The Wolf Of All Streets - $200 Trillion Bitcoin & The Stablecoin Tsunami | What's Next For Crypto?

Episode Date: March 27, 2025

Today we're joined by crypto experts Molly Jane Zuckerman (Blockworks), Joshua Frank (The Tie), Edan Yago (Bitcoin OS Core Contributor), and fan-favorite Dave Weisberger to unpack the REAL future of Bitcoin and crypto. Molly Jane Zuckerman: https://x.com/mollyjzuckerman Joshua Frank: https://x.com/joshua_frank_ Edan Yago: https://twitter.com/EdanYago Dave Weisberger: https://x.com/daveweisberger1 PLUS: Dan from The Chart Guys reveals his latest market analysis and hottest trades—don't miss it! The Chart Guys: https://www.youtube.com/@ChartGuys ►► 🔥 LBANK Exchange - No KYC Required! Claim up to 50% trading bonus! Join today & get rewarded! Start trading to claim up to 50% in trading bonuses!! 👉https://www.lbank.com/activity/ScottMelker-Cashback?icode=4M3HD ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEKDAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/ ►► Arch Public Unleash algorithmic trading. Discover how algorithms used by hedge-funds are now accessible to traders looking for unparalleled insights and opportunities! 👉https://archpublic.com/ ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. Use code '10OFF' for a 10% discount. 👉https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://x.com/scottmelker Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.com/ Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c #Bitcoin #Crypto #Investments The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor. Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.

Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go.

Let's go. All right. Hi, everyone. Welcome to the Wolf of All Streets with Scott Melker, but he is not here today. As you can tell. So I'm Molly Jane Zuckerman. I'm BlockWorks Senior Newsletter Strategist, and I'll be running today's live stream. So what if you guys can go around, say hi to everyone,

and then we can just hop right in. Hey, everyone. Go for it, go for it. Simultaneously, yeah, that's what I meant. At the same time. One, two, three, go. Thank you. Yeah.

Okay, I'm done. Great. Next. Yeah, I mean, this morning's conversation is obviously interesting given that we saw GameStop not just decide to put me into Bitcoin as a reserve asset but ape into the micro strategy strategy which I think deserves commentary for those who understand what the difference is. Not only do they have $4.8 billion in cash that they potentially will put into Bitcoin savings, but they are going to raise another $1.3 billion using their volatility.

That is a strategy that quite a few companies can use. The implications of the market are fairly interesting, and the market looked at it in a way which I think is indicative of them being hyper-focused on Trump and tariffs and everything else. But I'm curious what yours is because you are clients of the people who are actually running in this particular case. Can I just ask, is Dave cutting in and out for everyone? Yes.

He's cutting in and out a little. I got the main gist, though. Dave, you can. Yeah. There's a little wrong audio. Dave you can Yeah Audio just like a little Robotic in the pauses but You can think about that Well, I'll turn the question to you guys. So like Dave said

You know GameStop announced this new strategy in the market yawns Do you think that it's just because of Trump and tariffs or do you think that people are over this Bitcoin strategy already before it's almost even really started? Because this is the first example outside of strategy as far as I know. Well, it's not the first outside of strategy. There's a number of companies who are attempting this strategy. And in fact, there's a number of companies in multiple different countries. So we've seen this strategy being deployed by companies being traded on the Japanese stock exchange, the French, the English. I'll say first big American then to make myself sound less uninformed, the first big

public American. Yeah, my sense is that right now overall bullish news is not impactful across the entire market, not just crypto, but all markets. There's a huge amount of uncertainty in the market right now. And so what we've seen is hundreds of billions of dollars from funds, in particular hedge funds, have been removed from the market and no longer in the market and have gone to cash. And that is dampening any sort of ability for the market to react, especially in the equities market, to any add, obviously, the idea of more companies buying Bitcoin should theoretically be good for Bitcoin's price. But I think to Iago's point, obviously, you have a lot of uncertainty. But also, there are, you know, and this is no hate on GameStop, but GameStop is a mostly dead company.

I was going to say it's like a meme. It's like an internet meme, but it's like a brick and mortar internet meme. Yeah, I mean, I'm sure they make some money and they have some cash reserves and you know, they are they're they're a Real company, but this is not Apple. This is not, you know, Tesla going out there and buying Bitcoin again, right? It's GameStop. And so I think look the market did run up I mean we got a temporary run up to about 89 K But there is a lot going on from a macro perspective as well and from a regulatory perspective that's dampening this. Well I can, by the way, is this better?

I'm just, yeah, just whatever. In any case, I disagree. I think that actually GameStop is as easily as real a company as MicroStrategy was before MicroStrategy embarked on this. No, that's fair. That's a totally fair point. is as easily as real a company as MicroStrategy was before MicroStrategy embarked on this. No, that's fair. That's a totally fair point. In fact, they have more cash reserves

than MicroStrategy had when they started. I think they also have a strong revenue stream. And they have a revenue stream, and they have a cult following, and it's interesting for that. So honestly, I think it's, people love to wait on everything Sailor's doing, but the truth is, is that most people are concerned that Sailor is literally

doing exactly what those of us in the trading world know is the worst possible thing, which is to lever up as the price goes up, meaning that you continually take increase and increasing risks and people are worried about the concentration risk there. Having a cadre of other companies that are equally volatile, having the ability to financialize and acquire Bitcoin is a very big deal. I think that the market is missing this one. Financialization is something that's happened to our entire market. It's what took the financial sector from 8% of the S&P to 40% of the S&P, you know, over a few decades. And it's a very, very big trend.

And we're talking many, many trillions of dollars there. So you know, this is very, it is very clear that the financialization of Bitcoin is now underway and it feels somewhat unstoppable to me. And that is not a small deal. And honestly, since we all think Bitcoin, Bitcoiners at least all think Bitcoin is somewhere between 90 and 95 percent undervalued as a starting point. That financialization is the way that that will actually realize. So to me, it's a big deal.

But it's one of those big deals that we'll look back on in 10 years and say it was a big deal. But I agree with you, Josh. I think everyone's fixated on the macro right now and And I'm curious, you know what your people are telling you because I find it really interesting that macro economic news That says it's gonna cause the economy to slow down and at the same Well, this is the older risk on risk off crypto debate that's been happening forever where we all think Bitcoin should be a risk off asset, but it really does behave as a risk on asset. 100%.

And it's funny, but gold does this too at times. It's kind of amusing. In global financial crisis, people don't remember that gold dropped along with stocks and then three months later took off on a massive run. You know, this time people are looking at saying, okay, wait a minute, the Federal Reserve is, is the sent to the Federal Reserve. Are they going to allow long rates to move higher? Probably not.

Are they going to flood the market with liquidity? Probably so. Why do we care about, you know, economic slowdown if they're going to flood the market with liquidity? Historically, it's been good for Bitcoin. Market cares right now because you're right, it's part of the risk off. To me, it's interesting because you would think that the market would start to distinguish sorts of these things between them.

Yet, some of the charts and some of the altcoins actually were better yesterday than Bitcoin, which I found fascinating. Well, speaking about just sort of the main topic here today, Bitcoin and then Michael Saylor. So he said this week that he sees Bitcoin as going to be a $200 trillion asset class. It's going to be, I think it was like the global settlement layer for an AI driven internet. Did this seem like a realistic target for you guys? Or do you have any pushback on his aspirations for the future of Bitcoin?

Yeah, I think you're probably the most bullish of us. Yeah. So, I would answer this in two ways. First of all, was it a realistic assumption 10 years ago to assume that Bitcoin would be a multi-trillion dollar asset? Practically everyone would have told you no, and yet here we are. Was it a realistic assumption that we would see

within 16 years of the system launching that the United States is what as other countries were creating strategic reserves of Bitcoin, everyone would have told you no, including Bitcoiners, and yet here we are. What is the value of a global and borderless supranational, right, not controlled by any government, not controlled by any country. Super national ledger and settlement mechanism. It's massive. What is the value of that in a increasingly digitized world? Massive. What is the value of that in a world where productivity spikes and we go into a phase of economic growth probably unprecedented in human history, it's massive. Is 200 billion dollars a reasonable target? I mean, you know, maybe it's

300 trillion, but seeing Bitcoin within 10 years surpassing gold's market cap, gold market cap, creating a hundred trillion dollar plus economy. I think it's actually my base case. I mean, there's a there's a difference, though, between surpassing gold's 20 trillion dollar market cap and becoming a 200 trillion market cap asset. I mean, the global market, I just pulled this up, by the way. I'll share my screen here. Maybe somebody can can help with this. This is a couple of years ago from LSag,

but this show is kind of a breakdown. I don't know if, Misha, can you save us here and hold this up? Yeah, I'm trying to see. I think I can maybe present as the leader, I have nothing to present. Oh, here, let me drop the link. Maybe you can. Yeah, drop the link. Let's see.

This is slide three on the stack. All right. It's basically just a breakdown of global markets. I mean, global markets are about a thousand trillion dollars. I guess it's a quadrillion dollars. Yeah. And so, you know, to think that crypto is going to be 20% or sorry, Bitcoin specifically is going to be 20% of that I think is potentially a bit of a stretch.

However, you also have inflation and things in 10 years can look differently than they look now and maybe instead of 20%, it is some other percent. But I do think it's, I think the view that Bitcoin will at one point hit gold or surpass gold is a conversation that can be had. But I think 200 trillion is a bit of a stretch. You guys can see that I'm sharing this, right? It works? No, I don't think we can see it.

But look, I can't see it, but I know the chart, right? So what are we looking at? We're looking at about a hundred, 150 trillion in equities. It says that 175 in equities, 380, 687 in rates, 118 in FX, and then 9 in MM, which I guess is money markets. Right. So why is real estate 300 billion, 300 trillion? Right. Part of the reason that real estate is 300 trillion is because it is a financialized asset. Are we going to continue to see that kind of growth

in real estate? Could some of the financialization in real estate move to a more liquid asset that doesn't have the costs associated with maintaining it? I think definitely yes. Can we see part of government bonds moving into a significant new digital asset which has limited supply and the tendency to growth? Absolutely yes. But I think the primary driver here is that the global economy grows at something like 4% annualized. This quadrillion is going to close to double over

the next 20 years at 4%. Assuming AI does add an additional 1%, 2% or 3% to that global growth, that's a 10-year period. And so there's, and where is that capital going to go? And so there's there and where is that where is that capital going to go? Right. AI companies are being commoditized. Frontier models are being commoditized. What is digital and scarce, which is going to act as a bottleneck? I would say it's Bitcoin. And then in addition to that, over the next 10, 15 years, we're going to see millennials inheriting most of the world's wealth.

And millennials tend to have between 10 and 30 percent of their assets in crypto. So we're going to see several waves that are going to be driving many trillions potentially into crypto and specifically into Bitcoin. So again, I don't know what the timeframe here is and exactly to put a number on it, nobody can do that. But it is certainly a realistic target to expect Bitcoin to substantially surpass gold and to achieve 100 trillion dollars.

I was just thinking like as a millennial, is that going to be me? Like is that me and my friends? Are you going to sell your Bitcoin? No. Are you going to buy more? That's the thing. I am totally off topic here. Are you going to sell your Bitcoin? No. Are you going to buy more? Oh, Steve, that's the thing. I am totally off topic here.

I was a very strong believer in Bitcoin as money for a very long time. So I got paid a salary in Bitcoin and I would use it to do things like buy food, pay my rent, etc. That was years ago and I think Bitcoin has moved far beyond that. And I would not want to sell it in the same way. But I'll call it, I won't call it me again, but he knows we, I used to just, you know, I paid for my tennis lessons with Bitcoin for a very long time. Very expensive, very expensive tennis lessons. I hope you're good at tennis. You know what? No, anyway, sorry, Dave. I interrupted.

Well, I mean, look, the real question is in 1971 and before, gold was the denominator and effectively represented 100% of financial assets, right? It was a denominator. It was backing all the currencies until Nixon closed the gold window. And its price had to move pretty quickly once it changed. Actually, it's really 1913 that it was 100%. It devalued it, whatever. But at some point, for a long period of time in human history, gold represented all assets, not because it was the asset, but because it was a denominator.

If you talk to people on the Bitcoin standard, most Bitcoin maxis believe Bitcoin will become the denominator. And that's the path towards these numbers that are hyperbolic. In order for that to happen, quite a few things have to happen. And to be blunt, I think that it doesn't matter. It's sort of when you're looking at an investment case, there's the right tail of what could happen Are you still gonna own it at that point? Who knows maybe but what's the more likely scenario is Bitcoin replacing gold and reclaiming some of that denominator status

That even if it isn't full and so what sailor is basically saying is okay one-fifth the denominator status would get you there To where the global economy is going. And that's really the question. Will Bitcoin become the global store of value? And I think that if the answer to that question is will it become the global store of value at the level that gold is, meaning digital, a digital asset that's easily much easier to use, that's much more verifiable, that's a hell of a lot cheaper to store, etc, etc, etc. It seems highly likely. Will it go farther?

Do you think that- Is it a different question? Do you think that the launch of all of these new stablecoins is going to throw a wrench in the idea of Bitcoin being the backing asset? No, it's going to accelerate it. No, it's going to accelerate it and accelerate it massively. Because what happens is the stablecoins, the first order effect

is stablecoins will eat bank deposits because they are so much more efficient spendable. And frankly, the next generation of stablecoins are going to have yield that are going to be well above what Jason Citty pay in checking accounts. So it's going to attract a ton of assets.

And now all of a sudden those assets, as opposed to I have to do a bank wire and spend 30 bucks to move money, or I have to do Zelle, which is limited at $5,000 or $1,000 a pop and or potentially not on people's list. I can now move it dramatically cheaper on the weekend without a problem. It's going to be the apex predator of fiat vehicles.

And I think people understand that. But it's still a fiat vehicle. People spend fiat. People are starting to learn to save in Bitcoin. And those are very, very different. So it's one thing to do cash management. It's another thing to have an asset that you're buying. I think that when you introduce more and more people to the digital world

I think it becomes a lot easier to onboard than the Bitcoin and that's really the question now the other piece of that is Stable coins most people using stable coins within a year or two won't even know they're using stable coins It'll just be there as part of the plumbing So the question I'll go for you because I know this is what you're spending most of your life on, is how do you make saving in Bitcoin so ubiquitous that people don't have to know about the technology underneath it? I don't need to do anything. No one needs to do anything. People don't save in cash. The amount of cash and cash equivalents out there that represent savings or the global chunk of global assets is very, very small. I don't have the chart in front of me,

but Josh, you do. What is it? Oh, I removed the chart. So I have it open. What's the keyword I searched for cash? I don't think I think I think so. If FX is cash, it's about 11%. Yeah. So just above single digits, right? Around 10%. So assuming the ratios remain the same, I think the bigger chunks that are available is demonetizing to a degree gold, demonetizing real estate, demonetizing

corporate debt. But the big thing is government debt, treasury bonds. Government debt has underperformed and is becoming more volatile at the same time. The Sharpe ratio sucks. People are moving out of it. The 60-40 portfolio is dead. The new 60-40 portfolio is 60% equities, 40% Bitcoin. So Josh, BTC, easy 100X. Easy, easy. The market this morning disagrees. We only have a little bit of time left. So I was thinking like maybe for our last topic, we could talk about what's going on maybe with the altcoin ETFs that are coming. Does that sound like a good?

Yeah, I mean, I can jump in there. I mean, I think altcoin ETFs are very bullish. I think that we will see a tremendous amount of altcoin ETFs flood the market relatively quickly. And by relatively quickly, I mean, starting in Q3, Q4 of this year, I think we'll see a lot of them flood in. What I'm excited about is not single asset altcoin ETFs. It's multi asset altcoin ETFs. The primary reason I'm excited, well, there's a few reasons I'm excited about them. The first is, it allows people to get exposure to crypto more broadly beyond just Bitcoin, which I think there is demand for and diversified exposure and exposure beyond Bitcoin, ETH and SOL. I think the larger demand is going to be among folks to short that product. So if you are a crypto hedge fund and you are looking to pick a single asset winner over a basket of the overall market, I think that's very exciting. And I think there will be a tremendous amount of demand for that product. And it's very difficult to do today with market structure and borrow rates with

crypto. So I think there will be a lot of demand. And I also think you'll have an S&P 500 type effect where you have a smaller cap asset. And when they enter the top 25 index, they then get bought. Just like when an asset enters the S&P 500 that creates buying a demand for those assets. And so I think it's broadly a good thing for the market. And we're at a point right now where liquid hedge funds are really struggling to raise money. So we're not seeing a lot of demand from hedge funds rather than VC funds rather, like liquid crypto funds are really struggling to raise money. And so there's not a there's not a huge bid for alts right now.

And we're also not seeing retail bid for alts. So I think, you know, you need something that structurally is going to change to create a bit of a bid for alts. And I think this will be part of that structural change. I think that there's a nuance in what Josh said there, which is important to understand. I am very you know underwhelmed by the notion of individual crypto asset ETFs. I think everyone thinks that's going to be the savior. I think that's not yeah sure but that's the key. I think multi-asset the

ability for and this will happen once we get through a regulatory regime that is reasonable, which we are about to have, and I think Paul Ekins' testimony is today. And so I don't know when his confirmation will be, but I would imagine it will be fairly soon. Look the ability for someone who doesn't have a notion and doesn't want to follow every layer One layer to etc to buy a diversified basket that will continually update itself of what are the protocols in crypto that are? winning is Extremely exciting because there are a lot of people who believe that there's a huge tam for non Bitcoin crypto But they have no idea whether Solana aptos XR the great question The winners the big question is

how many assets are in the index of the ETF that takes off because there will be a Few of these products that win There's not going to be a ton and it makes a huge difference if it is a 10 asset product or a 25 asset product. I think the more assets, the better for the market. Josh, have you been seeing- Well, yeah, that's true. All right, Diego, last point,

and then we're gonna move on to the technical analysis, but you can gauge your say, because everyone else got a lot. No, no, I just wanted to ask Josh, in terms of the clientele that you're talking to, have you seen significant appetite for purchasing this product? There's significant appetite to short the product. And so there'll be many people who want to short it.

But that's also going to create new issuance of assets. So that will create issuance, the fact that people want to be able to short it. The demand is there. And also talking to the asset issuers themselves, like all the big ETF issuers, with the exception of maybe one of the biggest ones that is like, we're too big for this. I think all of the other ETF issuers are gonna come out

flying with multi-asset products very, very quickly. And I don't just mean CryptoNative, I also mean TradFi. All right, that's some great food for thought to leave it on. I want to thank you guys all for coming on with Scott out. You guys were a great audience. Or a great audience is great. You guys are great, great speakers. But now we're going to hop over to Dan from the Chart Guys

to do a little bit of a technical analysis. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. Thank you. Bye. Thank you, Molly. Of course. Take it away.

All right. So on Bitcoin here, still watching what I would refer to as a weak daily uptrend. Bulls will take it because it's an uptrend. But when I say weak, essentially what I mean is every time we break resistance, we're going straight into consolidation. And that's obviously not what you want to see. You want to see if you're a bull, you want to see a break of resistance lead to follow through. And we'll look at a couple of different examples, just a stronger alt versus weaker alt in just a moment. But essentially, I'm watching this Bitcoin 12-hour channel just as a bit of a visual guide.

I generally don't trade off of trend lines, but I like that's nice and contained and it's very clear. So we're testing the support right now. There's weakness in the NASDAQ. First thing this morning, and we know Bitcoin definitely is a part or I should say is impacted by that. But with where we stand in markets and this goes for Metta, NASDAQ, Nvidia, all these things, altcoins, Bitcoin, we're scouting weekly lower highs as the most likely result of the current bounce. And so that doesn't mean we're shorting every day or we're trying to nail a top every day. It just means in the back of our minds we know that the result of this bounce

is likely to be a weekly lower high. And if these bulls are going to prove that things are shifting on a longer term perspective, we will have to top out wherever we do and then confirm that weekly uptrend for us to say, OK, things are shifting back in favor of the bulls on a number of the longer term timeframes. And so, uh, again, at this point, we're testing the low of yesterday right now on Bitcoin here. First thing. And essentially you look at the NASDAQ, you can

see the NASDAQ is following through from the bear day yesterday. Big shift yesterday. You know, you could point to the headlines. Was it trunks? 25% auto tariffs, whatever. I don't care what the reason is. It is clearly showing weakness. And at the moment, it's not ideal for the bulls because this is a back test. This was the clear resistance where we failed multiple times on the way on the initial attempt to get this move going, reject, reject bulls really want to hold that on the back test and see bounce continuation. And you can see we fell through it and we're rejecting again

And so that's not a good look We need to reclaim that and again the same thing the Nasdaq is this a weekly lower high being set if the answer is yes That's a weekly bear flag the bounce or trace meant This is where I use Fibonacci's to help determine the most likely scenario. This bounce or trace mint is is weak to help determine the most likely scenario, this bounce retracement is weak. We would need to see a 50% plus bounce retracement if we're gonna be creating the space for a weekly higher low to try and form.

So bulls are really hoping this is not the top. Again, same thing. Technically, we're still in a daily uptrend. It's possible bulls form a daily higher low from here and keep the bounce going But again after yesterday It's just not a comfortable spot for bulls to be in the next couple of days are pretty important for us to Determine whether these weekly lower highs are being set or not You can see the Nasdaq right now is is back testing this 20,000 psychological level

ETH as we know is again the same thing as bitcoins just weak level. ETH as we know is again the same thing as Bitcoin, just weak. Again you break resistance straight into consolidation. You break resistance straight into consolidation. Anytime you change a trend with no follow through, you zoom out and look for a flag on a longer term time frame. And again same thing as the NASDAQ, ETH's weekly bounce is even weaker. And again my perspective and how I view it is okay OK, bears have been in control. The burden of proof is on the bulls to prove to us that this is not a weekly bear flag. And they're just not doing a good job at this point. Again, we need a clear leg up. And just as the example that I was talking about, SUI as an altcoin, it's topping out with an

upper wick today, but it seems some relative strength the last couple of days. On the left, that's what we have, a daily resistance break with follow through. That's 15% plus over resistance. And you compare that to ETH on the right, and it's just a very different picture. Resistance break with follow through, resistance break with zero follow through. So again, you know, if you're an altcoin bull, you want your alt to look like the one on the left, SUI, much more than ETH on the right. But with where we stand, most names look like ETH. If you go down the list, they're all getting the daily breaks with no follow through at the point, at this point.

Again, you could say, okay, we still have the higher lows and yes, that is true. But, uh, we need, we bulls to prove something. Again, I just imagine I'm not short on imagine I'm not short on crypto right now, but I just imagine that if I'm a bear, I put myself in that position. I'm in a short position. On the weekly timeframe, I have absolutely nothing to worry about right now in the majority of altcoins. We know some of them are stronger like XRP, but you got your lead bull XRP just confirmed a daily downtrend. This is a higher low, lower high, lower low. So again, is XRP shaping up a weekly lower high?

It certainly is developing that way at the moment. And so if our stronger lead bull like XRP were to roll over and lose this base of support at $2 and just under $2, that would obviously be a continued red flag for altcoin bulls. So I'm going to be watching that pretty closely in the coming weeks. Binance has been another name that's had a stronger bounce, but it's got a triple top at its high, you know, just really can't get over the 640s. We top out there two days in a row, top out a third time, and now today we're topping out a fourth time. So again, zoom out. Is this a weekly lower high shaping up?

Certainly looks like a possible scenario. Outside of the crypto world, we've been keeping an eye on the metal miners and GDX just tightening up sideways. This is the senior miners, what I call them here. So I've got swing positions in NUGT and JNUG, which are the leveraged version of these miners, but I'm walking up a stop. And we first talked about it on the show a few weeks ago,

right before this breakout got going. And I've now got my stop under this daily higher low to ensure worst case scenario is some profit. You know, this is a daily bull flag attempt. And if it fails, that essentially is me saying, all right, you know, I want to take my little profit, go home and patiently observe from there. Because again, for me, the most important aspect of these medals is silver testing something like 12 year highs.

And if silver cannot get over these 12 year highs, then we're not going to see follow through on these miners. So need to see silver with another leg up to keep me confident, but a little bit more of a protective play keeping those gains. So we'll see how that shakes out. Again, prove it bulls, burdens on bulls here. Need the NASDAQ to set a daily higher low, need Bitcoin to set a daily higher low, try and keep this bounce going, but just keep in the back of your minds the most likely scenario in tons of individual stocks, crypto, ETFs, et cetera, is a weekly lower high to be the result of this bounce.

Appreciate you all stopping by and we will see you next week. Thanks again. Let's go. Let's go.