The Wolf Of All Streets - Chainlink Rally, FTX Repayments & Jupiter Airdrop | Friday Five
Episode Date: February 2, 2024This crypto week has been rich on news, and I and Nathaniel have chosen the most interesting ones to discuss: from FTX repayments to Chainlink's rally, Jupiter airdrop, the Fed's rate decision and mor...e! Friday Five is THE show about the main news in crypto. Join me and Nathaniel Whittemore as we delve into the main topics that moved the markets. Nathaniel Whittemore: https://twitter.com/nlw ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/  ►►OKX SIGN UP FOR AN OKX TRADING ACCOUNT THEN DEPOSIT & TRADE TO UNLOCK MYSTERY BOX REWARDS OF UP TO $60,000! 👉 https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. USE CODE ‘2MONTHSOFF’ WHEN VISITING MY LINK. 👉 https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker  ►►THE DAILY CLOSE BRAND NEW NEWSLETTER! INSTITUTIONAL GRADE INDICATORS AND DATA DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY AT THE DAILY CLOSE. TRADE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. 👉 https://www.thedailyclose.io/  ►►NGRAVE This is the coldest hardware wallet in the world and the only one that I personally use. 👉https://www.ngrave.io/?sca_ref=4531319.pgXuTYJlYd ►►NORD VPN GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets  ►►COINROUTES TRADE SPOT & DERIVATIVES ACROSS CEFI AND DEFI USING YOUR OWN ACCOUNTS WITH THIS ADVANCED ALGORITHMIC PLATFORM. SAVE TONS OF MONEY ON TRADING FEES LIKE THE PROS! 👉 http://bit.ly/3ZXeYKd Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker  Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io  Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe  Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c  #Bitcoin #Crypto #fridayfive Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 1:00 Macro update 5:26 Blackrock overtakes Grayscale 7:20 Chainlink rally 9:40 Jupiter airdrop 12:55 FTX repayments 18:05 Celsius comes back 20:17 Layoffs in crypto The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor. Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Chain link is rallying, making a new high for the year.
Everybody talking about real world assets and how chain link may be the way to capture that value, but has been one of the most bullish tokens of late.
FTX is going to repay their creditors in full.
We're going to talk about why I just put that in air quotes.
And the Jupiter airdrop has the Solana world and the crypto world in general on fire.
It's Friday, which means it's the Friday 5.
NLW and I review the biggest stories of the week.
Let's go.
Let's go. here. We were going to try to not say ETF, but I have a feeling we're going to say ETF. Only a little though. Only a little today. Just a nice little baby check-in.
We're going to do the Salt Bay thing. Just a little sprinkle of ETF today.
Well, this wasn't necessarily my intention, but I think we should actually start with a bit of the macro because today's job numbers dropped. The US economy added 353,000 jobs in January as markets mull a slower pace
of rate cuts. If you guys weren't paying attention, I believe it was about 175,000,
180,000 that was predicted. And they revised this time the December number up, meaning that they
added more jobs. We've kind of been seeing these revisions where it looks like jobs are great,
and then they revise them down. In this case, it seems things are only getting stronger. And if you guys don't know why that matters, we live in the upside down where a lot the first FOMC meeting of the year and traders have basically been pricing in and betting on rate cuts for this year.
Everyone knows that that's where we're headed. The Fed has indicated that that's where we're
headed. It's a question of when it begins, right? So we're now over the hump into a new phase of
the cycle from a monetary policy standpoint. However, what we have is a situation where the Fed, because basically they're
seeing inflation continue to go down in the way that they want without any sort of negative
consequences of overtightening, it gives them leeway to just not do anything for longer.
And basically what Powell said on Wednesday was that it was unlikely, basically from where they were sitting, it was looking pretty unlikely that March was
going to be when rate cuts started.
So I think between the beginning and the end of that conference, the market had been pricing
in a 60% chance or something like that of rate cuts before the meeting, 35% chance coming
out of it.
Now with this, with these sort of numbers really reinforcing the thing that Powell was
saying was giving them a longer leash basically to do nothing. The market is even sort of now wondering if May
is going to be when these rate cuts start or whether they're going to be pushed out farther.
My money is on pushed out farther, right? And predictive markets have been wrong this entire
time for anyone who's paying attention. And about a year ago at this time, we were supposed to get, I think, three or four rate cuts in 2023, right? And that was being priced at 85, 90,
95% chance that we would see cuts. There's literally just no reason for them to do anything
right now, unless there's something under the hood that we don't know about that's already broken.
Also, for anyone not paying attention, when they pivot is usually when
the stock market crashes. Yeah. Well, the other interesting thing, which obviously they, you know,
Powell didn't get into this dimension, but the countervailing force of big tech and particularly
AI enthusiasm as a sort of risk on factor in a sea of things that might be risk off for the last year,
also has created a weird dynamic where it's almost like the market is behaving in two separate ways.
It is sort of less slavishly devoted to monetary policy than normal because there's this other
factor that keeps it sort of its animal spirits alive. And so it even doesn't feel really like it's been totally kind of
risk off and waiting. It's just an interesting dynamic right now that all of it definitely
points to Powell just sitting on his hands and the Fed having to do nothing.
It's incredible to me that markets have remained this high for this long,
that jobs have remained this strong for this long, that jobs have remained this strong for this long,
that inflation has come down. I can't possibly even wrap my head around the idea that Powell
pulled this off. There's really a soft landing. I can't. I don't know why. Maybe my bias was just
so wrong. Who knows, man? It's interesting. I mean, listen, the good news is it's probably
good for us, even if it's bad for the commentators.
But as things go, better than some catastrophic crash because they overtightened or something like that.
Yeah, well, let's do the SaltPay thing.
We've got a little bit of an ETF update. And the only update we're going to give you here is that BlackRock finally had more trading volume than GBTC in a single day, which is a big deal because
that means that the GBT selling is slowing, but also that the BlackRock buying is increasing or
staying high enough that it is bigger. This is what we all want to see. We want to see GBTC
marginalized. Yep, absolutely. I mean, listen, this is actually
two separate trends, which are both positive. One, as you pointed out, is sort of we want to
see the sort of, you know, the GBTC trade declining and that it has been, you know,
not as fast as perhaps everyone would like, but, you know, slow and steadily decreasing as a factor.
But then at the same time, in addition to just BlackRock trading more as an indicator
that GPTC is showing less of an impact on the space, it's also positive just entirely
in its own terms from the standpoint of there being these continued volumes weeks now after
the initial launch.
One of the things that would have been a question or was going to be a question was how much
enthusiasm would there be after the initial pop? Was this going to be the type of thing where there's a
ton of hype, race to a billion, a couple billion in assets under management, and then a real decline,
but the volumes have remained really healthy and really strong relative to other ETF trading going
on. Yeah, it's been really impressive. And I think we're going to continue to see sustained demand outweighing sort of the supply side, which just to me is huge. Exactly, again, what we want to see. We don't need to talk about the ETF anymore. I think at this point, that's the kind of last, I'm sure we'll find a way. That was sort of the last straw and the last thing we needed to talk about to finally see gbtc losing the race there i really wonder if there's any buying in those gbtc flows or if it's literally all still selling but i think
yeah who knows interesting to parse in the future the next one sort of uh the title here chain link
rally we don't talk about uh altcoins in these projects very much but chain links link token
taps 22 month high of 18 ending three month Now, A, it's interesting to see even
amongst all this Bitcoin ETF hype that we can have all coins still booming and having these
sort of select ones going up massively. But pretty big deal that this is making a 22-month high after
sort of sitting at these prices for a while and after already having such a big run. And this
really is, in my mind,
and if you read this article, because of the real world asset narrative, and maybe that's what's worth discussing here. Maybe that will be the king of the next cycle.
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, there's a couple things going on. So one is,
I think it absolutely does have to do with the real world assets narrative. This has been sort
of the second place narrative throughout this entire sort of recent buildup
where, you know, I mean, listen, it was even the second place narrative for Larry Fink,
right?
When he was sort of getting into the Bitcoin spot ETF, obviously, that's what they were
leading with.
That's what they were going with.
But he brought this up in every interview as well, tokenization of all assets.
And now that's a big, exciting opportunity.
We talked about how, you know, how he refused to make it an either or, right? Now, the other side of making an either or is not just sort of a boost for Bitcoin, it's a boost for this theme. Chainlink is sort of intersection of traditional finance and crypto
finance in a way that is not predicated on this hype cycle, right? If you watch what Chainlink
has done over the last couple of years during the bear market, it's been entirely focused on that.
There's been a series of partnerships and launches and announcements that, of course,
not really enough to make it through the din of Sam Bankman-free trials and things announcements that, of course, are not, you know, not really enough to make it through the din of, you know, Sam Bankman free trials and things like that. But they've been quietly
building towards this in a pretty kind of inexorable march. And I think that, you know,
maybe now the market is catching up as that narrative catches up a little bit.
Yeah, I agree. And just interesting to see that some of these monsters from previous cycles
actually have a lot more left in the tank and can, I think, sort of rebrand and get a new narrative and move forward. So
interested to see what happens with Chainlink. Now, something brand new, the opposite of Chainlink,
I would say, is Jupiter rallies on with Solana supporters leading the charge, one of the most
anticipated airdrops-based social media ire over its novel distribution plan. So nothing can go off without controversy, obviously,
in the crypto space. You can drop millions, 700 million or so in helicopter money all over
people's heads and people are going to somehow find a way to complain about that. But this was
huge, obviously a big fundamental event on Solana, but way out of my pay grade to understand and
discuss. Yeah. I mean, listen, if Chainlink's potential ascension into the ranks of big,
legitimate infrastructure for a new era between that intersects crypto and traditional finance. This is the straight up classic
beginning of a bull market, we're so back baby kind of story. It's a hypey new thing on a chain,
which to be fair to the Solana community is legitimately celebrating its continued survival
and a return to excitement. But it's giving away free money in the form of tokens. It's all those
dynamics. If you're watching from the outside and you don't particularly care or aren't invested too
much in the specifics, it just looks like a signal that we are really moving into a new kind of
bullish time in crypto. And new bullish times are always going to look like the old bullish times
in some ways. And this is that. Some people say that this time will be different. But I think, as you said,
we have a clear signal that this time will be exactly the same. In your opinion, is this
helicopter money and money printing, or is it a distribution of value? This is an argument that
I've been having with people. Maybe it's somewhere in the middle but apparently the team sold a whole lot when yeah i mean listen i think you saw it but yeah that's what that's
where the criticism comes from and then you dig into the tokenomics which i don't think are
necessarily horrible but it's sort of like they re-skinned the old ido ICO technique and disguised it as an airdrop that was good for the community.
Yeah. A couple hundred million out. Yeah. Taking a couple hundred million out at this stage,
I think is sort of self-evidently problematic. When it comes to, I mean, listen, when it comes
to the question of whether it's a helicopter money drop or like actually a distribution of value,
that'll be almost totally based on how things evolve over the remaining period. I mean, Jupiter's tried to
signal in certain ways in terms of the lockups and when team distribution happens and all this
sort of stuff that they're in it for the long term. But when you have that contradicted by
the behavior at the very beginning, it gets a little dicey. But ultimately, if the market decides that it doesn't care that much, crazier things have happened than something
becoming a legitimate play later on. But it's certainly not necessarily the portrait of a fair
distribution or a fair launch, at least as it appears currently. Yeah. And that's what it was obviously intended to be.
Now we have to look at this guy,
Sam Bankman Freed,
FTF,
FTX expects to fully repay customers,
but won't restart defunct crypto exchange.
A,
I'll say that I'm pretty happy that we're not going to see FTX 2.0,
because I'm not sure that I can deal with seeing that in my sort of inbox and newsfeed every single day of the rest of my life.
We can move on from those three letters finally. But what a misleading, utterly nonsensical
headline to say they're getting fully repaid. For those who don't understand, they're getting
fully repaid based on the account balance that they had when they went bankrupt, which is effectively
$16,000 Bitcoin. I think it's like $15 or $16 Solana. Still better than other scenarios and
bankruptcies like Voyager, but still, you're not getting repaid in full what your account is worth
today. Yeah. No, this is... So the FTX basically decided very early on in the bankruptcy process
that they were not going to even try to return people their crypto assets, because they didn't
have any right that the whole point the way that the fraud was perpetrated is that as soon as you
know, your Bitcoin was purchased, it was shipped on over to Alameda's accounts. Actually, it just
started there, basically. And they were betting with it, right?
So they decided from a practical standpoint that they were never going to be able to sort
of match crypto balances.
So instead, they abstracted it all to cash.
And your cash value at the time is what they're talking about repaying.
So to Scott's point, if you had one Bitcoin, you got $16,000 or whatever, because it was
already low at the time of the bankruptcy. And really, that last week of when we were waiting for
the bankruptcy to happen, really took it down its final peg. So it is totally misleading. You know,
the FTX 2.0 thing is interesting. I'm certainly more in in your camp on this one than than I am
in the disappointed camp, watching sort of ex-FTXer reactions, I think
it's a little mixed for them because there are a lot of people who wanted to see this sort of like,
you know, build back on the work that they actually did and have a chance to sort of like
make it right and do good things. But I think for the industry as a whole, being able to fully put
this, you know, behind us is a net benefit. It's some other exchange's turn to be
good. This is not a phoenix that we need to see rising from the ashes. There's no triumphant
comeback because there was no triumph in the first place when you actually dig into it.
When the phoenix was a fraud in the first place, I don't think you needed to rise again from the
ashes. Some interesting nuance here, though.
If you remember, people were buying other people's claims sort of at the beginning and throughout this process for $0.09, $0.10 on the dollar, even towards the end, $0.30, $0.40.
Those kind of hedge funds and people taking large bets on this distribution are going to actually be the ones who make a ton of money. And there's a lot of people who sold their claims for pennies on
the dollar. Yeah. And even up until recently, it was still, I can't remember exactly the number
was, but I think Travis Kling from Ikigai was transparent with what they sold their claim for.
Or maybe he said, maybe you didn't give the exact number, but, you know, I think that even as of, you know, a month or two ago, it was, you know, 60, 65, 70 kind of cents. So
there's still a big opportunity to make money on that. So, you know, good for them for taking that
risk because it was not guaranteed, especially given the fact that it seems to be in large part
based on the, you know, increase in value of a single venture investment that they're able to
actually return this. So, you know, even riskier than it, I think, appeared at first glance to buy those stakes at those prices.
They got super lucky. But to be honest, man, I'm really happy for FTX creditors that they did get
super lucky. As bad as this is, it's a much better outcome than was anticipated, much better outcome
than I think a lot of others had seen.
But at the end of the day, the real winners here are the bankruptcy lawyers who have charged
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars and the creditors who get paid on
the value of the day of the bankruptcy with zero upside as these assets rise. It's just
sickening, but glad that it worked out the way that it did.
We have a little more FTX news. FTX is missing 400 million were stolen in SIM swap,
SIM swapping hack. DOJ says they've actually charged three people over the SIM swap scheme
that targeted FTX. A lot of people saw this right when this was all happening. I'm kind of hazy on
the details,
but I remember that all of a sudden there was a 400 million went missing as the exchange was
closing down, as there was the bankruptcy, tinfoil hats were that Sam and the team were
running away with $400 million. And this was an inside job, but really this was
yet another crypto SIM swap, which we've seen over and over and over again.
Three friends from the Midwest having a $400 million party.
Yeah. What a party that must have been for them. Well, now they'll get to a party with Sam.
So maybe they won the sweepstakes, right? Because these guys are going to jail.
And we have another bankruptcy closing. I mean, all of it in one week. Celsius to distribute
3 billion crypto to creditors. As F firm emerges from bankruptcy. The distribution will be made through PayPal and Coinbase. I still
find it amazing that Celsius and FTX creditors who had literal frauds and Ponzi schemes at the top
did better than Voyager creditors. What a system. But here we are. I mean, is this a are we tying a
bow on this one? Is this closing yet another chapter? I mean, we haven't seen what's going to happen to Mashinsky, but at least Celsius
creditors now know their path. Yeah. I mean, listen, the, in some ways the, the, the creditor
outcome matters a lot more, you know, our, our sense of schadenfreude and justice and all those
things, you know, sort of demands that there be some accountability on Mashinsky's side,
but you have to think that
that's coming, right? His trial is set for September, could be pushed back, but, you know,
it's unlikely that he escapes, you know, justice entirely. I think, you know, it matters more how
much people get back, how whole they're made, how much they're sort of, you know, able to continue
engaging, you know, as they wish with the space. So I think it's a, you know, as good an outcome as it can be. Um, I do think that the prosecutions are sort of an important
step in, uh, in kind of the moving on, but I, you know, it feels to me likely that even that that
one's going to be more of a sideshow than, uh, than for example, the Sam trial was last October.
I think, you know, seeing SAM held to account was the thing
that was the most sort of emotional, psychological scar for the crypto industry to heal. And now that
that's passed, you know, I mean, we'll see what the sentencing holds. But I think that the
Machinsky trial will kind of, you know, probably be going off right at the same time as, you know,
the markets are going off, because we'll be six months post halving, and everyone will be excited. And that's the way it should be. Let him get punished. Let him be held
to account and let us move on and enjoy our lives, not facing down the prospect of jail.
Yeah. Don't even give him the spotlight or the time of day. Let it die and just accept that
he's the last vestige of another time, hopefully, in crypto, and we can all move on with higher prices and a lot
more fun. We have an honorable mention story here, which is that layoffs are happening across the
crypto industry and beyond. I don't have the whole list of layoffs in tech and all that, but
one of the lead stories, Polygon Labs cuts 19% of staff, 60 roles for enhanced performance.
The Block is cutting
jobs to achieve cap of 12,000 staffers. This one's a bit older. Near Foundation to cut staff by 40%
says treasury remains strong. This is kind of echoing what's happening in the actual economy
and markets, right? It's interesting. We have these huge job numbers, but then you see layoffs
across tech and across these companies. I mean, are all these companies just getting leaner and meaner and kind of cutting off the
excess? Or is there any sort of canary in a coal mine, do you think here with this job situation?
I think it's more the fallout of things we've already experienced than a presage of what's
to come. I mean, listen, specifically with Block, for example, which is the biggest set of cuts,
these were cuts that were announced last year, right? And they're just sort of following through on them. The total
amount of cuts that they made, they're not intending. But the logic from Dorsey is that
they just hired faster than they grew. And they have to address that balance. And I think that
every company in tech, especially, has had to go through some amount of that reconfiguration as it thinks about, you know, what the sort of the right, you know, headcount actually is.
As we've shifted from the growth at all costs world of the entire 2010s and the beginning of the 2020s into a very different world that's still emerging when it comes to efficiencies and revenue and
profit and all those things. So I think that to some extent, you're seeing the sort of just
recalibration going on. Now, bigger topic, maybe not for us for today, but some of the tech layoffs,
the big tech layoffs that I do think are presaging something else coming are more,
if you look at Google and Meta, the layoffs that are happening there, those are actually
pretty clearly driven by them implementing AI on their own teams, particularly around
advertising products, right? You got Google and Meta both sort of pushing all of their advertisers
to use self-serve AI-created
collateral now, and that's reducing the need for real humans to create that collateral on
behalf of clients. So that's a little bit of a different story. I think these ones in crypto
are really more just sort of people shoring up their staffs in advance of a new cycle.
Yeah, it's different, but dare I say that's actually bullish firing.
Yeah. Right. I mean, that's good for those companies. They're cutting staff,
finding a cheaper and better way to do it. Sucks for the people who are losing their jobs,
obviously, but that does tell you what the future holds for a lot of these companies,
a lot of people who have sort of marginal jobs at those companies. That's it, dude. We did it in like 20 minutes,
25 minutes today. We absolutely nailed it. I love a quick recap of the week. And I think we got all of it done. I'm not sure if we missed anything, but if we did,
it's always next week, right, man? So guys, you can follow NLW, check out the breakdown,
everything that he's got going on. Of course, you can listen to this on his channels and on
his audio channels over the weekend. Other than that, man, thank you so much, guys. We will see you on
Monday. Cheers, all. Bye.