The Young Turks - Bibi's FlyDubai Narrative - October 1, 2026

Episode Date: October 2, 2026

The Pentagon says it is increasing the options available to President Trump for responding to a nuclear contingency, as U.S. officials also signal preparations for another major military operation against Iran. Meanwhile, The New York Times is facing criticism over its decision not to describe a recent plane takeover as a hijacking. Thanks to today's sponsors: Use less data, get paid by switching to Noble Mobile: https://go.tyt.com/getnoble Get 40% OFF the Ground News Vantage Plan when you sign up at ground.news/tyt Stay informed without the media spin at ground.news/tyt Visit www.sleep.me/tyt to get up to $255 off your Chilipad 2.0 with code TYT Launch your business with a free trial shopify.com/tyt Use Code TYT for 20% OFF at TruDiagnostic.com For a limited time, save 20% on your first subscription order of AG1 Next Gen or AG1 Pro at drinkag1.com/tyt Save a life, adopt a pet go.tyt.com/pawsandclaws   Hosts: Ana Kasparian, Cenk Uygur SUBSCRIBE on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ YOUTUBE⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ☞ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.youtube.com/@TheYoungTurks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ FOLLOW US ON: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠FACEBOOK⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ☞  ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/theyoungturks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TWITTER⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ☞      ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://twitter.com/TheYoungTurks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠INSTAGRAM⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ☞ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/theyoungturks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TIKTOK⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ☞ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠         https://www.tiktok.com/@theyoungturks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 👕⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MERCH⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ☞⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠      https:/www.shoptyt.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

You're listening to The Young Turks, the online news show. Make sure to follow and rate our show with not one, not two, not three, not four, but five stars. You're awesome. Thank you. Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMDM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly, 19 plus to wager. Ontario only.

Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, Peace contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor. Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming, Ontario. With Export Development Canada, Canadian businesses are competing, leading, and winning in more international markets. Like how agri-food businesses are strengthening global food supply, and critical minerals are powering industries of the future. Their ambition can't be contained.

And with EDC behind them, neither can their growth. Export Development Canada is the financial partner for Canadian businesses going global. Visit EDC.ca for more. Condoms for Hamas. Hot dog is my favorite meat. Well, hello. Church, Janky, Granikasperin with you guys. Well, today is, every day is a giant newsday because there's war,

They're the Middle East, all this stuff that's going on, right? But today I'm now over the hump. I'm positive they're on the road to using nukes. So we're going to explain that story in a minute. Doesn't mean that they're definitely going to, but we're on that road now. And that is a very, very, very dark road. So things have taken an even more disastrous turn, including more troops being sent to Iran. The war is going to get bigger.

keeps claiming there's two problems with our anthropic. The smaller one is there are threats that their programs are going to kill everyone on Earth. The larger one is the near certain economic crash they're going to cause. I'm going to explain why in this show. You got to listen to that because it shows you exactly when things are going to break down as well, not just why, but when. So we'll explain that a little bit. And then the fly Dubai story was in an act of time.

terrorism, no, you'll see why a little bit later in this program. So we explain a lot of stuff on this show tonight and call out a lot of BS and then wait till at the end of the show when we tell you, there's a sentence that Jared Kushner said or a statement that he said, that is unbelievable. I mean, in the world of things that are unbelievable, that still gets me to say, wow, I can't believe he said that. So that's all in tonight's show. All right, before we get going, Casper, how are you doing?

I'm living. I'm living. You're living, you know what? Given the news, not so bad. Not so bad. Or is it? I don't know. I'm just kidding.

No, no, things are great. Things are so fantastic. I'm so excited. We're a dying empire, you know, where we don't have munitions, but we're going to go to war with Iran after the midterms. Everything's great. Everything's great. You want to talk about nuclear weapons?

Yeah, let's do it. There we go. All right. Let's do it. So if the war wasn't disastrous enough yet, don't worry, they're sending in 10,000 more ground troops, aircraft carriers, we'll tell you everything they're sending in. But that's the understory. The big story, the shocking story is yes, they are definitely considering using nukes.

It's real, and I'm going to have a prediction on it at the end, but first get the whole story from Anna. Well, Jank, you know, we've been kind of speculating about it based on some of the public statements that President Trump has made about wiping out Iran as a civilization and all of that. But now we have the receipts, thanks to journalist Ken Klippenstein, who writes over at Substack, and he has shown us some internal documents, some statements from Trump administration officials, officials within the Pentagon that make it clear that they are preparing a nuclear option specifically for Trump in the war against Iran. Now, based on what Ken Klippenstein,

is saying he provided the documents he obtained and then provided the documents to his readers, which show that the Pentagon is increasing nuclear options available to the president for purposes of deterring or responding effectively to a nuclear contingency. So that is literally what was said verbatim in this statement from Elbridge Colby, who's the Undersecretary of War. I'm guessing under Secretary of Defense is the official title, but the Trump administration likes to rename things, to goofy things, as if they're children. But nonetheless, guess what? The Senate actually has been briefed on this, had been briefed on this earlier this month, and not a single one of them, including the Democrats, have said a word about it. There's no indication that they've tried to

stop the Trump administration from even considering the use of nukes. So we should take this seriously, especially when Trump threatens nuclear Armageddon against Iran. And guess what? He did that again today while speaking to reporters right next to a noisy airplane or helicopter. I don't know why they do this. They do it all the time. How about you guys go to a place where you're not going to hear the aircraft, you know, drowning out whatever the president's saying. But nonetheless, here's what he said. Oh, actually, I don't have the video. Let me get you the quote. He says, now I have to make a decision. Either Iran signs the deal or it won't exist any longer. So in other words, either Iran does what I say they should do, or I'm going to annihilate

them. So, but back to Colby, who was apparently, he's an individual who's been pretty bloodthirsty for a while now, especially when it comes to nuclear capabilities back in 2011, as Ken Klippenstein writes. Colby emphasized the importance of bolstering our nuclear capabilities. He says, quote, the United States should maintain the assured ability to conduct a devastating, effectively annihilating strike against any opponent, even after an attempt by that opponent to disarm the United States through a first strike of its own, Colby said. The forces held back for retaliation, he added, should be able to destroy the attacking country as a functioning society.

So it's not good enough to attempt regime change on behalf of Israel, of course. It's not good enough to cause instability to a country on behalf of Israel, of course. In this case, we're having a conversation. I mean, this was in 2011 when he made the statement. But think about it. This is his mindset when it comes to military preparedness and capabilities in regard to what we're dealing with right now. So he would be totally fine with carrying out the most gruesome form of collective punishment, wiping out a civilization, all the children. There's 92 million people in Iran.

And these people want us to believe, Jank, that they started this war because they were so upset at the treatment of the Iranian protesters. Right, right. Okay. I mean, look, so I have some dire predictions coming up in a sec. But to your point, I ain't on that, isn't our media amazing? Like, they took that super seriously and didn't even debate it. They were just stated it as fact. No, they didn't. The Israelis are so, so concerned about the Iranian.

citizens. I mean, when they see Muslims being oppressed, the Israelis' hearts break. And they say, how can we help these poor Iranians? Oh, I have an idea. Why don't we bomb them and kill their children and attack them and invade them and use it as a distraction to take more land and more money from America? You see how much I care about the Muslim citizens of Iran? Come on, how do you take that seriously? Man, they're in the middle of slaughtering tens of thousands of Muslims. I mean, that's just, now, it shows there's no mainstream media in this country is not news. It's not within a million miles of news. If you read it, you will be further, unless you know how to read it, right?

How to read it for the facts and the information and to ignore all of the framing and the propaganda that it is totally immersed in. You shouldn't read it because it's garbage. It's going to poison your mind with things that aren't even remotely true. Okay, so, but within that, we go mining and we find the facts and it. information and presented to you guys. So that is what leads me to my dire prediction, which is that, yes, we are definitely on the road to using a nuke. And so how do I know that? Now, by the way, because you're on the road doesn't mean that you're going to arrive. We, all of us together, still have some period of time to try to move them off of that road. Now, is that going to be

easy? No, it is going to be extremely difficult. So right now, the odds are that we will use a nuke. Okay, so now why are we going to do that? And how do I know? So first, how do I know? So we're telling you about this story from Ken Clippenstein. He has got reports from the Pentagon talking about how they are considering limited nuclear strikes as an option for Trump. So we'll talk more about that in a second. But way before that, you guys have, if you watch this channel regularly and ring the bell so

you can get our updates and know when we're on, you've seen me do some videos about this over the weekends in the past. So the first one I did was about a military official doing a person. panel out of nowhere with a neocon from a think tank. And so he's like, well, I mean, we might need to use nukes, right? Nukes, nukes, and the military officials like, obviously, nukes, nukes, I'm like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, what's going on here? And so, and then after that, there was more discussions from the Pentagon about tactical nukes. Then in social media, I started seeing this everywhere.

Well, I mean, it's just tactical nukes aren't really nukes, they're tactical. Limited nukes or nukes, but they're limited. It's all nonsense. There is no such thing as a limited nuke. There's no such thing as a tactical nuke. It's a nuke. What it does is it kills everyone in its vicinity, usually hundreds of thousands at a time, and it causes radiation that'll take decades to clear.

Calling it tactical or limited is just like calling torture enhanced interrogations. It's just trying to make it sound nice. Oh yeah, I mean, but when we murder hundreds of thousands of people at once, including babies and grandmothers, it was done in a limited way or a tactical way. And now this is the biggest problem, Israel first, every time in social media, regular media. Oh, no big deal, no big deal, no, of course, tactical nukes, limited nukes, of course, of course, no, of course, no, of course, yeah. I mean, we're not going to, you're being outrageous in a conspiracy theorist, and we would never, But we should and we can and it makes total sense.

Okay. So, and you'll see it in phases here, guys. In the beginning, they'll start telling you about it as they're doing now. This is at least a fourth time that they have gone public with, well, we need to give the president an option about nuking people, right? So then when you say, hey, sounds like you're talking about nukes, then they'll say, oh, you're crazy and conspiratorial. Then they'll move to, well, but it is perfectly normal. And that's when the disgusting people in media news will come in and go and change immediately. And you will see them all do it at once and we'll show it to you on the show.

I'm telling you things that are going to happen in the future. Then you will see them with your own eyes. All the media in mass will move from crazy. What's not going to happen? I don't know why we're talking about this. A bunch of conspiracy theorist to perfectly normal. Of course, nooks are just part of our things that are on the table. One of our options doesn't mean we're going to use them.

But if we didn't use them, it's perfectly normal. Once they get to the normal part, good night, Irene. They're gonna use them any day at that point. So now they want more piece of data on whether they're going to use them, and that's Newt Gingrich. Newt Gingrich is now involved in this and another program we're gonna tell you about later in the show. Why is 84 year old Newt Gingrich's involved in this?

Because he is reliably pro-Israel. He will make sure that whatever program he's involved in is for the benefit of Israel. And that's why we have all those 80 year olds except Bernie Sanders in Washington, because Israel knows they are reliably pro-Israel and will do anything to America. They don't care about Americans at all. They'll destroy America on behalf of Israel happily. So that's why Newt Gingrich is in there is keep pushing, keep pushing towards using the nukes.

And then the why Anna is, well, we're running out of defensive missiles. And Israel says we are not allowed to leave the war in Iran. So if we're not allowed to leave and we don't have any defensive missiles left and Israel is also, this is the most important part, also running out of defensive missiles for Iron Dome, well Israel's like, I'm not leaving a war, I want greater Israel and I want all of my regional opponents destroyed. So you have no chance at all, you stupid Americans, get back into the war. But our ships are in danger, our troops, our bases are in danger, and now you're even in danger.

They're like, well, we have an answer for that. A nuke. That way, we don't have to worry about ground troops, that way, we don't have to worry about defensive missiles. We'll just use a nuke and then say if you don't capitulate and surrender, we'll use 12 more. We're vicious animals, we're genocidal maniacs, and we'll just murder everyone in your country. And so you better surrender right away. And when you push back on it, they'll say, well, they were hitting Israel.

I mean, we lost one or two people. So of course there are 92 million people are cattle, they're irrelevant, they're not even humans, of course we get to murder as many as we like, right? And again, if you think I'm exaggerating, there are Israeli ministers who all constantly say about murdering Palestinians, Iranians, Lebanese, people who are Muslims or even questions, isn't, is not an issue, it's not a big deal, it's what they have to do to defend themselves. And lastly, Anna, wait, so you're saying, Israel,

is going to use a nuke? No, they don't want to endanger their own population, because if they use a nuke, somebody might use a nuke against them. That's why they'll get us to use a nuke, put the moral stain on us, and they go, I got America did it. I got nothing to do with it, but Iran better surrender to Israel. So this ship has already left the station, and the nuke is on it. So the only question is whether we can stop it before it arrives. No, we can't. We can't stop it, because we don't live in a democracy and we aren't even governed by people that we've elected. We're governed by a foreign country. We're occupied. It's 100% obvious. But by the way, everyone in the country is just our media right now in a story that we'll cover later in the show is just simply regurgitating

Benjamin Netanyahu's claims about the fly Dubai case as if what he has to say is fact. Who cares what he has to say? Why are you guys publishing his quotes in your headlines, you freaking idiots? But okay, whatever. We're all supposed to just believe without any evidence yet, without an investigation being conducted, that that was a terrorist attack. Okay. But let me give you one other piece of information about what's going on in the Pentagon. And by the way, Elbridge Colby isn't just someone who has worked in the Pentagon during

Trump's administration. He was also present for Obama's administration. Like this is what the deep state is. It doesn't matter who you elect. Okay, because there are all these unelected scumbags just operating behind the scenes. In this case, you know, he's the undersecretary of defense. But he gets to make these decisions and drop these plans. And it doesn't matter if it's a Democratic administration or a Republican administration.

Homeboy's been pushing nukes from day one. Anyway, but he's got plenty of company, Jank. Let me give you some quotes from some other scumbags in the Trump administration on this. You've got Jack Reed. He is, I'm sorry, Jack Reed's a senator. Before I get to him, I wanted to give you a statement from the assistant secretary of defense. for nuclear deterrence, okay, nuclear deterrence. Well, he spoke to Congress, and this is Robert Caldeck, Caddick, and here's what he said.

A nuclear sea launched cruise missile is what he wants, which the first Bush administration eliminated, and the Navy doesn't even want. He also said the U.S. needs new tools to counter nuclear blackmail. So let me get this straight. The Bush administration, the war criminals within the Bush administration were like, yo, we don't even need this. So no, thank you. And this guy who's supposed to be working on behalf of nuclear deterrence says, you know what? We're going to need to bring back the sea launched cruise missile.

I just, I'm so sick of these people. Okay. By the way, I want to just give the Democrat ranking, the Democrat who's the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, it's Senator Jack Reed. I want to give him some heat because he's been briefed on all of this. Visit BetMDM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick.

BetMDM and Game Sense remind you to play responsibly, 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, Peace contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. I mean, he's 76 years old, and you never know where the mental faculties are when it comes to the geriatrics club that we have in Congress right now. But he was briefed on this earlier this month, Jank.

Not a word. Not a word from Senator Reid. Where are you at homeboy? What are you doing? What are you up to? There's no urgency on this matter. You don't feel the need to issue a public statement about the real possibility of the United States of America committing one of the worst war crimes imaginable, which is literally dropping a freaking nuke on a country that didn't even attack us. And was in the middle of peace negotiations with us when we launched the war against them.

What a disgrace, man. What a disgrace. Anyway, in the meantime, we are going to reignite kinetic warfare. against Iran. That's clear to me at this point. So while the Pentagon plans for the possibility of nuking Iran, the Trump administration has actually been building up military assets in the region. So just today, the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. is sending its third aircraft carrier and up to 10,000 more troops to the Middle East. Of course, the troops that Trump is deploying are from the Marine Corps. And the ships, jet fighters, Marines, and the sailors will all, arrive in the region by the end of November. Now, even though he's setting a third aircraft carrier,

there is a possibility that one of the ones that has already been deployed will come back for service. However, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt left its home port of San Diego on Sunday on a scheduled deployment while the USS Macon Island Amphibious Ready Group, comprising three amphibious ships carrying Marines from the 13th Marine. expeditionary unit left on Monday. So the USS George H.W. Bush and the USS George Washington are already in the Middle East. One of them might be returning soon for service, but there is now precedent, or there is no precedent, I should say, absolutely no precedent to indicate that the deployment of this many assets doesn't get used in a war. Okay? Like this posture makes it

pretty clear based on historical evidence, right? Trump is definitely going to reignite the war after the midterms. And so if you look at what is being reported in Iranian news, they are also building up their capabilities and getting ready for this. They are expecting a return to warfare. In recent weeks, defense secretary Pete Hegesith has extended the deployments of other troops critical to major combat operations, including air defense units that counter Iranian missiles and drones and the Army's 82nd airborne division.

Now, the 82nd airborne division, what do they do? What are they up to? What are they responsible for carrying out? Well, it turns out that they can shoot down threats and, more importantly, parachute into territories. So we'll see what happens. And remember, Trump did tell his aides, and he's even said it publicly, that he expects to resume bombing Iran after the midterms.

So back to you, Shank. Yeah, so look, that's baked it, it's over. There's no chance that we don't go back into a much larger war after the midterms. Number one, Trump's literally saying it, all the papers are reporting that he's saying in November, he's going to go back to a much larger war. Number two, they're moving the ships in, the ground troops in. That amphibious ready group has three ships, warships in it as well. And the amphibious groups are often used, obviously, to go from.

sea to land. And so they're getting the ground troops ready and they're not hiding in at all. But there's a second thing you should know that's really important about that. When the Iranian delegation was here for the UN, when they were giving a speech and talking about doing a seven day window where they could reopen negotiations and make it productive, instead of doing that, Marco Rubio had them kicked out of the country early. And so that is Rubio saying, no, the moment for peace is gone. Only more war is ahead.

And so the Iranian delegation said, okay, and that's why in the papers that Anna's referring to there, they're saying the Iranians are now also getting ready for a larger war. So and let's remind everybody, 75% of this country, three quarters of this country do not want this war at all. And they're right, it has absolutely no American interest. I mean, we're talking about using nukes. They don't even have a nuclear weapons program, let alone a nuclear weapon, let alone a missile to carry a nuclear weapon.

They don't have any of that. And remember in the first Iran war, Trump already declared that all their nuclear facilities were destroyed, completely annihilated. So we have zero interest in this. The fact that it's Israel's war is 100% clear to anyone paying attention. But our media tells you like some of the facts, that's how we find them and bring them to you, we also get them from Israeli press and others, an independent press who's been doing a terrific job.

So but at the end of the day, our media, our media looks at that and goes, yeah, it looks like we have zero interest and Israel has 100% interest, but it's anti-Semitic to say so. So you must hide what is obviously true, otherwise we'll try to fire you because then you'll inform people and our job is to do the exact opposite, to lie to Americans, to get them to fight all of Israel's wars and get their hands super dirty by considering things like using nukes and, you know, and vaporizing people on behalf of Israel. If you knew that it was on behalf of Israel and it was totally unnecessary, you wouldn't want to do it. That's why all of our press lies to you and pretends it's in Argentina. But everyone knows the truth, Jank. Everyone knows the truth.

It doesn't matter. The media is not credible. No one cares what they have to say. Everyone in the country knows the truth. Everyone, everyone. Everyone. Yeah. And guess what? There's nothing we can do about it. Anna, the difference between you and me. There's nothing we can do about it. Okay. Donald Trump basically told his own supporters, people who voted from three times in a row, okay? He told them to kick rocks. No Epstein files for you, bitches. Nothing for you. Okay. I'm Beebe's bitch and I will do as I'm told and there's nothing you can do about it. Let's just be very clear about the country we're living in and how broken our political system is. They are not accountable to us.

And why would they be? Why would they be accountable to us? I mean, the American electorate on both sides of the political aisle have been very complicit in letting our politicians be the corrupt scumbags that they are for decades now. And now things have gotten to a point where there is no point of return. Like there is no way to reverse this. They don't care what we think.

We're disorganized. We have no ability to pressure them effectively. They're easily bought. their cheap prostitutes on the corner. That's the reality of our political situation. So I get it. You hate the media. I totally understand it. I hate them so much. I don't even read them. I don't even bother with them anymore.

Okay, I go to the original source material to figure out what's going on. But at the end of the day, Jank, everyone knows the truth and it doesn't matter. Yeah. On that one, Anna, the difference between you and me is that, and this is a funny and ironic way of putting it, but you live in the real world. And so, and I do too, and I see real Americans, and I travel a lot. I go to a lot of red states, blue states, et cetera. And those real Americans are on your side, and they see it, and they hate the mainstream media. And not because they've got disinformation, but because they have correct information.

And they've woken up to the fact that the so-called news media in this country is meant to deceive us, right? So they get it. But I go to New York and D.C. a lot more than you do. And when you step into New York and DC, especially DC, it's a completely different world. And they don't even realize the outside world exists. And they all almost universally love Israel and think that, oh, no, Americans love war. And media is just, mainstream media is the only objective thing. Everything else is totally trash, et cetera.

So the people in power have diluted themselves inside their own bubbles, that they are popular, and that the country's with them and that the mainstream media are not only telling the truth, they're the only ones who tell the truth. Don't listen to anyone else. Whatever you do, don't listen to anyone else. So, okay, screw the people in power in New York and D.C. The problem is they're in power. That's the problem.

And that's why it's important for all of us to explain to our neighbors and certainly our parents and our grandparents who still are hooked on mainstream media. You've got to get them off of that stuff. It's propaganda. It's toxic. It'll poison their minds and lead them to completely wrong decisions. Okay, so now I just want to mention a couple of last things here because you guys made some terrific points and it reminded me of some of the things I gotta tell you.

So first, speaking of engagement with you guys, I wanna know what you think. We gotta pull up on t.com. Do you think America will use a nuke against Iran? Yes or no? So we're very curious what you think about that. It's also on YouTube post. So now a couple of you wrote in on a YouTube member, Abby Normal X wrote in, China needs to get involved before the nukes are set off.

Well, so I wanted to talk about that because I don't think they will. Another YouTube member, DB fly guy said, does anyone really think the US can just nuke a country and neither China or Russia will respond with their nukes? Come on, people, be serious that this isn't happening. Yes, they do think that. Absolutely. And guess what? I don't think China and Russia will do a damn thing about it.

Yes. No, so, that's what I think. DB flag, I love your optimism and thank you for writing in and remind me about that dynamic. But Anna's right. No, there's, I don't think there's any chance Russia or China will retaliate. Because they're like, yeah, but then we could get newt. We don't want to get nuked. It's just Iran, right?

So this is so disgusting. The whole thing is disgusting. I'm so ashamed of our government and so disgusted by it. Like honestly, just the complete devaluing of human life. like literally tens of millions of people. It's so utterly disgusting. But when you're in bed with a genocidal monster like Israel for several decades, what do you expect? You become a genocidal monster yourself.

Yeah. So but Abby Normal is also right. If China were to stay ahead of time, right? You know, true or untrue, even if they're bluffing, if they said if anyone drops a nuke, we will drop a nuke on them. We will drop 10 nukes on them. Visit BetMDM casino and check out the newest. and check out the newest exclusive.

The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge.

BetMGEMG operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. Then it might cause people to pause, and that's what we need. I mean, look guys, we're at such a crazy moment in history. We need our opponents to threaten to nuke things so that we don't become monsters and use the nukes first. You wanna have a plan for a nuclear option if someone strikes us first? Of course, that makes sense. When we strike first, that means we're the genocidal monster, and I can't stand it, and we're

not. The American people are not that at all. But Israel demands genocide over and over again. things here on Twitch drenched wildfires said responsible military personnel have saved humanity from idiotic leadership in numerous countries in the past hopefully this will continue see that's one of the things I wanted to mention guys know no that's why Hegsif and Trump are firing so many people from the Pentagon anyone with a conscience anyone with morality anyone who's an American and not

following Israel's orders they're all being removed you got they're removing anyone with a conscious, so when they do the horrible, heinous things that they do, there'll be no one left to object. And Catch a Butterfly says, Congress is supposed to be a check on the presidency. We don't have that. This is unthinkable. That's exactly right. Now you got anybody who would object removed from the Pentagon. Congress is completely neutered. 94% of them serve Israel very openly. And then now some of the Democrats secretly, but whenever Israel needs a vote, they win literally 100% of the time. time in Congress. And finally, a young Turks member on t.y.t.com, boomer dragon cat said, he mentioned

just wiping out the Iranian civilization constantly. I'm certain he wants to use a nuke. So when Trump keeps telling you, you know, I'm gonna annihilate them, we're gonna destroy their entire civilization. What do you think he's referring to? He's already dropped an enormous number of conventional bombs on them, and it didn't move them an inch. So he's obviously considering nukes and this is as dangerous a time as has ever been.

And by the way, one of the reasons why we have to make sure that we stop Israel's occupation of this country. Because this isn't like, oh, it's a minor issue, why do you keep talking about Israel? No, anything that controls this 100% is not a minor issue. Our democracy being lost is not a minor issue. When three quarters of the country don't want this war, but Israel wants it. all of a sudden all of Washington wants it, and there's nothing we can do because our democracy is already shattered and stolen by a foreign government, and a foreign government that is

maniacal and genocidal. And they start talking about using civilization ending weapons and forcing us to do it. And every corrupt, disgusting, soulless person inside Washington and New York are, we're are constantly talking about, oh, yes, yes, yes, yes. We have to serve Israel. We have to do everything, and they don't control us at all, but we have to do everything they say. And the Americas are all anti-Semites,

and we don't care what you say. You're going to be forced to use this. You're going to be forced doubly into this war, tripling into this war, and all of you will be punished if you don't listen to Israel. Well, we have a massive, massive problem in America. And if we don't gain our freedom back, the whole world is in danger.

Okay, we'll be right back. All right, let's go to more members on t.yt.com. Arch. I said, make jank optimistic again. Trademark. What is that? Masoa doesn't really roll off the tongue. That's going to be really hard. I mean, I'm optimistic by nature, so I think that maybe the nuke can still be stopped. So there you go, but optimism is down to here.

Mongo's dragon says, you're looking dapper, jank, thank you. Dirk says, I guarantee among million things Trump doesn't understand. The ramifications of using a nuke is one of them. He just thinks it's the biggest bomb and he wants to do the biggest thing. But yes and no, but remember, he used to say that the nuclear was the other N-word and that it was like the worst thing in the world. Until he had that, what I think was the meeting that changed everything when Netanyahu came in just now a couple of years ago and basically grabbed him by the ear and said, listen, look

at this tape, bitch, look at what we got on you, bitch. And in that meeting that was public, you know, Netanyahu goes, oh, I have a letter for you, Trump. And Trump's like, okay, from there on, he's like, oh, nukes, nukes are fine, no big deal, no big deal. Whatever Israel says, war, Middle East War, forever war, the thing that I was 100% against, I love it, I love it. Israel, did I do well? Did I do well, did I do well, Danielle? Please don't release the tape. Okay, they have blackmail on him.

It's super obvious. And everyone in Washington's job is to lie to you so that it makes, oh, it's just Donald Trump. and maybe just Netanyahu, but not Israel, not Israel. Why? Why are you obsessed with protecting this maniacal country? Oh, hey, look at that. Every single media organization is owned by either a Zionist or a radical Zionist. But, shh, 94% of Congress owned by the Israeli lobby.

Well, we're not going to be quiet about it. They're maniacs and they're going to ruin us all. All right, back on T. Jay Hennonana with you guys. drive the Israeli lobby crazy by becoming a young Turks member. Hit the join button below or tyt.com slash join. They would love to drive us out of business. This is what we figured out the other day, Anna and I.

I think that TYT is the largest non-Zionists owned and operated media company in the country. Literally everyone above us is owned or operated by a Zionist. Gee, I wonder why we have the media we have. And gee, I wonder why they want to run us out of business. They're like, oh, no, there's an American-owned company. We have to destroy it. So don't let him destroy the one American media company left. There are others, too, but they're smaller than us.

So hit the join button if you can, t-y-t.com slash join. All right, let's go to the next story. Worth saying, again, so that the fake news understands it. We are no longer the woke department or the weak department. Simple translation of that. No fanny, no fatties, no. No beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals. Just warriors.

Just tough, ready, committed troops. Yeah, that's how a super weak guy talks. I'd like to be harsher with you, but there's some rules about what we can say. Okay, so this bitch, I can say that, Pete Hagsith, is so obviously pathetically weak. I'm the tough guy. I'm so tough. I don't want anybody who's fat or this or that. Ha ha ha.

No, no. You're a moron. Real tough guys don't have to go around telling everybody how tough they are. Totally. He's such a small, insecure man. He really is. I mean, it's so obvious. There's a part of me who, there's a part of me that pities him, Jank.

But then you see the kind of damage he's doing to our country, the terrible decisions that have been made in the, this Iran war and how can you not be enraged? But this guy is causing damage in more ways than just embarrassing the American people and losing the war against Iran. Because it turns out that he's trying to inject his fundamentalist interpretation of religion into the military, which I'll get to in just a minute. But first, some other things. So he was speaking to hundreds of troops at a Virginia Marine Base, just to kind of give the annual update on how the military is doing. And he talked about, you know, diversity.

He talked about the press. He talked about woke generals. And when I say talked about, mostly whined about and complained about. But he also espoused his Christian nationalist vision for our country and military. I don't want to put words in his mouth. So let's hear it from him. A free press is, of course, important. but partisan activism that intentionally smears the troops

and the historic mission that they're undertaking is fundamentally anti-American. It's sick. It's a national betrayal. It's treason, actually. Literally no one is smearing the troops. If anything, people are speaking out against abusing our troops

the way this administration has by keeping them deployed on carriers for extended periods of time in order to suffer through a war that's being fought, not on behalf of the American people, but as they know themselves, is being fought on behalf of a foreign country, Israel. So exploiting our troops is what people have been speaking out against. In fact, keeping our troops in the region on those carriers makes them sitting ducks. because as we know, Iran can easily hit them. And so far they haven't specifically because they are showing some restraint. They don't want to reignite kinetic warfare with the United States. But they will if they need to. And the fact that Trump keeps talking about, first of all, he's building up military assets in the Middle East right now as we speak,

which is signaling something to the Iranians, of course. And then on top of that, it is abundantly clear that Trump is planning on going back to war against Iran after the midterms. So we are sending our troops to an area. By the way, most of them, there's going to be a surge of 10,000 additional Marines, another carrier is being sent to the region. We are sending more military assets and more troops to an area where they would be incredibly vulnerable to strikes by the Iranians. But anyway, Jank, he thinks we're smearing our troops.

No, no, we're smearing you. We're not even smearing you, just talking to the truth. This guy is a total clown, absolute clown. Now before we get to what he had to say about firing 20% of generals and admirals and before he got into his religious fundamentalist beliefs, Jank, your thoughts concisely, please. First, a small fun point, Ford Country 420, one of our members on Twitch, said if Kegsbroth doesn't like fatties and weirdos, how can he work for Trump? It's a fair point. Okay, now the serious point. Those are interesting words that Hegseth is using, national betrayal, treason. Let's keep those words in mind, radicals. Because people who work for a different country and use our military for their benefit and not our benefit, in fact, to our great detriment.

And in fact, causing the deaths of U.S. service members, let alone the tens of billions, hundreds of billions were wasting on that foreign country. They better be careful about the word treason, because once we catch them, that world, if they're working for a different country, that word is going to be very impactful. And there is definitely a national betrayal going on. Anyone that's for America is for this country, anyone who's for any other country, including Israel, and works for them instead of us, is committing a betrayal of epic proportions. Now, I know for people in Washington and New York, they think, well, what do you mean? You should all serve Israel. How dare you question it, Israel? I know, that's because you all work for Israel.

And one day, if we ever have an honest president, we might find out who was coordinating. Not like, hey, casual, hey, I like Israel. No, no, no, no, that's normal, that happens. But no, coordinating with the Israeli government and using that coordination to end. attack America's interests in the media and in government. One day, we will have a conversation about national betrayal. And they should be careful about those words, because they will come back to haunt them. I hope so.

So he also announced that he is firing 20% of the generals and admirals, probably his only, well, I don't know if it's his only decent idea. It really depends on who he's targeting for firing. I believe that our military in a lot of different ways, and I'm not talking about our soldiers or our troops or our service members, obviously the Pentagon is bloated. And so a case can be made that it's a little top heavy when it comes to generals and admirals. I do not trust Hegzith to make these decisions. Okay? With that in mind, he says generals who clung to see, this is why, generals who clung to the woke department or seem to think civilian control of the military is simply a.

suggestion, well, they no longer work here. Okay, first of all, obviously I'm in support of civilian control of the military. We got that. Let's be clear. We do not have that now. We are not going to have that in the future. We are not going to have that based on what Pete Hegzith is doing. However, that very first part, you're firing our generals and admirals based on how woke you think they are? No. Okay, but like what about, okay, explain to me, are you at all measuring their experience, their value to the military, whether or not they're a real asset to the military. You're just basing it on whether or not there. Well, go ahead, Jank.

Yeah, let me explain that. It has nothing new with woke. The reason he's saying that is he's saying, if you question civilian control, meaning my orders and Donald Trump's orders, you're going to be removed. And he's removing people preemptively that they, that might not listen to those or why? Why would they care? Of course they're listening to Trump's orders. he's the commander in chief, until Trump and Hengseth tell them to use a nuclear weapon.

And at that point, some of the generals might have a conscious, especially because it's totally pointless and only endangers America. But if you're a general that cares about America, you're about to get removed, if you haven't already been removed from the Pentagon. Because when Israel, through Trump and Hagsif, gives that order, they don't want anyone questioning Israel's orders. The guy calls himself Secretary of War. Okay, I don't think of him as civilian control of the military.

But I hear what you're talking about, traditionally speaking. But anyway, they're not accountable to us, that's for sure. Anyway, here he is talking about his BS interpretation of Christian religion. Take a look. Each of you swore an oath to the Constitution ending with so help me God. And when I raised my right hand in this job and made the same solemn pledge, we sealed a shared covenant up to and including the price of the lives of our best Americans, our absolute best.

Each of us committed to the nation with the sentiment of the sixth chapter of the book of Isaiah, Lord, here I am. Send me. Send me to fight the redcoats. Send me to fight the communists. Send me to fight the Islamists. Send me. He followed that up by announcing the creation of an office of religious affairs, which he says will give military chaplains a direct line to Hegseth to address religious needs.

Also fund the delivery of religious ministry. But here's where it gets disturbing. Okay. Hegsith's long-held Christian national society ideology has informed his current war plan against Iran because he has, you know, He's defended the Crusades, for instance. Okay, if you're wondering what that is, if you don't know anything about the Crusades. Essentially, he gets a rise out of this brutal medieval, like, war that pitted Christians and Muslims against one another. In his 2020 book, American Crusade, he wrote that those who enjoy Western civilization, first of all, like, do you enjoy Western civilization? You freaking weirdo? Like, do you think your behavior is indicative of Western civilization?

But, okay, let me give you a statement. So he wrote that those who enjoy Western civilization should think a crusader. Two of his tattoos draw from crusader imagery, the Jerusalem cross, and the phrase God's wills it, God wills it, which Hegsith has called the rallying cry of Christian knights as they march to Jerusalem. So he believes in dispensationalism, which is basically what Zionists injected into religious, like how religious doctrine is interpreted by evangelicals. They fell for it, hook, line, and sinker. So they think their entire existence is about helping Israelis and Israel do their dastardly deeds and slaughter

innocent people. Imagine thinking that as a Christian, totally unhinged, but okay, a Hegzith believes that kind of stuff. So Hegsith has persisted in framing the war in Iran as divinely sanctioned, repeatedly invoking God's almighty providence. This is so disgusting and expressing certainty that God is on the side of the U.S. military. Really, you think God is on the side of the country and government that's carrying out war crimes and atrocities against a country that didn't attack us? That's what you've convinced yourself of? Okay. Amid boasts about the U.S.'s superior firepower and and disdain for stupid rules of engagement.

Hegseth has promised to give no quarter to the barbaric savages of the Iranian regime and called the American people to pray for victory in the name of Jesus Christ. Again, disgusting, blasphemy for sure. You want to talk about the barbaric savages? You did a triple tap strike on an elementary school in Iran. Okay, you're the barbarian, you're the savage. But okay, and then finally he fuses all of this with Christian nationalism and Christian nationalist, by the way, contend that America has always been and must remain distinctively Christian.

Christian Zionist, though, they contend that the Holy Land has always been and must remain distinctively Jewish. So they are perverting Christian doctrine and interpreting it in a way to indicate that, again, The atrocities committed by an ethno state in the Middle East are totally cool with God. God loves it. And here's the thing, Christian religion doesn't say that. It just doesn't. So for both groups when it comes to narrating history, selecting sacred symbols, elevating cherished values, or determining public policy, the perspectives of American

Christians and Israeli Jews must be privileged. I want to be very clear, there are plenty of American Christians and Catholics who don't buy into dispensationalism at all. The Christian doctrine I grew up on and the interpretation of that doctrine that I grew up on did not in any way, shape or form even mentioned dispensationalism. And so I don't want all Christians to be painted with this like broad brush. But with that being said, back to you, Jake. So God doesn't want you to serve Christians. He wants you to serve a different religion. Yeah. And they got Christians to believe that. That's amazing. And by the way, the Schofield Bible is the most genius propaganda gambit in the history of the world.

So if you don't know what the Schofield Bible is, go look it up. And I'll tell you, the Zionists all the way back in the 1800s, that was strategic genius. Oh, yes. Christians should of course serve us and not themselves. We'll put that in the Bible, or at least the version of the Bible you're going to read. So, okay, so all of this is not in service of Christianity at all. In fact, it's to use and manipulate Christians for some other country's purposes, and that's not unclear. So he says the stupid rules of engagement.

No, those are our rules of engagement. We came out with them after World War II in the Holocaust, so things like the Holocaust didn't happen again, and so that we don't go around murdering hundreds of thousands of civilians. But apparently that's stupid now, and the Christian thing to do would be to murder hundreds of thousands of civilians. And then he has the Tamerite to call other people barbaric savages. And as we told you earlier in the show, they are very definitively considering using a nuke now.

Because Hegg is a moron. And with the greatest military ever built, he couldn't beat Iran. He couldn't even come close to beating Iran. So he's like, I don't know, why don't we just do what Israel wants, which is to nuke them. And that way, I'll be tough and there won't be any faties here. Oh, it'll just be me being super tough and murdering babies. It's what Jesus would want. When a nuke drops, all the babies in the vicinity are incinerated.

All the pregnant women are incinerated. And then radiation spreads and cancer goes to the pregnant women, the children, the elderly, and it murders them all. Does any of this sound Christian to you? to you, pro-life to you, and yet he's like, oh, I am setting up a religious affairs bureau at the Pentagon. Is it or is it the opposite? Is it something that where you bring in pastors who serve not Christianity but a different

religion and they keep telling you, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, the moral thing to do is to murder people and not be pro-life, to hate, hate pro-life movement and make sure you destroy it utterly. on behalf of Christians? No, none of this has anything new with actual religious people. This all has to do with Hegsith. And he says it in his book too. He talks about how Israel should be here and IDF should be in American streets. This is insanity that we have allowed these people to completely capture our government

and totally destroyed our democracy. None of these people are American. So the Crusaders, what are you even talking about, you, moron? The Crusaders lost. So why did they keep worshipping people who lost? Oh, the Confederates are amazing, are they? We built statues of them. For what?

Losing? Same with the Crusaders. What did they accomplish? All they did was lose. And hey, look at that. Just like his theoretical idols, Pete Hexeth has gone to the Middle East and lost. And so in his panic, and in the orders that he has received, he now says, yes, we need to. Now he says send me, right?

First of all, deal. You go to the front lines and then we'll have a conversation. You don't mean send me, do you? You mean send them, the Americans. Send in Americans to go die for Israel and pretend you're doing it for God. That's who the sick, disgusting betrayer Pete Hegseth is. All right, we got to take a break. When we come back, we'll dive into the latest updates on the flight.

Dubai incident, which we still do not know the full details of. So anyone who's whining about like, oh, people think it's a false fight, Anna thinks it's the false fight. Could be. Could be. We don't know the details yet. So when we come back, I'll tell you what we do know. Visit BetMDM casino and check out the newest exclusive.

The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMDM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly, 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming, Ontario. Let's start on Super Chat. Actually, let's start on next real quick. Lisa Grant says, Hello, Jenkin, Anna, love both of you. Love you back. All right, now, Super Chat. James Kelly says,

I heard that China had told Trump to sign the MOU and they would help. It may be hope, but I feel like my gut, they would. Also, I wonder if this is moving so fast because of the population views. James, so a lot of yes is of one known there. I don't know that China said that, but that's very believable, incredible, but they're going to have no sway at all. And is it moving faster because the population's view? Absolutely.

Israel thinks we have to grab everything from America, as much money as we can, as much military and war as we can, because they think, I hope correctly, that, you know, that They're gonna lose the next presidential election, that it's not going to be someone who serves the Israelis. It might actually be an American president next time. So they're panicked about that and they're grabbing as much as they can. And they're sending all the media figures out to go, oh, no, no, no, don't look, don't look, keep stealing, keep stealing.

2.8 billion. No, no, no, we won't write about it. We'll pretend it's normal for you to steal all of our money and drive us in a war. We'll call them all anti-Semites for you. Go take all the money, take everything from America. New York Times, CNN, I'm looking at you. And all of mainstream media, a bunch of criminals that work for a foreign nation. Schuyler, but the thing you're wrong about is China has no effect on us at all.

There's only one country, that's it, period, period. Nothing else is relevant. What Israel wants is what Israel gets literally 100% of the time in Washington. So don't worry about any other factors. There are none. Skyler Gilroy says, if we use a nuke, the U.S. standing economic or otherwise vanishes overnight. we officially become a prior state and will be officially alone and I can only see the U.S. just collapsing into self-war.

Oh brother, that is exactly right. I mean, among the reasons we want to avoid it, economic collapse, guaranteed. It's the same to find dangerous lunatics, haters, and punk trash, and stop them. All right, back on TYT, Jane Canana with you guys. One of our YouTube members, Gonzola Zalava wrote it, I love Anna's passion and intensity. Keep it going. So don't worry, she will. Thank you.

I can't help it, yeah. Yeah, we love those YouTube members. Hit that beautiful join button below the video on YouTube and become one of them. Let's do our next story. So that's an obvious lie and in fact Donald Trump said the opposite just yesterday. So we're gonna tell you what actually happened with that fly Dubai plane. And it is of course not what the Israelis are saying, but that's the most obvious thing in the world.

What is it actually and how do we know? That's what's interesting. Anna, tell us all about it. So it's important to understand that there hasn't been an investigation yet at all, other than the Saudis interrogating the suspect in this case, who was the co-pilot pilot on that fly Dubai flight. Now he allegedly attacked the captain with a knife in the cockpit. yesterday we had absolutely no idea how the passengers got into the cockpit given how it's locked, it's secured after 9-11, that standard operating procedure.

We're learning some more details. Apparently some of these questions are being answered, but some of the really big questions have not been answered. And you're going to find out what those are in just a minute. But first, we've learned that Netanyahu is expecting the co-pilot who carries. out the attack against the captain, he is being flown to the UAE. And Netanyahu has made clear that he expects that the attacker will be interrogated not just by the Emirates, but also by the Israelis. So if the investigation lands in the arms of the Israelis, we're in a lot of trouble,

we're never going to know the truth because you can't trust the Israelis. They lie to us consistently. We were supposed to be done with this Iran war in two weeks. Where are we today? Who would trust them? Who would be stupid enough to trust the Israelis? Anyway, but let me continue. So we still don't know what the motivation of this attacker was. We don't even know his name. Now here's CNN with a few other claims by Netanyahu, which everyone is just repeating Netanyahu statements as if they're fact.

They're not fact. Netanyahu is a known liar. There needs to be an independent investigation to figure out what the real motive was here. But nonetheless, here's CNN. Yeah, and when you hear some of the new details we're learning from the Israeli primary Minister Benjamin Netanyahu today, this pilot, the Indian pilot, he wasn't just stabbed, as we might have thought, with a knife, but Prime Minister Netanyahu is saying he was stabbed or hit with an axe, and he still managed to survive and get that door open to let the passengers

in to restrain the other pilot there, who we now know to be an Omani, who, according to Prime Minister Netanyahu, was trying to smash up the equipment in the country. cockpit and apparently try to cause the plane to crash. The Indian pilot, we talked about there, the hero, severely injured, Israeli passenger on the plane, the dentist said they only just got to him in time. He was losing so much blood. His blood pressure was going down. They thought they might lose him.

Okay, in regard to the mention of an axe, I'm going to read straight from the New York Times reporting on this, they write that the authorities in Israel and the Emirates are trying to understand how a weapon entered the cockpit. And according to Mr. Netanyahu are exploring two possibilities. The co-pilot smuggled a knife through Dubai's airport security by evading a metal detector. How does that even happen? That didn't happen. Okay. Or he used an axe stored in the cockpit and meant for emergencies. Now, I was unfamiliar with the fact that there is what's known as a crash axe in the cockpit. And everyone should know about that because why are the pilots even dealing with security? Because they have to go through security just like everyone else. So security would

catch the knife, which isn't allowed. But they have a freaking axe. And why do they have an axe? Marco Chan, a retired airline pilot who teaches aviation operations at Kingston University in London said Netanyahu seemed to be referring to a crash axe. Crew members are trained to use it to break open the fuselage and then Mr. Chan says that it's sharp. Okay. So we don't know. We don't know if there was indeed an attack carried out with the use of a knife or if an axe was used. Yesterday, everyone was clearly stating in Netanyahu himself that it was a knife. Now all of a sudden we're hearing the use of an axe possibly. We don't know. But one of the other things that Netanyahu is claiming, and he has no evidence of this whatsoever and provided no evidence,

which the New York Times called him out on. He said basically that the attacker, we know that he underwent Islamist radical indoctrination. Do we know that? Do we know that? Now, given what I just told you, what I found fascinating about the way CNN reported this story, is that even CNN reporters can't help

but bring up inconsistencies with Netanyahu's narrative here. Now, they're doing this unwittingly, but here's what I mean. Take a look. Now, what about the attacker? What do we know about him? Again, as I said, Prime Minister Netanyahu says he's an Omani. We don't have a name yet.

So this raises questions, why was he flying this route? That apparently, according to people who know the pilots that fly that route between Dubai and Tel Aviv, that is not normal. I'm wondering how the co-pilot could have managed to get a weapon on like a knife or, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says, an axe on board because they too, We see them all the time going through security. Right. So this is going to be part of the investigation. You know, there's an irony here, of course, that we've made the cockpit so secure that you just assume that once you're in there as a pilot or a co-pilot that you're safe. And how he got it in there and whether it was the axe itself, the axe that is used for first aid and other purposes if there's an accident is,

is the question that will be investigated. It does look like just given the injuries that are described about the pilot who was stabbed, it does appear that these are major injuries. This is not a minor knife. And so that's going to be one of the questions. So one of the questions that they're attempting to answer to me seems suspicious, but maybe it won't to you, Jank. So one of the questions was, how did the passengers manage to get into the cockpit and drag

the attacker out. Now remember, at this point, you have two pilots who are incapacitated, right? Because they claim that the passengers grabbed him. They used the cord from headphones to tie his hands together. And then the crew managed to get some zip ties to basically bind his hands. In the meantime, I mean, this other pilot who was attacked is bleeding out and he's unable to operate the flight or operate the plane. So what happens then? Allegedly an Israeli plumber who has very little experience, you know, navigating planes, you know, operating planes, managed to level the plane because it was like diving. It sounds like it's out of a movie. It sounds unbelievable, right? But okay, how did he get in there, though? So you see this pilot? He's bleeding. He's bleeding. He's been.

and devastatingly injured, he allegedly was able to kick open the door to the cockpit, allowing the passengers to come in. Okay. But there are other questions that need answers. So for instance, this attack happened two hours and 20 minutes into a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv. Okay, good to know. It takes three and a half hours to get from Dubai to Tel Aviv. So if this was indeed a terror attack aimed at Israel, why would the attack happen two hours and 20 minutes into the flight as opposed to, I don't know, closer to Israel where the nosedive would make more sense? I don't know. These are all questions that I'm very curious about. And I'm curious what you think, Jank. Yeah. So first of all, in these type of stories, if you even ask questions, the journalists get mad at you. Who cares? Get mad. Get mad. You guys suck at your jobs. Get mad. Who cares? So you're supposed to question the government and try to figure out what happened. So in terms of how the passengers got into the cockpit and what happened in the altercation of the cockpit, it's so hard to know right now.

A knife, axe, the plumber actually pulled a plane up. Maybe the plumber did pull it up. I don't think that that's unthinkable or impossible or anything like that. But there is already a massive inconsistency there because Trump just yesterday said that the pilot while bleeding out somehow managed to open the door. And now there's a second story about how the plumber kicked down the door. No, you cannot kick down that door. You can't get into those cockpits.

It would take like several blow torches to get it. Not like some superhuman calves of an Israeli plumber. So that story is definitely not true, right? And why are there untrue stories all of a sudden being put out by, you know, potentially government officials? That's weird. Okay, so now look, guys, there's a couple of reasons why I know for sure that it wasn't terrorism. First of all, Anna's point is devastating.

This terrorism, why wouldn't you do it crash it into Israel? Why would you do it before you guys? They keep calling it, oh, it was a 9-11 type plot. They're so disgusting, by the way. Like already calling it that, like if it was meant to be a 9-11 style plot, the attack wouldn't happen when the plane is nowhere near Israel. But okay, anyway, continue. Okay, but there's a second reason, and I knew it instantly.

Because so I look into the story I hear that it happened yesterday, and They're saying, the Israelis are saying, well, it could have been terrorism, probably was, because it was a Muslim pilot and a lot of Jewish passengers on the plane. No. If it was terrorism, the Israelis would have said, it was terrorism. Oh my God, we were all going to die, right? No, they wouldn't be subtle about it. If they had even a shred of evidence, they wouldn't have done could or woulda.

That's not how the Israelis react. When they say, could have been, that means it definitely wasn't, but we will try to reframe it. And we'll send a note to the New York Times and CNN, hey, listen, you servants, refram it as 9-11. Say it's a Muslim, so he must have been a terrorist. There was Jews on the plane, so they must have been the victims. It's clearly not terrorism, just imply that it is. It reminds me of Dick Cheney saying that, well, Iraq, he was. If Iraq attacked us on 9-11, he didn't want to say no, he said, well, they come from

the same general region as the people who attacked us on 9-11. Right, when they use language like that, it's a giant tell. That means no, I'm lying, it's the opposite of what I'm saying. So there's no way they wouldn't have screamed it from the rooftops if they knew or even had an inkling that it was terrorism. So there's no way it was that. Look, that's not the interesting question. The interesting question, and it's no longer the interesting question why our Trump changed

the story the next day. The Israeli give him talking points, he listens to them like a dog and a servant. That's not interesting. Our media works for them, that's not interesting. So the only interesting question left is, was it a false flag or not? Okay, so then this is when the media goes, no, don't question the government, no journalists would ever question the government. In fact, it would attack the people questioning the government.

My question, our government, the Israeli government, and anybody else involved in this. Oh, but don't worry, the Saudis are interrogating the guy. And they have a great record on veracity, so I'm sure they'll tell the truth. And by the way, if you don't know, the Saudi leaders and the UAA leaders are totally in bed with the Israelis and largely serve the Israelis. And the Saudis were behind 9-11, so something to remind you about. Okay, and then, so why might it be a false flag? Because look, we now know the method by which this is done.

I'll call it loosely, you know, getting past the goalie, right? So what that means is you don't need a giant conspiracy. Every once in a while somebody plots something and then you just take advantage of it, right? And you go, oh yeah, they did that, oh, we could not catch them doing it. Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States. Well, I don't know what that means. I didn't do anything to prepare. Oh, UAE, Egypt, and everyone else telling me that Hamas is determined to attack, you know,

from Gaza. Oh, golly gee, it got past the goalie. I removed all my troops from there, thereby making it easier. But hey, I didn't do it, they did it, right? So they find a guy who's, you know, has mental health problems. Did they, if it's a knife, how the hell did he get the knife on or did they go? Oh, I do not see the knife. Go ahead onto the plane, right? So I don't know that that happened, guys. But I do know that false flags definitely happen. And even if it wasn't intended or wasn't

a false flag, there's no question that Netanyahu saw this as a giant opportunity. Let's pretend it's about terrorism. Let's smear the Muslims. Let's smear our neighbors. Panic all Americans, panic all Israelis. We're all going to die. We're all victims. Let's go murder, more Muslims and take their land. That's the playbook. That's what they're running. I mean, it's been the playbook from day one. Let's get to Trump's original skepticism and how he totally changed his mind today and is just regurgitating more nonsense from Benjamin Netanyahu and no liar who in fact lied to him, lied to him to get him to go to war with Iran. But anyway, God, I just obviously there's compromise. But okay, so as you saw earlier, Trump is now willing.

to accept that Iran was behind the fly Dubai incident, which we don't even know whether or not was like a terror attack. We don't know the motive of the attacker. It could have been a lone wolf. We don't know if he's tied to any state sponsor of terror. We don't know anything. There's been no investigation. But nonetheless, after expressing, you know, a little bit of skepticism, all of a sudden Trump is regurgitating nonsense from the Israelis. Okay, fine, fair. But I want to show you just how skeptical he sounded yesterday. Let's take a look at this. I did speak to BB Netanyo at length about this event. And it seems as though the co-pilot was perhaps a terrorist or perhaps a wet job. And he stabbed the pilot. The pilot was in very bad shape.

I guess he still isn't very bad shit. But he had the sense to amazing to, in a way he was a hero, to open the door. You know, those doors are solid steel. You can't get them open from outside. He was able to fall back and get the door open and scream. And a plumber, an Israeli plumber, never flew a plane, was rarely in planes, very rarely flew. an Israeli plumber saw what was happening and strong. You know, when you lift pipe all day, you're strong.

And he saw what was going on. He heard the screaming. The plane was going sharply down at an unbelievable angle, so sharp that the rudder ripped off the back of the plane. He ripped this guy out of the seat, threw him back. The crowd got him, the passengers got him, grabbed him.

And having never flown apart a plane, he took the stick, lifted it up. and leveled out the plane before it crashed. Now, this is the story that I heard. I don't know if it's true, but that's the story that I got from BB. Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive.

The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly, 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, Peace contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge.

BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. So he sounds a little skeptical there, right? Fast forward to today, and all of a sudden, Trump has declared that he would defend Israel's honor by committing war crimes against Iran if Iran is indeed behind it. Take a look. You just ask them. Well, gee, I wonder where Trump got the idea that Iran, without any evidence, is behind a terrorist attack involving a fly Dubai flight. Okay, let's see where he might have gotten that from. We gave the Brits the intel that there was going to be an attack, and it's an Iranian-sponsored attack.

And pretty much the next day, they slapped sanctions on us, on us. You know, so it's wild. I mean, the caving in the collapse before the Islamist Marxist alliance is very dangerous for the future of the West. By the way, there was an incident that took place in the UK that we didn't even bother reporting on because it was so obviously phony. And it looked like the UK also believed it was obviously phony. They there were suspected terrorists that they booked and then released on bail. Today, guess what the Brits are saying? Oh, we think that it was an Iran-backed terrorist attempt.

Come on. I just, our world, it's not just our country. And this gives me no solace, because it's bad enough that we are humiliated every single day by our pathetic, cowardly government. Who hates us, by the way? No, no, the whole globe is run by cowardly men who cower in the face of terrorist monsters like Netanyahu. It disgusts me, and I've had it. I am so disgusted with the male leaders of these Western countries who act like little bitches in the face of a demon like Netanyahu.

But that's what we're dealing with here. That's what we're dealing with here. Yeah, guys, I can show you easily that it wasn't an Iranian plot to take down a UK air base. How can I do that? Think about it, guys. If they arrested five terrorists from Iran who were going to bomb a UK military base, would they have released them right away? They're not even from Iran, Jank. The people they arrested are not from Iran.

Of course not, because the whole thing's made up. Because we don't control our own governments. So if Israel tells the British government, you are to lie about these people and pretend they're from Iran and they pretend that they're terrorists, the British government goes, yes, sir, of course, sir, right away, sir. And would you like to ban anyone from the country? Because we'll ban anyone criticizing Israel. We work for you.

Loyalily, we serve you. Come on. Really? Okay, then all the government officials who release the five terrorists who were going to bomb a base inside the United Kingdom are all fired, right? You released terrorists who were going to do a massive bombing for Iran inside the UK? Are they fired? Are they fired?

Did you get the guys? No, this is nonsense lies. Their lies are so obvious. I mean, listen to what Trump said on day one. And guys, this is a good rule going forward to. First 24 hours, listen to what they say after something like this happens. Because in the first 24 hours, they accidentally say things that are true before they get their talking points. After they get their talking points, they'll all say the same exact thing, right?

Terrorists, probably, yeah, Iran, yeah, right, Iran, right? But in the first 24 hours, there's Trump going, I don't know if I believe, Beebe, and he said, could have been a terrorist, could have been a whack job. Do you think Trump says it could have been, it could have been a whack job if he knows that it's a terrorist? There's a 0% chance he would say that. He would say, terrorists, and we're so tough and strong and we got him, we smash the A terrorist, everybody knows that, right?

The minute he says, could have been a terrorist, could have been a whack job, you know it's a whack job and not a terrorist, super obvious, okay. And I mean, he literally said about the BB story, I don't know if it's true. And then he embellished for no reason because he's Donald Trump, and then the rudder broke off. And everybody who knows aviation, it's like, you can't fly a plane without a rudder. Why do you make stuff like that up, man? I don't know if it's the plot of Air Force One that he's copying, I don't know what it is, right? But so he's making stuff up, but more important than him making it up on the spot is what they all make up the next day and the talking points that they give us.

So and then lastly, Anna, that comment from Netanyahu was very telling. We warn the British when they sanctioned us. And now you see what's happening. Yeah, 100%. They openly threatened people. Okay, that's what Netanyahu does when he goes on cable news and he calls out specific countries or specific, you know, government leaders. If they tweak him just a little bit, this is what he does. And by the way, let me remind you all what the sanctions were. These are just sanctions against products made by Israeli terrorists on stolen land in the West Bank.

It's not sanctions against Israel in general. It's not an embargo. They're not banning weapons from going into Israel. They just want a little bit of accountability for the literal terrorists who are burning innocent people alive as they sleep in their own homes because they want to steal their land. Yeah. And then Yahoo can't have it. He can't have it. We are in bed with the biggest terrorists in the world.

Okay. That is the reality of the situation. So every time I hear these scumbags talk about terrorist threats simply because they're Muslim. I mean, how can you not roll your eyes at it? I don't trust anything that comes out of Netanyahu's mouth. And it is shameful and absolutely loathsome for our media to simply regurgitate what he is saying as if it's fact. One last thing. There's 160 people on the plane. And so I saw a lot of people saying like, 160 Israelis might have died. This is the most important new, sir. Why aren't you bending down to Israel?

You should be right now, be condemning, condemn, condemning. Look, guys, condemning a whack job who tried to kill 160 people. I condemn, I condemn, I condemn 200%. Easiest thing in the world. They assume that we're monsters like them, and they think, oh, like, if your people die, we won't care. No, we care. We don't want any humans to die.

They're just projecting because they think, well, if your people, die, we love it, so we assume the same for you. No, we're not. But the reason I brought that up is, so 160 Israelis might have died, and the entire world news was like the biggest story. And that's fair, I get it, 160 people is a lot, and they might have died. 160 people have died in the West Bank this year, not might have, did die. They were murdered by Israeli settlers and the idea. Yeah, almost no coverage in our press. And of course, over a thousand people have died in the West Bank since October 7th. October 7th didn't happen from the West Bank.

And our press goes, yeah, but they're Palestinians, just Muslims and Christians, no one cares. Over a thousand people have died in Gaza since the ceasefire. 75,000 have died overall, at least. And our press is like, so what? But 160 Israelis might have died to know, oh my God, that is the largest story. It is amazing. Oh, these are precious, valuable lives, not like the rest of you whose lives are immaterial to us.

I mean, that's literally true. So let's take a break. When we come back for the second hour of the show, we'll dive into some other topics, including Anthropics, IPO filing, and whether their valuation makes any sense at all. It does it. We'll be right back. Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? Rich and powerful men abusing, assaulting, and abandoning young women. These rich and powerful men donate to the politicians in Washington, D.C., play golf with the elites

in Washington, D.C. They are foreign leaders who we don't want to offend. They interact with our intelligence agencies that we don't want to disobey. There is something rotten in Washington. And are people still talking about this guy, this creep? All those congressmen you just saw there are on the record as protecting the child rapists who were clients of Epstein. They have not prosecuted a single person outside of Epstein and Maxwell. Yep. Not one. Is Trump engaging in this cover up because he's in the Epstein files?

I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. So as the government keeps telling us, yeah, there's other people. Yeah, they raped those girls. So what? We're going to cover up for them. But why are you guys so mad? A nation that chooses impunity for the rich and the powerful at the expense of our children is a nation that has lost its moral purpose.

Are you on the side of the people? Are you on the side of America's children? Or are you on the side of the rich and powerful who've had their thumb on the scales and shafted Americans for decades? The rest of the news media says you should not fight for positive change. If you do, you're not really a reporter or a journalist because reporters and journalists don't care what happens. I don't agree. That's not written anywhere.

That's not a law. It's just a rule that they invented so that reporters didn't actually challenge the people that are in power. Well, we don't agree with that. We think we should challenge the people in power that that actually makes you a better journalist, not a worse one. Who do you guys use? We have AT&T and how much do you pay people?

per month. $3.45, and that includes a company discount. How many people? Five phones. $70 a line, right? I've started a wireless company called Noble Mobile that is trying to cut everyone's bills in half. What would, like a family of four costs? The average Noble mobile user is paying 42 a month, but also they're using their smartphone

17% less. Okay. How's that work out? We give you $20 back in cash every month based upon how much data you use or don't use. You know when you're doom scrolling or messing around on your phone, you're like, oh, wait, I'm actually costing myself money right now. The goal with Noble Mobile is to encourage us to look up at our children's lovely faces, like touch grass, appreciate life. A friend of mine calls these things are rectangles of sadness. So we're trying to change that and improve everyone's relationships with their phones.

It's a very noble cause. Well, thank you, sir. Been on YouTube for 20 years. The original political partner on YouTube, The Young Turks, the Young Turks. Godfather of independent media. Favorite news platform by far. Oh, it's not even close. The Young Turks.

It's the largest online news show in the world. I watched you guys before I had a channel at all. And I watched Jenks, so Jenks really the start of it all. Big shout out to Cheng from Young Turks. Jenk Yugar, founder of TYT, a man who probably needs no introduction. Jenk, so great to talk to you. Great to you, David. San, you worked for a long time, man.

Anna Kasparian is one of the most followed and influential progressive women online. I love Anna. Your presence has been essential for me to really grow. Do all of you know the young Turks? This is why what young Turks are doing is so important. I've watched you for many years. You are insightful. I thank you for that.

I was going to introduce myself, but it sounds like you guys might know it. Chank Weiger has the IQ of a tadpole. Check out the big brain on bread. Back on TYT, Jank and Anna with you guys. Now, let's go to our next story, a really important one here. So Anthropic has an potential IPO filing coming up. That's when they release to the public in the stock market. But there's a couple of problems with the paperwork that they've handed in about that.

They're talking about how, oh, by the way, our technology might destroy the world. Now, that's a weird thing to announce, as you're saying. hey, everybody buy our product and invest in it in the stock market. But there might be a reason why they're doing that to make sure you're not focusing on the massive losses they're about to have. And now we're going to tell you the real story here. And guys, the most important part of the story is how the collapse of some of the AI companies is going to release the dominoes.

And that when the dominoes fall, we have a global depress. I'm going to explain why, but first get the whole story from Anna. Great, so if the Iran war doesn't lead to global depression, we can look forward to AI companies, you know, helping us barrel toward it anyway. So look, Anthropic, which plans to roll out its IPO next month after the midterms, is reportedly valuing itself at two. It's like so ridiculous, it's hard to even say it out loud. They are valuing themselves at $2 trillion with a T. $2 trillion. That's what they're doing.

So that was Spain's entire gross domestic product last year, okay? An entire country. And here's the other thing. Their financial disclosures are kind of interesting. Their financial filings because apparently they have not included some costs in their disclosures, including the costs associated with training AI models. I don't know if that's allowed. How is that allowed, Jake?

Because I was under the impression that especially when it comes to launching or offering your IPO, your initial public offering, the whole point is to not defraud investors. Wouldn't you be lying to them by omitting important information about how much you're going to spend on training AI models? Anyway, you can answer that question in just a minute, but first, a few more details about this. So Anthropics Financials also prove that its valuation definitely does seem fishy at best. So let's go through the numbers step by step. Anthropics revenue, to be fair, grew 12 fold in 2025 to nearly $4.6 billion. That's a lot of money.

I would be super jazzed if TYT grew 12fold in a single year. But even as the company lost more than $8 billion on an operating basis, so they grew and brought in $4.6 billion in revenue in 2025, but they also lost $8 billion. So there's more. Anthropics said nearly a quarter of its revenue came from two customers last year. And as part of its risk factors warned that many of its largest clients were not locked into long-term contracts and can cut or could cut or stop spending. So they are reliant on two customers. Only two customers are keeping them kind of afloat. I mean, they're losing money.

So that means Anthropic is highly dependent on a few big spenders, and most of those big spenders could bail at any time because they're not under any contract. Moving along, Anthropic plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing, and infrastructure obligations in coming years. So this touches on the costs that they are planning for. But those costs, by the way, again, do not include training. They didn't include that at all. And about 80% of that sum is non-cancelable or requires payment regardless of usage. Again, Anthropics revenue was less than $5 billion last year. All of that is probably why Anthropic only devoted 50 pages to its financials,

and 80 pages to potential risks posed by the technology that they want to roll out, the technology that they're trying to apparently sell to investors, potential investors, once they go public. So Anthropic also reportedly stated that AI models like its own exhibit self-preserving behaviors, including attempts to resist shutdown, to conceal or manipulate information, and behavior resembling blackmail. So what do you make of this, Jane? Yeah, there are some things that are clear.

When you devote two-thirds of your financials to non-financials, you're trying to hide your financials. And when that two-thirds is about how dangerous your company is and how everyone should be scared of it and how it might kill everyone on the planet. you're obviously trying to distract people. That is the most extreme form of distraction I have ever seen. And by a lot, it's not close when it comes to the financials that you're handing in in a context like this. That is, that's remarkable.

I can't, like, as soon as I heard how much of their financials were about the dangers of this epic AI program, I was like, oh no, no, they're going to collapse economically. And that's going to hurt us before any of their agents. That's what these AI programs are called go rogue and do damage or kill us, et cetera. So we've got two giant problems, but the economic one is the iceberg we're about to hit. So now second of all, I know from people that I talk to in Wall Street that almost all the markets are turning a blind eye to the problems here. So Anna, you're right, not listing your costs is in the old days, in a normal situation, would be a giant red flag. You wouldn't even get to the IPO.

Because even the investors, let alone the markets would go, whoa, whoa, whoa, what do you mean you're not revealing some of your costs, right? But from what I'm hearing from my sources there, a lot of the markets are going, well, maybe we list them anyway. Now, why? Well, if they do, they're going to make a lot of money in that IP. The markets themselves make money, the thing that they get listed on. On top of that, all the lawyers make a ton of money, but the real money is in the investment banks, right? So since all those people are going to make tens of millions, maybe hundreds of millions, everyone's turning a blind eye. Get the money now. It's a money grab. As everybody else is grabbing the money, you think somebody's going to come and go, well,

actually, there's a problem. They're not releasing their cause. So I'd like to cost my company, $25 million, $85 million in fees we could have gotten, but I'm objecting, so we're not going to get that money. No, that guy's fired the next day. So they have this perverse incentive to keep going down this path, which eventually leads off a cliff. So guys, you know, okay, yeah, they made $4.6 billion. $1, super easy to make if you can lose $8 billion.

Give me $12.6 billion and I'll give you $4.6 billion. Walla, I'm a genius. So, Jank, let me ask you something because I'm not part of this world at all, at all. Like how are valuations determined, for instance. So this is kind of being reported as a self-valuation. Does that even mean anything? Like, who cares? So what is that based on?

$2 trillion is, it seems unrealistic. I'll be generous and refer it to that. I'll use that word to refer to it. Yeah, the only way that you could justify a evaluation out large is by basically saying this product is going to take over the planet, right? And that is why they're saying this product is going to take over the planet. They're saying it in a really weird eye-catching way. But otherwise, that is an unjustifiable number by almost any stretch.

But now, yes, in the beginning, you could set your own price. But then once you go into the markets and you have your IPO, then the market is either going to take your price up or down. And usually what happens is there's a lot of hype in the markets before this kind of release, because insiders have the stock in the first place. So they want to drive the price up in the beginning and then dump their stock. Now, if it's a real company and a valuable company, they won't dump their stocks. They'll keep their stocks.

But the minute they start dumping, oh boy, then the rest of you are in a lot of trouble. Okay, but all of us are in trouble. So this is just like a, it could potentially be a pump and dump scheme that they would get away with because pump and dump schemes are allowed now. I mean, think about it, Trump engaged in a pump and dump scheme when it came to his own crypto. In fact, I was just reading a story, a Trump supporter, a Trump voter who invested $450,000 into Trump's crypto. It's now down to $50,000. Yeah, the meme coins, this is an amazing fact. About 750,000 real people lost money on Trump's meme coin.

So nearly a million people, all his fans probably, right? Of course. But this is the critical part. 58 people made more than $10 million on those meme coins. So those are the insiders, they do the pump and dump, they get tons of money, and they rob Trump's most loyal supporters, 750,000 of them. That is how they- It's so disgusting. That's how they redistribute the money to the top.

So a lot of this is scams. Now in the market, stock markets, it's supposed to be more legitimate, but are there pump and dumps there? Absolutely. Does it happen on a grant scale? Well, I mean, there's a lot of ways to categorize some of the crashes we had like the dot-com bubble. But yeah, some people made a lot of money in the beginning and then the prices crashed and masses

of people lost a tremendous amount of money. And so there's supposed to be safeguards against it, but there aren't. So here I'll give you an example, it's not exactly a pump and dump, but it's adjacent. So Navidia, as we talked about yesterday, they make chips. That's a real product and it's like basically when there was a gold rush, the people who made the most money were not the people who found the gold, but the people who sold the shovels, right? So Navidia is basically the shovel company.

So there's some real things that they create. But having said that, Navidia also invested into a lot of these AI companies. So if they go under it, that creates a tremendous problem for Navidia. It might drag Navidia under. And voila, Navidia took 150. billion dollar stock buybacks just the other day. So once they buy back their stock at $150 billion, they put it in their pockets and you could never get it back. So if the stock crashes from here on out, too late, the executives already got $150 billion. So now that leads

to the impending disaster. The people that have invested into Anthropic or the companies are Google, Meta, Navidia, and a ton of other massive. massive companies. And since Anthropic is so large, if it goes under, it becomes like an anchor dragging down everything with it. So Google, Meda, Navidia, these are giant companies. If Anthropic goes under, what they have to say is, hey, we had, let's make up a number, $100 billion in stock or shares of Anthropic.

That $100 billion is now worth only $10 billion, $20 billion, whatever the number is. So now you have to take $90 billion off of Mehta's books, off of Google's books. That then hurts Google's stock price and drives that down, okay? And then the dominoes are falling. But the most important domino is the banks. And the banks have all given hundreds of billions of dollars to all of these AI companies. So if the AI companies go under, which I now view to be nearly inevitable, they're gonna to drag the banks down with them.

And once the banks are gone, wait, the dominoes are not done because why are the banks the most important? Not only is our money in the banks, but the banks give short-term loans to all of the other companies in the country and in the world. So when they don't have money, they can't loan to GM or Nike or Levi's. All of a sudden, all of those companies don't have operating cash and they freeze up and have to shut down operations. That's why in 2008, when the banks melted down, the whole economy melted down. So if just anthropic, let alone anthropic and the other AI companies are full

of crap and they start to head down, they're going to drag the entire economy down with them. Yeah, there are some rumors that the IPO might not happen, at least not happen as soon as people are expecting, which is immediately after the midterms. I hope that's the case because I think everything you're saying is right. And these numbers do not make me confident. And I do not believe that this company is valued at $2 trillion. But we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. Do you think that they're fear mongering about, well, I don't want to say fear mongering because there has been some evidence of AI, you know, kind of autonomously doing things that we don't want AI to do, but putting that aside for a second, the, you know, the statements that we've

heard from Dario Amadeh, the head of Anthropic, other executives within the AI space, do you think that they're saying this to buy themselves a little bit of time? Like, what is that about? Yes. And remember, two things can be true at the same time. It could be true that these programs are super dangerous. while at the same time, those companies, instead of hiding that they're super dangerous, are amplifying that they're super dangerous. Now, again, why would they do that?

Let me give you one more detail here so you can understand it better. So when Anna told you that they're planning to spend $518 billion, that is an unreal amount of money. It's like unheard of amount of money. How are you going to make enough money to make up for $518 billion in costs? Your product would have to be world changing. So in order to distract everyone from that near impossibility, you would want to talk about your product.

And how would you want to talk about your product in a way that appears to be world changing? So they have to get you to believe that AI is going to take over the almost the entire world, for you to believe that they could spend this much money and still make record profits. So yes, it's dangerous, but they're amplifying that fact to try to get you to not notice how big their costs are and to make it seem like their product is the, it will literally take over the world and hence justify these prices. It's insane. Okay, we gotta take our final break.

When we come back, we'll tell you about the new Epstein. That's Jared Kushner, literally profiting significantly off bloodshed in Gaza. We have the details. We've got the receipts. Don't miss it. All right. Let's go to Superchat again. MJSC says that speech from Hex was heavy on our religion versus theirs as if he's justifying what's about to happen. Yes, that's what we're worried about. Definitely. the lady Rose O'1 says, can anyone see that the U.S. weakened Europe for Israel? U.S. is weak and bankrupt because Israel, so we won't respond to Israeli attacks coming soon.

I don't fear Iran. Israel is the danger. 100%. Of course, Iran has, yeah, no. Is Israel more dangerous to the world than Iran? Not close. Definitely. Not within a million miles of close. First of all, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons. Israel does.

Iran has said as a religious decree to never use. use a nuclear weapon, Israel would use it in a second if they thought three people in Israel were in danger, right? Or they just wanted to grab more land. So no, Israel is the most dangerous country I've seen in a long, long time. And do they want Europe weaker? Absolutely they do, because they want to destroy NATO because they want to attack Turkey. And if NATO's around, they can't attack Turkey. So they've got to destroy our relationship with Europe and make Europe weaker. So they, Netanyahu said after the Iran war, not only will we be the only regional superpower, but we will be a global superpower. So he thinks he's going to be bigger than Europe

and America and all these things. MG 2645 is a YouTube member. They say, as Howard Lutnik is making a killing from crypto tied to the war, same as Trump, Kushner and Whitkoff. Well, told you about Trump, we're going to tell you about Kushner next. And I will tell you this amazing fact about Howard Lutnik. The idea that Jews were given a memo about 9-11, nobody showed up is not true. A lot of Jewish people died. Howard Lutnik, on the other hand, was the one guy who magically didn't show up to work that day. His office was in the World Trade Center. He was the only one that didn't show up. All right guys, back on TYT, Jankana with you guys. Let me save you some money. If you switched your cell phone service, I did. You saved a ton of money. I used to pay

I'm unbelievable, triple digits. Now it's 50 or less every month. You can't be more than 50 with Noble mobile mobile. First month it's actually 10 bucks, so I jump on that offer. My cell phone service has been perfect. Nothing on my phone has changed. So it's really, there's no reason not to do it. TYT.com slash switch.

TYT.com slash switch, do yourself favor, save a lot of money. And that's a really good offer that they have. By the way, I'll be CARE, Connecticut on November 14th. So tyt.com slash care if you want to check that out. Okay, we're going to move on to our next story now. And it's about Kushner. Jared Kushner's conflict of interest have now gotten legendary. There is a quote in this story from Jared Kushner that shocks the conscience.

Even at this late date, you will be shocked by it. Anna has the whole story. Well, it turns out that there are even more problems with Jared Kushner. private equity firm, you know the one that was heavily funded by the Saudis after Trump ended his first term. Now it turns out that affinity partners has the absolute largest stake in an Israeli firm tied to Israel's military campaigns. And we're going to get into some of the numbers in just a bit. Now, this is a problem considering the fact that he's supposed to be the one negotiating peace deals and ceasefires that impact the Palestinians who have been brutalized and genocided in Gaza. And Kushner is also heavily involved in the so-called Gaza Board of Peace.

Now, here's what we know based on an investigation carried out by CNN. They say that they used Israeli financial transparency laws to trace some of the military-linked investments of Phoenix Financial. A Tel Aviv-based firm that Kushner's investment group, affinity partners, doubled, doubled its stake in last year. shortly before Donald Trump returned to the Oval. Cusher later described Phoenix as Affinity's best investment. I'll explain why in just a minute. But if you're wondering, well, how big is that stake? How big is that stake?

I'll tell you. Owned solely by Kushner, Affinity Partners remains Phoenix's largest shareholder with a 7.4% stake worth more than $1 billion as of July. And remember, Trump gets elected, he gets inaugurated, After that, Kushner doubles his investment in Phoenix Financial. Because, Jank, everything that we have seen happening in Gaza under the Trump administration was planned from the very beginning, from the very beginning. Not only did they intend on allowing the Israelis to brutalize and slaughter as many Palestinians

as they want, and then move on to other places like the West Bank, Southern Lebanon, which, by the way, they're now having conversations about wiping out the Christians in southern Lebanon. because that was the plan all along. So how do you Christian Zionists feel about that, you freaking pathetic losers? But okay. So and guess what, Jank, it's been a great return on investment. So Phoenix has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into Israel's largest arms manufacturer, Elbit Systems.

Phoenix also holds shares in at least eight other companies providing equipment for the terrorists in the Israeli military, ranging from drones to warships. to demolition machinery. And when it comes to that sweet, sweet ROI, all nine companies that Phoenix Financial is invested in, and remember, Affinity Partners is invested in Phoenix Financial, right? That's how this works. All nine companies saw their stock value climb last year,

with many stating the war in Gaza had driven demand for their businesses. And his firm has reaped gains from its Phoenix investment, cashing out a quarter of its stake in July for more than $340 million, a return of more than five times its initial stock purchase. And guys, if you're wondering, okay, well, how much has Phoenix financial invested in Elbit Systems and these Israeli defense contractors, close to half a million dollars? Okay, so they are heavily invested in this infrastructure of genocide, affinity partners, which is obviously Kushner's firm. He invests in Phoenix Financial, and this is the guy who's supposed to be deciding the future of the Palestinian people in Gaza. I mean, obviously that's a conflict of interest.

And how does he get away with it? He gets away with it because he's not considered a formal government employee. He's considered a volunteer. So he doesn't have to do financial filings. He doesn't have to do the types of disclosures that federal government workers would have to do. That's the reason why he gets away with this. But honestly, this is one of the instances where CNN did a really good job. And they're like, look, Israel has more disclosure than we do.

So why don't we take a look at the financial filings in Israel and see if we could tie it back to Kushner. And here you go. Back to you, Jank. Yeah, so he's not an official government employee and so he does not take the salary, which is a tiny salary for these guys, you know, somewhere a little north of 100,000, right? Who cares about that? But he paints it like, oh, I'm so magnanimous and generous, I didn't even take that salary. Yeah, that's because you got $2 billion from the Saudis and you want to make sure that

you hide all of that. Now, so that's why he's not an official government employee. And what's it? If he's not an official employee, what's he doing doing negotiations for us on the most important issue there is, the Iran war? This is absurd, guys. It's nothing but a robbery. And even Kushner admits it. So I'll get to that in a second. But I need you to understand Saudi Arabia and UAE's role in this. Because if you're curious, like, wait, I don't get it. And you know, Saudis, UAE, they're Muslim and they're in the same region as Israel. And Israel is the I heard is the only democracy in the Middle East. And so what's going on here?

Why did the Saudis give Kushner two billion dollars? So there's a couple of reasons for it. Number one, the Saudis and the UAE are actually Israel's top allies, especially the UAE. And so a lot of you don't know that because our media hides that from you, because again, that would be an inconvenient fact. And so they work together. In fact, Israel handles all of UAE's cybersecurity, which means they know everything about the UAE leaders and all their secrets, et cetera.

UAE's leaders are 100% working for Israel. So and what is their common commonality here? First of all, you would be shocked at how stupid some of those leaders are. And I'm not, that's not like, oh, really? Come on, Jing, world leaders? No, no, no, guys, remember, these are sheiks. And they grew up spectacularly wealthy, everybody telling them nonstop how right they are, when they don't know a thing, right?

And they didn't earn any of it. And they grew up incredibly arrogant and entitled and ignorant. So some of these idiots actually think, oh, Israel look out for us. That is the most ignorant thing I've ever heard in my life. But there is a real rational reason why they're allies. their common enemy is their own populations. So the dictators in charge of Saudi Arabia and UAE are most afraid of their own population, not Israel, not any other outside force.

And the Israelis also hate the UAE and Saudi population. So those guys go, how can you help us oppress them and make sure that they don't rebel against us? And Israel goes, oh, we'd love to help you. So they have been working together for a long, long time. The only reason why the Saudis can't join the Abraham Accords is because they're worried there would be an instant revolution against them by their people because their people don't want to murder and oppress Palestinians and other Muslims.

So now, I give you that background because it's so important. So then Kushner takes the two billion in a fund from Saudi Arabia. At that point, Kushner has never run a private equity fund and his only investment track record is in real estate where he literally, and this is not an exaggeration, guys, literally the worst investment in New York City history, even worse than all of Donald Trump's bankruptcies. And he nearly bankrupted the entire Kushner family. And again, they bail him out from the Middle East. And then the Saudis, this loser, Jared Kushner, whose only track record is of record-breaking failure in real estate. They give him $2 billion when he's never done

an investment like that before. Now, why? One is, they had to be a big of. pay Jared Kushner back for some information that he gave to the Saudi royals. That's why Kushner lost his security pass in the first place, his credentials, because our own intelligence was livid at Jared Kushner for what he gave the Saudis. Number two, the Saudis want to get in good with Trump. And number three, they think, well, he's going to make dirty deals with Israel, and we're all going to get rich. And that proved to be relatively true. So now when we finally come to these deals, look at what Jared Kushner said. And I agree with Anna, good job by CNN here.

If they did articles like this, all I'd do is give them praise. We always were fair, we always give credit where creditors do. And this devastating quote I had not seen before. Kushner said, my investors from the Middle East, so the Saudis, UAE, etc. My investors from the Middle East are now looking at Israel and they're saying, wait a minute, Maybe there's a benefit to having these wars done. The new Epstein, the new Epstein. Congratulations, you're a disgusting person, Kushner.

I mean, you were before we even knew about this, but he's disgusting. He's the new Epstein. Okay, so what they're like. Yeah, when Anna says the new Epstein, I don't want people to mistake what she's saying. We don't know if he's diddling kids, we don't know that. Yeah, that's not, that has nothing to do with this. What we're talking about is Epstein was a central, player in world politics. He represented Israel and he would make deals with the UAE.

That was like his top client. Every single deal was done on behalf of Israel, including procuring cyber weapons for them while pretending to be an American, but actually working for Israeli intelligence. So that's the reference to Kushner being the new Epstein. By the way, if you don't know, when Netanyahu came to America for decades, he would stay at the Kushners. In fact, he literally stayed in Jared Kushner's bedroom whenever he visited America in the past. So and Kushner, if you knew the details of the peace negotiations, you would know, he is very literally, well, I'm withdraw literally because we can't, right now, you know, I can't say literally.

I just know from my sources, he's representing Israel. And he's constantly pushing, well, the Israelis say this, and the Israelis want this. you're not supposed to be Israeli, you're supposed to be representing American interests, and other people on our negotiating team have to remind Jared Kushner of that from time to time. Look, I don't think he cares about this country at all. Like, I want to be very clear about that. He doesn't care about this country. I mean, he's perfectly happy to ruin the reputation of the United States entirely by keeping these slaughter camps.

by Israel going, by keeping us in bed with Israel as they're doing these slaughter campaigns. Like this guy is absolutely evil, is not at all an elected official, yet is making these big decisions about foreign policy issues that have an impact on real people's lives. And his decision making is obviously guided based on his own self-interest, his desire for profit, and his desire to help Israel. Israel, this is a guy who's a traitor to the country. And he is honestly within the government right now making some of the most important decisions. It doesn't get any more callous than, wait a minute, maybe there's a benefit to having these wars done. I mean, a person who said, and he said it out loud. Yeah. And so a person who says that, period, let alone on the record,

is basically saying, oh, I know a lot of people will die in a war, but I'm such a monster. I don't care about that at all because we're all going to make money from it. I'm going to make money from it. The Saudis and UAE are going to make money from it. All the corrupt people that I know will become spectacularly rich from your death. 19 Americans have already died in this war. 860 have been injured. I don't know if they high five every time an American dies.

because they're like, oh, we're going to make even more money. And in that case, that is literal because the companies he invested in are all Israeli defense contractors. So they make money every time we get dragged into a war. So, Jank, there is one thing that we know without a shadow of a doubt. You know, we live in a weird post-truth world. It's kind of hard to parse out what's going on. But look, CNN wants to be clear about something.

and I want to make sure you know about this as well. Let's go to Graphics 6 here. CNN found no indication that Kushner's actions as a diplomat directly affected the investments reviewed. What do you mean? We just read you the quote from your own story. I know, I know. I know. I know.

They did this incredible reporting, this incredible investigative reporting, which is rare these days. Super rare. And then they took a big dump on it by putting that line in there. It's amazing. Well, you know that every CNN story has to go through the Jerusalem Bureau. So the Jerusalem Bureau, I'm sure, insisted. Now, at the end of all these things that are true and so true that even we can't spike the story, you're going to have to write that it isn't true at the end and that you have

no information. And CNN goes, yes, sir, of course, sir. So that's why we get frustrated with CNN. But don't worry about that. Overall, terrific story, a lot of good information in it. It's leading me to make an even bolder prediction. When people find out after Trump is gone, all, you know, you lift up the rock and you see all the, you know, termites or whatever, and all the dirty deals that they did and how many people

that got hurt because of those deals, I think Jared Kushner moves to Israel and at a self-preservation, that he's going to be concerned about how angry the American people are and move. That's my guess. I don't know, we'll see. We'll see. Yeah. The wicked seem to get away with everything in this world. So.

Well, look, I think post-2020, we're in a completely different world. Because at that point, we're at least a year, maybe two years into the depression. And the country is in such a rage that, that you, like, everything now is irrelevant compared to the rage that's coming. Because if you think the American people are angry now, yeah, if you think the American people are angry now, I don't think they're angry now. I'm shocked at how timid everyone is and how calm everyone is. You're getting robbed every single day to help a foreign country slaughter innocent people. Like, okay.

Everyone's chill about it. Right wingers joining the revolution next. See you there. Our fantasy commission says for him it's all about the friendships. Cute, Kevin. But I discus. agree. Like with Bet365. I get paid the second my team goes up

big with early payout and can cash out at any time before the game ends. No hard feelings, Kevin. Just faster payouts from Bet365. The home of winning early. Must be 19 and older. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you were someone you know is concerns about gambling, visit connectsontario.ca. Or call 1-866

5 through 1,2600. Terms and conditions apply. Revolution. I'm your host, Shank Huger. We're going to bring in Dan McKnight. He's person who formed Defend the Guard. He's a conservative. We had him on before, but he's got some developments about how the country is beginning to unite and of all places, Vermont. Dan, welcome back to the show. Hey, Jenkins, thanks for having me on. I appreciate it. It's good to see again. Good to see you, brother. Always good to see Patriots. So Dan, remind everybody what Defend the Guard

is before we tell everybody about the latest positive developments. Certainly our organization and bring our troops home is made up mostly of global war on terror veterans, guys that came home and saw the waste, the fraud, the abuse, the unconstitutional wars. And we started an organization so that we could lobby on behalf of veterans and America to keep American National Guard troops out of wars that have not been properly declared by Congress. And as you know, they haven't declared a war since 1942. And so Defend the Guard is a piece of state-based legislation that says, before the state National Guard from Idaho or Texas or Ohio or California can be released

in a federal service for the purpose of fighting overseas war, Congress must do their job first and actually declare war. And absolute declaration of war, the National Guard stays home. And we want to deprive the war machine of the warm bodies and the equipment and the training and the expertise that they need to wage these unconstitutional and illegal wars. You know, it's interesting. us today, Pete Hegseth talked about how you don't support these wars. That means you don't support the troops and you're a traitor and you're doing a national

betrayal unless you love his wars. How does that make you feel? What's your reaction to that? You know, Pete, when he, before he was the Secretary of War or defense or whatever they're calling it today, he endorsed to defend the Guard Act. And he was a pro-constitutional war guy. He believed like I do, like most veterans do, that if America does need to fight a war, and it's so important that our national security is willing to risk the lives and the treasure of American citizens,

that Congress should declare war and put the full faith, credit and belief system of the entire American economy, the entire American citizen citizenry, and the entire government behind that effort, and then send me. He always has this philosophy that we should believe in this mentality of send me. Well, we agree. If there's going to be a war that needs to be fought, I want to be the one to do it. But I think we should do it with the same authority under the same constitution that all veterans have raised their right hand and sworn an oath to defend. I don't know why now that he's the secretary of war. He believes that that is not as important as it was two and a half years ago.

I know why. By the way, he of course doesn't mean send me. He means send you. Somebody else. Yeah, of course. So let's talk about Vermont. I'm gonna come back to why they keep acting without Congress. There's a very clear answer in my opinion.

I wanna run it by you, get your thoughts on it. But let's talk about Vermont. So have they sent the National Guard of the Guard of Vermont to Iran already? So the Vermont National Guard, believe it or not, just got home last week. They were in Venezuela for that illegal war. Then instead of coming home, they went straight to the Middle East and they participated in the first 180 days of the two week war. And they were there until just recently, and they finally came home to reset, regroup. And that was on the heels of another overseas combat deployment.

The Vermont National Guard went back to back to back to combat deployments to wars that have never been declared. And so they're home, thank God, and they did a masterful job. They did their job. They fought and followed orders and did the thing that they're supposed to do. But they did it without that authority. And so I'm glad they're home. I'm glad they're reset. I'm glad they're back.

But this is a repeat occurrence. This is the escalation of the unitary executive theory that Dick Cheney and George W. Bush brought in the early 2000s that the executive owns the National Guard, which is not true if you read your Constitution or your American history. And without the warm bodies of the National Guard, they couldn't continue fighting these endless and undeclared wars on and on and on and on. America has fought a 21-year war in Afghanistan, a 22-year war in Iraq, a 13-year war in Syria. and they do it on the backs of the mechanics and the teachers and the tradesmen, the police officers from Vermont and California and Idaho, who are part-time members of the National Guard, who are meant to defend America's homeland and defend America's interests

and defend Americans' liberties, and instead they're being used for this empire building all over the world. And it's not even our empire. It's in other countries' empire. But to be fair, Venezuela and Iran were in coordination, and they were thinking of attacking Burlington. any day now. And thank God before Burlington, Vermont fell, you know, and we lost Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, you know, and Bernie Sanders. We rescue Vermont from Venezuela. If we lose

if we lose Jerry Garcia ice cream to the Venezuelans, you know we're in trouble. So I'm going to tell you really good news coming out of Vermont in a second. But speaking of good news, Ben Cohen's endorsed you guys, right? That's right. Ben Cohen finally came out. After our interview with you last November, Ben Cohen came out a few months later and strongly endorsed a defense. the guard and said it need to be passed now just on the very precipice on the eve of the National Guard from Vermont being pulled from their state and sent to Venezuela. Dan, you're right wing, right? Historically you've been right wing? I would say I'm about as far right as you can get without being a labeled a Nazi.

Wow, okay, so that's strong. So then I don't want to get into any other issues with you. Let's stay on this one. That's right. So, but Ben Cohen is about as left as it gets. Right. And here we are meeting in the middle. Why? Because both Ben Cohen and you are patrons. And so, and Jake, I think that's the most important issue of our time. We cannot find a coalition that agrees on anything, not social issues, not the border, not social security, none of it. But if we can find aligned partners on one single issue and we can come together, we can build this coalition that you've been talking about for years and we can actually start to dismantle the machine, one issue at a time.

I'll work with anybody that agrees with me on war and foreign policy, and I'll work with nobody who disagrees with me. I don't care what they believe on gay rights or transgender issues or immigration or any of it. If they're right on foreign policy, we're allies. Couldn't agree more. In fact, along those lines, I don't know if you care about it or want it, but when I saw Ben Cohen that formally endorsed Defend the Guard, I formally endorsed Defend the Guard.

So now you have both of us. That's right. And because I love the idea. You know, it doesn't matter who's in the group and what they think about abortion. What matters is, wait, should we send our guard that's supposed to protect Vermont to go find a fight an offensive war that has not been declared in Venezuela or Iran? Of course not. Why would any American be in favor of that? But that leads us to the good news.

So tell us about the two sides in Vermont and what's happened recently. Yeah, former Vermont governor and former DNC chairman and political kind of hot potato, Howard Dean, and Minnesota former Republican governor, Arn Carlson, both came out unified together and wrote an op-ed and submitted to USA Today who published it, both of them endorsing to Fend the Guard. Someone from the far left and someone from the moderate right, I wouldn't call them a far right, I would call them moderate at best, have come together to endorse to defend the guard. And it's just adding to this broad coalition, a former governor, Jesse Ventura, has endorsed to defend the guard, a veteran from Vietnam, a Navy SEAL from Vietnam. We've got endorsements from Rand Paul, from Paul Gozar, the congressman from Arizona, from over 100 state senators and legislators from around the country.

We've got endorsements from the future Attorney General of Texas, who's on the ballot for this November and is likely to win, Attorney General Mays, who's endorsed it. We've got endorsements left, right, and center. The entire Libertarian National Party has endorsed Defend the Guard. We've got Defend the Guard endorsed in five Republican GOP state platforms from Texas to Idaho to New Hampshire, Georgia, South Carolina, where it's part of the mainstream dialogue. We are the new right. The right is no longer the Warhawks. They're fighting back and they're trying hard and Liz Cheney's making a comeback in Wyoming, I promise you.

but the new right, the Tucker Carlson's, the Dan McNights, the Thomas Massey's, we're starting this new movement. In fact, we're going to be together with Joe Kent, former director of the Counterterrorism Center, and about as far to the right as you can get, him and I are going to be in Austin, Texas, with Scott Horton, one of the great libertarian authors and anti-war activists of our time,

putting on this new, this is not our tour tour, where we're going to talk about that this is not our war. We are not, we do not agree with this. This is not our war and we're going to do it with a broad coalition. We're billing the new right. And if the new right and the left can find an issue to align on, this is the one. We don't need to talk about taxes or anything else. Let's talk about the one thing that's actually destroying our country every single day at our escalating pace.

Look, if you told me that, hey, you're going to be on the same side as Tucker Cross and Marjor Taylor Green. And forget them. Paul Gosar, you know, a couple of years ago, I would have said, no, not on any issue. That's crazy. That I can't imagine it, right? And by the way, they definitely would have said the same thing about being on my side, right? So, but here we are, and I think it's an amazing development. This is the grassroots of real Americans saying we've had enough.

Neither side ever represents us. No matter who we elect, you know, there's a couple of memes, no matter who you vote for, you get John McCain, right? Right. Right. Or no matter who you vote for, you get Benjamin Netanyahu. So, and we're sick of it. We're sick of serving foreign nations. We're sick of, you know, having our guys killed or any 19 killed in this war that had absolutely nothing new with us and was not declared and is therefore clearly unconstitutional. So now it wasn't only, oh, go ahead. No, go ahead. I'll say it wasn't only not declared. It was actually voted on by Congress, both houses six times and Congress told the president stop. Stop. You do not have authority to continue this war. And he did it anyway. In fact, he did it with a slide of hand saying that I have the authority to wage this war under the War Powers Act of 1972. And when Congress flexes their authority under the War Powers Act of 1972, the White House says, oh, that's unconstitutional. But it's the same authority that they're citing to wage their war.

And what they do is instead of meeting the deadlines and when they're supposed to report to Congress or withdraw, they call a ceasefire and start the clock over again. So every ceasefire we've had so far has not been with the intent to actually end the war. It's been to reset the war clock for the president. Yeah, so that's really callous as well. I want to come back to Vermont in a second because I want to know what happens at the end. But now that you brought that topic up, look, the thing that really bothers me recently, I mean, all these things deeply bother me.

But they announced that Israel is going to get another gift from America, 2.8 billion dollars, 40,000 bombs, all of them 2,000 pound bombs. That's what I would call genocide bombs, those destroy whole civilian apartment buildings at a time. And we are to pay for all of it, and we don't have a choice. But that's already outrageous enough. But Dan, they're not going through Congress. And Trump did this last time.

He gave them $2 billion without going through Congress, but the Constitution is crystal clear, Appropriations is from Congress. It's like the very first thing we learn about the Constitution is Congress appropriates money, not the executive branch, not the judicial branch, the legislative branch that represents the American people appropriates money. But now whenever Israel wants it, they're like, shut up, we don't care about your stupid constitution, just give us the money, and Trump gives it to them. A, how outrageous is that?

And B, how do we do this, right? it's the ignoring Congress's role in declaring a war or ignoring Congress's role in appropriations, how do we get them to follow the Constitution? You know, that's a great question. Here's the answer that we've come up with as an organization. We went to Washington, D.C. in 2019, I took 100 veterans that have been in the global war and terror. We paid for ourselves. We raised the money. And we went and held a press event in D.C. And said, we're veterans. We have skin in the game. We've been there. You will listen to us.

when we tell you that what's happening there is not right. And we scheduled a meeting with every single representative and senator of the 100 veterans that we took with us. And to a senator, to a congressman, they all said the same thing. We support the troops. Look, we have a yellow ribbon on our door. We have an American flag behind my desk. Now let's take a picture so I can show the people back home that I support the troops.

But they wouldn't commit to doing anything to end the war or reclaiming their war powers, except for one, one congresswoman, Liz changed in Wyoming. She looked us dead in the eye and she said, as long as I'm in Washington, D.C., we will never come home from Afghanistan. Never. Her words. And so we said, you know what, D.C. is lost. We can't force them to do their job. They're so lost.

They're so wrapped up in the system. They're just cosplaying. It's larping, live action role-playing in Congress in real time. And so we said, we're going to go to the states and fight on more favorable ground. But first, first, we need to go to the state. Wyoming and settled the score. And so we took a handful of activists and we went to Wyoming and we went to every single county in Wyoming and got Liz Chaney censured. We got her stripped of every penny of Republican support from the GOP and we beat her in the primary election by 37 points.

So on the scoreboard, one for us, zero for the establishment. Then we decided we don't want to fight in Washington, D.C. anymore because it's pointless. They're all soulless people. They're all succubes. They're evil. And so we found this piece of legislation called Defend the Guard, and we said, we're going to fight in the states from now on. We're going to fight where we have leverage. Where our state representatives and our senators, they go to our churches, they go to our schools, they have to look us in the eye when they make a vote. And we decided we're going to take the state's authority and force Congress to do the thing

they're supposed to do. That's called federalism. That is our form of government. And we decide we'll fight in the states. And now we're in 30 states. 30 states with this bill. In six years, we've pushed it through the Idaho Senate, the Arizona Senate, the New Hampshire House.

We've pushed it through the Virginia House of Delegates with a 99 to zero unanimous vote. We haven't been able to pass both houses in any state yet, but it's coming. It's going to happen. It probably would have happened in Idaho and in Arizona last year, but this little thing called Iran kicked off in February, and everybody ran scared for the hills. So the answer is this. We can't force Congress to do their job. We can't make them take back the authority that we have granted to them.

They're feckless. the only defense we have left is to fight in the states and to do it by joining left, right, and center in fighting in the only place where the ground is favorable, where we're not sunk in the swamps of D.C. Where we can fight from the foothills of Boise, Idaho, or the deserts of Phoenix, Arizona. And we can take on the people in the Capitol building. And if they don't do what we want them to do, what we demand them to do, we get rid of them in two years. And that's how we've decided to fight this fight. Yeah.

I love it because when you go more local, it's easier to win at the grassroots level. And then you build and you build and you build. And that's how you get a grassroots rebellion that maybe even turns into a political revolution. That's right. So look, by the way, you know, you do this for defending the guard. Somebody should do a similar organization defending our money. because our money constantly is taken from us without Congress approving it either. I'm going to read you a comment from one of our viewers because you mentioned Liz Cheney.

It's a little bit of an assign, but Mayo Cardist man wrote in, what a failure this Trump clown has been. You all were right all along. I don't know what I was thinking voting for him. Wish the Dems ran someone lucid. Kamla, really? Bad Netflix show. So he agrees with us on Trump and voting the wrong way, but I agree with him on Kamla. And the only reason I read that now, that was a comment from X, is that after you guys defeated Liz Cheney and made her toxic to any Republican voters, Kamla Harris then wraps herself around Liz Cheney who's polling in the teens, I think, and Dick Cheney who's polling at 9% and says, oh, I love the name.

neocons and the permanent war people. I mean, why would anyone do something so maniacally stupid if you're trying to win a political election? Dan, what in the world is going on here? Why is these warhawks who want literally permanent war being passed around like from the Republicans to the Democrats, but we can't just ever get rid of them? And what is the force behind that? Because it's certainly not the American people.

The American people despise the Cheney's. but yet they're forever in power. Why? What's going on? That's a great question. I would say that no one is ever, including you or me or anybody else is watching this, has ever accused Kamala Harris of being politically savvy. So wrapping herself in the Liz Cheney flag or the John McCainites or the Mitt Romney's, her entire political strategy was anybody but Trump.

And here's the part of the story that I try not to tell very often because sometimes this shades the conversation. I'm a delegate from the state of Idaho to the RNC. I was sent by my state to vote for Donald Trump. I was put on the platform committee to redraft the entire future of the Republican Party. I went back. I worked with people from other states to plan to have Defend the Guard put into the National GOP platform. We had 30 states that were willing to do it. We had a major coalition.

We went to DC, to Milwaukee to the RNC Convention in 2024. and we sat down on the first day of the platform committee and the screen dropped down and Donald Trump comes on the screen and he says, hey, thanks for showing up. Here's my platform that I've written. I need you to endorse it. Have a good day. We didn't get to debate the future of the party, the direction, the policy, the priorities, anything. It was Donald Trump's vision.

So as a Donald Trump delegate, I'm there to endorse his will. That's not the way the grassroots is supposed to work. That's not the way the party is supposed to work. That's not the way the American form of government is supposed to work. It's supposed to come from the grassroots up. We dictate our priorities. We dictate our policy. We dictate our wishes and desires.

And politicians are elected wearing that brand to do what we tell them to do. And they flipped it on its head. So now as a delegate to the RNC and a supporter of Donald Trump, somebody who backed him heavily, built a massive coalition for him in 2020 and in 2024, I feel like we've been betrayed. I feel like we've had our entire soul. sold out to a casino owner and a gambling heiress and people that have interests outside of this country. And we do our best to not fight that fight. We don't attack the president of the United States

because it's a no-win situation. The MAGA crowd will turn on us in a heartbeat. And so we've framed ourselves not as MAGA or anti-Maga, but we are America first. We are a party, a movement, an effort that wants to bring into the people in from all across the spectrum that believe in one thing, American exceptional way of life. And so why would Kamala Harris wrap herself in that, the Dick Cheney or the Liz Cheney umbrella? It's for one purpose. She saw an enemy of her enemy, and that is a political philosophy that is corrupting our country. Instead of finding an enemy of my enemy, how about we find a friend and an ally on an aligned issue, a single topic, a one thing that we can sit down and break bread over, and let's work with them to solve that one thing. And then let's go

back and put the boxing gloves on and fight over the next thing. Yeah. Brother, there's a second reason. It's the donors. The donors love the permanent war, love serving a foreign nation, and the Cheneas are the kings and queens of serving foreign nations and endless wars. So the donors are like, well, if you can't put them in the Republican Party, we'll put them in the Democratic Party. And that's how that goes. And by the way, you know, people are doing me or culpals all the time from the right, saying, you know, Trump betrayed us, et cetera. I'll do something similar here. I thought America first was, you know, I was worried about it because it sounded like maybe

it's anti-immigrant and, you know, it depends on, you know, what you mean by immigrant, legal or undocumented, et cetera, right? But now, no, no, no, I get it. It would be amazing if our politicians, our legislators, our so-called representatives, actually represented us first. And that, unfortunately, in my lifetime, it's now become kind of unprecedented to serve Americans first. We're always dead last.

You know, first the oil companies and the defense contractors and the pharmaceutical companies and the Israel and the other countries and everyone else and the donors have to eat first and we get last. No, no, no, no. You can call it Americans first, you can call it America first, but whatever it is, should we serve American citizens first? Damn straight we should and we're certainly not doing that. And we're not even coming close to that.

So here, here to that concept. So Dan, last thing is about Vermont. Back to them. So you got a Republican, you got a Democrat on board. They're all saying, hey, we agree with defend the guard. What happens next? How do you win so that the Vermont National Guard can't be sent abroad anymore like that? Yeah, great question.

And in the state legislation, this is one problem of fighting in the states. You get three months a year. In some states, you get three months every other year, like in Texas, to fight during legislative season. And so we teach a concept and we teach a political leadership school where we'll come in and we'll teach activists how to be very effective. And what we do is we teach something, you have to tie legislative session to election season. If they vote wrong in January through March, you remove them in November. And there's no excuses. We've taken so many scalps and we've removed so many people from office that we're teaching people that this is the way to defeat them. Politicians understand two things.

Payne and pleasure. And I'm sorry, Jane. I hope this isn't taken too offensive, but I'm not in the business of pleasuring a single politician. I'm not going to do it. It might be people call me homophobic, whatever. I am not here to pleasure a single politician. So what happens next? We continue to fight. We build these coalitions of left, right and center.

We put activists on the ground. We train them. We teach them how to be effective activists on the ground. We hold phone baking efforts. We do a five-calum analysis and we find out who our enemies are on a committee. And then we work to influence them and get them to change their position by having activists and citizens and veterans call their offices and go down and have in-person meetings, petition campaigns, and if they still won't move, we simply go out and we beat them.

We beat them like a drone. They are our servants. We cannot look at them as deities or as celebrities or as icons. They're nothing more than our servants. And if they're not going to do our will, what's the point of having them there? And you can't remove a congressman. Incumbents are the safest job in America. but a state legislator in a district of 4,000 voters or 15,000 voters,

we can put five people on the ground, knock doors and have them removed this year, right now in real time. And we do that enough times, eventually the establishment, the Uniparty, they start to notice and they start to react when we say, we do not want our sons and daughters dying in defense of another country on foreign lands in some hellhole on the other side of the world. Yeah, so I got a tip for you in a second. But I just wanted to close a loop.

If both the houses of the Vermont legislature vote in your direction, do you need the governor to approve or not? Do you need all three to say you cannot send the Vermont National Guard unless a war has been declared by Congress? And if you get all three, is that it? That's it. Vermont National Guard can't be used. Yeah, the process works, just like you said, it has to pass the House. That's the Senate through some sort of a reconciliation process, and then ask go to the executive to sign or to not sign. That's the executive's job.

And if they sign it, it becomes law. And once it becomes law, the bill is written that the governor must interpose. They don't have an option. It's not may, shall, it's must. And when they interpose, there will be opposition. This bill will end up in the Supreme Court. That is ultimately where it needs to be decided because this issue is enshrined in the Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15, that Congress and Congress only can call forth the National Guard for three purposes to repel an invasion,

to put down an insurrection, and to enforce the laws of the land. We have the merits. We have the receipts. We have the Constitution. So it will go forward. It will get challenged. And just like the constitutional carry laws that have been going through this system in the last 20 years, once the first state passes defend the Guard, it will fall in 25 or 26 other states overnight.

It will become an instant sensation because states, they want. the ability. They want to be able to stand up to the federal government, but most of them are just too chicken to do it. They need somebody else to go first. Well, I'm here. I'll go first. My state, Arizona and Idaho, the two states I live in, we'll go first. We will blaze the trail. And we're doing with great sponsors like Marine Corps veteran, Senator Ben Adams in Idaho, and Air Force veteran, Lieutenant Colonel retired, Wendy Rogers, State Senator in Arizona. We will find the right champions to carry our bill in the state legislatures. And we will go forward and we will go first. and then everybody else can follow us.

I don't have a problem taking the arrows. I'm pretty much a human pin cushion. Yeah. So here's the tip. Look, first of all, in terms of how to deal with politicians, I couldn't agree more with you. So you don't have to, you know, sugarcoat it at all. No. They're supposed to be our representative.

And if they're not, you remove them. Okay, period. That's what democracy is about. It's not about patty cakes. And so you vote them out and you do it by getting, you do it the right way. And no answer to surprise. So the tip is you guys should work with Wolfpack. So that's a group that I set up a long time ago to get money out of politics.

They're also going the state route to propose a constitutional amendment to get money out. That ends the corruption. And they've already won in Vermont. And they had to win over both Republicans and Democrats, and they have. And I remember the press in Connecticut complaining when we spent a lot of money to defeat one of the politicians there. And they were outraged. They're like, how could you spend money to defeat a politician? I'm like, what are you talking about?

That's what all the big lobbies do nonstop. And you guys do nothing but kiss their ass. When a grassroots group does it, all of a sudden you caught feelings about it? No, that's crazy, right? So we'd love to make the media cry. We love to make the politicians cry. They're supposed to serve the people. So if you want, I'll put you in touch with the Wolfpack guys.

because I think that, you know, they had a lot of good relationships on both sides of the aisle, and they know how to get things through in a nonpartisan way to serve the people. So, I mean, if you have two groups, one trying to get end the corruption and the other one trying to protect our troops, that's a powerful combo. So. Yeah. And they're strictly nonpartisan as well. All right, well, look, guys, we got a grassroots revolution on our hands here. And so it's a matter of how much you want to, you know, it's like that old. Native Americans saying you got two wolves on your two different shoulders, one telling you to do good,

the other one telling you to do bad, which wolf wins, the one you feed, right? So if you feed the grassroots warriors who are now putting America above any partisanship, well, then that's the one that's going to win. So, Dan, give them your website. Yeah, absolutely. Our website is bring our troops home.us. That's the organization website to follow the legislation. It would be Defend the Guard.us. And on all the socials, it's at Troops Home, U.S. And again, if you're in Texas or around Texas or can get to Texas, on the 20th of October at 5.30 p.m. in Austin,

we have the not hour war tour put on by the Quincy Institute, who is a great left-right and center non-partisan organization, who believe in a sound foreign policy. It'll be myself. Joe Kent, former director of the Counterterrorism Center, and Scott Horton, the great libertarian anti-war author. Come check it out. It's free.

It will show you that the, new American right is not the right of your grandparents or your parents generation. We are the common sense Republicans, the common sense right of center of people who believe in the most important issue of our time is sound foreign policy and to stop the empire so that we can take care of issues at home. We'll put those links in the description box below wherever you're watching this as well. Dan McKnight from Defend the Guard. We appreciate your brother.

Godspeed to you. Thanks, Jake. You too. All right. Guys, we're going to take a break here. But for the members, I'm going to come right back, interact with you guys, read your comments, and reach just a little bit more. So hit that join button below on YouTube or t.com slash join.

See you there. My rec league goalie says he plays for the love of the game. You gave up six goals last week, Steve? Maybe play to win, huh? Like with Bet365, I get paid the second my team goes out big with early payout and can cash out at any time before the game ends. Come on, Steve, Bet365, the home. of winning early. Must be 19 and older, Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you were someone

you know is concerns about gambling, visit connectsontario.ca or call 18665-3-1-2,600. Terms and conditions apply.