The Wolf Of All Streets - “Everything You Know About Bitcoin Is About to Change” | Johann Kerbrat At RobinHood
Episode Date: December 14, 2025Traditional finance still runs on 1980s infrastructure... limited hours, slow settlement, and endless intermediaries. But as the world moves toward 24/7, instant global markets, Robinhood is preparing... to rebuild the system on blockchain rails. In this exclusive interview, Robinhood Crypto’s General Manager, Johann Kerbrat, joins Scott Melker to discuss how tokenization, stablecoins, and instant settlement will reshape global finance. Johann breaks down how Robinhood is integrating crypto and equities, what the Clarity Act could mean for builders and investors, and why he believes the four-year Bitcoin cycle is dead. From the GameStop fiasco to the rise of stablecoins and prediction markets, this conversation reveals how Wall Street and DeFi are finally converging.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Bitcoin trading 24-7, tokenized stocks, instant settlement.
The next financial system is being built right now, and Robin Hood wants to run it.
Today, I'm joined by Johan Kerbrot, general manager of Robin Hood Crypto,
to discuss how one of America's biggest trading platforms is quietly preparing
to replace Wall Street's broken plumbing with blockchain rails.
We dive deep into tokenization, the future of stable coins under the Genius Act,
and why the U.S. is falling behind Europe's Mika regulation.
You also have to look at the current state of things in the U.S.
You have a very fragmented system where you have different regulators in different states.
You need different licenses.
We can launch XYZ in one state, but not on the other state.
Joanne also opens up about Robin Hood's expansion into crypto yield, staking, and prediction markets.
Right now, everyone is talking about AI taking your job.
And so if you're a trader, the only way for you to hedge against that is to buy
NVIDIA or EMD or one of these like AI first stock.
But you also have a lot of issues that can happen there.
Your edge against AI depends on so many factors that are not in your control.
But you could actually buy instead a contract around the future of AI,
which is a lot simpler for you to understand and a lot of simpler for you to control.
And why he believes the four-year Bitcoin cycle is officially dead.
I don't really believe in it at this point, especially for Bitcoin,
with the liquidity that there is.
I think it's hard to say that it's not a maturing asset cloud.
This isn't another defy dream.
It's traditional finance going full crypto.
without a central authority.
It's built on Arbitrum and supports markets for everything from major global news to niche topics.
The platform uses an automated market maker to dynamically adjust prices and maintain liquidity as participants place wagers,
ensuring markets remain balanced and active.
Anyone can create a market with a minimum of $10 in liquidity,
choosing between public markets open to everyone or private ones that require a code to access.
A standout feature is the resolution process.
Public markets can be settled by Delphi, an AI Oracle that draws consideration
from multiple data sources for impartial decisions or by the market creator.
If a participant disputes the result, they post collateral.
0.1% of the market volume or up to $1,000,
and the case escalates to human oracles for final review.
Whether your forecasting events, hedging risk,
or creating incentives for specific outcomes,
Rain offers transparent fees,
no refunds on wagers, and a rain government's token
with a buyback and burn mechanism tied to trading volume.
Visit their site or click the link right below,
link right below to explore Rain Protocol.
I think everybody in their crypto journey, at least if they get the luxury of experiencing
a bull market, has this experience where you buy a little bit of crypto and then it goes
up and it accidentally becomes a disproportionate part of your portfolio and then you don't
really know what to do with it.
I feel like that's been the same trajectory for crypto at Robin Hood.
As you guys dabbled a little bit and you got your feet wet and then it became this massive
part of your business.
Yeah.
I mean, I think it's a, it's true.
way. I think the really cool fact about Robert Crypto was that it was launched in 2018 in the
first quarter of 2018. So right in the crypto winter. So when all the competitors were actually
shutting down their crypto product, Robin decided to double down on it. So I think that's a cool
fact that I like to tell because I think it's really important in the crypto cycles to actually
invest in building the tools when it's a bit more of a calm.
market, that way that when the market is hitting up again, you're ready and you have all the
product that your customer wants. So definitely happy with the way that Robin has grown in the
crypto space, and there is still so much to do. It's funny because that's what I hear from
the founders of basically every platform and protocol in crypto, that they love the bare market
because things slow down and they can actually build, and they're not answering for price
every day. Yeah, that's true too. But I think for us,
It's also like, you know, we think that the way crypto will be in five, ten years, basically
replacing the financial system, it's going to be very difficult to just focus on, you know,
some crypto assets or what do we list next or like this kind of thing.
So for us, we try to make sure that we have part of our brain that they are focused on the
day to day, you know, like the trading of assets and feeling that.
And there's also a big part of our teams focusing on the longer term projects like tokenization
and projects like that.
Perfect segue, because that's I was going to ask about next.
That's obviously been a major focus.
You and Vlad both have been very outspoken about the future of markets and how tokenization
will play a role.
So, I mean, maybe set the table with how you think tokenization in general is going to look
and how we're going to evolve towards that, but then more specifically how Robin Hood prepares
for that.
Yeah, so the TRDR is really, you know, we think that the current traditional system for the financial assets has not really evolved since the 80s.
Like a lot of the system that we're built to run exchanges and market makers and everything is kind of like stuck in these old ways.
And so we really think that, you know, we need to evolve into a different world where everything is 24.
seven everything is instant and currently for example like many market makers or many exchanges
actually shut down at least once a day and it's not really a problem because the market is not
open 24-7 but the way that crypto is trading is 24-7 since the beginning you know like you can
buy any assets on a Saturday at any time of the day and that's how people want to work with finance
you know at this point in the world like um on friday night you can have a tweet you can have
you know something happening you can have a environment crisis you can have something happening
between countries all of it can happen on a weekend and so the market is only opening on on the
next monday and it creates all these uh problems for for customers so we're really excited
about this aspect like you know being able to offer 24-7s being able to offer instant settlement
being able to transfer between brokerage the same hour without waiting like days like it currently is.
And we think that it's going to make the customer, you know, owning their finance even more.
They will be able to decide where they want their finance to be.
They will be able to save on capital because they don't have to wait multiple days before trade sale and all these kind of things.
we're really excited about the vision of tokenization and how revenue that started to think about it is
we are really good at equities we know how to be a brokerage for millions of customers and so we want to
bring the u.s. stocks and ets. on chain and so that's what we did in the EU we have about a thousand
tokenized assets we call them stock token and they basically give you the representation of
the US stocks or ETF. But that's just the beginning. I think, you know, in the future,
you will see tokenization for private equity, for real estate, for arts, for basically anything
that can be traded. So it sounds like there's two systems in play and you can only account
for one of them at the moment. So you can control what you can control, which is actively
tokenizing certain assets and I assume you custody the asset behind it and you allow the trading
for that. But that doesn't speak for the system itself going on to blockchain rails.
Right? We've heard Paul Atkins, the chairman of the SEC, talk about this happening.
We've seen government officials all over the United States actually saying that, you know,
we're going to be utilizing blockchain rails.
So how do you sort of handicap that, right?
Because that's going to require some legislation, regulation, a fundamental change in the plumbing of markets.
And when that switches, you won't need to be tokenizing them anymore because it'll be on those rails, right?
And, you know, if that's the case, that's amazing.
I think for us, the idea of tokenizing the assets is really to solve a problem that exists.
today. If tomorrow, you know, all the exchanges and all the systems are all using the blockchain
technology and we can plug into it in a way that, you know, is open to all the participants,
I think that's a great story. But the reality is that the technology is so big, you know,
it's not just about plugging to the exchanges. It's also going to be about plugging landing
pool, for example, if you want to be able to lend your Tesla or Microsoft stocks. It's a
about being able to borrow or get a line of credit
in a way that are a lot more flexible
and a lot more automated.
Right now, if you want to get a loan
or if you want to get a mortgage using some of your assets,
it's a fairly complicated process.
You have a lot of people that are going to look into your accounts
that are going to underwrite things.
But all of this could be a lot more automated
if the information was accessible and verifiable.
And there is no way for you to say,
like, you have a million Tesla stocks if you only have five.
And so I think that's where we need the technology to advance.
And Robinneau itself, you know, we are extremely good at connecting to multiple market makers or multiple exchanges.
We've done it since the creation of the company.
The only reason why we decided to move on the tokenization is because we saw that nothing was really moving.
If you think about it before Vlad started to talk about tokenization, really nothing was really happening in the U.S. or in the EU.
And so it's all way to push the industry forward.
And if everybody is using it, I think it really just grows a pie for everyone.
You will be able to change brokerage just in five seconds because you will be able to transfer
like the same way you're transferring your crypto assets.
And so it just creates a lot more competition.
Instead of being stuck at your current brokerage because you don't really want to do this process
of transferring, you will be able to do it in five seconds.
So it creates more competition.
So I think it's better for the customer at the end of the day.
I think about what this means for the multi-chain world and the technology as it exists now.
How will we know if that's going to be on Solana or Ethereum or private blockchains or something that hasn't even been invented yet?
Is it going to be on Robin Hood chain?
Is it going to be on SEC chain?
I have no idea, right?
Or the DTCC or Citadel or something?
I've got to imagine that's pretty far out.
Yeah, I mean, you know, I think one thing I say often is that crypto was made by engineer for engineer.
And so, you know, you have these three flags to be like, okay, what is the chain behind it?
And what is the protocol?
And is it going to be proof of stag or proof of work or whatever?
At the end of the day, I think a lot of people don't really care about that.
You know, they want to be able to buy that Tesla stock or their Microsoft stock on Saturday at noon.
They don't really care if it's happening on Solana or on Arbitrum or on Rabium chain or whatever.
And so I think that's where we focus the most on.
The reality is that you're going to have thousands of chains, I think.
every single company is going to want to create some level of chain for their own systems
or they are going to partner with somebody.
But it's the role of the distributor, like the Robin Hood, for example, for us, to aggregate
all this chain and make it super simple and easy for your customer to just trade.
And they don't necessarily need to know what's happening behind.
The same way that when you text your friend, you don't really know what is the protocol
behind it.
Maybe you do, but most people don't do.
I take no insult to that
So you send your text
You know your friend receive it's you
And that's it
That's all you want to do
And I think that's what we focus on the most
If you look at our
tokenized asset that we launch in the EU
When you buy a share of stock tokens of Microsoft
You don't even know that crypto is behind the scene
What we did we actually put a pill at the top
Saying like it's a token to make sure that people are aware of it
But the flow looks very much the same as the US one.
And that was made on purpose because we want to remove this complexity.
You don't need to focus about gas fees, about custody, private key, whatever.
It's all about getting the benefits of the technology, but without having to actually worry about any of the complexity of crypto.
Interesting. I'm thinking back to when Robin Hood started offering crypto and then had the wallet, but then there was no send function.
and then you eventually added that.
I actually, I think I,
Glad and I had the first conversation about that when it launched.
Do you get those kind of, you know, criticisms anymore?
I do hear from that side of the crypto world, self-custody and all that,
or is it become, I guess, mainstream and trusted enough
that now you're focused on different kinds of problems?
Because I remember not even exclusive to Robin Hood,
but that's all anyone talked about when exchanges first started bringing
these things on. Yeah, I mean, look, I remember also when I joined Robinole, it was before the transfer
of functionality. So all we were being asked was to build deposit and withdrawal. And at the time,
there was like all this crazy story about Robin and not holding the crypto and everything. And very glad that
it's past us. But I think, you know, at the same time, it was a real criticism. Like we were missing
this functionality and it's a key feature for a lot of our customers like we see tens of millions
every day being transferred on the platform back and forth some people use robino to buy their
assets and transfer to their own wallet and you know do things on defy and you have the other side
of the of the coin I guess and you know we still have a lot of feature that we we haven't fully
launched yet for example staking is live in the u.s.
but not in five states.
And so it's our role as one of the largest crypto platform
in the US to keep building and making sure
that what we build is what the customer want.
And I think that's one thing that we really focus on.
We have this mental model that the customer needs
to be at the center of everything we do.
And before we launch product, for example,
we will spend time with customer, we'll test,
you know, how they react to their product?
Do they understand what they are doing?
Are they confused by one step of the flow or something like this?
And based on that, we'll go back to our design team and our engineering team
and it will make change until we feel like the customers are really happy with the product.
And, you know, there's still many features that people are asking.
And I don't know if we will ever be done.
I think it's a great thing to have your customers so engaged that when we see them in the streets
or when they're on Twitter are asking us to build more things.
It's crazy to me that in 2025, we're still having the same conversations.
This is not about Robin Hood, just in general on crypto, about UX and UI.
I remember having these conversations in 2017, 2018, that once we abstracted away all the complexity
and we weren't talking about private keys and grandma didn't need to know how to use
meta mask, right?
And we still haven't accomplished that, I think, at the level that needs to be for mainstream
adoption. I think stable coins are probably the best example. Even the fact that we
talk about what chain a stable coin is on, which stable coin it is means that we're
nowhere close, in my humble opinion. I think people, as you've said, just want to
move USD. They shouldn't even know it's a crypto rail. They shouldn't know which
stable coin. They shouldn't know which chain. They should just go on some platform
and send a dollar and whatever plumbing happens, it arrives. Yeah. And to be honest, I
think the day that you stop saying it's a stable coin, that's the day that you think
there is full adoption. And I think you're coming right. I think we are far from that.
But at the same time, I think it's also happening. And we are just, you know, sometimes I feel like
we need to look back and see how far we've come at the same time. You know, you can go in some
countries in Latam or in Africa where they will actually prefer that you send them a stable
coin versus giving them cash because they cannot verify the cash. But, you know, in the US, we also have a very
good system in place like you can use your credit card you go anywhere in the in the
country you tap your credit card and you paid you don't even really have limits like
i'm in europe right now i try to tap my credit card and that was like a 25 euros limit and i was
like wow that's that's pretty intense um but in the u.s like it is also that that you
need to compare to like when when people were thinking that crypto will replace the payment
system, well, okay, but like which one is it going to replace when you can go anywhere
we use a crack out currently? So, so I think, you know, it's going to take still some time.
The UIX is still so much better right now than it was, I don't know, like five years ago even.
But, you know, there's still a lot of complexity. Like you want to land money, you have like
the choice between 20 different pools with different API, there is different systems. They all have
crazy names. So, you know, I think we can still do a lot more there.
How much has the Genius Act or proliferation of stable coins affected your business?
I mean, how do you think about stable coins specifically at Robin Hood knowing that they're
just continuing to grow? Yeah, I mean, it's something that we've been using in the back
of our business for a very long time. So Robin Hood settled with market makers and
a liquidity provider using Stable, for example.
And that's something that is very important for us,
because like I said earlier,
crypto is a 24-7 business.
And so for us, it's really important to use 24-7 Rails.
Otherwise, you have a problem if you have to wait
two or three days during a long weekend.
And so for us, using Stable was kind of a necessity,
and slowly we realized that it was better for a lot of systems,
so we started to use it more and more.
We also have it available on the platform.
and it's something that, you know, for example, people can buy USDC on the platform one-to-one.
We don't charge any fees.
And we're also part of the global dollar network, which is issuing USDG.
And it's basically a stable coin that is more fair in the sense that it redistribute all the revenue of the stable
to the partners and the people contributing to the stable.
And so we think that it's going to be something that we are going to invest more and more.
more, and we were waiting on the Genius Act and the actual application of the Genius Act
to come into Frisian before we can really move a lot of products into USDG.
But I think the other aspect of it was really the impact of Genius overall in the industry.
Like I think, you know, it kind of created a way for companies to start thinking about,
okay, a stable coin is legitimate, we can actually use it.
And so you're starting to see a lot of banks and a lot of big institutions starting to look into it.
And I think that's what really needs to happen for crypto as a whole is the more institution and big companies and other are starting to think about crypto, the bigger the buy and the bigger the interaction you can have between systems.
And so I think that's really something that we need to cultivate as an industry.
Yeah, I think you're right. I think it just gave the industry a stamp of approval and some legitimacy that maybe it was lacking.
King before. But interestingly, now we look to the Clarity Act for the next stamp of approval
and legitimacy. It's like this never-ending process of trying to get more and more clarity,
no pun intended. A lot of people think, though, that if we do get the Clarity Act, which
seemed like a foregone conclusion before, but now obviously we're at the end of the year and
haven't seen much movement, but that could be sort of the next catalyst for the industry. I don't know
for price or not, but certainly for legitimacy and for builders. I think it will just simplify things
so much. I mean, and maybe, you know, it's pretty hard for me to say that regulation are going to
create simplicity, but you also have to look at the current state of things in the US. Like,
you have a very fragmented system where you have different regulators in different states.
You need different licenses. You can offer different products based on the states. And so right now,
even for us at Robben, we creates a very complicated product where we can launch XYZ in one state,
but not on the other states.
And so sometimes we have people asking us like,
hey, why is Robin Hood not doing XYZ?
And we're like, well, we would like to, but we can.
So I think having one federal level for the role
is going to really simplify things for all the businesses,
bring clarity to your point on the punt to a lot of companies
on what can they do, what can they not do,
how do they issue an assets, how do they use the assets.
So I just think it's much needed at this point.
It's been too long that we're having this mess,
you know, in the back and forth with a hard regulator,
not hard regulator.
And frankly, it's becoming a bit embarrassing to see that,
you know, in the EU, for example,
they have a framework already in place
that a lot of companies currently have a license.
For example, Robbins is a Mika license.
And the US is still trying to
define the Clarity Act. So I think the day that it passes, it's going to be a big day for the
industry, not necessarily about the prices, but about what can people do and start building
again in a way that is constructive for the industry and constructive for the country as well.
I'm a glass half full kind of guy, but let's empty the glass halfway and say they don't
pass it, right? Let's say that we get into midterms, we don't really just get it done in time,
And then, you know, one of the houses switches and we get utter gridlock and an anti-crypto army back.
I mean, it's possible, right?
I mean, I don't think we should take this Goldilocks period for granted.
Does that affect your roadmap at all?
It seems like you guys have just continued to build regardless of who's in power and where,
but it would suck to build something and then have it become regulated out of legality in some way.
I mean, look, we took a very conservative approach in a lot of way.
for a long time and we've been able to work with all the regulator during multiple
administration and i think that's the strength of robin is you know we no matter where the
administration was we we build our products and we know how to work with regulators we we have
many licenses on the brokerage side on the crypto side we have international licenses like we we know
what to do so i think it's not going to be the the end of the world for us like we're just
going to continue building with the restriction but like I said it's going to be a bit
more painful in the sense of you have the state problem where you have different
products and and to your point you may not be able to build some features that are a
bit more like decentralized in their in their core but you know I absolutely wish
that we we find a way even if to house sleep even if everything that you may
and Jen, we need to find a way to create a safe framework for crypto companies to execute on.
Like right now, you know, if you look at the previous administration,
all the founders were actually moving out of the U.S.
And that's a really sad situation, right?
Like as a European, you can hear the accent, I actually move into the U.S.
because I was inspired by how quickly the U.S. were moving and building on new technologies.
And on crypto, it was the opposite.
People were flying back either to Europe or to Asia.
So I think it's something that, you know, it will be really sad for the country to go back to.
And so I just hope we can get all the parties to talk to each other, talk to experts in the industry.
Like we do spend a lot of time doing outreach.
And, you know, if anyone wants to try to understand what is defy, what is crypto, why do we care about crypto?
So, you know, I think people should learn, and then they can decide to pass a regulation.
But sometimes I feel like sometimes people are voting on problems without necessarily knowing the underlying problems.
I want to go back to tokenization for a second.
I'm thinking about it.
I don't think any platform in history expose the problems with T-plus-2 and T-plus-1 settlement or any of that than Robin Hood during the GameStop fiasco, right?
I mean, you guys literally had people putting in billions and billions of dollars of orders and you somehow had to front the cash because the system's so slow and broken, right?
So nobody, I think, has felt the pain points probably more than your company and wants to see a more efficient market, right?
I mean, you just exposed how big of a problem this is, not specific to Robin Hood, for any platform for the system, for settlement.
I mean, you shouldn't have to wait days to own something that you bought, the intermediary.
shouldn't have to front the cash. I mean, it's insane when you think about it.
No, absolutely. And, you know, I think it's not just about Robin on this one,
but any major liquid provider or hedge funds or anyone holding this type of assets,
they're also losing on the capital that is locked, for example, for three days between the
moment where you made a trade to the moment it actually settled and then the cash shuttles.
And so for that time, you cannot actually do anything else.
So you have platform like Robin Hood where we give you instant, if you're eligible and everything,
and you're able to sell and right away buy something else.
But if you're moving a lot of money or if you're doing a large investment, you're not necessarily able to do that.
And so I think the instant settlement is going to be a key situation where it can really solve a lot of problems.
So a lot of people that are against tokenization or against this argument are saying like, well, not everyone wants to have instant settlement because they want to have time. They want to do net trading and all these kind of things, which is a fair point. But at least you have the choice. And you can decide with your counterpart or your partner what to settle and when, which gives you the optionality. Right now to your point, we don't even have this optionality. It's at least T plus one.
Yeah, it was a pretty fun moment when, you know, the SEC move from T plus two to T plus one and, you know, everyone was celebrating, which I think was a great step forward, but everyone in crypto.
We went from like 1750 to 1895.
Exactly.
So I think it's something that, you know, the 24-7 aspect, instance element and the way that you can have also fractionalization by default is going to be a key element for a lot of.
people yeah so outside of tokenization seems like robin hood is trying to be the everything platform
obviously right crypto and beyond i mean from banking services to custody to yield to but literally everything
right you want somebody to go to that one place and be able to do the breadth of financial services
without ever having to leave so you're on the crypto side obviously so as you're planning now
beyond the tokenization side what else is like heavily in your focus on the roadmap for what
could potentially come next towards achieving that vision?
Yeah, so, you know, advanced trading for us has been a big focus.
We want to make sure that any type of customer can use a platform.
For a long time, you know, I think people were seeing Robino Crypto as kind of a simple platform
just to buy a little Bitcoin or Ethereum and, you know, move on.
But since then, we added a lot of assets, we added a lot of future like staking.
we change our fee structures so we offer our new product called smart exchange writing with volume
t and so you can pay as low as three basis points based on your on your volume and so all of
these things are kind of helping us bring more and more advanced traders but at the same time we're
getting the feedback that the ui and the ux were not uh targeting them enough and you know the
the mobile app was too simple you could not see enough charts and detail on the
charts. So we also built an advanced platform called Robin Legend, which is a pretty nice web app interface where you can see all the charts. You can create tens of indicator on all the charts and kind of create even custom ones. So, you know, basically, we're trying to make sure that we have all the products for all type of customers. And the next step for us is also the international expansion. So we, you know, we launch in the EU. We also.
acquired an exchange called BitStamp that is in different places in the world, including
Singapore. Every crypto guy knows BitStamp, man. The good Bitcoin or the BitStamp Bitcoin. Those
are the good ones historically. It was. I mean, I lost my light coin that I had on Mangark,
so on BitStump, I didn't have any issues. Very, yeah, see, he's been around a while.
But, yeah, actually, I think BitStamp was even created before Robin, which is pretty fun.
I think, you know, for us, that's kind of the idea.
Like, the international expansion is going to be a pretty key component.
For a long time, we focused on the U.S.,
but the type of product that we build and the scale that we're able to manage
can scale to a lot of countries internationally.
Yeah, that makes sense.
I mean, am I correct in the assessment that Robin Hood is trying to offer the full breadth
of financial services?
I don't want to take for granted that idea, but I know, like,
I know that I think I once incorrectly said this to Vlad,
I was like, you're becoming a bank, and he was like, no, we're partnering with the bank.
I don't know what the vernacular is, but obviously you want to be able to provide banking services.
You want to do it all.
Yeah, I mean, look, I think there's a lot of values for having a lot of products within the same app.
You can, for example, transfer right away between platform.
So, you know, one of the big advantage that we have is that you can sell your Microsoft share
and buy Bitcoin in the same minute on your phone.
And I think for a lot of the products that we are building,
we're having still this customer-centric mental model that I was talking about,
where we're really focusing about what are the problems and what can we bring on the table
that will really solve the problems.
And we launched the credit cards, for example, that, you know, at the beginning, it's not
my group, but at the beginning when we talked about launching a credit card, I was like,
oh my God, another credit card, like, what are we going to bring on the table?
And actually with this 3% cash bag that we get,
I slowly started to only use the Rarmer card
and now it's the only card that I carry on my wallet
just because I don't have to focus about,
oh, I'm going to restaurant, so I'm going to use this card
and then I'm buying a train ticket,
so I'm using this card and blah, blah, blah.
And then, you know, we also focused a lot
on the UI and UX.
So, for example, you don't have the create card number
on the card, so you have to go on the app,
you can create virtual cards in one tap and you know it just light years away from what we see in
different bank or the different cards that I used to have and so the idea is the same for
banking like we want to create the experience that you have if you go to to a private bank even
if you don't have the type of net worth that you need to to get there and i think the team that
are working on all these projects are pretty special because they are able to make you feel
feel like you're an important customer without necessarily being like, you know, one of
this like multimillionaire that exists. So I don't know if the idea is to be the app for
for everything, everything, but I think the idea is to be the app that will solve your financial
problems and really make you at the center of all of it and make sure that you get the most
value for everything that you're doing with your finances.
Sounds like crypto should be at the center of that.
Definitely.
Because it allows you to do a lot of the things that nobody else can do.
Right.
It really interesting.
How do you guys frame then your competition?
I guess maybe you build kind of in a tunnel vision to some degree, right?
You know what people need and you build those things.
But I think there was probably a point where people said, you know,
Robin Hood is only serving, you know, wide retail, but maybe not institutional clients
or maybe not high net worth clients.
And as you said, it was kind of basic crypto, not advanced crypto.
So maybe you were kind of competing with Coinbase on one side and sort of with, you know, e-trade on the other.
But, you know, how do we take on Schwab, J.P. Morgan?
Yeah, I think it's a – I don't know, you know, if we have a strong focus on that, to be honest.
I, you know, I don't come up to my team on Monday morning being like, okay, this week we're going to, you know, try to extract as much customer from X, Y, Z.
I think for us it's more like an output metric where you know if you want to know if you're doing a good job this year or this quarter it's going to look we're going to look at market share and we're going to see like did people prefer to trade on one of our competing platform or did they prefer to trade on Robin Hood and that's to me like the success metric you know if tomorrow we have a better market share than one of our competitor or we see progression it means that we've been doing a good job and that the feature that we started to build
we're the one that our customer wanted or we're missing and that's why they were not using Robinhood.
But I think, you know, at the end of the day, crypto is still a small, very, very small portion of the global equity market.
And so I think for us it's more a question of like, how do we become number one on crypto trading?
That's definitely like something that can be done with like some of the crypto feature that we're working on and some of the new asset that we're listing and stake.
and all these things, but there's also this question of how do we use crypto for more of
this financial system that we're building. And that, I think, is a more interesting part
of the crypto adoption, because the crypto market is still very small. So it should be less about,
how do I grab market share from Coinbase and more about how do I get Schwab and e-trades and
other to also offer crypto? That way you have more people that are exposed to it. And what we see
in general is that when people start playing with it, they start to be interested and then
they start to actually care about it a lot more. So I think that's kind of more the thinking
here. Right. You don't need to control the whole pie if the pie is 10 times as big, basically,
which I think that's a reasonable way to look at it, especially if you really have the thesis
that this market's going to grow exponentially as I think anyone here does.
Exactly. And I think the aspect of like how much of
of the financial system of tomorrow is going to use crypto rel is really interesting.
Like, you know, how much right now of cash is being moved just using basic wire versus using
stable coin on blockchain?
How much equity is being trade on tokens instead of using the classic DTC system?
You know, like all these things are going to be interesting to see if the blockchain technology
is really being adopted and not just use for like short-term investment.
Is there any level at which you're concerned about Wall Street and governments getting involved in this asset class?
I mean, I think what's interesting is so far we've seen a lot of price releases, but when you actually go a bit deeper, it's a bit harder to actually get the contracts, the facts, I guess.
But I think at the end of the day, we need all these people to plug into it.
You know, if you want deep liquidity, you will need at some point to have someone connected to Wall Street or you will need Wall Street to be connected directly.
So either you pay a middleman or you can go directly on the exchange.
And I think, you know, it's going to be interesting.
The other part that is interesting is that the crypto rails already existing.
And so they have to plug into something that already exists, which I think kind of limit damages that, you know, the old institution can do.
That makes sense. So we've seen some specific odd events in the crypto space over the past few months.
You're in exchange, so maybe you have some insight or at least you can tell me what it looked like on your side.
Obviously, October 10th was this massive liquidation event.
Yeah. Many will say triggered by Binance, right, obviously by automatic de-leveraging and market makers having their
basically positions closed when they weren't expecting to. And obviously, I mean, from the numbers I saw as many as 1.1 million individual accounts,
liquidated. That's a lot of soldiers in a very small army of crypto traders in the world, right?
I assume Robin Hood was largely unaffected by that. And so was that a function of leverage?
Was that something to do with the way that the exchanges operated? Because I think it's fair to say
that something like that is pretty devastating for certainly the trading and speculative side
of the industry. I don't think it matters very much for guys buying ETFs and people adopting
blockchain rails. But I mean, how many crypto traders are in this world if a million of them lost
their account in one day? Yeah, I mean, look, I think any of these incidents, I think, is a damage
to the industry. I think, you know, you've seen it with FTX, you've seen it with lending
issues, you've seen it with Binance in the US. When this happens, people start losing trust
and they start to pull back and focus on another type of asset class.
And, you know, they're like, okay, we'll come back to crypto when it's more mature.
And so, you know, overall, I never really get super excited when I hear about this type of news
because, to your point, creates damages and we're losing customers.
On this specific issue, you know, I think there is still a lot that has not been said,
but to your point, it sounded like price of work went wrong.
ADL started and exposed a bunch of position. But at the end of the day, you also had a bunch of
defy platform that were fairly unaffected. And, you know, us at Robin, we didn't really have an
issue. But I think to your point, even on the ETF side, it still impact people because suddenly
the price moves and, you know, all the ETF suddenly lost a lot of value just because something
happened in a random exchange for a very specific product.
So I just think sometimes it's one reminder for a lot of people that we need to build in a safe way and we need to make sure that we have redundancy in the system and that when something goes down, we're able to check on an alternate system.
And overall, you know, I just hope that, you know, also kind of reduce the enthusiasm for some of this like thousands.
X leverage platform that we've seen, you know, that's pretty scary sometimes when you see them for like coin that are not very liquidizer and you're like, okay, that can really damage a lot of customers.
So you're saying we're not getting 100x leverage on Robin Hood anytime soon?
Definitely not a thousand because I started a thousand, but I think for us, so we launched 7X in the in the EU.
So you can see the spread is pretty wide.
And, you know, slowly we are going to increase it as much as, you know, it's permissible by the regulation.
But I do think that some of this platform that have very small liquidity, very small usage that are offering this crazy leverage are fairly dangerous for some traders.
So, you know, as always, I tell people to exert with caution and trade, making sure that they can understand what's going on there.
How much of that behavior do you, I guess, right off to gambling or like get rich quick
or do you think that any of it, I've been sort of kicking this theory around?
Obviously, you guys have launched prediction markets and that's the future.
I think everybody agrees on that.
But it also feels like everybody's urge to speculate on everything at this point is largely
a function of their desperation in their everyday lives or inability to get ahead of
inflation and all these things. I fully believe in predictive markets. I think they're great.
I think people should be able to use their money however they want. I think it's just interesting
that there was that much leverage from that many individuals in the system taking that large
of bets. And I wonder what that tells us. Well, you know, I think so on perpetual to begin with,
I think leverage is a great function to reduce your capital and reduce your cost of capital. So I think
not everything is about gambling there and for a lot of market makers and a lot of pro
traders or advanced traders it's more of them it's more a way for them to actually
optimize their trading so so I don't think it's necessarily a gambling kind of story
there obviously the thousand eggs on small volatile assets that's a different story
you mean fart coin on a thousand X leverages I would not trade
personally this one but I think on prediction market I think it's it's it's it's
it's such a different world that it really opens and and I'm personally really
excited about it I think he you can change so much so the way that you're
trading for example like right now everyone is talking about AI taking your
job and and thing like that and so if you're a trader the only way for you to
hedge against that is to buy I don't know like Nvidia or AMD or one of his
like AI first stag.
But you also have a lot of issues that can happen there.
Like, you know, maybe Nvidia is going to have a bad quarter,
or maybe AMD is going to, I don't know, have an issue or whatever.
And so your edge against AI depends on so many factors that are not in your control.
But you could actually buy instead a contract around AI, the future of AI,
which is a lot simpler for you to understand and a lot of simpler for you to control.
And so I think it's really a key element that until now was available to a lot of hedge funds and very advanced trader that could do like all the right position to hedge against particular events, but now it's accessible to to everybody.
And you've seen it during like some of the big, you know, election, like the mayor election or the presidential election, the prediction market were actually going the right direction every time.
And I think that's really an interesting point that shows that, you know, it's going to become a new ways of looking at the news, of following the actuality and what's going on in the world.
So I'm particularly excited about it.
But it's definitely a new world that open to a lot of new doors.
Yeah, you can gamble on tomorrow's weather.
Definitely, definitely additive to 1,000x leverage on Farquaint.
I guess you can't gamble on the weather with 1,000.
next leverage though yeah you can do that but you know even for that like you can worry about the
impact of the snow on the economy and based on that uh trade accordingly so i i think you know a lot of time
we're joking about all these contracts but you you can actually find a lot of use cases that
until now you could never do that the great hedges yeah it's an incredible way for the average
person to hedge i yeah i agree with that i think predictive markets are incredible i just
under what like rampant speculation in general on everything
tells us about maybe where we're at
in a kind of grander environment,
you know, those things usually are harbingers
of bad things to come when everybody's gambling on everything.
But I don't even think we're there yet.
I think we're in the very, very early innings
of people even figuring these things out.
For sure.
And I think the interesting part is going to be the cross
between all the financial instrument that you have.
So for example, we already have people
that are trading the ETF,
of Bitcoin and the underlying and they want to collect the premium.
But I think this prediction market also opens to a new type of cross trading.
So I think overall it's an exciting development.
My personal philosophy is that we should have access to things and then we can decide with
the right understanding and knowledge to not use it because to your point, like I will not
do a thousand X on fat coin.
I don't think it's a proper investment for my for my
profile but I should have access to to it if I wanted to because I don't
understand why for so many things we limit what type of customer can can access to
to what something that I complain quite often is the accredited investor role
that basically limit who can you know invest in private equity and based on
some arbitrary rules that if you have a certain income or a million
in assets, you are able to now invest in private equity.
In the EU, they do something different where you have a knowledge assessment.
So you will basically have a few questions.
Exactly.
You say like, okay, I understand that everything can go to zero.
I understand what I'm doing, blah, blah, blah.
And you have access to it.
And so I think that's really important is we need to give education to people so that they
understand their finance is so important, especially early on, because you have to build
for retirement and everything.
And two, we need to give them access.
So we are working on two.
I hope we can figure out some of these rules
that are limiting the customer also at some point.
Yeah, at least it's being discussed now.
I think there's a broad understanding
that accredited investor rules in the United States
are largely broken, and we'll just see if they actually get changed.
I know like with 10-ish minutes left,
I want to talk about the market a bit,
because I know that you can watch earnings
of any platform and know that you could probably
look at earnings and know how the market performed for the last three months, right? Because
either people are trading and there's high volume because they're excited or we're in a
sideways or down period and nobody has money left and nothing's happening. So, A, I guess,
where do you think we're at in this market? Do you kind of view the four-year cycle as a meaningful
thing or do you think, you know, we're not beholden to that anymore? But also then, you know,
how does that affect, I guess, Robin Hood when the market is just sideways and boring?
I think there's a combination.
So, you know, if you had asked me 10 years ago, where I thought Bitcoin would be
and, you know, we will be in the 90, I will still be very happy.
Take.
Go back two years and tell me you'd be unhappy with Bitcoin near $100,000.
And I were probably not sold as much as I did in 2012 or $20.
But I think, you know, the interesting part here is that you see all these issues, you know,
there was, last weekend, there was a hack.
on one of the largest
South Korean exchange. There was also another hack on one of the
Defi contract. You also had the Japanese
changes in their rates. So
there's a lot of factor and I think people are just not really sure of
are we done yet with all these micro-environments
or micro-impacts or are we still working on it.
And so we definitely see that the markets are a bit
hesitant and you see it with a price like you just bounce between the resistance and support
but I think you know for us like I was explaining earlier like we we focus mostly on building
the tools for for customers and so we have different segment of customers the advanced
traders are still trading because they don't really care necessarily where the price is
going it's more about doing doing trades intraday or doing a week or something like that
then we have the customers that are a bit more long term that some are using the equation
to buy the dip and some people are staying away because they don't know where it's going.
And, you know, for us, the goal is just to build the tools that they can use for all of that.
So are we getting Bitcoin to a million dollars by 2026? What's up?
I, you know, like I said earlier, like if I knew how to price Bitcoin, I would have not sold
that much. I was, I always jokes with people when they're asking me, like, you know,
what is the most stupid thing you bought with Bitcoin? And I have one receipt for a domain name
that I bought for like 80 Bitcoin. And I'm like, you know, I could have done. Was it a good domain?
Like McDonald's, not on Walmart. Not even. Not even. And, you know, I started my career by doing
payments. We were thinking that Bitcoin would be the next network for payments. And so I will
demo with like multiple Bitcoin at a time to show people like, hey, this is what you should
do. And I'm sure most of his wallets have disappeared and people don't even know that it existed.
So I'm definitely not the right person to give a price prediction of Bitcoin.
So not a million by 22.
Yeah, we love a good price prediction, though.
But I'm assuming that you kind of view this as a maturing asset class and you're not that
concerned with just because it's this time of year and this year that we now have to wait
three years and go down 80%. I'm pretty detached from the four-year cycle theory at this point.
Yeah, I don't really believe in it at this point, especially for Bitcoin, with the liquid
there is. I think the art coin is more like where it is in my opinion. What a disaster, though.
They never even got the upside of this cycle. And I think, you know, that also shows that the
the class is maturing a bit, but yeah, I, you know, look at the situation, right?
How many Bitcoin ETF do we have at this point, like 11, 12, like?
Yeah, and then the most successful ETF offerings in history, right?
So I think it's hard to say that it's not a maturing asset class.
And if you think about it, you still have so many brokerage and so many platforms that
you cannot access either the crypto assets or even the ETFs.
So I think we still have a lot of room for crypto.
to become really mainstream and not just something that we talk between gigs.
Anything I might have missed before I let you go?
Anything you guys are excited about that I didn't ask about?
No, I think that was it.
That means we nailed it.
We did a good job.
You did a great job, and, you know, I said earlier, I love the suit, so.
Yeah, I'm trying to, you know, I'm trying to grow up with my audience, I guess.
It's a challenge.
And, you know, just as an aside, obviously I've been very publicly using
Robin Hood alongside the arch public algorithms and it's been an incredibly smooth experience
even with something that, you know, there's largely experimental and outside of a Robin Hood's
control. So it's been a great experience and it's been where I've been, you know, just kind
of slowly and methodically dollar cost averaging and it really is just an incredible platform.
And we have a lot of new things coming up for the API. So hopefully soon you will be able to
actually be happy with it and test even more features.
Can't wait. Thank you so much, Johan.
it thank you see you soon
