The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart - Politics for ME (and You) with Graham Platner
Episode Date: April 29, 2026As Democrats search for a new generation of leaders who can reconnect with working Americans, Jon is joined by Graham Platner, U.S. Senate candidate for Maine and military veteran, to understand what'...s driving his campaign. Together, they explore how his service informed his political vision, discuss why his message is resonating so powerfully with Maine voters, and examine what kind of Democratic politics could actually deliver for people. This episode is brought to you by: UPWORK - Visit https://upwork.com/tws right now and post your job for free. SMALLS - For a limited time, get 60% off your first order, plus free shipping, when you head to https://Smalls.com/TWS. Follow The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart on social media for more: > YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@weeklyshowpodcast > Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/weeklyshowpodcast > TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@weeklyshowpodcast > X: https://x.com/weeklyshowpod > BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/theweeklyshowpodcast.com Host/Executive Producer – Jon Stewart Executive Producer – James Dixon Executive Producer – Chris McShane Executive Producer – Caity Gray Lead Producer – Lauren Walker Producer – Brittany Mehmedovic Producer – Gillian Spear Video Editor & Engineer – Rob Vitolo Audio Editor & Engineer – Nicole Boyce Music by Hansdle Hsu Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, everybody, it's John Stewart.
Welcome to the Weekly Show podcast.
We have a fine, fine program for you.
We're going to pivot a little bit from the issues of the day to the candidate of the day.
But boy, it's what is today?
Tuesday.
Tomorrow is Wednesday, April 29.
Who knows what's going to happen?
Apparently the Iranians are begging Donald Trump to be able to unconditionally surrender because they're collapsing.
They're apparently completely collapsing except for their ability to choke off the straight-of-home.
apparently everything is falling apart but their ability to keep all boats other than uh russian luxury yachts
out of the strait of hoomuz it's i don't know about you i am sure you're all fucking exhausted by all this
um to have uh the white house correspondence center and in gunfire and somehow that get flipped around and uh be an
assault on apparently jimmy kimmel's jokes uh that's the land of absurdity we find
ourselves in in today's society. But you know what? There is there is hope and the hope is in the
people that rise out of you know I've always believed this when they say make America great again.
Donald Trump will make America great again just not in the way that he intended because the reaction
to his fragility and impulsiveness and incompetence will spur people that you would not expect
to rise above the madness and help to begin to rebuild the very thing that we need in this country.
And our guests say maybe one of those individuals, and I'm very excited to actually talk to him.
He kind of came out of nowhere, one of those ordinary people who has suddenly stood up and raised
their hand and said, hey, maybe I could help run this thing.
He is from Maine, a simple man, a manor, a Marine.
an oyster farmer, and now a U.S. Senate candidate for the Great State of Maine.
Let's talk to Graham Platner.
Well, folks, we are excited today to be talking about a young rising voice in the Democratic Party from the great state of Maine, a Mainer.
Mainer?
Mainer.
Mainer.
Mainer.
Mainer is the correct term.
Mainer's the correct term.
Former Marine, oyster, farmer, U.S. Senate candidate from the Great State.
of Maine. Grant Platner. What's happening, man? Oh, you know, not much. Not much. Everything's real
mellow, having a real mellow, mellow resistance. My life is definitely on the exact path that I thought it
would be. Yeah, everything's chill. Very interesting. Grant, can I, just even getting started on this,
what drove you this idea to run for Senate in Maine to join that assisted living facility?
that is the Senate down in Washington.
What possessed you to even consider something like that?
Well, I mean, and do you mind if I give you like the two-minute spiel on this?
Because I think it's rather important.
Give me the spiel, baby.
That's what we're here for.
I'd love to hear it.
So I moved back to Maine in 2016.
After my, after I deployed a bunch in my 20s, early 30s in the Marine Corps and the Army.
And what I got back from that was very disillusion.
was very frankly bitter, was really, and then was also struggling with all the standard stuff that one goes to after, you know, multiple heavy combat deployments. And I went to college in D.C. I went to George Washington. I didn't graduate, but I kind of went to school, was a bartender, actually bartended on Capitol Hill, which gave me a look behind the curtain. And I realized that the wizard is, in fact, a very
small man.
And some seemingly dumb.
And seemingly, well,
that, so honestly, there was, there was, part of my disillusionment was actually living
in D.C.
And, in kind of meeting people in the political space and realizing it, like, this is it.
Oh, wow.
Like, I went through all of that horror.
I saw, like, my friends got killed.
I saw awful stuff because of you people.
You know, like, you know, like, there was this kind of, like, deep, I,
Like frustration.
But so in 2016, I moved back to Maine.
And after I moved back to Maine, things changed significantly.
I started getting help from the VA.
I moved back to my hometown.
I got into oyster farming and I wanted to check out.
I wanted to, I just wanted to be left alone.
I thought the whole thing was broken.
I didn't want to have any part of it.
I just wanted to sink all my time and energy into the place that I'm from.
Started making a living on the sea.
got into diving, got into oyster farming, became the harbor master, got really involved in my local
community. And honestly, in that time frame, all my disillusionment disappeared. Not with the bigger system,
but like I went from blaming like America and Americans to because I used to have this feeling like,
why did you make me go do this? Like, why did you guys make us go do this thing in Iraq and Afghanistan
that like I, for the life of me, cannot figure out what the purpose was. And when I got back here,
and started really, really settling in, I realized, I became quite convinced that the average American
is a truly wonderful human being. Most people are normal. The problem is, we have a political
system that elevates a lot of abnormal people. And so you get cable news. You've watched.
Yeah. And I've always been a very politically active and interested person, but not in like
electoral politics. So I got, I really sank my time into my, into local governance. I became
chair of the planning board. And then I got really into the community organizing around social
justice and economic justice issues. And in all doing all of that, I also came to the
realization that when the system itself is quite broken, or not even broken, when the system itself
is built to be a raid against the average person, you know, when you're working at the ground level,
you're pretty much just putting band-aids on things.
But I did think that that was exactly where my life was going to stay.
I mean, I moved back here to Sullivan, Maine, where I currently live.
I live on the road I grew up on.
Do you really?
You're on the road you grew up on.
Yeah.
I live like, I live a couple houses down from the house I grew up in.
Oh, fantastic.
Which is nice.
Yeah.
It's very, and like, and I come from a, I mean, my town has a thousand people in it.
And it's where I grew up.
So, like, I know everybody.
Everybody's known me since I was a kid.
It's a very nice, I don't know, it's a nice feeling.
Last summer, end of July, some people came to my house.
They had been in Maine for a few months, working with the AFL-CIO and a bunch of labor unions,
looking for someone to run for U.S. Senate against Susan Collins.
And they were looking specifically for like a kind of a working-class person on kind of
working-class economic policies.
And they had found me because I did a video a few years ago fighting against the Norwegian salmon farm that was trying to come into our bay.
A bunch of us mobilized against it and I did a video with the group.
I don't know that there's anything I've ever heard that's more Maine than this.
A bunch of guys come to my house because they saw your Norwegian salmon video.
Yep.
And then they looked me up and they saw I donate to Bernie Sanders.
And they were like, oh, well, maybe this like, they were like, they were like, we should go check it out.
So they literally came to my house and said, we think you should run for United States Senate.
And my wife and I, quite honestly, told them to fuck off because that was the weirdest, weirdest, most random.
The absolute proper response that you should have given.
I mean, it was also like, it was in the morning.
I'm getting ready to go out on the boat.
We're going to work and we're like, what the hell?
But they came back the next week with a more kind of fleshed out idea.
They're like, listen, this isn't like, they're like, this isn't like a joke.
They're like, we've got someone who can help you do small dollar fundraising.
We've got someone who could help get your name in the papers.
And we've got someone who can shoot a launch video, which was the launch video that got made.
And at that point, and because my wife, we have no money.
And so I'm like, I'm like, I know how this set.
I know how these campaigns work.
I'm like, where, how is this going to, is this going to happen?
And essentially they were like, look, we're not.
Like, we've got some people who can help early on.
And I'm like, well, so there was this moment where for my wife and I,
we spent a lot of time being frustrated with the larger system.
We spent a lot of time thinking that, and ironically, I've also had a theory for years
that the United States Senate, because it was set up to be a specific bulwark against
working class people to protect elites, that that actually makes it a unique place of
power where if we can get a few normal people into the U.S. Senate.
And I, and so like, but I, and I felt that way for years, never expecting that, like,
I was going to be.
Right.
You'd be one of the normals.
No.
I, it never once.
But then it, this opportunity showed up.
And so, I mean, essentially, my wife and I had to ask ourselves, do we actually believe what we
think we believe?
Because, because if we do, if we do, then.
an opportunity like this to do something of this scale and of this visibility and to frankly
organize like using this as I mean because my wife and I have been very engaged in a lot of local
community organizing and we realized like this is a this is an ability to do a statewide organizing
project on a scale that like we never could have dreamed of with resources and visibility
that we never could have dreamed of and so we said yes.
So the fuck off became actually this might be an opportunity to put our principles that we've kind of been living by for all these years into practice.
Yeah.
But we didn't expect it to do what it did.
I mean, we didn't think it would work.
We didn't have any idea that this would actually work.
I mean, early on, there was this element of like, it was almost like things are so.
bad now and people are so frustrated and including us were like we might actually pull this off
I mean there was this like but we did but we certainly didn't expect it to explode the way that it did
I mean I thought we we really thought this was going to be like a months long slowly building
kind of diligently going out and getting my name out I mean because I'm literally a random I mean I'm a
random oyster farmer from Sullivan Maine it's insane I have to tell you that the entire
setup is somewhat Disney-esque. Oh, it's nuts. Or just sort of this eye, you know, well, first of all,
there's always that. There's kind of always the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the,
the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the,
kind of, you know, a honest man who has real ideals facing off against a corrupt
system that is fueled by money and toxicity and all these, so, so there is an archetype for this.
But I'm curious in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in your
mind, why did the sort of Mr. Smith goes to Washington thing catch such fire? What do you think
you tapped into? What frustrations were it that you were able to articulate so well early on that
people just caught on to? If I may, like, you weren't mimicking any other politician to my, I mean,
there's, there's hints of Sanders in there, but like, you were definitely a, a, uh, a, a, uh, a, a,
bit iconoclastic when it came to what you were putting out there. And it didn't seem focus
grouped and considered or any of the other artifices that occur with with a lot of politicians.
So what kind of took off? I think it's honestly, I think it's two things. The first is that I actually
have politics. Like I have over the years throughout my life through my experiences overseas,
coming home, my disillusionment. I went looking for answers. And in the looking for answers,
I read a lot of books. And I developed, frankly, a theory of power. I developed a deep critique
of the American, not just the political system, but like the party that I've always been a part.
I mean, I've been a Democrat. I mean, I've always been a registered Democrat. I've also,
my entire life, been very frustrated with the party that I'm, that I'm in. You and me both, sister.
primarily around that theory of power thing.
I mean, I honestly have always been like, we can never articulate.
The Democratic Party's never made to articulate what it's trying to do.
Like, what's the end goal?
Never really articulates a clear set of policies to get us there.
And then never, never seems to want to wield power to make those policies a reality.
And you're nailing.
So, Graham, are you suggesting, sir, that your career is built on principle?
Hmm.
What?
A wild concept in this modern era.
Upwork.
Not to be confused with downwork.
No, this is upwork.
Then if you've got a business, you're feeling, I don't know, like I can use some more people,
some more people that maybe are good at this and not necessarily bad at this.
Well, how do I figure that out?
Well, we got yourselves a solution.
You got yourselves Upwork.
It's a one-stop platform.
You find hire and pay expert freelancers that handles all the hassle.
And it is a hassle.
It's a lot.
You got to look at the resumes and all kinds of, you got to call them, maybe message them sometimes.
Upwork handles the hassles.
They use them for contracts, payments.
So you can just spend more time running the business like you want to run the business.
Could it get any better?
I mean, now posting a job is easy.
I like the old days where you had to fax people.
Yeah, fax people.
Oh, no, no, I guess that's an old modem.
That's not.
I got to work on my references.
Anyway, like I say, Upwork is free to sign up.
Posting a job is easy.
Visit upwork.com slash TWS.
Post your job for free.
That is upwork.com slash TWS to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow.
That is UPWORK.com slash TWS.
So I think that the fact that like I, like the reason that it doesn't seem focus group and the reason that my messaging is is because it isn't.
Like I don't like I write my own speeches.
Like I give my own.
opinions when people ask me them. Like I don't like I've got like communications
people we talk about ways to like clean it up and make it easier like well I don't I
mean curse less I've well I mean oh my God well the first two months of the campaign
I like John literally the amount of news articles that existed which were
this man swears too much and I was like dude I'm like I'm a former combat
Marine and I work on the ocean what do you expect right
It's the only language the fish understand.
It is.
You got to talk to them.
Well, more important, it's the only language outboard engines understand.
If you don't swear at outboard engines, they won't work for you.
It's a scientific fact.
It has to be.
So there's that part.
There's the fact that, like, I honestly think people understand that I'm not full of shit.
Like, because I actually do believe these things.
That's right.
And I remember it was early on, I went like on CNN.
And I, you know, I,
went on, they asked me questions, and I just gave like, yes or no answers. And afterwards,
all these people called me. And they were like, oh, my God, it was so real. It was so like,
like the, like, you, like, you came across is so authentic. I'm like, what the fuck? Like, how fucking
broken are we? Oh, oh, oh, baby. Oh, I know, I know. You're like, you're literally like a
mermaid that came out of the sea and people are like, what is happening? So there's that.
Other part, though, is that I'm just saying the things out loud that I've heard from my neighbors and my friends and my community members for years.
I mean, it's something I, you know, I've gone all over Maine for the past nine months now.
We've talked to like tens of thousands of Mainers.
I hold multiple public events a week.
It's all open to the public.
We don't screen questions.
We don't screen people.
Like, anybody can come.
And so I've been talking to everybody, Republicans and the people.
Democrats the whole nine years. People that just don't care about politics, the whole nine yards.
And if you ask any manner, do you think you live in a political and economic system that has
your best interest at heart? Nobody says yes. Right. Nobody. And by the way, I mean, you transfer
that to any state in the union, I think. I mean, I think that's absolutely the undercurrent.
I mean, Graham, I have to tell you know, look, I talk to people in politics.
all the time and I've done it for many years.
This might be the longest conversation I've had
without a platitude
with a politician.
I like, it sounds ridiculous,
but I cannot tell you how canned,
how often you hear,
the Democrats just have to get back to those issues of affordability.
We've got to get back to what people talk about
around the kitchen table.
And I'm like, I don't think people
talk around the kitchen.
I think they're eating in their car.
cars like that's right but but that's what I'm saying I think there is a a refreshing
openness and honesty to approaching something this way and I cannot wait to see how long
it takes for you to be consumed by that system honestly like that is do you worry about that
yeah of course yeah of course and I don't like I don't worry about look I'll just say like
Like, I love Bernie Sanders.
And I've developed a very nice relationship with Senator Sanders.
And it is very clear to me that Senator Sanders has maintained his integrity because he believes.
And like I will, like, and I believe in the same thing Bernie believes.
Like, like, I think, I think we have a very, very similar sort of foundational politics, which is like we care about, we care about people.
Like, it's, it's a politics of humanity.
And it's a real policy.
It's not a politics of like trying to like get into power for your sake.
It's because it's only in, it's only in these, like I just have a theory of power,
these political institutions that we, that exist around us.
If we want to change things, we're going to have to like use them in some way.
I would love if we could just do something else.
But I, like right now it doesn't seem like that's possible.
Now, I do think that, because like I'm not really a reform candidate.
I don't, I very much like Bernie, believe in the need to have a political revolution in this country.
Right.
Like, I, we need to restructure things.
We need systemic changes.
Like, it's not a.
But it's not nihilistic.
I don't find what you talk about as nihilistic.
I think, and it's something that I think the Democratic Party has really struggled with.
which is, I think they're still relying on the idea that the New Deal was a good idea.
And that was in the 30s and that was the Democrats.
And so let's just figure out ways to continue picking around that.
Let's do a tax subsidy here.
Let's do.
But they don't think broadly and systemically in the way that I think is necessary.
And maybe that's what you're thinking of.
Well, and like if I'm any kind of Democrat, I am a New Deal Democrat.
Right.
But like the New Deal wasn't picking around the edges.
Exactly.
Like social security wasn't a tax credit.
It wasn't a block grant.
It wasn't a marginal amendment to an existing policy.
Francis Perkins and FDR and a bunch of labor unions invented social security out of whole cloth.
And the CCC, the WPA, the TVA, the Rural Electrification Administration, all of these things.
And listen, some of it work.
and some of it didn't, but there was a theory behind what they were accomplishing.
And there was also the political will, which, I mean, like, and FDR had a theory of power.
I mean, for instance, mid-1930s, Supreme Court is about to say that all the New Deal programs are unconstitutional.
FDR against the wishes of his own party.
Yes.
says that he's going to pack the court.
Suddenly, very quickly, all those unconstitutional New Deal programs became constitutional
overnight.
Yes.
Nobody changed the language.
Nobody, like, it's almost, it's almost as though political power goes a little bit further
than just the words on the page.
It's almost as though that political power is, in fact, its own unique thing that needs to be a
times wielded creatively. And, you know, like, and if that hadn't happened, then this country
doesn't get dragged out of the Depression. Right. If that hadn't happened, we, we wouldn't
have set the stage to win the war. And do you see parallels with this moment, you know,
one of the things that I think about sometimes, you know, to be fair to the system, Roosevelt did
have large margins. Oh, yeah. At that time, because Hoover would, you know, the Republicans had
fucked up at that point so grandly that there were margins there that could be worked within.
But even when Democrats have margins, I can recall when they've had the Senate and the House
and they had a super majority for a little while, they still did that thing that you're talking about,
which is don't let, you know, let's not go, let's not push this too far.
Let's make sure that this program for health care isn't health care for everybody because
That's going to scare people.
Let's just give a subsidy to insurance companies so that they will just bring more people
into this broken system that we have.
That's, I mean, that's it.
I mean, and which is exactly what has happened.
And it didn't fix anything because the problem isn't about, the problem isn't marginal.
The problem is systemic.
And systemic, I mean, you know, this is like, the reason we know it's systemic, by the way,
is because it's happening everywhere.
It's not like one state has a problem with housing.
It's not like one state has a problem with health care.
It's not like one state has a problem with affordability.
It's the entire country.
Which is very clear to me that this is a obvious systemic problem.
But, okay, I'm going to, because we've Roosevelted a little bit, I'm going to do one more.
How could we not Roosevelt?
We had to Roosevelt.
In 1928, Roosevelt writes that the problem with the Democratic Party today is it has no
constructive policy and vision of the future, and that if you ask the average American what
the Democratic Party believed in, nobody would be able to tell you. And that the entire theory
is that we're going to wait for the Republicans to screw it up so much that we'll just magically
get power again. He said that in 1928. Wow. And at that time was Chuck Schumer, the leader of
the Senate? I'm just curious. I mean, but possibly. Yeah. Same shit, man.
But here's the thing, though, and this is why I'm not remotely hopeless.
Roosevelt writes that in 28.
By 1933, he is president, and the nation is fully engaged in the project of fixing itself out of the new depression.
That's right.
Like the first hundred days of his administration, right?
Like the whole, there's the whole joke about the alphabet agencies because they just invent like 10 new agencies, just into,
existence. And created markets where they didn't exist before. Exactly. And created safeguards so that
bank runs didn't exist. And created financing for housing, which didn't exist. That's right. You know,
all of those things. Did it in a racist way, but still did it. Well, like, and the thing is, like,
the, the, the, those New Deal programs and in the society that they built, really, in the 50s and
60s, which had a myriad of faults. Yeah. I mean, like, faults of, I mean, of racism,
faults of leaving out immense amounts of the nation for however what we have to
understand is we can look to that and say like we can do that in a not bad way
that's right it's a blueprint in fact yeah in fact had we done it then in a more
inclusive manner we probably would have had a better society so but my
the for me the big the big lesson here is that one thing
can change pretty quickly. Now let's, I mean, it's important to remember, 1929, right in the run-up to the
total collapse, we had full deregulation of speculative financial markets. We had, we had rampant
wealth hoarding where money, money was no longer in the real world. It was just being
hoarded in vast numbers. We had a small amount of Americans.
owning pretty much all of the things and having all of the wealth.
You know, I mean, none of this resonates with the modern times at all, Graham.
But it's also why I think, and this is what's really important to me, in this moment,
we need, whether we call it the Democratic Party, whether we call it like a, I don't know,
like a more economically populist look at our politics, either way, we need to be ready.
We need to be there with the answers and with policies already written because I do think it's going to move fast.
The Trump administration has broken so much.
The Trump administration has destroyed so much of the norm, so much of the kind of the general way of doing business.
And in many ways, the spirit, the emotional spirit, I think, of Americans who are afraid at the edges by just the exhaustion, the constant assault on all.
of our senses and purposefully.
When we've had a number of moments of crisis for our democracy throughout our country's history,
right?
1770s, 1860s, 1930s, 1960s, in every one of these moments, the Americans that rose the
occasion to protect the project, they understood that they could not just go back to what they
had.
That to protect the rights of our children, we need to extend them new rights.
That to protect freedom, we need to come up with new definitions of freedom.
That it was in fact the status quo, the system that we had.
That's what brought us to the moment of crisis.
And so it isn't going to be enough.
Or the exploitation of those moments.
Right.
You know, the system oftentimes, no matter how, as you said, they put forth ideas that are going
to elevate people.
The system tends towards exploitation and corruption.
And that tends to lead to those moments, as you say, of collapse and reinvention.
And I honestly think it's because while we democratized our politics, but we never democratized our economy.
And within our political system.
Bars, yes.
Within our, like, wealth equates political power in this system that we have.
No question.
So without a democratized economic system, you are always going to eventually find yourself
with these consolidated moments of wealth, which will inherently create consolidated moments
of political power, which we keep doing this.
I mean, you're seeing it right now play out in the tech world.
And we can get into this.
You know, you talked earlier a little off camera about the $2 million that they've flooded
into Maine for Susan Collins.
And it came from people like carp at Palin.
here. But to your point and to the point of the 1920s, there's this one industry where trillions
and trillions of dollars are funneling into that industry through deregulation and through
wealth capture and all these other things. And then they're turning some of that money into political
power. And it's this cycle where they're just funneling the money that they've gotten
through deregulation and the fact that capital isn't taxed in the same way that labor is,
and now they're putting that back into the system to consolidate and keep that power at the top.
I'm okay.
I shouldn't do this moment.
I'm going to FDR one last time.
Bring it.
FDR me.
So in 44, FDR puts out the Economic Bill of Rights, which is this, which actually,
amusingly enough, it came out of the first real nationwide polling that was ever done.
Oh, wow.
In 42 and 43, the administration did a massive polling effort across the country to ask working
Americans, what are the things that you need?
Now, unsurprisingly, it was, we want security in our housing.
We want jobs that matter that pay us a living wage.
We want the ability to collectively bargain and join unions.
We want access to health care.
We want access to education.
1944, FDR puts out the Economic Bill of Rights, which is essentially,
says, we, we as a nation, in order to democratize our economy, we need to provide as rights
things like housing, health care, education, collective bargaining, all of it. When he kind of lays
it out, he says, and I'm going to paraphrase here, but he essentially says, look, if we do not
systemically change and not allow for this consolidation of wealth, we are going to wind up eventually
right back where we were in the late 1920s. And even though that this nation defeated fascism
on the battlefields abroad, that is going to engender and create fascism here at home. And then he dies.
Wow. He dies in 45. What an exit.
better though. And with his death, dies the political will to bring that economic bill of rights
into a reality. And I, look, I honestly, like, had we implemented that in the late 1940s,
we live in a different society today. I know a little secret about a lot of the folks that listen
to this podcast. You like animals. And in particular, the data says, cats. Many of you are
cat people. Single, married. I'm not going to stereotype.
you. I'm not going to put you in a box. I'm just going to say many of you like cats. And cats are
delightful. But you know, the thing about cats is they got to eat too. And Smalls makes the cat food.
And by the way, it's human grade food for cat. It's not, you know, there's over that joke like,
oh, that looks like cat food. This isn't, this is cat food, but it's the good cat food. You know,
most cat food brands, it's all cheap fillers and whatever they found on the floor of the factory.
that's not good for your cat.
Your cat is not going to be healthy.
But Smalls, protein-packed recipes with preservative-free,
100% human-grade ingredients that you would find in your fridge.
And by the way, it's not just me saying this.
Forbes, which is, I believe still a magazine,
ranked Smalls the best overall cat food.
And they tasted all of them.
BuzzFeed noted that cats go completely.
completely ballistic for it.
And then there was like a listicle of which cast members of the musical cats would eat which flavors of smalls cat food.
But that's a buzzfeed thing.
You don't need to bother yourself with that.
So stop serving your little carnivore, a bowl of process shortcuts for a limited time because you are a weekly show listener.
It gets 60% off your first order plus free shipping and free.
free treats for life
when you head to smalls.com slash TWS.
Holy shit, I don't even like saying this
it's such a good deal.
One last time, that's 60% off your first order
plus free shipping and free treats for life
when you head to smalls.com
slash TWS.
Grab let me ask you because this
everything that you're talking about, I think, brings up to me.
So I want to bring it more specific to the Democratic Party and sort of where they have failed to bring that broad-based thinking to bear.
We'll just go, you know, we've got to tax the rich.
You know, what you hear from Democrats a lot is we got to, we got to just tax the rich.
But if you don't connect the money that you're getting to the value that the voters are going to be receiving for that.
money, it is a hollow pledge. And nobody gets behind it because you have not earned the credibility
that voters need to have that you will be using that money responsibly. And for programs
that make sense, as you said, not just another tax credit subsidy. The Democrats seem unable to
connect money to value in a broad way that resonates with voters.
And can I tell you why I think that is?
I would that exactly why I'm asking.
It's because I don't think they actually do want to tax the rich.
I think I think there are a lot of people in the Democratic Party who want,
who want to use that language in order to try to like garner votes.
but they don't really want to go through with it
because that would really piss off their donors.
Oh, that's, I thought you were going to say something else, Graham, actually.
I thought you were going to say because they don't know what to do with it.
No, I mean, I don't know actually what to do with the money.
Look, I think that is also partially true.
I'm there, we have a political class right now that exists
that has really grown up in the politics of the last 50 years.
Right.
In the politics, the last 50 years.
The corporate money and that's right.
Certainly.
And so that system is going to elevate certain kinds of people with, frankly, certain
ideologies or certain kind of, I don't know, like, even just like emotional relationships,
which make them not want to do something big, right?
I mean, it doesn't, like a system like that does not elevate people who dream.
It elevates people who are going to be transactions.
What do they always say, Grant?
They say don't let perfect be the enemy of good, which I can understand within systems and you don't want to get paralyzed.
But you also, the counter to that is don't let good be the enemy of what's possible.
And too often that becomes the mantra.
And that's been my, look, I'm 41.
My entire life has been.
Your voice is 62.
Your voice is my age.
I know.
Well, maybe it was my time in the Marine Corps.
Coffee and cigarettes, baby.
Coffee, cigarettes, and yelling when I was in the Marine Corps.
That'll do it.
That'll do it.
But it's a, ironically, I've had this voice even before the coffee and the cigarettes.
You were the kid and the little rascals who's like, let's put on a show.
I mean, it's a joke, but it's not that much of a joke.
But the problem is, is people that are elevated within that system.
They're not going to want to like think big and that's actually my so my whole life I've just heard from establishment politicians that like the best thing we can ever do is keep electing the same people because they know how the system works and like that experience is somehow like the experience that's going to
get us something instead of nothing the problem is their experience is within the system that can't seem to do it.
anything. And like, and I actually think that that's a bad experience. Like, I don't think that
that actually equates to a political vision, uh, or even the theory of power for that matter,
because it's not about, it's not about getting things done in the service of something. It's just
like being able to play the inside baseball for the sake of playing the inside baseball,
not in the service of a greater goal. And I think honestly, that's one of the biggest problems that
we have. And in like, so in like, meanwhile, like, this is why I think we need a lot more
normal people in politics. Because the experience of normal people, like my experience is
having to fight in deeply stupid wars and seeing the, seeing the reality of that. Yes. It's also
coming home from those stupid wars and like then not being supported for many years and going
through like the problems. Then it's like trying to start a small business and going through the
problems of like dealing with all of like having the experience of like trying to figure out how to
make life work. And in all within a system that often is kind of arrayed against you. And like we need
more people with that kind of experience because when you have that kind of experience, you're living
in the material realities of policy. Not the not the not the words. Right. Right. Right. Right.
Write that down.
You are living in the material realities of policy.
That is fucking dead on.
But let me say, too, though, Graham, and I think it's important.
And in talking to you, it's something's kind of clicking in my head, which is, because we all talk about, you know, normal people don't talk like that.
You've got to talk to normal people.
You've got to get outside of water.
And all those things are correct.
But we also need kind of Rosetta Stones.
we need some people that can help translate those lived experiences,
the material realities of living through the effects of policy,
into those broader kind of philosophical and policy hierarchies
that need to be structured.
And I feel like that, if I may,
feels like a little bit of the magic I'm seeing from you,
is that you're able to have lived that experience
and then translated,
into Washington speak, to understand how that experience can translate into the changes in policy.
And it's such an important connection.
What are the weirdest things?
I actually think my education on this was in my time on planning board.
That's interesting.
Planning board in Sullivan?
Yeah, yeah.
Because like on planning board in a small town, especially.
you like craft policy, implement policy, and then see the material outcome of that policy
sometimes within weeks. And it's happening to your neighbors who are going to come tell
you if it's fucked up. And so like there's a, like for me that was a really incredible
experience because like you really, you begin to like the words on the page actually
translate to a material thing. And you have to be very careful.
about and also more importantly though you have to be flexible because sometimes you'll write the words on the page you implement it and then it does something different than what you thought and then you need to be willing that's really interesting does it make you distrust bureaucracy or does it make you in that instance do you do you begin to understand the frustrations of even well-intentioned procedure yes right yes and and i don't like i i'll be like i'm not mistrustful of bureaucracy because
because I honestly, bureaucracy in some ways is necessary. It's how we keep systems functioning.
The problem is we've resulted in like in bureaucracies that cannot be flexible at all.
And are captured by a lot of times the complexity of bureaucracy is put there by moneyed
interest because they know they're the ones that got team of lawyers.
That's right.
You know, they're the ones tax loopholes aren't put in there by poor people.
I mean, regulatory capture is a real thing.
Look, like even in the small business food world, I've dealt with it firsthand.
Like, you're like, the only way I could meet this standard is if I was like a multi-million
dollar company that could afford all this nonsense.
And you're like, oh, that's why.
Because this was written by a multi-million dollar company who's the only one that could
afford all this nonsense.
And then they gave it to a politician who made it a policy.
And that's like, you're like, oh, that's, there it is.
And they don't have the time.
Believe me.
And that was the other, you know, I.
I remember being down in Washington.
We were talking about it was the Pact Act.
Then we were talking about burn pits for veterans, things like that.
And I remember a representative coming up to us and going,
this is a terrible thing that's happening.
But like, we're really busy.
So could you guys write it?
Could you write the bill?
They're asking us, like, a couple idiots.
Like, we're like, sure, we'll write it.
But it made me realize, like, I imagine that somebody on Wall Street,
somebody in telecom, they might go like,
absolutely, we'll write it.
we'd be delighted.
Well, I mean, honestly, that's, I think, that's, I don't even I think, that is what happens.
Right.
I mean, like, that's, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And these are things that are written by lawyers.
I mean, meanwhile, like, you know, what a community organization writes something big,
and, you know, and then they give it and like, I don't even know what this is.
Is this written?
I mean, like, I, it's just this, it's structurally arrayed to benefit those with wealth and power
and an army of attorneys.
which is, I mean, I think that's why we continue to kind of fight ourselves in the streets we find ourselves in.
Graeme, can I ask you a question?
It's a slight change of topic, but like, well, first of all, let me just say, you know, all I heard about you for a while was, hey, this guy's got a fucked up tattoo and some Reddit posts that aren't any good.
Yes.
And yet, as I talk to you, your candidacy, the way that it's resonating with people,
It couldn't make more sense.
It's logical.
It has, I can almost watch the bottom stair and you walking up the stairs as something that is organic and builds naturally and makes total sense.
So I imagine the frustration, and I'm not saying people's backgrounds shouldn't also be a part of their story and the challenges that they face and some of the things.
But I'm saying it must have been a slightly frustrating.
experience to see the story that you're describing, which feels so organic and so grassroots
and so common sense oriented, be overshadowed by things that you might have regretted,
not done exactly right, or also have no real pairing. Yeah, I mean, it is, it was a uniquely
frustrating experience. It still isn't sometimes because it, you know, but to like to see myself,
being framed by people who have never met me,
who know absolutely nothing about my background, really,
who like just latched on to this like,
oh, this guy said dumb things on the internet 15 years ago.
And I'm like, man, man, I did.
Because I was like an angry young dude
who got back from my fourth combat tour
and was isolated and lonely and spent time bitching on the internet.
But let me ask you a question, Greg.
Why do you, so you just said something really interesting.
which is angry young man back from fourth deployment online struggling why weren't you think you captured
by the alt right because boy do you sound like their target audience to be captured by the anger
of that movement because that boy you're in the time frame you have the experience of it
white guy, working class, angry vet, struggling to fit in.
You are fertile soil, brother, for that kind of recruitment.
Why do you think it didn't go that way?
One is because even in high school, I had some absolutely spectacular teachers
who sort of opened, who opened my eyes up to, I would,
like a,
um,
like a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
a,
didn't require you to,
like,
look for scapegoats in other working people.
Oh,
that's interesting.
You didn't fall into the like,
pronoun trap where you're like,
ah,
these fucking pronoun people.
No,
like,
and,
like, and,
and,
and I was,
and,
and,
and so like that,
so like,
and also,
obviously,
I have two very loving parents who my,
like who very much engendered in me this idea that like you need to be open with other people
and you need to be like empathetic and compassionate and I think my lucky stars that I had I have two
wonderful parents that did that but I will say the other thing is like after I when I got back
I I definitely how do I put this like I I definitely was looking for like answers and in that you know
And a community.
And a community.
Hence why, hence why the internet.
Because I certainly wasn't getting it in the real world.
But I was also going to college.
And in school, I became friends with a number of people who had very, very, very different
lived experiences than mine.
And in doing that, I realized that, like, oh, like, the best thing for me to do is to, like,
spend time around people who have had a totally different life than I have and understand that
their life, their lived experience is just as valid as mine. And that the more that I can like,
the more than I can, I can one, open myself up to those people and then also have them open up to me,
the more I get to learn about the human experience and the more I get to learn about, and it's really
difficult to do that and also start thinking that you should like hate other people.
So, like, I think in some ways it was those sort of, I had a good foundation, honestly.
Right.
Well, it is, you know, the internet is so good at reducing things to two dimensions,
whereas life is obviously you're living in three and from what I understand sometimes four.
But, you know, I'm wondering if that world, did you understand its appeal?
because I imagine anybody who's a Marine or anybody who served in Iraq and Afghanistan knows those guys,
hangs out with those guys, loves those guys for other reasons other than some of their politics.
Totally.
But I also imagine you understand the siren song of exactly what you're saying.
And were you cognizant of it when you were looking for a community?
And did you ever feel its pull in that way?
I also got a lot of that in the Marine Corps.
Like, like, like, you know, like the Marine Corps is, I mean, if we're talking about like people want to be part of the community, having a purpose, feeling connected.
And like, and for young men, there's the whole like aggression and violence thing.
Like, I was the, I was the Marine Corps infantry.
I mean, it doesn't get more those things than that.
As aggressive and violent.
Yeah.
That's the training.
And I, but also, but I also got to the end of it and realized that it didn't fill any holes in me.
Like it, like, it didn't.
In fact, it had left me more alone and more isolated in many ways.
And so for me, there was like, I did kind of already know that looking for more of that
was not going to be the answer.
I kind of got like the maximum version of that or the maximalist version of that.
And it didn't, it didn't work.
Right.
You didn't need the alt-right.
You were enlisted in it.
So you didn't, you had lived it.
Yeah.
I mean, like, and don't be wrong, I mean, like, I will always be proud of, I love the Marine Corps.
I still, I'm very proud of being a Marine.
I love, I've many, I mean, the guys I served with still remained some of my closest friends.
But it is definitely like a, you know, it's, it's a hyper masculine, oh, certainly when I was in, it was all male.
And, and like, all, like, things that are virtues there are definitely not virtues in the normal world.
And then I had to go out into the normal world, learn that the hard way.
But then also, the thing that actually made me happy was real community.
Like the thing that actually ended up filling all the emptiness inside of me, it wasn't, it wasn't rage, it wasn't anger, it wasn't any of that stuff.
It was literally like just spending time with other people in the place that I live and like in working with people on projects to improve all of our lives.
lives. And suddenly in all of that, I was like, oh, man, like, I'm a, like, I'm a legitimately
happier person. I mean, I spent years, like, really, really disillusioned. And then I moved,
then I moved back to Maine, started working on the ocean, which has another big part. I mean,
it's, it's hard to not feel a sense of place when you're like on the sea, on your boat,
looking at the seals and the eagles and, like, you know, like, wait, what? What ocean?
I'm in Jersey, man. What are you talking?
Yeah. Yeah, Maine's pretty amazing.
I mean, that's one of me. Like, I, like, I am so lucky to be where I'm from.
I'm so lucky that my community, when I came home, really kind of wrapped its arms around me in some ways.
And like, it allowed me to come back. Like, I finally got to come home. And I was lucky enough that it actually is my home.
It's the place I was born and raised. That has a lot to do with it.
But the big thing was, like, really just engaging with human beings.
and building that sense of like real in-person community.
And it is challenging, right?
Like human beings are still people.
Yeah, it's complicated.
The thing to understand, like, it's never gonna be perfect,
but it is, I don't know how to say this.
It like, in working with other people
and connecting with other people in real life,
not on the internet, but in real life,
that is kind of what rebuilt all of my hope.
And it's what rebuilt,
all of my positivity.
And it was, and I didn't have any of that when I was looking for it on the internet.
I didn't have any of it when I was really, I mean, like I, like the military kind of fills that
hole for a little while when you're doing it, but the moment you leave it, it all goes away.
And now you're alone.
And so it doesn't actually fix it.
It's not like a long term sustainable version of community.
And in long term sustainable community is the thing that like actually is, I mean, that's
why I'm doing this. But see, this is why, Grant, I feel like what's so different about what you're
talking about is that it lacks the platitudes of somebody viewing something from above.
You're viewing everything from within. You're talking about roots. You're talking about I was
a drift and I went back and I planted these roots in my community. And here's how I
did it and here's how I rebuilt my sense of self and my sense of purpose it is a story grounded
in lived experience and I do think that you know it it certainly resonates with me even though my
experience in the world is so different than yours because I can touch it it feels really
tangible to me it feels really grounded in
a kind of hierarchy of needs that I can grasp rather than cable news platitudinous nonsense.
And that is what is so missing from our politics.
It's also, this is the part that gets me, it's not how people interact.
But like, I mean, like, that's the thing that gets me about this whole experience.
And like, like, I always get the question, like, from journalists.
to like, what do you think explains the fact that you, a random guy from Eastern Maine, is now, like, beating.
Yeah, I mean, like, we're, you know, I'm like up 40 points on a two-term elected sitting governor.
And, and, you, I'm polling far ahead of Susan Collins.
I mean, and so they're always, they always call.
They're like, how do you explain this?
And I'm always like, you know, honestly, it's because I think because I just like talk like a regular human being.
And in many ways, I'm coming at this very much from like this space of just being down here in the real world and seeing what's going on, which is.
And the other thing, too, is like, I also don't think that voters are, well, mostly because I am one too.
Like, I don't think we're this like mass of people to be manipulated.
Right.
Like there's, in the Democratic Party, is still really bad at this, by the way.
There's still this idea that we got to, you're like, there's like these magic words.
We're like, oh, we didn't use the magic word last time that would have made people think we give a shit about them without actually giving a shit.
Like it's, they're like, no, dude, people are smart.
People like, they don't like when they're being, they don't like the magic words.
They want you to say things like, no, we want you to have health care.
That's why we have this universal health care policy.
And here's the plan that we have that's going to connect.
plan the money we're talking about to the value you might receive you know the frustration with the
Democratic Party is always kind of this which what they'll say is this the strategy is authenticity and you're
like right that's not a strategy that's just a strategy that's just a thing and then you can smell
the thing that really rubs me the wrong ways you can smell the meeting on them when they talk the
meeting where they went Donald Trump's resonating with them because he
curses sometimes.
So the next day,
Chuck Schumer is out there.
I will fucking this.
I will fucking pass this.
And you're like,
it's,
it,
you smell the,
the marketing,
you smell the strategy.
You smell the PR on them.
Uh,
almost at all times.
Has there been any connection,
Graham?
Have they,
you know,
look,
the Democratic establishment,
has certainly put their Kalshi money
and their polymarket money on Janet Mills.
And that, you know, is there,
have you felt any sense of any curiosity?
Has there been any, hey, Graham,
I'm a more establishment guy.
You seem to be resonating.
What do you think is going on?
Or do they view you again
through the prism of insurgent?
This insurgent must be stopped.
So as of late, past few months, there's been a lot more reach out from like individual people, kind of in the, like senators, honestly.
I think there are a lot of senators.
Now, there are a bunch of senators like Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen, that whole crew who, Martin, Martin Heinrich in New Mexico, who like I've been, they reached out early on.
Right.
And have been big supporters really the whole time.
They felt a fellow progressive who they thought, okay, I understand where this fellow's coming from.
Totally.
So that's been going on since the beginning.
Past couple months, though, there has been more reach out from, I would say, more kind of
like establishment folks.
However, however, and this is the important part, not from like the DSCC, not from like the
DSEC, not from the DNC.
Like nobody in the places of power remains interested.
But they're lost, dude.
Like, there, I have...
Dude, it's so bad.
They're lost.
And the thing that bothers me the most isn't, like, I'm not asking for you to, like, be my friend.
But you should be curious because I'm pulling 40 points ahead.
Right.
Like, at least just reach out and be like, hey, what are you actually?
Because we've never, they've never, they've never spoken.
Ever, I've never gotten a phone call.
Like, no one's ever reached out.
I've never talked to anybody in leadership.
I've like no one's ever been interested and ever, which is like kind of baffling.
I think it's because they only know two stories.
The two stories are this.
You're either a moderate Democrat or your left wing firebrand.
And so what they're saying is, oh, sure, the left wing firebrand, that does well in the
primary, but that'll never travel.
You know, there is that idea that, well, electability, and there's something crazy about this,
as though you are the equivalent of a,
you're the democratic equivalent of a maga loyalist
who has come out with wildly controversial positions.
And then you talk to you for five minutes,
you go, oh no, this is based in historical precedent.
It has a very literate and literary foundation to it.
It has a foundation of lived experience.
Like, they should be, again, viewing this.
as a Rosetta Stone that can help them translate.
And here's the trick.
And maybe this is what we can kind of talk about.
And I'm cognizant of your time.
And because of your lived experience, your rural internet connection.
That's the issue, actually.
That is the issue.
How do you translate that lived experience?
You talked about it a little bit earlier, you know, being on the planning board and
understanding that, oh, sometimes the wording and the,
intention, you know, had unforeseen consequences and those kinds of things. How do we translate
those experiences to create that new deal for a more modern America where we do get that value,
where we do change the incentives of government, the way that that money is spent? How do we
make that transition? This is honestly the hardest.
question to answer and and my in my answer is going to be insufficient i'll just tell you that right now
no it's listen it's a process the the answer to it is that we need to build political power
through getting people like me into the u.s senate into the into congress and we also need to do it
while building organizational power outside of the system like i i there has never been a moment
in American history where we've gotten good things just because the institutions or people in power decided to do it.
They needed to be pressed.
I mean, this is honestly why this is why this country has killed the labor movement.
We did it on purpose. We did it because the labor movement is a foundation of power that can actually like push back against the system.
We need to, so like on this case, on our campaign, this is a.
Above all else, this is an organizing project because I firmly believe that while me getting
elected to the U.S. Senate, that's a big part of it, but that needs to be in tandem with a fully
organized broad-based coalition here in the state of Maine that can put pressure on frankly
other members of our delegation if need be. Because it's not going to be enough to just rely
on the systems. But the big thing is that it's not
It's that building that kind of outside power.
That's also how we're going to identify more people like me
and then have the resources to get them elected.
Because the biggest issue right now is that,
I mean, I think you probably saw there was an article recently
about how majority Democrats,
which is this kind of like PAC group,
has been essentially curating with a lot of money
these candidates to push forward.
And they're all, it's all built.
built around this idea that we're doing like the pro corporate pro business moderate types.
Right.
We need to build the opposite of that.
We need to build the infrastructure.
So like for me, the only reason this ever happened is because on day one, people who could
shoot a launch video, who could help with small dollar fundraising, and who could get my name
in the papers, those three things.
Those were assets that I had access to because some frankly,
labor unions had pitched in some support for the project to make that happen.
We got to find other people from the normal world like me.
And they're all going to look different.
They're going to sound different.
They're going to be from different communities.
And that's all what it's supposed to be.
But it's a matter of infrastructure.
Because if we don't have that infrastructure to give them that early support, then like if I
woke up one day and said, I want to be a U.S.
Senator, I would have walked out of the boat launch.
I would have told that to the guys that I fish next to.
We all would have laughed about it over coffee.
And then we all would have moved on with our lives.
Right.
Like it's just would not, there's no way that it would have materialized.
And so to turn all of this stuff into reality through policy, frankly, we need to build
the political power to make it happen.
And that's why it's, that's why it's kind of an insufficient question because it's not
actually about like, or it's an insufficient answer.
because what we have to do first before doing any of that is seize political power.
And to do that, we're going to have to create the infrastructure to get normal people into places of power, which is hard when all of the money is like you mentioned.
I mean, yesterday, Alex Carp and the CEO of Blackstone.
That's Palantir and Blackstone for those following at home.
Palantir in Blackstone unleashed $2 million of negative ads against me yesterday.
Just out of curiosity, what does Palantir have against you?
Well, I have actively said that I think that companies that steal everyone's data should be broken up and destroyed.
So, you know, it's...
So they're in the pro steal everyone's data camp.
And so that...
Fair play to them.
But...
Greg, you're talking about building this political movement and the power.
And I can tell you, at least from my experience of talking people, the thirst is out there.
And you see from these sort of pro, there is a general undercurrent of energy for something different.
I almost think there's a kind of a funny chicken and the egg thing here.
In that, you know, to get more people like you and to get more infrastructure, we also need more specific.
We almost, we need the outline of that new deal.
people I think need to know what they're signing up for yeah and right now they don't have a sense that
they're signing up for anything different they might be signing up for different people and and they
might be like well that person is pro choice so I'm assuming there's going to be more but they don't know
economically the specifics what do you mean by we all need health care like what is that what does that
mean we what does it mean that you know labor is getting its ass kicked by capital it's almost like
if you could put those parallel on parallel tracks one can build the other but i think you can't
build the one without the other right does that make sense oh what 100 percent like and this is the
it's a and that's the struggle honestly i mean that's the challenge that especially when we are a
against such a vast amount of wealth that is going to try to push back.
How what, but here's the thing.
We need to.
Like, we need to try.
Right.
Like, if we don't fight back, I mean, these, these lunatics want us to own absolutely nothing,
turn our lives into subscription models, turn like all of our being into some commodified
avatar in data that they sell.
Be replaced by, uh, be replaced by robots.
By robots and autonomous intelligence.
Like that's, no.
Like this is, like that like that's what they want.
And we can't we we literally cannot let them win.
I mean, if they if they win, that is a bleak future indeed.
And and we need and I, but they're not going to the problem that we are in this very unique moment where the system itself has been built to benefit them.
The average person has been sold the story for a long time that power is not for them.
power is for special smart people.
Power is for people who come from the system itself,
which is all nonsense.
It's a bullshit story.
It always has been.
But it's a, so where we are right now is we are in this moment of we have to change the
narrative around it.
We have to change the way people think about power.
We have to talk about the fact that it's universal health care isn't nebulous.
It's Medicare for all.
It's an existing Senate bill.
That's right.
It's not magic.
It's Senate Bill 1506.
It's a real thing.
We just need the political will to pass it.
Right.
We need to strengthen labor.
We need to pass things like the pro act.
And the connection to people to understand why it's not scary and how it would, how it would work.
Right.
And how we could do it.
But again, it's that double tract of, but then people have to be convinced that the government has the credibility to be able to.
But cases need to be made so that people begin to trust that the money that they're sending in,
which is significant for most people, is being utilized in a way.
You know, one of the things I think people, you know, we talk so much about the system of government that we have
and the way that it was designed.
And it was designed as a compromise with slave-owning states.
Let's be honest.
That's how the electoral college and that's how the Senate.
That's how all that stuff exists.
But I think in general, what people, I think,
think hopefully begin to understand is there's also this fourth branch of government,
which is corporate power, and that government's really the only organization strong enough,
large enough, to offset some of the corrosive effects of corporate power. And the government
has to be able to use that and not be held hostage to it and captive by it. It's my critique
of libertarianism. Yeah? Because you could have ended up in that camp. Right. You're,
The resume is libertarian coded, if I may say.
And I've got, look, I've got some libertarian, I mean, I live in Eastern Maine.
I do want to be left alone.
So like I, like I, there are elements of it that I, that I totally understand.
Yeah, yeah.
But, but like, but my, I mean, I'll be on, it's mostly just the fact that like, I read a lot of history books.
And in my reading of history, large, like consolidated capital, the only,
really effective way of going after it is with governmental power. And when we don't do it,
that's when corporate power, the power of capital, captures government. And the answer to that,
like the answer to bad government isn't no government. It's good government. Right. And good
government is possible. It is. I swear to you, I will die on that hill. Good government is possible.
All the northern European countries show us that there are better ways of doing this.
And you can make different choices about what you prioritize in your society, where you put your productivity, where you put your capital.
I mean, does it go towards making people's lives better or does it go towards somebody hoarding the wealth?
I mean, we've, and we've made, we've chosen option B as of late.
And it's just a bad option.
But the only way for us to get that stuff back is to harness the power of government.
Right.
Because otherwise, I mean, multinational corporations.
Yeah, we'll be consumed by the other, yeah.
Yeah.
Graham, I can't tell you how pleased I am to have been able to have this conversation with you.
You have been caricatured in many ways in the national media.
And so to be able to spend, you know, an hour or so just getting to know you and getting to know your story, you really make, you
make a lot more sense to me now after spending some time with you about what this is all about.
I just assumed that you were the sum total of your three Reddit posts that were kind of odd.
But I really do appreciate.
And I also know that for a guy who likes to spend time alone on the ocean and with his family
and with his community in Maine, this is a, it's a sacrifice.
I do believe that.
I believe in the same way that you signing up to serve and fight for this country was a sacrifice and a commitment.
And I feel like you're continuing that legacy of service and sacrifice in this.
It's not easy to face down the forces that are arrayed against you.
And I appreciate you, man.
I just wanted to say that.
And it was really lovely to get to know you.
And I wish you the best here.
Thanks, John. And I just before we get off, I just want to say, I mean, you're like, you've been an inspiration for a very long time.
No, you're very kind. No, I really appreciate it.
Grand Platner, Mainer, ocean sailor, oyster farmer, marine, U.S. Senate candidate for the great state of Maine. Thanks for spending time with this, Graham.
Thank you, John. Appreciate it.
I'm just going to say this. I didn't feel.
maybe for the first time in a while
that I was talking to a politician
and I understand, look, he's got to get elected
but that was, dare I say,
an actual convert,
it almost felt more like
it was a mix between talking to Heather Cox Richardson
and the Gorton's fisherman.
I'm going to put those two things together.
The FDR references.
Yeah, he's like, got you.
But what was so interesting to me is
he's built a political campaign
on the scaffold
of lived experience and philosophical principle based in historical precedent.
Yeah.
I feel it was one of the most refreshing conversations we've had on this podcast.
I've also, I've heard him talk elsewhere about just how integral organizing is.
And we've heard that from, you know, so many candidates who have gone on to do well.
And that is it.
You need people who believe in you to all.
also take up the message and be spreading it.
One person can't really do everything on their own.
No question.
And I think he knows that and he'll admit that.
But he's also like, this is me.
And if you guys like it, great, this is what I'm trying to do.
This is what I believe in.
I hope you do too and let's do it.
And it's just he's not trying to be real.
It's just like, this is who fuck I am, dude.
Right.
No, it seemed very clear.
You know, it's funny.
Sometimes you wonder like, how the hell is this guy in the position that he's in?
and then you talk to me and go, oh, I can see how when you go to different town halls and you talk
about your life and the planning board and your experience in the work. But it's not just about
the experiences. It's what those experiences represent to him. Yes. How he's processed them,
how he's filtered them. And after you talk to him, it's kind of astonishing that the whole story is
like, fucked up tattoo guy. And you're like, oh, I think we, I think we might have missed the main,
I think we may have buried the lead on this one.
Yes.
Purposely, you know.
People are not just the mistakes they make.
No, it's a headline.
I mean, like, that was the thing.
Like, we all saw the headlines about him, right?
But, like, you actually just listen to conversations he has, and you're like,
you get a sense of who he is.
Exactly.
I was curious that he wasn't captured by the, because I got to tell you, like, he would
have been a fertile person for the alt-right to have influenced.
Oh, yeah.
You know, when he was talking about his upbringing, I had done.
some reading on him and someone who was his former high school classmate did a write up on him. And
apparently he ran for student body president and lost, but was nominated for most likely to start
a revolution. So I have a feeling. He's like always been this guy. I didn't know that that was a
superlative you could have in your high school year. I think we had like best smile. I won't tell you mine.
Did you have one, Brittany? You got a superlative? What'd you get?
It's so embarrassing. It's most likely to be famous. Really? Here you are. And here you are
I don't tell many people. A podcast extraordinary. I didn't, did your high school have superlatives,
Lauren? Yeah, but I was not a cool kid. I was doing my own thing. Most likely to do her own
thing. Yeah. And here I am doing my thing. And here you are doing your own thing. We all end up together.
I actually, I was very pleased. I got best sense of humor.
Oh, man.
But not class clown.
Oh, you classy version of it.
I'm just saying.
Wait, do you know who did do it?
Because in this article I read, she was like, oh, class president wound up being a chiropractor.
I loved that detail.
Makes sense.
That makes total sense.
What else do the kids want to know this week, Brittany?
Okay.
John, they used to say only Richard Nixon could go to China.
Are we at the point now where only Jared Kushner could go?
to Iran? It really depends on if they're looking to build a series of malls. You know,
Jared Kushner, he can go anywhere. Anywhere that there is land that can be developed for either
a Barnes & Noble or a Macy's, Jared Kushner can go. As long as there's also a condominium
aspect to it and then a kind of throwing a bone to affordable housing and that there will also be
two units. So really, he's available any country that can be. I can't tell you how many mall
developments there are near where I live, where you're like, oh, what's going up over there?
And they're like, I believe that Kushner is a building. Oh, my God. So underground bunkers,
perhaps. This is a bit tangential, but it has been interesting to me how few articles have been
mentioning his conflicts of interest when talking about all of these negotiations that he's been
part of. And I get we're like desensitized a bit to it. And I guess that there's so much news.
But that is a really big deal. Oh my God. It's wild. Imagine going into peace talks where Saudi Arabia,
you have $2 billion from the sovereign wealth fund of that kind. And you're in there trying to
broker a deal between Iran and the United States and pretending that like your investments from
the Saudi kingdom have no bearing on any of that. This is just a volunteer gig for.
for me.
Bullshit.
It's not a volunteer gig.
It's what they used to call cold calling.
Like, you're going to a place to establish a relationship
so that you can extract wealth and money out of it later.
That's the whole modus operandi of that entire fucking family.
And I would doubt there is no peace deal that they make in any country that doesn't involve.
They also get a golf course and a hotel.
200% development for the whole thing.
Look at us going after the man.
We're inspired.
Yes, how gram of us.
What else they want?
How gram of us is a great.
That's a great little bumper sticker.
How gram of us.
I'm going to make him.
Yeah.
John, a few weeks ago on Sean Hannity's podcast, he called you and Bill Mar funny and clever.
Would you like to return the compliment?
No, why would he do that to me?
That is so not fair and not nice.
Which part of it?
All of it.
All of it.
Lumping me in with Mar and then saying something nice,
you're trying to fuck.
You know what he's trying?
He's trying to wreck my business.
That's what he's doing.
He's trying to ruin your brand.
He's playing the long game.
That's that martial arts training he's been doing on.
Yeah, that's, I think I can, listen, I could, I could do that.
Yeah, that's.
Would you like to return the compliment?
Yes.
He is Bill Moore.
Done.
Yeah, I don't trust anything that.
comes out of their mouths that isn't strategic. There's some strategy in there. I can't necessarily
figure out what that is. Why was he asked that? Or were they, oh, I bet it was, was it a
conversation like, late night sucks? It's all. Well, he gave you guys a good law, but then said
Colbert, Kimmel and Fallon, he doesn't understand they are no, they are not funny and should not be
on air. Oh. How brave of him. Yeah. Listen, knowing that he is the arbiter of humor in
country that he is the grand pooh-bah of i think most people look to him for uh hey what what kind
of humor do you like because you seem hilarious did he mention gutfield or forgot that's the only
one that does it right yeah he's apparently anybody else who's partisan that's turning off half the
audience they got it they got to they got to learn how to do it like gregg who's really you know equal
opportunity apparently yeah so
That's the way that goes. Yeah.
All right.
Thank you. Please do not compliment me again.
Next.
The last one is a riddle.
Oh, come on.
Do I need to write this down?
No, sure.
Okay.
I am so fragile that if you say my name, you break me.
What am I?
I am so fragile if you say my name, you break me.
What do you break when you talk?
Is there something that you, what do you break when you talk?
That was pretty close.
It is.
But yeah, I don't know what the name of that would be.
I was trying to come up with cover like, I'm so fragile.
I was like, Trump.
Like I was just, I was just going to keep going Trump, Trump.
I'm so fragile.
You're really close.
Air.
What is it that you break when you make a sound?
Quiet.
Quiet.
You break silence.
Silence.
Yeah.
You got it.
You got it.
Nah, but not quick enough to be qualified as those are, is that one of those things that like 60% of geniuses or, you know, 30% of people who get this right are considered geniuses.
And that's why you got most likely to be funny.
That sense of humor. Class clown would have gone with something very different, bunch of sounds and all that sorts of stuff.
Guys, once again, obviously we look forward to having our partner in arms, Gillian here next time, but truly enjoyed.
Brittany, how do they stay in touch with us?
Twitter, We are Weekly ShowPod, Instagram threads, TikTok, Blue Sky.
We are Weekly Show podcast, and you can like, subscribe, and comment on our YouTube channel, The Weekly Show with John Stewart.
Fantastic.
Guys, thank you so much.
Fascinating conversation today.
Lead producer Lauren Walker, producer Brittany Mehmedevick, producer Jillian Speer video editor and engineer Rob Vitola,
who was doing yeoman's work on today's rather spotty connections that were going on
through the, and our audio editor and engineer Nicole Boyce doing the same.
And executive producers, Chris McShane and Katie Gray.
We will see you guys next week.
Boy.
The weekly show with John Stewart is a Comedy Central podcast.
It's produced by Paramount Audio and Bus Boy Productions.
On Podcasts.
