The Wolf Of All Streets - Will Bitcoin Correct or Keep Climbing? | Crypto Town Hall
Episode Date: November 11, 2024Crypto Town Hall is a daily X Spaces hosted by Scott Melker, Ran Neuner & Mario Nawfal. Every day we discuss the latest news in crypto and bring the biggest names in the space to share their insight. ... ►►TRADING ALPHA READY TO TRADE LIKE THE PROS? THE BEST TRADERS IN CRYPTO ARE RELYING ON THESE INDICATORS TO MAKE TRADES. USE CODE ‘2MONTHSOFF’ WHEN VISITING MY LINK. 👉 https://tradingalpha.io/?via=scottmelker ►► JOIN THE FREE WOLF DEN NEWSLETTER, DELIVERED EVERY WEEK DAY! 👉https://thewolfden.substack.com/ ►► OKX Sign up for an OKX Trading Account then deposit & trade to unlock mystery box rewards of up to $10,000! 👉 https://www.okx.com/join/SCOTTMELKER ►►NGRAVE This is the coldest hardware wallet in the world and the only one that I personally use. 👉https://www.ngrave.io/?sca_ref=4531319.pgXuTYJlYd ►►THE DAILY CLOSE BRAND NEW NEWSLETTER! INSTITUTIONAL GRADE INDICATORS AND DATA DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY AT THE DAILY CLOSE. TRADE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. 👉 https://www.thedailyclose.io/ ►►NORD VPN GET EXCLUSIVE NORDVPN DEAL - 40% DISCOUNT! IT’S RISK-FREE WITH NORD’S 30-DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE. PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY! 👉 https://nordvpn.com/WolfOfAllStreets Follow Scott Melker: Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottmelker Web: https://www.thewolfofallstreets.io Spotify: https://spoti.fi/30N5FDe Apple podcast: https://apple.co/3FASB2c #Bitcoin #Crypto #Trading The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and should in no way be interpreted as financial advice. This video was created for entertainment. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision. I am not a financial advisor. Nothing contained in this video constitutes or shall be construed as an offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations of an investment strategy or whether or not to "Buy," "Sell," or "Hold" an investment.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Cut off that jazzy, sweet elevator music so that we can have a conversation here about 83k all day.
Bitcoin, $83,307.94 as I'm looking at it on my screen.
Absolute rocket ship at the moment.
Wow.
Bitcoin obviously broke out from a new all-time high on uh wednesday of last week or actually i
guess technically it was wednesday it started tuesday night as the uh election results were
coming in and it has been effectively up only since that point trading right now at a new all-time high
and at a record high pushing a new high every uh basically bid in the order book. Astounding price action, seemingly surprising a
lot of people. But I think if you've been here, a lot of us certainly I personally don't go out
on limbs very often with predictions. But in March, I was extremely vocal that I thought
two things. One, that that was the high, and it was going to be six,
seven, eight months before we started to see Bitcoin break out again. That's the normal
halving cycle. It's about six months after the halving. That's when you see Bitcoin break out.
And the other one was that altcoins wouldn't move until Dogecoin started making headlines because,
in my opinion, Doge is the asset that most people are actually
underwater on. And that probably caused them the most frustration in crypto. And it's natural
human nature that when you take a look at your portfolio after a few months and all of a sudden
you're making money again or things are bouncing that you start to get excited about the asset
class again. So I think things right now lining up exceptionally well, not only for Bitcoin to continue up before
consolidating, but also for the alt season, I think that many people have been waiting for
for a very long time. I mean, we can get into the nuance of what that alt season could potentially
look like in the future. But needless to say, in the time I've been talking, Bitcoin up another
200, 300 bucks. It's still pushing. And I think many believe, obviously, that this is still on the back of the Trump victory, the Trump trade and the idea that it's going to be an absolute
crypto Coachella free for all of the United States for the next at least year and a half
before we go back into election season. We got Robbie here. Robbie.
Got to feel good. Obviously, you guys are heavily exposed across the altcoin sector to not only finally see sort of Bitcoin breaking out,
but to see this, I think, renewed interest volume, new people coming in for the first time, I would argue, in quite a while to be, you know, various sort of altcoin utility tokens, layer ones, and even across the board to some smaller projects.
Yeah, no, I would completely agree with that. And I think, as you know, Bitcoin is kind of our
macroeconomic indicator for Web3 generally. So when the price of Bitcoin is doing well,
everything kind of drafts in its tailwind. I literally just stepped out of a kind of institutional crypto lunch um and you
know everybody is quite foolish across the sector not just the bitcoin maxis obviously but you know
the salon folks and the application layer folks you name it so yeah i think it's good news all
around you know i'm just gonna say this one more time because I just find it astounding that you could have looked at a chart of almost any crypto asset, including primarily Bitcoin, and ignored every macroeconomic indicator, election, stimulus, all of it.
And it's all just following the exact same four-year cycle that it always has in the past, literally almost like to the week or day.
It's comical how much time we've spent discussing things that seemingly just play out over and
over again in the same manner.
And this is exactly when altcoins should start to move with 2025 sort of being the big year.
I mean, Robbie, I've got to think that you guys are very excited to see what comes in
the next six to seven months ahead of sort of next summer when we get those doldrums again.
I'm not sure if I heard Joe, obviously, like you're pretty,
yeah, go ahead, Robbie, please, then Joe, Robbie, then Joe.
A hundred percent. I think the most important thing now is just, you know,
a lot of us...
Robbie, we're having trouble hearing you.
I'm going to go ahead when you get a better connection.
But Joe, go ahead.
Good intro, Scott.
Yeah, no, you know, I'm not worried about all the ETFs.
I'm not worried about Michael Saylor buying the top forever
with billions of dollars of uh microstrategy i'm not worried about you know the 75 of congress
including the president of the united states being orange billed i'm really looking for bitcoin to
fill that 48 000 cme gap that that we got from attack okay um it's's incredible when you line up everything right now. It's like, in a way, you're almost a little just like speechless, right? Like we are sitting at a complete paradigm shift in the way here, Bitcoin needed to run. We needed to see maybe something like a Dogecoin or some of the other layer ones make these really big moves upwards. Dogecoin's up 100% in the last week, 95%. These are pretty sizable moves. And Dogecoin's a $20 billion asset. I'm sorry, it's a $44 billion asset now again.
So moving up from 20.
These are not small numbers.
You know, there was a post today.
I think it was someone from like Baird or someone like more TradFi that was out there talking about, you know, like, is this just still a number go up technology?
Right. go up technology right and you still have this you have millions of people that are out there
that have real capital that are going to be reintroduced to bitcoin again at the top right
and they're barely looking at it right now at 83.5 right and it's coming back and these people still
think it's for for drugs you know like like ross albert is going to be out of jail by the time
they're like this is still for drugs it It's like, no, they got,
it's just like 15 years later, you know,
by the time they're looking at this thing again.
And so the setup's unbelievable. And so, you know,
I would say if you're out there and you're a builder or you're an investor,
you know, your, your chip should be where they lay and, you know,
just put your head down and go back to building and try to make as much money
as humanly possible in this time period. And, you know,
come back to this show every day for the next year and a half.
And when we start to kind of say it's over, it's probably over.
Feels like time to turn your brain off. Right.
And I think a lot of people doubted that we would sort of get that moment.
That said, I don't think a lot of these altcoins are coming back.
Maybe, maybe I'm wrong. You don't think a lot of these altcoins are coming back maybe maybe i'm wrong
you don't you don't think they're coming back no listen i think listen there's alt seasons of the
past like you literally couldn't miss like everything went up no matter what i do think
that a lot of things that launched like last cycle are just completely dead yeah talking about
larger i'm not talking about larger tokens or whatever but i i mean first of all like if we're
launching six million meme coins in a month i I think, which was the case last April, you got to imagine 99.99
infinite nines with a line over it. You'll never have heard of those again already. And they're
never coming back. But I do think that maybe in this cycle, there will be winners or narratives
will play heavier than they did in the past. Yeah. You know, I think if Rand were here,
you know, he'd probably say like, pick your winners and losers.
It's like, I'm probably buying a Solana,
I might be selling a Phantom, right?
Like outside of Polymarket,
I'd probably be buying a Stax and selling a Polygon, right?
Like these are some of the things
where you do have to kind of pick your winners
and your losers here.
And if you are holding on to an altcoin that hasn't moved a sizable amount up with the market in this last week or so, it probably means that it's going to be a laggard.
And people have a tendency to hold on to their bags when they're down and they want to hold their losers and they want to sell their winners.
It should be the exact opposite.
You should be selling your losers and doubling down on your winners.
Bitcoin's a good example of that, where I'm sure a lot of people think, you know, 83 is
too high and I don't want to buy that again.
It's like, what?
Like, we're going to a million.
And whether or not, you know, that's happening in this cycle or the next cycle, it's happening.
So you should probably be, you know,
selling your Elizabeth Horne and, you know,
buying some more Bitcoin.
Oh, God.
I love that you brought that back.
We haven't mentioned Horne in a while,
but man, those were special days when we were talking about Elizabeth Horne.
It was a good Q1.
That was a funny Q1.
Moment in time.
Really a moment in time.
Alex and then Lloyd, I think you had your hand up.
Do you mind, Scott, if I just jump in real quick?
I just got to jump here in a few minutes.
So I'll make sure I have some quick, just real quick comments.
Extremely excited about where this market is going.
Obviously, this is something that I think a lot of the people in this room have been waiting for for some for some time. You know, dating back to 2017, though, I don't think I could possibly be more bullish on the
future of Bitcoin. I think it was mentioned by Joe that, you know, you have this very,
I would say almost a majority of members of Congress who are extremely pro Bitcoin. You
obviously have a president now who's very pro-Bitcoin. And you have nation states jumping into this game.
You also have a lot of action taking place here in the US when it comes to policy.
People should increase their bullishness, in my opinion.
This market is just getting heated up.
And there's a lot of room to move, especially with the support that we have now in the legislative
and the policy front.
There will be some very big news. I do have something in the legislative and the policy front, there will be some very big news.
I do have something in the cooking, in the kitchen, so to speak.
Scott, you know me well.
I'm always trying to work on something.
So I always have a bunch of different plates, spinning a bunch of items in the fire to be
able to present to the good Bitcoiners in this space to go make progress for you on
the legislative front.
Some major news is likely to break on Wednesday,
maybe Thursday.
And I think we're going to be very,
yeah, it's going to be U.S. news.
Or because, yeah,
because we're starting to hear about,
obviously, you know, maybe Qatar,
Qatar, Qatar, Qatar, Qatar, Qatar.
You know, we all have different bad,
depending on where you're in the United States,
you pronounce it wrong.
But, you know, hearing that they could be buying,
we're hearing a lot of rumors
of nation state adoption, right? I think a 90 year old Saudi Arabian cleric, you know,
fatwa saying Bitcoin is, you know, kosher, wrong terminology. But basically, you know,
we're seeing a lot of action also in the Middle East. Yeah, definitely. I mean, I think the news
that's going to be breaking this week is I don't think I know,
I've been working on it specifically with a lawmaker, and it's going to be coming out on Wednesday, maybe Thursday at the latest, and it'll be some pivotal news that will advance what
we are working on here in the United States. I think that on top of that, there's definitely
going to be some nation state news. I personally am aware of some nation state news, which I can't
share. I was recently in an undisclosed location late last month and early this month.
And I have been working diligently to be able to help move this forward.
I think that Bitcoin is certainly something that is going to be winning in the United States.
But I also know that Bitcoin is a global movement and we need to be making sure that we do everything possible in the political space to ensure that some of these countries, especially those in the global south, really do benefit from the
technology. So major, I think it's just going to be honestly, between now and mid 2025,
you're just going to have back to back to back like major news when it comes to government
adoption in the United States, and also abroad internationally as well. And I'm actually jumping
off here. I that's why I wanted to just say a few words, Scott, and appreciate you letting me jump in. I got to go chat with another lawmaker and
another part of the world who is very interested in pushing forward to make sure that his country
can adopt Bitcoin as well. I mean, honestly, I don't know what it was other than just maybe
the election, but things have certainly changed. The momentum for our policy work at Satoshi Action
has never been more intense.
We're getting constant inbound now from lawmakers, not only in the US, but all over the world.
Makes sense. I mean, we got our stamp of approval, right? I mean, there's zero fear of
poor legislation, maybe we'll get it, but or and certainly not of regulators at this point.
When you even have John Reed Stark, who's on this show all the time, is a huge, obviously, crypto skeptic, 20 years or more at the SEC, obviously, doing enforcement action, who effectively thought that crypto was a scam.
When you have him coming out and saying, listen, the people have spoken, the SEC needs to end its crusade against crypto, Gensler needs to resign.
I think he said, you know, up only or to the moon, sort of, or to the moon,
I guess, or something like that. But I mean, you know, these are smart people who understand that
the environment has changed regardless of their personal feelings. We have a year and a half here,
depending on, I guess, what happens in the next midterm election where crypto and Bitcoin get
to prove their worth in the United States basically unrestricted, right?
Absolutely. Huge stamp of approval. I think a lot of people are looking at it as there's this Trump victory, which certainly is a big stamp of approval. But the even bigger stamp of approval
is the fact that Bernie Moreno was able to knock out Sherrod Brown, who's the head of Senate banking
in Ohio. That was the pivotal race where we were putting all of our chips on the table. We went all in
as an industry to see if we could take out one of the most powerful anti-Bitcoin members of
Congress. And we were able to win and win big. That has sent shockwaves through Washington,
D.C. People are paying attention and they are realizing that you should not stand in the way
of Bitcoin and really honestly, crypto writ large or your entire political career could be at risk.
Now, it's one thing to take out a representative.
They are elected every two years.
It is entirely a totally different thing for a member of the Senate to be and not only a member of the Senate, a leader in the Senate to be completely removed and taken out by a single industry this way.
I haven't seen anything like this in my entire political career, really in my entire life. And so now this is going to encourage
lawmakers writ large to understand that, well, hey, if I support this industry, I can get $200
million put into my race. Not like I'm saying I'm a big fan of big money in politics, but this is
the state of the world that we live in. And now they're saying, oh, well, if I support crypto and
Bitcoin, I can get $200 million put in my race. But if I oppose it, I can also have $200 million put in against me. That's a $400 million spread. People in the Senate
are smart. And I think they're going to start paying a lot more attention to how they can
support this industry. I love that the whole civic mobile is still supportive now. Right?
Whether they like it or not, they have to be politicians and get on board or else they're
going to lose. That's exactly where we want we want exactly positioned thanks for letting me chime in scott i'll uh yeah i'll talk soon
alex then lawyered as we had you guys queued up before and then we'll jump to the others with
their hands up so yeah i'll i'll just hit a couple i guess i love points number one definitely agree
rotate out of joe boden coin back into bitcoin that's that's definitely gonna i think perform
better for you over the next little bit i think think more generally, though, when I hear a lot of talk about altcoins
and what's going to go there, it feels very much like fighting the last war mentality to me.
There will always be a substantial altcoin market because people are going to be looking for where
there is higher multiplicative upside on the thing that
they're buying into than the established stuff, right? Even in a very bulk-based scenario,
Bitcoin has 10x in it this cycle. If you think it's going to a million, I think it's probably
more in the 2 to 3x range. But there are people who are going to want those 20, 30, 40, 50 X asymmetric upsides.
And so that there's always going to be people chasing some form of the altcoin thing. I think
we'll still see greater Bitcoin dominance at 50% or higher, but there will be something new. I don't
know what the altcoin battle is going to be exactly, but I think there'll be something there
on it. And then, yeah, on the political front, I think the one thing that I'm looking
at right now is when we actually start getting material announcements here. I think what Dennis
hit on is like definitely true in terms of and actually even more so than like the Moreno race.
It's just simply the fact that every single down ballot race where crypto wasn't 54, 50 of 54, 80 of 84. I don't want to misquote it,
but it was something like where crypto money went in. It was a hundred percent hit rate until a few
of the late decisions were made, but I think there were only four where they lost. Yeah.
It's something like that. It's an absurd, like 90, 95%. Yeah. And, and yeah, fair shake one,
almost all of them. I, you know, and I give a huge shout out to the FairShake
team for finding both Democrats and Republicans. I have obviously talked on this show over and over
again how important it is to make crypto a nonpartisan issue, even if it is a political
issue. And the FairShake team, I think, did a great job finding candidates on both sides of
the aisle that they could support. And it just showed like all basically all of their candidates won. And so I think even
more than like, yes, OK, Trump spoke or whatever, and we'll get a positive. It's that I think
anyone who was kind of on the fence about crypto and was like, maybe I'll oppose it. It's just
like there's just no upside for them. And it's I don't think it's just because like hey there will be money in the race against me it's because it really did show that
like the american people don't care about this as an issue they do don't care about it as an issue
of wanting a ban like they do not want congress spending their time trying to block crypto or
ban it or anything like that and so i think that that is going to be the fundamentalist
biggest deal here um i think what we're seeing right now on the price action, it's very speculative.
Not that it's not supported by where I think ultimately everything's going.
But I think if we don't start seeing actual announcements of things, then like, you know,
I think we'll run at these levels for a little bit and then it'll drop back down until something
does.
But I think if there really are major announcements that come out in the next week or two especially because just in the crypto
world it has been you know not always the case where stuff actually gets backed up by action or
reality on it but if we see actual major announcements if we see an actual move where
like genstler steps back or where we get told who's going to be in what roles and it's looking very positive there then we really are looking at like the moon is the limit situation
and very quickly and easily breaking out well over a hundred in the next couple weeks I look
forward to the time when we back test the previous all-time high of 74,000 and people are depressed
because it's coming right when we've dropped from a level and they can't believe that Bitcoin's back to 75,000.
Lawyer, go ahead.
Yeah.
Yeah, I was just gonna say real quick,
I had a friend text me this morning.
He texted me on Saturday and said,
what should I be buying on crypto?
And I gave him a list and he was like,
yeah, I guess I missed everything.
And then I texted him again this morning.
I'm like, you do know you're not too late now.
Like go after it.
Bitcoin's up $1,000 since we started this show, currently $84,300. Lawyer, go ahead.
Yeah. So my main point's already been made, but it's worth repeating, which is that if your
favorite altcoin is not hatching a bid right now, just get rid of it and find something that is,
even if you're waiting for a dip or buying. There's no reason that an old coin shouldn't
catch a bid right now.
But something else that I've been thinking from a macro level is that I think what we should be expecting with the Trump win.
Like, I don't know if you guys saw that ice guy, the Trump's new ice guy that got on this TV and he was like, fuck your family.
You're getting out of here.
Like, I think the new virtue signaling is going to be away from that sort of like suicidal empathy and more towards,
um, you know, excellence at all costs. And so if you can imagine America where they're no longer
balancing that and pushing for excellence, it's great. It's going to look like an Elon world and
a lot of companies are going to do very well, but with that virtue signaling, you may see a lot of,
um, anyone who relies on a bailout, anyone who relied on the sort of murky nature of the financial world might be in a lot of trouble.
And some of this may sort of bleed into crypto.
I don't mean to say that it's disastrous and may not be, but I think, you know, they may let things get destroyed, not necessarily in the name of anything else, but these new sort of shibboleths of, you know, we don't care.
Fuck you.
Excellence or be gone.
So I don't know what that means, but I think it's something to look at.
Douglas and Simon.
He's cool.
Yeah.
I was just going to follow up on your mention about.
Oh, can you hear me?
Douglas.
Yeah.
I was just saying, I said Douglas and Simon, but you go ahead.
And then Douglas can jump in.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Douglas will jump in after you.
All right.
Okay.
Yeah.
I was just going to talk about, Douglas, you can jump in. Go ahead, go ahead. Douglas will jump in after you. All right, okay. Yeah, I was just going to talk about,
you mentioned that it being classified as kosher
while we're speculating on the next country.
Kosher is obviously Judaism,
but in the Muslim faith,
being actually classified as halal
is actually a really big deal
because one of the biggest problems in Islamic finance is that it's
built upon a traditional central banking system. And then the banks that sit underneath it are all
fractional reserve, which means that Riba, which is a cardinal sin, is built into the financial
system. So to actually get past the fact that Bitcoin, now that it is like acting like a commodity and savings vehicle, because the big objection was around it being, you know, a currency for gambling and whether it didn't meet any of those criteria.
But if we as we as you know, this starts to be classified more in line with a savings vehicle, a commodities vehicle,
that actually solves one of the biggest problems in Islamic finance. And so,
if we start to see now a nation state, whether it be Saudi Arabia, whether it be Qatar, whether it be UAE, who have all made moves, whether it be on the mining side or supporting the ecosystem and industry, none of that is factored into the price.
It's a big market for new financial systems to be built upon.
And also the conflicts that we're starting to finally see where people can see the power struggle between the Fed and Congress and the admin the trump administration um i think it's going to be
really highlighted because there may be a plan from the fed to lower rates than hike rates in
order to create some kind of sabotage around the trump administration and we started to see
those types of tip for tax and arguments around who controls the board and uh you know, Jerome Powell coming out and saying you
can't change it. Well, there is actually in the Fed bill, there is actually a Bitcoin strategic
reserves. There is actually a bunch of states that are looking at building their strategic reserves
and the opportunity to actually start issuing money in a different way to the federal reserve
system as that argument emerges may lead to
some of the real big games and the real big differences that bitcoin can make in the financial
system into the future um so i just wanted to put out there that uh there are much much bigger
things to still think about that aren't factored into the price of bitcoin yet. Douglas? Yeah, I had a really great conversation
with Samson Mao, who obviously runs Jan3.
And, you know, when we talk about nation states,
he seems to be right next to the button.
I did this on a podcast, Old Men, New Money,
and it's all out there.
But the reality is, you know,
everyone's been waiting.
Well, certainly the Western states
or Western countries have been waiting
for the United States to announce a Bitcoin reserve.
And it seems like they're kind of got their finger on the buy button waiting for or over
the buy button waiting for the United States to announce that.
And what we're seeing right now is possibly front running of the US announcing that.
And that's why you see the large gap up moves over this weekend is that there are some nation
states that are actually getting involved now, but they're not announcing it because see you know the large gap up moves over this weekend is that there are some nation states
that are actually getting involved now but they're not announcing it because as soon as you announce
it the price is going to go against you and so i think that you know who writes the biggest tickets
well it's nation states and it's exciting for individuals to buy it and it's exciting for
mike microstrategy to buy and maybe even microsoft after the vote but you know is apple going to buy
is berkshire going to buy but certainly there seems to be a lot of excitement on the nation
state level and Samson had some really good comments on it I'm definitely putting Bill
chair halfway at unlikely my rating of uh probably not happen if that happens uh maybe I sell
everything actually because that could be the ultimate top signal is when Warren Buffett and
Peter Schiff have lunch together and both decide to buy Bitcoin.
That'll be maybe the dead top.
Go ahead, Dave and Tom.
Yeah, I think that if you look at it from a trading perspective, putting it on your balance sheet, it's literally the opposite, I think.
Well, I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but I think it's the opposite, i. you are now you buy it first then you announce it and
then it goes up so it goes in your favor but if you announce it before you're done the price runs
away from you and it's much more expensive and that's the kind of game theory that's going on
here the the simon mentioned something that that is absolutely important you know scott mentioned
on our show this morning that you're seeing fatwas written talking about bitcoin from influential
muslim clerics that matters uh throughout middle east money and when you consider everything that's
gone on uh understand that the origin and the reason the dollar is where it is today is because
of petrodollars so the to to not understand how important that could be is a big deal now if you're
in the u.s administration on the other hand uh they obviously can't do anything until they become they get into power but the
notion of of buying Bitcoin becomes a very interesting trade uh because you know as soon
as they do it and people know they're doing it the price goes ridiculous and and it's really
important to contextualize this move for Bitcoin.
It still is, although the Bitcoin gold ratio, you know, we talked about this morning.
I mean, my expectation is that this cycle's move might not be over until Bitcoin is substantially
higher, meaning that it starts to at least getting to half of gold's value a quarter of gold's value
right now it's not even close and so understanding and contextualizing that is is a very big deal
now as far as altcoins are concerned what you have is people taking profits from bitcoin and
plowing them in looking for that 50x and i don't want to go all max kaiser saying that everything's
to go to zero against bitcoin because i don't believe that but i do believe that it's going to go to zero against Bitcoin, because I don't believe that. But I do believe that it's important not to take it for granted that something that's a $10 billion
asset, because it always has been, will all of a sudden stay. Under this new administration,
what will end up happening is the wheat will get separated from the chaff. You will see
real economic value being able to be passed on to token holders. And that has some very major implications.
Mostly good.
But there are some coins out there and some token projects structured where token holders literally are just bag holders.
They literally get nothing.
And I think those are going to start trending downwards over the next three or four years.
In the short run, yeah, they're going to go up just like everything else is going up.
You know, it's force of nature and liquidity that trumps it but understand that the sea change that's happened
is a uh legitimization of the the entire crypto ecosystem the good parts of it and people who
want to restrain some of those those features of the system that nobody in this in this
space particularly cares about or wants to have happen.
Tom?
Yes, we can pontificate about nation state adoption, but I think really simply everyone has been caught off sides besides some of us in this room here. And you could see it very clearly
in just look at the Coinbase price today up 17%. Look at the emails we've seen from traditional allocators and RAs
that are clients that were putting in 1% to 3% position of Bitcoin in your allocation on Monday,
if you don't respond to us. There's just a huge appetite when price or narrative follows price.
And we're seeing that immediately on Bitcoin. Particularly on ETH though, you've seen this kind of rotation back in ETH, which is really
interesting. And it's primarily because ETH was the short leg of a ton of trades.
Looking at open interest data, futures data, a lot of stuff that you would say,
or people trying to put on an ETH trade and get some more leverage. Open interest on ETH is actually higher now than it was when
ETH was at 3.9K earlier this year. So the grab for upside on ETH is enormous. And you also finally
have some positive ETF inflows there. So I think altcoins, Bitcoin is going to do fantastic,
but you're going to see the majors do really, really well as well, particularly ETH tries to
get this cash flow. Someone offered me a bet recently, I think Joe Nakamoto
on Twitter, and I actually DM'd him. I just don't think he's seen it, but it's a bet I would take.
I think ETH was at basically 0.036, 0.037 versus Bitcoin. And it was basically equal money for
a single Bitcoin that ETH would outperform for the cycle. So the hard part was the nuance of
defining what the cycle
was. And of course, I don't want to make that trade publicly because then people think I'm
not a Bitcoiner and they're going to sacrifice me to the shitcoin gods or whatever. But if I'm
putting my money on something for the next six to nine months, maybe even a year, and then rotating
back into Bitcoin to the point of the max size or everything going to zero,
I would take the ETH outperforming from that level trade over the next year.
And I think it's not even close.
But I've been early on ETH in that regard anyway.
I mean, Tom, what would you think of a trade from that,
say, one year from now till November 11th?
I think it's actually pretty tough.
I do think ETH outperforms just because it's been so long. Your mic is really muscled. I think it's actually pretty tough. I do think ETH outperforms
just because it's been so long.
Your mic is really muscled.
I don't know.
Apologies.
No, I can't hear you at all.
Joe, would you take that trade while he
fixes the mic? Sorry, Scott. What was the question?
Basically
a year from now, whether the ETH Bitcoin
ratio will be higher or lower. Whether ETH will perform, because we call it six months.
I always actually would take it on six months is what I wanted going before next summer.
But which one do you think will outperform from here?
From 0.036.
It's so tough.
You know, I...
If you say two years, I'm all Bitcoin, no question.
Yeah.
It's, you know, the way I kind of think about Ethereum is all of the different layer twos and different chains that are constantly, you know, reinteracting with Ethereum.
You know, if you go to base, you know, you go to Polygon, you go to another chain, like you do tend to kind of find your way back to eat a lot of times, you know, depending on the activity that you're, you're trying to transact. And, you know, it's, it's, there's still so much value there, this latest move here,
like if this move wasn't so obvious that just happened, you know, I would say, you know,
I'm kind of on onto Bitcoin. But I mean, like, in a weird way, the market looks at market cap as like what is like
what can grow and what is like the worth here. And, you know, if Bitcoin is truly a five to
$10 trillion asset, like where does that put Ethereum? It's just a numbers game when it comes
to, you know, the percentages can move higher, right? Like Bitcoin, you know, ultimately,
like there's just a cap that things could grow into it's the same reason that people kind of chase memes and
everything else and like at a certain level like i think ethereum could potentially outperform just
because there's that mentality in the market of like oh the market cap's only 388 billion like
they're not 390 sorry just popped, but it can move up more.
Sorry,
just getting myself in order here.
Dave, you haven't
really commented as of yet.
I would actually be curious as to your thoughts on
that. I know you lean heavier to Bitcoin,
but from here,
do you think E or bitcoin outperform
in the next six months i hate six you know look i'm a long long term i think 10 years
can you not can you not hear me yeah i was kidding i said 10 years as a joke but yes we
both agree where which one wins in 10 years but go yeah i mean look the the eth narrative
is going to play out based upon something that we had originally thought, which is lots of ETF salespeople, that it's clearly a commodity and it has an advantage.
ETH lost that advantage over Solana and all the other layer ones with Trump victory.
I mean, yeah, they have it for a little bit of time, but it's a wasting asset because frankly, every one of these assets is going to become investable. And therefore,
the investability aspect of ETH is definitely lower. Now, that said, ETH has a huge advantage
in a Trump administration, which is that the large financial players, the Franklin Templetons of the
world, the Fidelities of the world, have all announced projects based upon ETH. So the demand for ETH will go up. So you have those
two cross-currents. I guess I come down on really trying to understand where the real demand driver
is going to come in. And I think that the excitement over that will probably cause a
short-term rally in ETH and that the sellers, that the supply just isn't there. So I think you
could have a short-term outperformance, but in the long run, I think it equalizes as projects
move to other chains that gain their investability over time. To be clear, I was treating the bet
strictly as a trade with a very clear point that I'd want to get back into Bitcoin at some point. Yeah, the only thing about Bitcoin and why, first of all, the downside to Bitcoin is dramatically lower.
I think that it's a reach-to-escape velocity.
And do not underestimate Dennis's work on getting states and sovereigns into Bitcoin.
Every time that happens, that's like another stair step up that is literally just a shift in the demand curve, meaning that it means higher highs.
It also means higher lows.
I don't see any of that on Ethereum.
And that is the one thing to keep in mind. So it
really depends on your macro worldview. If you think we are in a bull market for the next six
months, then I think you're right. If you think that there are going to be interesting cross
currents that are going on, then you may be wrong. So it's really, there are probably ways to
structure derivatives around that that are fascinating. I don't want to dump into it,
but I do think that those are the considerations
one has to have.
Robbie, then Simon.
Sorry to interrupt if you are talking.
Can you guys hear Robbie?
Cause I cannot, but I'll-
We should not.
If you can.
Okay.
Yeah, Robbie, I think something's going on with your mic.
So maybe I'll bring you, I'll knock you off and bring you back, bring you back up, close to, oh, there's downtime. Now let's
rely upon the developers to fix it. And I think Bitcoin is not at this stage going to be the
chain that they're going to try and build all tokenization on. So I do think as we get more
and more strategic reserves, as we get more and more people that are in the Bitcoin story,
I think there is going to be a big traditional finance play for tokenization.
Now, they're either going to do it in two ways.
They're going to try and do their own distributed ledger technology
and control the ecosystem,
or they're going to do it most likely upon Ethereum.
And I think the play is that they're waiting for the custodian to be Bank of
New York Mellon for the ETFs. And then they can take a lot of the volume away from Coinbase.
They can get more and more in the ETF. And then they approve staking into the Trump administration,
which will then give them, you know, not full control where they say this is our own chain. This is a decentralized chain, but we control the stakes. And now we're going to
build our tokenized exchange and all of our tokenized real world assets and our tokenized
bank deposits. So I still think that Ethereum is in front run to take all of that volume as a play.
I don't think it's ever going to be a strategic reserve asset.
I think it's all about control of the next financial system
and the next wave of financial products.
I agree.
Robbie, I'm trying to add you again, and I'm getting an error,
so I don't really know what's going on with the utter glitchiness today.
Dan, since we we got you here um we've obviously talked a bit about the election with you already anything changing in the last week i mean it seemed like for as far as price we've got a lot
of momentum yeah hey thanks for having me on guys um one thing a couple things uh this week's gonna
be interesting uh day after tomorrow, we have the Senate Majority
Leader race, which everybody
on Twitter is looking at right now. Obviously,
the overwhelming amount of our industry
Dan, you're breaking up as well. Is there any way you can
step to somewhere with a better signal?
You guys are hearing that too, right?
Rough morning for x yeah i
i think it might be his phone but then if you can step somewhere with a bit of better better signal
wi-fi yeah i can i can you guys hear me that's a little bit okay i was gonna say right now uh for
the senate majority reader race uh rick, John Thune, Cornyn,
whoever wins, it's going to be good for crypto.
All three of them actually are overwhelmingly supportive of our industry.
They got an A rating.
So, I mean, we're going to see other shakes out,
but keep your eye on that.
That's on Wednesday.
And then the other big event this week
is at Cantor Fitzgerald Conference.
It's this Wednesday and Thursday,
November 13th, 14th in Miami.
That'll be very, very interesting to see.
Quite a few players are speaking at that event.
I think there's going to be something coming out of it.
Keep your eye on that one too, at least for the market.
That makes sense.
What do you think, Cantor Fitzgerald?
I know this is a conversation we'll be obviously,
for those who don't know, Howard Lutnick,
who is the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald,
who famously kind of set out and said, listen, I believe in Tether, we back them. He really put
that butt to bed. But he's now one of the heads of Trump's transition teams, will be fundamentally
involved in the government and is very, very pro-Bitcoin and the head of a huge institution,
pro-crypto, I should say. Oh, yeah, that's exactly where I was going with this. I mean,
let's say he's got an enormous amount of influence on the transition team right now. Whether he himself
goes in or not remains to be seen, but he will be there. He's going to be providing a lot of
opinion. We got Saylor is going to be keynoting the lunch. A lot of big names are going to be
speaking. It's very Bitcoin heavy, but the infrastructure side, and I think the strategic
reserve concept is going to be part of the conversation. So we'll be covering that. And I think it'll be something just to keep your eye
on this week. That and then the Senate majority leader race, I think are going to be pretty
consequential for the market. Yeah. So exciting. You kind of summarized it, but of those Senate
majority candidates, is there one that would be a clear victory over others?
Well, you know, I was saying Rick Scott overwhelmingly has the support of the Bitcoiners, the crypto community.
But again, all three of them are very, very supportive of our industry.
They have an A rating.
Cornyn out of Texas, Thune out of Dakota.
I have no sense on how it's going to pull it off.
I mean, everybody wants Rick Scott, but the secret ballot really protects a lot of these.
It protects everybody's identity and how they vote.
So he seems to have most of the MAGA community backing.
I'd be happy with any, all three of them would be fine.
But Rick Scott certainly, I think, seems to have the support of most Bitcoiners. I'll just remember when Rick Scott presided over the largest healthcare fraud settlement
in United States history.
But hey, it's politics, right?
And was the least popular government, governor in the history of Florida with a 26% approval
rating.
I live in Florida.
For those who don't know, he was the CEO of Columbia HCA and they defrauded Medicare and
Medicaid, had 14 felony convictions and were
fined $1.7 billion. And then he became governor and senator. Welcome to America. Nobody even
remembers. But yeah, that's all right. That's the guy we're supporting, I guess, as the leader here.
Well, you know, it depends. Again, Texas Cornyn, he's a rock solid conservative too. And he's
always been supportive of Bitcoin in Texas. So again again i'd be happy with any one of them but i know it's become very very opinionated on twitter
crypto twitter uh i'm staying out of it but uh we're gonna we're gonna definitely know
yeah i listen i mean we know we know that uh that the environment in general has just improved
massively for the space so i think there's just a lot of nuance
as to who might be the leader, but it probably doesn't matter that much when everyone is so
sort of overtly pro-Bitcoin, or at least that's what I'm hoping. Dan, there's been this sort of
like sentiment that basically we have a year and a half, obviously, you know, midterms tend to swing
back the other way. I'm not, I know people will eviscerate me and say, how dare you think that the Democrats could ever win
anything again in history, but history generally shows that, you know, you get your like year and
a half to two years to sort of legislate on your own. And then there's some pushback because people
come back out to vote. And so do you think that we basically have carte blanche for this industry
to prove itself and try almost anything in the next sort of two years?
Is that a correct sentiment?
I mean, it seems like there's nothing in the way.
If we're going to get something done, we've got to do it in the first two years.
And honestly, the first 100 days would be great to come out strong and getting some of this legislation done.
Maybe even the lame duck, but definitely the first 100 days are going to be absolutely critical for market structure, for stable coin legislation, and then for these Senate confirmation
roles, like the confirmation of the SEC chairman, confirmation of the CFTC chairman. So the first
100 days are going to be absolutely paramount. I'm not convinced the midterms are going to be
as bad for Republicans on the Senate side, considering how good we did this last week.
It picked up a lot more seats than I think some folks expected. So there's a cushion there. But 2026 won't be a good year overall for Republicans. But I think that they still should
be able to hold the majority, even if it's by a whisker, in 2026, based off the races I'm looking
at. House is a different story. But yeah, again, the first two years, you know, especially when
it's a trifecta like this with any party, the president has the most opportunity to get things done.
Rob, are you back up? Are you working? Can we try?
Y'all can't hear Robby. Rough day for the glitches here. I'm kind of reading through the
news stories here. And there are some that I had not reviewed that are catching my attention here. I'm kind of reading through the news stories here. And there are some that I had
not reviewed that are catching my attention here. According to Bloomberg, FTX has filed a lawsuit
against Binance and its former CEO, CZ, seeking to recover approximately $1.8 billion in funds.
FTX alleges that the funds were fraudulently transferred to SPF in July 2021. Binance and
CZ obtained the funds by selling
part of their shares in FTX and the US division, approximately 20% and 18.4%. Wow. And then the
other one that just caught my eye because I hadn't actually seen the story. I just somewhat
heard the rumors about Qatar and Saudi Arabia. But David Bailey, who's often on the show,
obviously CEO of Bitcoin Magazine, one of Trump's campaign crypto aides, said that at least one country has been actively buying Bitcoin and is now
top five holder.
Qatar and Saudi Arabia may be the unnamed countries Bailey is referring to.
While he said it was not China, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Finland or Georgia, which
seemed like just he threw darts at five countries to see which ones it definitely was not.
But it seemed like this is really happening here, right?
I mean, Simon, maybe you're the best to talk to this.
We kind of spoke about it earlier,
but I mean, it would not surprise me now
to see five, 10 countries making announcements
in the next six months.
Yeah, this is geopolitical game theory.
You know, we manifested this into existence.
So let's not forget and credit to the community,
which I think we've always done at Bitcoin.
We've been given this technology
and really leading up to Bitcoin 2024.
And I think it's right to talk about David Bailey
because it is his conference.
And he did manifest that.
And Dennis Porter's work and everyone in the community.
So I do think this whole strategic reserve asset was something that we said was
going to exist. We played into the needs of the US election. And then they realized that actually,
yes, this is a strategic block. And it worked from, I do believe, to some
degree, started his allegiance with our industry, Bitcoin 2024, and then just became the clear
winner in terms of pro-innovation and deregulation. And so I think this is a great example of how the Bitcoin community used that and that set in a
chain of events when Michael Saylor presented the opportunity which clearly he was presenting to
either America or Saudi Arabia or Qatar saying front run this they were probably already working
on it but you know the vision was set and El Salvador set the model.
And so we've created that environment.
Now, there is no way that you cannot be involved in Bitcoin as a country if you are paying attention right now.
And the asymmetric bet that we all bet upon is there, which is that the upside is tremendous.
And you don't necessarily have to have a massive position in this game.
And that is the same for every country.
It would be completely irresponsible for any country not to protect themselves
by being what might become a very strategic reserve asset for all countries and central banks.
And the most important thing
is actually doing it as treasury. This is the bit that most people may not understand.
By governments acquiring it, many people like America have an independent central banking
system, which is privately controlled, and then a government. And sometimes into the future, those two interests do not align
in any way, and especially as national debt increases. So the ability for these governments
to actually have a tool where they can make themselves independent from a central bank
that's a member of the Bank for International Settlements, they actually get the opportunity to radically reform their
monetary system.
And if we end up in some kind of Black Swan war event, you know, these strategic reserves,
I think, are a national security thing.
So it's very, very irresponsible for a country not building a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
It's an obvious one. And I think that they're all
racing to do it. What a world. I mean, absolutely crazy that this is actually where we are in 2024.
And I do think that we're also going to see more companies. Do you think that
Microsoft obviously has their vote soon on whether to buy or add Bitcoin.
Do you think or does anyone think that the election could possibly actually sway that in the right direction?
Because I think there's been consensus that there's no way that actually happens, but it's a great news story.
Does anybody have thoughts on that?
I think the question is, I haven't looked at the shareholder table.
I know BlackRock's up there and Fidelity's
there.
But if Berkshire Hathaway there, I
think this is a really political question.
I mean, does the small investor have
any real say in this or is it
just net or is it a game of
take the top five investors,
top ten investors and what's
their opinion, which will determine whether it happens
or not. I don't know if anyone's looked at all the shareholders
dave your speech yeah i i think that you know if the stories of bill gates reaching out to try to
you know make nice with trump you know i don't know what balmer is thinking but i mean
honestly you know that's really the question it feels feels like a tremendous long shot from a Microsoft perspective, although to be blunt, I think it would be probably the right move.
And I'm pretty sure that the board vote is to study it, not to actually adopt it immediately, in which case I think that it would be – it's definitely a good move to study it, but it would be a bigger deal. The far more likely scenario is companies who have cash balances that are in industries that throw off cash,
where they have a question of putting it on their balance sheet or buying back stock to goose their stock price.
I mean, the success of MicroStrategy is not going to be ignored.
And I think that you'll see more and more of those,
and that's going to be like a snowball rolling down a hill before it gets to the Apples and
the Microsofts, you know, the mega, the absolute mega caps of the world. I mean, I could be wrong.
I mean, God knows if a mega cap did it, then that's a very big deal. But I'm sorry.
I mean, Apple should be the leader, right? I mean, Tim Cook is a Bitcoin holder. We know that. Yeah, right. And a lot of companies are like, look, you know, a lot of companies are like,
well, you know, I shouldn't let my personal opinions get into treasury. But Bitcoin to
the downside has been de-risked substantively in the upside, where, you know, look, I think that my call for 240 this cycle may be too conservative
if some of these things happen. And that's the kind of thing that could get animal spirits moving.
But right now, we're at 85,000. And there really isn't that much in the way of animal spirits. I
know that seems crazy. But it's true. I mean, this is like substantive buying. And, you know,
we talked about why that is this morning. So, you know, we haven't gotten to the animal spirits phase. I'm not sure when we'll get there.
When Doge hits 75 cents. When Doge hits 75 cents.
Well, Doge is hitting 32 cents as we speak. We're very, very close to it. So, I mean,
it's certainly moving. I mean, it's a crazy thing to think of. But you think of what we've listed,
everything Simon said is accurate in terms of company,
about game theory.
I mean, the last thing you want to be in game theory is the last to a party, right?
And, you know, there are a lot of people and that's where FOMO comes in.
I mean, FOMO for individual investors is one thing.
FOMO for nation states or corporate treasuries is a completely different kettle of fish.
So, you know, to me, it's a very,
this asymmetric bet can't last forever, right? And when we talk about it, we're talking about,
you know, a 10x from here, you know, at a minimum to be, you know, considered a global reserve asset
rivaling gold. So that's an asymmetric bet that is very hard to ignore for people who are doing
Treasury management because it has a signaling aspect of it. Never forget Long Island
blockchain from Long Island ISD and what that did. This has
much more staying power, in my opinion.
Dave Tao.
What's up, man? I was just going to comment on the long shot
on Microsoft.
I don't think, even though they can vote as they wish, the large asset managers, they have too much fiduciary obligation to their intern shareholders through whatever ETFs they have, whatever other financial products they've sold.
That includes Microsoft stock.
And I think it would be hard for them to go out there and say, you know, go out on a limb and vote for the initiative.
Interesting if any of the shareholder advisory firms would say something cavalier about this
proposal, like ISS, go ahead and support the investment in Bitcoin. But
my guess is, is that it's, it's the risk reward on this one is just not there for them. You know,
if you want Bitcoin, go ahead and invest in Bitcoin, don't invest in Microsoft because it is a Bitcoin holder. And it's a great
event that is happening. It is coming from a party that is not necessarily part of the mainstream.
So like everything else, it'll start at the fringe. Eventually, it'll make its way, you know, to more, you know, acceptable and more, you know, powerful
shareholders and shareholder related groups. But I just don't think this is the point of win
for Bitcoin making its way onto corporate balance sheets. Simon, you disagree?
No, I just wanted to, you know, I'm not sure. I think you'd, yeah, we'll see where that one goes.
I think that was all useful information. But one thing I did want to point out and just observe
that is happening just on the Spaces side is obviously, you know, David hosts the TradFi traditional finance space
in the morning, which I come to when I can as well. But more and more of the TradFi
conversation seems to be consumed by Bitcoin and crypto. And more and more of the TradFi people
seem to be joining these spaces as well.
So we seem to really be hitting this emergence
where the crypto, what was a fringe space or the Bitcoin space,
is suddenly intersecting a lot more with traditional finance.
And at some point, it just seems like it's all going to be one thing and an asset class.
It's just an observation from the journey that we've all been together, just covering these spaces.
Yeah, I think we're there as far as it being an asset class.
If there was any doubt, I think now that we've had this election, it's very clear.
But I mean, it's been four or five years now that I think, you know, Bitcoin and Ethereum have been tickers on CNBC and Fox Business and have been a part of almost every show.
So I absolutely think you're right. Go ahead, Dave.
Yeah, there's one point that I made this morning that I think is on your show, Scott, that the SEC and FINRA have blocked all the thousands of broker-dealers in the country from offering crypto trading services through their broker-dealers.
The technical term with that would be non-securities trading, just like they offer futures.
So none of those broker-dealers have been able to do it.
Robinhood went to the extraordinary lengths of creating a completely separate subsidiary
that was an affiliate that had nothing to do with the broker-dealer.
But that's a very expensive proposition for every mid-tier broker-dealer out there because of compliance
and lots of other reasons. That policy is almost certain to end in January. And that basically
means that you have the real sales forces and you have the gear up to be able to offer these
trading services to the entire broker-dealer network.
So when you talk about TradFi getting into crypto, that turbocharges it. And I can tell you,
I can't, you know, a bunch of them were, you know, were under NDA or conferences. There are
lots of firms on the buy side as well, even on the hedge fund community as well, that have been
waiting for that in order to, you know, commit to crypto as a legitimate asset class.
So this is a very big deal that extends beyond Bitcoin.
And that hasn't even happened yet because that can't happen until FINRA changes their policies.
Scott, you got to remember, too, the banks can't hold Bitcoin without it being a liability still.
I mean, we're sitting at such a...
Yeah, why now it can?
Yeah. Right. bitcoin without it being a liability still i mean we're we're sitting at such a moment right so but like what happens when you know the larger banks can do that or a lot of these kind of regional banks and someone could just kind of just like on zell you know move a little bit of
money around they can just move money from their checking you know from checking to bitcoin by
fifty dollars you know a week and that stuff starts to hit like actual checking account apps
is pretty interesting.
And then a little bit like more of a darker scenario
is these boomers are aging out, right?
And when the millennial generation gets in
and they are the potential CFO of regional bank XYZ,
they're not going to dip their toes in a Dogecoin too,
right? Like, these are the assets that these kids like grew up on. And so I just think that that
future also is incredibly bright. And, you know, we're, I think we're just very lucky,
even in 2024, to be sitting where we are today. And the shift that's going to happen over the
next couple of years, it's like, I think a lot of us weren't counting on this shifting, you know, maybe for
another like decade. So it's moving way quicker than I think that a lot of us thought.
Amazing. Well, guys, unfortunately, I could talk all day, but I got to wrap. It's been an hour.
We're here at 1115am. We'll be back obviously tomorrow morning at 1015am Eastern Standard Time.
Bitcoin, by the way, started I think think, to show at $83,300.
It's about to hit $85,000.
Absolutely flying at the moment.
We're at $84,860 and rising.
We will see you guys tomorrow.
Thanks so much to all of our guests, everybody in the audience.
Follow them because they're amazing.
And we'll see probably most of you tomorrow.
Later.