democratic governors we'll have out there.
If we pick up Virginia this year, we'll be at 24,
and then an opportunity to get either halfway
or the majority in 2026.
And what we see is that states that have
Democratic governors, you know, they govern well.
Their people see jobs.
We see the expansion of healthcare.
And so for me to try to lift up even more leaders is good in 2026.
I also think it'll be really good for 2028.
Right. I have a feeling, you know, and I'm sure you've thought about
you've obviously had your names been talked about as possible 2028.
But it seems like with the Democratic brand in Washington
at chlamydia levels of popularity,
the Democratic governors have kind of made a name
for themselves and it's you and Shapiro and Pritzker
and Whitmer and people that have had success stories
in building out the economies of states and getting things done in a way that I think is a different brand.
It's almost as though you're two separate entities of Democrats.
Well, our job is to get things done. And so what you find is we are practical. We also have to talk to our people every day, not once a week or once a month, which is
what you see out of Congress that's up in D.C.
And we don't talk in terms of what is point three, bullet four underneath, a clause of
a bill that nobody has seen.
That's really important for Congress.
But we talk in terms of what's
going on in our state, what's next, and how we can build that better life. And such great leaders
that are out there, everybody you mentioned, you look at Josh Stein and Roy Cooper before him,
you look at Jared Polis, you look at Josh Green, Bob Ferguson now coming in in Washington, Katie Hobbs in Arizona,
just Marahiele in Massachusetts.
But what's a lesson that you would say
to the Democrats in Washington
that you all have learned on the state level?
What's a piece of advice that you would give to them?
I think it's three things that we as democratic leaders
ought to be doing.
Number one, focus.
Focus on those core areas.
Spend 80% of your time not just in what you're talking about,
but what you're doing, focused on jobs, health care,
infrastructure, education, and public safety.
Second, talk like a normal human being.
I mean, we've got all these sanitized words.
John, unfortunately, my state has gotten hit with the opioid crisis more than just about any other,
though we have two straight years of decreasing overdose deaths, thank God.
Decreasing?
Yes.
Oh.
Yes. And we hope it's a national trend, and I think I'm going to have some really good news next week that I'm really grateful for.
What do you attribute that to?
Or was it a surprise?
What have you done to do that?
A lot of hard work.
A lot of great people working in recovery.
A lot of great work by law enforcement.
Sadly, all of us having lost a lot of people we care about
and trying to make sure that it doesn't happen.
Changes in prescribing, which has been really important.
But let me tell you, everyone I know that has fought addiction
has called it addiction.
They don't say it's substance use disorder.
Everybody who's, yeah, everybody's experiencing hunger.
None of them call it food insecurity,
but I'll give you another one.
Right.
Justice-in Justice involved population.
Say that again.
Justice involved population.
No, I don't know that I've heard that one.
What is that one?
Those are our inmates.
Oh, justice involved population.
Do you get those?
Does that come in a list from somewhere of here's the new glossary of terms?
Well, you get pressure by people who mean well to use them.
But when we talk in terms, in those sanitized terms, it has no emotion and no feeling.
And that's not how people talk to each other.
And so it makes you seem distance, distracted, maybe even professorial.
Who is pushing that terminology?
Because it's not, you know, I do hear it every now and again,
like pregnant people or things, but I don't actually hear it in reality.
I don't hear it utilized in, even on television for the most part.
Is that an over exaggeration of its usage or?
I don't think it is, but I think the point that you're making is you'd never hear that amongst your friends.
You'd never hear that amongst coworkers.
And so if you hear that from someone in office
or running for office, how different does it sound?
How detached from the world we live in?
And that leads me into the last thing
I think people need to do, which is explain your why.
Democrats talk about what they're for in minute detail, every
single bit of what they're for, but never why they're for it. So to give you an example,
during my election year, I vetoed the nastiest piece of anti-LGBTQ legislation my state had
ever seen. It was picking on kids.
What was the legislation?
It was an anti-trans piece of legislation directly targeting children that are already
picked on way too much.
And when I explained my why, I told people that this is my faith that teaches me that
all children are children of God.
And that if the legislature was going to show hate towards these children, I wanted to show
them love.
I wanted them to see that a governor sees them
and cares about them.
And I'll never forget the next day,
I had somebody walk up to me and I thought, oh no,
stuck out his hand, I shook it.
And he said, I'm not sure I agree with what you did,
but I know you're doing what you think is right.
So when we talk about that, why?
Sometimes we can get beyond that one hot issue
and get more towards, are the people running our state
or running for office trying to do what they think is right?
Are cultural issues your toughest legislative fights?
Because obviously, Kentucky, culturally, very conservative.
They've been red for a very long time.
Is that where you've had the most difficulty
with the legislature?
And what's the makeup of the legislature?
If it's reflective of 30% to Trump,
is there a super majority of Republicans?
What's the makeup that you're dealing with?
There is a super, super majority on the other side.
I'm not sure that there's anything super about about it. So do they crush your vetoes?
When you vetoed it, did they go back and go,
yeah, screw that?
They do, but I wanted those kids to know
that I care about them.
When I vetoed anti-diversity legislation,
I wanted everyone to feel welcome.
And there's a power in that, John,
about a governor saying,
I believe in you.
I see you for who you are.
And I believe that there's an important place
in Kentucky for you.
And I get to hear that, but I mainly do it
just because it's the right thing.
And sometimes we get away from that.
Oftentimes the right thing is the right political thing.
But if people see you standing up for your principles,
they can respect that, even if they sometimes disagree.
Quick break, then we're coming back.
We are back.
You know, you talked earlier about, boy,
that we have to really consider our language
and speaking like in the way that people speak. You know, you talked earlier about, boy, we have to really consider our language
and speaking in the way that people speak.
I would imagine there's no initiatives more popular
in a very red state with a super majority of Republicans
than anti-DEI or anti-trans or anti-immigrant kinds
of legislation
and that they can put those through pretty easily.
Boy, that's a needle to thread to discuss those things
without sounding like a woke intellectual
that is trying to do their.
How do you convince people in pragmatic terms
that DEI isn't about merit.
It's about investing, showing people about Appalachia, like you're a community that's
been left behind.
Investing in you is kind of like DEI.
It's bringing in communities that have been historically left out of these kinds of things.
Well, I think the first thing you do is explain your why, which I was able to do.
Diversity is always a strength.
It makes us better.
But then the next day, you're opening that next factory.
You're opening the new road that's going to save people 20 minutes each way.
Yes, those pieces of legislation may fly through, but they will never, even as politicized as
they are, be as important to
the American people as that good job or being able to afford their kid's prescription.
And it's just not losing sight of that, that you stand up for your principles, but you
recognize that you've got to spend the majority of your time on things.
The greatest part about that focus is it helps everybody.
A good job helps a Democrat, a Republican, an independent.
It's truly that common ground.
And so when I talk about what I think I wrote forward is,
I'm hoping it's not just Democrats,
I'm hoping it's Republicans too.
I don't wanna leave a broken country to my kids.
I don't wanna see this type of division.
And I think that the most important things aren't partisan
and there should be a way in the future
for us to come together.
Now, when you look at that,
the things that are happening with the tariffs,
the Doge cuts, they've also cut an awful lot out of,
for instance, mining inspections.
Which one of those coming down in a practical way
to your state is gonna create the most difficulty for you?
Is it straight up,
I'll get less money from the federal government? Or is it the practical services that the feds were helping provide, whether it be for environmental or safety issues or any of those
other things? Where are you looking to triage the most? Well, the Medicaid cuts would be devastating.
That's the biggest one. Huge Medicaid cuts will wipe out rural health care across America,
and that's not an exaggeration. It will wipe out rural health care. Will you have to try and make
that up financially to provide them, or does that just go away? We will try, but the numbers are
enormous. Okay. The numbers that would be required there
would tax the rainy day funds of states very, very quickly.
Medicaid is a part of our health care portfolio,
and it's going to need to be a part in the future.
Other things that keep me up at night
are the doge cuts or the firings that
impact our public safety.
I think about firings of CIA analysts.
I lost a classmate in 9-11.
What they do is really important.
Firings of FBI agents.
I worked with them as attorney general
to catch child predators, fewer FBI agents,
fewer child predators are caught.
Or the National Weather Service,
which has given us a heads up on the last three
major natural disasters.
We deployed people all over the state
and made thousands of rescues.
Well, if we don't have that heads up,
we can't help as many of our people.
More people die in those disasters.
So there are real world impacts that can even
be life versus death to what this administration is doing.
Now, are you just, are you right now in kind of emergency mode buckling down to try and,
you know, prepare yourselves for is everybody kind of just curling up and preparing for the storm?
What I'm doing is pushing back. I am in court. My attorney general doesn't want to file these lawsuits, so I'm doing it as governor.
Your attorney general does not want to file the lawsuits.
No, no, but he's not challenging my ability to do it either.
I don't want to be too tough because some other AGs might otherwise do it.
So you're suggesting the Justice Department in Kentucky has some independence from the
executive.
It absolutely does, and it absolutely should.
Interesting.
What an interesting principle.
Yes.
I mean, when I was AG, my governor was a Republican who attacked me just about every day, but
it worked out okay.
But I also didn't challenge his ability to file knowing how important it could later
be.
So I pushed back in court and then I'm doing everything
I can to speak out, but it's more than just
Democratic officials speaking out.
John, I think how we change the trajectory
of what we're seeing right now
is getting individual Americans to speak out.
Everybody's got the cell phone, everybody's got the camera,
and everybody's on one of these social media platforms.
It's videoing how much more your groceries cost.
It's showing that facility that's shutting down.
Testimony.
You're asking for testimony.
Exactly.
I think that's wise.
Witness and testimony.
Well, I got to have this amazing experience.
I got invited to Selma for the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday.
And I got to talk to some of those brave foot soldiers
that are still here.
And it just hit me that there wasn't one person speaking out.
It was a collective courage that just changed the world
in such an important moment.
And everybody stepping forward and making their mark.
To that end, perhaps even a podcast,
they were telling me, you just started a podcast.
I did.
I started the Andy Beshear podcast.
I'm trying to take tips from you.
We are on YouTube.
Let me please disabuse you of the notion
that that is a, get out of this business now.
Familiarity breeds contempt.
You don't want any part of this.
It's just a chance to talk to people directly.
But more than that, it actually came from people
asking me to do something like what we did during COVID.
I mean, there's uncertainty out there.
It's a scary world.
The news hits you over and over.
The level of stress on the American people
is as big as it's been since that pandemic.
So to try to talk through things like you do with humor
or that I try to do with a conversation among friends,
just trying to help people process, speak out,
but then refresh themselves for the week ahead
because we're gonna get hit by more.
Now, do you have your constituents sometimes come on
and do like a little Zoom with the governor
and do different things like that?
We've done an Ask Andy segment.
We have guests on that.
You're going casual.
Ask Andy, not ask the governor.
That's right.
Then we've had Senator Amy Klobuchar on.
Senator Coons is coming on.
But then we'd like to introduce people to folks
that they haven't met.
And in the first two episodes,
my kids even teach me Gen Z lingo.
Oh, for God's sake.
It turns hysterical. Governor, get out of this
business now. You don't want anybody. In the first one, we
learned the difference between skippity and fire. Now, I'm,
let's see. Alright. Now, I'm already lost. I don't, I'm not
sure I know any of that. If someone says your podcast is
skippity, you're doing great. If they say it's fire, you're
doing amazing. Your kids, how old are your kids? Fifteen and
and 14.
And they're still talking to you?
Sometimes, if I invite them on a podcast.
All right.
It's only got to be a skivvety podcast and then they'll come on and do it for you.
That's right.
I'm glad about that.
And I really appreciate you taking the time.
I very much enjoy talking to governors because again, it's so much about the day-to-day practicality
of trying to get these things done.
And I think it's so important.
We are so focused on the national conversation, right?
And it's the 24-hour news networks and it's all about the cultural issues.
Very rarely do you get a chance to hear about the realities on the
ground in a state where you really are locked into your people's needs and what's necessary
to care for those.
And the more that that story can be told, I really do think the American people writ
large will understand better what the stakes
are for these different changes in policy, what the stakes are in these different changes
in the whims of our current mad King, King Donald.
And so I appreciate you helping to educate on that.
Well, I think it shows that there's a path forward and forward I think is the important word.
You know, in DC, they worry about left and right.
We worry about forward for all of our people.
And I'd like to think that that gives us a path to heal
and to ultimately bring people back together
after the most divisive time I've ever seen in my lifetime.
No question about that.
Governor Andy Beshear, the great state of Kentucky.
Thank you so much for taking the time to spend it with us.
And good luck on your podcast.
Thank you, John.
Thanks.
Wow. So important.
I'm so pleased that we got a chance to talk to him.
I hope it wasn't too in the weeds,
but it's so important to see like what the aspects go into
about revitalizing economic activity at the state level
and all the unforeseen consequences of the tomfuckery
and dickfoolery that is occurring
through this administration and the effects that have.
The guy literally gets two battery factories to come in
and help re-industrialize a state
that's been de-industrialized,
but because of these tariffs,
or the plants that get put on hold,
or the $900 million project to revitalize Churchill Downs,
it just gets, we can't do it now
because of the uncertainty that has been injected into this economy by one man I think that's a very interesting point. I think that's a very interesting point. I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point.
I think that's a very interesting point. points. But very, very interesting on the ground perspective
from Governor Beshear, I thought really helpful
to get a better understanding of what all this is doing
to even the reddest of states.
That's all, we're out of time, but once again,
thanks to lead producer, Lauren Walker,
producer, Brittany Mametovic, video editor,
and engineer, Rob Vitolo, audio editor, and engineer, Nicole Boyce, our researcher and Associate Producer, Gillian Spear,
and of course our Executive Producers, Chris McShane and Katie Gray. Thank you guys so much
for listening and we will see you again next week. Bye bye.
The weekly show with Jon Stewart is a Comedy Central podcast produced by Paramount Audio and Busboy Productions.