Timcast IRL - Biden Plans Blanket PARDON FOR FAUCI And Others In Fear Of Trump Admin w/Decoy Voice

Episode Date: December 5, 2024

Tim, Phil, & Ian are joined by Decoy Voice to discuss the Biden White House discussing a blanket pardon for Dr. Fauci, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare being targeted in a fatal shooting, major advertisers fleeing twitch due to rampant anti-Semitism, and a court denying Target's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit alleging Target damaged its own brand with their pride campaigns. Decoy Voice is a social media personality and content creator known for producing commentary videos on trending topics, often blending humor and critique to engage audiences. Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Decoy Voice @DecoyVoice (YouTube) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In a move that is surprising to no one, it is being now is now being reported by Politico that Biden's White House is preparing or I should say having the preliminary discussions about blanket pardons for the likes of Dr. Fauci, Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff. Yeah. And the excuse they're giving is that Donald Trump wants revenge. Never mind the fact that three years ago, and we know this is true, Dr. Fauci lied under oath. Hey, I can say that definitively as a statement of fact that three years ago, and we know this is true, Dr. Fauci lied under oath. Hey, I can say that definitively as a statement of fact. Come at me, bro. Dr. Fauci lied under oath and committed a crime, and he should be criminally charged for that. Now they're apparently they're going to pardon him. So I wonder how sweeping these blanket

pardons are going to be. And I wonder if it'll be deemed constitutional, but that will be very, very interesting. So we're going to talk about that. Plus, look, along with Dr. Fauci, we do have that report from from Congress about the origins of covid, which will be going along with it. We got some big news in the digital space, Twitch. The adpocalypse is getting worse as JP Morgan and AT&T are pulling all of their ads because of anti-Semitic streamers. We'll talk about that stuff. And then, of course, man, United Health CEO, the biggest health insurance company in the United States, the CEO is assassinated this morning in midtown Manhattan. And the video has gone viral. We can't play the video. It's graphic. But this looks like a professional hit. And once you start looking at what the gun people are saying about how the assassin was

like manually chambering rounds, they're like, that guy knew what he was doing. That's crazy. So we'll talk about all that stuff. But before we get started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com. Due to a programming error on the website, we've accidentally extended our Black Friday sale to Wednesday, tonight, by midnight. So if you're watching live right now, get your discount cast brew while you still can.

And I'm gonna be honest, this is not an ad play. Like, literally, they put the date in wrong when they were programming the discount and then messaged me on Monday being like, we accidentally made the discount Wednesday instead of Monday. And I was like, okay, cool. Well, you know, we'll just, we'll promote it. So if you buy two bags of cast brew, you get 15% off.

If you buy three bags, you'll get 20% off. And if you buy four or more bags of Casper coffee, you're going to get 30% off. So you can stock up for the whole month or two. You know, you want to keep it fresh, but hey, stock up.

Everybody loves Appalachian Nights, but don't forget, we got Stand Your Grounds, which is also a very popular blend. And of course, Rise with Roberto Jr. Rest in peace. But don't forget, my friends,

step on snack and find out. Skateboards are also available at boonieshq.com. Massive demand for these things. We keep selling out like crazy. So I know many of you were unable to buy them because we legit sell them out

like super quick. Right now we have, I think, only, we only have a couple boards left. Holy crap, I didn't realize we had very few left. Looks like the only size available now is 8.25, and it's about to sell out. So if you want to pick one up, boonieshq.com.

Of course, the boobies, that board that also everybody loves for some reason, because it's hilarious, it's a blue-footed booby bird, and it's called a booby. These sell really quick too, so pick them up. And don't forget to also head over to timcast.com and click join us to become a member. Because as a member, you support and sustain this show. We had an awesome uncensored show with Cenk Uygur last night. And we largely talked about religion and his worldview, and it was particularly interesting. So I recommend you guys check that out. As a member, you can watch our uncensored shows and submit questions. Call in during our uncensored members only show. So you'll get access to our Discord server.

We can hang out with tens of thousands of like minded individuals. Definitely check that out. But don't forget to smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Joining us to talk joining us tonight to talk about these things and so much more is Decoy Voice. What's going on? I'm Decoy Voice.

I run a small channel on YouTube where I cover crime, culture, and politics with concise light order commentary on the tragic status that is today's reality. And I'm very excited to be here. So I'm glad you guys got me on. I'm always really excited when we have YouTubers on because they know the rules. And I'm like, this is what YouTube bans you for. And this is what they don't. And they're like, oh, no, we know.

I'm like, OK, great. Because Ian's here. And I'm always worried. Yeah, he's on edge. You can tell. So hey, guys. Good to see you again. I'm Ian Crossland.

I'm back. I cast magic for a living. And I want to give a special shout-out to Grofty. Dude, you should see Phil's face right now. I saw him do a take when I said that. I want to shout-out Grofty is in the chat. Everyone loves Grofty. So if you don't know him, you know him now.

Send Grofty some love. What's up, dude? Good to see you, man. Phil Labonte. Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains remains i'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary and i don't know grafty let's go here's the story from politico and i love it they used this uh

little picture of joe biden giving what looks like a wink wink it says biden white house is discussing preemptive pardons for those in trump's crosshairs uh-huh the nomination of cash patel who has vowed to pursue Trump's critics as FBI director, has heightened concerns within the president's inner circle. They say Biden's aides are deeply concerned about a range of current and former officials who could find themselves facing inquiries and even indictments, a sense of alarm which has only accelerated since Trump's last weekend announcement, last weekend announced the appointment of Kash Patel based to lead the fbi patel has publicly

vowed to pursue trump's critics yes but not because they're his critics he's going to pursue them for being criminals and it just so happens that criminals don't want to be held accountable so they criticize the person who wants to hold them accountable you see how that works politico they go on to add that uh white house officials are carefully weighing the extraordinary step of handing out blanket pardons to those who've committed no crimes. I love this. OK, I just want to stress this. Who've committed no crimes, they say. Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like now to give you an example of why you watch this show and why we hate, hate the corporate press and the fake news, the corporate media. They go on to say those who could face exposure included such members

of Congress. January 6th committee as Senator-elect Adam Schiff. They sat to be rep Liz Cheney of Wyoming, former rep. Trump had previously said Cheney should go to jail along with the rest of the unselect committee. Also mentioned by Biden's aides for a pardon is Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, who became a lightning rod for criticism from the right during the COVID pandemic. Now, let me just stress this. As it says, who've committed no crimes? I want to say it again. Politico says who've committed no crimes.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Newsweek.com on their X account from September 9th, 2021. Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research appearing to contradict what Dr. Anthony Fauci had said previously. Then we have the actual article. And the headline is Fauci was untruthful to Congress about Wuhan lab research. New documents appear to show. Let me make sure it's really easy for you all to understand. And I'm talking about the audience, the core audience, because I love and respect you guys.

I'm talking about the corporate press, the Democrats and the people who seem to just believe all of those lies. I'll make it simple for you guys. From Gosar.house.gov, Dr. Fauci testified under oath before the United States Senate that the National Institute of Health had not funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yet a report by Project Veritas proves that Dr. Fauci did in fact fund research in Wuhan, China and several sites across the United States. Quote, Dr. Anthony Fauci has repeatedly lied to Congress and the American people throughout the entire COVID-19 pandemic. Let me then just jump back to Newsweek. Fauci was untruthful to Congress about Wuhan lab research. Can I throw it to the panel here?

What is it called when you're under oath and you lie? Perjury. And is that a criminal offense? Yes. So that would mean that Fauci did, in fact, commit a crime. If the Newsweek, they say it appears to show this. They haven't. It sounds like the Newsweek article hasn't been confirmed.

No, no, no. Newsweek. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Ian, read the headline. That Fauci was untruthful to Congress about Wuhan lab research. New documents appear to show. Uh-huh.

And now I'll give them that let's prove it in a court of law. Fine. And that's where they're going. But I will state definitively, as it is stated by a member of Congress as a statement of fact, Fauci lied under oath. There's also a congressional register, like everything that's said when they're in hearings, it's all written down and it goes into the into the congressional register. So he did actually say these things. There's no question about it. He has to be found. Obviously, he has to be brought before a judge and jury to be officially guilty.

But there's no question about whether or not he said false statements. Those things are he actually did it. They're in the congressional register. It was so egregious that Seamus and I actually ad libbed this comedy bit that he has on us. Freedom Tunes channel where we were talking about it's this viral video where Rand Paul is saying, Dr. Fauci, did you fund gain of function research? And he's like, we did not fund gain of function research. And then Rand Paul's like, I have here a document from the NIH with your name on it saying gain of function research. Like, nope, it was it was It was a viral moment everybody saw happen, and nothing came of it.

It basically was like they asked him, did you do gain of function? And he said, no, we did all the things. We function gained it. Like, Ian, are you sitting on a chair? No, I'm sitting on wood and plastic with wheels and leather. Exactly. Which is, when saying no is the lie, basically.

He could have said, if he didn't say no, if he just said, we did this, and he rephrased it and refused to answer, but if he actually said to him no, he's still a lie. It's the Patrick Starr meme, where the, I don't know the guy's name, the character is holding the picture,

and he's like, so this is you, Dr. Fauci? Yes. And you run NIH? Yes. And you sign this document i did and this document says supporting gain of function research yes and it with submission this got the funding transferred to nih and eco health alliance for gain of function research at the one lab yes so you funded gain of function research no yeah one other way that they were trying to weasel out of it was by saying that the nih didn't fund the research they funded. And then his point was, no, we funded a company called EcoHealth Alliance that funded the gain of function for us.

Or they didn't go to the source and say for us. We funded a company that funded gain of function. So technically, we didn't fund gain of function. It's like me giving you five bucks to give someone, Phil. Or obviously, they didn't acknowledge that they gave it to him to give to the person. It's like when I was younger, you'd go to these keggers and then you'd walk in and you'd be like, where's the beer? Whoa, whoa, whoa. We don't sell beer here.

We sell cups. Beer's free. It's like, dude, cops aren't going to fall for that. It's stupid. Yeah. Well, this is essentially what Newsweek is doing right now, too, where they know he lied about it. They know that's in the congressional record, but they're saying he may have said this thing. Reports show. So they're admitting it without admitting it also i think he was like a lapdog for the administration so they're wanting they want to get him off the hook the administration's like

we're not gonna yeah we're not gonna let you suffer for what we made you do you understand i'm not so sure that that he was made to do anything like he is he was in a position of authority right like he wasn't there wasn't people higher than fauci saying fauci do this he was in a position to he was he's what you call a shot caller he was saying we need to do this we should do this he was telling other people to do this he was securing funding he was he was not he was not a victim he He was not, you know, he was not there, you know, doing some, some, some work for other people.

He was in charge. Like the buck stops somewhere and it stops with Dr. Fauci. When it comes to the NIH, he called himself the science for a long time. I am the science. It's not, he's not a Patsy.

And the way that, the way that you're framing it is like, you know, some other people were doing, no, no, the buck stops with him. He was the guy. He was the guy.

He was the shot. My assumption is the executive branch made him do that stuff. But I think that stuff doesn't go to the not that the president, not that the president couldn't know. But things like like everything doesn't go to the president. Right. That's why you have administrations. That's why you have the director of the NIH. That's why you have the the the the secretary of defense the secretary of state like there are big things that are decided by the

presidents that that says okay this is the policy of the administration this is the policy that we want and then it's delegated down to the you know the DNI to your DOD your people in charge of the DOD the you know the people at state, the people at HUD, all of these cabinets exist so that way the president doesn't have to be involved in the day-to-day operations of every single administration, all of the different bureaucracies. So when you're dealing with cabinet, that's why cabinet-level administration matters. Like who is in charge of the, that's why it matters that Kennedy is going to be, you know, is nominated to be in charge of the

Health and Human Services because he's the shot caller now. He's the guy that's saying, this is what we're going to do. He will discuss with the president, say this is what the policy is going to be, the president says this is what we want to do, and then he's going to say, okay, cool, I will go and execute it, and then how it gets executed

is largely up to whoever's in charge of the of the particular bureaucracy. One of the big challenges, too, for Trump in his first term was he trusted the experts. They'd go to him and say, look, you know, Trump's sitting there thinking, look, I've got to negotiate this this deal, pretend to the Red Sea in this trade route. I don't know what's going on with that health stuff. That's not my area. And says i'm gonna do x y and z a b and c it was okay go go get it anyway guys what were you saying and then fauci ends up basically in charge of these things because trump just said sure and it wasn't just fauci it was burks as well because i can't say it's all like executive branch fault because remember fauci's trump's guy and he kind of just let him do whatever he wanted even though he disagreed with it publicly.

So Trump made the made a very big mistake of thinking that he could be president when he when he ran. They accuse him of being a traitor. And he thought, once I win, I'm going to go in and say, OK, guys, look, I'm the president now. And the deep state had other intentions. They said, no, you don't you don't understand how this works. Trump thought he was going to play ball. He was going to bring in some of these cabinet picks for some of the uniparty establishment but he was not the player they wanted so they sought to destroy him this time around it seems to be quite the opposite when that chad chronister guy dea had nomination and then everyone points out uh yeah he locked up a pastor during covid lockdowns we won't stand it. Trump stated earlier today that he personally removed him saying, you're done. Get out.

I like that a lot. Yeah. Very based. Trump has learned. He's got no tolerance for the shenanigans. I think that that's a big part of why so many of the people that have been flouted for nomination or brought up for nomination, why there's so much pushback, because these people are a threat to the established order, right? Like RFK at HUD, you know, health and, or I'm sorry, not HUD, at Health and Human Services,

that's going to make a big difference, right? If you get Tulsi Gabbard as the DNI, that's going to make a big difference in the way that the U.S. looks at intelligence gathering and looks at who is going to be scrutinized by the intelligence services. You know, if you get Kash Patel, if you do get Kash Patel in at the FBI, the way that the FBI behaves is going to be significantly different. And I mean, I don't know, I don't have any kind of information, any inside information, but I imagine that these people, if they do get their job, there will be significant changes in the upper management of these bureaucracies, because there are people in the bureaucracies that are going to work against the desires of the administration. That's what Peter Stroke was doing at the FBI. He and I forget the woman's name, that was his cohort or whatever, but he was actively working

against the president, actively working against what the president had stated he wanted. So you have to make, you have to do more than just change the people that are the heads of the agencies. You have to get people that are the heads of these bureaucracies, the cabinet level, the people that are secretary of state or whatever. You have to get people that are willing to go in there and get rid of the people that are going to inhibit the job that the president wants done. The president, as the president, he has the authority to say, this is how we are going to execute the daily business of this country, right? The executive is supposed to

execute the laws that are passed by Congress. As the executive, he gets discretion as to say, this is how we're going to do it, and these are the things that we're going to focus on. So he needs to have a cabinet that is aligned with his desires and is also empowered to fire people or at least remove people that are going to inhibit the administration's, you know, stated desires. And that's the reason that the president got elected is because the

American people want that. Right. So your Congress people are supposed to pass laws that reflect the desires of of the different different different jurisdictions. So you're you're you're a congressperson is supposed to be the person that's going to go ahead and pass laws that are going to represent, or they're going to vote in ways that represent your area or whatever. But the president, by being elected by the whole country, ostensibly, he's supposed to execute the desires of the American people when it comes to the way that the administration operates. And you need to have people in these positions at, you know, at state, at at HUD, at at HHS, at, you know, DOT, at all these cabinet level bureaucracies. You have to have people that are going to actually do the things that the president wants let's let's let's jump to this story this is a wild story gunmen at large

after united healthcare ceo fatally shot in brazen targeted attack police say uh the first thing i want to say on this is it's it's tragic man i don't know anything about this guy any story of death i don't care who it is i i i these things are awful war is bad even when bad guys die i'm unhappy okay but you know look we here in this country you know there are people who like to joke online about righteous retribution and the death penalty and all that stuff and i think okay fine i understand your anger when it comes to war terror conflict crisis evil people but we should always look at death as a bad thing and the reason i say that is we're going to get into the story and everything. But the first thing I want to point out is that you've got liberals and leftists all across blue sky and on X cheering for and advocating for more

of this under the idea that the CEO himself is responsible for the death of people. And what really pisses me off is they're communists. Their worldview is if I get sick and you don't help me, it's your fault. And I'm like, dude, if you get sick, I understand, like, if you pay for something and don't get it, you're being ripped off. But you getting sick at the fault of some business guy, there's institutions at play. So let me let me read the story for you. And they're going to break down what's what's hot here is you've got Taylor Lorenz. I mean, she's plum lost her mind advocating for more murder on blue sky. Crazy. CNN says United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot and killed in Midtown Manhattan Wednesday morning in a brazen

targeted attack as he walked toward the hotel hosting the company's annual investor conference. Shortly before 7 a.m., a gunman masked in the freezing temperatures was lying in wait before opening fire on Thompson outside the Hilton Midtown, according to NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch. Many people passed the suspect, but he appeared to wait for his intended target. I want to be clear at this time, every indication that is that this was a premeditated, preplanned, targeted attack. So the video in question, this is crazy. They have the video. I'm not going to play it, okay, because it actually shows like I died. We're not going to do that.

CNN's got it. You can watch it there. But the gunman's wearing a hood, a mask, a gray backpack, and he walks up with a suppressed pistol. I'm sure people who are watching it can identify what it is. Fires, chambers around, fires, chambers around. And at first it was interesting because I'm not an expert on guns.

The chat can correct me on this one. They said that the news reported the gun jammed and he kept having to clear it. A bunch of other people I see who were gun people on X were saying that's not the case. It's that he's using subsonic rounds to reduce noise, which don't have the power to pull the hammer back and chamber a round.

So he's manually doing it. It's intentional because he's a hit man. So the speculation right now is one of two things. Big CEO. There was some scandal pertaining to a ransomware hack. They lost like a billion dollars in this ransomware thing. Some people think it's related to that. And a hit man got called and lost like a billion dollars in this ransomware thing. Some people think it's related to that. And a hitman got called and he made a move on this guy. Others

think it may be related to any one of the millions of people who feel wronged by a loved one who was not given their proper medical treatment coverage and may have gotten ill or died or become crippled. So a lot of people are saying, I bet it was a dad whose daughter got sick and they denied coverage and then he got revenge. And I'm like, dude, this is a professional. Well, the actual, like what you're saying about the way that the guy operated the firearm and stuff, it is likely that it was, if I understand correctly, the police report said that there were nine millimeter casings

and a couple of nine millimeter rounds. So that would lead me to believe that they were undercharged, so they're subsonic, so you would have to rack it because it wouldn't have enough energy to actually work the action. The guy looks like he knows what he's doing. Whether or not he's actually been in, you know, whether he's a professional hitman or just a guy that's familiar with firearms, I can't say, and I wouldn't make the assumption either way.

But he definitely knows what he's doing. He's definitely very familiar with firearms. He knows exactly. A lot of people are saying subsonic rounds don't have the power to cycle that kind of weapon. That's why. I have heard people say that the right suppressor could do it. But, you know, I don't know. But the thing is at any

rate he had a bike like across the street so it was all perfectly premeditated and there's still a manhunt underway so that's why i think it's important uh to you know discuss the story especially because if you're in new york however very clearly i think it was a hit i'm seeing a lot of comments where they're like dude this guy's guy's in Columbia already. Well, I mean, he got on his bike. He changed his clothes from the backpack, hopped in. His buddy was waiting around the corner. He got in a nondescript white sedan. They drove to probably, what's that?

Wait, did they say that he got into his sedan? No, no, no. I'm saying this is what people are assuming. Well, they know he got on a city bike and someone that was just scraping the data constantly was able to track where he went, somewhere where there's no cameras. I thought it was Central Park. We actually, I believe we have the tweet in question. So this guy, he's going to be blocked, by the way.

He says, I'm fairly confident of where the UnitedHealthcare assassin escaped to. He escaped on an electric city bike, according to police. I happen to continuously scrape city bike data every minute so I can see where the individual bikes go. The only northbound city bike, he says, the only northbound city bike to leave within 10 minutes of the shooting from any dock near the hotel went to Madison Avenue and 82nd Street. And then he mentions the bike number. And you can see that's where the assassination took place. It's right there. And then it rode up north.

I don't know. What did he get, a train station or whatever? He goes on to point out more details here. Here's what's and then it rode uh up north i don't know what do you get a train station or whatever he goes on to point out more details here here's what's wild about it okay so so we get it we get it the responses from the left are advocating for this man's death because this guy said police hey look i found evidence that may lead you to this murderer leftists on x are calling him a snitch, threatening him with violence. Take a look at this. Natalie F.

Nannolition on X says Blue Sky is allowing threats of violence on its platform from none other than Taylor Lorenz. So a big story broke where Blue Cross Blue Shield will no longer cover anesthesia for the full length of certain surgeries in Connecticut. And she responded by posting the CEO of Blue Cross. Now you may say, oh, well, maybe she wants to protest. No, she said, and people wonder why we want these executives dead. She actually said that this is insane.

This is what we have been fighting against for a decade. When we say the woke people are nuts, they're violent and they're dangerous. It's people like that. They should not be tolerated. Well, I think that it's going to be tolerated on blue sky. No, no. I'm saying like I agree. But I mean, like politically, we voted to shut this stuff down.

We voted for Donald Trump to bring accountability, to say we're not going to tolerate a fringe far left extremist element in these spaces anymore. Now, to a certain degree degree you have your free speech but when you cross over into advocating for i should say being careful here if you are directing or a or party to discuss like planning to commit harm and advocating for these things there are varying degrees of repercussions that i believe you should face i mean look man i think that the the that the law is a valuable tool that we have in these United States. And I do believe that what Taylor is doing there could be construed as illegal.

So, you know, I wouldn't have a problem if the police gave a visit to Miss Taylor Lorenz for advocating harm to someone? Saying that this is why I wish someone was dead is very different than advocating for someone's... Unfortunately, in this instance... Putting up her face? I mean, it's legal. No, no, no, but I didn't...

So here's the issue. She said... There's a third post where she said, people have very justified hatred towards these CEOs. I'm not going to read everything she said. She's nuts. She then says that she personally wants them dead and then posts the image. So, no, no, hold on.

I'm not saying she should go to jail for it. But I'm saying there is a degree of repercussion you could face where it's like I'm okay with banning people from social platforms who are doing things like this. Granted, she's on Blue Sky. Blue Sky will ban you for using the wrong pronouns, but they're going to allow her to do these things. That's nuts to me. Taylor literally just yesterday banned me because I said, she's a, she's a national treasure.

She's a treasure. She, she blocked me because I took a post that she said on blue sky and I put it up and I was like, she's hilarious or something like that. Something, something innocuous. And she blocked me. But then the crazy woman goes and starts alluding to you know positive messages about uh harm to other people she said she's a horrible person i honestly horrible person this is just her trying to be like a shock jock now where she's

kind of skidding out of relevance and knows that she wants to just tread the line of you know the first amendment as much as she possibly can. Just so we talk about her. She goes to the front of blue sky. People know about that. Don't you think that she believes it, though? Don't you? Because my sense is that she's actually a leftist and leftists believe that people that make too much money are evil. Like that's not there's no like there's not a lot of debate about that.

If you're dealing with the far left, they believe that you are a bad person for making too much money. And I don't follow her too much, but isn't she the person that got, like, she doxxed the other girl and then got very, very upset. People were coming, has the infamous crying.

That's her, right? She has done similar things to that, yeah. So then I kind of feel like this would be the perfect thing. I'm not saying she's playing 5D chess necessarily, but what if she's out there just saying, let me say these astronomically insane things that are just terrible to her fellow human then later on it's like oh my god when everybody calls me out i'm the victim here and it's just

this new cycle that she gets where she becomes relevant again producing absolutely nothing for again i can't i can't see see inside of her heart i heart. I don't know what she intends. But it's my belief by reading past things that she said and knowing the left that at the very least, she does think that rich people are bad. Like you are morally wrong if you make too much money. If you accept a position that makes too much money, you accept the position that that makes too makes too much money that's a very common perspective on the far left very i mean it's the whole reason for the communist rebel for communist revolutions all over the world and those are as bloody as you can get right the reason that communist revolutions happen is they believe that the that the the

the bourgeoisie have stolen from the proletariat by having all the money that they have and i i don't ascribe to that worldview at all i believe that the pie grows and some people get outsized portions of it but the whole when the whole pie grows everyone benefits so the more successful an economy is the more benefits everyone that lives in that economy will enjoy. People that are on the left tend to believe that the pie is static. It doesn't

get bigger. So the larger portions that other people are taking, the less fortunate have to scrape by on. And if that were the case, which again, I don't agree with it, if that were the case, then it is actually reasonable to say those people are evil. But that's, I think that that's not the case. And I, but I do believe that the Taylor believes that, that she believes that it's

okay to, to look at people that have, that have a lot and say, you've gotten that by taking from someone else. So this, I'm going to give a shout out to land man, that new Tyler Sheridan show. You guys got to watch it because it's great i mean yellowstone was awesome and it sucks costner left because now the show is basically falling apart they're just killing everybody i'm not gonna watch it uh but landman's got billy bob and billy bob's great i don't know about his politics or whatever but the show is good and there's this viral scene where he's talking to this presumably liberal woman and they're looking at wind turbines and he's like you know how much oil it takes to make this effing thing? He's like, from all the diesel to haul it out here to 12 feet

of concrete in the ground and how much oil got to lubricate it, that thing won't offset its carbon footprint. He explains that they set up wind turbines to power the oil pumps. And she's like, they're using green energy to pump oil. And he's like, no, they're using alternative energy because there's no lines out here and they need electricity from somewhere. The reason I bring that up, the average person believes complete and utter BS. And we all know it. That's why we rag on the fake news all the time. So what's disconcerting to me is, I'll tell you, I don't know a lot about this guy. What I see with this guy, though, and the response from the left is they don't know what they're talking about.

So they see a CEO and they blame him personally for why they got denied or what happened. For all we know, this guy recently got promoted a few years ago and he was like, it's my dream to fix these stupid insurance companies are screwing people over. For all they know, this guy's in that company banging his fist on the table, being like, stop denying these people. And they're like, you don't have the power. I'm going to be CEO. Mark my words. You have no idea. I doubt it. But there's a great scene also, shout out Game of Thrones, which kind of, oof, they went off the rails there, where Daenerys Targaryen takes over a city of slavers, strings up all the oppressors. And then some guy comes in and says, my dad was fighting to end slavery and you killed him. That's what worries me when these people are violent, dangerous lunatics and they target random people. This is why we have courts because

the founding fathers were like, yo, we don't want mob justice because the mob is wrong. So you got to prove it to a jury of peer to of your peers and to the public why someone did something wrong. So I see this. Look, I get it. I talk about how the insurance companies are bringing us off, how I got ripped off, and it was this weird scenario where the bill was super high. You get it. You get it. But the idea that the left would celebrate mob murder is terrifying. I'm with you, dude.

I think I'm very concerned with for-profit medicine and giant corporations taking control of corporatocracy, but to say that, I want to believe that this guy did some behind-the-scenes malfeasance and this was a personal hit on this guy, that he messed up somebody's money and now he paid for it, as opposed to some angry father hiring a hitman or going rogue. I mean, honestly, it doesn't matter either way, but it's not something to be so afraid of. Where are you headed with it? What do you think? Dad? Mad dad? No, I think it doesn't matter either way, but it's not something to be so afraid of. Where are you headed with it? What do you think? Dad?

Mad dad? No, I think it's a professional thing, just the way they had the city bike waiting for them. The police can't figure them out. Isn't there cameras all around New York City? And then you have the, what is it? It's a gun-free zone, guys. How come they didn't save them? Not only that, but the suppressors are illegal in the state of New York as well.

So you're saying that Hitman broke the law? He may have broken the law. I'm surprised, because New York's, you're supposed to not have guns in New York. Yeah, I thought what happens is as soon as you drive across the bridge and you get to that barrier of where New York starts, the gun just freezes in midair and it can't, it's like up against the barrier and you can't get in with it. It's like a Harry Potter spell, gun free zone. You can't bring it in there. Very close to magic. Did you hear the story about how whoever is doing the trading for Pelosi,

they had heavily invested in the company that is there to protect them from cybersecurity threats? No. What's that story? No. I got to pull it up then. You're talking about the ransomware side of this or what? Yeah, where the company that's going to protect them from the next attack got a huge investment from pelosi or company oh which i mean i don't know what that is

inferring at all but i mean it's an interesting aspect yeah i mean i don't know that that that i'm not sure that that would speak to this and you know or or it have have a context that makes it related to this. But I don't, I mean, I personally don't want to talk about motive or anything like that until there's more information that comes out. But if the guy, you know, if homeboy split and he's in, you know, Cartagena now, you know, it's not. It's some South American city, right? Then there might not be much more information

that we ever get. I guess it really comes down to if they catch him. Exactly. He's a super pro when he's going into Columbia or something. Let's jump to this next story from Sportskeeda. Three major firms, J.P. Morgan, AT&T, and Duncan? Wow. Reportedly stopped Twitch ads due to allegations of anti-Semitism. But, you know, this is the Twitch adpocalypse getting worse.

All these leftists that are on Twitch are losing massive sums of money. But for those that missed the previous, I just want to shout this out as well. When you go on Blue Sky or X right now after the assassination of this healthcare CEO and you see all these leftists cheering for it, yeah, that's why big brands don't want to advertise, because nobody wants to put their toothpaste next to a guy advocating for murder. Sorry, it's not going to happen. Here's the story. They say American multinational JPMorgan Chase and Co., telecommunication giant AT&T and Dunkin Donuts parent company Dunkin Brands have reportedly stopped rolling advertisements on Twitch.

This move comes following allegations of anti-Semitism being levied against the purple platform over the past few months. Further, a fourth firm, Chevron Corp., is also reportedly considering terminating future sponsorships for Twitch's signature TwitchCon convention after a controversial panel involving Twitch content creator Frogan took place at this year's event in San Diego with the petroleum company's name and logo in the background. Oh, why?

What did he do? So Frogan was on a panel and they were saying that they were listing streamers as either Halal for good or Sabra for bad. And Sabra is, I guess it's it's a it's a popular hummus it's a hummus that community yeah but it was I guess it's kosher

or it's made it's Israeli it's a company Sabra hummus I believe so it's good they got the rose red pepper ones yeah

but the point was if you're Sabra you're a bad person if you're you know halal you're a good one because it was Jewish

yeah it was a jewish so yeah i mean is she they've been doing this stuff for like a decade and we've been complaining about how the woke are hypocrites and they're racist and they're sexist and all the things they claim that everybody else is and now now the companies are like oh well i mean not only is it like there's frogan but there's also also currently Destiny's fans are going after Hassan and they're reporting him for anti-Semitism. So between Destiny, his whatever you want to call his people, just constantly mass reporting Hassan for for anti-, um, it's finally broken through, or it seems that it's finally brought broken through to, you know, the, uh, the advertisers and stuff. And I mean, look, Hassan is anti antisemitic, you know, like I'm not going to defend Hassan. Um, I'm not one

for mass brigading people and, and, and stuff like that, especially when the people that are doing it is Destiny, who's kind of a piece of garbage as well. So, I mean, the things that he said about MAGA supporters or the Trump supporters and stuff, he's lambasted all conservatives. He's made personal attacks at Tim. So he's garbage, too. So I kind of hope they kill each, you know, not, I mean, like, injure each other's streams badly. I'm not, I don't want to say the wrong thing. You mean, like, cause political damage to each other? Exactly. You know, I hope they do a bunch of damage to each other.

But it is because of, you know, that kind of stuff, that anti-Semitism that Hassan engages in regularly. And Frogan's worse than Hassan, which is hilarious. They've been doing it for years and no one seemed to care. I really wonder if it has to do with Trump won the popular vote by a landslide and all of a sudden you're starting to see these companies do more regular conservative type of advertisements. Like who was the, there's that car company that did a very conservative ad.

And then Target even has changed the way they lay out their stores again. So who has? Target. Like, cause you know how Target had all the, the controversy with what they were pushing during pride month. And now all of a sudden they're saying Merry Christmas again, which they dare not do that before Donald Trump got, what is it,

80 million? There was, I guess a federal court ruled today that Target may have violated federal security laws by failing to disclose the risks. We do have that story. Oh, never mind then. We'll wait for it then. Sorry, go ahead. No, but it just seems like all of a sudden all these companies care about not advertising on Twitch because of the popular vote.

It's not because any of these companies necessarily believe in what this is or they want to shut down a Frogan or they want to shut down a Hassan. They just don't want to be caught in the wrong side of what's currently trending online right now. They're in it to make money. Yeah, I mean, I do think that you're right, that the fact that there was such a strong uh you know change in or a strong signal sent from the american people

is probably the best way to say it because even if people will people will nitpick as to whether or not it was a landslide for donald trump but what you can't do is say that there wasn't a landslide for the right i i think that it was, it was something like 11 counties in California moved to the right and shifted red. If you look at a, if you look at the, the, the, the shift nationwide, there's a massive shift for policies that are more conservative. A lot of this I think is because of the, you know, the backlash from the a lot of the stuff that went on with, you know, defund the police and stuff and the the border situation. I think the people are seeing those things.

If they're not seeing them in their in real life and in their day to day lives, they're seeing the results on social media, they're hearing the stories. So I think that it's undeniable that there has been a shift from the left to the right in the U.S., and I think that you're probably right. You're seeing it with advertisers, but you're also, like, we had, you know, we had Cenk on last night from the Young Turks, and both Cenk and Anna have had a bit of a, at the very least, I think Anna's made a shift to the right. But I think that at the very least, Cenk is softening on opening the doors to discuss things with the right.

Where for a long time, it was outside of acceptable conversation to say, yes, I'll talk to conservatives. I'll give Cenk some credit because he has made the point for a long time, we should accept the victories we can where we agree with the right. He's made that point whether you agree with him or not. He says Trump was an insurrectionist and all these things I totally disagree with. But I've seen him several years ago being like, hey, if the right wants to end foreign wars or whatever, let's take what we can get. And more recently, he got flack because he was he tweeted Elon like they're talking about making it so that generals can't work in the defense as defense contractors for 10 years or whatever.

This is a great thing to do. Ban them from doing this. They overspend on purpose to get, you know, they then once they're done with their term or they leave the military or whatever, they go with these defense contractors and the left attacked him for agreeing with Elon. Yeah. Well, I've watched, what is it, Anna, Anna Kasparian? Anna Kasparian would, I believe her shift right is very genuine because of what happened to her, I believe, when she was walking her dog and she said that it was like transients attacked her and then she saw the backlash she got for saying, hey, I'm in danger in Los Angeles County. Why can't I request safety from the police? But Cenk or Cenk? How do you say his name? Cenk. Cenk. I mean, I saw him on election night

kind of going down with a ship and all of a sudden, I don't follow him enough. So you guys know him better than I do. But when he's reemerged, now he seems to be very open to Trump and very open to the conservative point of view. And it's almost like, does he see the writing on the wall? I'm not going down with CNN, MSNBC and all the other woke media outlets. I need to become more centrist so I can capture the actual audience that isn't propped up by bots. My take on Cenk, I'd like to see him, is that he's what you would define as a good faith actor. Whether you agree with him or not, or you like him or you don't, he's always been acted out of what he truly believes.

He's like a hothead at times. I would say he's hotheaded, emotional, wrong, and I'd give him the good faith thing. But the reason why I add the hotheaded stuff is because often he's so wrong, he can't see straight. He's like, ah! He's so emotional about it. Yeah, and he'll admit it, too.

He admitted it last night. He's like, he's so emotional about it. Yeah, he'll admit it too. He admitted it last night. He's like, sometimes, you know, I go, he's, I gotta be honest, with all due respect,

he's, this is gonna piss off everybody, but he's got an element of left-wing Alex Jones. Oh, I love him. He does. I love Alex for 20 years,

man. People were posting a video from the show of him going like this with his arms next to Alex Jones doing the same thing. We got to get them in a room together.

They don't agree, but they both have those moments of getting heated and culture war. That's your culture war episode. Dude, if we got Jen, you go and Alex Jones on one, they'd do it. They'd both do it.

I think they would actually. Yeah. So I can appreciate it. It would be insane. He definitely like, we're not, when I was talking to him, I was like,

you know, complaining about, about the way that he was framing it and, I was, like, you know, complaining about the way that he was framing it and how people were, you know, framing the situation with the Senate and how senators are elected and what their designated role is.

He was, like, really just yelling over me as if me articulating my point was going to be a bad thing, and it was very Alex Jones-y. A lot really pushes buttons. I thought they were going to get into it. It was fun to watch.

I had to go to the bathroom. I was like, I don't want to miss it. I just turned the volume up really loud because I had to walk out of the room. It was a cacophony. It cut to you and you're like smiling and watching. And then I'm like, okay, okay like okay okay guys guys now it's just I can appreciate that then because I know a lot of people in Los

Angeles that are like that where if you only watch CNN and what famous celebrities said about news cycle items you would probably be like him too because you'd think Trump is after you he was attacking the Capitol all that stuff where if he's if he means well he just is misled then i i have he's like what do you say a a good faith liberal yeah based in communication

first like that seems like his number one tenet is communication he said something last night that was like if we don't communicate with people we think we disagree with we'll never find out about the things we actually agree with each other on. That's something that we've been saying here, you know, for a long time. The goal of, you know, kind of what we're doing here is to get people, you know, is to find the off ramp, right? To prevent the meme from coming to life and and the civil war from happening the goal is the point is to try to find a way to prevent our country that we all love from descending into chaos and so it was really bleak for a while because the left wouldn't talk and the left essentially just said

well everyone that supports trump is a racist bigot. They're all deplorables, blah, blah, blah. And the people that were in positions of authority in the Democrat Party, they were repeating this. You had the media, you had Hillary Clinton. Joe Biden was saying MAGA Republicans are a threat to the very soul of this country, he said. And when you have that as your starting point, then it makes perfect sense to be like, I'm not going to talk to them. They're clearly the bad guys.

I wonder if Cenk was legitimately trying to stop a civil war by saying, let's listen to them. Why didn't he start doing this when Biden got elected? Cool off the political climate. It's only when, oh, my God, the popular vote went to Donald Trump. Now it's time to start listening to the other side. I would say he started off by saying Biden can't win. Are you nuts? We have to defeat them.

But this is not the way. And they maintained Biden, basically smashed his face into the ground figuratively. Like he ran for president. He's not. Cenk Uygur ran for president. He came on the culture war being. Yeah, he was like, Biden can't win. What are they doing?

And we argued. We talked about like Armin Arby case and it was heated. So I told him this. He's like, hey, I'm not I now know MAGA is not my enemy or my mortal enemy. I'm like a little thick there, huh? Like you were basically screaming in the face of the left. We have to defeat Trump. Biden's not the guy. And then when Trump wins, he says he basically said, OK, what are you going to do? Like Trump? He said Trump legitimately won. He got the popular vote. He said for the longest time that Republicans were winning without the popular vote. And so we're pushing back against it. But

this time Trump got it. And I think Cenk realized the Democratic Party is defeated. They wouldn't listen to him. They wouldn't listen to the people screaming Biden couldn't win. They lied out their teeth every step of the way. He running for president he can't he wasn't born in america but now he's got he's left with no choice that only choice is to try and reach an olive branch out to mega one aspect of what i think phil you mentioned it just a bit ago about how part of the problem from the last eight years was that there wasn't a communicate there was a communication barrier from it was a lot of it was the media telling people don't associate with them and it was like the deplorable whatever it was don't associate with them and uh there was is probably both sides

but there was a lot of it coming from the mainstream media a lot of it a little bit from what the underground but a lot of it from the mainstream media i'm concerned with these these ad boycotts on twitch and kind of tying it back into the story because it's sort of like a don't associate with them vibe again and i know it's just it's different because it's corporations and they're like we're not going to associate our brand with you but it does feel like hey anti-semitic guy bad don't associate with frondo what the hell is that guy frogan frogan don't associate with frogan it's a girl and like no associate with frogan have It's a girl. No, associate with Frogan. Have a conversation with him. If you disagree with him, then

talk to him and figure out why. I'll say this. I can't speak to Frogan. I don't know who that is. But I think it's fair to say be careful of the people whose intentions are not to have real conversations, but to create chaos and harm people. I'm not saying there should be an arbiter of who the determination is.

I'm just saying, trolling is fine. But some of these people are chaotic evil and their intention is I'll say I'll say like this. There are people that I know if I invited on this show would be like, no, no, no. Trust me. Like, we'll have a conversation as soon as the camera turns on. They're going to break every rule imaginable on YouTube to try to get the show banned. Like, so some people you just are like, OK, that person's the joker. We can't have them on. Yeah. And also to the point that you're making, there's nothing wrong with trying to associate with people and talk to people. And I agree with the spirit of your comment. But advertisers are not people. Like, if you're just like, I'm going to put up the sign for my brand, you can't have a conversation with a sign That's not, you can't have a conversation with a sign. You know, you can't have a conversation with a commercial. So as much as I do understand what you're saying about we should talk to people that we disagree with,

that's perfectly fine. I agree with that. But if you're an advertiser, if all you're doing is saying, I'm looking to, you know, to put my brand up and then the person that is standing in front of the sign that has your brand is saying horrible things about Jewish people or what have you, I think that it's pretty reasonable for advertisers to say. Now, I mean, I do think that it's probably not a bad thing for some brands to say,

oh, we're okay with edgier content. I think if the UFC is looking for people to advertise, you could probably have edgier brands and stuff like that. But when it comes to Dunkin' Donuts, I totally get why they're like, no, don't put a Jew hater in front of our sign. Much describing like Kick and Rumble compared to Twitch. Twitch was supposed to be the clean one

that's more in line with what happens on Netflix as opposed to what happens on those alternative streaming sites, but then all of a sudden they turned around and said, hey, wait a minute, this is by far worse than anything we've seen on Rumble or Kik. Let's jump to the story from America First Legal. Victory! U.S. District Court denies Target's attempt to dismiss AFL lawsuit and transfer venue.

Shareholder action against undisclosed risks and losses caused by Target's ESG, DEI and LGBTQ pride campaign to continue. So this is not necessary. It's not a victory in that the courts have ruled that Target caused undue risk to the shareholders by running these pride campaigns. They are basically saying, no, you can't dismiss this. We want to hear these arguments. Take a look at this. They say in a groundbreaking decision, the court denied both motions holding. Target's 2021 risk disclosure could be materially misleading because it was not specifically tailored to the risks related to its plan for a new and aggressive 2023 Pride Month

campaign. Target failed to account for the specific risk that Target's upcoming Pride Month campaign or previous campaigns championed by Target could cause customer boycotts and a loss of sales. The amended complaint alleges that Target knew the risks of the 2023 Pride Month campaign and failed to publicly disclose such risks. Generic risk disclosures are inadequate to shield defendants from liability for failing to disclose known risks. Long story short, Target ran this massive Pride Month campaign. Everybody knew it was toxic to do because I believe this happened after Bud Light. And yeah, Bud Light was before this because that was April, I think, and then June was Pride

Month. And they did not disclose to shareholders, hey, you know that thing that's costing billions of dollars over here? We're going to do it too. So we may see a serious victory, they say. Due to boycotts against Target, the company lost $10 billion in market valuation between May 18th and May 23rd, with an overall loss between May 17th and October 6th of that same year of more than $25 billion in market capitalization. In denying Target's motion to transfer, the court noted that many of Target's directors live outside of Minnesota, and most of its corporate employees are required to come into the office once per quarter,

implying that many of them work remotely. Furthermore, Target's 2020, 21, 22, and 23 shareholder meetings did not occur in Minnesota. For these and other reasons, Target failed to carry its burden in demonstrating that this court should transfer the securities litigation case to the District of Minnesota. Wow. So are they trying to say that since they saw how Bud Light tanked their stock with the Dylan Mulvaney fiasco, that Target, since they already set up their—because I worked in retail many years ago, but the idea is— I don't think they're connected.

Okay, they're not connected. I think I think the the the point is everybody knows that these campaigns are extremely politically divisive. OK. And Target did not disclose, hey, this is actually a political ideology that's risky and they should have. Now, granted, the court didn't say they did. They're saying you can't dismiss this. Like we're going to move forward and hear the evidence. And this could result in Target getting serious penalties for running these pride campaigns but i'll tell you this this where we're at right now with this oh it's going to send chills down the spine of every other corporation yeah not only donald trump's victory in the republican sweep but seeing that they

couldn't get this dismissed companies are going to be like yeah we stay away from that stuff you have they have it won't go broke they have a fiduciary responsibility to inform the shareholders of things that they're going to do that may negatively affect the stock price and if you're going to do something that's controversial again like we were talking about you know we were just talking about why you wouldn't advertise with people that say controversial things, you know, whether they be, you know, acceptable to one group or not. children, that's a risky thing to talk about and to have in your store and to make that, you know, to not disclose that to your shareholders when they're the ones that are, you know, they have a right to know what you're going to be doing and what you're doing. And if you do something that could negatively affect the stock price, you know, you're obligated to let your shareholders

know and if you if you cost people money you've cost them money and they they may have the right to say hey you owe me money i want my money back i lost money because you mismanaged the business that i invested in i think the important thing to understand uh that I have little respect for is these people saying, like, we better watch out for cancel culture on the right. And I'm like, look, you know, I am not some surface level classical liberal guy who is like all free speech must be protected at all times for everybody, no matter what. That's silly. I was naive probably 10 years ago as to regard to these things. And now it's very clear that there is moral worldview and there are those that would adhere to one and those that would not. So it's not so easy to say, I believe in free speech, because then you end up with woke institutional elements trying to destroy you. So my view is simply overwhelmingly, I agree with free speech, but I don't defend the free speech rights of people who seek to destroy my rights. That's it. That's what the line is. I will not aid and abet people who are trying to destroy

our worldview and our values that pertain to, you know, classical liberal traditions and things like this. What I see with a lot of other people is they're like, we have to defend all of our enemies and let them do these things. And I bring this up in this context because the idea is, oh, I mean, we can't cancel these companies and boycott them for doing these things. I mean, I'm like, no, yeah, we absolutely can. Absolutely. These employees, these corporate employees, these are the ones who are running the censorship campaigns. These are the people who are getting your products banned. These are the people who are making sure that your books don't appear on Amazon. So when we say, no, no, no, no, enough of this crackpot ideology

at shutting everybody down, I will not defend you. In fact, I will be happy to see your company fail. And then we can, once we've stabilized and we're all in agreement that we, that these people will not be in control of what we can see, think here or purchase, then we can say, okay, fine, have, have your, your section in the back of the store or whatever. And, you know, if people don't want to buy from me, they won't buy from you. But I'm not going to tolerate institutionalized authoritarian ideology. That's that's my view. So if Target is going to play these games with these ideologies, I say sucks to be you. I'm not going to defend a single ounce of your speech or anything like that.

It kind of seems like they're done because they've shifted back to like Christmas, not holiday season, Christmas stuff again. And you're seeing it with, what is it? Apple just did a very un-woke, just family, not necessarily family friendly, but like family first with not all the DEI woke nonsense interjected in it. So it seems like these,

you say you couldn't like attack a company because they're a faceless machine, but it's oftentimes like the CEO and the board, how taken over are they by the woke mob? So it seems like these corporations and companies are starting to turn back to what the regular person wants to see, which is just, I want to know Jaguar is going to be the coolest car. Don't tell me about all the inclusivity.

I'm with Jaguar on that one. They were right. What were they right about? Did you see their new paint car? Who's Jaguar's target market? I thought it would be just a regular person that all of a sudden,

like I saw the cool vehicle when I was a kid. Jags are expensive. Yeah, but when I become wealthy, then all of a sudden I'll want to get that car. Like I've kind of... Wait, is it...

So for the people... No, no, no. It's rich people, right? Yeah, yeah. So these cars are going to cost $100,000? Yeah. What kind of person of person's got 100 grand to spend on a car capitalist city dweller right oh yeah so jaguar said who buys jags it's upper class individuals who tend to live in cities and what are their political affiliations they're liberal they're woke he said okay that's what

we're targeting then democrats tend to be higher income individuals with crackpot ideologies. And they realized they're not going to get the cool city slicker guy anymore with the old classic jag. They need to target the urban dwelling upscale individual. I guarantee that a marketing meeting where the guy said, here's your current 35 year old millionaire in New York City is going to buy a jag. And it's some hipster guy with black glasses and a beard and a flannel. And he's got a pride flag pin. And they're like, that's it. He works for BuzzFeed.

He writes listicles. And he makes a million bucks. Or not BuzzFeed, but he runs a blog. That's the guy who's going to buy a luxury car. That's cool. And here's the best part. They've abandoned Tesla. Here's our target market.

So I think the cars are ugly and nasty and they never buy one. But I think their view is, we know the Democratic Party has become the party of the wealthy. And we know it's higher income people that tend to vote Democrat. And then you look at regular working class people, they're not going to buy Jags. And so they're like, screw it, go woke. That's our target. And they're not a broad market company anyway. You know, Jaguar, these are luxury cars. They're not like Coca-Cola in a grocery store or Bud Light.

They're specifically targeting one group of ultra-wealthy people. And they probably said, eh, a disproportionate amount of people who live in cities and have money that are woke. So let's roll with it. Is Jaguar owned by a company kind of like Lexus and Toyota, or are they their own thing? No, it's owned. I'll pull it up. Hata Motors, is that who owns it? Yeah, I think it is. I'd be curious if they have a smaller, more economy line underneath their umbrella, and are they just doing regular stuff at the same time they're having Jaguar?

And that's why they're doing EVs. Yep. It's an Indian company. These people ditch Tesla, and they want the EV, go green, woke, well off, uppity liberal. They own Land Rover, Jaguars and Land Rovers, and they merged them into Jaguar Land Rover Limited. Yep. Tata owns it.

It's an Indian company. Oh, wait, Jaguar's the one that's doing the Waymos right now, right? Waymos? Waymos, that's like the autonomous car in San Francisco. So it's like that makes sense then. They're targeting that they're only going to target. They're so in their bubble. They can't see beyond Bud Light because they know that they're not trying to

sell to like beer drinking, college football-watching people. They sat down and they said, look, that $55,000 a year plumber, he ain't buying a Jag. Who is? And they're like, well, you've got this software developer who lives in New York. Well, they are non-binary, and they've got disposable income. They could buy one. And they're like, okay, what do they want? I don't know.

Baby blue and salmon pink with a trans flag on it. Did you see the new pink Jaguar? I just saw the reveal today. It's awful. It's a weird car. I like the front. And then you go on the back and you're like, now it's getting ugly and oblong. Yeah, I'm kind of drawn to it.

It's electric? Yeah, they're all electric. Okay. And they're just so goofy. Real, real thin looking lights. I love it, man. It really changes my perspective. they're all electric. Okay. And they're just so goofy. Real, real, like, thin-looking lights. And look, man. It really changes my perspective. They're very Art Deco.

Yeah. Get woke, go broke, I gotta say. Get woke, go broke. All concept cars don't really turn out to be what actually goes on the assembly line out there for the regular people. But it does change my perspective on this, because then you're saying how, like,

they targeted their people, and us seeing from the outside in, what is it, all the promotional stuff for that Wicked movie? And it's like, it was insufferable for anybody regular but my girlfriend loved it i heard it's doing great on the box office so they know their target demographic the movie ever even conservatives like actually the movie was really good okay but the press tour is psychotic danny palaszczuk has an epic ai. You guys got to watch his video on this where he's interviewing

them and they're saying these... It's really good. I can't do the bit justice, but Danny, we've had him on the show. You know, Ryan Long and Danny Palaszczuk, they do bits together. But Danny's YouTube channel, check it out. He's sitting down with them and he asks some questions. The last question he asks is like, he's like, 9-11 Tower 7.

How did it fall down? And then he uses AI to have the, or I don't know what he does. He edits it to make them answer these funny questions. But anyway, I digress. So there's wicked movies about the Wizard of Oz? The prequel to Wizard of Oz, where the Wicked Witch is actually the good guy. Oh, of course. Is it good?

But apparently it's good. Apparently people like it, but it's sad because I don't know the, not Ariana Grande, the other girl. I really liked- Cynthia and- Cynthia Erivo? Erivo? Yeah.

Erivo? E-R-I-V-O. Erivo? Erivo? I really liked her in that Stephen King HBO miniseries, if you saw it, The Outsider. It's with the guy from Arrested Development. Which guy? The main actor.

Jason Bateman?ason bateman and it's like it's kind of like a slow turn but it's a good if you're into something spooky it was really good and to see her kind of go off the deep end on press tours it's like i really wish i didn't see that because i thought she was an amazing actress and then speaking off the deep end i guess that that uh snow white movie is going forward did you hear anything about that yeah snow white let's uh let's jump to this we have this story this clip from drama alert car crash involving a kick streamer wow that's a clip ladies and gentlemen i give you idiocracy is live and it's now yeah my bad my bad my bad so kick doesn't wow that's a clip. Clip it.

I went live, though. Holy shit. Six viewers. Okay, another person. Bro, I can't even move my car up. Holy shit. That's why you insure your fucking car, bro. I gotta turn it off, man.

It's in the back, bro. Damn, that's like the calmest I've ever been in a car accident. That's a clip damn man i've had this car for two years oh i was gonna put an exhaust on it man well r.i.p guys so uh welcome to idiocracy a man live streaming in his car while he's driving he has stopped there's an accident behind him which hits the back of his car and blows out his wind his rear windshield and uh you know in the in the normal, insane normal reality 15, 20 years ago, a person in their car would get hit.

They'd look back. They'd check themselves, get up out of the car, grab their phone, or if they had a cell phone, look around and be like, is everybody okay? Is everybody okay? And then they'd call 911. We had an accident here, guys. Instead, it's like, oh, dude, clip it. Let's go.

Viral clip. Yeah. And it was like, oh, it's's go viral clip yeah and it was like oh it's a clip he didn't even sound excited it's like a this dead end like prozac i don't know this prozac i don't want to call out prozac by name i like people are fried dude if he's a car snob why is like i would i'm i'm surprised he wasn't upset that his car was hit like if he's a car like if that's his deal is to like do car streaming or whatever you know i think he's a car snob as a means to an end he just wants to be a social media star so he's doing it with the car and then he sadly it looks like the car

is tumbling towards him so the person could have had lots of damage to them and then he's only seen it as an opportunity to go viral which he did but it's sad that that's how disconnected we are from reality, where it's not a car accident where someone almost got harmed. It's, oh, my God, this is my moment. I have six live stream viewers right now. Now I'm going to be somebody. This is the most interesting thing that he could produce is getting rear-ended by a vehicle. And where we are headed with this, it's not about this one guy. This is just one example of internet psychotic disorder, what do you want to call it, where it's like someone finally hit something where they're going to get looked at.

That's it. Let me tell you guys, okay? I see the people in the chat say, why are we talking about this? What's this about? What it's about is when I was a kid, what I looked up to was can you jump the highest can you run the fastest can you save the most people can you build the best car can you be the best can you score the most points now it's how many views do you get well how do you get views I don't know something dumb happens to you so you end up with young women getting suicidally depressed on

Instagram because they don't get enough likes and the only way to get likes is by filtering their faces and looking weird and then you got dudes like this being like, yes, yes, this is my moment. I got rear-ended. It used to be, you're growing up and you're like, I just ran and broke the state record in the 100-meter dash. Yeah, and then you'd high-five your friends and you'd have a video of it. They gave you a trophy.

Now they don't give you trophies anymore. Now everybody gets a trophy. And it also used to be about consistency, where it wasn't about that one-off moment where you get this viral blip. It's like, no, dude, I run 100 meters really fast over and over and over and over, and people take notice, and then they put you on a pedestal and take a picture of you. And that's why you're famous is because you consistently create greatness. Not some stupid flash in the pan.

That picture was the blip for you. You worked really, really hard for that fleeting moment where they would hand you that one trophy. There's one. There's only one first place. And if you're not first, you're last. Yeah, because I was going to say it's like this disgusting culture of people putting cameras on themselves. But we're putting cameras on ourselves right now. And it's not disgusting because, yeah, this isn't a flash in the pan moment where we're hoping to get a viral clip. This is a consistent endeavor where it's constantly putting out quality over and over and over and over and builds a huge audience as a result. You make a good point,

Ian. I don't think we go for the viral clips enough on this show. Can I throw it? That's it, Tim. I'm fucking done. Oh, there's a thumbnail.

That's what he was thinking. Yeah, exactly. See, that's all we got to do. Ian, you son of a bitch. Clip it. See, that's all we got to do. Ian, you son of a bitch. Oh, no.

You know, it's funny. Clip it. What's funny is there are shows that do that. It's all reality television. Oh, I know, but there are podcasters that are like, can we make fake drama? We want to get a viral clip, so we're going to intentionally say or do a thing.

Oh, yeah. It's not fulfilling as an artist. For me, it's not fulfilling to do that. I tried to do that in the early days of YouTube. I'm like, I just find the videos that got featured, and I'd respond to them because I'm like, how do I get famous faster? I'm like, why am I getting famous? It matters what you got famous for. They're going to clip you crying.

Fuck yeah. Do it, dude. Whenever anybody wants to talk about you on YouTube, they're going to use crying fuck yeah do it dude so that'll be the whenever anybody wants to talk about you on youtube they're gonna use that as the thumbnail beautiful for make it they'll make a gif of it and i was so loose well see here's here's a crazy thing like obviously we could do stupid things like that and make the show have more viral moments with like i don't know someone could throw a frisbee at you and just say he gets hit in the head or beach balls in the office but this is the point right so you see people like and Ian and just say he gets hit in the head. Or beach balls in the office. But this is the point, right?

So you see people like Andrew Tate, and he gets ragged on all the time. And I think they're silly guys. I think they know that they post. I don't need to say I think they know. They literally post these silly cringe things, and the left thinks they're owning them by mocking them. For example, when Andrew Tate got out, he's like, I just bought 10 new Bugattis.

And they're scooters. He has these little scooters, and he jumps on one, and he's like, I just bought 10 new Bugattis. And that's their scooters. He has these little scooters and he jumps on one and he scoots away in a goofy looking way. And the left is like, why do people look up to him? He's screwing around, dude. Calm down. Now, by all means, criticize the guy for everyone to criticize him for. But there's a reason why he's got so many followers that are young men. There's a reason why Jordan Peterson got so popular among young men.

Because we're sick and tired of a society where it's like to be great well everybody gets a trophy so accomplishment and merit ain't going to get you any recognition or greatness music is done by ai now they're doing ai videos the movie industry is dead what can you do get hit in the face with a pie i guess now you got have you seen those videos where the dudes go to walmart and then they grab the gallons of milk and just spray themselves with milk? The internet is breaking people's brains. I think consistency is a big part of winning in life, is being able to replicate what you do.

I just think that they're mistaken. They think if they go viral with this moment, I'm going to go from six viewers to ten viewers to a thousand, not knowing that they only tuned in for this viral moment. He has to recreate it again. He had six viewers. That's exactly right, though. The idea of getting one thing to go viral is missing the point.

The reason why you can become an internet star whatever, is because you continuously put out, produce content that people find compelling. Whatever it may be, it has to be something that you can, that you can do over and over and over. And it has to continue to be fresh. Just, just having one thing that goes big, you know, that, that was, that's, that's like a one-hit wonder. That was what happened to artists that had one good song and then nobody cared about anything afterwards. The sad part is he's going to get this little dose of fame. This clip right here has like 200,000 views compared to his normal six. It's going to be crazy.

So he's either going to always wonder why he let that opportunity slip for him to become the next Jack Doherty or whatever, or he's going to continuously outdo himself staging things or doing something dangerous to put himself in this situation. There's no path out of this that ends happily. No, no. I mean, look, you can learn how to,

you can spend your time trying to go viral by doing things like this, or you can spend your time trying to do something or hone a skill that people find valuable. So, excellent super chat from Amtru. Dylan Mulvaney is a perfect example. There you go. This is hitting the nail on the head with the hammer. Why do we bring these things up? What are we talking about?

Dylan Mulvaney. 10 million followers. Why do we bring these things up? What are we talking about? Dylan Mulvaney. 10 million followers. Why? Dylan, we looked back at Dylan Mulvaney's TikTok and went to the early days. Did you see his early posts? It was just a regular kind of social media, aspiring social media star. Funny animals with Dylan Mulvaney on the Savari. And these things weren't working.

And then Dylan was like, I'm coming out as gay. And it's like 10,000 views. And whoa, now I'm coming out as gay. And it's like a thousand, you know, ten thousand views. Whoa. Now I'm by twenty thousand views. I think I might be trans. A hundred thousand views. And then finally, I'm going to be a girl. A million views. And then day one of being a girl, a million views day two. And they were all I mean, it looked at first like it was parody. Like one of the first things Dylan Mulvaney made was I'm a woman now and I'm going to cry. And it was like, are you insulting women? It's like that was the bit. And then what happens?

I believe that Dylan Mulvaney ended up getting all that surgery for the same reason Madonna does to play to a character, to be a personality and to generate traffic and attention. I don't think Dylan Mulvaney is actually trans like the average trans person. So that's what I described it as. it as there's different kinds of transgender. And I don't want to get too much into it because we try to be family friendly, but oof. There's the kink version. There's the gender dysphoric version,

which is the one that people are typically discussing, although there are a lot of people that do the kink stuff. But then there's Dylan Mulvaney, which is the Madonna version, which is get plastic surgery to be famous in the pictures or whatever. So Dylan was like, better get surgery to play this role and get traffic. And you can see it in the evolution of Dylan's content.

That's what we see with all of these people. It doesn't matter if it's good. It's just it's insanity. Whatever terrifies, shocks, enrages people the most in that moment to get views. All that matters. Being good, smart, funny doesn't matter to these people. There's, there's like, um, there's this, there's this, I don't know what you call it, but there's this miss, miscalculation by a lot of people that get famous doing something that they have to keep doing that thing now that they're famous to get more famous.

But a lot of times you might springboard into notoriety through doing one thing like complaining on the Internet. But then once you're famous, you don't need to complain anymore. Like you can now do humanitarian things. You're still well known and you can evolve. And some people get trapped in that cycle of doing what they used to do because they think they have to keep doing that to get bigger. I think it's when a celebrity gets bigger than the medium that brought them into stardom, where you have somebody like Michael Jordan or Mike Tyson. They get famous from this particular sport, but then once more people know about Mike Tyson than watch boxing,

now he can do whatever he wants, be in The Hangover or do cartoons or whatever. Or the same thing with musicians. Once a rapper like Outkast and Andre 3000, once he becomes bigger than rap, he can pivot to whatever he wants, movies or do that different type of album, the experimental type of stuff. So if you can get past that, I guess it's called an inflection point, then you can do whatever you want. But the people that are still trying to recreate the same thing

and the same medium over and over and not evolving, it's because they don't have the option to. Because if they experiment outside their genre of music or their experiment outside of the movies they've been typecast into all of a sudden people like oh i don't like this and it's like yeah because you're not popular enough to just make it on just your face i feel like it'd be the same thing if if um some random guy off the street wanted to do a youtube channel and become a youtuber compared to will smith he can come on the platform and become popular day one i guess it's a bad example right now but if you're a celebrity um other famous actor i don't know uh kevin spacey kevin spacey can do that's another one

that's probably what are we doing can't wait no no no whatever she can do whatever kevin spacey made a youtube video after the scandal and it was massively viral every news station picked it up every website picked it up. And Will Smith could probably pull it off, too. Yeah. Let's jump to this next story. We got this from Axios. Supreme Court seems likely to uphold ban on gender-affirming care.

My friends, today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments as to whether or not Tennessee can ban child sex changes. I think it may go one step further. Depending on how the court wants to rule on this, they may keep it limited and just say, Texas, you're allowed to do this. They can have a nice day. However, if they say the states, you know, Tennessee can't ban this. It has ramifications for all the other states that ban child sex changes. Now, there's a few things that were interesting here. The first thing is that the transgender attorney for the ACLU admitted there is no evidence that child sex

changes prevent suicide. That's crazy. Quote, tragically, deaths by suicide in trans people of all ages continue to be above the national average, but there is no evidence that gender affirmative treatments reduce this. Shocking. This is where it gets interesting. This is the story right here. May Mailman tweets, Alito asks whether transgenderism is immutable, meaning you can't change it. ACLU says it's biologically driven, trying to dodge. Alito says, what about gender fluid? ACLU admits that exists, that exists. Immutability is the key to being a protected legal class. This argument for the Supreme Court, I don't think it's likely, but has the potential to effectively remove 1964 civil rights protections from people based on gender identity under the argument that gender fluidity proves that being trans is not immutable.

In fact, you can change whenever you feel like it, and thus it is not protected. I hope that it actually does turn out that way. Well, the question then is, is SCOTUS a bunch of cowards? Well, there are some cowards on SCOTUS, but there are also some absolute idiots. So like Sotomayor and Cade, I forget what her name is. Yeah, she is an absolute idiot. She's not a biologist. She's not a biologist.

She definitely isn't. And I mean, and that's part of why I think that, you know, she's she should be disqualified like she should or she should have been disqualified. The fact that she refused to answer what a you know, what a woman is. I mean, if you're going to refuse to answer based on ideological grounds, I think that that should prevent you from sitting on the Supreme Court, particularly when cases like this are going to be brought before the Supreme Court. We know exactly where she's going to come down. There's no there's no reason for for her to even spend any time inquiring with the with the you know, with with anyone about about this stuff, you know exactly where she's coming down and going to come down. And it's not because of her opinion on the Constitution, but because of her ideological possession by the left. I got to say, when it comes to being trans,

if someone feels that they're in the wrong body, that would be very rough. And I think people like that, it should be taken seriously if someone's feeling like that, and they should be handled with whatever kind of care and kindness or whatever you need to do to help someone like that. But if you can truly say, I'm a woman now,

and then tomorrow you can be like, I'm a man again, it's not a protected class. Yeah, it's all it is about how you feel, and you're definitely not. You should not receive protections from the government, which will also require accommodation from the rest of society. I don't understand why these leftists are trying to bring these Supreme Court cases right now.

So when it comes to defamation. For the lulz. Perhaps. Okay. When it comes to defamation, if Ian says, you know, Tim kicked the dog. And I say, no, I didn't. Ian, I'm going to sue you. Let's say Ian's a big publication.

These big publications tend to settle out right away because it's not about whether they're right or wrong. Their lawyers say, listen, you accused a person of doing a thing. You made a statement of fact. They're suing you for defamation. You'll probably win. However, if this goes to court and you lose and you appeal or if you win and they appeal and this goes to the Supreme Court, they could overturn Times v. Sullivan and you will get sued 5,000 times before the end of the month. So they say, OK, pay him out. The lawyer could say you're going to win the suit. And if they appeal, if it goes to trial, you win, they appeal, Supreme Court could shut down this protection you have in precedent. So they typically just say we're not going to be involved. We're going to pay you what you want. We're sorry.

So for the ACLU right now, knowing it's a six to three conservative leaning court to say, let's bring this lawsuit forward and try and do they think that Alito and Thomas are going to be like, yes, give children sex changes. Yeah, I really don't see that happening. So then you've got Amy Coney Barrett, and you've got Kavanaugh, and then I suppose everybody's hoping that Roberts is going to side with them, but he's probably not. But still, I think Gorsuch.

And then that's it. I only hope that this does come out where the Supreme Court, you know, does uphold the ban because this is about children. Right. This is about kids. And. I've heard, you know, you hear the meme when you have transgender children, the people deciding the children are transgender are the same people deciding that their cats are vegan, right? You know, it's not something that the children are actually deciding. And I think

it's something like 85% of transgender children desist at puberty and it just turns out that they were gay or lesbian, which like there should be no limitation limitation or whatever on on who you want to marry or whatever but as far as children go and furthermore if you are taking a position that transgenderism is something that we should we should you know affirm when they're adults and you and you want to make sure that that transgender people can can get surgery and blah blah blah if you prevent the trend the children from going through natural puberty you cannot produce neo vaginas and you cannot make like because there's not enough material with the genitals because they don't develop properly so even you can make an approach trans argument you. You can make a neither here nor there trans argument.

Or you can make an anti-trans argument. But the fact of the matter is they're kids. You should not be doing life-changing surgery or giving children drugs that will sterilize them for life because they cannot make an informed decision. This is interesting. Axios says, just four years ago, the court ruled that firing trans workers because they are trans

is a form of illegal sex discrimination. Advocates argued that that same logic should apply to healthcare. Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, wrote the majority opinion in that case by Roberts and the court's liberals. Gorsuch did not ask any questions Wednesday, so there's no way to know

whether he thinks the two cases are aligned. Even if he is inclined to side with the families challenging Tennessee's law, he would need to bring along at least one other conservative justice to achieve a majority. The oral arguments are an indication of how the justices are thinking about a case, not a surefire prediction of how they'll ultimately rule. It would be insane if the Supreme Court sides with the ACLU and says that Texas isn't allowed to ban these treatments. The oral arguments from Tennessee were sound. He outright said we used to have lobotomies and other surgeries that irreparably harmed children.

We know that. But it was incumbent upon the states to impose those regulations to stop these practices from happening, as we are doing now. And you even have the story from the Postmillennial where the attorney for the ACLU admitted there's no evidence child sex changes help prevent suicide. That's really the sticking point for me, because a lot of the argument of we need to rush these kids through life-changing surgeries, God, is that they would kill themselves if they didn't get it.

And if now they're admitting that that's actually not the case, it's not preventing suicides, then I don't see the reason't get it. And if now they're admitting that that's actually not the case, it's not preventing suicides, then I don't see the reason for rushing it. Yeah. It's life-saving medical care. That's how they keep on pushing it. Now it's out of the window. So I don't know what they can do now.

There is no... All the evidence indicates that if you give children these surgeries or these kind of life-changing drugs, there is no change in suicidality afterwards. It's still ridiculously high. Some people don't, but it's still incredibly high compared to the rest of society. These people need help. They need care, but they don't need to have the idea that they are in the, that they're the wrong gender or that they were born in the wrong

body affirmed. That is, that is not, that's not okay. You know, if you're an adult and you say, I want to live as a, as a woman and you were born a man or you're a man and you want to live as a woman, we can, society can handle that. We can absolutely deal with that because once it stops being something that's pushed in schools and as a trend and something that, that is, is cool and unique. And, and once the LGBT community that are the politicizedbt community stops trying to create more trans people and and and tell children oh maybe you're this once it returns to normalcy it will go back down to being an extremely small percentage of the population i just saw a tweet and i don't know where it went to but something like one in 33 people now one in 33 people in gen z say they're

they're they're trans or something like that it used to be one in 170 and this is in the past 10 years mario i think it was mario an awful that posted it but the point being it is a trend and it is a trend because this is the cool hip hip, new thing. And it is not something that we should be allowing children to have life-altering surgery or take life-altering drugs for. If you're a progressive parent and you want to let your kid dress a certain way, let them do it. I don't care, really, but we shouldn't be supporting this. We've got enough time for just one more quick segment. So we're going to do something on this show we've never done before. We are going to talk about Akhtua.

Ian, do you know? I was going to bring her up earlier when we were talking about viral moments making people famous. So right now, there's this tweet going viral. And I quite honestly don't care about Akhtua and any of that stuff. However, she may go to jail. Yeah. So check this out. The Hawk2a girl says,

Hawkonomics, the team hasn't sold one token and not one KOL was given one free token. We tried to stop snipers as best we could through high fees in the start of the launch. So apparently, look, I don't know exactly what this is about but there's uh the rumor going around right now she launched a meme token she is telling people to purchase that token hawkonomics and take a look at the context the community note the team and insiders have actually

been selling their tokens since launch a majority have never purchased anything and have only sold the tokens they were given. Haley is lying and will likely have to talk to a judge about this. So right below it, you have this guy, Jackie, says the team in question hasn't sold a single token. Note, none of their team besides the top sniper actually bought any tokens, only sold. And you can see this huge chart, because it's public blockchain, showing these individuals bought nothing and only sold to the tune of $40,000.

On average, it looks like about 40K. So I don't know a lot about this. I don't know if what she's doing is illegal. People are claiming that the Hawk to a Girl has launched a crypto scam and is publicly lying and defrauding people. And they're making tens of thousands of dollars. And she's going to have to talk to a judge. So what is it?

I'm trying to find what is the what's the like the symbol for it on coin market cap? Is it Hawk? Hawk can. I think it's like just jail bars. Hawkinomics. Hawkinomics. Hawkin. Hawk count. like just jail bars just economics hawkonomics hawk in hawk count i honestly feel like if they were going to actually make her talk to a judge what about all those other people like didn't jake paul have a big crypto uh logan logan paul yeah coffee zilla yeah but but are they scams or

are they just you know look there's the there's the there's fraud and then there's the a scammy thing to do is it a grift? Is it a fraud, right? So if I was like, we're launching Timcast coin. It's worth nothing. We have tons of it. I'm going to sell it and make money off it. You can too.

As long as I'm being honest about what it is, people can buy whatever they want. The issue is, did she say nobody's selling them and they're all selling them? So she essentially did what they did in Wolf of Wall Street where they launched an IPO and they already held it and they were selling it off? I don't know. What do you mean? Like in Wolf of Wall Street, they held all the stock in the beginning. That's what an IPO is.

They had their brokers selling it to everybody they knew and then once it capped out, they all mass sold off just themselves. They had their, what do they call it, right holes? Oh right, n off just themselves. They had their like their right holes. Oh, right. Nuke the company. And then, yeah, I don't know. I don't remember that from Wolf of Wall Street.

I don't know. I don't know much about it. All I'm saying is it's kind of funny that people are saying she's going to go to jail for a crypto scam. And why would you do this? Get rich quick scheme. I mean, that's why that's why people do like the whole, you the whole crypto stuff now. It's like everyone thinks that, oh, you know, Bitcoin did it, so this weird

token we can get people to buy, blah, blah, blah. I personally think that she probably got scammed by somebody saying, hey, put your name on this. We'll both get rich. Her not knowing a thing about it. Possibly she programmed it herself. I don't know, but I think... I doubt it. Or she makes the argument argument I don't run that

X account it's HAW is the token if you want to go to coin market cap and look at the lifetime value of the token it popped up to 30 cents yeah it's hawk actual 30 cents no 3 cents pardon me 3 cents and then it dropped back down to 5 thousandths of a

cent and it's just been barreling at 5 I gotta be honest i mean if this is true i do think she's gonna go to prison take a look at this so someone pointed out that her hawk token went in sort of 500 million before crashing and she's saying yeah nobody's selling so they list it they all dump out for 40k and they're basically just stealing money from people would you consider that a securities fraud? I'm not sure. Because if it has a utility,

like you can use the HawkTua token on HawkTua.com and get free pictures from all the HawkTuins, then there's a utility. But if it just is a token that does nothing and they're selling it, it's a security. And then I don't know what the laws would be with pumping and selling a security. That's illegal.

It should be. It is. It is. The SEC will have an issue with that. They'll have a significant issue with that. Yeah, it's too easy to do. Well, yeah. I mean, essentially, if you can make a token and you can get it onto an exchange and you make a boatload of them, you could just change those tokens for Bitcoin.

And the Bitcoin is actually valuable. You know, so, I mean, you have to have a lot of them. If the tokens are worth less than one cent, you're going to need a lot of them. But still. $6 million. Yes. you're going to need a lot of them, but still. $6 million. Yes, as a popular name in crypto, Hayley Welch has launched its own token named Hawk. While insiders sniped 97% of supply,

a newly created wallet sniped $175 million Hawk for $4,195 SOL worth $965,000 and sold it for $2.6 million for a profit of $1.66. Wow! Straight to a prison! Once you can get it on... You know the rise and fall of Hawk Tua Girl. She was standing in a street corner and talked

about blowing some dude, and then six months later, she's in prison. I was going to bring her up earlier. We were talking about the pot, the flash in the pan, people getting famous and what they do next, how they maintain it, and I was going to ask, up earlier. We were talking about the pot, the flash in the pan, people getting famous and what they do next, how they, how they maintain it. And I was going to ask,

do you guys like that girl Hawk Tua? Is she doing good with her life? I thought she did everything. The, that MFR is not real girl should have done. Remember she was everywhere. Everybody was talking about it. And then she just waited too long to reveal herself and then do a podcast,

went into relevancy. But I guess that's still infinitely better than I really do. I think she had a great episode on her talk to a podcast about the inversion of time and parallel realities where time could flow in reverse that's so big quantum state and entanglement was talk to it's called talk to a two one no the meme is to try is to make a point about something that's like academic and and intelligent that then apply imply that she said it because we know she didn't. I just saw her on a Whitney Cummings show and I saw her be like,

I hate men and saying just this dumb stuff. I was just a clip. I feel bad for her. She's literally some random... As bad as you can, right? She made a lot of money. But if she goes to prison, I guess. I doubt she will.

She'll get in trouble. Depending on if this is true and what really happened here, it's looking like she just launched some crypto scam. Maybe she says, hey, I don't run that X account. That's not me. It was a business thing. And then if the business did a thing, you go to prison for it. But look, she's some random woman sitting on a street corner. And one of these street men on the street dating things is like, well, you are a guy. And she's like, you know, spit on that thing goes stupid viral for dumb. Gets picked up by people who are like, I'll profit off of this.

And then all of a sudden, that's who she is forever. But congratulations. I guess she was saying something like her dad was pissed when he found out. Like, I'm not surprised. But if she ends up in prison, I think it'll be a nice little bow wrapped on top of this stupid saga. I'm trying to find out if that's her actual account. H-A-L-I-E-Y. That's her account.

Yeah, I had to pull it up. Well, Jax's launch zone token named Hawk. It's not Hawk. It's H-A-W. I don't know why it says H-A-W-K. If you want to search CoinMarketCap, it's just H-A-W. H-A-W-K is something else. Look at this.

Hawk is live four hours ago. Oh. 96% of the token supply has been snipeded and it's slowly being sold on the community. Buying this highly speculative coin might result in a loss and high due diligence is recommended. Yo, look at this. She's been promoting this crypto scam the whole. This is crazy. She probably has no idea about anything about securities. And she just got probably someone came to her and was like, we're going to make you fucking rich, dude.

And she's like looking. She wants to be an influencer. She doesn't want to work be an influencer she doesn't want to work a job she doesn't want to like a job she hates so she's looking for easy money yeah man just keep just what what could be the like what's the what's let's steal man what she's doing if this is all true like what's the how do you how do you can you even explain it away no i mean it's like assuming these these these blockchain things are correct she's just committing fraud yeah i mean part of me wants to say that she doesn't know but i mean oh shit bitcoin hit 100k no did it it's all thanks to hawk to a ever since trump got nominated cryptos flying flying. It touched it. Oh, it touched it.

Ripple doubled. ADA, Cardano doubled. Crypto is doing very well. I don't know why, but what it was about Trump getting people believe that they will have disposable income. The attitude that people have towards the economy changes when

Donald Trump became the... I bought more Bitcoin after that happened. And I bought a bunch of Doge, too. I keep saying the word Doge because they're creating this government company called Doge. It's like putting that word in the mind. It's a useless token that does nothing, but it's like... It's too high of a market cap. You can never be worth anything.

It doesn't do... It's worth 42 cents right now that stupid token that was like one hundred thousandth of a cent four years ago in the meme economy this is the greatest thing ever what a we're in this the the age of fiat currency where money is completely meaningless well no i mean the the the there there is something that goes into the mining of bitcoin you know it takes a certain amount of energy to mine bitcoin so there's there is something that goes into the mining of Bitcoin. You know, it takes a certain amount of energy to mine Bitcoin. So there is something that has to be done to get it. And there's utilities in certain tokens where they can actually instigate smart contracts

and you can like embed data transfers within the tokens themselves. So just moving a token will cause a program to take... I don't know that it did hit. It's 99.968. According to my... According to the thing that I have right now compared to Tether, it's at

99.9... 100,000 right now. It's tripled in 10 months. It was 32 in February. What does that mean for the next 10 months? So I see it didn't hold at 100,000. It hit it and came down. It's $100,000 now.

$100,031. Where do you have that? Coinmarketcap.com. So it's going up and down? Yeah, it's going up and down. It's up 4.46% in the last 24 hours. There's like $100,000 is going to be hard. There it is.

It's going to be hard for it to actually break and stay over. There it is. You got it live. There you go live, everybody. $100,000 is going to be hard. There it is. It's going to be hard for it to actually break and stay over. There it is. You got it live. There you go live, everybody. $100,058. Holy. There's a lot of people that are selling it as soon as it gets to $100,000. They're like, you know, you're going to take profits.

I invested a big amount of Bitcoin when it was at $1,000. Yeah. Oh, my God. Good move, man. No, it would have been a good move if I did it at $5. I knew a dude that got it when it was like $1.90. And he was just, yeah, write it down on paper. He was smoking.

We were playing poker. And he's like, I got a bunch of Bitcoin. I'm like, how? That seems so insecure. He's like, yeah. I remember him just sitting back smoking cigars. And now I haven't heard from him in a decade. I had about 20.

I think I might have had like 30 or 40 Bitcoin when it was at $0.70. My famous story is that I was hanging out at Hacker Space in Los Angeles. It's in Culver City. It's called Crash Space. I was hanging out with my buddy Jeff, sitting at my computer, typing away. And I'm like, hey, Jeff, you see this Bitcoin thing? This is 2011. It's like March.

And he was like, yeah, I heard of it. And I was like, it's like 70 cents for one of these coins. I was like, hey, look, I got like five grand in savings right now that I'm not using. What if I just put it in Bitcoin and then just, I don't know, just kept it there? He goes, man, it's probably a scam. You're going to give him all your money, and then what do you have, internet points? And I was like, yeah, good point. But, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but everybody understands.

If I did that, as soon as that thing hit $5, I'd have sold it all out and been like, Oh, quintuple your investment. But when we saw the, when I saw a few cycles of the rise and fall, so I remember when it hit a hundred bucks, I was like, this is crazy. Bitcoin can't be a hundred dollars. That's nuts. And, uh, Max Kaiser was like, Tim, you gotta listen to me. You're going to be rich. And I was like, okay, Max. And I should have listened to him. But once it got to 1,000, I was like, okay, I don't even care anymore. Every time it spikes in some ridiculous amount, I just don't have any. And so I was like, I'm just going to buy a bunch.

And then I bought a bunch. I think it's a sad reality, but it's also just reality, is that the U.S. dollar spiraling out of control with the inflation indicates that everything is going to go up in value because it's it's solidly over a hundred thousand now it's a hundred thousand hundred thousand and 140 so there's um man that that'll turn that i'm just that'll turn that hundred thousand dollars from resistance into support i'm just i'm just gonna say this to everybody look i'm not gonna give you any advice i'm just going to say this to everybody. Look, I'm not going to give you any advice.

I'm just saying, when I saw Bitcoin at $1,000, I was thinking to myself, like, man, I missed the train. I had Bitcoin when I was at $5, when I was at $0.70, when I was at $20. And, you know, when I was at $20,

I sold. I had 21 Bitcoin. I sold it at $20. And I was like, $400, dude? Talk to Luke. Luke and I were hanging out in Manhattan, and I had, like, 17 Bitcoin. And I was like, I'm just going to sell this. I sold it at 20 bucks. And I was like, 400 bucks, dude. I was so talk to Luke, Luke and I were hanging out in Manhattan and I had like 17 Bitcoin. And I was like, I'm going to, I'm just going to sell this. I just want the cash. And Luke was like, I'll buy it. And I was like, sure, whatever. And he was like, I'll give you cash right now. And I was like, okay. And like,

here you go, buddy. It's all yours. I'll take the cash and I'll use it for things that I need. Yeah. I got the time. I needed the cash more than I needed the Bitcoin. So, and that was when it was probably worth, like probably was what? 30 something dollars maybe when I traded it to Luke. And I don't know, I'm not trying to imply that Luke kept it or whatever, you know, Luke's going to be like, stop telling people about my Bitcoin. But when it hit a thousand, I was just thinking to myself, like, dude, it keeps spiking. It keeps going up and it's a deflationary asset. It can only go away. In fact, I had 20 something Bitcoin on that laptop and it was destroyed when a sprinkler went off. And I was like, I didn't give a crap.

The computer was destroyed. It was garbage. I couldn't turn it on. I threw it in the garbage. So there's $2 million in a trash somewhere probably compressed and destroyed. El Salvador making it there. So when it hit $1,000, I just bought a bunch. And I said, screw it. I'm just going to buy a bunch. And I did. And oh boy.

I bought a bunch. A lot. And I'll put screw it. I'm just going to buy a bunch. And I did. And oh boy, I bought a bunch. A lot. And I'll put it this way. I'm just saying right now, I look at that $100,000 number and I'm like, I don't think that number matters. Like when I was looking at it at $1,000, I was kind of like, man, it's crazy to buy a Bitcoin for $1,000. It's going to crash.

Then I hit $20K and I was like, oh, then it hit $60K. I was like, oh, now it's at $100K. And I'm like, yeah, yeah, I get it. I get it. I get it. Yeah, it's not the number. It's the percentage of increase is really what you're looking at when you buy that. If you're buying it as an investment, it's the percentage of increase. And that's all that matters.

You can buy one hundred thousandth of it and you can buy one of it. It doesn't matter. Here's the secret. That $5,000 that I had had in 2011 i have never spent it the five thousand dollars that you earned i had a i had a savings in 2011 of five thousand dollars and i was like oh it just kept going up from there that's after you started making your money right right right i i never went below five thousand that's awesome i had it my savings had in my bank and i was like this is for if I'm destitute with no options.

But if I need to find food, I'm going to find a way to get food and I'm not going to touch that money. And so I was eating tortillas with tomato slices and mayonnaise. And I would spend like $1.40 on a pack of tortillas, tomato slices, and this cheap Mexican

mayonnaise from Super Mercado. Do you think that the Trump administration is going to push to make a Bitcoin reserve? They've already been... Look, man, there's been discussions about a U.S. Bitcoin reserve. If the U.S. government makes a move and says we want to invest $500 billion in Bitcoin,

Bitcoin to a million bucks. It's going to be nuts. It'd be crazy if they didn't do it. No, they're going to. Super chat, super chat. Smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know. Become a member over at timcast.com

for that uncensored show coming up. And we'll have you as callers coming in. All right, let's go. What do we got here? Jacob Holly says, yo, we've been infiltrated. That isn't Tim. He's not wearing the same shirt.

And Phil, my God, he's a criminal in zebra clothes. What did you do, Ian? Save us from Cthulhu body stealers. Okay. Umni says, Tim, where'd you get that jacket? I must have. It's like a hoodie from Old Navy, I think.

I got one of those. Yeah. It's like 19 bucks. I like that. I have this funny story that I don't care to get too much into, but some crazy guy came up. I rarely ever have bad interactions, but some crazy guy came up to me when I was at Cracker Barrel,

me and Allison. He was screaming at us because people are crazy. And he was yelling at me for eating at Cracker Barrel. What had they ever done? Well, he says, I'm rich. I'm not supposed to eat at Cracker Barrel. What? Because rich people go eat somewhere else.

Cracker Barrel's all right. Cracker Barrel's amazing. I was like, what do you mean? He's like, why are you eating here? And I'm like, because it tastes good. It's not good for you, but it's good. No, it's great. I had eggs and I had catfish.

Yeah, there you go. For breakfast, you get grilled catfish and eggs with tomato. I get tomato slices, scrambled eggs, and I get catfish. Is it fried in corn oil? It's grilled. So it's probably grilled in some vegetable oil or whatever. But, you corn oil i probably it's grilled so it's probably grilled in some vegetable oil or whatever but you know hey it's fish so now you can appropriate classes of food now i just said this is this is i think people are crazy okay wow it's bitcoin's

at 100 since we start talking about it what is going on dude a jump of a thousand dollars well yeah because people are buying in. They're like, oh, okay, now I'm going to get it, you know? Well, it was a wall. Yeah. So what happened was a bunch of people who bought it. It's a major spike, too. So everybody, here's what happens.

Somebody buys a Bitcoin at $30K. They then put in a sell order saying, if Bitcoin hits $100,000, sell it instantly. Everybody did that thinking, well, look, I got a Bitcoin, but if it hits hits 100,000, sell it instantly. Everybody did that thinking, well, look, I got a Bitcoin, but if it's 100, I'm happy. So tons of people set 100K as this mental wall. It is really human psychology. What's the number where the average person is going to say, I'll cash out 100 grand once that wall finally broke, meaning every time someone tried to buy, let's say there's a thousand

people with a Bitcoin and they want to sell it a hundred thousand, you need one thousand and one to set the price above that number. Once they officially sold out of all of the Bitcoin at a hundred thousand, the buy, the demand is going way up. The crazy thing is people have noticed the exchanges don't have Bitcoin anymore. The amount of Bitcoin available for purchase has been dropping dramatically. I don't know who's, I think governments are buying in. Bitcoin's now at 101,168. I'm not telling you guys what to do. Who knows? I just think it's going to go way up from here. And the estimates in the next few months have been around 200K. I am not telling you to buy any of this stuff because that is probably not true. I don't know. But a lot of experts are

saying once that wall breaks, what's the next psychological barrier that people are going to say? Someone's going to put 100K into a Bitcoin and then say, well, if it's 200K, I'm cashing out double my money, right? 100% return. And so the demand is going to be there. People are going to be buying wherever they can. They're going to be spending more. It's going to hit 200K and it's going to pause until it gets over that hurdle again. We'll see. But there is no actual limit on how

much a Bitcoin can be worth. Because it breaks up into people that aren't familiar with Bitcoin, it breaks up into like, what is it? Eight decimal points. Eight decimal points and one, you know, it's called a Satoshi, which is the guy that created it. If one bit, so if you were to break it down to eight decimal points, the smallest decimal position, we call them sats or Satoshi after Satoshi Nakamoto, if that were equal to one penny, if one Satoshi was one penny, that means one Bitcoin is $1 million.

It's going to be worth more than that. But that's only because of inflation. It's relative to be worth more than that. But that's only because of inflation. It's relative to the U.S. dollar. So if we go up to 70 trillion, then Bitcoin's equally worth double all of a sudden. You're right. You're right. But to some, that's only to a certain degree, because right now, like Bitcoin has gone, is worth way more than there's inflation. So it's escalating yeah so if i bought bitcoin back uh way back when in 2011 for 70 cents with my five thousand dollars in savings i would have 722 million dollars 320 722 million 320 570 there's a lot of people that are in that position that it just would get off the map that are like they don't want and the government anyone to know. So here's the crazy thing about Bitcoin. The initial adopters were creepy weirdos who wanted to do nefarious things and have a way of exchanging money that people weren't tracking.

So they're kind of weird people. And so I know a handful of these, like, seedy underbelly hacker dudes who, I won't say too much about them, but let's just say they're not good people. We call them black hat hackers. And they haven't worked in eight years. These are people who are probably worth $100 million right now. And they're just lounging around being like, my life is over. Not in the bad way. It's literally like, I can do whatever I want whenever I want.

Because they wanted to buy drugs 10 years ago. Like, let me just stress that. 14 years ago, some dude I know was like, how do I buy drugs on the internet? And now he's worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Yeah. Okay, maybe not hundreds, but maybe just stress that. 14 years ago, some dude I know was like, how do I buy drugs on the internet? And now he's worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Yeah. Okay, maybe not hundreds, but maybe tens of millions. And it's like, how crazy is that? All right, let's grab some more Super Chats.

Let's go. General Hydra says, hey, this is the first time doing this. Can you bring on Real America channels on your podcast next time? What is that? I don't know. Is that a channel? Real America. Wait, is that Chase Geyser? Real America News? No, he's got something that sounds like that. All right, Scott. Dedrick Jr. says, let the pardons happen and force them to testify

under oath without the ability to plead the fifth so they can tell the world what they did. Hearing the truth is more important than their jail time. The shame can be the punishment. So my understanding is that even if you have a blanket pardon, you can still be charged with perjury. So you're given immunity. You still have to testify. Now you can't plead the fifth because you're immune. You can't self-incriminate. If you don't tell the truth and you do lie, you can still be charged.

Because you'd have to be able to. It's almost better that hunter biden has to he can't plead the fifth anymore because i some doubt how doubt that he is the criminal mastermind behind everything that happened over in burisma so have him testify and tell us who was going the shots all right here's one alex a says hey tim the quartering said four hours ago on youtube that you're suing crystal ball and will you? I think you should have. What does the rest of the group think? Yes or no? I am not suing Crystal Ball. I simply told her she was, I said, what you have stated is false and defamatory and I expect a retraction and apology. Question now though, will you sue Jeremy the quartering for saying that you're suing Crystal Ball? Jeremy, how dare you? That is a false statement of fact. I am suing Jeremy.

I'm not going to sue anybody. I don't know. Maybe I'll sue Crystal. Do it for the lulz. Well, because she stated definitively that I was told to say things on the show, despite the fact that all of the facts of all of the issues surrounding the case, that is absolutely not true. It would be better if you had her on.

In fact, let me just stress this. Merrick Garland himself said the people who had a deal with Tenet were completely unaware of what was going on. How could I then be told to push propaganda? So the point is, it's false and defamatory, and it's particularly damaging right now because we're in what's called up fronts. This is when people are selling ads.

This is right before the year starts. So I would appreciate that apology, Crystal. I am mad. I'm just saying you said something that was not true. I assume you just got it wrong. All you got to do is say, okay, I didn't realize I was wrong and that'd be great. She's a rich leftist.

Sue her and then give the money away. Why would I give it away? That's what a leftist would do. Actually, they probably wouldn't because she shouldn't have it. No, I mean, I don't know. Look, I asked for the honorable thing to do, and the question is, does she have honor? Have we reached out to her to come on ever on one of the shows? I don't know.

She's a pretty good guest. Her husband's been on a bunch, right? Kyle? We never had him on. No, he agreed to, but then he went nuts. Oh, okay. Kalinsky bleaching his hair. What's going on a bunch, right? Kyle? We never had him on. No. He agreed to, but then he went nuts. Oh, okay. Kalinsky bleaching his hair. What's going on with you, Kyle?

Nothing good. Alright. Sean says, Tim, if the gunman mounted a suppressor without a booster, the suppressor will make the barrel too heavy to unlock and properly cycle. Someone else pointed out that you can actually modify the weapon so that the gas exits through the front of the gun so it won't cycle the weapon intentionally to reduce volume. Yep.

And so he's using subsonic rounds, a suppressor, and modified it so that it would reduce volume, implying this dude is a professional. And he probably got on a private jet within 40 minutes and he's already in the Bahamas or something. We got to keep changing the location he went to because, you know. The moon.

He's on his way there now i don't know if that's the case christian w says he chambers around every time instead of the gun cycling automatically using a slide lock spec ops guys do it when they use subsonic ammo to suppress noise signature to a minimum by canceling the slide noise and gas escape from the ejection port interesting so that's it that's basically what I saw someone else was saying. Interesting. Steel Toad says 9mm is a subsonic round regardless. Same with.45.

No. Would have no effect. That is not correct. No, 9mm is not a subsonic round. Because, and I know this because of our good friends over at Phoenix Ammunition. He has a, he intentionally makes lower speed rounds rounds for i think uh like competition shooting and so he explained this to us that there's you know different speeds but uh all right let's uh what else we got here all right al rum says google search did anthony fauci work for the cia will bring up a ton of mM reports as well as alternative media reports that he had

a role outside of NIH with a gain of function research. Interesting. Gary Hardy says, let's hear a bit more from Decoy. He's worth listening to if you give him a chance. I appreciate that. Say something. Thanks for watching. People are going nuts for you in the chat, man.

You got some hardcore fans. Awesome. Sergeant SGTC says, Tim, these CEOs have veto power over physicians when it comes to prescriptions, life or death decisions. I could die because the CEO said it was bad for money. Indeed, I don't think that warrants going and taking someone's life. Like, we're angry about people dying.

If he's a bad person, then let's use the political system to the best of our abilities and change the system. You're not going to change the system with what this guy did. It's not going to happen. It's going to make the system worse. They're going to entrench. They're going to double down. They're going to say, we need more money and more profits because the job is risky. And they're going to hire private security. And then the cops are going to be on their side because they pay big funds. Then these insurance companies are going to go to media companies. And they're going to say, you're going to put up the message we want because we sponsor you.

And they're all going to say, brought to you by health care, brought to you by health care. The way you do it is preempt all of those things. You've got to get those strategic lawsuits. We've got to get people, good members of Congress who are willing to challenge these institutions. There you go. All right. Texas Grin says that SOB Peter Hotez basically came out saying one twenty one twenty five viruses will be released. Biden often said if people make it through twenty twenty five, it's a threat.

Yeah, he said Hotez, what do you say that Trump will be like will be there'll be like a wave of pandemics or something like that. Something like that. Really? Yeah. Which is I mean, it's terribly incriminating. You know, it I suppose I didn't actually listen to the bit that he said. So he it may have been misrepresented. But I mean, look, I don't know why you would even want to say that kind of stuff, because I mean, you're you're in a you're I don't know if you're in an actionable position, but you're definitely in a position where the incoming administration would look at you and be like, all right, well, what do you know? And what happened? And you'd be under investigation and they're going to haul you before Congress to explain why you said that if something does manifest and prove you to be right. I saw him at the top of Twitter. That was a video of him doing it. Was he giving a warning?

Like, hey, watch out. There's some shady organizations that are going to try and mess you up by releasing viruses? Or was he like... Do not know. Do not know. But, I mean, like I said, do you really want to be the guy that says, oh, there's going to be a bunch of pandemics coming right when Donald Trump is inaugurated and then actually have a bunch of pandemics come? I mean, it seems pretty incriminating to me, you know, so. All right. Ham Sandwich says Flip used to make those wave tech boards. Love them.

Can you make those? Great on a curb, even with minimal soap. A no-step-on-snack waveboard would be perfect. So are you talking about the new waveboards where they... That was my first skateboard, actually, where it was like it was wavy. We can't make those. Those are weird. But the idea was that it would reduce friction

with less surface contact, and it would be stronger because it was wavy. Don't know if that was the case, though. It was a weird board. New wave. They always try to do weird things sometimes, huh? Let's go. What is this one up here?

What do we got here? Kyle Goodwin says suppressors are NFA items and require a tax stamp for purchase and take time. I'd be willing to bet this was either a swamp-sanctioned hit or the suppressor was homemade to avoid the scrutiny. Of course. Or the dude's not from the U.S. Yeah. Or the weapon wasn't from the U.S.

or something. I bet, look, if this was targeting a CEO for the biggest healthcare provider in the country, probably the world, I don't know, outside of governments,

if this job was professional, assuming it was professional, then they probably got a non-American. They bring someone in the dead of night by flying him over the border on the south in a single-engine Cessna. He goes to New York, gets on a bike. He doesn't care. He doesn't live here, and he's gone. That's it.

Could be. Could be, but who knows? Who knows? All right, where are we at? Grand Peppy Frog says, Tim, please invite Alex and Cenk for an 8 year anniversary of their fight on YouTube Alex Jones and Cenk Uygur fight maybe Elon and Cash would join you too I was there

Luke and I were at the RNC when Alex Jones was streaming and walked up to the Young Turks set at the RNC and started a fight Jimmy Dore spat on him and Luke and I were standing there going like at the RNC and started a fight and Jimmy door spat on him. Yeah. And Luke and I were standing there going like,

indeed we were, uh, those are the days, man. And that was, that was almost 10 years ago. That's crazy. Eric says, Taylor Lorenz quit WAPO to become an influencer.

Someone should tell her that only fans is not an influential, an influence platform. I mean, I think the, the joke works better of being like she'd maintain more credibility and respect if she went with OnlyFans instead of writing that she's raw-dogging the air. Or that, I'm sorry, sorry, that we are raw-dogging the air. Unbelievable. Yeah, you saw the story? I didn't. She wrote the people who don't wear masks are raw-dogging the air.

In 2024? Yes, she published this, yes, like two days ago raw dogging the air. In 2024? Yes. She published this, yes, like two days ago. Alliteration there. Raw dogging. I'm going to raw dog this Spindrift right here. Oh, delicious. You are just doing it raw.

No, LifeStraw. Wow. You need a LifeStraw. Just bareback that Spindrift. Raw dog. You know what? Raw dog. Do you know what a LifeStraw is?

Yeah, I have like six of them. Otherwise, you got to drink all your, you know what? She should be drinking her water through a LifeStraw is? Yeah, I have like six of them. Otherwise, you got to drink all your water. You know what? She should be drinking her water through a LifeStraw. She better. Yeah, otherwise she's raw dogging her water. Yeah, call her out on Twitter. She's on Blue Sky now.

I don't think she's on Twitter anymore. No. Do you know why she's saying these things? It's because her followers click the like button when she does. That's so sad. It's because they subscribe to her sub stack. And they give her money. I want to fix her. I just don't want to live like that. I think she knows she's nuts, but she's got crazy followers that pay her bills. It's like, why is Joe Scarborough saying stupid

things on MSNBC? Because the people who are watching demand it. So she's like the news version of getting rear-ended while you're live streaming and having to recreate that over and over. Exactly. I think Joe Scarborough says crazy things because Mika got to him. I think it's because they have an audience that they have. So when Donald Trump got elected, CNN and MSNBC were basically like, what's spiking our ratings? Anti-Trump.

What they didn't realize is that their subscriber base wasn't going up. It was, so this is the thing about YouTube or any social media platform. People would be like, hey, I gained five followers today on X. When in reality, you lost 50 and gained 55. There's a constant change of who's watching your show.

So MSNBC and CNN go full anti-Trump. Their normal viewers leave. Anti-Trump viewers join. And then once Trump is no longer the narrative, they've got nothing. Now they're just pandering to weirdos. All right, everybody. We'll grab one more quick super chat. Okay, all of the super chats are basically saying Bitcoin 100K, Bitcoin 100K.

So, all right. My friends, smash that like button. Share the show with everyone. You know, become a member over at TimCast.com. Click join us to become a member because that members only show is coming up right now where you as members get to call in. It's a lot of fun. Not so family friendly. And we'll talk about some of these others. We got one more story for you coming up. Unknown disease, killing a bunch of people in Africa at a time when you got this guy claiming that Trump's going to

have new pandemics. Could there be a plan? I don't know. But we'll talk about it on the Uncensored show for obvious reasons. So smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know, become a member at timcast.com. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Decoy, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, follow me over at Decoy Voice on YouTube. I do a small channel that does concise, light-hearted commentary on the tragic status of today's reality, and I really appreciate being on here today. It was great. And hey, you do something creative. You'll reward yourself and you'll be thankful for it later in life when you look back at this time. See you later.

My name is behind me. It's Ian Crossland. I think the I's cut off, though. But there it is. Subscribe to me on YouTube and everywhere else. See you later. I am PhilTheRemainsOnX, where you can subscribe to my page. I am PhilTheRemainsOfficial on Instagram.

The band is All That Remains. You can follow us on the whole of the internet. You can check out our new videos for Let You Go, Forever Cold, No Tomorrow Divine. It's all available on YouTube, Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora, and Deezer. And don't forget, the left lane is for crime. We will see you all over at TimCast.com. Thanks for hanging out.