The Young Turks - Bunch Of Hucksters - February 20, 2026

Episode Date: February 21, 2026

Sen. John Fetterman declares “you can’t negotiate with cancer—you have to attack it” when discussing Iran. A Fox New host says Trump has to make a better case for going to war with Iran. In a 2.5 hour conversation with Tucker Carlson, Mike Huckabee denies Epstein's ties to Mossad, claims Israel has a biblical right to the entire Middle East, and defends America sending billions of dollars in aid to Israel. Tragedy deepens in the West Bank after a Palestinian-American teenager shot by Israeli settlers dies of his wounds. Thanks to Shopify and Zip Recruiter for today's episode: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at shopify.com/tyt Just go to this exclusive web address right now to try ZipRecruiter FOR FREE: ziprecruiter.com/tyt Hosts: Ana Kasparian, Cenk Uygur SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE ☞  https://www.youtube.com/@TheYoungTurks FOLLOW US ON: FACEBOOK  ☞   https://www.facebook.com/theyoungturks TWITTER  ☞       https://twitter.com/TheYoungTurks INSTAGRAM  ☞  https://www.instagram.com/theyoungturks TIKTOK  ☞          https://www.tiktok.com/@theyoungturks 👕MERCH  ☞      https:/www.shoptyt.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

You're listening to The Young Turks, the online news show. Make sure to follow and rate our show with not one, not two, not three, not four, but five stars. You're awesome. Thank you. A plan. You wouldn't be high by any chance, would you? Bearing on a Friday. What a rare treat. Okay, we like this.

We have a lot to get to today. We've gone to Supreme Court ruling on tariffs. Donald Trump losing his mind over it. We'll tell you why they ruled the way that they did, the ramifications of it. That's later on the show. Obviously, war with Iran is imminent. We're going to talk about that. But also, Tucker Carlson drops an interview with Mike Huckabee, and it is startling.

I mean, we know that Mike Huckabee works for Israel and not America, but wait until you see the details where Huckabee basically calls for a genocide and says that Israel doesn't know anybody, anything, that we should be giving them even more money and working for them even more. I mean, Jesus, that like that is, it's an amazing interview. So hold on for that. What you're doing? I'm doing great. I'm really excited for the first hour today. I'm excited for the whole show. But man, that interview with Huckabee was illuminating to say the least.

And there were no third rails for Tucker Carlson. He was ready and willing to ask about anything. We're talking Epstein files. we're talking about obviously, you know, my favorite part was why we went to war with Iraq. So just buckle up for that. But before we get to any of that, we do need to give you all an update on the war, potential war with Iran. So without further ado, let's get into it. I don't care about Iran at all.

I care about America. And if blowing up Iran makes my country richer and safer, I'm for it. And if it doesn't, I'm totally opposed. It's that simple. I think most Americans feel that way, no. How many boots on the ground has the U.S. placed on behalf of Israel? However many went to Iraq. We did that for Israel. No, I don't think we did.

But you said we did it because of 9-11? That was the U.S. justification for it. Now, that might be literally the only thing I've heard, Mike Huckabee say. That's correct. The American people were absolutely manipulated by our government in the aftermath of 9-11 to do a preemptive war on a country that had nothing to do with 9-11. And, Jane, currently we are barreling toward another war based on false pretenses on behalf of Israel. But I'm curious what you think.

Yeah. So in this story, there's a couple of shocking developments that we're going to tell you about. One is that the New York Times has done a good story about this. Oh, my God, yes. Okay. Asking this simple question, why? Why are we going to Iran? And then you're going to see Democrats, of course, betray us and support Israel and demand this war instead.

So Anna, tell us all about it. Well, look, we still don't have a clear picture in regard to the scope of this war with Iran, this seemingly impending war with Iran. It could be a limited strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, which I thought we had already completely obliterated, which is something that Trump repeatedly said, and its ballistic missiles. It could also be a sustained military campaign, and we don't know how long that would last, how long it would take. We don't know whether we'd have boots on the ground. There's a lot of confusion and a lack of clarity when it comes to something that's pretty

serious and would cost the United States a lot in terms of blood and treasure. But nonetheless, Donald Trump seems to be totally fine. with this uncertainty and even conservative media figures like Rachel Campos Duffy are kind of frustrated about this because a lot is on the line, including people's sons and daughters. So let's take a look at what she had to say. The president made a case for Operation Midnight Hammer saying we're going to do this operation and then we're not going to have to do anything else. Remember, there was a lot of bragging about that. And I think most people, even those who were skeptical about operation, going in and doing that, at the end, we're like, okay, I can deal with this because I don't want

a greater war. I think that the president needs to make a better case as to why this is in American interest to potentially go into a kinetic war. I don't think the case has been made sufficiently for me. If you read the New York Times, there's a lot of people who also feel that way. If you're going to get us potentially into a war, you have to explain why it matters to us, not to other countries, but to us. Now Rachel Campos Duffy is asking President Donald Trump to do the impossible to explain how going to war with Iran would benefit the United States. It wouldn't. There's no way in which it would benefit the United States. Iran's ballistic missiles are not capable of reaching the U.S.

The only country that has a vested interest in regime change war in Iran, of course, is Israel. Trump knows that, which is why he keeps waffling on this issue, and we have no idea what he will ultimately decide. We do know that Benjamin Nanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, has met with him seven separate times in Trump's first year in office during his second term, obviously. But look, since the president has done a poor job expressing to the United States, States to the American people, how this war would benefit us in any way, shape, or form. Maybe we can turn to a Democratic senator. Let's hear from John Fetterman, who appears to now live

at the Fox News Studios. Take a look. If they have 900 pounds of near weapons grade uranium, why wouldn't you strike that? Why wouldn't you hold them accountable that way? And now here we are again and we've demonstrated. That's the only thing I ran ever responds to is strength and power and hit them. And if they want to hit them again, because I don't think you can't really trust and negotiate with them. You can't negotiate with cancer. You have to attack it and go right at it with superior force. So John Fetterman just says, hey, you know what? Just go to war. Who cares? You should just hit them. You can't negotiate with cancer. We have to be. We have to, have all sorts of allies across the globe who are unsavory to say the least. Saudi Arabia being

one of them, by the way, Israel is conducting a genocide and is engaging in a land grab in multiple countries. In Lebanon and in Syria, they have broken every ceasefire deal. In fact, they have carried out more than 100 air strikes against Lebanon since they agreed to a ceasefire. So you want to talk about who cannot be trusted, Israel is the country that lied to us about Iraq's so-called weapons of mass destruction, which of course they didn't have. That's what convinced the American people that we needed to go to war with Iraq in 2003. It's just amazing to me, Jen, that we find ourselves in the same place we were in 2002, 2003. And luckily, this time around, a lot of Americans aren't falling for it. The fact that Rachel Compost, Duffy was able to say what she said.

on the Fox News channel is kind of a big deal when you think about it. But I'm curious what you think. Yeah. So let's also remember, by the way, her husband is Sean Duffy, Secretary of Transportation in this Trump administration. Look, she's been a talk show host for a long time. So she speaks for herself and not necessarily for her husband. But it's still an interesting thing to note here how close the rebellion is to the Trump administration. Because I think that she's reacting mainly to what she's seeing from the audience. And right-wing audience has completely turned around on Israel and on Iran. So, yeah, there's some portions of MAGA for sure that still say, oh, as long as we just bomb them and we never get hurt, there's never a scratch on us, then it's going to be fine.

First of all, that's not how wars go. Second of all, this is not just a bombing campaign. As we described to you guys earlier, and Axios is reporting weeks-long campaign, maybe months-long campaign. and trying, some believe, trying for regime change so much longer, more protracted, transport planes are on their way, et cetera, and people are asking the same question that everybody's asking, Tucker asked, which is, what does this have to do with us? And Huckabee's answer was revealing because he's like, well, our justification was 9-11. When asked, did we do the war, Iraq war for Israel?

Well, our justification was 9-11. So yeah, we did it for, I mean, Huckabee loves Israel and serves Israel loyally. We're gonna get back into that later in the program. And even he can't muster up an excuse. And we've lost $8 trillion in the global war on terror, otherwise known as the global war on Israel's enemies. And yes, they definitely wanted us to go into Iraq. Don't anyone saying otherwise is 100% lying.

We have all the quotes of the neocons, including Benjamin Net and Yahoo, they did that demanded that we go in Iraq, which then brings us to Fetterman. So Fetterman says the same nonsense we heard before the Iraq were, oh, weapons of mass destruction, 900 pounds of uranium, and they're evil, and they're a cancer, we can't talk to evil, that's literally what Dick Cheney said. And the only thing they understand is violence, that's why we have to do massive violence on them before they even touched us. They haven't done anything to us, but we should do massive, massive violence.

Because all they understand his violence. Whenever I hear them talking, Anna, I like the Israelis, Israel First, and that definitely includes Fetterman. And Huckabee, I feel like I'm, it's just one giant confession. All you have to do is flip it. And instead of Iran, all they want is to dominate the Middle East. And there are cancer there constantly endangering the security of everyone else. Like, you know you're describing Israel, right?

Iran has not attacked any of its neighbors. Israel has attacked almost all their neighbors. And finally, you know, Trump, for this round, Trump gets, says, oh, I'm anti-war in America first. He gets in and says, I'm just kidding, I'm totally pro-war in Israel first. So you vote for him, you get Israel first. We vote for Federman thinking, my God, the guy's totally anti-war, progressive, populace, etc.

American voters first. Nope, he comes in. Nope, Israel first, totally pro-war. So no matter who you vote for, you get Israel. So mainstream media can lie till the cows come home and they will, but the rest of us are all noticing who our politicians actually work for and it isn't us. This will be fun, let's talk about first dates. We've all been there, you're trying to figure someone out, so you ask the important stuff

up front. What are you looking for? What are your deal breakers? You get right to the point to see if they're the right person for you. Well, the same goes if you're hiring, you definitely want to to address key questions first to see if someone could be right for your role. That's why you need ZipRecruiter. When you post your job, ZipRecruiter suggests screening questions to help you identify top candidates faster. And today you can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com

slash TYT. Their matching technology immediately starts finding qualified people who actually check all your boxes. No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site. Ask key questions and hire faster with ZipRecruiter. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. Tried for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash TYT. That's ZipRecruiter.com slash TYT. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter. You're exactly right about that.

And in fact, right now there is an effort. I think that it's probably going to be a fruitless one to kind of rein in the Trump administration because, you know, prior to 9-11, Congress had a lot more say in regard to whether or not the United States goes to war. Now, after 9-11, unfortunately, Congress ceded much of its war powers or war powers to the executive branch. And now that Trump is considering a sustained military campaign against Iran, which would be absolutely brutal and disastrous for the United States, you have Representative Roqana and Thomas Massey working together yet again. It's a bipartisan effort to put a war powers resolution on the House floor as early as next week.

Now, it would prevent President Donald Trump from unilaterally declaring war against Iran, but there is a pretty big problem. There's an obstacle here. Most Republicans, of course, are willing to just go along with whatever Trump wants to. do on any issue. And unfortunately, this happens to be one of them. There's still plenty of neocons in the Republican Party. Let's not forget about that either. And two Democrats have already stated that they will oppose the resolution. Okay, so they are representatives, Josh Gottheimer and Jared Moskowitz. So let's hear from Moskowitz, who says, they should just rename it the

Ayatollah Protection Act because that's what it does. Okay, we should just name you, okay, the representative from Israel. Because explain to me, Moscow, it's exactly why the United States should attack Iran when Iran does not pose a threat to the U.S. its ballistic missiles can't reach us. So what are we going to get out of it? Because we're going to pay for that war, money we don't have, by the way. So we're going to increase our national debt, which is already disastrous enough. And if it is a sustained military campaign in an effort to overthrow the regime in Iran, then you have no choice.

You need to have boots on the ground. And obviously that risks the lives of our soldiers. But even if you don't get to that point, obviously we have soldiers based in that region who will be a target should this war pop off. So there's that. Now let's take a look at how much money these individuals have taken from APEC, A PACTrack Tracker, does great work. When it comes to Jared Moskowitz, that number is 741,058 bucks. When it comes to Josh Gotheimer, it's over $2 million. Jank, back to you.

Yeah, they're sellouts. They have betrayed America. They work for Israel. It's crystal clear. They're supposed to be Democrats who are anti-war. The minute Israel wants war with Iran, they say, absolutely. And if you are not in favor of it, you're in favor of the Ayatollah. Sounds like Dick Cheney, okay?

So I don't want anybody get confused, okay? There's wonderful Jewish American legislators who've been opposed to this throughout. Bernie Sanders doesn't take any A-PAC money as opposed to sending more money to Israel for offensive weapons. Jan Shikowski, we're going to talk about later in the show about wonderful progressive Democrat, who's Jewish-Americans say, withdrew her endorsement from another candidate because she took money from A-PAC. She's like, no, no, no, no more money from A-PAC, okay? And so that's beautiful. So I don't want you guys to see Moskowitz and Godheimer who are core evil and make any wrong

assumptions. They just have chosen to serve Israel instead of America. That's their personal choice. They partly out because of the legalized bribery, you see the millions of dollars they've taken. And for whatever other reason. But those two, I've tracked their career, they are loyal to Israel in every way. They always vote for Israel. Not only do they do that, they're the kind of thug.

who come around and if you don't support Israel, they say you're an anti-Semite, you should never be allowed to speak, your career should be ruined, et cetera. They try to bully Americans into serving their beloved Israel, they're disgusting, and we should not go to war for Muscoids and for Godheimer and for all of Israel first, including Fetterman and Mike Huckabee. It isn't about religion, guys. There's a cancerous group in this country. Yes, there's Christian Zionists, there's other religions, etc.

But that's not the uniting thing. The uniting thing is they have decided for either because of largely for money, but there might be other reasons, including yes, potentially blackmail, that they are 100% going to serve Israel. This war with Iran has no benefits for America at all. We already wiped out their nuclear facilities. Their ballistic missiles can't reach us. They're saying that, oh, that Israel and American politicians are so concerned about Muslim lives

in Iran. That's why their heart is broken and they wanna serve the Iranian people. Literally no one in the country is that dumb to believe that. Literally, no one. I mean, as they say it out loud, they probably have to be humiliated that Israel forced them to say such a stupid talking point that no one would believe. So what's our interest? They say, wow, I mean, they also help Hamas and Hezbole.

Yeah, that's Israel's issue. organizations haven't attacked us. They don't even, they barely even exist now. Israel already obliterated them. No, Israel wants the entire Middle East totally defenseless. And as you're going to see later on the show with the Mike Huckabee interview, yes, Greater Israel means they want almost the entire Middle East. And the way you do that is by getting us to destroy all of those countries and their

militaries so Israel can continue to expand, which they have expanded and expanded since 1948 and all of our politicians are, almost all of them are liars, almost all of our media is liars. And they keep telling you that Israel's the victim as this imperial empire grows and grows and grows and what is so frustrating, Anna, is that it grows with our money and our troops. Thousands of Americans died in Iraq for Israel. They never had any weapons of mass destruction, and they never did. And Iraq didn't do 9-11. Iraq hated al-Qaeda. So I'm done with all of the They're the conspiracy theorists, they're the sellouts working for a different country, and when they get us into this war, which is nearly inevitable, remember to blame Jared Moskowitz,

Federman, Mike Huckabee, Godheimer, Trump, Biden, all the sellouts, all the sellouts who don't work for America and work for Israel. We're up to here with it. The American people can't take it anymore. So how much are these people going to continue to betray us the minute around? The minute Iran sinks any of our ships, this country should be on fire against Israel, against Israel. There's 100% the reason we're going to this war.

Literally no one can give us a single other reason that we have to fight that war other than Israel has ordered us to. And they bought our politicians, sell out sons of bitches. I'm 10,000 times more angry at them than I am at Israel. Well, when we come back from the break, I want to just discuss this incredible two hour to half long interview that Tucker Carlson had with the US ambassador to Israel. And that's of course my kakabi, lots to get to. You don't want to miss it.

We'll be right back. So let's go to our members at t.yot.com. Amber of Hope says Anna, so glad to watch live today. Kuna Matata says Anna on a Friday, this is the best power panel we've ever had. Ben, I agree with Anna, I'm not sure about that. Ben Jamman says, I don't know that she said that. Ben Jammin says, TYT is spoiling us. Don't shoot on the goalkeeper says, I don't care about Iran.

Wow, something I agree with Tucker Carlson. Well, watch that interview, watch my interview with him, watch Hannah's interview with him. And you'll see a lot that you agree with Tucker Carlson. There's still tons of things we disagree with Tucker Carlsonan. But you guys don't want my feelings about that. All right, Wong John says, if they're going to reboot Dick Cheney, could they at least cast someone a little less pathetic than Federman? For real. Yeah, but I mean like, that's the thing with Israel.

There's such a blunt instrument and they're so arrogant. They think we don't have to find someone appealing. Let's find another ogre like Dick Cheney. Who cares if we drive his popularity in 9%. They're just junk we use as a tool to get America to do whatever we want. And then we dispose of them. And that's what they did with Cheney and that's what they do with Fetterman. And when he's in a garbage heap somewhere, he'll be like, oh, what happened to me?

I was so loyal to you, Israel. Yeah, okay. I hope that John Fenerman is miserable the rest of his life. I don't know a bigger traitor than that son of a bitch. Okay, anyways, happy Warrior Dragons. Thank you for gifting a sub. On Twitch, we appreciate you. Eddie Jameson, thank you for gifting a membership on YouTube.

We appreciate you. Acoustics Minor writes in on YouTube member section and on a Friday. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, said in Harry Enton's voice. Did I do that right? Eddie Jamison writes and I saw someone online today say Democrats in Congress could create a shadow cabinet to offer policy alternatives leading up to midterms in 2028. Maybe Roe Kana could lead that. Let's call his office. Eddie, I got bad news for you. Roe is like most Democrats in Congress don't like Roe.

They think he's embarrassing them by taking action and they and they're like oh, and he's complaining about Israel. We're supposed to serve Israel. I'm getting all these bribes from Israel and Rose. kind of exposing us. So that's why they always hated Bernie. They hate anyone who's honest and clean. So our revolution is trying. I interviewed their executive director last night. You can check that out on the conversation,

which is another YouTube channel we have. And of course members get everything on t.yt.com. Anyways, they are bringing together some progressives to offer a different agenda. They're not really bills, but it's at least a plan. Not bad. It's a good effort. That's a start. So there's some tiny bit of signs of life there. Neosaturn says, maybe you should just move into the White House. Yeah, I mean, he almost has. He's been here

seven or eight times. And by the way, one of the Congress people that I, when I was in Washington I heard about said that, they're like, I don't get why Rose being talked about for maybe presidential candidate. They're like, I raise more money than him. I have more donors. Look, that's how corrupt Washington is. You want to talk about a cancer. Washington is the cancer. Lady AF says, aliens, that's so interesting. Epstein, never heard of him.

Yeah, now, by the way, not just Trump, but Obama came out. Aliens, aliens, everybody, look at aliens. Don't look at Epstein flies, look at aliens. Bradley Jisley says, who do you think Trump's favorite Democrat? I'm nominating Senator John Federman. Who are you nominated? No, no, no, it's definitely Federman. That's no question.

All right, we'll be back. All right, back on TYT, Jank and Anna with you guys. Anna, what's next? This is next. Why do you expect me to have knowledge of something like that? Well, because you attacked me personally for suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to massage, just as like a man and a father and a Christian, how could you resist saying, like, were you on Petto Island with Jeffrey Epstein? There's an acute, there is a charged child molester. But I'm saying if you are very involved in.

The details of this. And you think it's the U.S. government that's hiding and shielding somebody, then bring it up to the people that you personally know. I don't think that. I know it. Tucker Carlson traveled to Israel, which is, of course, not without risk, to interview the U.S. ambassador to Israel. And of course, that's Mike Huckabee. And it was a wide-ranging conversation slash debate about various issues tied to Israel, as you just saw from that video jank. They did touch the topic of Epstein and his connection to Mossad, which we'll get to in just a minute.

But what I was really impressed by was the fact that Tucker asked him everything. I mean, he asked Huckabee about his meeting with Jonathan Pollard, a well-known traitor to the United States who sold our secrets to the Israelis. And the Israelis then in turn sold our secrets to the Soviets, who were our obvious enemies at the time. Just an incredible interview. And I can't wait to show you the clips. What are your thoughts? I want to get straight through the clips because you'll see Huckabee also talks about that Israel should have the entire Middle East. And of course, we should pay for it. All right, let's do it.

He does indeed say that. So stick around for that. But first, let's get to the part of the conversation where they discussed Jonathan Pollard. Now, for those who are unfamiliar with this figure, he's the guy who used to work for the U.S. CIA. He sold U.S. secrets to Israel, and then Israel then sold those secrets to the Soviet Union. Trump allowed the scumbag to return to Israel, cut his sentence short. To be fair, he did serve 30 years in prison, but as I've said on this show before, as a traitor to our country, I think that the punishment should have been much harder than prison time. And since he was encouraged, since he's gone back to Israel, he has encouraged other Jewish Americans. to spy on our country on behalf of Israel. Now, Huckabee claims that the clandestine meeting that he had with this traitor wasn't

really that big of a deal, right? He claims it wasn't even a secret because there's so much surveillance at the U.S. Embassy, not buying it. The White House didn't know anything about it. At least that's what they allege. Now, here's Tucker Carlson confronting Huckabee about this meeting with traitor, Jonathan Pollard. So this was the most profound betrayal of the United States in my lifetime.

Why advocate for that guy's release before he serves his full sentence? Let's remember it was President Trump who probably facilitated his departure. And I'm certainly supportive of President Trump. I think you are. Poller's not. He called him a madman after your meeting. That's why I say. Pollard is not for me the real issue. it was the fact that he did something that was despicable.

I'm not denying that. You make it sound like I'm hosting a meeting. I simply met with him. I meet with people all the time. You can just walk in without a... No, they have to have an appointment. Of course they do. Oh, so it is hosting him that, I think.

Well, I don't know if it was hosting, but it was certainly he was able to come to the U.S. Embassy to have a meeting at his request. I did. And frankly, I don't regret it. I met with a lot of people over the course of the time I've been here and we'll be. with a lot more. That's it. You don't need AI agents, which may sound weird

coming from service now, the leader in AI agents. The truth is, AI agents need you. Sure, they'll process, predict, even get work done autonomously. But they don't dream, read a room, rally a team,

and they certainly don't have shower thoughts, pivotal hallway chats, or big ideas. People do. And people, when given the best AI platform, they're freed up to do the fulfilling work they want to do. To see how Service Now puts AI to work for people, visit ServiceNow.com. Huckabee doesn't regret it. Huckabee doesn't regret taking a meeting with a well-known

trader to the United States, who, by the way, has also suggested that Israel threatened the U.S. with its nukes if we refuse to give them what they want. And so that's who Mike Huckabee is. I would argue that the willingness to meet with Pollard and his lack of remorse about it is a form of being a traitor as well. But it's amazing to me. Yeah. Yeah. So look, I'm going to get to the most important question about Pollard and Huckabee in a second. But first, Pollard said, hey, all Jewish Americans should betray America in favor of Israel. Nothing endangers Jewish Americans more than a comment like that. But always to serve Israel, not to serve Jewish Americans, but to serve Israel.

So secondly, you know who flew Jonathan Pollard back in a private jet to say great job for betraying America? The Edelson's did. The number one donors to Donald Trump, they've given him over $300 million. And they think Jonathan Pollard is a hero. Obviously, he's not a hero to America. He's a hero to Israel. And the Adelson serve Israel. They bribe our politicians legally here in America to make sure that they also serve Israel.

Israel. And you could tell I mean, there's, I mean, there's nothing more spectacular than I'm gonna give you a private jet to fly you back in class for betraying America. Okay, so that's who controls this government. That's why guys like how it could be do what they do. It's not complicated. The only reason that everybody in the country doesn't know that is because mainstream media's job is not to cover the news, but to cover up the news. That's why they never tell you these unbelievable brazen facts. So was it a secret meeting? Well, he didn't tell the White House or the CIA. The CIA kind of flipped out over it. which was nice to see because apparently there's still some Americans inside the CIA.

And so, but the most important question, Anna, is why? Why did you meet with Jonathan Pollard? Because what could you possibly get out of that meeting other than, I mean, if I got, was in a meeting with him, I would have some choice towards for him. I mean, the only reason I can imagine is Mike Huckabee was asking for tips on how to betray America. I mean, honestly, he didn't just, obviously he didn't disclose any details about what they discussed, he simply said that Pollard wanted to come in and thank him because he was so polite and nice to him after Pollard's wife passed away. Oh, come on. I just, it's, look, they're laughing

in our faces and every single American should be furious and insulted by this. And in fact, this part of the conversation really stood out to me because if you look at the quality of life, for Americans versus the quality of life for Israelis. Honestly, it's night and day, especially when it comes to various social programs that they get to enjoy that we don't have here in the US. And at the same time, we're the ones who pay for their wars. We give them nearly $4 billion a year.

Every time they get involved in some sort of conflict or genocide, we fund that on top of the nearly $4 billion a year. So keep that in mind as you hear this part of their exchange. Over, say the last 20 years, America's not gotten richer or freer at all. And I come to Israel and the infrastructure, we were flying in. And I said to my buddy, I was like, man, the person looks great. I love the agriculture in Israel because it's just beautiful.

I love green. I love plants. I remember when it didn't look like that. Yeah, yeah. First time I came in 53 years ago. It's great. It did not look like that. It looks a lot nicer than our country.

And it has higher standard of living. It has nicer roads than the United States. And so it's like, okay. Why are we sending all this money to a country that is a higher standard of living than ours? I don't know that they have a higher standard of a living. They do actually. They have free health care. They also have free abortion.

Are you okay with that? I personally don't like that. Why would we be subsidizing? Why would we send any money? We're not. Why would we send any money to a country that provides free abortion? Because the money that we send does not pay for health care, does not pay for abortion. It pays for military things. It's like if they don't spend it on this, I'll spend it on that.

But they do spend it on that. And then we get many more times back in the return of the nation. investment. Let me get this out of the way. I fully believe in the right to choose. But at the same time, these are two conservatives, allegedly, right? Huckabee claims to be one. And they claim to not want to fund abortions. And Tucker Carlson is absolutely correct. Money is fungible. So if we're paying for their war efforts, their genocides, their atrocities, you know, obviously that frees up money for them to spend on other things. In the meantime, Americans are drowning in debt. We are are suffering without the same benefits that they get to enjoy, like paid family leave,

for instance, universal health care is another example. But what's amazing to me, Jen, is I remember Huckabee, being one of those like, ooh, deficit hawk Republicans, right? These days, I don't really hear much from Republicans when it comes to our national debt, which I'm actually genuinely scared of. Like, I'm worried about the future of this country because we're already spending a trillion dollars a year, simply servicing the massive amount of debt that we're in, just paying the interest on that debt. But what are your thoughts on that exchange? Because I love the fact that he did that

juxtaposition between our quality of life versus the quality of life for Israelis. Yeah, so let me point out those two hypocrisy. So first off, Mike Huckabee's been saying his entire career, you have to vote against Democrats on abortion alone. So if somebody is pro choice, they're murdering babies. Then he's, Tucker asks him, well, why are we sending, hundreds of billions of dollars to a country that allows abortion. He's like, yeah, that's okay, it's Israel. Okay, all right, well that, and then they're going to talk later about killing kids and Huckabee's going to say that it's okay to kill kids, pro-life guy.

Israel killed 20,000 kids in Gaza. Huckabee's like, oh, who cares about the kids? Like, it's, they're making it so obvious. They're almost like smearing it in our face. Like, what are you going to do about it, huh? I work for Israel. I'm Israel's ambassador. I'm not the American ambassador.

than on standard of living. So we're not paying for their health care. Yeah, but when you give them $330 billion, it frees up $330 million. That's why they have universal health care. We don't. They have paid family leave, we don't. They have free college, we don't. And Netanyahu just a day or two ago gave a speech bragging about, until recently,

Israel's average income was $17,000. Now it's $63,000. And where did that money come from? It came from us. They're just literally robbing us, giving it to Israel, and then go, oh, no, no, it makes sense because they're a special ally. So they could break all the rules, they could break international law, they could break a pro-choice, pro-life.

No, like no one, they could commit a genocide, they could attack all their names. Nothing matters. The only thing that matters is shut up and give all of your money to Israel. And if you complain about all your money being sent to Israel, you're an anti-Semitism. So that's who Mike Huckabee is, traitor. loser slave to Israel. But let's keep going. In fact, I have to just point out something he said during a recent interview with Fox business, because during this exchange with one of their anchors, the anchor asked,

should Israel be expected to even pay one penny to rebuild Gaza? Now, here's the context you need to know. Trump just said that we're going to spend, as Americans, $10 billion on rebuilding Gaza. Okay? Here's what Huckabee said in response to the Fox business anchor. Absolutely not, absolutely not. And I'll tell you, if anything, there ought to be reparations to Israel for the extraordinary fight they have had to conduct to get their hostages back. He's a traitor to the country, period.

That's all you need to know. And by the way, if you're a good Christian, he's also a terrible traitor to your religion. I mean, here's this guy saying, oh, they just committed a genocide and murdered 20,000 babies over 80,000 people at a bare minimum. They're planning it, as you're going to about to see, they're planning to do it again and again and again and he says, yeah, we should be paying them for committing the genocide. Hey, congratulations, Mike Hockabee, you got your wish. We did pay for that genocide.

We paid for it completely. And now they're saying, oh, now the places we utterly destroyed, America should clean it up. should not only get clean up Gaza, but give Israel more money for destroying Gaza. I mean, what a pathetic servant. What a servile little disgusting barely human person. Yeah, reparations for modern day Nazis. That's what this is. Anyway, let's move on to the next part of this. Let me reset because it's a little bit of a different topic, similar Israel related part of the conversation. So during Tucker Carlson's, kind of contentious conversation slash debate with U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee,

the topic of land rights came up, obviously. That's usually front and center when it comes to the ongoing conflict between Israel and pretty much everyone else in the region. And so in order to justify the mass slaughter campaigns and land theft from Palestinians, Israelis claim that they're, you know, the original Israelites from the Bible and that they have a biblical right to that land. So Tucker Carlson challenged Tucker be on that. Let's take a look. Abrams descendants are the ones who have the right to have this land, correct? Yes. Okay. Why don't we do genetic testing on everybody in the land and find out who Abrams' descendants are? It's really simple. We've cracked the human genome. We can do that. Why don't

we do that? Would you be against doing that? I have no idea what that would prove. I mean, maybe it would be. What do you mean? It would prove who Abrams' descendants are and who has a right to live here and who doesn't, according to the theology that you yourself just explained. And so I'm very confused as to why we don't do that. If you believe the theology that you've just explained to me, would we do that all over the world? Well, this is the only country in the world that you've said has this covenant with God, that this people have a moral and legal right to the land. What about people who convert to Judaism? Would they have a right? No, they wouldn't have the right. They wouldn't have the right to go into a country on land

that doesn't belong to them and literally ethnically cleanse it and steal it from the Palestinian people. No, they wouldn't have the right to do that. That's my take on it. But hold on, Jank. Then Huckabee says that it would actually be fine if Israel took all of the Middle East. Take a look. You have gone in it three times that God gave this land to this people. And so it is entirely fair for me with respect to ask, what land are you talking about? Because I just read Genesis 15, as I have many times. And that land, I think it says, from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is once again, basically the entire Middle East.

So God gave that land to his people, the Jews, or he didn't. You're saying he did. What does that mean? Does Israel have the right to that land? Because you're appealing to Genesis. You're saying that's the original deed. It would be fine if they took it all. Yeah, he is one of the worst people on the planet, and he's a traitor to the country.

And I'm talking about Mike Huckabee, of course. I also want to clarify that the theology that Tucker is challenging him on is not theology. that he believes in. He's just challenging Huckabee on what he claims he believes. And it's a cult, guys. It's literally a cult, a death cult that thinks it's okay to steal, to slaughter, untold numbers of innocent people in order to take over land that doesn't belong to you. That is what he's advocating for.

And he prances around pretending as though he is a good moral Christian. No, he's a demon. Okay, bad people advocate for garbage like that. But I'm curious what you think, Jank. Do you think that genocide and land theft is okay if, you know, your mythology somehow buys into that? Well, look, he's not the only one saying that. Yeah, there's a lot of demons in the world.

Yeah, no, no, no. What I mean is historically, every time an imperial empire or fascists come into power, They always say that they have a genetic right to the land. That's literally what the Nazis said. They said we have a right to the Sudeten land, to Poland, to Austria. Those are our birth rights because of our genes. Israel is making an identical argument saying we have a genetic right to this land. I'm going to come back to that in a second.

But that's why Tucker asking that question to Huckabee makes sense. Well, who has the genetic right? Because if it's a genetic right, put aside the fact that it's, that's a fascist proposition to begin with. But don't we have to know who it is then? Like what if I raised it in my hand and said, okay, I'm now Jewish, I have the right to all of that land, okay? Well, they say that's absurd.

No, we're not gonna give it to you. Well, why not? Well, because you're not Jewish, you're not genetically Jewish. Or well, then let's find out who is, right? Okay, now the reality is, you don't have to do any of that because there is no genetic right to land. That's insane. And again, literally fascist. And so in this case, Anna, Israel did this propaganda in America, and it worked brilliantly. And strategically, I gotta give them credit for it. They what they wanted was they wanted the Christians to be on their

side, right? So they said, oh, the Bible says that we, not you guys, and not the Palestinians, Not the people who live there, not anyone else, but we will have the right to that because that's what Christianity wants. That's what the Bible wants, that's what Jesus wants, right? Now that was a giant lie, and by the way, if we're doing it like that, okay, well, are gonna go back into the Bible and go, okay, wait, which land now belongs to the Canaanites? How come there's no talk of the Canaanites, right? So I mean, this, and then what if the Muslims go, okay, well, that's your religious belief.

My religious belief is that the entire Middle East should be Muslim, including Israel. So I have a genetic right to your land. Oh, now we're at crossroads, aren't we? We're at loggerheads because you don't do stupid things like genetic right to land. And of course, my favorite point is that we could always come back in, the Turks can, and go, well, brother, I had it all. So now I have the right to that land. And that's what leads to perpetual war when fascist monsters say that only their people,

their ethnicity has a right to the land, and they can murder anyone they want and wipe them off that land. So when Tucker asked, are you going to help Israel wipe out everybody in the Middle East, from the Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in Turkey? And you just heard the answer. And Huckabees is like, they should have it all. And of course, we should pay for all that ethnic cleansing, all that genocide, all that war. We should pay with not only treasure, but with our blood and not there.

That's right. And so it doesn't matter what religious beliefs, the people living in these, you know, neighboring countries believe. If it were Mormons, if it were Christians, if it were Buddhists, we would hear the exact same propaganda about them as we're hearing about Muslims today. So just remember that as our airwaves and our print media. media will be full of all sorts of claims, making it seem as though the bad guys here are those who are being invaded, those who are being bombed, those who are having their land stolen from them, and they're in some cases democratically elected leaders overthrown on behalf of Israel. When you want to talk about the lack of peace in the Middle East, the heart of that conflict

has been and always will be Israel as long as we enable that country. We got to take a break when we come back. I want to get to the Epstein portion of the conversation because, man, Huckabee plays dumb. And Tucker doesn't budge. It's amazing. So we'll come back with that and more. Don't miss it. YouTube members want to be dragging 13 says, I'm surprised at Muskowitz.

I thought he was one of the good ones. No, what Muscovitz does is he puts on a show. So he'll wear like cool sneakers on top of his suit. So he's so hip. And then he'll have like snarky insults of Donald Trump in hearings. I am I'm a Democrat. And then when you're not looking, he's like, yes, I want war just like Trump does. We have to support Israel.

We give all your money to Israel just like Trump wants. And that's not all. He's a corporate bitch too. So like he takes tons of corporate PAC money, serves those guys. There's so many of these frauds guys. Like when we've been saying it for so long and everybody's like, oh, you guys are so rude. You should work with Democratic colleagues. If they were just unity and you guys bowed your head and you just listen to what they said about corporations and Israel, everything wouldn't be great.

Has that worked out for us? How's that worked out? No, Muscoitz is terrible. You should definitely vote against them in Democratic primaries. Godheimer is the worst of the worst. And Godheimer is like, oh, he's also, Godheimer, forget Israel. Like one of the most pro-corporate Democrats in the entire Congress. There isn't any corporate bill that he hasn't loved and pulled.

and helped the Republicans to pass. Ranford governor, I think, came in fifth or 18th or whatever he came in. None of these guys are popular. They were all propped up by mainstream media going, well, obviously, Muscovitz is the leading candidate in this race. He has raised the most amount of money. And so he's got, hyper, God, He was the greatest, wonderful corporate Democrat raised so much money. He's number one, he's on the Democrats side. They never tell you about his voting record.

They never tell you about how many times he betrayed you. Because, oh, shh, no, don't talk about Israel. Dragon Line 69 says BB says more time in the White House than Melania. Great one. That's hilarious. You know what? Let's go old school on that one. You remember rewards at t.com, a $100 blue apron gift card, okay?

You make us laugh out loud like that? Nice job. Rewards at t.com. Get that cash in on that. Partisan hypocrites everywhere says, by the way, that's just for dragon line. Partisan hypocrites everywhere. He says we give Israel benefits, we don't even give it to Americans, it's outrageous. But if you say that, anti-Semite, like literally everyone on cable news will call you an anti-Semite for saying that.

So it's just disgusting how our media works for Israel. Independent conversation says, by the way, so nice to see Anna hosting on a Friday, that we can all agree on. Kevin Shea says, but my God can beat up your God. So there, that's the level of conversation we're having. And all media's like, oh yeah, no, that's a legitimate point. His God can beat up your God. Yeah, good point. Israel is owed the land.

Shut up. Kill the Muslims, take their land. God promises to them. And he's the bigger God. He's the bully God. Okay, CDN, Norse dog deaths. If a politician takes A PAC money, then they should be in the words of wise man, Willie Nelson, vote them out, vote them out, vote them out.

100%. Not another dollar.com, not another dollar.com. If your politicians take a dollar from Israel or give a dollar to Israel, vote against them in the primaries. You don't have to vote for the other party. Make sure you clean out Congress with all the Israelis that are betraying us. We'll be back. And TYT, Jen Canana, with you guys. John Marr, thank you for the contribution through Super Chat.

SEDA and North Dogdad. Thank you for giving the membership on YouTube. And Vincent Hamilton, thank you for joining brother by hitting the join button below. So please everybody, it's a great way to help the show and we really need it. Obviously, we're battling a lot of tough opponents here. And so if you can join or upgrade through the join button, Anna, what's next? Well, there's a little more from the Tucker slash Huckabee conversation that I want to get to. So the Epstein files came up during Tucker Carlson's debate with U.S. ambassador to Israel,

Mike Huckabee. Huckabee sure did play dumb while displaying a shocking level of disinterest when it came to pedophiles victimizing American girls. Take a look. The current president of Israel, current president, who I know you know, President Herzog, apparently was at Petto Island. That's what it says in the disclosures. And of course, we know that the former prime minister, Aude Barak, was living on an off at Epstein's house. So still living high level Israeli officials are directly implicated in Epstein's life, if not his crime.

So I would think that you'd be following this. Only, I was not aware that there was any connection with President Herzlach. I would be surprised to hear that and knew there was about the former prime minister who apparently had a lot of dealings with Epstein. But there's a lot going on in this part of the world. And frankly, that has not been top line item. But you're surprised to hear that the current president of Israel, whom you know, is listed as a visitor to petio Island. Had never heard that.

Never heard it even in the Israeli press. You know, there's like so many other things going on. I don't really have time to be concerned about a pedophile ring tied to Israel that's carrying out sexual misconduct and rape of American girls. So can we just move on now? That's effectively what Huckabee said there. Amazing. Yeah.

So first of all, if I'm ambassador to a country, let's pick a random one, Kazakhstan. And it turns out the current president of Kazakhstan went to, you know, Pito Island, as he's calling it, with Epstein. That would literally be my job to know that. Like if an interviewer surprised me with that, that would be deeply embarrassing. I'm the ambassador to this country. But of course, Mike Hockabee is not our ambassador, he's Israel's representative. representative. But Anna, there was one telling moment there outside of that Epstein conversation.

And of course, there's the overall point, which is like, oh, Epstein, what's the big deal? I mean, he was just raping American kids. He didn't even do anything to my beloved Israelis. In fact, he worked for Israel and getting, you know, getting cyber weapons or so many other deals. But my favorite moment was actually, he said, well, I didn't even hear anything about that, even in the Israeli press, which was an accidental confession that. we do such a great job of controlling the American press, they never criticize Israel. But in the Israeli press, you could actually find out some truth because we can't call them anti-Semites. And even in the Israeli press, we didn't, there was no reporting on this.

No, you're, Jank, you're absolutely right. I did catch that actually. And as I've said on this show a million times before, I get my news about Israel from Israel. So I'm very aware of what gets covered in Israeli press versus U.S. press. And it hadn't really struck me until the moment I heard Huckabee say what he said. I actually haven't seen much in the Israeli press in regard to the Epstein files. I certainly haven't seen anything about President Herzog. So that's not to say that there isn't any reporting at all. Obviously, I'm not like a superhero. I can't read every single thing that they put out. But in terms of like the main publications, I certainly haven't seen anything about the president's relationship with Epstein. But look, there's one other part of this Epstein portion of their conversation that I want to get to because, look, Epstein's ties to Mossad did come up.

And at this point, anyone who is denying that Epstein had a close relationship with Israel is either ill-informed. Okay, I'll give them that if they just don't know. But in the case of Mike Cuckabee, I would just mention to say they're just trying to cover it up. So let's watch that exchange. Do you attack to me personally for suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to Mossad? And you said that. You think he does? What's very clear he does from the files.

You think he does? Where do you get that? Well, the fact that he was in contact repeatedly with members of the Israeli government, including the current president and the former prime minister and all kinds of Israeli intel-connected people. I'm not saying he worked for Assad. I don't think we know that. But there's no question that he had extensive contact with CIA.

I think you said it a turning point event. Everybody knows Jeffrey Epstein. I said everyone thinks. And it turns out everyone was right that he did have. I'm not sure everyone was right or everyone thinks. You haven't looked at the evidence and you're not pushing for the release of the total corpus of evidence. And I'm confused because I want to believe that your goal is to get to the truth. And the fastest way to do that is by releasing the evidence.

Don't you think? Do you suggest that I can release the evidence? I'm suggesting you could call for it right now. Well, I bind, call for it. Let's have it all open. I thought it was being all opened up for everything. Once it's open, I hope you'll read it. I'm pretty sure that Huckabee is acutely aware of Epstein's close relationship with Israel.

And yes, Mossad. I do have one, you know, criticism of portions of this interview that Tucker carried out. Because everyone knows what you already think, Tucker. So just say it. Okay, you've already said it before. Yeah, Epstein worked for Mossad. Now, whether he was an agent or an asset, we don't know for sure. And I don't even think it really matters.

I mean, just this week, a story that DropSight News broke had to do with how Ehud Barak would spend so much time at Epstein's Manhattan apartment that the Israeli government set up security, including in-depth surveillance of that Manhattan apartment. You're going to tell me that Israel didn't know? You're going to tell me Israel didn't know. Really? Come on. No, I just gotta say this because I keep mentioning the cyber weapons and I'm not sure people are like fully comprehending it. Think about it guys, is there just a random guy who's not working with Mossad? Hey honey, I'm gonna go grab some milk and eggs from the grocery store and on my way, I'm gonna

get Israel cyber weapons. No, there's no such person. You get Israel cyber weapons if you work for Israel. That's not complicated at all. So like this, they're all lying to you. It's right there. He procures cyber weapons. That's an intelligence operation and you work for that government.

That's the most obviously thing in the world, let alone the mountain of other evidence, including the Israeli spies staying at his place. And literally every international deal he did was for Israel. They're just lying to you in the most brazen way you could possibly imagine. Yeah, that's exactly right. So I highly recommend watching the full conversation. It was about two and a half hours long, give or take. And they even talked about Tom Alexandrovich, who was one of the Israeli government officials having to do with, you know, cyber protection and stuff like that.

He was in the United States, got caught in an FBI sting operation, attempting to solicit a 15-year-old for sex. And the United States allowed him to fly back to Israel. And he hasn't been extradited. It doesn't look like Israel would even agree to extraditing him. It was a great conversation. Please check it out. All right. Now with that in mind, I want to move on to the final story for the first hour.

It's an important one because yet another American has been killed by Israel. Terrorist Israeli settlers have slaughtered yet another American citizen. This time, 18-year-old Nasrallah Abu Siam, who was killed in the West Bank, as the other American citizens were. And he's just the latest victim of this deranged culture among these settlers who feel entitled to taking the land in the West Bank, stealing the homes of Palestinians. Now, Jank, your thoughts before I give you more details about this tragic story. Yeah, so this is the 10th American killed in Israel with no consequences at all. And our government doesn't even ask for justice. So is our government really our government?

So as you hear Anna tell you the stories of how they murdered him, think about how much you would want justice for an American who was killed like this. But you will receive none because Israel is above us and we have to accept them killing our citizens and having no consequences. Now if you think I'm exaggerating, go ahead, Anna, give him the facts. So the Israeli settlers attacked a farming village in Mukmus. This happened. on Wednesday. Now, this area has been repeatedly targeted by Israeli settlers who have assaulted residents. They've committed arson, literally lighting people's homes on fire. And they have also built outposts. Now, we have reported over and over again about the Israeli government, essentially emboldening these individuals by announcing that they are going to make illegal

settlements formally legal for whatever that's worth under the Israeli government. government's rule. And whenever the IDF soldiers are there, they're not there to protect the Palestinians from terrorist Israeli settlers. They're there to further emboldened the settlers as they carry out acts of violence and steal homes. So this attack snowballed into additional conflicts between Palestinians and residents in the area. I'm sorry, residents in the area and the Israeli settlers. And when the Israeli defense forces arrived, it only enabled them, right? So the violence didn't settle down or anything like that. Here's what one eyewitness says. Quote, when the settlers saw the army, they were encouraged and started shooting live bullets. He added that they clubbed

those injured with sticks after they had fallen to the ground. So in the case of Abu Siam, the 18-year-old American, Palestinian-American who was killed, he was beaten and he was on the ground and an eyewitness claims that a settler then shot and killed him. Abousiam's father told the New York Times that his son was in fact born in the United States, however, spent most of his life in the West Bank. And here's what he said to the New York Times, quote, my heart is on fire, I'm broken, he helped me with everything. The Israeli military stated that the incident was under review, which means that it's not under review, which means that yet another American citizen has been killed by Israelis and there will be no justice whatsoever. This will be yet

another instance of a tragic story where an American was victimized, but it'll be memory hold. Trump doesn't care or government doesn't care. And to be fair to Trump, if you want to consider this fair, there were American citizens who were killed by Israeli settlers under the Biden administration. He couldn't be bothered to deal with it either. So it doesn't. It doesn't It doesn't matter, Democrat, Republican, we, the American people really don't have representation in either party when it comes to, I don't know, justice when terrorists rob us of our lives. That's what we're dealing with here. No arrests have been announced, by the way. Of course not. So why do I say, of course not. That's not just a throwaway line here.

Let's show you graphic six. This is the nine Americans killed before Abu see. now it's up to 10 in just the last three years by Israel. There has been no accountability, no jail time, no arrests for any of them. They can literally murder American citizens and 100% get away with it. Our government doesn't even ask for anything. And you could see all the lack of accountability there. That's from Grock. Jacob Flickinger was killed in April 2024.

He was an aid worker and an aid worker. and they'd killed and murdered him in an airstrike because he was trying to help Gazans eat. And Israel, that's the only one where any action happened at all. Israel dismissed the officers who murdered him. They were not arrested, of course, no jail time. It's just an American life, it's, you know. And by the way, Flickinger is the only one on that list who isn't a Muslim American.

So they're like, okay, okay, a Christian American would give you a little bit, we give you a little We'll pretend to dismiss that guy and later we'll probably hire him from something else, but the rest of them. Now, when people point out that Israelis get to murder Americans with no consequences, sometimes the only pushback I ever get, Anna is, they'll say, yeah, but they're all Muslim. Wait, is that a thing? Can other countries go, oh yeah, we can murder Hindu Americans, Muslim Americans, Buddhist Americans. I mean, as long as they're not a certain religion, we're allowed to murder them,

even if they're American. Is that a thing? Is that a standard? So. Okay, I just want to be clear. They'll kill Christians too. And in fact, they killed Flickinger. Yeah. Yeah, like, why are you? You think you're safe because you're Christian? Are you ridiculous? Like, that's, first of all, even if you think that is true, you're a bad person, thinking that any group of people deserve slaughter simply because of their religious beliefs or their identity is disgusting. and I reject it in any and all forms. But you're also wrong, okay? If the Middle East was full of Christian majority countries, we would be hearing about how, ooh, those Christian terrorists,

they really had it coming. I guarantee it. How many Christian churches have been bombed by Israel? How many? The one Catholic church in Gaza bombed by Israel. In the West Bank, in Jerusalem, how many Christians have been persecuted by Israeli terrorists? But you think you're safe? Okay. Okay, good luck.

Yeah, so yeah, they did bomb churches. And when I had mentioned that in social media, Israel's defenders go, yeah, but it was only a couple of bombs. They're terrorists, okay? They're terrorists, they're terrorists, they're terrorists. Plain and simple, time to wake up. That's what they are. And look, on another show, we'll show you videos of settlers who brag about how they're going to wipe out all the Gentiles from the Middle East because it's, it's their land. So they're not hiding it. The settlers are Jewish supremacists. And they say it out loud all the time. Jews are the chosen people. They deserve all of that land. And anyone who's on that land should be killed and we should take that land instead. Now, that doesn't represent all Jews at all, at all. The settlers are radicals. They're terrorists. They're extremists. They're

They're terrorists and their supremacists, right? But why are we giving money to these terrorists? It's insane. And then they use the money to murder us. And then we're supposed to bow our heads. And if we don't bow our heads, our media goes, shut about those Americans. They're irrelevant. But you, you're an anti-Semite.

You're the real problem. Not Israel that murders American citizens, but anyone who criticizes Israel for murdering American citizens. And there's no other country on earth where you can kill 10 Americans in the span of three years, let alone one American, and there wouldn't be massive consequences. And finally, guys, go to t.com slash campaigns. We'll put the link below. Those are our different petitions, including the one on Alexandrovich, because he came here for sexual tourism. Because now the Israelis laugh at America.

They go, we can do anything we want. It's our playground. So he came to rape our children. We let him go back to Israel. And Huckabee is saying, well, who cares? We're not gonna extradite him. He's an Israeli, he's above Americans. America's are inferior to the Israelis, and if they wanna rape you,

we're going to send them back home. We arrested the guy, he was in prison. All the Americans who were arrested with him are still in prison. He's the only one that was free to go, because he's above us, he's an Israeli. That's where we are today. Anyone else telling you otherwise is literally lying. Those are the facts, they can't dispute the facts, that's why they do ad hominem attacks. Those facts are correct, but if you state those facts, then we're gonna try to label you a bigot and end your career.

So that's how much control Israel has in this country. All right, Anna, thank you so much for doing this on a Friday. Those are super important stories. We really appreciate it. When we come back, Jordan Yule is going to join us. We've got more for you guys, including Donald Trump gets, you know, slapped around by his own, kind of his own Supreme Court, has he nominated so many of those guys. and he's furious about it, and he's vowing to destroy countries that defy him, all of that when we return.

There's one reason why health care is so messed up in this country, and that's because of our money and politics situation. Because those industries that are deeply corrupt can just simply purchase all of Congress. And then the problem never gets fixed because of that bribery. Mike. Yeah, I mean, it's the it's greed and it's the greed of politicians, right? And so everything they do is dictated by the donors and the money. I mean, I shouldn't say that, not everything. I actually, a lot of what they do is. And I do think that there are people who do things in spite of the fact that they have to raise money and often don't get that money and often don't win because they don't, but are in their fighting for ideals that they believe in.

Bernie Sanders is certainly an example of someone like that. I'm back to gaslighting. Didn't you and I talk about gaslighting on old school? Probably. That boss gaslit all his female employees. People who manipulate others like that make you feel like you're the weirdo. Why won't you punch yourself in the face? What is wrong with you?

And you're like, oh my God, I feel so bad. Why didn't I just punch myself in the face and poke my eye up out? I'm 47 and I just figured out like earlier this year. You figured out somebody was doing it to you or that you were doing it? That it was a phenomenon, that it would have been happening my whole life and I didn't realize. Right, right. You want to know the three shows that I'm watching lately? Shogun, Anjinsa.

Those guys are badasses. Then you go to the Dutton's Yellowstone. Now, they don't always do it right, but they are badasses. But the third show has the biggest badasses of all, the Young Turks. Live every weekend. Sick that I was so good. God damn it. Okay, live.

Weekdays at 6 o'clock Eastern. That's what I meant. son. How do you know if you're a populist? Easy. Do you work for the donor class? You don't? Great. You're a populist. Okay. So the establishment takes money from the donors and serves the donors. Mainstream media takes money from advertisers and they are giant corporations themselves and they work for themselves and they work for the powerful. If you care about the average person and you want the average person to have better health care, better wages, a better life, and you hate corruption, congrats, you're a populist.

All right, Amazon Prime members, here's how you can subscribe for free on Twitch. Start by linking your Amazon Prime account to your Twitch account, and then click that little subscribe or resubscribe button below the stream on Twitch. Scroll down and select the subscribe free with Prime button. And then you're finished. Close out immediately and share your little subscription alert with the chat. Send a cute message along with it and bathe in the sweet, twitchy Bezos funded love. Hashtag Bezos Bucks.

with Jordan Yule with you guys. Also Boxy Brown and Ruby Hoove. Thank you guys for gifting memberships on YouTube. We appreciate that a lot. And I just quickly want to tell you about Noble Mobile because it really does save you a lot of money, people writing in about how much it saved them. Max you could pay is $50, although right now it's $40 off the first month. So it's a great time to act. t.yt.com slash switch. If you switch nothing on your phone changes, but your bill goes down dramatically. They also give you money back. for data you don't use, so I've only been paying in the 30s. TYT.com slash switch, and you will literally save hundreds of dollars every year,

and nothing else on your phone will change. All right, Jordan, what's next? Take a look at this. Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing, and I'm ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country. In a 6 to 3 split, the Supreme Court struck down some of Trump's tariffs this morning, and he is not happy.

Justices Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett voted with the three liberal justices. And in his press conference about the decision, he made his anger at Gorsuch and Barrett, specifically who he nominated quite clear. And we'll get into more what he might be doing next. But first, Jack, what are your thoughts on this decision? Yeah, there's two sides of this. Is the decision right or wrong? And I'll give you Trump's point of view. And three justice did vote for him. And it's not crazy. But ultimately he was wrong. And I'll explain why. But also the fallout from it. You know, he's now threatening to destroy countries. So what does that mean? Let's find out. Here's what you need to know. The U.S. Supreme Court and said President Trump's tariff policies imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act,

AEPA, are unconstitutional, dealing a major blow to the president's signature economic policy. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, in light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, we must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it. Roberts wrote, concluding Trump has not. Now, the government could be on the hook for more than $175 billion in refunds to corporations. The potential refunds to a broad range of companies would be for tariffs already collected by the government since Trump slapped on the duties without authorization from Congress.

But let's get back to that press conference for a moment for more of his reaction, starting with this. Justice is fortunate and fair. Are you surprised in particular by their decision today? I am. Do you regret nominating them? I don't want to say whether or not a regret. I think their decision was terrible. I think it's an embarrassment to their families.

You want to know the truth, the two of them. Now, singling out those justices specifically could make for a tense, dynamic. at the State of the Union next week, and he was asked about that. Are they still invited to your State of the Union next week? And will you speak with that? They are invited, barely. Barely. Barely.

Three are happily invited. No, no, they're barely, they're barely invited. Honestly, I couldn't care less if they come, okay? It's so fragile. And in his press conference, he let the mask slip about what the tariffs were ultimately being used for. Now the court has given me the unquestioned right to ban all sorts of things from coming into our country, to destroy foreign countries, but a much more powerful right than many

people ever thought we even had, but not the right to charge a fee. How crazy is that? Now Trump is saying he has a plan B. The U.S. will impose a 10% global tariff, President Trump announced on Friday, to replace many of the duties ruled ill. illegal by the Supreme Court in a decision that morning. The new tariffs will be imposed under section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, Trump said, which allows the president to impose tariffs for up to 150 days. During that time, Trump said they would also begin new tariff investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act, which can result in more permanent tariffs. Jank, what do you make of this? Yeah, so I want to explain the legal side of it first. So the Trump

administration said the IEPPA, which is a law, gave them the right to impose these tariffs. Why? Because they're the emergency power, the executive branch does, and the president does, to deal with regulation and imports. They go, you know, imports, that's tariffs, right? So understand that when you go to the court, usually, although sometimes Trump side doesn't even bother making a case or presenting evidence, which is stunning. But in this case, they did. And it's a legitimate argument.

And they say, okay, because it says those two words, this law applies and supersedes the part of the Constitution that says that Congress has to pay enact taxes, not the executive branch, not the president, right? So the Supreme Court said to that, no, the Constitution is above the any bill that you pass. And the Constitution is not unclear at all, Congress has to do taxes, not the President. And you can't, the president cannot unilaterally impose attacks and tariffs are indisputably attacks. Second of all, the law that you're talking about doesn't say anything about tariffs.

So if Congress had an intent to override the constitution on tariffs, they would have mentioned tariffs in that bill and they didn't. So it's like his case is not absurd, but it's clearly wrong. So that's why the courts kind of didn't have a choice in my opinion if they're trying to interpret the law in a sane way. And so obviously the Constitution supersedes and they've got to follow it, right? So okay, so that's the good news and they did their job. At the same time, I have to note that a lot of people have a misnomer about the Supreme Court.

We've talked about this on the Young Turks many times. Are they right wing or are they left wing? Are they Republicans or are they Democrats? No, the Supreme Court is mainly picked based on how much they'll serve corporate power. So that's why Gorsuch is on there because he said in one case, he was the only judge that looked at it at any level and they said that if you don't follow your company's orders to freeze the death, then you should be fired. Because that's a real case, you could look it up.

And so, and guess which side Gorsuch went with here? He went with against Trump and against the tariffs. Why the Chamber of Commerce and Corporate Interests are against tariffs. So three of the justices, even though they're conservative or Republican, voted with what seems like, it's not really the liberals. That's why I'm saying it's a misnomer. They voted with corporations. They almost always vote with corporations.

Obama and Clinton used to brag about how the just as they appointed were so in favor of business interests. So it's come from both sides that conclusion. Now in this case, I think they're right anyway, but I want you to understand their motivations, and you'll see that most often they're not following the law strictly. They're not following right wing or left wing strictly. They're almost always vote in favor of corporate power above anything else. And that's also what happened here.

Now, when you turn to Trump's reaction, obviously maniacal as always, right? And I've got this killer quote here. First of all, they're an embarrassment to their families. I mean, no one knows how to do trolling better than Trump and insults. We talked about this before, too. Like if his career path was as an insult comic like Jeff Ross or something, that would have made a lot of sense. He'd been pretty good at that, right?

But to me, the killer line, Jordan, is at some point he said, But I'm allowed to cut off any and all trade or business with that same country. In other words, I can destroy the trade. I can destroy the country. Who is like, this is why we told you to vote against Trump, because this is how he thinks. I can destroy anyone and anything in my path. What I'm worried about is the country is going to destroy is us, not anyone else. Yeah. And that type of isolationist policy or thinking is something that we see in other aspects of his policy.

And for other countries, why would you want to negotiate with somebody like that? Why would you go out of your way to help a country like that? It's why you don't see people buying into his board of peace plan. And it's why you see people thumbing their nose at the idea of trade negotiations for these tariffs. Like the guy is a tyrant. But the piece that interests me is the refunds, because we're going to see a prolonged, drawn-out battle over that because those corporations are going to want their money back there is a slew of lawsuits already over those rebates or refunds because they argued that those were enacted and implemented illegally, which was confirmed today by the Supreme Court. But my interest, the piece that's interesting to me is what about the people? What about the people who had to pay higher prices for the past several months?

Because those corporations passed those costs of those tariffs onto the consumer. So those corporations ultimately brought in more gross revenue. They had to pay some to the government. They want that money back, but they got it from both sides. What do we get? We get nothing. And also, corporations love to use moments like this, just like they did with the supply chain crisis that led to higher inflation in 2022. They like to blame those moments on or say that those are justifications for raising prices rather than letting it affect their bottom line.

They pass those costs on to us. But then they keep the prices high and they continue to grow. So we're already seeing higher prices off of the supply chain and inflation crisis, you know, the middle of buying. Biden's term, and then they got higher with this, they're not going to bring those costs down. So they want a refund and keep the prices high. And at the end of the day, we all get screwed. And it is effectively yet another transfer of wealth from the working class to the top. We've seen it time and time again.

This is no different. See, that's exactly what I'm talking about. So they pass a, you know, or state a perfectly reasonable conclusion on this. case, but then they come in with Salt Bay and sprinkle in a little bit of, oh, here's $175 billion to corporations. Yeah, and plus you can kill your workers if you want. I mean, it's absurd. Wait a minute, we paid the tariffs. They raised prices on us.

Where's our refund? Supreme Court says, no, you didn't get me elected to or selected to the Supreme Court. My beautiful Chamber of Commerce did I serve them. So now we got to pay back the corporations, $1,000. No, that's maddening, man. Maddening. Of course, as usual, the American people get bubkus, nothing. So you got no ally in Trump, you got no ally in the Supreme Court. And Trump says, I'm gonna do 10% anyway. I don't care. I don't care what the law says. So you're still gonna have higher prices. And later corporations

will want you to double pay for that too. The one last thing I want to say before we got to go to break is we saw this in a conversation on Fox yesterday on the topic of a wealth tax, making the wealthy corporations pay more, both in New York and in California. And Jesse Waters, just grotesque individual, but said the billionaires should get out ahead of this and employ a bread and circuses strategy with a superficial appeasement, where they should just, he was being disgusting saying, buy everyone a value meal from McDonald's or make the homeless people fight for entertainment,

lucky with the gladiators. But even on this point, that appeasement was the refund checks or the rebate checks that Trump had kind of tossed out there, but was never firmly committed to, potentially up to 2000. He was asked about that recently by a reporter, and he said, I did that?

Didn't even remember making that promise. And now, of course, we certainly will not see that because he's going to say that his hands are tied because he has to pay back the corporations because of litigation. So no matter what, we're getting screwed. Yep. And with that, we'll go to the break. I have concepts of a plan.

He's a cycle. All right, guys, if you can ring the bell, that would be amazing. If you share and like the live stream and all the videos makes a big difference. So we appreciate it. All right, let's go to our members on TYT. 36 Chambers Dragon says, not only are they smearing it in our faces, Jane, they're doing it with our own cake and laughing at our faces too. Yeah, Israel first feels like they can't lose. And what's amazing is that there's this giant tsunami of opposition to Israel today in a way that I've never seen in, you know, over 30 years of covering the news.

And they're more brazen than they have ever been. And they're like, so I think what's they're doing is they realize they lost the media wars and their propaganda isn't working anymore. So they're trying for full intimidation and suppression. So you have that to look forward to. In fact, we're in the middle of it. Solidarity Works says, I can't believe I'm sitting here going yes, yes, yes, Tucker, you go, smear the MF on his own turf, referring of course to Huckabee. I agree, but some others didn't. I'll try to get to them in a second.

Spider-Man Dragon says, Abraham has held his father of Judaism, Christianity, and Muslims, so it's for everyone, you moron. He says, The Huckabee. Yerai Heap says, Get Jeremy Sacks on the show, Jank. He shares your views on Israel.

We've had Jeremy on the show before, and we should get him back on. Yeah, he's brilliant, and I appreciate him. Boomer Dragon Cat says, I expected Trump to burn down the U.S. My imagination had failed me. He wants to burn down the whole world. Smitin for Anna says I'm asking honestly what action would our government be likely to take if another ally murdered 10 Americans in a similar time frame travel restrictions.

Oh, there would be record breaking sanctions at a minimum, at a minimum. Imagine if Turkey, which is a super strong ally of America, they're a bulwark against Iran, Russia, and the second largest army in NATO. If they killed two Americans, let alone 10, it'd be hell to pay. But they're not beloved Israel, and they don't control our government. Israel does. So happy Warrior Dragon. Thank you for gifting two subs on Twitter. You're awesome.

So this is the one I was referring to. Bradshaw crew of one said, TYT's getting behind Tucker for agreeing on Israel. Meanwhile, BB is still killing innocent women and children every day. How is siding with Tucker doing any good? He's a terrible person, and part of the reason we have MAGA. the left will gain nothing from him. I'm amazed, I'm stunned by that comment, but that's okay. I used to get angry at that.

I don't get angry at it anymore. So Jordan would be happy to hear that. So look, look, brother, I can't believe you look at that Huckabee interview or the Ted Cruz interview and you go, not doing us any good. He destroyed Ted Cruz. He destroyed Mike Huckabee. He's fighting for the things in those interviews and in those issues that we care about. why would you reject that help?

It doesn't mean you have to agree with him on everything. How many times do I have to say this, right? But that's amazing. So yeah, BB's still killing everyone. But Tucker is against that, and he's fighting the people who are for it. I'm just perplexed. Tucker Carlson, a terrible friend. I'm back on TYIT, Jeng and Jordan with you more news.

Let's start with this. I have to listen to the fake news talking about affordability. Affordability. Do you notice what word have you not heard over the last two weeks? Affordability. Because I've won. I've won affordability. I had to go out and talk about it.

But we inherited a mess. Donald Trump is now claiming to have one one affordability, whatever that means. Jank, are you buying it? All right. I think that's going to be his mission accomplished moment. So we're in for a lot of economic pain coming up over the next three years. I'll explain why in a little bit.

But him bragging like, that's going to go in so many commercials. Hear me now, quote me later. All right, Jordan, give him all the facts first. So during his speech at a steel mill in Georgia yesterday, Trump boasted wildly about the economy and claimed that the media had stopped talking about affordability because of how good it is. You don't hear the word affordability. You know, they just say the word that look at the camera say affordability. And I'd be watching, I'd say, oh, I can't believe it. Do people believe it? They would say affordable and everybody would say, oh, Trump's cause, no, no, they cause the affordability problem, and we've solved it. And we're going still lower, but we've solved it. I have two questions.

One, why is he so wet there? And second, what's the truth? While inflation is nowhere near where it was mid-COVID, Trump has not solved the inflation problem as he's repeatedly claimed. In reality, there have already been higher than usual price increases for utilities, electronics, appliances, and other household staples in 2026. Home electricity prices are up 6.3% and natural gas service 9.8% in the last year, while prices for ground beef have jumped 17.2% and coffee, 18.3% according to the January

consumer price index. Additionally, the core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy, rose 3% in December, up 0.0%. up 0.2 percentage points from November. That matched the consensus forecast, but kept the pivotal inflation measure well above the Fed's 2% target. On a monthly basis, goods prices climbed 0.4% while services increased 0.3%, indicating that price pressures remained relatively broad-based, rather than concentrated in any single price category. And the annual inflation rate in January was 2.4. only slightly lower than the 2.7 annual rate at the time of Trump's election in November 2024. That's why the American people aren't buying Trump's claim that he has won affordability.

And a survey released this month by the economist in U-Gov found that just 34% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the economy. That puts his net approval rating on the economy at negative 23 points, the lowest it's been in either of his terms. The survey also found that just 31% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of inflation, and 53% believe the economy is getting worse. And while Trump is bragging about the economy and public, his team knows affordability is a major liability for Republicans in the midterms. His chief of staff, Susie Wiles, reportedly held a closed,

strategy session this week to talk about messaging. Wiles, Deputy Chief of Staff, James Blair, and pollster Tony Fabrizio spoke during the meeting about how energy, housing, health care, fuel, and grocery prices desperately need to be Republicans' main focus right now in order to put up a fight in the midterms. Unfortunately for Trump, he got even more bad economic news today. U.S. growth slowed much more than expected near the end of 2025. gross domestic product rose at an annualized rate of just 1.4%. According to the Commerce Department, well below the Dow Jones estimate for a 2.5% gain.

Trump lashed out when the news was announced writing on Truth Social. The Democrat shutdown cost the USA at least two points in GDP. That's why they're doing it in many form. Again, no shutdowns. Also, lower interest rates. Too late Powell is the worst. It's always someone else's fault. And I'm very curious, Jack, with the State of the Union on Tuesday, how he's going to try to spin all of this negative news.

Did he mean to misspell two in that too late? Maybe he meant 2% like 2. I don't know. It could have been a. I'm not going to try to make sense of anything. The president's a child. So who knows, right? So maybe we shouldn't elect children going forward. All right, look, here's why the economy is going to be in a world of trouble, although there's some irony here. So they're basically lying about the job numbers. Trump fired the guy who was giving the accurate numbers. So that's why they had to adjust the 2025 numbers by, oops, it turns out there was a million less jobs.

And that's among the reasons why they had to adjust it. The AI apocalypse is coming. And Donald Trump and his administration appear completely unprepared for it. They never talk about it other than his AI great. I was about 50,000, right? No, not great. The irony there is that we might lose so many jobs that inflation might go down because no one has any money to spend.

And then the disastrous war with Iran is coming. So he is going to, if I'm, let's see, you know, I love to, you know, make these predictions and see what happens. But I think that the rest of Trump's term will be cataclysmic. It'll be an absolute epic disaster and maybe unlike any we've seen in our lifetimes. And so at that point, people will come back to, I solved it, I won affordability. And my guess is people will be furious. So he's already lost trust with his own base over the Epstein files.

So once you lose trust, then all of your lies are exposed because then at that point, curtain is lifted and you realize, oh, he's not the populist hero fighting for you. It turns out he's another con man from the elites. And he just wants to do things for his own vain glory and ego. And once people see that, then everything unravels for him. And he's at the beginning of the unraveling nowhere near the end. It's going to get pretty ugly. Yeah, that's something that's been on my mind a lot. We talk about this, this, this, this fight in New York to tax the wealthy there, this potential billionaire tax in California. And, you know, they're trying to do the same old scaremonger. Oh, we'll just leave. No, you won't. You're not going to leave like two of

the best cities in the world. You're not going to do it. And to me, it's science, like, you're talking about people like Mark Zuckerberg, $220 billion, $11 homes, five yacht, or three yachts, not even a dent, all of that together, not even a dent in his net worth. And he's, oh, I don't want to pay more in taxes. What do you need that money for? And the greed that we're seeing there and we're seeing here, these corporations raising prices, stretching people thin. And of course, that is an extension of his tariff policies, which ultimately benefit the corporations,

especially these refunds come through. We get screwed. The collective greed at the top is unsustainable. And like you're saying, it could get ugly, but I don't think they recognize that. When you throw in AI, the job loss is there, the outsourcing, all of these things that continue to stretch people more and more, they can only stretch so much before they break. And these people are so greedy and so hubristic that they don't even recognize what might happen, how ugly things might get. They don't care. I don't think they care.

They're so detached from reality that when you have a single person controlling more wealth in the bottom half of the country, they think that's totally fine. No, no, no. We can't have taxes on billionaires. Let them sort it out. The hatred they have for the working class is just truly repugnant. Yeah, so I think there's a head-on collision coming, Jordan, on a couple of cases. counts and I don't know what's going to happen.

You know, I mean, just made a prediction earlier. I love making them, but on that one, it's a black box to me. So here's what I mean by this. Two different collisions that are going to happen. One is a topic we've been talking about a lot, which is the establishment says Israel is the greatest ally we've ever had and we should keep sending them money, et cetera. And now the entire American people left, right and middle go, no, no, no, no, no, we're done with them, right?

Then there's this issue. And the establishment says, what, that was over 50,000? This is the best of times. AIs miraculous and wonderful. Or the rich are getting even richer. This is the greatest times. And the rest of country is hurt dog. Don't ask them if they're all right.

And they're getting angrier and angrier. And that's a head-on collision. Now look, on this show for over 20 years, we've been covering the difference between the establishment and the rest of us. And so, and even so, I have never seen. that difference as stark as it is today. Like when I go to talk to Normies who still consume establishment media, they're on a different planet.

They like they don't understand anything we're saying. And you guys are being hyperbolic, that's ridiculous. No, like, oh, Israel controls us. That's the craziest thing I've ever heard, right? Oh yeah, like you were saying, I think you have to 94% of Congress. That fact is anti-Semitic, you're crazy, crazy. Oh, AI is gonna destroy all these. What are you talking about?

No, I got NVIDIA stock. Navidia's doing great. I don't know what you're talking to. You guys sound nuts to us. Meanwhile, like, the rest of the country's like, what are you doing, man? Our wages haven't got up for 50 years. Adjusted for inflation.

And we can't afford anything anymore. And so Edwin had a great line the other night. Ed was our stage manager here. And he said, they're worried about the stock market. We're worried about the supermarket and they just don't get it because they're too rich They're they're blind and Jordan I'm worried about the collapse But I'm also worried about what's going to happen afterwards because it could go in a wrong direction So all those super rich billionaires they think oh no you're charging me you want to charge me one and a half percent

more tax I do the class or top of them out go get them right guys you'd be so lucky man after the collapse People are going to say none of us have any money anymore. Oh, right, those guys up there, the 900 billionaires, they have almost all the money. Why don't we redistribute that wealth on a much grander scale? Because they redistributed it to themselves by rigging all the rules on their behalf. And that's a fact. That's another fact that mainstream media covers up and lies about and doesn't tell you about. But we can show you exactly how they rigged the rules to get that money to flow to the top.

And at some point, people are going to want that money back. They're going to want the money back from Israel. And then things are going to get weird. And so we're now at the beginning of the unraveling. And it's the establishment and the people in power have no idea what's coming next. It's a head-on collision. Got to take a break, but we'll be right back. The word affordability is a con job by the Democrats.

All right, let's go to Super Chat. Mekar Dave says, every time somebody asks an Israeli support or anything, they should preface it with, do you support Israel keeping thousands of Christians in Area C under an occupation that Israel says will never end? Again, that is factual. They have occupied area C now. They're being to annex the West Bank. Yes, thousands of Christians live there. And yes, Israel says we're never giving it back.

But hey, that's okay because they're above us and we're inferior to them. That's what our politicians and media tell us all the time in their actions. Timothy Gibbons says Israel's plan is to sacrifice the USA in a war against Russia and China, thus removing America's control, just as they did with the King David bombing. Becoming Zion means it's essential the other world powers are destroyed. Now, Timothy, I think you're going too far. They want to continue to milk us. So they don't want America fully destroyed.

They want to take as much as they can from us, and they want us to fight all their wars. So are they like on the other hand, they love that the Ukraine war is sapping Russia of its strength and its military prowess, etc. So it's it's just for their own benefit. The damage it does to Russia and America is just a side benefit. Honestly, it's done no damage to China. When they go talk to the Chinese, they're like, oh, you owe Israel. The Chinese are like, say it again. Say it again.

We owe Israel. Hey, hey, hey, guys, come in here. coming here. They just really say we owe them. Meanwhile, us, America's like, yes, sir, of course, sir. We're so sorry, sir. Yes, sir. We owe Israel, sir. Okay. Elliot ZP says all humans came from modern day Kenya, slash Somalia. In what world can anyone go kick Kenyans out and take their homes? By the way, that's a great boy, man. So I guess the Kenyans own everything since they are the ones that we all came from the Kenyans. So that's Israeli logic.

Pessimistic progressive wrote in on the t.com. To all your critics that say you platform Tucker too much, I'm sure TYT would love to show clips of CNN, ABC, MSN, etc., asking these same questions, but where are they? Has anyone in media asked about Epstein's connections to Israel, the traitor Jonathan Pollard, Israel's war crimes, greater Israel, et cetera? I hate many of Tucker's positions, but he's legitimately the only person asking these questions. And I'm glad he's opening people on the right to this corruption and Israel first.

That's an inarguable point. And God, I wish I could interview Mike Kulkeby or Kyle Kuliski could interview Mike Koukaby. That would be amazing. But we can. Tucker can. And he's the one that asks those questions. The word affordability is a con job by the Democrats. Tucker Carlson, a terrible friend.

All right, back on TYT, Chank and Jordan with you guys. Don't forget to switch to Noble, save you hundreds of dollars throughout the year. Your phone number and your phone don't change. TYT.com slash switch. TYT.com slash switch pay in the 30s instead of in the hundreds, which is a lot of people pay. All right, Jordan, what's next?

APEC just helped a pro-Palestine progressive win her primary. But the organization is stating they have no regrets and they would do it again. Jank, you're two cents here. No, I love the irony of this. So you're going to see a wonderful Jewish Americans standing up to A-PAC. You're going to see A-PAC bury a candidate, but then accidentally promote an even more anti-A-PAC candidate. So this is a beautiful story. Jordan, give him the facts. So Tom Malinowski is a New Jersey Democrat and self-proclaimed Zionist, but APEC's PAC spent over $2 million to make sure he did not win his district's primary, all because he stated that Israel should not receive unlimited and

unconditional aid from the United States. On Alila, Mahia won the primary instead. In response, a spokesperson for AAC stated, we are going to have a focus on stopping candidates who are detractors of Israel or who want to put conditions on aid. We had very serious concerns about Tom Malinowski, who clearly was open to conditioning aid to Israel. He knew that he had moved to what is not a pro-Israel position. Adding conditions to aid to Israel and undermining the U.S. relationship is a top priority for us in addressing candidates. Malinowski has. since promised to campaign against any candidate who is supported by APAC. In response to their branding problem, APAC is attempting to go undercover, but it's not working. In the state of Illinois,

two groups have recently launched an onslaught of campaign ads. They are elect Chicago women and affordable Chicago now. Their ads have nothing to do with Israel. Yet both are accused of serving as APAC's puppet organizations. Why? Well, they use some of the same vendors as APAC, and they're supporting candidates with a lot of APAC linked donors. Not to mention, APAC has used shell organizations in the past. Elects Chicago and, elect Chicago and affordable Chicago are, once again, attacking Democrats who don't believe Israel should receive unconditional aid from the U.S. Their strategy has already cost them one key endorsement. Donna Miller is a candidate for Illinois' second district.

Affordable Chicago now is supporting her campaign. Sitting Representative Jan Schakowski endorsed Miller last month, but now she's taking back that endorsement. Illinois deserves leaders who put voters first, not A-PAC or out-of-state Trump donors. And these are the same types of groups, Jank, United Democracy Project, who we heard from, earlier in this piece, they throw millions of people like Cory Bush, Jamal Bowman to try to get them out, but their ads never touch on Israel. Yeah, I love the fake words that they use because they got caught before and we were among the people who caught them. So when they spent $4 million against Nina Turner, they did it through a pack called Democratic majority for Israel.

And we kept asking, where is the Democratic majority for Cleveland, which is where that, district is. So no, like, and APEC has the word Israel in it. They're saying, yeah, this is so that American politicians don't serve America, they serve Israeli interests. And they're not hiding it, guys. You heard Jordan's quotes, just let that sink in for a second. They demand unconditional aid. So they say it doesn't matter what Israel does. You owe them. And you know what? If Israel kills Christians, who cares? K kill Americans, who cares? It's unconditional.

They do a genocide, who cares? It's unconditional. A Holocaust, it doesn't matter, it's unconditional. They attack all their neighbors, it doesn't matter, it's unconditional. Well, what if they attack America? It doesn't matter, it's unconditional. Americans have no choice, you must submit to Israel, and you're not allowed to complain about it, and you're not allowed to put conditions on it.

That is insane. Imagine any other country coming in Bosnia, coming in and go, I demand unconditional aid. But wait, what are you going to do? Shut up and give it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to eliminate you from the American Congress. Well, it seems like the Bosnians are kind of running this place when they spend millions eliminating Nina Turner and Malinowski and Marie Newman and Corey Bush and Andy Levin and we go on and on. You're anti-Bosnian and you should be eliminated too.

No, these are thugs. They're not from our country. They're from a different country. They're trying to manipulate and control our country. And anyone who takes APAC money is a traitor and you should never vote for them. We have a website, not another dollar.com, go and sign the pledge. I'll never vote for a politician that takes Israeli lobby money. And I'll never vote for a politician that gives a single more dollar to Israel.

That's our money. They don't have any right to it, conditional or otherwise. Now, as always we tell you guys, look, they try to make it, there's two groups that are trying to make it about religion. Groopers and Israel first. They both say it's the Jews, it's the Jews, it's the Jews. Now, we tell you that's not true, and we could prove it. So, and we do it all the time, we've given dozens and dozens of examples and give you hundreds. Jan Shikowski, yet another person who's a wonderful, progressive, Jewish American, and she's saying, no, if you're taking money from APEC,

I'm withdrawing my endorsement. It doesn't have anything to do with religion. It has to do with, are you serving our country or a different country? So God bless Jan Shikowsky for doing that. A wonderful progressive throughout. And so Jordan, we're at a crossroads here, man. So most of the politicians still don't get it. Shikowski and some of the others are pioneers and trailblazers and a lot of times they'll take heat for it.

But most of Washington is like, well, I don't know what you're talking about. Of course I'm going to take millions of dollars from Israel and of course I'm going to loyally serve Israel and the media is still backing them up So again, I don't know how this movie ends But but I love that they got rid of Melanobsky got someone that was more against Israel And I hope they keep wasting their money that way But we we don't have to give Israel anything. We don't owe them They're giant liars and honestly I don't know if I'm going too far if you think I'm going too far I think they've literally been robbing us for all this time

Like if any other country, Mongolia took $330 billion off of us while pretending to be our special ally and having a, you know, a Christian shaman heritage and whatever other garbage propaganda. And then we woke up one day and realized, wait a minute, why did we go to war against all of Mongolia's enemies? And why did we give them $330 billion? We would say that that was a robbery, an absolute robbery. So I don't, yes, what do you think, true? Well, let's be clear about what they're upset about. They are upset about all members of Congress, but in this case, Democrats saying that we should enforce our own laws. So the conditions on aid is us enforcing the Leahy laws on aid to Israel, which says you can't support or provide aid to a country or a military that you know is.

committing human rights violations. We know Israel is. Us, the objective observers know that. The members of Congress who are funded by APEC have blindfolds on and somehow can't see the human rights atrocities occurring in Gaza and the West Bank. They're saying, we're going to fight to get you out if you defend and uphold your own laws on human rights. That's the issue here. And I also want to add some context to how these types of super PACs operate. So DMFI, UDP, those are arms of APEC where they have, you know, there's a little bit more clear with Democratic majority for Israel, but United Democracy Project, that could be anything. The ads that they ran against people like Nina Turner weren't about, again, Israel and

weren't even about Cleveland. They attacked Nina Turner for criticizing Joe Biden. Do you think that they care about that? APEC backs Republicans. They don't care about that. They back J-Sixers. They don't care about that. They want to manipulate you. On the other side, totally different issue,

the same tactics that people need to be aware of. On the crypto space, there's a large super PAC called Fair Shake. They have two extension, two arms, one called Protect Progress, which supports Democrats, and one called Defend American Jobs, which supports Republicans.

Now, all of these groups, all they're doing is going for candidates or incumbents who will bend over for the cryptocurrency industry. And one of the ads I saw they're running in Houston to try to get Al Green out and support this younger guy, Christian Menifee, goes after Al Green because it's time for a new generation of Democrats. They don't care about that. And you can tell because they're also supporting people in their 70s and 80s. who support the crypto industry. They are lying to you. They are exploiting our campaign finance system. They are corrupting our society so these crypto industry guys can fight against any and all

regulation for their notoriously predatory industry. They're doing it with Israel and they're doing it with crypto. People need to wake up. And that's why the fight to get money out of politics is so important. Yeah. So they say, oh, you know, we gotta get rid of Al Green because we need a new generation. And that's why you gotta vote against Nina Turner because she wasn't for Joe Biden. Wait, what?

Okay, now look, the people that run those ads know that they're liars. They know that they're lying to you. They know that they're saying two different things. But if you call them deceptive, they go, trope, trope, trope, I'm the victim. And so why do they do that, guys? Now that I'm back in my seat, because they have a partner in this, a silent partner, so not nearly silent enough in my opinion, that is not talked about. And that's mainstream media.

Because when they say that it's a trope, they know mainstream media will come in and go, okay, that person's an anti-Semite and is never allowed to speak again. And that's their career is ruined. We've eliminated them now. The second thing is when they go, oh, you see Nina Turner wasn't supportive enough of Joe Biden, The line that they used against her so effectively was Nina had said, voting for Biden is like eating a half full, a half bowl of crap, right? But the rest of the sentences, voting for Trump is eating a full bowl of crap.

But since the Israeli lobby and mainstream media were working hand in hand without any memos exchange, they just, it's group think, they both love Israel, they both hate outsiders, They hate progressives and populists, both on the left and the right. So it's almost like an assist. So then mainstream media took that, and they're like, oh, you guys are running all those ads saying she's not for Biden enough. And almost every article read, had only half the sentence. They also, Nina Turner says voting for Biden is like eating a half a bowl of crap.

They didn't mention that she said that Trump was a full bowl of crap. See, that's how you know they're deceptive and they're lying to you. And mainstream media lies to you all the time, all the time. And so that's why they, and they feel brazen they could say this. Look, if we had a real media in this country that was representing Americans, like they're average readers and viewers, wouldn't they ask, what do you mean unconditional? So I gave a bunch of hypotheticals, Jordan gave you the real issues. So you're saying it should be unconditional, even if Israel,

that Israel violates our laws. And they say yes. You're saying you should be unconditional even if Israel is committing war crimes. That's the violation of the Leahy law. And they say yes, you should pay for our war crimes. And if you don't, you're an anti-Semite. And our media goes, that's true. Well, okay, then our media is liars.

Why didn't anyone in Establishmentia ask any of these questions? Why did they purposely smear Nina Turner? Why did they constantly, why did they never tell you that the group elect Chicago has nothing to do with Chicago as a front group meant to deceive you on behalf of a foreign government. Do you think they wouldn't have told you if elect Chicago was a Russian pack? Or do you think they would have said, the Russians, Russia, Russia, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel.

Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel. The Russians are Chicago, they're pretending that they're for Chicago, the Russians, the Russians, right? Isn't it super weird that they don't say that about Israel at all? Come on, man. And to Jordan's point about the crypto guys, Israel's the tip of the iceberg, guys. The issue is in Israel, the issue is money in politics. So here's another great deception by establishment media.

So big oil comes in and goes, oh, we're the victims, we need subsidies. You guys are the most profitable companies in the world. They're like, yep, nope, every year we want $35 billion in subsidies. That's 10 times what A-PAC takes. And they go, nope, you owe us, you owe us. And no one in media goes, why do we owe ExxonMobil and Chevron $35 billion? What a bunch of criminals. They obviously bribed, legally bribed.

All of our politicians and those politicians took our money and gave it to them. That's a robbery. But instead, our media goes, nope, nothing to see here. Money in politics is not important. We never talk about the donors. The donors have no effect. Oh, look, Lindsay Graham and Chris Murphy are having a debate. Oh, Lindsey Graham won the debate again.

I guess we're going to war. It has nothing to do with the oil companies, the military companies, Israel, or any of the donors. It's just that Lindsey Graham won the debate. Okay, so now you know almost everyone in legacy media are liars. And what's amazing about it, we gotta go, but what's amazing about is they don't know that they're liars. They think like, I am a serious journalist working for ABC. And the donors have, well, they've got a little bit of access, but they don't have much influence at all.

And anyone who criticizes Israel is an anti-Semite who should never be allowed to speak again. And of course, A-PAC is holy and wonderful, and you should all serve Israel unconditionally. Otherwise, you're all anti-Semites, and the whole country should be fired. And I am a news reporter. Are you? I'll leave it at that. Okay, Jordan. Much love brother. Everybody check out the insurgents podcast. Love it when you're on the show.

I have a wonderful weekend. I'm coming back. I got an interview with someone we've forgotten climate. The whole country has. The planet is still burning. We'll talk about that. But now here's something super interesting. After the interview, I'm going to share with you guys a bot that I caught, pretending to be a left winger, but actually an Israeli bot. Oh, you guys are going to love this. So stay right. here.