The Wolf Of All Streets - Bitcoin Back to $86K! Dominance Surges to 64% | Crypto Town Hall

Episode Date: April 15, 2025

Crypto Town Hall is a daily Twitter Spaces hosted by Scott Melker, Ran Neuner & Mario Nawfal. Every day we discuss the latest news in the crypto and bring the biggest names in the crypto space to share their opinions. ►►OKX Sign up for an OKX Trading Account then deposit & trade to unlock mystery box rewards of up to $60,000!  👉  https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER  ►►THE DAILY CLOSE BRAND NEW NEWSLETTER! INSTITUTIONAL GRADE INDICATORS AND DATA DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY AT THE DAILY CLOSE. TRADE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. 👉 https://www.thedailyclose.io/   ►►NORD VPN  GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL  - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets    ►►COINROUTES TRADE SPOT & DERIVATIVES ACROSS CEFI AND DEFI USING YOUR OWN ACCOUNTS WITH THIS ADVANCED ALGORITHMIC PLATFORM. SAVE TONS OF MONEY ON TRADING FEES LIKE THE PROS! 👉 http://bit.ly/3ZXeYKd  ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/    Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker   Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io   Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe   Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c   #Bitcoin #Crypto #Trading The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor.  Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.

Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Crypto Town Hall. Every day here on X at 10.15 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. I'm going to start by saying good morning, Carlo. Good morning, Scott. How are you? Just figured the mood would be better if we just got that out of the way from the very beginning. We set the tone, man. A little enthusiasm. Got to set the tone. A little enthusiasm.

It's a good day for a bit of enthusiasm. Bitcoin looking a little bit jumpy. It was at 86,000 when we made the tone. A little enthusiasm is a good day for a bit of enthusiasm. Bitcoin looking a little bit jumpy. It was at 86,000 when we made the title, currently trading about 85,500 to 700 depending on the second that you're looking at it. But I'm definitely getting the distinct feeling that Bitcoin really wants to push. Just feels to me like if there was any level of certainty or any good news in the market that it's set to outperform as it has kind of been doing slowly throughout this period of market uncertainty. We got a couple news stories that are probably worth just mentioning before we get started and

dig in. Obviously, we've continued to see net outflows generally from the ETFs, although there was a very small net influence of Bitcoin ETF yesterday, but we've had three weeks of sustained flows as the carry trade unwinds. That seems to be the reason for that. Big news from Kraken, they've announced the launch of commission free stock and ETF trading up to 11 million assets or something, I think it said in the article. So 11,000, maybe, sorry. But basically coming into the market to compete with the bigger exchanges and

brokers and traditional markets, absolutely huge news for, for crack and positioning them exceptionally well. We had too many, a bit of a surprise from the sec. They basically kicked the can down the road on a few rule changes, staking in the Ethereum ETFs and in-kind creation for the Bitcoin ETFs. A lot of people scratching their heads saying the SEC was going to make these moves for us, but I think it actually makes a lot of sense to wait for Atkins to get their regulatory plan in line and make decisions.

So these are not rejections. They're just a bit of a kick kicking the can down the road. Solana ETFs in Canada are set to officially launch on April 16th. Those will be the first, I believe, official Solana ETFs that are launching. And another piece of news here that many may have seen, Binance, KuCoin, Mexi and others reporting some issues doing to Amazon web services. So I think that Binance I saw had had to suspend withdrawals for about 20 minutes or something, but that is coming from AWS and not something to do with Binance. But let's start talking about price bursts. Chris, thanks. Haven't had you here in a while, man. How are you looking at price action right now on the charts? Well, I mean, you know, Bitcoin I posted here last week, we running up into that descending

resistance off the all time high and I was looking for a three wave pullback because we got five waves up, looks like a leading diagonal, but we pulled back a bit, you know, we popped out just a bit higher today, looks like a flat correction. So I wouldn't be surprised to see it maybe come back toward 83,000 or maybe even 81.5 to finish out that wave two before it kind of really takes off. So that's what I'm watching right now for it. You know, even the stocks, you know, have been looking pretty good. So I mean, you know, we found a lot of alts lately that are set up really great.

It looks like it looks like there's a lot of potential right now. We just need price to actually follow through. I mean, do you agree that it's just sort of waiting for some level of certainty or good news? It just kind of feels that way. I know. Well, yeah, yeah. You know, markets hate uncertainty.

And so, you know, when you get that, it doesn't mean that, you know, that anything bad has to happen. It's just the market has to be uncertain about what's happening. And that's when you see all that kind of this way and that way, you know, Trump's tariff on tariff off and everything else going on. There's just a lot of uncertainty out there. So at any point, you know, if you're looking at narratives like that, at any point where things become more clear, regardless of which way it goes, I think that ends up being a positive for the markets there.

Yeah. While we're talking about price action, BC Follis, I know both of you guys are actively watching the charts. BC, what do you think is likely to happen here? Does it align with what Chris is saying or I'm saying? Yeah. Thanks, Scott. Actually, good to... I love being part of these crypto sound halls, but actually, you know, price action being my kind of main area of interest here is good that we've got a price action question for a change, right? For me, and yeah, I do agree with Chris. You know, a lot of respect for Chris, actually, as an analyst. I used to kind of employ more Elliott Wave on traditional markets, not so much anymore. So more kind of looking at the markets

from a liquidity perspective, you know, aside from traditional kind of support and resistance areas, hence where the buyers and sellers are stepping in. Something that resonates with me though, with what Chris said is I've got a level here, kind of around about 82, 587, that kind of region, which lines up first of all, with a major kind of inversion of a bearish gap

Which is something that I look for when I'm looking for kind of key reversals, you know Simple concept of an area that should provide downside continuation Being invalidated and therefore looking to move that to support in doing so this is on a daily scale By the way, I'm doing so we kind of set a key and new order block here for price as well Which is again areas that I just look to hold so at the minute price is kind of if we look at you know what the equity markets are doing if we look specifically at like the S&P 500 the NASDAQ which is something I use for that kind of proxy risk bid and to kind of see amongst other areas obviously the DXY

normally as well to see how the market's kind of appetite is for risk. A little bit difficult to do that with the DXY at the moment because it has very different drivers behind it obviously currently with what's going on with Trump. But you know I could see this kind of market correction coming back we're kind of looking at an intraday correction at the moment on the NASDAQ after that ran quite hot after the US Open. We saw that kind of you know typical pump now that's retracing I think still you know Bitcoin's going to struggle that kind of, you know, typical pump. Now that's retracing, I think, still, you know, Bitcoin is going to struggle to kind of catch a bid if we're in that kind of scenario. Kind of sat a little bit flat at the moment. In truth, we've had a lot of long positions from lower down, you know, talking about entering the weekly gap, looking at price being a

little bit overextended to the downside and getting those nice long downside weeks for absorption. a little bit overextended to the downside and getting those nice long downside weeks for absorption. Upside target wise kind of got some key liquidity up at around 88, 750, that kind of area or 88, 748. So ultimately, like kind of Chris alluded to, like you talked about as well, the market's very new, it's very fundamentally driven at the moment. So looking to kind of build out intraday positions,

looking to kind of pyramid them up into some swings, but kind of still in truth, from my perspective, looking to kind of make those little and often on the intraday plays, it's quite difficult in these conditions, just another announcement from Trump or something coming through can turn these markets a lot quicker than it can support it.

I think we're seeing a little bit of that hesitancy come through into price action. But if we start closing above 85.269, that kind of area on the daily scale, I think we continue with this, respectfully building that market structure to the upside. So until we break that level down, or we start to really get closes below around about 81.2,

holding a bullish bias here, but just news conditions and fundamentals make it a little bit of a tricky environment for the read. Yeah, and I know it depends on the exchange, but I was taking a quick glance at the chart this morning that 88, eight ish area that you're talking about. I think you said 88, seven something, but that 88 ish area getting above that, I think would be the first higher high in this series since the all time high. So I think for those who watch my market structure, when you're looking at a series of lower highs

and lower lows, you wanna see that broken. So above that area, I think is where you start to actually get interested and you can have a much stronger bias, I think bullish. I mean bullish as well, obviously, but just for people who watch lines, I think that's kind of the one. Absolutely. Oles, you're throwing up the hundreds. So think that's kind of the one. Absolutely.

Oh, you're throwing up the hundreds. So clearly you agree with me for once. Well, yeah, exactly. Well, it's just when you when you hit on structure, that's exactly how I was going to start my little spiel. And just maybe it's a slightly contrary intake. And, you know, as much as I love Reese to death, who is BPC Richfield, by the way, I slightly disagree

on the bias. For me, it's still bearish until proven otherwise. And when I talk about being proven otherwise, my bias flips if we can clear that 88 point whatever, 88.7, 88.8k high and accept above it, right? So far for me, this is just a series of high timeframe, lower highs and lower lows, going back to like the end of January, right? And the last thing I wanna be, I'd much rather be 20, 30, 40% late to a move, but have the conviction that the reversal is actually in,

have the belief that I can enter with size and be relatively safe because the reversal has been confirmed Rather than being that guy who's trying to call the bottom every time we put in a new lower lower or say that this time Will be different for me structurally nothing has changed this this current The current price action a price action from the last few days Even though it looks good, we're bouncing, we bounce like 10 or 11K off the lows, we're still putting in a lower high, right?

Structurally speaking, the structure is still down trending on the high timeframe. And that hasn't changed for me. Now, I think any good trader will tell you that you should wear, your bias should be something that you are willing to change very quickly in light of any new information. And that is no different with me. I never marry a bias. I love being proven wrong.

I love when the market tells me that my read is incorrect and I have to change it. There's nothing wrong with that. All good traders are aware that you buy should change once new information comes to light. So if we clear this, I'm calling it an 88K high, we clear that with volume and price starts looking good, we start accepting above that level, then maybe I change my tune a little bit. But for now, this just looks like a downtrend

and I don't wanna be the guy who is longing into a high timeframe downtrend. Buying the dip is one thing. If you're buying a pullback in a clear uptrend, that's completely different to what we currently have. Longing here for me just feels like you're longing into a high time frame downside move and that rarely ends well.

We saw it with altcoins back in last year. There were altcoins that had been down trending for like six, seven, eight months and every time we bounced 10% off the lows guys would say that the bottom is in, right? The bottom is in, the bottom is in. And you know, eventually like, you know, a broken clock is right twice a day. Eventually they will be proven right. They will catch the move. But I'd much rather be the guy who's hesitant to call that the guy who waits for confirmation

and then goes in with conviction and size once I have that confirmation. So yeah, for me, this is still a downtrend. I'm still leaning cautiously bearish here. But if we can clear 88k, 89k, start putting in some structure above that level, then I'll start looking for longs again, because at that point, my bias will have flipped. Chris, go ahead, Chris. Yeah, so I mean, mean no I absolutely 100%

agree there. I've been saying for a while here you know since we made that 88.5 and then we dipped down lower that's actually the the market structure the last kind of lower high if you're looking at that daily and so it's imperative that we get above that but I also like what he said there about you know and hold above it and so what I usually teach is, you know, once you break that last lower high, you're actually breaking that market structure, which is great. But what you want to look for is then you want to look for a pullback and then a breakout above that breakout. And, you know, again, there's never any guarantee in trading other than, you know, that you're going to lose money from time to time.

And the newer you are, the more money, the more often you're going to lose it. But when it comes to structure like that, one of the easiest things for people to do is look for that breakout, watch for a pullback, and then look for a breakout above your breakout. That's pretty significant. Most of the time, that'll get you in a continuation and kind of solidify the idea that that trend's been broken. So yeah. The hams disappeared for me but BC and Dave I saw you both had them up, BC quick and then to Dave. Yeah perfect he was just in response to policy obviously yeah really top-led and a huge respect for just to put it into context just so that it doesn't maybe mislead some of the kind of listeners that are in here that maybe others experienced

on a higher time frame scale, definitely still not not back to being fully bullish as for what I do as an intraday trader which is my main kind of specialty, looking at it more from kind of a liquidity perspective. I do completely agree with Fonis and I think obviously Chris has made some really good points as well when you're looking at structural recoveries and I agree what Chris is alluding to here is that you're looking for that market structure break, not a shift, right? You're looking for that support to hold and move up.

So that ATA kind of level is still really clear. Really want to see a kind of displacement above that high volume to come out and then looking at that whole area to basically, you know, have exhausted the sellers and then the buyers to kind of take over. But on an intraday basis, one thing I would say that has kind of helped me a lot over the years in building my career is looking for these intraday key reactions aligned with equity market volume and volatility coming in to trade from those kind

of key levels where you might spot those reversals. And actually it is a little bit of a kind of knife grab situation, but in terms of how price reacts from there, and then we tend to see these kind of inversion gaps setting, is very much an early stage indication of potentially for higher price action. But until we get those structural changes, it's purely trading this level to level

from liquidity pocket to liquidity pocket. Just try and pick up on that uncertainty. And I think to echo sort of our point about news at the moment, obviously, price action is in the charts, but we can see things moving when news drops. The EU basically just said no agreements have come out on tariffs and they expect the U.S. tariffs to stay in place. And we saw everything drop across the board right the minute that that was sort of announced.

So it's very clear that crypto very susceptible to what's happening in the macro at the moment. Dave, go ahead. Sorry. Yeah, I think that it's really interesting because I totally agree with what Falas said. I think the single most important sentence in what he said that the vast majority of people listening to this who are more investors or who move in with, you know, weeks to month timeframes is that traders who are any good react to new information and change. And why am I pointing that out? I'm pointing that out because, you know, look, with like, I don't,

you know, look with like I don't if you're not trading as a business then Taxation in a bull market means selling is really stupid, right? Because you literally have to bend on what your income is. There's a fairly Significant hurdle rate for any trade in and out. So unless you're trying to catch a big trend You really you know, a lot of the people listening are just trying to decide, well, when should I deploy my capital? And my answer to that is if it's in Bitcoin, DCA, dollar cost average.

But what's also really important is I don't know anybody, I mean, literally nobody who's technically bullish. And generally, that's what makes me the most bullish. So I actually thought Chris, what he said was exactly right. So, you know, look, this feels technically heavy, right? You see it, it's technically heavy. The technical traders that are setting prices, you know, every time you think it's gonna pull back to a number,

it generally goes part of the way toward that number and doesn't get there because there are still long-term buyers coming into this market. And I will continue to repeat for Bitcoin that most of the people who are buying it toward that number and doesn't get there because there are still long-term buyers coming to this market. And I will continue to repeat for Bitcoin that most of the people who are buying it believe it's at a 90 to 95 percent discount to its fair value. And that's something that you have to keep in mind. What does that mean?

It means that if you're paying significant capital gains taxes to try to capture and buy back in lower, it's the moral equivalent of picking pennies in front of a steamroller. If you're a nimble trader, this is an awesome market to make money. And so you really do have to distinguish between the two. So people like BC and Chris and Follis totally get the drift. And you're making money because the people who are dumbly in retrospect doing things not using firms like Arch Public, which I hate giving a plug to someone who's not paying me to sponsor, but so be it, who's

using the time your entries in a way. Most people are just saying, yeah, okay, I'll just buy. Okay, wait, it's at 85, 86. Okay, maybe it's going to go up now. I don't want to miss it. They buy it. And pretty much every day that we've had a pump on the open, it retraces after that. Now, today it's European tariff news.

Tomorrow it'll be something else. Tomorrow Navarro will be wearing a more high-priced suit than Bascent, and people will think, oh, my God, maybe he's becoming dominant in the administration. Who the hell knows? I mean, markets will do what markets will do. The main point is something Billy Barhart made this morning is that liquidity has already turned and Bitcoin lags that and there the ground is set for something to happen I think we're gonna need to get some through some of this uncertainty

But don't get caught out if if you're you're trying to wait for an entrance or use tools that could get you into the market. That's really the point that I would make. I would be much less bullish if all the technical traders were saying how great it was, right? But that's not the case. So we don't have a bullish sentiment. We still are towards fear on every sentiment indicator. And to me, that means that, yeah, retracement, a few thousand bucks here or there.

Look, we've been in a trading range between effectively 85, 86 and 78, which is a really small trading range for a month now. And yeah, could it go on for seven more months like it did last summer, I suppose? Doesn't feel like that's possible this time, but we'll see. But the range is still intact. I find it interesting, though, that we're always one tweet or announcement away from these multi-thousand dollar swings and that fear, but we forget the incredible tailwinds and that we should be one tweet away from the United States just bought some Bitcoin to add to the strategic Bitcoin reserve and what that would do to price. So, you know, it seems like we're basing things on fear-driven tweets right now and forgetting

about the insane tailwinds that the industry has at every level, specifically with the United States government. Go ahead, BZ. Yeah, so just to add to that as well, and again, amazing points made by Dave, is I think the kind of big distraction here that people aren't necessarily paying attention to is when these economic conditions settle, you know, especially in crypto, you're so used to the average participant is so used to getting beaten up in these conditions that, and as markets typically work, it drives you down, drives you down, drives you down to the point that you're just frustrated, you want to give up and then you miss the rip, right? Now we've all been there at different stages of our career or different stages of our

participation in this, but I think what we're looking at at the moment in terms of the big picture is the fact that the US needs to refinance a lot of their debt, right? I'm not going to go too much into that because I know we've covered it on this awesome show a few times before, but to do that, the central bank typically get a print when that kind of comes in, it's a form and we've had this kind of conversation whether it is quantitative easing

or whether it's a form of it. Either way, when the money printers come on and they look to refinance that debt and they start buying back the debt, the bonds, et cetera, when the market's at that sweet spot, and I'm really watching the US 10-year yield at the moment, when that kind of gets back down in that region below the kind of 4%, and it makes sense for them to do that,

we need to realize that in such a narrative news and fundamentally driven market, when Trump decides to turn that screw, right, and then he decides, okay, now we want everything back on, maybe the pressure is working and it's exerting it. We had a relatively dovish tone from Waller, you know, the speaker from the Fed last night who's kind of saying a lot of people thought that might be a little bit more hawkish and it wasn't. We've got Powell speaking tomorrow. At the point that those rates either look to get cut right or there's real

kind of confirmation that okay, money prints are coming on here, you know, the fiscal stimulus is coming in or, you know, another great point from Dave, you're looking at liquidity indicators and that as well, looking at that there's a lot sideline ready to deploy in there. I think it kind of certainly changes my mindset if I'm looking at a longer term view, I'm very much aligned with Fonis obviously, as well as what Chris is saying and Dave's agreeing to

as well looking at this structure. But the reason sometimes it can make sense to take a nibble in and around these key levels is because, you know, as for me, I'm trying to enter this as kind of a day trade or a short term swing, very, very aggressive in cutting it if it doesn't get there, but also looking to kind of see if you can feel out a way into that early wave, that early resurgence. Now, it's not necessarily the smartest way to trade. You need to do it typically in my experience, in very low timeframes, look to build those positions and you can lose obviously quite hard as well. But I think when we see those catalysts start to really materialise in the

market and we see that liquidity start to really come in, we see that volatility inject and Trump pulls it onside and the debt is being refinanced in the States, I just wonder how many people that that's going to leave behind that move. I think it's going to really, well, to use a real crypto term, but it has the real potential to melt some faces. Carlo. Yeah, look, they're pretty much telegraph in the playbook from the White House. It's funny that we have these conversations about, is this a good time or not a good time to buy Bitcoin?

You've reported this. We have the executive director of Trump's Council on Digital Assets, Bo Heinz, telling an interviewer that the United States wants to accumulate as much Bitcoin as possible. They want to reexamine different arbitrages for doing that, including repricing our Fort Knox gold reserves, which are really underpriced in relation to the current market price of gold, and then just dropped a potential play on tariffs and using tariffs as a means to accumulate more Bitcoin. So I don't know how they can be more transparent about what the plan is here.

And yes, we're definitely seeing sideways price action. I think that's largely the consumer not catching up to these very loud glaring signals from institutions, from the major financial talking heads. And they're kind of behind the curve here. I'm curious, have you given any thoughts, Scott, to how in the world they would leverage tariffs to buy more Bitcoin? That was a really interesting comment and kind of left field. I would love to go to the panel on that. My assumption is that if we end up down the road with a bit of a surplus, which is laughable

for the United States government, or a certain small percentage they could allocate, then it would make sense. But to be quite frank, rationally, tariff income is a drop in the bucket for our national debt, and you would anticipate them wanting to pay down the debt before buying Bitcoin, hence the budget neutral strategy.

So I don't know. I think it's very exciting to hear him say that as a Bitcoiner, but I think all of us, if you're truly a Bitcoiner, you want the debt paid down first. You certainly wouldn't want the United States to print more money to buy Bitcoin. The irony. Very thick.

Noah, you're giving the thumbs up there. I mean, what do you think of this? I agree with you. I'm just emoting because I agree with what you said and I agree with what Dave said. I don't see why the US would be using tariff revenue to buy Bitcoin when we have a huge, huge deficit that needs to be paid back. Yeah, I mean, I find that we have these sort of cross narratives and it's always very confusing, right?

Some obviously say tariffs are a negotiating tactic to get rid of tariffs. Some say tariffs are the way that we're going to fund the government in the future. But I think there's consensus that the administration wants interest rates to come down to refinance the debt lower. So I would think that they would use all of the revenue to pay off that same debt that they're going to refinance lower in theory. Robert Ansel, nine of you have had the opportunity to jump in. Feel free to jump in with your thoughts. Specifically in regarding tariffs?

I mean, specifically, generally with tariffs or the conversation on Bitcoin, your thoughts generally on what we've been discussing? All right, well price action, I see that we hit oversold on the daily back in February, and we've had a series of bullish divergences. Now we have a hidden bullish divergence with the RSI. Today's candle is the first candle that's completely above the 50-day moving average, so I do think that we're kind of at a turning point here with a breakout of the downtrend over the 50 day moving average with a bullish divergence on the daily. So I think the price action looks pretty strong right now, but it depends on where we end up. I think the top kind of resistance would be around 95,000 if we can get above there. That was the plateau back in February. If we can get above that plateau,

you know, all-time highs could come pretty rapidly. One thing I've been following is the end of the four-year cycle being replaced by something like a stair-step cycle. So six months in a consolidation followed by a breakout higher and then six months of further consolidation. But that remains to be seen if that's where we're at. More like traditional markets, really. And the four-year cycle as we know it is cooked. It's been cooked. Bitcoin had never broken previous cycles time high before it's having and it did so this time around.

And also more importantly altcoins have not behaved how they ever have in the past and the fundamental part of that four year cycle. In the past, if you really deeply believed in the four year cycle, which I did, by the way, you would have expected that when Bitcoin hits 106, 109 and then consolidates that altcoins would have gone absolutely nuts and we just haven't seen that. Scott, what do you think about the idea that there are just far too many alts and we didn't have tools like Photon and layers like PumpFun and Solana, which basically you just trade this stuff and experience alt season at the speed of the internet.

There was a huge alt season in Solana throughout the duration of 2024 and even, I guess, like first month or two of 2025. So there was an alt season. It just didn't happen the way that people expected it. What do you think about that? Yeah, it's the barbell we've talked about here a lot. Obviously there's been institutional and nation state adoption of Bitcoin. So it makes a lot of sense why Bitcoin made its move.

And then all of the things that people used to have to go to centralized exchanges for in previous cycles for alt season have gone onto Solana DEXs. And it's basically, as you said, at the speed of the internet has caused alt season to happen on a token in three hours instead of three months. And so you've had this sort of barbell of the most degenerate speculation on one side and Bitcoin on the other and nothing able to catch a bit in between. I totally agree with that. And listen, as we're all here, we all see projects launching, even the most hyped legitimate projects with real use cases, people just are not buying them right now. I'm not saying that they won't, but more you know you can look at I think altcoins as aggregate supply right most people don't differentiate between them individually so when another token comes on you know with more

supply and 10 more launch and 50 more launch and 100 more launch and you've still got all the old ones that people are interested in it's just really really really hard for anything, I think, to make a significant move. Robert, then Dave. Yeah, so this year, I think, as you said, there were a lot of good news from institutions, but price action did not really follow through. And if you look not necessarily at the price, but at the usage of the blockchain, it is quite staggering to see empty blocks in case of Bitcoin and Ethereum as well. So it shows somehow that the people are a little bit over on the blockchain space or some of the narratives did not work out. For short term, especially,

probably people have moved to the AI side mostly and trying out all the new creations there. But I think that the price action will follow only when there is usage actually on the chain. And then people start seeing the technology for what it is. Otherwise, it's only just finance and Wall Street. And we have that on Wall Street, probably better than on any kind of blockchain yet. Yeah, to some degree, you can look to Solana as proof of that idea. I think Solana did have the hype and people bought it speculatively. But because the meme coin casino we just described ended up on Solana, people

had to buy Solana and it went up in price. Whether you agree with the utility of what it was being used for or not, there was a fundamental reason to buy Solana to participate in something. So it obviously kind of happened. It's also just a better user experience. Anyone that's used Sol, anyone that's played with PumpFun and used tools like Photon, it's a better experience, period. It's faster, it's cheaper, it feels smoother.

I was a Solana hater for the longest time. But after really getting into it for the last six to eight months, I don't understand how the EVM is gonna come back from this they will find a way but even layer twos I mean souls is a better experience than layer twos and this is hard for me to say because I own a lot of eath Yeah, it's it's it's sad. I wish you know, I mean not wish but like I just I think that people need to start actually Exploring why soul did so well and it's not just because of memes. There's multi-faceted. Yeah, I agree with you I think it's two parts of the same argument

I'm saying it went up obviously because people were interested in memes, but people were interested in memes on Solana because it was a better Experience and cheaper and faster. Yeah. Yeah, sure. I mean, I totally agree with you. I also think that memes, the reason memes are so popular this time is because people are tired of utility projects, LARPing. They don't really do anything. They don't need a token. And they end up just like slow, soft-rugging over the course of a cycle rather than rucking over the course of a day or a week.

So it's just faster. It's speeded everything up. Absolutely true, Dave. Yeah, I know I'm a broken record on this topic, but the changes that you call tailwinds and they are massive tailwinds are going to create a different environment inside of crypto. And what I mean by that is in a world where people invest in meme coins that literally have no way by design

to reward the holders with anything other than potentially the ability to sell it to somebody else later. Until that is kind of ground out of the market, you're going to have people with a bad taste in their mouths about crypto. And it's important to understand what that means because we're talking about when people with most of the world's money see a casino, they look at it and they turn their nose up at it. At the same time, there are many, many projects in crypto and there will be new ones that could figure out a way to pass on value back to the holders. And so we have this and what's going to happen because

it's been telegraphed. Paul Atkins has very very clear about this as as Bo Heinz as has David Sacks as a basically people in control of financial Regulation and the financial markets in this country that they want innovators They want entrepreneurs to be able to offer to the public These tokens that could potentially pass on value. And so it's a completely different change, but the, this is, this is a massive, a massive sea change that our, that the market is just not reacting to. Because the correlation between Fartcoin and Solana is still high. Right.

And, and that's a big deal. Can we agree though, Dave, that that people perceive crypto as a casino far before Solana was even incepted, right? Oh yeah, no, I'm not. Look, Solana's like the biggest holder, right? And it's a little long term. And while I'm not up as much as I used to be, I'm still comfortably in profit in my

position and don't really care because I'm not selling it because I don't want to take the tax consequences. So I'm just going to ride it out and we'll see what happens. I think Solana has the opportunity to branch into a lot of things that will be very very real and while still casino-like because anybody who thinks that Wall Street isn't a casino is just not paying attention. I mean all you have to do and I say this on this this this on Crypto Town Hall every once in a while, if you look at the most successful new product on Wall Street,

other than the Bitcoin ETF, it's single day options. Well, what kind of degen buys an option that only gives you that you're only trading one day's price? Basically, it's a way of day trading leverage, and it's the most popular product that's been introduced on Wall Street in the last decade. So look, Wall Street's a casino. It's just a different kind of casino. Solana is extremely well positioned to get into that once it becomes legal. Now a bunch of things have to happen for that to occur, but it's going to occur. So don't underestimate that potential.

I mean, I would like to bring up one coin because there's one token in my mind that's kind of the bellwether for this. So, and you could talk about the price action on Ando as much as you want. But the issue is we created as an industry this notion of a governance token to give people the illusion, and it is an illusion, that they're buying something with value. Now, you can, the people who run it can change that to pass on real revenues as real revenues accrue, but they would have to change it. They didn't architect it that way, specifically to avoid Gary Gensler, because they thought governance tokens, well, it doesn't really give you anything, it gives you a right to vote on it, but you don't get to participate in it.

And we're still putting that significant values on that. And my guess is, is those that actually can change those tokens, can vote with their governance to actually award themselves a part of the revenue, that will become worth something. So, you know, every time people talk about RWAs in the crypto world, I get this, my stomach gets upset. Why? Because real world assets, where you can't participate in the value of those real world assets is a paper tiger. And there's a lot of those. Now, it's really going to be important because in the second half of this year, once regulations

happen, they're going to be fumble stumbling over themselves to figure out a way to monetize real world assets and to make the token worthwhile to the investor. We haven't seen any of that happen yet. Frankly, it's not legal yet, although I think the SEC has signaled they're not going to come after people who are trying. So people could be doing it. That to me is a major trade change. And when we see that, that's when alt season is going to start. But it's going to be like DeFi summer was in things that were different than the previous alt season. And you know, memes were different than DeFi summer. So you know, you're So you're gonna see a new war, it always happens. That war is going to be real utility,

but real utility where token holders are rewarded. Robert, go ahead. I think that, yeah, on Solana, you had some kind of amazing meme coin season for a few months. But you know, everybody knew that crypto is some type of casino, but people were promised utility and a bunch of applications and everything to be moved to the blockchain. So when that kind of dream doesn't happen, then people are moving on to the next the chains, when block space is utilized, when people are excited about a new upcoming thing, whether to make money or in general

whether to make money or some applications find out that the technology is really good. What I liked about the US president and everybody saying about blockchain as a technology and that the technology is so important to innovate. And we see that with digital payments and everything, yes, at the current moment, you could innovate a lot on the payment systems, whether the old guys will let you do that or not, it depends on a lot. In Europe, they seem that they don't want to let at all this kind of fintech innovation, but we will see what will happen in there. But again, that's another area which was promised 15 years ago and not yet delivered. So we will see whether that will fill up the block spaces and make people again excited about blockchain. Robert, I was just going to say, do you think we can't just leapfrog over the old guys or are they still gatekeepers?

Isn't the whole point of this, and I asked myself this question as well, isn't the whole point that we don't want the old guys to be making decisions? Blockchain technology is supposed to be peer-to-peer and we should be able to build payment rails somehow without having to answer to the to the men above. That's that would be the whole game plan, but they are blocking in every kind of, you know, with the crypto choke point 2.0 what happened in the US and right now with the digital payments and everything with TBDCs and digital euro and how stable coins should look like in Europe. They are just choking out everything. So we need this kind of alternative and blockchain offers this kind of alternative, but somebody

has to, let's say, get into this kind of alternative fintech payment system and make that massively adopted. Without the old guys knowing. First of all, as the token old guy on the panel, I can tell you not all old guys feel the same way. So let's just go there. There are two things I want to say. I wanted to pivot to something Byron Donalds posted yesterday, which I think that's extraordinarily important. He's the first congressman that I've seen, and he's running for governor in Florida, so maybe he won't be in the Congress for too much longer. But he actually correctly identified one of the

biggest reasons why crypto has had a problem in the United States, which is the accredited investor rule. And he's calling for its repeal, which is the accredited investor rule, and he's calling for its repeal, which is a big deal if a lot of others start understanding it. Because that is the rule that makes it impossible for founders to basically offer something that might possibly be considered a security in the United States because you have to season things for a year. There's all sorts of things if you're not a rich person. So basically only allowing it for rich people.

It turns retail into exit liquidity. It's horrendous in terms of price inequality and it's all justified by the nanny state of, well, we got to protect people from themselves. And you know, it basically protects VC. So we know that. But it's a very big deal that is a public mention. The first one said like a little green shoot, but that's something that you really want to see happen because it matters. As far as the conversation about, you know, governments, I've said this before, but, Noah, governments care care about two things and as long as those two things are solved

They're gonna let people do something in the United States at least they want to be able to collect taxes when you make money And we could argue about whether capital gains taxes, you know should be changed I personally think they should be cut in half and we should eliminate stepped-up basis and that would probably be revenue positive and very very stimulative the economy But you know stepped up basis is what the really rich people do And the other thing you do is you tax people when they borrow against their appreciated assets You tell you you know you do that at that lower capital gains rate And as I said revenue positive taxes the rich more than the poor and be very stimulative

But we'll see whether they go anywhere with that They haven't even had a chance to even think about that sort of policy. But as long as you pay your taxes and you don't finance North Korean hackers and drug dealers, they're going to be okay. So if you ask yourself a question, what's going to happen? Will peer-to-peer that allows drug dealers and North Korean hackers to move money as fast as they can, they're going to declare war on it. When you get to the market structure regulation, do not be surprised if you see that any DeFi

exchange that is going to want tracking. They're going to want to be able to find these people and take their money from them. There's just no way around it. Those are the two things they care about. Now in Europe, they care about something else. In Europe, they're clearly moving toward a CBDC. They want to stop you and I from exchanging value. Our government doesn't care about that.

They just want to make sure that you and I aren't drug dealers and that if they are, they can go in and get it. It's a very big difference. I personally think that AML has been almost counterproductive and borderline useless in the way it's been implemented and I think there's been pretty good research on that but it doesn't change the fact that they want to do it. Robert, I get those points on the terrorists and everything but we can definitely argue that the current banking or payment system does not resolve that. Oh, 100% Robert, I just said. Current ANL is counterproductive.

We agree. So they were moving much more money from terrorist to terrorist in the traditional banking than on crypto. Actually, the traditional, I know that it's much bigger. But the funny thing about it is that blockchain can actually make blockchain would make their job much easier. Like you know with all kinds of chain analysts, it's super easy to see all the funds the North Korean Lazarus Group is moving from left to right. So you can do it. and it's much more obvious and easier to do this than on a banking system where everything is about whitelists and internal databases. So I would argue that even tracking the

terrorists would be easier on blockchain, so there is no reason for not to go into blockchain as a primary service for payments. Yeah, no, let's be clear. I thoroughly agree with you. I'm just telling you that there's two things. So the governments want to be able to do that. And that is clearly direction the US is moving towards. That's what certainly the Republican Party and a bunch of the Democrats understand. Europe doesn't seem to be doing that. They seem to want to empower the banks. And hell, the European stablecoin regulation is basically forcing stablecoin issuers to

hold some of their reserves in fractional reserve banks, which is dramatically less secure than fully reserved holding of Treasury securities of its dollars or whatever, basically government debt from the currency that it's backing. So look, there is a difference in the US and Europe, and it's one of the reasons why Europe has had so much trouble over the last 30 years in startups and technology and why they've lost so much. And by the way, that's going to continue as long

as they continue to do that. So I do think that's true. But my point was that there's going to need to be certain things that are going to follow it even in the U.S. and we mentioned this before. And Carlo I know you care about this I don't know if you're up here. I'm seeing Scott's having issues so that's why I'm talking so much. Yeah it's the main I'm here but there's a connection issue with the main host but we're still running for now. Oh okay cool. I'm here too the there's a connection issue with the main post but we're still running for okay Cool. I'm here, too. Okay, cool. Well the point Carlo is I even in the US we're gonna get a stable coin bill That's gonna be really good in many respects, but it's gonna allow

Entrepreneurs to make money by offering seamless ways to save and get yield Separate from the stable coinsable coins become a payment thing. So people who believe that something that can move so easily, people are just gonna hold it and leave it there. I mean, sorry, but that's not gonna be the way it's gonna go. People are gonna, the minting and un-minting process is gonna happen, but a lot of people are gonna be, they're not gonna leave money in stable coins

like they leave it in tether because they won't need to. And that's- Yeah, I 100% agree. It's tantamount to the railroad, Dave, because you're laying the tracks for an entirely new financial system and a way of exchanging value. And from that, there are so many permeations. I am so excited about the future of startups in this country. And I'm finally so excited about the future of startups in this country. And I'm finally so excited about the future of crypto in this country, because we're getting all this amazing clarity. Yep.

And that's a very big deal. So just for those who don't understand, once the stablecoins are simple, checking accounts are going to go poof. Because why the hell would you write a check that takes three days to move back and forth when you can move things instantly? And moving things instantly means you can be much cheaper under the covers for the Zells and the Pay Pals of the world. And oh, by the way, moving things instantly means people are going to be able to sweep or they're going to offer accounts where, okay, use our stablecoin and we'll do this, but we'll sweep it into this instrument or watch coinbase and crack in and the reason cracking by the way is going

Into stocks is they're gonna be and they already have a trust bank, right? So they're gonna be offering financial products that have yield that you can put your money in with stable coins and use it for Payments and all of that's gonna get integrated. I mean it doesn't take a rocket scientist I have not talked to Jesse or anyone at cracking to know it and if that's not get integrated. It doesn't take a rocket scientist. I have not talked to Jesse or anyone at Kraken to know it. And if that's not what they're doing, then they're nowhere near as smart as I suspect they are. And by the way, Coinbase has the ability to do that too. They will watch.

And Robin Hood. And Robin Hood. Robin Hood just became a bank. Yeah, Robin Hood. Look, I spent hours with Dan Gallagher as their chief legal officer, who's by the way one of the funniest and smartest people in the financial history. And the mind, the great mind behind Rabin Hood, from everyone I've spoken to, who really is driving the ship. He is a very smart guy and the

opportunity to be in a conference, which I was, where he's allowed to, which is Chatham House rules, so I can't talk about what he said but watching him unfiltered with the the acting chair of the SEC was worth the price of admission it was one of the most one of the most enjoyable panels I've ever seen but I'm telling you if you're not bullish on where crypto can go with the amount of money that's gonna be coming into it you are literally blind and yes that doesn't just make me disagree with anything anybody else has said but It may not be fart coin It may not be the Solana mean casino

But there's going to be in massive a wave of wealth created over the next decade based on what's about to start happening here and so if you're if what you care about is building wealth over time slowly, then get yourself and understand and do some research to figure out which are the projects or which are the things you think will win. That's a very big deal. I literally came away from a week, two different TradFight conferences, more bullish about crypto than anything else than I've been in a very long time. crypto than anything else that I've been in a very long time. Just quickly before we wrap, an amazing comment. If you're wondering, circling back to tariffs and what the environment is in this massive game of chicken that the United States is obviously in with China, one of the top Chinese officials that's pinned above in the nest just said, and those peasants from the US will soon be crying tears in front of China's 5,000 years civilization. Pretty

aggressive. Sounds like Baghdad Bob, for those who remember that Gulf War reference. But you know, look, we are, we have a lot of adjustment to make. I mean, as I said it yesterday, we need to be able to refine rare earths. We need to be able to use integrate AI into manufacturing. I'm not Simon Dixon, who thinks that the whole plan is to actually decrease employment in the United States and just make more money here. But I think it'll be kind of in the middle of it, but he's not wrong in the sense that all manufacturing China is the best at at non

Non AI based manufacturing, you know in the world and they are probably developing AI manufacturing We have the opportunity to to do that from scratch and it is going to happen The question is is does it make sense to pick the fight now while we're building that capability? Or should we build the capabilities first and incentivize it? That's really the issue and I kind of think that we're a little bit trying to do too many things at once But it'll work itself out All right, everyone well having some connection issues here and within five minutes of the and anyway So give everybody on the panel a follow and we will be back of course tomorrow

for another Crypto Town Hall at 10 15 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Thank you to the panel you guys are amazing we love these conversations and thank you to everybody else for listening. See you guys tomorrow. Bye.