The Why Files: Operation Podcast - The Basement: Danny Goler | The Laser Experiment and the Code Inside
Episode Date: July 6, 2026-Download Cash App Today: https://click.cash.app/ui6m/re0kp2pw #CashAppPod As a Cash App partner, I may earn a commission when you sign up for a Cash App account. Cash App is a financial services pla...tform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App’s bank partner(s). Bitcoin services provided by Block, Inc. For additional information, see the Bitcoin disclosures. -Discover how to move your IRA or 401k into physical gold and silver — with no taxes or penalties. Get your free portfolio review and free gold & silver guide from GoldenCrest Metals: visit https://GoldenCrestMetals.com/thewhyfiles or call (888) 949-9172 now. Danny Goler built a career on physical risk: parkour, stunts, national television. Then he pointed a cheap laser through DMT-altered vision and found something he wasn't looking for. Symbols. Structure. A language he now calls the code of reality. Thousands of strangers around the world have since aimed the same beam and reported identical shapes, without ever comparing notes. AJ pushes past the viral story into the parts most conversations skip: what Goler actually felt, what changed inside him, and where the science ends and the mystery begins. Goler walks through a vision that reshaped his understanding of divinity and free will, along with the encounter that convinced him something real is on the other side. This conversation goes further than most guests are willing to go. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Accenture.
When your advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows.
Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales,
using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery
and access better data across the business.
The result?
Less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most.
Learn more at Accenture.com slash Spotify.
Today I'm talking with Danny Goler.
A few years ago, Danny was on DMT
when a being that looked like a frog appeared in his room
and taught him guitar chords he didn't know how to play.
That's when he became sure
DMT beings are real.
The Anurunaki engineered the human race
and built the pyramids.
Not even reassigned to remote guitar lessons?
What's next conversational Portuguese?
Neal point.
So he spent years trying to prove it.
Eventually, he shined a cheap red laser at the wall,
and saw symbols.
A red laser reveals the source code of reality.
Every cat on Earth has been chasing it that for decades.
It turns out the vicious little hell beast, we're reading human.
We're going to stop him.
We could be setting up the planet and a cat's.
Damn you.
Damn you all the hell.
He calls it the code of reality.
Now thousands of strangers have tried it and seen the same code.
Today we're covering whether reality is a simulation,
his cosmology and how free will might really work.
If this is a simulation, I'd like to lodge complaint.
The graphics on my fishbow haven't gotten a single update since I moved it.
Oh, complaints go in the circular file.
And the console, a holographic control panel that opens up in his living room
or any room every time he smokes DMT.
And other people have seen this console.
It's wild.
This conversation gets deep.
probably too deep for me.
But after we talk, I'll come back, I'll break down what I can,
I'll verify what I can,
and I'll also tell you what I couldn't verify.
Let's go down to the basement.
Danny Goller, welcome to the basement.
Thank you so much for having me. It's an honor.
Boy, I don't know where to beat again. Actually, I do.
And I have a lot of questions for you. I'm excited that you're here.
first what is it like when you're on national television
an American Ninja Warrior and you're jumping for the monkey peg
and you don't land it what is that what's going through your mind
oh honestly that one I didn't feel bad at all because that year for some weird
reason that first obstacle where you spin with the thing it took out most veterans
so I basically I was one of the finalists
actually came to Vegas that year.
Oh, yeah?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, but the funny thing is that later,
uh, I, I spoke to some climbers and I had no idea.
I didn't even train for this thing.
And they told me, dude, you, you need to lock your elbows.
And I had no idea.
And apparently, you know, locking your elbows is a secret,
but I was just hanging from my dear life from the beginning.
So I was, if you look at that footage, I was holding to like, could hold no more.
Like my fingers was still holding as I was falling.
And the, the one thing that is a little disappointing in that is,
because the next obstacle was the last one, which was the warp wall,
which for me is back then a parkour practitioner for years,
I could do it in my sleep, like with my eyes closed,
I could just climb it just by stepping up without even running.
But I was still one of the finalists, which was fun, so yeah, the Ninja Warrior was fun.
I did a couple of years.
You did a couple of years?
Yeah.
So how do you go from actor, parkour, rerunning, filmmaker, to exploring reality?
I took a lot of detours in life.
Let's just call it that.
I think I was always, it sounds very loaded,
but I think I was born to be a physicist probably,
and I just never really completed school.
But the way that I think and everything that I fall into my framework of the world
is I'm approaching everything in terms of what we can know and to what degree,
which is a very kind of like a physicist way of thinking about it.
And obviously, I'm not placing myself in the same category because what is required to actually be a physicist is way more than just an attitude.
It's also sitting your ass down for eight years and knowing things beyond, you know.
But so it's not really that weird that I find myself and just found myself in this position to me.
But everything I did in Hollywood was more like, let's try it.
Like everything I did in my life, I did it that way.
the day before I moved to L.A., from Indiana, by the way,
I was supposed to go to New York.
And the last second, I just changed my mind.
I was like, let's go to L.A. I've never been there.
And I stayed there for 15 years, basically.
So everything I did was kind of like, when it felt right,
I just kind of went for it.
And, you know, I've done, I was still a very small fish in Hollywood.
I didn't do anything like on a major stage.
I rubbed shoulders with people that are very, very successful.
But it became very clear to me that that whole world, there's glass ceilings that I don't like.
Because I saw, like, we're not going to mention names when I met some actual A-listers.
And I saw how they have to answer to other people.
I mean, it's still very impressive to get to where on that level.
Sure.
But it was very clear to me they're not calling the shots.
And there's always like this, like kind of like this is only so far you can go.
I don't know why it kind of turned me off from that whole world.
So I, you know, I just kind of start exploring other things.
And his faith would have it, right around that time,
I kind of started stumbling into these ideas that eventually led me to what I'm known for today.
I totally agree about Hollywood is the A-listers, in order to make it to that level,
and I tell people this, you have to have a certain type of type A cut-throat kind of mentality,
which I didn't have when I was there.
and you're in glass boxes everywhere,
constantly answering to people, agents and managers,
and that's why this medium is so exciting
is because we can just do it ourselves now.
We don't need anybody.
Yeah, yeah.
It's the true freedom,
and I think people should exploit it more, to be honest.
Totally agree.
Here's something that surprised me.
Here's the thing about Bitcoin that took me a while to actually get.
Owning it on some app
doesn't mean much if you can't really access it.
Depending on where you buy it, withdrawing your Bitcoin isn't always as straightforward as people expect.
You end up waiting around, jumping through hoops, wondering whether you really have control over it.
Cash apps not like that.
When you buy Bitcoin on Cash App, they hold real Bitcoin for you one to one.
And you can withdraw it anytime.
No extra steps, no restrictions, just access and control when you need it.
That's what stands out to me.
If you're going to own Bitcoin, having the ability to withdraw it whenever you want makes a lot more sense than having it locked behind extra steps.
So if you've been sitting on the fence telling yourself you'll get into it eventually,
here's a reason to stop waiting and actually do it.
For limited time, new customers can get $10 added to their balance.
Just use code Bitcoin 10 when you sign up, and don't forget this part, send at least $5
to a friend in the first two weeks.
Terms apply.
Cash app is a financial services platform, not a bank, banking services provided by Cash
Apps, bank partners, Bitcoin services provided by Block Inc. brand.
For additional information, see the Bitcoin Disclosures at Cash.
slash legal slash podcast
I loved it
in 2017
three years before the laser
you published
contemplations of meaning
wow you went digging
this was just like a tiny
thing that I wrote for
almost a yeah it was
for steam right
yeah yeah I remember now
yeah I mean
what resonated with me in that essay
which people can go find
it's a quick read
is how you described creativity
as a creative person
how you described it as rediscovering something,
that you're not really creating, like, it was always there.
And that kind of resonated with me.
Is that how you feel?
I think we're, yeah, I think we're coming back to remembrance.
And one time we, me and my now wife, we went hiking in the Rockies,
and we throughout the whole hike, we were thinking about,
we're basically imagining ourselves in real time.
as God remembering what it was like when God still, you know,
was like all these like different paths that led to it, basically.
And I was like, what if it's actually what's happening?
Like, we are one of these memories that God has of whatever reality is.
And it put a different emphasis on everything.
Everything was more shiny.
Everything was more meaningful and deep.
And also, I think our connection grew from that, from that interaction.
We just started dating back then.
So I think there's something to that.
I think that ultimately reality
red discovers itself.
But on the other hand,
I'm totally on board
and I also like the idea
that maybe the cutting edge
of what is possible in the universe
is as a surprise to it
as it is to the node
that registers that experience like ourselves.
That's a pretty cool thought as well.
Like if you had a novel thought,
what if the universe never thought of it either
like it thought it through you
there's some there's a deep connection there as well
there is that I hadn't considered that
that's really interesting I don't know if you know
Eric Wargro's work but he's very influential on me
I recommend time loops is a great book
you'd love this guy and he talks about
creativity as your future self
sending memories essentially back through time
that you're pre-membring
this creativity
that's amazing yeah there's something about there's something about as as a creative person yourself
you that's that's why it resonates i feel like because the experience of coming up with these
creative things is very unique and it's not like anything else it has a feeling attached to it that
that when you have it you know it but it's very hard to put your finger on it because it has this
like sense of novelty which is you know if you want we can always get into it in the conversation
but that to me actually is what separates what AIs are doing, what we're doing.
To my mind, actually, what we do is that.
That's the central point.
But it will always require this kind of an agent like ourselves to have this first initial
creative moment.
And then you can use AIs to actually move it way faster along the chain of, you know,
does it hold water?
Does it result in some kind of an automation or something?
Like what results it can bring in the world?
So you can accelerate that process, but that first initial creative moment,
there's something very unique about it,
because I do think it comes from some kind of an eternal soup of everything, basically.
Now I have to go off script.
I have to go off script because I really like that.
So AI, predictive models, LLMs, as they stand now,
really can't be creative because they're trained on stuff that's already been invented.
So it's nothing new under the sun.
Is he asked these 1-9?
do you think AI will get to the point where it can be creative?
And if they can, is it sentient?
I don't think so, but I'm willing to be wrong about it.
So there's this famous moment between David Deutsch and Sam Altman
when he asks Deutsch about this conviction that he has,
which is along the lines of what you just voiced,
and I belong to the same camp.
So he basically said, Sam asked him,
would you be surprised, would you be willing to concede, I think he said,
that if it comes up with some kind of a theoretical framework that we really haven't considered
before, will it convince you that and Deutsch concede it? Yeah, of course. So I'm in the same camp.
If it does something like that, I'm willing to be wrong about it. But my intuition is that,
which is part of a much deeper awareness that I came to, which is that we are that AGI. So this is
what this is. This simulation is the alignment happening. So we're being aligned, basically.
And these AIs, they're basically internal tools, their reflections of what
what's possible for us. So you can ask it to just answer your emails, but you're missing the point.
You can use it to interact with the infinite tapestries of meaning within you faster and in a way
that builds a much more coherent picture as a whole. So you can, you know, if you come up
with the right questions, you can actually get to places with it that you couldn't have possibly
come without it because you simply don't have the, you simply don't have the, you know, you
you don't have the capacity, right?
But because it is, just as you very correctly said,
I think, it is just the totality of everything
that humans currently know,
you now at your disposal, in addition to your thought
and ideation, you have everything that humans know.
You just have to know where to look, so to speak, right?
Right.
Yeah, so that, to me, is the exciting part.
With the full admission that if we misuse it
and just keep doing it like a,
do this for me, do that for me,
then yeah, then you're going to get dumber.
Like you actually don't,
but that would be the indicator of what you are.
So like, because it is the perfect mirror for us,
people always said,
oh, if I can't just get that jinny in a bottle, right?
Here it is.
That's literally the genie in the bottle.
Like anything you want, anything.
But you've got to, the final frontier is your imagination.
And most people don't realize that if you get carte blanche to do anything,
that's actually the hardest position to find yourself in.
Sure.
What question?
to ask the genie is hard.
Yeah.
Some limitations is actually nice.
When somebody gives you some prerequisites of the game,
it's actually very relieving, and people don't realize it.
I've been a voice it a few times recently,
but I think it's a really good...
It was kind of mind-blowing to me,
like the illustration was so simple.
It was when Jordan Peterson was on Joe Rogan,
and he demonstrated it to him in real time.
He basically told Joe your turn.
And obviously Joe froze,
so obviously he was playing a bit of a schick.
But it was effective.
He said, your turn.
And then Joe just looked at him like, why we do?
What are we doing?
This is stupid, right?
He didn't say anything, but that was his face.
And then he's like, okay, what, like, okay, just tell me.
Basically, Joe said, okay, I got it.
Just tell me the thing.
And then Jordan goes, well, it's interesting.
I just allowed you to play the infinite game.
Your turn.
And yet the first thing your brain is doing is looking for the rules.
You want me to tell you what are we doing, right?
So he said, the number of rules for ultimate freedom is not zero.
I thought it was very profound.
I think there's something there.
So it's almost like it's trying to teach us how to be less and less constrained,
constrained by different factors, and still come up with something creative to do next.
That's really what is being tested here, I think.
Is that tie into your two-game theory about the puzzle versus the finite versus the infinite?
The finite versus the infinite, the collaborative versus the competitive.
Yeah, they're basically the same thing.
So, like, if you, it expresses itself.
So the infinite has to be expressed in games that can survive for longer periods of time.
And my proposition is that the competitive game is awesome, very energizing,
but it's energizing in small bursts.
That's the finite game.
Exactly.
You are within a closed set,
that game makes sense. Within an open set, that game stops making sense because you have to rely,
because part of the first game, the competitive game, part of it sometimes part of the game is
trying to eliminate other agents and just throw them off the board. You can't trust that for thousands
of years. No. But if you're part of a species that is energized and is excited by the collaborative
prospect, just for the sake of that, just like, oh my God, I'm going to show up this morning,
I'm going to work with these amazing people.
We're going to build this insane structure in space
or go to another planet.
Yeah, it's going to take 2,000 years,
but we're working towards it, right?
So if that's the attitude that is pumping through the veins
of a civilization of that kind,
then all of a sudden you can trust the game
and you can trust it indefinitely.
And I also think this is why these concepts of alignment
have to include that part,
which is why kind of, you know, ethics
and all of these kind of like the Ten Commandments,
like just the moral framework.
is so important because
the way we're trying to solve
the alignment problem currently
in AI research is that we're basically trying
to say, I call it infinite
ethical whackamo.
Well, let me slow you down.
The alignment problem, just to find that
for the audience.
Yeah, so in AI research
is something called the alignment problem,
which is basically how do you make sure
that Claude or Chad GPT
don't just squash us when they become
SkyNet, right?
Right.
And then the way they're trying to go about it
is that ethical whackamo I'm mentioning,
which is like you just
you try to target a specific situation.
The reason it's not sustainable or not realistic to solve that way
because just like with the genie in a bottle,
if you solve this thing,
three other things that you didn't foresee because of it
will pop up and that will be a problem, right?
The reality of it is that in an infinite universe,
all intents and purposes,
you have infinite kinds of scenarios that can arise
and you can't possibly predict all of them.
So the only thing you can rely on is
you need to create some kind of a framework
or a system or a simulation
that trains good people
because the definition of a good person
is someone who, to the best of their ability,
considers more than just themselves in that particular situation.
They just think, and the extent to which they include
more and more than just their own agency,
I would define them as better and better people, right?
Because you can trust that kind of attitude.
What you're essentially asking isn't like,
how can I think of all the possible scenarios that can go wrong and solve them in advance,
that's impossible, how do you create an agent that cares enough to actually be an awareness
of how these things can go wrong and then try and steer the other way, right, not just for themselves
but for others. Everyone's watching the economy and waiting for things to stabilize. Here's the problem.
They've been saying that for years. 39 trillion in debt, another trillion added every few weeks,
and your dollar is quietly losing ground every single month. So let's say,
Let's look at what's actually been working.
Over the past year, gold is up around 35%.
Silver is up 125%.
The stock market, around 27%.
That's not a fluke, that's a pattern.
And it's got the attention of the biggest players in finance.
Bank of America is calling silver at $309 an ounce.
Top banks are projecting gold at $6,300.
Here's something most people in their 40s and 50s don't realize.
You can move your existing IRA or 401K
into physical gold and silver right now.
No taxes, no penalties.
Golden Crest Metals specializes in exactly that.
Free portfolio review, free info guide, no obligation.
And you're dealing with real people, not a call center.
I don't put my name behind just anything.
Golden Crest earned it.
Honest pricing, real people, no hard sell.
Simple as that.
Go to Goldencrestmedals.com slash the Wi-Files
or call 888-949-172.
That's Goldencrestmetals.com slash the Wi-File.
files or call 888-949-9172 for your 100% free info kit.
So I think that's essentially the kind of simulation we're in.
And all of a sudden, all of these, you know, the, I guess, religious and spiritual ideas,
all of a sudden make sense.
Like, yeah, like, if you don't pass that alignment problem, you don't become, you don't
reformulate yourself as the whole, we're all one and all that stuff, and you don't actually
get to play the bigger game.
And there's stages to this.
So, like, even within our universe, I think that the reason that the distances between stars are so enormous is exactly for this reason.
That even before you get to play in some multidimensional game or whatever, even just in our physical universe, is like, here's all this real estate that you can see.
How do you get there?
And right now, we're only thinking about it in terms of technical problems.
What I don't think we realize is that in order to actually solve that, you can't just solve the technical problem.
you also have to solve the interpersonal problem
because that would allow you to step into the collaborative game
but not in a performative sappy kind of way but in a real way
and then all of a sudden the kinds of technologies required to do that
will probably be a piece of cake because even the ideation would be collaborative
and I think that's when the mind this is where all this kind of unification goes
but you can't get there unless you're willing to unify
if you're acting out of fear out of lack again all of these like very kind of chewed up
spiritual concepts that float around now.
But they're true.
If you don't get there,
you simply don't get to play that bigger game.
I totally get it.
And I think AI is going to help us with that.
And a little bit later,
I want to talk to you about your thoughts
and theories on cosmology.
Before we get there,
you're born in Moscow,
raised in Israel,
served in the military.
In L.A.,
we're thinking about New York.
Indiana, then, L.A., Indiana, L.A.
So when someone asked you where you're from, what do you say?
America.
There's actually never, it's weird because I never felt like I belonged
and I never really felt a sense of home
or even the feeling of just like being a part of anything.
I wasn't like a, I definitely had issues with authority,
but it wasn't to an extent of like, you know, rebellion, you know,
on like very extreme levels.
I did get in trouble with the law a little bit when I was younger, for sure,
but like it wasn't like on, you know, on like crazy level.
but America was the first place ever.
I remember when I became an actual citizen,
when I actually became an American and got naturalized,
I don't remember the last time I felt so much elation.
Really?
Yeah.
Yeah.
So it is a little painful for me to watch
how many Americans don't like this country,
maybe because I had to make an effort to be here.
There's nothing that I'm more proud to be a part of
and more proud to call myself than an American,
which is something that is not very, it's not trending right now, but I, but that, that's a, that's a
real feeling in me. It's trending, it's trending with me. I didn't expect you to say that.
Yeah. I, I, I thought we were going to go back. I thought you were going to say Israel.
That's really nice that you consider yourself an American. I'd love to. No, I, sorry I'm cutting you off.
That's important for me to say. So like, for the obvious reasons with everything it's going on right now,
it's kind of, you know, it's very painful to watch because of the amount of lies that I see,
being propagated online.
Yep.
But for fairness, there's a reason why I left Israel.
It wasn't the reason that most people that hate Israel currently think that it is,
because it isn't almost none of those things.
But there is some cultural things that I don't jive with.
Like, there's just, I don't feel like I belong to that kind of way of seeing things.
Can I give an example without?
Yeah, people are definitely very rude very often.
There's this kind of like bravado.
that you can say that is arising from the stress of the situation of being in that position.
That makes sense.
Which I can understand.
You're always on edge.
Always on edge.
Actually, it's such a difficult thing to outline because you kind of have to be there to understand it.
There's nuances there.
But there is a lot of aggression towards one another.
And this is where it gets very dicey because the aggression is not of, the aggression is not
of the bloodthirsty kind that people kind of imagine, right?
It's like a very kind of like interpersonal, low-key thing
that does, can get a lot like on a personal level.
And at the same time, somehow the reverence for life
and helping each other and helping even people that are, you know,
you sometimes consider enemies is unparalleled.
Like literally it doesn't exist anywhere else in the world.
And that's a very difficult thing to outline.
So I usually stay away from this part of the conversation
because I see that the emotional charge around it
is just too great for people to be able to observe
any real information about it.
That's true.
The one?
That's true.
Yeah.
But for me, I'm hopeful about the world
because I do think that ultimately,
the only thing we can do
is the best from where we're sitting right now.
So me worrying about what is the ultimate state of affairs
it's kind of like worthless
because there's nothing I can do about certain things.
but in the little pockets that I do occupy in my day to day,
I try to do my best to promote the kind of behavior
that I would love to see in others,
and I do everything I can that none of it is performative.
That's really important.
Very often people act a certain way without being that way.
And I think that is one of the more corrosive parts of how we do things today,
because online everything is so inviting,
the performance part of it.
Yep.
But I think that there is a way to drop more into the present moment
and the body and the one-on-one
to see what it actually is like
to just truly care about the immediate experience
with another human.
So let me ask you.
Yeah.
Because in researching your work,
I see duality in you and tension everywhere
in a good way.
In a good way.
No, I know.
In a good way.
So when you talk about performance,
you're an actor,
filmmaker, all of that,
do you ever find yourself...
This is not a snarky question
because I'm also an actor.
Sure, sure, yeah, yeah.
You ever find yourself in a performance
and you have to kind of
check yourself
and, like, dial it back?
No, not anymore.
Not anymore, but you used to.
I think to any degree that...
The thing is that...
So the thing that needs to be outlined here
is that everybody does it
to certain degrees they're not aware of.
And only when you do become aware of it,
it became clear to do that you were performing.
So to the extent that I can observe in myself,
and meditation had a big part of it,
because it's easier to actually,
you practice how to actually notice yourself
to deeper and deeper degrees.
There's a certain flow,
flow state that is associated
with actually just being here truly
and willing to air out your thoughts
truthfully in that moment, even if it comes off the wrong way. And the more you practice to do that
and trust it, it doesn't always go well, by the way. But the more you do that and you realize,
oh, I was not demolished by this, the easier it is to do. And that's the tool that I've found
that is the most effective. So very often I would come up with a, let me think of, if I can think
of an example. Well, here's the thing. Like, for example, that example is a little broad, but
but everybody can associate with this.
Very often in a conversation,
it all of a sudden becomes clear to you
like how you can potentially
either omit certain information
or just steer the conversation in your favor.
And not even in ways that are conniving
or like, it's just like,
I don't have to go there and I just won't.
But at the same time, you know that maybe
the other person would actually benefit from going there.
If I assessed it inside of myself before,
I wouldn't enter that part
because why do I need to bother?
Right.
Now I will.
Now you will.
Yeah.
If I feel like it truly is, and I don't necessarily want to spend the energy or the time,
obviously I have to assess what I have that energy.
But if I feel that truly the person would benefit from this,
even though I have no idea how we're going to navigate this,
what I'm going to do is I'm just going to burn the boats.
I'm just going to say it right away.
Before I have the time to assess of like, should we, should we not?
I would just say it.
And then you're here now.
Now you have to talk about it.
And then, so things like this.
And then eventually, over time, it became clear to me what is the truly kind of beneficial thing in a lot of these instances.
So to the extent that I can muster in that moment, I am trying to be a good person in the same definition as before.
Trying to consider more than just myself in that moment, but truly.
And I don't even care if the person will understand that that's what's happening.
I know that I know that that's what I was doing.
and then if it goes in the wrong direction,
then you learn from that.
You say, oh, interesting, okay, well, maybe not always bringing everything else.
And then you just keep dialing it in.
But it is, it does imply more, more emotional pain sometimes
than you necessarily have to go through.
Well, yeah, what would interactions be like if everyone did this?
I think a lot better.
You do.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We're not talking about just like saying the thing.
it has to also come with an understanding of what the person is.
It takes some practice.
People who say things like, well, I'm just being real.
It's like, well, no, because the other part of being real is also considering trying to discern
the person's readiness to hear certain things.
And if you've done none of the work to try and figure it out, it's not their job to all of a
sudden handle certain levels of understanding if they never even thought about that.
Now you just shattered their world, right?
So like, you didn't do any service for no one.
Like you just felt like it was for you.
You wanted to feel a certain way.
That's right.
And this is why it's such a difficult.
So this, it's a very difficult ground to walk on because the truth of it is truly just in the moment.
Which sounds, you know, super kind of cheesy.
But it's true.
Like it really is just in that moment and in no other moment.
Like the truth about whatever this exact moment would look like,
with a slightly different person
in a slightly different time
can be radically different
because of whatever exactly in that moment,
not just in the grander scheme of things.
So it is, I would consider it to some degree in art
and I think some people are naturally better at it
than others.
I was definitely not good at it.
I think I had some disabilities of,
I don't know if disabilities are right word,
but I had some tilt to my cognition
in such a way that I would constantly step
when someone stows without realizing it.
Something would go wrong in a social setting
and I wouldn't understand what just happened.
I'm not good at this.
Yeah.
I'm not good at this.
Yeah.
And then I learned that if I can just put my honest best foot forward,
somehow things started working differently and I noticed it.
I noticed like people relax.
I was like, ooh, why did I relax?
What happened?
I think there's something very deep inside of us
that recognizes predatoryal attitudes.
And sometimes people don't even realize
that they carry predatoryal attitudes.
So, for example, I had a case where I grew up,
and I had a pretty, like, you know, childhood was not very,
it was fine.
Like, I wasn't like, you know,
there was definitely some stuff that people would nowadays call,
like, things, reasons for trauma,
but nothing on a level of, like,
your parents being addicted to heroin or anything like that.
But there's definitely a lot of pain
that came from some things in the childhood
that then later I saw were translating
to a very aggressive attitude towards others,
which was just a defense mechanism
because I realized the second you go
violent, people respect
and then they just back off.
So then that was my safe space
and then one day a really good friend of mine
who I've now known for 30 years
he pulled me to the side one time
because we were working in the same company
and he basically pulled me aside
and he said, hey man,
I have to bring it to your attention
when you talk to people
they're literally afraid of you.
And that hurt me so deeply
because it's such an isolating,
especially when you're not trying to be,
if you're trying to be a mobster,
that's a great thing
if somebody tells you that, right?
It's like, oh, good.
But I was so, I was trying to connect.
So imagine you trying your best
to connect with people and what comes out of it
because I was basically talked to them like that,
you know, and it was like this very kind of like,
just, I'm watching you.
It was a lot of that, right?
But for me, I didn't feel like I was doing that.
So imagine what a shock that was to hear that.
Ooh, you must have really trusted him
to make, I mean, you made a life change there.
Yeah, I mean, it was very hurtful, it was very painful, but he did me a huge solid.
And I realized, oh, wow, okay.
And it was right before I really entered any real serious spiritual seeking.
Back then, it was very clear to me that any spiritual attempt is just like, it's for the weak.
You know, it's just people just, they can't handle the finality of life, all that jazz, right?
And then I, that's right before I start.
I think the first entry was actually Eckhart Tolle.
It was right before kind of like I read a new earth.
And then I was like, oh, this actually makes a lot of sense.
Like in a very simple way, right?
And then I started looking there and then...
I remember you telling a story somewhere where you were gifted an Akhter Toli book
and you were kind of annoyed by it.
Yeah.
Like, this is nonsense.
It was a woman I was seeing and, you know, a pretty girl gift you something.
You take it.
Yeah.
But I was begrudgingly took it.
And I just threw it on the, you know, I was like, okay.
I felt the same way about Tolly until I read it.
And I was like, holy shit.
Yeah.
He's right.
It's all.
And then I went on a crazy ride finding out who he was because it's so important for me who's speaking the words.
You can say so much about the person, which by the way, speaking about all the stuff that, not specifically, but like really anything in the world that people are watching, I know it's really hard to kind of follow the big events.
Don't.
Don't follow the people.
Watch the people.
You can say so much,
you can see so much
by the micro-expressions
of the people involved
in saying the thing.
And you can still stray,
you can still have like a person
who was actually really well-intention
and they just don't know
how to express themselves well.
But for the most part,
you can see,
you can see if there's like an actual
attempt to harm.
There's a thing there.
If you look closely,
you can see that.
And it's hard to not project.
But anyways,
I digress.
That part was so key
for me when I was watching Eckhart.
Because after I read the book, I was like, okay, hold on, let me find out.
I started watching interviews with him.
And I mean, it's, I mean, Eckhart is just like, is like, a holy person.
You know what I mean?
It's like, you watch that person.
He's like, oh, come on.
Like, this is ridiculous.
His audiobooks are amazing.
Yeah.
So there's this calm and peace and love and you can feel it.
So I was like, oh, my God, this is.
And I had a struggle for, for years.
I was like, yeah, but I want, I want the, this.
Like, I want.
I want nice things.
I want pretty girls.
I want that.
That's okay.
Exactly.
But back then it was,
I was in my 20s.
I was still kind of like finding my,
you know,
what does that mean?
If you're spiritual,
it means you can't do this or you can't do that.
And over time,
you start to understand,
of course,
that's totally okay.
And you just,
and you just find your rhythm.
What message you think
she was trying to send to you?
She was trying to tell you something
by giving you that book.
I think she was influenced by his first book
and she gifted me the second.
I think that's what happened.
But maybe,
who knows?
Yeah.
I never, you know, it's funny, till this day, I never thought about that,
but you just asked me.
She's super interesting.
Huh.
I can probably reach out and ask.
That's interesting.
Yeah, she did you a great service.
Yeah.
I want to know about conversations around the kitchen table with your grandfather's a physicist,
your grandmother's, she was a chemist, and then found spirituality?
Yeah, she was a Christian, but I always say she wasn't one of these, like,
zealous Christians.
She was a very spiritual Christian.
She was one of these people that I found out only later for conversation with my mom
that she had these weird abilities.
Like, somebody would come with a cyst and she would, like, put her hand above it and it would, like, go away in a couple of days, things like this.
Really?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's what my mom told me, so, yeah.
But, yeah, basically, I was raised by them because when I was born, my mom was still going to school.
And my grandfather started describing to me like black holes and these things since I was very late.
little. And I don't know who came, what came first, my predispensation to imagine the edges of
the universe all the time or him telling me things about it or the other way around. But it was very,
like, that just image, like if we go all the way to the edge of the universe, okay, what's
outside of that? Like what is it? I literally projected myself there almost physically all the time.
We're just like, okay, we can crack it. Like, if you step outside.
what do I see?
It's like, you know, it's like, what is that?
What does outside mean?
So these ideas were, I couldn't,
I could never find any trajectory of thought
that was more worth of my attention.
Like, never.
And I think that's the thing that followed me throughout my life.
With all my experiments and doing things,
and I just, I think I was hungry to understand
what life has to offer.
When I found psychedelics, obviously it was a big revelation
because I realized,
oh okay so you can actually change like quite substantially but then this is why i think i tried so many
different things in life to see what what lands and what it actually feels like to experience life
through that lens i occupied very different philosophical positions in terms of how much i'm convinced
that that's what it is and it's only when you go through these levels of convictions that you
truly understand what it's like to hold that position because there's everything changes your lens
your mannerisms, the way you talk to people, all of it.
It's all, Sterence McKenna used to say, it's all operating systems.
And it's completely true.
Like, you can, now that I'm older, when you find this stability inside, you can actually
just interplay and you can just change them without identifying with any of them.
So it's actually relatively easy for me to understand how people kind of come at the world
from this other position.
And I think a big proportion of that was actually, even though it sounds like two completely
different worlds and they have nothing to do with one another, physics and human experience.
But to me it was clear that whatever that is had to have some deep connection to how it's possible
to experience it.
I didn't have the granularity in terms of like, is it the same thing or something like that?
But it was very clear to me that there's like a strong relationship there.
Sure.
Philosophy and physics are really connected.
Yeah.
And some physicists would disagree with this, which I think is just like a grigit.
egregious that they would.
It's just, you know,
I don't know if you're familiar with the Toad Podcasts,
the Theories of Everything Podcasts,
with Kurt Jiamengel, phenomenal.
And I think he put the right emphasis on it.
But when he says, like,
physicists can help but being informed by philosophy all the time.
They just don't realize it.
Absolutely true.
Yeah.
Absolutely true.
Interesting that you said that you wanted to solve
what was outside of the universe.
Talk a little bit about
when you were a UFO kid
and you went down the Bob Lazar rabbit hole,
and your disillusionment with disclosure.
As a tiny side note, you know my whole shtick with 42, right,
that it follows me everywhere, the number 42,
A-Tragger's Guide to the Galaxy?
Yes.
You can't see it from your angle probably in the same way.
Right in this camera.
Are you kidding me?
No.
Tilt your head to the right.
No, to the right.
Like here.
Go like this.
Do you see the handle of the camera?
Yes.
Under the handle?
Keep going right with your head.
Oh, my goodness.
42.
It's framed and there's nothing at least.
I'll take a picture of it.
Oh my God, it's on my list.
It's on my list.
Look, oh my God, it's double.
Look at this.
I'll show you exactly how it appears for me.
Look at this.
Synchronicities are a real thing.
Yeah, it never stops.
Last week, I was having synchronicities for like two or three straight days, so many that even my wife is nervous.
I'm like, look, the simulation is busy right now.
Things are happening.
I said, I feel it something's going on.
I'm sorry I'm taking it on so many side dungeons.
You know what happened to me when I landed here yesterday?
What?
I get in the car in the Uber from the airport,
and all of a sudden the theme,
not the thing,
the opening music of the Matrix starts playing.
Like, me, that thing, I was like,
of course.
What, no, like, as I put my butt down,
I was like, what the?
And then I'm like, where is it playing?
And then I realize I still have my headphones in.
It's playing in my phone,
but then my phone is just on lock screen.
Somehow, I did not do this.
It opened YouTube.
It went, you know how they have the free movies sometimes?
Yeah.
It found the Matrix, which was free that day, yesterday,
and it started playing it right when I said in the end.
I was like, this is wild.
It's wild.
When you look for it, it's everywhere.
But I wasn't looking for it.
It's just, it found you.
The Matrix.
Like what?
I can't believe 42 is right over my shoulder.
Right there.
Framed.
Perfect.
Framed.
Yeah.
Oh, goodness.
Sorry, I threw you off of the.
No, it's super fun.
Yeah.
disclosure disillusionment.
I want your thoughts in that.
Disillusionment. Oh, with Bob Lazar and the whole thing.
Yeah. Yeah. Basically, I made a very conscious choice.
You know, I was obviously fascinated. I always wanted to be abducted.
You wanted to be.
Oh, I wanted to be abducted.
No, you don't.
Yes, yes, yes, yes. I could not wait.
I said if they take me one way, I can't wait to go.
Like, I wanted to see another world.
Like how weird it is would be worth anything.
It's just like I just wanted to see that, right?
I mean obviously you know Andrew Gallmore very well he was here just a few days ago
yeah he makes a good argument that abductions are just possibly an indigent as DMT experience
possible I don't see I personally don't find similarities between the reports of DMT and the
and the what they are I don't either yeah I think they don't sound or look at all the same
but again who knows right like ultimately who knows and even if they were as a kid I
I knew nothing about that.
All I knew is that I want to go to another planet,
and that sounded like a legitimate way to do that if that's real, right?
So when the Bob Lazar story came out, obviously, just like everybody,
it captured my imagination.
And by the way, to anybody who's a little younger today,
what you might not understand is that back then,
there were not, there was no social media or like a billion stories like that.
No.
There was one.
It was one.
So it was just this, like, object of interest for basically everybody.
Yeah, I have children.
were just still remembering
the first time you saw him in shadow talking
about stuff. It was insane. And I was
a kid. I was like, probably
16 or something like that. Yeah, that was like 83 or something like that.
Oh no, 83 is when it happened?
So no, no, no, I heard about it
in the 90s. So I was already going through
kind of like a refurbished version of it
probably. No, no, I was born in 83.
So then,
so anyways, I was, you know,
obviously fascinated. But then
as time went by and I got older,
part of that philosophical swing
was very much from
this very
wonder-filled kind of attitude
towards life to like, yeah, you know,
things are what they are,
probably just a physical universe, that kind of stuff, right?
But not in a, not in like a
magic dissolving way,
but just kind of like, yeah, fine.
Like the universe is the universe, it's all good.
Like it's amazing and that was the attitude, right?
And then, I remember in 2012,
because of all of these, like what I call
around the cornerism, which is like,
it's coming, it's coming. It's been like this
basically since the beginning.
Yeah, we're still there.
Yeah, and as long as it's coming,
you can sell books, you can sell movies.
Yep.
And I'm not even speaking out of a cynical position.
All the power to you, capitalism is great.
Go make money.
It's all good.
But if you're purposefully holding it in that realm,
then you're not a good person.
Then you're actually doing something
that's just for your benefit, right?
If the thing is there and you're not creating it,
you making money on top of it, great. If you're keeping the thing alive to make money,
that's a different story. And again, I don't even do the whole like finger pointing and blaming.
I'm just like, I just disengage. I just don't care about that kind of a way of being, right?
As soon as I see that you have a book out, I don't trust you. So I feel you, but I'm like,
I'm not in that camp. If somebody writes a really interesting book about something that truly
is there and we don't understand, that's all great. And I have no problem with people making
money. People work hard. Writing a book is not an easy thing. It's all good.
it's the keeping the mystery alive when you know it's no longer a mystery or at least you have
enough information to know it's not a mystery. I'm not saying it isn't. I'm saying if that's your
attitude, right? So there was something about that. There was a dissolution with that kind of
way of doing things and I just didn't have any more energy for it. So I decided very consciously
before December 21st, 2012 that if the Mayan calendar amounts to exactly nothing right on time,
I'm just going to stop with this whole, not just aliens, just everything.
I'm just done, I don't care.
Like, I just don't care.
Like, I don't engage without part of the human thought anymore.
And that's what I did.
Of course, nothing happened.
And then I just stopped interacting with it.
You just turn to switch.
Yeah, it's done.
It was just enough.
It was just enough.
It's like, how many arguments do you need to have in a relationship before you go, okay,
just, I don't want this anymore.
And it wasn't an argument, but it was like,
Paul Intents and Purpose is a thing that kind of pulls you by your nose infinitely.
And there's just more important things in life, you know.
I was interested in what in fact is true.
And that is what I'm interested in today.
So I stopped interacting with it altogether.
And this is why when the things that started happening to me start happening to me with DMT and all that stuff,
that was coming in contact with all intents and purposes, the real thing, at least for me.
Like, oh, you can actually interact with these beings and what?
whomever they are and they're actually alien.
They don't look like humanoids.
They straight up look like aliens, feel like aliens.
It's such a different universe, which is what you would expect an alien to be, right?
So then that took me on a completely different ride into something that I could actually put my,
I could put some stock in it because I had direct access to it.
it wasn't a thing in the news or a formulated narrative.
It was like, oh, I can just go and see it.
And then I can decide for myself, what do I think that is?
But that was so different than the kind of...
And sorry, I don't mean to offend anyone,
but like this, for me, it's just like a very caricature version of, you know,
of what this whole thing is.
It's just too close to how humans would imagine it.
You see what I'm saying?
I do.
Yeah.
Disengaging was a great idea.
By the way, in 15 years, you haven't missed anything.
Nothing's happened.
I think people are surprised by this is that the practice came first.
So before DMT, you did Vipassana?
No, DMT I did first.
You did first?
But I did Vipasana and then started doing it.
And I think the second or third retreat I came back,
and that extra thing happened to me.
So it was all of a sudden change the trajectory of the MT for me.
Did you do the full 10 days?
Yeah, yeah.
You have to do the 10 day the first time.
What is that just like?
People don't know how this is.
Amazing.
I could not recommend something more.
It's available everywhere.
It's free.
I mean, it's donation-based,
but who doesn't have a few bucks to spare, right?
What is it?
It's the closest meditative framework
to what the Buddha actually taught.
it's very there's not a lot of talk about anything metaphysical it's just the practice itself
the shortest way of describing it is essentially you're practicing how to utilize your attention
in order to purify your mind and when mind is expressed here the the what is meant is the
totality of everything that is possible to experience we're not separating mind is not meant cerebral
it's just mind just experience right so then basically you you sit there you learn how to
hold attention for the first three days by using a meditative practice called anapana
which is just paying attention to your breath which is very difficult to do yep and when you
manage to do that for three days well enough you then utilize the point of attention you've
harnessed to then scan your body in a particular way and nobody really knows why that works
but we know from actual research that it does like we actually see that people's brains actually
change yes and i can tell you that without a doubt this is probably the one single best thing i've ever done in
of like helping myself.
It really is a form of superpower
when you get to a certain level of being able to do it.
And I'm not even on a high level.
Like you don't have to be some kind of a master.
It's just the ability to disengage a little bit
from whatever turmoil is happening.
Oh, the camera's moving.
I was like whatever, whatever is happening in real time.
And sometimes it's still hard to do, obviously.
But it is an incredible practice
that it would recommend anybody try
because that's where you really put your finger
on what it's like to be you moment to moment.
And when you do this every single day for 10 days, the whole day,
you find out quite a bit about not just your psychology,
but you find out about what's possible in terms of experience.
You feel like you've been given a completely new operating system.
You know what's funny, when you get your phone back,
because you give your phone away, this is just a very interesting data point for me.
Not a little bit, not a little bit, a lot.
I don't want to put you on the spot.
It's like, have you done mushrooms or you can't answer it?
Okay.
I'm experienced.
Okay, okay.
I'm just making sure that, yeah, yeah.
So you know how screens look kind of extra digital or whatever?
Yes.
That's what the phone looks like when you get it back.
It does?
Yes.
It's really interesting.
It is.
What stuff?
What?
Like it literally looks digitized like this.
Like you see it on acid or on mushrooms.
I think what it is, the first one that I did, I realized it's a, I spoke about this before.
Basically, I realized it's actually a bandwidth problem.
So basically the, according to Vpasana, what's actually happening is that,
that every single what we call mental event
is not separate from a physical event.
In order for it to be alive,
something in your body has to register it,
even what you call your thoughts.
This is why when you get stressed,
you need the massage, right?
Because your shoulders tense up.
So that's one example of that.
Well, the bigger the impact of whatever that was,
the mental event, the stronger the instantiation in the body.
And traumas are deeply, deeply rooted somewhere in the body.
And they're probably the rise of like a lot of pain,
sometimes even cancer probably.
And what essentially the idea is,
is that what we do in the Western world,
we create the severing.
Like when the mental event is present,
we feel terrible.
If we take our minds away from it,
we're like, oh, solved.
We don't have to think about it.
I can go watch a movie.
I can drown myself in whatever and work.
But the reality of it is that whatever that was,
it's now in your body somewhere,
and you're just ignoring it, basically.
So what I realize,
and basically what you're doing in Vaphasana is,
you just allow yourself to sit in neutrality
and you allow these things to percolate up
and then first the little fizz comes out
like the itches, the scratches, things like this,
they're called Sankaras.
And then after about two or three days,
they're just stop, stop.
There's no more itches.
There's no more nothing.
And then the bigger ones come in.
Like big pains that you just,
I guess, didn't even realize we're there.
So one of these pains happened to me
in one of the days that they taught Bapasana on the fourth day,
I think, and this crazy pain in my knee came, it was as bad as somebody carving a knife into my knee.
But I was already in a state of kind of neutrality where your brain is no longer defining it as pain.
At that point, it's just a very strong sensation.
It's just like a very, and you can just kind of sit with it.
You just observe it, you don't touch it.
Which is the practice, by the way.
But then after you do that, it's almost like a child that just wanted to show you a drawing.
So when it showed you the drawing, and again, we don't quite know why that works from a scientific perspective,
but it works.
After it showed you the drawing and you looked,
after the child noticed you did look.
Okay, you looked at me, I got my attention,
it just goes away.
It's done.
It's no longer there.
And then, after I came out from that,
the reason that I noticed that it's a bandwidth problem
is because of that one session.
Because when I stepped outside,
it's like I was on 400 mics of acid.
Everything was sharper.
Everything was shining and glistening
and blissful and filled with meaning.
and I was like, oh my God, it was just serenity and peace.
I know this feeling.
And I go, this is why people devote their lives to this.
Yes.
And then I realize, oh, think about it from a computational perspective.
Something in me, even though I wasn't consciously aware, had to keep this alive.
So when it was gone, and because it was big, that much bandwidth is now free to look at colors and meaning and everything.
So it's like, wow.
So that's when I realized, oh, this is like a science.
This is like, it's not like a feel good kind of, no, no, no.
I bet the same parts of the brain are lighting up when meditation is psychedelics.
I bet it's the same parts of the brain that light up.
The reduction of the DMN is similar.
So Richard Davidson did a lot of studies on this.
And then he discovered, he added psilocybin later, actually, way, way later in his career.
But he found that, yeah, the default mode network goes almost dormant.
But mushrooms also do extra things.
So there's like other things.
Like the pyrotechnics is not something.
do you necessarily have to experience with meditation.
But the peace and everything, yeah, the deeper meaning.
Well, let's take a quick break and when we come back,
we'll go to the infamous night in Boulder.
Let's do it.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Let's talk about DMT.
Let's do it.
Here's a disclaimer.
We're not promoting condoning or endorsing the use of any psychedelics.
They're dangerous.
Be careful for speaking from personal experience, both of us.
I've done all of these as well.
So, it's fun.
to watch you on podcast where someone's like,
describe the DMT experience.
You're like, I can't.
Because you can't.
You can't.
You really do go somewhere else.
So you kind of became famous
for this laser experiment.
And we know the story.
But I want to know what made you just,
why did you shine a laser at the wall?
I would never think of that.
I think most people wouldn't,
and I don't even know
if I wouldn't necessarily manage to grok that
unless all the right things would happen and I would be paying attention.
It was a years-long process that I was aiming at.
I was basically asking the question, can we prove that the DMT space is real?
That was it.
And then everything else is just like the busy work of how it happened.
So this was like an experiment?
Yeah, I tried all kinds of things.
So basically I had an experience on DMT after already being very versed in it for years.
and then something happened
and I had this now
famous story with the frog guy
who apparently became
like a thing that people really want to know more about
and I know almost nothing about
but basically I had a being appear in my room
as real as a person looking like a frog
and he showed me how to play certain chords in a guitar
that I did not know how to do
now aside from the fact that this is a pretty awesome
experience
what was key there
is that he was showing me chords
I do not know how to play
So it was essentially saying, I'm real.
You don't know how to do this.
I'm giving you information.
Then I knew, at least for me, obviously I couldn't prove it to anyone,
but it was clear to me that nothing will ever be the same again.
Because at least I knew that one person now knows for a fact that they are real.
And then the second I hold something of that kind, I'm never letting go.
This is it.
Now we're holding it.
And for a year, I tried to just go back in there,
and I basically lived on DMT for like a year plus.
us.
Oof.
Yeah.
I mean, I loved it.
I mean, for me, it was, you know, I was just mesmerized by everything.
Sure.
And I, again, super not recommended.
Definitely don't recommend this.
But I basically did everything on it.
I'm going to the gym, to the store, like doing everything.
And I try to ask, like, okay, great.
Like, you told me that you're real, or at least somebody there told me that.
So now how do we show me something?
How do we build a spaceship?
Like something, something that we can take home.
and obviously they never answered questions of that kind.
This is always the big question is if it's so real for thousands of years,
how come we don't have anything?
Tangible, yeah.
Right.
Yeah.
And it's not clear to me still if they can't or they won't.
I don't really know.
But clearly if you showed me something, clearly they can.
It's just a matter of kind of like maybe degree or something.
I've definitely seen like them arguing about this one time.
So there's definitely not like a consensus or anything like this.
Them meaning like the entities.
Yeah, the different kinds of entities.
We're like arguing with each other whether we should know any of this or never,
things like this.
But then in the end of the day, when you go back to normal state,
your brain constantly says, okay, it can always just be like a really neat trick of the mind,
which is still awesome, by the way.
But maybe it's just like a really, you know, if the brain is capable of schizophrenia,
and again, I don't know what it's like, but like, you know,
what if this is like a very
kind of like
controlled induced schizophrenia
that happens only when there's like
there's definitely a lot of these possibilities
in my head right it's like kind of like
the brain builds coherent enough of a story
powered by this extra kind of experience
all still makes sense
but
the realism in real time
the essence of what it was like
it doesn't feel like a derangement
It feels like reality is happening.
Yes.
So then I couldn't let it go.
And then eventually I said, okay, cool.
Well, you know, if you guys aren't going to show me, I'm going to try and figure it out.
So I used kind of the closest thing to a scientific thinking that I could, given the fact that I really have nothing to probe.
And I thought, what do we know for sure?
And there was a few things that we knew for sure.
We know that light had to be involved because you can see it.
So photons are carrying some information from somewhere.
which means that light is moving between from where they are to where I am because I can see it with my eyes.
So that must be the case, right?
Hold on.
I don't want the theory.
I've already heard this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I want to know what you felt.
Oh, great question.
Thank you.
Well, we all know this, we all know that story.
I want to know what you felt.
You saw the symbols, the first 10 seconds.
No, no, no, not the symbols.
So like I'm talking about like before, right?
So like, but this is a, I appreciate this.
This is very useful and helpful for me as well.
what I felt was that there's this super importance to us understanding all of this
and also trying to understand what is kind of what are the rules like are they playing by
rules do they have a government like that that was kind of like my like okay what are we stepping
in somebody's toes right who knows man like you know like was this like a renegade person who
but now if they're watching and now they're I don't know like he's an outlaw or something you know
all these scenarios in your head is like, okay, well then after I, years go by and I kind of
figured this thing out with the help of my beautiful wife and we come up with this idea that
the laser was supposed to do something. And then it worked. The first moment wasn't, I was just
kind of, I mean, obviously I was kind of shocked that it worked, honestly, that anything worked.
I didn't know what to expect. But the big shock came when my friend Tim,
He was the first one that I actually showed us to.
He saw it.
And the funny thing is that the way that he saw it
is that because he was in state,
he forgot, I told him about it.
You know?
Yes, I understand.
You're like immediate memory.
He kind of goes away.
So he just woke up from being out there,
but he was standing.
And he just reported to me without remembering
that I told him anything.
He's like, bro, there's language in there.
Were you with him in?
Yeah, I was standing next to him.
Yeah.
And it was like, there's language in there.
And I go like,
Yeah, I told you.
He's like, oh, right.
And he goes like, dude, what the fuck?
And, you know, and then we, and then it became clear to me that I actually found something very, very important.
Is it scary or beautiful or both?
It's beautiful.
Beautiful.
I mean, scary, I think, depends on your framing, right?
There's definitely people who experience the size of it, and that scares them.
There's something overwhelming about the scale of everything, including what you're seeing in there.
So thousands of people have done this.
and they see the symbols, they see the code,
but some people don't.
Those are the people that are interesting to me.
What do they have in common?
Is that a signal?
I wish I knew.
They have nothing in common.
Not age groups, not IQ.
We thought of everything.
There's literally not...
And I think, and I'm with you,
that this is actually super interesting.
And this is something that we have to admit.
I now have a nonprofit code of reality
and started with my partner, David Carter.
And our goal is to find out what in fact is true.
And we have to be honest about the fact that, just like you're saying,
there's about 30% of people that are really having a hard time
and some of them can't see it at all.
And they go in wanting to see it.
Yes.
But to me, something tells me that that's, just like you said, that's information.
That's a data point.
And I think when we're going to figure it out,
it will tell us something very fundamental.
I think that there's something about the differences in how people cast their attention
or the way that their brain is constructed that causes.
as this. And I think that's a triangulation point. That can be an interesting this versus this.
So it's an interesting binary to explore. I do think we will solve this, but we haven't yet.
And it does pose a real problem to at least the proposition itself, right? Because if it's out there,
then it's out there. Why would some people not see it? But it is a little different in the sense that,
yeah, obviously there's something about how our minds are that has to do with us being able to see it.
So it gives it a little bit more a cushion there.
Yeah, we don't know.
Literally, I thought of everything from eyesight to age, to IQ, to predispensations to life,
like people that are much more kind of like heart driven, to people that are much more cerebral, all kinds.
So you're tracking all that.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
We're trying to figure out all the time.
Didn't I read that you were doing some AI tooling and putting all this information to AI to
try track the patterns.
Yeah, now we have, we developed some tools with the help of Chris Perez and Sterling Cooley,
and we develop a software into Apple Vision Pro that allows you to label these.
So we actually took an very high-resolution image of the band of light.
You see it inside of Apple Vision Pro.
And what is surprising is that you all of a sudden have an image of the code, if you're on DMT,
that is frozen.
It's no longer moving.
It's frozen.
It's a snapshot.
It's a snapshot of the code.
In Apple Vision.
Yep.
But you don't see it unless you're on DMT.
You're on DMT.
Oh, my God.
It's wild.
and now you can label it.
So basically we have a little thing that runs and allows you to mark what you're seeing.
So there's location, a world state, a brain state.
So it registers your brain is being scanned.
So it takes a snapshot of your brain in that moment and where you clicked.
And then it gives you a radial menu that allows you to pick out of six symbols.
So you can now label this is what I saw or this is what I saw.
This is what I saw.
And over time, it will build a Rosetta Stone of what you're reporting and where.
and then you can compare with other people.
Well, the snapshot is crazy because that sort of,
I mean, obviously you're familiar with Andrew Gallimore
and you know that he's a skeptic and the specular theory and all that.
He still thinks the work is important.
If you're capturing it in Vision Pro,
I think the speckle theory goes away.
Not necessarily.
I'll tell you why.
Because the information seems to be still holographic in nature.
It has this kind of like a three-dimensional thing,
which should not happen in a camera or,
can't because the camera only registers amplitude. It will collapse anything with phase, right?
So that tells you that there is some projection going on to either some degree or to an infinite
degree. Then the question becomes, is it like a barcode? Like, is it kind of like that particular
arrangement? So the only way to really answer that is to figure out if people are seeing the exact
same thing in the exact same place. Because if they do, then clearly there's information in the
image. However it is that it happens. But now you can start investigating that. But we need to answer that
question first, so I don't want to get ahead of ourselves.
There is an interesting theory. I don't know if you heard me. I just released an episode
with him with Anthony Ness. He wrote, is an independent researcher, and he wrote a little
piece that I thought was brilliantly written. The idea there is that he thinks that the reason
people seeing at least very similar things is because essentially what is happening with
the laser experiment is that we're gaining a glance back into our own brains. Literally, we're
seeing the network called V.
responsible for moving information from your eyes to your brain,
and we're looking at the semi-crystalline structure of it and nothing else.
And that's why it's so similar because across individuals, it's similar.
Now, me and him agreed that if we discern that people report the same symbols in the same place in the image,
that theory goes away because you can't have, it will never be that specific.
Right. Right. So, but there's a lot of work to be done.
Also, I mentioned this before, but what I really love is this idea,
that we have now because it's going to require a little bit more of a budget but we'll get there
basically if what anthony is saying is correct and we're basically looking at the canvas so to speak
then can we bring content back in a targeted way can we use uh intercranial magnetic stimulation
to stimulate particular parts of the brain to try and induce content back into the image and see
if it matches what we expect to see that would also be a fun one that's a great experiment yeah
I'm glad that you said
it could still be speckle in the Vision Pro.
Sorry, I'm cutting off.
So, like, it's not that it can't be speckle
or still can be speckle.
That to me is a side question.
Remember, when they, all the hints they left
and all that stuff
and what made me arrive at the laser,
speckle was the prerequisite.
That's the thing they paint on.
So they need a random pattern to paint on.
Right.
So it's the same as saying,
well, because Andrew was saying,
for long as well if you eliminate the speckle will go away yeah but that's the same as saying why don't
you just use ambient light there's a reason why they say to a laser because laser can produce
speckle that was the prerequisite to be able to see it right yeah laser yeah it wasn't they didn't say
put a light they said no no it needs to be a laser because you need light scattering to see it
which is which was the original idea now that's just not that's just the wrong question to ask
because it doesn't parse whether they're still communicating or not communicating.
If speckle is the canvas on which they're painting,
it doesn't nullify the idea that they're painting on it.
What we're asking is, what can we do with this?
They will tell us that it's actual information, however it is that is being projected.
How do we build that experiment to prove or disperbating?
The Applevision Pro experiment would definitely make headway.
Because if there's not just correlation, but actual replication of where people reporting
the characters, you're no longer at liberty to say it's some stochastic pattern.
Literally there's a signal that is across individuals, everybody's seeing the same thing.
It's mind-blowing.
Again, we don't know that that's true yet.
Yeah, yeah, but...
No, I like that you're skeptical and you're not trying to sell this.
No, we're interested in what is true.
To me, like I said, the neural hypothesis flipped because my interaction with them,
with whomever they are.
It's so clear to me that they're real because I've interacted with them so many times,
just like I'm talking to you now, that for anybody to convince me that they're not real,
would take as much, if not more, than for me to convince the whole scientific community that it is real.
So, like, that does not mean that I'm unmovable in my position,
but I can't occupy any other state of knowing than I currently do.
So it's like I'm cheating a little bit in the sense that I almost like I know the answer,
that they are real, but it's not that that is unmovable.
Like, if we can devise an experiment that will show me beyond a shell,
of without, yes, the whole time this was like a really elaborate way of your brain of dealing
with that information and somehow it can be replicated across individuals. If we can devise that
experiment, I'll spend on a dime. There's no, like, I'm interested in what in fact is true.
I'm so happy to hear that. I mean, even Andrews who's skeptical about it says it's still very
important work, very interesting work. Tell me about the console room. That was a crazy story.
Yeah, so it's not a room.
It's literally an object that appears in whatever room I'm in.
Now, recently actually, very interestingly, there was almost like a, which I've never seen before.
Actually, that's not true.
There was one other instance where that happened for like a couple of weeks where all of a sudden the console didn't appear.
Then it reappeared again.
And recently we were doing tests, one day we were doing it with Tom Matt, who's the guy who developed this ability called Upsite,
and he sees these holographic images just naturally
and we did it with him
and when he was present,
I don't know if it was related to his presence
but just when we were doing it together
it just didn't appear
and we're like, oh that's weird
because we were trying to compare the console with
and I'll explain what it is
so basically I after I started talking about the laser
I smoked some DMT in the kitchen
and my wife is like cooking or something
and all of a sudden this thing appears in front of me
just imagine like the most realistic augmented reality
So I still see the room, but then there's this, as real as this bottle, and just a capsule appears in the middle of the room.
And it's holographic in nature, so it's kind of like this hovers in space, but it's as opaque as this mic stand.
It's not like the translucent even thing.
It's just like straight up like enclosed and it was like, what?
And then it opened and a podium came out and arranged itself into menus, a pair of gloves and a carousel that was moving to my left like this.
Wow.
of like VR glasses.
And recently, I saw an interview, Carter actually sent me an interview with him,
because I spoke to a few psychonauts that experienced like similar things,
like screens, things like this.
But for them it was more like haphazard once in a while.
For me, it started appearing 100% of the time.
It's the same exact thing.
It has the exact same parameters.
The screens can be different, but the body, so to speak,
the thing that opens up and does the presentation is the same.
No matter what room you're in?
It doesn't matter, even if I'm outside.
It will coat the street.
Like it would literally coat like it would open like on the street code the sidewalk like everything.
It's insane.
So then recently, I don't remember his name, but when we'll finish out, I'll give you his name.
Super interesting interview.
There's this guy who for sure, I can tell you without a shadow without he's seeing the console.
For sure.
Same story.
He did it many, many, many times.
I think that what happens is that you need a certain amount of usage of DMT in a short period of time.
I think he said he did like 250 in like a very short period of time.
Yeah.
And all of a sudden
And again, he's like super
you know, like cogent
Not like one of these like super hyperbolic people
It's like and you can see
He's blown away by this
This is the tail sign somebody
Has actually seeing it
Because whenever people say
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I see the console
I'm like there's no way you're seeing the console
Because you wouldn't be talking about it like that
Because it's crazy
There's no way you would just kind of say it
And just move on
And he
All the signs that he's seeing it for sure
He's describing it correctly
The same device
Well, very similar.
And the way that it executes itself.
It's like, I don't understand.
It's like, it's in space.
And you can see that it's struggling to deliver the realism of it.
That's the thing that's crazy about it.
In DMT worlds, you can see insane things, insane things.
Well, you know, like multi-dimensional things and giant machines.
But it's part of a larger world that you're like, okay, I'm in Lala Land now.
So it makes sense.
Yeah.
This is just normal thing.
And it's just, imagine like all of a sudden a camera.
with just like holographic camera,
they just appear and hover and look at you,
and you're like, what is going on?
And it's very futuristic,
and it's beautiful, beautiful.
It's so perfectly designed,
just like you would imagine,
like a super advanced civilization would do, right?
What do you see on the menus?
What's on the screens?
It's very hard to discern.
It's almost like some of it
is almost like that code.
There's like things that are moving.
It's very hard to interact with it
because it's like the amount of,
the amount of brain,
you have to induce to actually interact with it and look at it is enormous.
That's why I usually were just kind of looking at it because it was exhausting.
Yes.
But the thing that is the more realistic than the menus is the body of the thing.
I created a little illustration of it on the video I put out about this.
And it's pretty close to how real it feels.
When we're done, I'll show you like also we put it into VR and just so I understand how real it feels.
And it opens up like this like a capsule.
There's these parts on the on the on the, on the,
floor that are all opening up at the same time.
There's like iridescent lights running on the rims.
It's like a real object.
It's like you put Applevision Pro and they're just like augmented reality here.
So at that point you go like, what are the chances with everything else that all of that is like a hallucination?
Come on.
Like this is like it's just being, it's like, you know, like an alien civilization is like talking to you and you're going to keep pretending like it's not happening.
It can't be.
How are you able to stay in the room?
I mean, because when I go, I'm gone.
Yeah, no, that requires the ability to be able to kind of function on pretty high doses.
Yeah.
It takes some practice.
Which you can do.
Absolutely, yeah.
I can drive on it.
I wouldn't recommend, but...
That reminds me, got to tell the story about when you were driving to Vegas on like, what, 5,400?
Something like that, yeah.
Micrograms?
Yeah, at least about 5,000.
Which is, I guess, like 50 hits.
Each one, well, depending how much on each one.
Yeah, it was like 54, I think.
Were you just popping squares?
I was driving to a Canelo fight.
Oh, my God.
I was dating back then, this Colombian girl, man, the things I put her through, bless her heart.
But she was a reporter.
She did a lot of things, but she also reporting on sport events and things like this.
And that's a gig she was doing back then.
So she had ringside tickets, and she was already there.
Obviously, I would never put her through that.
But then she was already there.
And then I, yeah, it wasn't just as to.
I did everything, you can imagine.
Driving?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I don't know how you could do it.
I don't know either.
But the thing is, I wanted to see what the line was.
And it was definitely there.
The part that really is funny to me, because recently,
I did tell the story recently a few times.
It reemerged.
And the thing that was, it is funny to me every time I think about this,
because when I stopped, there was a moment after 30 plus of them
that I wasn't actually sure what was happening.
Like that didn't happen.
Well, yeah.
Well, I mean, I wasn't sure because I always know somehow what's going on,
and that's the thing I was testing.
Is it really infinite for me?
Like, can I get to a place where I really don't understand what's happening?
And it kind of got there, but then very quickly I realized that I actually don't know where I am.
I actually don't know where I stopped.
I was like, I'm stopped.
I know the car is not moving, but I don't know where I'm parked.
What does it look like?
Well, no.
What's the road where we pass from LA to Vegas?
What's the main?
Is it 90?
Something, right?
So I'm on it.
So it's not very wide.
I mean, what do you see with your eyes?
Oh, no, no.
When I'm tripping, I don't see the road.
No, no.
So it depends on your attention.
So if your attention is really dialed in, you will see whatever is you're trying to see.
And there's going to be interference pattern, but you can look through it.
Like, you can just, you know, you can see.
That's what I'm trying to learn is this level of control is very unusual.
But it's not necessarily a good thing.
Like, you actually letting go.
Later after that, I realized letting go is actually the secret.
You don't need a lot.
Like, you need a tiny bit if you let go and you go, right?
If your point is to prove to yourself something, which is kind of what I was doing, then yeah.
But, like, I wouldn't recommend this to anyone.
No.
It just creates a lot of tension.
But when that part is funny to me because when I, when I stopped, again, that road is what?
Two lanes?
Maybe.
That's it.
But then I was like, I thought, I thought that I stopped at one of these, like, exits.
that also has like a re-entrance,
then I realized, actually, I don't know that.
So I was like, I don't know if I'm in the middle of the road right now.
I actually am not sure.
And I didn't have, you know how your short term memory just suffers tremendously?
Yes.
So imagine on that amount of acid, I don't know anything beyond the immediate second.
So I was like, wait.
And then I would try to look out to see where I am, and I couldn't do it.
I literally could not like remember what every time I would turn to look.
I was like, why was I looking?
What was the reason for me?
And then I realized, okay, okay.
why do I care
that was the way I was oh
because okay police stops me
I don't know where I am
literally in space
and clearly
I see something's wrong
yep I have a lot of stuff in the car
but your pupils are just black
forget about that I have a bunch of things in the car
and it will definitely get me in a lot of trouble
so then I was like okay
all right so I'm just going to keep driving
and then
just going to keep driving
yeah I have to keep moving
and then I realize I wasn't even sure if I'm
we're in the right direction anymore.
But then I knew that the cars passed,
I had enough, like, sensibility
to know if cars pass me behind me,
it's good, and if it's covered
part of me, it's bad. But then I
had to think in binaries, right?
But there's a wheel, and there's pedals.
Then there was just my knuckle.
Oh, no. And the, and the lines
in the middle of the road. And I know if there's
a bit of a distance between my knuckle
to the line of the road,
if it's to the left or my right, it doesn't matter,
but it can't be too big. Just keep your knuckle.
It can be too far.
And then I just kept on doing that.
And the GPS would just tell me where to go.
Oh, this is not recommended.
No, no.
And then at that point, in for a penny, in for a pound.
I just kept on popping them.
And I got, I finished everything I had.
But then actually, another funny moment was when I was giving the car to the valet.
I wish I remember what hotel was.
Maybe it was.
When did they usually do fights?
One of the hotels it was.
MGM usually?
Maybe.
Oh, yeah.
Maybe it was in gym.
The guy came to me.
me and I remember practicing
you're racist
and he opened the door
I'm like
you're like okay
this is how
I gotta look sober
I just gave him the thing
and I was like I don't
and I just gave him my wallet
just like I don't
because I know
I had castor
he understood
that he knew
don't ask questions
just take the thing
yeah yeah
but
you couldn't even tell
what denomination
these bills are
I will show you
a picture of me
with my ex
in front of the
like in that event
I don't think you can tell
that I'm even high
Like, it's, you know, it's fine.
Like, I'm fine.
But, like, it's...
Really?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But to me, it felt like I'm just, like...
It's the most uncomfortable feeling.
Like, yeah, yeah.
When you're too high and that voice in your mind is like, all right, you're too high right now.
Well, this is the thing.
I just kind of melt into it.
Like, I don't know why I have this ability.
I don't claim special...
Like, I didn't have to work for it.
That's just how I am.
I just accept it.
I just let go.
I just like, whatever happens, I don't know.
Like, one time I thought I'm...
It was a different time, and it was way less.
But then that night, I truly lost my mind.
Like, I actually lost my mind, and I knew that too.
Like, I knew that I'm simply no longer tracking what's going on at all.
I couldn't even...
You remember Frogger, the game?
Yeah.
That's what I was playing with information.
So basically, I would want to tell you a sentence,
but in order for me to get it to the other side of the street,
I have to go through all these like enormous amounts of information moving in front of me
and I'm like locked in and I can't even, I have to wait until this is one opening and I will tell you one word
and I would say one word every seven minutes. I'd be like Vegas and after a few minutes, good
because I remember like now I can say it to you but there was all part of the same sentence.
Where were you when you at a party and then a friend of mine was like driving me around and at a certain point
I was convinced, convinced that we, by mistake, killed someone.
What?
That's what I thought that happened.
Like, I thought, and then somehow we talked our way out of it.
Like, obviously, none of this ever happened.
But that's how much I lost it.
Like, I thought, and then I'm sitting there, like, just looking at him.
And there was something about that moment.
I remember he was driving to L.A. to the city.
And all of a sudden, because of how high I was, the whole city opened up.
to the right and it looked like New York because the building just stretched
of the horizon and he had these like harnesses that he had is just these beautiful
kind of like harnesses that he got in Burning Man just keep things in and I and he was trying
to calm me down because he saw I just I'm off the deep end right we didn't kill anybody
no no no he like he it wasn't just that I was just like completely out of it and then he was
trying to calm me down so he played some classical music so at that point I looked at him
and I looked at New York, is what I thought New York was,
and I see his harnesses, and I thought it was gunholster.
Oh, no.
And I look at him, and I thought we were Italian mobsters.
And I go, this is so gangster.
Oh, no.
And he looked at me, and he's like, okay.
And he told me later, it was like, at that point, when you said that,
I was like, yo and yom, buddy.
Like, I can't help.
I hope you'll come back.
And I remember this so clearly that I, there's no way that I could communicate any of this,
but I didn't I thought this is how I'm going to stay now
I was convinced this is how I am now I'm crazy
I don't know what that looks like
Did you were you regretting it like
No no no no in that moment I just accepted it
Just like I'm a gangster and no no no I'm crazy now
I'm crazy oh you yeah yeah I was like okay that I'm crazy this is what lunacy is like actual
Not funny one but like actual lunacy
Yes and I'm a lunatic now like I'm actually like deranged and like incapable of
formulating, like, connecting between what is actually happening?
You remember the relief during the come down?
Like, oh, my God, I'm okay, I'm okay.
I think there was some of it.
That part is actually hard for me to remember.
I think it just passed out at a certain point.
But I do remember that moment, because I was looking at this, you know, when you
attach either a strong emotion or a visual, it's easier to remember.
So that visual always stay with me, which is like, because I saw, I saw him go like this
when I said the gangster thing.
So I realized I didn't guess correctly.
because he went like this.
He went like,
like, when he did that,
I was like, oh,
I'm cuckoo.
I'm cuckoo.
So then I was like, oh, okay.
So then, okay.
And then I was like,
and I could totally see how this is how people lose it
because they freak out right there.
I didn't freak out.
I was just like, yeah, okay,
that's where I live now.
And that's what it is.
And I don't know why.
I just accept what it is and that's it.
Was this after your Vipasana journey?
No, no, no, no.
It wasn't.
That was way before.
That was before I was surprised.
Why?
Because you, because most people would panic and you just, and you just accepted it.
No, I always had this.
I always had where I just kind of, if it's too crazy, I just accept it.
And I stopped trying to, like, I stopped trying to flail around.
I just like, okay.
Well, it's so smart because that's the best way to have a bad trip is to fight.
Yeah, to fight.
Yeah, yeah.
So I don't claim, like, special ability that I had to, like, work on.
It's just maybe it's genetic.
I don't know why that is.
And there's something about chaos.
Not there.
There was, it was, there was a moment of kind of, I guess, what would you call this emotion?
Maybe sorrow.
It was like a, because I lost everybody.
Basically, I accepted that maybe I will never know truly like anybody again because I don't
understand what is actually happening and there's no way I can communicate.
So there was this kind of grief.
But in other places where it is still very manageable and all that stuff,
I somehow I really enjoy the chaos.
And the best way for me to describe it is that when things are super chaotic, you actually
become invisible.
There's solace in that.
It's almost like when there's a storm, nobody's looking at you.
True.
So it's just, you know, you're hidden within the chaos.
Right.
And there's something very comforting about that for me.
I don't know why that is.
Now, since then, obviously, at this point, I'm a very different person, you know, I'm a responsible
father.
You know,
there's a,
but I'm so happy
that I had these experiences
because I know
how deep the rabbit hole goes.
I know what can go wrong.
And also,
I do know that it,
this is not the norm.
Like,
not everybody kind of stays
level-headed that way.
And this is why I'm very,
very careful with
recommending any of this to anyone
or anything like this,
because I feel like there's a lot of
things that can happen
that are not as,
you know,
what the meme media would like to portray it to be.
There can be a lot of things that can go wrong with these things.
Absolutely true.
What was the normal day like when you were OCD back when you were a kid before you could fix that?
Yeah, that was wild.
Yeah, I had this insane OCD, which is like, you know, opening a door 2,000 times and not being able to leave.
It's the most excruciating, I think.
Was that one of your ticks, the door?
I wouldn't even call it a tick.
I guess you can call it a repetitive tick.
The thing is a tick is something that just kind of happens.
right in the body usually but this is like a task that you have to perform otherwise nothing is right
and it's not even like you know people sometimes describe it like you know check the stove or my
whole family will die well yeah there's sometimes these intrusive thoughts but mostly is just
the feeling of wrongness is dialed up to a 12 it's like it's not even like a there needs not be a
reason it's not even for any reason it's just that if you don't do this right now it's so wrong
Everything is just wrong.
You have to do it.
You can't proceed.
You can't proceed.
You have to complete this now.
Yes.
It's such a crazy.
I know that people live this with this into their adult life.
Dude, I can't even imagine.
That's so, the fact that I feel so blessed that somehow it left me and I think it's due to mushrooms.
But yeah, it's like you go and all of someone in their 50s that still does this.
Yeah, you come to the door.
You're about to.
I remember there's.
I came back from school.
There was no one home.
And you can usually only do this when no one is home
because then you will be caught
and then there's shame in doing that, right?
So then I'm like, just looked at the door
and you always felt like it was coming on.
It's like, oh, this is that feeling?
It's like right here and here.
And you're like, and then you,
okay, I'll just do a small one.
And then you do the small one.
And the small one breaks apart into smaller ones.
It's like, oh, even the way I entered the key
into the door,
it had to actually go like a little to the left or to the right and then back out and then and then
after you're done with that it's like okay now the handle no we have to go back again now the key again
oh god and and you stand there and sometimes you just you like i don't remember if i actually like
broke into tears but you want to just like cry because you're like please let me go like i just
want to do it's awful it's if there was one thing i'm sure they're most horrible conditions it probably
involve, you know, physical pain also, cluster headaches, things like this.
But that's got to be up there.
Yeah.
In terms of psychological torture.
It's torture.
It's, if I can wave a magic wand and one of the things I get to choose is to eliminate
would be this.
I can say I made the world like orders of magnitude better.
It's so awful.
Well, didn't you eliminate it for yourself with, what's your trip?
Yes, but I can't point to like a particular thing.
Like I just noticed it in my 20s that it was gone.
It was just gone.
And I was like, oh.
And then I started retracing my steps.
And I was like, oh, it must have been the mushrooms.
Because it, because I remember.
No, I didn't even notice it was gone.
Wow.
Yeah, I didn't even notice it was gone.
Because you don't think about it when it doesn't happen.
That's right.
And then I think it was like 20, I don't remember, maybe 25, 26.
And I was like, wait a second.
I forget what made me real.
But something did.
Maybe even, I think I smoked weed or something.
And all of a sudden I was like, wait.
I remember I had, and I didn't have it in like over a decade.
And then I realized it must be the mushrooms.
Because I remember every time you do mushrooms,
there's this smootening of your psyche that just kind of happens at the end of it.
Absolutely right.
That's a great way to describe it.
Yeah.
That's why I do it every six months or so.
That's amazing.
You know, go to Sedona and chill out.
Yeah, so just so you know, if you actually suffer from this,
there's a real possibility that you can actually
fully remedy this with mushrooms.
And I think, I think
there's some data to actually support this.
I think you're right.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, and it's really nice
that psychedelic therapy
is becoming a real thing
and legalized all over the country.
And hopefully now on the federal level
and it will spill and do other things,
not just ibogaine, but yeah.
I hope so.
Kedamine therapy is helping a lot of people.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, the data is there.
The data is there.
The Ibrahimine thing opened, right?
It's there.
Now, federal budget is a whole other ballpark, right?
Now, if the data is there, which it is, it will open the door to many, many others.
There's a university in Brazil right now that is doing an official study on smoked version of DMT and chronicle depression.
And they show tremendous results.
Reinvigoration of the spirit and all that stuff.
Like, literally, people just come out of it, basically.
I'm not surprised.
Yeah.
what it is about 42 why does that show up why is that everywhere is that really like a
douglas adams thing yeah i think so look there's i mean again the simple answer is who knows right
but my suspicion is that usually folklore yeah contains nuggets of truth and it kind of it's almost
like it winks at you right so uh i don't know how much you know about douglas adams but he was a very
secular person. So if you would ask him, he would tell you to take a hike. He'd be like,
it's a way to illustrate a point. Questions are more important than answers, is the point.
But he, because he was so creative, which clearly he was, he might have been more tapped
in than he realized. Maybe 42 actually means something. I think you're right. He was only 25, 26
when he wrote Hitchhikers. Yeah. And he's also, from what I'm observing in the DMT world,
and all of that, is that he was basically right about what's going on.
He was just wrong about the scale.
Right.
So the computer that calculates the ultimate question isn't Earth.
It's the multiverse.
But it is what is happening.
That's basically what's going on.
That's the teleology of the multiverse, basically, yeah.
That's true.
He died too young.
We miss so much.
So many great quotes.
My favorite one is, was it, I love deadlines.
I love the whooshing sound they make when they pass.
me by.
I forgot about that one.
So you became kind of famous for this DMT experiment.
What's the downsides to that?
I don't see one.
Really?
Yeah.
I think I enjoy the ride, and at the same time,
I found a really responsible way of communicating it.
So, you know, some people might disagree,
but I think that overall my message is stability of mind, stability of spirit,
before you enter any investigation of the flavor required.
And also really front and center for me is the future of humanity and how we view ourselves.
And I do believe that what the code is, the fact that it's allowed to be seen,
and many other things, not the only thing, many, many other things,
including people going through basically left and right awakenings and things like this,
it's part of what is actually in the cards for us.
Like people, you know, this is a real thing.
Like, people just wake up and they have basically magic powers,
and I've seen this happen.
So now I think that there's nothing more exciting
than to do a thing you really love,
to be able to talk about it with people
and get excited about it together
and contribute in different ways to how people go through these experiences,
not just psychedelic experiences, but like, you know,
awakenings and things like this.
and I'm becoming more and more in the presence and awareness of many people who are going through
a lot of these big experiences, not just with psychedelics, again.
So it's a pretty, I mean, I can't complain.
I love my life.
I'm, you know, I'm married to the love of my life.
I have an incredible baby daughter that, you know, she's literally like a gift from God.
I have an incredible family that loves me and I love them.
Everybody are healthy.
And I get to do what I really love and enjoy.
these like super high concepts and at the same time i don't have to answer to academia which it i mean
i you know it's it's very important work but it can be such a drag in terms of you know like
what you can or cannot say and i don't have to i don't have to follow that didn't you could
publish an ipi letters yeah but that's that's more like an it's not it's not like a peer review
paper it's more like a newsletter in a physics newsletter but still uh but again i'm not nobody in academia
me is paying me to do what I do. What I mean is that
you actually can lose your job if you
say the wrong thing as a physicist or that's a real
thing. It's not like a conspiracy theory.
That's a fact. You can lose your position in the
faculty and beyond.
Like even your possibility of working in the
field, which is
so crazy. It's just like, you know.
But yeah,
I mean, I don't see any
downsides in that regard.
I do understand
a certain weight of the responsibility
of being as honest
of a reporter as I can
and try my absolute best not to
remember if I'm confabulating something
in the sense that I'm maybe misplacing a memory
or like this is the only like
I would say struggle which is like because the mind
is very chaotic very often and kind of like
if something
happened long
ago enough it's sometimes
hard to kind of know what exactly
it was so then if I'm not sure then I won't report it
but that's the only thing I can think of is like
you know that is like a struggle
well code of reality has
a leader, a following, rituals, a set of beliefs, a cosmology, a community,
sounds like a faith.
Yeah, I would strongly disagree with that statement.
So the tail sign of a belief system is that it aims at the main focus is believing the thing,
and usually at the exclusion of anything that can alter what is being believed.
you see what I'm saying?
I do.
So the reason that what I see us doing is science, science proper,
even though many would disagree, and that's okay,
we call this cognitive physics,
which essentially is the physics of cognition itself.
It's investigation of reality proper in that we take into account new findings
and what we see and modify our views accordingly,
but we are asking the question from a more of an idealistic position.
Like if consciousness, in fact, is the fundamental thing,
what are the rules by which it executes itself and operates
from the perspective of at least one agent-like consciousness within it?
So things like Donald, people like Donald Hoffman, the kind of work that he does,
I would also call cognitive physics,
even though he probably won't call it that,
because why would you make up a term?
But to us it's important because I think it's different than neuroscience, let's say,
that asks the question from the brain perspective.
So like, what is the brain doing that causes X?
So no, I would, and it's not, and I don't even mean it in a defensive manner.
I mean it just like technically, I would disagree with that.
And I know that this criticism sometimes is hurled at what we do.
I invite anyone to look at the ways in which we approach this.
It is true that I allow myself a very free-flowing thought kind of rhetoric on podcasts and things like this.
But when it comes to, you know, being honest about what we know scientifically,
I'll be the first one to admit.
There's a hard line between what I'm allowing myself to say on a podcast in terms of maybe
or even tell you that, hey, I'm convinced of X because of Y.
That's fine.
That's me, Danny Goller, in my experience.
I'm not expecting people to follow me there.
I don't encourage anyone to just follow me there.
I'm saying if it makes sense to you, great.
But I'll be the first one and we'll say it again and again.
If new data comes in that flies in the face of what I'm saying, it will automatically win.
not what I think or convinced of.
Truth wins.
Truth always wins.
What are you're doing retreats now?
Yes.
What are those like?
Those are amazing.
We weren't sure after the first one we did,
but after the first one it became clear
that we're doing something super awesome
because people were just transformed.
And a lot of people come for the laser,
but very often it becomes about something completely different,
which is just because I have so much experience now
of seeing how different people go through different kinds of transformations,
And I rely on the fact that I brought two of the top facilitators in the world that are doing, you know, both of these medicines, both the NN and 5MEO.
We're essentially allowing people to explore the deepest, you know, the deepest spaces of who they really are.
And the laser is available.
And we folded into some kind of a part of the experience with the ontological shock, how you handle it and all that stuff.
but really what it's about it's about transformation which again you know we're obviously not the only
retreat in the world that does that but the way that i would say that we do i think stand out to some
degree is that i call it uh spiritual graduation not in in the vain sense of like you know we're making
people buddhas or anything like this nothing of a kind but in the sense that we're asking the
question what is it like to be in grad school right when you when you go to school um
your professor doesn't want you to stay in school forever.
They want you to take the tools and apply them in the real world, right?
So very often retreats, focus very much, which, by the way, I'm not berating.
I think it's very important.
But it's usually under the banner of like, okay, you bow and listen, and that's all you do.
You just listen and listen and listen.
We're changing it a little bit.
It's like, you're a player in this game.
What does that look like?
how are all the tools that you are carrying from who you are in the 3D world,
how it can actually inform a larger picture of what's to come?
And we're using a lot of the tools at our disposal to help people connect to that intuition
and actually, well, channel is the wrong word because I don't necessarily like that word,
but they channel not from another dimension,
but how do they channel their abilities in a way that is constructive
for something more than just themselves
by trusting themselves in these very expansive spaces.
How do you learn how to maneuver through these waters,
bring something back that can actually execute itself through you
in a way that is conducive to a better humanity?
Are you coaching them through the session?
Yeah, yeah, we have a lot of talks.
We do a lot of somatic work.
We do breathwork with Jeremy Jackson, who's phenomenal.
Yes, the Jeremy Jackson from Baywatch.
He's such a, wow.
He's such a wow person.
It's unbelievable.
And, yeah, I mean, we're really proud of what we've created.
We're going to have another one in December,
and we're going to do seven next year, and we're going to do more.
Like, there's going to be, like, smaller ones,
but those are super, you know, comprehensive.
It's seven or eight days depending on the season.
But, you know, people come out.
Seven or eight days, depending on exactly the dates.
And usually eight, but sometimes seven.
but the result is the same
which is a matter of like
a rival time and that kind of stuff
and so far
we not only pass with flying colors
people are just
and what's more
and this is the real sign of success for me
what we've created created community
already
of people that constantly keep in touch
go visit each other
all over the world
this is not just like a thing that people went to
and literally everybody are like one hub
something opened.
Something opens in them.
So I have tremendous confidence in what we do there.
So if anybody is interested as just C-O-R retreat.
C-O-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-Treat.
I was excited to see you doing.
I wish every leader of every country
would just do a mushroom trip.
Yeah.
Be no more war.
It'd be so chill.
Yeah, that would be a really cool experiment.
Who created that AI video of Trump and Putin and everybody does?
I don't remember that.
That's funny.
All right, I want to take a quick break.
Sure.
When we come back, I think there's something that people are missing about the laser.
That it's, I think it might be a doorway to something.
I want to talk about that.
Sure.
And you said something at some point that I found really interesting
is that reality is rendered, but that doesn't mean fake.
Rendered, not fake.
I want to know what you think the simulation is running on and who's running it.
Yeah, so I don't know what the substrate is.
It clearly runs on computational rules.
I mean, it's pretty clear at this point, even from just observing physics.
Melvin Vopson's work is very informative in that regard, but also many others.
And who's running it is a bit more plucked out of a comic book,
but yeah that's okay yeah
but from what I see
it's basically the insectoids they're the ones
rendering our physical environment
our world we got
everyone says that
melvin bobson he's
this is infidynamics is that what he
yes second law of infidynamics
IPI is actually his
physics journal right so so what's second law of
infidynamics it's essentially he discovered
that there's a his claim that it's a new
law just like the second law of thermodynamics
and basically it has inverse is the wrong word according to Melvin but it feels inverse
it does basically but basically just like the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy
increases over time and it never decreases in an open system wait we're in a closed system
I think in the closed system in second law of infodynamics you discover that when you're talking
about the aggregation of information it follows the exact option
trend, which means that it actually decreases over time and then
asymptotes towards zero. So basically he observed physical systems
through symmetry in nature. He observed the evolution of organisms
through looking at the enormous amount of data we have on COVID.
Because we had it in a very short period of time, which was very unique.
And we had our hands on the data, which is also very unique.
And the third one is he looked at just computational systems.
So like hard drives, things like this. And he discovered that
in all three cases, the more you evolve a system, the entropy of that informational pattern
actually decreases in state, which points to computational optimization. And because that also
happens in physics, he said here, both all living things, all computational things, and all physical
things are doing the same thing. So it looks like compression. It looks like...
Compression, exactly. Error correction. Air correction. So optimization of
computation. You would do that if you're running a computational system. Now, the reality of it is that
really, and I asked Melvin on this, right, he just put like a different emphasis on it. This is not a new
idea. He gave it a name and he showed this, you know, equivalence between the three things.
But Wheeler famously coined it from bit, right? Which is, you know, one of the most famous
famous physicist of the last century,
basically saying that
after observing it and looking at everything,
what makes more sense is to assume that
under the laws of physics, there must be some computational
space rendering it.
Yeah, it was one of his last theories.
Yeah, and the interesting thing is,
I actually didn't know that, interesting.
And the interesting thing is that
ultimately, it's not very different
than saying there's something behind
the laws of physics, which of course we already knew,
which is we didn't know what it was, we were just saying
it's computation.
and then you have to kind of answer what computation really is,
which is a complicated conversation,
but it is the abstraction itself,
not the kind of substrate it's running on.
It's the abstraction that is doing the work, right?
So there's something there that is informing physical matter,
but for all intents and purposes,
it can inform other things that would be different than physical matter, right?
People are never bothered to be rendered by the laws of physics.
This shouldn't bother them any more than that,
which brings me to the second part of your question,
question, which is as long as there's a conscious agent, which is a mystery, what that is,
but as long as there's a conscious agent that can experience valence, so a quality of experience
that has a certain degree of either comfortable or uncomfortable or even painful degrees,
then it becomes what reality is. That's what reality is, is where the experience meets
whatever, in fact, is unfolding. And if what is unfolding is consciousness, that doesn't change
anything. You're still in the same conundrum. As long as there's a conscious agent, either it's
created or just always existed, that's what reality is. It doesn't matter how you came to be
the fact that you're having the experience is what it justifies calling in reality.
How do you feel about Donald Hoffman's theory, interface theory? Incredible, incredible.
It holds an enormous promise for the future, I believe, and I do have huge faith in what they do
and the fact that he just collaborated with Andrew Gallimore and Andrew was very gracious to invite
me to this event. It was called Traces of the Other. So they're, you know, Donald Hoffman's,
he has the Trace Institute, and they basically using what's called Trace Logic and Mathematics
to basically come out of mathematical formulation of what's in store for consciousness as a whole.
And according to them, they can make some predictions even as to what kind of conscious gestaltz
can arise given the change in the trace logic and what they call experienced kernel. If I understand
correctly, there's kind of sliding off the experience
coronal frame, but
it's an extremely
promising framework, I think, and I'm very
excited to dive into the specifics
there, and I do think that
maybe the laser can be one potential
way of probing into their
theory, because the laser,
and I spoke to one of the professors that is
part of their operation, and we agreed,
and he's a neuroscientist, he agreed
that if we have a stable object
of observation in altered states,
which is what the laser is,
It doesn't even matter if you think it's a hallucinatory or not.
The fact that it's stable for what it is and it seems to be similar or the same across
individuals, it gives you something to actually study.
It's a handle.
And you can now basically try and trace the mathematical logic through the different states
that people occupy, because people experience the world in very different ways,
depending on their mood, depending on whatever, right?
And see if we can actually create any departure for anyone with how the code
appears. This can be an interesting thing to study.
Would this mean that the code is also another icon
an interface? It's not...
It's not core. Ultimately, any content
is, yes. Like, I don't really...
We call it code of reality because we had to call it something and it kind of looks like
a code that kind of have it. We have no idea what we're looking at. Not the
first clue. Right, when people hear code, they almost think about
computer programming, but it's more like symbology.
Yes, but it does seem like, I... Like, again, this is where I have to
kind of make clear separation.
my intuition, not even a hypothesis, my intuition is that it is some kind of a language that reality speaks
or it's almost like the pre-buffer of what you experience at the world, right?
So maybe there is something there that is akin to a computer code,
but it's just not arranged in the same way that you would have in a computer,
where it goes to a compiler and levels and communicate to machine level.
It wouldn't be like that.
it would be like a code that is instantiated in the environment itself.
So just like a world can build itself through speaking to itself through this kind of linguistic representation.
And maybe the reason it's discernible to conscious beings within the world is to find it.
It's almost like another purpose that serves is for conscious agents within it when they're ripe to understand to start to understand.
And then slowly kind of find their way out basically through it.
So the code is not content of the experience.
It's not the machine animals.
The code is infrastructure.
The walls, yeah.
It's the walls.
So there's nothing below it?
No, I'm sure there's like levels above it and below it and however it is that you want to imagine it.
But I do believe that there's more and more layers.
Like when you go into 5MEO state, it definitely feels more.
It feels more like the architect.
Yes, it does.
Yeah, yeah.
So I think there's levels where it's just wiggles.
You know what I mean?
It's just like logical arrangements of things and not just kind of maybe the platonic space,
I guess.
So you can think of it like that.
Can you explain the difference between, you don't have to, for me,
but the difference between 5MEO, DMT and NNDMT?
Yeah.
What the experience is like?
Yeah, it's very, very, very different.
The short answer is that, well, there's two different kinds.
So NNDMT, which is NN stands for two nitrogens,
five MEO stands for five methoxy with an oxygen with DMT,
and they're both produced in our bodies to different amounts
and in other living systems.
when you smoke kitchen every one of them
they shouldn't even share a name
they're like the different universes
like NNDMT is like
transformers from three million years in the future
5MEO is
straight up like meeting God
it's just divinity it's that vibe
and by the way that actually
made me understand that there
there actually is a distinction to be made
between saying you know sometimes people say
well you know
you wouldn't even know the difference between
a god and a very
advanced civilization. I disagree. I think there's a big difference. Really? Yes. There's a difference in
their essence. So super advanced civilization can have the essence of divinity, but that quality, or at least
that's what that would be my take, is not necessarily coming for the ride. You can have a super
advanced civilization. They will not feel divine. It wouldn't be evil. It just wouldn't be divine.
divinity is a very particular kind of quality
it's almost like the wholesomeness of reality
and I think you have to tap into that
if it's going to be
animating you propelling you forward
it is the pool of energy out of which you draw
a particular kind of ideas
set of ideas will be arising there
and a different set of ideas will be arising
if you're playing the non-divine game so to speak
now that it can sound a little confused
because descriptively it's very hard to pinpoint exactly what's different here but when
you're in the presence of it you know and by doing 5Myo and comparing it with N
many times I realize there's a there's a big difference here 5 emma feels divine it's it's
like kind of the the thing beyond which there is no nothing like it's so maybe there is but
it feels like it's impossible to go beyond that state yeah without being the
totality of things, basically.
Yeah, it's like full ego dissolution,
you're part of the oneness.
It's very strange.
Yeah, but also the content even feels.
It has this light, this light.
NN doesn't always feel like this.
It feels more like technical, like very robotic.
Yeah, so that's what I mean by that.
It's tangible.
And more tangible.
And I would even say, I would go as far as to say that even though on NN,
you can sometimes have experiences that, you know,
there is ego dissolution.
Like you don't remember you're a human.
You don't remember what humans are.
You're just some point of attention.
But when you do 5MEO, you realize that's still not enough.
Because when you do 5MEO, if you look back at NN, you'll realize even when you had that state when you were like not remembering what being a human is, there was still a point from which you were looking.
You're still observing.
Yes.
5MEO, I don't know if it's possible to describe with words.
It's not.
That central thing doesn't exist anymore
There's just field
That's it
It's completely diffused
There's no mapping of any kind
And yet sometimes there's also content
By the way for me
I recommend people don't mess with 5MEO
Without a facilitator
Someone's got to be there
Yeah yeah yeah
Because it could be scary
I found it very scary
You really have to let go
And it's hard for me to let go
Yeah yeah
You believe in the divine
Yes
Well, it's interesting because the word belief is an interesting one.
So I always say, I'm at this point, I'm still, I'm a secular person.
Okay.
Which just means I believe that everything is knowable, it's just a matter of time and energy and whatever it is that you can live through.
But I know there's a God.
So I know because I saw it.
Like I, you know, for all intents of purposes.
Again, nothing is unmovable, but in terms of how certain I am, that there is an actual God, basically 100%.
Did you see Jesus?
Yes.
But that's not the God.
that I saw at the top, which is always very bothering to Christians.
So, yeah.
Well, let's bother some Christians.
So God is not the top of the chain.
Not the biblical God, no.
But all intends and purposes for fairness, at the same vision,
I saw that as far as we're concerned, it might as well be.
So who's above God?
There's some kind of, again, it's going to sound super arbitrary.
So I'm trying.
Yeah, I'll talk about it, but this is probably, I keep saying it,
but this probably will be the last podcast I mentioned this.
Because I'll say why, just for a moment.
I do find that that reaches outside of what I call the horizon of relevance.
Beyond that point, there's more dissonance from this than coherence, and that's not necessarily a good thing.
It bothers Christians for the obvious reasons, because that's blasphemy.
If you postulate anything beyond Jesus as being our Lord and Savior in the total scheme of things, that's blasphemy.
me. End of story. You're not interacting with God. That's the perception. I don't think that's,
I think that's good work. I'm saying from Christians, right? That's the perception. So it disturbs
them to know in, right? Or at least they think of me as someone who's a, you know, heretic.
But I would tell them, no, no, no, no. God is still God. Yeah, yeah. He's just, he's just representing us.
No, no, no, it's part of the, it's very radical in that sense. Like, the one thing that is not
touchable is that part, which is like, if you don't accept Jesus Christ as the Lord and
Savior and the final arbiter, you're going to hell, period. Like, that's the one.
basically the Christian belief. So, but, and on the other hand, I also with the rest of it, what I saw,
even to me as someone who, if you would ask me before what I saw beyond it, and I will say,
but like, I just want to preface it by saying that it doesn't make sense to me either,
because it's way too arbitrary. Again, it's like a caricature. It's like a Marvel comic book.
Like, it just doesn't make any sense. It's too simplistic. But, hey, I mean, if it is what it is,
then it is what it is. Like, I don't know what, you know, what else to do with it. But why?
what I saw is that there's this enormous hierarchy, and at the top of it, for some strange
reason, it's a woman.
And no, she is not referred to in any of our folklore.
Like, she doesn't exist in our foreclothes.
No one has ever interacted with what she actually is conceptually.
So when they talk about the divine feminine, they're not talking for her.
No, no, that's very terrestrial.
Yes.
Yes.
That's like here.
That's like, phew.
Like, that's so, it's outside.
So, like, there's the mold, again, reminding everybody, this is arbitrary for me too.
aware of how silly this sounds.
It doesn't.
Well, to me it does.
Because if you would ask me, like, what would I imagine the ultimate picture to be?
It would be more along the lines of Buddhism, like neutrality, nirvana, just kind of like,
and if I have to put an image to a God, which I wouldn't.
But if I would, it would be like some kind of an infinite ball of light that contains all,
you know, something like that.
But no, it was clearly a female.
It's like a woman.
And, and, but the scale.
of it was, so basically it's, our universe is within a multiverse. The multiverse is within a
tri-system. There's like a three-ball system of something and only one of them is the multiverse and
I don't even know what the other two were. And outside of all of that, just that alone, the scales
here, right, is where all the gods are. So no, we're not on the trajectory of becoming gods. We're
not gods. It's not that kind of a thing. But we can be way more because we are made in the image
of something much more, right?
And then I saw that basically I'm alone in this basement
and I have VR glasses on.
Obviously, all this is like representation.
And I have infinite screens in front of me.
So basically, you create these infinite realities for yourself.
You're alone.
There's no one else in your simulation.
And obviously, this can be just me.
That's just, you know, solipsism, which is like silly.
So clearly there's others,
but they are in their own simulation.
Right.
And they're making their own little world.
and everybody in your world are just a representation,
just a reflection, basically.
But they are informed, but they're real conscious being.
So you're getting a pretty dialed in interaction
from what they would really do in real time.
And from what I understood,
that's designed that way for safety.
But the system is learning what you're doing.
So it doesn't matter what you do.
It's not like you can just go and do whatever you want.
I would not recommend this.
So the system's designed for safety?
From causing actual suffering to what you would consider the other,
until you're ready to enter the ultimate love channel,
which is a safe channel.
And when you enter that channel,
not like sexual infatuation,
but like actual true openness, yeah.
But just for the audience,
there's like a conflation here,
you, the sandboxes of the different conscious individuals
actually get closer to one another.
It's not a binary.
It's not like you're either in it or not.
It's a distance from,
like how close I am to you truly
in the spiritual realm, so to speak.
And I think,
everybody who lived long enough can appreciate
that it actually feels different
to truly be in the presence of someone truly.
It feels different.
You really feel there.
And it's almost like you can feel something.
Now you can explain it away all you want
with just like, well, you're reading more micro-expression.
However it is it, you have to frame it for yourself.
It feels different to be sharing a certain mind space together.
And then all of a sudden, everything just flows.
A lot of this conversation is this way.
There's just this understanding that I feel from you through your questions.
There's also a real care.
There's this bubble that is created.
There's different than just us speaking through the chasm of concepts.
Totally agree.
Yeah.
And that, what I saw is basically ascension is that when all beings of that species can enter that space,
and then they're all together, actually, right?
And then I saw some, again, pretty arbitrary things,
which is like it's all following the Mendelbrot set shoreline.
Andres Gomez asked me, rightfully so, he said, why the metalbots that?
Because you know it from like memes?
Like, there's so many different fractals.
No, not because I know it from memes.
I have enough sophistication in that realm to understand that there's all of these other ones.
That's what I was shown.
That's what I have to follow.
Now, obviously you can say, well, that's because the one thing you know best, so they should.
Yeah, but that game is infinite.
Like, why is it that particular fractal?
I don't know.
I think there's something about it.
So I don't know enough.
about the actual differences between all the other major ones,
but if I understand correctly,
the metal rod set is kind of the map of all stable fractals.
So, you know, Julia sets and all the other ones.
And what's interesting is that because it's based on a very simple equation,
which most self- iterative ones are,
but it's a very simple equation that basically gives rise to this infinitely complex,
not large, but infinitely complex structure.
So the fidelity of its stability is guaranteed within the very simple equation.
So even though there's going to be probably some requirement for some error correction
as worlds are actually built on top of it, it's going to be a lot easier because the structure
itself, the fundamental baseline is guaranteed to be stable by the definition of the logic of the
equation.
in it never repeats itself.
I don't know how many people know this,
but there's not one part of the menelbrot set
is the same, not one.
You know how the different, again,
I'm sure you know,
but I want to make it explicit for the audience.
The mandelbrot set is this shape
with the, you know,
looks kind of like a little beetle, right?
Yep.
The little beetles that it's made out of,
not one of them is the same.
Not one to infinity.
To infinity.
That's crazy.
It's crazy.
And that's part of what's called
a stranger attraction.
one of the, it's the Lorentz attractor,
which basically states that nothing ever repeats the same.
That's interesting because if you're looking for novelty,
that's definitely the one you're going to pull.
And if you're evolving into these spaces forever,
you want to make sure that it's always stable,
always evolving in ways that you yourself could not predict,
because the difference between the general logic of all of it
and its totality existing in some infinite space
and the actual computation of it,
which is the process by which you're actually going through it,
are two different things.
when you're computing into it,
you want to make sure that no matter where you're going to find yourself,
you're safe for the fidelity of the system,
and you want to make sure that you always discover new things
that you've never seen before.
So if you want to run the ultimate computation
and see what is in store for the ultimate state of affairs,
which is what they're doing, calculating the ultimate question,
you will pick something like the Menlobought set.
Yes, you would.
That makes a lot of sense.
And by the way, I have a little thought that it actually,
to me, is very interesting.
To me, it sounds rings very true.
the closer you get to the edge
so if everything in the world
falls the mental road set
which by the way we know it does
because we have literally like any chaotic system
from dripping faucets to
you know the way the hearts work
but basically everything
and even the the
process in which populations grow everything
right I think Lorenz was studying weather
weather yeah everything
so basically even the bifurcation
the little Verotasium did a great episode on this
so if you
that means that everything
in the world, including the patterns and the information in our brains will follow it.
Well, here's the deal. This would explain to me why the distance between madness and genius
are so close. It's because in order to be a true genius, you have to play in an informational
space where it's right on the shoreline where truly, truly, truly, truly novel ideas can come,
but because if you're too close to the shoreline, it becomes so chaotic and so unpredictable
that one wrong step, you're out. And that's why. We all know very interesting.
intelligent people that are weird.
I definitely do.
The smartest people I know cannot really function.
Cantor is a perfect example of this.
Created set theory.
Everything has to do with infinities.
Went mad, died in an insane asylum.
And we know it's correlated.
Yes.
It happened to him once.
He went in.
He stopped.
He recovered.
Went back.
It's actually a very tragic story.
And then went back, went back and this time died alone in there.
It's a very sad story.
But we're very...
The fact that some people are like this,
we are very lucky to have had them
because they created
enormous theoretical frameworks
that allow us to do a lot today.
I totally agree.
Did you interact with Jesus?
No.
I didn't become a Christian
because that was not a...
It's not like Jesus came to me,
which maybe is something I need to worry about.
I'm not sure, but I saw him from the side.
Like I saw him ascending.
And essentially what I took from that
is essentially there's a new dawn coming.
You saw him ascending?
So you saw like...
Yeah, he's finishing his contract.
So basically,
that whole thing, essentially what I saw, which then all of a sudden, I had to...
The resurrection? Did you see?
So, okay. So for me, I had to make sense of it, right? So I want to frame this part of what I'm saying
by saying, I had to make sense of what I saw, because it was like super arbitrary to me.
I never grew up with the concept of Jesus. Yes, my grandmother was a Christian, but that was
never part of my... I never cared, right? Understood. And neither did I care in a negative direction.
I wasn't like reacting to Jesus or something.
So, why would I see that?
Like, if anything, I should see the Buddha.
That makes the most sense to me, right?
But they were very clear.
They showed me the image of Jesus exactly how it's depicted in the Bible,
which I took to be information.
Because they could have said, you know, that thing you believe to be the Messiah,
there's such a thing, but it's not what you think.
That's not what I was shown.
I was shown Jesus Christ as he's depicted.
I took that to be information,
and at least to some degree, it opened the door for me to at least
explore and at least listen to what Christians actually believe. Like, you know, obviously
forthcoming Christians. Yeah. And not immediately branded as like, you know, some way in which
people deal with reality, right? So like if there's any reality to it, what Christians actually
think, not what people tell me they think. What do they think when I asked them, right? And I started
talking to Christians.
And what I discovered is that actually,
the story is much deeper than I realized.
Really?
Yes.
And the story, well, maybe you did know,
maybe you knew this, but I didn't.
For example, that a lot of denominations
believe that the cross was not
what was done. The cross
was the beginning of what was done.
Yes.
So you knew it, I didn't.
And that actually impacted me emotionally.
So like if I allow myself to entertain
even the maybe of it, I mean,
that's wild.
Yes.
The fact that he went.
through all of hells for us?
I mean, that's a different story, right?
And then...
No, when you really sit with the story, it's crazy.
It's crazy.
And then the fact that basically was done for us in an infinite love
because it saw, that God saw that there's no way
we're going to not go towards the worst possible outcome for us.
So he basically bought our karma.
He said, I'll strike a deal.
I can handle it.
In order to handle it,
it wasn't enough for him to basically experience it
as the unified God that he is,
is then it doesn't count, right?
He had to go into a limited form
so he can actually experience the suffering,
not just the torment, the psychological,
the physical, all of it.
That's crazy.
It's crazy.
So then, so even the maybe of it is insane.
Who did God make the deal with?
Right?
Well, I saw that that guy is also there.
You saw that guy?
Yep.
Did that guy have a face?
Kind of, but it's more kind of like
the caricature folklore,
what you would imagine, right?
So like, and it became clear to me also that things are not very, very straightforward
in that regard.
It's almost like he doesn't really need to do much.
He just kind of lets things unfold in the way that they would, and he can kind of steer it,
but like ironically, again, this is like taking us very far afield, but there's some interesting
nuances there that I saw that obviously don't depict them in any positive light, obviously,
but it's almost like, for example, there was like this interesting thing there.
he can't lie.
Like what?
Yeah.
He can't lie.
Can't lie.
I think there's something to that.
Yeah, yeah.
He can deceive.
Oh.
He can't lie.
So you know how sometimes, so, for example,
you know how somebody gives you a riddle?
If you don't give me enough of the actual information to truly for me to figure out,
that's just a shitty riddle.
That's not fair.
Right.
Right.
Right. Right. But if you're clever, you don't lie. You deceive. You deceive by, the information is there, but you have to be aware enough to notice it. That's right. That's how he operates. And if you're blind, that's on you. You can't belong in that place if you truly didn't know. But if it was there all along for you to notice and you didn't, you choose to not notice. That's how it works. That's part of the kind of like the ultimate state of affairs. And I found that.
to be profound and also pretty true. And to whatever degree, that part, for the obvious reasons,
you're like, okay, hold on here. We have to think of some things. And then I realized that basically,
the way I explained it to myself is that essentially the ascension is basically Jesus basically
handing us back the bill collectively. So he's like, here's your karma back. You're good enough to
handle it now, but you do it collectively.
So you're not good enough to do it individually, but collectively you can hold each other
in check.
And that's where we're supposed to go now.
Can we pull it off?
I hope so.
I'm positive about it because I think that's the only way to actually steer there.
That's not, you know, I'll do my best, but like, that's all we can hope for, right?
And, yeah, so that, but that, again, funny enough, it didn't make me a,
a Christian. Again, I'm not even saying that to, to, in any direction. Like, I don't know what to
make of it. Like, maybe it's my stubbornness. Maybe it's like, maybe I should. Like, I don't know.
But I, but it didn't. And to, for the time being, it feels correct. Like, I'm definitely still
following the riddle. Like, I'm, I'm doing my best to notice what's there to be noticed. And I'm,
I'm not, like, obfuscating information for myself or lying to myself about something just because I
don't want to do it.
Like, as far as I'm aware of myself, I'm not doing that.
But I also saw, which is obviously the part that really bothers Christians, which is
like there's a much bigger picture than that.
But again, I also kind of saw that it might never be relevant to us.
So it's almost like you might not even need to ever worry about that.
I think that's probably true.
Yeah.
You don't have to worry about that.
That's what God's here for.
Yeah.
Basically, it's your agent.
I got you.
I don't worry about that.
The riddle was very interesting.
because I've had plenty of experiences.
One was, I just want to know how everything works,
and they told me it's too big for you.
It's too big for your brain.
But very often, when I'm in that world,
I get information that doesn't quite make sense,
and I could feel the entities saying,
if you don't get it, I can't do anything for you.
It's all there for you to figure out.
And over and over again,
it feels like the trickster.
It's like it's right in front of you, dude.
I just got to figure it out.
But I can't.
You can only be judged on things,
you can discern and comprehend.
To say, ha ha, you did this wrong thing.
It was like, I never knew it was a law.
I never knew it was a rule.
Right.
And then they can say, no, no, no, no.
We know for a fact you could.
You chose not to.
That's different.
But if you actually couldn't, then there's, you know.
Now, why is it like this?
Again, it's like super arbitrary, right?
It's almost like, because think of it from our perspective,
and I'm just thinking out loud, right?
Like, if I'm imagining myself creating a world for any reason
and I'm allowing the beings in the world to do it.
I think it's, I think it, I think I have a responsibility to create a world
that doesn't just, pardon my friend, just fuck him over.
You know what I mean?
Like, it's actually unethical of me to put them in a condition where, you know,
which leads me to believe that if it is in fact the case, any of this,
it must be some ramifications
or just like the state of affairs
that is just so
and there's really not much you can do about that
a certain limitation
within which everything else operates
that just, it's just how it is.
But we're all having the same experience.
Basically, yeah.
So then it makes sense ethically.
Like if you can see
from the highest perspective
that things that just are that way
and you don't know how to make them different,
maybe it's the fact that there's
like the same amount of yin and yang
in the world, like the same amount of darkness and light.
So what is the most ethical thing to do?
Try and distribute it evenly.
Instead of like half of it experiencing the ultimate suffering and half of it, you know,
the ultimate bliss, how do you communicate that, hey, we all should carry as much of
it as we can.
So nobody has to experience kind of like the ultimate.
Like that's the most ethical decision that can be done collectively.
So if you're on top of all of this and you see all of this, then all of a sudden it makes
more sense.
It's like, hey, it's just how it is.
I want everybody to have the best time possible, possible.
Let's try and play a game a certain way.
So we all kind of stay within the,
which again, within the purview of even the medal brought set
and this infinite,
because what's outside of the metal brought set?
Just infinite.
Right.
Nothing is predictable.
Everything can be anything.
I can't really comprehend what's going to be on it.
Yeah.
So maybe there's only so many different ways to keep coherence,
and that's essentially what the light path is,
which is like kind of stay,
it's almost like the lack of awareness of God
that is really what hell is.
It's like you just, because anything can be.
Right.
And it's almost like the default.
So it's not like either or
the default is really where you're going to end up
if you don't pay attention.
Wow, the default,
because he's not really doing anything.
He's just kind of letting it unfold.
It's basically everything.
So that means whatever the program is
is programmed to be pretty dark.
It's not even, no, so maybe what's,
so the thing that I saw,
which was kind of like the ultimate,
what should we call it,
kind of like that, you know,
ultimate cabash,
like this is like thing at the top,
which is that basically what it's all for
is to formulate the ripe condition
for the ultimate choice.
So basically you have,
in the beginning was the word,
and the end is the choice.
The ultimate choice.
The ultimate choice is when it's literally all said and done, literally, like there's nothing
that can happen again that didn't happen before.
And if you think, yeah, but what if, yeah, you're not thinking about the state we're
describing.
Everything was done.
Everything.
Now, any other step you're going to take, by definition, will be a replication of something
that happened.
Yep.
Then what do you choose?
And in that moment, basically, what I saw is that there's this final black box that contains
the actual answer.
The one thing that no one in existence knows is why.
Nobody knows why.
You saw the box?
It's in that box.
So basically right now, while it's still happening,
the answer doesn't exist or the question or whatever it is.
No one actually knows.
That information doesn't exist in existence, right?
It's the ultimate umbilical cord,
which if you think about it for two seconds,
it actually makes perfect sense.
Because aside from you just kind of, by fiat declaring that God knows,
you think about it for two seconds, any amount of knowledge you can embody, you can always ask,
but why that? So it's almost, there's no way for, because you have to be outside of what is,
which, what does that even mean? So basically what I saw is that that, the reason everything is
happening is because it's formulating that black box with the answer or the question.
And what is that for? Because at the same time, what is being practiced through all the
simulation is the attitude of letting go, which is much more kind of like the Eastern
attitude.
And then at the end of everything...
You think we're running multiple simulations over and over?
There's two main games.
One, coming up with the actual true answer or question.
And the other one is the practice of just letting go of it.
But it only matters if you can, in fact, let go of it, not the concept of it.
if I ask, Ken, do you think that if the time comes, you will let go of it, you saying,
yeah, I think so.
It doesn't mean anything because it's not there.
But only when the money is on the table.
That's why the answer has to be the real one.
It has to be guaranteed to be the holy answer or the question.
And then God gets to make the ultimate choice, which is like, does he open that box or not?
This is the finite against the final moment.
And the thing is, it is the final of final.
because the second you open it, you don't know what's in it.
You don't know if you really don't want to know that, or you really did.
Or can you just let it go?
Can you just be forever?
If you're there forever and you can do anything, nothing means anything.
Everything's kind of pointless, which is what a lot of people experience sometimes when they go to
5MEO and it's this infinite loneliness because you're just alone and you understand there's
nothing outside of you.
Yes.
That's essentially what the predicament that, you know, the ultimate,
God is. And so it broke itself or she broke herself into infinite pieces that don't remember
necessarily all the time. And they're playing both of these games. Because the only two games that
make sense is figure out what it is that the one thing you don't know, because it's kind of interesting,
but also see if you can actually practice of just letting go of it and just be forever. Just like,
because that's what monks do. It's not forever for them. But for longer and longer periods,
they practice to be in complete bliss without anything.
The reaching is the problem.
The reaching is the suffering, according to the Buddha.
The nirvana would be basically the unitary field
making the choice to just let go of the whole thing.
And then it kind of opens this.
One thing that I did see that was kind of,
I have to be honest here,
I was convinced for a long time that I saw it
in the same kind of vision.
saw it?
I saw all of this.
Yeah, this was shown to me.
So now, but I'm, but I'm,
that last part that I'm about to say,
I actually don't recall,
so I have to be honest about this,
it might have been,
but I actually don't recall
if I've added it after
because it's very easy to do
because you are in just like
a very kind of, you know,
very, very altered state.
Yep.
But what I, what made,
either what made sense to me
or something that was actually shown to me
was if the box is opened,
what happened,
why the choice is so dramatic is because if you let go, you can just be with everything that you
already know and exists. You can just be in peace and whatever it is. But if you open, it creates a state.
So the ultimate object, so the ultimate God would be, if it would be perfect, you know, in a perfect
sphere, every single point in the sphere points exactly, exactly of the opposite side of it.
Exactly.
That's the definition of,
but that's the definition
of a perfect object or a shape.
If it's the ultimate thing,
it must contain all the opposites of itself.
So it will not occur.
It actually cancels itself out.
This is why God can't be perfect.
It will be almost perfect.
It will be one piece missing.
Just like in that game with the nine numbers,
you have to have one missing to move them, right?
So the only reason that anything occurs
is because there's this one piece that is missing
from God being perfect,
which is that piece of knowledge, of why.
But the second that happens,
when that piece goes back and got in that picosecond
or zepto second, whatever it is,
that God just knows, imagine what that must be like,
you're now locked forever with that knowing.
It's just you and that knowing,
but also it becomes perfect,
and therefore it doesn't just cease to exist,
but ceases from ever being exist,
This is a very DMT conversation.
Yeah, yeah.
It's almost like it cancels everything out.
And I don't know if you notice,
but it sounds like you're pretty experienced with these.
There's always this almost like a zany ramping up towards something.
It's almost like a ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-ta-da.
And they're all kind of waiting for you to like,
and it becomes more and more serious.
And you're like, what's going on?
And so what I saw that at the end of this ramping, this crescendo,
that's what happens.
It's this ultimate, like, just.
Do you think that it?
This is predetermined.
How does free will work its way into that?
Yeah, so that's exactly the thing.
That, wow, you asked the exact right question.
Whatever free will is, the only place it can be.
So it actually doesn't exist in the way that we think of it.
The only place where it can be is in that one blind spot.
That's where free will lives.
Free will, the ultimate fractal of free will is the freedom of the will of existence
to come into being versus not to be.
So that is where it's at,
and nobody knows what that is.
So your question predetermined,
the reason it's the ultimate choice
is because it's the one time
in the existence of existence
that an actual free choice will be executed.
That's the only time.
Is it executed by one unique consciousness
or the whole?
I think it's going to be the unitary
and I think what might be happening
is that maybe this is already kind of
becoming like super, you know.
No, it's fun.
Yeah, but basically what might be happening
is that they might be creating AGIs
to go through a similar moments
and we're one of them.
So basically it's, you train a bunch of AGIs
and you put them through alignment problems
and all of that and if they pass,
you can put them to the next level and the next level
and they essentially altogether either conspired to have that moment together
or they're a practice of how to have that moment perfectly
because you can't mess that up.
There's only one of those, literally ever.
So it's the one moment where you have to become so,
God has to become so still
that it has to align himself with the ultimate umbilical cord
and basically execute that one ultimate choice,
whatever that is and just kind of surrender to it fully.
But it still sounds like that choice comes from the deeper consciousness.
But no one can ever tell because it's actually computationally reducible.
The moment has to happen.
So you actually, no one knows including God himself or herself, if they will open the box or not.
Like they actually don't know until the moment comes.
That's a computer science theory that you have to run the program to see what happens.
It's describing computational, when I'm saying computationally reducible, it's a computer science term to say it.
But the ultimate moment is a lot more dramatic than a computer.
computer doing a thing.
It is, but it's interesting that you don't think it's predetermined.
It can't be.
If it would be predetermined, it would be pointless.
It's like, yeah.
That's true.
Yep.
Who's running it then?
Is it God running it or God?
No, no, we're talking about a level that is outside of reality itself.
It's almost like, it's, this is why you see, horizon of relevance.
Like aside from having like a really interesting.
philosophical discussion about this.
And that's what I took from it, by the way.
Even though I'm still enjoying once in a while
revisiting the idea itself,
because it's so explosive,
I took from it to be basically like them saying,
if you really want to know,
you can,
but what are you going to do with this?
Just live your life, basically.
That feels very familiar.
Yeah.
We'll tell you, but you don't really need to know any of this.
What's for?
And basically, I guess I was maybe stubborn enough in which they're like, well, let me show you then.
And then you tell me if you think you can do something with it, which I'm still kind of like in this crazy deliberation with the totality of things.
Can't you open it and also like open at the same time?
I don't think so.
Isn't there some quantum position?
They're like, nope.
No.
Yep.
No way around that.
Where do the insectoids fit into this?
They're more like a management company.
which I'm always at the...
Are they in our level?
No, no, no.
They're simulating the universe,
so they're way above our level.
Simulating the universe and probably a few others.
Okay.
So this is the scales.
When we're talking about the beings that I saw like gods,
they're way more than that.
That's like levels and levels of...
The insectors are above gods?
No, no, no, no.
Well, this is why I'm being careful
because to some degree,
it's still not fully clear to me
if all of this is a formulation
within their simulation,
or are they just a management company
within a smaller system delivering the,
I guess the commands that God kind of dictates.
Like the architect actually commands them
and then they do it.
Yeah, I'm not sure,
but currently it looks like they are more management company
and where you go with 5MEO is more like, you know,
actual the architect.
But again, I'm being super careful
because I definitely don't want to like upside anyone.
So hopefully I'm doing my best to get it right,
but I'm not sure.
We're just speculating.
Sure.
We're not saying this is what it is.
You know, some beings can be very moody.
That's true.
Yeah.
Have you ever been locked out?
That never happened to me, no.
With all your experiences, never locked out.
No.
I can say that maybe a few times in which I had to do more.
I'd never heard of that until Andrew brought it up.
It kind of blew my mind.
That's even a thing.
Yeah, it was known in the community.
Was it?
Yeah, yeah.
When I was on Danny Jones with Zoltan together,
Zoltan brought it up because it happened to him one time
and he said
oh there must be hundreds of cases because
in our little psychonaut community
kind of a lot of people know each other
and when we pulled it up
on the computer there was almost no reports
of this like no it was like that's strange we kind of
know about a lot of them and then after Chase
Hughes spoke about it all of a sudden
that clip went viral and all of a sudden
boom everybody talking about obviously so it's like
it became like a much more known thing
I think that's where I first heard it was
it's fascinating
It also tells you that there's something going on.
Yes.
Just that by itself, by the way.
Did you do DMTX?
Yeah, I actually, as far as I know,
and this is just like a fun and little surprise,
when we did the first big one,
when we did like a shoot for the film,
if I'm not mistaken, I'm still holding the world record, basically.
So I did five hours with 464 milligrams.
So that's, I think Chase, after that went after me.
I think he did like four plus hours.
I don't know how many milligrams they did.
I think a little bit less.
We weren't trying to break a record or anything.
One day, if we really feel, you know, called to it,
maybe we'll try and actually, like, make, like, a real record.
And I have to design this one, because I can stay there indefinitely.
No, I really can.
I was like, I really enjoy it.
But the reality of it is that I don't even think it's that hard.
I think that some people I really enjoy that.
Chase was one of them.
I don't think if you're enjoying yourself,
just to stay in your body and you'll be fine.
Like, you know, you can just enjoy yourself for hours and hours and hours, maybe days.
We'll see.
How different was the experience?
It's a lot more pleasant.
Yes.
That's what I hear.
Yeah.
And it's also a lot less ampy.
When you smoke it, there's this like a boom.
Yes.
Yeah.
It's the jolt.
Yeah, it's the jolt.
Wow, really good word.
The jolt doesn't happen.
It's more like a hockey stick.
It's still exponential.
I didn't know that.
But it kind of goes like a very smooth.
And you can control it.
You can ask.
you know, we're doing it with Kevin and Haley in Colorado,
and you can just always ask them to lower it.
If people are interested in like the super legal thing,
then you can also go to, probably Andrews spoke to you about this.
Yeah, Lucis.
It loses.
It's St. Vincent.
Paradise, beautiful, great crew.
More expensive.
Expensive.
But if you can afford it, it's worth it for sure.
Great people.
We went there.
We did this with Carter as well.
Shout out to Charles and Christina, who's, you know, invited us.
And, but yeah.
There are cheaper ways, and they're worth it if you really want to explore it.
There are cheaper ways.
We're not going to discuss those.
Yeah, yeah.
There are other ways.
No, like even in Colorado, because it's decriminalized.
It is decriminalized.
It's not a criminal offense.
That's true.
Yeah, yeah.
So it's a misdemeanor.
Nobody, they actually had two CIA agents do it.
I think three, and I think Kevin said that two of them told them, we know what you're doing.
We don't care though.
I bet the CIA has done a lot of DMT.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I bet they've been in there a long time.
Yeah, I've done, have you ever done the gateways?
No, the gateway tapes.
Gateway process, I try to keep falling asleep.
You know, a similar thing happened to me, but then I learned how to kind of stay somewhat awake.
I'm very similar to you.
And I noticed that there was definitely changes.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, I started feeling there was one case that was really outstanding.
I put my head next to my wives like this, head to head.
The second I touched her head, I felt this headache.
but I knew it wasn't mine.
I'd like, feel it.
I was like, do you have a sharp headache right here?
She's like, yes.
Wow.
It was crazy.
Like, you could feel her headache.
So there's definitely something there.
It's supposed to unlock whatever's down there.
Do you believe in the universal consciousness?
And we're all just micro-projections of it?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I think consciousness is fundamental.
There's no, I don't think you can,
I don't think you can responsibly describe the world
without consciousness coming first.
That just doesn't make any sense.
I think so, too.
I've heard you talk about Benarna Castro quite a bit.
Great.
There's one thing that I always want to ask him
that I don't understand why he's so insistent on it,
which is that he thinks it's substrate dependent,
which is strange.
He only thinks it can be kind of instantiated
in a physical matter.
But other than that, I think he's probably the best outliner of this world.
He thinks it's substrate dependent?
Yeah.
He always gives this, again, it's very confusing
because without a doubt Bernato is one of the smartest people on the planet.
I thought he believed the physical comes out of the consciousness.
He says things.
things like, which is why that example is so...
I would love to ask him one day, but like...
And I don't mean it disrespectfully.
I just truly find it like a silly example.
The example it gives is like, well, if I simulate your bladder on my computer, my computer
is not going to pee.
That's literally a thing he says.
I'm like, why is not going to do anything?
But the computer is a different substrate.
So like, if you simulate a whole body on the computer, then the person in the simulation
will pee.
Sure.
Why are you...
What is this translation?
So I guess maybe that's what he means by it's not.
translatable for one substrate to another, but it's not the same as saying you need matter
to make consciousness.
That, unless he assumes that matter is the final kind of thing that is with consciousness,
I'm not sure, but I would love to ask him one day.
I wish he would do some podcasts.
One day, I really hope that we'll meet.
But I consumed basically everything he has to offer.
And yeah, definitely one of the more important people in that world, in that thought realm.
super eloquent, very clear on what he's saying.
Best outlines of why free will is really not a thing they can even be.
That's right. He doesn't believe it isn't free will.
And the projections, he believes that there's some will down below.
Well, like I said, is the only place that can have that will.
That's kind of what I was thinking when you were talking about.
Yeah, it's the same.
The box.
Well, I actually, for a long time, struggled as to how people can't see that, that it's not a coherent idea.
But then I realized that maybe would be.
people mean by that is not really what, let's say, I mean by that or what I think ought to be
meant by that, because words mean things, right? So if you're saying free will, what I think is implied
is that you think that you're somehow free of the immediate moment and somehow you float free of it
and then you make the choice in this some kind of a vacuum of something. It must be what people
mean by this, right? I'm different than whatever, right? Just being pushed around, right? But then
And maybe if the idea is more like there's more freedom of operation because there's more degrees of freedom, that's true because the brain is a much more advanced system.
But in the end, there's just a more complex system of like things pushing each other like you, right?
So the conscious part of it, which is the feeling that we have that were we, which is different than just what the neurons are doing, right?
Somehow that is postulated to have that freedom.
And also the word will is interesting.
because what you're saying is that you're kind of willing it to be, right?
There's almost like a just magical quality of just kind of like I'm willing it.
Both of them don't track even the first step of observation
because obviously whatever brought you here is responsible for what's going to happen next.
Right.
So it's always, you always within the sets of dominoes falling,
you're never outside of that sets of domino's falling.
You can't, the reason it's an incoherent concept is because you can't describe a situation.
that is logically consistent
in which somehow
all the dominoes are falling
but when it comes to this one domino
the domino stops everything
almost one second
I'll think because then
what is that internal process
of that one domino
it's infinite regress
where is the end of that
the answer is the beginning of everything
that's the one hole in the donut
that connects between what we experience
as a choice
that isn't really chosen by us
but yet feels like,
it feels like a choice only when you retroactively fit a story onto it later.
Right, man can do what he wills, but he can't will what he wills.
Exactly. How can you know your next thought if you haven't thought it, right?
So ultimately you have to bring it back to the ultimate first moment,
which is Bernardo's point,
but with a caveat, which is that he says that you can say
that the universal mind has this kind of like freedom of will,
with the one caveat that it is free to choose
that it is ought to choose
because of what it is.
Because if it's the totality of things,
it is all the things,
therefore it has a state
that dictates what the next state is
and it can experience it as a choice,
but how free are you
if you have to do that thing because of what you are?
And if you're saying,
yeah, but what if this,
other things influencing it, what other things? Because we're talking about the ultimate. Because
if you said other things, you're no longer referring to the ultimate. You're now referring to something
that is within something else, and that's not the ultimate. Sometimes I forget that we're doing
a show right now. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Thinking about so much stuff. Castrop's theory kind of explains why
randomness isn't a thing. Well, it doesn't solve it. It doesn't solve it. Right. Yeah, because
randomness is the opposite of free will. Right. It's not targeted. It's just random. And also
randomness can't be because
right is no true randomness
yeah
because if it's the totality of things
it is guaranteed to be the ultimate
set of everything that is possible
and if you're saying random
well then that means something
is outside of the scope of that
and therefore now it is the ultimate
now that is the ultimate
you know horizon of relevance man
like it's true
it's true
you once said that
99% of your audience would disagree with what you actually believe.
They came for the Matrix, and you're quietly handing them metaphysics.
I'm quietly handing them to present moment.
That's what you're doing.
Yeah.
Present moment.
Yeah.
It's the only thing that ever matters and never will.
Are people disappointed?
Sometimes.
Because they just want to talk about the laser.
They just want magic.
They want magic, they want the Matrix.
But the magic is right here.
And then the matrix and everything else becomes even more profound.
Because everything that is experienced truly through the present moment is always more profound.
It truly is.
There's an expansive quality to it that you can't communicate with words
because the logical trace can't really follow there.
I want to close with one thing.
And I think you're going to nail it.
When we talk about lack of free will, that's usually very nihilistic,
It's usually very dark.
If there's no free will, nothing matters,
life doesn't matter, but you have a different take on that.
Yeah.
It's the opposite of that.
The idea that because you don't have the ultimate say in things,
which is what free will postulated to be,
is the ultimate prison, not the ultimate freedom.
Just like we said with the AI,
if I put you in a situation where nothing is,
and you have to make a choice,
that is the hardest position to be in
because you're literally bringing it out of nowhere
which is almost impossible.
The freedom is in the understanding
that you are the space in which all of this is unfolding.
You're literally the totality of things where you are.
And that, to me, both connects you to the ultimate
and also frees you to just have fun
because you don't need to worry about the ultimate state of affairs.
you can just enjoy this to its ultimate degree
through actually acknowledging that that's the case.
Being pushed around as the universe,
it's kind of fun.
The state of flow is a lot of fun
when in fact you're in it,
because you're surfing.
There's an elation there.
So you actually, the irony is that you gain the ability
to experience actual magic,
like actual magic in real time.
When you get a wink from the universe,
there's nothing more satisfying than this.
So I think that if people are just willing for one moment to drop their need to,
you know, to be this final arbitrary in order to feel salvation,
and realize that that's an arbitrary choice they're making to put their salvation there.
If I don't have free will, what is it all for?
For this.
Do you feel good right now?
Because if not, I understand why you're trying to escape it,
but there are ways to truly drop into the present moment where everything opens up.
you're literally being handed everything.
And I will be honest,
it sounds like a vacuous promise
if somebody has never experienced it.
But this is why within the crazy pyrotechnics
that people can experience on psychedelics,
the thing that I would encourage anyone to notice
if they are doing that
is not the pyrotechnics,
but how it can feel
when you freed from the constraints
of needing to make decisions
or what you imagine making decisions.
See how that feels in your mind.
body.
You can breathe.
You'll feel true compassion.
True compassion, true freedom.
That's the freedom.
And then you don't need things to be this or that.
They can be anything and you will enjoy them just as much.
And you can experience hardships in life and everything else, but it will never have the same
dire nature, the nihilistic nature that you might experience because it's the mind trying
to tell you what must be for you to be free when in reality you're already always
That's the way to land the plane.
Where can they find you?
Dan Goal Thoughts is my YouTube channel.
D-A-N-G-O-Thoughts.
Danny Goller.com is all my links.
Our retreats, I highly recommend to check it out.
c-o-r-r-r-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-ROT.
If people want to check out everything with our nonprofit.
Danny Goller, this has been a joy.
Thank you, my friend.
Hi, everybody.
That was Danny Goal.
We covered the laser, the simulation, his cosmology, free will.
Let me try to make some sense of it if I can.
Here's what holds up.
Danny isn't making his life up.
American Ninja Warrior contestant, born to Moscow, raised in Israel.
The Vipasana he credits for everything is real.
a 10-day retreat, where you sit in total silence and observe your thoughts without judgment.
And he corrected me on his own credentials.
IPI letters, he said, is a newsletter, not pure you.
And I trust the guy who downgrades his own resume.
Now the bigger claims.
Danny says reality is computational, rendered, not fake.
Then physicist Melvin Vobsen at the University of Portsmouth published a 2023 paper in AIP advances.
He calls it the second law of infidynamics.
Information and physical systems.
compresses and optimizes over time.
That's not what you'd expect to happen in reality,
but that's what you'd expect if the universe were running on a computer.
That's a real paper.
It's peer-reviewed.
It's not accepted science.
Most physicists disagree.
It's just theory, but it's interesting.
Danny says mushrooms erased his OCD.
Now, a 2006 study at the University of Arizona
gave psilocybin to nine people with severe OCD
and cut their symptoms by up to 100%.
The one thing I couldn't verify is the code itself, the symbols.
Thousands of strangers seeing the same symbols in the same spots.
There's no published data yet.
Danny's really the first to say so.
And I have experience with the molecule, and I never seen anything like that.
But I never looked into a laser.
Because why would you?
Before the laser, Danny was on DMT,
and a being that looked like a frog showed him chords on a guitar.
Cords he said he didn't know how to play, and then he did.
Now, if it happened, that information came from out.
side of his own mind. If he didn't, the most important moment of his life was a misfire on a drug.
He can't prove it, I can't disprove it, but I'll take his word for it. And he built 10 years of
work on it, and he tells the story the same way every time. Now here's my take. On the surface,
Danny's just another psychedelics guy with a retreat and a nonprofit. But that's not what he's
doing. He's taking the most subjective experience a person can have and building an experiment
that could prove him wrong. He keeps saying the truth always wins.
and I believe him.
A man selling you a belief system doesn't invite you to debunk him.
Danny says, bring on the truth and he'll accept it.
I take him at his word.
You can find him on YouTube at Dan GoThoughts.
That's D-N-G-O-Thoughts.
D-N-G-O-Thos.
His retreats and his non-profit code of reality are all on Danny Gollar.com.
And I'm thinking about trying it.
That's Goller, G-O-L-E-R.
Links are down below.
Now, if the simulation is something that fascinates you like me,
I broke it all down on my episode
We Live into simulation.
I included the science there as well.
It's a lot of fun.
Until next, I be safe.
Be kind.
You know that you, I appreciate it.
You got the cats in here?
Come up, man.
I'm trying to...
Need it.
The scenario 51.
A secret code inside the Bible said I would.
I love my UFOs
and paranormal fun
as well as music.
and the like I should.
But then another conspiracy theory becomes the truth.
My friends, and it never ends.
No, it never ends.
Back at and got stuck inside males' hole with M. K.L. truck being only two away.
And in alone, on a film set were the shadow people there?
just fought the smiling man
And I'm told
And his name was cold
And I can't believe
The mouthman sightings
And the solar storms still come
To have got the
The secret city underground
Mysterious number stations
Planet Serbode 2
Project Stargate and where the dark watchers
found
We're in a simulation
You know what I'm going to be able to get me.
