Timcast IRL - Democrat NAZI SCANDAL Erupts, Trump Says THEY CHEATED In California w/ J. Chase Davis

Episode Date: June 5, 2026

Tim, Phil, and Tate are joined by J. Chase Davis to discuss democrats tanking, people longing for the 90s, Trump says democrats are cheating in California, Democrats are panicking as polling suggests they will lose 2026, screwworm is here, and a NY state trooper is found guilty of manslaughter after police chase led to death.  SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/ Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwN... Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) | https://www.shoutout.fans/timpool Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) | https://allthatremains.komi.io/ Tate @realTateBrown (everywhere) |  @TimcastTateBrown  (YT) Producer: Carter @carterbanks (X) |  @trashhouserecords  (YT) Guest:  J. Chase Davis @jchasedavis (X) Podcast available on all podcast platforms! Democrat NAZI SCANDAL Erupts, Trump Says THEY CHEATED In California | Timcast IRL For advertising inquiries please email [e-mail]

Donald Trump is accusing the Democrats of cheating in California and stated that the federal attorneys in the state are investigating what's currently going on. Now, if those are not following, the Republicans in the state did very well in the California primaries a couple days ago. But for some reason, they can't get us the results on the day of saying, well, you know, we got so many that just came into the mail. It's going to take a very, very long time. Interestingly, the margin for each candidate coming in through these votes are perfect as such that Spencer Pratt and, Steve Hilton will actually lose. I don't know that they have enough to get Steve Hilton out, but people are pointing out that at the rates they're returning these mail-in ballots or counting them, Spencer Pratt, if this stays as is, will get knocked out of the running for the mayor's

race, which is weird anyway because it'd be him versus Karen Bass. I just want to make sure it can't happen. Now, still, it's all pretty good news how Republicans have been performing, especially with California, and Democrats are in deep trouble. Their favorability is in the gutter. says they don't have enough. There's not going to be a blue wave, or at least his warning, it probably won't be. And then the big scandal of the day, Graham Platner saying he knows what a totem conf is, being accused of, let's just call it Me Too territory. The New York Times is ripping this guy to shreds, and everybody is going after him now.

Yeah, Democrats are throwing him under the bus, and with this latest scandal showing, He knew exactly what that Nazi tattoo was and they got it on purpose. His whole campaign is unraveling. So we'll talk about that. We've got a bunch more. John Bolton has pleaded guilty. The Carmelo Anthony trial is underway or I should say the court proceedings are underway. We'll get into all that.

Before we get started, my friends, head over to Timcast.com. Click join now to get involved in the Discord community. It's not what you know. It's who you know and the most important thing. We can do as humans is build community together because we live. for the human experience. Unless you're like some hippie that wants to live in the woods and, you know, feed squirrels or whatever, most people are trying to better the lives of other people and share their experiences with other people. And that's what we've built. And that's what you guys

have made possible by being members. Support the work we do as a member. Get access to a community of over tens with tens of thousands of people in it, hanging out every single day with morning shows, afternoon shows, hangouts, meetups, et cetera. And as a member, you can call in and talk to us and our guest Monday through Thursday on this show, Timcast, IRL. Don't forget to also head over to castbrew.com and pick up some graphene dream k-pods or maybe some vault black cold brew concentrate. If you're someone who doesn't actually have a coffee maker and you're like, well, I don't buy coffee, I've got a coffee maker.

You can buy the cold brew concentrate where you just pour a little bit in a cup, add water or cream and bang. You got a nice cold brew cup of coffee and it is delicious. We also got bottled water for some reason called pool water. think about how funny it would be to offer a drink of pool water to your friends or neighbors. They might think you're gross. But hey, we did it anyway. And, of course, you can get Appalachian Nights, all the other really great flavors we got at casparoo.

Don't forget to also smash that like button. Share the show with everyone, you know, joining us tonight to talk about this and everything else is Jay Chase Davis. Hey, thanks so much for having me on. Author of Offensive Christianity. I actually got this copy for you. Right on. Right on. I'll slide it on over.

There you go. Appreciate it. Yeah. What's it about? you. What do you do? I'm a pastor at the Well Church in Boulder, Colorado, also podcasts at Fullproof Theology. But I wrote this book for men. I'm a pastor. I want strong Christian men in our nation, and it's one of the biggest issues facing our nation right now is kind of a dearth of strong ambitions, agenic men who know their place. And unfortunately, the church has not helped them.

Many churches you go to are very feminized and want to get into therapy and, you know, really suppress the nature of men. And so it's kind of walking through that and giving men practical applications on how they can be strong. Right on. Well, great to have you. We got the boys hanging out, Tate's here. I'm here, and I'm happy to be here. We got the great Phil as well. Hello, everybody. I'm Phil. Nice to see you. Carter. What's up, everyone? I'm Carter, and let's get into it.

We got the story from the New York Times. It is a major scandal. Several women who dated Graham Platner recall unsettling behavior. What I love about the female coded New York Times is the lead they choose. Now, I think for most people, the real story here is that he's an admitted Nazi, knows he's a Nazi, he's proud of being a Nazi, was a Nazi for 18 years, and they're like, yeah, yeah, but he was unsettling towards women, because that's the most important thing to women, I guess. So when you actually take a look at the secondary reporting on this, we've got this from Town Hall, Graham Platner bombshell details.

He knew the tattoo was a Nazi symbol and called it, quote, my toten cop. His unit picked the SS death set on purpose they were killers, joked about it being a Nazi tattoo while dating. Three exes called him toxic, demeaning, heavily drinking, and cheating. The New York Times story delayed by his own lawyers. X blocked her from leaving rooms, uncontrollable fits of anger. One woman said collateral damage to the world that is his, called exes to vouch for him before story dropped, obsessed with rape and bruised women. So, yeah. Now, I honestly don't care. He's a bad guy. There's a lot of bad guys. what I'm principally concerned about is what does this mean for Democrats moving into the midterms?

If Graham Platner sinks the Democrats in Maine, it will be impossible for Democrats to win the Senate. I want to stress that Democrats will have to win every swing state and flip at least one Republican state, already sounding impossible. But you take Maine out of the equation because the frontrunner for the Democrats is a Nazi woman beater. And you're going to have, admittedly, a weak Republican, but a Republican in the Senate, which means Democrats will not be able to secure control. Now you factor in the Supreme Court recently ruled that Alabama is clear to redistrict. And the current swing in the House is Republican districts 211 to 2.1 to 2.5 Democrat. Republicans need to win much less in these swing districts in order to keep control of the

House. For the life of me, I don't understand why anyone would think Democrats have the probability to win these midterms. This scandal, it's silly, it's laughable, Platner's a Nazi guy. We get it, but the big picture, Democrats are cooked. They're supposed to win a historical trend, defeating the party in power to be the opposition, and it's looking like that won't happen. But I'm curious what y'all guys think. Yeah, well, it's made it's hilarious because the Democrats, It's like they're a line in the sand for all these guys is if they're just like creepy around women. I mean, I know Grand Plano was like actual rape threats. But like before the rape accusations even came into play, they were just like, he has problematic behavior on women.

That's enough for him to go. And men. Yeah. And it was the same thing with Swalwell. Like, Swalwell literally was like quite literally in bed of the Chinese spy. And they were like, that's what you can't, you know, where you're not allowed to, you know, have a little like yellow fever once in a while. Who among us? Exactly.

But then as soon as it was like, yeah, he's kind of creepy and probably. problematic around women. They're like, you're done. So it's like, you know, as a right-winger, I'm hesitant to like dog-pile in these situations. But at the same time, it is kind of like a taste-your-own medicine, which I'm perfectly happy with. I mean, I don't know if I'd say a taste-your-own matter. The Democrats have been so focused on women's issues. The way they treated Kavanaugh about, you know, when it came to completely fabricated stories. I mean, you know, people were, one of the Democrats was talking to Kavanaugh. I saw a post on X about this that reminded me he was asking about like farting like or something like that like the the kind of of minutia they were getting into when it came to Kavanaugh and now to to just brush this aside.

It's unsurprising. It only adds credibility to the idea that Democrats are only interested in power. There is no no desire for for any kind of virtue or anything. So when they do point their fingers at whether it be any Republican or specifically Donald Trump, it is totally reasonable. In fact, it is the preferred course of action to just disregard anything they say and don't worry about it. They're going to make a mountain out of a molehill. They're going to do everything they can to slime you. Just ignore them and continue doing what you're going to do. And that goes for the same thing for policy as well. They've been totally taken over by feminism. I mean, their whole framework for all of this is just projection and feminism and men is bad, and this is what they've been doing,

and this is why they're going to continue to lose young men who are swinging to the right and conservative and going back to church, and they're going to continue to attract women, particularly single women, into their party. But they have no categories for like what you said. It's just total hypocrisy on their part, right? They will celebrate, you know, strong women, and they'll overlook a lot of blatant corruption in their own party, and yet with stuff like this happens, they have no concept of what to do, and it's because they become feminized completely. The term hypocrisy, I don't know that that's particularly useful in this context, because it's not about the fact that they actually have any kind of moral compass or anything.

It's simply, it's okay for us. It's hierarchy. When people that agree with us behave badly, it's perfectly acceptable. It's perfectly acceptable that Hunter Biden was doing crack. It's perfectly acceptable that Hunter Biden was doing crack. It's perfectly acceptable that Hunter Biden had illegal guns. It's perfectly acceptable that the Ukraine war was basically a slush fund for the Biden administration or for the Biden family. It's perfectly acceptable. But if it's a Republican, well, then they're going to go ahead and clutch their pearls and they're going to say this and that. So it's like I said earlier, just ignore them.

It's a true that like when this sort of situation plays out, now this is the second high profile instance of this happening in the last few months, it kind of short. circuits them because I think to your point that is kind of like one of the core planks of the Democrat Party in which they understand that look a lot of our power now comes from women and so again if you are to encroach on that power vector at all you're going to be in serious trouble this is why it short circuits and they're presented with something like this because typically what happens is what you're saying is if they engage in something corruption related or you name it they just sweep it under the rug and the Republicans do it they bring the knives out but this does show that there are aspects of

of being a Democrat that you must maintain. And one of these is like being a wholesome chungis, you know, respectful guy around. If you demonstrate that you're too heterosexual, it's a huge problem. It's a huge problem. Well, I mean, but grandpladder's clearly not too heterosexual. He said that he would rape a guy.

Look, that's just, that's a power play. That's exactly what he said. But I think you're right that it's, they're about power and they're totally willing to overlook their own offenses or anything like that. But for the general public, right, it's very apparent that they're like this kind of stuff just exposes them completely. And they're not, they're not honest at all.

What would you say to someone that says, look, the general public just feels like this is standard procedure in D.C. It doesn't matter whether it's a Republican or a Democrat. Because generally, Americans are not happy with D.C. They're not happy with the people in D.C. And so whether it be, you know, staffers having sex, you know, gay staffers having sex in the, you know, Senate Chambers or what have you or Grand Platner or what what have you the American people are kind of just like yeah that's what they do it's almost like the American people look at you know DC like you know District 1 or the the the capital I actually think those two guys having gay

sex in the Senate is like the best argument that there's going to be a civil war because uh aside like it's it's shockingly offensive and in a disturbing disturbingly hilarious kind of way but I would just say, and I mean this in a half-joking kind of matter, when your Senate building has people having gay sex and filming it and nothing happens, nothing, you don't have a country anymore. I'm sorry, because I just want to stress, you guys think that was the only time it happened? Wouldn't that be an argument against Civil War? Because that happened like Nigeria. They'd have a different name right now. Like they would just pulverize the parliament building there. Like, if that were to happen over there, where in the United States, everyone's like, yeah, that's just

kind of how things operate over there. No, I think that's exactly the argument. Something so shockingly offensive to your country that you would demolish the building and be like, this is what our country stands for versus half the country is shocked, but no one will do anything about it. It's not shocking and offensive to at least a large enough segment of the United States. And the fact that they had, you know, when you look at the LGBT party they had on the White House lawn where they had, you know, a dude taking his fake breasts out and another, you know, like on the White House lawn. Like this kind of debauchery, this kind of just deviant behavior. I'm, and look, I'm a guy that's been in a band for 25 years. I've done my fair share of lewd and lascivious behavior, but even I can see that this kind of stuff is just unacceptable behavior. Yeah, but to your point, I mean, I think what's being demonstrated with this story is that they have a lower threshold for what, like, behavior is considered beyond the pale.

Because, like, when the Thomas Massey stuff started coming out, even the most ardent Thomas Massey opponents, weren't really harping on that as like a reason why he shouldn't win his seat back. They were mainly focusing on like policy related matters or other sort of things of Trump, et cetera. If that sort of scandal broke out with a Democrat, I think that would be enough to get them bounced. I mean, I don't know what you think.

Yeah, I think that to Tim's point, I think that a lot of people are scandalized by it, but they don't know what to do power-wise about it because the Democrats have a stronghold. That doesn't make sense. And that's why it's super important for men, especially to become agenic, to become men who know where power lies, how to get power, how to accrue power, and how to leverage power. A lot of the American people feel powerless, whether it's economically, spiritually, whatever. And when they're desecrating these civil sites

with just degeneracy like this, a lot of people, the reason they don't care is because they're like, well, what am I going to do? That's D.C. And that's why it's important to get men raised up who are capable of not getting into a civil war, I would not prefer that outcome at all, but to know how political machines operate to get them into power to get them into positions where that kind of crime and heinous sin could be punished. I mean, this is why people have coined the term demoralization porn,

because what happens specifically on Twitter is there is these people that will just, there's like this account Radio Genoa, and he just, you know, paladrives all day long. He's like, he'll post a video of like, know a Swedish woman with like a bunch of like African migrants and he'd be like, this could be your daughter. And like, if you were to question him on it, he would be like, well, I'm trying to wake up the masses. And I'm like, I think every man in the United States and broadly the

West kind of understands what's going on. They just don't understand what the actual proper mechanisms are to actually attempt to deconstruct it. So when you show them that, they're like, I know, I know, trust me, I'm clued in. I know what the problem is. And you keep hitting them with that over and over again, all that says to them is actually there's nothing can do about it. There's nothing you can do. Yeah, they'll hold it over their head. And I think that's part of the reason why people tend to be frustrated with Trump, right? So they see all of this stuff and they want some kind, they wanted to see some kind of release out, something to be done about the things that they see in D.C. that are problems. And when Trump doesn't have the ability or the authority to just go in

and say, you know, you're fired, you're fired, you're fired, whether it be because of procedure in D.C. or because the president just can't make those kind of calls, whatever it is. They get frustrated and they're like, well, Trump's not the guy. Trump can't do it. And the Republicans are blah, blah, blah. And Tate uses this phrase all the time. Even though Donald Trump is the most viable political vehicle for the right, people are just jumping ship saying, well, throw my hands up.

There's nothing that can be done, again, to Tate's point, there's nothing that can be done. We can't fix it. So, you know, I'm just going to focus on my video games or focus on whatever. Well, I think there's no unified culture anymore. I think the younger generation has no unified culture. It's funny because we made the joke the other day talking about music, like, oh, man, the 90s music air. It's the best, and we get these callers on the show.

And it's like, I'm a millennial. What was the best song of the 90s? Tate doesn't know what that is. He is. Well, it's actually kind of the opposite problem is that we end up having to dig back up the 90s to find sort of a viable culture. Scott Greer, he's like combating this all the time where he'll have Zoomers coming to his mentions. And they'll be like, Blockbuster was the greatest thing ever. and Scott would be like, A, you weren't there.

B, it's actually a very innocuous thing that just kind of exemplified what like the lower middle class lifestyle would be like in the United States. So the fact that you glamorized that demonstrates something seriously wrong with Zumer culture. Because in the past, people would have...

Well, think about people that grew up in the 90s. They glamorized Arnold Schwarzenegger. You know, they glamorize like Hollywood stars, top athletes, musicians. Where like Zoomers will just go back to the 90s and they're like, what was a normal middle class life like? Yeah, that's what I'm glamorizing now. And I think that indicates to your point.

One, the culture is completely disunified. There's nothing. knew that we can grasp onto and say that's ours. But then B, it also shows how bad things have gotten that they just view like a normal middle class American life in a stable suburb as like a dream. Yeah, they're desperate for meaning. And as our country has become flooded with illegal immigrants and our culture has become degraded spiritually where people have no connection to eternal things, the things of God, they look desperate for meaning. So they're going to latch on to something like Blockbuster or, you know, Halo or something that.

that right think about malls that you see these videos of of malls that used to be full of nice people who were walking around with their families i remember doing that when i was a kid but this younger generation has no concept of that and it's because it's not only a material crisis it's a spiritual crisis for these young men that are looking for meaning and can't find it anywhere not being given meaning in public schools or anywhere else yeah to point about malls there's actually like videos on youtube where it's just like pov you're in a mall in 1990 Literally, it's the creepiest thing now was seeing Gen Alpha glamorized 2016. And like that would have been my, the Zoomer prime would have been 2016.

And so I've always had this like thing as a Zoomer where I'm trying to retcon millennials lives. And I'm trying to retcon and say, well, the 90s look like the best time ever where it's like actually the 90s had a lot of the same problems. But now you're seeing Gen Alpha's that are like, wow, imagine being a teenager in the pre-COVID era. Like how amazing would that have been? And I sat there and I lived through it.

And I was like, I mean, it was all right. But, you know, it's kind of sad to see that they think that's the greatest thing ever. And I live through it. I'm like, it was fine. But it wasn't like the top of human civilization. The reason why I think this is a problem that can't. What I would say is this is a problem that can't be solved. And it's something that we need to pay attention to.

But I don't know what we can do anything about in that millennials are fighting for something. Gen Xers are fighting for something. Boomers are fighting for something. Gen Z is fighting for what they think maybe millennials had. Yeah. Gen Alpha is fighting kind of. But, you know, my point ultimately is, boomers, gen Xers, and millennials have a small overlap in a shared experience of the 80s and 90s. For millennials, as little kids barely remembering it, but kids into the 90s, society shifted dramatically in the 2000s and started to fracture and break apart, substantially more so in the 2010s.

And now into the 2020s, it's who knows what, especially with COVID. when you look at Gen Alpha and Gen Z, there's no world that they want to preserve or they want to have. Right. When you mention like Gen Z, there's actually been a bunch of studies and articles about this. Gen Z is nostalgic for an era they did not live in. So I suppose you could say that there are some that are fighting for something similar to what everybody is fighting for. But the way I see it is when you take a look at voting patterns, you take a look at media interest, when you take a look at political interest, It is the younger you get, the more fractured and spread out it is, which is one of the things I've warned about in terms of the potentiality for civil war in that liberal boomers and Republican boomers overlap almost entirely in their political worldview. Similarly for Gen X and millennials, but they slowly start to come apart.

Gen Z is where you start to see that there are two distinct moral worldviews isolated from each other and gen Alpha to a more extreme degree. And then within those pockets, you have your own versions of left and right. So what happens then when, you know, someone who's 20 years old today thinks a woman is whatever a person, a person claims it to be, and that babies aren't alive until three months after they're born, and they try implementing and passing laws in this way? What happens when you get these young people who grow up on Antifa violence and they say, this is the path towards victory and they want communism? You have such shockingly disparate worldviews. You will get violence because of it. Well, they've broken the nation. I mean, when Obergefell passed and they disintegrated marriage as marriage between a man and a woman, this is what you have because marriage is the foundation of any nation.

This is how ethnicities form. This is how nations form is from marriage. And when they passed Obergefell, they broke it wide open. Well, first of all, they didn't pass it. Right. The Supreme Court just decided. They decided to destroy marriage. Yeah.

Later, after California objected out of all states. Yeah. But I would actually argue that the cultural problems happened. before that. Well, sure. Like, you can't have O'Bergelfl unless you have a society willing to say yes to that. Right. I think Obergefell is when the government institutionalized those cultural.

For sure. And it was all happening through, like you're right, it was happening through media before that. It was soft selling all these relationships, all this lifestyle before that to where when it did happen, nobody, there was nothing happened. If there was a civil war that would have happened, it would have been. But, you know, I wouldn't point to just one thing like that, though I'd say it's a component, because really it's just the idea.

of not having kids. And that created a generation of people with no ties to the future and nothing but selfishness. So you have a combination of factors. The financial crisis played a big role. For someone like me, I'm, you know, I actually grew up, though we were a moderately liberal family, we were Catholic initially, and family was very important, and we understood this, and I always valued it. But the financial situation put me in an inability. I mean, I was sleeping on floors when I was in my early 20s. There's no circumstance in which I could have a kid at all. In the inverse, the people who actually had the means, they just told all these young men to go get abortions, not have kids. Kids are bad. Kids are destroying the planet. Then when there's not enough people to end the workforce to

sustain our, either social security or just general economy, they say, open the borders and flood the country. Now you get tens of millions of people who don't share your values and you create a country where the Trump base is the last vestige of the American tradition. and everyone else is saying, get your bag before the system crumbles. That's what it feels like where we're at. It does feel like people are doing everything they can to, you know, enrich themselves before things fall apart.

And not to turn this into it or not to, you know, drag it off into an economy talk, but like when you see the way that the government's spending money and you see the way that Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are being treated and you hear, things like I heard on what's his name Caleb Hammers financial audit maybe a week ago he had a transgender person on that had breast implants paid for by the state through Social Security, through Medicare. That is insane and so it makes perfect sense that people would be like,

it's over man, I'm just going to get as much as I can because this is going to blow up. They're only going to keep importing, you know, illegals. Donald Trump can't get as many out as we need to get out even though the Republican Party Donald Trump and his administration have made you know significant progress when it comes to illegal immigration there's basically no illegal immigration you know no one's coming over the border at all um they are deporting people not in the numbers that I would like but they are deporting people there are people that are self-deporting they're making it harder for people to stay here they're looking at ways to make sure they can't get bank accounts and all kinds of different methods to get illegals to leave so that way we don't have the massive ice raids that we

had that caused such a hubbub earlier this year and last year um Even though all those things are happening, they're like, oh, well, you know, there's still people that are coming into the country. there's still all these economic problems. We're still giving away all this money. And we've got all these people that are committing fraud that we don't seem to be able to actually clean up. It makes perfect sense where people are just like, well, I guess I'm going to get mine. You know, I used to be very much a deficit hawk. I used to be a libertarian.

I don't consider myself a libertarian anymore. But like, I used to think, you know, we've got to stop this. We've got to stop this. And at this point, and, you know, basically when COVID hit, I was like, all right, they're just going to keep printing. You know, they printed so much money, both Biden and Trump printed so much money. And I was like, there's, there's no stopping it. There's being on board the whole fiscal hawk thing and trying to get people to understand that all these problems are going to, you know, they're going to blow up the dollar and inflation

is going to go through the roof or what have you. It's pointless. It's a waste of energy. The government's never going to do it. The incentives aren't there. So why bother worrying about it? Yeah, I think a lot of this, I mean, I address this directly in my book. So it's not just Obergefell and it's not just money.

It goes back to a fundamental understanding of human nature. And what I like to say is that modern solutions require pre-modern problems require pre-modern solutions. And what we need to do is get back to a basic understanding of what men were made for, what men were made for. Because a lot of these young men are looking for meaning. They don't know what they were made for. People are confused on men and women today, and men need to be told directly that they were made for glory. They were made to find glory in Jesus Christ. This is what our founders knew.

And if we're going to have our country again, it's going to look like that. it's going to look like men coming back to Christ, returning to him, and it's not going to be a weak Christianity. You see so many young men veering into ideologies that are un-American or whatever it may be, and instead of coming back to Christ, they get into that stuff. And I'm trying to say in my book, look, this goes back to the Enlightenment. This has been baked into the cake this whole time, and the fruit of no fault of Oris, Obergefell, all this kind of stuff, was baked into kind of a separation of body and soul, that God made us body and soul as integrated beings destined for glory, eternal glory in him that can only be found in Christ, but men have a drive about them.

So this country was Christian dominated for a long time, patriarchal. Why did Christian men give it up? Christian men gave it up. I don't know if they gave it up so much as what... They let it get taken from them or... It got infected through a lot of movements, particularly like pietism. Piety is great. we want Christian men and all men to be pious and righteous and holy. Jesus honors this. This can only be found in Christ ultimately, and we should live it out. But pietism made men retreat inward. So a lot of the existentialist, subjectivism from the 19th century, German higher criticism, all of which is addressed in the book, it comes to full bloom in the 20th century, and evangelicalism just adopted

a lot of this. So you talked about the evangelical base, and kind of that being kind of a lone bullwork of sorts against the moral insanity, a lot of it got compromised at elite institutions through seminaries. This is what the communists understood well in the mainline church, was that the useful idiots were the clergy, and they would just go along with these ideologies. And so as America got wealthy and as evangelicals compromised, and they put their main emphasis on being non-offensive to the world, we're not going to speak the truth because we don't want to upset the lost person down the street. You can only play that game so long. Once the lost person down the street is cutting off their genitals, and you still won't say something. You

won't say, that's bad. Don't do that. In fact, we should make a law to say you can't do that to yourself. If the church is unwilling to do that, of course we're going to keep going this direction. I'm trying to call men back to like, hey, where are the pulpits, where are the Christians that are willing to speak up about very clear moral issues, and especially towards men, the church is compromised, telling men they're toxic, bad, they go to church and it's therapeutic, and it's kind of fake and gay. like just a caveat what I'm about to say with, obviously you're seeking to solve for what I'm about to say, but it feels like Christianity is going to just get wiped out. And I'm not, I'm saying that to be a bit shocking, but you take a look at Europe, you take a look at the United States,

Christian men that are strong and willing to stand up and defend their worldview and the religion are few and far between. In Islam, it's quite the opposite. Almost, I think, what is it, more than half. They did a bunch of polls, and they found it like more than half believe that violence is justified, and dealing with apostates and nonbelievers and things like this. So you take a look at what Christians have been willing to do over the past couple of decades, and the nations that were once dominated by Christianity are just being run over. And you take a look at Islamic nations, and they're doing the running over. Yeah, and this is why Elon Musk tweeted that Christianity has become toothless.

It seems like there's no agency, no power, no willingness to defend their way of life, which is what all of our forefathers understood. It's what gave them the spiritual backing to fight the revolutionary war and justify their existence and really move westward. So no, Christianity won't go away. It may go into a season of decline for a while, but that's never the way it's worked. I mean, we saw this with the fall of Rome, the Roman Empire. This is what Augustine wrote the city of God about,

because a lot of people were actually back then, it's a similar thing that happens today in some circles. A lot of people were accusing the Christians of being the reason the Roman Empire fell, which of course is not true. There were many other reasons. But Augustine was making an apologetic back then for why Christianity was actually surpassed the Roman Empire in terms of eternal destiny and gave people a vision of a heavenly city. And so Christianity has gone through this before. It's not going away, but I'm trying to speak practically to right now. if we can get Christian men to understand their purpose in life and stop entertaining sermons and music.

I mean, I grew up in the Christian church, and a lot of it was just feminine. It was feminine stuff. And if they can understand what they were made for, why they have a competitive drive, why they want to dominate, why they want to win, why they want to beat competition, all this stuff, Christianity and Christ does not come in and say, be a woman, don't do any of that stuff. Our forefathers understood this. That is why they were able to fight. That is why they were able to defend their way of life.

And so I think we can have our country back if everybody would read this book. But that's kind of my pitch. Let's show to this next story from Newsweek. Trump accuses Democrats of cheating in California over slow vote counts. Well, Trump's got two posts and truth social. And he says there's big cheating by the Dumocrats, Democrats in California. He wrote. And they say, without providing evidence, he did when he did.

mentioned it's taking weeks to count the vote. Votes are all tied up, may not be in for weeks under investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office in L.A. It is unclear whether the President has ordered the investigation he mentioned. What he said he did. I guess the argument is maybe they were already doing it. News we counted to the White House for more information. Quote, they are trying to steal the governor of California primary and the mayor of L.A. primary away from two great Republican candidates, Trump said, here we go with the very late and massive number numbers of mail-in ballots. Now, I got this tweet I want to show you. Useless tree just pointed out. If the remaining 38% of votes cast for the L.A. May are all allocated at the same proportion as the last

batch that came in, Nithia Rahman will come to within 100 votes of Spencer Pratt. This is so precise that it appears those doing the counting know the rate at which they need to proportion the votes to eliminate Pratt. And I would say, uh-huh, yes. Why would, why should any, believe an election is legitimate when they have weeks behind the curtains to count votes you can't see. You see, you do the ballot all in one day. It's hard to cheat. People are sitting around outside.

You got to count them. You only got a few hours. But when you have weeks to do it, it might be easy to find some ballots. The other interesting thing about the results that are now coming in from L.A. County is that L.A. County is a single electoral jurisdiction. yet for some reason, the mail-in votes that are coming in deviate from the actual ballots previously, the early vote count. Considering you are taking a singular county in all of its votes and counting them, the proportions should not change. Now, for the governor's race, it's a different story.

If a batch of votes from San Francisco comes in, you can expect it to be 90% Democrat. And then if something from Tulare comes in, you can expect it to be 90% Republican. That makes sense. So you might say a new batch came in from a liberal jurisdiction and they heavily favored Democrats. But what about L.A. County? How does that make sense? A new batch came in from the same county, but this time Spencer Pratt's losing. And it took us a week to find these ballots and count them. So I would argue that there is cheating, but what they do is ballot harvesting. I would say first and foremost, collecting a ballot from a nursing home is not a legitimate election.

sending out activists to collect ballots is not is not advocating that individuals support a candidate for leadership. It's a procedural win. I would call that cheating. It's not the spirit. But as for the law, I'd also make the argument that many of these returned ballots probably are coming from houses where the individuals no longer live. So this was what was accused back in 2020 pertaining to universal mail-in voting and ballot harvesting.

Activists show up to a house. They're getting paid five, ten bucks to ballot harvest. You know, you get five bucks per ballot. return. They say, they're not on the door. Did you send in your mail and vote? No, I didn't. Well, why don't you fill it out? I'll take it back for you. They go, well, I also got these three others. Don't worry, we'll take those two. I would, I would be willing to bet the probability that Democrat activists are forging loose universal ballots that get sent to random addresses from people who are no longer registered there. I'd be willing to bet that's actually happening. How do you

investigate that, though? How do you prove it? It's very difficult. Yeah, I mean, It's very tiring to continuously see the same type of phenomenon, right? There's an election day. Then the powers that be in whatever the jurisdiction is say, okay, we're not going to be able to finish counting the ballots today. It's going to take a couple weeks. And then there is a frontrunner or someone that's in a position that is an opposing party to the Democrats.

And slowly you see the lead get picked away. and the only thing that you ever hear is, well, you know, you have to have these mail-in ballots. You have to have the ballot harvesting. You have to get every vote when there's no way to verify that these votes are real, that they aren't just people, you know, sitting some backroom, writing them up or what have you. And again, I don't know the method by which they're doing this, but it's a consistent pattern over and over and over, whether it be the election, whether it be a presidential election or whether it be state and local. You don't see that in Florida.

they're done the same day because the 2000 election was such a sham and such a mess, they were like, this is never going to happen again. And Florida, Ron DeSantis has made it clear that he will do whatever he can to help any state that wants to get the system that Florida has in place in their states. Democrats don't want it because I truly believe it's because Democrats have figured out the way to rig the elections. But it also seems like Republicans don't want it because they won't pass the Save Act. Like if they would pass the SAVE Act, wouldn't this solve everything?

I don't know if it would solve everything or not. It would definitely help. And I think that there's only a handful of Republicans. And I think that that's because of Capitol Hill, BS. Yeah, bureaucracy stuff like. Yeah, I don't know what the SAVE Act actually. I don't know if it impacts state elections. But something that must be noted, most obvious point that could ever be made is that this is not normal.

But it's like you should keep this in mind, India, 1.3 billion people. And we all know India. they have some problems going on over there. Take six weeks for them to collect or to vote. They have a six week voting window. Fair enough. If you want your early votes, that's fine. You can have them. We'll have six weeks. Everyone in India

over six weeks votes. And then on one day, they count every single ballot. And by the time India is going to sleep, a country of 1.3 billion people, they know what the results of the other people. In India. In India. Yeah. So in one day, they're able to, and that's on election day. So, you know, they have a six week voting period, but most

people turn up on election day. 1.3 billion people, they have pretty high turnout. And by the end of the night, they all know what the results are. And to your point about the SAVE Act, I mean, whether or not it would fix everything, the idea that you shouldn't have an ID to vote or you don't need an ID to vote, the United States is unique in that. Every other country, you have to show your ID. I mean, every other country.

There are people that are pretty far left that I've talked to on the internet that are like, yeah, that are not Americans. They're like, yeah, that seems silly. We have to show ID. Yeah, I saw some people joking that they were going to drive to L.A. and vote for Pratt out of state because apparently it's legal there. India comes up again. I mean, are we seriously having to like take election, you know, inspiration from India?

Clearly. They have a thing called an epic card in India. So they have a separate ID that is required to vote. It's administered by their electoral commission, their national electoral commission. So you take an epic card to the ballot with you. And that's India. And I mean, again, it's like if they're able to pull this off and they use electronic voting, so it's all done in one day.

What could possibly be the explanation for the United States? Even in Europe, I mean, Europe, a lot of these countries in mainland Europe, far to the left of the United States, they have ID, they're able to get the results by the time they go to bed. Like, this is not rocket science here. But again, most obvious point in the world is what's going on here is just obvious thumb on the scale. I think everyone's been ranting and raving about it so long that it's kind of desensitized us to the fact that, like, literally we don't have fair election. the United States. And that's like something that when you utter that, when you utter, we do not have fair elections in a democracy, you should be like trembling when you say that

because that quite literally means the foundation of your country, the thing that you're buying into doesn't exist. But on conservative shows, we just say it so much. A President Trump says it so much that it kind of loses this punch. But like when I say that, when I say we do not have fair legitimate elections in our largest state in our country, that should be like a terrifying proposition. But we just say like, yeah, I know all the fixes in, you know, it is what it is. Well, I mean, that goes back to the point earlier that we were talking about where people are just kind of like checking out there. They're just like, well, I guess there's nothing we can do about it. You know, when your population feels so impotent to be able to do anything, you know, you do it.

Say people, well, I guess there's nothing I can do. Mr. Pratt is popular enough. And I think he's demonstrated such a, just how a politician ought to be and going into the 21st century that I would imagine, you know, based on what I know of the Trump administration, the people staffing it. They're fully aware that Spencer Pratt and a normal election would be, you know, at least politically viable, right? I mean, L.A. is very liberal place, obviously. So it's not safe, you know, it's not fair to say he would win in a landslide like some people have said. But it would be fair to say, Rick Caruso, the last, you know, right wing candidate in Los Angeles. Not right. He's a centrist, ran out as a Democrat. He lost by, what, about 10 points. I think he got about 43% of the vote or 44% of the vote. That's Rick Caruso. God, no one even knows what he looks like or sounds like.

Pratt, he's on everyone's television, by all accounts, very popular. All this to say, I think there's people in the Trump administration that, as we speak, are combing through what options the Trump administration would have, again, if they were truly convinced that this election in Los Angeles is fraudulent. So I don't think it would be fair to say that, you know, what some people are going to say is Trump should go do something about it. I am fairly certain that they're going to comb through whatever they have at their disposal, because this is another thing that's parroted on conservative talk shows, is that, well, it's Los Angeles. Who can cares. You know, we should fight for, it's like that's the second biggest city in the country.

30% of it, give or take, are still Republicans. They have the right to fair governance. If we maybe think the Democrats don't deserve anything. In addition to that, there's still a lot of capital concentrated, whether it's like fiscal capital or quite literally cultural capital that's concentrated in Los Angeles County. No, the United States won't be great if California's not great. I know that's like a really freezing cold take to hear with, and this is coming from me. I'm from Tennessee. You think I want, you know, do you think I'm a big fan of California? Not really, but I do understand that we need New York City firing on all cylinders. We need Los Angeles firing on all cylinders because when our country was great, those two cities

were quite nice places and they certainly pushed above their weight. It doesn't feel like the Trump administration is doing everything they can be doing as it pertains to election rigging and ballot harvesting. Certainly the redistricting is good. Trump has applied pressure, but it would seem that at least on the surface, I feel like to the right to a regular person, the efforts on the Trump administration to deal with electoral issues is for Trump to say things. Well, I think, well, I partially, I understand my people would say that, but to be fair

to Trump, this would require an act of Congress. He's endorsed the Save Act. He said, like, multiple times, you'll, primary people that are opposed to the Save Act. He came through on that promise with, you know, John Cornyn seemed to be one of the guys jamming up the Save Act. You know, he weighed in, endorsed Ken Paxton. by Ken Paxton, by the way. In addition to that, Trump is trying to ram through an EO, where if the Save Act fail,

it's basically dead. The Save Act's not going to happen. He is trying to ram through an EO. That's all he can really do. You mean the post office one? Yeah. He did it and he won, didn't he? Yeah, but it doesn't quite have the same, like, degree.

It doesn't have the quite the same scope as the voter. Where's the infrastructure and the Trump administration to be dealing with these things? I mean, look, I am excited to see Bill Pulte as DNI. It's going to get real interesting. Todd Blanche, Trump says he's going to move him forward as just AG. He's going to nominate him for AG. These are good, good things. So I am excited.

I'm hoping, based on what we've seen right now, actually, let's do this. Let's pull up the, let's pull up the story and get into it. We got this from Mediite. Carl Rove reveals why Democrats' polling lead might not be enough for a blue wave. Now, take him at his word, I guess. The point Carl Rove brings up is that Democrat favorability is, lower than Republicans right now where historically they should have a double-digit lead. This is absolutely crazy. You then factor in. This is the current map, congressional map,

211 seats are Republican, 205 are Democrat. This means Republicans have to win less in order to keep control of the House. When you take a look at the Senate race, you can see that it's 50 Republican seats with 46 Democrats, but that includes two of them being independent. Democrats would have to win every toss-up state and flip at least one Republican state, which it doesn't even look like they're going to be able to flip Maine with Graham Platner being ripped to shreds by the corporate press. Somehow, and I love to bring this up, people are still betting big on Democrats sweeping with the plurality on call sheet. In Maine, it has flipped now. The probability that the market is giving for the Republican Party to win is 52. So let me just say this. It's looking real bad for Democrats.

Send that hopium straight into my veins. What I am hoping is that with the procedural moves made by the Trump administration, with his election integrity army, meaning Trump expects to have some kind of watchdog going on, or at least the pressure of, making it more difficult for Democrats to pull shenanigans. But with the redistricting efforts, Republicans may at least hold Congress a little bit. And if they do, I hope Trump unleashes the dogs of war after the midterms. I am hoping that what we see after the midterms is a bit more gruff, aggressive, and brutal than what we have been seeing now. And I want a caveat, people really need to understand that when Trump said, Drain, swamp and then he shut down USAID.

That was a large portion of the swamp. Don't get me wrong. He's friends with swampy monsters. Lindsay Graham's got a seat right next to that throne, which is nasty. But USAID being shut down was one of the most aggressive and brutal things a president could have done to curtail the deep state and drain the swamp. So amazing work. I'm just hoping that all of these dirty games we see playing played by the Democrats, like

in California, oh, it's going to take us a month to figure out who won. in a city? You want to make the argument about the state and I'll roll my eyes. You make the argument about L.A. County. It's like, bro, you're not talking about a statewide race. You're talking about a city. Come on. I'm hoping Trump just unleashes a dogs of war after he says, okay, we're going to go send federal watchdogs. There's going to be direct federal management on how you're handling your elections. Sue me. I hope he goes nuclear. I mean, I would love to see it as well. I mean, I don't know. I'm still of the opinion that that if the economy is in the toilet,

the Republicans are going to lose. If the economy is not in the toilet, the Republicans can win. I think if the economy takes a significant downturn before election day, they have no chance, no matter what the polls say now, it would be great to see the Republicans hold on to the House and Senate and have Donald Trump not have to worry about,

you know, the administration, not have to worry about just endless, inquiries and impeachment, you know, papers filed and stuff. I don't know that I have high hopes yet. We'll see as it gets closer to election day. Yeah, because the gas prices are totally freaking people out. I mean, it's a real problem. And unless we can figure out a way, and I don't know what mechanisms of power can be used, but the economy has to turn around, at least when people are going to the pump, because it's not building a lot of confidence in voters' minds for the current president. Regular is four.

24. Well, it's 460. I mean, it's crazy how expensive. Midgrades, 475 premiums 512. Diesel. Here's the real trick, people. The real secret is you got to watch diesel. I understand that when you go to the pump, you're like, oh, man, gas at $4 is brutal. And it is brutal. But when diesel is really, really high, that means everything is going to go up and it's going to get real bad. You know, we had this debate in the uncensored portion of the show. You guys should check it out with Myron Gaines last night. His argument was the war in Iran. is for Israel and all of the actions taken by the Trump administration that seem to line up are unrelated or just coincidental. I don't want to, I'm not trying to put words in his mouth, but the

general idea I made was, or I put a posit it is they take out all the drug traffickers and criminal element in the Caribbean, these, these narco-terrorists and boats. Why did they decide to do that? Good question. They then move in on Venezuela. Why did they do that right now? I don't know. It's an interesting question. Surrounding Cuba. securing the Panama Canal from China, trying to secure the Northwest Passage, access to Greenland. And then, of course, the Suez is a large component, hence the war with Iran. My argument is taking out the drug traffickers was to clear traffic lanes for oil ships that are going to be coming from the Gulf, which is happening now.

Taking oil from Venezuela is because Donald Trump wants to secure energy for the Western Hemisphere and for American interests. You factor in the Panocanel Northwest Passage. Those are paramount if you are going to be the principal oil exporter of the world. If you're going to be the dominant oil producer and trader, you need to be able to access the other parts of the world. So these trade routes are extremely important. Then you get the war in Iran.

And my argument is Trump is not reopening the straight. Trump is yo-yoing these negotiations. If he wanted the straight open, he could leave. My run's argument was he can't because he needs a political win. My argument is that does not account for all of the actions taken previously, such as sending an armada to armada there, securing oil. It seems like Trump is taking all of these actions for the purpose of shutting down Eastern oil production, cutting off China and centering the world's energy in the West, in the United States, through the Gulf. That being said, Myron said he did not believe that was a good thing for America, nor was in America first. would simply agree and say, it would appear that if this is the case, Donald Trump's strategy is

we're going to give the world a fever. We are going to make our enemies suffer more than we suffer, but everybody suffers all the way down. So the American people are going through tremendous hardship with these gas prices. The economy is not in good shape. Ugov poll showed that around half of people polled believe the economy is on the verge of collapse. A third believe the economy's going to collapse and there will be a civil war. Hey, thanks, UGov. You know, I'm always. interested in that polling data. Housing, the housing market's in trouble as sellers are giving up and pulling their houses off the market to just sit on them, which is creating a weird phenomenon. And arguably, gas prices are a principal component in why everything is getting crazy.

If this is true, Donald Trump, the Republicans are going to be in trouble. This is their war. These are their policies. Now, I'm wondering if maybe the strategy is, maybe in, September, maybe in October, Trump's October surprises the straight finally reopens because Trump just leaves. Gas prices come down and instantly everybody feels a pressure release, which creates the mirage of improvement. Entering a midterm, feeling like everything just got really good thanks to Trump, forgetting that several months ago, it is the war in Iran for which Trump is president that caused it all, that could be a strategy. It's kind of like you ever go into the covers and you get real, real hot? And then you come out of the covers and you feel cold, even though

it's still hot. You know what I mean? That's what I'm saying. That's what it seems like Trump is doing. Yeah. And Trump doesn't have great options right now as far as getting the gas price down with the global energy pinch because one thing he could do is repeal the gas tax. I would drop it by about 30 cents per gallon. That's fair. But a lot of people have proposed, and this is like more of a populist proposal as we should just tariff oil exports. We did that for a long time. We did that, I think it's starting in the 60s or 70s. I think it was like 2015 is when Congress finally lifted it. The problem with that, why did Congress lift the, you know, the oil export in 2015? Well, because that's actually impedes our domestic oil production, you know, from expanding. So like,

if you're in the oil business, if you're ExxonMobil, the more access to the global market you have, the more incentive you actually have to expand your oil production, and the less or the more restricted the market is, like the harder you have, the harder time you have exporting oil, the harder it gets to run your refineries, the harder it gets to run your drilling and all of your related oil operations.

So what would end up happening, this is why I think people should be cautious, saying, well, why doesn't Trump just tear, if we're truly exporting so much oil, you know, why don't we just tariff it and bring that back home? Because that'll give you temporary relief. Like, yes, the gas prices will drop pretty hard, actually. for, I don't know, maybe a year, maybe two, maybe three years.

But once the oil companies start losing money because they can't export to the global market, you talk about diesel, most of the diesel gets produced in the United States, gets exported overseas because everything runs on diesel, especially in Europe. They don't even have unleaded gas there. They use diesel. These oil companies will start hemorrhaging money. They'll start closing down their production. They'll start closing down refineries.

Right now, a lot of the refineries in the U.S. are actually designed for global export, and it will actually drive fuel up even more. So everyone's proposing this, everyone's saying, well, why doesn't Trump just do this? And it's like, he can't because it'll actually make things much worse if you're just kicking the, you know, can down the road. Well, yeah, but he may need to kick the can a few years down the road in order to save the midterms in order to continue implementing his policies. Yeah, well, I mean, there's two, it's a twofold problem. It's like, one, it would require an active Congress, most likely. It could get jammed up the course. Yeah, that could limp you across, you know, past the midterms. But then, you know, if there's a successor to Trump, if he's wanting a Republican to win and we're nearing the. end of the Trump term and then gas starts going crazy. Sure. Now these oil companies are lining up to give money to the Democrats. Right.

Then we're screwed because that's what's going to end up happening. People think the oil industry is naturally conservative because the guys that work in they are naturally conservative. That is true. Like whenever you meet a guy in the oil business, he's typically a conservative. But Exxon Mobil, they don't care about transgender bathrooms or whatever. They're concerned about their bottom line. And if they say Trump just screwed us over and he ran the oil industry into the ground,

that we're going to be better believe they're going to be lining up to put money in the Democrat Party's pockets. Yeah. I don't know that anybody's giving the Democrats any money. They're in debt, and it's just the funding is not going to the party anymore. I'm just saying this would be a good way to give them some relief if you destroy the oil industry. I just kind of feel like the state of the Democratic Party is the donors don't see. Look, if you're $3 million in debt, why give you a dollar?

Well, the problem that Democrats are having right now primarily why they can't fundraise is because they still are successful at smaller dollar donations. So you still have your random libtards across the country that'll throw a few bucks the Democrats way. but they've lost all their major donors. And the primary reason what they've all cited is because the Democrats are pursuing redistribution policies. And so far as what you're from California, the billionaire taxes, et cetera, et cetera, these taxes, you may as a populace say, well, that sounds great, you know, let's like punish these rich people.

Again, that's who creates jobs. That's who creates capital. Like, I hate to go, I'll pray you on everyone. But like it's, you know, let's get back the basics here. Everyone go back to your Ben Shapiro 101. What happens if you start driving big business into the ground? It actually does impact you. It actually will screw you over at some point.

I know that's like, you know, boring take, especially from a Zoomer, but it's like true. And what will happen is you'll start losing elections because, again, if the Republicans started just driving business into the ground, they're going to line up and bail the Democrats out. Because to Tim's point, the Democrats are on the ropes right now. They have no money. They're like, what, $3, $4 million in the hole. $3 million in the hole. Yeah.

And so, again, why give them a ball of branch right now? They're on the ropes. They're suffering. They're completely dependent on their activists. base. And if Trump keeps racking up victories again, if he can put a bow on Iran and get out of there, get a golden parachute, these activists are going to be demoralized. Look, in the first year, the activist base of the Democrats, they were completely demotivated. So if you can return to that, that activist base is shut down, there's no money flowing into the party, it's over for them.

Do they, I wonder about this. When, when Trump won in 24, it was kind of a wild night. I remember we're, you know, we're live streaming. We were in Nashville. And we all thought it was going to be a long I remember when we were talking with the Daily Wire guys, we were negotiating like, hey, maybe we'll come down and do a special where we'll do election coverage there. We'll set up our own studio at the Daily Wireplace and studios and then we'll do a crossover. And it'd be really fun. They'll have a great idea. And then I said, I guess the problem is it's not going to be an election night. It could take weeks.

And then they were like, maybe we need to plan for that. I said, what if we stayed for the week and then prepared for maybe having to stay into another week? And they're like, that's a good point. And then Trump won handily that night within a few weeks. hours and we're all sitting there like, wow, immediately following this, every major Democrat pundit said it is the fault of the Democratic Party for not investing in media. Yep. We need the Joe Rogan of the left.

Has Trump not learned that message? Like, they need to be, one of the most important things you can do is invest in culture and community. Trump should be, I don't know if he can do this through, like maybe not a governmental thing, But I'm saying the conservatives need to be dumping as much money as possible into into pro-America cultural media spaces. They don't get me wrong. The Ellison certainly are doing that. But I don't know that the moves they've made have been so overtly pro-American culture.

Don't get me wrong, the firing of Scott Pelly. I was tap dancing and laughing my ass off. I hate these people. And it's tough for me. I never like to say I hate people. But man, when Barry Ward started firing these people, I'm just sitting back. be like someone get me a coconut. I'm going to, I'm going to kick back and put my feet up and watch. This is my entertainment. This is better than WWE.

So that's incredible. But I suppose I should say this. They bought TikTok. They're buying Paramount, you know, they're potentially going to get Time Warner. Maybe they really do recognize it. I'm just hoping that they're doing something bigger than it seems they're doing because the midterms are coming up. And it does not seem like they're making large moves in cultural spaces the way they could or should be. Well, I think the reality is the Ellison's Elon Musk, who would be probably classified as 90s Democrats, are having more impact on the culture right now than like 90% of conservative media whose sole purpose is to influence culture. There's something to be said about that. I don't want to name names, but if you look around the conservative space, these guys are more interested in funding their pet projects than they are in like actually investing in like something people would want to watch. and I think that kind of opinion

like the Daily Wire. Yeah, there's some Dragon something that lost a ton of money and was really embarrassing and was a total waste of money and it was the pet project that's sad. Fair enough you tried.

I mean, you can like give it someone for trying, but it's like everyone's trying. I actually, I will disagree. The idea behind it is if we own Game of Thrones, we dictate culture and Penn Dragon was supposed to be a Christian coded Game of Thrones

to try and re-center the culture through entertainment. and it didn't work. Well, because the problem is, and this is what Elon Musk learned that a lot of these guys haven't learned, is that sometimes you have to retick the core institution. Because sometimes, sometimes it works. Sometimes you can build a parallel institution. I think podcasting is a great example.

I would say Timcast, IRL, and other night shows that are in the new media have dethrone late-night television. That is true. But that's an exception to the norm. Generally, you need to retick the core institution insofar as what if we make a base Game of Thrones. But you're saying we're just defining ourselves in what we're against, which is Game of Thrones. Elon Musk learned this lesson. How many Twitter alternatives were created? We can name them.

We need two hands to name them all. Just retake Twitter. Boom, problem solved. We're good. Yeah. Well, I mean, to be fair, then Libs just left Twitter and went to blue sky and threads. And now you've got two psycho platforms full of psychotic people. But what's happened to the culture for the last nine months?

And I can use my Normie oracles to fact check this is the political discourse has been between one side of the right and the other side of the right. The left has been completely frozen out of, like, the political discourse. And that's not me saying that as someone that's in it. I've spoken to my normally oracles. They know more about Tucker Carlson feuding with, you know, Mark Levin than they do about, you know, whatever Sam Cedars are there. Yeah, that's what everybody's talking about. But I don't know that Democrats need, like, they can have all the debt and they still have a lot of cultural cachet. As long as the divide between men and women, particularly single women, and you saw that poll from the last election, that single women overwhelmingly vote Democrat.

Why is that? Because the government for them functions as a husband and a father. It's their dependency. And as long as the Democrats keep pushing this empathetic feminized framework, this moral virtue signaling, and these young women are lapping it up and knowing that the government's going to take care of them, that's their base at this point. Yeah, we can get super esoteric here. I mean, like, a good indication of, I think a big problem, what you're seeing is like who's controlling the culture is like hypergamy playing out in real time. as long as dating apps make up the majority of how couples met, that indicates that the left's winning. And I know that's like a really reductionist thing to say. That's almost like cliche, but it's broadly true because that effectively institutionalized this hypergamy, which indicates that women and men are both miserable and that's going to continue the political divide between the two. If you see a restoration of like, again, healthy institutions that like function how they should and one of those being courtship dating, whatever you want to call it, turning into a marriage, if that starts firing on all cylinders, again, that does indicate that the conservative, so to speak, or the right wing is back in the driver's seat. But if you look at the, I think it's the, I believe it's the IRS, actually,

that releases data on how couples met, believe it or not. I think it's the IRS. It's one of the government institutions you wouldn't expect. There are the ones that actually released the data on how couples met, and it's like 70 percent so they met on dating apps in the last batch of marriage licenses issued. It's insane. And that just institutionalizes hypergamy. Well, the other thing is at the evangelical church right now, which is supposed to be Trump's base, a lot of the institutional leaders keep promoting singleness for women as like God's path for them. So they keep releasing videos and articles saying like, no, it's good. You should stay single. Say single. It's disgusting. Can you break down, because this is interesting, you kind of were like maybe hinting at it earlier.

Can you break down? Because I get flack from this by, I'm not saying girl dads, when I attack girls, I'm not saying men that have daughters. That's just fathers that have daughters. That's a separate thing. I'm talking about the specific girl dad brand. Can you maybe explain this better because I think I lose people when I say. Oh, there's so many, yeah, I have lots of thoughts. this. But yeah, typically, I think what you're talking about is the Dave Ramsey. Yeah, the guy, the father who becomes feminized himself, who almost worships his daughter as like an idealized, you know, this is going to sound scandalous, like partner, somebody who idolizes him back and respects him, like ultimately and finally, he gives her whatever she wants. And this is a huge problem.

And it is a problem in the evangelical spaces because the church, it's poisoned evangelical. Yeah, the church has taught them that women basically don't sin. Women don't have problems. And here's my heart as a pastor is like, women are suffering tremendously right now. I would argue more than men. I mean, the depression rates indicate that. The depression and anxiety among women is horrible.

I mean, I almost should have written a book for women because they're really suffering and they need, ultimately, Christ. They need help. And the evangelical church, instead of helping them, is just reinforcing the same pattern of life by suggesting singleness and becoming a boss babe, whatever, instead of like saying, hey, this church is a great place to meet a husband and get married. We're going to raise up strong men who are attractive to you naturally, even though you're

going to tell people that, you know, that I'm not attracted to that. That's what they want. And so we're going to raise up strong men that have stable jobs, that have a mission in life, that know where they're going, that aren't filled with bitterness and resentment playing video games all day. Nothing wrong with video games. I enjoy a video game. But you know what I mean? Like productive members of society. And that's going to be attractive to women. Instead of that, they're often reinforcing kind of this boss-babe mentality among young women, raising up women in the church, putting women in the pulpit, all this kind of stuff. And so the evangelical church is typically, like, what, 10 to 20 years behind the culture?

And they're living out everything that was like 10 to 20 years ago in terms of raising up women in every institution. Well, and this is why I think like this sort of thinking, which is completely ticked over the evangelical church. And to your point, we dealt with like 10, 20 years ago. And like, I guess you would say the cultural zeitgeist is at battery farms. This is almost like two on the nose, but at battery farm. Farms Democrat voters, because again, it pulls on like the deficiencies that women have right now that are engaging in the girl bossism because, A, it gives them a sense of stability and strength and a father figure being the state. I mean, I hate to go like Jordan Peterson and everyone,

but there's like, that's broadly true. And then it also siphons off their maternal instinct with migrants where they like legitimately view these migrants as like a newborn baby that's paralyzed. We've got to care for them. And it's, yeah, it's totally praying on their maternal instincts. This is what women, like, are literally hardwired and built for biologically is to be this way. And unfortunately, they've been given a vision of like, well, my baby now is an immigrant from a third world country. And now daddy government has to feed the baby. You think this is world vision's fault? No.

I'll be lost actually. Let's tell you the story from NBC News. Flesh-eating screw worm returns to the U.S. after 60 years threatening cattle herd. The case of New World Screwworm was confirmed in a three-week-old cat. in La Pryor, Texas, near the U.S.-Mexico border agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins said, a flesh-eating parasite that had been kept out of the U.S. livestock for decades has been detected in Texas, threatening the nation's cattle industry. And I just want to let you guys know that basically it's a parasitic fly that will lay

its eggs inside your body, and it can target humans too. And then my question to all of you that are watching, please comment, how do you think this thing came back into the United States? How could it have possibly have come here? You can swim, swim across the railroad grant. It just one day it got a bus maybe. It rode the beast. The weird thing was when I was going through Africa and he would cross border crossings,

this was in every country, is they would have like a little pool. So when you're cross, the border, it's very primitive, like border patrol. Africa? Yeah, go figure, right? And they would have a little pool. So when you would get off the bus, you would walk through this little pool of like, it looked like water and get to the other side. And I went through like three border crossings. And I found the assholes like, why do we walk through this little pool?

And they say, oh, we put like bleach and stuff in there. It's like to disinfect your shoes. So you don't track in like any parasites or anything across a border that has no fence or anything. And I'm like, okay, it's interesting. And as the guy is explaining to me that this is what we do to ensure that disease doesn't spread, literally a farmer shepherding a bunch of goats just like walks right through the border crossing. And I'm like, it's really remarkable stuff. So I-

Now, for those that haven't answered, the reason. I believe that the parasitic flies have got its country is illegal immigration. Yeah, and I think that's true. So it's like all of us law-abiding citizens are washing our feet in a little pool, the African pool. We're getting the job done. We're ensuring everything's, you know, a-ok. But we have a lot of goat herders coming into this country. And then they're saying things like, oh, you know, moms and polio.

And it's funny because the UK is having a polio outbreak? Yeah, I know. And why is that, Tate? What, how could that? It's the same reason that we're seeing cousin marriage just skyrocket. It's the British people. Something weird's going on there. The old British gentlemen have just decided. They said, how dare I say, the polio is a good thing.

Let's spread it intentionally and marry our cousins. My cousin's looking right. She's looking fit, eh? She's looking proper fit, eh? That's what's going on. I don't know. It's some sort of woke mind virus. We have that's Connor Tomlinson, as he found his cousin attractive. Do leftists marry their cousins? Is that a thing?

I'm going to ask them. You can marry anyone? That's the problem. I think if they were marrying their cousins, that would be an upgrade versus what they're doing right now. I'm just saying, you know, like, why are they hell-bent on having these people coming to this country? It's not that leftists marry their cousins. It's that people that marry their cousins end up voting for leftists. That's probably true, yeah.

Well, I mean, if the argument is contending adults can marry whoever they want, it's never going to stop. I mean, the argument for Obergefell, of course, is like, well, contending adults can marry who they want and live how they want. It's like, that means siblings can get married. I mean, that's not a principled argument. That goes in weird directions. Yeah, they have no framework for this. It's all based on what feels nice to people. And this is the biggest problem is we keep suggesting policies.

And the problem with going back to the single women thing is they're typically driven by their feminine instincts, which what sounds the nicest, that's going to upset the least amount of people. And so that's what they're going to keep pushing is this kind of nonsense. And there was some pushback during trans stuff, and they still celebrate this in many places. But people kind of saw it then, but they're not going to stop. I don't think Woke is going away at all. It hasn't, I know. I think the Jackson DART thing illustrates back in full swing. What does?

Jackson Dardy went and endorsed. He spoke at a Trump rally, and I was getting raked through the cold. Oh, right, right, right. Well, and all the major league sports ought to bring up the pride flags again for Pride Month. Yeah, yeah. So, yeah, I mean, I don't think, well, I think Woke just wasn't, you know, maybe you on sabbatical or something, but it's back. But to the broader point you were talking about, I mean, I think this is true because, again,

they view illegals broadly as their children. And they use really, like, vapid, redundant statements to justify it, or they'll say, and I know it's like, let's dunk on leftist show, but it's like true is they'll say, oh, well, they're looking for a better life. That's like a really redundant statement because every decision I make at all times is to make my life better. So it's like, yeah, America is like awesome. Of course they're coming. Like, so, you know, but as far as this fly, I don't know, maybe it's just a fly decided to cross the plane.

Didn't they have a program? Because I thought that this thing is not new. It's not novel. Our government was fighting this. As far as I know, I mean, someone correct me here. I think you're right. I think they were dropping flies that were like inert in Latin America in order to prevent the spread of this fly north. Because this has been a problem in Latin America for decades.

They'd eradicated it for the most part. Yeah. Here at least. Well, here, but I, I want to. wonder if that program somehow got canceled with USAID or something. I don't know. Oh, we eliminated the fly eating program. We cut the frog program and now the frogs die and they can't eat the flies anywhere. It's a big problem. I mean, yeah, I mean, like, as much as I, you know, I'd be the first person to blame this on the third world, which I think broadly is true. There probably is some just, I don't

know, a micro-revolution and a fly and it's like caused this to come roaring back. I mean, it could be a possibility. Did you hear about Google, dropping a bunch of mosquitoes recently. Yeah, and it's because they want to kill mosquitoes. Yeah. So Google is seeking a permit to release a bunch of diseased male mosquitoes. So they'll go out

and bang the females giving them mosquito aids. I'm not joking. Oh, this happens in New Orleans all the time. Google wants, wants, yeah. And then the female mosquito, what happens is the eggs can't hatch. Right. So again, I want to stress because I see all these people being like, why would Google be releasing mosquitoes? And I

I'm like, you know, I'm kind of, I kind of with you on this one. Like, I don't trust Google. The stated objective is they got a bunch of mosquitoes infected with mosquito aids that will go. I'm not joking. Oh, yeah. We'll go and then bang the female mosquitoes and give the female mosquitoes mosquitoes mosquitoes, and then the female mosquitoes eggs are inviolable. So they just get wiped out by this mosquito AIDS epidemic.

I think it's fantastic stuff. It's like, you know, if your enemy is like throwing you a bone, take the bone and run it. Like if George Soros got up and he said, I'm releasing things that's going to kill all wasp. Yes, sir, take over my district attorney. That's awesome. I support you 100%. But the issue is, do we believe them?

I hate mosquitoes and wash so much. I'm willing to go to the devil. Like, what if the mosquitoes weren't carrying mosquito aids, but like regular AIDS? You know what I mean? That would be terrible. That would be Africa. That's why I'm just kind of like, maybe you can find other ways to get rid of the mosquitoes.

But here's the problem. Let's say Google was like, we're going to spray pesticide to kill these mosquitoes. People would be like, these chemicals are bad for us. And RFK Jr. would be like, you've got to be out of your mind. So what is, you know, it's not easy, right? How do we get rid of these mosquitoes? I've been asking this since I was a young boy and I hate mosquitoes so much that I am willing to, you know, let's test this here. Let's y'all guess.

What about we do like one gigantic bug zapper that ever, like you put on a big metal post so everyone can gather around like town center and like hold hands and like they watch? We just have big. Slugs exploding. State mandated bug zappers. Every American, this can reboot the economy. Like what Switzerland does with rifles. Yeah, every American man. Every American, yeah.

Every building must have a 20-foot pole with a gigantic bug zapper and just wiping out all bugs. You walk in every town, zzz. I think that would probably destroy the environment, like, you know, pollinators would vanish overnight. Yeah, yeah, like half the bugs just die and like no one knows how. Yeah. I was reading that day, they were like, yeah, like half the worms died. We don't know what happened.

It's worse than that, actually. Yeah. Windshield phenomenon. Are you heard of this? Yeah. So you don't, you don't know the state. This is actually, this is the important thing that people. When I was a kid, if you drove down the highway, even a short distance, your windshield is covered in bugs.

Like, every time you stop for gas, your windshield is splattered with bugs. You've got to wipe it all if it's disgusting. Not anymore. Now you drive it on the highway, there's no bugs. Well, because I remember, you know, this, can we, maybe there's a little culpability on the bugs here, because I remember, uh, in high school, I moved to San Antonio. And like the year we moved there, there was this like butterfly migration wave or something. And all the butterflies. This is on them. They were flying way too low, so they were just getting like, we're stacking bodies every time you commute. But I remember that had a psychological toll on me because I was learning to drive,

and I'm driving for the first time, and these beautiful butterflies are just, like, kamikazeing into my car. And I remember everywhere I'd go, I'd have, like, tears in my eyes because I think I've just killed 50,000 butterflies. This is a traumatic event for you. I know, so I'm like,

there we should be, the bugs got to be on the hook a little bit here. Like, maybe we could do some retraining with them or something. Like, guys, fly a little higher. Maybe they learn. Maybe they adapted. They were just tired of getting murdered by you.

They're going underground. They're sleeper agents. They're going under. Yeah, they're sleeper agent. I'm skeptical on the ability to train bugs. We should try. We need a paleteer or something. I don't know.

I don't know that I want my tax dollars. Because they have those moderate Muslims who come out and de-radicalize Muslims. Like, hey, don't blow yourself up. Like, see how it's bad taste, bad optics and stuff? Can we do those bugs? It's like, hey, you know, you're a bee. You're going to die if you sting that guy. He's probably not going to mess with you.

Like, maybe think it through. Just stick with the honey or something. I don't know. but we should send some moderate bugs out to fix the radicalism problem. I mean, this is a great idea. It goes in line with the creation mandate. We should, you know, have dominion over everything,

including the bugs. Perfect. Like the worms. Like, guys, you don't need to go out in the sidewalk when it's scorching hot out. Like, that's not going to be good for you. They do that. But that's true.

You remember when you're a kid, you go out after it rained and all the worms are dead on? That doesn't happen anymore. Oh, really? That still does. Oh, we still see the worms. Yeah.

Oh. There's some splatted worms. I thought you could at least like, no, no, no, no. No, it's just a really wrong. The driveway's got some splatted worms on it. Oh, the Roli Pollies are gone, though. There used to be Roli Pollies everywhere.

It's a Rulli Bollies. Well, we got June bugs everywhere. Fireflies are low. We got to strap some LEDs. It's pretty wild when I was little, like growing up the 90s. You'd go outside in any summer night, and there's thousands of lightning bugs everywhere. I used to catch him in a mason jar and poke a hole in it, and that'd be my nightlight. I'd wake up and I just committed a genocide.

They're all dead. It's why my fall. You got to put food in there for him. That's a hand-up moment. I killed all the fireflies. Did you watch a Bugs Live, too, when you were a little? I did. You know what the worst thing about that is?

Can I just say this to you, Tate? You understand what the lightning bugs light up, right? No, I have no idea. Does anybody know why lightning bugs light up? I thought it's for show. What message are they saying? I'm looking for sex. So when you capture like a hundred of them in a jar,

you got a jar full of dudes being like, I want sex! But there's no women anywhere. The horniest jar in town. San Francisco microclimate. It's like bourbon street in a jar. It's great. It's getting wacky and wild. It's like prison.

You just created a prison. And then they're all dead in the morning. Yeah. It's like prison. Just too much horny. There's a funny meme I saw someone said something about like what the left is actually advocating for is jail. So we should put him in jail because when you think about it, it's guaranteed housing.

You've got, you know, you've got free food, free health care. And that was actually one of it, same-sex relationships. So it's like exactly. what they want. Universal basic income. Yeah. They did homosexuality. Yeah.

Just because they're going to like jail doesn't mean that we shouldn't put them in jail. We should just jail them. If anything, you feel a little better about yourself. Yeah, you know, hey, look. Yeah. We should make, we should make an island and call it Progressive Island. And we tell these progressives like, look, we set it up. It's free housing.

Free food, free health care. If you're into same-sex relationships, like, that's always allowed. and here's a ticket, but once you go in, you can't leave. Like, you walk in the front door, but it's a turnstile, just only goes one way. Yeah, so we can't come out. Cuba and just make some minor tweaks, and then we're good. That's effectively what it is. It's like, you just walk through this, you know, turnstile, and then once you go,

it doesn't go back the other direction, you're just in there forever. Yeah. And then when they're like, what do I don't, don't worry, food's paid for? Can I leave? No. Yeah, you're good. That's the trade. You're not allowed to leave.

Everything you've ever wanted and more. I think Cuba, like, just throw the same-sex marriage in there. They're good. They'll go run hog wild down there. It'd be kind of fun. Like, hey, kids, we're going to go to Liberal Land for vacation. It's going to get Wilder. You can never leave.

Don't interact with Wildland. It's like Jurassic Park. Let's talk about Liberal Land. We got this story from Syracuse.com. Have you guys heard the story of this cop? His name is Christopher Baldner? No. I'll just give you the story.

He'd go to jail. He's going to jail. Former New York State troopers sent him to prison for crash that killed 11-year-old girl. Give you the gist of the story. He pulled. a guy over, approaches the vehicle, and the guy refuses to give him my driver's license. He instructs the guy to get out of the car. The guy refuses. He pepper sprays the guy. The guy flees in the car. Officer gets in his car and pursues, performs a pit maneuver, causing the car to crash,

ejecting the 11-year-old girl from the car, not wearing a seatbelt. She dies. New York said the cop is guilty. They charged it with murder. And the jury was like, no, no, no, he didn't murder her. And they said, how about manslaughter? I said, yeah, manslaughter. So let me just stress this. The child in the vehicle was not wearing a seatbelt. I believe it's the story. I could be wrong.

And the criminal was fleeing from police. And they said it's the cop's fault for pursuing a criminal fleeing, resulting in a death. What do they expect to do? That's liberal land. That's insane. They expect the cop to say you are free to go, criminal. Have a nice day. So in other words, let's build a giant fence around New York.

and once you walk in, you can't walk out, you're in forever. Then we can have our liberal land where they just keep them away from us. We'll air drop food periodically. I mean, that's in Kingston. I mean, that's not New York City probably fairly, I mean, I don't know, the voting of Kingston. I know that area is fairly red. So, I mean, like, you know, this is kind of the problem is when we talk about, like, sectioning the country off and having like a national divorce, it's like, well, even in these blue states,

I mean, obviously it's where the people live, but the liberals are concentrated at the cities. you're going to sacrifice all these red state folks, these conservatives on the altar of like our national divorce. Yeah, and that's why we can't give up California. Can't give up L.A., can't give up New York City. I know it's tough, but we got to work through it. New York City is a whole borough that votes red. You know, the West Coast analog, Orange County votes red. So it's like there's still a lot of people there.

I lived in New York City. I lived in Queens where I used to live. I won't say which specific neighbor. It looked like Alabama. There was Trump flags everywhere, Confederate flags. I was like, oh, guys, well, unlikely allies, the Italians. But yeah, it was actually one guy had a kingdom of Italy flag and then a Confederate flag. I was like, wow.

Interesting. This is like a, you know, 12-year-old's wall, but in real life, it's really amazing stuff. But, yeah, I mean, I just, I reject the notion of like we should just divide the state up because then also it's not like the conservative moving to successfully excise the problems that led to what we're in in the first place. Most conservatives still have a lot of preconceived notions that are very liberal ideas. And so if you divided the country red and blue on a long enough timeline, there's a good chance that red America would just turn into what we're dealing with maybe 2010, like in the not so distant future. Look, the joke is that in 20 years, the Republican Party will be a bunch of gay communists

and the Democratic Party will be AI. Like the trend of the political parties in the direction that they go, the Republican Party today is pro-game marriage. It's shifted, mind you, but go back to like 2010 and it was like absolutely not. I mean, this is. Go to 2016. Six years later, Donald Trump unveils a gay pride flag on the stage of the RNC. To fanfare and applause.

This is why, you know, Carl, Sargonne McHodd, makes the argument that liberalism is, is. A mental disease? Yeah. Well, I mean, that it's, that it's... I don't think he says that. No, but he says that it's, he says that liberalism is the problem. It's not, like, you can't, like, the idea that that man is detached from, uh, man in society is actually detached from, from his nature. And he, and, like Rousseau said, you need to make man into savage man.

that lives in cities and stuff, like that kind of stuff is baked into liberalism and all of the things that follow from liberalism or from the foundational principles of liberalism, all of the stuff that we're seeing today is all the stuff that obviously follows. And I think that while I don't agree 100% with his with his estimation, I think that there's a lot of things he's got right about that. No, I agree with a lot of stuff in the same way I write about. It's, it's, it's, you can trace it back to the Enlightenment. A lot of the ideas of our founding class, liberalism with good basic ideas. When you say enlightenment, which one, because there's different enlightenment, like the French Enlightenment was different than the Scottish Enlightenment. The different

than the Scottish Enlightenment. Yeah, I'm trying it back to the age of liberalism and the rise of liberalism. And all these institutions that we have today that we've inherited that are now kind of being sacrificed, gutted, and corrupted. And so when we detach ourselves from nature and when we don't understand human nature and our purpose in life, and we just have rationalized, and it came up through the Enlightenment, through romanticism, all of these movements. And you saw it worst, of course, in the French Revolution, which was early stage 2020. These ideas that what they do is they separate body and soul for people. And so no longer, like, if you return to a state of nature, it's going to be very apparent

that men are the more powerful and dominant creature. But we've anesthetized ourselves through modern civilization to where we don't have to to live in reality. It's detached from reality completely. I don't think you turn that off. We've got insane weapons. We've killed off all the predators and we eat whatever we want, whenever we want. So it's fascinating. We live better than, you know, I was saying this other day, the majority of people, poor people in the United States live better than 99.99% of all humans who have ever lived. Well, yeah, you could argue Samuel Colt institutionalized the sort of modern world that we live in in many ways.

The cartridge? Well, because I mean, if again, if the state has a monopoly on power, not to go like libertarian, but like if the state holds a monopoly on power, that does reduce the ability for men to organize and But it's not just that, it's that you know, it used to be

if you go back a couple hundred years, women weren't involved in issues of conflict because there was a real threat to civilization if women got hurt or were unable to have kids or raise kids or raise families. Babies. need milk. They can't eat food. So the men were like, stay here. We'll take care of the crazy stuff. Then we built great walls around our cities, massacred all of the predators, eliminated most of the

war in conflict. I suppose the argument is the women are desperately trying to bring it back by voting for these policies that release criminals under their streets. But when you live in a society where you've eliminated all of the threats, then there's no more reason for women to be shielded. There's something to shield them from. The problem then emerges when these women start voting, develop voting patterns. I'm not saying literally every woman, ladies, calm down. We know how you like your micro-level politics. It results in a tendency among female voters to vote for policies that release criminals. The criminals then victimize prey upon women. Yeah, well, you can actually get a great case study of this in motorsport in which, like F1,

NASCAR is a great example, actually, where when you were driving in a season, a NASCAR season or whatever, there was a good chance that driver is going to die every year. Like the threat of death was very real, very palpable. All the drivers knew, you know, one of the guys, one of my buddies is probably going to die in the next few years. It was a very real phenomenon, very real reality. But as the cars got safer, this new generation of drivers, there's zero fear of death whatsoever. They know for sure, no matter how reckless I drive, I'm not going to die. I'm completely safe. And what's ended up happening to the sport is the drivers, I've never been more reckless. It's actually, like, ruined the sport in a lot of ways because these drivers know that I don't need to

respect, you know, space or like, you know, proper kind of like traditional racing maneuvers. Because again, if I crash and I take out half the field, we're all going to be fine. But when there was that really real reality of death, it was actually, it had a civilizing effect. It had a civilizing effect on the drivers. And so far as they knew that one wrong turn could kill me and or kill this guy next to me. Once that was gone, there's no civilization anymore. And on the track, I mean, I know it's like a very southern sample.

but expand that illustration to how few people talk about eternal matters like hell. Like you rarely hear the topic of hell and judgment brought up in church. And many people want to avoid this. They find it offensive to people. But this is like basic Christianity that there's eternal judgment. Whatever you think happens in that judgment, at least let's agree there's eternal judgment. When you remove that kind of real, of course, I'm a Christian, I believe that's actually true. it's going to result in widespread degeneracy everywhere because people have no sense of consequence,

not only from the civil magistrate, not only from the government, are they not going to punish them, but there's going to be no pulpit that's going to be teaching from God's word. Like, hey, sin has consequences, not just in this life, but in the life to come, which are much more severe than this life. Well, I mean, that's the specific mechanism as to why the Christian West was so successful, is because people knew even when I was out of sight, out of mind from the government, I still ought to behave myself because there's still like a cosmic ledger that is accounting for all of this.

And again, once that began to dissolve, people only feared accountability from the state. This is why, like, at the outset of the United States and even like broadly every Western country, the government was minimally involved in a lot of your affairs, your day-to-day affairs in your life because they trusted their population could behave in a certain way. And yes, there's a whole conversation on high-trust, low-trust society, but that, We can't downplay that effect that you're talking about. If God has an eye on me, if God is watching what I do, even in my own room, I'm still going to be a hell of account for that. And that has a massive civilizing effect on people.

Yeah. I mean, the idea of freedom, there is a corresponding idea of responsibility that comes along with it. And we have totally rejected the idea of responsibility, whether it be the concept of, you know, women looking to the state to be their husband and their father and stuff. like that, or whether it be, you know, men that have decided that they want to, you know, check out of society and stuff. The, the, we're so focused on, on my, my freedom, my ability to do whatever I want with no regard for the responsibility that comes along with it. Well, and what I go back to is that the, the freedom is great so long as it's in service of your duties and responsibilities. And people have, everything in our modern world teaches people that

they have no bonds. Yeah, no deal. They have no loyalty, no honor, no duty to anyone. And what happens in Christianity sometimes is that you'll have evangelical leaders who never want to talk about obedience, what you owe to the Lord, sanctification. And that's what young men right now are being drawn into faith traditions and the churches that are not heavy-handed by any means, but just honestly telling them, this is what God expects from you.

They've so devalued duty. I like to put it this way, you'll get a lot of churches that will say you can belong here or you can belong before you believe. And there's another word called behave. And no church in the right mind nowadays would say you have to behave before you can belong. Yeah. Because that would seem counter-gospital. That would seem counter to the love of Jesus.

That's non-inclusive. And it's like, no, there's actually like responsibilities that come with this life. And it doesn't just play out eternal. It plays out practically in the material. around as well, and we have no sense that we have bonds that we didn't choose. We have a mother and a father, and I didn't choose them, right? And that's good, actually. God designed the world that way, and I should submit to that reality, rather than bucking against it and, you know, buying this Disney narrative of like the parents are always dumb and the kids are always right, we're going to buy

God's story, what he's written, that I'm going to honor my father and mother, and I'm going to live to my legacy. I'm going to honor my duties and responsibilities to my family, my church, my nation, and carry on a legacy. People just don't have a vision for that anymore. Yeah, that's like functionally the mechanism to see that's broken down is that, again, previously when you were born, you did have this sort of slate of identities that had expectations that had responsibilities that correspondence and that you're pointing out, like as a father, it's a mother, husband, son, et cetera, et cetera, American, you know, Protestant, Christian, like, you can get really granular, but you were assigned a slate of identities at birth.

that demanded something of you, where in the modern world, even if you're born and you become a conservative, it's too late. That's already been severed because of how liberalism functions. And so you're seeing, I think what you're talking about is a lot of young men struggling is because now they realize they're coming into life as a husk. Like, I don't have any responsibilities, nothing binding to me. And so they have this menu of identities that they can choose from. And when you hear that, you instantly think of LGBT people or whatever where it's like, but you see this on the right where men will start adopting very kind of strange sort of, identities and traits. And it's because

to their defense, they didn't have any pre-assigned. So they are forced as a adult to sort of rebuild themselves in a sense. And so some people will nail it, but a lot of guys just end up miserable because they're in a weird fit or something. We're going to jump back

to the story we were covering in the first one, but a new element of it. See, I wanted to be a little bit more serious in terms of political discussion, but now I don't. This is an excerpt from the Graham Platner's story on the New York Times. where he said that if anybody ever broke into his house, or he said, quote, if anybody ever broke in here, I would rape them in a sexual way, not in a gay way.

He was like, I would rape them to show them that I'm dominant. Asked about those remarks, a Platner campaign official did not dispute them. A friend who knew Mr. Platner and Ms. Fifthfield during that period that the comments sounded out of character. Apparently, it's not in dispute. Platner threatened to rape men who would break into his house. I guess he said if anybody,

so I guess that would include women. I just don't think a lot of women would be breaking into his house, but, you know. Well, I have to say, I mean, this is a guy with a toten cough tattoo. This might be his most right-wing thing he's done or said. Because, again, this idea, this is like Greco. This is like very Hellenic tendencies.

Like literally dominate a man who's your enemy. I can't get over this sentence a sexual way, not in a gay way. Yeah, there's something to. I mean, look, I'm not endorsing this. I'm against this for the record, but I am saying that is, like, very rooted in deep, like, Greek tradition. But it's, like, true, because, like, you can see,

if you get a group of guys together and you're watching, like, you know, like football or something, and the ref just keeps, keeps, like, just making horrible calls. One of your friends is going to say, I want to rape that guy. And it's like, that's, like, that's, like, a real thing that happens. And, again, I think it's wrong. I don't know what circles your, uh, very masculine ones. Is that an endorsement?

Yeah, no, Greek ones, huh? Yeah, we shouldn't be threatening to rape. It's rape is wrong. I know that's like a freezing cold take these days with how far the zeitgeist has moved along you come out against like raping and not a gay way that's like a like Democrats are for it they want to vote for this guy

yeah maybe I'll go to a little liberal and denounce this but um but no in all actuality I think this just shows that he's like completely mentally unstable he's not actually like illustrating the traditional right wing yeah there's a you're absolutely right and there's a resurgence in a lot of circles on I know this kind of right wing stuff and that's also what I'm trying to warn against is like no all those traits

because they'll call Christians Christ Cucks and all this kind of stuff. And I'm like, no, no, no, no, no. You don't get to do that. We have the Christian West and we conquered you and we adopted your best ideas and got right of this nonsense. We're not going back this way. We'll take the Christmas tree, but we're leaving the rape behind. Yeah, we're going to leave that right behind.

Thank you. No, but yeah, so like this clearly. Not platinum, apparently. I think, no, I was making a joke, kind of a wink in a knot, but like in all actuality, like this demonstrates mental instability. I don't think this is attached to any, like Nietzsche and ideas, really. I think he's just a mentally. unstable, like psychopath.

And I think this very clearly illustrates this. I got to say, like, I think he was macking on this chick. You know, like, he's saying, like, she's sitting there talking to him and he's like, yeah, I wouldn't let someone break in here. And she's like, what would you do if something broken? I'd rape him. She's like, really?

What would you do? Not in a gayway, though. Yeah, but, you know, we all know, like, tough guys. You know, these guys who do a tough guy routine, we're like, if I was there, I would do this and that. I'd beat the crap out of him. And you're like, okay, dude. Yeah, or whatever.

But if you're with one of your buddies and he's like, I swear if that guy walks, I'm going to rape him, you'd be like, dude, this guy's crazy. No, we'd be like, this guy's gay. I'd be like, yeah, but dude, some of the, some of the scariest people I know are like really gay. Like, the question is for Graham, how would he get it up? He's crazy. He's a psychopath. He's hot for it, dude.

He's getting all hot and bothered. The guy breaks in. He's like, this is my fetish. He's hot for it. Waiting for you all night. He sits in his living room He's got like signs outside Like this this home has no guns

Like the door is like swinging open He's sitting there and be like My dog is lovely Are you a home shooter Are you just excited to see me? You ever see that bit James O'Keefe did Where he went door to door and he was like You know we're anti-gun activists

You're like we want to get gun control And the houses they're like yeah that's fantastic We agree. He's like would you sign this petition? Sure and he goes we actually have this sign Would you want to put up It says gun free home Yeah

And the guy's like well no and he's like well why not he's like isn't that kind of inviting you know like criminals and then james like kind of sounds like you're saying you need a gun to stop crime and he's like well they don't want to advertise they don't have guns but they don't want anybody having guns amazing so you imagine grand platinor's like the adt sign but it's like i will rape you if you break in like that would be you wouldn't break into that house i'm sorry like if you put no no actually if it was san francisco something you put guns on there or whatever like people would probably still break in, but if it said you will get

like danger rapist in here, you'd be like, I'm not I couldn't help but notice that Tim started talking about guns and you started you brought it right back to rape. I mean, that's the scariest thing I've heard in a long time. And I, like, you know, we get death threats all the time here at Tim Gasseth. We don't really get raped. That would be terrifying. I would have my head on a swivel. If Graham Platner

lived in San Francisco and publicly stated, you'd break into my house, I will rape you. Dictatorial. He'd have like 700 burglary attempts in like 12 hours. A bunch of Quinks just like, where's that bear? It'd be like, oh no, you caught me. Like, walks in his living room and there's just like a bunch of naked guys.

And he's like, all right, who's first? I'm campaigning. I warned you. But more about guns with Platner, he, it's worth noting that he did admit to one of the girls that he was talking to that he had an AR-15 in D.C. That's something that a lot of people aren't talking about. That's an actual crime. and everyone's focusing on the bad behavior, but allegedly he had an AR-15 at the D.C. apartment.

She said, Fiffield said, he kept an AR-15 lying around his apartment on Capitol Hill and would sharpen an axe, a relic from his time working on the Appalachian Trail before he enlisted in the Marines. He had what she described as a warrior ethos and would fantasize about killing people he deemed a threat, she said.

She said he told her that rape was about power. I got to be honest, I think he just secured. the suburban woman vote. Like, every suburban woman rating this is just getting all hot and bothered being like he's got a gun illegally and he sharpens his axe threatening to murder people and he wants to rape. Like this sounds like 50 shades of gray, but, you know, the Democrat Party edition.

Like an axe wielding rape is that sounds like one of my mutuals on Twitter. I could think of like two dozen guys that probably fit that description. Who would rape guys at the same time. How did this guy even get in like up? He said I would rape them to show that I'm dominant. Platner, who had overlapping relationship with other women, while he and Miss Fiffield date, it also referred to women as hatchet wounds.

This guy's terrible. I'm going to say, I'm just scary. He's going to get Luigi Mangione. They're going to be cheering and dancing for them. Women are going to be like, this is the hottest thing ever. They love it. That's the unfortunate reality. I mean, we've made this point on the show multiple times,

but men will unwind with, like, I don't know, like a documentary about like a fascinating historical figure, you know, maybe like, you know, a Ken Burns documentary or something. Women will unwind with, like, the actual thing rapist, the documentary. And they're like, this is great stuff. You're just sit down and watch. They just watch crime shows all the time. Yeah, literally.

It's scary. Yeah, so, no, Grant, I mean, this thing does illustrate this guy is like, you know, when we use the word all the time, but he, like, genuinely is mentally unstable. I don't really have much more to add. I denounce, obviously. I think, can we go around the, do we all denounce this? Totally denounce. Yeah.

I'm just shocked. But wait, wait, like, like denounce Platner's actions? Just denouncing, like, rape broadly, I think would be helpful. Obviously. Because that's a scary threat, dude. I'm like worried now. I want to see an investigation. I heard you're talking about me too.

Because the Democrats have, like, we had this masculinity problem for a while. What if they all just turn into actswielding rapist? Like, it's over for us. Dude, that's terrifying. It goes back to the Shane Gillis bit where the Vikings come over. And they're, like, you know, they're intimidating. And then they raise the rainbow flag. Yeah, literally.

And you're like, oh, that's worse. I know. I'm like, I'm not crazy. No, you're not. It's terrifying. Yeah, like, right now we can, this is easy. We can handle this. They're like, you know, maybe it's actually really masculine to cry.

Like, I can handle that. That's easy to deal with. You guys want to, I'm just going to throw it out there. You guys want to know what the definition of rigged is. It's decision desk calling the top two primary for Javier Bessera, who's in second place while arguing Steve Hilton in, first place is vying for second place. No joke.

Decision was made 8.58 p.m. Javier Bacera as one of two winners, and they're arguing currently that Hilton, despite being the frontrunner, might lose. To Steyer, whose 400,000 votes behind him. Yeah. Yeah. I mean. Interesting, huh?

It's, it's frustrating. It's very frustrating. And look, I mean, not to beat a dead horse, but we should have seen this coming when, you know, at first Hilton and Bianco were topping the jungle primary before Swallow jumped out. And someone asked Gavin Newsom, you know, well, you know, before, and then someone asked Gavin Newsom, what are we going to do, you know, if it ends up with two Republicans, because the whole point of the jungle primary was the lock Republicans out of power forever. And it's ended up being that all the Democrats jump in the race and it ruins it.

But they asked Gavin Newsom, what are you going to do if it ends up in a runoff between Hilton and and Bianco? and he said, well, I have some, you know, I have some tools in my toolbox to ensure we don't end up with two Republicans. So, like, he was basically explaining out in the open, like, yeah, I'll rig it. Don't worry. Yeah, which, I mean, we should, when you said, we should have seen it coming, like, you can just, just by the fact that there is an election coming, you know that the Democrats are going to be rigging it. Like, it's, it's kind of, it's a standard operating procedure and it is exhausting to continue to see this stuff and not be able to do anything about it. Yeah, I mean, look, Trump. Trump does have some tools at his disposal, so what he could do is again, so he can start, well, what he has at his disposal is he can start campaigning for litigation.

So if there's a state-level litigation, right, someone sues the state of California or whatever, that gives the DOJ. If it's credible grounds, which it likely is, that gives the DOJ precedent to go in and investigate. So they can start investigating, they can issue subpoenas, et cetera, et cetera. what can then end up happening is again if a DOJ investigation does turn things up they can't force a recount but the Californians could potentially force a recoup that would be the situation that could play out but that doesn't seem terribly likely but to be fair i mean California has issued a recall election fairly recently it went terribly but at least that shows that I'm not going to you know I don't think the California GOP is going to necessarily like roll over on this if there really is a rig and I think the DOJ is a is sniffing around this. Like, I'm not black-pilled on this at all. I think this is on the DOJ's radar. I can just say, like, I have on direct good authority that the DOJ, this is on their radar, so I'm not terribly worried here. But California's? Yeah. But even with, like, Colorado, for example, Tina Peters, she goes to jail because she was trying to catch election fraud, and Trump pardoned her,

and they still kept her in jail. Finally, Polis now has released Tina for his planning to, but his whole party's pissed about it, right? Because it was so apparent he was releasing somebody else, another corrupt politician, let her off, I believe it was a woman. And then Tina is just suffering in jail, this patriot who was trying to secure elections and make sure it was all good.

So anywhere they get power, they're a threat, the true threat to democracy. You know, maybe they always have been. Colorado was the most egregious case in the country because it was a swing state with the McCain election. Even the Romney election was considered a swing state, and now it's one of the safest blue states in the country. It's insane. It's insane. And you could maybe chalk that up to like interstate movement or even immigration, but clearly that was a bureaucratic entrenchment that happened

there. It's a lot of bureaucratic entrenchment. It's a lot of they know how to get power. And they pursue power. They were relentless who want power. And so what happened with Colorado, I believe it was in 92, they passed an amendment to ban gay marriage back then. And the homosexuals just got so angry about that and so offended about that that they made it their mission you can go read about it um there's multiple books that have been published on the uh the plan to take over colorado and to turn it blue so it's it's an immigration thing and it wasn't just happenstance and it's not just institutional it's a set out plan how are we going to turn it blue we're going to take these tech guys who just happen to be gay and we're going to just flood the the market with money to moralize

the base because there's a lot of good people just like in california there's a lot of good people in Colorado. And a lot of these states who just don't either have representation or the GOP there is pretty feckless. And they don't want to either go along with Trump, don't want to upset people, and they have a bunch of compromisers in the ranks. And so they won't accrue power, won't pass legislation, and won't, they have no vision for punishing their enemies. Like, they view that as like ungodly. And it's like, that's totally not true. I mean, the fact that the California GOP, and I don't know, this isn't my domain, you know, the statewide. affairs of the GOP in California, but the fact that they weren't on the same page and ran to

two Republicans is a bit of a problem. Because again, Bianco right now, it seems like he's taking about 10 to 15 percent of the general ballot vote right now. Again, he has the right to run, you know, to be fair, he's a native California and Steve Hilton moved here or whatever, but clearly like it was obvious that Steve Hilton was going to be the guy. He had the backing of Trump, the national GOPs of Fox News. Clearly he's going to be the candidate. And I, and it's like, I love Chad Bianco. I think he's great. But at a certain point, it should have and like let's consolidate around one guy. This pipe dream of it being two Republicans

and winning the jungle primaries. Because what are the Democrats know how to do this because they get rid of swallow, right? Yeah. They know exactly how to handle it. Well, and they sandbag, Katie Porter. Yeah. Yeah.

So we're going to go to your comments, your rumble rants and super chats. So smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. And then the uncensored portion of the show is coming up at 10 p.m. You don't want to miss it because it's going to get spicy. I've got this a big story. I'm not going to talk too much about it because it's racy and violent,

but it will be very interesting. It's going to be at rumble.com slash Timcast. IRL. But in the meantime, we'll grab your chats. Silas 5G says, can we say something about Henry Novak and the situation in Britain? Yeah, I mean, it's insane. Apparently now they're saying that the seat guy who murdered Henry Novak was filming and taunting him as he was laying there dying. Oh, God. For several minutes. And the cops show up and they're like, oh, he's racist. Better lock him up. Yeah, I think it's. I don't think you are, mate. It's one of those things, right. I know I talked about earlier. the demoralization porn, but I think this is a good example, the show that things are

actually maybe even a bit worse than people realize. And again, a lot of Americans are resting on their laurels and they're saying, well, that's Britain. You know, they're crazy over there. Like they have all these corrupt police, et cetera. And it's like true, but the underlying tension that led to that murder is very much present in the United States. We do have a bit more of like buffer zone because our police are a lot more base. There's something weird about the British police. We don't have hate crime laws or like hate speech laws, um, per se. say, but that same mechanism that led to Henry Novak's death is absolutely present in the United States. And we can list countless examples of why that's true. But that video specifically,

I can only watch it once. In this business, like you watch, unfortunately, I hate to say, you watch like gruesome videos all the time. Like you develop a pretty good stomach for that kind of stuff. And if you have a Twitter account, you see it all the time. That video, I can't rewatch it. I mean, it is legitimately simultaneously so enraging that you almost want to like vomit. and unbelievably depressing, unbelievably tragic. And I was talking to Steve a Dengitaine. I had him on the show on Tuesday. He's a good friend of mine, but he's a fantastic guy, super smart, loves his country,

works for GB News. And he did say, and he's not a guy that is dramatic. He's a no-drama guy. He doesn't say platitudes. Every word he says is careful, calculated. He means what he says. He said he believes that this will be a turning point in Britain, that legitimately the average of British person is not going to see things the same way after this.

That would be a news. I don't know that I believe that. Well, I think you do see it because, I mean, the Uniparty is going to be a crush there. I mean, the reforms top in the polls and restore Britain's, you know, picking up quite a bit of steam. So I think that this is going to effectively guarantee that reform won the next election, barring some serious scandal. All right. We got Christian. UNC.

He says, Tim, what do you think about PlayStation's state of play? Did you see Cuck of War, ugly Gene Gray, Deborah Wilson as Colisto? and her voice in Ace Combat 8. Do you think Xbox showcase will be better or woke, too? So, I don't think you guys have seen any of this stuff, have you? I saw the... They're doing God of War Lafay. It's starring the main character will be Fay, played by Deborah Ann Wall,

and they put the ugly filter on her. They put the ugly filter on her, and this is what they do. And the funny... And also, for Ugly Jean Grey, for the Wolverine game that came out, Gene Gray is Fugly. They gave her a weird asymmetrical face with, like, a twisted nose and she's ugly. And it's crazy that feminists instead of being like, hey, why do you keep making the female characters ugly? They go, men are stupid for thinking women are ugly or getting

mad about it. No, no, no, no, feminists, feminist. Listen, Deborah Ann Wall is attractive. She is a famous actress in one of the biggest Disney shows right now with Daredevil. I don't know, she might have a cameo in the Spider-Man movie. We'll see because Daredevil is going to be in it. they made her the lead for this game and they put her through the ugly filter. And what these guys have done is they did renderings showing you don't need to make her a gigantic boobed,

weird bimbo-looking woman. You can just smooth at the face a little bit and make Deborah Ann Wall look like she does on TV shows. Just give her a little makeup. Instead, they make her ugly. And I got to tell you guys, this is called the ugly filter.

I don't know if y'all have ever seen the actress who played, who was the model for Aloi in Horizon Zero Dawn. Let me do this. I'm going to show you guys what's called the Ugly Filter. I'm going to prove it for you. You guys are going to be like, this doesn't make any sense, okay? So let me load up some of these images.

First, I want to show you the actress, who was the model for the character. It's this Dutch actress named, what's her name? Let me find a nice picture of her. Hannah Hoekstra. Okay? Let me, this is kind of a grainy image, but we'll pull it up anyway. Here you go. Here's Hannah.

She's a Dutch actress. They used her as the model. Let me pull this one up. She's the model for the character Aloy in Horizon series. Hey, look at that. She's an attractive woman, right? Here's what they made using her likeness. You ready for this one?

We call that the ugly filter. That is not the same person. That's insane. Why did they do that? Why did they bring on this attractive young model and say, we're going to scan your face to make a character, and then we're going to make her ugly? I'd be pissed.

Like, but why? That's what they want to do everywhere. I mean, they were flaunting obese women on billboards telling us this is beautiful, like three years ago. Of course, now everybody's got GLP ones, and so now body positivity is out. But this is like what the left does. They hate humanity. They want to destroy humanity.

do they want to destroy our civilization? They want no future for children. And so anything that's beautiful, anything that's good, anything that's true, they're going to corrupt and pervert and invert and flaunted and show their power. And look, we can take anything from you and make it ugly. But beauty implicitly creates hierarchy. Yeah. And it's hierarchy that no one has control over.

You're born beautiful or you're not born beautiful. The left absolutely hates that kind of stuff. And it discriminates. It does. saying something's beautiful or something ugly, you're saying, look, I have a discerning sense of taste, and I prefer one and not the other. And that's illegal. In a liberal, egalitarian framework, you can't do that kind of thing. And beauty has been the chief marketplace for the left for a long time. Conservatives have not paid attention to this. But I think that's the chief vector for a lot of

leftist ideology is taking over beauty and then trying to promote a vision, which now everyone can see, this is ridiculous. You know my, my, my counter argument, though, is it's a secret sci-op to get, uh, to promote natalism. And my argument is, so there's this thing called power creep in, in, in card games and it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, I'd give is magic the gathering. So in the early, the very earliest magic the gathering cards, I got a bunch behind me if you can see them. They had cards that were so psychotically powerful. They were like, okay, we did not understand the nature of card games. We got to, we got to get rid of these cards. They banned them all out, right?

Probably one of the most powerful cards in the game is called Black Lotus. It's like worth $5 million if you get one in like grade 10. So anyway, they reduce dramatically the power of the game, slowing it down. And then every time they release a new set to keep the game fresh, they have to introduce new game mechanics and new cards that invariably become more powerful. They're faster, they're stronger. Suffice to say, if you were playing with fourth edition from 1994 or 95, you would get absolutely crushed by a set that came out in 1998

because the cards are just getting stronger and stronger. So there was a set that was released. It's called The Block. It was three different magic sets, Erz's Saga, Legacy, and Destiny. And it was bonkers. The cards were fast, powerful, games were over super fast. Calarine Academy. Exactly.

They banned so many of these cards, Tulane Academy being one of them. And so the next set to come out, I believe after this was Mercadian Masks. And Wizards at the time said, we are going to make this set the worst possible set imaginable. The cards were just miserably weak, super slow, boring, and it was really incongruous trying to play in modern tournaments

or in standard tournaments, I should call them. Like, I meant modern, like, at the time. Because you have like two sets that are just ridiculously strong in this really trash that nobody's going to use. But once they rotate out the older sets that were really powerful, you're only left with three really true. trashy sets and everyone's brains readjusts to the speed of the game. My point is, we've been inundated with perfect celebrity big-tittyed women and porn. So young men have this view of women that is

not attainable and not real. And so I say this somewhat facetiously, the gaming industry goes, we have to, we have to nerve women because of the power creep. So they're like, we need to stop showcasing all of these like perfect big titty beautiful model women because it's ruining young men's brains and they're not satisfied with regular women. So what they do is they crank up the ugly filter, start showing nothing but fat ugly women and then guys reduce their standards quite a bit. And I'm mostly joking. I think the real reason they're doing this because feminists are jealous and they're ugly. And so they're like women should look like us. But they don't put big fat guys in games, you know? I mean, what guess technically they do? Sometimes, if they're in characters

are always just ridiculously ripped, dehydrated looking guys. So anyway, to your question, yeah, I saw it. And it's ridiculous that they put the ugly filter on women every time. And I'm just saying one more time, ladies, ladies, feminists should be mad that they're doing this to you. Okay, Debra and Wall is a beautiful woman. They should not have put the ugly filter on her. But you know what? If you're going to keep defending the ugly filter, then that's on you. Anyway, all right, Evan for U.S. says, if I'm not mistaken, the Bible tells us that Christ will come when every nation bows to him and say that he is Lord, Christianity will never fade from this earth, Deus Wolt. Amen.

Is that true that Christ will not come until every nation bows to him? That verse is, that's one interpretation of that verse. The application of the verse is basically, like, we need to be evangelizing to discipleing the nations. We believe that as Christians, we should be disciples in the nations, and we should be, honestly, you know, going into nations, promoting Christianity, promoting the one true religion, and yeah, bringing them into submission. But as it currently stands, Christ is seated on his throne, ruling the nations now, and he will return with a rod of iron to judge those nations who are unfaithful. And yeah, all the nations belong to Christ.

This was the faulty, the temptation of Christ, where Satan says, I'll give you the nations. Jesus knew that not only he rebutted him with scripture, but he didn't need to do that, he needed to go to the cross and rise from the grave and ascend, and now he's seated at the right end of the God where he rules and reigns eternally. So, yes, we do need to evangelize. That's part of the Great Commission. We do need to go into all the nations. The nations do belong to Christ, and it's our job to take them for Christ. Lava Bear says, remember, quote, those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything. Correct. Think of our life says, we can help deport illegal. Step one, order food delivery ride services. step two. When the driver can't speak English,

snap a pick of the plate, ice takes tips of suss illegals. I don't know that just because they can't speak in English, it means that they're illegal, though. So you may just be inundating ice with false tips, which actually makes it worse. So it might work. I'm not sure. What I can say is whenever someone shows up via DoorDash and it's clearly not the person who's accounted is, now I'm pissed off. and they've actually, I think they've been fixing this. I think they addressed it because we brought it up on the show. But we had this period where we'd order food and it would be like KDS is coming.

And then some like Mexican dude pulls up in a car and he goes like, Katie's my wife. And we'd be like, turn around, get out of here. We're not taking, who are you? And they'd be like, oh, it's my wife. It'd be like, nope, report. It'd be like some strange person was clearly. And it pisses me off because even if what happens if it says John and a guy shows up And I'm supposed to assume this is John.

Ridiculous. They should be shown. Like an Uber, you see the guy's face in his license plate. DoorDash and Seemless and all, they should be doing the same thing. An easy fix would just be at random points during your shift that just asks you to verify, like briefly. That would solve all the problems. Or every job. It's like, except the job, yes, please take a picture of your face.

The problem there is the guy would just take a pick. Like, they would just have the phone at home then and give the instructions to the person to go do it without the app. Yeah. You could. But just face ID could do that with your, with the. You know what it, it, put the pin in and all that. One thing that's pretty crazy is like the dash or delivery fraud stuff. Like people will walk into a McDonald's and walk up to the mobile delivery box and just grab the food and walk out.

Nobody stops them. I know so sad. When I lived in Manhattan, when the local Chipotle, when I first started going, they had the shelves. You could put your mobile order in, your food to be on the shelf. It was so nice because you could just be like 15 minutes. You walk by. You grab your food. You're out.

And then like literally six months into discovering this, they took. shelf away and they moved it behind the counter. And I was like, it's the socioeconomic problems. All right, let's read this. Changing consumer habits. Eric Schaever says, if a fantasy world full of hemoglobin siphoners who vamp out

at the site of a symbol, and a hunter goes around flashing in their face, then one bites him, so he feeds it a steak. Who's the bad guy? And I'll like to give a mouse a cookie reference or something. You're saying if a guy kills a vampire,

Yeah, is that the point? Marushia says, Tim, please don't give up on law and principles. Indeed, they're what separates us from the bad guys. The problem isn't having them. It's failure to enforce them. You lose if your enemies beat you and also you become them. Agreed. I am going to call the AG right now in demand.

He arrest every young couple that is cohabitating in West Virginia. I'm not sure. That's the law. Got two allies here. Okay. Hey, look, the problem is that we don't enforce our laws. I love you. It's not personal, but it's not personal.

but, like, laws the law. It doesn't happen to my kid. Principle. You know, we'll separate them from the parents, you know, and it's going to be the cage. Maybe there's a cage. There are. You betrayed me. The problem with this country, one of the problems we have, and I'm not saying it's just

unique to us, but it exists, is that we have laws in the books that no longer exist, but can be enforced. And what I mean is there are laws that are on the books that no one thinks make any sense, like you can't put a pie on your window cell on Tuesday. But the cops can come and search your house if you break that law. So we need to have sunset clauses. on all of the laws that we pass, all of them, always. I think that makes perfect sense.

Indeed. The pie on the windowsill is actually important in Colorado, and our home in Colorado, our family cabin, a bear broke in. Indeed. But that's why it's actually illegal in a lot of places. Exactly. So please keep that law. So there are, in the east and northeast, there are states where it's illegal on certain days to put pies out on your windowsill,

and it sounds weird to the average person today, Like, why? Well, it's because on Tuesday, that's typically when people were gathering at the town center for, you know, public meetings and they didn't want to attract wild animals. Oh, so they said, don't put pies on the window on Tuesdays. Today, you're like, huh? That makes no sense. Because you could be in a skyscraper, like maybe I want to put a pine in my window. I want it to cool, you know, put by the window, get some air. Straight to jail. Nope. You're done. But it's the thing, no cop's going to arrest you. But here's the other thing. If they want a reason to do so, they can say he was in violation of a public ordinance. We know it wasn't the most extreme of crime, but he had a pie on the windowsill. I can't do that.

Stephen Miller's going to use that at some point. I hope he does. He comes through all those ancient laws. Rego Garcia, he was rhubarb pie. He's done. You're gone. All right. We're going to go to the uncensored portion of the show.

We got a crazy story to talk about. It's racy and it's violent, and I'm going to get real mean with it. So we'll save the story for there. Go to rumble.com slash Timcast, IRL, for the uncensored portion of the show. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Sir, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, you can buy my book, Offensive Christianity Book.com. That's where you need to go. It's also available on Amazon. You can follow me on Twitter at J. Chase Davis. You can also visit my website, jchase Davis.com. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Real Tate Brown. And yeah, make sure you buy this book. I got a copy a few days ago. I'm through the first chapter and it is fantastic so far.

So where can people buy it again? Offensive Christianity Book.com. Yes. Get over there. You thankfully sent me a copy, but... I need to sign yours. You do need to sign one. Yeah.

Make sure you head on over there, Phil. I am Phil that remains on Twix. The band is all that remains. You can check us out on Apple Music, Amazon, Amazon, Music, Pandora, Spotify, YouTube, and Deezer. We're also playing Warp Tour in Washington, D.C. Next Sunday on the 14th. You can get your tickets at, I believe it's Warptour.com.

Don't forget the left lane is for crime. I'm Carter Banks. You can follow me at Carter Banks everywhere and at Carter Banks official everywhere else. Be sure to follow our label at Trash House Records on YouTube. Drop a promo last night and go check it out. We'll see you all at rumble.com slash Timcast.I.R.L right now. Thanks for hanging out.