Think Fast Talk Smart: Communication Techniques - 225. Speaking Fluent Internet: How Algorithms Are Changing the Way We Speak

Episode Date: August 26, 2025

In the digital age, it’s critical to craft communication that fits the context.Like it or not, algorithms now decide whose messages get heard. “If you want to communicate effectively,” says Adam Aleksic, “you need to be exactly aware of what that medium is doing.”Aleksic is a linguist, author, and educational content creator with millions of followers across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. His latest book, Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language, explores how the platforms we use create new contexts that require new ways of communicating. “Every medium uniquely affects how we communicate, and we adapt our speech to these media,” he says. In the same way that we tailor communication for the contexts of the office, the gym, or the bar, digital platforms — and the algorithms that drive them — require the same contextualized communication. “You have to appeal to [the] algorithm,” he says.In this episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, Aleksic and host Matt Abrahams examine how words are born, change meaning, and spread in the digital age. Their conversation highlights practical ways to be more intentional with the words we choose by considering the medium, understanding the context, and adapting communication accordingly.To listen to the extended Deep Thinks version of this episode, please visit FasterSmarter.io/premium.Episode Reference Links:Adam AleksicAdam’s Book: AlgospeakEp.91 Um, Like, So: How Filler Words Can Create More Connected, Effective Communication Connect:Premium Signup >>>> Think Fast Talk Smart PremiumEmail Questions & Feedback >>> [e-mail] Transcripts >>> Think Fast Talk Smart WebsiteNewsletter Signup + English Language Learning >>> FasterSmarter.ioThink Fast Talk Smart >>> LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTubeMatt Abrahams >>> LinkedInChapters:(00:00) - Introduction (02:36) - Language, Labels, & Identity (04:55) - What Is Algospeak? (06:01) - Generational Language Gaps (08:18) - Communicating for Multiple Mediums (11:00) - Mastering Virality & Engagement (12:27) - Semiotics & Going Viral (14:13) - The Evolution of “Like” (15:24) - Hedging, Ambiguity, & Power Dynamics (18:02) - Actionable Takeaways on Communication (19:13) - Grammar: Rules, Context, & Changing Norms (21:16) - The Final Three Questions (26:35) - Conclusion ********Thank you to our sponsors.  These partnerships support the ongoing production of the podcast, allowing us to bring it to you at no cost.Strawberry.me. Get 50% off your first coaching session today at Strawberry.me/smartJoin our Think Fast Talk Smart Learning Community and become the communicator you want to be. 

Hi, Matt here. We have two days left before we close our listener viewer survey. A big thank you to all of you who have already provided feedback. Please take a few minutes to share your input on the show. We still have a few prizes left to give to lucky respondents. Go to FasterSmarter.com.com. To give us your input. That's FasterSmartter.com.io slash survey. And now a word from one of our sponsors.

Their support allows us to bring you quality content free of charge. If you've ever thought, I know I can do more, but something's holding me back. You're not alone. Whether you're navigating career growth, seeking better balance, or wanting to communicate with more confidence, coaching can help you bridge the gap between intention and action. At strawberry.comme, you'll get matched with a professional coach who's trained to help you clarify your goals, build lasting confidence, and make intentional choices professionally and personally. This is not therapy. It's not consulting. It's a thought partnership designed to help you take action with more clarity and purpose. I strongly believe in the value of coaching. All of us can benefit from the help of a coach.

Visit strawberry.combe slash smart to get matched up with your coach today. That's strawberry. dot me slash smart and get 50% off your first coaching session. It's the most affordable time ever to see if coaching is right for you. Words and language are conduits for culture. My name's Matt Abraham's, and I teach strategic communication at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Welcome to Think Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast. Today I'm delighted to speak with Adam Alexic. Adam is a linguist and content creator posting educational videos under the name the etymology nerd. And he has over two million followers. He's lectured on language and social media at Stanford and other top universities. His latest book is called AlgoSpeak, How Social Media is transforming the future of language.

Well, welcome, Adam. I look forward to our conversation. My younger son is a follower of yours, and he and I are both really excited to hear this conversation. Thanks for being here. I'm excited to be here. Thanks. Should we get started? Go ahead. As the son of both a lawyer and an elementary school teacher. Language and words have always been really important and interesting in my life. I'm curious, where did your interest and passion come from? And why should any of us care about the words we use in our grammar? If I'm being honest, I got into it for the fun facts. I read this book in 10th grade, the etymology con, great book connecting how different words are all related to each other in different ways. Fascinating. And then the more I looked

into it, the more I started doing my own research and eventually studied linguistics in college, I began to realize that language is the way humans identified the world and relate that to each other. It's so much more than just fun facts, but those are still good, you know, in and of themselves. It's how we communicate who we are as people, and you can see this as a language as a proxy for culture. Absolutely. And if you have a word to identify it, then it exists and you can share that meaning, right? Exactly. But once it's identified, it also changes reality a little bit. The fact that a label is out there. You identify either with that label or against that label. If that label wasn't there, now it's It's not something affecting your identity.

This is something that's very interesting to me because the book that I wrote gets into algorithms and how algorithms create new words and you have new labels out there because algorithms push these like cottage core or something. Now that cottage core is out there, I'm either cottage core or I'm not cottage core. And that affects my identity subtly. I have no idea what cottage core is. What you share with me? It's a fashion aesthetic of like, it's sort of a bucolic lifestyle of prairies and whatever.

You're dressing toward that aesthetic. But it's packaged as an entire lifestyle on social media. Interesting. So when Spotify identifies a particular. type of music or labels the type of music, all of a sudden it now exists and you're either it or not it. Exactly. For this book, I actually interviewed Spotify's chief data alchemist Glenn McDonald, and they have over 8,000 microgenres on Spotify. You know, in the past we'd have something like R&B, hip-hop pop. Now it's also escape room pre-verb. These are like things they made up because

they're just putting new labels on things. And now artists try to conform their musical identity for these labels that are out there. Hyperpop is the term that wasn't really on the scene until Spotify created a hyperpop genre in 2018, and now people are trying to make hyperpop art. They're arguing over what is and what isn't hyperpop, but they wouldn't have been doing that otherwise. They would have maybe just been making music in this space and more fluid, perhaps, but maybe the label constrains identity. At the same time, maybe the label gives people a way to pinpoint exactly what this thing is.

So what you were saying, words have tremendous power. That's fascinating. The words we use not only create and identify what exists in the world, but how we see ourselves as being part of or not part of. So let me ask, you talk a lot about Algospeeth. What is Algospeak? And how is it impacting our communication? Traditionally, AlgoSpeak has been the label for speech used to circumvent algorithmic censorship online. The classic example is the word on alive. You can't say kill on TikTok or you can say it, but your video might be suppressed. So many creators choose instead to use words like

on Alive. And now we have kids in middle schools writing essays about Hamlet contemplating on aliveing himself simply because they see it on TikTok. And so now this is also changing our reality as well. That's traditionally been what's referred to as AlgoSpeak. And that's what got me interested in this because I'm a creator and I'm a linguist. And I started studying my own language because you can't not if you're those things. And I started realizing, wow, my speech is being hampered and by the algorithm and I have to reroute around it. At the same time, it's so much more than censorship like on a live.

It's memes. It's trends. It's which groups are created. It's where words come from in the first place and how quickly those words. spread. Wow. So the algorithms are replacing the traditional way that new words came into being subcultures using concepts and ideas. Given that there's this new language, if you will, or at least new words in a language, how do we best become fluent? I'm thinking of the modern day workplace where you have four generations of folks. And some folks are religiously on TikTok and Instagram and part of that

algorithm culture. And then you've got folks who are older who don't even know what those things are. How can we expect to communicate when we're not even speaking the same language in some cases? Right. Each social setting comes with a unique set of linguistic expectations. In the workplace, like you described, there's still like a general corporate kind of language or an attitude about what words are acceptable and not acceptable. Same with unalive, right? It seems unacceptable for a kid to write that in an essay, but it's acceptable to say on TikTok because that actually is the expectation. That's the sociolect, the social kind of dialect of the internet, that people have this certain way of speaking that finds a community.

So if we are to be a leader in an organization, a manager of a group, and I want everybody to feel included in that group, do I have to have a glossary of terms that we agree to to use? If I've got a colleague that refers to something I don't understand, am I being left out? Am I being ostracized? What recommendations do you have or have you seen so that we can all communicate the same way? Well, I think a lot of these expectations are implicit, and it's strange to make a list of words that are acceptable and not. There are keywords that are being flagged by the algorithm. Or some words the algorithm knows are trending and then the algorithm pushes them and then

creators use these words and then the word gets perpetuated further into virality and now it's more of a word. That to me is also Algo speak. I am a strong believer that the medium is the message. Every single medium uniquely affects how we communicate and we adapt our speech to these media. The algorithm is one such medium and we have a unique way of speaking for these because algorithms are an infrastructure underlying how videos get distributed.

you have to appeal to this algorithm, not only in which words you're using to avoid censorship, but also in which words go more viral, but also generally, if this is a social expectation that we should be speaking this way, you have to accommodate for that as well. In an office setting, the medium is different. You should not be using the word on a live in the office. And that's just not the expectation. So each context brings its own expectations, which brings along with it the certain rules that you have. I find it really interesting. One of the most ubiquitous bits of advice that comes from this podcast is you need to know your audience and you need to adjust and adapt. And I'm hearing that you're

adding a new audience that some of us need to consider, which is the algorithm and the tools that we use. And that's really interesting because if I want to be understood, I need to at least speak the same language or understand and appreciate the language of the tool that I'm using. The context is really important. For example, right now I know I'm talking to you and I'm accommodating my communication to talk to you. However, we're also being observed by an audience of many other people and I don't know who these people are. So I'm using a psycholinguistic phenomenon known as audience design, where I have an idea of a perceived imaginary audience, and I am accommodating my communication for that as well. This is something we've seen with radio hosts and broadcast presenters. You'll notice that they talk in specific

accents, right? I was on MPR the other day. They were talking about the MPR accent and how they talk like that. And we all know, this just in. Breaking News, they have a certain way of speaking on TV as well. Influencers as well have a sort of an influencer accent. They're accommodating for their perceived audience. And again, this comes with the specific social setting and the norms and the underlying values of that medium. However, we're also communicating not only for the actual person in front of us, not only for the people invisibly perceiving us, but also for the algorithm itself. There's also this invisible infrastructure that analyzes every single word that's uploaded to these platforms. And you need to be performing for that as well. I want to come back to

influencers and creators in a moment, but two questions pop into mind. AI and the algorithms are only as good as the data that they have come to digest and understand. As language is changing, is it possible that the algorithms don't yet know what some of these words in terms mean and they might actually make mistakes? Not only possible, but that's exactly the reality. The fact is that AI, as sophisticated as it is, has a training set and has reinforcement learning that is a biased version of reality. It contains an idea or representation of language that is a map, but the map can never be the territory itself. So the way human language is actually used in all of its nuances, in all of its little forms, and the way that it's currently changing, AI can never fully catch up

to that. And that's why if you ask chat GPT to use slang, I don't think it'll ever quite be hip to that. Human language is always one step ahead, which is why we come up with new phrases like on alive. And now that's being standard as well, because the algorithm caught onto that. But now creators use phrases like, still unalive, but like spelled with an at sign instead of an A or an exclamation point instead of an I, one step ahead of the algorithm. If there's one thing I can count on humans, it's that we are ingenious and tenacious with coming up new ways to express ourselves. I want to dig into your expertise as an influencer yourself as the etymology nerd, but as somebody who studied Algo speak, if it is all about getting

attention, sustaining attention, leading to virality so your ideas get heard by more and more people. What types of advice would you give to people who are trying to be really fluent and maximize what AlgoSpeak gives for them? Are there some specific tips and tricks that you would recommend? Start with what these platforms want. The platforms give us the infrastructure. And unfortunately, they are trying to grab our attention as much as possible to commodify us as people so they can sell our data and so they can sell us ads. That's what they're doing. They make the structures in place. They have retention as like one of them. That's like how long people stay watching a video.

They use engagement metrics and whether they recommend videos. That's like likes, comments, shares, all that's normal stuff. So as influencers, you are then incentivized to maximize for these things. It's all downstream of how the medium is baking in certain expectations, certain priorities. And so you need to be very aware of that. And it's also, again, be aware of your invisible watching audience as well. I speak differently than the lifestyle influencer because I have a different audience. The lifestyle influencer is probably speaking to young women who expect this sort of

of Valley Girl derived accent. I speak very quickly. I mean, I do in real life, but online, I'll stress more words to keep you watching my video to make sure you don't scroll away. And I'll up talk as well. But it'll be like a different thing than the lifestyle influencer because I'm also accommodating for both my imaginary audience and the algorithm. Really interesting. And you're making me think about what I do linguistically when I speak. I guess I am purposely doing things for that imagined audience. It might not be good for the algorithm, which might not be good for me to get my word out there. Are there certain things people can do that enhance virality beyond just the spoken words? So, for example, what we name our posts, which not everybody is an influencer or a creator, but I put titles on

emails. I label what my meeting is. Are there words, I mean, words communication as well? Written words grab our attention more than other things. I want to bring in visual semiotics as well. Take a step back to find semiotics for us. Oh, it's symbols, things we look at that have meaning. So the fact that we have microphones right now in front of us, and if this is uploaded to social media, there are studies that have been done that show that videos where people have microphones in front of them go more viral than otherwise because they connote authority. This is a semiotic symbol that holds authority within it. And so there's actually an influx right now of real creators using fake microphones because that simply goes more viral.

And it literally is a visual indicator that this person has something important to say. And so we are subconsciously primed to perceive that person as more important and as having something worthy, when they're talking, and so we watch further. I really find that fascinating. Not everybody, again, is going to be a creator or influencer, but all of us do virtual presentations where we might put a background behind us. And you have to think about what's in that background,

because that sends a semiotic message as you're talking about. It's implying things. I think culturally we're still grappling with the move to Zoom and the fact that you can just see inside people's bedrooms now. That's crazy. So now your bedroom, this very private sanctum, is now perceived as a professional environment as well. In the same way that we see visual stuff very physically affect,

how we perceive a message. The same is happening with communication, both written and verbal. I'd like to talk a little bit about the word like, because it is used in a variety of ways. And I'm curious to get your perception of its evolution. And people use like in some ways as a filler, as some ways as to replace the word says or said. Help me understand like.

Yeah, this isn't even Algo speak. It goes back to 1980s Valley Girl speech and early internet speak, but also like, you, I just use it as a filler word right there. When you said, you can use it as a synonym for said, that's not quite true. It has its own kind of feeling. Set is more connoting evidentiality, that you literally are repeating something verbatim. Like is embodying an affect of somebody who communicated something, but not necessarily saying 100%, this is what they said.

So if I said, then she was like that party was low-key great. I'm not necessarily stating that she literally said that. But all these uses kind of evolved out of how young women talked in California in the 80s and 90s. And language often follows the conduits of what is perceived as popular, what is perceived as cool, what is perceived as funny even. And the Valley Girls were popular. And they spread language because of that. Yeah, I grew up in California in the 80s. And I remember Valley Girls speak very much.

And it's interesting to see what has lasted from that all these years later. You know, for the past little while, I've been studying how we can use ambiguity in our communication strategically, hedging language, if you will. Think of things like politeness, flirtation, negotiation. All of these are situations where indirect speech, indirect language can actually be very helpful to you. We don't want to get in trouble. We don't want to risk our reputation or make a mistake. So we use this ambiguous hedging language. What are your thoughts on ambiguity and how does that play out in this world of algorithms?

rhythms. My first ever linguistics research project that I did as a senior in high school was I was an intern at a court and I was analyzing how lawyers talk to the judges. And they'll often say things like Your Honor, I would submit this brief. As they're submitting the brief, you don't need to say would, right, theoretically, because you're literally submitting the brief. You could say, Your Honor, I'm submitting this brief. But they say would as a hedge. They say because it shows deference, it shows politeness to the judge. And this is how you'll see a lot of people use as sort of, what is an example of a modal auxiliary verb? And you can say, I could, I should do this, I shan't do that. All of that is an example of modifying your speech to make it seem more play. And like is actually

one use of the word like is to hedge. It's showing that you're not asserting yourself too much. On social media, I think it's probably bad to hedge that much because we want to convey authority. That's why the fake microphones actually work. And real microphones. These are real, I'm assuming. But hedging does work depending on different contexts. If you're trying to talk to a judge, maybe it is good to be less abrasive. I see. The hedges that bother me the most are, I think, and kind of. Because they diminish your status and power.

But at some points, in some ways, they can serve a useful function. If I'm the big boss and you're my employee and I genuinely want your input, if I were to say, I kind of think we should do this. What do you think? That lowers my status and the certitude of my assertion so that you're more likely to say something versus we should do this. What do you think? That's a very different sounding phrase. So I find that really interesting. Do you see that play out in your world? Yeah, when we're talking about performativity, one thing you're performing for is there's always an imbued power dynamic in any

conversation you're having. So if we were like seated on stage in front of an audience, the audience is definitely less powerful or something. Or if you're talking to your boss, that's a perfect example. You have less power than your boss and you need to show deference. And there's languages like Japanese that literally encode this. They have many layers of like different particles you attach to show your relationship to this other person. In English, we do the same thing, but we do that through these sort of hedging particles. Interesting. I love learning from you, and I love the ideas of language. I'd like you to reflect across all of your work, the book you've written, all of the social posts you do, your own research that you've done. What are two or three key actionable takeaways that our

listeners can have from that body of work that will help us in our communication and help us in the language that we use? Takeaway number one, each medium is going to uniquely affect how we communicate and you need to be exactly aware of what that medium is doing if you want to communicate effectively. Algorithms are a new inflection point from language. I think as a medium, they value attention more than any previous medium we may have had. It's causing language to occur faster and you need to be tapped into these trends because that's another thing these algorithms are pushing.

So be aware of the medium. The second one is that algorithms are changing the way we speak. It's a reality that even if you're not online, you need to be aware of these new slang words where they're coming from because these are also conduits of culture, like I said earlier. We know, like, in the same way that Light came from Valley Girl English, there's like conduits of popularity, what we perceive as cool or prestigious, and we borrow from that. It's good to be aware of these things so we can communicate more effectively and so that we can be more aware of our own word choice and perhaps the implications of what words we're using.

I want to put an exclamation point after this notion of every channel through which you communicate, we have to be mindful and think through the language that we use to communicate for that channel. A lot of us just create one message and then put it out in lots of different channels, and we might be missing an opportunity to optimize and we might be doing ourselves a disservice because in essence we're not communicating in the way that we should and the algorithm is one big channel we need to be considering. So I'm a grammarian. I think grammar is important. I will defend the Oxford comma. I'm curious what you think about grammar. How does grammar play out? I know in social media people don't use grammar. And in fact, when I text younger people and I put punctuation in,

It actually conveys meaning that I'm not intending it to convey. What are your thoughts about grammar? Grammar is a set of rules or expectations about how language should be used. This differs on context, and this is where I might push back on you. I agree grammar exists. And I agree that when I'm writing my book, I should use the standard grammatical conventions of English. I am an Oxford comma enjoyer in that context. If I'm texting my friend or my roommate or something like that, it doesn't matter.

In fact, it would be weird if I used a period when I texted my friend. because here's the thing about texts and how boomers tend to, no offense, hey, they tend to use more periods in their text than younger people. The act of sending a text itself is already a signal that this sentence is completed. So going out of your way to include an extra period is actually saying something extra. You have your sentence and then you have this period at the end of it that you didn't need to send because the message as a whole already communicated that this message ended. So now we as younger people are asking yourselves, why did this person add a period? And we think that's passive aggressive. And so there's this idea of a passive-aggressive period.

You have convinced me not to put a period while not a boomer. I do appreciate that. I appreciate that the grammar syntax is important and it varies by channel. If anything, that's what I mean when I say that every medium really affects the message. It's good to be aware of standard grammar for sure because there's a lot of context in which that is the way you professionally communicate with other people. But it's also good to be aware of the informal grammars. And being aware of all these grammars at once allows us to communicate better across different media.

Yeah, but it puts the onus on us to actually take the time to think about that and learn that. Absolutely. We'll be right back to finish our conversation. But first, a quick word from one of our sponsors. Their support allows us to bring you this show free of charge. If you've ever felt like you're trying to do everything yourself, especially when the stakes are high, you're not alone. One of the biggest shifts I see in effective leaders growing their organizations comes from focusing on the right things. But that's hard to do when you're stretched thin. You need to be able to delegate some tasks to competent professionals. That's where Upwork can really help. Upwork is a one-stop platform to find, hire, and pay expert freelancers

across areas like marketing, development, data and analytics, and more. It gives you fast access to specialized talent so you can move quickly, fill key gaps, and scale your work without taking on full-time overhead. You can browse profiles, review past work, and get support scoping your project so you can hire with confidence. It's a simple way to focus your time where it matters most. Visit upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That's upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow.

That's UPWRK.com. Upwork.com. And now back to our conversation. So, Adam, before we end, I like to ask three questions of everyone. One I create just for you and the other two I've been asking across all the episodes. Are you ready for that? Let's do it. So I would like, as a very bright, young,

linguist for you to give a commentary on the name of this podcast because it is grammatically incorrect. Think fast, talk smart. It should not be grammatically worded that way. Is this a good thing? Is this a bad thing? What do you think? It's funny because, again, grammar is subjective here. We've had an increasing informal dropping of L-Y suffixes, the turning of adverbs into adjectives and vice versa. We've had this mixture. And it's not grammatical. incorrectly incorrect if you're trying to connote this hustle vibe or like, let's get going. Yeah, I think the name of the podcast works for the feel you're trying to create. If you think smarter, you know, smartly or whatever, yeah. It doesn't have the same vibe and different ways of speaking

have different vibes. So I think you're totally fine. And it's grammatically correct for what you're trying to do. Excellent. The high school English teacher that I had who is upset about the way we named the podcast, I'm going to send this clip to him so he can understand it. But again, I think your answer shows that the language we use, the words we use convey more than just meaning. They convey a feeling, a sense, a vibe, as you said. Question number two, who is a communicator that you admire and why? I interview a lot of different educational creators in the book. And I think these people are in a unique position because you have this desire to communicate something and let people know more about this topic. But at the same time, we're heavily constructed.

by this medium. You've always needed attention to educate people. A teacher still needs to get her students' attention because that's how you like hold the floor, right? Otherwise, the students will be distracted. However, educational content creators are faced with that unique sort of need to create edutainment. And I'm very impressed with especially the early people who's had to figure out this space, the Green Brothers v. Sauce. I think they've done incredible work in that regard. This ability to get attention and sustain attention, I define engagement as sustained attention is To me, engagement is a dirty word just because it's like algorithmic, social media kind of a word, but you're absolutely right. Long before these algorithms existed, I've been teaching this notion of engagement. And I'm happy to use a synonym, but there's a need to not only get attention, but to keep that attention. And whatever we call that is important.

Final question for you. What are the first three ingredients that go into a successful communication recipe? I'm a little biased by everything I've just said. The first ingredient is just being aware, knowing what the rules are for each social setting, knowing what the, background is of the words you're using. Being aware is just step one, always for me. Step two is know the exact setting that you're in. Now you know how these words are used across settings. Now you know what setting you're in and then communicate conscientiously based on that. Step three, continue observing, become more aware. It's just a cycle. We're performing our own awareness into existence as well. So really it boils down to being open and aware to seeing what's going on and then make conscious choices to the language you use.

And then you can sort of reflexively respond to what's going on. Continuously, I think, re-evaluating our state in the world because here's the thing about language. It's always changing. The mediums are also always changing. And unless we can become complacent. It's so easy to become complacent. You're like, oh, I figured out how language works. This works great.

And then we have a new medium. We have algorithms now. We have new words emerging. And you're no longer aware. And now you're out of date. You're using periods and your text messages. I told you I'm going to stop doing that. This idea of awareness allows you to be agile.

and it allows you to adjust and adapt, and I appreciate that. Adam, this has been fantastic. I knew it was going to be a really interesting journey. You helped us understand that it is important to think about our audience. The algorithm is one of those audiences. This notion that language is a conduit for culture and meaning is very critical. I appreciate your time, and best of luck on your book, I'll go speak. Thank you.

It's so fun talking to you. Thank you for listening to another episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast. To learn more about language and words, tune in to episode 91 with Valerie Friedland. This episode was produced by Catherine Reed, Brian Campos, and me, Matt Ibrahims. Our music is from Floyd Wonder, with thanks to Podium Podcast Company.

Please find us on YouTube and wherever you get your podcasts. Be sure to subscribe and rate us. Also, follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram. And check out Faster Smarter.io for deep dive videos, English language learning content and our newsletters. Please consider our premium offering for extended deep think episodes, Ask Matt Anythings, and much more at FasterSmarter.io slash premium. Before we wrap up, I just want to say thank you for listening.

It really means a lot to hear how people all over the world are using these ideas in their own lives. It inspires me and the whole team that brings you this show. If you want more episodes and resources, feel free to follow, subscribe, and explore, conversations. We're grateful for your support of Think Fast Talk Smart.