The Wolf Of All Streets - Are Stablecoins The Killer Crypto App? | Crypto Town Hall

Episode Date: May 5, 2025

Crypto Town Hall is a daily Twitter Spaces hosted by Scott Melker, Ran Neuner & Mario Nawfal. Every day we discuss the latest news in the crypto and bring the biggest names in the crypto space to share their opinions.►►OKX Sign up for an OKX Trading Account then deposit & trade to unlock mystery box rewards of up to $60,000!  👉  https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER  ►►THE DAILY CLOSE BRAND NEW NEWSLETTER! INSTITUTIONAL GRADE INDICATORS AND DATA DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY AT THE DAILY CLOSE. TRADE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. 👉 https://www.thedailyclose.io/   ►►NORD VPN  GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL  - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets    ►►COINROUTES TRADE SPOT & DERIVATIVES ACROSS CEFI AND DEFI USING YOUR OWN ACCOUNTS WITH THIS ADVANCED ALGORITHMIC PLATFORM. SAVE TONS OF MONEY ON TRADING FEES LIKE THE PROS! 👉 http://bit.ly/3ZXeYKd  ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/    Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker   Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io   Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe   Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c   #Bitcoin #Crypto #Trading The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor.  Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.

Good morning, everybody. Happy Monday. Welcome to Crypto Town Hall. Every weekday, 10, 15 AM Eastern Standard Time. Huge thank you, first to Dave Weisberger for holding down the hosting duties last week while I was abroad in Dubai for token. 2400% hit rate of coming home from said conferences, sick, struggling even today after basically missing it for the entirety of last week. Would be worth definitely doing a bit of a Dubai recap. Carlo, I see you in the audience. We'd love to bring you up because I know you were there. I have a request if you would like to come up.

I found it to be a great week. Obviously, Dave, we discussed this last week as I was landing. Carlo, are you on stage because you show as listener to me? Yes, I'm here. Do you hear me? Yeah, the glitch. Good morning, Carlo. Go ahead. Good morning, Scott. I just sent you a recap I wrote up about token 2049 Dubai insanity. Got the opportunity to obviously visit with you and a lot of the crypto town hall team

and that was fun. I don't even know where to begin with it other than to say that I'm extremely bullish on the future of crypto and Dubai is telling me that innovation forward is the path and that the US is on board and waking up to that. So I think we're going to see some exciting things coming. Most importantly, did you come home sick? No, I had a rough flight. Someone had to be taken off of my plane due to a medical emergency. I had delays in Houston. It took me over 30 hours to get home, but I'm intact and back to the office. Congratulations. You did well. Yeah,

I share the same sentiment about the conference. I thought it had the proper amount of FOMO and hype and it was not peak bull market insanity, which I'm glad, because you can pretty much judge exactly where the market's going by the level of excitement at these conferences. And I thought that it was relatively measured probably because Bitcoin has done well, the rest of the market has lagged. And so token 2049 is pretty much the rest of the market, right? Yeah, I can't disagree. And I think my biggest takeaway is that I think we're going to see a massive stable

coin summer. All indications seem to be that stable coins are going to be the meta of this cycle as far as I'm concerned. And I think everyone's going to want to build on stable coins. And a lot of attention is going to go in that direction if this bill can get through Congress and signed into law. Great, Mark. Hey guys, thanks. Yeah, I agree.

I like the term the meta of the next cycle. You know, we had, what was it? ICO season, we had, you know, DeFi, and then this is going to be stable coin just feeds a lot of the fishes in our TradFi and digital universe. But I don't know if I want to steal the theme, so Scott put me. You can steal it, go for it. Go for it, go run. We kind of have recapped it,

and everybody's seen the conference recaps, so yeah, don't need to be it today. To me, it's the two cans of Coke in front of the old guy. I think Buffett's swan song, it is, you know, with US dollar down, bonds down, equity down, pulled up 2.5%, it looks like everyone was watching Warren Buffett's farewell song It was more strident than I would imagined His focus on the dollar and debasement And the fact that he struggled to give it It's kind of like the arc of the Queen dying the Pope dying and Buffett stepping down

I don't know if there and many more of the old guard left So very constructive and in a good segue into the whole stable coin adoption So, very constructive and a good segue into the whole stablecoin adoption. So that was my sort of five cents. Anyone wants to take, you know, provide their take on the Buffett speech? I don't know if everyone heard it, but it was pretty damning, I thought. Dave? Well, I'm of mixed opinions here. I mean, look, Buffett has been the probably single largest beneficiary of financialization on the planet. And so, you know, if you understand, you know,

how Berkshire has made money in the derivatives markets, you know, what they've done, it's been incredible. And yes, you know, he's done an incredible job of seeing that meta trend. And at the end, I find it a bit disingenuous, sort of like, you know, when he talks about tax policy, and he ignores the fact that that it's all because of capital gains, and, you know, etc, etc. So there's all sorts of stuff about Buffett. But the interesting thing in my mind, is to have a conversation about dollar debasement and not have and not even acknowledge, you know, Bitcoin, which he is called

rat poison squared, considering what everyone else has said there. I mean, I think that it's just it's you're in your 90s, you're not going to change. And he goes off into the sunset without seeing, you know, without seeing effectively the antidote to a lot of the financialization that made Berkshire an enormous amount of money. I find that an interesting juxtaposition, curious as it were. I wanted to talk about stablecoins a bit because the news that some of the quote, Democrat supporters are bailing because using Trump as an excuse

and descending into more partisan politics, I think it's fascinating. I think what happens now will be really important. I've said before, I don't think that it makes sense to do it without yield, but I totally understand they're going to. I also don't think that that really matters. And I think that the real question, the real philosophical question is there are people in our

space, we all kind of understand this, that know that the whole fractional reserve banking system, which is what is being defended by those who are trying to slow down or stop the stablecoin bill, is under threat because it's no longer necessary. It increases risk, it requires government backstopping, and frankly, capital formation doesn't really need it anymore. And the increase of velocity of money that will come out of stablecoins, I think is, I mean, Carlo understands it, you understand it, but I think a lot of listeners don't really

understand why do we care about stablecoins? And the answer is because that's how you reshape the financial system. That's how investors can earn real interest that the market determines and not their bank determines. That's how most capital raising is going to happen. It's going to change it. And so it's a very big deal. And you could go down that pathway. But that's why all this matters. That's why the mood in Dubai is what it was, which is we're building our heads are down. And we see, you know, we see a green field ahead of us. But you know, still, you know, we'll see what happens. Yeah, the stable court situation is interesting. Dave, I didn't dig too deeply into that. I saw that obviously there was some opposition growing.

Elizabeth Warren, you know, fired a few shots, but with the Republican majority, is there really a threat of legislation not getting done? I haven't dug deeply into this. I'm legitimately asking. They need seven Democrats to avoid a filibuster or before they have to include in the big beautiful bill, which can... And just so people understand that I'm being a little bit sarcastic, but the reason for the big beautiful bill is because the same way the infrastructure, whatever the Inflation Reduction Act got passed. That kind of nonsense is, this is stupid, but it's true. In the US, you can avoid a filibuster on something

that's called reconciliation. If it's part of a budget, then you can avoid it. I think the hope is, and it would be great if Ron, you know, Ron Hammond or Perry Anne or someone were up here to comment on it, but the hope is, is that there would be more than seven Democrats that will be passed the filibuster level. And that's really what what the that's what a lot of the Washington policy advocates are trying to make happen. I also saw that this was specific to the genius act, which is the one coming out of the House, right?

Oh no, Genius is the Senate and stable is the House. It's the Senate because the House are not going to be able to stop it. There's too many pro crypto Democrats in the House. And remember the difference, just for those once again to understand why, two years is that the House you have to go run for reelection every two years. So it's more likely that the Democrats in the House, that there are those who know that they won't get reelected if they obstruct us. Whereas in the Senate, there are lots of senators who have another four to six years. So they're like, eh, whatever.

And some of them are really old and probably won't run again. So it is different. That makes perfect sense. them are really old and probably won't run again. So, you know, it is different. That makes perfect sense. Carlo, we had a conversation about stable coins literally at I think one o'clock in the morning at a crypto banter event somewhere in Dubai, because that's what happens at crypto conferences. Maybe it was a bit earlier, but you voiced some concerns. You know, I had some concerns and I actually talked with some people at Aptos the next day. I went over to their booth and talked with one of their devs. My concern was our stablecoins and I've talked about this with you as well, Dave.

My concern was our stablecoins, if successful, going to be the death of L1s. And their dev had an interesting take on it. Given the throughput speed of stablecoins like USDC, not great, not huge, they still are going to have to rely on high throughput, high speed L1s. And they're looking at it as an integration, almost like an API plugin to whatever stable coin you're launching. So what concerns I had about that seem to be addressed by the devs. And I think long term, I have to agree with Dave, it's the future of commerce. I think there's so much traditional finance backing behind this that I don't see any probability

that this bill is going to die because it would essentially be shooting down the biggest hope the United States has for financial innovation, not only for the United States, but globally. Because one of the takeaways from talking with a lot of family offices and VCs over shisha bars and tobaccos and teas over there is that they also believe that the United States is open for business again. And I think we're going to see a rotation of capital back into the US. And I think it'll be built on stable coins. Yeah. And also, I don't think it should be taken lightly that stable coin issuers could

be the buyer of last resort for US treasuries, depending on how the world evolves. Oh, yeah. I think that's going to be some quantitative easing in a very stealth way. And but yeah, go ahead, Mark. No, it's hard not to come back to these, you know, core parts of it. Stablecoins are going to be dollar based, the majority of them. And if that's the case, I would think even if it's not a mandate by the Fed, you being a stablecoin user would like to see treasuries back in Fed, you being a stablecoin user would like to see treasuries backing them. Tether notwithstanding, if you believe their audit, I guess they're 85%.

So if that's the case, there are two things. You're right. There's an incentive to make it happen by the US government. There's an incentive to use it by users because it still is the largest, most liquid asset. And then the banks, I think, and this is a part Dave or Carlo, you can help me with, I haven't done work on what the likely dynamic is if, if, if the interest is not paid out to the holder, but the holder just, you know, benefits from the velocity, then obviously it's a boon for the, for the issuer.

I think absolutely the banks are going to win big here and Dave, I know you're about to hit this and I'm going to give you the opening. This is a fee bonanza for them. Jesus in the beginning. Yes. In the beginning. Yes. And in the medium to longer term, no, it's going to open them up to competition. But you know, look, having been at at Citigroup during the the entire, you know, changes in the equity markets and the internet and all the stuff that went on, I mean, I kind of understand

how they're going to approach it. But just think of it this way. Right now, when you send money to somebody else, and it seems like it's immediate, although there's very strict limits on it, try doing a Zelle transfer of $50,000 and you'll see what I mean. Coincidentally Zelle went down on Friday network-wide so yeah you're right. Right but the reason that it that they put strict limits on it is because they have to because it is an instantaneous transfer. It's sort of like you know it's a network but it's still relying upon relying upon the ACH network underneath it, which takes three days for the money to actually clear. And so this is going from three days to three seconds, actually, not even to sub second in many cases. And so what does that enable? Well, that enables a much faster movement of capital. It means if you're right now you keep money in a checking account, the internet banks are going to very quickly and that's by the way,

why you see Coinbase applying for banking licenses. The internet banks are going to very quickly say, listen, you don't need, you know, you can do all your payments, whatever, instead of overdraft, we're going to give you automatic, whatever we're going to have an account that's a savings account, or we're going to have an account that's a savings account, or we're going to have an account that's a money market fund, and we'll automatically debit your money market fund from your checking account if you check this little box on your form. It's now all of a sudden, instead of $5 trillion sitting in checking accounts and whatever is sitting in savings accounts at money center banks paying a half a percent interest, people

are going to immediately start to figure out that that money could be deployed and you could be earning whatever the market interest rate is through a variety of places. Well, that opens up something very different. So yes, it will delay by if the stable coins themselves paid interest, well, then you wouldn't need to do any of that. But there is an adaptation coming. It is essentially the, I won't say the death of I mean

Elizabeth Warren's right. I mean checking account balances are going to decrease rather dramatically over time Why because you don't need to keep them there the notion of free capital to banks is gonna go away But what is that actually doing? That's more that's five trillion dollars being placed into the real economy earning real interest rates that real people can do things with. And so you're taking money from a cartel and giving it to the economy. That is stimulative. There's no two ways about it. It also means holding dollars is much less painful for people. So there'll be more of them. Therefore, they'll buy more treasuries. If you ask the Treasury Secretary, what would he want? Well, it's like, they want that.

They want more people to own Treasuries and less people to hold money in checking accounts. Right? At the end of the day, the backing is what they care about. Mark, do you have a comment? Yeah, yeah. I think that's well said, Dave. And when you're talking about your time at Citibank

and about maybe how you know, how all the banks will adapt or get involved. I go back to Jane Fraser's statement in March of 23 when she said, you know, when we saw the deposits flee those banks so quickly, you know, we were, she said the word surprise. We were surprised We didn't know that the money could leave that quickly but now as if it was a revelation and you know I think the criticism is is deserved in in her statement and not a fan or a

Detractor of Jane Frazier, but the statement is very telling she said we were surprised that now with mobile banking, the deposits aren't as sticky. So this is, I just don't know how on top of things these banks are, if anyone has a window, because I haven't been in a bank in years, but to able to adapt and foster this, or will it be neo banks? Will it be other faster adjacent fintech companies running this i mean personally my thought process is is you'd be surprised how fast banks could mobilize themselves but yeah it's going to be driven it's like it it's the old innovators dilemma problem right but the fact is that the it will become obvious business models and obvious business models sweep the industry pretty quickly. So yeah, it'll

probably take a few years for everything that I'm talking about to happen and it will start with Coinbase's bank and Kraken's bank and Revolut and whatever. It's not remotely surprising that Morgan Stanley said they're gonna offer crypto via E-Trade first. Remember, E-Trade, somewhere in their charter, they had a bank as well. And of course, it's all part of corporate Pac-Man now,

but there's a lot of changes that are coming. But why does this matter for the crypto verse? Well, I mean, it unleashes global capital is what it does. And that is not a trivial thing. Right? You know, and so when you when you when you go back to layer ones, I mean, you're talking to the development side, yeah, okay, it's not a problem. But what does it do? Well, when you can trade autonomously via stable coins, and not have to go out into the fiat world, it's essentially,

I mean, it's dramatically improves the quality and the ability for the crypto software for things to operate. I mean, think of it this way, anyone who traded US dollar versus Bitcoin or ether, whatever, it doesn't matter, in the United States, when Silicon Valley went down and then signature and silver gate were paused, the spreads widened, the weekends became more volatile, things really were problematic because those dollar rails were gone.

Whereas Tether trading has never been a problem and Tether now trades more, more crypto trades against Tether. Well, what happens when stable coins are fully legal in the U S and everybody has them integrated into their payment rails. It means that the fight to see five movements can become dramatically easier. And there's lots of things that are opened up by that. And those second order effects are where a lot of wealth's going to get made. Dan, and then tell her.

Hey, yeah. Morning guys. Um, one is a chip in with my kind of experience with stablecoins. I'm a British guy that lives in Singapore, so nothing to do with the US whatsoever. But I've only been paid in stablecoins for the last five years. I've never done any work that have paid me in fiat and paid the money into my account. Currently I get paid in stablecoins and then I put them onto my CAST card. So I'm working with a company called CAST, they're really good. Can spend

it on my card. So I live entirely on stablecoins. I even pay my rent on my card in stablecoins. When I have excess stablecoins, I can move them across the Coinbase. Currently paying 12% on USDC. So it's very, very common that I'll have like maybe less than $100 in my bank account. Coinbase is paying 12% on USDC right now. Coinbase is currently paying 12% on USDC if you put it in your perpetual accounts. It's probably not available to Americans. But yeah, 12%. One of my buddies in Singapore told

me the other day, there's $2 million in there, earning 20 grand a month. Incredible. Chauber? Wow. I guess I want to ask a question. It's not a loaded question. It's just genuine curiosity. The more we, the enthusiasm I'm hearing about stable coins is leading me down a bunch of

questions including, does this accelerate the debasement of the dollar? There's more sources of capital that can be fractionally reserved where proof of reserves don't necessarily exist or where there's more potential for inflation. And this whole cryptocurrency thing started with, hey, let's have a currency that everyone can verify the supply of and everyone can monitor and verify every single thing with respect to. And now it's like the attention is wandering off of that core principle and into, hey, let's get a velocity of money going so that more treasuries can be bought and more government debt can be issued.

But it seems like it's a really shift, it's a shifted focus. And I appreciate what Dave was just saying, which anticipated some of my question, but I'm still, I'm still kind of left with my jaw hanging open and saying, what, where's the excitement and what's the excitement about? Is it, is it a hyper fiat world that we're headed to? And suddenly everyone from the crypto space is excited about that? Or is there something really fundamental that's an improvement for transparency, auditability, rationality? So I think that's... Yeah, there's always been some irony to put perhaps outside of Bitcoin, the next killer app in crypto being digital dollars, which is why Bitcoin was created, obviously, because as an

alternative. So I don't think what you're saying is a surprise at all to many. So go ahead, Dave. Dave Korsunsky So we were talking about this this morning on Macro Monday. I think that Bitcoin is the antidote to fiat and is growing in adoption and stable coins ironically are going to help that happen. The rest of crypto is a our technology platforms that will automate and create more you know basically more efficient more inclusive better versions of a variety of different verticals and we don't have time to go through all those verticals now. Stablecoins weirdly will accelerate fiat world's velocity. It will help because it will automatically,

assuming we do it right, effectively accelerate the dollar's dominance in the fiat system because it'll be the one that's most used. That's because of network effects and critical mass. And so from a US-centric perspective, they're an incredible help to, you know, kicking the can down the road in fiat world.

If you're smart and you're invested in Bitcoin, then you like that because it gives you more opportunity to accumulate and you have your out already. And so it really is a question. The divergence is crypto as an alternative to fiat. I don't like that. I think Bitcoin is an alternative to fiat. I know I sound like a maxi when I say that, but I am a Bitcoin maxi when it comes to that use case, which is opting out of fiat. But I'm not a Bitcoin maxi in the sense of I don't think every other token is worthless. I think there are lots of other value propositions that will ultimately rely upon Bitcoin as a store of value in the distant future,

but in the interim is going to rely on the dollar more than other fiat currencies because the US is going to pioneer these stablecoins. Tether has already done an enormous favor for the US, not just by owning treasuries, but by popularizing the US dollar as the currency of trading and the currency of being paid. You just mentioned yourself, but Dan did. When we were at CoinRoutes, we paid contractors in USDC or USDT all the time when they wanted to outside of the country, but only outside the US. Now it's going to happen inside the US. Yeah, I operate primarily in stablecoins as well within my business, but then do convert

to the actual bank account. I'm curious more, Dan, on utilization of the card and how you actually manage that. That's interesting. Dan is not going to break that down for us. You there, Dan? Hey, sorry, you speaking to me? Sorry? Yeah, I'm actually interested in a bit more detail on how you basically operate your life using the card. How do you pay your rents using the card? Is it effectively credit card? No, so it's a company called Cast. They're a client of mine that I work with. You can deposit stable coins.

The card technically is flagged as a credit card. So it has no limit. You can spend whatever you want on there. It immediately works with Apple Pay and Google Play. So that was great for me. Everywhere I go, I just double tap my phone and pay. As for my rent, there's a platform in Singapore you can use called Ipaymy where it's designed for people to pay their rent on their credit cards to get

air miles and things like that. So you pay a small fee. I think I pay about one or two percent on top of my rent, but then yeah, it's just automated. It just comes straight off of my card. So as long as I make sure I have enough money on my card, it comes off. I get my 10% cash back on the card and spend everything on my card. 10%. Yeah, that's incredible. Yeah, it used to be 12. Now it's dropped down to 10.

Is it paid in points? Is it strictly for stable coins or is it for altcoins? Yeah, at the moment it's just stable coins. You can deposit USDT or USDC. It immediately gets credited into your account. Just shows up as a dollar balance and you spend on your card and wherever you go. Currently, the cashback accumulates as points. They're doing a token drop in Q3, Q4, I think it was here.

Yeah, I've referred a bunch of my friends onto it. So when they spend, I get cash back as well. It's really great. I was an early user of Crypto.com and I get cash back as well. It's really great. I was an early user of crypto.com and I lived entirely on stable coin, well entirely on that card during COVID 2020 or whatever I was in Bali and staying in Airbnbs most of the time. So I'd spend everything on my card that way.

You can go to ATM, take money out, piece of cake. I don't use my bank account. I really don't use my bank account at all. I had to use it the other day for something and it's just so archaic and backwards. But I had to, I had not enough money in my bank account because I keep like a couple hundred dollars in there only. So I had to very quickly in this bar transfer some Bitcoin from my Coinbase.com, some from my crypto.com account to my Coinbase and then sell it and then sell the USD for SGD and then move it. But I did all of that and got it into my bank account in about 10 minutes.

So yeah, that's how little I use my bank account. I wonder how, if that's usable in the United States. The cash card is entirely available in the US. Yeah, absolutely There's no foreign exchange fee if you spend stuff in USD, so yeah completely works Yeah more curious about the red side. I can drop you a link or whatever. Yeah, I would love that Oh, red side. Yeah, that for sure, but more curious also that because I mean yeah about whether there's a platform. There's probably some service you can use Yeah, you probably have to Google it, but I'm sure that there would be one. Because normally you wouldn't pay a one to two percent premium With the structures we have here for points because usually it't pay a one to two percent premium with the structures we have here for points because usually it's like one percent points are worth, right?

So but if you're getting 10 percent, it's interesting. 10 percent cash back. And for me, it's easier because then I don't have to worry about moving the money into my Singapore bank account and then manually doing a transfer. I just set it up. It just comes off my card piece of cake. So even just for the peace of mind, paying a couple of percent for the peace of mind is like, yeah, whatever.

I used to do that before I had the crypto card. I would do it on my regular credit card, just because then I have one bill to pay at the end of the month. So I'd have a credit card and everything for the whole month and I just pay the credit card bill at the end. So I would just sell some Bitcoin or whatever and then pay off the credit card.

Now I don't even need to. Now it's just all my stable coin card. It works great. I'm in Bangkok right now, take it wherever I go. Whenever I go traveling, spend it anywhere. Perfect. Scott, Dan is doing this on a high level and it's incredible, but you think about what this opens up for the world as far as the unbanked emerging nations. It's the depth of Western Union. What is the point? If people at Western Union are not looking at this as an existential threat and adapting, then they are on the verge of extinction.

I just can't see any way they pivot on this. Yeah, that's always been the promise of crypto, except for that it was supposed to be with Bitcoin. Right? And then stablecoins have sort of stolen that thunder. I think it's fair to say that. Right. But Scott, but think of all of a sudden, Dan said it, you know, it allows you to save in Bitcoin seamlessly. Think about that. So now you can save in Bitcoin seamlessly. So Bitcoin becomes your savings account. Your checking account pays some

interest so you can keep some stuff there. So what have you done? Well, when this is all done, what we've done is we've dramatically decreased the friction for every single person in the world, banked or otherwise, to be able to participate in the economy at the same time, dramatically increasing how much easier it will be to use Bitcoin as a savings vehicle. It's actually quite bullish.

I mean, I know Carlo is probably sitting there saying, yeah, that's what I've been saying. That's exactly right. But the net of it is better for Bitcoin for saving, better for the economy for spending and better for autonomous, more automated financial, you know, market, you know, evolution using crypto. So it really is a very big deal. And I don't think most people have thought beyond just, oh, am I getting interest on my stable coin? Okay, that's cool. You know, there's a lot there. Mark. Yeah. And so Dave, are you saying that I agree with you on that? And I want to

make sure or test why if the friction drops and there's more fiat in the digital realm on rails that can then people get more familiar with again what I think was Dan talking about his system, which I took some notes on. I'll get back to you later on that. Is that if it talking about his system, which I took some notes on, I'll get back to you later on that, is that if it's in the system, then people may get more familiar and have more velocity even in Bitcoin, where maybe there's a savings technology in Bitcoin

that they use, but then they maybe even draw from it to make certain payments, where maybe your stack of Bitcoin, there's 10% of it that's more used for quarterly or annual payments and savings. Is that what you're saying? That there's just more in the system and Bitcoin gets adopted quicker? I'm saying if it's easier to transact between fiat between, if it's easier to transact between your daily life at a lower fee to Bitcoin at a higher confidence, it will make it easier to save in Bitcoin, it will remove frictional costs.

Now yes, there's right now it's still relatively expensive for individuals to trade small amounts of Bitcoin, the spreads that are taken out are too large, et cetera. A large part of the reason for that is because there's limited numbers of providers and all of this is going to dramatically increase competition. And so yeah, you're going to get that that will become much easier. The other big shoe to drop the big one from in terms of just raw numbers of dollars is Bitcoin as good collateral. So if you if you coupled Bitcoin becoming good collateral with the ability to move fiat and Bitcoin on these rails instantly it becomes a very different world right? Yeah that's really my point. It's both. Yeah I agree with that and you brought in the

collateral of Bitcoin you know that folks like Leaden and others are doing on the borrowing against where you still have the upside in your stack, but you have some, you know, introduced maybe some counterparty risk, depending how you do it. But yeah, I, and then on the other side of it is the resistance. You can kind of see why the trading world doesn't want that to happen. You know, because once you see the big city, it's going to be tough to keep, you know, the, the stacks on the old farm, the slower animals. So yeah. So who was it? Was it you, Dave, saying people embracing or was it Otomar? You were you were saying that it's like Buffett taking a shot

at the dollar after making money on it for 50 years. Is it Bitcoin or celebrating stable coins on Bitcoin's promise? And I don't think so, Lee. I think that they are complimentary for reasons that- Mark, I think that they are complementary. And yeah, for reasons that Mark, I think structurally, exactly what Dave said, what you're alluding to is that most Bitcoin Bitcoiners, I think, can get on board with spend dollars and save Bitcoin. And if that's frictionless, as Dave said, I think that works. I

don't think there's many Bitcoiners left to think that right now you're going to live your life entirely in Bitcoin or that they actually want to spend it. So if it's a better way to do dollars in the meantime, it makes a lot of sense, I think. Bill Barhart, I see you in the audience. If you do want to jump up, I sent you a request because obviously, Abre is at the forefront of this exact conversation, because obviously, Abre is at the forefront of this exact conversation. Structurally, obviously, lending, borrowing against your Bitcoin in stablecoins and doing that, something I've actually done myself with them. It's pretty remarkable how frictionless and easy that is to do. Steve, you haven't really had a chance to jump in. We'd love your thoughts here on the conversation. Yeah, I'd love to just get everyone's take on, you know, if stable coins, we use it at

our company to pay, you know, probably 90% of employees. But the one thing the issue is, I found that like in Asia, it's a lot more like USDT on Tron, same with Africa. And then the US, in the US, in Europe, it's mostly USDT on ETH. And it's like, there's so many cross-gen there, you think it's always going to be, you can see that the market cap of stable coins on Tron has been growing very consistently and just curious what everybody thinks.

Yeah, it's always, I haven't looked lately, but I often quote it's over 50%. I think people are surprised how much Tron is used, but I think it's fast and it's cheap. And people say, hey, I'm gonna send you dollars on this wallet. And that's the one they tell their friend to download because that's where it is. And it's had this snowball effect.

But I think people underestimate watching this is happening on Tron steep. It's really pretty remarkable. I've also seen some of the banking providers that we use, like the neobanks, like the Dakotas or, you know, like Mercury or stuff like that, they don't switch chains between Tron and ETH. So in the US, it's sort of difficult to get Tron stablecoins.

Yeah, Bill, thanks for joining. Sorry, I missed you yesterday at the race. Although now I'm really sick, so you're probably lucky that you missed me at the race yesterday. We're just talking about obviously this sort of perfect world where you're able to never sell your Bitcoin and you can use it as your savings account and take loans. You guys have finally solved that in the United States. Bill's here, but not here, it would seem. Yeah, no, it's been a long time coming. we're certainly seeing the uptake, but yeah, I mean,

very few of our clients ever want to sell Bitcoin. We do see, I think April is probably the month where we see the most Bitcoin sales from existing clients, and that's just for fashion. Yeah, and some of that is around our yield products even. But yeah, I mean, the uptake on the loan side has been clearly the fastest growing business for us, even faster growing than the yield products and staking products.

And it's across the board. People are borrowing in Tether and in USDC Straight to dollars via Bankwire across the board. Yeah, it's been Super interesting to see the the pet the lack of pattern emerging That was my next question. I you know, your clients are American right? So no, no Yeah I was gonna ask if the behavior because we obviously just had this incredible conversation with Dan about how he lives his life in stablecoins basically, but most of your clients are taking

out the stablecoins and putting them into dollars? I believe that's correct. Yeah. I don't think we have many clients that with the exception of clients that are actually using the loans to buy more Bitcoin. We have some of those as well. Right. So some folks might say, Oh, I want to I want a 20% lever on my Bitcoin to buy more Bitcoin. Right. That's that's growing in popularity. And those those folks are just holding in either Tether or USDC to convert that to Bitcoin on some DCA model, most likely. Yeah.

That makes sense. Do you think? Bill, just curious, are there any, if the tax code in some way meaningfully changed around Bitcoin or crypto in general, could that meaningfully affect people's urge to take loans? We've seen it flowed by the administration, or at least we've heard rumors. No capital gains taxes on American based crypto. I don't even know what that means, to be honest. I don't think anybody here can explain it either. Give me an example of what that means and I guess I can

answer. I've been trying to figure it out myself. Yeah, I don't have one. It's a good topic point though. Exactly. For them. Who knows? No, I don't think there's going to be any special tax treatment for crypto anytime soon, especially given the budget gap they're going to have to fill with all the, you know, all the tax cuts they're about to propose. And quickly just to circle back, something you may not have been here at the beginning, we were talking about how Democrats now kind of shifting gears and maybe coming out against stablecoins, at least in small numbers in the Senate. There could be a risk to the stablecoin legislation.

Is that on your radar at all? It is. And I think it's clearly Warren reexerting herself into the narrative, kind of waiting silently on the sidelines to see how the first 100 days or so plays out, see how she can rerally her army against Trump, and this is clearly one of her knits. I think she's going to lose the CFPB battle to some degree, that the agency might not go away, but its strength or punch is going to be greatly diminished. And I think she's going to do whatever she can to exert herself or re-exert herself in

these crypto discussions. Why? Because she believes that at some point, Trump, the midterms could go their way. It's a gotcha. Yeah. Not only is it a gotcha, it's, it's a future election narrative for her, right? Say, okay, well, what happens in 28? When it's, you know, Vance versus AOC? Well, they can re absurd themselves and say, see, gotcha, you know, Trump is making money on

world liberty. Well, by the way, if Trump's not allowed to make money in world liberty, Well, by the way, if Trump's not allowed to make money in World Liberty, why is he allowed to make money in real estate? You know, I mean, so it doesn't really make any, the whole narrative is obviously silly, but you know, it's a narrative. And so I don't think they really have anything else right now since they've clearly lost the plot. And so that's, that actually is the biggest problem. I actually think they don't know what to

stand for that differentiates themselves at this point, when it comes. I had high hopes, Bill. I had high hopes that like the Anti Crypto Army had been so unpalatable and was so clearly the loser on that side of the election. I mean, you could argue literally that the election was won by pushback against the Anti-Crypto Army that she would have just given up. To think that she's still going to push that because maybe Democrats will take one of the

House or the Senate, most likely, I guess, the House in two years. That's scary. Well, that's correct. But here we are. They haven't learned their lesson because all that's going to happen is the proverbial hat is going to get passed around again and the world is just going to line up against these morons who think that the crypto companies have forgotten what happened the last time around and trust me, we're never going to forget because of what it cost us both personally and professionally. And so, he's gearing up to make exactly the same mistakes again. The one thing I will say is, you know, this whole provision around, you know, yield payments still really bothers me. But that having been said, you know, take the win, fix it later, and it later, and move on, all things considered.

Yeah, totally agree. Stas, is that you on the Elastos accounts? Hey, Scott. Yeah, that's me. Yeah, I want to talk about Elastos a bit, but just your thoughts on this entire conversation since you've obviously kind of been building in this space for so long. Yeah, no, it's very interesting. I mean, the stablecoin, we can see the narrative emerging and we can see how fundamentally, like our belief is that Bitcoin has to be the settlement layer beneath this new economy. So it's the cornerstone of this new financial economy.

And then what we need to enable is, I don't think Bitcoin was made to be like a stable day-to-day currency, as much so as a store of value. But what the New Bretton Woods agreement originally tried to create with the dollar was a gold-backed system where we had then something liquid we could use in day-to-day expenses. So system where we had then something liquid we could use in day-to-day expenses. So something that Elastos is incredibly excited about is its Bell 2 protocol, which is the Bitcoin Elastos Layer 2 protocol. And really that's enabling Bitcoin to talk to smart contracts without locking up Bitcoin with custodians.

So what you can do is you can actually collateralize Bitcoin in a decentralized wallet, send a message to a smart contract on any network, and then you can have a performer function like taking out a loan in stablecoins. But actually, a recent Harvard Illuminae led team are building a native Bitcoin backed stablecoin using the Elastos technology. So I think this is really exciting because Bitcoin should stay on the settlement layer, we should collateralize it in a non-custodial way, and then we should unlock its value by minting new stablecoins in this new smart contract led economy. And blockchain fundamentally is about bringing trust into a trustless environment.

So when we start to move away from old systems and we have creative destruction taking place, we actually, we move into Bitcoin as a store of value, our life raft, and then we open up that value without selling it by unlocking it into all of these smart contracts in this new economy. So definitely, I think stable coins is the next narrative as we start to establish Bitcoin as the store of value and everything's going to be backed by Bitcoin ultimately, in my opinion.

You and I had a conversation about three weeks ago on YouTube, three weeks, something like that. A few weeks ago, we didn't even talk about the Bitcoin side of this. I literally, in all our conversations, I don't think I realized that you were merged mine with Bitcoin. What does that mean? And maybe then you could just give us kind of the CLDR on Elastos. Yeah, sure, sure. So I think with what we talked about, Scott, was the monetization layer. So I'm founder of Elastos and we're building a data marketplace. So Scott, you know, you uploaded a video and within three minutes,

within a couple of days, you've made $300 selling that directly with the world. So we tokenized your access rights and we made them available. With every payment, it was streamed out to every royalty holder, but in this case, it's you. But we can fractionalize and tokenize royalties too. So we can create this whole new tokenized global marketplace. But then when we look at what we want to transact in this new digital economy with, it makes so much sense that it's going to be stable currencies that are on top of a blockchain.

And so, yeah, Elastos, which is the infrastructure we've been building all of this on, it's been merged-mined with Bitcoin since 2017. So what that really means is, return for Bitcoin miners, they get ELA rewards in return for providing the same answer they give to securing Bitcoin to the Elastos network. Satoshi actually advocated for merge mining back in 2010. There's these great Bitcoin forum posts where he talks about why compete against Bitcoin but instead tap into it. Right now, Elastos has 50 percent of Bitcoin's hash power,

which is about 400 EHS securing it. Again, that is an insane amount of security. That's roughly like $7 billion worth of security that's securing this sidechain network, Elastos. Given that ELA, the token that secures this new digital economy, it's an incredible showcase of how you can leverage Bitcoin to actually create new networks, which provide unique functions that are secured in Bitcoin's hash rate. But then what we enable then is the ability to stake this ELA token, and we then open up this new stablecoin economy, which we can talk about a little bit more after. Merge mining is an incredible property. I

encourage everyone to explore it because it's something that Satoshi advocated for, but very few actually implement today, something which Elastos does. Yeah, obviously, it was interesting. I do this occasionally when I see that I'm going to have a guest and we speak to producers, I actually go try it. And as you said, I literally went, took me 30 seconds, I uploaded a video, my thoughts on Bitcoin for the day, uploaded it and actually made a bunch of money, right? Which I didn't necessarily anticipate or expect after our conversation, but incredibly cool and incredibly important sort of as you talked about the way to actually monetize your own content and royalties instead of going to a

platform. Maybe talk a bit more about that side. Yeah, it's insane considering because I think we forget the value of our data. In the real economy, we're a liability all the time. We're increasingly going to get replaced by AI, robotics, and automation. But in the digital economy, we're actually an asset all the time. Right now, we're creating an asset in this podcast. But generally speaking, we're creating data day-to-day in everything we do. The issue is that the evolution of the Internet required in order to have business models like buy now,

subscribe or monetization with advertisers. We had to use gatekeepers to help make that happen. So we had middlemen who supported it. Now this is a fundamental need for the internet, so that's okay. We got to where we are today, which is really exciting, and we've seen the birth of Bitcoin and all these new innovations. So it's inevitable that as technology allows us to become more and more independent over time, that we're going to rely less and less on these gatekeepers anymore because the internet's maturing beyond that. So Elastos, again, which is my project that we've built on Elastos,

it's a digital marketplace. But what we're trying to showcase is that Web3 has focused so heavily on ownership, and it's done a great job, that it's kind of forgotten about actual business models and revenue. We have speculations, we have memes, and we have buying and selling tokens on the hope to make profit, which again opens capital markets and they're extremely important. But what we don't have is sustainable business models where you can actually license out

value. So Scott, you encrypted using Elacity, a video. You then released a number of access tokens which were traded, and that income poured directly through smart contracts to your decentralized. I didn't know any of that was happening, by the way. Yeah. It's now on autopilot, but you also put it inside

a smart contract which has a subscription model. So you can add more assets to that contract, and not only can you individually buy and sell the individual assets, but you can actually collect subscription revenue, which for the buyer, they get to unlock a library of assets. So it's almost like it's an even nicer user experience. But the point being is there's a digital gold rush that's going to emerge,

which is tokenizing assets and it can be physical assets or it can be digital assets. But when we claim ownership of assets by minting them onto a blockchain or minting the rights, we can now begin to think about how we can attach business models to those assets as well and start generating revenue from them. And when you're collecting 95 to 100% of the revenue, and you might not even be a creator yourself, you might go to a global marketplace and buy royalty rights to all types of assets that you love. And every time someone purchases to use that asset, you get your fractional percent immediately sent to your decentralized wallet. This is what drives new economies. Just to quickly circle back with the

stablecoin narrative emerging, the kinds of tool sets we're building and offering are the kinds of tool sets which just feed into these stable economies. We have discussions with these stable economy. So we have discussions with these stable coin entities on the goal of why not use this, build this all together, because it's going to be what fuels new revenue in this new economy. Yeah, what you were speaking to there was what sort of was the spark for me, why I actually decided to try it. Obviously, many people know they said basically a 20-year music career. And many people know they said basically a 20 year music career. Uh, and I tried to all of the, you know, band camp and SoundCloud and every way to sort of, uh, find ways to monetize music and nobody really perfected it in any way, shape or form.

And, uh, this is really a further step on that path with the promise of web three. And then you talk about being able to actually buy those royalty catalogs. I mean, we've seen people make insane amounts of money buying the catalogs of famous musicians. I'm not talking about the Web3 market, like historically in normal markets and the creator obviously ends up getting screwed in those situations. And some larger entity or investor makes a ton of money on their entire catalog. And this really democratizes that and allows the individual to protest. Yeah, it's fundamentally, it's about having control and capturing the value in which you offer the world. And the AI agent economies is as relevant to this as possible because

for your smart contract that you've uploaded some content to, you can just continue uploading into that contract. Then the goal next is why not give an AI agent access to your contract, and then it can learn everything about your content. Then you can sell that AI agent to the world as well. Then we can have AI agents talking with each other, doing deals and buying and selling access to data and understanding it. Everyone who's participating in this economy is actually getting paid. I think the biggest fear people have actually is, we're both loving all these new technologies,

but there's also the fear that we get left behind. We need to have business models and ways to tap into tokenized revenue and access and all these kinds of things. And yeah, that's what we're really focused on with Elastos. And actually, I encourage everyone just to go to Elastos and learn a bit about Bell too, which is how we enable a Bitcoin-backed stablecoin economy and also loans, because that's just a whole new avenue which is opening up now, which we're really excited to be developing. Yeah, it's incredibly cool. So in that instance, your AI agents, basically, you would own them. They'd be for sale on the marketplace and you would earn a royalty when people utilize

or bought those AI agents. And would those AI agents then be transacting in Bitcoin, stable coins, ELA, how would that work? Yeah, so the whole system for us is underpinned in ELA. So ELA is the merge mind assets, the gas is paid in it. Right now, it's the only currency that can be used. For the stable coin issuance on Bell 2 that's being worked on, it's basically creating what are called zero-knowledge proofs. So when you collateralize Bitcoin in your decentralized wallet, you generate a zero knowledge proof,

which is then passed into a smart contract to release either to mint a stablecoin or to release a loan. As a node, you can join this network, you stake ELA and you will earn a small percentage in Bitcoin for supporting that transaction. So everything fundamentally underneath the hood is being powered by ELA, and that has 50% of Bitcoin security as well. So we love holding Bitcoin in our wallet because we know it's secured by the miners. We know it's the most secure system in the world. I mean, there's even quantum computing that's becoming a big topic. And so why would you hold ELA in the same context? It's because it has 50% of that hash rate securing it, so you feel safe with it. all products, individuals, myself, we're going to be all not necessarily tokenizing ourselves, but digitizing our value into some agent

which can represent us and go do things. With Elacity, where I really want to take this project is where, Scott, you set up a channel, but think of that channel as an AI agent and you're actually dropping assets into your AI agent, which are being tokenized and people can pay to access that, but actually you're training up your personal AI agent, which can then support you in day-to-day interactions. And then we can imagine AI agents with liquid market caps, where anyone can invest in those

AI agents and it actually uses revenue or uses investment to go buy assets all around the world and to gain like unique intelligence and then offer that intelligence as a service with a business model behind it to the world. So again, everyone can get paid and be a part of this economy, but we have to have blockchain underpinning it and that blockchain has to be underpinned

by Bitcoin security and that's really to be underpinned by Bitcoin security and that's really what Elastos is here to provide. How far are you along or are we along on that trajectory of what you just described becoming a reality? So for Bell 2, the whole of last year we built all the infrastructure for Bitcoin backs finance. So really, it's, you know, we've done a demo for lending. And next we're doing the stable coin, the stable coins. The first demo is going to be ready in the next month or two, Max. But again, within the next four to six

months, there's going to be a Bitcoin backed stable coin that Elastos will offer. For Elastity, you know, Scott, that it's a working product now, so anyone can go try it out. It's on Elastos today. But you can mint a video. We do audio and video markets. But we're going to continue to open this up towards an operating system environment.

So this is where you basically have to build a system that checks against the blockchain, do you own the access rights to decrypt the content? So it's like a playback machine. Right now we have a playback machine for audio and video. But when we open up to an operating system, we can open up gaming markets, we can open up software markets,

we can open up the AI economy markets, like we can do every single asset. So we released a very basic, minimal viable product for the OS. Only last week it can be seen on the Elastos Twitter. But again, we're going to be in the next six months, you're going to see this develop and become extremely interesting, be it that the Elastity marketplace technology will be installed on this. So, yeah, I really think, you know, fundamentally, we need a new economy backed by Bitcoin. And I think we're seeing creative destruction in financial markets. Old monetary systems are being replaced by new ones.

And I do believe the flight to safety will be into Bitcoin. And then we open the doors to say, you can, without selling your Bitcoin, leverage its value to enter into this new smart contract world where everything is automated, it's much more efficient, and we're in an economy where everyone actually can participate and we've got markets for every type of asset. That to me is a very exciting future we should all be a part of. Really perfectly. We're here for this conversation today. Because we said you had sort of perfectly into that. So people, you can follow Elastos info, obviously, that's Sasha,

Mitchell behind the account today talking to where else can people find out more and any final thoughts, anything about it? Sure, sure. And, yeah, again, stable coins is the topic. And I see it being a huge, the next coming months are going to be huge. So head over to Elastos, go to Elacity, that's ELA city and check out, that's the project I'm a founder of. And if you want to find me at sash s-a-s-h underscore underscore MIT. But yeah, if anyone's interested in what we're building, feel free to drop me a message. Otherwise, check out ELA, which is MergeMind with Bitcoin and I think a really interesting

asset class. Incredible, man. Thanks so much for your insight. Thank you to everybody else, obviously, on the panel for the great conversation today. As usual, it's great to be back for me after letting Dave take my job for a week. He might just take it permanently, it feels like. But for a week at least. We'll be back obviously tomorrow at

10.15 AM Eastern Standard Time for another Crypto Town Hall. Give everybody on stage a follow, especially Elastos Info. That was a really great conversation. Glad Sasha that you showed up today was perfect. All right, everybody, we will see you guys tomorrow. Thanks so much. Bye.