The Young Turks - Fetterman Gets Exposed - September 4, 2026

Episode Date: September 5, 2026

A new report examines Sen. John Fetterman’s limited involvement in Senate work behind closed doors, while Andrew Callaghan reports from Iran during a “Death to America” rally. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is pressuring the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by threatening trade consequences for countries running surpluses with the U.S., Abdul El-Sayed criticizes Congress over a vote to freeze federal funding for schools that boycott Israel, and a billionaire linked to the “Board of Peace” is backing an AIPAC fund targeting pro-Palestinian candidates. Elsewhere, billionaire Leon Black is suing a congressional panel investigating Jeffrey Epstein. Hosts: John Iadarola, Cenk Uygur Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

You're listening to The Young Turks, the online news show. Make sure to follow and rate our show with not one, not two, not three, not four, but five stars. You're awesome. Thank you. Football is back. Every game, every weekend, Draft King's Sportsbook has you covered. Every snap matters. Every comeback can shift the game. And every fourth quarter moment can change everything.

Follow the action with Draft Kings, the number one sports book for live betting. Built to keep up with a speed of sports. built with Canadian sports fans in mind. Draft Kings brings the action together in one easy-to-use app. Follow the biggest matchups, build your parlays, and explore live betting markets as the game develops. So you can focus on the football

and enjoy the action with confidence. Download the Draft Kings app today and see what everyone is talking about. Draft Kings, the number one sports book for live betting. In partnership with Draft Kings, the crown is yours. Gambling problem.

Call Connects, Ontario. 1866-531-260-90, 19 and over, physically present in Ontario. Eligibility and restrictions apply. See draft kings.com slash sportsbook for details. Please play responsibly. Number one sportsbook for live betting based on available live market data. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025.

Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. Influencer Hassam Piker has disavowed those past comments he made. Does this sound like you, you're lying in bed and suddenly you realize it's 2 a.m. And you've been doomscrolling for hours.

That late night doomscroll doesn't just wreck your brain. It spikes your internal temperature. And when you're overheated, your body never hits that deep restorative sleep. The fix isn't in a new mattress or a renovation. It's your bed temperature. That's where Chili Pad 2.0 comes in. This water-based topper slides right over your current mattress and runs from 55 to 115 degrees. While fans just push hot air around,

chili pad uses actively chilled water to actually extolling extract heat from your body. The 2.0 upgrades include a quieter dock with a bigger tank, a premium cover that zips off for washing, and my favorite, the nightstand remote has a sensor that knows when you climb in and fires up your schedule automatically. Dual Zones lets you and your partner pick completely different temperatures and you both win. No subscription, just a two-year warranty and built in the USA. Visit www.sleep.m.me slash t-y-t. To get up to 200 $155 off your chili pad 2.0 with code TYT. That's www.sleap.m.m.m.m.m.m.

slash tyt. Free shipping, free returns, and a 30-night trial. So you can test it out, dream big, and wake up better. The headlines will still be there in the morning. You might as well wake up ready for them. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement. And nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system.

This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. When they gaze upon your Semites, Yosemites. Well, hello. Jane Cougar, I'd are all with you guys. John also does damage report.

I don't know if you know that. Damage report is awesome. Check it out every day at 1 o'clock Eastern right here on the YouTube. So damage report on YouTube or t.uyt.com or all of our 24 hour channels. Okay, big news today. So John Fetterman, you know he's lost his mind. We have a poll about whether it's like literal. But some of the allegations today were shocking, nevertheless, even for Federman.

So we're going to get into that a little bit. So finally thinks to ask, hey, you know, you guys all talk about Hassan biker, how about Laura Lumer? Of course, all the politicians in the media go, shut up. Okay, how dare you do the same thing we're doing? What do Iranians think of us? Well, an American went and tried to find out, very interesting revelations. You're gonna be shocked to find out that Israel First has done another frontal assault on our First Amendment.

And Congress has rubber stamped it and they have passed yet another law against Americans, very literally, and in favor of Israel. Because our government is not our own. So we'll get to that a little bit later. And then people like, why are you obsessed with Israel? I don't know, because they run our government. If Norway ran our government, then I'd be obsessed with them. them. Like, oh, why aren't you talking more about other issues?

What difference does it make? We don't run our own government. So you could have all the opinions you want, it's entirely irrelevant. There's only one opinion that matters, Netanyahu's. So we'll prove it later in the program, and as we have throughout. And then Trump was one of the most perplexing things he's done on the economy. And that's a hell of a high bar. Like I didn't, it took me a minute to figure out what the hell he's even talking about.

I'm still not positive. So, but apparently it's gonna affect the whole world, except it's not because he's a lunatic and no one takes him seriously. So that's the state of our country where the entire planet knows our president should be in a mental asylum and it doesn't really matter because he's not our president, the Israeli prime minister is. So that's your state of affairs, everybody. So that's the fun show we're gonna do for you guys today.

So you find out what's actually happening in this country. And every time, guys, we don't just talk, we give you receipts, we give you receipts, we give you evidence and mainstream media goes, I hate your evidence, I despise facts, I'm not going to report any of that, I'm just going to call everyone names. But I'm the real reporter. No, they're not the real reporters at all. They're fake, they're propaganda, and they almost work for a different country. Okay, so you do want to say something before?

Yeah, I believe that you should be able to provide receipts and call people names. That's what I bring to the table. I thought that's what I brought to this. That's what I brought to the table. Okay. Historically, yeah. Well, then let's get started doing that. Here we go.

Da-da-da-da-da-da called. John Federman wins. Federman wins up 25 points now the New York Times has called it as well. John Federman going on to represent the Democrats in that Pennsylvania Senate race, which is going to be monumental. Federman had all three, populist, progressive, and ran on economic issues. I guarantee you, they win the primary and they win the general election, easy. I don't care if it's Trump or DeSantis or anyone else, they win it easy. You gotta run just like Fetterman.

Well, things have taken a turn. So first of all, running like Fetterman did turn out to be exactly right. Fetterman won, and anyone who ran as an economic populist from the left won. In fact, they've won so much, it's really pissing off the establishment as we speak. So that part was correct. Him being an actual populist, progressive, et cetera, and something you should celebrate was dead wrong. And guys, you see that it doesn't take much to just learn and adjust the facts. It's not that big a deal.

The only thing on the line is your ego, so what? So was I wrong about Fetterman? Obviously, he's been abysmal, one of the very worst senators, and that is that is. is a very high bar. Tuberville's in there. And so, okay, now the New York Times breaks a story, John's gonna tell you all about it. But the revelations in here are so shocking that even I was like, wait, what? Yeah. Oh my God. Okay, so hell of a story, John. Yeah, he's earned his spot amongst mansion cinema all time worst, especially with disdain for the constituents, as you will see. It's very cinema-y. So yes, Wall Street Journal

did this big expose very well sourced. They talked to, I believe, a couple of dozen former staffers of his. And they found that he doesn't really like doing the job much at all. He likes to go on Fox News. He likes to, I guess, speak out for the interests of every individual person who lives in Israel instead of Pennsylvania for some reason. That's pretty much it. So they profile all these instances in which he could deliver for his constituents and just doesn't have any interest in it. So one morning in June, three, paralyzed military veterans in wheelchairs from rural Pennsylvania arrived at the office of John Fetterman for a long-awaited meeting to discuss legislation that would improve their care.

Long-awaited and obviously a high-stakes meeting. The problem was they get there, Federman staff greets them with bad news. He had to cancel, I'd eaten something bad, and he wasn't feeling well. Well, that's unfortunate, but understandable, people get sick, except that less than an hour after his staffers met with the vets in his place, Federman walked into his office showing no signs of illness, except for all the mental ones that he's been showing for a few years. I added that, not the Wall Street Journal. He had an appointment that he didn't want to miss. He told staff an interview on Fox News to discuss Israel and the war in Iran. So his staff do his

job of meeting with his constituents. That's going to be a constant throughout this. I think they technically are the senator for Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, he cruised in last minute because he's got to talk to Sean Hannity or something. That's pretty much all he's interested in doing. And this isn't the only example. There's a text exchange we're going to show you between him and an aide last September after an aide told him that the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Chop, wanted to meet with him. And he said, why do I have to keep meeting with Chop? Because they're worried about vaccines and Medicaid cuts.

Well, I'm not. I'm convinced they just want free trips to D.C. Dude, you're the one getting free trips to D.C. That seems to be the only thing you're in it for. It's the free plane rides and, I guess, lunch on the Capitol. And free rides to trips to Israel, of course, et cetera. Oh, sorry, go forward. Yeah, just real quick, John.

I only have one thing. When he said, well, I don't about Medicare cuts, I'm sorry, Medicaid cuts, that's one of the parts where I was, I guess I was naive. I was a little bit shocked at that. Like, so because even I was not jaded enough to think like, yeah, look, I get it. He's mental on Israel and, you know, I don't know what's on the tape. So, okay, I understand that and that's an issue in and of itself. But he claims that he doesn't want to be a Republican, that he's a Democrat. So I assumed he would at least go through the motions of pretending to care about things that Democrats care about.

When he's telling his own staff, oh, they're cutting Medicare, why would I care? Yeah. I was a little bit surprised by that. Yeah. Like, apparently he's just a ghoul through and through. doesn't mean anything, doesn't care about any democratic policies. And as you can tell from this story, there's only one issue he cares about, only one, Israel, period.

And he says it too, as you'll see. It's clear, yeah, he has disdain for the people of his state. He, I mean, senators generally feel entitled to a lot. He's barely been in the Senate. There's a couple of years, he already feels as entitled as Bishop McConnell. Why do I have to keep meeting with them? And look at the way the aid talks to him, because they're worried about vaccines and Medicaid cuts.

Now the aid didn't add on, you dumb ogre, like I would have. But that's the vibe that they have to guide him through doing just the bare minimum of his job necessary for him to not get recalled or create a national scandal, I guess. So since he's gotten out of the hospital back in 2023, he's repeatedly expressed disdain for several core day-to-day aspects of his life as a senator, according to multiple former staffers, meeting with constituents, obviously, attending hearings, and making public in-state appearances like town halls. So he doesn't want to do like the hearing work, As you'll see, I believe at one point, he's in agriculture, I think commerce and I think

Homeland Security. At one part earlier this year, he'd lost 11 out of 12 meetings of it. So he doesn't wanna like listen to experts. He'd never seen him craft legislation. He doesn't want to meet with his constituents. Other than doing Fox News hits, I literally don't know what he does. Does he use the congressional gym? Like I don't know technically, is even a senator, I'm not sure.

And he backed out of attending a funeral for three police officers killed near his hometown last September. He had a reason though, as you'll see in these text messages. So, Aides says update on the event, no one will be allowed to staff you due to number restrictions. The organizers are requiring everyone to be seated by 11 a.m. And the funeral will begin at noon and last at least three hours. The dress code is formal. He says, three hours, question mark, question mark. The aide says, yes, it's a very formal ceremony and the equivalent of three separate funerals because, and I'll remind you, it's three separate funerals for three cops that died in his state and he said this may be a non-starter.

Now I'm impressed that he can handle a multisyllabic word like non-starter, but beyond that, I'm not impressed with much with this dude. Just show up to the goddamn funeral. Show up for an hour and then walk out, pretend that you ate something bad and so you couldn't stick around, but this dude didn't even want to show up, he didn't want to go even to begin with. And I want you all to recall who he was that produced the jubilant reaction from Jank when he won.

Take a look at this. There's a lot of great towns in Pennsylvania that feel like their community's best days were a generation ago. No one deserves to be abandoned. All these communities deserve to be helped. John Federman grew up in York, moved to Braddock to start a GED program, a forgotten steel town. When two of his students were gunned down, John ran for mayor to stop the violence. John bought out the best than people. He gave people hope.

Five years without a murder. of Braddock is celebrating a milestone. Today, people are really starting to have hope. He runs for Lieutenant Governor, reformed the office, got rid of the LG's mansion, saved taxpayers' dollars. He's a different kind of character, I'll tell you.

A Democrat with backboat does the right thing, no matter what. Never taking a single person for granted. Never taking a single place for granted. I'm John Fetterman, and I approve this message. Case could be made that he's taking a few people for granted. He's taken a place for granted. I'm in Pennsylvania, I mean America literally at this point.

It makes me sick to see that. It's, there should be a law that you can't just run viciously lying to your own base about about everything that you are and care about. And as soon as you get in, the hell out of your peasants, I don't care what any of you think. I'm not meeting with you, I'm not going to your stupid funerals, I don't care about any of this. I'm gonna go chill with Laura Ingraham. And Sean Hannity, I'm gonna talk about how much I love Israel, and that's it. Yeah, I mean, as we're gonna show you in a little bit on the live show here,

you know, he, there was another shocking situation where he canceled a meeting with people that he really, really should have met with, and just to hang out with some radical Zionists and talk about how great Israel is. Like, no, this is beyond the pale, even for Congress, and that's a, super high bar. The people in Congress are generally the very worst people in the country. And even some of them are looking at him like, Jesus, man, you're overdoing it, right? So like the indifference to his position, to his constituents is amazing.

Other things you learn from this is that people are kind of relatively used to senators barely working. So yeah, he's worse than the others. Like for example, Senator Britt from Alabama, she's the younger one. woman senator from Alabama. When he was the hospital, she went and visited him with cookies, which is a kind of endearing story. And then she told him how to cheat in terms of the hearings.

She's like, John, you're not going to any of the hearings. And since you're not showing up even for a minute, they're saying that you're not coming. But I can teach you this trick. If you show up for just one minute and then leave, they have to say that you showed up, then it'll seem like you cared, right? And so she's like, here's a Republican senator in the hospital, the sweet moment of teaching a Democratic senator how to cheat so that their voters don't find out how lazy they are and how little they care about their voters and their jobs entirely, right?

So one thing I was positively surprised by was his staffers cared, right? That was a little surprising. The staffers are like, hey, we might get arrested if you write this op-ed for Israel. We'll get to it in a minute. Like, you might not want to get arrested, right? I'm surprised there's anyone in the building in Congress that pumps the brakes on anything Israel wants. So that was a little bit shocking to me, like hey, look at that, there's a person in Congress

who's working for someone that they thought was a progressive who says maybe we shouldn't betray America for Israel because we might get arrested. Like I'm surprised that that even exists. So that's my sense of Congress. And then one more thing before we go to the Israel part, so why this story at all? Because whenever there's a story like this, I always wonder who leaked it, why did they leak it, what's their purpose, right? It's possible that it's just good journalism, right?

Because we found out a lot of things we didn't know, okay, great. And I talked to a lot of people. Yeah, and Wall Street Journal before Rupert Murdoch bought it used to do really good journalism from time to time, right? And so, okay, that's a possible. And I don't say that like with snarky, like that's actually possible in this case, which is very rare, right? Another possibility is Murdoch thinks if you do this, enough Democrats get enraged at him,

and they push him closer to the Republican Party. And as the Republicans might lose the Senate, if Fetterman flips over to the Republicans, then they might regain the Senate. And you can, and Republicans don't care about any morals, like the politicians, I don't mean the voters. So the Republican politicians are like, oh, you don't work at all. You betray your voters and cops, by the way, and you have disdain for every, you have disdain for Everyone that isn't Israeli, you're perfect.

You're totally welcome here. None of that will bother them one scintilla, right? Whereas it really bothers Democratic voters enough for us to create pressure on other Democratic politicians. So that's the possibility. One more thing before we go to the next part is you guys, because I thought good comments from our members on YouTube, Mark Francis said, Fetterman was a great disappointment. I regret giving him money. Here, here, brother, I hear you.

And sometimes that happens. So Kirsta Cinema also started out in the Green Party. That's how progressive she was pretending to be. And there is something in the water. The minute, and then we're going to ask you a poll question about that. The minute they go to Washington, all of them, almost universally go for, and it's just a matter of how much they move. They move from like, yeah, the power to the people to, oh, you want me to criticize my beloved colleagues? Those are the most important people in the world.

I'll never criticize them. The establishment is amazing, right? That's your best case scenario. To Federman like people. Yeah. Dead cops, who cares? Who is this really money, man? And that's like a lot of them.

Yeah, I think it is a case we made that he's the worst of the three that I mentioned. Like cinema had been in the green party, but it was like more removed. And I don't feel like she campaigned as like, um, I'm kind of Bernie as Federman did. Like Federman really, I tried to identify himself in this particular way. Oh, definitely. And cinema, it turns out, she just wanted to make money. She just wanted, like she just was like implicitly corrupt.

He just doesn't seem to give to him about anything except Israel. I don't even think he's enriching himself. I think he literally has one issue that he either cares about or one issue that his brain is capable of holding on to for a second or two. And that's it. And in some ways that's more reprehensible. So that's going to get to our poll question. But last two comments here from the audience, more YouTube members, Jeffrey Dottie said, if Federman doesn't like his job, then he should leave, which is like a great point that nobody ever makes.

If you, like imagine if you got a job and then you only showed up for a couple hours a day. And a lot of days you just didn't even bother showing up. Well, you'd get fired in every job unless you're a politician. Yeah. In fact, you'll get more money from the donors. Oh, you're not doing anything for the people? you're only serving us, perfect, here's more money, here's millions of dollars. And then I'm, and MVNI writes in, Federman is worse than George Santos.

And I wanted to read that because that's a great point. Who lied more before the election? Santos said he was a Republican, he was a Republican. He actually did all the policies that he said he was in favor of. He's a giant liar for things that are like relevant to humanity. Like he's a deeply immoral person, but not that relevant to politics. Whereas the kind of liar Fetterman is where he stabs you in the back with a scimitar, right? And guts you.

Most of media normally goes like, oh, that is clever positioning. He pivoted after he went to Washington. Very clever, oh, what a good politician, that pivot, right? That's usually how they frame it. Here, again, credit to Wall Street Journal, they're not framing it that way. They're framing it like he might have lost his mind. But yeah, Fetterman is arguably definitely a bigger liar than George Santos. I mean, he lied about every single thing going into office.

So I don't know how you could be a bigger liar. So we're asking the same question that I think is in a lot of your minds. This is on t.yt.com. What made John Fetterman an a hole? A, he was always an a hole. B, the stroke. C, lobbyist money. D, Israel is blackmailing.

Okay, I know, this is what the report is like, it's outrageous. Israel would never do that. They're so moral, they only put your 23,000 kids. They would definitely draw the line at blackmail. They'd never do that, except for the fact they already did it to Bill Clinton, and we all know, but the media is gonna ignore that possibility. Look, I'm not sure which one I'd vote for. Like, A means like, he was planning to betray you from day one.

It was just, he was just an actor, right? I think it's- I actually- I don't think so either I actually think that it might be B the stroke that's that's where I leave like but yeah and some other stuff too but but it could also be a combination of things because he seems to genuine like if there's one thing left in his black heart it's his absolute love for Israel like he loves Israel more than he loves everything else in the world combined so let's get to that yeah let's turn to that now Coming out of this Wall Street Journal article about John Fetterman, one thing is very clear, there's one thing he cares about, and it's Israel.

And you probably don't need me to tell you that. You don't need the Wall Street Journal to tell you that, but they've got some new details that make it look pretty damning. So according to the report, he canceled the meeting with state lawmaker Liz Handbage, who drove from Pennsylvania to introduce herself and discuss programs to help the homeless and lower class families in her county. She must have thought, oh, this is the Federman of his campaign. He'll care about this stuff.

Well, unfortunately, for her, he did do. take a meeting that day, just not with her. He didn't, she came all the way, he didn't meet with her. He met with Bruce Pearl, the former college basketball coach and advocate for Israel. The pair discussed legislation that would affect college sports. And Pearl thanked Fetterman for his stance on Israel, Pearl said in an interview. He actually revealed this. And look, obviously, we've talked about his appearances on Fox News, talking about Israel and all of that. But the lengths that he's willing to go in that defense of Israel go so far that like even in his own staff there's concern. So take a look at this.

So late last summer, Federman told his advisors and senior staff he wanted to introduce a resolution forcing every senator to take a public stance on whether the war in Gaza constituted a genocide. His senior staff tried to talk him out of the idea according to people familiar with the matter, but he was undeterred. So then he met with the Israel ambassador of the US and offered a salute. So write an op-ed explaining why he's still supporting Israel. Lighter, the ambassador would help supply talking points for Federman to consider. And Federman agreed, but his staff did not give him the drafted points from Leiter for a particular reason. The staffers decided not to tell him about it out of concern that drafting an op-ed based on suggestions from the Israeli embassy under the senator's name risked violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Federman dropped the issue according to former staffers.

And yeah, so they've got to dodged a bullet right there. You're supposed to make it at least a little bit more indirect than that. Not that much more indirect, but just slightly. Let's not break the law after all. And a reminder, he has obviously received quite a bit of campaign funds from PACs in support of the Israeli government. Yeah, so there's two things in there. One is, huh, look at the staff, we're saying you would have to register as a foreign agent

if you just copy the Israeli ambassador's op-ed as your own. Again, I'm surprised that actually exists in the building, someone who has breaks on like doing Israel's talking points word for word, because they do that all the time. As Tom Massey explained, everyone has an Israeli handler. 94% of Congress gets money from A-PAC or the Israeli lobby. They all have someone that they communicate with. You could argue report to and you could argue that they get talking points from them.

I would make that argument. I'm positive of it because we've shown you guys videos of the congressman saying the same exact talking point. One after another, after another, after another, which they obviously got from their Israeli handlers, right? And the talking points are always like, oh, we should spend so much more money here in America for Israel. We should go to war for Israel because it would help America so much, right? These kind of nonsensical talking points are in the media is like, oh, wonderful point. That's right. America would be helped so much if they gave all their money to Israel and died for Israel.

That would help America so much. Hey, look at that, the same talking point in media and in government. But you're not allowed to say it. If you are, they'll destroy your life. Okay, so at least somebody though, but here, Silver lining, if I ever find one like this, a nugget like this, we do report it to you guys. Hey, there's somebody in the building who said, let's not copy the Israelis word for word. And they were able to distract better men enough that he didn't actually do that op-ed.

Yeah. Okay, great, score one for America. Okay, so- He distract him. He saw a squirrel out the window or something. Probably. Yeah, he eventually got off of the train of thought. But the first thing you mentioned there, John, wow.

So he says, oh, there's someone advocating for the poor in my state. I don't want that meeting. No, no, representing the poor's? You poor? No, I'm gonna go and have a meeting instead with a really rich Zionist. And he's gonna tell me what to say about Israel, and then I'm gonna do that, and then I'm gonna receive hundreds of thousands of dollars. So I don't care about the stupid Americans who are my citizens and that I'm supposed to be the representative of. You're poor? An American, I don't care about you at all. Hey, Bruce Pearl, tell me how great is.

Israel is. Yeah, we told like you. By the way, Bruce Pearl, you might have heard that recently because he just gave a speech at the Republican Jewish coalition that J.D. Vance had gone to. He gave one, Norm Coleman gave one, many others did, but they are clearly on tape where they talk about we took out Tom Massey for Israel. Wait, I thought that was a trope. But here they are on tape, admitting we're doing this for Israel, and we've destroyed

American politicians so that everyone will represent Israel instead of America. Well, thank you for saying it on tape. And that's who Fetterman met with instead of the person representing poor voters in Pennsylvania. I mean, that right there, John, is the epitome of Washington. If I can narrow it down to one single act of what represents Washington, that's it. Why would I care about my voters? Are you crazy? Of course I hate my voters.

I can't wait to meet with a donor because I'm gonna do exactly what he tells me to do. And that's exactly what happened. And that's John Fetterman, but that's honestly Washington, D.C. in a nutshell. So if you're shocked by what Fetterman did, understand that there's about 90 other senators that do about what, 80% of it? Yeah. So at least, and some even more. So these, this is what we pass us for democracy these days.

So when you hear the media telling you, oh my God, our democracy might be in danger. No, it's the ship has left the dock already, are you crazy? We have total and utter corruption. You could bribe politicians, you could literally, the Aidosons gave Trump over $300 million, an unmitigated bribe. And our media goes, no, it's not. And no, they're not working for the donor. That's a conspiracy theory.

And all of America, by the way, that now pulls at 93% that the politicians are working for their donors and not their voters. The 7% percent. Yeah, and media says the 7% are correct, and the 93% of Americans are anti-Semites. No, they never work for their donors. They just have philosophical debates. And whoever wins the debate is how we pass the law. So that's why every reporter is a weird old liar in national media. And it makes me question, who do they work for?

Yeah, we know who Federman works for and it ain't America, it's a foreign country. And for the reporters that didn't reveal any of this stuff that know that he works for those donors, well, who do you work for? That's an excellent question. But today, Wall Street Journal, Credit Work Credit is due, good story. Hey, we love real journalism. Yeah, why don't we take our first break? last point gets after this. So people leave Pity City. Let's get it done.

All right. So let's go to Super Chat. Antifay says, I live in Pennsylvania. Federman was an amazing progressive lieutenant governor. He changed after he got to Congress or after the stroke. But I just want to set the record straight that he did not lie or pretend in the campaign. So Antifa, thank you for writing in on that. Or Antifa. I don't know. Oh, Antifa, I got him. Anyways, okay, it's so slow. What a boomer. Anyway.

It's a sleep or sell. So thank you for saying that because I totally agree. At the time, his entire track record was in that direction. So I actually think it was the stroke. That's my best guess. And maybe the stroke like left him with only one thing he cared about already, right? So it could be a combo in that way. But thank you for that perspective.

All right, Bo 3670 says play Al-Salai. Senate Island ad, if you haven't seen it yet, perfect and positive messaging, yet the entire party is turning against them. It's okay, though, it's just going to bring much needed reckoning sooner. Yeah, that is a great ad. We'll talk about it another time, but yeah, of course, all the Democrats hate that Al-Said is honest. That's why they hate Bernie. They hate anyone who's honest. And one of these days, Bernie doesn't do it, somebody's going to get in there and start naming names and going,

That Democratic congressman is a sellout and he works for the donors and this is the money he took and he's a traitor, right? And they're scared to death of that because they're almost all traitors. 0-003 says the answer for Federman is all of the above, but you can keep voting on t.t.com. Gaze upon your semites, your semites. All right, back on TYT, Jank and John with you guys. A really nice comment from Nader Studio 2377 on Super Chad. Love you guys. Keep honest journals and moving.

Side note, you two, you, my two brothers and I are members. Jenk can be our long-lost brother. Oh, that's awesome. Hi to you and your brothers. And thanks for being members. Thanks for the super chat. I love this community. Thanks for letting us do this show for you guys.

All right, let's go to our next story. Do you have any comment on Laura Lumer, who of course has advised Donald Trump in the past? Her comments calling some of your colleagues, I apologize for this language, I'm repeating what she said, ghetto black bitches. No, I have no idea we're talking about. You know Laura Lumer, of course, right? Yes, so she had been repeating these comments. I haven't said, I have no comments. I don't know.

Would you condemn such comments, though? I haven't had no idea to talk about, buddy. I learned from something from this video. So Premtaker asked Republicans, what do you think about Laura Lumer? Because that's what they ask, Abdul al-Said, and every Democrat about Hassan Piker. It's a perfectly logical question. Not one of them answered as you're about to see, but there's hilarious tape on it. But I learned something from this tape that I want to share with you guys, and I think that

they might have the right strategy and that maybe we should all adopt. So let's find out, John tells the story. Okay, yeah. So as you said, he was trying to engage with as many representatives as possible, and almost all of them refused to engage with it. They said the thing that they always say, I don't know what you're talking about. Even though he just explained it. Laura Lumer, you know who she is? Here's what she said.

You have her thoughts? No, he doesn't have thoughts because he doesn't want to have any thoughts. And as you'll see, that was pretty common. Take a look. This is someone who's advised Donald Trump. Advised him on staffing changes. No comment? I have heard those.

She's been saying them all over the place. Would you condemn such comments generally? I'm not going to comment on anything that I've not heard of correctly. I have not seen that comment, so I wouldn't. able to comment who is she referencing? Corey Bush Ilhan Omar Katanjee Brown Jackson, Angie Nixon so not even just congressional colleagues but also the Supreme Court justice a candidate. I obviously don't agree with it. I don't comment on stuff I didn't see it's been all over the place. She's been repeating this.

Like I said I didn't I didn't see it. Sure. Would you condemn such comments? Okay, okay. I was wondering, what did you make of Laura Lumerous? I have no idea who you are. Fem Tucker with Zetaio News. What's the Ceteo News? U.S.-based political outlet. Okay, absolutely. No comments. I'm not going to interview with you, but thank you. Not nothing on Laura Lumer's comments calling your call us black ghetto bitches.

An advisor to Donald Trump? Yeah, this shouldn't be difficult. Now, I know you're worried, maybe they're lying to me. Okay, first of all, many of them had seen the comments. They're pretending that they didn't, but let's say that they didn't, and you don't want to get pulled into condemning something, I understand the context. Here's what you say, if the way that you're characterizing it is accurate, then yes, I condemn that. And if it turns out that they were manipulating you, then it wasn't accurate, and you're not condemning them. This should be so, so easy for adults to do, but these representatives aren't adults, and they don't want to run afoul of the president.

And then many other high profile Republicans that for some reason that I will never understand, do like Laura Lumer and do what she is. says. So just in case any members of Congress are watching, I'm going to get you. I'm going to make you listen to the comments now. Take a look. If you are a member of the black community and calling out this behavior, call out the entitlement of these, as I like to call them, ghetto black bitches. And no, that's not, that is not painting all black women with the same brush. But there is a stereotype. And I've noticed the stereotype exists in the Democrat Party. And I don't think it belongs in the United States Senate. Unfortunately, it's already in the United States Congress. And we've seen very destructive, very destructive policies and very destructive behavior

already carried out by these women. I'm just going to read their names. And I think they all fall in the same category. Angie Nixon, Ilhan Omar, Ayana Presley, Puri Bush, Katanji Brown Jackson. I mean, look at that disaster. Yeah. And then she goes on to cite so many reasons that it's a disaster. They're like, no, she just says the name, it's face alone. It's what the Republicans do, it's identity politics, that's literally it. Now, she doesn't want you to think that she's a racist, which how could you not? She says, it's not all of them. It's not all of them.

I'm just gonna name these, which is all of the ones I care about. Every single high profile one that I talk about, their ghetto black bitches according to her, regardless of education, career achievements, the fact that they comport themselves with infinitely more class dignity and gravitas than Laura Lumer literally ever has. From that stream to when she handcuffed herself to the front door of Twitter, they're classless, they're getting, not Laura Lumer, she's not an empty headed bigot. No, no, it's gotta be them, it's gotta be everybody on skin alone. They have the problem, not Laura Lumer.

Well, America has a problem, because despite the fact that I literally can I go to a website without seeing another write-up condemning Hassan and through that Abdul El-Said. For some reason, the fact that the President of the United States was flying around with Laura Lumer, among potentially other things, and that she gets to decide who's hired and fired at the NSA. According to Tim Poole, I don't know if you saw this, he says she got Milo Yanapolis deported. That what she says goes in the government, and if she wants somebody gone, deported or fired, it happens. Hassan doesn't have that power. He doesn't have that power over Abdul al-Sayed, let alone the president of the United States.

She apparently has that power over the federal government. But they don't have anything to say about it. They don't have any thoughts, Chang. Yeah. So look, if you get into obnoxious Laura Lumer comments, it'll take up the entire two-hour show because she goes on and on. She says all Muslims should be deported from America. We should round up the Muslims and you should never elect a Muslim to Congress.

and it goes on and on. Now, to me, the story is definitely not about Laura Lumer, and it's not even about Republican hypocrisy. To me, the main story is mainstream media. So if she said these comments about Jewish people, or forget Jewish people, if she said it about the Israeli government officials, everyone would say that she was persona non grata.

No one could talk to her. Not only would she be canceled, every person she's ever talked to would be canceled. And if you don't believe me, okay, well, what if somebody said, again, verbatim, we should deport all the Jews, right? What if they said we should round up the Jews? Do you think that our mainstream media would say, oh, it's perfectly okay, yeah, why don't, oh, you should have power at the White House. You should get to decide who gets fired or not. You should get to decide who gets deported or not, and all the Republican politicians working with you should be no big deal if you said, let's round up the Jews.

Well, of course that wouldn't happen. Her career would be obliterated. She says it about Muslims and mainstream media is so bigoted, so racist against Muslims and Arabs, they're like, no big deal. We don't think it's not. Prem Tucker had to do it for Zateo because not a single mainstream media reporter will do it. They're like, what do you mean?

Okay, so if you said to the reporters, hey, is Laura Luma obnoxious, they say, well, of course she's obnoxious, I agree with that. Is she out of bounds? Yeah, I agree she's out of bounds. So did you ever ask a Republican who's in cahoots with her about how she's out of bounds? I mean, I hear that if you campaign once or you say something positive once about a candidate, that ties you together forever, right? So she's tied to like dozens and dozens, maybe hundreds of Republican candidates.

Did you ever once ask them about this one of the most bigoted people in the country? Nope, never asked them. Well, why don't you ask them? Well, that might be perceived as a criticism of Israel, and I would never do that. Well, that's what I thought. That's what I thought, there's no other reason, right? Now let's take her comments about black people. Imagine if she said, that ghetto Jew bitch, gone, obliterated.

Her career would be nuked. Anyone who disagrees is an obvious liar, right? If she said about them, she said in that video we showed you, there's a stereotype about black people, and then she didn't say it like, oh, that's bad. She said it as that is correct, the stereotype. So if somebody said, you know, the Jews, there's a bunch of stereotypes about them. That's because their stare-attacks are right about the Jews, you know what I'm saying? Upliterated, right?

No one disputes that. So there's two different standards. If you're a supporter of Israel, you're allowed to be as racist as you want, you're allowed to be as bigoted as you want, and mainstream media is like, out of girl, we swear we'll never ask any of the politicians you're associated with, because we want to help you. Because I think in their heart of hearts, almost all the reporters in D.C. that work in mainstream media, and every cable news anchor is as big in it as Laura Lumer. They think it's no big deal to massacre 23,000 kids in Palestine. That's not a conjecture.

None of them care about it. Not one anchor is called it a genocide. Not one of them has devoted 1% of the energy that they did to October 7th. To this day, like, what about the feelings of Israeli supporters? It's the most important thing. That's late. That woman is saying that black people are ghetto bitches and that Muslims should be rounded up.

Oh, who cares? Shut up. We don't care about any of you black people or Muslims. The only thing we care about is Israel, right? Your actions prove it 100%. Okay, so I've got more, but go ahead. Yeah, just let me should go. Okay, so put up graphic one, this was the response from Angie Nixon initially.

Girl, you ate dog food on camera, which she did. Laura Lumeer ate dog food. In the words of Queen Latifah, who you call on a bitch, which was a great response. And then Laura Lumer has repeatedly doubled down. She's not, she didn't go too far in her own mind. She then tweeted to her, I called you a ghetto bitch because you are Angie and your record proves that again, she doesn't cite anything. They shouldn't need to provide evidence.

She's on the right. But you speak ebonics though, so maybe I need to bark at you and tug your leash and then you'll finally understand. She is in full public view and social media fantasizing about putting a collar and leash around a black woman's neck and then doll. and then dog walking her around. Now, metaphorically, she says I want to have a leash around you and then tug on it. I want to use physical reminders of my dominance and superiority over to you to a Senate candidate.

And to a black woman. Yes, I want to treat you like a slave and put a chain around your neck and drag you around, but not one son of a bitch, racist. Reporter or anchor on TV thinks that that's anywhere near as that. is outrageous as what Hassan has said. They've asked about Hassan Piker two million times, not once about Laura Lumer. It is indisputable that every cable news anchor, including everyone on MS Now is deeply racist and deeply bigoted, and they don't care about anyone that isn't an Israeli supporter. But if God, if God help you, if you offend feelings of an Israeli supporter, because then all of those anchors will converge, Fox News, MS Now, CNN. They will all

converge. How dare you? You should be punished. No one vote for them. No one vote for them. They have offended the feelings of Israeli supporters. So come on, man. It's so obvious. Our media is totally working for Israel. It's unbelievable. And they're like, oh, you want to be racist? As long as you're for Israel, everything is hunky-dory. So, okay, now, I learned something from the Republicans in that clip. They're like, oh, you're going to give me something that one of my supporters said, I don't know it. So what? Well, everybody knows she said terrible things.

I don't know it. I'm not going to answer it. I haven't heard it. I'm not going to answer it. But if Democrats did that, what would the mainstream media do? Oh, yeah? I'm going to ask you again and again about Hassan, Hassan, Hassan, Hassan, Hassan, Hassan. But they haven't even asked them once.

Prem Tucker sneaks in, ask a couple of questions. And they're like, yeah, we're not going to answer it. We're Republicans and we support Israel. So we're above the law. We could be as racist as we like. We can be as baited as we like. It doesn't matter. And by the way, Republican voters, they're smearing the crap out of you.

That's why people think Republicans are racist because your politicians are deeply racist on behalf of Israel. And so they go, well, I guess the voters are the same. But Democratic politicians also work for Israel, also act like Muscovitz and Wasserman and Wesley Bell all deeply bigoted against Muslims, that freak, that mutant that replaced Jamal Bowman, Latimer. All deep bigots, like they despise Muslims. But in Washington, they're like, man, boy, way to disqualming.

destroy Muslims. You're all sick, disgusting bigots. And by the way, I'll debate any cable news anchor over this. Any day, anytime, but they'll never do it. They'll just go, he caught us. You know what? Anti-Semite. No, shut off his mic, shut off his mic, never allow him on air.

Do you know that they said all this crap about Hassan? Hassan has said some wild and outrageous things. But do you know that none of them will have Hassan on? It's wild. They talk about him like six hours a day. And they're like, no, but we won't let him talk back. We won't let our audience ever hear from him. We reserve the right to smear the living crap out of him.

Not let him respond because we're objective. Are you? No, no, no. You do propaganda for the powerful and the wealthy and you're disgusting. I hope that's clear. Last thing. I like that, actually last two things. I like the exact line that they use, though.

I won't comment on anything I haven't seen myself. I didn't see any of Hassan's clips. I can't comment on it, right? I don't think I've ever seen it, actually. Yeah, I can't comment on anything I haven't seen. And if media cries about it, go, well, then why don't you ask the Republicans about Laura Lumer? That's what they say.

Yeah. They're like, how dare you? Laura Lumer supports Israel. How dare you? We will never ask the Republicans about that. Now that goes to my final point. So they haven't asked about Laura Lumer. To Mike Rogers, I mean, on Abdul, they asked about Hassan, again,

We all saw with their own eyes, two billion times, right? They haven't asked Mike Rogers about a staffery he has that was defending a neo-Nazi chat group among young Republicans. They have, if you care about anti-Semitism, wouldn't you care about people who are pro-Nazi? Nope, as long as they support Israel, we're still okay with it. He has a donor that has said deeply anti-Semitic things. Because they don't care about anti-Semitism. The only thing they care about is their beloved Israel.

And they know what Mike Rogers will do in the Senate. Yeah. And he has a pastor who's deeply bigoted. Not one question about any of them. And he has said the same exact comments as Benjamin Netanyahu of 20 straight years about how Iran is about to have a nuke, and we must, must, must do this war for Iran for Israel. So that, and he has taken a tremendous amount of money from the Israeli lobby. His benefactors are Israel, right?

So do you denounce Benjamin Netanyahu who was murdered 23,000 kids? That is the most logical question there is. You're taking money from the lobby of a foreign government. foreign government has massacred 23,000 children, 1,000 babies under the age of one, has pulled plugs from incubators and had American Jewish doctors watch those kids die, right in front of their eyes. Those babies die, and they say the Israeli defense forces did it. And you're not gonna ask him a single question about his benefactors in Israel? So that's it, it's over. Mainstream media is not news, it's not 1% news. So if you watch that, you watch that, you

you're voluntarily signing up for, please brainwash me. Give me propaganda on behalf of the wealthy, the powerful. It's not just Israel, but Israel is the biggest one. Like, you know, you insult the other donors, they'll, you know, they'll be upset. They'll try to smear you, et cetera. And they ignore the donors in every regard. They're like, oh, not negotiating drug prices. Well, that's killing capitalism.

That's saying the free market shouldn't work. We should do price caps. But the drug companies should decide what they are and they should be infinite. We should be forced to pay whatever a company tells us we have to pay. You're like, no, every reporter in DC is like, I love the donors. So I'm never gonna tell you that's outrageous. I'm not gonna tell you that that's an attack on capitalism, which is it is indisputably an attack on capitalism.

Instead, I'm gonna go, Abdul's a socialist. But wait a minute, he's not even a socialist. He's literally not. He's literally not, he's a capitalist. And they're like, yeah, but I reserve the right to lie about him. and to cover up all the crimes of all the other donors, because they're not reporters. They're thug propagandists who are trying to manipulate and deceive you. But if you think they love big pharma and big oil, wait till you get to Israel.

That is where their love affair drives them so much that if anyone even criticizes Israel, their job is to seek and destroy. And they're proving it to right in front of your eyes. And by the way, they could prove me wrong, they got two months now. They could reveal all the things Mike Rogers has done. They can ask him to denounce all these people and go, ha ha, jank, we told you we were objective. But they won't do any of that because they're not reporters. Their entire job is to manipulate you into voting for Israel, big pharma, and every donor class there is.

If you're a reporter in mainstream media, you should be sick to your stomach. That's what you signed up for? You went into journalism to do propaganda for genocidal governments and oil companies and defense contractors? Don't tell me you're not doing it, because I haven't seen a single report from any of you about how the donors are robbing us blind, $35 billion in oil subsidies. That is a direct theft from the American people. And every report is like, so what?

Normal, perfectly normal. How dare you object, right? Where's your article on it? Where's your segment on it on cable news? Zero. Giant liars. I accuse national media of being the most corrupt institution in this country and leading to America's demise. It is their fault, young Turks.

Get old black bitches. I love my people. Oh my God, man. All right, let's go to YouTube members. J.B. 49 writes in, if you do a report on Josh Gottheimer, it'd be very, very identical to Federmans, they all run for Israel and could care less about America, but they can't run out of suckers voting for them repeatedly. To be fair to those so-called suckers, they don't know that the media is propaganda. They don't know it's like North Korean propaganda outlets that are

running our cable news stations, almost all, let's be honest, run by radical Zionists. And so they think it's the real news. I don't blame them at all. I blame the people pretending to be in news that have lied to the whole country over and over again. Yeah, and by the way, Kushner and Hakeem Jeffries met. Hekeem Jeffries then comes out of that meeting. I said it was about Israel. They said it was about that Jared Kushner cared so much about housing and affordability. And right after the meeting, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Muscoitz, and Wesley Bell, three rabid

Zionists were put on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Muscoitz was the head of the Middle East subcommittee. And he said, I'm going to work for Israel. And he said, I'm going to make sure in this job that I protect Israel and that we support Israel no matter what. 80% of Democratic voters are against Israel. So that's the Democratic Party spitting in your face. That's Akeem Jeffrey saying, I'm betraying you and I work for Israel. How many Democratic congressmen have objected to that meeting?

Only one, Rokana. That's it. Unreal. And a sentiment of all right back on TYT, Jenkin. John, with you guys are. Let's save you some money, Noble mobile, it's a cell phone service. You're crazy not to do it. It's so much less than what I was paying.

Nothing on your phone changes. The $10 a month for the first month, that's a great deal if you go now. TYT.com slash switch. They give you money back. If you don't use your data, we're all on Wi-Fi, we don't use our data. I never pay above the 30s. The max you could pay is 50, but the first month's 10. There's just no reason not to do it.

I don't understand why the whole country doesn't do it. TYT.com slash switch. TY.t.com slash switch. Okay, all right, let's go to our next story. America here, it doesn't mean that there's to the American people. It means death to the imperialism. It means that's just making people slave. Andrew Callahan went and talked to the people of Iran.

So he'll probably be excommunicated from the rest of our media soon. How dare you be a journalist and get their point of view? So what do they think? Do they hate America or is it our government? And they ask some tough questions that are hard to answer about who's in charge of our government. John, you got the whole story. Yeah, and this is probably inconvenient to people who just want endless war with them, but they can sort of make a distinction between the people and the government.

It's an important thing to make. I would personally understand if a lot of them did hate us. I mean, we're bombing them. We're trying to ruin their country. has threatened to destroy their civilization. We murdered a bunch of their school kids, but they seem to understand nuance better than most in our politics and our media do. So let's get to a little bit more of what Andrew Callahan recorded.

I really want to tell to every American young people over there that we are even standing with them. Iran was showing that from the first days after the revolution, we were standing with Bosnia in Europe. We're standing with people in Afri, Africa, in Yemen, Palestine, Gaza, Syria, Iraq, it doesn't matter where. And we are standing with American people as well, because they're also the one who's just getting effect from the American policies.

And that effect sucks, and it's so bad that even people in Iran know about it. So yeah, no, it's good to know that there is nuance, there's understanding, that people are not necessarily their government. And when we hear the Iranian people talked about in the context of this conflict, it could not be more obvious to our politicians that they are pawns. They are pawns to be used or tweeted about, when will they rise up? When will they finally solve this problem for me? I got to a war, I don't know how to get out of it.

Why won't they kill the government and fix it? That's how they talk about them. But no, they understand so much more. I wanna play one more clip because in this, they talk about the coverage that their media provides that the American people don't get from our own media. Another example of sort of how that system is betraying the American people. Take a look. I've heard a bunch of people here talking about Epstein. Is it a common conversation point here? Yes, because it was like a shock. I mean, not the sexual cases, but eating babies section was very like a total shock here.

Was it distributed pretty widely by traditional, I guess, state media channels? Yes, yes, everywhere was distributed, yes. Iran is portraying these figures. as part of a corrupt, amoral global network manipulated by dark forces. I mean, why would America spend this much, bring all its resources? It must be something that's, so people think it might be at stake. Yeah, I just think, I don't know, it's strange that considering how they still haven't released millions of the documents, we still don't know about the FBI agents, notes from the interview with the woman that accused Donald Trump, there's so much that we don't know, and they're obviously not.

looking at all, the media has moved on. Why would they? Todd Blanche doesn't care. He's putting the job to make sure that we don't pursue that. Him and Cash Patel and Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi, they were all the Epstein Defense Force. That's what they're there for. And meanwhile, they're getting better coverage of the topic over in Iran. Like we just found out, you see the thing about Geelyne Maxwell, her prison transfer paperwork? No. It was totally redacted. Freedom of Infraition Act. They won't tell us almost anything about who actually okayed it, why the conditions, all of that. They're still covered. covering all of it up and Bloomberg did great reporting on that, but I've barely seen any

a national discussion of it. I'll probably have to tune into Iranian state media to get any coverage of it. Yeah, look, Callahan's reporting was actually very balanced. He talked about all the downsides of the rating government. He's totally right about those downsides. Sure, yeah, yeah. About not allowing, certainly nowhere near freedom of speech there, you can't criticize the government.

And they do the death penalty almost as much as China. So those are two leading folks. So this like we're not in favor of the Iranian regime. They're fundamentalist Muslims, I'm atheists, I've got no interest in fundamentalist religion, etc. Now, on the other hand, when you talk about the Iranian people, the Iranian people, Andrew's not the only reporter that's gone there, every reporter that's gone there has come back and on tape with tons of Iranians all say we don't hate the American people, we kind of like

the American people, it's the government that's the problem, right? So that's a very nuanced point of view. Now, you come back to America, and what does everybody on cable news say? The Iranians hate us. We have to attack the Iranians. But wait a minute, that's not even true. I mean, aren't you going to give a little bit of sophisticated answer, a nuanced answer about the people?

No, they chanted death to America. You should hate the Iranians. Okay, then our propaganda, they do propaganda on Iranian TV. Everybody knows that, Andrew, mentioned that in his report. Of course, right? Our propaganda is worse. our mainstream media is much more sophisticated in their propaganda. First of all, they don't tell you that they work for the government as they do government

propaganda over and over and over and over again, right? I mean, when we attacked Iraq, you know, 20 years ago, 70% of Americans thought that Saddam Hussein had personally attacked us on 9-11. Why did they think that? Because mainstream media lied to them in mass and told them that Iraq had something new with 9-11, when Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. How did seven out of ten Americans get that thought in their head? Media lied to them.

Yeah. It's the most sophisticated propaganda operation I have ever seen in my life in history. And then on top of that, their propaganda is more over the top than Iranian propaganda. So they say, the Iranians are like, hey, we got a problem with the American government. And our propaganda is, no, no, it's not just the Iranian government. The Iranian people chant death to America. Iran is a country as a problem. By the way, if you say anything about the Israel,

Israeli people, are you anti-Semite, right? You say something about the Iranian people. Oh yeah, of course, of course. They're Muslims, just smear them, smear them, right? So, and then let's bomb them and murder them, right? That's great, yeah, that's wonderful. I'm not saying everybody's on TV's in favor of the war, but it's interesting. Even the ones that pretend to be against the war, like Morning Joe, then we'll do a 20-minute

screen about how, we gotta stay in. I mean, Israel hasn't finished, we haven't done the job for Israel, we haven't finished We gotta stay in. Remember how evil the Iranians are. Morning Joe, legendary, they hate us because they hate us. That was his brilliant deduction about why some Muslims in the Middle East might have an issue with us. Not that we are helping Israel slaughter Palestinians and take their land, not that we are helping

that all the bombs say made in the USA that drops on their kids' heads. His brilliant deduction on the liberal channel on television, the left-wing channel on television was they hate us because they hate us. They hate us because they hate us, okay? That's our propaganda, way less sophisticated in that sense. Like much more of a blunt instrument, you should hate the Iranian people. You should hate all Muslims so that we'll do all of Israel's wars for them. So, and then when they turn to the, why is our government acting in this way?

Well, look guys, they have a very fair point and that a lot of Americans are saying the same thing, which is clearly our government. government knew about Epstein, we let him off the hook in 2008. The guy, the prosecutor was given instructions to let him off the hook, according to that prosecutor. He magically winds up becoming the labor secretary into Trump in the first term. And our government, knowing that he and all of his wealthy and powerful friends are raping our kids, lets him do it for another decade. They've known about Jeffrey Epstein since the 1980s.

Jeffrey Epstein was involved in the Iran-Contra affair. So our CIA has known about Epstein for now, what, four decades? So our CIA let him rape our children. Our CIA does not work for America. Our CIA is compromised. They work for, I don't know who, my guess is super wealthy and powerful people, probably not just Israelis, but is there a deep sense? state in our government, namely the CIA, and Epstein clearly worked with Israel.

Every single foreign deal he made was on behalf of Israel. And that's another thing that the media hides from you. But you read on DropSight News, they have the actual emails. It's not in dispute. He even procured cyber weapons for Israel. Why was he involved in the Iran-Contra affair on behalf of Israel? They were helping us launder the planes that we brought the drugs in. The CIA brought the drugs in.

The CIA does not represent America. The CIA is a deeply evil organization that has captured our government. And look, I'm positive. You can go read it or you could trust propagandists in television and in mainstream media whose job is to lie to you and deceive you. But I've now read enough about the JFK assassination. I am positive that it was a faction within the CIA, including James Angleton, who was a number two guy at the CIA and continue to run the CIA for years after that, there's

no question that people in the CIA murdered our president. And yet American media is like, oh yeah, CIA, yeah, wonderful, lovely, great, and part of American government. They'd be so terrific. No, they're not. Well, who's the deep state? The CIA is the deep state. So are the Iranian people correct that the people running our government that protected Jeffrey

Epstein and all of his powerful billionaire friends who all, by the way, happened to be in favor of Israel, who are all rabid Zionists, almost all of them. And our media says, don't talk about it, don't tell anybody he worked with Israel. Don't tell, and, oh, tapes, don't worry about the tapes, even though we know there are tapes. And our government covers up his death, covered up his crimes, covers up who he works for, covered up the tapes, and most importantly, covered up the disgusting pedophiles who raped our children. So is there a problem inside the U.S. government? Absolutely.

And it's not even close. And the job of American media is to make sure you don't see it, because if you see it, you'll be really angry. And then you won't want to keep the status quo, and the job of our media is to deceive you enough so that you keep the status quo in place. Okay, I hope I was clear enough. No, I don't know where you stand on this. Okay.

Okay, you know in a war we murder each other? Do you know how dumb that is, how barbaric that is? And yet, again, everyone in our media and our government treats it like, oh, no big deal, of course, gotta go to war every once in a while for Israel. Got to spend trillions of murder people, all for Israel, but shh, don't say it. When's the last time we went to a war that wasn't for Israel? Israel, Vietnam, every, think of any war, like Afghanistan, you can count Afghanistan, right? Because bin Laden was there, the Taliban kind of sheltered al-Qaeda, although they said they'd

give them up at the end and we said no, okay. Okay, but I'll give you Vietnam and Afghanistan. I can't name another war since then that wasn't for Israel, and it's cost us trillions of dollars. But our media says, not even shh, if you say it out loud, if you do journalism out loud, we'll We'll give you the scarlet letter A for anti-Semite, and on behalf of Israel, we'll try to destroy your career so no one hears the truth from you. So that's the disgusting state of American power structure. So that's real, and they're right about that.

All right, we gotta go, everybody check out Damage Report 1 o'clock Eastern Monday through Friday. It's a terrific show. When we come back, we've got a lot news for you, including Donald Trump's mysterious comments about the Fed that we will try to decipher because he's. He's gonna inflict some sort of damage on us. And it's not clear what it is, but we'll do that when we return. All right, so you got a message for John Eyedroll?

Tell him to be nice to me. What contributions to the progressive cause are you most proud of? I mean, I don't I don't have super high aspirations for a singular role that I can play in the movement or anything. I just, I try to present myself as what I think that I am, which is a progressive man who is driven by, a I think well interrogated and well organized system of values that I try to stay consistent on and I demonstrate that that's the sort of life that a person can lead and be successful and be happy and all of that and that should not need to be done but there are so many people on the right that are trying to push men in the opposite direction that I want to be able to do

that along the way if I can get people to care about some topics that not that they wouldn't necessarily care about or that for some men might they might think that's not a topic that they should be focused on. That's definitely something that I relish doing. And along the way, I mean, we've been able to introduce people to a lot of candidates. That's been a big part of what we've done. You know, not all of them necessarily got in office. Probably most of them did not. And a lot of them, you might not even remember their names. But it was great to be able to provide people the platform where they had the chance of, you know, making a difference. Obviously, AOC and all that. But there's been a lot of great people along the way.

You know that feeling when you're doing everything you're supposed to be doing, eating healthy, working out, getting sleep, taking supplements, and you still wonder, is any of this actually working? Because doing all the right things doesn't always mean it's working for you. That's why I'm excited about the true age tests from true diagnostic. It uses epigenetics, which may sound complicated, but it's really about tiny chemical tags on your DNA that change in response to sleep, stress, diet, exercise, and your environment. environment. True age reads those tags to estimate how your body is aging. And unlike many biological age tests, their methods are published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and

were developed with researchers at Harvard, Yale, and Duke. You get a clear picture of where you are and where you can improve. Plus personalized recommendations around nutrition, exercise, sleep, supplements, and lifestyle. The process is simple. At-home finger prick, send it back, get your report online in about three to four weeks. So if you want to optimize your health, true age gives you a much clearer starting point. So if you're serious about longevity or even just curious whether your body is aging faster or slower than your actual age, this is one of the easiest ways to find out. Right now, go to true diagnostic.com and use code t-yct for 20% off your entire order.

That's true diagnostic.com code t-yt for 20% off. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19 speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. In the bonus episode for the members, we do some inside baseball. We're going to look at

John's desk. Nice little spaceship here. Nerd, but it is kind of look cool. Who has Legos? Oh, no. He's taking apart a keyboard. Who has a mouse pad that's this big? He's got a dog with a nose that you can hang something like. You know what this desk screams to me? Nerd. And that's how we like him. We love Johnny Pye. He's got his own personality like everybody does at TYT. Come meet us all in the bonus episodes. TYP.com slash team. David Soror. Neanderer.

Is Adam Green Drop by? Charlamine. It's been great to have you. It's great to be with you, Chuck. Your show is a great thing. You're informing people. A lot of the shows that I live on. You know, my CNN and my MSNBC and even Fox and any of the other shows,

NPR. They are so quick to decide that they know what this building means today. The one thing that I hate that politicians do, you know, they talk about the people they should be talking to. Do they have any idea that they're the, the establishment and that they're hated? Or do they not realize that at all? People are so deeply in their little universe. I think it's very easy to not really question what you're doing. Voters have a right to ask questions of any nominee, whether they're

independent, Republican, or Democrat. The system is monopoly that suppresses competition. How is it the year 2024 and we're still like maybe they'll talk about pain medical? I know. How is that like at one level it's like what we're talking about it now? You're like, it's 2024. And that's always been the critique that your critique of us is, well, you guys give good speeches. You've put out good tweets, but you're not wielding actual power. Now we're starting to. My favorite news platform by far. It's not even close. It's not a country and a principle. And that's what you and I both work to achieve. And I'm so glad that at least half the battle has now been one.

If you want to go really hear what's going on, honestly, you should tune into the young turks. Thanks for doing such a great job. Please keep it up. Hang tough. Yeah. That makes me so happy. Oh, I like making that. I didn't know about that. This is a happy Anna Kasparian. You're welcome, YouTube. Join the Dragon Squad by becoming a YouTube channel member.

Click the join button below or sign up on t.com slash join to get access to fun emojis, a member only chat, exclusive shop TYT designs, ad free watching, and so many other amazing perks. Plus, you get bragging rights for being part of the coolest community on the internet and help us drive real positive change in the world. The Dragon Squad awaits, so join today. Piker literally wears a male uniforms. I'm Turks Jankyager, Yasmin Oliya Khan with you guys. Yazzo, So in Rebel HQ, check that out on YouTube. And if you're on YouTube, you could help to show a ton by hitting the join button below.

And we'd appreciate that. Thank you guys. All right, so let's do our next story. Government and the media are all celebrating the jobs report that just came out. It's way better than people expected. But wait a minute. There's some reason why you should be very, very suspicious of that report. And we're gonna tell you why, yes, tell us about it.

Yeah, I am a little suspicious because economists are estimating that the US economy would add 50,000 jobs in the month of August. But according to the Trump administration, we actually added 162,000 jobs last month. So that's quite a discrepancy there. So restaurants and bars led with 59,000 new jobs while government and government and education rose by 42,000 and manufacturing contributed just 16,000. Healthcare, the primary engine of job growth, saw a gain of 13,000 compared with the monthly average of 32,000 over the prior 12 months.

But wait, there's more. When the government releases its monthly job reports, it often revises prior estimates downwards. In other words, the government comes out and says that it overestimated past numbers. But this time prior estimates were revised upwards. Okay, so June's gain was raised from 20,000 to 31,000, while July was revised from a loss of 23,000 jobs to a gain of 21,000. And the report, you know, it wasn't all sunshine and roses, to be fair.

They had to throw in a little bit of gloom just to make it believable, I guess. So there was some evidence of artificial intelligence hitting employment roles. Information related industries reported a loss of 23,000, putting the 12-month average at a loss of 8,000. And unfortunately, there is more bad news, specifically when it comes to wages, which I'm sure is what everybody wants to hear. Economist Heather Long had this to say about that. She said one big source spot in the August jobs report was wages. Wage growth is the lowest it's been in five years. Wage growth equals 3.1% in the past year.

Inflation is likely to be 3.5% and it was 3.4 in July. Also, Americans are being squeezed financially right now. Inflation has wiped out all wage gains since April and March was close. Credit card debt is at a record high. Savings is at the lowest in years and personal loan use is up. Consumption is almost certainly going to slow. But on the whole, you know, the report is somehow being celebrated as a win. Let's watch.

Hold on to your seats, folks. Non-farm payrolls for the month of August, up 162K. It's blue-collar jobs, construction, manufacturing, room building things again in America. This is a reversal of the last three months, which were pretty poor reports. So I'm ecstatic about this. This is one of the best numbers relative to expectation that I've ever seen. And the reason to dig into it is that the policies are working. And so, for example, President Trump's tariff policy and his big beautiful bill have made it so people should be building factories. Well, the number of people building factories has gone from about almost nothing under Joe Biden to about 90 something thousand people who are now building factories because they're onshoreing production and they're expensing the factories. Also, we saw a big surge in utility employment because while people are anxious that data centers might raise their utility bills, the utilities are working overtime to hire people to expand their capacity so that data centers can go wherever they want without making people's electric bills go up.

All right, okay. So that was Kevin Hassett. He's a fan favorite here at at TYT, I'm sure. But there is of course a big catch to all of this as reported by DropSight News. They said it was the first monthly drops report issued under the Bureau of Labor Statistics new commissioner Brett Matsumoto. Matsumoto took office in August 11th replacing Erica Mick and Tarfer, who Trump fired in August 2025 hours after the BLS published weak employment figures and steep downward revisions that he did not like. Trump baselessly accused her of rigging the data to make him look bad. So take this news with a huge grain of salt because the truth is we cannot actually really trust anything that comes out of this administration, at least not where

the jobs are concerned. And Jenk, we saw him fire someone for making him look bad. So it makes sense now that he might try to hire someone who would make him look good. Any quick thoughts there? Yeah. So we warned you guys about this when he fired the person who was doing the job earlier. We said watch out. You shouldn't trust the numbers going forward because he's doing it because he doesn't want the actual numbers.

And you know, the biggest tells when they do projection. So whatever's in their head about how they would normally react, they usually accuse the other side. So he's like, oh, they're probably rigging the numbers. Because he's thinking, well, if I put my person in, I'd rig the numbers for political reasons. And when are we now? Well, we're right before an election, the midterms. And look at that. Somehow a spectacular number out of nowhere that no one expected.

But there's something wrong with all of our journalists. And this one is just about like their complete belief in the government. Like if the government says something, yes, they all go, well, it's absolutely true. And anyone's saying otherwise as a conspiracy theorist. They're lunatics, the government always tells the truth. And if you don't think the government always tells the truth, we think you're should be in a mental asylum. You're a kooky conspiracy theorist.

Okay, but wait, I thought the job of the journalists and the reporters was to challenge the government. So where did you get these numbers? Can you explain them? Can you show us the data behind them? No, no, no, don't you dare. We all instantly believe it. So, okay, if you want to get excited about it and think that Donald Trump's done great

job with the economy, okay, you can do all this propaganda you want, but at the end of the day, I got gas yesterday and prices sucked. And I went to the grocery store a couple of days before then, and prices sucked. So you want to try to deceive the American people, you can, but they can see what their wages are. And if you tell them, oh, don't worry, other people are hired. Okay, maybe they believe you and maybe they don't. Yeah, I mean, the affordability is still a huge problem for the American people.

And then you couple that with all of the reports that wages are still projected to go even further down. Things are supposed to get even less affordable for the American people, generally speaking, across the board. And these jobs, it's like, where are they? Kevin Hassett, he went around for a while saying that, oh, we're adding all these jobs to construction and manufacturing and things like that. But that wasn't even a really significant chunk of the jobs that were reported on this last report. But Donald Trump, you know, he put all these people in place because that's what he wanted to do. He wanted someone to make him look good. And he did.

He got these crazy numbers reported back to the American people. But, you know, if he was excited about this actual jobs report, he has a very funny way of showing it. Trump has always pressured the Federal Reserve to lower its interest rates, even in his first term. But today he told the Federal Reserve that if they do not lower their interest rates, he will stop trading with certain countries. Okay. And this is, it's really just kind of incredible. Like today he said that he wasn't going to do it. Here's what he had to say on truth social. He posted this long, super long post, said great jobs number just announced breaking all estimates except for mine by double and triple. You haven't seen anything yet. Employers added six. 162,000 jobs in August, where I don't know, lower the interest rates because the USA is a much stronger credit than it was just a short time ago, blah, blah, blah. It goes on for a very long time. So he wants lower interest rates and he says it's going to be better than tariffs.

So during fiscal quarter two, the United States recorded a trade deficit with all these countries. Okay, so you have a whole list of them, including Canada, China, the EU, Israel, Ireland. Mexico, all these countries, and that's according to the U.S. Census Bureau. However, Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh is hinting that he could raise interest rates in order to bring down inflation. And so the stage is set for yet another showdown between Trump and his Federal Reserve chair. Just the same old thing every time this man decides to do something fiscally. And at the end of the day, things never ever seem to get better for the American people.

Jank, I was just in California, kind of in your neck of the woods. I was in San Francisco. And all these Texans in the car at one point, we looked over and we all gasped because we all saw the same thing. Your gas prices are out of control. I know we're spoiled here in Texas, but even here, our gas prices have gotten out of control. So what are your thoughts, Jank? Okay, I'm perplexed by what Trump is saying.

And I don't understand why people aren't saying, what the F are you talking about? So he's saying if the rates are not lowered, I will stop trading with these countries. But Canada can't lower our rates. Japan can't lower our rates, they have nothing to do with our interest rates. So you're going to punish them for the Federal Reserve not lowering the rates. Does he know that the Federal Reserve is not in Canada? It's not in Germany or Taiwan or South Korea. Does he know that?

They have nothing to do with this. This is like the most irrational thing I've ever seen in my life. So I guess he's threatening the Federal Reserve. I'll try to destroy the South Korean economy if you don't give me the interest rates that I want. But wait a minute, that would also hurt our economy if we stop trading with it. In fact, it's arguable that it's not arguable. If we stop trading with all those countries, there'll be one country that's hurt the most,

So is he, he's holding America hostage and the entire global economy hostage and basically using as a gun to the head of the Federal Reserve, you better give me what I want. Otherwise I'm gonna cause a global economic collapse. That's what a lunatic would do. Like that's crazy. There's no other explanation for that. I've never seen anything like this, nobody's ever seen anything like this, threatening different countries that can't affect our interest rates at all.

And then threatening the Federal Reserve, I'll hurt those countries and I'll hurt myself if you don't do what I tell you. Just bizarre. But like CNBC is maybe the most bias out of all the media networks and that is a hell of a thing to say. It's a very high bar. But like as long as anything causes the stock market to go up, they're like, yeah, of course. Well, Japan better make sure the Federal Reserve lower.

the rates. I thought you guys are business reporters. Does this make any sense at all? Aren't you gonna say anything? Okay, so, okay, now one other thing, he keeps complaining. They have lower, like Canada has lower interest rates than us, why? Well, there's a very real reason, why a practical reason, why somebody could explain it. You're the president, you just call an economic expert or 10 or 100 of them into your,

or into the Oval Office and ask them, why are you asking us? You sound like a moron. It's because they have different economic circumstances and different laws. So for example, in Canada, they get three to five year mortgages. We have 30 year mortgages. Interest rates affect them a lot more. Their economy is depressed these days, so they're not worried about inflation. They're worried about stimulating the economy.

So their interest rate logically for balancing their economy should be lower than ours. We're worried about runaway inflation. So that's why we have a higher interest rate set by the Fed because we don't want inflation to go out of control. Like these are normal explanations that anybody could give the president. But he doesn't understand any of that because his brain is the size of a pee. And he's like, well, we have no interest. I punish Taiwan unless Fed Reserve gives me what I want.

What are you gonna do with a guy this dumb? Please guys, we gotta stop electing idiots. Like elect a smart president, it's not too much to ask for. Someone that understands economics, he doesn't understand anything. So, and lastly, if the Fed lowers the interest rates, that could add fuel to the fire of inflation, which makes affordability worse, not better. He doesn't understand anything. But no, me lower interest rates.

Me heard once that it stimulates economy. Me wants stimulating economy now. And if it blows up on the next guy, who cares? Me want it. And that's the baboon who's the current president of the United States. I mean, I don't know if I agree that he doesn't understand the economy or if he's just doing these things knowing full well, that it is going to backfire on the American people. And he just doesn't care. Like he's told us before that he is not worried about the affordability crisis.

Other members of his cabinet have just outright denied that there is an affordability crisis at all in this country right now. They keep telling us to stop complaining about jobs because the jobs are out there. All of these white collar workers who got laid off from their jobs, who got doge out of their positions, you know, they could just become construction workers now and go help and build some data centers, not my problem. And that's it. They kind of just like wipe their hands clean of all of it. But what's happening is that what's not happening is these white collar workers are not taking these construction jobs that they say are out there and so abundant.

they're not becoming wait staff in restaurants because they're way overqualified for those jobs. And the government is just kind of doing all these things, saying all these things. The president is tweeting all these things that make no sense. But the thing is, so many of his supporters, they say this all the time. They're like, you know what? He knows what he's doing. He has a lot more information available to him than I have. So I'm sure he knows something that I don't.

And the truth is, he probably does know something that you don't. And the thing that he knows is that this will somehow benefit him or the people that he wants to help, which is other billionaires and his very rich or very powerful friends. Because that is how it's been consistently the whole time this man has been president or even in the political sphere anywhere. Every single thing he does, he has an ulterior motive for even if it looks or sounds good to the American people. And the thing is, even if it looks or sounds good to the American people, it very rarely is. It's not even usually a side effect that the American people get something good from the things that he does, but he just does what he wants to do.

And his people continue to support him despite all the evidence that suggests they should stop doing so. So I know a lot of people personally who have voted for Trump three times. I know a lot of people here in Texas who are getting ready to vote for Ken Paxton for Senate in November. And it's really sad because all the terrible things that these people have done, they don't hear it. They don't understand it. They don't think about it. All they think about is what is very, very easy for them to understand or what is comfortable for them to understand. And I'm not trying to, you know, speak badly about an entire group of people.

But this, it's been 10 years of this. Why are we still doing this? And why are people still falling for this? Yeah. So look, I get that he, of course, he works for his own self-interest. But I swear to you, he has no strategy other than you give me money. You won't give me things. I want your banana, right?

But he doesn't, like he doesn't understand, I swear to you, he doesn't understand economics. And if you're out there, you go, oh, Jake, how could you say that? I mean, he's wealthy. You know his dad gave him over $400 million. If he took that money and just put it in the bank in a savings account, or better yet, in a mutual fund, he would have way, way more money than he does now. He's a moron who lost almost all of daddy's money through six bankruptcies. NBC rescued him with that show The Apprentice.

He didn't make any money from business. He made money from TV from being a reality star. He made another $400 million from that show, from the apprentice. That Zucker gifted him, okay? And Zucker knew that he was a terrible businessman, but he's like, I don't need a good businessman. I just need someone the country thinks looks like a businessman who's been in front of the cameras. And so they hired a baboon to act like a businessman. even though they know he had bankrupted every company he'd ever run before that.

You know what he did with NBC's $400 million? He lost that too. He was, he had barely had any money left before he became president. But good news for him because of his crypto scams last year, he made $1.4 billion. The first time he's ever made any real money, and that was because of pure corruption. That's our president. All right, we'll take a quick break here when we come back. you're going to be shocked to find out Congress passed yet another bill in favor of Israel,

and that takes away American rights. Again, huh, that is so strange. Because I hear from mainstream media, they have no influence on Congress at all. Well, we'll find out when we return. Antifa! All right, let's go to our members on t-y-t.com. Burrito Bandito says, I love Friday because of Yaz. That's so sweet.

That's a very sweet comment. Old Woodsman 53 says, Jenks disparagement. Oh, this is challenging me, I like that. Jenks disparagement of mainstream cable news is wearing a little thin. You're probably not alone, brother. I know, I overdo it. MS now often provides pieces that truly leave the listener enlightened. For example, Ali Valshi's guest recently was Noga Tarnapolski,

an independent journalist who has covered the deployment treatment of Palestinians for over two decades. Ali Valshii is really good. I like that you're giving me counter evidence. And that's why I usually try to say prime time anchors, but I don't always say it. So Ali Vilshi is definitely an exception to the rule. But and you know, they fired, you know, they got rid of a lot of their Muslim anchors, but they didn't get rid of Ali Valshi. But I think he's on the weekends if I'm not mistaken.

But if you've got more examples of them doing good things, I'm ready to hear it because I don't want to be wrong, right? If you got examples of MS now being like, you know, the prime time anchors being outraged at what's happening at the Palestinians, criticizing the Israeli government, you know, criticizing our politicians who are clearly working for the Israeli government, et cetera. Just mention the genocide. Any of those, send it to me because I don't want to be wrong. But my guess is I'm gonna get more segments from Ali Valshi, but maybe I'm wrong.

All right, pessimistic progressive says, the only discussions I've seen on Luma versus Saddam was on Abby Phillips' CNN panel where guests like politics girl have had strong defense of Hassan. But yes, they don't discuss it directly. Anchors don't say that's true. And Anna used to make points like that on Abby Phillips CNN panel. And then she was taken off the air for criticizing Israel. That's mainstream media.

They won't let you do it. Back on TYT, Jenkins Yez with you guys. Now we're gonna go to another story. So Congress took up another bill in favor of Israel. I know, shocking. It passed easily, I know shocking. 237 to 169, not even close. But this one also takes away.

your rights. It says if you'd like to do freedom of speech, but it's against Israel, you will now be banned from doing that if it's a college campus. So more of our rights abridged to philate Israel. This is not normal. This is super weird. So Yaz is going to tell you the story and give you all the facts regarding it. And I'm going to come back and talk about how deeply strange this is that our Congress does more to serve the economy of a different country and a different government than our own. Yeah, let's tell us about it. Yeah, it's not even just the economy. It's also like the feelings of this other country and it makes those sense.

And if you think about it too hard, it'll make you crazy. So the legislation that just passed says that these schools here in the United States, colleges and universities, could lose federal funding if they engage in discriminatory commercial or academic boycotts against Israel. Not against any other country, just against Israel. So as you can see there, 203 Republicans voted in favor along with 33 Democrats and one independent. Only two Republicans opposed the legislation as well as 167 Democrats, which is honestly a little bit more than I expected. Of course, none of this has anything to do with actual anti-Semitism, nor is any of this being done in an effort to stand up for American Jews who are facing actual anti-Semitism. This is all about Israel and A-PAC funding.

But someone who doesn't take any money from A-PAC is House candidate Abdul El-Said. And here's what he had to say about this vote on X. He posted this. He said, today rather than focus on the price of gas, the price of groceries, ending the war or stopping the trade war, Congress spent its time declaring this. Dear colleges that receive American taxpayer money, we will take away that American taxpayer money if you decide to keep it from going to Israel. Aside from being blatantly unconstitutional, it's wild. Why is it wrong to want our taxpayer money spent here to provide for schools here instead of being sent somewhere else?

And he's absolutely right. And fun fact, Israel is one of the most highly educated countries in the world right now, with nearly half of Israeli adults holding post-secondary or tertiary degrees. Their higher education is also heavily subsidized with about 75% of costs being covered. By whose money, you can guess, I'm sure. Well, he's not even in Congress yet, but Abdul El-Sayed is at least thinking about the American people right now and the issues that actually matter to them right now. However, his sentiment was echoed by one of those Republicans who voted against the bill, and that is the ousted representative from Kentucky, Thomas Massey. Massey had this to say.

He said, Congress did one and only one thing today. the House passed a bill to withhold money from universities if they don't play nice with Israel. I voted no, it's not proper for our federal government to coerce universities into engaging with any particular foreign country. And just a reminder, Massey lost his reelection bid after a record $37 million was spent on ads against him during his primary campaign. And again, there is no other similar legislation pertaining to any other country, like this, the way this country speaks about Israel or isn't allowed to speak about Israel is unlike anything that we have ever seen in this country, at least in recent years. But recently, Ben Shapiro, of all people who loves to talk about Israel, argued that Tucker Carlson

is way more obsessed, that's the word he used with Israel than he is. He said he doesn't talk about it that much, but Glenn Greenwald actually had an interesting response to that comment from Ben Shapiro. So here's what Glenn Greenwald had to say. Said Ben Shapiro doesn't need to talk about Israel because his country owns both parties in Congress and especially the White House. He's content with the U.S. servitude to Tel Aviv and just has to nudge now and then. It's those opposed to this warp dynamic who must object constantly. And that is absolutely true. There's a reason why people like us here at TYT are constantly talking about Israel because we don't like what's going on.

We don't like what's going on over there. We don't like what's happening here at the impetus of Israel. We don't like any of it. We wish it would stop. And so, yes, we have to talk about it. We have to keep talking about it. And unfortunately, it's constantly relevant because our government and the Israeli government keeps doing things that we need to talk about, that we need to report on.

For example, they're trying to make college campuses abstain from criticizing this other country entirely or else they're going to withhold federal funding. And as Abdul al-Said pointed out, that is our money. That is the money that we are providing to our government to distribute to these universities because we, the American people, are supposed to believe in higher education. But anyway, Jenk, what are your thoughts here? So why are we talking about it right now? Oh, right, because they passed the bill.

In fact, it was the only bill they passed. And the only bill was to help Israel, because it's almost always just to help Israel. And you know what they did right afterwards, yes? Recess. So like we're not gonna do anything else. In fact, we're just gonna go home. They're gone until past the elections. That's like almost two months.

After September 17th, they're gone, okay? So well, six weeks say, right? So are you gonna pass anything that helps the American people? Nope, not gonna do it. But you care so much about Israel's businesses. You can't boycott an Israeli business. You care about American business? No, I'm not gonna do anything about it.

You can wanna protect the Israeli now we're not talking about security anymore. Now we're talking about protecting their money and their economy. Okay, but are you gonna do anything to protect our ranchers? Are you gonna do anything to protect our farmers? Are you gonna do anything to protect Americans? Nope, no, only Israelis. This is not normal. This is not anywhere near normal.

So, okay, we're forced to talk about it because you passed a stupid bill. And so now let's break down why it's so stupid. We don't want anyone boycotting Canada. Well, Canada's our closest ally. No, we don't care if you boycott Canada. You can boycott Canada all day long. You can boycott Sudan, Russia, England. We don't care.

You can boycott anyone you like. And by the way, that makes sense. That's Canada's business. And Sudan's business, it's not our business. We're going to do sanctions against them. I don't know why you're doing them. I don't care. Like, you know, Canada, good luck.

We love you guys, but it's not my business, right? But they say you're right. No other countries are your business except Israel. Israel is a very important thing. You are not allowed to boycott them, only them. Okay, and all of our reporters go, that is normal. Only anti-Semites would object. No, Israel has to stand above everyone, including America.

They're not going to pass any bills that help you. They're only going to pass bills that help Israel's economy, and that's normal. And if you complain, you're an anti-Semite. Okay, that's super strange. That's like as weird beyond description. Okay, now let's go to the next stage, which is wait a minute, this bill takes away our rights. So if a university decides, hey, you know what, I think a genocide is a bad thing. I think murdering 23,000 kids is a bad thing.

They're like, no, you have to be in favor of murdering 23,000 kids. And if you try to object and use a freedom of speech, no, that's a take his freedom of speech away. Who do you think you are an American? Americans. We're allowed to criticize anyone we want, including Israel. No, you're allowed to criticize anything you want, including America, but you're not allowed to criticize Israel. And if you do, we will take away hundreds of millions of dollars from your university. We will, because that could endanger the most important thing in the world is really money. And Yaz is right there, top 25 economy in the world. What do they need our help for? No, they're demanding that you give

them billions per year. You use all of your military for all of their wars and that you shut up about it. And if you dare complain, then Congress will take your money away. Well, obviously, those 237 members of Congress are working for Israel. They're not working for America. And if you want to call them traitors, that actually makes a lot of sense. Because they're actively saying, I don't care to pass any laws about you. We have a massive affordability problem here.

We have a massive economic problem here. I'm not gonna pass a single law about that. All I'm gonna do is obsess with how to take more of your money. And by the way, now your kids send them into a war to die for Israel. I'm gonna take all of that and give it to Israel. And if you complain about it, I'll take more of your money and say, shut up about Israel. You have no freedom of speech in America. They're burning our constitution for Israel.

And the media is like, oh yeah, that makes sense. Oh, do you need help? If anyone objects, we'll call them anti-Semites and try to destroy their life. That's how we'll help the government betray Americans on behalf of Israel. And that's what they do. Like if they saw this video, they couldn't object to a single fact we're giving you. But what they would do instead is anti-Semites, never watch the young Turks, never do this or that. Make sure that we shut down that voice against Israel, because Israel must be protected at all cost.

Well, it sounds like you're working for Israel. But that's a trope, anti-Semite, double anti-Semite, double cancel them. Shut up, okay? So a bunch of Israelis running our government, it's super obvious. Those 33 Democrats voted against 80% of their voters. 80% of their voters say, we have an unfavorable view of Israel. We do not want you to send any more money to Israel. And they go, shut up, you're a stupid American.

I don't care about you. I'm gonna take away your rights, your right to First Amendment, your constitutional rights, your human rights, and I'm gonna give it to Israel. And if you dare object, anti-Semite, hey, Jake Tapper, destroy him. Dana Batch, New York Times, call them anti-Semites and destroy them. Okay, but none of us work for Israel. My ass, you don't. They look at the bill you just passed. So now you're gonna, if you're on a college campus, you better not speak up.

And if you're a college or university administrator, you better kneel to Israel. Otherwise, they'll do congressional hearings, they'll have you fired, which they did, we all saw it with their own eyes, and they didn't do anything against Israel. They just allowed peace protesters. They're like, you were, you allot people for peace anti-Semite. And they did it right in front of my eyes, they've gone. They fired those administrators. And now they say if you dare object to a genocide, we're gonna fire you and take away your money.

And you tell me you don't work for Israel, though you definitely work for Israel. And look at that, almost the entire Republican Party, America first, America last, dead last. The Republican Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli government. That is how they vote nearly 100% of the time. Okay? And lastly, you know, Yaz said there, you know, this make you crazy and it does. Because we report what the vote was, what the issue was, the rights that were taken away, and the money that is threatened, and all on behalf of.

Norway, no, Israel every time and including this bill. And they go, no, we will not report on that. We will not say that it's weird. We will say that it's so normal that anyone who objects is a racist bigot who hates Jews. Okay, we're utterly controlled by Israel, utterly. Every bill that is in favor of Israel passes easily. If this is not control, what the hell is control?

We're in a war for them. We've given them over $300 billion. We spent $8 trillion on their wars, and now we can't even criticize them. Otherwise, we're going to lose our livelihood. We're going to lose our money and our rights. And you're telling me, Israel doesn't control our government? That's absurd. Obviously, they control our government.

And at this point, it's 100%. Yeah, and, you know, Jank, it's also kind of incredible how quickly all of this was done. It seems like anything that actually benefits the American people can't even get a vote on the house floor. But anything for Israel, they have a vote, a very quick vote, and then they have a recess. It's very convenient. But what they're trying to do now, like they're trying to beat us into submission by just outlying beliefs and shutting our mouths. They're seeing that there is no way to undo what the American people have finally now seen of Israel with their own eyes, of the genocide that they're committing against a Palestinian people. We've seen all of this

with our own eyes. You can't tell us that this isn't happening. The people of Israel, we've heard the things that they say. We heard the way that they speak about Muslims and about brown people and about anyone who is not one of them. So now here in the United States, they can't have that. They can't have this 80% disapproval of Israel. So what they're doing is they're just trying to use legislation now to silence people so that they can pretend that there is no opposition. And by targeting the universities and the college campuses, this is extremely troubling. And here in Texas, I got to say, like we've already been experiencing this to an extent. I don't if this has been happening elsewhere in the country, but our governor here is a very wannabe

Donald Trump. But he has also been threatening state funding to our universities here across the state. I know in Houston, the University of Houston, if they don't stop doing anything that could be considered DEI, they are threatening to pull their funding. And that's at the University of Houston, which is ridiculous, because this is actually one of the most diverse cities in the entire country. And they're like, don't do anything that could remotely be this way. So the fact that they're targeting higher education, it's really disturbing and we nobody should take this likely. Anytime they target education in general, especially higher education, I shouldn't say especially, just education in general, that is a very, very negative

bellwether for what they're actually trying to do. Yep, all right guys, when we come back, another radical Zionist that has enormous control over who wins our elections. And he's apparently part of the plan to rebuild Gaza. Oh, great, putting radical sinus in charge of Palestinians. Sounds like such a great idea. We'll talk about it when we return. All right, back here. Let's go to super chat.

James Kelly says, probably wishful thinking, but I feel that the corruption is in our face because they know the game is over. hopefully because Americans are demanding change, but worried that it could be because of something bad happening. No, James, I hear you, and that's a rational conclusion to draw if you're outside the D.C. bubble, but I've having gone inside the D.C. bubble many, many times. No, they don't know it. They all think that the 90% of Americans are radicals. We're all anti-Semites.

We're all nuts. And the status quo is the greatest thing in the world. And money in politics is wonderful. They don't know, and they don't even understand that we've got the pitchforks in hand. Like, they think, no, we'll just keep lying to you and you'll do exactly as we tell you. And we'll just cancel you if you don't. They haven't learned anything. They haven't moved at all.

They're not even aware of any of this that's happening. Like if they watch today's show, they would be shocked out of their minds. They, like, that can't be, nobody thinks that. That's got to be the only the most radical people. must be thinking that. They don't realize that it's two thirds of the country now. They don't get that they're surrounded. They're the minority.

And their entitlement complex is legendary. It's historic. They feel entitled to rule over you. Allie writes in, my mom is 76 year old black woman who never heard of Hassan. Since CNN talks about him nonstop, she looked him up and told me she sees nothing wrong with his views. She's now a fan. I love that when it backfires.

Miyagawa Katsuki Otaku Dragon says, why do Republican politicians still act like Trump can tank their careers? He's extremely unpopular with voters, distancing themselves would help them more likely. They've realized that in the general election, but in primaries, he can still eliminate them. That's reality. We'll be back. All right, we're back on TYT, Jenkinson, yes, with you guys. And if you want to help keep the show around, we deeply appreciate and do need it these days. TYT.com slash join. TYT.com slash join.

All right, let's go to our next story. Mark Rowan is a billionaire on Trump's so-called Board of Peace, sure. And he's overseeing the redevelopment of Gaza. There's no redevelopment of Gaza, but he does want to build like high rises on it. I'm sure on top of the dead Palestinian children that he'll be able to profit off of. It's being reported that he's also given one and a half million dollars to APEC, super PAC this election cycle. That's so weird that a radical Zionist is on the board of peace that hasn't brought us any

peace at all. But wait till you find out the whole story, Mark Rowan, his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, and how many of our government officials he has legally bribed. Yes, you got the story. Yeah, this guy is terrible. And just to give everyone an idea of how terrible he actually is. is he said that the development potential in Gaza is quote tremendous. Who who who are these people? It's terrible. So Rowan has donated 1.5 million dollars to

the United Democracy Project or UPD which is a super PAC for A PAC and for a billionaire. And for a billionaire you know that's not really a lot of money for a billionaire but the timing does matter. Okay. Before we get to that though, you already know that he has been affiliated with Jeffrey Epstein and now Rowan's an executive member of the president's board of peace. So he's got presidential influence, keeping all of that in mind. His first donation of $1 million to UDP happened back in March, just as they were ramping up spending to oust Thomas Massey from Congress. Thomas Massey, as he know, has been a vocal critic of Israel and a prominent advocate for the release of the Epstein files. I'm sure that was unrelated

to Rowan's donation though. The second donation, the remaining $500,000 happened in July, and it happened on the same day that UDP ramped up spending against progressive candidates, Abdul El-Said in Michigan, and Cory Bush's campaigns. So thanks to aggressive spending from A-PAC, El-Said, and Massey's primaries were, by the way, the most expensive ever. And here is a little bit more about Rowan. So Rowan, a major donor to Trump's failed 2020

presidential campaign has long made his animus towards critics of Israel known. In recent years, he has been a fierce advocate against student protesters calling for an end to the genocide in Gaza, broadly mischaracterizing their anti-genocide calls as anti-Semitic and played a key role in ousting leaders at his alma matter, the University of Pennsylvania, over the handling of the protests. In 2025, he served as a consultant to the White House in its recent attacks on higher education. He donated an initial $250,000 to UDP in 2022, the year the APEC Super PAC was founded and more than quadrupled his giving in 2024. Trump appointed him to the Board of Peace this past January. So yeah, this is especially relevant considering the story

that we just covered here on the show where the U.S. voted to block, the U.S. House voted to block federal funding to the universities and colleges for speaking against Israel. It seems like this is exactly what a guy like Mark Rowan was pushing for. And outside of his A-PAC donations, Rowan has given directly to several other pro-Israel congressional candidates, including a few Democrats like Representative Josh Gottheimer and Senator Cory Booker, who really is just the worst. He's also a prominent donor for Susan Collins. She received nearly $10 million from roughly $1,000, 100 billionaires and their spouses since the beginning of last year. So one of the super PACs donors is private equity firm Apollo Global Management's billionaire CEO

and founder Mark Rowan, who ran two of Maine's largest paper mills into the ground, bankrupting them both and eliminating more than 1,000 jobs in Buck Sport and Jay. So he's a private equity guy, and that's what he did in Maine. And as I said, she got $10 million from 100 billionaires. So 10 million from 100 people in comparison, just to give you a comparison, Graham Platner received just as much nearly $10 million from 265,000 small donors. So the influence really is wildly, unfathomably disproportional. And just one more thing, in case there was any doubt of the depravity of these people. In Rowan's view, there is money to be made from the carnage in Gaza. At the meeting in Washington, D.C. this past February, when Trump also pledged

$10 billion in public funds to the Board of Peace, Rowan fired off property value estimates in Gaza, more than 80% of which lies in ruins. He cited a coastline valued at $50 billion, a housing stock, if rebuilt, worth $30 billion, and infrastructure projects worth another $30 billion. dollars. Rowan spoke next to generic renderings of glistening high-rise apartments, palm tree laden highways, solar power plants, and coastal oil depots. Consolidating all these assets under the supervision of Trump's Board of Peace, Rowan said would allow for conflict-free management of the resources to benefit the Gazans. And he promised 115 billion of value. It just needs to be unlocked and finance and unlocked in finance and also get those pesky Palestinians

out of the way. Jank, it's unbelievable. Like, it's so hard to just read all that because what kind of like inhuman people are these? Yeah, so look, look, in their minds, of course, they're heroes. They're protecting their beloved Israel who they view as the victims. And my God, they only got to murder 76,000 Palestinians. There's so many more to murder. And so obviously they're the victims.

I mean, we said that it wasn't about self-defense, that it was to take land in Gaza. By the way, the other person who said that was Charlie Kirk, who's conveniently dead now. He said it right after October 7th on Patrick Bed-David, David showed that the Israelis that he knew, and he knew, his top donors were people who supported Israel. He said, yeah, they're planning to do to ethnically cleanse Gaza, move out 2.5 million people. And what happened? happened? They moved out all those people from 70% of Gaza and Israel now has it and Netanyahu says they're gonna keep it. They also have southern Lebanon. They keep acquiring land, but in the

crazed minds of radical Zionists like Mark Rohn, they're like yeah, that's self-defense. We had to keep murdering them and taking their land. Well, how else would we defend ourselves? And you know what? We haven't murdered enough. That's why I'm buying off Susan Collins. That's why I'm buying off Gow Rhine who ran against Tom Massey. I'm buying off Mike Rogers and all these guys. I'm just going to buy and buy these politicians for Israel. But if you say that I'm buying them for Israel, even though it is factually correct, I will have my dogs and media attack you and call you an anti-Semite and try to destroy you in every way.

Because I'm pro-American? No, not remotely pro-American. All he cares about is Israel. That's why all of his donations are in favor of tax cuts for himself and more of your money, not his money, your money funnel to Israel. Hey Mark, you're a billionaire, why don't you give your own money? Why don't you give them a couple of billion dollars? What are you taking us our money for?

Because that looks like a robbery mark. It looks like you're giving them millions of dollars to the politicians and getting billions back for your beloved Israel who you are obviously loyal to. And don't give me this crap that you're not loyal to Israel. Then why are you giving all this money for politicians who will unconditionally support Israel? And not Norway, not Canada, not Nicaragua, only Israel. And that's not an open question.

We'll get his connections to Epstein as well. But look, why do we call him immoral? My God, they just slaughtered all those people, 23,000 kids in Gaza. And this guy's talking about what a wonderful economic opportunity. I can't wait to make money off of it. Yeah, that's going to be great. Now imagine if they said that about the Warsaw Ghetto, after World War II.

Oh yeah, the Jews were slaughtered in the war, so get it. What a great real estate opportunity. Now we could build high rises and condos there and make money on it. Well, that would be the most despicable thing you ever heard. But he says it about the Palestinians without like one scintilla of a conscience. And what did Trump do? He's like, oh, I'm gonna put unbiased people on the board of peace. So I'll take this radical Zionist that's buying off our Congress on behalf of Israel,

And I'll put him in charge of Gaza and the peace there and he'll be unbiased as he's trying to figure out how to make money off the Palestinians. The board of peace is supposed to help the Palestinians. Do you think Mark Rowan is interested in helping Palestinians? He would spend as much money as he has to defeat any politician who would dare to treat Palestinians as humans to say that maybe they should also be free. Maybe there should be two states where Israel is perfectly safe and the Palestinians are perfectly safe. They're two different states. Well, how dare you? Well, that wouldn't allow Israel to steal all their land and ethically cleanse them.

Spend millions against that guy. He has morals and decency and treats humans the same way. Well, that's an American idea. I hate American ideas. Right, Mark, right? You don't want the Palestinians treated the same. You want the Israelis above us, above all of us. That's why you spend all your money in politics to fund politicians who unconditionally support Israel.

Mark, we have all their votes. It's not unclear. And mainstream media, they come in and they're like, don't see it. Don't no, no, no, no. You gotta go to the intercept, you gotta go to independent media. These are facts, anyone can look them up. But the media goes, what am I, a reporter? I can't look up facts.

Oh, he is funding all these politicians. Well, I'm never gonna talk about how he's funding Susan Collins and how they destroyed a thousand jobs in Maine. That actually affects the voters of Maine. I am never going to talk about that, right New York Times, right CNN? Have you written article after article? Have you asked Susan Collins over and over? What about the jobs lost in Maine?

What about the jobs lost in Maine? What about your donor? No, never. Instead, Grant Platiner, tattoos, tattoos, old girlfriends. He had a girlfriend in 1987, and he was mean to hurt and blah blah blah. No, no, you can't say that. Now we're gonna cancel you too because you want to support a grand platinum. And we found this thing on Grand Platinum.

We dug and dug and dug and destroyed him for Israel, right? Right? Do you think they objected to his any other point of view that he had? No. Mark Rowan goes to try to destroy it and he's not the only one. A-PAC and all their donors go to destroy anyone who would represent Americans over Israelis. And so now finally, I promised you his connections to Epstein. So let's go to the Financial Times.

Top Apollo global management executives, including Chief Mark Rowan, held wide-ranging discussions over the firm's tax arrangements with Jeffrey Epstein throughout the 2010s, despite private capital firm having previously said, quote, it never did any business with the child sex offender. So they were lying. And then the Times continues. Apollo co-founder Leon Black, wait till you see in the emails what Leon Black did. Jesus, man.

Another huge supporter of Israel, Epstein, a huge supporter of Israel. Apollo co-founder Leon Black was forced to step down in 2021. After revelations that he paid Epstein more than $150 million for personal financial advice. Yeah, I'm sure it was for advice. A guy who runs Apollo needed financial advice from Jeffrey Epstein? Or could it be the $170 million was spent for a different reason because of what Leon Black did and that was on tape? Anyways, but we'll, but we're never gonna find that because the government is owned by

Mark Rowan and Leon Black and all of Epstein's clients. That's why they're never prosecuted. Never ever prosecuted. They're above the law, they're above us. Okay, so Leon Black is free to go. Now he's suing the government in his infinite entitlement. Now financial times continues. Pfizer released last week revealed that Rowan, black successor, was also in contact with Epstein

during the mid-2010s. Epstein pled guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008. So Mark Rowan, Leon Black, everyone who dealt with Epstein knew that he was already had sex with underage girls. And they're like, oh yeah, great, let's do business together. anyway. Seems like a really moral guy, doesn't he? Oh, you're raping children? No big deal. Let's do business. Let's make money. And God knows what else they did. Okay, I don't know. Rowan repeatedly corresponded with Epstein, who ingratiated himself among senior figures in finance by positioning

himself as an expert on tax planning, wink, wink, over the value of Apollo's so-called tax receivable agreement. So repeatedly corresponded with Epstein. Earlier Apollo lied and said they had no business with Epstein. Gee, I wonder why they're trying to cover up their contacts with Epstein. Epstein's contact with Rowan appears to have extended to various issues. In one email, he describes a meeting that appears to have been with the Apollo chief, quote, Mark was here this morning. We talked Athene, Montauk, Rothschild, planes, boats, etc.

Okay, well, Jeffrey Epstein's business associates, In the case of Leon Black, maybe more, contributing to all of our politicians, buying them off, demanding that they serve Israel. Every foreign policy deal that F-seen did, according to the emails, was on behalf of Israel, including procuring cyber weapons for them. Here's a clue as to the fact that you might work for a foreign government. If you procure weapons for that government, you are very likely working for them. But our government has covered up all those crimes.

Why? Oh look, it's the same politicians that got money from these guys. Huh, and then after getting that money, they put them on a border piece to make money off of dead Palestinian children. This is the sick, sick state of our government and our media. And the job of the media is not to cover any of this news. The job of the national media is to cover up this news. So you never find out the monsters that are running our government.

Okay, I hope I was clear enough. Okay, we're way past time. Yeah, you're awesome. Everybody check her out on Rebel HQ. Thank you for joining us. We appreciate it. Thanks so much. All right.

All right. I'm going to come right back and I'm going to light in. I'm not done. I think I'm done? Okay, I'm going to light into Richard Hudson. Richard Ojeda is running against him. I want to show you some of the things. I want to show you some of the stunning poll results from you guys.

And it juxtaposed to what they say in Washington. It is amazing. So we'll do all that when we return. I want to tell you about a new podcast series I'm enjoying from future hindsight, Occupy an unfinished uprising. Occupy Wall Street is the story of the improbable becoming possible. In 2008, millions of people were devastated by an economic crash caused by Wall Street greed. But it wasn't until 2011 that there was a mass response from the left. A call to protests went out and thousands of people responded.

I know I was there. They raged against a system that was rigged against them and tried to create their own anti-capitalist village in a small Manhattan park. The movement quickly spread across the country inspiring hundreds of occupations and a new generation of activists. Occupy an unfinished uprising is told through the voices of activists who camped out in Zaccati Park for almost two months, getting inside the drama of a movement that grew rapidly, felt both transcendent and chaotic. and then violently flamed out. Occupy changed the national conversation about capitalism, popularized the language of the 99%

and inspired a generation of activists. As we approach Occupy's 15th anniversary this September, this series offers a reminder that collective action can reshape what seems possible. To listen, search for future hindsight wherever you get your podcast. In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this.

Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19 speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility and optic delivers with precision

to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. So a lot to go through here.

So on The Revolution, obviously, host Jane Hugar. So first, I'm going to give you some polls that are stunning from our own audience. Then I'm going to go to amazing facts about one of the members of Congress. The way that they work for the donors is unreal to me every single time. All right, so we asked a series of questions that you guys gave amazing answers to. And so I want to share that with you guys because sometimes you tell you about the polls and then we don't come back and tell you what happened with the polls.

And so I want to do that now. So one of the questions we asked was what do you think of the charges of anti-Semitism against Israel's critics? And now that's a issue that's not even in question in Washington, right? They're like, well, of course, they're all anti-Semites, what do you mean? Those charges, they never treat them with any skepticism, never, never, never. They're always like constant, always, they're all anti-Semites, right? So did you guys agree?

Well, it was 40, 45,000 votes? Yeah, 45,000 votes. So these are on our YouTube channels posts, right? Those that's like the X on YouTube. What do you think of charges of anti-Semitism against Israel's critics? Legitimate and concerning or largely bullshit. Legitimate and concerning came me at a whopping 7%. largely bullshit came in at 93%.

45,000 votes. And by the way, that's not just our audience. That's a post that's public and different people can participate. I'm sure algorithmically it's more our audience, but it's not at all completely our audience. That's a wide ranging audience, 45,000 of them and 93% percent say largely bullshit charges of anti-semitism. Okay, so that's the exact opposite of Washington. So I'm trying to give you a sense of what actual, and these are generally younger people, not all of them, okay?

They're on YouTube, they're not watching CNN, they're not, you know, it's a wide range in age, but a little bit younger on average because it's online. Okay, how much influence do you think Israel has over the American government? And as soon possible answers or none, small amount, huge amount, near complete control. So if you ask reporters on Washington, how much influence do you think Israel has, they would say my guess is I'll be fair to them and say most of them would say a small amount. Some might be outrageous enough to say none. But if you told them a huge amount, they'd be like anti-Semite, I'm never talking to you again.

Complete control, they'd be like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. You should be arrested or something, right? Well, how did the real American people respond? 92,000 votes. None was 2%, small amount was 4%. Huge amount was 44% near complete control was 51%. The majority of 92,000 votes. Okay, I know, I know mainstream media will look at that and go,

oh, it's just your audience, it doesn't mean anything. We don't understand how YouTube posts works, we don't get that it goes to the general public. But it doesn't matter, you're all anti-Semites, everyone on YouTube's an anti-Semite, everyone's an anti-Semite. So that makes sense that we're gonna ignore it completely. But it's interesting that the actual American voters disagree with American media, nearly 100%. And media is like, we're the objective ones. Israel should get everything.

And you guys are all disgusting anti-Semites. We condemn all you of you, lowly Americans. Okay, so let's go to more. Let's go to this one. Who do you think Jared Kushner is representing in his negotiations in the Middle East? America or Israel? Now, first of all, in mainstream media, that would be an outrageous question. What do you mean?

He's an American. Are you saying, do a loyalty, troop, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, protect the Israelis. All right, well, let's see. Do the American people agree? 38, 38,000 votes. America, he represents America, 3%. He represents Israel. 97%. Go ahead, go ahead. Every reporter in D.C. call all of these Americans anti-Semites.

They're watching a show that believes in nothing but peace, wants everyone in Palestine and Israel to be perfectly safe. We want a two-state solution. We don't want anyone harmed in Israel. We don't want anyone harmed in Palestine. And media says, no, you're an anti-Semite for wanting equality. You should know that the Israelis should be safe and the Palestinians should be murdered. And that's normal. And you should pay for their murder. That's normal. Well, a lot of people don't think it's normal and they don't think our government represents

us at all, especially Jared Kushner, 97 to 3. Okay, but they'll ignore it because they hate the average American. If you don't support Israel, everyone in Washington hates you. So I say everyone, you should assume I always mean almost everyone. Bernie Sanders and Roe Kana and a couple of other decent people are in Washington, but 97% of them believe that if you dare oppose Israel, you're a lowly American who should be branded a bigot and hopefully your life destroyed. So what should our relationship with Israel be?

This has got 80,000 votes. Complete merger of interest, one of our biggest allies, like any other country, no relationship. Now, even I would have probably guessed that like any other country would have won. It didn't. Complete merger of our interests, 1%. Well, that's pretty fitting. The 1% agree we should be ruled by Israel. One of our biggest allies, that's what everybody in Washington believes.

In fact, Sid Rosenberg the other day yelled at J.D. Vance, say, what do you mean? One of our biggest allies. Top ally, number one, bow, bow to Israel, right? And media was like, oh, that's totally normal, totally normal. And then one speaker after another came up at the Republican Jewish coalition, and they said, ha ha ha, we defeated Thomas Massey for Israel. And if you quote them, they'll call you an anti-Semite. But they said it, I know, but the job of the media is to lie on behalf of Israel.

So they can say, they can brag about their control over our politicians, but if you just repeat their quotes, they'll call you an anti-Semite. Because our media is a bunch of disgusting propagandists. Okay, but what do you guys think? Well, one of our biggest allies came in at 4%. Like any other country came at 38%. And the winner was no relationship at 57%, 80,000 votes, saying, no, we should have no relationship with Israel.

And that's obvious if you're not disgustingly biased. Why would we want to have a relationship with a genocidal government? one that's attacked seven of its neighbors and taking their land. It's clear fascist imperial empire in the Middle East attacking everyone around them, slaughtering children at no end. I mean, you say they killed 23,000 kids. They say that is factually correct. But that's blood liable.

And what is that? It's a bullshit thing we made up. It's a trope that maybe like two idiots in Eastern Europe believed in the 1700s. And we're going to pretend that that's a thing that's still around and that that's what you're saying by repeating facts. The IDF later confirmed that the 71,000 were killed just like the Palestinians said. That includes the 23,000 kids, but if you say it, they go blood libel. Trope, anti-Semite, destroyed, destroyed, destroyed, destroy.

Well, as you can see, the American people are tired of being destroyed on behalf of Israel. We're tired of being called anti-Semites, we're tired of all of your bullshit on behalf of this foreign government that has a complete lock on our media. and our government. We can't stand it anymore. God, all right. Guys, I, you know, I hope that you guys are patient with me because this kind of corruption and these kind of lies, as you can tell, drive me crazy. I can't stand it. When they all get together and do the gaslighting, oh yeah, it's, oh yeah, yeah, you're all anti-sevah, oh, yeah, Israel's the greatest, our greatest ally. You should give them. money. Yeah, of course, when someone's in the middle of a genocide, you give them $21 billion from the Democrats and $13 billion from the Republicans. That's normal. That's to help people slaughter 23,000 kids as normal. How am I not supposed to lose my mind over that? How am I not supposed to get enraged by that? I mean, they take my money, your money, you work so hard,

they literally take your money and send it over them to kill kids. And I don't care what their religion is, who gives a goddamn what their religion is. Stop hiding behind your religion. It's perverted. It's disgusting. And by the way, what it does is it endangers good people in your religion that didn't have anything to do with your monstrous actions. That's the government of Israel and the president, D.C. And our government, they're the monsters who say that a genocide is great. And if you don't bow your head to it, you're the bad guy. And then it applies to all of their lies about all the donors. So that brings us to Richard Hudson. So Richard Hudson is the

Republican incumbent in North Carolina 9. So has he taken money from APAC? Of course, $550,000. That has he voted with the Israeli lobby every single time? Of course, that's 259. There's another number that if you include the entire Israeli lobby is 550,000. Okay. And so in our media will say no, it's a coincidence. Yeah, he happened to take hundreds of thousands of dollars for them and he voted with them every time. But he's such a angel that that money didn't affect him at all. I mean, what a bunch of preposterous, disgusting liars.

But it's not just about Israel at all. So now Hudson's a, you know, look, he voted twice against certifying the 2020 election. But like, that's not that unusual from the rest of the Republicans who are like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Hugo Chavez stole the election in 2020. Whatever, they gotta do say whatever Trump says. I hate it, but it's relatively minor compared to the corruption. The corruption is what I care about. And because the corruption already killed our democracy.

Yeah, Trump attacked our democracy in 2020, but it was already dead because the donors rule us all. So that brings us to the pharmaceutical companies. Hudson ranked number two in the 2019-2020 cycle for both pharma and health products and pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. Farmer brands, Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, et cetera, et cetera. So the number two donor recipient of funds from them in that cycle in Congress. Then in 2020, he was the number one top pharmaceutical PAC recipient in Congress, pulling in $240,600 from just big pharma in just that election cycle. Our media says that's because they both cared about higher drug prices and wanted higher drug prices ideologically.

It's just a coincidence that he took hundreds of thousands of dollars and he's their top recipient. And the fact that he voted to make sure we could not negotiate drug prices is normal. And it has nothing to do with the money that he took. That's why we never mention it. And we protect the corrupt. Right, New York Times? Did you ever write about how Richard Hudson is deeply corrupt and has taken big forma money and has voted with big pharma every time.

And he's voted to make sure we cannot negotiate drug prices, which means that's a direct attack on the free markets. We are, they voted to make sure the markets could not set the price. We have to pay whatever the drug companies say we have to pay. That's not anywhere near normal, but if you read the New York Times or you watch CNN, they go, no, that's perfectly normal. Perfectly normal, there's nothing wrong with Richard Hudson. No, Hassan Piker, Hassan Piker, destroy all opponents of Israel.

But what, what? Donors, I don't know anything about donors. I'm a reporter. I don't know anything about politics. Oh, do donors affect politicians? I don't know that. Oh, do they? No, they don't.

Ha, ha ha, anti-Semite. Look, if you're a national political report, are you the dumbest people in the country? Do you think that Richard Hudson voted for those higher drug prices? Just because he ideologically believes in high. drug prices and it has nothing to do with being the top recipient of big pharma? And if you, I mean, you can't say yes to that. Everybody, like if they're watching this, they have to know, well, I can't say yes. If I say yes, it's a coincidence that has nothing to do with the money.

I'll look like the R word. I'll look like the dumbest, dumbest, dumbest, dumbest person in America while I'm posing as a reporter in DC. So I'll just say, well, okay, okay, let's say you say this. So then why didn't you cover it? Nobody cares about money in politics. It's campaign finance reform is a tiny little thing. But wait a minute, when they ask, even though none of you guys talk about corruption,

corruption always comes in the top two issues. If it's on the list, most of the time they'll leave it out of the polls. But if it's in the poll, it'll always come in at number one concern or number two concern. But they go, I have talked to reporters, they go, nobody cares about that, nobody cares about corruption, campaign finance reform, it's just a little technical stuff, technical, No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Don't tell me about the donors. Otherwise, they'll find out we're all crooks.

We're all criminals in Washington. And our job is to rob you blind. And we love Richard Hudson. We love Susan Collins. We love anyone who robs you. Mike Rogers, what a beautiful guy. That's why we haven't wrote a single negative article about him. We haven't wrote it, forget negative.

We haven't told you any of the facts about him. We haven't told you any of his donors. Because our job is to protect the criminals, right? Right, reporters in D.C.? You know you can't argue with me. And I challenge any of them. Go ahead. If you work for a mainstream media outlet, let's do a debate. Oh, no way, right? You'll run. I don't want to platform him. I mean, he has all the facts. What do we do?

He's stating facts. What does stuff? Facts, a reporter, I hate facts. No, Richard Hudson's lovely. Yeah, right. Why didn't you talk about his donors? Why didn't you? Did you talk about him in North Carolina? No. But wait a minute, there's something weird going on. He's the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee. That's the guys who are supposed to, he's He's the guy in charge for the Republicans in the House to get all them reelected. That's with that position. So do you usually give that position to someone who you think it doesn't have any problems with his own election?

He's very comfortable, so he's raising money for everyone else. And that makes sense because this district favors the Republicans by about 10 points. But wait a minute, now all of a sudden, that district is getting added to the list of competitive districts held by Republicans. So all of a sudden he's in a little bit of trouble. Why is he in trouble? I'm gonna show you an ad from Richard Ojeda who's running against him in North Carolina 9.

This might be a little bit of why he's in trouble. There's one thing I learned during my three combat deployments in the Middle East. A veteran's oath doesn't end at retirement. After spending 24 years serving this country, it's clear what that oath means to me today. The soldier's creed says it best. I am an American soldier. I am a warrior and a member of a team. I serve the people of the United States and live the Army values.

I will always place the mission first. I will never accept defeat. I will never quit. I will never leave a fallen comrade. I am disciplined, physically and mentally tough, trained and proficient in my warrior tasks and drills. I always maintain my arms, my equipment, and myself. I am an expert and I am a professional. I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.

I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life. I am an American soldier. That's what a populist from the left looks like. And nothing scares Washington more than that. So reporters probably had to go order more depends if they watch that ad. New York Times is such a hilarious propaganda outlet. So after the 24 elections, they wrote all these think pieces about, you know what might help is like a Joe Rogan from the left or like if we dated populism from the left,

populism from the left. And then when you do populism from the left, they're like anti-Semites, disgusting, we hate them, destroy them. Did you know who they dated in 1987? Do you know what kind of tattoo they have? Do you know this? Do you know that? We're never going to cover their opponents.

I hope their opponents win. I hate these populace from the left, right? Have you, has the New York Times now featured any populace from the left? No. Well, there's a populace from the left that's getting a lot of attention right now. His name is Abdul al-Said. He's not in DSA. He's not a socialist.

He's very pro-America. He's very populist, and he's clearly from the left. And the New York Times who wrote all the think pieces about the populist left now is set on trying to destroy Abdul al-Said. One piece after another. Hassan Piker, Hassan Piker, Muslim, Muslim. anti-Israel, Muslim, Basan Piker, destroy, destroy, hates America, hates America. Wait, he didn't say he hates America, you're connecting him to somebody else.

Are you gonna connect Mike Rogers to Israel? He's taken money from them for the last 20 years. Benjamin Netanyahu just slaughtered 23,000 kids. Shut up! No, we're never gonna ask about Netanyahu, we're never gonna ask about Laura Lumer, we're never gonna ask any tough questions of Mike Rogers. We like a populace from the left. There's a populace from the left, destroy him, right?

Right. All of you disgusting people in Washington, all the so-called reporters. Okay, so I hope Ojetta kicks the living crap out of Richard Hussein politically. I hope he embarrasses him. And then I can't wait to see the reporters in D.C. cry. Somebody from the left who we can't control one. He's not going to vote for Israel. What happened to objective, bitches?

All right, anyways. So if you think Ojetta's ad is tough, well, Rebellion Pack has endorsed Ojetta. Here's that they're running in his district. Richard Hudson is Israel's pet. He took over half a million dollars from the Israeli lobby. Then he voted with them 93% of the time. Just kidding. He voted with them 100% of the time.

Yep, when you buy Richard Hudson, he just. Just plain stays bought. But hey, don't worry. He also took money from the oil lobby, drug lobby, bank lobby. Hey, you got a lobby? Richard Hudson will kiss your ass. He doesn't want to go to Congress to represent you. He wants to represent Israel.

Why do you think he's putting in our ground troops instead of theirs? He's richer to them. But back home, he's dick to you. Enough. Vote for O.J.' Jedda, he wants to put body cams on lobbyists. We're cooked. Get a real American to represent you, not some corporate servant boy.

Look, we're always transparent. So I started Rebellion Pack and I'm super proud of it. And RebellionPack.org, if you want that ad to run more, that's your choice. RebellionPack.org. But forget like the cartoons and all that stuff. Just the facts in that ad, and then we verified the facts eight times over. The facts in that ad versus how mainstream media paints it. Mainstream media is like Richard Hudson, esteemed, honorable representative from North Carolina.

Since they've never covered his donors, those voters don't even know he has corporate donors, foreign government, lobby donors. They don't know any of that because the media is like, don't tell them facts. Right? So if the people of North Carolina Nine knew all those facts, by the way, Fort Bragg's in North Carolina Nine, Ojetta served in Fort Bragg for a lot of his career. If they knew all that, who do you think they'd vote for? Now, why do you think mainstream media never tells them that? Because if they tell them the facts, they know that they'll never vote for Richard Hudson. But mainstream media's objective. Just coincidentally, every time it's hit pieces on the populist left, and they never

analyze the establishment politicians. What a coincidence from the objective reporters. Okay? By the way, Richard Austin's also a moron. He was trying to question the head of TikTok, and he thought he got him on something clever. Look at how stupid he sounds here. watch. Mr. Chude, does TikTok access the home Wi-Fi network? Only if the user turns on the Wi-Fi. I'm sorry, I may not understand the- So if I have TikTok app on my phone and my phone is on

my home Wi-Fi network, does TikTok access that network? It will have to access the network to get connections to the internet, if that's the question. Is it possible then that it could access other devices on that home Wi-Fi network? Congressman, we do not do anything that is beyond any norms. I believe the answer to your question is no. It could be technical. Let me get back to you. So TikTok is going to come in through your Wi-Fi and access your computer. No, no, you receive it from there. I remember when one of the senators was like, the internet, a series of tubes, no one can understand. Yeah, again, if the voters knew how stupid he was, would they put him back into office?

That's why the reporter's like, don't cover the race, don't cover it. What if they find out he's the top recipient of big pharma money? And that's why you have so much higher drug prices in North Carolina. Well, then they wouldn't vote for him and we want them to vote for the more corrupt guy.

That's why we're posing as reporters. Okay. So, I think that's pretty clear. God, if people really knew the truth, like the real facts that the news industry in our country hide so carefully from them, none of these corrupt guys would ever win an election.

Okay, all right, so since the core of the problem is money in politics, and as I've told you a million times, Israel is not the main problem. Israel is just a symptom of the problem. It's the tip of the iceberg. And one of the reasons that Washington is in a panic is people are noticing the tip and they're saying, oh, that's a foreign government. That's weird that they control us. Wait till they find out it's not just foreign governments.

It's also all the corporations that completely own Washington. Wait till they find out what the reporters have been keeping hidden from you for decade after decade. That's what they're pissed about. Well, you can find out about it at Harvard because Larry Lessig, let's bring up his tweet, is doing kind of a we the people, but, Vee the People convention discussion and panel at Harvard. And I love it.

Lessig is the godfather of money out of politics movement. This is going to be at v.thepeople.org. You got Lessig and Michael Ferris and Governor Chris Sununu is going to go in for a fireside chat. I kind of want to see that. It's on October 2nd and 3rd. So, and 30 leading legislators, scholars and organizers. So guys, the reason to go to this, and it's really important is I learned in one of these

conferences that Lessig put together all the details of how money and politics works. And so as you could tell many, many years later, I still have the zeal of the converted. And so once you go to one of those places, that's a rare thing that's done with anything part of the establishment, in this case, Harvard Law, where you actually get a little bit of the amazing, relevant information in your life. And if you go to one of those conferences, you will see all the details of how this robbery happens and how the politicians get money from these donors. They serve the donors, not 90%, 100%.

And that's why they killed our democracy. And until you get an Article 5 convention to propose an amendment to get money out of politics, none of this will ever be fixed. And that's why the Democratic politicians who pretend to want to get money out of politics, If you say to them, oh, great, let's do a convention to propose an amendment to get money out of politics. They go, no, no, conventions are dangerous. No, never change the system. Keep the status quo.

Yeah, thank you for the confession, right? So a lot of Democratic politicians, establishment ones, and the Republicans are entirely full of crap. But there are real honest Americans that are trying to fix this problem. And of all places they're going to Harvard on October 2nd and 3rd, like I said, I probably learned more at that conference you know, more than a decade ago that I learned it the rest of the conference I've ever gone to combine. So make sure you don't, if you're anywhere near Boston or if you want to go and learn about it, go check it out. Let me give the website one more time. Let's put it up again. It's tiny in that tweet. That's why I wanted to read it to you guys. It's V as in the letter

V as in victory, v the people.org. V the people.org. And the reason it's v. It's because it's an Article 5 convention, our constitution tells us to do these conventions to propose amendments. And then people in the establishment will lie to you and say, no, no, no, our founding fathers didn't want any amendments. What? They passed 10 amendments. What the hell are you talking about? They did it immediately. And those are the best 10 we have. No, no, no, they don't want you to change the convention. They definitely didn't want to, if they didn't want a convention, why they put it in the Constitution? You just told me, don't change the Constitution is like the greatest thing in the world. The Constitution has a thing called Article 5 that tells you to do these conventions to get amendments.

Those are the political revolutions that Thomas Jefferson said should happen once a generation, so you don't have to do a physical revolution. Now, all of the liars in our media and all of the liars in our government say, no, they didn't want you to do that. That's why they put it in the Constitution. The lies are obvious the minute that you expose them. All right, that's our show for today. I am gonna come back and do a quick bonus episode because some of you wrote in terrific comments I wanted to respond to.

So if you're a member, I'm gonna see you in a minute. If you're not, hit the join button below on YouTube or t.t.com slash join. We'll see you there.