The Young Turks - Trash Man Trump
Episode Date: November 1, 2024Trump stages a garbage truck photo op in an attempt to deflect Puerto Rico backlash. He claims he’ll “protect” women—“whether the women like it or not.” GOP strategist warns Trump campaign...’s internal polling is cause for concern. Bill Clinton argues that Hamas is forcing Israel into civilian attacks." HOST: Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur), Francesca Fiorentini (@franifio) SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE ☞ https://www.youtube.com/@TheYoungTurks FOLLOW US ON: FACEBOOK ☞ https://www.facebook.com/theyoungturks TWITTER ☞ https://twitter.com/TheYoungTurks INSTAGRAM ☞ https://www.instagram.com/theyoungturks TIKTOK ☞ https://www.tiktok.com/@theyoungturks 👕MERCH ☞ https:/www.shoptyt.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to The Young Turks, the online news show.
Make sure to follow and rate our show with not one, not two, not three, not four, but five stars.
You're awesome. Thank you.
Hey, we know you probably hit play to escape your business banking, not think about it.
But what if we told you there was a way to skip over the pressures of banking?
By matching with the TD Small Business Account Manager, you can get the proactive business banking advice and support your business needs.
Ready to press play? Get up to $2,700 when you'll
open select small business banking products.
Yep, that's $2,700 to turn up your business.
Visit TD.com slash small business match to learn more.
Conditions apply.
Welcome to our Trash Revolution.
I'm so upset.
Oh my God.
Begha!
All right, welcome to the Young Turks.
Jake U.S.ca, if you're in Tini with you guys, live from the Polymarket Studios in
LA.
So I've got the first story for you guys.
We'll get right into it.
Today, Israel killed hundreds of Palestinians.
and obviously it was the Palestinians fault.
They were using themselves as human shields and had it coming.
And they weirdly hated the people who were occupying and killing them, thereby making it doubly their fault.
Also, a piece of legislation passed today.
Lobbyists and campaign contributors had nothing to do with that legislation passing.
In fact, honorable gentlemen on both sides and gentle ladies had an honest ideological debate over it,
and the Republicans won that debate.
So that is why that bill has passed.
All right, trick or treat.
Happy Halloween, everybody.
I play mainstream media reporter on Halloween every year.
So for the first minute of the show, there you had it.
Is that why your collar is extra popped?
Yeah, that's right.
Mainstream media reporters have enough money to pop their collars.
I attempted a little bit of like a spooky situation behind me, but that is very scary.
I think you need to do your voice, Jank.
I like your Cedra's voice.
I feel like it's one of my favorite impressions that you do.
Oh, yeah, I don't know if I'm going to do it right now, but you're right.
I should have had a more welcome, everybody.
And tonight on the news, Israel was right.
The Palestinians were wrong.
There are no donors and politicians are honest.
Was that better?
Yes, beautiful.
We do have, we do have, basically we have polls coming up that kind of sound like that.
They're going to make everyone crazy this holiday.
But happy Halloween, everyone. I'm glad to be here with you all. We've got so many stories.
Jenkins or anything you need to say before we jump into it all?
Yeah, so the two stories, look, there's a million wonderful stories in the show today, but
the one where you have got polls going in exactly the opposite direction is amazing and is a perfectly
symbolic of the election. So if there's one video you're going to watch in this election cycle,
I think that's it, and that'll summarize the whole thing from his leases to who's going to win.
And then in the second hour, I'm probably going to have a huge debate with one of our hosts.
So, and then we're going to ask you guys what you think.
So that ought to be super interesting.
So stick around for that too.
All right.
So let's get started for instance.
One of our hosts.
Is it me?
I'm not prepared.
No, no.
It's in the second hour.
It's Jordan.
Okay.
Damn it.
Now I got to watch the second hour.
All right.
Let's do it.
It's Halloween.
And people are dressing up.
up. Let's jump into this.
How do you like by garbage truck?
This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden.
I think that the comment paid by really both of them because there's really two of them
about being garbage, maybe 250 million people.
They shouldn't be talking.
That's like deplorable for Hillary.
This is the deplorable for Hillary.
Joe Biden should be ashamed of himself if he knows what he's even doing.
And she should be ashamed because she shouldn't let him do it.
She's the vice president, but I assume she's acting as the president.
She should never have let that happen.
I hope you enjoyed this garbage truck.
Thank you very much.
Oh, we did.
We really did.
Yes, it is Halloween and Donald Trump decided one day early to dress up as a sanitation worker
in response to President Joe Biden's comments about his supporters,
Donald Trump supporters being garbage, not the people of Puerto Rico.
But is this just another method for cleaning up the mess that the Madison Square Garden rally
and specifically the comedian Tony Hinchcliffe made when he made that joke about Puerto Rico
being a floating island of garbage?
It's a little bit on the nose there.
I have thoughts.
I'm sure Jank has thoughts, but if you remember those comments, they really think that this is
it.
This is the October surprise that Joe Biden did the deplorables line and said this about Donald Trump.
supporters. Take a listen.
Puerto Rico, where I'm in my home state of Delaware, they're good, decent, honorable people.
The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters. His demonization of scene is
unconscionable, and it's un-American. So right, that's, that is the big line. And so Donald
Trump decided to play it up and put on the sanitation worker suit. He looks really more like
an air traffic controller. He's also like on a tarmac weirdly. I don't know.
There's also, let's just bring up the photo first.
There's this photo because that was seemingly a good idea when, let's be honest,
the orange reflective outfit with the orange of his face and the white little blow-up doll
mouth.
Like it just doesn't work.
Like that's literally, that's an undoctored photo people.
But there it is.
Again, and Donald Trump actually, interestingly, for the first time his campaign distanced
themselves from the comments made by Tony Hinchcliffe comedian, again, who made that joke about
Puerto Rico, which was vetted by the Trump campaign.
But still, in his garbage truck, he said, I love Puerto Rico and Puerto Rico loves me in case
there was any doubt.
And apparently this stunt went over really well, especially if you're Sean Hannity.
Take a look.
As a saying goes, one man's trash is another man's treasure.
And today in Wisconsin, take a look at that.
This may go down as an iconic, epic moment that we will remember for a long time.
Donald Trump pitching a very special ride on a garbage truck decked out in American flags,
MAGA gear.
You can tell a lot about the state of a campaign by optics.
I guess?
I don't know.
I would just put a slogan on the truck like, you know, cleaning up the Democrats mess or
draining the swamp or something.
Otherwise, it looks like you really are leaning into being garbage people.
And look, obviously, I think we can talk about Jank has thoughts.
I'm sure about whether that comment was a smart comment from Joe Biden.
I will say this from a little bit more of a comedic perspective on the comments about
Donald Trump supporters being garbage.
I don't think they're garbage, but I do think some of them are trash.
And like, they know they're trash.
Let's be real.
The reason that people like Donald Trump is because he's kind of trash, right?
He says the thing you're not supposed to say that allegedly you're all thinking like Mexicans are rapists, right?
And women, you know, she's not, she's not a 10, right?
Like, that you want to just, you grope them, you do whatever you want, as we'll talk about a little bit later.
Like, that trash part of America, I think is exactly what appeals Donald Trump to his base.
And they, many of them, would agree.
They're okay with it.
They're like, yeah, I'm going to just say how I feel.
I don't like the trans.
But that's my take, Jank.
I know you have a different take and there's also a poll coming.
Yeah.
So was this a good photo op as a poll?
Let's go nuts right now in the live chat.
Yeah, I do definitely have a little bit of a different take than Francesca.
And I would argue that it's nuanced, but it's not wishy-washy.
I'm coming out strongly on all sides.
So as you'll see here, so number one, look, I don't think it's productive to call anybody
garbage and trash as, you know, how mad were we when he called Puerto Rico garbage?
Well, that's how mad the other guys are when somebody on our side calls them garbage or
trash. So it's counterproductive. I don't, I don't love it. So now, and I've got a real
reason why they're, why the Trump guys are mad and I understand it. I'll get to that in a second.
But first, all the fake reasons.
So, guys, really, if you're MAGA, you're going to pretend that you're upset about name calling?
Nah, come on, guys. Be real.
Nobody name calls more than Donald J. Trump.
He game calls in every direction, everyone that's, is it just, oh, no, it's just Democratic leaders to come on.
Please don't lie.
Please don't be embarrassing.
He's called America a garbage can.
I mean, look, he constantly says,
America's a mess.
He's terrible.
America's terrible.
Brother, you were president like three and a half years ago.
So why didn't you fix it completely back then?
Anyways, that's the whole country, but you're going to say,
oh, no, it's because of the immigrants.
Well, okay, then he just called the immigrants garbage.
And the immigrants were such garbage.
They turned the whole country into garbage.
So it's not just this comic.
He's the one saying it.
Okay?
And then when you get into Latinos, Jews, blacks, Christians, like every, not only does he insult
every group, but then he says, if you don't vote for me when you're Jewish, you ought to have
your head examined, and you know, it's probably going to be your fault.
That seems like blaming the voters, doesn't it?
Right?
And he does that with almost every ethnic group.
If you're pretending that you're offended when your Maga God is the biggest name caller on planet
at earth. Please, please. Either understand that you're super entitled and you think I get to say
anything I want about you, but don't you dare say anything about my fragile, fragile snowflake ego
because then I'm going to need a safe space for the rest of the election. No, not buying it.
You know what that is? That take is garbage and you know it. You know you don't believe that.
If you do, you're totally detached from reality. More, wait, Biden, I thought you said Biden was
senile. And I agreed with you guys on that. So now all of a sudden he's not senile and he meant it.
Did you see him stumbling around with the words if you watched the whole clip and he's like,
he doesn't know what he's saying? And did he mean the comic or did he mean all of Trump supporters?
My guess is in his senile mind, he meant the comic. We can disagree about that. You can say,
no, no, no, I know they hate us. And he meant all of us. Okay, fine, whatever. I don't care
about that. But don't pretend that Joe Biden is all of a sudden like has incredible mental acuity
And he meant exactly that and he meant to insult you guys because he thinks that's a brilliant
political strategy.
Kamala Harris went out and immediately apologized for it.
So apparently not a great political strategy if he meant it and you know he didn't.
So or I don't care if you think he did, but you certainly can't complain if you've been
loving the name calling that Trump has been doing this whole time.
Now, why are they, one last fake reason, why are they pretending to be so mad?
And so maybe some of them are because they just, they're so biased, they can't see how much they've attacked left wing voters and Democratic voters.
But I think most of them are pretending. Why? Because they want to be able to say, we're even.
We called you 2,000 terrible names.
The senile old man slipped up and accidentally said something that we're going to pretend is about all of us.
Oh, you are a fat, dead weapon. We're all even. We're all even. Okay. So that's a huge reason why.
But the second reason is a little bit legitimate.
So look, guys, part of Trump's appeal is he hates the establishment.
And the establishment is full of elites, and the elites look down their noses at you, right?
And so when anyone on the Democratic side calls them garbage, it triggers them more because then they think like, oh, here comes the elites again, looking down at us.
I hate those guys, and it drives them to go vote.
So that part, I think is true.
All right, I said a lot there.
Frannie, what do you think?
Yeah, no, I think that's absolutely right.
You have to, I mean, it's really, it's unfair, right?
We're in these debates, and it's like, you have to handle MAGA with kid gloves,
as if not just what they're saying, but what they're advocating for.
You know, to me, the bigger headline of the Madison Square Garden rally was Stephen Miller saying America for Americans.
And we want to, I don't know what that was, but it sounded spooky.
You know, and we want to, like, deport, you know, tens of 11 million undocumented people.
Like, who's calling for mass deportation?
Who is calling for an entire policy towards pro-Palestine demonstrators that basically, like, locks them up and criminalizes their speech, right?
Has an entire plan.
It's called Project Esther, look it up.
It's a whole plan for criminalizing pro-Palestine people and is calling them the enemy from within.
Who's using, let's be real,
fascistic and Nazi language.
This is the same thing when racists are like,
the real racism is when you called me racist.
No, that's literally not how anything works.
That's like fart logic.
Whoever smelt it, dealt it.
That's not how farts work, people.
Whoever smelt it didn't deal it.
But do you understand what I'm saying?
It's just so funny to me that they're trying to equate this.
But, Jank, you're right.
We always have to be the bigger ones and I have to say,
wow, what a good stunt. You really handed it to us. Yeah, no, look, again, the policy and
politics are different, right? What was a good political maneuver versus what do they actually
believe what's actually going to be the policy? So I don't think that Trump's going to give us
any good policies. But in this photo op, yeah, I get it. They're doing the fake outrage. And
some of them are actually outrages I just explained. But this is probably a good photo off.
for him. That's my take on it. Because he's flipping the frame and he's making it seem like
the Democrats are the most guilty of accusing the other side of garbage. And it's taking the power
away from what the comic said in Madison Square Garden. He did this with fake news. He originally
his team did fake news all over Facebook in 2016. They literally put out fake articles. That's where the
term comes from. But then he jujitsu did and said the mainstream media is fake news. Now, nobody
remembers that he's the one that started fake news, they think his opponents did fake news.
So when you have a giant garbage truck with Trump on it and him doing this whole shtick,
I think people are, you know, going to think, oh, right, the Democrats called the Republicans
garbage. So I think it's, you know, whether it drives us crazy or not, I think it is a good
photo op. That's my take on that. And yeah, in terms of the photo op, just the photo op,
what's your take on the politics of that? I don't think it overcomes the,
comments that were made on Madison Square Garden. I don't think that, again, it's on the nose for
trying to be a cleanup crew. He's literally physically trying to clean up the mess from the Madison
Square Garden rally. It's just a few degrees removed. Not everyone heard Biden's comments. Not everyone
who heard Biden's comments, even as you said, thought he was even being cogent or serious or
didn't even remember what he was saying. So again, it's like, nice try, a for effort. It's not like,
You know, it doesn't make like Mark Anthony and Jennifer Lopez and all of the like massive like Puerto Rican celebrities just sort of like come to your defense.
Nah, man, you're not getting a Hulk Hogan only has one shirt to rip off.
Although no, he's got like a couple, but you know what I'm saying.
I do.
There is more gaff, though.
We can move on.
Yeah, no, no, it's just two things here.
I want to see how the poll ended.
But also, I don't think that it makes people forget about that.
And I think that Puerto Ricas are genuinely super pissed.
I've got to put my glasses on my 6832 saying no, it's not a good photo op.
So only show in America where I'm like, all right, look at that.
The audience disagrees with me.
Way to have an open mind.
Okay.
So, and we'll put that up our YouTube community.
TYT.com, you know, member votes count a hundred times more.
Members go out there and support me.
Okay, no, I'm just plain.
It's perfectly good opinion to have on that.
I like that he also had kind of like almost a Halloween outfit the day before Halloween.
By the way, the noise that you heard was me just trying to help with the Halloween feel of the story.
No, I accidentally opened up something.
Anyways, bottom line is, it's not going to.
So it's not going to, I opened up Twitter for a second and it's like, okay, okay.
I was like, was that like a new drink that sounds really intense?
No, no, it was a video.
And so, but bottom line is, no, the Puerto Rican American voters are not going to, well, they're all Americans, are not going to forget that.
Our side's not going to forget the things that he said.
But now we're in the get out the vote part of the campaign.
So I think this will drive a lot of his voters to get even angry and go, oh, there they are again.
Looking down and I'm definitely going to go vote for Trump.
So in that sense, I think it helps them politically.
I think that's a good point.
But, Jank, I mean, like, can you imagine in the final week of your election, the big question that the mainstream, that everyone's asking is, did you just have a Nazi rally or not?
Like, you can't imagine that's a good place to be for a campaign.
And my people told me about four weeks ago, I would say, no, I want to protect the people.
I want to protect the women of our country.
I want to protect the women.
Sir, please don't say that.
Why?
They said, we think it's very inappropriate for you to say.
I said, why?
I'm president.
I want to protect the women of our country.
They said, sir, sir, I just think it's inappropriate for you to say, pay these guys a lot of money. Can you believe it?
I said, well, I'm going to do it whether the women like it or not. I'm going to protect them. I'm going to protect them from migrants coming in.
Okay, there was Donald Trump continuing to not practice.
the art of consent, especially when it comes to women.
He is admitting there that he was told by his advisors, who he pays a lot and then sort of scoffed
at the idea that he would pay them and that they would tell him something he didn't want
to hear, which is when you continue to say, I will protect women and they will be happy
if I am reelected, it sounds kind of creepy.
And instead, he doubles down on it, shares the information that they didn't want him to say
it and then adds to it and makes it even creepier by saying, I will protect the women whether
they like it or not. Now, for those of you don't remember what he's been saying, let's go back
to what he's been saying, again, without that sprinkle little non-consensual piece on top.
And I will protect women at a level never seen before. They will finally be healthy, hopeful,
safe and secure, their lives will be happy, beautiful, and great again. And it's my honor to do so.
Super non-threatening. It doesn't sound like a plan for mass lobotomies at all. So that already
was creepy, but now he says whether they like it or not. I can give my thoughts. I did want to
give the presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, a moment to reply because she did
take a moment specifically to call out what he just said. And I thought it's pretty well done.
Take a look.
The former president, Donald Trump's remark about women and whether they like it or not.
And listen, it's just, it actually is, I think, very offensive to women in terms of not
understanding their agency, their authority, their right, and their ability to make decisions
about their own lives, including their own bodies. And this is just the latest on a series
of reveals by the former president of how he thinks about women and their agency.
See, now I think for a candidate who doesn't often talk about specifically her gender,
that was pretty powerful because it's true. He does not view women.
as people with agency or the ability or care about the ability to consent.
In fact, just yesterday, another story of a groping encounter with Donald Trump broke this time
with a beauty queen who he invited specifically to his pageant.
This is according to the Daily Mail, we can throw this up, claims Donald Trump groped her
after luring her back to his suite at New York's Plaza Hotel.
She was a Swiss banker and she was also a part-time model.
Her name was Beatrice Kuell, and she was going to the Donald J. Trump American Dream pageant and Plaza Hotel, because somehow, yes, they let Donald Trump run beauty pageants.
According to the Daily Mail, she now lives in the Swiss capital of Byrne and said that after a press luncheon, a Trump staffer approached her to say the celebrity hotelier wanted a private meeting.
He took me up to the upper floors.
It was one of those big suites, she said.
When I entered, he jumped on me.
I had just time to turn.
I was not prepared.
I tried to do what I could to get rid of him.
Kewel says Trump attacked her at the New York Plaza Hotel, which he owned at the time.
She said Trump groped her as she told him to stop and tried to shove him off.
He kissed me on the lips and on the neck.
He tried to lift my dress.
He was grabbing and touching my body everywhere he could.
She goes on.
Obviously, this is a week after.
We now know that he also groped a sports illustrated model named Stacey Williams,
who is then a girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein.
So, jank, I'm going to protect you whether you like it or not.
I mean, is that what he was doing when he was doing all the gropes?
I'm just protecting you from all of the other gropers.
Yeah, like, he seemed, you know, we've all known that guy who's like,
I just want to make sure no one's bothering you.
That's why I'm going to breathe down your neck like a creep.
Yeah.
Well, look, especially when you're the candidate who said, I grabbed them by the crotch.
even if they don't want to, I kiss them even if they don't want it.
When you're a celebrity, you get away with it.
When you tell women you're going to do something, whether they wanted or not,
it comes across a little differently from you.
It already comes across terribly, if you ask me, from anyone,
but especially from Donald Trump.
So if this is your big pitch to women, you know what, I'm going to do things to you,
whether you like it or not, not a great pitch.
I think both sides are trying super hard to lose this election.
So, and this is Trump, do you don't have enough common sense, especially after the Hollywood
access tape, especially after your history of groping women, by the way, dozens of women,
which I'll get into in a second.
And you have an adjudicated case that just happened where you were found liable for sexual
abuse because you grabbed a woman without permission.
I wouldn't go around telling women that you're going to do things to them without their consent.
even if it's what you think is protecting them, right?
So we get it, guys, for the MAGA guys.
No, no, no, no, he said that he's going to protect them without their consent.
No, don't do anything without their consent.
And any time that Trump has done something to women without their consent in the past,
it's been to grope them and to sexually abuse them.
Look, you can't talk to MAGA guys that are in La La Land and think, no, Donald Trump's an angel
and he's never touched another woman without consent.
Okay, I mean, then I can't help you because you don't live on this planet.
Okay, but for the rest of us, how many times does he have to do this?
Like, look, guys, I know that they bring these stories out right before the election on purpose.
That's called Apple Research, they plan on the news, et cetera.
Does that mean that in this case is false?
No, these stories have been around for a long, long time.
And I would talk about them when no one was talking about them.
I bring it up every once in a while because it goes to the character of the guy.
The story that I often tell is a reporter's interviewing Donald Trump and Melania when she's pregnant with Baron.
Milania goes upstairs at some point in the interview, and Trump starts to take the reporter
on a tour of, I believe it was Mar-a-Lago, and they get into a room, and he puts her against
the wall and starts groping him.
Because that's what he always does.
So- His mood.
I mean, look, again, Maga guys will be triggered by this.
But given that history, and given the fact that he's so proud that he took away Roe v.
at fundamental human rights for women, I can't imagine that anyone's even close to him as
the most anti-woman presidential candidate in history.
I don't mean in history because in the old days, there's lots of sexist massages.
Very, very, very bad.
I mean, in our lifetime, right?
Yeah.
So, I mean, are we really pretending that there's any chance he's better for women in this
country?
Come on.
Well, what's interesting about that clip, Jank, and I don't know if we have time to watch
it again, but it was just interesting because when he said,
says, no, I'm going to protect women. They're mad at me because I said I'm a protect women.
Big applause, huge applause. Because I've spoken to Republican women, you know, I pour one out for them
and their beliefs and how their party perennially hates them. But, you know, a lot of them are
like, you know what? We just need a big strong man, which is truly sort of the hallmark of,
you know, a desire for authoritarianism and fascism. The political system is, you know, corrupt.
It's not working for me. I just want a dictator and be done with it. But a lot of
A lot of women have said that to my face.
I just want a big strong man.
He got huge applause.
But then he added, and I will protect them whether they like it or not.
Ah, you ruined it.
Because it was creepy before, but now we know you're going to, it did sound forced before.
Now we know it's definitely forced.
What does that even look like?
You won't be able to see a doctor when you're miscarrying as a woman in the state of Texas who recently died from an
infection from a miscarriage? Like, you won't be able to get any kind of contraception.
You won't be able to talk to your husband without him ratting you out. You won't be able to
seek legal. Like, what is it that you will make, that you will make a woman's world so insular
and so perfect? Like, do you don't understand what I'm saying? Like, it feels much more like a
threat. Yeah, I hear you. Look, there's again, I'm going to disagree on one thing. Look, I think a lot of
women like the idea of somebody looking out for them and protecting them. It doesn't have
to be a man. It doesn't have to be, you know, political, et cetera. I think it's a normal instinct
for that almost all people have men and women. So if, and you're right that he got a big
applause line for that and if he'd left it there, it would have actually been pretty good. I don't
agree with you that that's like some sort of like leaning towards authoritarian or fascism.
You could be a woman who wants to be protected by your husband or et cetera and not be.
authoritarian or want authoritarianism but but do they go too far they clearly go too far the
leaders here it's like Tucker Carlson did the speech the other day we showed it to you guys
where he's like told about like oh your kids aren't acting right and in there you know you got
to teach them better et cetera and they got to know there's going to be consequences and dad's
coming home and it got a big applause line if he left it there that's classic conservative way
of thinking, no problem. And then just like Trump, he has to take a weird turn. He takes
a weird turn. She's been a naughty little girl and you got to spank her. I'm like, what are you
doing? What? Why did you take that turn? Same exact thing here in Trump, like I'm not going to
begrudge him going with classic conservative thing. I'm here to protect women. But then when you
take the turn and go whether they like it or not, okay, well, then you took a creepy turn. That's
my take up. You made it weird. Yeah, you made it weird. I'll give the last word to one of our
magibus dragon with a girl tattoo wrote in at t yt.com slash 2024 to become a member or hit the
joint button below. They wrote in women don't need protection from Trump. Women need protection
from Trump. Yep. And that's probably the best point. All right, I'm going to take a break.
When we come back, we've got more news for you guys, including who the hell is going to win this
thing? The numbers are amazing. We'll share it.
Why just survive back to school when you can thrive
by creating a space that does it all for you, no matter the size?
Whether you're taking over your parents' basement or moving to campus,
IKEA has hundreds of design ideas and affordable options to complement any budget.
After all, you're in your small space era.
It's time to own it.
Shop now at IKEA.ca.
I'm back on TY-Y-T-Jank and Francesco with you guys.
Of course, check out Francesco's podcast, The Bituation Room, on the T-YT network.
Anywhere you get podcasts, just Bituation Room, and you got it.
Rage Rock for now, thank you for gifting 10 memberships on YouTube, making you an American hero.
Brandi, what's next?
All right, this one is a lot of whiplash.
So bear with me, but we're talking about how close this race is.
The pollsters don't even know what to do.
Take a look.
The case for Kamala Harris, the signs as clear as day.
If Republicans win come next week.
Donald Trump wins comes next week.
The signs all along will have been obvious.
Okay, all right.
That was CNN data analyst Harry Enton's back-to-back segments, just one day apart.
saying that Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have signs of a surge.
I feel a little bit like Mr. Enton might be covering his zone.
You know what on all this.
So if he wins, then there was a surge sign.
But if Kamala went, there was also signs.
Don't look at me.
I think pollsters are pulling their hair out, just like we all are,
as we are only a few days away from the November election.
And let's just start with his full explainer for why Kamala.
Harris could pull off this win.
It has to do with her favorability.
And the number one sign is that Harris simply put is more popular than Donald Trump.
Her net favorable rating is higher than Trump.
She's at minus two.
Trump's at minus seven.
I went all the way back since 1956 and looked at the polls.
Does the more popular candidate usually win?
The answer is absolutely yes.
16 times the more popular candidate is won.
Only one time the less popular candidate is one.
I will note that was Donald Trump back in 20.
But of course, remember, Hillary Clinton was quite unpopular herself.
Democrats in special elections, their performances the last two years, what has happened?
We're looking at state legislative and federal special elections.
On average, these Democrats have surpassed Joe Biden's 2020 margin by two points, by two points.
And remember, Joe Biden won.
So the fact that these Democrats have been doing better than Joe Biden's been doing is a good sign.
In 2022, these metrics look awfully, awfully similar.
In fact, slightly less believe the country was on the right track, slightly more approved of Joe Biden shot, but very similar numbers here.
And remember, even though the top metrics were bad for Democrats in 2022, the White House party did historically well in that midterm.
Okay, so that again, Harry Enton from CNN, sort of like a very giving off like very over eager finance bro vibes right there in all of his his predictions of Kamala Harris.
So showing that Kamala Harris is much more popular, but the one time that the American public did vote for an unpopular candidate, it was Donald Trump.
Oopsies. Anyway, but here is his bid and is for Donald Trump surging and why he thinks maybe it could be Donald Trump.
Just 28% of Americans, voters, think the country is going in the right direction, is on the right track.
And I want you to put that into a historical perspective for you.
Okay, what's the average percentage of the public that thinks that the country is on the right track when the incumbent party loses?
It's 25%.
That 25% looks an awful bit like that 28% up there.
In fact, I went back through history.
There isn't a single time in which 28% of the American public thinks the country is going on the right track
in which the incumbent party actually won.
They always lose for Kamala Harris to win.
She'd have to break history, be a Democrat to succeed Joe Biden,
when Biden's approval rating is way underwater.
Republicans have been registering voters in big, huge numbers.
They have been gaining in party registration versus the Democrats in the swing states with party
registration.
We're talking Arizona.
I think it's a five point.
They've expanded their lead from five points from where it was back in 2020.
How about Nevada?
Big Republican registrations there.
They like the early vote.
How about North Carolina?
Big Republican registration games.
How about Pennsylvania?
We spoke about it before a few months ago.
Big Republican party registration gains versus.
from where they were four years ago.
Okay, well, that graphic doesn't even have numbers on it.
That's just, you're just underlining states, my guy.
But that's cool.
This is a hard job, people.
So he's saying, yes, there's a swell of registration of Republican voters,
according to, again, Harry Anton.
And that's why he thinks maybe Donald Trump could pull this off,
also because Americans do not think the country is going in a good direction right now.
And generally, that doesn't bode well for the incumbent, the incumbent being the Democratic Party.
But again, not Biden.
So Biden's also not running.
So just a little pushback on that.
But more whiplash for you.
Republican strategist Margaret Hoover, I believe was on CNN.
And here she is saying that actually behind the scenes, Republican operatives she's speaking to are like, it doesn't look good for us.
I have heard from Republicans that there is concern at the Trump campaign, amongst the operatives
that actually really do know the political wherewithal, that the turnout and enthusiasm numbers
aren't aware they need to do.
Okay, and then others jump in or like, nobody knows.
And then here's a communication strategist, Frank Luntz.
He's also a pollster who says that, yeah, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Trump has the momentum.
Take a look.
Biden may have tainted Harris's chances of becoming the president because of his comments
about Trump voters being trash, which he has said was a gaffe.
But she's also come out and said, no, no, no, I'm going to give people a seat at the table
and not call them the enemy within.
Why do you argue that this might be the big issue?
Because it reminds me so much of 2016, and I think there are a lot of similarities right now
between this campaign and that campaign.
The divisions in the country were significant back then.
People didn't think Trump had a chance back then.
He's been gaining and gaining.
The momentum, I don't know who's going to win.
I can't call it, and nobody should,
because statistically and polling and focus groups,
it is way too close to call.
However, the momentum is clearly in what I see,
and what I hear, is in his favor.
I mean, at this point, you know, stick your finger in your mouth and put it up to the wind.
Your guess is good as anyone.
These are pollsters who have been doing this for decades who are like nobody should actually guess the outcome of this.
Jank, I don't really know who to trust on any of this.
I think obviously the numbers are better than just hearing someone say like, well, I heard people who were worried.
No, I heard the dump truck thing was a really good.
Good, good move.
What do you make of it and how do you stay calm in these final days?
So, well, first of all, I have a battle plan in case either one of them wins and we're going
to do a populace revolt.
So come watch us on.
Well, hell yeah.
Yeah, come watch us on Election Day.
Let's launch that populist revolt together.
But now, in terms of who's going to win, you know, I like to think that I'm pretty good
at this.
And my answer is right now, well, we've got four or five days left before the election.
I have no idea.
Okay.
And so, look, I don't think Harry Enton and the other pundits are covering their ass.
I think they genuinely are right that it is tied.
And not just tied, it's confusing.
So what I mean by that is the numbers keep contradicting themselves.
Harry had a pretty good job of explaining it there.
And those are two big metrics I also look at in elections.
you know, who is the country going in the right direction or not?
And clearly the Democrats are not winning on that one.
So that's a big problem for Kamala Harris.
But then, you know, who do you, which candidate do you approve of?
That is normally very, very telling.
And the Democrats are winning on that one.
It's so, color me confused.
So the one that usually tells you who's going to win is, especially in the last 10 years,
is who's the change candidate?
And on that one, they keep flip-flopping, she's the change candidate, he's the change candidate,
she's a change candidate.
So the country hasn't made up its mind.
I've never seen an election like this.
It doesn't mean that it's going to be razor thin in the electoral college, I'll get back
to that in a second.
There could still be a perceived blowout, but right now, if any pundit is telling you or pollster
is telling you, oh, I know for sure who's going to win, they're lying.
Because all the professionals, all the guys who are the best at this, including, yes,
begrudgingly Frank Luntz and Nate Silver are all going, I don't know.
I mean, I can give you more numbers.
So, and more indications.
So for example, as you saw there, Margaret Hoover is saying the Trump campaign, slight panic
about their internal polling.
Then when you go to Kamala Harris side, they pulled their ads from North Carolina,
which means that they, that nine out of ten times, that means they're giving up because
their internal polling is showing that they're going to lose North Carolina.
And in Nevada, the local reporters are saying rural turnout, more likely to be Trump,
etc., is overwhelming.
So now Nevada looks really bad for Democrats.
On the other hand, why are the Trump guys panicking about their internal poll numbers?
I, you know, and look, Nevada and North Carolina, et cetera, are probably not going to settle this.
What is very, very likely going to settle this is the three blue wall states of Pennsylvania and Michigan and Wisconsin.
And again, every day that I look, there's a new poll with a new leader.
For a little, and it's the reason Luntz, me, Nate Silver, whoever else you want to put in that bucket,
have all said in the last week or so, week to 10 days, it's tied, but our intuition as says,
Trump because of the momentum is because the polls were headed in that direction.
As they're wobbly and wavering, they're a little bit wobbling towards Trump in the last
two weeks or so.
But now there's some new polls out going in Harris's direction.
And maybe it's because of all the crazy things that Trump and his allies have said recently
and which goes to the point that I've been making throughout, which is Trump loves to juggle
hand grenades.
So he dropped a couple of them recently.
And by the way, this thing's not over.
I mean, as you're going to find out later in today's show, Rudy Giuliani is saying
the Haitians, you know, should have never come out of the jungle.
Tucker Carlson is saying he was attacked by demons in the middle of the night.
I mean, like, there's no end to their madness.
So could they punch themselves enough times in the face to cost themselves a super close
election at the end?
Yes.
So there's no way of knowing.
I'll tell you who could make all the difference in a second.
But so far, are you with me on that for Annie?
Does that make sense?
I mean, yeah, I agree with you.
I disagree with Frank Luntz saying that this is exactly like 2016 in terms of underestimating
Trump.
I don't think that people are underestimating Trump this time around at all.
I think that we are taking Trump incredibly seriously, far more seriously than honestly
he takes himself.
I think people are very sober about that.
And what's so upsetting, and we're going to get into maybe why, is that Kamala Harris
was clearly the change candidate.
Of course she was a change candidate.
jumps in when Biden's, you know, too decrepit and genocidal to, you know, keep running and
yeah, of course she's the change candidate.
But she's cozied up to some of his worst policies and she hasn't embraced some of his
best policies and she hasn't really staked out her own, you know, her own vision for a
country that is different than Trump.
Trump's got a vision.
We got mass deportations.
You know, we got abolishing the Department of Ed.
We've got no trans of gender affirming care.
Like all the kinds of harrowing visions that Donald Trump has.
And that, you know, I mean, some of it's not much of a difference considering people can't get abortions in so many states.
But a lot of it is like, hey, there's a twisted little vision there.
So I just think it was incredible that somehow at this late stage, you could still imagine that Kamala Harris wouldn't be the change candidate.
I still think she is, but also I'm biased towards democracy.
and stuff. So I think that that is just more of a disappointment on my end. But I don't think
that we are starry-eyed about Kamel Harris winning. No one's cavalier about this. And but the other
thing that does feel like 2016, Jank, is like, you know, Kamal Harris has sort of said bye-bye to
the progressive base. It's more of a like, I got this. I don't need you. Me and Liz Cheney are
going to ride out with, you know, the undecided voters and anyone who likes Liz Cheney and the Cheney
family still, which is nobody. So there is that vibe that I've gotten from this campaign so
far. Yeah, totally. So let me build on that. So look, if you're looking at these two awful
candidates, Trump and Biden, that the country didn't want, like 70% of the country wanted
different candidates, then obviously Kamala Harris is a change candidate. But if you're looking to
change from the establishment, which most people in the country want, well, then she's not really
the change candidate because she's much more establishment. Now, Trump's not, Trump is anti-establishment.
it doesn't really mean he's a real populist, he's just looking out for himself, but that leans
in his favor when you're looking at how does the country feel about change? And so what's going
to happen at the end and how is this thing going to get decided? Look, first of all, I want you to
understand that as close as it is now and as unclear as it is now, all Trump has to do is get like
a one and a half point lead in the blue wall states. And next thing you know, he sweeps all the
swing states, because that's what, that's what would happen. And then it looks like an electoral
college blowout. And then of course, they'll frame that as a mandate, a blowout, etc. But the
electoral college is so dumb, if you win it by a lot, it doesn't really mean anything. So,
I mean, Biden won by a decent number in terms of the electoral count, and certainly in the popular
vote, but he actually, in reality, only won the election by 43,000 votes in three swing
states. So what do you mean by a close election? So it could still be a perceived blowout. And
a real blowout would be if Trump won the popular vote. Pause to note how funny that sentence is.
Okay. Our system is so insane that if a Republican wins the popular vote, that's considered a blowout.
So we expect a Republican to lose the popular vote in a democracy every time, but still win the
electoral college in the presidency, half the time or more than half the time.
So the system's totally screwed, but that would be, that would be a surprising result if he
won the popular vote. And it would mean he'd win the electoral college by a lot.
Okay, finally, the key to victory is at this point, this is not a thing that usually
makes a difference, even though it's, and I love it, and I want it to be true, but it's usually
the most overhyped thing. Get out the vote, right? Those campaigns, the door knocking,
etc. Well, good news. This is the one campaign where it matters. So go and get out the vote
on whichever side you're on because that's what's going to make a difference almost for sure.
And finally, the undecided voters, not the undecided, sorry, the unlikely voters, the ones that
the polling is not picking up. Did they go towards Trump historically? Yes, definitely,
2016 and even in 2020 is in surprising fashion but in 2022 and 23 they went to the Democrats
because of abortion so who's got more unlikely voters and hence it's look if Kamala Harris
loses she has no one to blame but herself I think she ran a very subpar campaign for
most of the same reasons that Francesca just laid out but if she wins it will definitely
be because an army of women showed up that people didn't expect and they carried her to
victory. Yeah, and I just want to just double down. There is one more weekend to go. And yeah,
if you want to knock doors for your candidate, go ahead and do that. Honestly, every little bit
does indeed help. And there's some awesome grassroots organizations that are doing good work.
And they're connected to the communities. They're not just parachuting in to try and get their
vote at the last minute. Yep. All right. So we're going to take a quick break here. When we come
back, as we promised you, Bill Clinton punching himself in the face and the Democratic Party
in the face in Michigan, what in the world are they doing here? We'll share that when we come back.
All right, back on TYT, Jank and Frannie with you guys and Preston the dragon.
Good to have you with us, Preston.
Presson hit the join button below.
Instantly turn into an American hero.
I appreciate it.
You could do that or you can go through t.com slash 2024.
We appreciate you either way.
Franny.
All right.
This one, this one's painful.
Let's go.
It isn't ham.
many we've had to kill because Hamas make sure that they're shielded by civilians.
They'll force you to kill civilians if you want to defend yourself.
Okay, that is former president, Bill Clinton, campaigning for Kamala Harris in Michigan, talking
about how Hamas just surrounds itself with babies and straps and so you got to kill all the
babies. Of course you do. Again, Michigan, home to the largest Arab and Muslim American
population in the country. And somehow he thought this would go over well, oh my God, what are
they doing? Again, once again, there have been 43,000 people murdered by Israel in Gaza at the
lowest level possible. Again, the high end of what estimates of how many people have been killed
are 200,000. Okay? So again, all of this is still going on as refugee camps are targeted like
Jabalia, as children in incubators are being targeted by having the oxygen supplies of their
hospitals deliberately taken out, as children are found with bullet holes right into their
skulls like an assassination. Bill Clinton says that.
So you can see why some voters might be upset, you know, those who don't like killing children.
And here he is about a little bit more, there's a lot more, in fact, about why he thinks that
at the end of the day, these voters should just get over it.
I understand why young Palestinian and Arab Americans in Michigan or think too many people
have died.
I get that.
But if you lived in one of those cabootsam in Israel right next to Gaza and Hamas butchered them.
And so then the people who criticize that are essentialists and say, yeah, but look how many people you've killed in retaliation.
So how many is enough for you to kill to punish them?
for the terrible things they did.
That all sounds nice until you realize what would you do if it was your family
and you hadn't done anything but support a homeland for the Palestinians.
And one day they come for you and slaughter the people in your village.
You would say, well, you will have to forgive me.
I'm not keeping score that way.
Oh god, okay, so not only is it awful, it's rambling and it doesn't make sense, but there he is asking Arab and Muslim voters like, hey, what if you had family who was killed?
And they're like, yeah, we have. But no, he's only counting the family members of the people who were killed by Hamas.
He's not counting the family members of the people who were killed by Israel. It is just, it gets worse.
though, he is now criticizing Americans for criticizing Biden.
Just don't criticize how Biden's handled this, in fact.
When I read that people in Michigan are thinking about not voting because they're mad at
the Biden administration for honoring his historic obligation to try to keep Israel from being
destroyed, I think that's a mistake.
Kamala Harris has said that she will try.
to negotiate an end of the violence, an end of the killing, and a new priest process.
And that ought to be enough.
And there you have the audience, at least trying to help him out and applauding,
saying that she says she's going to negotiate, even though, let's make sure we keep it 100.
The Biden administration has foregone negotiation at this point because they don't have a partner in Israel.
Negotiations have stopped.
There's no more around the clock.
there is no negotiations to release hostages.
We haven't even talked about the hostages in weeks.
We haven't heard any American official talk about them or their well-being to say nothing
of the people being slaughtered every single day.
But, Jank, how did they know he was going to just wax on about this and just freelance
on how, you know, you should really stop criticizing Biden because he's trying.
And I'm going to say other incoherent and very Islamophobic things.
Yeah, it was a super offensive speech and it was incredibly counterproductive.
I mean, this is how you try to lose a race.
So let me break it down.
First, look, I'm going to stick with the confirmed numbers, 43,000 dead.
That's already horrific and it's 40 times the number of people that Hamas killed.
That's going to get to the main point, which Frannie alluded to, which is look at his perspective.
His perspective is, look, when he talks about the fan,
family members in the kibbutz who were killed, he's right about that.
There were a lot of people there that actually were more in favor of a two-state solution than
in other parts of Israel.
That's why terrorism doesn't make any sense.
You're killing civilians, you don't know who you're killing, and they might actually be
your allies and your friends, and so it's a counterproductive way to go.
But at the same time, he says, now, if you had your family members that were killed that way,
wouldn't you want to, what, kill 40 times as many of their family members?
Number one, my answer is no, no, I wouldn't want to kill 40 times as many families in Palestine.
And I would hope that you would be a decent human being and not say they, oh yeah, let's get vengeance and kill.
Oh, remember, the people who were killed, some of them really believed in a Palestinian state and were good people to Palestinians.
That's why they would want 40 times as many of them being murdered.
How does that make any sense?
And but even more importantly than that, he never even once considers, wait, what if my family was in?
Gaza, and 43,000 of them were just slaughtered, what would that make me want to do?
Wouldn't that want to make me defend myself?
And how would I defend myself?
And what can I possibly do when Israel says we're never going to end the occupation?
That is literally a vote they had in their cabinet, that Palestine will never be a state.
What are they supposed to do?
So I say terrorism is bad.
I hope a lot of you say terrorism is bad.
But no matter what they do today in the Israeli press, Israel said that they will not negotiate
with the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank for peace.
Well, wait a minute, if you're not negotiating with Hamas or you're not negotiating with
the Palestinian Authority that works with you in the occupation of the West Bank, who can
you, oh, right, you don't want to negotiate for peace.
So this is disgusting.
And then to blame the Palestinians for their own deaths, well, you know, they're using
human shields, they made us do it.
They made, the poor Israeli victims, the IDF are such victims here because Hamas made them kill
all those civilians in Gaza.
That's a disgusting thing to say.
I know that it's a regular talking point on television, and I know that just five years ago,
maybe two years ago, that Bill Clinton would have said that and everybody would have applauded.
Oh, yeah, of course, human shields, the right to defend yourself.
Of course, slaughter all the Palestinians you want.
But today's a different day, man, because you know why?
because we all saw the slaughter with our own eyes.
You don't have mainstream media to protect you anymore and to pretend that Israel is the victim
when they kill 40 times the number of civilians.
Oops, I did it again and again and again and again.
But they're just collateral damage.
They're just human shields.
And the Palestinians made us kill them and made us occupy them because they're the violent ones.
Yeah, okay.
Well, you look disgusting when you say that.
So that's Bill Clinton saying, giving his speech that he would normally give his most precious followers, his donors.
And his donors were going, yes, yes, yes, yes, let America, so you better send him a $26 million check.
And Clinton would say, and the Democrats would buy in the Harris, everything, oh, yeah, and by the way, Trump too.
Oh, right away, sir, we're sending the 26 billion right away, kill more Palestinians.
They had it coming.
It was their fault.
It was their fault.
That would work great in a donor room, and it has.
That's why they raised a spectacular amount of money.
But when you're going to try to get Arab and Muslim votes in Michigan, you moron, you might want to try a different speech.
Do you know they also sent Richie Torres to Michigan?
Oh, God.
Richard Torres is- What do we do?
Are you trying to lose the election?
Why don't you send Federman to go punch a couple of Muslim voters in Michigan while you're at it?
I mean, Jesus, Christ.
How stupid are you on top of being immoral?
I've got more of a franny.
No, but you know what, though?
This is it.
Like, I understand that on this issue, Kamala Harris doesn't deserve to win.
But also, we understand that Trump would be, would be, and has been far worse.
But so if anyone says that anyone who votes for Kamala to do, you know, to do damage control or harm reduction isn't serious about ending the occupation, I give you, I give you.
a massive movement, myself included, who will not give an inch on this issue when it comes
to the Democrats. But they are better adversaries to fight against. They are people who,
when you protest them, they will not criminalize you and drag you out by your feet and tell
you should be pushed off of bridges. But there are people going to be sort of like, all right,
all right, we hear you. We're all trying to work around the clock. No, you're not. We know you're
not. And we're going to be holding your feet to the fire. And we're going to be pushing you on this
issue because as decrepit, as Bill Clinton sounds when he advocates for the mass murder of
Palestinians, that decrepit little Zionist voice, I want nowhere near the mainstream
at the Democratic Party.
It is decrepit.
Why?
Because it's dying.
It is a dying perspective.
And we need to make sure that it dies, truly.
Like, that is so old.
And then he starts going on about, oh, the Palestinians rejected a homeland in the year
2000 when I was doing the Camp David Accords.
This guy, again, still wants us.
What are we supposed to do?
You're going to lean over a child who's starving to death in North Gaza and shake your
finger at it and say, look, number one, you voted for Hamas, even though you were not born
yet.
And number two, you rejected your homeland and Yasser Arafat did a terrible job representing
you in the year 2000.
Ergo, you need to starve to death and Israel's going to recolonize Gaza.
miss me with all of these talking points.
It's so gross, and I just want to throw up the mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, Abdullah Hamoud,
who, if you can tell by his tweet, is very much invested in a Harris-Walls campaign winning,
but says this, rumor has that the dams want to send Bill Clinton to Dearborn to rally the era both this weekend.
Do us a favor.
Stop sending surrogates who have no respect or regard for this community.
You're only inflicting more damage.
Again, it's a little bit of vote.
Word to the wise.
Stop.
So, let me break down a couple more things in this awful, awful speech.
And to Fannie's point, yeah, I agree.
Trump is always worse on every issue, right?
And Trump right now is lying to somebody because he's out there going,
oh, we're going to have peace in the Middle East as soon as I'm elected, right?
And I'm anti-war.
Man, wars are going to be over when I'm elected.
And he's going to telling his donors, I'm going to let Israel do whatever it wants.
And I'm going to finance it, you know.
So I got you, dog.
And that's why Netanyahu is backing Trump.
because he knows Trump's going to let him go wild.
Anti-war, my ass.
And who do you think Trump's going to serve?
The people who gave him millions of dollars or the average guy?
If you think this the average guy, you're the sucker at the table, okay?
So this guy's a legendary con man.
All he ever cares about is himself and money.
So between the two people that he's telling completely different stories to, my guess is
he's going to deliver for the donors and not you guys, which again makes him a very standard
politician from both parties. Okay, so to the point, back to this speech. So he says, well,
you know, Hamas is using human shields. And so that's why the Israelis had to kill the kids.
But the American doctors on the scene said there was an extraordinary percentage of kids with
headshots, snipers shooting them from a long distance. Kids, why didn't they, if they're
snipers, why don't they shoot the Hamas guy behind them if that story was theoretically true?
Why did they shoot the kid?
No, and over and over and over and over.
Collateral damage my ass.
Look, I get it.
Some people are biased and they're like, no, no, no, my side is so pure and moral.
They would never do anything like that.
I don't care if you give me overwhelming evidence.
By the way, you sound like a Trump supporter.
Oh, overwhelming evidence by every news agency and every human rights group.
No, they're all wrong because the whole world is anti-Semitic.
So we get to kill all the kids and we're the good guys.
No, you don't. No, you don't.
You need to, it doesn't mean that you're not good guys.
It means you need to turn around.
You need to turn around now, okay?
Because this is not what good guys do.
This is awful.
And don't tell me you had to do it when you use snipers, let alone the fact that they
use snipers to kill an American journalist and an American recently in the West Bank.
All sniper shots.
What happened to human shields?
No, the snipers are trying to kill those people, innocent civilians,
news journalists, et cetera. And then he said later in the speech, look, you know, Israel was
was there first anyway before your religion was even formed. Okay. First of all, do you think
that's a winning message to say to Muslims? It's not your land anyway. I mean, they were there
first. A couple of thousand years ago, maybe according to some ancient texts. By the way, Israeli
professors went to Egypt to prove, like, they were like, oh, this is really interesting. Let's see if we can
find some archaeological finds show that Moses was there and the Jews were enslaved in Egypt,
etc. These are Israeli anthropologists, came back. Nonsense. The Egyptians have so many records
and there is no records of Jews being enslaved there or Moses leading them out, let alone,
of course, the nonsense about the Red Sea and the frogs running down from the sky, etc. So the whole
thing is fiction. It's not that there were no Jews in the Middle East, not in Egypt, but there were
in the original area, right? But that justifies it? Well, if that justifies it, well,
the Turks were occupying both of them. Can I get it back? Am I now in charge? What kind of moronic
history is this? And to say, oh, at some, several thousand years ago they were there. So now
they get to take your actual home, your actual home, and drive you out of it and take your
land. And you think that's a winning message to tell Muslim and Arab voters in Michigan.
I don't know what happened to the Democratic leaders' minds. I think they all simultaneously melted.
I'm not done yet. One more thing. When he said that, no, two more things. When he said at the end
there that we showed you, he said, she said that she'll try to negotiate. That should be good
enough. She'll try to negotiate after the election and that should be good enough. No, no,
it's not within a million miles of good enough. That's basically saying, I took the donor money.
I'm going to do what the donors say, shut up and vote for me. And then afterwards, I'll pretend
I negotiated and I'll do the same exact thing now. Send them a blank check and let them slaughter
your family members. But remember, the only people you should have sympathy for is Israeli family
members. Now, we say, have sympathy for both, for both. And they say no, no, no. Finally,
the human shield nonsense, I can't stand it anymore. That talking point is vomitous. Every single
resistance group, whether they're terrorists or not, whether they kill civilians or not,
every resistance group has lived with civilians. You know why? Because they don't have a choice.
They're a resistance group. They don't have military bases. And where do they come from? They
come from an army, the army's already been defeated. They come from the civilians.
So under this logic, well, the Nazis had to kill the French. They had to kill them.
They were resisting. They had to kill the Jews. They were resisting. They were doing violence
against the poor Germans. Are you offended by that analogy? You should be 10,000 times more offended
that Israel right now is starving the children of northern Gaza. They barely let any humanitarian
ate or food in since the beginning of this month, an entire month of a plant starvation
where the Palestinian starving children just look like the Jewish kids out of the Holocaust.
That should rip your insides out.
That should make you so sad for what Israel has become.
But instead of turning around, you have a bunch of corrupt, immoral politicians like
Bill Clinton going and yelling at Muslim and Arab voters that it's their fault.
And if they know what's good for them, they should bow their heads and support Kamala Harris,
even though she's 100% on Israel's side.
It's disgusting.
Yeah, I mean, and this is, look, I think they're going to lose Michigan.
In my opinion, I don't think the blue wall's done if they lose Michigan.
I have a little bit of a different take.
I do think they'll, you know, they, I don't think the whole wall will fall, but I don't
think they're carrying Michigan.
And I think they'll pick up either North Carolina or Nevada or Arizona or something.
But this is bad.
I mean, when the mayor of Dearborn's like, you're doing more damage.
He's saying, uncle, uncle, you've already told us that you don't care about our community's lives.
Uncle, stop making it worse.
You've already told us.
And they want to do more.
They're going to send Richie Torres.
Stop, just stop.
Yeah, if you don't know, Richie Torres is the most virulently pro-right-wing Netanyahu government.
supporting a member of Congress. Maybe he's tied with Federman, but he's out there trying to
make sure that no one's allowed to criticize Israel. He's on a cancel culture, war pass. He's gotten
$1.2 million from pro-Israel packs. I mean, his corruption is so over the top and so disgusting.
And he dehumanizes Palestinians. And why is he used like a stupid stooge that he is? Let's be
honest. Oh, look, we got a minority
to say that minority lives don't matter.
That only, only
Israeli lives matter.
Only Israeli lives matter.
40 times as many children killed,
grandmothers killed aunts and uncles
and moms killed in Gaza.
Who cares?
I don't have to think about their families.
They were stupid human shields
and they had a coming. That's your stupid
message, Richie Torres, Bill Clinton,
Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris,
Joe Biden, you monsters.
and also morons.
And you'd rather serve your donors than win this election.
So if Kamala Harris loses this election, I don't want any stupid, idiotic, moronic,
mainstream media or Democratic Party leaders coming out and going,
no, it was the voter's fault.
It was the Arabs' fault and young black male's fault and women's fault.
They didn't come out enough.
And it was progressives' fault.
And it was somebody else's fault.
I mean, she had to serve the donors, even though it cost her the election.
she has to. She has to serve the moneyed interest. No, she doesn't. And by the way, you idiot,
you already have the money. You're supposed to use the money to win the election. In the end,
at least have enough common sense to turn to the voters, even if you're faking it.
But she's not even smart enough to do that. And neither is Bill Clinton, neither is Joe Biden,
a bunch of donor-obsessed goons who have no morality at all.
I mean, tell me how you really feel, jank, but like.
Yeah.
By the way, as always, Trump also.
But like, you don't know that Trump's immoral?
Congratulations.
You're in a tie with Donald Trump.
You must be so proud.
All right, we got to go.
All right, everybody check out the bituation room.
Frannie, thank you for doing it today.
Appreciate it.
Thank you.
Happy Halloween, everybody.
You too.
When we come back, Rudy Giuliani, going after Haitians in the most viciously racist way.
because they're both trying to lose, they're both morons trying to lose.
Tucker Carlson claims he's wrestled with a demon, but literally.
Now, he's not saying figuratively, literally.
And then I'm going to have a debate with Jordan on a topic.
Should be interesting.
We'll be back.