The Wolf Of All Streets - Crypto Crashes Amidst Escalating Inflation Fears | Crypto Town Hall

Episode Date: January 8, 2025

Crypto Town Hall is a daily X Spaces hosted by Scott Melker, Ran Neuner & Mario Nawfal. Every day we discuss the latest news in crypto and bring the biggest names in the space to share their insight. ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. USE CODE ‘2MONTHSOFF’ WHEN VISITING MY LINK.  👉 https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker  ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/    ►► OKX Sign up for an OKX Trading Account then deposit & trade to unlock mystery box rewards of up to $10,000!  👉  https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER ►►NGRAVE This is the coldest hardware wallet in the world and the only one that I personally use. 👉https://www.ngrave.io/?sca_ref=4531319.pgXuTYJlYd ►►THE DAILY CLOSE BRAND NEW NEWSLETTER! INSTITUTIONAL GRADE INDICATORS AND DATA DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY AT THE DAILY CLOSE. TRADE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. 👉 https://www.thedailyclose.io/   ►►NORD VPN  GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL  - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets    Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker   Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io   Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe   Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c   #Bitcoin #Crypto #Trading The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor.  Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.

Good morning, everybody. Happy Wednesday. For me, it's 1015 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. I know for many of you, it's afternoon and evening. So I guess in the words of Truman, good afternoon, good evening, and good night. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, good afternoon, good evening, good night. Is that what it says? Yeah. From the Truman Show, obviously, I see we've got a bunch of guests we're still trying to bring up in the audience. Joe, Carlos, sorry, if you're there and want to join. I sent you an invite, Dave Weisberger as well. I see you guys out in the audience trying to get everybody invited up on stage. As always, it takes a little bit of time to get the show going.

Obviously, I think today people are concerned about Bitcoin price action currently trading at $95,330. A lot of people pointing out the fact that it has lost, once again, the 50 MA, the moving average on the daily chart, as support now looking at it as resistance from a technical perspective, causing people to wonder, where's the bull market? What's happening? Obviously, Monday was a really good day. And then yesterday retraced all those gains and more to the downside. So and altcoins, as usual, taking it on the chin much more than Bitcoin with Bitcoin dominance rising quite a bit. The kind of the worst case scenario for altcoin enthusiasts is when Bitcoin goes down and

Bitcoin dominance goes down with it, meaning that your altcoins lose even more value than your Bitcoin is losing in that moment. But hard press to find people who believe that we're heading into a bear market and that this isn't just a normal retracement, but would love people's takes on that before we dig more into the news. Foles, obviously, we've got you here. You're a tech analyst. You're looking at the markets every day. What are your thoughts on this sort of, you know, we had the move two days ago up above 102,000, and here we are at 95? Hey, Scott. Yeah. Hi, guys. Yeah, it's an interesting one. I think the consensus opinion that Q1 was going to be bullish has been definitely called into question with this last 24 hours of price action. That's a pretty

sharp rejection and price on the high time frame now is starting to look a little bit distributive, a little bit like guys are rather than adding risk in January and getting back into positions they might have gotten out of at the end of the year. They are continuing the trend of

getting out of those positions. I just think that, yeah, I think this is probably a deeper correction. I think that the chart looks a little bit cooked, at least short term. We have the inauguration in less than two weeks. That was an event that I had earmarked for quite a while. It's probably going to be a sell the news event. Maybe it's a little bit different if we're selling into that news for a couple of weeks. But yeah, I mean, I think that, yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to see this being the beginning of a slightly deeper correction. I'm not calling for, you know, 50 or 60K, but I think looking at sub 90 is actually pretty reasonable at this point, just on the basis of, well, the fact that we haven't really taken liquidity at that area.

There's quite a large price imbalance at that level. There's a CME gap. There's what we call a fair value gap. There's an area that price hasn't traded into since leaving uh since leaving that imbalance behind i just think it makes sense to for price to be drawn there uh no real indication of buyers stepping in on this drop there's not much of a buyback not much uh not much of a bounce something as well i discussed yesterday on my own stream is the fact that these these these dips that we're getting these corrections that we're getting are are different to the ones that you would see in uh in a proper

bull run whereby there's you usually have sharp spike down and open interest flush uh liquidity liquidation cascade uh followed by basically the dip being bought, buyers stepping in and forcibly V-shaped reversing price back to the level that it was. We saw that a ton last year when BTC had just put in a new all-time high. We saw price would put in a new all-time high and then around 70, 71, 72K. And then it would dip. It would be a very sharp drop that would be bought back extremely quickly uh the the dips slash corrections we're seeing now

are not like that they're far more forceful um they're they take longer to resolve uh sure they get bought back up eventually but it's a very different type of price action to what a lot of guys would have been used to trading quote unquote bull markets i think it's leaving a lot of guys kind of scratching their heads and wondering what the next steps are i i see there's a huge amount of sentiment shift on the timeline between uh one week to the next that there's guys saying that the cycle top is in this bull market is over it never really started etc um but i think it's it's indicative really of just the price action being very different this time around and we've spoken about this scott on on numerous uh calls before how the etf landscape the etf has changed the the

the market landscape uh kind of irrevocably uh especially when it comes to all coins and i think that has left a lot of people yeah as i said just kind of scratching theirably, especially when it comes to altcoins. And I think that has left a lot of people, yeah, as I said, just kind of scratching their heads and saying, well, maybe this time it really is different, at least in terms of what we're likely to expect from a bull run. Yeah. So I think that's a very good summary of price. And we don't need to dig too deeply into it because, you know, it's easy to get caught in the weeds of what's happening day to day.

And on this show, I think it's important that we keep zoomed out and talk, you know, it's easy to get caught in the weeds of what's happening day to day. And on this show, I think it's important that we keep zoomed out and talk, you know, less about price action, which we definitely do. And talk more about sort of the fundamental underpinnings of what's moving price and what's likely to happen. And it's still early in 2025. So fun to talk about sort of what we think will happen this year. Fidelity had a report just came out that said nation states, central banks expected to buy Bitcoin in 2025. That's going to be one of the huge narratives we think. Obviously, if the United States passes a strategic reserve, even just hold on to the Bitcoin that we have, that's likely to just send nation states around the world and central banks into a buying

frenzy because they'll be forced to basically to keep up with the United States if we add it to our balance sheet. And then, of course, we have competition at the state level for Bitcoin strategic reserves. I think we're going to have a lot of corporations adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, as we've seen following along with the success of MicroStrategy. So we have sort of all these just fundamental tailwinds, in my opinion, that are going to keep driving price of a scarce asset up in a market that's this tiny relative to others. So just important not to, I think, get caught in the weeds of, holy crap, we're down from 102 to 95, when most people agree we're probably going to 150 or 200 or even much higher if one of these major catalysts happen. So Dennis, obviously, have you here,

probably the best person to talk about when it comes to strategic reserves and what's happening certainly at the state level. I keep reminding people, Dennis, that we talk about maybe Canada will add Bitcoin to the balance sheet if they get a new prime minister or one of these countries around the world. But then you talk about a state like Texas, which is the eighth largest economy on the planet if it was a country. So this state level action that you're working on and pushing towards,

I think I saw you say maybe 20, we'll see 20 proposals soon. I mean, can you give us sort of an update on the strategic reserve landscape? Yeah, absolutely. And it's a 727 here on the Pacific coast. So I'm talking a little quiet as various members of the family get up. But yeah, definitely, there's a lot going on on the state level. And I agree with you scott that you know oftentimes people get very excited about this international strategic bitcoin reserve um efforts you know i think it gives them the idea that there's a lot of validation when other countries are moving on board with bitcoin but uh you know when you're talking about size of economy um and just impact and potential impact and purchasing power of a state versus country, I mean, just look at, like you said, Texas, it's the eighth largest economy in the world.

It's a $2.7 trillion economy. Them getting into the game is huge. But also states like California are the fifth largest economy in the world. So just like people need to keep in mind when they're thinking about the states, you know, oftentimes I think we take it for granted as Americans that these states are huge. They're massive. So we have, as you said, 20 pieces up. I say up to 20. So we're right about there right now.

It's probably like 19 is more so like the firm number that I'm aware of. I would assume there's probably a floating strategic Bitcoin reserve bill out there that I'm just not aware of because we find out about them all the time. And also lawmakers are constantly hitting us up. In fact, we just had a former lawmaker reach out to us yesterday and he's been putting us in touch with two people in a state, actually in a blue state that really want to introduce strategic Bitcoin reserve, strategic Bitcoin reserve legislation. That is about 14 states in total. And the reason why it's 20 and 14 states is because there are now lawmakers battling with each other to be able to be the first to get this thing across the finish line. The public is already aware of those efforts. Like in Ohio, there are already two bills to create strategic

Bitcoin reserves but there's another state where there are four lawmakers in that state that want to get the they'll want to be the first one to get strategic Bitcoin Reserve legislation across the finish line because and these guys are normally friends like they're not they're not doing it because they're like you know screw you like i don't want to work with you it's just that strategic bitcoin reserve legislation is the hot ticket item when it comes to policy i i would say not even just like in the bitcoin space like all policy really from what i can tell i very rarely come across issues where the lawmakers are unwilling to work together and they basically just want to compete to be the first one to get it done. So yes, 20, I would say 20, 19, 20 right now, pieces of

legislation that are floating out around there is an accurate estimate of where we are. I'm aware of, I'm personally aware of 19 of them. So moving forward, I think for people to have some expectation of like how quickly this stuff will happen, just to put it in context, and then I'll toss it back to you, Scott. In January and in February, things are going to start picking up really, really fast. In fact, one lawmaker just reached out to me. They got the bill number officially yesterday, and we're going to be announcing that state on friday most likely um and they are telling us that there's going to be a hearing next week post most likely so these things are going to start picking up very rapidly and they're going to start getting voted on and then hopefully

of course yeah that's my next question sorry yeah sorry to interrupt but like so it's one thing to have to get on the ground and get like one lawmaker to propose a bill, right? So you, I guess at first you just have to convince one guy and then he gets the like, you know, media benefit or PR push of saying, hey, I'm proposing this bill, right? So like, what's the gap there from odds of those, you know, from somebody proposing it to odds of it passing? Yeah. So generally I would say that for most pieces of legislation, for us as an organization, there's like a 20 to 30% chance of a bill passing. However, there is a one state in particular, I would say there's a multiple states where there's higher

odds in that there's one state in particular where the lawmakers meet in the off season. They have a task force of lawmakers. And for people that don't know the state process, like they don't meet year round. They only meet for like two or three or four months sometimes. So during the off season, they will get together and say, okay, let's pregame.

Let's figure out what we're going to do. Let's vote on, let's pre-vote on a bill to give it an extra oomph. Well, this task force, every time they vote on a bill and they say, yeah, we like this one, it passes into law 100% of the time. And so our bill, which creates strategic Bitcoin reserve in that state, vote on a bill and they say, yeah, we like this one, it passes into law 100% of the time.

And so our bill, which creates a strategic Bitcoin reserve in that state, just passed out of that task force. So that's why we give it a very, very, very high chance of passing, almost like a near guarantee. But you can't guarantee anything in life. Now, the rest of the states, it's going to range in how much we think they have a chance of getting it done. But given the political momentum and just how excited people are about being the first to get this done, I do believe the odds are significantly high for us to have multiple states get this stuff across the finish line. Hey, Dennis, just looking at Texas.

So Texas has $37 billion in reserves at the end of fiscal 24. What percentage of their reserves are they talking about putting in Bitcoin? So Texas is a unique case. Texas, when we started to work with the lawmaker, they initially wanted to just allow for donations to go into the reserve. We didn't think that was enough. And we pushed for them to be able to allow for taxes to be paid in Bitcoin and digital assets. Of course, the other digital assets will be converted into Bitcoin. So some people are like, oh, it's kind of underwhelming. But at the end of the day, like we as an organization, our goal is always to pursue policy that's rational and achievable. And we're never going to be telling lawmakers to take like moonshots, like even the idea

of like the federal government, you know, with our executive model order that we have finalized and we have submitted to the administration, that incoming administration, and also the transition teams, that model executive order is not going to say, hey, let's take a moonshot and let's go buy a trillion dollars of Bitcoin. It's just not reasonable. I know it gets a lot of clicks and views and likes on social media, but for us, it's really about pursuing what we believe is achievable and also exciting, right? Because at the end of the day, Texas, even though it's not as exciting as like some of our other legislation where generally our model says that we allow for up to 10% of a fund to be allocated to Bitcoin, that's the one that you're going to see in like 99% of these

states. That percentage could vary. But even in Texas, like let's say they get this thing across the finish line, they get this thing across the finish line, they get the ability to create the reserve, they're allowed to accept donations, which I know a lot of people are lining up to be the first to do that just to get the, you know, the little, they actually have it set up. So the comptroller will like send you a letter of like, thank you. So it's kind of like a cool little way, a little piece of history you can put on your wall if you donate to the Texas Strategic Reserve, but also the taxes on top of it. At the end of the day, we sort of have a Reagan-esque approach to our policy. We believe we should go for half the loaf and come back for the other half the next time around.

So even if Texas gets this done, we're not going to be done with pursuing further purchases. We will be coming back the next legislative session to have them continue to buy even more. Did I answer your question, Lou? Yeah. I mean, I was looking maybe for like a percent. Do you think Texas could put in 1%, 2%, 3%? 3% would be like a billion. Texas can't. Yeah. So I hope maybe that wasn't clear. Texas is the only state where out of all the pieces of bills that we're working on can only do donations or taxes paid in Bitcoin. So there's no theoretical cap. The other states are all the other states that we're working in, it's a 10% cap of their fund that they allocate towards. So in Pennsylvania, when we were working with them, I believe it was a $9 billion fund

they were looking at. So it could be up to 10% of that fund. And then the rest of the states that we're working with, it'll also be up to 10% of their funds can go into the Bitcoin strategic reserve. Do people donate to states? Why would you donate to a state? Is that what people do? Again, I thought, listen, this is the Texas one again, just to, yeah, and people are going to donate.

Actually, legitimately, people are lining up to donate because it's sort of historical. But when we came alongside the lawmaker, we also thought that there should be an additional way for them to build their reserve. And so given the amount of Bitcoin mining in the state, we wanted to enable the possibility for those miners and others that are in the Bitcoin mining ecosystem to pay their taxes in Bitcoin. And I know that there's also people lining up to do that. Now, is that going to be something that's going to like get Texas to a $50 billion Bitcoin fund? Probably not.

That's why we're going to come back to the next legislative cycle and continue to purchase and continue to push for Texas to create avenues for them to purchase Bitcoin, to put it into the strategic Bitcoin reserve. Cool. Well, just a word of warning. Keep your Bitcoin and give it to your state. I don't see that that's a good idea. Or at least if you want to give it away, give it. Think about how some folks in the state of Texas are going to feel like, you know, being the very first to donate to the strategic Bitcoin reserve. And then the comptroller sends you like a special little plaque that says you were the first one.

Like, I'm not saying that they're going to get a ton of donations, but there are people lining up to do that for the historical purpose of it. But definitely, I don't think it's enough. We need to continue to push these states to be doing more and more and more. And that's why I'm really excited about states like Ohio and Pennsylvania and a lot of these other states where we're going to be working in, because they do have specific abilities to allocate up to 10% of their rainy day fund, or it could be another fund that they're working on. I don't want to say the funds that these states have, because then you'll know kind of sort of which states we're working in. But that's our goal is to have them pick one of their major funds that they can use

and then allocate up to 10% of that fund into Bitcoin. You know, Dennis, just thinking aloud, sorry. There are 13 states that will do that. I was just trying to think, and crazy ideas, but I hope this type of thing could be used to even rethink political campaign financing. Like imagine if you could actually just donate strategic Bitcoins to your state instead of to the individual people,

lots of flaws in that, but I just don't know why people would donate to the state. We're answering. There is a big push. Oh, I just was going to say there is a big political push to say that campaigns should all be funded by the state, like in a very small amount so that we don't have this like runaway money problem. I mean, the amount of money in politics right now is I mean, it's a problem.

Like, it's just a problem that can't go away. And if you don't take all the money that comes in, then you're not going to win your race. And so I personally believe that there needs to be campaign finance reform in this country. So yeah, I don't know about donating Bitcoin, but certainly I think that we should get away from spending a billion dollars to see who the next senator is. I was going to say that, Simon, in the United States, we call donations to your state playing the lottery. That's how you donate to your state. You go to the store and you buy a lottery ticket and you lose your dollar and the state takes the money. I see. You also call bribery campaign financing.

No, the literal lottery. That's right. That's how we fund our states. You're allowed to gamble, but you can't buy crypto. But that's effectively how we use the lottery. I mean, to the rest of the panel, you know, as you hear kind of Dennis talk about this, we see how much of a groundswell there is for this level of adoption. It just feels like it's going to just take one of these things to re-spark a crazy, crazy bull market, in my opinion.

I know, Dave, we talk about this a lot, Weisberger. But I mean, these are your favorite statement. Like it is not priced in. It's not priced in. I don't think it's priced in. Oh, did you guys hear Dave? We obviously have, we have glitches here all the time. Can any of you guys hear him? Okay. Oh yeah. Now you hear me. Okay.

That was boomer user error, not Twitter glitch. Good job. Is that okay? Yes, you found wonderful, my friend. Okay, good. Yeah, I mean, none of this stuff is priced in. You know, what's what's really amusing to me is there was a tweet I saw this morning, and I wish I could find it again, where someone made the point that investing should be like watching paint dry, and you shouldn't be looking for dopamine hits with investing. And I think that so many of the people who are, you know, like Simon, myself, and others who save in Bitcoin, and yeah, they may be trading around the edges, but you know, not

leveraging, not doing any of this stuff. You just look at these moves and it's like, okay, well, whatever. What matters is not whether it's $87,000 or $97,000 in the next three days. What matters is, is it going to be $500,000 or $1 million in the next five years? And honestly, all of the news is setting up for the latter. And, you know, it's kind of amusing. Like I was looking this morning, you know, there was about over half a billion dollars of liquidations over the last day. At the same time, funding rates were really, really low. What does that mean? That means that,

yes, there are people who are consistently putting in obscene levels of leverage and getting wiped out. And, you know, obviously, that means professionals on the other side are making a lot of money against those people, right? Because this is a zero sum game, you know, when you're talking about derivatives. But it's happening from a situation where the moves are relatively small. Why? Well, because there's no big liquidation cascade. I mean, a liquidation cascade. I mean, we've seen liquidation cascades in Bitcoin that were 10, 20, 30 percent, you know, in blinks. We're just not at those sorts of numbers right now because there isn't that much froth.

This has been spot ledled buying so when I look at this stuff I I just think that you know people need to to take a chill pill and understand what's going on but let's talk about about what could be for the audience what could be catalysts the lat the news stories that are out there things that will actually matter uh watch the Senate confirmation of Pam Bondi and and Hezget Hezget might be the hardest confirmation of Pam Bondi and Hesketh. Hesketh might be the hardest confirmation that he has. The market is not priced in Trump being able to expeditiously get his cabinet in in any reasonable time. If people think that Besant and then Atkins and Kintenz and everyone's going to sail through, the market will react quite positively to that. And we will start seeing news

of that over the next few days. Watch this idiotic, not farce of a sentencing thing that's going to go on on Friday. Will Trump, you know, have to be diverted by, you know, by what's going on in that particular court case? I don't want to go down that rabbit hole, but a lot of people are concerned about that. These are all things that could stop momentum. And I think that that's playing out. I think there's a lot of nervousness on the part of marginal traders on that. Lastly, I want to push back on the notion

of sell the news at the inauguration. If we're at 150,000 with crypto rampaging for the next two weeks up till the inauguration, yeah, I think it would be a sell the news event. If we're at 150,000 with crypto rampaging for the next two weeks up till the inauguration, yeah, I think it would be a sell the news event. If we're doing this, then I think it's a buy the news event. Because frankly, I think there are people out there who still think it's not going to happen. And I think you just have to look at it that way and understand what's going on. As far as the strategic reserves go, I mean, the more important one, to be blunt, is now I'm not minimizing Dennis's work,

which is amazing. And I think it's really good to see it. And I think it will matter ultimately. But corporations are the big deal because there's a lot of cash rich companies out there. And all you have to do is look to see which stocks have been some of the best performers. And those CFOs are going to say, well, wait a minute, guys, maybe we should be putting our cash in Bitcoin because it'll pump our stock price. And that will help us attract employees. That will help enrich our board of directors, et cetera, et cetera. And companies like to do stuff like that. David.

Speaking of news, can I break some news here? That's what we're supposed to do here. So, yes. All right. So just for everyone's knowledge in the audience, in addition to a crypto hedge fund that I run, I'm also the CEO of a publicly traded company. It is listed in Canada on the TSX, also trades in the United States on the OTC. The name of the company is Centaurus Energy.

We broke some news a couple of months back regarding using ETH as a strategic reserve of the company. The company is now out of the oil and gas business. Took three years out of my life. Feels a lot longer than that. But in any event, the company is just sitting on a passive revenue stream that it receives semi-annually. And the company has pivoted into cryptocurrency.

After six months of our stock being halted and extensive discussions with the Toronto Stock Exchange, press release will come out later today that we have been approved to not only invest in and stake ETH, we can also invest in and stake Solana. And we have been invited to suggest to the exchange additional layer ones. The company will be renamed to the layer one after an upcoming shareholder meeting in February we'll change the name we'll change the ticker and we will go ahead and hopefully methodically go through a bunch of other layer ones to go ahead and add to our portfolio it's going to be an actively managed portfolio I frankly don't know if somebody else in the audience does know with

certainty which layer ones are going to be the winners 10 years from now, please let me know. But for now, we will actively manage that portfolio. And based on lots of things that we consider appropriately rebalance the portfolio with regard to what layer ones we go ahead and put our money behind. We're launching a capital raise right now, initial $25 million. It's actually an interesting capital raise. It's going to be a debt raise with a 7% guaranteed coupon, guaranteed by the revenue stream that we have, along with a sharing of the upside on the gains of the crypto that we buy. 65% of the gains will go to the investors, the lenders, and 35% will go ahead and stay with the company. So essentially, a crypto-linked investment, more fixed income,

but yet upside as well in terms of the appreciation on the crypto. Micro-strategy of ETH, Solana, and down the chain. Yeah, you got it, man. How do you guys like my TLDR? You got it, baby. You got it. And I think the idea is going to be, not I think, I know the idea is going to be that once we get to critical mass, we're going to use the staking gains to go ahead and pay our shareholders dividends. And so we will have kind of a dual beneficial structure of folks that go ahead and commit capital either on a debt basis, hopefully one day 0% convertible notes that we can go ahead and issue. But we'll have people gaining both on the fixed income side of things from the appreciation in the crypto, and then on the equis side of things, along with a dividend yielding piece of

stock. So there you go. Breaking news. The press release will come out later today. And looking forward to exciting things. What's the current yield on ETH staking? I have no idea. It's like mid single digits, three, 4%. It's been there for a while. Yeah. I didn't know if there had been some material change in it, but yeah,

I think that that's going to make you a lot more attractive than Ethereum spot ETFs. Although, you know, we do have Hester Purse saying that she thinks that staking and also in-kind rather than cash redemption is likely coming to these ETFs in the United States. I have no doubt. I mean, this is this is a race. I mean, I'm in a race. I want to get biggest, fastest and have the most optionality and have the most active management and have the most kind of shareholder friendly or holder friendly terms. And we're out of the gate. Great to hear that you're no longer halted. So I thought you were just going to say, hey, our stock's not halted yet. The fact that you got approval for the staking and to look at other assets was a huge

surprise even to me. And we've talked about a lot of this in the past. Yeah, no doubt. It was an arduous process. There were no less than, I don't know, I'd say eight very long requests by the exchange. I have a 50-page PowerPoint that I had to assemble and present. So, yes, I did my homework. I put in my my time, rolled up my sleeves for the benefit of everybody. I've gone through this. But, yeah, we're going to get unhalted hopefully in a couple of days because of some crazy exchange rules. I need to go ahead and issue a bulletin and then wait two trading days until it starts trading again and then we'll have the meeting in mid-february and and then we're off congratulations david i look forward to seeing you becoming as flamboyant as michael say that that's a hard one to follow in to the next the next party is going to be in canada yeah

look um just for to answer the question, the current yield on ETH is 3.29%, but it changes all the time. Yeah. It seems to kind of vacillate around the mid threes, though, of late, right?

I mean, I don't check it too often, but it seems to me that's kind of just where it's at. Yeah, everybody's agreeing, giving me the heads up. I'm looking at all the other news. So, you know, when we talk about, obviously, strategic reserves, Czech National Bank considers Bitcoin Reserve was one up here, one of the main stories today. I wonder, I mean, Dennis, Dennis still here. Yeah. When we talk about these, once again, it says, you know, the governor of Czech National Bank

said the central bank is considering allocating Bitcoin to diversify its reserves. But then kind of said, hey, I'm like one out of a number of people that would have to visit this. It just makes me wonder each time we hear these news that like, again, one guy who thinks it's a good idea and maybe hopes it'll be a groundswell. Or is there a meaningful chance that it happens just because one of these governors kind of alludes to the possibility? Can you guys hear Dennis?

I cannot. I hate awkward silences. I cannot. No, Kanye. With spaces, you never know when it's your own glitch or a major glitch. Okay, so I guess I can ask that question to the rest of you. I mean, how big of a news is it when something like the Czech Republic

says that they would add Bitcoin to the balance sheet? I'll say there is actually a difference with the Czech Republic news. I just read the headline. I didn't read into it too deeply. But the headline did say that it's a central bank that's going to be holding it as a strategic reserve. And so obviously there is a big difference between the Treasury holding it and the central bank holding it. And so this, yeah, this is a very strange and interesting model. I think it's way more interesting that countries are able to hedge

from the risk of their central bank's monetary policy and build their own reserves. But I'm not sure of the exact structure between the Czech Republic, central bank and treasury. But this one was an announcement of a central bank doing it. me yeah i can hear you go ahead jumped off and came back um yeah i'm not really sure exactly on the czech republic one but yeah i agree ultimately we should sort of celebrate any interest from anyone around the world wanting to pursue these things um and there are some good groups in the czech republic that i'm aware of that have been working on legislation there for in a variety of ways so i don't think it's just like this one guy waking up one day and saying, like, oh, hey, look at this Bitcoin thing. Maybe I should make a public comment and get a lot of

views. There's certainly people on the ground there in the country that are probably most likely advocating to him and to the people there, pushing them into the right direction. And Czech Republic was where I spoke at the very first Bitcoin conference after the New York conference. So it was the first one in Europe in November, 2011. And yeah, so I remember having to go around Prague and you had to knock on the,

you had to get these SMS text messages to find the after hackathon venue. And when you would go around, you'd get these codes around different parts of Prague. And then you'd end up on what I can only describe as a crackdown. You have to go through, knock on the door in a certain way. And there were a bunch of people in anonymous masks and a Bitcoin vending machine. And I did make my first Bitcoin purchase of a Mars bar for one Bitcoin. Like.

So one thing that occurs to me or when I'm speaking to some people is that the Michael Saylor FUD, which is the idea that somehow he's going to get liquidated and he's going to tear down the market, and he's why it's going up with. I'm sure some of that is true, but that i mean it doesn't hit institutional players like if they're if you're a country or a business looking to get in that's not changing your mind most likely you've already got some bigger reasons but if you are an individual and you're thinking should i you know top blast a hundred thousand dollar bitcoin it makes you a lot more nervous and a lot of people are thinking you know i've heard i've been hearing people say well i heard the only reason it's up is Michael Saylor and he's

going to get liquidated. So I'd like to wait for after all that and like, sure, but you, you may just miss it. Um, I mean, this is my advice is always, you know, take what you were going to buy in DCA over a year weekly. I'm not saying that you should do any of those things, but I think that this particular FUD, um, is on you know the larger players and very effective on the smaller ones it is quite dangerous that the strategy of look you have whatever your strategy is but i can't tell you how many people i've met over the years that were expecting bitcoin to come back down to a price and they sold their Bitcoin and said, I'll re-enter at this price.

And that price never came. And they missed the whole thing because they would rather buy it like $10 lower and they set a price. I'm sure people have their own strategies for how they enter. But I can't tell you how many people I've met over the years that really wanted

it to go to a price that never got there and they missed the whole thing and they never reentered. Dave? Yeah, I mean, that is a very important point because, you know, I get asked that question all the time by people. And, you know, that's why I'm always so overly, you know, despite, you know, having founded a I'm always so overly, you know, despite, you know, having founded a company that caters to professional traders, and actually understanding, you know, what a lot of the professional traders are doing, I talk about, you know, dollar cost averaging, etc. You know, that's why, you know, there are companies out there, like, you know, your friends

at Archpublic, who do things that will facilitate that it is so important for people to understand that if you start picking price levels in asset that and we have to bring this up, Scott, I mean, what is it 10 days out of every bull run is 90 plus percent of the move. So you know, if you think of a bull run or out of 365 days, I mean, if if you're not in the market for 10 days, you literally lose 90% of your upside for that entire move. I mean, that's just insane. You know, and so that's why you know, the notion of exiting your position, not and understand

there's a difference in exiting a position and was which is what Simon was talking about. And people do this and saying, Okay, I'm going to hold 80% of my position forever, and 20% up and down, I'm willing to be as much as 100% invested, or only 60% invested, or whatever your numbers are. I mean, those things can be done. But it's really important for people to understand that Bitcoin has a very, the reason it's volatility is considered so high is because of the kind of gaps that it can do. And you won't get that entry. If you're if you miss it, you miss it. That

doesn't say that you shouldn't trade around it. But there is a difference between what you do Scott putting out stink bids for those in the audience. I don't know a stink bit is saying, Okay, I'm gonna I'd like to buy extra if it drops to 88. And so stick it out there. And if it gets hit, it gets hit and you're happy. You know, those are very, that's a very important point that Simon was making because people really do need to understand that a lot of the squiggles and technical training is not where the drivers of the price are and so the drivers of the price are different yeah that's a very important point

so I wanted to highlight a couple other news story. It's supposed to be a news show, and we always forget to actually discuss the news when we get down deep in the weeds of these conversations. But there are kind of a lot of, I think, important things that I just noticed that are worth discussing. plans $2 billion capital raise to buy more Bitcoin. Shocker, as BlackRock's iBit acquires $596 million in Bitcoin. That's interesting. I think that we're still seeing, at least for now, major inflows even on the downturn of Bitcoin price and not so notable, I guess, but always worth discussing that MicroStrategy is still going to continue to raise money and continue to buy Bitcoin. Next one was South Korea seeks to lift ban on institutional trading of cryptocurrencies, which I don't know if you guys know how much volume comes from South Korea for crypto, but holy crap, it is a lot. When you dig into the numbers, this is actually relatively big news. South Koreans account for a massive amount of crypto trading. Some would say some of the gambling side of it, very popular over

there as well. There are two stories about Coinbase. Coinbase receives virtual currency business license in New York, which anyone who knows New York is arguably the most difficult state to get any kind of approval. I think that this really, another story that shows sort of the spalling of the regulatory environment in the United States, but this is the approved assets that they can now offer. Kusama, Alluvium, Oasis, Gnosis, and Metis all with established market histories, but allowing New York residents to trade more. I guess we'll say they're not securities anymore. The other one, Coinbase versus SEC legal battle will set precedent for the US crypto industry. But the real story there is that Coinbase gained a major court win in the SEC legal

battle over securities law. Maybe a lawyer or Zach, you can give us a little more on this. Yeah, go ahead because we can butcher it. But happy to give the quick rundown on that. That actually is huge for the industry. So the Coinbase motion to dismiss was partially granted on the Coinbase wallet not being a securities broker, which was good. But the legal theory that Judge Fela in the case seemed to agree with was very favorable to the SEC.

It more or less, it didn't accept the sort of ecosystem theory that probably you've heard about that is the SEC's strongest view, but it did adopt sort of the mainstream view that Judge Rakoff had about how the Howey test applies to secondary transactions. Judge Vail granted what's called an interlocutory appeal to the Second Circuit, meaning the case pauses and the Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, which sits over SDNY in the federal courts, gets to decide this specific legal issue, which means that Judge Vail is taking it seriously. The Second Circuit will have another bite at this. And the most damaging part of the Coinbase motion dismiss ruling for the crypto industry is immediately up for review. So that I think is sort of bullish in general for, you know, even if the Second

Circuit narrows it somewhat or speaks differently, that will become binding authority in the Coinbase case and in the other cases in SDNY and other federal courts. So this is something that could really change the game. I mean, if they accept Coinbase's theory, which I think is kind of unlikely, then that's a whole new paradigm. And that potentially legalizes a ton of secondary trading for tokens. But even if they narrow the SEC's theory somewhat, that could provide a lot of headway that will go much faster than we're likely to get a market structure bill passed. So glad that we have lawyers here to help us. Go ahead, Simon. Zach, yeah, just question. Is there any impact? Is this like Coin coinbase the centralized custodian trading service or is this coinbase wallet the self-custodian no no no wallet the claims about the wallet have already been dropped from the case those are already dismissed this is about secondary trading

of tokens on the centralized exchange which is the which is the most important part of this the ripple question uh i mean that that that with Gensler on the way out, you would think is likely to go in a more favorable direction now than it would have before, right? I mean, a lot of people kind of view this... You wouldn't necessarily expect that from the courts, which are not administration dependent. They're lifetime appointments. Right. Totally. Totally makes sense. So the other story we had here, Movement Lab set to close 100 million funding round as crypto markets heat up. I know Mario's not here, but his favorite topic is VC funding and how much money is flowing into the space. Well, these guys

raised 38 million Series A in April of 24. I think they just launched a token now, Series B being raised 100 million, which values MVMT as another unicorn at 3 billion. So if there are any questions, I love that I'm reading the article in Fortune Crypto, and it describes this as founded by two college dropouts, MVMT previously raised 38 billion Series A. I love that that's what they highlight on is two college dropouts. Is that equity or token? It's so it's I think it's a mix. I'm reading through it right now. It said it here. Or it's in the article. And now I don't want to butcher it. But it is here. I think it's a blend.

It's just interesting if people are calling like tokens series a series B, like urine securities are calling like tokens series a series b like you're in securities territory farpoint series b at two billion uh valuation right yeah i'm trying to find it's a mix it says uh move which launches yeah i i can't find it but i think it's a mix of stock and tokens uh i know it was in here somewhere when i was reading but now uh because in the 2017 days there was very much a pretense you're not investing you're buying the token because you want to use it and all that type of stuff but this sounds like things have progressed yeah i mean some serious pretty uh serious uh here we go investors will receive a combination of equity and movements proprietary token move, which launched in December, said one of the sources. But the emphasis will be on the token, common funding structure and crypto venture deals.

This round is expected to close by the end of January. So, yes, I mean, I think it's in question like what, you know, where's that valuation come from? But still interesting to see the layer two on Ethereum. So anyone who thinks that interest there from institutional capital or VC is dead, clearly not, right? That kind of sets the model. Just sell equity and treat it as a security with all the defined securities laws, but add an element of, and you get this token, seems to be what they're what what they're going for there you've seen a lot of like smaller and weird deals coming around now that are like structured similarly you know it's

an equity raise but then you get a token match when they launch have you seen that a lot of that simon uh yeah i mean this is uh you know this i mean in in the 2017 days when everyone stopped buying equity and everyone was buying tokens um you know this is how we we tried to do some of our structures that we kept it as equity because we were authorized to sell securities and then some of them were launching things that also came with tokens it's just and then it kind of pivoted away from that model where everyone was pretending they're not securities and saying you're not investing, you're using the token. Then obviously, it switched to the SAFT model that says, we're selling an investment contract, but the actual

token's not a security. And now it seems to have gone full circle of we'll sell equity. And this is kind of the whole thing, right? That people are buying tokens and people are selling tokens. So can we stop playing gymnastics and figure out what these things are, what the disclosure is? And kind of this is the root of the issue with these tokens for so long. Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see

how this plays out in the new regulatory regime, right? I mean, how close people have to dance to the line of what is okay and what is not, I think moving forward is going to change dramatically. I just saw a story too, this blows my mind. Kazakhstan regulators announced they have blocked more than 3,500 illegal cryptocurrency exchanges. 3,500 exchanges. Wow.

Good to know that we're still de-genning as hard as we ever have in the past. Guys, I think we've pretty much covered every story for today. We're going to call it a day and come back tomorrow, 10, 15 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. As always, guys, everyone in the audience, please follow all of our guests on stage. They're here because we love them. We listen to them. We deeply believe in them. And you should be following them for all the alpha that they give on X outside of these conversations. And looking forward to another great one tomorrow, 1015 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Thanks to all of you for listening. Thanks to all of the guests for joining. We'll see you guys tomorrow. Bye.