The Wolf Of All Streets - Bitcoin’s Biggest Mystery Solved? So Who Is Satoshi Nakomoto?

Episode Date: October 4, 2024

Friday Five is THE show about the main news in crypto! ►►JOIN ME ON ROUNDTABLE TODAY! START EARNING WEEKLY REWARDS! 👉https://roundtable.rtb.io/shortUrl/r6ZvMws ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEKDAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/   ►► The Arch Public Unleash algorithmic trading. Discover how algorithms used by hedge-funds are now accessible to traders looking for unparalleled insights and opportunities!  👉https://thearchpublic.com/  ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. Use code '10OFF' for a 10% discount. 👉https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker  Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://x.com/scottmelker Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.com/ Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe   Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c   #Bitcoin #Crypto #Investments The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor. Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.

A new HBO documentary being released next week says that they have discovered who Satoshi Nakamoto is. Do we believe them? We've heard this before. Did HBO seriously get to the bottom of the biggest mystery, arguably, in financial markets ever? We're going to talk about that, but obviously all of the big news stories from this week. It's the Friday Five. NLW wasn't able to make it last minute, so you guys get a whole heaping dose of me. Let's go. Let's go. What is up, everybody? I'm Scott Melker, also known as the Wolf of Wall Street.

Before we get started, please subscribe to the channel and gently smack the like button with the back of your hand. Right on that like button there. Satoshi Nakamoto. We're going to get to that. I have my doubts that HBO has figured this one out, but even Polymarket now has a betting market on who they're going to say is Satoshi Nakamoto. And there have been some leaks as such. Of course, this is the Friday five. So we're going to focus on the news today. And listen, this wasn't on the docket per se, but the first piece of news obviously has to be job numbers just released. September jobs report crushes expectations as U.S. economy adds 254,000 jobs. Unemployment rate falls to 4.1%. That is down from 4.2%. And for those of you who are keeping track,

we were supposed to only add 150,000 jobs because obviously the job market has been softening, added 254,000. Also 159,000 added in August with revisions in both July and August, adding 72,000 jobs. Now you might remember that we had a revision down like 860,000 jobs for last year, meaning that the strong labor market that we were all making decisions on and that markets were reacting to were not real, that the labor market was softening. It was weak and it gave the Fed an excuse to cut 50 bips at the last meeting. So now we're in that is good news, bad news, is bad news, good news situation once again, because if jobs are strong, that means the Fed doesn't need to cut anymore. That means less liquidity. That means people are fearful of stocks. But you would think that good job numbers would be, I don't know, good. Can you imagine Jay Powell taking a walk down

the road and saying, with the strength of the United States economy, we're going to need you to lose your job, right? I don't think that that would be very popular, but at the end of the day, if the Fed wants to cut and they want to bring rates down and they want to make sure that obviously the United States debt is refinanced at a lower level, well, they need weaker job numbers. Getting pretty ugly. And the most important part of this is these job numbers are fake. They're going to revise them. And I don't know why we have to talk about them every single time. But right now, you would imagine that maybe markets are going to go down because jobs are good, which means that the Fed might cut less at the next meeting. So this is what we were waiting for, for volatility. The really first

topic though that I have today is, is Bitcoin a safe haven asset? Because we have some big banks talking about it. JP Morgan, of all people, says geopolitical risk could drive investors to gold and Bitcoin. Now we've seen that the price action of gold and Bitcoin have not been similar. Mike McGlone loves to point this out all the time, of course. We talk about Bitcoin as digital gold, as a safe haven asset, as a flight to safety. Okay. Well, I think that we all think that's theoretically true, but that's not necessarily reflected in the price. When people buy gold is not necessarily when they buy Bitcoin yet. But JP Morgan saying that this geopolitical risk could drive investors to gold and Bitcoin. That's JP Morgan, you know, of Jamie Dimon, who hates Bitcoin and once said that anybody in his company who touched it would be fired. that guy. But then you get to flip over to another big

institution, Standard Chartered, and they say, Bitcoin, not a safe haven from geopolitical risks, but still by the dip. And they're saying here that the digital asset is not a safe haven against geopolitical risk, but Bitcoin is a hedge against traditional financial issues. What does that mean? Well, let's go back to March, a year and a half ago, Silicon Valley Bank. We saw exactly what happened when there was a serious threat of bank failures in the United States, besides the ones that the government just pulled a full mafia technique and offed because they were part of the crypto industry like Silvergate and Signature. Recently has come out that neither of those banks were insolvent or had real issues. They just used the

Silicon Valley bank failure as an excuse to go ahead and murder those. But when we see traditional finance issues, we tend to see Bitcoin go up. Bitcoin went from, I think, $19,000 to $25,000 that weekend when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed. But they're saying that if there's geopolitical risk, like a war, that JP Morgan says Bitcoin is a good safe haven for. Standard Chartered saying, not a good safe haven. And then as we dig into that, we know last week that BlackRock put out this incredible report that was saying that Bitcoin is not a risk on asset, is a risk off asset, largely agreeing with what JP Morgan is saying here, saying that with time it will offer idiosyncratic risk to your portfolio and that people should flee to Bitcoin

in times of geopolitical strife, in times of inflation, in times of questioning the honesty of your government. So basically, we have a huge shit ton of institutions with varying, confusing views about what Bitcoin is as an asset. And to me, the moral of that story is we are still, still really early. And the fact that institutions are even talking about this, trying to figure it out, trying to parse where Bitcoin fits in a portfolio and what it's most akin to in other financial markets is a huge step forward from the past. But it is deeply, deeply, deeply misunderstood still as an asset. And I once again point out the fact that I make quite often is that the price of Bitcoin does not necessarily determine or is not necessarily reflective of the value or the narrative. It's like Dave Weisberger, right? It's an option on its own future adoption. How many times have you heard Dave Weisberger say on a Monday,

I'm going to say this again, Bitcoin is an option on its own future adoption, right? So when we talk about these narratives for Bitcoin, it's largely what we believe Bitcoin will be and not exactly what it is acting as now. The next story that we have to go into is all of the price predictions and thoughts about October. Supposed to be Uptober. So far, it's been October. Rectober. Yeah, call it what you want. It hasn't obviously been a great month so far. I mean, we can take a look at the seasonality chart. I've showed this to you guys before. Let me even blow that up a little more. We've never had a September as good as we just did. And we've certainly never had a bad October after that good September. And we've certainly never had a bad run from October, November and December in a post halving year, which is also an election year, which is also when

we see global liquidity rising. Right. So October, even though it started bad, could be objectively good. And you may have seen my recent guest, Marcus, the other day, Marcus Thielen. And he pointed out that when recent guest, Marcus, the other day, Marcus Thielen. And he pointed out that when you take a look at the Bitcoin chart, the beginning of July, this was the first week, bad, then up. Beginning of August, first week, bad, then up. The beginning of September, bad, then up. The beginning of October, bad, maybe then up. This is becoming a bit of a pattern for us. But Bitcoin set for unusually busy weekend after Friday's payroll data volatility kink indicates. And Bitcoin's implied volatility curve shows noticeable kink, kinky, on October 5th, signaling expectations for an unusually

volatile Saturday. Well, we're already seeing some nice volatility today. Luckily for us, it has been to the upside for Bitcoin while we've already gotten that jobs data. Bitcoin's poor start to bullish October continues, but there may be cheer ahead for bulls. Most gains for Bitcoin come in the latter part of the month. Now, we have had Octobers in the past where everything flies literally on October 1st. But if you do start to take a look at historical charts, those big Octobers tend to happen on the back half leading into those bullish Novembers and Decembers.

So there's a lot of reason still to have hope that this tiny plastic bull toy will be able to defeat this tiny plastic bear toy right there. Curious as to your thoughts here in the chat. Does seasonality matter? A lot of people think that it's a bit of a meme. Does the cycle matter? Are you expecting, even with geopolitical risk

and with what's happening with the election and all the uncertainty in the world, we know markets hate uncertainty. Do you think that in the face of all of that, that Bitcoin can still repeat history in these halving years and have its parabolic move to the upside? I would love your guys' opinions since I don't have another guest here to discuss it with. I will go out on a limb and say I've been expecting it to be good. It scares me that everybody else has been expecting it to be good. But I have been saying that since earlier in the year when it was very unpopular to say that these last six months would be bad. So nothing in my

mind right now has changed except for the fact that we're all over emotional. And when you get to the sort of bottom of these sideways choppy cycles, whether that's now or soon, when you get to the bottom of those, you're obviously naturally going to doubt your conviction in the fact that the upside that you've anticipated is going to actually happen. And even if you look at Bitcoin as a ranging asset right now, you would think that it goes to the top of the range and at least tests those low 70,000s and tests the recent all time highs. I see over here you guys saying cycles matter until they don't. Q4 is going to be a bloodbath. Too much macro turmoil.

Listen, like rationally, that's a very McGlone-ish take. And what Mike says, McGlone, has been well-established in data. He has great reasons for saying it, but shit just keeps going up. It's the old adage, markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent, right? So I, I don't necessarily expect that just because rationally things should go down, that they necessarily will. And I'm certainly not willing to attach a time base to that, right? I don't know that I can say, hey, that's going to happen in the next three months. Like as Matt Hogan famously said on my show last week, governments have made recessions illegal, right? So I'm seeing your opinions over here. Time to buy was under 20K.

You might get another chance. Wow. Okay. That's pretty, pretty, pretty brutal. I would be real surprised to be back under 20K. And honestly, as I sort of dug in yesterday, I think it was yesterday, I spoke with Gary Cardone, maybe it was two days ago on his show. And he made a great point. He said, on a risk adjusted basis, this is actually the cheapest and best time to buy Bitcoin. Because if you were buying it under 20K, which I agree with, was the right time. If you were buying it under 20 K, you were buying it at a time when the industry was quite fucked in the United States. And there was a legitimate chance that if things went badly with governments that we could have seen much lower prices or seen Bitcoin become an illegitimate or become an asset that was attempted to be banned by the

government. So I never believed that was going to happen. But when you look at the price now, you're talking about an institutional asset with more institutions coming in, how much they'll buy, I have no idea what that demand will be. But we now have the plumbing for any institution on the planet to get exposure to Bitcoin if they so desire to do so. And we don't have to worry about Bitcoin being a security. Nobody's talking about it wrecking the environment. I think right now, Bitcoin is at its most established point with the most tailwinds it's ever had. So even at 60K, it's probably a safer bet to buy Bitcoin here than it was in previous cycles when there was a lot more

uncertainty as to what the asset class would look like moving forward in the eyes of governments. That's all I got for you on the Bitcoin price action for the moment. I mean, I guess we could take a really quick look at the chart while we're at it. You can see that we do have this still series of lower highs and lower lows. I was an idiot saying that 65, as I told you, was being broken as a higher high. We really need to get above 70 for that to be the case because this lower low was never, this lower high right here was never confirmed by a lower low. So that makes this 70K level, literally exactly 70,000, the main level. But as you can see on the daily here, taking a nice bounce off the 50MA, seeing a little bit of volume come in and these sort of doji candles down here, that means there was some indecision we could be reversing. It would be

really nice to see this reverse and start heading back up from here. Even if we go sideways, more downside, holding 60 and avoiding more downside would be really, really nice thing. But OK, so we know that the back end of October tends to be the better part of the month. Wonderful. This is a really interesting story right here that was not really on my radar immediately. This was reported quite a while ago that the Swift system was going to start testing blockchain technology to improve cross-border transactions. Anyone who used Swift knows that it's ancient. It's like existing in the 1970s. It takes forever to send money through traditional banking rails and wire. Good luck sending five bucks from the United States to Uganda through the? Through the Swift network. We all know

that crypto literally fixes this. Some people say XRP fixes this. Some people say Bitcoin fixes this. In my opinion, stable coins fixes, right? People want to send dollars. They don't want a volatile asset that's going to be worth more or less when it arrives. So you could just send a stable coin from anywhere in the world to anyone else in the world, extremely cheap on multiple networks, almost for free, and you can send $1, right? So I think that we know that that's the case. But the fact that Swift here, Swift, this is Swift, right? This is the single probably thing on the planet that if you believe in crypto as a use case for cross-border payments, this is the single thing that disrupts the most. Well, banks are set to use SWIFT for token transactions starting in 2025. They will be

testing this. I mean, this is pretty crazy. Here's a quote. What we don't want to see is the emergence of what we call digital islands appearing. We've tried to help the industry figure out a way to ensure that where every digital asset or a digital currency is created, whatever technology that's created on those can successfully work together with each other and the existing financial system. So it's basically them saying this thing is real. It is happening. We don't want to get blockbustered by Netflix. So we're going to start testing it and using it ourselves. And they've actually already start testing it and using it ourselves. And they've actually already been testing it and experimenting with it. That was the old story in test environments. While they're going to do this, this is happening. So we will see cross-border payments from bank to bank

using the Swift network on blockchain rails. I'm sure there'll be private blockchains. I doubt it would be like, hey, we're using Tron, right? But if you're talking about the bullishness and use case of the technology, it is being adopted for the biggest use case possible right here. This is pretty crazy to me. And it also lends to obviously the tokenizing of other assets. Assuming this works and becomes popular, they're going to very quickly realize that tokenizing of other assets. Assuming this works and becomes popular, they're going to very quickly realize that tokenizing your stocks, like Larry Fink is out there on the roadshow talking about, is going to be a much faster way to transact and move peer-to-peer and eliminate the third-party middlemen. Sort of along the same lines, another story that was not so deeply on my

radar, PayPal completes its first business transaction using a stable coin. Did you guys see this? Pretty big news. PayPal paid an invoice to Ernst & Young on September 23rd using PYUSD. Still reads like pussy to me. The stable coin the firm launched last year, relying on an SAP SE platform to complete the transaction. SAP's platform known as the digital currency hub allows enterprises to send and receive digital payments instantly around the clock. The invoice amount wasn't disclosed,

but PayPal paid their accounting invoice to Ernst & Young in a stable coin. They paid Ernst & Young in pussy. I'm alone. I know there's children that are going to listen to this. I'm sorry. But I mean, come on, man. We have such a big problem with our acronyms in crypto. POS, proof of stake. That means piece of shit.

P-Y-U-S-D. Have you seen the name of Coinbase's wrapped Bitcoin? C-B-B-T-C. Does that sound at all like C-B-B-C to you? It sounds a lot like C-B-B-C. C-B-B-T-C. But like, nobody wants to talk about NFTs, dude. Non-fungible token. Explain that shit. We need to like start using really simple words and not stupid ones like PUSD.

Either way, PayPal, I don't want to say they paid in PUSD. PayPal paid an invoice to Ernst & Young, who's been very ahead of the curve in crypto as an accounting firm. They paid them in PSD. All right. Anyway, stable coins, obviously seeing a meaningful level of adoption to all the offendable people in the chat. You too are PSDs.

I'm sorry. I'm sorry. This is what my show used to be. Some of you might not remember, but I used to just come on here and make jokes about one inch and say really bad words. And then I became a very serious person. All right. Now we have to talk about Ripple because everybody wants to talk about Ripple. It's the best. Look at that. There's Christine Lee. I'm going to pause her. You guys can look at Christine. Okay. SEC files notice appeal in case against Ripple. What the F, man? You all may remember that earlier this year, we had this amazing moment, amazing moment where the judicial system gave the SEC the smackdown and said the initial

creation of XRP was a security offering, but that the programmatic and secondary sales on exchanges were not the exchange of a security. And we all went, yeah, uh-huh, right, what, right. I don't even know. Where's the music? Right. Anyways, I found my buttons again. Either way, we did this. We were really excited.

It was amazing. We cheered. Our favorite altcoins are obviously not securities. It's going to be a shitcoin fiesta of Coachella proportions. And now the SEC is trying to do a full-on unregistered security fire fest instead. So the SEC has decided, which, by the way, Meta Lawman on this show two months ago said was likely to happen. The SEC has decided to appeal this case. Now, there shouldn't be a surprise that Gary can't take his L's like a man.

And there shouldn't be a surprise that the SEC wants this changed because obviously they have cases against Coinbase about unregistered securities and Kraken and others. And if they can get this effectively removed, they can go back to saying that everything is an unregistered security, that we are all breaking the law by trading shit coins and whatever, whatever, whatever. So now we're going to have to go through the long process of this being appealed by the SEC. Great. As a result, XRP's bear skew persists amid 10% price slide following SEC appeal and ETF filing. XRP, not surprisingly, getting a little wrecked when people think that it might go back to being an unregistered security. But in the meantime, the chads, the giga lords at Bitwise giving precisely zero fucks have filed a registration statement with the SEC for a spot XRP ETF. Not only that, when they filed it,

they actually went as far to say and assert in the filing that XRP is not a security, pushing against what the SEC has said in the past and pushing against in front of all the bullets for all of us to make the important points that have to be made. The courts said this is not a security, therefore they are filing an ETF for XRP. And they're doing this with Coinbase custody as the trust company, but the trust administrator, BNY, that's the Bank of New York, Mellon, which is the largest custodian on the planet, where if you've been keeping score, just got an exception from SAB 121 to custody crypto assets. Right? A lot of weird kind of incestuous circle companies using strategery, 4D chess happening with Bitwise. But right now, XRP,

for better or for worse, very much back in the spotlight. And it's pretty interesting. Pretty interesting that we're talking about whether XRP is a security again. And the reality of all of this, I'm going to say once again, politics. I don't care who you're going to vote for. I'm going to once again share some objective truths. If Kamala Harris wins, we don't know what the approach will be, but we have to default to more of the same.

Default. I'm not saying things can't improve. I'm not saying she won't get rid of Gary Gensler. I'm not saying that we won't get a better SEC chair. I have no idea what's going to happen, but I'm pretty sure that we won't just see a clean slate of all these enforcement actions and a wholesale change of policy. If Donald Trump wins, I think objectively, if we're sharing truths, he is not going to pursue any of these claims that these offerings are unregistered securities because he is literally offering these unregistered securities. own DeFi token and NFTs illegal? Probably not, regardless of your feelings, regardless of your deep-seated emotions about the election. And you don't have to be a one-issue voter, but it is an objective truth that in the case of the XRPs and Coinbases and such,

these cases probably go away under Trump because it is in his own self-interest, whether you like it or not, to make sure that these things go away. We have no knowns. We have unknown knowns. We have unknown unknowns. We have all of these things. But we know that Trump ain't going to prosecute himself. OK, so the fact that Trump ain't going to prosecute himself. Okay.

So the fact that we're back discussing this on the eve of the election should tell you that the SEC continues to push through with these policies right into the next administration, because this will not be decided while Joe Biden is president. And the final story here, the beautiful clickbait from the title, new HBO documentary aims to reveal Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto's true identity. Guys, we've heard this many times before. Is it Adam Back?

Is it Hal Finney, who obviously has passed away, sadly? No, Predictive Markets and Galaxy's digital head of research, Is it Hal Finney, who obviously has passed away, sadly? No. Predictive Markets and Galaxy's digital head of research said he heard the HBO doc claims a true identity of Nakamoto is Len Sassaman, which would lend to the obvious question of what the fuck is a Len Sassaman? I have been in Bitcoin a long time. I've only heard this dude's name in passing, but apparently it's going to be Len Sassaman, this absolute mega giga Chad right here. You can see him right here proposing to his girlfriend and I guess future wife at the time.

And if you read this, it says Len slips a blue cable tie ring on Meredith Svega this guy was such a cryptographic programming nerd that he didn't get a ring he used blue cable tie to get engaged to his wife I think that's literally a twist tie like when twist tie put on the thing god man how did he get, man, how did he get away with that? How did he get away with that? But you guys can look up Leonard Harris Sassaman, Len Sassaman, but he was studied under David Chom, who I've had on the show.

I mean, very early cryptographer, talked quite a bit about the importance of cryptography with money and basically all the narratives that we've ever had here with Bitcoin makes a lot of sense. But also, the guy killed himself right around the time that Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared. So he died of suicide right when Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared. This documentary is entitled Money Electric, The Bitcoin Mystery. It is out next Wednesday on HBO. Now I'm going to try to do this. I don't remember how to do this. So give me a second. I'm going to try to share it so that we can actually watch the trailer because my producer's not here. So I'm going to try to share it so that we can actually watch the trailer because my producer's not here.

So I'm going to try to see if I can share this screen in a way that would allow us to present. Share screen. Chrome tab. Share the audio. If you guys want to watch it. Here, let's do this. Let me know if, please just give me like a thumbs up that you can hear it. Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin, could be one of the richest people on earth.

But many years ago, Satoshi had disappeared. You hear it? Bitcoin being woven into the fabric of the financial system, solidifying its role as digital gold, perhaps the question of Satoshi's identity was more pressing than ever. We should start with just an interview with you in Malta, if that sounds good to you. Adam back.

OK. Who would have been working around the clock to introduce something like Bitcoin? A lot of technical people will say, I could have done that. It's actually much harder than it looks. Anyone confident enough to go do Bitcoin probably would be confident enough to not leave any traces. Satoshi's got nothing to pick up by his snatch. Yeah, just a million Bitcoin.

The currency derived from electricity might pose a real threat to the dollar. Three, two, one. If it gained in popularity. I'm the crazy prince that was told to be about Bitcoin. What we're trying to do is get parallel systems in place. Dollars, Bitcoin, pesos, Bitcoin, yen, Bitcoin. If it looks like something could replace the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency,

three-letter agencies will do whatever they can to disrupt projects like Bitcoin. I would rather buy shit that's worth something than buy crypto. Bitcoin is about undermining the Federal Reserve, disintermediating the nation-state. It's not like Satoshi had some master plan. Yeah, it's like you're in some sort of cult. You guys are having fun though. Right? Satoshi left a lot of digital history.

When he left, he distributed control amongst different people in the community. Were you the first person that Satoshi reached out to? I believe so, yeah. Best evidence of him being Satoshi? Of not being Satoshi. Being Satoshi. What indication did you have that he was collaborating with the government if you dig deep enough the inconsistencies will emerge it's an easier spark i've been told satoshi was a group of people i have to be careful talking about that topic

he checks a lot of boxes i will admit you're pretty creative you come with some crazy theories here's what i think happened it's bitcoin don't trust verify hbo man hbo hope this uh documentary has a better ending than game of thrones because they didn't wrap that one up particularly well to be quite honest um but uh that looks pretty compelling don't you think you're gonna watch it i'm gonna watch it we should probably do like a watching party right can you say i i see lou mabo here where where'd it? Can you say Len Sassaman five times fast? Len Sassaman, Len Sassaman, Len Sassaman,

Len Sassaman, Len Sassaman. It's a pretty good tongue twister, but I kind of nailed it, to be honest. Yeah, guys. I mean, that's really all I got for you today. I mean, the chart looking kind of decent-ish for those who weren't paying attention at all, which is probably all of you at all times to me.

But I showed you guys. We had bullish divergence on the four-hour chart we had bullish divergence on the four-hour chart there uh with oversold rsi at the bottom just saying it works 60 of the time every time all right guys that's all I got. I'm sorry that NLW wasn't here to entertain you. I'm not Satoshi. I'm not Satoshi. No, I'm not Satoshi. Although I was on Twitter before I think Bitcoin was created

or right around the same time. Somebody up here said that they like my show, but don't love the, except for the parody. I'm really fucking sorry, man. I don't usually do it, you know, but I get out here alone and my personality and I just, I become who I am and I can't help it. Guy can't, can't, can't help it. Gary Cardone says I'm a walrus. I think that's good.

Do we want to be walruses? Definitely not Satoshi. Satoshi wouldn't have lost millions of dollars on Voyager like a jackass. Anyways, guys, that's all I've got for you today. Jeff's saying pump it up. I think this is it. Wait. You know, pump it up i think this is that way

don't you know pump it up you've got to pump it up It's almost like I was a DJ once upon a time in my life. You guys might remember, though, throwback Friday here to a time when we used to do things like that all the time. Oh, my God. You guys remember this? Now do Gollum. I forgot about this. Let me see if I can do it. That's my precious. We want it.

We need it. You guys remember that? Remember that? Wow. Iron Maiden hat. I used to wear an Remember that? Wow. Iron Maiden hat. I used to wear an Iron Maiden hat. Now we're just talking, man. What was your DJ name?

It was really, really clever. It was Scott Milker. For a while, it was the Milker Project. Yeah, I used to do some vocal impressions. Oh, Smiggle. Pure elication the murders. Scott can bring back the old show. Yeah, anyways.

Bobby, you remember that? What? I don't remember that one. My name is Bobby and I need to go to the party. Is that it? It's my party and I'll cry if I want to.

Tyler says it's going off the rails. You know, man, it's Friday. I slept like two hours last night. Horrible night's sleep. Just show up. Just got to show up and be yourself. Now I got to go.

Apparently host Twitter spaces. Supposed to go to the gym today. I'll probably limp into there. Not feeling grace uh if you don't laugh you will cry at bitcoin dumping uh what kind of coffee do you drink literally any that has caffeine in it i don't care but uh no uh what are the ones that we get love something italian dude i don't know man when gary on your show literally anytime literally anytime miguel says off the rails uh i don't know why my wife says i'm not really working at the moment i'm at work right now uh valerie says okay this is a good laugh to begin the weekend she survived my uh pay points paypal stablecoin

jokes so you know that valerie is one of us um time to adjust your stop loss fam we are moving i'll take it just don't drink that canned crap dave drinks i don't i don't uh i really try not to put like aggressively toxic chemicals into my body it's a thing for me not not judging but like i've never had like a monster energy drink i probably haven't had a red bull in two decades uh did they find you guys remember the old jokes who just said this did they find their two dollars is that in here once again bye felicia that's bye feliciaicia. I want my $2! There it is. What else do we got in here? That's dope. Oh, no! We suck again!

Oh, no, we suck again, yeah. I'm free to be honest. I haven't changed those in a long time. We're going to need some new sound clips at some point. Yes, they found their $2, apparently. They did. What do we guys got over here

what gym going to the gym is important someone's saying what gym uh i do like uh i mean i used to be a very very like heavily into crossfit but then uh now i kind of do like crossfit light a lot of lifting a lot of like uh you know body weight stuff a lot of you know high intensity interval training but i definitely don't do like uh snatches anymore in olympic lifting yeah wow jeff are you talking about gainesville health and fitness the legendary gym in gainesville my parents were like members like 17 and 18 at Gainesville health and fitness, but I do not do that. Gregory says,

Scott smoking that good stuff this morning. I don't smoke anything. No CrossFit for older dudes. I mean, it's not, no, you're going to get hurt. It's fine.

Whatever. Still got the golf simulator. Yes. But, uh, I have this problem. I have a neuropathy in my, and I can't feel this whole side of my hand. It hurts really bad, so I haven't played golf in quite a while. I am trying to get back into tennis, though, and I've been kind of falling out on the tennis courts.

Guys, I got to go, man. It's enough. Thank you for listening to ADHD in person. I'm not smoking chicken fish, but that is all I got. Jeff, you are a member of Gainesville Health and Fitness in the early zeros. My God, how is that even possible? Wow. Anyways, that is all I got for you guys. I will see you on Monday with the boys for Macro Monday. See you later. This was fun.