The Wolf Of All Streets - Ethereum To Break $4,000 | Massive Crypto Rally
Episode Date: March 8, 2024Today we are discussing a massive crypto rally that we kicked this week off with, Ethereum's attempt to break $4,000 and CFTC' comments, Shapeshift case, bank failures (again!), and much more! Tune in... at 9 am EST! Friday Five is THE show about the main news in crypto. Join me and Nathaniel Whittemore as we delve into the main topics that moved the markets. Nathaniel Whittemore: https://twitter.com/nlw ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/ ►►OKX SIGN UP FOR AN OKX TRADING ACCOUNT THEN DEPOSIT & TRADE TO UNLOCK MYSTERY BOX REWARDS OF UP TO $60,000! 👉 https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. USE CODE ‘25OFF’ FOR 25% OFF WHEN VISITING MY LINK. 👉 https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker ►►NGRAVE This is the coldest hardware wallet in the world and the only one that I personally use. 👉https://www.ngrave.io/?sca_ref=4531319.pgXuTYJlYd ►►NORD VPN GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c #Bitcoin #Crypto #fridayfive Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 1:24 Market update 3:08 Ethereum to $10K? 5:25 ETF inflows 6:40 Meme coins 8:40 SEC vs Shapeshift 12:13 Crypto & Super Tuesday 16:10 CFTC & Prometheum 19:15 Banking crisis again 24:45 Wrap up The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor. Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This has been an absolutely insane week in the crypto market and the news cycle. We had Bitcoin
touching a new all-time high. Ethereum looks to be pushing towards $4,000. The SEC is back at it.
Super Tuesday happened and crypto had a meaningful impact. And we yet again are talking about banks
failing. NLW and I have a lot to talk about today on the Friday Five. Let's go.
What is up, everybody? I'm Scott Melker, also known as the Wolf of All Streets. Before we get started, please subscribe to the channel and gently tap that like button. As I said, it has been
an absolutely massive week. I got a message from NLW last week that said, dude, you took
quite a great time to go on a vacation. Like last week, we had Bitcoin going from like the high 40s
up to almost a new all-time high.
And I was in Japan and it was 1 o'clock in the morning or something when we should have been
streaming. I'm going to bring him on right now. We can still talk about it all today, right?
Our first topic is literally the price action. Yeah. I mean, it's all part of the same story,
right? Yeah. So maybe it was just I was delaying a week so that we could actually talk about the
new all-time high. I mean, take a look at the market right here. Bitcoin, we saw it. We've talked about it endlessly on Tuesday, up to 69,
down to 59, now just chilling at 68 like it never happened on that leverage flush. But Ethereum
really seeming to want to catch up here, up 4% in the last 24 hours and 24 bucks short of $4,000.
I mean, do you think that that's the rotation narrative is still alive and well?
Yeah. I think that Ethereum is in an interesting spot in the sense that Bitcoin obviously is
sucking a ton of oxygen out of the room with the ETF, but then Solana and meme coins are also
pretty dramatically loud narrative right now. And I think there's a lot
of folks who are still sort of in the excitement about Ethereum camp. And maybe to some extent,
we're seeing people positioning for what seems like an inevitable rotation in catch up return
to focus. But right now, I think the most notable thing about all this is like,
think about how different this is than where we were two weeks ago, the last time we talked. I mean, it was just a dramatically
different situation. And now somehow inside of a week, we've gotten completely used to Bitcoin at
levels that it had previously only spent a couple of days on ever. I feel like if we went down to
60,000 now, people would be crying in the streets. So
it just shows you how fast we get used to new normals here.
It's the great memes. It's like Bitcoin on the way up and it's Wolf of Wall Street or
Great Gatsby Leo. And then you get him in like dying in the frozen tundra on the way down at
the exact same price. It makes a lot of sense that that's sort of how it is.
We also have here, Ether could run to $10,000 or higher this year on numerous catalysts.
So we're already talking about huge topics for Ethereum.
And of course, this one, Ethereum's Dancun upgrade could mean near zero fees for Layer
2 blockchains, Fidelity Digital Assets.
This is happening next week.
Yeah.
I mean, you know what's interesting is if you look at all the research houses, you would think that the place that they're sort of narrative making would go
is speculation around ETH approvals. And there's a little bit of that, but there's actually a lot
more that we're seeing around some of these technical upgrades as being, you know, meaningful
catalysts. So it's interesting to me that you've got non-crypto actors paying
attention to stuff that was previously fairly inside baseball. Yeah. When the mainstream is
talking about the halving or the merge, you know that things have slightly changed and for the
better. It's funny because we always get this social metric, how many people are searching
Bitcoin? How many people are searching Bitcoin, how many people are
searching Ethereum, and people say, we're so early, it hasn't happened yet, the searches are low.
I take the other side of that, which is that everybody just knows about these things now.
So now I think that the average person doesn't need to Google search Bitcoin anymore,
but they may need to Google search the halving. So we're moving into the actual narrative
surrounding it rather than just the asset. Yeah, I think that's a good observation.
I think that there are probably other of our kind of traditional retail signals that are
stronger.
I think that probably Coinbase's position in the App Store is a slightly stronger indicator
than sort of the Google search thing.
You know, I mean, on this note of whether we're early or not and where we are in terms
of retail awareness, again, going back two weeks, we were still speculating on when retail would start paying attention again. I think that it's certainly the
case that the sort of approach of all-time highs did in fact capture some amount of attention.
We started to get those text messages. I'm sure everyone who's listening now got at least one of
them with a friend or a family member asking about things. I don't think that that means we're fully back to people
going crazy for some... The average person in your uncle in Topeka is not buying Joe Bowden coin yet, but we're certainly- That's right, and they were buying Doge.
Exactly. But we're certainly seeing more of that attention being paid.
I mean, if we're talking about price action, we have to talk about inflows because even with the drop from 69,000 to 59,000 on Tuesday, BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF added a record 12.6K
Bitcoin that day, which is over $700 million worth. So on the one hand, you have degenerates
getting flushed of leverage because that's all that could be to see a $10,000 drop. And on the
other hand, fundamentally, you have more buying than ever into these ETFs. Yeah, it was interesting. I think that during the day, everyone
kind of assumed that despite, I mean, we watched massive volume taking place during the day,
but then when the actual sort of flow reports came in and it was a huge day up overall, and
especially for BlackRock, it sort of told a different story, which is probably why things recovered so quickly
the next day is that it clearly wasn't sort of a break in trend so much as just whatever,
some market flush. And there was a bunch of interesting stories that we didn't necessarily
cover, but those 2010 vintage Bitcoins moving in sort of a huge patch right at the top, that
frankly could have been enough to trigger some of this.
So, you know, interesting times, but it certainly doesn't feel like the trend has somehow shifted
dramatically and we're, you know, headed back down all of a sudden.
No, I don't think we've had mania at all, to be honest.
And you kind of hinted at this.
Pepe leads meme coin rally as Ether nears 4K.
Trader's been using meme tokens as a proxy bet on the growth of Ethereum or other blockchains.
I mean, we always have the consistent cycle.
Bitcoin goes to ETH.
ETH goes to mid caps, mid caps.
And then you get meme coins going crazy in a flush.
Right.
And we did have meme coins going crazy right at the top.
But meme coins are still going crazy.
So maybe we have a slightly different cycle this time. But I've made the argument this is nobody new coming in to trade these meme coins are still going crazy. So maybe we have a slightly different cycle this time,
but I've made the argument, this is nobody new coming in to trade these meme coins,
just like you just said. This is the classic crypto degens, rotating, pumping tokens and
creating. This is not like the Dogecoin days where you had three months waiting periods to sign up
to Binance because you wanted to trade Doge and they couldn't onboard you fast enough. No one plays higher stakes musical chairs than we do. And
that's what this is. Now, I think that if you wanted to get highbrow around this, go read
Travis Kling's thesis about financial nihilism and why it makes sense perhaps that meme coins
are the choice for this cycle. It's fascinating. It's such a Rorschach test for not even just
individuals, but how you're feeling on any given day, whether you look at meme coins as just you know it's fascinating it's it's such a rorschach test for not even just individuals
but how you're feeling on any given day whether you look at meme coins as just you know a great
example of pure unfettered capitalist games in an environment where who cares and everyone knows
the stakes and they're just doing it or super cynically like there's nothing better that we
could be spending our time on i feel like for most people it's uh for most people, it's more of a day-to-day assessment, but
it certainly is a factor right now. Yeah. I mean, there's like 5,000 people that are
probably actively doing this and we are pretending that it's this massive movement like GameStop or
something. I was on Yahoo Finance the other day and Cynthia Lummis was on before me, coincidentally,
and they're asking her about Bitcoin and then they asked her about meme coins. And I thought, man, this is really
embarrassing. And she had to answer for the meme coin degeneracy of our market. So at least there
is some consciousness of the media that this madness is happening. We got to move on to the
next topic, which is the SEC back at it again. SEC charges Shapeshift AG crypto platform with
operating as an unregistered dealer.
Quickly, the take started coming in, ShapeShifting Justice, SEC's weakest case yet.
Literally a $275,000 fine.
Eric Voorhees, the founder of ShapeShift, laughed this off, took it as another opportunity to dunk all over the SEC.
And then, of course, immediately you had Hester Perse and Uyeda coming in and questioning
the ambiguity, dunking once again all over their quote unquote boss, Gary Gensler.
They even wrote out a hilarious Hollywood level script of what it would be like to come in and register to the SEC.
It seems like this is just becoming comical if it wasn't already. Yeah, I mean, the most it is this sort of feeling of a last gasp of
a beleaguered, you know, combatant on the field, just trying to leave the field with their with
one final sort of blow, you know, to keep their own sense of their pride intact. The fact that
the commissioners are in such open rebellion now, I mean, Hester Peirce is not a Trumpian shitslinger by personality. That's not who she is. She's an extremely reasoned, thoughtful person who, if you look at her dissents in the past, they've always been super highbrow and specific. So the fact that we're now seeing just outright mockery,
I think is reflective of one, just the level of frustration that has been after this hasn't
changed for so many years, but two, probably an assessment of Gary Gensler's political position.
This is something that you wouldn't do if you thought the person that you were mocking and
the institution that you were mocking was in a strong sort of credible position. So I think that for those of you who are watching
sort of inside politics kind of baseball, it's potentially an indicator there.
And Hester Peirce has long been dubbed crypto mom. And I actually said that to her on one of my early
podcast conversation with her. And she pushed back very hard and hates that title, to be clear. She says, I'm not pro-crypto. I'm pro-sensible regulation and rational thinking. This isn't
even about her believing in these assets, which maybe she privately does. This is more about her
saying, this is the way that the SEC should operate and we should give clarity and we should
do the right thing and we are not. So it's not even about crypto. She
dissents and pushes back when there's nonsense in other markets as well.
Yeah. You're seeing more of that kind of specification happening too. One story that
we didn't cover last week was the Kraken attorneys general amicus brief where eight
attorneys general kind of filed an amicus brief in the SEC versus Kraken case. And Kraken went
out of its way to make sure that it was clear as they discussed it, that this was not a pro-Kraken
position. It was a anti-SEC overreach position. And those things do make you sort of for strange
bedfellows, but it's nice that we can have allies on the basis not of, again, people wanting to get into meme coins alongside us, but just sensible looks at the world.
Yeah, we are not the only industry that's angry at the SEC, right? He's poked the nest of Wall Street hedge funds, private equity, short sellers. It's not great for him. And I think that it's going to go pretty badly for
Gary Gensler and the anti-crypto army, which gives us a very nice segue into the next topic,
which is politics. Crypto seeks to make mark on US elections during Super Tuesday. Coinbase CEO
Brian Armstrong calls primaries a chance to send a message to US politicians, ignoring digital
assets policy issues. And if you guys haven't been paying attention, whether this is a narrative or is actually true, I cannot speak to. But crypto
super PAC fair shake had a $10 million ad campaign against Katie Porter. And they released this
statement after she lost to Adam Schiff, who, by the way, is no friend to the industry. It's not
like I think we're cheering Adam Schiff in this case, but basically saying that it was crypto voters and their money that cost Katie Porter her election.
And they specifically called out Senator Warren and her anti-crypto army and said, we are coming for you.
Did they really swing this election and are we actually having a meaningful impact moving forward? I don't know enough about the dynamics of this particular race
to know how fragile Katie was going into this or how strong her position was. I think that she
came in third. So she clearly really fumbled the ball in a big way. I think a $10 million
ad buy in a local campaign like that is meaningful and it's significant. I think that the ability for the
crypto industry and sort of these super PACs to frame crypto in ways that are more broadly resonant
than just for hodlers is also probably on display a little bit here. But frankly, I think that part
of what we're seeing now is early inning narrative jockeying where, interestingly, both sides want
crypto to claim the victory here.
If you saw Katie Porter's statement, she blamed it on billionaires from away who tried to manipulate
the vote. And she actually had to clarify her statement because she made it sound like there
was fraud and manipulation. And she clarified that she just meant that there was too much money from
outside. But fascinatingly, we have a situation where the crypto lobby wants to claim credit to seem powerful,
and the people who lose to the crypto lobby also want them to claim credit so that they can use it
as a bully cudgel. But ultimately, to some extent, these elections will be a referendum on whether
the anti-crypto army or the pro-crypto army is the better bet for this election season.
Right. She's squarely a member of Elizabeth Warren's anti-crypto army. She's definitely someone who gets in line. Card carrying. Yeah.
Card carrying long, long since from my cold dead hands anti-crypto army. And whether it was the
effect of the crypto lobby that did this or not, we get to use that narrative moving forward. And
it has to be on Elizabeth Warren's radar right now,
especially with John Deaton stepping up to run against her and him having a pro-crypto stance
and openly talking about those things. So the loss, regardless of how it happened, I think
is a move in the right direction for our industry. And you have to wonder that even if Elizabeth
Warren wins at this point, maybe she tones down the rhetoric. Maybe not. I doubt it. Maybe she's going to learn that it's not that politically
popular. I think the question for me is much less whether Elizabeth Warren learns that because for
her, the more that crypto does, the better entrenched it is for her personal position,
I think in some ways. The bigger question is whether other people who might be on the fence about whether they're going to join the anti-crypto army see it as a political
vulnerability moving forward. I think, obviously, a big election or a big campaign to watch is
Sherrod Brown in Ohio, which looks winnable based on those sort of primaries. And it's going to have
an impact on individual politicians, on particularly the Democratic side of the aisle, should these close races start going against them in areas where crypto is spending big money. They're not going to fail to notice that. an army and Elizabeth Warren steps out front boldly and turns around and they all bail and go the other way. Very Braveheart-esque. Exactly. So we also have some more regulatory news outside
of what we've shared before. That is the CFTC's venom says Prometheum's Ethereum stance could
create interagency conflict. Effectively, to my understanding, Prometheum, which we all know is a
complete farce that's been approved by the SEC, says they came in and registered and followed the regulatory path to getting approved, but can't list anything on their exchange because we don't know what a security is.
The whole thing is nonsense.
Aaron Kaplan, their CEO, I guess, looks like a villain from a Steven Seagal movie or maybe Steven Seagal himself if he lost a lot of weight.
It's nonsense.
But they basically said that it's a security so that they can list it. And the CFTC pushed back
very hard and flat out said, Bitcoin and Ethereum are commodities. What do you make of this story?
I mean, they pointed to years of Ethereum futures trading perfectly well without anyone being hurt,
the sort of how well it's been working, that there's a presumption of it. And moreover, you know, this was a detail that was called out by the industry,
obviously, because of, you know, the specific battle with Prometheum and the SEC. But if you
listen to sort of the full testimony as crypto came up, I think the loud and clear message from
the CFTC chair, Rostan Benham, who, by the way, is again, not an out and out crypto bull or anything. I
mean, he bristled when during the FTX era, the CFTC was continuously referred to as the easier
crypto regulator. I mean, so much so that he actually, I think maybe overreacted in the
other direction at some points. But the point being, he is not a sort of an ally, a crypto wolf in sheep's clothing or anything like that.
What he basically said to especially the Democrats in this hearing was the idea that crypto is going
away, this fantasy that this thing is just going to go away. And if you regulate it, it's going to
give it legitimacy. And that could be the difference between it going away and it not going away
is exactly that. It's a fantasy. It's a delusion that legitimacy. And that could be the difference between it going away and it not going away is exactly that.
It's a fantasy.
It's a delusion that needs to be gotten rid of.
And I think that the rational people are now looking at the destruction of the last cycle
into where we are now with the market screamingly loud and clear that they want this asset class, not just the DGENs,
but the BlackRock folks as well. It's not going away. And at some point, the folks who have been
just hoping it would have to stop burying their head in the sand and actually figure out a common
sense way to do it. And now that message isn't coming from us. It's not coming from our lobby.
It's coming from the CFTC chair. It's coming from SEC commissioners. It's coming from anyone rational in positions of power who doesn't have a huge ax to grind.
It's coming from Larry Fink, who has a 576 in one record in ETF approvals.
And last time I checked, filed for an Ethereum spot ETF.
Exactly.
So I think that the path for Ethereum is relatively clear here.
I dare not give a timeline, but it's all happening.
In the words of almost famous, it's all happening. And our final topic here,
banks are collapsing again. We're back to the SVB era. We've got NYCB, New York Community Bank,
in crisis. What the hell is happening with New York Community Bank? Well, their stock was dropping circuit breakers every five seconds,
seemingly 30% an hour, seemingly going to the floor. They lost 7% of their deposits in the
past month, slashed their dividend to one cent, all of this happening over the past few days.
And then the bailout. NYCB raises more than $1 billion in equity led by Steven
Mnuchin's firm. What the hell is
going on in the banking system right now? Yeah. I don't know. I think that my best
analogy is sort of a visual analogy of that meme where the guy slaps a piece of tape on the water
tank that's just exploding out. That was effectively the bank term funding program and the Fed last
year, right?
There are these long-term structural issues with these regional and community banks that were not
solved in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank. They were just dealt with, right? And to his credit
and to the Fed's credit, Powell and Co. didn't say they were doing anything other than trying
to deal with that issue so that they could continue their program of tightening at the time, they weren't trying to solve the underlying. They were focused
on making sure that there was a program that could solve it. The bank term funding program
has given out something like $164 billion, I think, over the last year and a half, or the
last year, I guess. And it is wrapping up in three days or something like
that. So all eyes are on this, and I'm sure not only this, with that funding program deadline
looming. Yeah, the question to me just becomes at this point, how long can the Fed and the
government just continue to kick the can down the road and delay the inevitable?
Because it's similar to the narrative that the recession is always coming.
This time last year, there were predictive markets pricing in three rate cuts, for example.
And we keep saying rate cuts are coming at the next meeting.
And then Fed Chairman Powell keeps saying, I don't see a reason for rate cuts yet, but maybe. And it seems like the government just has endless tools and levers to pull to kick more bank failures down the road,
or to kick a recession down the road, or to kick a stock market crash down the road. And it's become just exceptionally hard to predict if and when these things will happen. I mean, if we remember
when SVB went down last year, we thought 100 of these banks were going to collapse, right? And it's been
an extremely slow trickle. You know, I mean, it's interesting. I wonder if it's been too slow of a
trickle in some ways, you know, if the feds, the fed could be viewing itself into or its role in
two different ways, or, you know, one being, it's trying to solve this problem, or two, it's trying
to gracefully, you know, prolong a transition period that could be really violent
otherwise, where the structure of the banking center and the role of these types of regional
banks changes in fairly fundamental ways based on shifting patterns and changing economics.
And if it's viewing itself as managing the death of this type of institution, then it
doesn't necessarily want them to sort of
persist forever as zombie companies. It wants some amount of sort of consolidation and change,
but it's a very hard line to walk because by very nature, when banks start failing,
they really start failing and it goes crazy. So it's kind of hard to gracefully manage a
structural shift in the banking industry, but who knows?
It's interesting that Powell's had to speak to this so much.
His job, in theory, is inflation and jobs.
Commercial real estate is not necessarily normally on the docket for the Fed, but he's
openly said here, we have identified the banks that have high commercial real estate concentrations
for anyone who wasn't paying attention.
That's kind of what crashed NYCB here, particularly office and retail and other ones that have
been affected a lot. This is a problem that we'll be working on for years more. I'm sure
there will be bank failures, but not the big banks. Doesn't see it as a systemic risk.
And this is all because NYCB had a huge portfolio of billions of dollars in apartment loans and
New York's rent regulated complexes that are coming to and going bad. So we've been talking, again, this has been 18
months of narrative of commercial real estate is going to crash the entire system. It hasn't
happened and he's saying he can manage it. Yeah. I mean, I think that even the most hardened
Powell haters at this point, when he says he's going to manage something, he's done
fairly what he said at this point. But we'll see how long he can hold that tape on.
That's why it's been blowing my mind about these predictive markets on the cuts. I mean,
it's just like the guy never changes his tune. The other Fed governors are generally in line.
They all give the same speech, yet people hear exactly what
they want to hear because they just want the liquidity. It's nuts. It's nuts.
We live in a weird time. The financial nihilism that we spoke of earlier exists in many different
forms and has many different faces, but it is everywhere. Well, I can't highly recommend that
you guys nihilistically enter the meme coin casino
or take out any bad commercial banking loans.
That's all the topics that we have for today.
I think we pretty much covered it and nailed it.
It's amazing now just how normal these huge stories become.
SEC cases and politics.
It's just like passing part of the news cycle, probably because we're sitting at 68,000 on
Bitcoin. Guys, you can follow NLW, of course,
on Twitter slash X and listen to the breakdown.
I highly encourage you to listen
to every one of his shows every week, just like I do.
It's the best download for 10 or 15 minutes
to catch up on the main topics of the day.
So thank you for that.
You guys should check that out.
Otherwise, man, I guess I will see you next Friday.
Thank you guys.
We'll be back. should check that out. Otherwise, man, I guess I will see you next Friday. Thank you guys.