Throughline - Hong Kong
Episode Date: May 28, 2020Last week, the Chinese government made the latest and perhaps the most serious move yet to crack down on Hong Kong's semi-autonomy. It's just the latest such effort by Beijing in the decades-long tens...ions between China and Hong Kong and it seems to take advantage of the quarantine calm that has subdued months of protests. But when did these tensions begin and what have Hong Kongers been fighting for?Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for this podcast and the following message come from the NPR Wine Club, which has generated over $1.75 million to support NPR programming.
Whether buying a few bottles or joining the club, you can learn more at nprwineclub.org slash podcast. Must be 21 or older to purchase.
Hey everyone, before we jump into the episode, we wanted to bring your attention to something pretty awesome that's happening tonight.
So a few weeks ago, we held our first ever virtual trivia night, and it was really fun.
So much fun that we decided to do it again.
Come hang with us online and play three rounds of ThruLine-inspired trivia that will put your history knowledge to the test.
And watch Rund and I make fun of each other.
Rund's favorite rapper in the world. We'll put your history knowledge to the test and watch Ronda and I make fun of each other.
Ronda's favorite rapper in the world.
She has so many posters of him in her closet.
Bad Bunny knows the answer to this question.
America acquired which U.S. territory under the terms of the Treaty of Paris?
And the answer is, if you know who Bad Bunny is, Puerto Rico.
And you know what?
I'm going to lean into this.
I'm going to lean into it.
Let's do this.
I told you. See?
There we go.
Why would you have that on your phone?
You love him.
I queued it up, okay?
To sign up, head to nprpresents.org,
where you can RSVP and get all the info you need to play.
Kickoff is at 8 p.m. Eastern.
See you then. Now, on with today's show.
Hong Kong is a Chinese name and means island of fragrant water.
Hong Kong was really at the edge of the Qing Empire.
It was a barren island with hardly a house appointed. It was a collection of a number of fishing villages,
a little bit of farming,
and also a place that pirates often use
as a base for operations.
It really wasn't a particularly valuable piece of real estate
that concerned the government in Beijing all that much. Reduce the territory's autonomy. Tear gas once again shrouds the streets of Hong Kong.
It would bypass the local legislature and is expected to ban what China calls treason.
It's an example to interfere in Hong Kong's relatively free media, in its free speech, to reassert Beijing's control over Hong Kong.
You're listening to ThruLine from NPR.
Where we go back in time.
To understand the present.
Hey, I'm Ramteen Arablui.
I'm Randamnit Fattah.
And on this episode, Hong Kong.
Last week, the Chinese Communist Party announced the broad outlines of its plans for Hong Kong.
Under the new law, Chinese security forces, including secret police, will now be able to roam Hong Kong at will.
Judges will have to enforce the new directives.
Those plans confirm fears that many Hong Kongers have had for decades.
But they seem especially focused on the quarantine calm that has settled over Hong Kong
after months and months of intense protests, which were responding to the last time Chinese
leaders tried to limit Hong Kong's unique rights. Last year, protests erupted over an extradition
bill that would essentially allow Hong Kong to send people to the Chinese mainland to be tried for certain crimes, a major erosion of the unique autonomy Hong Kong has had for more than 20 years.
Last week's proposal would allow Beijing to directly respond to the protests that ensued in Hong Kong, circumventing Hong Kong's government,
law enforcement, and independent judiciary. And there were hints that Beijing intends to
create a way to bypass Hong Kong's freedom of assembly and press.
It's just the latest and perhaps boldest instance of China clamping down on its unruly example.
And it's complicated because it seems to strike at the heart of Hong Kong's semi-autonomous status,
meaning it has some degree of freedom and self-governance and is not under China's complete rule.
So as Hong Kong grapples with its current and future autonomy,
tensions that have been building for decades,
we wanted to look back at an episode from last year that asked the questions,
how did we get here? How did these tensions begin? And what, after nearly two centuries,
are Hong Kongers fighting for and against? In this episode, we look at the shared history
between Hong Kong and China, and one agreement that was supposed to seal the future for the global city.
This is Rachel Copley from Ashland, Massachusetts.
You're listening to ThruLine from NPR.
This message comes from WISE, the app for doing things in other currencies.
Send, spend, or receive money internationally, and always get the real-time mid-market exchange rate with no hidden fees. Download the WISE app today, or visit WISE.com. T's and C's apply.
We begin with a war on drugs.
It was the 18th century, and China was raking in profits from trading things around the world.
Western powers like Great Britain weren't doing so well.
So Britain decided that in order to compete with China,
they needed to trade the
Chinese something that would fly off the shelves. They got the idea of selling opium to China,
and that then completely turned the trade balance in the opposite direction.
Great for Britain, but it came at a cost for China.
And there were efforts in China because opium is something that's addictive. And it got many people sick.
And the courts decided that they had to do something about it.
This is Victoria Tinbor Hui.
She's a political scientist at the University of Notre Dame.
I'm from Hong Kong. I grew up in Hong Kong.
I did my undergrad in Hong Kong.
So then I've been talking a lot about Hong Kong lately.
Back to the trade war.
The opium that was coming into China was a problem
because it was hurting their society and economic progress.
So they retaliated by confiscating over 1,000 tons of opium.
Britain was outraged and demanded that China pay for those drugs.
And the ruling power at this time, the Qing Empire, refused.
And then that triggered the first opium war.
And Britain invaded.
China was the most powerful empire in East Asia.
But its military was still no match for Great Britain.
So after three years of fighting, China asked for a truce. That was concluded by the Treaty of Nanjing in 1842.
This is Steve Tsang.
Professor of Chinese Studies and Director of the Seoul China Institute
at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
One of Britain's demands in this peace treaty was for China to hand over one of its territories,
the small, little-known, undeveloped island called Hong Kong.
It was a collection of a number of fishing villages, a little bit of farming,
and also a place that pirates often use as a base for operations.
The population was very small, maybe just several thousand people.
Because of this, the Qing Empire didn't consider the island all that important.
But the UK saw the benefits.
Hong Kong Island had a natural harbor, which offered the Western power a strong Eastern
trade base. And also as kind of this gateway to the rest of Asia as well. The Qing Empire wasn't
thrilled about handing anything over to Britain, but they figured if it had to be something,
it might as well be Hong Kong. The British wanted to have just a whole pile of barren rocks, so whatever. This pile of barren rocks was given to Britain in 1842,
which was the first of three handoffs that slowly but surely
gave the British all the tiny islands and surrounding territories
that we know today as Hong Kong.
The geography of the Hong Kong colony consists basically of three areas.
Hong Kong Island, the Kowloon Peninsula.
Stage two happened in 1860 after the Second Opium War
when Britain gained the Kowloon Peninsula.
And the new territory.
And then the third stage of expansion was the leasing of the new territories in 1898 for 99 years.
This 99-year lease gave Britain all the remaining territories of Hong Kong,
but with it came an expiration date, 1997.
This marked the beginning of what China called a century of humiliation.
While Hong Kong, now entirely under British rule,
began its modern makeover.
You started to see
Hong Kong being transformed
from a collection of
fishing villages
and a few farmhouses
and the occasional pirates using Hong Kong as a base
into a thriving town and it developed into a city. A city that was sounding pretty good to folks in
neighboring Chinese provinces who started moving in. Simply because it provided opportunity, it provided safety, because British law prevailed.
And British law was far more open, fair and just than how law was applied in China at the time.
From the beginning, Hong Kong was a refuge from turmoil in mainland China.
People were just essentially refugees coming from China
into Hong Kong. And my parents themselves, they left China and walked into Hong Kong.
Oh, they just crossed the border? Yeah, they crossed the border. Because at the time,
the borders were really not very well controlled. Many Chinese families have escaped in these
fishing junks to Hong Kong. To raise the $45 passage money, they sold their lifelong possessions in China.
Hong Kong was for quite a long time a borrowed place at a borrowed time.
A borrowed place at a borrowed time.
This was a saying in colonial Hong Kong that referred to the economically open society established under British control. People came from mainland China for refuge, but they also came to make money.
All types of people, rich elites from Shanghai, working class people, rural farmers, even if they
knew it wouldn't last, they wanted to get in on this independent economy. But they still saw themselves as Chinese.
A lot of those people who fled China, they still continue to see themselves as Chinese.
So there wasn't a separate sense of identity among Hong Kong people.
At least, not yet.
When we come back, Chinese people in Hong Kong start to become Hong Kongers.
Hi, this is Elisa from Guam, and you're listening to ThruLine from NPR.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Autograph Collection Hotels,
with over 300 independent hotels around the world, each exactly like nothing else.
Autograph Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio of hotel brands.
Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Carnegie Corporation of New York,
working to reduce political polarization through philanthropic support for education,
democracy, and peace.
More information at Carnegie.org. All right, so by the 1930s, there were nearly a million people living in Hong Kong. It was no longer the barren, rocky island filled with fishermen and pirates.
Migrants continued crossing the border to get in on a flourishing economy.
Then, in 1937, Japan invaded China, and thousands more refugees arrived.
Hong Kong was only a safe place for a few short years.
Because in 1941, just hours after Pearl Harbor, Japan also attacked Hong Kong. Britain
tried to defend their colony, but they lost. And Hong Kong was put under Japanese military
control, which was very, very brutal. But the really important point here is that for the first
time since the 19th century, the idea of the invincibility of the white man,
and in particular, the invincibility of the British Empire, was not only challenged, but indeed broken.
The Japanese takeover during World War II challenged assumptions of white supremacy for the Chinese,
which is important because even
though Hong Kong offered certain freedoms and opportunities, Chinese folks were still treated
as second-class citizens by the British. But when the war finally ended...
The last of the major Japanese surrenders was signed in Hong Kong on September the 16th.
Hong Kong was formally surrendered. The colony was British again.
The idea that the European colonial empires could simply restore the status quo was not really very realistic.
And this time, Britain realized that the Chinese were no longer going to tolerate second-class status.
So when the British governor returned to power…
He had to make changes to post-war Hong Kong.
And he started to look at political reform.
For the first time, the Chinese population had a voice.
And therefore a reason to feel that they are citizens of British Hong Kong and a commitment
to the future of maintaining Hong Kong as a British colony.
Gaining respect from Hong Kongers was crucial for Britain,
because China was suddenly making eyes at Hong Kong again, and wanted it back.
In the course of the Second World War, the leader of China, Chiang Kai-shek,
asked for the first time for the British to return Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty.
So the British knew that. And so as Hong Kong started to look a bit more democratic,
China started to look a lot more communist, Maoist to be exact. On October 1st, 1949,
Mao Zedong proclaims the birth of the People's Republic of China in the new communist capital of Peking.
Our country will never again be an insulted nation, says Mao. We have stood up.
When Chairman Mao and the Communist Party took over China in 1949, both sides immediately closed their borders.
And the long trend of open migration between China and Hong Kong
came to a screeching halt. So for the first time after 1949, Hong Kong had a settled population,
and this settled population will change, and they will develop a very strong, clear sense of identity as Hong Kong people by the 1960s.
A natural cosy haven for junks and liners alike,
but the approach to Kai Tak Airport is as spectacular as a hop across the Andes.
And by the beginning of the 1970s, Hong Kong became a significant financial center.
The runway juts 8,000 feet into the water, and every day,
Boeing's bring in businessmen, engineers, and economists
keen to observe and join in the expansion of Asia's fastest
growing economy.
And Hong Kong became much richer practically
by the year in the 1970s.
And people also started to be able to afford
luxuries like entertainment and leisure. Between 1961 and 1981, Hong Kong achieved some of the highest sustained rates of economic growth
in the world. And it looked it, with skyscrapers and resorts lining the once jagged harbor.
Hong Kong had become the goose that laid golden eggs.
But at the peak of its prosperity, the future of that fortune was re-entering murky waters.
The 99-year lease was inching closer towards its expiration date. So by that time,
Hong Kong really was a
crown jewel, essentially
for the British. So there were these
looming uncertainties.
In order to hold on to a piece of the pie,
Britain needed a game plan.
When we come back,
negotiations and an agreement
that don't turn out as planned.
Hi, this is Jack calling from Neptune Beach, Florida,
and you are listening to ThruLine on NPR.
Will you now please take the three required oaths. Please take the three required oaths.
This is Sir Murray McLachos being sworn in as Hong Kong's 25th governor in 1971.
I, Crawford Murray McLachos, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,
her heirs and successors, according to law, so help me God.
Murray McLehose was Hong Kong's longest-serving governor,
and over 10 years of his tenure, you could say he was well-liked.
And he was able to build up a very strong relationship with the people.
He was jokingly called by many people in Hong Kong as the Big Mac,
because he was also physically a very big Scotsman.
Big Mac was over six feet tall,
and photos show him towering over the room, like a friendly giant.
And Big Mac had a whole slew of nicknames,
including Jock the Sock and Murray in a Hurry.
Yes, yes, I was in a hurry.
And he was a character, a character who wanted to be seen as a man of the people.
McElhose ditched the governor's uniform for short-sleeved, open-neck shirts.
He passed on a governor's limo and chose to walk, literally walk, to meetings instead.
He was the man who established the credibility of the colonial government
as a government that would listen to people in Hong Kong
and would look after people's interests in Hong Kong.
So he was a bit of a progressive in his own mind.
By the end of the 1970s, Makoho's was thinking ahead.
While it was possible to wait
until the very last minute,
Britain chose to initiate talks in advance.
But that was an enormous gamble.
There were nearly 5 million people
living in Hong Kong
whose future was at stake.
And the idea that you simply put
the future of so many British nationals,
even though they're not UK citizens, on the pit of a gamble would have been irresponsible.
So they started negotiations.
At first, the Chinese government was not particularly keen to engage in negotiations,
but it didn't take very long for them to realize that it would be in their interest to negotiate. In 1979, Murray, in a hurry, went to Beijing to meet with the leader of the People's
Republic of China, Deng Xiaoping. I was very excited. He is a very great man. And to meet him
was a great excitement to me. The visit was really to test the waters and find out what China's intentions were with this looming 1997 expiration date.
And one of the main concerns was real estate.
Business leaders and developers began to worry about what would happen to their property leases if and when Hong Kong reverted back to Chinese sovereignty.
McLehose was worried this would sink property values. And this would be very bad for Hong Kong and incidentally for China
because so much capital in Hong Kong was wrapped up in property.
So in that meeting, he proposed that the British be able to continue to issue new property leases
as a temporary solution to maintain confidence in the economy.
But something got lost in translation.
The Chinese government misunderstood what he said,
to which Deng Xiaoping's response was quite simply that
we will never negotiate about the lease.
Deng Xiaoping thought that McLehose was suggesting
that they extend the 99-year lease,
and slightly offended, he clapped back with a
vow that China would fully recover Hong Kong. It's long been understood that it was Sir Murray
who sprung the Hong Kong question on the Chinese leader, forcing Deng, many say, to reject anything
that suggested a loss of Chinese sovereignty over the territory. So when MacDee Hose returned to
Hong Kong, when he walked down the plane
and was met by the Chief Secretary of Hong Kong,
Sir Jack Cater,
the first thing MacLehose told Jack Cater
was that disaster.
Disaster.
The meeting was a failure.
For the next couple of years, China worked on policy proposals
while London prepared for the formal talks.
And that responsibility fell not on McLehose, but...
The Iron Lady of the Western World.
Britain's first female Prime Minister, Margaret
Thatcher. Margaret Thatcher
was apparently thinking that,
well, you know, Hong Kong Islands,
the Kowloon Peninsula
was ceded to us for
perpetuity. So
maybe we can return only
the new territories.
Maybe we could convince
Beijing that while we return sovereignty to them,
but we continue to maintain
administration in Hong Kong.
Thatcher wanted the Chinese government
to agree to the British
being able to continue
to govern Hong Kong,
even though it would technically
become Chinese sovereign territory.
So there was a kind of formula for using sovereignty to exchange for governing rights.
In 1982, Margaret Thatcher went to Beijing to meet with Deng Xiaoping.
And all of Hong Kong was watching, hoping that somehow, some way, their future would be safely secured.
When I was talking to him and said we had done so well for the people of Hong Kong
that could we keep the sovereignty of Hong Kong Island and the administration?
Xi took a tough stand, as per usual, and told Deng Xiaoping that Hong Kong's economic
prosperity was dependent on Britain's
continued governance. His response?
Over my dead body.
So the beginning of the negotiation was not easy.
And there was this very famous scene of her just slipping as she walked out of the Great Hall of the People.
Leaving the meeting, she fell down the steps of the building.
A rush of men in suits lifted her off the ground as she brushed herself off.
And Hong Kong people just basically, our hearts sank.
We watched this on TV news.
Uh-oh, this is not going well.
Oh, like it was an omen?
Yeah, like an omen.
During the various rounds of negotiations, after each round, there was always a standard
answer.
Wow, this round of talks has been useful and constructive.
People didn't know what was going on on and everyone was watching very nervously.
What were they worried about? They worried that Beijing was just going to take back Hong Kong.
When you have all these uncertainties, then people don't know what to do.
Because there was nothing they could do. Throughout two years of talks,
Hong Kongers never had an official seat at the negotiating table.
So they were negotiating over Hong Kong people's future, but without any participation of Hong Kong people.
People were expecting the worst.
People were expecting that, you know, China is going to take back Hong Kong and Hong Kong will become just like another Chinese city. China successfully strong-armed Margaret Thatcher
and got her to drop the idea of a continued British administration in Hong Kong.
The idea that they will allow Hong Kong to stay on beyond 1997
was simply something that the Communist Party and Deng Xiaoping would not contemplate.
And they had the capacity to insist on that.
And in 1984, an agreement was reached.
The joint declaration on the future of Hong Kong, which we have just signed on behalf of
our two governments, is a landmark in the life of the territory. Blinded by flashing cameras and
surrounded by their respective entourages, Thatcher and the Premier
of China sat side by side to sign the Sino-British Joint Declaration.
I remember that I was in secondary school for the signing ceremony. The entire school
just stopped all the classes. We were all shuffled to different classrooms with these
tiny TVs, and we were all watching it.
People in Hong Kong, here we're talking about the general public,
were not consulted until the agreement was reached and then the agreement was published.
But do you think Britain would have negotiated much harder
to provide protections for Hong Kong?
We could not have negotiated any harder than we did.
It was basically a take it or leave it kind of deal that people were being offered. And of course
people in Hong Kong take it. Britain acknowledges that when the lease runs out in 1997 on most of
the territory, the whole of Hong Kong will revert to China.
The Chinese government outlined what they called
a one-country, two-system model.
This meant that Hong Kong would be returned to China in 1997.
But it could continue to operate in the exact same way
it had over the past 100 years.
It would enjoy the same freedoms.
And the rights to free speech, free press.
And to a free
market economy. These are fundamental freedoms and they must continue. Hong Kong would come under
China's control and China agreed to let the region maintain some political and social autonomy.
The policy was set for a 50-year period starting in 1997 and going to 2047. After the agreement was signed,
China went out of its way to reassure the people of Hong Kong.
Don't worry, everything is going to be the same.
Whatever you guys like about Hong Kong,
whatever you value about Hong Kong,
the rule of law, your freedoms to do all those things,
you make money, to do anything you like,
everything is going to stay the same.
Hong Kong tried to stay calm.
They had no choice but to believe Beijing's promise to honor this special status,
which meant Hong Kongers needed to figure out what they wanted Hong Kong to look like.
And so in that era, these young professionals were thinking,
oh, we can rule Hong Kong.
So let's really talk about how we can rule Hong Kong.
So Hong Kong's democracy movement was really born in the mid-1980s.
People were very optimistic.
Let's really map our future.
Let's write our future. Let us press the Hong Kong government to actually begin democratic reform
so that we can be prepared to rule ourselves after 1997.
A democratic spirit also got into the minds of some mainlanders.
In just a few years after the ink dried on the Sino-British Joint Declaration,
thousands of demonstrators blocked the streets with their bodies.
The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests erupted.
For a month straight, students gathered in Beijing and called for basic democratic reforms. That was the first time that something like that was being allowed to take place.
And the people in Hong Kong saw this as a sign of hope.
They thought... If the Beijing protests could result in political reforms in China,
a move towards democratization,
a change away from communist authoritarianism,
then Hong Kong will have a much better future.
Hong Kong people were all upholding this one prominent slogan,
today's tenement to most Hong Kong.
The hope was that if China itself becomes democratic,
then Hong Kong's reunification with China would be no problem.
Hong Kong provided resources and helped the movement grow.
At its height, about one million people
took over the square.
It is very important to know,
to let the people in the world
to know the situation in China.
Deng Xiaoping is very stubborn.
He should go down, you know, immediately.
That's very important.
But on June 3rd, 1989,
Deng Xiaoping
ordered a crackdown.
And by morning...
Scattered protests continue to sputter and there are new reports of skirmishes and violence
in the wake of this weekend's massive military assault
aimed at smashing China's pro-democracy demonstration.
300,000 troops rolled in with tanks and opened fire on the crowd.
They just killed another one in the square.
Killing demonstrators and bystanders.
The students are gone.
The air reeks with the smell of gunpowder.
A gray pall of smoke hangs over the square.
People in Hong Kong were absolutely shattered.
They were emotionally destroyed.
Hundreds, if not thousands, were murdered point-blank by their own government.
A government that was about
to re-inherit Hong Kong.
So the idea of, you know,
today's sentiment, tomorrow's China,
its meaning was completely turned
upside down. If today
they could fire at protesters
and kill these protesters
in Beijing and in different cities in China.
What would they do to us after 1997?
People were terrified.
Those who could afford it made plans to leave Hong Kong and started seeking foreign passports.
Those who stayed mourned.
Something like over half a million people just poured out into the streets, out of a total population of six million.
They march in silence to mourn what happened in Beijing.
The demonstrations sent a strong message to Beijing.
Tiananmen Square revealed Hong Kong's subversive base.
Hong Kong was now a threat.
Pressures continued to mount right up to the official handover of Hong Kong,
which the Chinese sometimes call the return.
In the late evening of June 30, 1997, the ceremonies began.
I still remember the evening of the handover when the British were pulling down the flag and then the Chinese flag was getting hoisted, and then the last
governor was leaving, and it was pouring, and I was in the street, and then all the
people around me were saying, oh, even God is crying for Hong Kong. And then I went home and I watched CNN at midnight
and the screen changed from just Hong Kong to Hong Kong comma China.
And on July 1st, 1997, Hong Kong was officially handed back over to China.
It was a very, very strange feeling.
There were some small protests, but mainly it was quiet.
People in Hong Kong knew they had to accept their fate.
They had no other choice.
Some Hong Kongers were genuinely going to miss the British,
who, let's not forget, were the colonizers.
You had parents taking their children to the Hong Kong government offices
and other places to have pictures taken with those colonial symbols
before they were taken down.
But not everyone felt that way.
There were some Hong Kong people that saw the handover in a positive light.
You also at the same time have many in Hong Kong who feel that
it's good for the colonial eras to end.
We are proud Chinese again.
We may be a very special kind of Chinese, but we are Chinese nonetheless.
And the following day, the sun came out. It was all right again.
China could have made Hong Kong's worst fears come true immediately. It could have gone back
on its word and violated the agreement, imposed its own rules, squashed the free market and
democratic aspirations. But that didn't happen. Not right away.
So in Hong Kong, there's also this saying of how you can kill a frog in lukewarm water.
They saw that Hong Kong's prosperity, Hong Kong's special status,
was of value to China's economic development.
And in the past several decades, Hong Kong has served that role very well.
Deng Xiaoping was playing the long game.
So Deng Xiaoping was a very smart person.
He realized that it's much better to keep Hong Kong the way it was
and to offer all these reassurances
so that Hong Kong could then really serve his agenda to build up China's economy.
But Beijing started appointing Chinese loyalists to various positions, slowly eroding Hong Kong's government.
People in Hong Kong interpret one country, two systems as a guarantee that their weight of life and their system would be protected for at least
50 years. The Chinese government's interpretation of it will be that sometime between 1997 and 2047,
changes will happen in Hong Kong so that by 2047, Hong Kong will be fully, properly Chinese again.
For many mainlanders, the return of Hong Kong marks the end of China's century of humiliation.
Hong Kong, for them, is China's.
And Hong Kong should be returned to China.
Hong Kong is a part of China. And if Hong Kong
people don't like Beijing, well, you guys, there's something wrong with you guys. So most of the
mainland Chinese, they really support Beijing's position on Hong Kong. The thing is, in the years
after the handover, more and more mainland Chinese people came to work in Hong Kong. And the more that
happened, the more Hong Kongers were like, wow, we are truly not the same. We've spent over a century
living under different governments, different economies, and different cultures. And they
wanted to assert their own identity even more. Which frustrated China to no end. And you also have the Chinese government and people
in China increasingly feeling that all these Hong Kong people are kind of almost like spoiled
children. It's always asking for more. They already get more than anybody else in China's
court. And they keep on asking for more and more of their rights being protected.
Still, China's infringement was relatively slow going.
Until 2003.
Six years after the handover, the government of Hong Kong introduced an amendment to Article 23,
commonly known as the National Security Bill.
It was essentially an anti-subversion law that many Hong Kongers saw as a threat to their civil liberties.
For the first time after 1989, again you had half a million people marching in the streets of Hong Kong
to protest against the Article 23 legislation.
It was the largest protest in Hong Kong since the Tiananmen Massacre.
And it worked.
China shelled the bill indefinitely,
but then regrouped and came back even harder.
Around 2012, a demand from Chinese governments that Hong Kong should change its educational
curriculum and make Hong Kong's education curriculum patriotic.
And then you have the high school students in Hong Kong coming out and saying, but this
is brainwashing us.
We don't want brainwashing.
We want a proper, free, liberal education. This is the environment Xi Jinping walked into when he became the leader of China in 2013.
And a year later...
In the streets, a sea of umbrellas, the symbol of a mass demonstration underway in Hong Kong.
Students and young people formed the Umbrella Movement,
a series of sit-in protests that opposed Beijing's decision
to have more say and control over Hong Kong's electoral system.
Hundreds of thousands packed the streets of downtown Hong Kong as police fired as many as 87 cans of tear gas,
determined demonstrators shielding themselves with umbrellas and spawning the so-called Umbrella Revolution.
And in the last three or four years, you even have some of them beginning to talk about maybe we need to look at self-determination.
Because Hong Kong as a Chinese colony will never be allowed to have democracy.
And those words of self-determination and independence caught the ears of Beijing.
Red light flash all across Beijing in the Chinese government, and they come up with an even harder
approach. And that is the background to the events that erupted in Hong Kong in the summer of 2019.
Which brings us back to the beginning of this episode, and to the current protests that
are still going strong, and only escalating.
Beijing has violated these promises and has been trying to really encroach into Hong Kong,
controlling Hong Kong more and more, eroding its autonomy.
So all of those have then really got Hong Kong's young people to feel that they have
no future.
That has really triggered this resistance from young people.
And at the same time, we also want to understand that this trend has been increasing over time,
and it didn't just fall from the sky.
Now you are talking about a younger generation of people in Hong Kong
who feel that they must now stand up and fight for the core values of Hong Kong.
The kind of language they are using is that if we don't fight,
we may not have a chance to fight for Hong Kong's core values any longer.
So we will now make our last stand. We may all fall.
But if we have to fall, at least we fall having defend our values. That's it for this week's show.
I'm Ramtin Arablui.
I'm Rand Abdel-Fattah.
And you've been listening to ThruLine from NPR.
This episode was produced by me.
And me.
And.
Lane Kaplan-Levinson.
Jamie York.
Lou Okalski.
Jordana Hochman.
And Nigeri Eaton.
Fact-checking for this episode was done by Kevin Volkl.
Thanks also to Anya Grunman and Jason Fuller.
Our music was composed by Ramtin and his band, Drop Electric.
If you like something you heard or you have an idea for an episode, Thanks for listening. Thank you. customer satisfaction scores would rise, and everyone would be more productive. That's what happens when you give Grammarly to your entire team.
Grammarly is a secure AI writing partner that understands your business and can transform it through better communication.
Join 70,000 teams who trust Grammarly with their words and their data.
Learn more at Grammarly.com.
Grammarly. Easier said, done.