This Week in Startups - Jason predicts a “major M&A moment” in the next six months! | E2213
Episode Date: November 22, 2025Register here to join Founder University Japan’s kickoff: https://luma.com/cm0x90mkToday’s show:Google and Meta had their cases dismissed (or received a slap on the wrist)… Despite all the back...lash and cynicism, AI companies continue making bank and releasing hot new products… What does it all mean?For Jason Calacanis, the signs are pointing to a “major M&A moment,” with huge opportunities for increased efficiency and consolidation among America’s favorite brands and largest companies?Who will it be? Join Jason and Alex for a round of hot speculation.PLUS why Jason thinks Michael Burry is both right and wrong about GPU depreciation, why NOTHING is certain about these OpenAI mega-deals, Google’s Nano Banana Pro can make infographics and they’re VERY impressive… and much more.Timestamps:(1:54) Jason’s calling in from Vegas… He’s doing a hot lap at F1!(3:18) How restaurants are becoming the new Hot IP(6:50) Founder University is heading to TOKYO!(9:27) Why Jason thinks the future of startups is truly global(10:06) Pipedrive - Bring your entire sales process into one elegant space. Get started with a 30 day free trial at pipedrive.com/twist(11:39) Nvidia killed it on the numbers… but what are the vibes around AI? Jason sounds off.(13:05) Why nothing is certain when it comes to the Nvidia/OpenAI deal(19:40) Is Google now WINNING consumer adoption of AI? How did it get this close?(19:57) Crusoe Cloud: Crusoe is the AI factory company. Reliable infrastructure and expert support. Visit https://crusoe.ai/build to reserve your capacity for the latest GPUs today.(26:07) Meanwhile, AI apps are still dominating the iOS Store(27:09) Why Jason and Alex think Michael Burry’s both right and wrong about GPU depreciation(30:13) Northwest Registered Agent - Form your entire business identity in just 10 clicks and 10 minutes. Get more privacy, more options, and more done—visit https://www.northwestregisteredagent.com/twist today!(37:46) We’re testing out Nano Banana Pro on a BBQ infographic challenge(43:42) What a week for AI models! It doesn’t seem like things are slowing down…(46:12) Kalshi is growing fast, but can it catch Polymarket?(47:50) Is a rate cut coming? Jason and Alex read the tea leaves.(50:13) Why Jason predicts a “major M&A moment” in the next six months(52:09) VIEWER QUESTION: What should a software engineer be working on RIGHT NOW.(54:02) Founder Friday is now… STARTUP SUPPER CLUBSubscribe to the TWiST500 newsletter: https://ticker.thisweekinstartups.comCheck out the TWIST500: https://www.twist500.comSubscribe to This Week in Startups on Apple: https://rb.gy/v19fcpFollow Lon:X: https://x.com/lonsFollow Alex:X: https://x.com/alexLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexwilhelmFollow Jason:X: https://twitter.com/JasonLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanisThank you to our partners:(10:06) Pipedrive - Bring your entire sales process into one elegant space. Get started with a 30 day free trial at pipedrive.com/twist(19:57) Crusoe Cloud: Crusoe is the AI factory company. Reliable infrastructure and expert support. Visit https://crusoe.ai/build to reserve your capacity for the latest GPUs today.(30:13) Northwest Registered Agent - Form your entire business identity in just 10 clicks and 10 minutes. Get more privacy, more options, and more done—visit https://www.northwestregisteredagent.com/twist today!Great TWIST interviews: Will Guidara, Eoghan McCabe, Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Bob Moesta, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarlandCheck out Jason’s suite of newsletters: https://substack.com/@calacanisFollow TWiST:Twitter: https://twitter.com/TWiStartupsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thisweekinInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisweekinstartupsTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisweekinstartupsSubstack: https://twistartups.substack.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
If that's happening every two to three years, that means theoretically that you might buy more of them.
But that does not mean that you're throwing the old ones away. That's ludicrous.
That would be like saying I had a Corvette C7 and the C8, eighth generation came out.
So I took the C7 and I parked it in the garage and yeah, they just took the air out of the tires and the battery and I put it on a cinder box and that's it's over.
That car can't be used ever. It's got 30,000 miles on it.
That car is going to be driven for another 10 years.
is what are we talking about here? It's not that egregious to think that Oracle believed in 2020
that they would get five years of life out of one of this depreciating assets. Then, you know,
the next three years, they said, yeah, it's still five. And then in 2024, they said, you know what,
we think it's six. And the Microsoft one is more dramatic. It goes from three years of useful life to six.
So they doubled. But everybody's winding up at five and a half six, six, six, six. And the year before
it was four and a half six six six. So Amazon brought it down a year. These are all kind of within
30% right?
This week in startups is brought to you by Northwest Registered Agent.
Starting your business should be simple.
With Northwest Registered Agent, you can form your entire business identity in just 10 clicks and 10 minutes.
From LLCs to trademarks, domains to custom websites, they have got you covered.
Get more privacy, more options, and more done.
Visit Northwest Registeragent.com slash twist today.
Crusoe Cloud.
Crusoe is the AI Factory Company.
reliable infrastructure and expert support.
Visit crusoe.AI slash build to reserve your capacity for the latest GPUs today.
And pipe drive.
Bring clarity and control to your sales process with pipe drive.
The number one CRM for small and medium sized businesses.
Supercharge your sales today.
Start with a 30-day free trial, pipe drive.com slash twist.
All right, everybody, welcome back to this week in startups.
I'm your host, Jason Gallaghanis here with me, Alex Wilhelm, again.
and I am in Vegas, if you're watching the video on YouTube or Spotify.
I'm in my suite at the Venetian.
Thanks to my friends at the Venetian for their hospitality.
I'm here for F1 with the All In podcast doing, I'm going to do a hot lap.
And then they did all these really nice things for me.
Look, they built this like little chocolate thing for me.
Oh, there goes all the chocolates.
You can eat this whole thing.
I can eat the track, I guess, and all the little chocolates on top of it.
Is that a roulette wheel made of,
candy? Yeah, basically. It's a roulette.
But it's also like a track. They redid
the Venetia and they redid the poker room
and they've got like a live poker room where you can do
live shows. So we did a live show where
we played a little poker with Jason Koon,
Alan Keating, if you know that maniac
and Phil Helmuth. So we're having a blast.
Sounds good, man. Vanishes are gorgeous. They reeded the poker room there.
You would like it. The poker room has like a nice spread
of 1, 2, 3, 5. You can get in all kinds of different games, good
crowd. And very classy. You know, they got a nice espresso
machine. They classed it up. You know,
most of these poker rooms,
we leave a little bit to be desired.
My local poker room,
it looks like the back office
with like a 1970s accounting firm.
There's no,
no curb appeal whatsoever.
I really want to go back to Vegas
and play cards,
but I haven't gone to Vegas
since I quit drinking,
to be honest.
Just have it made it back sense, so.
Good for the games.
Yeah, I mean, you got kids, too.
I mean, it's nice to see a show.
You know what the most amazing thing is?
The restaurant scene in Vegas is absolutely absurd.
It's the best in the world now
because what they do is they're in a competition.
People book their hotels
based on the restaurant.
So last night we ate at a restaurant C-O-T-E.
It's a Korean Michelin-Stard restaurant from New York.
They built an outpost here.
Amazing.
Like six-course tasting menu, unbelievable.
There's a famous Peking Duck Place.
I love to go when I'm in Hong Kong,
but I don't travel to Hong Kong like I used to
because I've been a little bit critical of the government over there.
And I don't need to, and I can't do business there anymore.
It's kind of a bummer, actually.
I kind of liked it when we were partners.
Maybe that'll happen again in our lifetime.
Mott 32.
Turns out Moth 32, just opened in Dubai, and they opened one here at the Venetian.
So now they're collecting the best restaurants.
I had dinner at Carbone when I got here on Wednesday.
That's over at the ARIA.
So they're in this competition to see who can get the top restaurants around the world
to open their outpost here.
And then they have now, like, they'll put more effort into the restaurant here, like the
quality of the meats, the quality of the produce.
It really just goes to show you the value of IP.
These restaurants are...
you know, kind of IP machines.
So they opened the second carbone here.
And then when I was in Riyadh, the hotel I was staying in, which was a very nice hotel,
had a carbone in it.
And I was like, what?
And then I found out the PIF, the sovereign wealth fund from Saudi Arabia had somebody told me,
oh, yeah, they invested in the restaurant group that does carbon, the very elite New York institution.
So then, literally, I ate at carbon in Riyadh, carbon in Vegas in the same 30 days.
You start to think about like, which one was better. Come on. Do it do a side by side.
Honestly, if you took the experience from each, they're sourcing everything from the same place.
So the parmesan cheese, the salami, the pasta, the rigatoni, their spicy rigatoni is like a very famous dish.
It was exactly the same. If you were to, you know, swap it out, it would be the same. So it's kind of like just a really interesting lesson for entrepreneurs.
There are many different markets where you can bring your product.
So if carbon can exist in all these different markets, then they opened up at the Bellagio, a carbone on the water there.
And they changed the menu a little bit.
So now there's two carbons in Vegas in two different properties.
Both, I think, are owned by the MGM group.
And so I was stalking with the CEO of the Venetian, a really nice guy, a fan of the pods.
And he was explaining how now people sometimes come for a show.
Sometimes I like the games.
but most frequently, people are talking about coming for the food.
They're perfecting specific dishes.
So when I was talking about Japan on the show last week, they will do like one dish really well
at most restaurants, and that's what they do.
It's a sober place or it's a, you know, sushi place, but it's not like a sushi place
where you can get sober, you know, it's a temporal place, you know, but you can't get sushi
vice versa as opposed to an America or experience.
All of this is to say, if you can perfect something in one market, the markets are
are now becoming very similar.
We have a global culture now that has emerged.
So the people in Saudi, Dubai, Tokyo, Vegas, New York, Europe,
they're all kind of becoming connoisseurs of great products.
And if you can make a great product, it can make it to those different cities,
whether it's Uber, Airbnb, or Carbon, or Mot 32.
Speaking of global expansion, part of why I'm bringing this up is we had something
work inside of our organization, Founder University. It really clicked with people. And so we're going to
be launching Founder University in Tokyo. Started in America, we've done 11 cohorts. Then we brought it to
Riyadh, and I was just talking about that. And last week, I announced that we are going to have
it start in Tokyo in January. So we have the details for you. Applications are now open for the
2026 cohort. Startups are going to get to be part of basically a three-part experience. Let me just say in plain English.
and this will help them expand their reach.
We're going to have a boot camp in Tokyo, January 12th to 16.
Then the program will move to online from January 19th to March 6th.
Finally, you're going to come to the U.S. for a week, March 9th to the 20th.
So we've designed this so you get to have the Tokyo experience.
You get to hunker down, get work done, and then you get to come to Silicon Valley and meet investors
and meet founders there.
We're also looking for mentors, some of my friends, if you're an angel investor, and you
want to work with the 35 companies, you can join us there. To apply, it's very simple,
launch.com.co slash Tokyo. There are a couple of unique things about the program. The program is
for companies that are in Japan, Japanese founders, or focused on the Japanese market,
as well as the U.S. market. So go ahead and go to launch.com slash Tokyo. I'll see you in Tokyo.
I'll be there for the launch. Just for folks out there who are listening and heard us
talk about the Riyadh program last week, Jason. You said that in Riyadh, it was mostly for Saudi
founders, but you could also join if you weren't Saudi. They were focused on Saudi nationals
because they're trying to build an ecosystem there. But if you're willing to spend time in
Saudi, great, come similar for our friends at Jetro in Tokyo. If you're going to spend some time there
or address the market or you're a Japanese national, you'll have a preference there coming in.
And you can see the picture there. I had the incredible hospitality. If you look on the website,
I just gave like an opening keynote where I explained what the program would be.
And they had 200 people show up for this thing, 150, 200 people.
And they had like 100 or 200 people on the wait list trying to get in.
But there is a big founder community there.
And there is a very large group of Americans who are based there now.
So I met with, I won't say which ones, but there's a half dozen Americans who I had lunch
with who are active investors from America, spending either half time full
time or majority time in Japan and still investing in the U.S. So we're really seeing this globalization
where you can be in any market, you can address any market. And there's investors in every market.
And I think the future of startups is really going to be, you know, folks starting in whatever
market they want to go after first, but then going global. Just like carbon can exist in different
places. They can build an incredible product. That product might need to be adapted. For example,
In Saudi, they had mocktails, you know, and like some very flavored, really nice mocktails without
alcohol in them. And because alcohol is not approved in all regions in the Middle East yet,
but it's starting to be. And so you can't have an effective sales team without an organized sales
process. Trust me on this. I've seen thousands of startups up close and personal and man,
a messy, chaotic sales process that is a major red flag. This show, this week in startups,
is about helping founders. I want to do.
to tell you about the tool I use. Pipdrive. Pipe drive brings together your entire sales process
in one clear, easy to understand and centralized space, giving you one place to check on all your
customers and the deal information and to keep you and your team moving faster and working together
as a single team. Teams using Pipe Drive close an average of three times more deals every
month. You could average three times more deals every month by joining over 100,000 companies that
use PipeDrive. And when you use our link, you'll get that 30-day free trial. No credit card or payment
needed. Go to pipe drive.com slash twist to get started. That's PipeDrive.com slash twist. I have been
using this product for close to a decade. I don't have time to babysit the sales team. I need them to
have the right tools. And that's why I use Pipe Drive. You have to adapt for the local culture.
I'm sure if Carbone was in Japan, they might have some nuance there. Maybe you have to take your shoes off
when you go in, like you do in, you know, some homes or restaurants, depending on how you sit.
So they have it, folks. And I will be there. I'm going to be in Japan again for, I'll be doing the show
for two weeks from Tokyo in January. Which is going to be a lot of fun because I think that's
also what I'm going to be on paternity duties. So we're going to, we're going to have some fun
scheduling times. Easy peasy. Easy peasy. All right. What's in the news? Let's get some news done here.
After we finished the show on Wednesday, Jason, Invidia dropped its earnings. I think we should
spend just a minute explaining to folks what happens so they understand the lay of the land.
just in case people didn't read the news,
Nvidia beat on revenue.
It beat on earnings per share, and it beat on guidance.
And then it shares Rose and then it shares fell.
Jensen actually made a comment about this in an internal meeting
that Business Insider got a recording of.
And he said, quote, if we delivered a bad quarter,
it's evidence that there is an AI bubble.
If we delivered a great quarter, we are fueling the AI bubble.
So a little bit of damned if you do, damned if you don't from Nvidia.
But overall, a very impressive print.
I'm curious what the vibes are amongst the group.
regarding the current AI bubble discourse, Jason, now that we have Nvidia's numbers in hand.
I mean, the number one thing people are talking about is obviously AI build out going spectacularly.
Obviously, Nvidia can't keep their chips on the shelf.
Obviously, the market got a bit overheated.
So people throwing money into late stage startups or public companies without really understanding the details is people's concern.
There was an interesting tweet from,
Gavin Baker that I retweeted. Essentially, the gist of it is,
NVIDIA came out, I believe in this quarterly earnings, and they addressed the open AI
investment. And they addressed also, I guess, their potential investment in Anthropic.
So what the themes are now showing is, and what people are starting to discuss,
you know, walking from casino to casino between playing games or, you know, in the group
chats is which of these deals are actually guaranteed. And I asked you that question, hey,
I don't know if you remember on a previous show. I was like, is that guaranteed? Can you look it up?
And it's like, we can't find anything. Okay, as you speculated correctly, we'll find out in
coming quarters when they announced because they're going to need to disclose this.
This is from Gavin Baker. It's a bit long. I'm going to read it verbatim, everybody. Just bear with
me. We expect to continue investing in strategic partnerships in the third quarter of- This is Jensen.
This is Jensen speaking. Yeah. In the third quarter of fiscal year, we, we
entered into a letter of intent with an opportunity to invest in Open AI.
In November 2025, we entered into an agreement subject to certain closing conditions
to invest up to $10 billion in Anthropic.
There is no assurance that we will enter into definitive agreements with respect to
the Open AI opportunity or other potential investments or that any investment will be
completed on expected terms, if at all.
The timing and magnitude of these and other investments we may make will depend on various
factors, including the ability of our partners to successfully develop and deploy
AI infrastructure. There can be no certainty as to the timing or amount of capital. We may
ultimately invest in these or others strategic partnerships. And we may be limited by our available
liquidity and capital resources. In other words, Jason, this is all handshakes and good vibes,
nothing locked down. And they can all kind of walk away if they want. Yeah. Essentially,
you know, the opportunity is doing a lot of work in that sentence. And May, I think,
doing a lot of work in those sentences. Lots. They obviously have an agreement. It's probably more
or then a handshake. It's probably written in fairness to them. It's probably a memorandum of understanding
or, you know, a letter of intent. We call it a letter of nothing in the startup community.
So when people are like, oh my God, we've got a letter of intent. We're like, you've got a letter of nothing.
People will do these as favors for each other. Now, when big companies do them, okay, well, there's a little more at stake.
So if you're a cloud provider and you write, we're going to get tens of billions of dollars in
build out, those are the ones that I really want to see.
So this is the one where Nvidia is sending money to Open AI and Anthropic as an investment.
Obviously, those two companies are buying compute, whether they're buying it themselves or buying
it through a cloud provider.
You know, doesn't matter.
They're going to be buying compute.
So that's where the round-tripping concern comes in.
is this around tripping. So there's one interpretation of this. Okay, they're making sure people
understand that these two things might not be tied together. In other words, we're agreeing to
invest, you're agreeing to buy. Now they're kind of backtracking it, right? This sounds very different
than the initial announcements. Now, part of that could be that the press ran with these,
which is why I hear on the show, I'm always like, can I get the details on this? Where are the
details? Because the press does run with things sometimes. And the companies might run with
sometimes, social media might roam with things sometimes, and we're like, oh, my God, look at all this
money. It's all optional. So this chart of all of this round-tripping, et cetera, we now need to
redo that chart. And we need to know if it's a dotted line, which means it can be broken,
or if it's a solid line, which means it has to occur, right? It's an actual commitment.
And just you're referring to this famous chart right here, I presume, right? Yeah. And so at the
center of this is Nvidia at a $4.5 trillion valuation. And what you see is Oracle, Intel,
core weave, Microsoft, OpenAI, AMD, XAI, Figure, Mistrol, we had on the program recently.
So they're all sort of explaining where the money goes, and investment services. So the red lines on
here are hardware or software. I guess the blue is investment, et cetera. It's complicated,
but now if we have dotted lines, we'd actually know. So I think it's,
some ways, this is a good way to let a little air out of the bubble and remove the concerns around
round-tripping. That's my two interpretations here. I also think Jensen's a little pissed off at Sam
Alman. Okay. Tell me what. I think, you know, if you're going to offer to invest all this money
and then the next week, you know, he's buying chips from AMD and, you know, dropping these other
announcements, I think he maybe thought maybe he was part of a tighter, more narrow relationship
set. And I think Sam just did, how many deals did Sam announce over from the summer till now?
574 deals. No, no, but it was literally, I think, closer to 10 than 5, right? I mean,
we should actually do a little research on him because it seemed like he was announcing one or two a week,
right? Investment, the secondary sale, AMD, Nvidia. I mean,
It was pretty Amasa's investment.
Oh, yeah.
It was notable.
It was absolutely notable.
But the thing is, we've talked about how people at OpenAI,
when Sam was ejected for a couple of days,
had struggles with him, working with him,
and there were discussions of elements of truthfulness.
Then we have OpenAI and Microsoft.
That relationship eventually kind of breaks.
Now we're seeing OpenAI and Nvidia cracks there.
You know, Jason, if everyone you date is a jerk,
yeah, might be you.
I mean, I think he,
He makes, he's a consummate dealmaker. I mean, I've known him for, gosh, close to 20 years, I guess.
He's always been like an operator, a networker, a dealmaker, really knows how to get into the room
where it happens, understands how power works, understands how to take power. That's how he wound
up on the top of the pile of a crazy scrum that is known as Open AI. And it's working out.
I do think when we look at this, the company that's going to have the most market share decline,
because they were first up the hill is going to be open AI.
So their percentage of AI jobs from APIs and their lock on the consumer is going to go from
essentially 100% of consumers, right?
They had the first chat product.
It's going to go down to less than 50%.
And I don't know what their percentage is now of consumer searches.
And I don't know if we're tracking them in a robust or refined way because some of the companies
are private, Mishro-anthropic X-AI and a long tail of different LLMs.
And I don't know if Google's taking the time to break out Gemini searches or the AI results
that you can click over to and how many people are defaulting to AI versus search.
They said in their Gemini 3 announcement to Jason that there's over 2 billion users
now of the AI overviews in search.
And they said that their Gemini mobile app now has 650 million monthly active users.
Hold on a second.
Wait a second.
So they have 2 billion people using AI search.
Launching a new company is all about finding your first customers and then just learning how to solve their problems.
And that is going to put you on a relentless pace.
And that means you're going to be releasing new products and features, hopefully at a brisk pace or better.
But my lord, the complexities of working with AI, it's going to slow your developers down.
You're going to have to install new GPU drivers.
They're going to be provisioning clusters, all of this detail-oriented, labor-intensive work.
can distract you from working on the thing that you're building your product. But now there's
Crusoe. They are the AI factory that worries about your backend so you can focus on your code.
And their hardware has been designed specifically for AI developments, so they're going to make
sure that your models run with unparalleled performance every time. Head to crusoe.com.
To apply and receive $100,000 in credits for virtualized Nvidia, GB, 200, NVL,
7-2 on Crusoe Cloud pending availability, okay?
That's C-R-U-S-O-E-D-I-S-BIL to apply and get those $100,000 in credits.
And OpenAI was at 850, I think, the last time, or 800 monthly active users.
That means Google has two and a half times the number of people using AI on a consumer basis.
How come nobody's talking about that?
This is incredible information.
Yeah, I'm just double-checking.
So AI overviews now have two billion users every month, the Jim and I,
app surpasses 650 million users per month and more than 70% of our cloud customers use our AI.
That's from the Gemini 3 announce.
But I think people aren't counting them as M&A user D is in the same way, just because you can use
them by accident.
I can do a search in Google like, give me one of these.
But I don't know if that's as strong and intent signal as actually loading chat gpt.com, for
example.
If we're going to use, did you go to, did you start at an AI portal?
Fair enough.
650 million users of the Gemini app.
Is that correct?
Unless Google's lying to us.
That's what they said.
I'm just confirming with you how they phrasing it.
The Gemini app surpasses 650 million users per month.
And what is the latest from chat GPT on their number of users per month?
800 million per week.
Okay, so we give them 900 million a month, give them 10% more.
So that means the Gemini app is already two thirds of chat GPT.
This blows my mind.
How many of the 2 billion clicked on the AI result?
10%, 20%, 30%, 30%.
30% as opposed to just serving it up.
Let's say 30%.
Let's be generous.
Okay, so 600 million.
600 plus 650s, 1.2.
And you do 10% overlap, 20% overlap.
You're out of a billion.
Google's ahead.
I mean, this is like major news that nobody's reporting on here.
Nobody's just taking out a calculator and done this.
Let me just state this clearly.
If this information is correct, Gemini now has 20% more users every month than chat GPT.
Gemini is beating chat GPT in consumer adoption of AI.
Just flat out.
I would say the Google AI family of products is beating the open AI family of products
at reaching the most number of consumers.
Just to be a little bit simplified.
So Google's winning consumer AI.
That's an interesting question.
I don't know if I would go quite that far.
Winning implies to me a revenue and usage calculation.
And I don't think we know enough about Gemini's monetization.
But it just in terms of consumer adoption.
adoption, they're winning. If we use the term consumer adoption, I think you concede consumer adoption.
I mean, Google doesn't need to make money from this. This actually dovetails neatly with another
story, Jason. Before Jim and I three came out, I think Open AI had a little bit of inkling about
what was coming. And so the information got a memo that Sam Althman sent out around Open
AI. And he said that basically Google's progress could create some temporary economic headwinds
for our company. And then he said that we know we have some work to do, but we're catching up
fast, I expect the vibes out there to be rough for a bit. So I think that we are kind of in
the Open AI Nadir, like they're getting beat up on infrastructure costs. Their rivals are
launching impressive models. They're losing some of their consumer edge. They're not winning
the API game, Viz Anthropic. And so I think they're struggling a bit. They're doing great
as a business. They're going to reach 20 billion annualized revenue by the end of the year, Sam says,
but certainly the Open AI of January 1st, 2025 is not going to be the Open AI of December
the first, 2025. And I think the, if I were to steal man this, the defense that the open AI team and
investors would say is the AI results from Gemini are being forced upon these consumers, right?
Because they do have it in Google Docs now. So I wonder if they're counting those as Gemini
searches. When you do something in Google Docs, did they just say any Google Doc searches that were
done through the AI button are part of the overall Gemini?
and I, it would seem fair to do that.
Would seem fair?
But this would go back to the Teams versus Slack.
If you remember, when Microsoft Teams came out, they turned it on for everybody who uses Office
365, whether you wanted it or not, it was bundled.
Therefore, if you were to click on it in the interface, and I don't use Office 365,
I'm on Google Docs, I'm going to use Slack.
But my understanding was it's just all automatically in your interface and you're going to
wind up clicking on it at some point.
Therefore, their active user count compared to slacks and there's like this dramatic chart of how boom, they just got everybody.
But this was always my thought was, what has the guts to put AI first in their product with an established product is going to win the day?
Meta has some number of people on Instagram doing AI first searches.
When you do a search on Instagram, you cannot do a normal search anymore.
It is by default an AI search, right?
Instagram is the worst app in the world.
I just want to say that I use the desktop interface on this and meta, it's just garbage.
Like, try again.
Two things, Jason.
First of all, here's one of the charts you're mentioning with Slack versus Microsoft Teams.
This only goes to 2012, but it shows the hockey stick-like growth of Microsoft Teams DA is compared
to Slack, which was a major narrative up until Slack's eventual exit.
And then the other thing, just based on what we're talking about, about consumer usage,
this is a top apps for iPhone ranking for the US.
And if you look at the top of this, you'll note that it's chat GPT,
and Google Gemini.
Yeah.
It's kind of impressive
how popular they are.
But if you look,
GROX number six,
like in SOAR's number nine.
Like these AI products are incredibly impressive.
And as you point out,
repeatedly on the show,
this is new downloads.
This is not a usage chart.
This is folks still downloading it.
The App Store rankings are based,
I think,
in a blended algorithm
that benefits the new
so that it doesn't become
self-perpetuating top list
because people will go to the top-10 list.
or top 100 list to listen to music.
And then those artists stay in the top 10.
So new entrants do get a little bit of, I think, a push.
Same thing happens in podcasting.
Somebody comes up with a new podcast.
They always tweet and they're like,
oh my God, we're the number one podcast in the world.
And it's like, okay, you're the number one new podcast this month.
Therefore, Apple gives you a little shine.
They do the same thing in their podcast rankings.
Before we move on from this entire hardware conversation,
there's a detail that I wanted to just bring out of the earnings call, Jason.
We've talked on the show about GPU depreciation.
How long will this hardware last?
Is it just going to be a couple of years?
During its earnings rundown, the CFO said most accelerators with Cuda, which is their software suite,
and NVIDIA's time-tested and versatile app architecture become obsolete within a few years.
Thanks to Cuda, the A-100 GPUs be shipped six years ago are still running at full utilization today,
powered by a vast improved software stack.
Six years ago, Nvidia is using their same hardware.
Yes, the A-100 GPUs.
So Michael Burry, you may have seen, and you can pull up some of the software.
Michael Burry's tweets. Michael Burry likes to delete his tweets. I don't know if he's deleted them,
but if you follow the Michael Burry account, famous from the Big Short, he is accusing the
big tech companies from committing fraud literally thinks that this is fraud and that they're
cooking the books because they're taking the depreciation schedule for servers from three, four,
five, five, six, seven. Now, we had a very granular discussion about this on All-In and Freeburg
went like deep into the generally accepted accounting practices. You have a new piece of hardware here,
is my take on it. How long do you get to spread out the lifetime value of them? So when you buy
a building for your office space or you buy an airplane as an airline, instead of just taking a
charge for a $100 million airplane in year one, you say, this has a 20 year life. We're going to take
the hundred million. And theoretically,
five million per year. It might be more in the early years and it may taper off a little bit,
but essentially there's some lifetime. What people are finding is with these Nvidia chips,
some people thought, well, we're just going to rip them out because Nvidia is doubling the power
of them every 18 months or 24 months or maybe even better. So therefore, they're going to be
ripped out and new ones are going to be put in and they're just going to be turned off in year four,
year five. And nobody's going to want them. Well, it turns out like there might be jobs that
these are perfectly suited for, and they might last in year five, six, and seven.
So then the question becomes, when are these consuming so much power?
Yep.
Because it's also power.
And there's like the facilities that they're housed in.
So you have power, water, staffing, cooling, all that stuff is involved in the maintenance
of them.
So let's say you get to year seven.
And the maintenance cost is higher than the appreciation of a new one in the first year.
And the cost of swapping them out isn't that.
expensive. So therefore, you get to some reasonable moment at time where you would just turn these up.
Now, what they're finding is, well, maybe those SORA jobs where people are making goofy five-second
videos and eventually becomes five-minute videos, maybe these old ones will be just sitting there
ripping those for people or making new advertisements for people or indexing their I photo
or their Google photos in the background so that when they open up their photo app, you know,
the AI is already done for it. Being a founder is a lot of work. You have to focus on your
Then you got to hire the perfect team.
Gosh, product market fit, finding your first customers.
But all of this means nothing if you're not actually a real business that's structured properly,
giving your investors and clients the confidence to partner with you at launch.
We're constantly recommending Northwest registered agent to our founders because for just $39
plus state fees, they will act as your registered agent.
That means they take care of all the paperwork, making sure your business remains compliant,
protecting your privacy and more.
And as a founder, hey man, there are so many organizational odds and ends that you have to worry about.
So why not have a partner who can focus on all those little details?
Then you can obsess about your customers.
And Northwest Registered Agent is even going to help you set up a phone line,
a professional email account, and find you a great domain name.
So here's your call to action.
Go to Northwest Registeredagent.com slash twist to get your company set up the right way.
Michael Burry is correctly saying, hey, if you double the lifespan of these and these are your major expense and you're doing this massive buildout, well, then you, it might be the equivalent of 10% of your earnings, 20% of your earnings. And he's kind of insinuating. And I don't know if he's explicitly used the word fraud or cooking the books. But let's see what he says here because that's kind of what people are interpreting this as is that there is shenanigans. I'll use the technical term shenanigans. So let's see what he says. So Michael Burry says,
understating depreciation by extending useful life of assets artificially boosts earnings,
one of the more common frauds of the modern era.
Again, this is quoting here.
I'm not saying this.
Massively ramping Kappex through purchase of Nvidia chips and servers on a two to three-year
product cycle should not result in the extension of useful lives of compute equipment.
Yet this is exactly what all the hyperscalers have done.
By my estimates, they will understate depreciation by $176 billion between 2026 and 2008.
by 2028.
Oracle will overstay earnings 26.9% meta by 20.8%, etc.
It gets worse, more coming later on.
Here is the table that he showed, Jason,
and it shows the depreciation schedules for compute,
essentially chips, if you will,
inside major hyperscalers,
meta, Google, Oracle, Microsoft, Amazon,
and you'll note that they've risen over time.
The reason why the six-year point
from the Nvidia earnings call matters so much now
is because most of these companies
Google,
sorry, Alphabet,
Oracle and Microsoft
are all running
six-year
depreciation schedules
on their GPUs.
So it seems
that they might not
be nuts, but I do
think that what Michael
Burry is saying is
that if these do
burn out in one to three
years, then these
numbers they're putting
out are, in fact,
I think he's making a,
he's confusing
something here.
If you look at
the original tweet
in that first sentence,
he's saying the,
I'm sorry,
in the second paragraph,
NVIDIA chip servers
are on a,
two to three year product cycle. So that's the product cycle. Okay, they come out with a new one every two
years, you know, or like new, it might not be a new version because obviously they're versioning these
things up, like a new platform, like the new version. Hopper to Blackwell. Exactly. And so if that's
happening every two to three years, that means theoretically that you might buy more of them. But that
does not mean that you're throwing the old ones away. That's ludicrous. That would be like saying,
a Corvette C7 and the C8, eighth generation came out. So I took the C7 and I parked it in the
garage and yeah, I just took the air out of the tires and the battery and I put it on a cinderbox
and that's it's over. That car can't be used ever. It's got 30,000 miles on it. That car is going to be
driven for another 10 years. What are we talking about here? I think he might be making a story here
that isn't in touch with reality. And then using the term fraud is like, that's a big, big accusation.
It might just be when you pull up that chart one more time, thank you, and you look at that table,
it's not that egregious to think that Oracle believed in 2020 that they would get five years of life
out of one of this depreciating assets. Then, you know, the next three years, they said, yeah,
it's still five. And then in 2024, they said, you know what? We think it's six. Okay. It's 20,
it lasts 20 percent longer. That'd be like saying, oh, yeah, that Corvette I'm talking about. You know what?
We change the oil and we change the filters on it and we maintain the tires and we rotate the tires.
it can get another 20% of life out of it. And meta going from, I don't know why meta was so low at
three or Microsoft was so low at three. And the Microsoft one is more dramatic. It goes from three
years of useful life to six. So they doubled. But everybody's winding up at five and a half six,
six, six, six, six. And the year before it was four and a half six six six. So Amazon brought it down a year.
These are all kind of within 30 percent. Yes, absolutely. We do have the kind of rejoinder from
Michael Burry here, Jason. I'm just going to pull that up for us. He argues in a November 19,
kind of update to his argument that the idea of a useful life for depreciation being longer
because chips from more than three to four years ago are fully booked confuses.
Physical utilization with value creation.
Just because something is used does not mean it is profitable.
Gap refers to economic benefits.
Airlines keep planes around for overflow, sure.
A100 take two to three X more power per flop.
So they cost two to three X more than H100s.
Yeah.
Invidia claims 820% energy efficient the blackbook for inference.
Okay.
So his argument is that, yeah, everyone pointed to this.
to him, but maybe these chips won't be profitable. Here's the thing. The chips will be turned off
when they are no longer gross margin positive. And so far, we have not seen that. And as you pointed
out, Microsoft for four years now has had this six-year depreciation calendar. If it was wrong,
they would already have some early warning signals and we'll be telling investors about that.
So I like that Burry here is poking at things. I just think he's a little bit overly certain
before enough of the facts have come in. But then again, that's how you make money.
Has he talked to the people? I mean, Shumma made this point on All In. Like, has he actually gone and visited the data centers and talked to the people who run the data centers and looked at the jobs they're running? Because if that airplane in his analogy is flying people on Thanksgiving and Thanksgiving and holiday tickets and July 4th tickets, Memorial Day, if those extra planes are incredibly profitable during those peak seasons, but then you just do the math on it. Like, is it worth keeping this one around for the overflow? In these cases,
The overflow jobs, like I was saying, are things that might be running in the background that
need to get done. And then you're going to do whatever the newest jobs are in three years on the
latest generation. Like maybe they're going to be doing synthetic data. Maybe they're going to be
doing self-driving data. Like just more complex things. Doesn't mean people don't want to make
bulldog, you know, superhero videos for their daughter still. And those will get done to those jobs.
And there is the backstop of the power consumption. Because power consumption and the staffing of data
centers and the cooling of data centers and the HVACs and all that, the water consumption.
Because that all exists, that's a backstop against keeping this stuff online unnecessarily,
because those bills keep coming in.
That's not part of the depreciation schedule.
That's just cash off the book.
So there is a real incentive to turn off things that don't work.
Like for the airplane, I guess, would be the maintenance contracts on the engines, etc.
You still have to maintain the engines, et cetera.
Every certain number of hours, the airframe, et cetera.
You have to have a hanger, right?
you have to have somewhere to put it.
So, like, at some point, they might be like, you know what?
We don't use his playing that much and it's costing us more than we make on Thanksgiving.
Anyway, I think he's off on this one.
I do think it's great that he's stress testing it.
All right, moving on.
Really quickly, I want to talk about nano banana pro.
This is actually Gemini 3 Pro image, but we did a little test, Jason.
We're going to get your take on this.
So we gave it a prompt.
This is Oliver and I.
Shout out to our front.
The prompt is create an infographic of the top five barbecue spots in Austin.
and we have one version from...
This is great.
I haven't seen this.
I can give you my...
Yes.
So actually, here is the nanobanana pro image.
I want your take on the information
because I know you know Austin Barbecue
and you're rating on the overall design.
So this is very interesting.
So they were able to make this
without giving it the data and the text that's in the image.
It went and did the research as a language model
and then also did this beautiful image.
Okay.
So let's start.
First of all, it's a good-looking image.
If you were to make this in a magazine, this could in the 90s in early 2000s, if you had a magazine
that was doing a feature, this could be an infographic in the magazine as is.
It might not be one in a Condi Nast magazine, but every other magazine would be totally fine.
Timeout, New York, whatever, would be fine with this as an infographic.
It would have been improved.
So that's mind-blowing.
And it would have taken a week for a designer to make this.
Yes.
So, and that designer would have been a 50, 60.
the $70,000 a year designer for a mid-tier magazine.
Maybe they would have been a 70, 80, 90 if they worked at a condo-in-ass.
Actually, you probably don't get paid that much of condonist.
But putting it aside, this would have cost $2,000 to do internally, internal costs.
So now we go to the data.
Franklin Barbecue, Leroy & Lewis, Interstello La Barbecue, Terry Black's Barbecue.
I'm just looking for spelling errors.
And do you see any spelling errors in this?
I didn't see anything that caught my eye when I went through it before the show,
and I still don't see anything.
I'm just more terrified about the idea of fatty brisket, which is not my jam.
Yeah, I like a little, they call that wet brisket in the business.
But looking at these, Terry Blacks, I always say get the beef rib and the brisket there.
That's my order.
It is cafeteria-style service.
It is consistently excellent.
It is spacious.
And they do have a quick moving line.
It does have family legacy.
That's all true.
For a barbecue, Michelin Star, I don't know.
Female-owned, I don't know.
Locally source means, I actually do know that.
And they are known for their brisket.
I don't know if it's known for their fattie brisket.
glazed pork belly from Interstellar.
I have heard about that, and I'm certain they have the Michelin Star.
I do remember hearing that.
Leroy, smoked beef cheek sounds amazing.
And for Franklin, they are considered the best brisket in Austin.
This is unbelievable, just from the design to the accuracy.
I'll tell you the other thing here that's interesting is that is what Terry Blacks looks like,
the illustration is close to the vibe.
And Interstellar and the barbecue,
I think that is also the vibe.
I think Interstellar is like a strip mall.
Well done.
I mean, apologies to infographic creators and graphic designers everywhere.
If you're a graphic designer,
you need to know how to use these tools
and know how to edit from third base, essentially.
Yeah.
Like you're starting on third base.
It's literally like...
It is not as good when we do the same prompt through open AI.
Just so people know the process.
here. I asked Chad GPT 5.1, my version of it, to give me the same thing. It gave me a written list
and then said, would you like me to design an infographic? I said yes. Jason, this is what it looks
like in comparison. And I made this this morning. So this is absolutely, you know, same in the art
from what we have in chat GPT. It's a mess. So a couple of things that are wrong here. One,
beef briskexit comma ib. Oh my God. Is there a special thing. Yes. And you can just there's
overlaps between the images. It's inconsistent about what's shown. Scratziad.
Go iya y'all if possible.
Mikkelthwaqqqqmeats.
What is that?
Anticonditional sides.
Thwait craft meets.
Anticonditional sides.
It's not reliable, central.
It's relible.
But the point is, this just goes to show how good the new Google model is.
And I think this goes to underscore the earlier points about their growth in consumer, their rising app store rankings.
And the fact that opening the eyes kind of just not winning right now, which feels weird, given
where we were most of the year. If you're going to look at where gains will be compounded,
the person who is first up the hill who has to spend all their time fighting to raise money,
fighting to build out infrastructure, is going to spend, let's just take these three buckets of
founder time. One third spent fundraising. One third spent building infrastructure. One third
building the product, right? Now we move over to Google. Infrastructure is taking care of.
And fundraising is taken care of. It's called profits. So that team over there now has but one thing
to focus on. The output of their image and the output of their language models, which is spectacular.
And so this is super important for founders to understand when they're making a company. If you were
spending your time to my points earlier about outsourcing things, there might be an argument for
having your own servers and saving money in a robust business or maybe you have some competitive
advantage because you don't have to pay overages for your bandwidth and you're a bandwidth-driven
business like YouTube and they would do well to put up their own servers and not have to pay
somebody for the orruges. Putting all that aside, the more you can focus on the thing, the better.
And that's why not having side quests, not having, you know, things you're doing that are not
the core thing is so critical because eventually a competitor does show up. And this is why Zuckerberg
was such a formidable competitor. MySpace was trying to keep their servers up and running.
They were trying to deal with the politics inside of news corrup and the integration.
And Zuckerberg was just like, I'm just going to focus on growth and making the service faster
and growing the product. And that's it. And then he ran them over. So you got to focus on what matters.
Quick recap before we move on to Kalshi on Monday, GROC 4.1. Excellent. Tuesday, Gemini 3. Excellent.
Wednesday, Grock 4.1 fast, well reviewed. GPT 5.1 Pro. Gpt 5.1 Codex Max. Thursday,
Nano Banana Pro. What a week for AI models. There's no training wall. What a time to be alive.
I mean, literally everybody firing on all cylinders. This is why people are looking at the space and there is an America first, America only movement that is gaining steam in America.
The reason is people are starting to believe on the right and on the left. We're getting into this horseshoe theory that my warning,
that job displacement could happen faster than we think it will and that I am concerned about it.
Now, I'm not a dumerist. I'm just saying, hey, I just think it's a little bit faster.
And people inside my circles, a number of people have pulled me aside and say, can you stop saying this?
This is like, you just, people want to be in the room where it happens. I've had multiple people
in the industry. Hey, can we keep the music playing here? Like, please don't not scare the public that
jobs are going away. But I just showed that image. And I just said, like, if,
If you were running a magazine, why would you have a graphic designer on staff when you could
just do that?
That's more than enough to get the point across.
If you had three designers on your team and one of them did illustrations, you would just
get rid of the illustrator.
That's it.
Period.
Full stop.
And so here we are, folks.
Get concerned.
Get curious.
Somewhere in between those is the truth.
I'm curious about why this is happening and I am concerned.
I'm not a dumerist.
I'm not saying ban AI.
To your point that like five things came out in one week and like we're going
into the holiday week? Like, I don't think this is slowing down. And AI is going to make these AI
tools better. Disgratzi odd version that chat chipit made. If you were to use AI and just say,
hey, we made this and Gemini made this, why is our software sucked compared to Gemini? AI is going to
start fixing those problems. That's where the compounding gets really weird. In the, in the
open AI memo that, or a conversation that the information reported, Sam does stress the importance of
working towards super intelligence and eating some losses along the way to get there.
Because I do think that there is a moment in which one company reaches this idea of a
self-improving AI, Jason.
And it might be that the first person there has a long-term advantage over their rivals.
But right now, dear God, it feels like everyone's at the cutting edge and I love it.
Moving on.
Kalshi is going to raise again.
TechRuntary works that Kalshi is raising new capital.
This is stump a billion dollars at an $11 billion dollar valuation.
Keep in mind that Kalshi last raised $300 and a $5 billion value.
in October and raised in a $2 billion valuation in June.
So what the hell is going on?
Well, I went and pulled the data.
So, Jason, from the block, a crypto-focused news and data service, this is their reporting
of Polymarket and Kalshi volume on a monthly basis.
Now, Kalshi is in blue, if you're looking at this on the visual version, Polly Markets in red.
What matters is that after some very modest growth through August of this year,
Kalshi and Polly Market had grown very rapid.
in the last couple of months, Jason. And this to me explains why investors are salivating to get
more capital in because they're seeing incredibly impressive growth from maybe about $2 billion in
volume between the two companies in August up to $7.5 billion in October. Amazing. It's becoming
a integral part of understanding the world. And I think it's fantastic. We now have people doing
research in the world and there's consulting firms and survey firms, people who do polling data,
Then you have journalists over here.
You have experts going direct and talking directly to consumers on podcasts.
And so as a consumer, I've always felt it's your job to take all these disparate news sources,
data sources, and try to figure things out.
And now area where people are placing bets, they're putting skin in the game and trying to make a profit,
well, it really does help people understand where the market's going.
So pull up polymarket and the chances of a rate cut in December.
You know, the stock market, as you were pointing out, in the first story, we didn't get too deeply into it, has had a little mini correction, like 10% or so.
Some stocks, 30%.
Yep.
But if we were to look at the Fed's decision here in December and let's put it at like one week so we can get a little bit of a better picture here, you had the stock market crash on, not crash, but correct a bit on November 20th, right?
Today's the 21st, I believe.
Yep, yesterday was a bloodbath.
The crypto market specifically has gotten really, has really corrected.
So we believed that there was going to be no change.
That was, looks like, almost 80% chance of no change in December yesterday, right?
67, 76, it looks like.
76%.
Yeah.
And I think also this is after the jobs report that was better than expected.
But not ridiculously.
So then here you look at today, now the change.
chance of no change is down to 34%. So if you hover over today, it literally flipped. Now,
why did it flip? Well, there was one of the people who work for the Fed said, you know, some things
that might indicate. Right here. Here we go. Yeah. New York Fed, John Williams, said that we might
actually need a rate cut in December. And people are kind of thinking out loud that the Fed doesn't
communicate on accident, Jason. So if John Williams is saying this, they're probably trying to calm
the market a little bit and make it clear that there's a good chance. We'll get a 25-bips rate cut
in December 10th. Not financial advice. But I think the market's going to rip when we have these
rate cuts. It's going to be super stimulating to the economy. And we already have a ton of money being
invested in America through a lot of these international deals that Bessett and Lutnik negotiated for
Trump in America. That investment's going to be starting to land at the same time that we're continuing
to spend money. Japan's spending money. Everybody's doing stimulus. So this is going to be like,
man, a lot of pent up energy going into spending. I don't know what that does for debt load.
I guess we're kick the can down the road, but I think it could be an absolutely crazy market.
And then if you look at M&A, the fact that the meta deal resulted in a nothing burger.
The meta FTC scrap over a monopoly in the personal social networking market.
Nothing burger, right? Just absolutely nothing burger. And then the Google one,
was like, it was this.
Yeah, it was like a tap on the wrist.
They're like, here's a speeding ticket.
So M&A is going to be on fire.
I'm going to predict on the show right now.
We're going to see a major M&A moment in the next six months.
In the next six months, we're going to see a company on the scale of an Airbnb, an Uber, a
coin base, you know, call it the midcaps, like not the true, not the MAG 7.
Between 50 billion and 500 billion.
Let's say 50 to 250.
I'll narrow it a little bit.
It can't be as high as $500 billion.
Those things are going to, all kinds of alarms you're going to go up.
But I'll say $25 billion to $250 billion.
We're going to see two or three of these get discussed, and we're going to see at least one of
them get pop.
It's going to pop in the next year.
So I'll say in the next year, well, in the next year, there'll be a half dozen discussions,
and we're going to see one of these pop.
And it's going to be Amazon buying DoorDash or DoorDash and Uber merging.
or Uber buying and Waymo spinning out into the same company or Tesla buying Uber.
I don't have any insight information here.
Autonomy in cars, delivery of products, Amazon.
Maybe somebody like Apple says, where is our growth going to come from in the future?
What would be interesting for us to own?
Yeah, you know, maybe it would be really interesting to own Adobe or Figma.
Oh, if Apple bought Figma, oh my gosh.
Well, I mean, let's just, I don't have, again, I don't have any inside information.
But the M&A teams are on.
That I know, because we have a portfolio.
And once in a while, we'll hear,
that's not somebody at my suite.
Oh, I've got to turn over your room.
That's the M&A people are knocking.
The knocking is starting to happen.
It's going to be really juicy 20, 26 is my prediction.
Question from Arnodi, Rishav Rajan.
Hey, man, what do you think software engineers should work on considering AI?
Answer this question, Jason, in terms of self-learning
and what they should be adding to their roster if they want to be.
employable in the next couple years? You know, the thing that is top of mind for all organizations
is trying to make agents, which is to say something that runs, like a cron job, we used to call
them, on some set schedule, could be every minute, could be every second, that does something
for the organization that would fall into chores. So if you can study chores that people do,
whether it's in customer support or sales, you know, distribution, whatever those chores are,
that are going on and being able to study people in an organization and build an agent that allows
this to occur on some regular basis. I was just saying the other day, man, I really wish somebody could
make me an agent that just went to these 10 home pages and told me the top news stories on each
and then made me a ranked list, a weighted list of the top stories and then made them on a graph
so I could see, okay, the Epstein story is, you know, waning. And this story is coming back. Oh, the
Comey story is coming back. Oh, the unemployment story is back at Spike today. Oh, it went away. And then just
tell me over time in some, you know, reasonable way what is happening. And there's no Bloomberg terminal of that.
But I could architect it really easy. There used to be medalists that would do this. You know,
pop URLs was a product that did it where you just see all the top things. Tech meme does this really well for tag.
So anyway, long story short, I would look at agentic workflows, whether it's in the accounting.
department, the HR department, whatever it is, because people want to be more fit in their companies.
They don't want to have fat. They want to have muscle. They want to be lean, mean fighting machines.
All right. We're super excited about startup supper club. Remember we were doing Founder Fridays.
Well, our friends over at River, Rachel Lambert, she's the CEO of River, she realized
through just studying all the people who were coming to Founder Fridays, that what people really
wanted was to just share dinner. They wanted a very simple concept. So if you go to startup supper
club.dnnr.io, December 5th, they're going to start doing amazing dinners in New York City, Austin,
and San Francisco. I might just randomly show up in one of those cities in the future. I don't know if
I'll do it on December 5th, but I might. It's pretty simple. You take a little personality quiz. They do the logistics.
You show up, you have a great dinner, you make new friends, maybe there's a little after party.
It's working.
They tested this.
People loved it.
So get matched with other founders, investors, and just tech people who share your interest.
The dinner reservation set, all you got to do is show up.
Yeah, a lot of the groups, they'll meet at a bar afterwards.
So New York City, Austin and San Francisco, December 5th at 7 p.m.
The link is in the show notes.
Startup supperclub.
check it out founders investors go make some friends that's what life's all about all right
everybody that's another week in the books for this week in startups and we'll see
everybody on Monday bye bye
