Timcast IRL - Democrat DEFENSE Of MS-13 Member BLOWS UP In Their FACE, Trump Admin DROPS PROOF w/ Shawn Farash

Episode Date: April 17, 2025

Tim, Phil, & Mary are joined by Shawn Farash to discuss Democrats defense of MS-13 gang member backfiring after Trump admin drops proof, the wife of a deported MS-13 gang member defending domestic abuse, NY AG Letitia James suspected of mortgage fraud, and the UK Supreme Court officially recognizing "woman" as a biological female. Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Mary @PopCultureCrisis (YouTube) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Shawn Farash @Shawn_Farash (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Democrat Senator Van Hollen of Maryland has traveled down to El Salvador and he has demanded the return of Abrego Garcia. And boy, did Democrats walk right into this one. The DOJ had the evidence. They had the documents. They have damning information on this man who is reportedly now a violent member of MS-13 who mercilessly beat his wife. Allegedly. We don't know exactly how it all went down, but not only have they released documents showing how they determined he was a gang member

in MS-13, but also what was released in the press was domestic violence petitions from his own wife. So here you got a guy who was with MS-13 gang members, identified as one, wearing their clothing, and yeah, they really walked into this one. It's sort of blowing up in their face now after the DOJ released this information to back up their case. They also had the press conference where they had a woman whose daughter was murdered by an illegal Venezuelan migrant. All this while Democrats are lying, claiming this guy, Obrego Garcia, was here legally. He was not. And saying that he was a Maryland man.

Now, that's crazy. The Maryland man, PSYOP. All the media is marching in lockstep, saying a Maryland man who was legally here was wrongly sent to this prison. It's a lie. An illegal immigrant with a deportation order was deported to his home country. So I would like to thank Donald Trump for bringing Obrego Garcia home. Means a lot. We'll talk about that. Plus, man, Judge Boasberg in this case is saying the Trump admin is in contempt. And now they're threatening, I guess, to arrest these individuals.

And then, man, it's kind of crazy how much news there is today. Letitia James has been referred to the DOJ for criminal prosecution for mortgage fraud. That took place at the exact same time she was alleging Donald Trump was engaged in civil fraud to secure loans at better rates. Basically the exact same thing she accused him of. And based on the fraud that she's alleged to have committed, she would have voided her position in New York as the AG. So it's a crazy story. We're going to talk about all that, my friends. And more before we get started, we got a great sponsor. It is Kalshi, my friends.

Kalshi is the first and only legal prediction market in the U.S. After years of working with the federal government, Kalshi got regulatory approval from the CFTC to offer a new asset class, quote, event contracts, which allowed traders to take positions on whether a future event will happen or not. You can bet and trade on anything from who will win the Grammys or Oscars. Will the U.S. buy Greenland?

How high will Bitcoin get this year and more? Kalshi was the first place to legally trade and bet on the elections. We also launched sports in all 50 states recently and went live on Robinhood. So Kalshi event contracts are being actively traded on Robinhood. Very cool. People use these markets to make money on their opinion, hedge risks, or just look at the market's odds to understand the chance of some event happening.

These markets tend to be quite accurate because it's people putting money on the line trying to predict what will happen. We call this, my friends, wisdom of the crowd. Not always so wise, but sometimes they get it right. Actually, it's a tendency. Whether it's the election, inflation, interest rates, or nearly any topic, prediction markets tend to be extremely accurate in forecasting the future. I think they actually nailed the election.

Go check them out. See what the likelihood is that conservatives will win in the Canadian elections this year or other similar events. Go to Kalshi.com slash Timcast and get 10 bucks when you trade 100 bucks. Once again, that's Kalshi.com slash Timcast. K-A-L-S-H-I. Check it out. And shout out. We appreciate the sponsor of the show. Don't forget to go to Castbrew.com. Maybe pick up some Focus with Mr. Bocas. Or how about some Misty Mountains coffee? It's the best coffee. Everybody agrees. And we got Phil dressed like Santa Claus right here. Maybe you want to Focus with Mr. Bocus. Or how about some Misty Mountains coffee?

It's the best coffee. Everybody agrees. And we got Phil dressed like Santa Claus right here. Maybe you want to buy that one. And also become a member of our Discord at TimCast.com. The Culture War live show. May 3rd. May not be sold.

I'm not entirely sure. But we are going to bring up you guys from our Discord server to the debate stage at the table with us live. Now, we want to do this every week. The pilot is May 3rd, and we're hoping that we will get them up weekly. The plan right now is monthly until we hammer all the details. If this first event goes really well, it will be a weekly event Saturday nights in the D.C. area where you as members get to submit your position on debate and then get invited up to debate. Think Kill Tony meets Jubilee. It's going to be fun. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Joining us today to talk about this and so much more is Donald J. Trump. Thank you so much.

We're very happy to be here, right? Nobody does a better job than Tim Pool. And he has a beautiful hat. I have to say that a lot of people give him a lot of you know what for wearing the hat. But I think it's a nice hat. I think it fits you very well. Thank you, Mr. President. Who are you really? My name's Sean Farish. It's an honor to be here. Thank you for having me.

And I've been looking forward to this since it was set up. So it's going to be a fun night. I wonder if there's somebody just passively listening to the audio version. And they're like, wait, what? Mary's hanging out. Took me by surprise. Hi, everyone. My name is Mary Morgan.

You can usually find me on Pop Culture Crisis here at TimCast. Mary's hanging out. Took me by surprise. Hi, everyone. My name is Mary Morgan. You can usually find me on Pop Culture Crisis here at TimCast, but I'm happy to be back. Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and counter-revolutionary. Let's get into it. Here we go. From the post-millennial, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, arrested in 2019 while meeting with MS-13

members, entered U.S. illegally in 2012. You know, the things that they dropped on this guy, his rank of how do you say that? Chequeo? Chequeo? I don't even know what that is. And his name was Chele. I want to show you this. We have this from Libs of TikTok, this video. Democrat U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen is in El Salvador demanding that President Bukele do the right thing and release an MS-13 gang member who was, quote, illegally abducted. Let's let's rotate. as president of El Salvador to do the right thing and allow Mr. Obrego Garcia to walk out of a

prison, a man who's charged with no crime, convicted of no crime, and who was illegally abducted from the United States. Illegally abducted. All right. Well, let's roll, ladies and gentlemen. Aside from that headline, we got this one. Kilmar Obrego Garcia allegedly physically abused his wife years before his deportation. So here's, this is just so stupid. I can't believe we're still on the story. Everybody who's listening, who watches the show, you know exactly what this guy is. You know exactly what the DOJ has been saying about him and why he was deported. Let me just add on top of this.

Withholding of deportation. That's what was currently in place from the courts. It is conditional and temporary. It can be voided if the circumstances in the home country of an individual have changed. Thus, the threat no longer exists. Fact since Obrego Garcia the United States, Nayib Bukele has cleaned up El Salvador to the point where it is one of the safest countries in the Western Hemisphere, if not the safest, he says it is. Clearly, there is no longer a threat to this man and he can go home. So it sounds like the only error was that they needed what's called a USCIS interview to determine whether or not he could return home, but they did not do that.

Oh, now the Trump administration has argued is that because of the Alien Enemies Act, withholding of deportation does not apply to terrorists under the AEA. And two different judges determined this guy was a member of the MS-13 gang. Now, here's what they got. The documents have been released, And it's not just, they say, a criminal informant. They actually mentioned that he was, Abrigo Garcia was found with other, look at this, a member of the Prince George's County gang, unit MS-13 intelligence and squad have encountered, how do you say that, Christian Hernandez Romero on multiple occasions. He has an extensive criminal history for multiple assaults, dangerous weapons, etc. And he was hanging out with these guys.

So the simple version of the story is when the cops picked him up, they saw him with guys they knew to be MS-13. He was wearing MS-13 gang clothes. Another informant identified him as a member of MS-13 and his rank and name used by the gang. And this is the reason why two different judges said, yep, looks pretty likely this guy's a member of the gang. Now, he should have been deported. He had a deportation order was upheld by an appellate court. They didn't deport him. The dude was skipping his hearings. He didn't file for asylum. And for this, he gets deported. Not only that, there was a there was an order of protection that his wife filed. And now she's claiming he's the best husband ever. Jesse Waters on Fox News is saying he was closed fist beating his wife.

I don't know how true that is or what happened in this in this in this hearing. But let me just say Democrats walked into this one like sideshow Bob stepping on a rake. Best news, the best part about this is that Democrats are actually going to El Salvador, asking President Bukele to release essentially, you know, gang members. I'm not going to get into the whether or not they're terrorists, but asking them to release gang members that were in the United States illegally. There is nothing that I like better than when the Democrats take the side of the absolute bad guys and on an 80-20 issue. And they continue to do it.

I think they should send more people down there. They should send AOC down there. Bernie and AOC could go down there and have another rally like they've been doing. Get them both together. Have a big old rally. All the MS-13 guys can can sit there and cheer for AOC. And I would love it. It'd be the best if they're going to if they're going to take this side. I mean, it's only good for Republicans for Trump. Mary, are you are you happy now that this evil man has been removed from our direct vicinity? Because we live right here in Maryland. Why are you asking me specifically?

Because you are a West Virginian. Yeah, but we're like five minutes away from Maryland and you are but a short and tiny white woman. I am a Marylander actually. It does make me proud of my state to not have this gang member in it anymore.

Good. The story about his wife is kind of crazy. Claiming that their marriage grew stronger over time. He's a good man at the end of the day, but she's literally a battered housewife

with Stockholm Syndrome. They listed one of the gang members he was meeting with went by the name Bimbo. I don't know why that was his moniker in the gang, but I think she probably saw the name Bimbo pop up on his text messages and was like, who the fuck is this? And that's probably what precipitated the fight. I love it love what do you think man well i i think it's great that he's out of here uh the country's a safer place but um i i think it's and it's just par for the course for the left now that no matter what donald trump does if he says water is wet it's dry right if i endorse oxygen we love oxygen right they're gonna

hold their breath that's what's gonna happen i mean it's it's you live by tds you die by tds so now they're taking the side of uh you know someone who has been designated a terrorist or a member of a terrorist organization these are the same people who said that the j6ers were terrorists right that parents at school board meetings were terrorists bad people but now they're saying that this guy, he's just a misunderstood Maryland father. The Democrats are, and to your point, yes, they're taking the side of, you know, they do the, if it's, if Donald Trump likes it, then we're against it. But not only that, they're on the side of people that are firebombing Tesla dealerships. They're on the side of Luigi that are firebombing Tesla dealerships. They're on the side of Luigi Mangione, who's a murderer.

The Democrats literally cannot help but say, we like evil. Yeah. It's straight up where they're at. And there is a meme portion to that. You know, Taylor Lorenz came out and said, oh, you know, in America, we've always we've always you know, we stand bad guys, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I mean, even so much as to the normies. Now, I know that the chat's going to have a conniption fit about me saying this, but to normies, Hamas are the bad guys. Right. They look at Israel like Israel is America's ally. And that means Hamas is the bad guys.

But the Democrats are all waving Palestinian flags. Literally, the Democrats have gotten themselves into a position where they're just on the side of bad guys. Every time. I'd also like to add, sorry. No, I said. I just wanted to add, they're calling him Maryland man in all of these sub headlines in every single article.

And it just reminds me of the game that they play every single time. It's something about black crime. They're called teens or youths. And similarly, they're going to continue referring to him as Maryland man because I don't know he was here. Yep. Because they're betting on regular people passively watching the news. And they've said a Maryland man who was legally here is none of it is true. None of it was here illegally. A withholding of deportation is not legal status. It's temporary protected status is not legal status. And what they're doing is they're saying he was legally here.

We don't mean he was granted legal status remaining that he was here with a temporary stay, meaning it was legal that he was here. It's like, OK, it's conditional. What claim would he have to asylum anyway? He didn't. He got denied. And he said in that police report that originally that 2019 I-213 form that he did not fear going back to El Salvador. So, you know, when you claim asylum, you're being persecuted. You're running.

What was his original claim to asylum then? I don't think he ever... Did he ever claim it? Yeah, he did. He was denied. He was on the grounds for it. If he goes home... He said MS-13 tried to force him to join the gang.

Oh, right, right, right. And if he had to flee the country, if he goes back, they'll kill him. But meanwhile, he's hanging out with people known to be in that gang, by the gang unit. So they're like, okay, this guy, he's wearing the same clothes as them. He's clearly in the gang.

I mean, if he walks like a duck is the phrase right yeah and he's he's quacking and walking and he looks like a duck and water just big beautiful back you know we love ducks democrats really really love evil stuff they have taken the side of the bad guys and i'm here for every single time they used to hide it a little better right like they used to i feel like it was that they never they never just this is a full-on embrace now right where maybe they would have ignored this story in the past or kind of you know maybe mentioned it once or twice and then said oh this guy's really bad news let's let's find something else they are they are they are advocating for him to come back well no you just don't understand because he was involved in gang activity due to his childhood trauma. Of course.

He never went to Freudian psychotherapy to resolve in himself. So he deserves to be here so he can continue that process of growth. This is a common thing that you see with the left. And I guess so. Anyways, it's a common thing you see. They don't believe that people have agency. Right. So the people that are criminals, they're criminals because of the situation they're in, because of the way they grew up, etc.

It's not that the criminals decided to do criminal things. It's that all... Wait a minute. What? I kind of disagree with your point of view here. Go ahead, please. The question of whether or not these violent criminals have agency is kind of irrelevant because they should just be thrown in jail anyway.

Fair enough. Doesn't matter. Fair enough. Honestly, personally, I don't think that they have a lot of agency. I think some some of them just have a propensity to violence and they're just psychopaths. They're just born that way. So you think that. Well, OK, so that so it's not they're not a product of their their environment.

They're just born. You need some of both. I mean, I tend to agree with you, but the leftist, I don't think that whereas I tend to agree with you but the leftist i don't think that whereas i i tend to agree with you i think that that there's a lot of um a lot of people have certain proclivities right like if you're conservative you're probably you've you've got a significant portion of your conservative leaning is because of like longer time preferences or or um higher disgust factors and things like that, you know, like the big five that Jordan Peterson talks about the IQ above 100. Fair enough. You can hold a job.

Right. General emotional stability. These things. But I think that what I'm talking about is is more the way the left kind of makes excuses for people that act. They say, well, it's not their fault. It's the conditions that they're that they're in and they do it they do it you know you hear people that again the israel palestine thing people always say well you know what would you do if you were in palestine i

mean i wouldn't go into israel and kidnap people you know it's like you may have a problem with the with the fight but i wouldn't be getting you know when the actual terrorists went into israel i wouldn't have been jumping on mopeds to be like, yo, let's go grab some Jews and bring them back. You know, I wouldn't have done that. That would, is what I would not have. They want to believe that crime happens to criminals. Exactly. And the same things, and same thing, like when it comes to the Ukraine, Russia, right?

Like there are a lot of people that are out there, they're making excuses for Russia invading Ukraine. that are out there they're making excuses for russia invading ukraine and it's like well you know look i mean i understand that the u.s foreign policy you know let up that's not derail that far well i'm just saying that's something that you hear a lot people taking taking agency away from the actors like putin's the guy that said we're gonna go in well shot was gonna say something well just basically to add on to that is that the left will go and find something horrible and try and justify it or say, well, you know, they have a point. Mangione is a great example where they say, well, the health care industry is so evil. And it may be.

I'm not going to deny that there's bad practices in the health insurance industry. But the solution to that is not to kill CEOs on the street. Absolutely. And that's the thing. So there's common ground there if we want to find it, right, where we can say, all right. But the solution to that is not to kill CEOs on the street. Absolutely. And that's the thing. So there's common ground there if we want to find it, right, where we can say, all right, health care, health insurance, there's a lot that we may want to fix. There's a lot of things you may feel slighted by whoever is your insurance provider. But the solution isn't to murder the CEO. First of all, it wasn't the CEO who did it.

Brian Thompson, I think was his name, he didn't deny that person's care. He's just the to murder the CEO. First of all, it wasn't the CEO who did. Brian Thompson, I think was his name. He didn't deny that person's care. He's just the CEO of the company. You know, if it was new, if my if my T-Mobile went down, right, I wouldn't. The CEO must die, you know, because I have no service in the hills. You know, that's not that's just not the way a rational person thinks. Let's jump to the story from CNN. Abrego Garcia's wife responds to Trump administration publicizing civil protective order from 2021. You know, why is everybody calling him Abrego Garcia?

I just realized his name is Kilmar, isn't it? Yeah, well, maybe they don't like that name. I don't think so. Kilmar. It doesn't sound like a very Maryland man type of name, right? I mean, Kilmar? You know. Kilmar, MS-13 gang member. Such nominal determinism every time.

Yeah, so check it out. The wife of the Maryland man. I'm going to fix this real quick. Can I fix this? Can I go in and edit it? I got to fix this. There we go. Maryland man.

So for those that are watching, you'll understand. The wife of the terrorist. Enter. Did we get it? I fixed it. There we go. The wife of the terrorist to the U.S. government mistakenly deported to El Salvador. OK, I'm not going to do that again. Acknowledged she had filed a civil protective order against him for four years ago, but said it was out of an abundance of caution.

And the couple had worked through their issues. We call that Stockholm syndrome. No, she's just a ride or die. Oh, like, like El Chapo's wife.

She just said she had no idea about any of the criminal activity. She, I've never heard anyone more right. Right. Or died. I don't know what you're talking about. An abundance of caution for what, though? What was she being cautious about?

Nobody wants to ask that question. Left and right. Exactly, right? So you're being cautious. Why did you feel like you had to be cautious? That's it. Because he's beating her up with closed fists. That's why.

She burnt the enchiladas. You don't understand. That does suck. I like my enchiladas. You don't understand. That does suck. You know, I like my enchiladas. You're just not, like, really stepping into his shoes and, like, understanding. Not understanding him, no. Well, I mean, look, you know, he's trafficking humans. He's trafficking humans and at the same time trafficking mud on the carpet.

And she's yelling at him. And then he gets physical, right? Yeah. That is a joke, by the way. That is not a statement of fact. Let me read more. DHS posted portions of the order on X Wednesday and described Obrego Garcia as an MS-13 gang member who is not a sympathetic figure. The Trump administration's release of the documents comes as part of a renewed push to portray Obrego Garcia,

who has not been charged with or convicted of any crime, is a violent and dangerous criminal and a member of MS-13. Obrego Garcia's wife and lawyers have denied he is part of a gang. Well, two judges said he was. In a statement to CNN, Vasquez Sura said she sought civil protective order after a disagreement with Abrego Garcia. Oh, so she was falsely accusing him of domestic violence? Because in the filing, it says domestic violence. So, okay, she's right. Abrego didn't do anything wrong.

Trump, lock her up. She filed the false report. Yeah, go after her. That's it. Yeah. There you go. Pretty simple. right a breakout didn't do anything wrong uh trump lock her up she filed the false report yeah go after her that's it yeah there you go pretty simple well things did not escalate and i decided not to follow through with the civil court process we were able to work through the situation privately as a family including by going to counseling our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed no one is perfect and no marriage is perfect lady i got news for you if you're filing domestic violence petitions,

we ain't talking about whether it's imperfect. We're talking whether or not you're going to die. And, you know, maybe the reason she's doing this is because MS-13's threatened her. That's true. That could be. Yep, they're like, we want you to go out in a statement and say he's a good guy.

And she's like, oh no. You know what's really funny is like, honestly, she filed oral protection against this guy. He gets deported. She might have been very happy like oh thank god and the reason why she ultimately doesn't follow through with the domestic violence petition is because ms-13 will come after her yeah and so she's like even if i win here i lose there now how much i think there's a possibility that ms-13 and other gangs went to the wife and said go and say he's a good guy and say he's not in the gang or else so now you got this woman and i don't think it's unreasonable to say what what is the proof that when she filed the domestic

violence petition she and she intended not to follow through with it when i go to the i go to a bar in the bathrooms you ever see the signs where it's like, are you being trafficked? And it's like, here's the hand sign you have to do. And there's some bathrooms in bars where there's like little red ribbons. And the women are supposed to take them and then hand them to the bartender. And that signals the bartender to call the police because they can't speak up about things. So here's a guy that two judges have said is in MS-13. Hanging out with MS-13 guys. His wife filed a domestic violence petition. And now all of a sudden she's going,

no, actually everything's okay. I'm like, okay, well, I learned from going to a bar that sometimes people who are telling you it's fine are secretly being trafficked or under threat. So thank you, CNN. Wow. I don't know. Just speculating. Maybe she should go into witness protection. Yeah, I don't think you escape a gang like that. You know what I mean? They're brutal. Yes. Yeah.

MS-13, when I grew up on Long Island, they took over a whole town. It's Brentwood on Long Island. And they are brutal. Now, Trend de Aragua makes them look like Boy Scouts. But these guys, they chop body parts, the Colombian necktie. I mean, it's bad. It's real. And they don't mess around.

You know, when you're on their list. Wait, what is the Colombian? When they kill someone, they pull your tongue through the throat and leave it on the body. Yeah. Oh. Yep. It's disgusting. Wow.

I had no idea what that was. And this was something that happened. Long Island's got a nice suburban little. What it what's it called when they when they put the tires around you necklacing necklacing necklacing okay what are they they put it around your whole body or just your neck top of the neck they put gas geez oh my goodness bro it is it is wild that's the that those are the people the democrats want to bring back. That guy, now I'm not saying he did any of that, we don't know, but he was a part of that gang that routinely did those things. Like on Long Island, if some story came in the papers

that said that there was a dismembered body part found in the woods, the first thing you would think was MS-13, without even thinking twice. That's the people, that's the type of person that that senator van holland is down there trying to bring back i don't again i don't know if he did any of that but you're a part of that gang you know just so long as democrats are unsuccessful in their efforts i am all for their efforts because most of the american people look at this and say what is wrong with you yeah they. That's why the media is lying.

Well, yeah, the media, of course, the media lies. But I think that nowadays, most people don't watch the mainstream media. I think that, you know, they'll look to podcasts or look to other forms of news. Yes, but you know that like Midas Touch and David Pakman are using the same talking points. Yeah, but I don't know that. Is it your sense that those people that watch David Pakman could be reached? Or do you believe that they – because I feel like people that watch Pakman, people that watch Midas Touch, those people are already going to be like whatever the Democrats say that's –

Bro, there's no middle. There's no middle at all. We actually have the data, and we've gone over the charts on this show the middle is like three percent of the country at this point so certainly it matters to a degree of course but that three percent how much are actually watching the news and that's why they're in the middle and it's going to be like 27% of 3% actually actively pays attention. So you're saying that there's no point in even addressing it?

I'm saying that we do this show to call it out every single day. We want people to share this show, and we are hoping that by exposing how they've lied, people who are in the cult might break free. But there's not like an undecided individual who's like, I'm not sure who we can talk to about this. No, it's not about whether or not,

about them trying to find out who they can talk to, but it's about platforms like ours and like others trying to make sure that the narrative that the Democrats are putting out, that the truth comes comes out you know and and the average person that doesn't go out and search for this information or even the people that do make sure that there's the the the truth is out there i just mean that there's a large contingent in this country that are going to turn on david packman and he's going to lie about every element of this story

and they're going to believe him. That was the initial point. Yeah, I don't disagree with you. Yeah. But I do think that there are still people that get their news in small bits, the kind of people that are not super plugged in, but they'll go and they'll watch an hour, two hours worth of news. You have to make sure that they have the ability to hear the actual truth of the story, which is he's not a Maryland man.

Right. I mean, the funny thing, too, is like how long was he even in Maryland? Like six years or seven years, something like that? So it's like the guy is – how old is he? Like 39 or 40? I don't even know how old he is. I don't know. A tiny portion of his life.

38, something like that. Like he's a Maryland man. Yeah. Like where was he before this? El Salvador? That's the attempt to kind of distract from the fact that he's illegal, right? You know, because you're not allowed to use that term, right? So they say he's from Maryland because that's where he was.

But that's not where he's from. He was resting his head here for just a moment. You know, it's like I grew up in New York. I live in Tennessee, you know, but it's like uh it's like i i grew up in new york i live in tennessee you know but it's like i'm i wouldn't say that i'm from tennessee yet i mean i've been there for two years i grew up in new york for 31 i'm from new york i live in tennessee right he's and i love it i call tennessee's my home i have a you know we bought a house there it's a great state but where people ask where i'm from my response is always well i grew up in new york i live in tennessee now because i spent 31 years of my life in new york and three years of my life in in tennessee right so where where where

where is this guy actually from well he was in maryland when this whole deportation happened but he's from el salvador right they can't admit that they can't they can't put that they have to it's branding they have to brand him a maryland man you know uh it's anything anything you see in the supermarket you you who they don't call it chocolate milk right it's chocolate drink right because it's not milk and it's a whole like you have to you have to brand him a certain way to gain to garner that sympathy. Yeah. So to say that you just mistakenly deported a guy from Maryland, that sounds horrible. But you didn't just mistakenly deport a guy from Maryland.

You did you intentionally deported an illegal alien who belonged to a terrorist organization out of Maryland because he was a danger to the people in maryland yeah i mean it's good that the the trump administration had the um the what's called the the press conference that they did today and they had the evidence that that shows that he's you know all these terrible things but at the end of the day like that's kind of an aside because he's here illegally right you know so immediately he's right for deportation it's not like one of these things where he came, overstayed his visa, and that's a civil violation. He admitted, I walked across the desert for a few days and entered the country illegally in 2012.

So on that alone, that's a crime. Out. Goodbye. All right, here we go, ladies and gentlemen, from the Washington Post. Judge Boasberg to launch contempt proceedings into the Trump administration. Oh, boy. Is the judge going to try to arrest Donald Trump's administrate like lawyers, U.S. attorneys who who would be doing the arresting? The the argument is that warrants would be issued and any jurisdiction would pick him up. Really? But the I don't think anyone's going to arrest U.S. attorneys. This is this is a massive gambit on Judge Boasberg's part. And this is the this is the game. Someone had to escalate this to executive

authority. Check this out. The Washington Post says Chief U.S. District Judge James E. Boesberg of Washington, D.C. on Wednesday said he would launch proceedings to determine whether any Trump administration officials defied his order not to remove Venezuelan migrants from the country based on the Wartime Alien Enemies Act. The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders, especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. He says, blah, blah. Boasberg's order is the latest development.

He basically said that there was probable cause. He said, the statement he gave out, I don't know if they have it in here, probable cause determined that contempt of court did occur. And essentially what this means is, not yet they're going to have a hearing on contempt, but he's basically fired a shot across the bow at Donald Trump. Now, I will ask you all, what happens if he actually tries to issue, if he actually does issue a warrant to have Trump's attorneys or anyone in his administration arrested i i mean i don't know exactly who i depends on who the uh the arresting authority is right well i mean the argument is does no one try to arrest them like what happens if a judge says warrant go arrest trump's u attorneys? Yeah, I'm not sure who would actually be the, who would have jurisdiction, because I would assume the Department of Justice has to.

If the warrant gets issued, doesn't that go out to all departments and agencies and they look up someone's information? Is a cop going to be like, there's a warrant, but I don't agree with it, so I'm not going to arrest you? That's interesting. I don't know. Yeah, I don't know it's yeah i i don't isn't this the case that was just kind of overruled by the supreme court though that donald trump was it was within his authority so can he even do that i mean can he can he actually hold them in contempt for something the supreme court said isn't a something like there's no there there anymore so hasn't his authority

essentially been overridden in this case it's a judicial coup that's no there there anymore so hasn't his authority essentially been overridden in this case it's a judicial coup that's what that's what it is it's likely that regardless of the supreme court's ruling he had a ruling that was defied and they went to supreme court so he's making a side argument it's kind of like when you get arrested for resisting arrest yeah okay okay yeah who does the arresting though that? That's an interesting. I don't know. Who does it go out to? I guess the big question is, is this criminal contempt? It is. He wants them to face criminal contempt charges. So a cursory search. It's a willful disobeying of the court's criminal contempt. So what will happen next is a contempt finding will be issued. The judge will enter a formal ruling. It can be a summons, fines, or even jail time. The U.S. Attorney's Office would likely seek appeal, which may work.

DOJ leadership may get involved. If criminal contempt is upheld, the attorney could be fined or jailed, although jailing a federal prosecutor is exceptionally rare and would provoke a major legal and constitutional standoff. If it's tied to a politically sensitive case, it could trigger congressional investigations, DOJ reviews and a mass and massive media attention. That's about it. There was, let's see, a federal judge threatened DOJ attorneys in 2015 with contempt in an immigration case. Interesting. He stopped short of any sanctions. So we will see.

We will see. It's hard to know what, but what would happen. But this is him basically saying like criminal contempt. We want to put you in jail. He's going to try it. I mean, he's already threatening it. He's going to I think he's going to follow through. He thinks so.

He is right. And I think it's highlights another problem that we have, obviously, with the judicial branch in the country where one district court judge, one ruling from a district court judge. I mean, these district court judges actually have more power than a singular Supreme Court justice. You know, it takes five on the Supreme Court to to push a ruling through. That's interesting. One from him is and you have a national block. Which is unconstitutional and brings us to the ongoing constitutional crisis that is happening in this country. Donald Trump needs to start ignoring all the orders. And I think I think Trump knows this. And I think the play he's currently making is he's got to be careful because perception is reality. Right. If he is going around laughing, saying no

one can stop me and the courts won't do a thing about it then he's gonna the public will stand against him like people are gonna freak out and be like whoa yeah but if trump says we're doing everything we're supposed to be doing what are they talking about then people are going to be more more confused and more willing to see what's going on yeah yeah i mean i i'm certainly not an expert in in judicial process. I mean, this is probably unprecedented, right? Well, none of this whole injunction thing at the rate that it's happening now happened under Biden. Under anyone.

Under anyone ever. And they'll say, well, that's because Biden didn't, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah. He didn't break the law. Like, did he not defy the Supreme Court with student loan? Let me pause you on that argument. Universal injunctions are unconstitutional, period. Judges have authority only over those in their court proceeding. So if you if you and Mary were to lawsuit to me, I could only say you and you. I couldn't say the whole nation nation. And they've done 81 of these in 64 in Trump's first term and

17 so far into a second, more than any other president and around half of all universal injunctions ever issued. And they are not constitutional. Trump and the DOJ need to bring this up. This needs to be their fight. Yeah. Well, yeah, because this judicial tyranny is what it is. And you have it's supposed to be separate from equal branches to coup.

You're supposed to, you know, each branch is supposed to have equal power. That's not and it's not right now a a district court judge a district court judge has more power than a supreme court justice doesn't make any sense and a district court judge can decide that he's the president now and can start telling the executive branch how to do their job yeah and and within the authority that you know this like the trans ban in the military. Donald Trump is the commander in chief of the military. A judge shouldn't be able to tell Donald Trump how to, that's not their lane. You can't get in that lane.

No, and the idea that a judge should be able to affect the whole country like this. We have an executive. We have the separation of powers for a reason. And a judge stepping into what the executive is doing in all of these different like every single different arena that the president is trying to act in and he's that there are multiple judges that are stepping in the way they're literally taking the the authority away from the president which was given to him and i've said this multiple

times the only person elected by the whole of the electorate, right? The whole country is the president, Congress and the Senate. They're elected by their constituents in the congressional districts and the states. The only person elected by the whole of the electorate is the president. And the president won clearly with the majority of the vote,

right? And the president won clearly with the majority of the vote. Right. Seventy seven million people didn't win just by the Electoral College won the the popular vote. And of course, won the Electoral College. He had a he had a mandate from the American people to do these things. And now the judges are stepping in because they're politically motivated. This is not about this is, this is all politically motivated. I got a question for the listeners. If you were the U.S. attorney or the DOJ, and the judge issued a fine for criminal contempt,

would you say, thank you, your honor, I will pay it post-haste, or would you say, shove it? Honest question. Put one in the chat for bending the knee to the judge and to the chat for giving in the middle finger. And, you know, the reason I asked this, I'm just I'm curious why it doesn't happen. You know, like. At this point, why isn't the Trump attorneys and the DOJ just laughing at the judge being like, bro, you're a district court judge. You don't mean

ish. Right. You can't do nothing about it. I don't know. I think the only reason why is that you just mentioned public perception. And would it be something that the public looks at? And, you know, does the normie crowd understand that he's a district court judge? They know what that means. Or does it look like Donald Trump is violating a court order and that's bad? You know, I don't I don't know what they're thinking. It's twos. It's like 100 percent twos. Everyone's saying, like, screw this judge.

Screw the judge. I'm with I'm on the screw the judge train. I look at him. What would you what would you do, Phil? If you were if you were in court and this judge said, I'm going to fine you for criminal contempt, would you be like, I will I will pay? Or would you be like, nah, I'd be like, you know, contempt appears. Right.

Yeah. Indeed. Yeah. Indeed. Yeah. That's why this is all, you know, we had a hand out yesterday. Hannah Cox, she was saying that she fears

it'll escalate to like a civil war with this tit for tat is ongoing. But it's like the day after she, she's here saying it's a tit for tat is escalating. It's the Democrat judges threatening to imprison or fine Trump's legal team.

And they did. And the Supreme Court actually said that they could not be compelled to engage in foreign policy actions like this. Right. So it don't matter if Judge Boasberg thinks they're in contempt. The Supreme Court said you couldn't have ordered this in the first place. Right. Well, I guess, to be fair, he's arguing that he wanted a detailed timeline on how this all went down. And they cited, I guess, state secrets, executive privilege of some sort. Sure. Yeah, that's what they said. State secrets was state secrets. And the judge has no right to these things. No. Bye bye. That's it. They should ignore that order. Look, we, you know, call it a cold civil war, call whatever you want.

You've got judges issuing unconstitutional edict over this nation at rates we've never seen before it is unprecedented you know you got all these young people that are like nothing ever happens and it won't stop happening right right he's been he's been on you about stuck with you huh i mean look the fact of the matter is like we talked about this before you know the this wouldn't be the situation if the previous administration had not been totally lawless when it comes to the border yeah right like if if the biden administration had done their job and not if joe biden had not specifically said to people surge the border right come he said that in the debate and if you think that the that people around the world don't listen when the

president talks you are wrong right you're just wrong he made that statement and consequently there was an wave after wave after wave of people coming to this country that have come into the United States. They're seeking asylum, but they didn't go to ports of entry, which is the proper way to do it. They would just come across the border, and when they would eventually bump into a border patrol or whatever, they'd say, I'm seeking asylum. And for some reason, the border patrol would say,

okay, let's take care of you as if this is the proper way to seek asylum. If you came here seeking asylum and you didn't go to the port of entry, you're here illegally. You got to go back. That's it. You got to leave. We got to toss them out. This is the current administration trying to fix the lawlessness of the previous administration and over and over the courts are literally getting in the way try upholding the illegal actions or preventing the the the remedy to illegal actions

by the previous administration you know i say it all the time right no matter where it is laws only matter if they're enforced right so when you have the because because and the proof is in in the pudding right now 95 percent drop in border encounters on the southern border and there was no new legislation passed all trump said it in his state all we needed right was a new president and a beautiful president and i highly respect that he's a beautiful guy but no seriously biden and and they didn't enforce the laws that we had on the books. Right. So, you know, I make this example. I get pulled over for speeding, but the law is such that paying the fine is optional. I'm not paying it because there's no enforcement. There's nothing compelling me to give somebody else my money for a traffic citation or whatever it is.

IRS sends me a signed, beautiful. You never have to pay taxes again and we promise you're not going to jail. They will not get another dollar out of me. I'm not going to pay it just to feel warm and fuzzy. I'm just not paying. The problem is that's not the case. They enforce those laws.

They didn't enforce the laws down on the border. When Biden, when these people don't, what was it, don't, right? Was that one word policy? But it was like, you know, if you're not enforcing the law, then the law doesn't matter. Trump and his administration is enforcing the law. So the law matters. The problem is you have these courts that are basically saying the enforcement of the law is illegal.

But it's the law. It's it's it's it's it's it's it's frustrating. This is the constitutional crisis. And it is that. The judiciary is asserting constitutional correctness, as is the executive. Both are saying we are right and you can't do this. And guys. This is the issue that we've talked about when it comes to the concept of civil war, when two factions reach the highest level of government. Right now, the judiciary, which is which is propped up by Democrats and these people were all appointed by Democrats or largely are outright saying our worldview is correct and your worldview is wrong. And on the right, they're saying the exact same thing. No, your worldview is wrong and our worldview is right. And I happen to think that reality has a right wing bias because Maryland man is a lie. Yeah. And that's what they do to maintain power. Trump's only option is to stay course and defend the Constitution. The argument the left is going

to make, the liberals are making, is that Trump is violating the Constitution. He's in fact not. He's abiding by it perfectly. Yeah. They are in violation of the Constitution. If Trump does not stop them, he has abandoned his oath to the Constitution. It's a good point. You know, and you mentioned reality has a right wing bias, which is an interesting way to phrase it. But I think when Bukele was in the Oval Office, they had a conversation and Trump said, you know, the people that are running it right now, it's not conservative, it's common sense. And I think that just kind of goes to what you're saying, that reality has that right

wing bias, right? In other words, Donald Trump has espoused a lot of common sense positions. Right. Securing the border is a common sense position. You can ask anybody right, left, center, up or down. Do you lock the door to your home at night because you hate the people on the outside? I hope you don't live in that type of neighborhood or because you love the people on the inside because you want to protect what's yours. And it's like, well, of course I of course i lock my door right well apply that to the country you know you don't just let people into your house without permission if you don't know who they are i wouldn't okay i mean unless we get a SWAT call and i really have no choice and sometimes but you

know but i wouldn't let somebody in my house or if i don't know who they are they're not coming in that's the point right well we do have some news on this front from the the New York Post, Trump administration refers New York Attorney General Letitia James for potential prosecution over alleged mortgage fraud. This is crazy. It's like there's so many instances it's hard to even go through all of them. In one instance, she was buying a house in Norfolk, Virginia, which she listed as her primary residence. And she did this, they say, to secure favorable

terms, it said as a primary home. Quoted appears Miss James property and mortgage related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent 2023 Norfolk VA property purchase in order to secure a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms. If she if her primary residence was in Virginia, she is ineligible for being a G. And she apparently this happened in 2023 while she was preparing her case against Donald Trump for civil fraud pertaining to the accusation that Trump inflated his assets for more favorable loan terms, of which is a total lie. They also want to mention that she misrepresented building as having four units when it had five. Why? Because there was a restriction, I believe, on some mortgage applications where you couldn't get a five unit building in order to qualify for a special loan. It had to be four or less. So she lied about the size of her building for more favorable terms.

That's what she accused Trump of doing, which was also a lie. The question now is we've seen nothing but half measures. Judge Boasberg says contempt of court hearings to maybe determine whether or not you did housing. What is it? The the housing finance agency saying you should prosecute. Maybe they will. And then this morning you had pam bondy say we are suing maine for having men and women's sports and considering maybe at some point just a little bit taking away their money like how about anybody just do something go in gotta go arrest leticia james criminally charge her for mortgage fraud. Let's roll. Yeah, I'm with that.

Because again, what I just said, laws are only laws that are enforced. If you give her this carve out, then you're setting the precedent that what she did is okay. And you just can't do that. She tried to set the precedent that what Donald Trump didn't do was something that he did to the tune of a $450 million judgment. Right. She literally, she listed her husband, her father as her husband. She's not even married.

It's not one of those things where, oops, I made a mistake and put dad's name where hubby's name was supposed. That's, that's, you don't have a husband. Maybe she's banging her dad. Well,

I hope not. You know, it'd be like some Ilhan Omar type stuff. Some people did something. See, see, See, we instantly... We had to do it, right? Jar Jar Binks, we call it Jar Jar Binks. I forgot what I was going to say.

It's such a great impression. It's so distracting. Oh, right, right. Some people, I'd say most people, because we're reasonable and obviously incest is wrong, when you hear that she listed her dad as her husband, you're like, she must have been lying to secure loan terms.

And it's like, wait, wait, maybe she's just gross. Yeah, she could be. She looks like Sasquatch. Look at her. That's Sasquatch. You will not see anything different. You look up a picture of what Sasquatch looks like. No, she's not blurry enough.

Right. Yeah. She hasn't been taken on a Nokia flip phone. And I got to give a shout out to Mitch Hedberg for that one. What is his joke? Maybe Sasquatch is just blurry. That dude was a legend. But look, in terms of the escalation, the question is, will the Trump administration has saber rattled quite a bit? Now these judges are saber rattling. Is any one of them actually going to say, OK, let's go arrest people? Trump's pulled clearances.

The rumor is when he pulled the clearances of like Hillary Clinton and Biden and Secret Service and all that, it's preparation for an arrest. I would argue with midterm season starting in like not even a year, like it's going to be less than that, to be honest. We're already in the 2028 primary cycle with Shapiro and Newsom. Trump's got a very limited window to do bold things. If he waits a year to issue indictments, that will upset the midterms and could hurt him. Yeah, it'll I think it'll demotivate the base. You know, I mean, you we heard about retribution. Right. And I don't think retribution wasotivate the base. You know, I mean, we heard about retribution, right? And I don't think retribution was supposed to be half measures.

And I'm not saying I'm disappointed in what he's done his first 100 days. I'm very happy with how a lot of things have started off. But he's got to go all the way on at least some of it. You know, I'm not saying you got to round up everybody who said, you know, and take broadcasting licenses away from everybody and indict and arrest like like crazy, you know, like whack them all. But but something's got to happen. I mean, Letitia James, this should be low hanging fruit. She lied on this. It looks like it anyway.

Yeah. Right. Unless this was a calamity of coinc coincidences which i don't believe in there's there's no way that what she did isn't mortgage fraud if she actually did that you know intentionally which looks like she did well she responded i am not afraid of no president oh god come on gentlemen gentlemen once again you're making an incorrect assumption that's a double negative in which she's saying she may be afraid of some president. That's true. It's true.

She says she's coming for Trump. I'm not afraid of no president. So you are afraid of some president. Donald Trump, we are ready for you. We're coming for you. Let me just stress that the appellate court has been sitting on their ruling in the civil fraud case for seven months, which is very weird. Yeah. Makes no sense.

I think that this was clearly deep state versus Trump. And the appellate court knows if they issue a ruling, they're either saying we will help the deep state or we'll help Trump. And they're they don't know who's going to win. So they're they're just doing nothing. They're waiting, sitting on their hands. Yep. I see in which way the the wind blows. The wind blows.

Yeah. Yeah. Oh, I ain't afraid of no president. OK, well, Sasquatch. She's afraid of a... Again, we all learned our double negatives. Right. Okay.

You don't do that. Right. Right. What did you say? So I've got to rush back to the office because you know that there's nothing more close to my heart than a lawsuit. And so you tell Donald Trump the lawsuit's coming in a matter of hours. Uh-huh.

Okay. And then she said a bunch of stuff I don't care to read. I just want to see some people get arrested, you know what I mean? I mean, that's kind of something that I was thinking. The whole issue surrounding the real estate stuff, I feel like it's fairly obvious that that was corrupt. Right. And I don't know the process that would have you have

to go through the or the doj would have to go through but i really feel like hey shouldn't you be investigating this this is clearly a bs charge and isn't there some kind of violation of the law when all the parties involved said no we're happy with this situation and they blatantly lied about the value of mar-a-lago, you know, and she went to prosecute. Isn't there some remedy or isn't isn't didn't she break some law? And again, not that I know, but I feel like shouldn't the DOJ be like, all right, look, you broke this law. We're going to invest or you broke a law. You broke the law by trying to, you know, improperly prosecute this person. It was it was based on total bs it was politically motivated isn't that i feel

like that again i don't know but i feel like there should be some kind of law that was broken that i feel like that is illegal somehow and and why is it that the doj hasn't started to investigate that kind of i i can't answer that question i'm gonna get arrested no i i mean i don't think so either well even for this you don't think though no it's all bravado and nothing ever happens i hope that i hope i hope this is the exception to the rule i would i don't like when i lived in new york i never liked this lady all right before i figured out that she looked like sasquatch i still never liked her and you're saying that you would have liked someone else more? Like, if you...

Probably not. Yeah, I probably wouldn't like any... I don't like any Democrats in New York. You have Kathy Hochul. No, but you said even... What did you say? Even before... Before she looked like Sasquatch.

Right, so the implication is that there are some people you've not met that you would like more if you saw them and they looked like Sasquatch. Well, if... I agree with that. If I knew a dude,

but I only ever talked to him on the phone, and I showed up, and Sasquatch was there, I'd be like,, if I'm if I knew a dude, but I only ever talked to him on the phone and I showed up and Sasquatch was there, I'd be like, yeah, I would be like, we found him. Right. It's like, finally, we got something. I want to see her. She is such she is.

There are things I want to say we can't say. Right. But she is such a detestable person. And she always she's carried herself in this. You know, how many times did she post on X? Nobody's above the law. And she's carried herself in this you know how many times did she post on x nobody's above the law and she's doing this right her insolence should be smacked down right that's not gonna happen that's what i feel like like if she got arrested i'd be like oh karma's a bitch but like and then you say things happen then i would finally admit that

something happened they arrested arrested Donald Trump twice. Is that not a thing happening? Okay, that's a happening. Fine. And that was only last year. Like, they literally arrested him. Yeah. It was funny because we kept saying, like, maybe they'll arrest him.

Actually, no, wait. He's been arrested several times already. Right, right, right. I've said before, he's just not angry enough. He's so magnanimous that he's,'s like the retribution thing was. Give me the Donald Trump that the left says. I know. Yes. All the time that he

were the man they say he is, but he's not. The famous dictator. I'm not into the whole authoritarian. I like that. I have a very strong libertarian streak. I don't want a president to rule like a king, but I want angry Trump with these people. The saying is, you know, be the change you want to see in the world. I like the meme that's be the right. The left thinks you are. Yeah. Yeah. At least be as tough,

you know, the right is the please leave me alone side. And the left is we will win side. Yeah, that's true. That is very true. That is very true. You saw that in Wisconsin. And for the tables to turn then. But that's what Trump is. And that's, you know, so with 2015, you had the populists with Bernie and the populists on the right with Trump. Trump is a forceful guy who knows how to get things done. And Bernie is a shallow, weak-willed hypocrite. So he got washed out in two seconds. Trump kicked the door in and started rearranging the furniture. They did not like that. I want to see Trump

doing a little of the FDR. A little of the Abraham Lincoln. Four terms? No. That's not what I'm thinking. I'm thinking about actually being an expansive energetic, muscular president. I want him... Well, I mean, I don't president. I want him.

Shock and awe. Well, I mean, I don't know about shock and awe. Maybe he should start taking some tea and get ripped and just look. He can be the Trump that Ben Garrison thinks he is. He's 220 pounds. Yes. So they say. Donald Trump.

So they say. Have you seen the meme of Donald Trump 6'3", 225, and then DK Metcalf at the Seattle Seahawks? Donald Trump. And this guy looks like Superman. And I'm like, so maybe Trump is 200. Well, muscle weighs more than fat, right? Yeah, I guess so.

Yeah. I'm not fat, though. I'm a beautiful guy. I think, Mary, you're probably not familiar with ben garrison comics i've seen them so like trump's always ripped you know yeah okay okay i don't know because you know you're like a young person over here so i don't know if you're into those boomer memes you know what i mean yeah i don't know um i guess i guess it's kind of like a mexican standoff the concern is that whoever makes the first move for law enforcement, it's like we're at that point where Matt Taibbi described it as two vehicles speed towards the police station,

and then two men get out of the cars, run up to the stairs, run to the police officer, and they point at each other, arrest that man. Right. That's a game of chicken. But I would say right now, Trump's play is now for one reason. He is the duly elected president with a popular mandate, and there is no reason to doubt that if Trump gives Democrats a long enough period of time, they will create a criminal narrative, which they are doing with, quote, Maryland man. Now, Boasberg is saying criminal contempt because they're trying to create a fissure within the psyche of law enforcement in this country that they will be justified in the arrest of Trump at some point. If Trump right now made moves to arrest, he's the president.

This is the DOJ. This is the FBI. What questions are to be asked? Six months from now, the narrative may be implanted in the minds of half the country that Trump kidnapped a legal U.S. resident and sent him to a torture dungeon to die. And that's the narrative they're trying to build. Yeah. And when that happens and Trump says, we've got a warrant for your arrest, they will turn around and say, what Trump is doing is illegal. Don't forget, he kidnapped American citizens and sent him to torture dungeons. Yeah, that's a good point.

And that's why that goes back to the branding of Maryland man. Exactly. And then what happens is you'll get a cop and he's going to be like, I don't know nothing about this. OK, see double negatives. He's going to he's going to be like a warrant was issued. I don't know what I'm supposed to do. And that the governor of his blue state is going to say, do not you do not report to Donald Trump. You are a Maryland police officer.

Trump is breaking the law. No one is above the law. Trump can't let them get to that point in shattering the psyche of this country, which means he has a very small window for going after corrupt people like Letitia James and Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney for the crimes that they are alleged to have committed with falsifying evidence or tampering with witnesses because if he waits they're now accusing him of stock manipulation they are trying to stack up the things for which they can accuse him of committing crimes yeah so that they can get people willing to fight trump do you think

it'll be on a state a state basis like that like you said a maryland judge it has to be yeah so it's going to be a bunch of democrats who are arguing for states rights again yes ah well so where have we seen that before what happens underwear what happens if boasberg says we're going to have a criminal contempt proceeding and i want you in my court and they say go go after yourself when it's showing up and then he says then you are in contempt and i will i will issue a warrant for your arrest they say nice try blue states will absolutely uphold those warrants absolutely you might get a conservative leaning cop in Maryland. Look, the cops in Maryland talk a big game. The cops in Jersey talk a big game. We're we're Trump supporters. We're conservatives. People have right to bear arms, but they will arrest you in two seconds. In Jersey, they arrest little old ladies for

having weapons. It's a famous story about some little old lady from PA crossed the bridge, not realizing they did not have reciprocity. They threatened her with four years in prison. Cops are just like, look, man, my boss told me what to do. And I ain't giving up my salary for you. Just following orders. Yeah. So you're going to get a blue state where they're going to be like, you know, Madam U.S. attorney, I have a warrant for your arrest. And she's going to say, I am the U.S. attorney for this district. This is unconstitutional to say, I don't know nothing about that other than my boss told me to arrest you and I'm not going to lose my job for you because I don't know who you are. And then what?

They get arrested. This is what people say, like, no, they would never do it, bro. Yes, they would. Yeah, they absolutely would. Absolutely. A cop who is a diehard Trump supporter who lives in Los Angeles would absolutely arrest one of Donald Trump's cabinet or administration. He'd be a hero to the left. No, no, no. I'm saying a conservative cop who supports Trump and wears MAGA hats, who works in the L.A. police department,

when told to arrest a Donald Trump administration official, would do so and say, sorry about doing this. You know, I know because they literally did it over and over again with with the arrest of Trump's lawyers and the arrest of Trump himself. Not a single cop said, I got a problem with not a single cop had a problem with arresting Trump's lawyers, administration officials and and and Trump himself. They all just did it. They all just did it. So Trump right now is the president.

He's got a short window. That's all I'm saying. I don't think I don't I don't think you're wrong. But I think that when it comes to, you know, who who would arrest Trump? Look, man, there's a lot of people that would love to be like, I'm the guy that arrested. Yeah, but I'm and you're right. And there's a lot of liberal cops, too, who are going to be like, I hate this guy. I'll arrest him.

But the scary thing about it is not a single police officer in any of these states where they arrested Trump's people at the federal in the federal government. Where was any of the FBI, a single FBI to actually come out while on the job and say the raid on Trump's home is wrong and should not have been done. Now, there are a couple FBI agents who got fired and blew the whistle for other for unrelated things, so then came out and spoke out. But no act is as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you guys chat me and tell me if I'm wrong. But my understanding is no active FBI spoke up and said this is wrong. What we are doing to the front runner for the Republican Party. No, no, no officer in any of these cases publicly said, I will not arrest Donald Trump. This is unconstitutional. Not a single one.

No. When it comes down to it, they will all say, look, man, I've got kids that need food and I will not sacrifice my children for you. Yeah, that's unfortunate. But that's the position they're going to put themselves in. And when we've seen people capitulate in the past, I mean, look at the look at the vaccine mandates, for example, and people regret doing it, but they had to do it to keep their job. And I don't know what to do in that, you know, in that situation. What do you do? But now you're talking about something a little different than just getting a shot right in your arm. You're you're throwing the country into turmoil. You arrest now. I don't know. Donald Trump be arrested because he is the president and

the Supreme Court has given him immunity for official acts. So so can he be arrested? Yes. So shooting someone on Fifth Avenue is not an official act. That's true. But these these actions to deport somebody is an official like this. But the issue that we're looking at is they're going to argue that it is that the court ordered him to facilitate the return of this man. And so Trump is an active defiance of what would be his constitutional duties. OK, so look, the reality is when they say the word Maryland man, you only need understand they will lie to create a justification for why Trump. What he did was not within the confines of this. With Letitia James's

case against Trump, you know that they will lie and make up a crime to go after Trump for. They accuse him of 30, a 30 year old rape case that makes literally no sense. They had to change the statute. Indeed. Once they build up a substantial position where they have enough law enforcement questioning whether or not Trump is going to maintain his position, whether or not what he's doing is constitutional, then they will create a criminal pretext and then they will start going after Trump's personnel. They did this in his first term. They did it to Michael Flynn. They did it to Paul Manafort. They did it to Navarro and they did it to Bannon. They put Peter Navarro and Bannon in prison. In prison.

And Merrick Garland, who committed contempt of Congress, got no time. That's true. So there are a couple more happenings for you. Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, Trump's economic advisor, was jailed by the Democrats. His lawyers were jailed by the Democrats.

They've done all of these things. They're going to do them again unless Trump takes it seriously, I guess. I'm assuming he is. I'll ask him, I guess. Yeah. Next time I see him. You get the chance. Well, I certainly want to talk to our FBI because let me just tell you, nobody knows any of this better than Dan Bongino. That's true.

He's deputy director. Yeah. Right. And Kash Patel had the book of all the deep state people in it. He was a target, too, during Spygate. So I can't imagine, like with the conversations we've had with Kash and Dan in the past, I can't imagine they're sitting there being like, we are clueless to this. No.

I wouldn't be surprised if they were aware of this conversation right now and they're like we know i yeah i'm i'm i mean look if if there are investigations going on the last thing that they want is that kind of information getting out of course not you know so it's like as much as there are people that are that are like oh the trump administration's not doing anything the trump administration's not doing anything because you know administration is not doing anything because, you know, they don't have anything. Dan Bogino himself has said, look, just because you don't see it doesn't mean things aren't happening. I trust Cash and Dan. That's the only reason why I actually have faith in the FBI is because of the leadership.

If this was still Christopher Wray and Andy McCabe, you know, I'd be like you know what even trump's first term yeah it's like we don't trust comey we don't trust these people no and uh now he's got cash patel and dan bongino and i'm like wow they deserve time i get the frustration and faith and and faith i get the frustration you know we want and and we're in that it's 2025 we're in that everything's got to happen in the first 90 seconds yeah and tim's not wrong about the time frame either he doesn't have forever he doesn't have forever hey look look um i am not frustrated in the least with pam bondi cash or or dan i know a lot of people are and you're wrong to be frustrated um i'm gonna i'm they have all of my benefit of the doubt, all of it.

And so from all of the people that we've seen be in these positions, even in Trump's term and Trump's during Obama was a joke during Trump's first term, he had bad people during Biden's term. We had real bad people, real bad people. Now we got real good people, real good people. And so I'm sitting there being like, let them cook. Bondi, I'm lukewarm on Bondi. Only because of how the Epstein stuff was handled.

Where she came on Jesse Waters the night before and said, we have it. And then the next day, well, we don't. But how did you not know? That's the one thing I'll push back on her on. That's fine, but I think she's talking big game. She is. And it spiraled. And it was, you know, then the three ring binder three ring circus whole thing you know whatever but i will say we've we have found and and charged with domestic terrorism a lot of these

folks who were uh the the real bad ones with the teslas uh the drug busts with the fbi have been have been big and you know you know, Bongino, he knows where the bodies are buried. I mean, the guy wrote books. He built his career off of all this. But he can't he can't just come out and say, well, yeah, we're investigating this guy and this guy and this guy and this guy for ABCDEFNG because you don't do that. I will say this again. You know, I said this the other day, but Dan's a great guy. He gave up the biggest live show in the country. Yeah.

He was averaging like 170,000 concurrent. It's incredible. No one could hold a candle to his show. And he decided to be a public servant instead. Yeah. And there's very few people that I actually look up to. But that move right there, I look up to Dan for making that move. And that's why I'm like, that's why one of the

principal reasons why I trust Dan. First of all, he's right. He talked about this stuff every single day. He knew the ins and outs of it. He was right. Cash, because we've sat down with cash and we've talked to him about all this stuff. And cash never blew smoke up our asses. When he was asked on our show about pardoning Assange, he said, I'm not so sure that makes sense. And here's why. He didn't just say what he thought we wanted to hear. Heing Assange, he said, I'm not so sure that makes sense and here's why. He didn't just say what he thought we wanted to hear. He says, no, here's my actual thoughts on the matter. I have tremendous respect for that.

He didn't just try and pander for support. He's a good dude. And I think we're going to get some moves. I do. I really, really do. And I don't know if that means that, like, you get tribunals and, like, paddy wagons pulling people over or whatever, picking people up and stuff like that. It'd be sick, though. It would be sick. I think they're going to do exactly what they can do within the confines of the law and the Constitution. But as far as they can to make sure it gets done, because they're on the chopping block, the same as Trump and everybody else.

Right. Right. And Dan gave up. I mean, you mentioned that he gave up a lot when that news came out because i've been following dan for a very long time you know back to when he started really going crazy on on spy gate and i was like this sounds like a like a loony story but he had the receipts you know you mentioned he talks about it every day he brings it all to the table and and i'm like this is not a loony story story. This is the biggest political spying scandal ever. It made Watergate look like nothing. The fact that he built it from there to, like you said, the number one live show, to walk away from that, for people to think that he's going to walk away from that and then do nothing with it, why walk away? Right? So why would you leave what you built to just, what, so you could tweet on an account with a gray check?

You know what I mean? Like, that's not what he's doing. But it is going to take time. He's only been on the job for a month, you know? So it's going to take, I think his first day on the job was, what, the 15th of March or 16th of March, something like that? Yep. So it's been a month.

Yeah. I mean, look, knowing Dan from his show, what he represents, I kind of imagine when they approached him and said, how would you like to be deputy FBI director? He just went, let's go. Like everything he has talked about. We will give you the sword of the DOJ to get that job done. And so I'm looking forward to it. Yo, what do you think the salary of the doj to to get that job done and so i'm looking for it yo what do you think the salary of the deputy fbi director is it's like 150 grand yeah yeah is that what it is it's like guessing between 150 and 200 000 depending on uh how long they've been there and you know

yeah he's at the low end of that probably because he's a rookie in that department. I mean, to be fair, he has— He's rich. He should be fine, right. But still, to walk away from just what he built, Rumble, how Rumble has taken off, he's an equity holder, just put a new studio together, he started to expand his network, right? And it's not like he left everybody high and dry but to do what he did to walk away from that the number one live stream in the country yeah and world and going going into the administration knowing what the previous

administration and the doj had done and the attack the attacks to donald trump's previous administration he knows that it's possible that they could go after him that's right if the The attack, the attacks to Donald Trump's previous administration. He knows that it's possible that they could go after him. That's right. If the Democrats win in the next election. We do get a couple more segments. So I just want to grab one super chat in context here. Nick G said, I think it was Bannon that said something like we'll see arrests by midsummer.

I mean, look, man, just let me I just want you to just close your eyes real quick and I just want you to imagine it's the 4th of July. You're in your backyard. You got some burgers and some brats on the grill. Your kids are playing. Everyone's smiling. Your fireworks are ready to go.

Your friends, your family there, you're smiling and say, life is good. Your phone vibrates. You look down. Hillary Clinton has been arrested. You smile and the fireworks is good your phone vibrates you look down hillary clinton has been arrested

you smile and the fireworks go wonderful ah yeah i'll be on the where let me ask this question where do i sign for that like where is there a piece of find a lamp to rub and ask the genie where's the ha the ah the only thing i want right now for the next, like, from today until autumn, I just want to be sitting outside, sunset, with burgers on the grill, with my phone going, another arrest. Yeah, another one. I don't know, man. It might be a pipe dream.

You know, it might be wishful thinking. But there's so many things a person could wish for. A million dollars, a new car. But that scenario, that's serenity right there, you know? Yeah. I don't know if Hillary is going to get, but some I when Bannon says arrest by midsummer, I just. OK, OK, wait something. You're sitting there. Your your your buddy's got the burgers on and he's like extra cheese, right? And you're like, definitely. He gets the burger ready.

Your phone vibrates and you look. Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney arrested. There you go. Again, where do I start with that watermelon head? I mean, I love the idea of wrapping up a Clinton, but I think that there are people that have more, at least more recent substantive crimes that should be actually prosecuted. It's possible that Hillary Clinton has broken the law, especially when it comes to her server that she kept in the bathroom.

Bleach pit. But I think that the attempts to put trump and his administration in jail are because of their their recents are a little more visceral for me so i'd love to see people that were were in biden's administration wrapped up and and people in congress you know like schiff and stuff like that judge mershon it would be more satisfying you know a judge mershon to me would be an alvin bragg you know these people that you just mentioned perverting the law. You know, there's got to be some sort of violation in there. You know, a Mershon, a Letitia James, an Adam Schiff, folks like that.

You know, I mean, I would arrest Eric Swalwell for farting on live television, but that's just me. All right. Let's jump to this next story from the BBC. Supreme Court backs biological definition of woman. Amazing. This is actually big, big news for the UK. It basically ends all of the trans stuff in public accommodation. Now it's for the UK. They say judges at the UK Supreme Court have unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law.

It marks the culmination of a long running legal battle, which could have major implications for how sex based rights apply across Scotland, England and Wales. The court side with the Campaign for Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government, arguing that sex based protections should only apply to people that are born female. Judge Lord Hodge said the ruling should not be seen as not be seen as a triumph for one side over the other and stress the law still gives protection against discrimination to trans people. Yes. But what this basically means then, in law, and I can't speak for the British law, but in the United States, if there is a law that specifically says like women are granted a thing, then they redefine the word woman to mean a man who wants to be female and they're going to give those protections

to that individual. That's what this ruling will do that means a woman's room which is designated for females that means trans women can't be going in there anymore but we'll see how the uk actually handles that that ruling a lot of people are wondering why we're not getting similar rulings here in the united states already i would imagine the supreme court would rule this currently uh i mean hopefully the it would be five four the i would hope that the way i would hope it would be at least five four but you you can't no amy coney bear exactly you know and you'd think the women would be like no we know what women are but it's likely that the women would actually be like well you know that would be a follow-up to the executive order which already stated the same definition of biological women.

Just how crazy is it that we live in a world where a court has to back a definition of a word that we all know is true, right? I mean, like, I think it's just nuts. Like, we know what the word means, but you have to have a court sign off on the definition. Did the Supreme Court meet with Merriam miriam webster and put this in the dictionary like i'm gonna what's going on here uk is ahead of us on uh regulations against mutilating

as well yeah there's going to be a ruling in june we're following suit the ruling in june on tennessee's gender affirming care ban it should come out in June. So that would be pretty good. I just remembered that J.K. Rowling lives in Scotland, and I ran to her profile, and sure enough, she's drinking whiskey and smoking a cigar in celebration of this. I saw the tweet. I might have a cigar later. Look, it's something that needed to happen. But again, like you said, the whole Tavistock thing, the fact that they closed that down, it was a big step. It shows that there is a sense that reality is real.

You come into contact with reality and you can't ignore the ramifications of coming into contact with reality. And men cannot become women women cannot become men it doesn't matter how much people wish that they could be it's funny because you know in english culture it's all about politeness and artifice and not making things explicit that are implicit and this is the opposite of that you think the politeness is why they were so quick to pick up the- I think so. I mean, politeness is the entire reason why this falsehood spread in the first place. Because ultimately, people who are in the middle of the road on this, they just- They want to allow people to live how they want to live and, like, do what you want and identify how you want.

Like, just, I don't know, like, leave me out of it. Leave my children out of it. But that was never an option. Like that was naive to think that was an option to begin with, that you would ever not be pulled into the delusion. That was the intention from the start. So this is funny because the big controversy was the dictionaries were all changing the definition. And so Merriam-Webster has a definition of woman as having a gender identity that is opposite of male.

I don't even believe in gender identity. What does that even mean? What's male? That's BS. Male is the opposite of female. Oh. But that means it's binary, right? Yeah, well.

Well, Amazon, you know, they say, what was it? There were T-shirts that says there are more than two genders, but there were only two options. Do you want a men's or a women's? Right, right, right. I was like, that is beautiful, you know? It's wonderful when you see things like that. It's when you see those little bits of truth. Like they'll have the – so Mary and Sarah and I were in, uh, DC last weekend or whatever.

And we saw these two people walking. One person said, make law, had a sign that said, make lying illegal. And the other person said, trans rights are human rights. It was like trans women or women or something. Trans rights. Something like that. It's like these two things contradict each other. Earlier that day, we were in Bethesda, Maryland, and we saw a man with his daughter and this man, the father, he was dressed up like a woman.

And he's this huge, hulking man. They always are. And I just look at this and I'm like, I'm not even mad. I'm just like, why does everyone have to have some kind of situation? It's weird. They're imposing themselves on society. And that's my point. We're dealing with fetishists. We're dealing with autogynephiles who are aroused by people's disgust and fear of them. So letting people live how they want to live and identify how they want to identify was never an option because the intention is to impose it on you that's how they get off right they just they just use like empathy they hijack empathy and then make you feel bad for it and they say oh don't you

feel bad for this and they just use it to get whatever they want through the door every single time what is the logic well that's a stupid question there's no rules but you know what is the limitations right i mean the question's been's no rules but you know what is the limitations right i mean the question's been asked before but if you have to use someone's preferred pronoun words address them as they want to be addressed what else can be asserted well everything and the answer is everything like to the point where like if a student in the classroom identified as a cat they put a litter box in the classroom the the so i don't know that ever actually did that there are there are some reports that schools put litter box in the classroom. So I don't know that they ever actually did that. There are some reports

that schools put litter boxes in bathrooms. And there was a story about a hotel that had a furry convention and they put litter boxes out too, and people were using them. The cutting edge of this stuff was... I do think there was some witness corroboration on the litter boxes in schools, though. I think there was.

Let's put it this way. I wouldn't be shocked by the way if that was something that was was widespread yeah yeah the answer is once you have once you have accepted delusion there really is no no there's no limit there's no and to that to that point the one of the things that was really repulsive to people is you saw a lot of trans women telling lesbians that they were bigots because they were rejecting them. And you saw trans women telling straight men that they were bigots because they were rejecting them and at the end of the day if they had their way they would force people which is super rapey and creepy but they would force people to say hey uh they to say yes i accept that you're a woman regardless of your genitals and that is something that human beings

are not going to take right like that is not ever going to go over. Lesbians are never going to be like, yeah, I don't mind that you have a penis. Right. And dudes are never going to be like, come here. Right. Right. It's not going to happen. Right. Straight guy. It's just not. And that was the I think that that was one of the things, even though you didn't hear it spoken about in polite company very much on the internet you did so if you went into places where people would talk about these topics 4chan or whatever um you would hear those kind of conversations and you would hear people saying no you making the assertion that no you if you're if you're a trans woman lesbians that reject you are bigots and they were just like we don't care you know same thing with me like if a if a trans woman's like you have to do this or else you're a bigot. I'm like, sick, I'm a bigot. No care at all, man.

Don't care. Yeah. Yeah. It's insane. The litter in the schools thing is really funny because I know that there were a few teachers and school employees who had come out saying that they had done that. But the media said it never happened no matter what. And when you look it up, it's the the litter box hoax or whatever despite the fact there are some teachers it's not like 50 of them it's like three or four right said no my school did this despite that the media is claiming it

never happened and the whole thing was a hoax which is weird it's very very weird that they've created a wikipedia entry for this when it was like a single teacher being like one time my school had a litter box for furries and they they're like, nope, you made that up. Never happened. Yeah, because they know it's crazy. That's why they don't want to admit that that happened, because they allowed it. They encouraged it. You know, again, you can't.

Lisa, so let's just go through it. Lisa Hansen at a school board meeting was a parent, and she said that they put a litter box in a unisex bathroom. The superintendent, Michael Shero, refuted that, saying there's no truth that whatsoever. That's contested, not not not debunked. Fargo school board member in North Dakota, Jennifer Benson, mentioned that litter box had been placed in school restrooms. When pressed for evidence, she declined to provide any. Again, this is not debunking. It's just disagree. It's just disagreeing. That is to say, it's fine to say it's never been proven. It's just weird that there have been Montana superintendent of public instruction, Elsie Arntzen, claimed there was actually, she had evidence that in Montana schools they had done this, but then they never provided any of this. thing is if someone comes out and says oh yeah at the schools over here they they put a litter

box in there and you go prove it and they go i don't know i'll go okay and that's the end of story right to do this big media campaign where they claimed it never happened is very strange that's suspicious i'm not saying i'm not saying it proves it but i'm saying that's weird right why go through the why go through the all that work and all that time all that energy to try and disprove it? Was it Rogan who told that story about the litter boxes in the hotel? Something like that. It might have been Joe.

I've heard it. I don't know. Right. But there was a story from somebody where there was a furry convention at a hotel. And then they insisted they had litter boxes in their rooms or whatever. We need animal control. Windowless vans going to the asylums. Just call it a free Uber.

Wasn't that the furry con thing they did? It was that big convention that they did. I can't remember what it was called. I was unfortunate at the time. I don't remember what it was called, though. Don't you guys remember that? I don't ever remember this. I can't remember what it was called.

It was a furry convention. Yeah. And throw a con in Pittsburgh. Yep, that's right yeah yeah they uh knew it an account from 2016 mentions hotel rooms contained a litter box and then once again it says but there's no evidence dude a person told a story about it they were requested a litter box like it's it's the craziest thing that they can come out and say abrigo garcia is a maryland man with no evidence. And then if someone's like, oh, they once put a litter box in my hotel, prove it. That's like, I don't know.

Evidence to the contrary. Right, right. You know, not just no evidence, but evidence to the contrary. They'll say he's a Maryland man. And then when it comes to, well, there's no evidence of the litter box, blah, blah, blah. Well, they do that all the time. You can have somebody make a claim that they don't like. They't like that you're making the claim and they'll say there's no evidence but you don't understand like making the claim is evidence or or having a picture of it is

you may not it may be evidence that is later said well this doesn't prove it or it's circumstantial but it's it's evidence nonetheless testimony is evidence it doesn't mean it's evidence nonetheless. Testimony is evidence. It doesn't mean it's evidence to convince you that it happened. But people saying that they saw it is evidence that it may have happened. So they can't say that there's no evidence. They can say that there may not be enough evidence. But they can't say that there's none, that there's an absence of evidence because that's not true. There is evidence. And they would love to have you believe that there was no evidence because it hurts their narrative.

It makes them look bad. But they, you know, they don't have that even. Well, whether or not they have the ability to say that they're going to say that because they'll just assert BS over and over and over. And I think everyone, you know, is pretty aware of that. Well, it's like you look outside, it's wet, right? And you say it rained. And somebody goes, well, there's no evidence it rained. You can't prove it rained.

But the evidence is that it's wet. Now, it could have come from something else. It could have come from a sprinkler. You could have spilled water. But the presence of water on the ground could be interpreted of evidence that it rained. Do you need more to conclusively prove that there was rain? Sure.

But they can't go, well, you don't have evidence. You do. There's water on the ground. And that's what they do. They will make you prove, and then even if you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, they'll still, you know, this Abrego Garcia. That's a good thing. Right.

If you prove it, they'll say, no true that's a good thing that's that's that's the way it always starts remember critical race theory was like there is none doesn't exist it's only in college uh it's actually everywhere and it's a great thing and if you don't think it's a great thing you're a racist and that's the way they always do it yeah that is that is true it's it's it's it's not happening until it is happening. And it's a good thing. Yeah. So soon litter boxes will be celebrated in public restaurants. I do think that's the path that we're going. I do feel like the left is not in the ascendance anymore. And because they're not in ascendance anymore, they're not going to be pushing the boundaries. These kind of things like the idea of furries being acceptable in schools or, you know, tampons in boys rooms or or those kind of

crazy things. Those things are only going to be attempted when they're in when the left is in ascendance. It's the whole Martin Bailey thing. Yeah. You know, they retreat to the Mott or they have to retreat to the Mott because the American people are fed up with their garbage. Right. When they were ascendant and in control, they were in the bailey saying you know we're going to do all

these crazy things and men can be women and blah blah blah blah let me let me tell you guys why ai will destroy the world all right how exciting we can watch irobot it's because i uh have been i asked it chat gpt did a hotel put litter boxes out for furries? And it says there are no verified reports that this ever happened. And when pressed, well, there was an account in 2016 that, yes, this did happen, but there's no evidence of it happening. You mean like did the guy who claimed to have put the litter box out taken a camera and filmed himself doing it? Right. No, a guy just said he did.

And we say, OK, it's possible it happened. Right. So then I just said, because it's lying to me, is a Brego Garcia an MS-13 gang member? What do you think it said? There's no verified evidence that he's an MS-13 gang. Indeed, it says it's up for dispute. There's no evidence. So I asked, did two judges say he is? What do you think it said? Yes. Both judges found insufficient evidence that he was a member of MS-13. That's a lie. Absolutely. The court finally said the opposite. Why are you lying? And it says, I'm not lying. So then I said a judge and an appellate judge in 2019. That's all I said. And it goes, apologies. You're correct. In 2019, a judge found the evidence

was sufficient to determine he was a member of ms-13 and denied him bond citing concerns to public safety and then it says a board of immigration appeals also stated the lower court appropriately considered the allegations and evidence and held that he wasn't a member of ms-13 and a danger to the community and i said so two judges found the claims credible and ruled as such says Says, yes, you are correct. And I said, you lied and said they found it insufficient. And it goes, you're right. And I appreciate you calling that out.

Wow. The AI world will be one of the machine state lying to you for political reasons. It's already doing it. Well, it is. Yeah. I mean, when people are no longer actually look what's going to happen this is already happening right now i am not predicting the future if you take a brand new computer or or open an incognito tab and go to youtube and look at shorts and start swiping

through maybe what 30 40 will be ai generated garbage videos yeah there was an expose recently you know we haven't gone over the story we We should I should cover it tomorrow. There was a YouTube channel that was getting millions of views and it was AI generated scripts and videos of Trump doing things that never happened. So one of the videos was like, you ever see those videos where the guy talks like this? You know what? I don't know whose voice that's supposed to be. And it goes like a little girl at a Trump rally looked up to the president and said, Donald, how will you help Mr. President? How will you help the American people? And then it shows photos and then it shows Trump looking down and goes, Trump looked at a little girl and said, and it had a million views and it was making it was auto churning out these videos.

None of it is real, but people were watching it and they believe it when that starts to replace what we consume with this. And it is already because YouTube shorts are starting to get way more views than long form videos on YouTube. That's their intention. That's why they want to talk at Instagram. People are going to just watch AI fake news garbage and believe stupid BS. Well, they already turned to AI to make their mind up for them. You know how many times I'm browsing X and they'll go, well, Grok said, and I'm like, yeah, I know Grok's never made a mistake. You know, Grok lies all the time. Grok is not the most accurate thing. I mean, it's a nice supplemental tool, but my gosh. I don't think people realize how cooked we are. When I go on X and I tweet something, I'll probably, I get within 30 seconds, five AI generated responses that don't look like AI accounts.

But it's obvious they are because they responded too quickly and they respond with questions. Yeah. So I'll say something like, Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13. And I'll get an immediate response saying, very interesting that people have been reporting this. Is there any evidence that proves this is the case? And it looks like a normal guy. And then he gets responses from people being like, duh and those responses generate money yep yep it's happening a lot on that platform actually i think i saw you talking about that today yeah it's it's slop too it's and you could tell yep these things are ai you'll

tweet something like the moon landing is cool and then you'll get three responses for me i get a lot because i have i have 2.4 million followers so i'll get an instant response well it says like in 1969 during the apollo missions blah blah and it'll just like it'll give me a wikipedia entry right i'm like why why did you post that right there's they're all bots the internet is dead yeah it's it's it's getting to the point where we're we're close. You know, the organic interactions that used to happen daily. You know, think of X, Twitter, whatever. I mean, I joined that platform in 09, you know, because my favorite football players were on there.

And I was like, I am going to tweet at Larry Fitzgerald, you know, because he's a great, you know, and I got a response from him. And now it's like if you get a response from one of your favorite it might be a it might be an intern you know running the account it might not be the actual person you know it's it sucks yep i i think uh it's worse than people realize i i think dead internet theory is correct they that that is around 2016 that's when the bots overtook regular people. So it's going to get real interesting because right now,

one of the things that we're dealing with is we've only recently started in the past year doing any kind of real marketing for the show. For the podcast app version of the show, which is like Apple, Spotify, and others, we've done zero promotion. Let me say we've done like minimal as in I've done guest appearances with other shows

and we've tried to see if we can we can market that way but we've not bought ads or commercials or anything like this it's actually kind of hard to do there are podcasters with millions of followers that get millions of views that are completely bought and paid for and fake yeah it's not organic matter doesn't matter they all they got to do is message an agent and say, I have 3 million followers and we get 100,000 an episode. Will your guy come on the show? And they go, sounds good. We'll squeeze you in.

100,000 a show is not very big. But when he's in New York, we'll find a time for you. And then this guy with no show, no following as a nobody gets the booking. And that's happening all across the industry right now. It's relatively easy for someone like me who all across the industry right now. It's very, it's relatively easy for someone like me who works in the industry and has done all this backend stuff and has been working here and watch the evolution to see when a show is fake. And there's telltale signs and there's certain things you can point out, but it doesn't matter

anymore. Cause if you want to book the big guests, they don't care. They just want to see the numbers. Right. And so, for instance, for like IRL, we have 2.3 million followers. And we do on YouTube. And then on Rumble, we have half a million. But comparatively, both videos get around 300K. YouTube's gone a little bit down because people have moved over to Rumble. So Rumble's doing a little bit more. Some are doing 400.

And those numbers are there. And so that affords you certain access to guests. For instance, I won't name drop anybody, but there was recently a prominent individual who is from Europe who was traveling through the States. And he had to decide when he was in DC, which shows he was going to do. And he passed on ours. And we know why. He decided to go on other shows that are bigger. That's totally fine. He went on legitimate shows that were bigger. And I respect that. Right. But then I see oftentimes we'll try to do bookings. Fake shows will get the bookings because they appear bigger and they're not. That's the way I want to know which ones. It's astroturfed. Yeah. Yep. And then they get the bigger guests and bigger guests do lead to bigger views. What's going to get interesting though, is people can't sell products. So perhaps to our own detriment, we've never done anything like this. Most of these other shows do. And we know this because one, we track the metrics, but two advertisers ask us, how come when we buy from you, we sell at higher rates. So here's the way advertising works on podcasts. An advertiser goes to you and says,

you get a million views per episode. $20 CPM is typically how much it costs. That means $20,000 for one ad read on your show with a million downloads. They expect to sell a certain amount of the product based on that viewership. When we started selling ads a long time ago for the first time, the response we got from the advertisers was we were actually overperforming on your show. When we buy ads from you, they do way better. And I was like, oh, that's cool. I wonder why. At this point, we've had almost every single advertiser say, we really want to work with you because these do so amazingly well now we know why most other channels not all not all but many others fake their numbers and a fake viewer doesn't buy anything that's right real viewers do now bot can't buy anything right right

you know i mean my shirt is the same thing they hit me up and and we have advertisers that'll that'll hit me up in the emails i'm honest honest with them. We haven't, we have actual people in our chat. Yeah. You know, um, that, that we do calls and stuff like you could hear the voices. They,

we get feedback from, from our sponsors, you know, uh, of, of, Hey, this person bought this,

that, and they said the same thing that I've had conversations saying the same thing. We've, we've gone to other places and it hasn't worked as well. And I don't have a huge platform. platform this is this is why network tv is dying out yeah so when msnbc they they say you know you know let's do this let's do bill maher i'll keep him i'll keep bill i'm on i'll be on your radar they say that he's getting like 70k in the key demo that's it on on real time with bill maher

70 000 yeah how many of those 70 000 key demo are in the bathroom yeah right is it on the tv on a leave are they actually people watching right don't know yeah and that's that's the whole cnn is on in the gym and in the airports thing those aren't views right now to be fair screens with the thing on you know airport contracts ended but they counted those views they absolutely did and so in the podcast era you had this with uh the major media brands that were the big digital brands i'm not going to name any but you know what i'm talking about the clickbait ones that appeared on on facebook and stuff like that and it was garbled regurgitated garbage views from disinterested people that weren't actually clicking on things. Right. So the ads didn't do very well. Now, there are a lot. It's it's I think what may end up

happening is there's going to be a lot of advertisers who start now that we're in the podcasting era with the podcast presidency and cable TV is basically gone. Advertisers are going to create lists of real and fake. Yeah, they're going to start learning how to sort through this and they're going to stop buying from the fake ones. But guess what? The fake ones will still get the big bookings so the agencies are going to have to start doing this as well and be like, guys, don't go on that show. It's a waste of a trip. It's a fake show.

Legit, there are some fake shows out there and I've seen them book big guests and you can tell it's a fake show. And it is so, it is cringe. Is it because of the comment engagement? Like you can tell based on what fake show. And it is so it is cringe of the comment engagement. Like you can tell based on what is in the comments. Not necessarily.

That is a factor. But also consider that some shows are astroturfed in a real way, in a fake way. And what I mean by that is some podcasts will say we will get one million views. We get one million views on our show. There's two ways they go about doing it. The real fake ones that are like the worst by bots. And so those views are absolute trash, right? They're not real people. The other technique that's long been used in digital media is they will actually promote the podcast. So they'll say, we will do a show with you and

we guarantee 1 million views. So here's, here's an old school that's an old school 10 year old advertising technique getting this let's say uh sean comes to me he's got a comedy special it's coming out i would like to advertise on tim castaio route the show's coming up i say okay how much do you want to buy and you say i'll just buy one ad read from one of your episodes. How many views is that going to get? We say, 700,000 maybe. And he says, okay, for that, we'll do, you know, I'll give you 15 grand or whatever. I say, hold on, I got a better idea.

I will guarantee you 2 million views. So we'll more than double that number. Meaning we'll do as many reads as we have to get to 2 million. You give me 20,000. That's a $10 CPM. That's way cheaper. This is a good deal, right? Right.

Yeah, it sounds great. What I'll do then is I'll do one ad read. I will take the video and run that video as an advertisement on the Google network for a penny per view. Those are real views from real people who don't know or care about my show. And I will get you those 2 million views.

Big, these digital networks, this is an amazing technique that people don't know or care about my show, and I will get you those 2 million views. These digital networks, this is an amazing technique that people don't realize they do. They're selling to an advertiser that our show gets a million, and if the show doesn't, they will just go on Google, load up the video,

and say, get me a million views. One cent per view. The garbage of garbage views. Some random guy in Turkey or India. He watched it, but he's not going to buy your product. Right, right. So it's not a bot. It's a real person.

It's a real view. It's not fraudulent. Botting is fraud. Ad boosting is not. And that's one reason why people are like, we don't sell when we buy from you. It's like, well, we got you the views. Thank you and have a nice day. Right. Maybe your product is bad. Right. The challenge for the advertiser is they're like, well, we got you the views. Thank you. Have a nice day. Right. Maybe your product is bad. Right. Challenge for the advertiser is they're like,

maybe our product is bad. We don't know. Yeah. That's the scary thing for new businesses, too, because sometimes they might have a good product. They run some ads. It doesn't sell. I guess the product sucks when in reality they get ripped off. They walk away from it, too. You don't know what you're walking away from. That's a shame. Go on Google ads. You can literally load any video you want if it's political. So our show ads. You can literally load any video you want if it's political. So our show, we can't do this because anytime you mention the word Trump, you're not allowed to. You're not allowed to do it. I want you to promote it. Right. Super hard. But if your show is about video games or pop culture, absolutely you can. And then you can

tell an advertiser, we guarantee you 50,000 views on. We will read as many ads as we have to to get that number surprise surprise they buy one ad on this channel the video got 50,000 views perfect everybody's happy crazy right that's crazy

that is all a rigged game man that is nuts alright let's go to your chats my friends smash that like button share the show with everyone you know join us TimCast Discord server TimCast.com.

And Rumble Premium members-only call-in show. You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to quit everything and I'm going to do a media industry behind-the-scenes podcast. How to be successful in the media podcasting industry. Because I could talk about that for 47 years. I can name all of the cheaters. You can show me a show and I can break down what they're doing and how they're doing it. I can look at scheduling.

I can tell you the whole rigged game, my friends. And there are dirty deeds happening across the board. Anyway, the only reason I'm not going to say their names now is because I don't want to get sued. And you don't win lawsuits, even when you're right. All right. Bill Dozer says Maryland man misinformation. I have a Bernie bro friend who responded to the headlines as if they were gospel. Important to remember that most Americans have an IQ under 100.

Sad but true. Well, it's actually not most. It's around half. Wow. 100 is the average. All right. Chris Van Hollen is in violation of the Logan Act. That comes with a three-year prison sentence.

Arrest him. You're right. Is he in violation of Logan Act? Yes, he is. Because he's an elected official. He's not a private citizen. I thought the Logan Act only covered, I thought that was a private citizen thing.

I'm trying to, I saw conflicting things on the Logan Act. Senators can violate the Logan Act, yes. Okay. Unauthorized diplomacy that interferes with U.S.s foreign policy holy yeah that is that is definitely unauthorized diplomacy that's legit adam that's that's in defiance of the trump administration's uh actions you know where he should serve his prison el salvador stick him right in the jail guantanamo you got to stay in america you know what i mean but but guantanamo is fair. Send him to get. Wow, that's a great point from Levinful Spade. I want to say that again, we missed that and that should have been obvious to us. He did violate the Logan Act. I think that's why Cory Booker said he'd consider it and didn't do it. That's unauthorized diplomacy on behalf of the U.S. government. Wow. So as long as it's unauthorized you could be elected or not yes i

mean if you're obviously it goes against u.s foreign policy all right then then that is definitely a violation because we know trump didn't authorize that or or so so it says that it is kind of blurry because senators are federal officials right however if a senator goes rogue and tries to negotiate foreign policy against the administration stance this violates the logan act that's cut and dry right so the argument is it's not a violation of the logan act if a senator goes and meets with zelinski to talk to him about what's going on in ukraine right it is a violation if they act do that in direct defiance of the u.s uh of the of the uh executive administration so example a senator goes to zelinski tells tells him, don't sign the minerals deal.

Violation. That's a violation. Senator goes to Zelensky, say, hey, we sympathize with what's going on and we really we want to try to do what we can to support you. That's just a conversation. I would I would argue and I'm not a lawyer, but I but I would imagine if a Democrat senator went to Zelensky and says we really aren't big fans of the mineral deal, but we understand what's being offered to you. We would like to see a lot change in this country and we want to see you beat Russia. We appreciate your time. That's fine. That's okay. But if they go and say, don't sign the deal. That's a little, that's

because then you're advocating against. Right. Right. Okay. At least that's what it says when you Google it, and I'm not a lawyer. Lock him up. Lock him up. In El Salvador. I say El Salvador. You say Guantanamo. I say put him in the same prison where Kristi Noem was at. Yeah, I mean like—

I mean, you can't do that. Right, jokingly. Jokingly. But in all seriousness, Guantanamo for the worst offenders. Sure. Trump says he wants U.S. citizens. He's going to lose his base. Yeah, no, even the crystals.

I ran a poll on this on X. 50-50, it was split with like 50,000 votes. Yes and no. Some people said that, you know, capital offenses, the offenses the worst the worst send them out of here half said it doesn't matter because it's a line you can't cross and so trump risk losing way too much support in that and personally i disagree with doing that i do too and the only argument that i heard that's somewhat compelling on that is if it's a u.s government operated facility sovereign territory in another country.

But I am in no way, shape or form in favor of taking U.S. citizens and exiling them to another country to serve their sentence. I don't I don't think that's appropriate. All right. Scientific fanfic says, man, Tim, you got every bit of the science wrong in your Blue Origin video. One atmospheric pressure inside zero. one atmospheric pressure inside zero outside. Which way do you want the door to swing? Also, Blue Origin did not achieve orbit. I stand corrected. Yeah, they were.

They were arguing that because the door. So this conspiracy is we have the story pulled up. We didn't get to it. They were saying Blue Origin was faked because the door opened inward and it shouldn't because it can you know blow inward or whatever um which is not correct and they were arguing that uh on the inside you can't actually open the doors they can only open from the outside also not correct because you mentioned apollo one apollo one yeah so but it does appear to be a pr stunt for bezos definitely because they cracked the door open then closed it right away then he walked up and wrenched the door open, which he

didn't need to do. Right. Well, you have to be accessible from the inside because of the Apollo 1 fire on the launch pad. It was a tragedy. Horrible. All three astronauts died. Wow. Burned up inside from the fire. The fire happened in the capsule and all three

of them in that capsule burned and died. Apollo 1. Crazy so that's when they allowed they made it you know regulations you have to have the door has to be accessible from the inside all right brown bear says the el salvador man story reminds me of the marine that spent months in a mexican prison because he took a wrong exit and ended up at a border crossing with his guns in the trunk of his car no No politicians did ish to help him. Yep. That's brutal.

They're fighting harder to get a Maryland man home, you know, a Brigo Garcia than they did for Paul Whelan in Russia, too. You know, spooky toucan says Michael Malice says the corporate press is factual, but not truthful, but not even factual anymore. No, I think he's right about that. Like the man lived in Maryland. So they're using a technicality to call him a Maryland man.

Sure. They're evil. That's what they are. They're evil. They are demons. Manipulative. I'm fairly confident that all of these

corporate press people when they get home, they peel their skin back and hang it up on the wall and then bask under a heat lamp and just stand there like this. You're mixing up lizard people with demons. They're not the same.

Lizard people would bask under the heat lamp. Demons wouldn't bask under the heat lamp. Okay, I'm sorry. They get home. They peel their skin off, hang it up on the wall. A fissure emerges in their kitchen floor, and they crawl down back to the depths of hell. Back to the depths, yeah. Only to return once again next morning. No, they crawl down, uh, back to the depths of hell to the depths.

Yeah. Only to return once again, next morning. No, no, no. I'm sorry. Only to return once again when their phone vibrates because Trump tweeted and they're forced to come back out of hell to write a story.

You have to write it. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. Or, or maybe they're in a signal group chat. Who knows? Down the empire says,

quote, nah, she's just a ride or die. Ho Mary. It's a good quote about it all right is this choice as sean i love the fridays with 47 segments oh those are fun you uh you do on your morning show with michael del giorno mike del giorno it's a fun he we call him we call him pizza boy i do it like it's a fake it's like a fake Trump interview I do every Friday morning.

Have you done any voices for Seamus on Freedom Tunes? No. You should. Really? Seamus loves his Trump impression more. Yeah, but his Trump is like a Bugs Bunny version of Trump. He talks like this. By the way, I got along very well with Bugs Bunny.

He's a great rabbit. You know, he's got beautiful. Elmer Fudd was trying to get him, too. And Yosemite Sam. But we wouldn't let it happen. We're protecting bugs. Do you have any other voices? Nancy Pelosi.

Does that count? This is Nancy Pelosi, right? Donald Trump is an evil person. What is that thing she does? I don't know what this was when she did that. But she rubs her wrists. This little insect movement she's trying to like. She rubs her wrists together. This little insect movement she's trying to make. She's like a praying

mantis. Make some cricket noises. Makes me think of a fly. What's wild about her is this is a woman who can't stand upright. This is a woman who can't keep her teeth in her mouth. And she's a great stock trader. I don't know how she does it.

Let's go. Tim Pohl says, Tim, preach. Cops follow orders. They all took a big game, but go with the program. Agreed. Trump has a very short window. Reminder, Obama killed American citizens without due process. Trump should arrest Barack Obama for the killing of Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki.

Let's go. If Trump just came out and was like in, what was it, 2012, I think it was. I forget the year. Barack Obama ordered a drone strike on a civilian target in Yemen, killing a 16-year-old American citizen. We're indicting and charging him for, you know, capital murder. You know, he would never do it, though, because even Trump is bombing Yemen. So that's the way it goes, right? That's the way it goes.

What have we here? Marie Evans says, as in war, you don't lay out your plans before before hand. The quietness we are seeing from this administration is the groundwork for the surprise attack with a ton of arrests at the same time. That way they don't know what happened. I hope so. I hope so. I don't know, but it does make sense. They need to make sure that when they do launch any kind of executive offensive in terms of

arrests, they have to do it all at once. If you do it piecemeal, then you're giving them time to strategically plan and prepare. So Trump's got to do rapid fire. Make them spin in circles. Raymond G. Stanley Jr. says, I'm looking forward to a true mega month. July is mega month. Did you know this? Yes. Yeah.

Mega month. Get your Twitter in, you guys, ready. We are going to grill burgers every single night. Every single night. Just burgers. We're going to be sitting. So we set up the, the, the trailer outside so that we can have like a clubhouse for people to hang

out in when we're doing the show and you got to be quiet. So that way you can hang outside, grill burgers, skate on the ramp, play music. I won't bother us in here. Once we wrap, we walk outside.

I'm so happy. Winter's about over. Indeed. Yeah. The trees are coming back. It's going to be fun. Yes. All right. What have we here?

Thuren says, Mary has a copy of the Turner Diaries in her purse. What is that? I don't know. I don't know what that is either. Well, all right. Jeffrey French says, Bannon and Navarro ignored contempt. This time we fight. Yo.

Aaron says that the ruling is unconstitutional. Isn't that breaking the law? If so, why isn't he being charged with a crime? Because it's not codified in law as a criminal offense. It's just unconstitutional. Yeah. Meaning Trump must not abide. The Turner Diaries is a 1978 race war novel by William Luther Pierce.

What are you trying to say about me? Become racist? Yes. What the heck? All right. Someone also quoted your ride or die ho with that thing again. I like that. Pinochet says, do nothing, Dan Bongino. Not one of the corrupt feds will be prosecuted i i i don't see that being a reality i don't think that's true yeah dan was like pretty heavy-handed on his show he was bold right he made he made as many claims and it backed it up i don't think he's gonna do nothing guys dan is not the kind of guy who breaks his word. No. He would not sacrifice the entirety of his legacy for a $150,000 a year job to only leave after four years and go, I did nothing. Right.

Like, what? Why would you walk away from millions of dollars to accomplish nothing? To only hurt your legacy? That makes no sense. You come back to nothing if that's the case, too. You know, when you're done serving, he's going to come back. And I would imagine, you know, people will be back in the helm. You're going to you know, everyone's going to be mad. So he's got to do something.

This is why I'm like, there's no there's no equation in which Dan isn't going to get the job done. Right. He either he either stands by his word and the people who believe in him and does the job that needs to be done. Or he does nothing. Loses his show., loses millions of dollars, hinders his investments, leaves the administration with maybe have a couple hundred thousand dollars saved up after taxes, and then everyone's mad. That ain't going to happen. It's not.

Plus with his tweet, you can tell when he said, guys, just because you're not seeing something doesn't mean it's not happening. It means something's going on. But it means you know that he takes to heart guys, just because you're not seeing something doesn't mean it's not happening. I mean, something's going on. But it means you know that he takes to heart that people are frustrated and want to see something. Right. And it means something to him. Right. He cares about his people, man.

He cares about doing the right thing. All right. Let's see. Mill. Millike says, hey, Tim, I kind of struggle between your membership and your free Rumble premium. Since winter summer time shift, I lost Rumble part, I'll write an email to your support and to Rumble for more

detail I will confer with them and hopefully they're listening now so we can get that sorted the other thing I'm going to do is I'm going to talk to Rumble about doing an amnesty that means anybody who is a lapsed Timcast member, if you sign back up get you into Rumble Premium.

I think they'd say yes to that. And I probably shouldn't say it to literally everybody watching the show before I ask them. I'm going to do it anyway. Honor system, yeah. No, but I think, like, the challenge is that it costs money to run these networks. Right. The reason we split up is because it's the discord needs it needs staff to maintain and then rumble premium is a much much bigger network which needs to

generate revenue to survive so we were like well grandfather and everybody was a member of timcast i think it would be beneficial because you get more people in the community you know we have we we have a huge email roster of people who have been members or signed up for our email list. I think if we offered like a promo, like sign up now and get both, I bet we could add tens of thousands to the Rumble Premium Timcast Discord. Like, it's going to cost us more money. But one thing we have to do right now is build network and get more people involved. So I bet they'd be like, let's do it. Let's make that investment.

More people are involved means it's a cascade effect. They tell their friends, you get more friends. Right. So we'll try and get that figured out. Let's go. Elder Zimraya says, Kash Patel and Dan Scavino, fiercely loyal, act only on Trump's orders, disciplined and tactically reserved. They mirror his approach. Little happens without Trump's focus and action. Trump must act. I agree. I agree. All right, Mr. Mike

says Trump allows the media circus. He could fix it easily by undoing Obama's 2012 Smith-Mundt Act. If you don't know about it, check it out. Explains everything happening in mainstream media. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act. Yeah, but what that really did was allowed for voice of america to be broadcast in the united states it doesn't really do much like guys the cia was already doing this stuff whether it was legal or not yeah maybe they're just trying to like make it so they can get away with it you know basket case says tim and crew please welcome baby eloise to the world i ask you to send prayers well wishes and vibes for her as she is our first and is having a rough start. You are all great.

And God bless, uh, all of the, the, um, prayers and wishes and vibes. I can send you away, man.

I wish you the best, you know, just had a kid. She's doing great. She's fat and happy. We're very excited. You know, we brought her out for a walk today and she looked at the sun.

She enjoyed it. That's good. Very, very good for her. Indeed. Indeed. My friends friends smash that like button share the show with everyone you know join us on the timcast discord we're gonna do that members only uncensored show right now over at rumble.com slash timcast irl join rumble premium with promo code tim10 to get 10 bucks off your annual membership we're gonna do a little preview. We'll keep the, uh, uncensored show for, for a couple,

for a minute, for a few minutes. So you can get a feel for it before it goes totally members only. And we take our callers, but, uh, come join us. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Tim cast and,

uh, Donald, uh, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah. You could follow, uh, my show rumble.com slash LFA TV,

but, uh, this has been great. This has been a great time. Um, we're on 10 AM to 11 AM Eastern time, Monday through Friday. We love, we love rumble.com slash LFA TV but this has been great this has been a great time we're on 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. Eastern time Monday through Friday we love we love rumble we have a great time by the way we do a fantastic job you do a fantastic job

everybody does a fantastic job and the best is yet to come not much I could tell you all right you even have the side eye that he does I watch him so much it just becomes what happens. All right. You guys should go subscribe to Pop Culture Crisis.

We go live every Monday through Friday at 3 p.m. Eastern. We actually have Phil on tomorrow. And you can go send me validation on Instagram at Mary Archived or send me hate on X. That is also Mary Archived. I finally did the outro that you wanted me to do. That's the one that everyone that watches Pop Culture Crisis is used to. That is your outro.

Just do it. I am Phil that remains on Twix. I'm Phil that remains official on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. Our new record dropped on January 31st. It's entitled Anti-Fragile. You can check it out on all the streaming platforms. The left lane is for crime.

One more quick thing. Stuart Votsberger says, Tim, I've watched your 4th of July story three times now. That has to be a short 100%. You have to make that short happen. We will. Also, you guys should clip that story if you did like it and share it because i thought it was funny but you know that's just me being arrogant so thanks for hanging out we're gonna go ahead over to the rumble uh rumble.com slash timcast irl members only exclusive and uh we'll see you there about 30 seconds you you