The Young Turks - Puss N Snoots - October 28, 2025

Episode Date: October 29, 2025

Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/TYT and use code TYT and get $50 in lineups when you play your first $5 lineup! Kamala Harris suggests she’s considering another presidential run. Progressive commentator Jennifer Welch slams Democrats who refuse to back Zohran Mamdani, calling the party leadership “MAGA lite” and “beholden to the same corporations that helped Donald Trump get elected.” Hosts: Ana Kasparian & Cenk Uygur Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

You're listening to The Young Turks, the online news show. Make sure to follow and rate our show with not one, not two, not three, not four, but five stars. You're awesome. Thank you. All right, well, young Turks, Jane Cougar, Anna Consparing with you guys. Anna's still in New York, she's going to be on stand on tonight again at 10 o'clock Eastern with a number of interesting folks like McCarrie Sellers was fiery yesterday, probably fiery today. This show is also going to be fiery. We're going to do a number of topics here. The Normies are turning and that is great news. I'm going to explain that in a little

bit. And then on tonight's show, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Zoran, Mom Donny. So all a rowdy friends are here, at least the discussion of those folks talking to one another, et cetera. So big show ahead and then Operation Joy at the end, which you guys are going I'm going to love. All right, Casper, what's going on? Well, we're going to begin today with a little bit of a discussion on what we can expect in 28, because it does appear that some of the same old, same old are planning to run on the Democratic side. And I have strong feelings about that, as I'm sure you do as well. So let's get into it, Jake. I'm begging the Democratic establishment to just consider how much of a target-rich environment Gavin Newsom happens to be. Look at his leadership.

in the state of California. That was from the panel discussion on CNN last night, where clearly I had strong opinions about Gavin Newsom and how, despite what the Democrats nationally think, locally here in California, anyone who lives in the state knows that Gavin Newsom's leadership has been pretty disastrous, which would make him a target-rich environment as the Democratic candidate in the 2028 presidential election. But make no mistake about it, Gavin Newsom, is planning to run and he's not even really hiding it. Take a look. I'm looking forward to who presents themselves in 2028 and who meets that moment. And that's the question for the American

people. They'll make that determination. After the 2026 midterms, you're going to give it serious thought. Yeah, I'd be lying. Otherwise, I'd just be lying. And I can't do that. I don't think anyone was under the impression that Newsom had given up his political aspirations. He's been eyeing the White House probably from the moment he was born. And that's clear in the way he's neglected his duties as the governor of California and has instead engaged in political campaigning for a presidential role. But Newsom isn't the only establishment Democrat who is in fact gearing up for a 2028 bid. If you could believe it, former Vice President Kamala Harris

was not at all deterred by the experience of running for president not once but twice and losing not once but twice. Let's hear a little bit from her. In terms then of what is next for you, you write very powerfully about the differences that many women have made to your life, whether that was your meeting with Angela Merkel

or the experience of growing up with your extraordinary mother or the stories of your baby nieces, Mara and Lila, when are they going to see a woman in charge in the White House? In their lifetime, for sure. Could it be you? Possibly. Have you made a decision yet? No, I have not.

But what do Democratic voters think about that? Well, Harris weighs in on that issue as well. Take a look. In my experience, interviewing politicians, when someone says, I'm not done, it means they are thinking seriously about running. that when you look at the bookies odds, they put you as an outsider, even behind Dwayne the Rock Johnson. I mean, is that underestimating you? I think there are all kinds of polls that will tell you a variety of things. I've never listened to polls. If I listen to polls,

I would have not run from my first office or my second office. And I certainly wouldn't be sitting here in this interview. What do you think about that, Jake? Kamala Harris essentially pouring cold water on the polls, she doesn't like to pay attention to the polls. What are your thoughts? I think she's right. If she had paid attention to the polls, she wouldn't be sitting there. She'd be sitting in the White House. Instead, when the polls told her, hey, stop bragging about all the corporate CEOs backing her campaign, she wouldn't listen. When the polls showed, hey, stop bear hugging Liz and Dick Cheney, they're sitting at nine and 13 percent

popularity, she wouldn't listen. No matter what the poll said, she wouldn't listen, Biden wouldn't listen. Biden, you're in the mid-30s. No, incumbent has ever won in the 40s, let alone the 30s. What are you doing? No, I don't listen to polls. I don't listen. That's basically saying, I don't listen to the American people. I don't care what they think at all. Democratic voters, who cares? I got anointed, and I'm going to get anointed again. Well, this time around, nobody's going to get anointed. So I think she's going to have a rude awakening there. And like in the past, if you were the earlier Democratic candidate, Anna, there was this fawning from the media.

And you saw a little bit of that in that interview. Oh, tell us about your brave mother and daughter and how it's got to be a woman. No, no, no, tell me about how the policies will affect women. That's relevant. Don't tell me, oh, no, you have to vote for someone because they're a woman. And they had a nice mother and daughter. We all have nice mothers and daughters. I hope.

So that's not relevant to any of this. And it looks like they haven't learned at all. To be fair to Gavin, he's at least being honest. because normally cheesy politicians go, oh, no, no, I would never think of any office, but the one I'm currently holding up, oh, further ambitions. It's never once crossed my mind. I'm like, oh, come on, guys, come on, can we just get past it? So here, definitely Gavin and partly Kamala seem to have gotten past it.

They're like, yeah, of course I'm thinking of running for president. What else would I do? That makes sense. What's amazing to me is while they might have these lofty goals, because they want that of power, have they reflected on their own political leadership? I mean, it's just more so Gavin Newsom, to be honest with you, because Gavin Newsom has an incredibly important role as governor of California. And under his leadership, I mean, the state has squandered $24 billion in taxpayer money that was meant to help the homeless, that money gone. Okay, we're still doing audits trying to figure out where it is.

homelessness has exploded in the state. It hasn't gotten better. On top of that, he has all sorts of corporate donors, including the utility companies here in the state, which he did favors for, bailed out, even though they refused to upgrade and update their over 100-year-old equipment, which keeps falling onto dry brush and causing devastating wildfires.

I don't know if you know this, jank, but the state currently owes the federal government more than $20 billion because of the way we handled the unemployment funds that the federal government gave us during the COVID pandemic. So remember, they bolstered the unemployment funds on a federal level. So during COVID, when these shutdowns happened, people who were forced to stay home would be made whole. Well, it turns out that there was so much fraud. There There was very little oversight of that money, and that fraud amounted to $55 billion. That's billion with a B, okay?

And now we have about $20 billion left to pay back to the federal government, and we keep missing the deadline to pay that money. So all of the businesses that operate in the state of California, whether they're big corporations or small businesses, now have to pay a per employee payroll tax. or a penalty in order to get that money paid back as soon as possible. So think about the high taxes in this state. Think about how little we get for that money. Think about how much of our resources have been squandered under the leadership of Gavin Newsom. And then on top of that, on top of all those expensive business taxes and taxes for ordinary American workers in the state, now these small businesses are forced to pay an additional payroll tax per employee to make up that massive debt.

that we owe to the federal government because Gavin Newsom and the political leadership in the state couldn't be bothered to do the proper oversight to ensure that that money didn't go to fraudsters. So I know I'm going on and on and on, but I have endless complaints about Gavin Newsome. And the reason why I was begging that panel, and more importantly, near a Tandon who was on that panel, to take into account how poorly he led the state of California is because he is a target-rich environment. And so we're going to make it all the way to the the 2020 presidential election. Gavin Newsom is a snake oil salesman and people love appearances and they think he looks young and he looks like a politician. He's got the slick back hair.

He's probably going to win the nomination. And he is going to be politically destroyed because he is a target rich environment. So that's my take on it. I know there's people in the audience who don't care. They just want, you know, a Messiah or someone to save them in the Democratic Party. anyone, anyone who can beat these Republicans. And I understand the urge to want someone who can beat the Republicans. But at the same time, right now is when the vetting should happen. Right now is when we should be asking ourselves the difficult questions in regard to who is the best Democratic candidate to go up against the Republicans. And my opinion is Gavin Newsomey. What do you think, Jank? Yeah. So I have a more complicated, you know, calculus on California. And so

I think this is a great state. I think we have paid family leave that most of the country doesn't have. We have higher minimum wage, which driven out wages, which by the way has not hurt our economy. And we, even with a very high minimum wage, we're still the richest state by a lot. So there's a lot of good things in California. And then there are the issues that you brought up, which are also true. So two things can be true at the same time. Look, I don't think a lot of people are looking for messiah in this audience. I was just reading through the comments of the members, they largely agree with you, Anna. And at some point, we are going to need someone to win, right? And so you can call that a Messiah, you can call it a candidate,

but you need someone to actually deliver, right? And if it turns out that no one steps up who isn't a corporate candidate or hasn't changed or whatever, and no one delivers, yeah, then I think it's a death knell for the Democratic Party. But that's why I think it's so monumentally important to pick the right person in this primary. I think there's really good news that the primary is basically starting now, because we need as long as we can to vet folks to hear them out in interviews. And to be fair to Gavin and now all of a sudden Kamala Harris, who's apparently, you know, is the zeal to converted a little bit, a little tiny bit, they are finally doing interviews. Like not Gavin Gavin's been doing interviews throughout, but Kamala Harris

is like, oh right, interviews, free media. I don't know why I missed that earlier. Could helped earlier, right, when she was in the middle of that campaign. So I liked that they're out there, although ironically, as we're going to see in the polling here, one of the guys who dips is towing, but it's not in media as much these days is doing really well. We'll get to that in a second. The last thing is, in those panels, Anna, on CNN, and you throw them for such a loop, because they're expecting you to be in a box. And they're like, okay, here's the right winger, here's the left winger. Okay, now you guys fight over partisan brain, right? And the others are exact on that panel last night were 200% partisan brain.

Republicans are right and everything, I mean, the same thing you were saying, the opposite of what you were saying just like a couple of years ago when Biden was in charge, it's maddening and the Democrats flipped to the other side. You're the only one who's staying consistent and saying things that are true, so it's refreshing. So let's take a look at the polling and see who's leading now and give our thoughts on that. This episode is brought to you by prize picks. You and I make decisions every day, but on prize picks, being right can get your paid, which is kind of awesome.

Don't miss any of the excitement of this sports season. On prize picks, whether you're a football fan, a basketball fan, or a fan of both, like me, it always feels good to be right. And let me tell you, with the NBA season starting off and NFL season in mid-form, there's no better time to play. I'd be using it all-season. What I love is how fun and simple the experience is. You just pick more or less on player projections for guys.

guys like Patrick Holmes or Steph Curry. I've been right about Puka and Bijan all season, so I feel good about that. And when you cash in, of course it feels great. What I really like is the new Stacks feature. You can pick the same player up to three times in one lineup. So if you love Kevin Durant, for example, you can pick more on his points,

rebounds, and assist all at once. It's the best way to put your sports knowledge to the test. And if you want the biggest payouts, go for the power play. It's that simple. Download the prize picks app today. Use code TYT to get $50. to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

That's code TYT to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup. Price Fix. It's good to be right. So Semaphore revealed a new poll that was conducted by a group called Welcome. They describe themselves as center-left. So this is coming from a polling agency that has a political bent. And according to Welcomes polling, Democratic voters are looking for a candidate who supports economic populism with moderate stances on issues like crime, immigration, and identity politics,

which I could have told you, I don't know, a few years ago. Actually, I was telling people a few years ago, but that made me a turfell. apparently. But nonetheless, Welcome conducted the survey over six months and contacted hundreds of thousands of voters. The organization was originally created by a political action committee, but later formed a research organization for polls like the one that we're about to explain. So here are the results of the polls that they've conducted. According to Welcome, here's what Democrats absolutely want to avoid. A pivot to corporate centrism and the pursuit of progressive ideology, purity.

I mean, already, I totally agree with this. This doesn't surprise me at all, but there's more. So welcome states that Democrats have focused far too much on highly educated and affluent voters. Meanwhile, according to Welcome, 70% of voters think the Democratic Party is out of touch. So that kind of plays into the elitism, criticism that the Democratic establishment has been getting for multiple election cycles now. Most voters, the group found, believe the party over-prioritizes issues like protecting the rights of LGBTQ plus Americans and fighting climate change while not caring about securing the border or lowering the rate of crime. It turns out that people are concerned about things like public safety. That is very shocking, isn't it?

They also need to fight for working class Americans, according to what their poll results found. The report reads, quote, we have much to learn from the relentless focus of Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Zoran Mamdani on the topics of economic opportunity and lower cost of living. So I feel like I'm just kind of relaying obvious information to you all. So I apologize if you're bored. But I do think that there are some who need to hear this message. It's really important if the Democrats want to start winning elections again. Yeah. So we've got to pull up on t.com. If you're forced to vote now in the Democratic primary, and these were your only choice, who would you vote for? Kamaharis, Gavin Newsom, Pete Buttigieg, or AOC. Now, we didn't put Rokana or John Stewart or any of the other folks that, we like in that poll because it would have made it a little bit easier.

What we want is your real opinion among those choices and it might still be easy for you guys. It might be very easy, but I don't know, I'm curious. That's why I wanted to find out. Buttigieg is doing well in a recent poll that came out where they compared those candidates. Now, part of the reason for that is mainstream media restricts your choices, right? So they don't often put Rokano in the polls. Sometimes they do, but they also don't often cover him as a potential presidential candidate,

Democratic leader. They're not terrible to him. It's actually much better than it used to be. But overall, like Johnster's never in any of the polls, I get it. He hasn't announced. He hasn't done anything. He's by all accounts, doesn't want to run, et cetera, right? So I'm not overly blaming for them for that.

But the way that mainstream media thinks is, no, it has to be a corporate Democrat. So I'm going to give you a bunch of choices, corporate Democrats, and then I'll through an AOC who's like, establishmenty on culture wars, but not as much on others. And obviously she's winning in our, you know, audience. The voting just got started. That's not overly surprising, but she's head and shoulders at least above the other corporate Democrats. But like there, the idea that the media is going to push is not what are the choices you're. have among 330 million people, but what are the choices you have between Buttigieg Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom? And so be wary of that trap that the media is setting for you right now.

Okay, now to the substance of the poll that Anna quoted about the policies, I mean look guys, there's no way to avoid saying, sorry, but we were totally right, right? And so look, that should matter. And forget everyone else, forget the other shows, forget other folks. I'm just saying for you guys in the audience, it should matter who's right and not, right? So if you listen to the wrong sure, you're gonna back the wrong people and you're gonna back the wrong ideas and we're gonna go nowhere. We're gonna spend our wheels, right? So what did we tell you guys? You all know it was pretty spectacular, right? The way that we were attacked for saying things that were to me and Anna, obviously true. We said, look, we gotta go towards economic populism, the Bernie Sanders message from 2016.

And if you go towards corporate centrism, that's a disastrous idea. That's the idea. That's the idea we dislike the most and the polling indicates that perfectly, right? Then you go to the other side, but we said that doesn't mean that we're just on a left right political spectrum and then no matter what, you should go max left. But don't go max left and pretend there's no crime when people are pissed about crime. Don't pretend that there's no problem at the border when there's obviously a problem at the border. And these identity politics and the culture wars are not helping us.

It's gone too far. I know the Republicans said a trap, but don't fall into the trap. And the polling indicates every single thing we said was true. So, okay, it's not about personalities, guys. So if you say, yeah, I don't really care. I don't care that you were right. I just care that those ideas were right. Perfect, beautiful, yes.

Who cares about who said it? The point is, make sure you don't get off that path. Because the mainstream media is going to try to veer you off to right-wing economic corporate establishment ideas, oh, make sure you pick Buttigieg. Buttigieg is going to give you a perfect sense of what the donors want and the donors will be so happy. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. You're definitely going to lose if you go in that direction. And if you go, well, okay, we're going to be left and we're going to stand for everything and we're going to be max,

max, max, max, max, max, max, and okay, this the next president has to be a Muslim queer black woman. No, what are you doing? What do you? I know that's an absurd example. No No one actually says that, right? But there are plenty of people who say you shouldn't call someone a woman. And that was insane, insane. And we were attacked for saying the most logical, reasonable things that now all of the polling and all the electoral results have confirmed. Just take care of people's actual needs.

But it's that simple, right? People are suffering and no one is actually addressing the causes of the causes of the the causes of their suffering. So address that, okay? And then we can do language policing when we live in a utopia where everyone's needs are met. But we're nowhere near that right now. So let's take a break. When we come back, we'll talk a little bit about, well, Zoran Mamdani, because there was a pretty vicious smear against him on CNN's panel last night.

And I attempted to correct that smear, so we'll be right back. You know what's better than the one big thing? Two big things. Exactly. The new iPhone 17 Pro on TELUS' five-year rate plan price lock. Yep, it's the most powerful iPhone ever, plus more peace of mind with your bill over five years. This is big. Get the new iPhone 17 Pro at TELUS.com slash iPhone 17 Pro on select plans.

Conditions and exclusions apply. All right, back on TY-Y-T-Jankana with you guys. More news. Well, yesterday when I was on Abby Phillips' show on CNN, I had the displeasure of sitting next to someone who is not living in the same universe that we're living in. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, here's a little taste. What Zorhan is doing, this is a guy who's spoken vile about Jews, vile about the NYPD. It is true.

What did he say about Jews? What did he say? From the river to the sea. Please. Vile. Zoran Mabdani said vile things about the Jews. Okay, what did he say? From the river to the sea.

Which, by the way, Zoran Mamdani actually has never said that. that. Just because Andrew Cuomo, his political opponent, said that he said that on a debate stage, doesn't mean that Zerodamam Dani has actually said it. But even if he had said it, even if he had, I wouldn't really care much. Now, why is that? Well, I explained in the next clip. Take a look. The coach charter literally said that they're going to pursue the greater Israel project and literally steal land from all these countries. And this is why you have rabbis, This is telling their congregations to vote for the new Democratic Party. Please, this is the.

So Jank, the gentleman I was speaking to or shouting at is a former staffer for Byron Donald's and also a former White House spokesperson. His name is Harrison Fields. For those of you who are unfamiliar with him, I do have one more moment that I'll share with you. But before I do, I want to get your thoughts. Yeah, I have a lot of thoughts. First of all, his big get was from the river to the sea. which Mamdani has not said, as you pointed out. Vile. Number two, so he's literally has no evidence that Mamdani has been anti-Semitic 1%. Just made it up.

And but and added vile, the imaginary fantasy I have about Mum Donnie is wild. Well, that's true. And by the way, they're viciously anti-Muslim against them, but they pretend that they care about bigotry. Secondly, I want to apologize to the people that I criticize for saying from the river to the sea. I said that early on, a year and a half ago or more, but I think I was wrong. The chant is from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. What's wrong with that chant? Why should Palestine not be free?

They're like, oh, it implies the murder of Jews. No, it doesn't. It just says the Palestinians should be free. Where does this say murder the Jews or anyone in Israel? You just made that up. Oh, well, it implies it because if you say from the river to the sea, that means you're going to take all that land. Oh, guess who else said from the river to the sea?

Netanyahu, as he's in the middle of taking all that land and actually murdering the Palestinians and actually taking their land. So this chant is not Israel will be free. It's from the river to the sea, I'm going to take all your land from the Israeli position. From the Palestinian position is, can you just let us go for a second? Jesus Christ, how long are you going to keep five and a half million people hostages? So no, no, all of it is Israeli propaganda. All of it is meant to get you to hate Muslims so that Israel can kill them and take their land and you can pay for it. Now remember, it's okay that you're paying for all of this because you're supposed to hate all Muslims, but I'm so concerned about bigotry. That's why I was

worried about anti-Semitism. All right, now one more thing here, I can go on for hours, as you know, Anna. I just saw a poll today. Guess who's got the most Jewish voters, according to Poland, in this New York mayoral race? Oh my God, it's Zora and Mamdani. And I guess what percentage of Jewish voters Mamdani has under the age of 45? Okay, so young Jewish, but 45 is pretty, you know, it's getting up there. So all right, well, it's good, I mean, what is it, 33%? That would be a huge number because I hear he's a vile, vile anti-Semi, so obviously almost no Jewish would vote for him, so maybe 10%, 5%.

You don't know what the real number is? 67% of Jewish voters under the age of 45 are backing Mumdani. So there's no anti-Semitism. 67? I didn't even know. I didn't even know it was that high. He's winning in a landslide with Jewish voters under the age of 45. And with Jewish voters overall, he's the number one candidate.

He's easily beating Cuomo and Sliwa among Jewish voters in New York. Now, it's amazing that even you didn't know that, Anna, and why? Because mainstream media has been saying the exact opposite the entire time. Anti-Semite, as the Jews hate him, he hates Jews. Oh, you remember everybody, hate the Muslim, hate the Muslim. I care about bigotry, okay? No, they're all liars. They're all liars. Okay, but to your point, and guys, if you don't mind,

please queue up the cold open because I want to play it one more time. It's not just that the Republican detractors are going after Zoran Mamdani with that smear. And to be sure, Harrison Fields is a Republican, of course. But pay close attention to the split screen because the other person you're going to see is near a tendon, an animal or a creature of, the democratic establishment. And so what's amazing to me is that she appears to kind of give the affirmative, okay, as this smear is taking place.

Take a look. What Zorhan is doing, this is a guy who's spoken vile about Jews, vile about the NYPD. It is true. What did he say about Jews? What did he say? From the river to the sea. Please. Okay, so two things about that.

I mean, you just see near a tan in space. first she starts off with like that that disgusted look on her face because she's like oh yeah Republican I got to make the facial expression but the second he says that Zoran Mamdani has said vile things about the Jews she's like oh yeah I that's a message I can totally co-sign on to but the other thing is Jank after he had said that Zoran Mamdani had said vile things vile things about the Jews and I asked him to name something specific when he said from the river to the sea. I literally, I was shocked. I literally had a moment of shock because I'm like, that's, that's what you're citing as the big, vile, anti-Jewish thing that he said.

What? So it gets worse because he realized, oh, I guess that that doesn't work. So let me pivot over to something entirely different to prove that Zoran Mamdani is in fact a hater of the Jewish people. So, take a look at the next clip. It is a rejection of the establishment. That's what it is. Because the establishment has not actually looked out for anti-Semitic. That's what it is. Fundamentally anti-Israel.

I can call it as fast as every single day. I can call you an anti-Semitism. It's so pathetic. It's so pathetic. The Democratic Party has an anti-Semitic. Why? Because he doesn't want to visit Israel as the mayor of New York City. Is that why?

He wants to arrest. He's a war criminal. Hold on a second. Hold on a second. I'm right. He wants to arrest. Bibi Danielu. Yeah, there's a warrant out for his, what?

Yeah, there's a warrant out for his arrest. He is a war criminal. Yeah. How is that hating the Jews? It's wanting someone who has committed war crimes to be held to account. So guys, I can solve this mystery for you. It's the easiest thing in the world. So none of those people, whether they're corporate Democrats or corporate Republicans,

and Anna, you're so right about Nia Tana's face. She's like, oh, I am against you, you're a Republican. Oh, Moundy, I'm anti-Semite. Where's the check? Where's the check? So the reason why they don't care about Jewish people at all, like that guy, the guy who worked for Byron Donald's, the African American Republican, care so much about Jews. And he's like, oh my God, I stay up all night working, worry about Jewish voters.

Hey, good news. Then you should back Mom Dani because that's who, the people. Plurality of Jewish voters are backing, it's way more than Cuomor Sleva. So it's clear, if you love Jews, you should back Mom Dani. No, no, I hate Mom Dane. Why? Because guys, come on, you know, the Israeli lobby is funding 90% of Congress. That's a literal fact. And they fund a giant number of politicians, pundits, media figures, et cetera.

So those people are not loyal to Jewish Americans. In fact, they are opposing the wishes of Jewish Americans. they are loyal to Israel and the money that is being funneled to them to do propaganda for Israel, not for Jewish Americans. So in this case, it's crystal clear. So this clown of all clowns is saying that 67% of Jewish voters under the age of 45 in New York, which is a giant number, by the way, New York is the second most Jewish city in the world. Okay, so used to be number one for a long time. So, and that's why it's driving A-PAC in the Israeli lobby crazy. They're like, no, you're gonna ruin our biggest talking point that anyone who

criticizes Israel is an anti-Semite and then we canceled it when we'd ruin their lives. Please Jewish Americans keep up, help us do this propaganda on behalf of Israel and Jewish Americans are like, no, we don't want to. We want lower housing prices in New York because we live in New York. We want lower prices because in New York because we live in New York and I'm not your goddamn uncle, right? So, but this guy, Fields or whatever his name is, goes, no, 67% of Jewish voters under the age of 45 in New York are anti-Semites because they're backing mom done. Well, okay, I mean, if you're going to be absurd, thank you. We appreciate it.

You're at least advertising that you obviously work for Israel. You don't care about Jewish people at all. Just some inside baseball after that segment ended. I was so he, that I kept going at it with him. And the panel was like, it was awkward for sure, for everybody, except for me. I enjoyed every minute of it. But I basically told him, like, I never want to hear a conservative like you talk about the sanctity of the lives of unborn children, okay, which they love to use when pushing their anti-abortion agenda.

When you're totally okay with endless numbers of Palestinian children getting slaughtered by your precious BB. And he made some argument about how most people agree with me. Doubt it. No, no, real quick. So the Benjamin Nanyahu is despised here in America. The polling indicates that. Also by the way, hated in Israel, but he's paying all these people.

So since it's him funneling the money to these fake pundits whose job is to just support Israel, that's why he's like, he thinks he got you, Anna, because he's like, this is the modern Democratic Party. They would want to arrest the war criminal like Benjamin Nanyahu hated by about 80% of Americans. The reason he thinks that, Anna, is because in the elite circles, they're all almost all bought off by Israel. So they think, oh, Anna, you just helped me. You eliminated yourself. Now you can't get a paycheck.

So he thinks he disqualified you. He doesn't care that 80% of Americans hate Nanyahu. He knows that among the elites, 98% of them work for Israel. So he's thinking, she did my work for me. She's eliminated. She's disqualified. She wouldn't kiss Israel's ass. I win.

Do you? Well, yeah, enjoy your blood money, bitch. All right, we got to take a break. When we come back, we'll talk a little bit about, well, how the Democratic establishment is handling the assent of Zoran Mamdani. There is one woman in particular who's calling out the Democratic establishment pretty aggressively, and I'm here for it. And then later in the show, we'll also talk a little bit about, well, Candice Owens, still on the story, still investigating Charlie Kirk's death. She is not buying the official narrative. We'll tell you what she has to say and more when we return.

All right, back on TYT, Jank, Anna and Ferris Feizzi. Farris, thanks for joining by hitting the join button below on YouTube. We appreciate you, t.com slash join is another great way to support the show, and we appreciate it and we need it. You guys are amazing for doing that for us. Jeffrey Dottie writes in as a YouTube member, I love Anna going on other shows because it gets our message out there. Totally agree, and that's why we do it. One more programming note. You know, yesterday I interviewed the founder and CEO of Chapter.

That's one of our sponsors. I hope you got a chance to watch that. Look, I know they're a sponsor, but there's a really interesting conversation about Medicare and how you, the different plans under it and what might happen to it next is a solvent, not solvent, why it's in the kind of the mess that it's in now. So really interesting, as I said in an interview, we did a lot of research on this and the brokerage business that helps you pick out the right Medicare. plan for you is a bit of a disaster. Chapters whole business idea was why don't we be honest. Just hilarious that that's like their differentiation point in an industry where almost no one is honest.

So and it's confirmed by all the reporting, etc. So that's why we chose them as a sponsor. So Medicare enrollment goes through December 7th. So you got to act now, your plans might have changed. And if you have the best plan, chapter will just tell you. So then you'll have peace of mind that the plan didn't change. and you have the best plan or they'll tell you a plan you can save a lot of money on and on average people save $1,100 that's 707 TYT help 707 like the plane TYT like us help as in they're

going to help you so it takes about 20 minutes is free 707 TYT help all right Anna what's next Why don't we get to our next story? Stop missing out on these big rallies. Hakeem and Chuck should have been front and center introducing the next mayor of New York City. But no, they wouldn't show up because they're they're that are beholden to the same corporations that Donald Trump, that helped Donald Trump get elected. And this is just an embarrassment. More and more people are. are speaking out about their exhaustion with democratic leadership, their ineffectiveness.

And Jennifer Welch, a host of the I've Had It podcast, has certainly had it with Democratic leadership. She went scorched earth on Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer for essentially refusing to help rally the troops behind Zeran Mamdani, the mayoral candidate for New York City, ahead of the election that's set to take place. Now, he does appear poised to win nonetheless, but they were nowhere to be found at the 13,000-person Mamdani rally in New York last week, which did feature Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders. Now, Hakeem Jeffries proved her point yet again just last night. The minority leader finally offered a tepid endorsement of Momdani last week, which Schumer still has yet to do, by the way. But when asked last night why he decided to endorse now, as opposed to earlier, Jeffrey's made sure to distance himself as much as possible from Zoran Mamdani,

which seems like it's kind of a half-assed endorsement, but nonetheless, let's take a look. Well, Zoran is a Democratic nominee, and there's alignment as it relates to the affordability crisis and the need to decisively deal with it. And of course, there's alignment around the existential threat that Donald Trump confirmed. front face, you know, will bring to the city of New York. That said, I will continue to take positions that are important to the people that I'm privileged to represent in Brooklyn on racial justice, on social justice, on economic justice, and of course on foreign policy, particularly as it relates to the Middle East, which has been

an issue of great interest to people, particularly over the last two years. I will always support Israel's right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. an eternal homeland for the Jewish people. So House Minority Leader, Hakeem Jeffries, more concerned about a foreign country as opposed to our own country. And that is the reason why he has decided to distance himself from Zeron Mamdani following his tepid endorsement. Jank. Yeah. So God, it was cathartic to listen to Jennifer Welsh. Say honestly, what we've been saying on this show for 23 years straight.

And we were piled on and hated. and attacked for saying things that we thought were super obvious, but apparently they weren't obvious to a lot of people. And guys, that's why I get so mad at mainstream media. I mean, chapter five of my book, Justice, coming is all about how corporate media is the most powerful weapon that corporate rule has, because it brainwashes everybody into thinking, no, everything's fine. These Democrats who are doing nothing for you are amazing. You guys should always listen to them and let them anoint your leaders because they're such geniuses. And I used to you guys remember a lot of you that have been around for a long time with us.

All the talk of how Nancy Pelosi was a master legislator and how I'd make fun of it. And Paul Krugman attacked me, other mainstream media reporters. How dare you, Nancy Pelosi is the greatest legislator. I was like, okay, but so what did she pass? Obamacare when they had a super majority and that's it in like, 200 years of legislating and the Lilly Ledbetter Act, right? So but the reason why people didn't see it back then is because unfortunately, I mean, it's fortunate for us, we're in media, I guess, but it's unfortunate for the country

because the media is everything. And before when we had mainstream media, which is a factory of lies, they would tell you that all the corporate Democrats, but also the corporate Republicans were amazing. And the greatest thing of all was when they had bipartisan agreement. And oh my God, what did they agree on? War, war is beautiful, of course we should do more war. What else did they agree on? Giving tax cuts for the rich, what beautiful bipartisan agreement?

The whole thing has been a trick from day one. So now that mainstream media has lost his power, then people like Jennifer Welsh shows waking up and going, wait a minute, what the hell does these Democratic leaders ever done for us? And they said they were such geniuses, they had it all figured out. Hillary was definitely gonna be Trump, Trump had no chance, come, it was definitely going to be Trump. But it turns out, no, they didn't know what they were doing all along,

That's right. So this great awakening is happening. So now I've had a podcast like one of my favorites. They're the ones who took on Cory Booker too. I mean, she's taking on A-PAC. But this stuff was unimaginable before. And these are people that, look, I don't know their history and I would love to learn it. But it feels like that show is filled with folks who previously would have voted for Hillary in a primary, Joe Biden in a primary, and now have realized we've been had, we've been took. And it's a beautiful thing to see. Not because of who was right or wrong, but because they've come to the correct position. They're awake now.

Now we could all join forces together and actually pick a candidate that we love. So in terms of Hakeem Jeffries or as Charlamy and the God called him Apex Shakur, which is such a great nickname for him. He's like, oh, I guess all my voters want Mum Donnie. God damn. Let them. All right. I tried donors.

I'm sorry, donors. I'm so sorry. Okay, fine, I'll endorse Mom Dani. But hey, everybody remember, I timed it. He spent like 60% of the time talking about how much he loved Israel as he was endorsed to Mbondani. So he's like, but remember, oh my God, Israel's like the greatest country in the world. And we should always serve Israel.

Israel's so great. I'm like, all right, dude, we got it. We know, man. Please stop embarrassing yourself. It's humiliating. Well, I mean, look, it is, well, it is humiliating for them because, look, if they really wanted to defeat Mom Dani, then they would have an answer to the affordability crisis, right? a counter to what Mamdani is offering, but they were so busy, like, firmly affixed inside the ass of Israel that, like, they didn't even give themselves an opportunity to address or consider

how they would address the affordability crisis in New York City differently, right? What are the counter options here? And honestly, Andrew Cuomo had nothing, absolutely nothing. They just leaned into the smears about how Mamdani is so scary. oh my God, that Muslim guy, oh my God, he's an anti-Semite because he doesn't want to visit Israel as a New York City mayor, okay? And so the campaign against Mom Dani was complete another utter horse crap. It was bad. It was really bad. And the American people weren't buying it because the American people are concerned about what's happening here, okay? Including the Jewish

voters in New York City who overwhelmingly backed Mom Dani over Andrew Cuomo. So look, you and I have very briefly kind of gone over some of the policies with mom down mom donnie that we think might actually hurt him um you know you've talked a little bit about rent control uh rent control sound good but it ends up hindering uh the development of housing or the construction of new housing which is desperately needed that's like the main way increase the supply that's the main way to lower prices um and honestly i just think whether you're talking about los angeles County, where we have a lot of rent control units all across the county, that has played into the lack of development of new housing, right? So how is he going to address that? Either

way, I think that this race has been, what's been absent from this race is a real discussion about Zeran Mamdani's actual policy proposals because the Democratic establishment, along with other detractors of Mamdani's, have been hyper-focused on foreign policy, which really should play no role whatsoever in a local race for mayor. Yeah. So look, I think it's now too late. They don't have enough time to turn around or to listen to the young Turks and make ads out of it and stuff. So I can say it now. They should have focused on economics and crime.

And so just as a matter of political strategy, not that I agree with them, but they should have said, oh, he's going to drive up crime. He's going to actually drive up housing prices because of rent control. And there you could actually make an argument, et cetera. But they couldn't help themselves because they have Israeliitis. So that's all they have in their brain. So that instead they went with Muslim, dirty Muslim, hate the muz, hate the muz. Right?

And that's what they did 24-7. And Andrew Cuomo ran a 100% bigoted campaign. But like, it's disgusting. But at the same time, it was like, keep going, brother. Keep going. Because that is super dumb campaign. So just saying, oh, remember Jews in New York, you're as racist as I am, right? Right, he's on no good muz.

And now Jewish voters are like, no, majority are gonna vote for Mamdani. So no, they're not as racist as you are, Andrew Cuomo. Sad day for you. You ran a terrible campaign, you never addressed the voter's concerns. Instead, you're addressed, as always, your donor's concerns. Because your donors are the most bigoted people in America. And they said attack the Muslim and try to smear him. And it's a two for, number one, we'll try to win this race.

You know, pro-Israel group spent $35 million against Bumdani for a mayoral race that has nothing new with Israel, but they can't stomach the idea of a Muslim winning and non like Israel supporting candidate winning. So they stooked them and they got Cuomo to run a campaign that was all about Israel and all about hating Muslims. And it backfired spectacularly. We've just got to finish strong here. So whatever disagreements I have with policy on Mamdani, oh my God, I'll take it just to

rub it in the face of the Israeli supporters who think they had 100% control over this country. I love that it's driving them crazy, that they're like, oh my God, we couldn't buy the seat. We spent $35 million trying to buy it. Oh, God damn it, we couldn't buy it. Good, good, it warms my heart that you couldn't buy that seat. And especially because it's Jewish Americans voting against you. Oh, that's the beauty of America. Okay, I'm going to skip ahead to C4 because I want to revisit Jennifer Welch's commentary here.

And in this clip, she talks about what's going to happen next. So listen up, Democratic establishment. You can either jump on board with this or we're coming after you in the same way that we come after MAGA. Period. Stop taking APEC money. Go on an, I'm sorry I take APEC many atonement tour if you want to stay in power. Mm-mm, mm-mm, mm-hmm, yummy in my tummy. Oh, I like that video so much I want, I might play it again, but, Jane, brief comments.

Yeah, yeah, no, no, I love that. I mean, look at this, they're not even stopping at the water's edge. They're going right over. Nobody's listening to mainstream media anymore. In the old days, nobody would ever said that because your career would have been ruined over night and they would have viciously slandered you would be over. By the way, new A-PAC strategy now, a couple of articles about it where they're saying, okay, we're not going to call it A-PAC anymore. We're going to direct all of our donors to give, but give under your personal

name. So it just seems like, oh, golly gee, do we all support Israel? Oh, that's just a coincidence. Okay, you got caught. I love it. I love it too. All right, I'm going to take our break a little early because when we come back, we have a monster segment about Candice Owens. You know, she took a one week break and came back and is really diving into this Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. She is not buying the official narrative. So we'll get into all those details and more when we come back. Thank you.