Timcast IRL - Democrats SHUT DOWN Congress Blocking Censure Of Al Green, OBSTRUCT House w/Joe Redden

Episode Date: March 7, 2025

Tim, Phil, & Charles are joined by The Older Millennial to discuss Democrats obstructing congress during censure of Rep. Al Green, Democrat women roasted for cringe "choose your character" video, Charlie Kirk destroying Gavin Newsom on Gavin Newsom's podcast, and DOGE accidentally exposing a CIA black site. Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Charles @Frank_Trueblue (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: The Older Millennial @teameffujoe (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.

And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.

Bet MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. So the House today censured Rep. Al Green for wiggling his cane and screaming at Donald Trump. And they were supposed to bring him to the well so that they could actually issue the censure. But Democrats instead obstructed the proceeding and started singing and ignoring Mike Johnson, banging the gavel, calling for order in the House over and over again. And then Johnson gave up an order to recess and they left. The video is absolutely unhinged. This is the craziest Congress of my life, perhaps the craziest Congress since that one where the other guy came to the other

guy. I don't know. But it's absolutely nuts to see the Democratic Party with Donald Trump's speech earlier this week, the most obstructions of any speech, refusing to clap for a 13 year old who survived brain cancer. And now when the House says Al Green, who had to be thrown out for screaming in the middle of Trump's speech, they all back him. They all defend him. And they once again obstruct an official proceeding. Oh, boy, I wonder if the DOJ is going to charge them with anything. Really doubt it. We got a couple of other funny stories for you. How about they've begun walking out CIA agents and taking their badges in a Doge-inspired reduction of force?

And the best story of the day probably is that as a Doge-led effort, apparently, I think it's Doge-led, to sell federal buildings, accidentally exposed the location of CIA black sites operating in northern Virginia, which a lot of people responded by saying the CIA is not supposed to be operating in the U.S. What's going on and why do they have secret facilities? OK, so when they posted the real estate listings, they immediately took a bunch down, reposted it and then took all of them down because they realized, oh, wait, some of these the public aren't supposed to know about. So we'll talk about that. We'll get started first with the Democrats being as cringe as they could possibly be.

Also, don't forget, go to Casper.com. We got coffee. Ian's graphene dream now back in limited stock. Only 600 bags remain. That means Ian sold nearly 200 bags already. And it's been one day. The more he sells, the more we say that. And the more people rush to try and buy it, the more we sell. It's an endless cycle, but you're all putting Ian through college. You know he needs it. Check out Appalachian Nights as well.

It's really good. And, of course, always go to Rumble.com slash TimCastIRL if you aren't already and become a premium member to watch the Green Room behind-the-scenes show. It's ramping up, baby. We got a bunch of fun content. Today was pretty great. That Green Room episode will be up in an hour or so. And that was a lot of fun. We were talking about TikTok bans and how the system works and how it is very censorious. My friends, don't forget to also smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know if you really do like it. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so

much more is the older millennial. Thank you so much for having me. You're the only one, the only older millennial. The only one that matters. That's right. So who are you? What do you do? So I started out as a TikTok creator after, you know, COVID shut down the corporate world.

I was, my MBA is in strategy. I used to help companies with trade agreements or how to grow new businesses and things like that. COVID brought that all to an end, and I gave TikTok a run. Ended up being a lot more successful than I expected to be, and it has continued to grow as I continue to get in trouble. I think my success is directly corollary to how much I upset people, and especially how much I upset TikTok TikTok as I'm now on account 62. Wow. But it seems to work real well. People resonate with the way I communicate with them. And it's just been a ton of fun. I mean, I never expected to be a 41 year old guy who yells at people online. There you go. Made a living out of it. Yeah, it's worked out pretty well. Well, thanks for hanging

out. Should be fun. We got Chuck hanging out. Hey, guys, back again. I'm Charlie. I'm the host of The Green Room Show, where we just hang out, talk about uncensored, unfiltered, kind of the stuff you can't really say online these days. If you want to become a member and see that real talk, behind-the-scenes stuff, become a member on Rubble Premium and check out the good stuff. Promo code TIM10 on Rubble Premium. I am Phil that remains. Phil Blondie.

I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains, anti-communist and counter-revolutionary. Let's go. Here we go from the Wall Street Journal. House censors rep Al Green as Democrats face fallout from Trump protests. I love that. The fallout's only getting worse. It has now been several days. I watched this video and I was torn between anger and joy. It was a strange emotion as it felt as though fire and ice themselves were concentrated within me because the Democrats singing songs as they were trying to censure Al Green for screaming at Donald Trump. I'm just thinking to myself, these people are insane. They need to be expelled from Congress. They should not be tolerated. Republicans have the

majority start expelling these people. But then I went, breathe them. They're singing and dancing. An obstruction of Congress means we're going to win the midterms and they're going to expel themselves. So I'd like to show for you the moment at which Al Green was censured. And instead of the actual censure process, this is what happened. By its adoption of House Resolution 189, the House has resolved that Representative Al Green be censured, that Representative Al Green forthwith present himself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. And that Representative Al Green be censured with public reading of this resolution by the speaker. Can we turn that up somehow?

It's like it's hard to hear the singing. I think we all benefit from not hearing that. So, OK, I'm going gonna pause for those that are just listening now watching there is a gaggle a large gaggle of democrats all singing in the well they're supposed to be issuing the censure of al green because al green stood up during trump's state of the union not so state of the union and was wiggling his cane and screaming and he was doing that because he wanted a campaign video to get reelected, not because it actually mattered. Nobody could hear what he was saying. And now

Democrats are doing this very same thing again for the exact same reason. I mean, he's going to here you go. The House had come to order. The House had come to order. Yeah, that's not going to work, Speaker. Order. No, that's not going to work. These people are psychotic. Just like an old white dude to cut the music off. That's right. Here we go. Come to order. Clear the well, please. Clear the well. The House has to continue its business. No. And they cut the audio for a second. And then my favorite part of this is the Republicans give up. Here you go. Pursued to clause 12A of rule one,

the House will stand in recess subject to the call of the chair. That actually pissed me off the most. I don't, Democrats are insane. I get it. But what pissed me off the most was that the Republicans just walked off. I mean, Mike Johnson should have said, I'm calling on the sergeant at arms to physically remove these people from the well so that we can finish this hearing. And if not, we will have them criminally charged for obstruction of an official proceeding. I mean, I don't hate that idea either, but I mean, it's not like he's not going to be censured like

this is still going to go into the congressional record and that and censure is meaningless but no I mean it's me it doesn't have any any they're going to censure all them too now I mean the point the point is you can't like they can't impeach for every every kind of you know small infraction they're obstructing an official proceeding they should be arrested yeah but i think for al green he's the one that was getting censured you can't al green is also obstructing an official proceeding because he started the song yeah he started the song he was holding it up and everything but i think i think they benefit if if you individually walk them out i think they get the pictures, they get the video they want.

And I mean, I'm not in favor of the Republicans giving up at all. But it's one of those of like, we're going to make you sit here until we're able to conclude this proceeding like that, because it is important to do. I think. I used to think things like that, like, oh, we don't want to give them the press. At this point, Democrats have become so unhinged. I think that we're dealing with a critical mass of Democrats keep doing insane things. When you get Colbert, Stephen Colbert on his show, holding up a sign, say, tried doing something, making fun of Democrats for how they reacted to Trump's speech. There's no benefit for these people for anything they're doing. So maximize it. Walk them out, get their

photos. And then when it comes to the midterms, you can say these are criminals who committed crimes. They don't do their job. Don't vote for them. If you had a picture of Rashida Tlaib and Al Green in cuffs being walked out, come the midterms, they're going to say, is this who you're going to vote for? Representatives who refuse to do their job, obstruct Congress and instead use it as an activist pit to preach and fundraise. But do you worry that if you were to cuff them, because I mean, honestly, like they need to be let out. But if you were to cuff them and do that, do you worry that leans into the authoritarian narrative they try to create around Trump? No. When Donald Trump says they were very fine people on both sides and i'm not talking about the new nuts is the white nationalists and then the media lies anyway

they cut off or how about a story we have for you guys where donald trump called out millions in spending for transgender mice and jimmy kimmel bald face lie on his show saying it's transgenic mice. It's transgenic. Oops. He read the wrong thing. Jimmy Kimmel is blatantly and intentionally lying. CNN initially called Trump's claim false and then had to retract that because they literally did this. And Trump was the first person to point out it's been reported by a bunch of outlets. They are intentionally lying. So this whole Trump's a fascist authoritarian. I literally don't care at this point. We're not going to. There's no more narrative anymore. You had Alan Lichtman. You know who he is? He's the keys to the White House guy. He got it wrong. He said Kamala was going to win. He's been having a mental breakdown

ever since. And that is not an exaggeration. You watch the videos, the dude sweating bullets and shaking. He probably cries himself to sleep, confused at the world. He put out a video today saying Trump voters are regretting their vote. They Trump's latest the latest poll has him down 44 percent to 51, the worst of any president. And then you pull up the aggregate polling and Trump's up. Oh, yeah, he's up and everything. So Alan Lichtman, these people know they're wrong. They know they're lying. And regular people voted for Donald Trump. There is the Trump regret is not statistically significant.

Trump is up in aggregate one point one on RCP and he's down point three. So it's both are statistically tied. And the liberals on the left are going to keep lying to everyone no matter what. So how about we start setting the narrative? How about we say you're hereby obstructing an official proceeding pursuant to, you know, U.S. code, whatever, whatever they used against the J6ers. I'm ordering the sergeant at arms to place you all under arrest unless you leave right now. They don't leave. This is your second warning. You will all be placed under arrest for obstruction of a proceeding. They don't leave. Sergeant at arms, I hereby call upon you to some of the Capitol Police and have these people

arrested. Let them all be walked out. Let them all go to their district where they can wiggle their little butts and be like, look, I got arrested for a protest. And then we can set the narrative and say we elect members of Congress to pass legislation, not sing mother songs in Congress and obstruct the proceeding. So let's change the game. I see where you're coming from on that because you're right. They're going to make the narrative that regardless of what they do. So at least, I mean, look, I would have gotten a certain satisfaction of watching them walk out cuffed.

I'll be honest. I can tell you right now I would have got content out of it. Indeed. It would have been fun to make. I think that's content out of it. So it would have been fun to make. I think that's what should have happened. I think I don't have a problem with with throwing Congress people in jail. It would have given them something to take back to the base.

I don't think that there and there are. I'm not actually I'm not sure maybe there maybe there are enough people where it might matter. But I continuously say the Democrats are in disarray right now. They don't know if they want to be obstructionists or if they want to try to actually legislate or participate in legislation. And I think we're going to get more of this kind of stuff until they actually get that hammered out. So it's going to be just obstruct, just do things that are you know performative and stuff which is not particularly different from the way they were they were behaving last time donald trump was was in office but considering the fact that they don't have the majority in either the house or the senate you know now they don't have the ability to do things like write up articles

of impeachment again and have them pass you know if the republicans remain passive and keep just bowing out then i i i i fear we lose the midterms i honestly i don't think that i think that it's an we're the underdog shot of winning the midterms as it is it'll take it'll take some serious uh honestly i think it'll take serious deregulation because it'll take the economy doing really really well and yeah well the the stories you guys saw the story from earlier, the three hundred seventy five billion dollar slush fund that Podesta set up. Yeah. A nonprofit was set up and one month later was awarded seven billion dollars. So the EPA has since frozen this money and there's criminal investigations. We got another story for you coming up in a bit.

They're they're considering criminal charges for USAID staff and the recipients. Really? So I think when it comes to the midterms, gutting the resources the bureaucratic machine uses that's funneled to these establishment politicians, Republicans included, is going to dramatically change how elections work in this country. Because a lot of these members of Congress in two years are going to find they have no money for their campaigns. And the primaries are going to be very, very interesting. It's a good point. I never really thought about how USAID and those nonprofits really impact the campaigning for those individual

parties. So it's well, the it's circuitous, but some of it is true. The theory is that it's larger than we see. And that USAID gives money to a non-profit who then disperses that money to various non-profits who then donate to Democrats largely Democrats some Republicans so what you could get when we roll up on the midterms if we continue to cut the funding is you're basically getting the circus without the money you're getting the circus without the funding behind it to actually have any effect which again I mean I'm all for that but I you know i my my worry is that um you know because i i don't believe in the the trump regret people just because i i don't see it

and i see people i see liberals telling me that trump voters regret it i don't see trump voters regretting it but i think that that the liberals benefit from looking the craziest because they get to play the we can only act crazy under this type of government because they don't let us act like we're supposed to. I think things are changing. I think it's embarrassing to be a Democrat now. And that's why one of the reasons I think Trump won and why he won a popular vote and a mandate every swing state. I think it's because people are looking at Democrats singing songs and it's just like, yo, this is I don't want to be a part of this. Let's let's jump to this next story. I'll give you a real example. Ladies and gentlemen, from the postmillennial House Democrat women make cringe.

Choose your fighter video. Yeah. So I have to watch it. So you have to watch it too. All right. So choose your fighter. Not to mention it says choose your character, not fighter. For those that are just listening, I don't think any of these women, except for AOC, have ever played a video game in their life. And AOC only because she tried pandering to young people to pretend like she never played video games. But to be fair, she probably plays Candy Crush. So it is a bunch of Democrat women with a

remix of the Smash Brothers Choose Your Character song. and they're doing this thing where the video starts with them falling down, and then, you know, if you want to do like a fighting stance for a martial art, you can't, I mean, they clearly have no idea what they're doing, and it's just as cringe as it could possibly be. There's little stats. AOC, plus New York's 14th Congressional District, plus youngest woman latina youngest woman plus latina to back of the house negative trekkie uh-huh then uh i got to

refresh it because excellent nerds they don't approve it well aoc outright says it's a negative that she's a trekkie sue lee jessica woo bento box queen mommy of the century negative sleep deprived you know they've been putting out these videos like that really cringe one 22 senators put out Jessica Wu, bento box queen, mommy of the century, negative, sleep deprived. You know, they've been putting out these videos like that really cringe one 22 senators put out where they were like, ish, that ain't right. And they're like yelling about Trump. They must have hired the worst social media marketing company for the DNC ever. And they're like, I got an idea. Act like you're video game fighters and then we'll play Smash Brothers theme and then you'll bounce up and down.

And it's like the weirdest thing is the women who've never played video games before doing like booty bumping, thinking they're like doing some kind of like martial arts dance. I saw this and I just said, Democrats are trying as hard as possible to create a single party super majority for the GOP. Well, the thing is, this was a trend on TikTok about 18 months ago.

And that's the thing. I look at whoever they're hiring to do social media. Because social media, it's trend. You follow the trend. You hit on what people are talking about. You can progress. But there are trends that would have worked for this. But to see this from a social media creator aspect and go this is from 18 months ago this is not going to resonate with anyone to

be fair did they make did they put this video 18 months ago and we're only just finding it now or did they just put it out because i assume they just put it out they're not they're i can tell you right now this was just put out because there's absolutely no way in hell this could have been out there and i on tiktok wouldn't have found it agreed agreed and libs of tiktok like libs would have posted this the moment it dropped which is probably why it dropped right now but yeah i mean look they've they're again they're just they're they're struggling to find any kind of purchase at all they're they have no cohesive message because inside the Democrat Party,

they don't know what to do. They don't know what the Democrat Party is. They're fighting between the progressives and the quote-unquote normal liberal Democrats. And until they get that squared away, it's going to be this kind of stuff. You know what it feels like? It's like a beehive with no queen.

You know what I mean? Like the cult members have no direction anymore. And I think largely, you know, if we want to get outside of like the semantic debate or the insults or whatever, it is largely culty in that they just march in lockstep with each other. But there used to be leadership. Now the leadership has largely quit. And it's not so much the leadership where people who are actual Democrats were telling them what to do. It was prominent, influential individuals in the party offering up direction and strategy. have all quit who like bill ackman is that his name right look at his name wrong yeah yeah and then obviously elon musk yeah donald trump was a democrat a while ago but we go back 15 20 years for that one the point is all of the prominent leadership and resources have been slowly pulled

away from the democrats and the more that happens the more unhinged they become to the point where in the past year we see many of the top prominent ceos and billionaires that were funding the democratic party are gone so what's left literally there's it's a hive of bees with no queen, and the bees are just spinning around. And sooner or later. And I love that analogy, because it really is because if you're going to be a member of the Democratic Party, or you're going to be on the liberal left these days, there's so many things that you have to agree with and so many things you have to be a part of right you have to believe in you know in transgender stuff you have to believe in uh going against trump you have to believe in supporting ukraine you have to believe in so many different

things that unless somebody's telling you what to support this week they lose track and you can't support anything exactly and that and that's the wonderful thing is because on the conservative side we can be one thing and disagree on another and still be together on the liberal side the a great example is um uh angela bella camino on x yeah she's the bold lib i don't think she's actually a little no no i was on her show the other week and she's she's phenomenal but um she is liberal minded but she's's like Anna Kasparian liberal. So is Elon. I agree.

But that's the thing is that you can't. She only disagreed with like a little thing of like maybe, maybe, you know, you shouldn't transition children, you know, at nine years old. Everybody went after her. Apparently, Anna Kasparian said something like, I don't blame you for who you voted for. What choice did you have? And the liberals are losing their minds over it. It's a cult, you guys. Like when you have more and more, you know, I'll just pause. OK, let's step outside of the first person perspective of Tim Kast IRL and like my view of that's the Democrats are. Let's just go outside the country.

You've walked into America for the first time, You're an alien. You've landed here. You've studied the language. You're in disguise. And you don't know anything about what's going on in politics right now. You see one political party falling apart, refusing to cheer for normal things, booing normal things. And another party is growing, winning and and people from that side are slowly going over there you'd you simply would conclude this is what is socially popular that's it now for me i'm like they're cultists and they're insane and they're driving people away right i can say it like that then they make videos like this and i'm just like keep doing it but a wonderful example is gavin newsom gavin news simply created a podcast. The first guest he had on, he literally, Charlie Kirk gets him to do. He's followed every liberal talking point. He's done everything.

And he just says, OK, maybe the six foot four chick shouldn't be spiking on the five foot one. And and now he's public enemy number one. There's no room for dissent. They they treat everything as if it's as if it's like a religion. So, you know, if you if you step out of line at all, you become the heretic. And so they call you all the worst names. You're a Nazi. I haven't seen anyone call Newsom a Nazi. But if he stands firm on this position, it's only a matter of time.

It's literally only a matter of time. This is I believe Newsom's strategy is to try and moderate. Yeah. And you can't just dive in. So if Newsom came out right now and said, trans and the kids is bad we shouldn't have men and women sports uh closing the border is a good thing illegal immigration is a bad thing instantly they're like you're a fascist yep so if he starts with no no i'm a democrat well you make a good point but i still think this and then every day he can increment he's going to try and moderate

the democratic party because he wants to win the presidency i get that maybe charlie kirk was a bad person to bring for your for your start like maybe bring a more moderate person no i think that i think charlie kirk is the right person in that it shows that he's willing to talk to the right and the left has been completely unwilling to do that now i'm not saying that i want uh newsom to be successful but for his ends for the goal that he's after talking to someone like charlie kirk is the perfect person he moderates on and he's moderated on stuff that is absolutely the 80 20 stuff right so this the people you hear people talk about 80 20 positions that donald trump takes most people i don't care what you read online i don't care what you hear on x or on tiktok most people don't believe

that men can become women or women can become men and most people don't think it's fair to have young boys competing against young girls in in sports in high school at high school age and when when you have young men just going through puberty and stuff or or college age when they've just gone through people it's absolutely unfair it's the most obvious thing in the world the only the most dedicated ideologues support it and so your average person is like no this is wrong that's why gavin newsom said it's obvious you know it wasn't even that it's oh this is you know maybe it's not you know he didn't really him and haw about it it was like no this is it's unfair. It's he said deeply unfair, I believe, was the quote. Yeah.

And it's it's like that is an obvious position to 80 percent of Americans. It's not something that's controversial. I mean, even in California, California shifted rightward in the last election. Oh, yeah. But I mean, what was it? Every every county in America did. Yeah. I mean, everybody is shifting, right?

Eighty nine percent of the counties. Well, 89 percent of the counties have shifted that way. And it shows, that's why it cracks me up when they go, oh, it's not a mandate. Because they're going from the starting point of 50-50. It's like, no, it's a mandate because when you go and you look at what happened in 2020, and then you compare the numbers to 2024,

that shift across the country, like that momentum can't just be stopped. I mean, Republicans do a great job of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, shift across the country like that that momentum can't just be stopped yeah you know it i mean republicans do a great job of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory so they could find a way to stop it but i don't want them to we have this clip that gavin newsom posted and i'm surprised he did but uh in another sense i'm not so surprised i think gavin newsom wants to run for president in uh 2028 he's aware the democratic party has become psychotic and he's trying to moderate so he sat down with charlie kirk here the clip. And he talks about the book bans. And Charlie

does a fantastic job in addressing these issues. How about the book ban stuff on a serious note? Forty two hundred and forty books or titles, libraries and schools are banned in 2023. Is that not as a conservative? Well, it depends depends i mean like i think we can both agree pornography should not be taught to nine-year-olds fair point okay so that's a book ban all right well there are some other books no no no no that was the moms for liberty contention time out yeah like i agree on bill o'reilly the moms for liberty movement that you made a big thing of was just no porn to 10 year olds yeah we agree so those bands should be those books should be banned well okay so what we should do right now is every cal every California school that has porn in their library should be kicked out.

Does that include the Bible? Well, I wouldn't say the Song of Solomon is porn. No, but I mean, some have made that point. Is that a fair point? I don't think that's fair at all. And as a man of faith, and I deeply admire that about you. Thank you. Sincerely. But no, I mean, again, the Song of Solomon is rather risque.

No, it's very. But what we're talking about in these books is not just the words. It's also the images. And again, your audience can look at the images themselves. Okay, okay. It's highly graphic. But again, what I. But it seems a banning binge.

I mean, at next level, sort of cancel culture. But why do you think moms are doing that? Do you think it's because they want to have mind control? No. Or do you think that they have come across incident of incident of highly provocative material? I love moms. But this moms, I mean, we don't have to get into moms for liberty. I mean, you brought up the book bands, though. I mean, deeply organized for a larger agenda.

But that's my humble opinion. That's a non-answer. But let me just, you know, kind of complete the point is that it's easy to just call it kind of a book band. But when you actually have to read some of these books, it will take your breath away of some of this stuff, right? You're like, okay, you know, we're teaching a 10-year-old how to put a condom on. I know. I just have a problem with, you know, who the hell is going to decide that? Government?

I mean, Doron DeSantis is going to decide what I can read or say in the boardroom and the classroom? This is the exercise of politics, though. The exercise of politics is the highest form of community because it blends morality and sociability. So what we do is we have discussion and elections and we have boards and commissions, right? And we as a people say, okay, no porn for 10-year-olds. And that's politics, right? So I don't know why Gavin Newsom posted this clip, to be completely honest,

because he gets absolutely annihilated. He begins to defer to Charlie Kirk saying, yeah, okay, yeah, well, you're right. Giving him every point. Now, what do you think the response on the left was? I mean, he's probably that he's bowing down to, you know, the radical right telling him what's going on. Maybe. But what is the first post in response to Gavin Newsom do you think it's saying?

He was wrong to talk to Charlie Kirk. Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. I'm surprised you guys are being so kind to Democrats. There's no. Well, I mean, they call them Nazis. It's what? There's no porn in schools. No, no, no. I'm surprised you guys are being so kind to Democrats. There's no. Well, I mean, they call them a Nazi.

It's what? There's no porn in schools. No, no. You're leaning into fascism. Wow. I'm surprised you guys can't figure this one out. It's that porn. They argue that porn should be in schools.

That was close. That was close. Never change, Democrats. Well, this guy responded by saying porn is not bad. Forcing people to feel sex is bad is evil. Legalize sex. That is exactly what I wanted to hear. I'm so proud of you.

Thank you for saying that. Well, look at Emma Vigeland from the Majority Report. She came on the Culture War podcast. And when I was like, here's a book that is for kids. And in it is an explanation how to use grinder okay that that's telling kids to go meet adult men that's wrong and she's like we shouldn't we shouldn't censor books and i'm like okay so you're in favor of adult materials like that book has scat in it you know what that is literally we're trying to keep it family friendly so i'm not going

to define what that is okay and she defended it and said it was a good thing you don't think i've ever been more aggravated by an episode of your show than when you had her on because it was just it was watching somebody who obviously didn't know what she was talking about trying to defend something she didn't know about and and it was insane to watch somebody just go well you don't ban books it's like there there has to be nuance to this conversation it's not it's not it's not nuanced they're they're actually lying to you okay there is no is no book ban. It is curation. There's a word for it. It's what you...

You can't have every book that's ever been printed in the school library. You must curate your library. So you curate it and you select things that are acceptable and are not. It's not banning books. It's not libraries. It's curriculum. Fair enough. The issue in Florida was curriculum, meaning they were giving sheets to children saying,

here are the books we want you to read. So I have a question for Democrats. Should Mein Kampf be in the curriculum for grade school kids? Well, I mean, half their side supports that as a Bible. So sure. Have the Democrats. I mean, their whole argument against white supremacy and fascism, they'd say, how dare you? Of course not. Blah not blah blah blah and i say should we ban that book in grade schools from curriculums or should we say we will not include mein kampf in the curriculum for seventh graders i'd like to see them say no book bans are bad fine stick to your principles i guess all books all the time everywhere well that's why it's weird to see gavin news to talk about a book ban because i i had to look it up because i couldn't remember the actual titles of the books but under his administration they banned the adventures

of Huck Finn to kill a mockingbird and of mice and men wait Newsom did yeah under the California has banned the the adventures of Huckleberry Finn to kill a mockingbird and of mice and men for being racist yeah so so what you can do apparently it's like you can ban examples of of racism or you know or even in literature but you can't ban examples of sodomy which is in the literature that they want still to be in these books it's like okay so where i'd love to try to figure out you know give them a give them a zen venn diagram and make a and make a you know show me where they're where their points are 30 what is it, 32 attempted book bans targeting 87 titles across the state

focused on the books were basically considered, what is it? And again, it goes back to, it's not a ban because you can buy these books. It's just that they're not in the curriculum. So the whole premise is a lie. It's not a ban. It's curation. You can still get these books in the States.

You can buy them on Amazon. This is all BS. It's all a lie. I think Newsom came out against those bans. Oh, did he? I'm not sure, but a cursory search says that Newsom's administration pushed back on book bans. Let me read what it says um new governors signed assembly bill uh 1078 the legislation prohibits school boards from banning instructional materials

or library books based solely on their inclusion of diverse perspectives particularly those related to lgbtqia and racial themes so i think the racial themes was specifically targeting the bands of huck finn and things like that okay Okay, he opposed it. He did oppose it? Yeah, so he recently, what was it? He passed AB 1078. Right. So it required that you need two-thirds to ban it, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

So, yeah, sorry to attribute that to Gavin Newsom. That was California's attempt to censor those books. But it is fair to point out that he's complaining about Republicans wanting to ban books while Democrats are equally banning books. Yeah, it's just they're banning things that go against what they see in their head. That's why it cracked me up when he asked me, he goes, who's going to make that decision? Ron DeSantis?

And the answer is yes. Yeah, you make that decision. It's like, if you want to have those books in California schools, maybe the parents that go to the PTA meetings? That seems reasonable. Parents having a say about children? That's crazy. Crazy? Well, no. In California, the kids keep all their problems a secret and only talk with

strangers. The teacher gets to know everything and the parents can't be told the truth. That's wild, man. I can't believe that they chose that as a campaign platform. But let's be real. The Democrats are they they they are a how would I describe this? A shadow monster. Right. A bizarro American person. Right. So, you know, bizarro Superman. Oh, yeah. Yeah. He's insane. He talks backwards half the time or whatever. So Republicans are like, we shouldn't allow criminals and rapists to come in. And Democrats go, yes, we should. And you're like, what? Why? And then you're like, I'm going to clap for this 13 year old brain cancer and they go oh that's bad and you're like why everything that regular people like they hate every bad thing we're trying to stop they like

it's just it's just opposite opposite party well that's where we say like the joke that you know donald trump could cure cancer and the left would complain about all the out-of-work oncologists right you know they'd be upset about that and that's the reality of it i think bill maher said it best he was like on that uh he was on was a podcast save america and he said um uh he said if you want to lose every election coming up make parents put parents in second place when it comes to decisions about their children 100 and that's that's exactly the message that the Democrats have been sending, at least the message the Democrats in California have been sending. If you want to lose elections,

tell parents that your children are not your children. Oh, yeah. Imagine trying to make children community property, basically, is what they're doing. The crazy thing to me is that there are liberal parents who agree with it yeah the sad thing is i don't think there's like i think it's one of those uh silent majority vocal minority things where the people who oppose it don't want to be ostracized in their community maybe but i mean there are parents who literally support the

school inflicting upon their children horrible things and they there are parents who literally support the school inflicting upon their children horrible things. And there are parents who bring their children to fully nude drag shows or like just inappropriate drag shows. When this whole thing was happening with the all-ages drag shows they were trying to do, which have largely been pushed aside, they were parents bringing children to events where grown men were doing sex acts or they were putting their children on stage at gay bars for men to throw money at there are parents that were doing that that's that's there are evil people individuals i remember to be fair though there was a story out of uh uh europe i think last week where a young woman gave birth to a baby and threw out the window

where where where she was she was an american i think she was an american who was visiting france and she gave birth and then chucked the baby out the window from like the third or fourth floor because there are insane people who do evil things see that's that's one of those i would use as a test case i'll takeok i can make a video about that and and that's where i love to see the insanity of the left because i could post about that and just say this was wrong and then watch my comment section tell me how not wrong it was yeah here you go i mean i don't want to dive too much into this but u.s women in custody after allegedly throwing newborn out of paris hotel window insane baby was pronounced dead at the hospital and authorities

are investing the case as a homicide of a minor younger than 15. That was from February 25th. There are evil, evil people and this was a parent who killed her child. Yeah. Allegedly. That's terrible. Allegedly.

Allegedly. Can't blame the woman. It was the gravity. You know, like that's what they'll say. Yeah. Well, let's get into the nitty gritty politics here. We got the story from Newswire. It's from the Bloomberg TV wire. This is funny because I saw this this headline from Newswire.

And when you read the AP headlines, there is key context missing in their stories. The title is Doge effort to sell off federal properties inadvertently exposes CIA black site in northern Virginia. Bloomberg TV reporting. Oh, yeah. Massively viral story. Now, what happens when you actually try to Google search? It is not a whole lot comes up, but we do have this story. Trump administration deletes list of hundreds of federal buildings targeted for potential sale.

So, OK, here's Bloomberg. The Doge effort to sell a federal property inadvertently exposes CIA black sites. AP reports they delete the list of federal buildings for sale. They don't give you the context of why it was deleted. The Trump administration Tuesday published a list of more than 440 federal properties that identified a potentially offload, including the FBI headquarters and the main DOJ building, after deeming them not core to government operations. Hours later, however, the admin issued a revised list with only 320 entries. And by Wednesday morning, the list was gone entirely. Non-core property list coming soon. The GSA, which published the list, did not respond

to repeated questions about the changes or why the properties had been listed, why the properties that had been listed had been removed but now we know why and i think it's absolutely hilarious it's because the cia was operating operating buildings off the books and whoops yeah and the cia is not supposed to i mean this is obvious to most people but the cia is not supposed to be have not supposed to be operating in a fashion like that domestically. So I like the fact, obviously, that this has been exposed. I do hope that it leads to more investigations as to what exactly they were doing. And I hope that becomes public so the American people know what CIA was doing in the U.S.

I do think that it's acceptable to have an intelligence bureau working internationally, but I don't think I also think that it's unacceptable to have them working in the United States. There is an FBI for that reason, for when it comes to federal crimes, which there should actually be few federal crimes, in my opinion. There's there shouldn't be a lot of crimes that the federal government actually investigates. Kidnapping those kind of things, you know, maybe interstate drug trafficking or international drug trafficking, et cetera. But otherwise, there shouldn't be a lot of crimes that the feds actually have to investigate because that's what we have states for. That's why we have state police. That's why we have municipal police. There are multiple police agencies. You don't the federal government doesn't need all the policing agencies that it has.

And furthermore, things like the EPA don't need an actual police force. That's what the FBI is for. You don't need to have a federal police force for HUD. But they all do. I mean, the FDA has police force. That's why they have SWAT teams that kick in the doors of people that are selling raw milk. Chicken police. The IRS has police force, too, I think.

I mean, all these federal agencies have some sort of police force. My question, what exactly is a black site? Is that kind of like one of those places where— It means off the books. So it's just off the books. That's pretty much all it is yeah okay so activities are untracked by you know by actual federal spending and things like that but the bigger thing well please sorry no it just it also means there's not gonna be oversight yeah right so it's pretty straightforward as i was saying when you talked

about the first response on the article on the other on the other x post the funny thing to me is like on this one the first response should be why is the cia operating domestically that should be the response from the american people but instead if you go to if you go to that twitter post the first response is how can they just sell our property it's like how are you that delusional like it was like i look at the same way i look at when edward snowden came out and told everybody people were i expected a response to be how dare they spy on us and violate our constitutional rights the other one is what the actual response was uh why did you give this young guy access to this information like i was like that's insane i would like to ask this this person

on joe ma'am do you think that you are CIA? There is no hour here. Bro, guys, clearly this is a CIA sock puppet account that didn't realize they had switched over to their main. It's a joke. I'm kidding. But the CIA is probably running sock puppets from that office. Who knows? Yeah. Probably.

But one of the smartest things that Elon Musk did was when he said we're going to make it so that non-verified accounts don't get seen. He was basically saying all the bots we can't find and get rid of so by charging at least a dollar we make them pay so now the cia they probably had a meeting where they were like how many bots do we run on x and they're like three million like what's that going to cost us it's going to be like 50 million a year and elon Elon's sitting there being like, yep. Yep. Absolutely. I did think it was funny that when you look at the verified accounts, that when he put that out there, that the anonymous accounts, the accounts for hackers, anonymous, they all verified their account.

So if you look, every anonymous account on X is verified. I was like, one of y'all put your ID in, which is hilarious. Yeah. But the question of whether or not they were actually operating, the CIA was actually doing domestic operations. We don't actually know that. It should be answered. That's true. And the problem with the black side operating in the United States is, well, for one, it's probably not the only one. If you think it's the only one, I got a bridge to sell you.

And we don't get accountability when they do these things. But based on what we saw with Eric Chiaramella, yeah, the CIA was running operations in the U.S. And for those that don't know, he's the guy who got Trump impeached. And YouTube and Facebook would delete any post made with that guy's name in it. This is what's really funny about the Epstein stuff. When the people come out and they're like, Mossad, he was working for Israel. I'm like, well, slow down. So I think what Mike Cernovich say, it's whatever's above Mossad, right? That doesn't mean it's not related to Mossad, but it's got some higher clearance than you can just say. And the evidence to that is

when Trump got impeached due to the Eric Charamello whistleblower thing when Real Clear Investigations, a reputable, prominent national news company, issued their report saying we've identified the whistleblower. If you went on Facebook or YouTube and said that name, they'd nuke the content and they wouldn't say anything. The weirdest thing was you post on Facebook. Hey, here's the guy's name. Your post would vanish without warning. No strike, no notice, no notification. And so what I ended up doing was I posted, I said, Eric Chiaramella is a 50-year-old dentist from Dubuque, Iowa. He has three kids and enjoys his day. Deleted. And I'm like, hold on. I didn't say anything about that guy. Certainly there are other people with that name, right? Nope. If you said that name, Facebook would remove what you said

within seconds, within minutes. YouTube took down, I think, two of my videos where I was talking about the RealClearInvestigations report. I just covered the news. I'm like, wow, big breaking story. RealClearInvestigations has, they say they've unmasked the whistleblower. Video disappeared. I didn't even know. I didn't get a strike. I didn't get a warning. I didn't get an email. I got, I saw comments from people saying, they were like, Tim, why did you take the video down? And then sure enough, the weirdest thing was when I went to my YouTube page, the video was still there. But when I moved the mouse over the title, it wasn't a link. It was just like.

Nothing? Nothing. Your thumbnail was just hanging out. Yeah, it was like the thumbnail, the title. And instead of the cursor turning into a little finger to click, nothing happened, and I couldn't click on it. And I'm like, this is weird. So, yeah, that's the domestic operations they've been doing,

and we know they're doing. And we don't get accountability when they're running black sites in Northern Virginia or who knows where else. Or anywhere, yeah. Right. The double standard is crazy because we had, what was it, Nate? Is it Kane? Like a few weeks ago where he was the whistleblower.

And he was saying that his name got leaked and that people are saying it over YouTube, X, and everything. No reaction like that, you know, because it's rules for thee, but not for me. Oh, yeah, the CIA, they protect their people. So it's just the double standard is just crazy to me. I got to say, though, I'd love to see the internal documents because Twitter wasn't doing this. Twitter allowed you to talk about it. Okay. I'd love to see the internal documents from Facebook when this was going on, why they were taking these things down. And Zuckerberg went, remember when he went on Rogan and he was like, you know, we made a lot of mistakes and we're

changing and we're going to do things right. I'd like to see any human being sitting across from at that point, be like, tell me why you took down all the posts related to Eric Charmella. Tell me why. It's really funny because for a while we didn't know if they lifted the auto ban on his name. And then Jack Posobiec was on the show and it was like a year later or two years later. And then he said it and we all looked at each other and we were like, are they going to ban us? Now it's just like, bro, there's no rule against saying Eric Charmella. If they want to take the live show off the air with 50,000 people watching because we broke no rules, I don't know what to tell you, man. Let the world see exactly how the CIA operates in this country.

But I will say, I will say, outside of this, there's some things I can't talk too much about because confidential sources talking on background can't say too much. But let me just say with the moves Trump has made against the deep state, largely with the reform reforming or attempted reforming currently of the FBI, the stuff I'm already hearing is wild. And I'll give you one example. The case against James O'Keefe related to ashley biden biden's diary evaporated overnight we're i think we're going to start to see the the exposing of the criminal weaponization of government against private citizens so it's going to get it's going to get rowdy but see here's what worries me about that we did that already right we knew like we had a guy we had multiple people

come out and tell us hey by the way the united states government is violating your constitutional rights they're digging in your email they're digging into your phone calls they're they're observing all the stuff they're not allowed to and our response was the american peoples was to say hey that guy that told us that that dude's a criminal and it was like and and i hope the american people have evolved to a point this we recognize that was a bad idea. This is going to be formal documents coming from, you know, declassifications. Trump says he wants to put out the documents on the attempted assassination, reveal these things to the public. And I think not that I believe Pam Bondi or Kash Patel want to be overly transparent. I know that there's a narrative

about that, but that in this regard, the transparency we seek benefits them. And that's why you're likely to get it. So Epstein files, I don't know. Honestly, they probably were destroyed a long time ago. But weaponization documents currently within the FBI New York office, in the attorney's office at the Southern District of New York, it is within the FBI New York office, in the attorney's office at the Southern District of New York. It is within the agenda and interest of the Trump administration, Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, that we get transparency on all of those things. If it was perhaps information pertaining to a Trump operation, you know, in the Middle East that could spark war or something that was related to the extraction

of U.S. personnel, who knows? They're not going to just reveal this information. If there's information pertaining to drug cartels and, you know, someone gets shot and killed, they're not going to release this information. They're going to be like, these are ongoing things. But the weaponization, all the stuff we're deeply concerned about, fortunately for us, we're all aligned. What Kash Patel wants is exactly what the people want. And so that's what you vote for. I mean, hopefully that it continues. I mean, so far we are getting what we want. Hopefully that continues. I think we'll be I think I was pleasantly surprised. I thought it was gonna be a marginal. I called it a marginally good presidency. I said,

you know, Trump showed us that in his first term it was marginally good. He had a lot of bad people. There was some bad policy, but it was a net positive. I think it'd largely be the same. Then sure enough, in the first month, Trump is basically just nuclear bomb after nuclear bomb. Yeah. Exceeding all expectations. I think it will taper off to a certain degree in some ways, but I don't know the volume gets turned down from here. What I mean to say is right now we're seeing this parabolic curve where it's just getting crazier every day. The Democrats are losing their minds. I don't think it's going to keep going up like that.

I think it's in a plateau, but it will remain tense and high. Like Trump is going to be doing a lot of things at this level for a long time. I think it's going to be pretty intense up until midterms. It's going to be kind of leading that crescendo right to there, and then we'll see. I don't know. I think it gets crazy before the midterms. No, I'm saying it's going to keep going up, and then midterms, if they win, the midterms.

No, I think he's got to push for J.D. I think he's got to push to say, we're going to keep this going, because if it does tail off, what he's saying is that he's basically spent his powder, that there's nothing else to reveal to to reveal to the american people but i mean i i do agree that i think it's it's mutually beneficial with cash and then one is what the american people want so we're going to see it um and and i think the reason why it was so moderate the first time is i think trump trusted the government yep first time he was in office he was like these people aren't actually evil they're not trying to screw over everyone let me hire john bolton that's a perfect example of trusting the government and then he came in the second

time and he's like all of these people are out of their minds let's let's go ahead and just let's go wild yeah i mean that was you know we've said this on the show before but the four years that trump was kind of in the woods and and in the wilderness um really gave him the ability to not just plan what he was going to do when he came back but also find the right people clearly people that had been persecuted by the government people like rfk people like tulsi gabbard people like kash patel uh like uh i forget his name um the uh hhs not the the HHS guy, the, anyways, finding people that had been persecuted by the government

to get into positions that were doing the persecuting, right? With Tulsi has had a DNI and stuff. That kind of stuff is where you see the real change, the real changes are going to happen because these people know what the, exactly what these bureaucracies have been doing. Did you say Peter Navarro? I didn't mention Peter Navarro. the real changes are going to happen because these people know exactly

what these bureaucracies have been doing. Did you say Peter Navarro? I didn't mention Peter Navarro. Is that who you're thinking of? No, it was the guy that was basically banned from the internet for talking about vaccines. R.K. Jr.? No, no, for talking about the COVID vaccine.

There were a lot of people who were basically in the administration now is what i'm saying i forget what his name is yeah it totally slipped my mind well let's uh doctor well let's because i know like a friend of mine dr simon godek he was attacked relentlessly for that he actually ended up moving to brazil let's jump to this next story from variety jimmy kimmel roasts Trump for claiming Biden spent eight million dollars on making mice transgender. Are they so dumb they don't know how to Google? OK, we have two possible scenarios. Jimmy Kimmel is, in fact, so stupid he doesn't know how to Google or he's lying to you because I'm going to show you what he said. But first, we call this is Ian.

Ian refers this as information vaccination. That's the wrong story. This is the story. Nope. That's the wrong story, too. The story we're looking for is right there. CNN forced to issue correction to Trump fact check. After false claim CNN forced to issue correction to Trump fact check after false claim Biden admin did not spend eight million dollars on transgender mice. This claim needs context. CNN was forced to issue a correction Wednesday after they falsely fact-checked President Trump's claim that the federal government under former President Biden had spent $8.2 million on gender-affirming hormone treatments in mice. The funding was funneled through the National Institutes of Health, but CNN's Deirdre McPhillips clapped back at the president, saying that the experiments were only kid on monkeys and that it amounted to a mere 500,000. Turns out she and CNN were mistaken.

It was the White House that pointed that out. Under the Biden administration, the National Institute for Health doled out millions of dollars in taxpayer funding grant funded grants for institutions across the country to perform transgender experiments on mice. The White House said in a statement before laying out some shocking examples of egregious spending. CNN had originally reported that Trump had falsely claimed that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending eight million dollars making mice transgender in the reporting. They had cited three studies. So I don't know if they have the actual image, but we also have this from Fox. CNN edits fact check saying Trump falsely claimed there were trans experiments

on mice. This story was huge. It was it was it was a couple of weeks ago. We went over the story, quote, between twenty twenty one and twenty two. NIH awarded a total of four hundred seventy seven thousand dollars to three projects that involved administering feminizing hormone therapy to monkeys to understand how it may affect their immune system. The fact check continued. Transgender women are nearly 50 times more likely to be infected with HIV than other adults. Blah, blah, blah. We get it. There were also numerous studies where they gave cross-sex hormones to mice. The purpose of these studies. So what CNN first did was they were like, no, Trump's wrong. Then they went, well, OK, Trump's not wrong. It's just they weren't trying to make the mice

transgender. They made them trend transgender so that they could do different experiments, which doesn't matter because that's not what Trump said. Jimmy Kimmel, who is either as dumb as a box of rocks or as evil, sorry, rocks, perhaps both, came out and lied, claiming he meant transgenic mice. No, he didn't. They made that up. And it's a weird, clever way to manipulate stupid people who don't pay attention. They say, Jimmy Kimmel continued to roast Trump on his talk show, blah, blah, blah, saying $8 million on making mice transgender. This is real, to which Kimmel fired back, no, it's not real. You know that you hear the president of the United States say we're spending $8 million to do sex change operations on mice. You say, well, I'm sure he's exaggerating, but there must be something there.

Turns out there's not. It's not real. The government spent money on transgenic mice, which are genetically modified mice they use in lab tests to study disease. It has nothing to do with being transgender other than the word. The trans part of the word, you think they know this and just ignore it, or are they so dumb they don't know how to Google? Or maybe they think we're so dumb we don't know how to Google. I don't know. Well, perhaps if Jimmy Kimmel read CNN, he'd realize Trump was meaning literally transgender mice.

Well, I'm not going to blame him for not reading CNN. Most of us try to avoid it. Even Jimmy Kimmel. I mean, Jimmy Kimmel's going to say negative things about Donald Trump no matter what. So it's, you know, I feel like taking, you know. Yeah, but this is egregious. Well, I can tell you that the transgenic argument made at the TikTok, that is the trending thing right now the what every all the liberal creators making videos making it very very a lot of videos about it's transgenic not transgender and trying to obscure lying yeah well yeah but

that's a fact check and liberals aren't going to go look for that right so but they're gonna look for the big creators so tiktok banned me for like i don't know the eight out of the time or whatever and we only we only recently restarted account i hate tiktok i think it's awful and And I only recently restarted the account because of the controversy, everything going around about the banning. I said, OK, like, let's play ball banned in like two weeks. And they said that we don't exist in their shared reality. So we have stories like this in The Telegraph. Trump said the U.S. spent eight million dollars on transgender mice. He was right. Really awful list of examples of apparent misspending. Trump said that 45 million has been on diversity, equity, inclusion, blah,

blah, blah. The left wing said this, that or otherwise. The White Coat Waste Project, a nonprofit campaign to stop animal testing, which investigates taxpayer funded experiments on the effects of gender affirming drugs in rodents. The president was referring to their investigation. Justin Goodman, senior vice president for the lobbying group, claimed that his document over 250 million dollars spent on transgender animal experiment experiments over the last couple of decades. He added there were over two dozen active federal grants funding transgender animal experiments worth a total of 64 million dollars. These include NIH funded project at Duke University that allegedly received $455,000. In another experiment, scientists at the University of Michigan allegedly spent $2.5 million of a grant

investigating the effects of hormone treatment in mice to imitate gender transition. So all they can do is lie. This is so shocking to the American conscience. Jimmy Kimmel probably sat down with his CIA handler, who is out of a job now and shaking and smoking 800 cigarettes, being like, just say transgenic, I guess, because Jimmy Kimmel is an evil person. And you know why he's evil? Because when his friend, Dickie Barrett, who was the host, the introductory voiceover for his show was mandated to get the vaccine and he and he said he wasn't going to do it they fired him jimmy kimmel went on a show later and said people who don't get the

vaccine shouldn't get medical treatment or something that effect i don't i'm paraphrasing but he was like the first we bring in the people who got the vaccine and the rest of them you don't get the medical treatment something like that i'm i don't have the exact quote pulled up so i want to make sure i'm cabinet with i'm'm paraphrasing something to that effect. I think that's evil. Well, yeah. I mean, look, the whole – this whole project that they're talking about is – pardon my French. It's Frankenstein shit, right?

Like this is straight up like trying to play God, and it's gross and creepy. I don't care what people think of me for saying what it is it's crazy how i mean i guess i should say this is the stupidest like the stupidest attempt at calling trump a liar it's one thing when you edit him out of context to make it seem like said the wrong thing it's another thing to go crap they found out about the transgender mice thing uh transgenic mice thing i mean and then you're like, bro, come on, we're not falling for your puns. But I can tell you how this is going to progress

on social media. So the defense right now over the last two days has been it's transgenic. Like that's the push. You see any large liberal creators, they're using that line. And then as we come out with the fact checks of them, because there's a ton of us creators

who will fact check them to death. And as we come out with that, the next line is going to be, well, the intention wasn't to make them transgender. The effect, you know, that was just a side effect of the experiment. So the goalpost when it comes to that type of stuff is always the dead sprint away from. But you got to make sure you got the response then. So if you're talking to your liberal aunt and she's saying transgenic and then you show the actual from the Telegraph, come on, prominent British newspaper. And she goes, well, but the intention wasn't to make them trans.

You respond with, whoa. So it did happen. That's it. That's right. Wow. They did that. But for other reasons. Well, I don't care what the reasons were.

Trump didn't cite reasons. He said they were doing it. Yeah. I mean, like I said, you have to be totally ideologically possessed to think that it's OK for the government to be spending money on these types of programs for the intended purposes that they're talking about. Like this is again, this is Frankenstein shit. This is straight up. It's it's on par. It's closing in on like, you know, making mutants in a lab but you have to think their morals are obviously i mean they're when you're looking at the moral compass of liberals who believe in this type of stuff i mean their their moral compass starts at we can we can chop body parts off kids so the the idea of doing it to mice to them that's nothing to them yeah you know this is it's it's crazy how the argument they're making is trump misread the report because it's plausible to stupid people who don't actually investigate the news. Do you think the intent of them saying Trump misread the report, other than to cast Trump as a dumb person or something, do you think the intent is to mislead people into thinking that it doesn't happen?

Yes, because it gets backed up right away. So a good example is on TikTok, we have a few creators who pretty much get their marching orders directly from Midas Touch. We can see the FEC documents, they get paid. So the funny thing is, when you see Midas Touch come out with an article, these dudes have videos for it, right? They're the little crew of guys that make videos

about whatever Midas Touch tells them. So when they run with the transgenic line, these are the heaviest hitters when it comes to the liberal side on TikTok. They're going to get 10 million views on it's transgenic before anybody got around to mentioning the CNN fact check. Because Midas Touch is telling them, this is what we're making an article, go talk about it.

And it just gets out very quick. And then most of us on the conservative side you know we're playing catch up where the whole time we're just receiving it and trying to and it's so it's such an overwhelming sense of i gotta debunk it by the by the time you get the actual rebuttal out it's you know it's spread like wildfire the that's the whole uh you know the lie gets halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on exactly once everybody sees the headline they're just like okay yeah especially when you're especially when you're primed to believe something like you want to believe that trump is the bad guy and then someone can go ahead and feed you a line you're like let me get on tiktok let me get on on

x let me get on blue sky or whatever your your platform of choice is and spread this around and again it's it's something that i don't think is compelling to the average person that's plugged in but i still think that there's a significant portion of the united states that are that are significant portion of the u.s that isn't plugged in these people are evil i know i agree and i mean any anything along this line of science, like he said. No, no, I'm saying the liberals who are lying to obfuscate that the government is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on this stuff, they're evil. Well, yeah, like I was saying, their moral compass, if they're willing to chop stuff

off kids, they don't care about mice. Right. To them, it's not a big deal. But again, I'm not talking about the science. Oh, I'm talking about the liberals that are saying to prop up the cult. Trump must be wrong. We are going to lie about what's really going on. They're evil.

So we'll give a shout out to this lady, Andrea C. Love, Ph.D., who tweeted, I can't believe this needs to be said. Transgenic mice are not transgender mice. And it's got 14000 retweets. And then, of course, I just posted this. And then you've got everybody claiming you are wrong. But she still gets what, six point four million views. And the liberals attach themselves to this without factoring it because they're dumb as a box of rocks. So, you know, I have to say it, but there's a reason why when Charlie Kirk sits down with Gavin Newsom, Gavin Newsom goes, oh, yeah, well, yeah, you're right, I guess, because these people don't read. Marianne Williamson told me after she came on the

show, I'm paraphrasing again, it's been a long time, that she wouldn't do this ever again, and there's a reason why liberals won't do it. And it's because she said something to the effect of like, you know, the questions you ask and things you bring up are just so outside of how we handle things or whatever. And just the conversation was simplest form. We actually showed her the proof and she could not answer these questions. For instance, when she said book bannings are bad and I grabbed one of the books because we have them all and I showed it to her, she gasped. I showed her the blowjob in the genderqueer book. And she was like, I don't want to look at that. And I'm like, do you think kids do? But that's exactly, I remember you saying that to her and you were like, I cannot show you this on camera because this video will get taken down.

The presence I'm going to give to Bill Maher when I go on his show. You know, so I don't think they'll ever have me on that show. What are you bringing for Gavin Newsom when you're on that show? Similar things. I'm going to be like, you know, let's talk about these books. But Bill Maher is halfway there, you know. But I do have a lot of stuff to bring him related to Trump because he gets the book stuff.

He gets the gender ideology stuff, right? He gets the stuff Trump is saying. He doesn't understand the economic stuff. He doesn't understand the the he believes too much of the of the corporate lies. I think if you're somebody who passively absorbs the news, like like Bill Burr, for instance, you're as dumb as a boxer. You know what I mean? Like, let me clarify that. People who don't watch news programs, who, but are fervent, is what I'm trying to describe. If you're a plumber, you don't watch the news, you don't pay attention, I got no beef, right? We're going to do our best to get you educated. If you are someone who doesn't watch the news, but you are fervent on political issues,

I'm saying you're dumb. So, presence abound for all of these people when I visit them. I'm going to give them books. I'm going to give them, I'm going to print out news reports. I'm going to hand it to visit them. I'm going to give them books. I'm going to print out news reports. I'm going to hand it to them. And I'm going to be like, I'd like you to just look at these things. Like the Ukraine stuff especially. But when you said with Bill Maher you're going to bring him stuff, especially on Trump, right?

My worry with Bill Maher, because Bill Maher definitely gets it. He definitely gets it that liberals have lost their minds. And he doesn't even see himself in that party anymore. But I think when it comes to Trump i honestly think with bill maher it's like a religious hatred of a religious dislike where you know like you could present uh you know a priest say hey look here's my all my evidence you know god isn't real and he's still going to believe it and i think that's how bill maher is with trump is no matter what evidence you give him he's just gonna have a hate of donald trump like i think he's just done it so long he's

gotten so used to hating him well trump trump and him also have personal beef oh so it's emotional like trump insulted him or something i can't remember what happened but but again donald trump insulted something no so like apparently they won't have me on the show for some for some reason and the people have been trying and then their their people i talked to on the phone and that will get you out and then they offered me some dates, but my kid was just born, so I couldn't go. Congratulations, by the way. I appreciate it.

But now apparently they've gone radio silent again, which, you know, I got to be honest, I wouldn't go on real time. It's just not going to happen. I don't respect the show. I used to watch it all the time when I was younger for a very long time. But I think Club Random would be very interesting

to sit down with Bill Maher. I think the issue is, for the same reason Marianne Williamson says she can't come on a show like this, for the same reason liberals are terrified to come on Tim Kess IRL, is that it's a show where we literally have 30 news stories pulled up from reputable sources and we read through them. So it's like when I pull up ABC News or CBS or Fox or The Telegraph or Axios, how do they respond to a CNN article that says they're lying or wrong? They can't. So we've had the famous instance was Hunter Avalon came on the show.

If you remember that guy. Oh, yeah. And I mentioned some of the effect of, you know, Joe Biden said, if you don't find the prosecutor, not a billion dollars. And he goes, that never happened. And I was like, OK, pulled it up and said, roll tape. And we played the clip right there in front of anyone. Oh, how can you maintain the liberal lies of your platform if you're forced to sit down and confront the facts? So these people won't come on these shows. They're terrified. But for some reason, conservatives are knocking on the door and won't leave me alone. They're asking every day, can we come on the show?

And I'm like, we'll find time. The schedule is packed up like two months out. And we have to try as hard as possible to get liberals to come. And then we had, what was that, Dean Withers was his name, I think, whatever. He agreed and then at the last minute canceled. And they always make excuses. Hassan agreed to come on the show and the last minute canceled. These people are terrified.

Shout out to Sam Seder who agreed to come on the show, though. And we. These people are terrified. Shout out to Sam Cedar, who agreed to come on the show, though. And we had a discussion, and it was wacky, but it's okay. Luke Beasley. David Pakman wanted money. Dean won't come to an environment, because I know Dean very well. Dean, Parker, Harry, they are the liberal

team for Midas Touch. So it's like, when it comes to those guys, they will never – Dean needs an environment like that 30-on-1 that he did with Charlie Kirk where he gets to fire out stuff and he – Fish Gallop. Well, he knows there's an end. Right.

He's like, okay, I have 15 minutes to just be the most, you know, insane version of myself and then I can step away and get away and nobody can challenge me on it. On a program like this, he would say something and you would just go, well, let's look it up. And if you do that to him, he's destroyed. Because he's got a pre-loaded speech he's going to give you. It's also why they struggle with Joe Rogan. Oh, yeah.

Because Joe Rogan also says, Jamie, pull that up. So they have a hard time going on shows like that and being their authentic selves. Hence, Kamala didn't want to go on they want to set special rules their rule for rogan i believe it was he had to go to them and their studio why because then he couldn't pull that up they were trying to take him out of that environment i've told all these people by all means i will pull up anything you tell me to pull up and when we had on um who was it uh we had a liberal on i pulled up everything that they asked me to pull up oh luke beasley yeah yeah he said pull up i pulled it up we'll pull it up and we'll talk about it and uh he got he got embarrassed and then he and then

guess what he said he would come back on the show now he's refusing is he really i was refusing i was refusing the thing was like people like got annihilated people that the left that they'll come on here and even the fact that you'll pull stuff up they're still in they still have a slight advantage in the fact that most of the things that you're going to pull up are going to be left we have a left-leaning bias if you bring up fox they're going to say well it's fox and if you bring up wikipedia which they're gonna say oh that's that's perfectly legitimate which is completely untrue when it comes to political things all of that stuff has a left-leaning bias your most of your media has a left-leaning bias so and there's still there's still people that won't come on when you have

like not just have to deal with the truth but you have to deal with the truth that's presented in a way that is friendly to your side. So I will just do a quick clarification. The first time we tried booking Pac-Man, I was told that he requested an honorarium to appear on the show, to which we said we never pay guests. And then recently, I think a year ago, we tried getting him on again and he said he tried to find time and we bounced back some dates and it never never came through. Kyle Kalinsky agreed to come on numerous times and then never did. I don't blame anybody who hosts their own show. And I wouldn't ask anybody to quit their job or cancel their their thing for me. So I can respect that. When Hassan Piker agreed to come on the show, he canceled because he said it was during COVID. It was at the tail end and he was concerned about traveling.

And I said, totally legit. That's fine. Sam Seder, on the other hand, made up a fake story and then like i leaked i leaked i published the dms proving he was lying he eventually did come on the culture war and we had a conversation because i was just like i'm not gonna have that guy in the show but then i said no let's bring him on because he was lying about me again and like the only thing they can do is pull clips out of context lie about my views but i think i think it's a mixture of they're liars and also really dumb. And that's why you have most of the prominent, as we mentioned earlier in the show,

most of the I should say most, but many of the prominent liberal leadership have moved to Trump. So I'm talking about the donors, the industry leaders. I'm talking about RFK, Tulsi, Elon, et cetera. A lot of the big default liberals that were in industry that were donating, that were leading the charge and what the Democrats were supposed to be doing. They're on Trump's side now, as as am I. And I'm still a liberal guy. I'm not particularly conservative, but fairly moderate left leaning a little bit in some some respects. The left right now, as I say all the time, there's there's left and right means means one thing. If you're on the left, you don't pay attention to the news. And if you're on the right, you scrutinize the news. That's that's the gist of it. And it's it's a gradient. If you're super

far left, you literally don't read the news. And if you're a liberal, you probably read a little bit. If you're a moderate, you may be reading quite a bit. And then it's funny because the Overton window of I should call the Overton window, but there is a column center right, slightly moderate conservative leaning where the the the left and to the right of that. So staunch, hard right conservatives are in this alignment. And then in the middle, you have like fairly moderate conservative types. And that's where we tend to have that coalition. So the more you pay attention to the move, the further right you go to a point. And that's when it comes to like identifying with part of a party, because like, sure, i see myself more on the conservative side now but my thoughts were always liberal but i i didn't have i just watched the liberal party leave me like i can't believe in their positions and you know anything they believe in because it's so insane to me and but also on the other side i can look at you know the right the the i'm gonna

get my truck wrapped in make america great again and I'm like, I don't I don't identify with you because I think you're out of your damn mind, too. So it's a balance of like. But the problem is, is that if you're a little on the left and you don't identify with the crazy people, you're not on the left. You're not a liberal. You're you're you're a fascist. Well, I saw this comedian that he had this joke where he was like, you know, the if you're if you go talk to people that are conservative and you're like, oh, I'm a conservative. They're like, oh, yeah, come on over, hang out. And he's like, if you go talk to people that are liberals, you'd be like, oh, well, I'm a liberal. And the reply is, well, we'll see.

Because if you step out of line, you're going to get crucified. It's the meme where, you know, it starts with the person on the right and person on the left and the guy in the middle and then slowly as each it goes it's like they get pushed for the person in the middle gets pushed further to the right by the person on the left and they're just yelling you're a bigot you know person in the middle is staying in the exact same place yeah oh yeah they're just moving left and then they're just being like you're a bigot and you're like what but but again i mean there's no cohesive ideology on the left but like i think a wonderful example of what you were saying is like that's why i brought up anna casperian i think she's a wonderful example of somebody who lived in the liberal world. The liberal world went left and she stayed fell out of it, I don't believe, of their own choosing.

So when they were making videos about me, like, look, we had Cenk Uygur on the show. I'll invite him back whenever. There was this fake story that got published in like 2018 called the Alternative Influence Network. It was a hit piece that claimed independent news creators were secretly networking with white nationalists. They connected Chris Ragon, who made video game and comedy sketch videos, with Richard Spencer with a direct straight line.

That line, according to the report, said that they had collaborated on video work together. Chris Ragon never met the man. He had nothing to do with any of that. He barely was political. He doesn't make any political videos anymore. He even took down some of his political videos. Because the Young Turks had beef with Dave Rubin, they ran this story, fact as if it was true, and in their thumbnail, my name was right in the middle. So I know Cenk Uygur. I've known him for 13, 14 years. And so I saw him at Politicon and I was like, hey, how's it going, man? I was like,

good to see you. You know, I sent you a message about that piece boom he starts screaming in my face top of his lungs okay and then i'm like why are you yelling at me cameras swarm us everybody's filming what's going on he screams i'm a trumper and blah blah i was like what are you talking about and he went nuts he's never addressed we've never actually addressed that issue. But Anika Sparing went on to make a bunch of videos lying about me, calling me ugly, saying that I was like, I did a story on five reports that had come out saying conservatives tend to be more attractive than liberals. The thesis of these of these is privilege. It's literally a leftist argument. That's why I say the left has no cohesive ideology. The argument is if you grow up ugly, you are less likely to

receive benefits from individuals who are courting your attention. Thus, life will be somewhat harder for you to acquire resources. You will then start to align with collectivist principles of we need to band together because life is hard. If you are attractive, tall, deep voice, chiseled, whatever, or if you're a woman who is busty and beautiful, people do nice things for you because they're trying to court your attention. Thus, you say, wow, this is easy. If I can do it, anyone can. And you start to adopt a more independent or meritocratic worldview. That's actually rooted in the left supposed ideological argument around privilege.

When I made that video, young Anna Kasparian made a video saying Tim Pool is ugly and he's wrong. And they just started making fun of fat Trump supporters, despite the fact I was actually just reading the Washington Post. So then now now she's having this this awakening moment and I can respect that's fine. But I think it's fair for a lot of people to recognize that Jenk and Anna played the game as long as they could until they could not do it any longer. And while it's easy to call them out, I'll give them some respect for doing the right thing now. There are a handful of others that saw the moves that were happening behind the scenes before everybody else and quit their corporate press jobs and

became heterodox. And you know, they never really meant it. I'm not going to name these people, but y'all can figure it out for yourselves. Prominent people who worked at corporate press had this epiphany moment where they were like, oh, I can't believe the woke. I'm quitting. And now they're trying to gatekeep the the heterodox position of liberals that are, you know, in the Trump coalition. I mean the gatekeeping is gatekeeping is something that is typical but it's something that I think that we should clearly avoid because the reason we won is because of the broad coalition and what I mean is

these people who were woke liberals who attacked heterodox voices on the right who all of a sudden at some point decided that they were abandoning ship it was an inorganic change and now they're gatekeeping this very same movement to keep people out well i mean that there there probably is to some degree that's that's true but at the same time like the whole point or at least from my perspective and this is something that we've talked about

on the show multiple times like when you have people that have a change of heart and or or that that are rejecting the far left and are saying hey we're going to go ahead and and and support you know the the big tent maga movement i i i know there are people that are going to be disingenuous i know there are people that are going to do it for money i don't care and when they are actively suppressing growth of the populist movement is the point yeah fair fair enough there are people who worked at big corporate press outlets who had this come to this awakening moment where they said you're right the democrats have gone too far i'm heterodox and then a year later they were saying don't let those people in and i'm like right that's those people are full of it. They're fake. That's fair. But like I said, we have to welcome as many people as we can.

There are people that are going to try and gatekeep, but if they're spreading the message that we're trying to get and then they're complaining. Which is my position on Cenk Uygur and Anand has always been. Well, like the biggest one right now is Lindy Lee. Oh, right. She's the one where it's like because i have i have had knocked down drag out fights with her on x and because i just you know she has been the the left's funnest little

puppet online that is a tough one and then she made the switch and i'm like like look i recognize the timing makes what she's saying complete and total bs right but it's a grift but lindy lee i'm not going to attack her too much only because it's it's fun watching the puppet play well she's untrustworthy she either voted for Kamala uh or she either lied back then about voting for Kamala or she's lying now about not voting for Kamala exactly so that is the woman that said that like they use the phrase uh we have to use vaccinations as a carrot for people to get their freedom back is that the same no no no you're talking about the the health official the health official made that lindy lee

is the she is she was a mouthpiece for the democrat party she was this tiny little asian thing that was uh made she was a mouthpiece for the democrat party but she was the push like she right now she was on the left and it was coming near the election she would be the one who would have been the first person to put out the post about transgenic mice. Yeah. She's that person. Right. And then magically she, you know, she had a come to Jesus or a come to Trump, I guess, you know, moment.

Right after the election. It was perfectly timed, you know. Let's jump to the story from Axios. Scoop. State Department to use AI to revoke visas of foreign students who appear pro Hamas. OK. Secretary of State Mark Rubio is launching an AI fueled catch and revoke effort to cancel the visas of foreign nationals who appear to support Hamas or other designated terror groups. Senior State Department officials tell Axios the effort marks a dramatic escalation in the U.S.

government's policing of foreign nationals conduct and speech. Don't care. Thank you. Have a nice day. What do you guys think? I mean, so I think that I would like to think that this can be done properly. I don't know that AI is is sophisticated enough. And also, look. I do think that if you are a foreign student and you're here on a visa, I mean, protesting probably shouldn't be high on your list of activities. And I think that you should probably refrain from protesting. Granted, we do have the freedom of speech that's protected here. But if you're here on a visa, maybe you should focus on your schoolwork and not focus on protesting.

I would agree. If you're here on a visa, you're trying to make yourself better and ideally make the country better because the brain dump is a big thing. You're taking smart people from other countries. And if you're going out to – what was it, a library the other day where all those protesters took over and they did the fake bomb threats? I mean everywhere really. That's not what you want in the country in my opinion for me i would feel like it needs to be based in the fact that hamas is a terrorist group like it can't be based in protest it can't be based around people who are you know focused on people who are protesting it has to be people who are taking action to benefit hamas whether even

through there because i don't know if you make it in protest now. Now you're dancing around the First Amendment. Maybe, but I kind of don't like the idea that we give people temporary stay in this country and then they just start becoming disruptive. American citizens petitioning. So what is protest and what is the what is the what is the spirit of the First Amendment? The idea was not the founding fathers did not intend for 17000 people to march to the street, waving signs, blocking roads and shutting down businesses. Peaceably assemble. What was going on back then was they were concerned that the crown would come and arrest them for meeting in bars and having planning meetings about the structure of their own government or going to Continental Congress, you know, sessions, shutting them down. So their view of peaceably assembling speech was not rooted in marching to the streets. But we've largely interpreted it to be like, OK, Americans can

assemble in many different ways. Foreign individuals who are here on specific visas, pretending to specific things, choosing instead to block our roads and obstruct our economy i think it's i say no to i say no and the reason is are we going to allow bad actors to come here and then cause economic damage to our country and communities if that and that and that may have been their entire intent like what i don't understand for what purpose are we allowing non-citizens who cannot vote try to petition our government? Well, so I look at it more in like a practical sense. Right. So how would you how would you define as doing something pro Hamas? I don't care if it's Hamas.

So you're talking about just protests as they're caught protesting. I mean, let's put it this way. If a you know, let's let's clarify. Protesting, I don't let's put it this way. If a you know what? Let's let's clarify protesting. I don't care about to a certain degree. If a person here on a visa, noncitizen is at a university or in any way obstructs our official proceedings of government or proceedings of university, I say we retain the right to revoke their visas because these are not voting individuals. They should not be making attempts to influence our governance.

Okay. So, I mean, but that, again, that would at least give the basis of in violating rules or crimes. Because if they're actually stopping people, okay, that I'm 100% in favor of. If they're standing on a sidewalk holding up a sign, I kind of say, I don't like that a foreign individual is trying to influence our government. But you can do that from anywhere. If an American protests, we can argue that the protest is, you know, there's there's limitations on if you're a roadway, we're going to clear you out of the roadway and then you can get a permit. So I guess I'd put it this way. I don't think noncitizens actually I think it's actually pretty clear.

I think we're not even I'm not even arguing anything. Even Americans aren't allowed to obstruct roadways or official proceedings. Exactly. Right. So these protests that they're always doing are unlawful assemblies in that they are not for one a protected instances. So the foreign students at these universities who are obstructing are breaking the law and they are not protected by 1a okay revoke their visas bye see that i don't argue against if if you're if you're here on a visa you get caught violating our law you're gone like

i'm all for that my my worry is that the this is this is worded very vaguely the way they're talked about i'm sure there'll be more specificity, but it's vaguely worded in the sense that if you are taking activities that are pro-mosque for you would be sign on the side of the road, not obstructing traffic, not violating rules like that, making that deportable. I worry. Why do we have to let. But why should any non-citizen be granted the rights to advocate against us, even in our own country? Because that's the beauty of the First Amendment, is that you have to allow people their voice. You have to. American citizens.

Again, if you're here on a visa, if you're here on a visa, you are here because we are allowing it. You don't have a right to be here. You're probably on a visa that's attached to the fact that you're a student. Focus on your schoolwork. If you want to protest or go to a protest, I think that that probably should be okay. But if you're engaging in the protest, if you're out there throwing things or making a scene. I agree with that. I agree with that.

It's kind of like imagine imagine you got a roommate. And you walk in and he's washing his feet in the kitchen sink. And you go, bro, are you legit washing your feet in the kitchen sink? And he goes, hey, man, I pay rent. I pay utilities. I want to use the sink this way. And you go, okay, we need to come to an agreement on what we're allowed to use the sink for. So you draft up these rules and say, okay, fine.

I'm going to say you're allowed to wash your feet in that sink there but don't use my sink we agree then you invite a guy over he walks over just washing his feet in the sink like no no no dude you're a homie who's hanging out you don't get to do that that guy's paying rent and i had to make a compromise with him you stop doing that now leave no i can i can understand like i said i to be fair i don't think we disagree i think we agree that if you're if you're doing something that you shouldn't be doing, that you're not allowed to do, where the First Amendment wouldn't protect you anyway. So first, 1A does protect non-citizens.

The Bill of Rights, the Constitution applies to tourists, 100%. There is a question over guns, which is interesting. How would a non... So how would a non-citizen buy a gun in this country, despite the fact it is I believe the Supreme Court already ruled the Constitution applies to noncitizens and they have the same rights. And the reason we do that is because and here is the is the real challenge. The reason why we give noncitizens constitutional rights is because to to take or to deny them those rights would mean that the police could stop you and say,

what you are doing is we're going to stop you in search and say, hey, man, I'm just standing here minding my own business. I'm an American citizen. I have a right to protest. And they go, we don't think you're a citizen. Now we're going to stop you. And then we'll figure out if you're a citizen later. Because the restrictions on the government, the government has to say, we can't actually stop to check if you're a citizen or not. And that's one of the challenges of the legal immigration. So navigating this thing is difficult because I'll put it this way. You got people who are coming here for ill intent. They seek to cause us harm, to obstruct, cause damage, and they will do it and create friction and economic friction in any way they can. I don't like the idea that we have to let people come into our country. And the issue of Hamas is

is it's secondary. I'm not talking about that. Anybody who comes to this country on a visa as a guest given benefits by our country for, let's say, it's a three month visa or a two year visa who then decides I want to use this opportunity to influence your country. I say you are not a citizen. You have no right to influence our government in protest. I reject that. I can certainly understand the argument of how does the government differentiate between citizens and not. But I do think there is a problem in saying non-citizens can influence our government in some way with our protection i don't like that yeah if if they're if you're here as a guest which is what a visa is

then you know and you're going to protest you're going and and i i think that it should be you know basically engaging in any level of protest beyond just being at the protest. You want to put your body there and stand there and stuff, whatever. That's fine. If you're yelling at people, if you're causing a nuisance in any way, that, beat it. There's no reason to say, oh, we must allow you to be here. You have no right to be here.

You are here because we are generous. If you're going to go and protest and cause a disturbance, even cause a disturbance, hollering through a megaphone. You can be at a place where there are people hollering through a megaphone. But if it turns into something where the police come and they just start scooping people up and you're among them, bye. That's it. You know, if it starts getting rowdy you should get out of there before the police arrive because if the police decide we're going to scoop people up and i'm not saying that police should i'm not taking a stance on that but if they do and they

find out that you're here on a visa see ya just go home you can have your opinions you can type them on the internet but if you're going to a protest and you're going to make a stink and make noise and the police end up picking you up, beat it. No, I understand. Like I said, for me, it's a it's a dance for me. It really is just because as somebody who's pro Israel and was dealing with a lot of the pro Hamas protests and all stuff like that. And I would I you know, I recognize it would have been so much easier just to get rid of those people from those crowds and allow the people that wanted to peaceably carry on with their lives to go and then it butts up because i i always look at free speech as an absolute you know and i've recognized that we've made rules around it and we we make concessions on that and this would be another concession on that is from my perspective and

it's anytime there is a concession when it comes to the first amendment i'm always i'm always would err on the side of the first than i would on the side of the government making a new rule. Yeah, I mean, fair point. Fair enough. Indeed. Shall we go to super chats? My friends, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button? Share the show with everyone you know, if you do like the work that we do. We're going to read your rumumble rants and your super chats, and of course we're going to have that uncensored call-in show coming up at 10pm at rumble.com

slash timcastirl. You've got to be a premium member at Rumble, so use promo code TIM10. Sign up now at timcastpremium.com. But for now, we will read your super chats and Rumble rants. Alright, let's see. Uh-oh, YouTube's crashing. YouTube does does that we'll start

with rumble i guess rumble's not crashing all right dookie pox says i like turtles excellent whiskey biscuit says turtles suck tortoises rule these are these are very very contentious rumble rants um i got news for you, Whiskey Biscuit, though. The internationally, the academic recognition of the turtle family includes tortoises. So everybody likes saying turtle, even though tortoises are technically different. But I forgot what happened. I was at a pet store and they explained to us, you can look it up, that tortoises colloquially are still in the, as per English, the turtles represent everybody. That's right. That's right. Sorry, guys.

That's just the way it is. All right. Let's grab some super chats now that we've already started off with some hot takes. Alpha Turkey says, with China acting up near Australiaia and ready for war plus 2027 coming up gaza and israel and ukraine wars are we on the inevitable path to world war three i don't know um with trump in office you know if if uh a year ago i might have said it's possible depends on what happens but now that trump's in i don't know so much yeah maybe a war happens without us because trump's gonna to be like nope i mean

there's israel and he's going to be like whatever you need one of the things that uh that i'm it's actually a little concerning is the way that the eu is behaving the whole like oh we need to to arm up and blah blah i i get that they're not meeting their NATO obligations, but it sounds like they're looking to do it independently of NATO. And the last two world wars were because of Europe. And I don't want to see, you know, a third world war because of europe so well there was an amazing tweet that somebody put i'm i don't know what you call it now on x but an amazing post on x where a person from germany said hey europe just checking you want us to march across europe and to go fight russia he's like just checking this time i want to get that out of the way but are you guys sure exactly like you really want us to do this

because we wasn't cool last time but one of the things to me, I don't think there's a world war possible. Because, like, there's one of two realities that exist. Either, because liberals love to act like if we gave Ukraine a bunch of money, they could defeat Russia, which I don't think is a reality. But let's just say it was. Let's just say the least funded and the least military equipped country in all of Europe could defeat Russia. Okay, cool. Now they're not a world power anymore. We don't have to worry about them. One of those two realities has to be true, because if Ukraine can beat them, they're not our enemy. They're not our worry anymore. But if you can't beat them now, now Europe knows you can't beat them without us.

They don't go to war either. So either one of those realities keeps us from having World War. Yeah, good point. All right, let's grab some more. We have Horsehead saying, Tim, did you see your good friend Emma Vigeland mocking Peyton McNabb being injured? What a real winner. I did. I in fact did a whole segment talking about it saying, thank you Emma. We need these things to win the midterms, so please mock young women who

are brutalized by men. I insulted her. In a very vulgar way all right let's uh let's grab this what is this um kenneth hart says pcc uncovered a pretty serious genocide active in conga and gongo uh-huh is that a joke from no it's the it's the gongo oh it's it's a it Oh. It's a meme that was made up in PCC. There is a femagenocide going on in the gongo. Oh, jeez.

Aaron Goodrich says, in TimCast tradition, I'm listening to the show while my wife is in active labor. I will welcome my fourth daughter, Helana, likely by the end of the show. Congratulations. Good sir. Congrats. And give my best to your wife. I'm sure she is working very hard right now. You know, a very difficult thing to do.

Doug Blask says, shout out to Discord's Seven Days to Die server now running Darkness Falls, my friends. You want to play Seven Days to Die? Join the TimCast Discord server. Go to TimCast.com. Click join us. Sign up. The Discord server, for those who don't know, it's a big chat room. If you're asking yourself, how do I get involved?

Are you tired of sitting there on your couch, flipping through YouTube channels, wondering how you can actually get involved and help make a difference? One way is to meet people. You can do that however you want, or you can get started on the Discord server. TimCast.com, you get active. 20,000 plus individuals. They're all hanging out. You'll make friends. And this will create that connection between you and them. And who knows?

Maybe you will launch the new podcast or make a new video game or a new comic book. And you change the world. I thought they were talking about the Killswitch Engage song when darkness falls, which is a very sick song. It's based. All right. Tyrant God says the childish display from the Democrats during Trump's speech was funny because grow the F up, but also angering because of the disrespect it displayed. But I agree. But part of me is like when a child has a temper tantrum, do we not understand that they lack the cognitive abilities to to to calm themselves? Their brains are not fully developed. So for the developmentally disabled Democrats, they can't help themselves.

I feel bad for them. Well, going along with the kid analogy, that's perfect because, you know, when you raise children without consequences, they continue to act that way. Here we go again. Bagus Radda says, Tim, the story on the newborn being thrown at the window is why I disagree with you on the death penalty.

No, it isn't, because that means you don't understand what my argument at the death penalty. My argument is not that evil people don't deserve some kind of punishment or penalty. My argument is I will not accept Kamala Harris telling me who deserves to die. OK, if someone is actively going to end the life of a child legally, we recognize in this country a capital punishment for those offenders.

We recognize the right to use force, be it the police or individuals in most states. No shout out to a few of them. New Jersey. The point is, morally, we recognize as decent human beings, sometimes bad things happen to bad people and we must do what we have to to protect society. The problem is there's a difference between active self-defense and me walking into a room, seeing two people I've never seen before, and Kamala Harris going, I think he should die. What do you say?

I'm going to say no every time. I'm going to be like, lady, you're nuts. Okay, you are an evil witch. I am not going to pull a lever for anybody nor lend my voice to that. That's my problem with the death penalty. Gavin Newsom and these Democrats in these states, you know, I got to be honest, the things these people would do if you allow them to. OK, so this is these arguments don't even align, not even whatsoever. All right, let's grab some more. What we got?

Pino Shays says, what was the CIA doing in the black sites? Has everyone already forgotten when the feds fight an RPG into rural Virginia home last summer? That was a crazy clip. Memory hold as usual. What? I didn't see that. Did we see that? I didn't see that one. I never heard of that. It was in House Exploded. The House Exploded?

It was not an RPG. No, that was the one with the gas line. I mean, the gas line is the cover story we hear on all the movies. So, you know, although an RPG isn't going to do the same thing. So when you get that, like people that see RPGs see an RPG from a movie. That's not what it does. Yeah.

All right. Stavrak says if a member of Congress is censured, they should be unable to run for reelection. They need consequences. They want to be locked up. There's expulsion. You can be expelled. Censure is like. It's just nothing.

Exactly. If you can even call it that, it's more of a this. They even get a fine or anything. No, no. They go. It just goes. It just goes into public record that these guys were schmucks. And the problem is to censure, you only need a simple majority.

Did people ever actually wiggle their fingers? My grandmother did. Wagging your finger? No, no. Yeah. Oh, no, no. That's what they do. Don't touch those cookies.

The problem with ending the censure on re-election, doing that would be, because you only need a simple majority to censure someone. And so the minute democrats had power they would censure every single republican in congress and make us elect all new people which the minute would not be super opposed to and the minute republicans had power they sit there and go well we can't do that exactly i believe they should be expelling democrats right now but the problem is is that while we're not willing to take the extreme steps they are i am no no i mean the people in, the people in Congress, our people in Congress.

You know, if if they asked me to be speaker of the House, I might say yes. It's never it's never going to happen. But I said, you know, I've always said I would never get involved in government. But there's one job I'd take that two seconds. With a smile on my face, I would be locking up cops left and right. I can only hope to God you would stream it. If they let me, I'm talking about the CBP agents at the border who are handing children off to sex trafficking slavery rings, knowing they were doing it and saying Biden told me to. I would love to be the person to perp walk that guy, you know, and the FBI agents who weaponize the DOJ against Trump and against everyone else. I'd love to be the person to lock them up as well. Anybody who broke the law and said, but I was just following orders,

you will make my day if I get just one a week, just one criminal government agent per week being arrested, and I'd be signing autographs for libertarians all day. I would love that job. Libertarians outside going, yeah! And I'm like, no, no, no. You'd be the most popular guy for libertarians, absolutely. Without a doubt, you'd be the most popular person and

you'd be the most popular person in government libertarians libertarians have not had this much uh this much winning ever i think like seriously the the behavior of donald trump and the things doge is doing are stuff that libertarians have been dying for and begging for ron paul's in contact with uh elon musk regularly to talk about doge and and things that should be cut and and stuff so libertarians right now are are ecstatic so if tim could actually go in and actually fight like put put people in jail i mean that well i think they got that way by nominating their worst candidate ever. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I don't know if it's the worst candidate ever, though. Bill Weld is a candidate.

These CIA officials who lied to get Trump impeached, all of these evil people who have taken a dump on the vision of the founding fathers, the Constitution in this country, all of the federal law enforcement who cover up and protect crimes, who refused their jobs or the CBP thing is the biggest thing because they knew that these children coming across were being sold into slavery. And they said, boss told me to do it. Each and every one of these CBP agents, every every airline pilot who transported illegal immigrants, I would be arresting everybody. Just don't get right to jail. If you're an airline pilot and you knew that you had illegal immigrants on your plane because they were there were there were so many reports of this that the Biden admin would load up illegal immigrants onto a plane and the pilots were like, whatever boss said it was fine i would arrest that guy so quick he'd be like but but i'm just a pilot and i'm like did you transport illegal immigrants

across state lines yes you're under arrest i don't care when i was flying back from houston last year we had a me and my wife had an illegal immigrant sitting next to us they had one of those pamphlet things remember Remember the handouts out? Yep. She had three brand new cell phones, like this whole thing. And I asked her, I'm like, so, and using my phone because I don't speak Spanish. And I was like, so where are you coming from? How long has your journey been?

She's like six months from Guatemala. And I was like, oh, you look, she's like, I'm four months pregnant too. And I was like, oh, geez. People need to understand. We live in a society. It is changing under Donald Trump's leadership. We live in a society where airline pilots knew what they were doing was wrong, transporting no punishment for committing this crime. So I'll do it anyway. We must return to a country where an airline pilot for American Airlines is standing there about to board his plane. And when his boss says, we've got 15 people under the country illegally, they don't have identification and you will transport them. He says, hell no,

I won't. I don't want to go to prison. Or I'd love it if he said, well, that would be morally wrong, sir, and I won't do it. Let's just not forget. I'm not talking about Biden saying we're granting temporary status. I'm talking about people who did not have identification. We didn't know who they were. They weren't vetted for security. And we brought them on on taxpayer dollars. And these airline pilots were like, what do I care? I can't get in trouble. I can't get in trouble when I do this. Imagine if every pilot, every single one, every flight attendant said, I will not board that plane so long as there are people on there that are not identified. I will not be in violation of the law. And their boss goes, don't worry. I said, it's okay.

And it's like, no, it doesn't matter because I'm the one who gets in trouble. It never would have happened. Imagine if every CBP agent said, I ain't transporting that kid to sex slavery. Are you nuts? Never would have happened. But we are in a sick country of amoral, dishonorable individuals. So many men who are spineless cowards who are like, my boss told me to do it. So I guess I guess I have to. I would I dream of being empowered by the federal governor, Donald Trump, to just go arrest all of them. A big old naughty list for every single person who was a spineless coward who said my paycheck is more important than the fabric of my nation. I say, well, you broke the law. You go to jail. And you know what? To be fair, to be fair, I'd make sure every single warrant and every arrest was 110 percent.

No, no overzealous, emotional targeting of individuals. You either confess we have video evidence and documented evidence, or we say we, you know, the idea being we want to be very, very careful on this one, but we want to make sure people realize breaking the law. There is no excuse that my boss told me to do it. I don't care if you're in the private sector or in the public sector. Imagine someone saying, I took $10,000 out of the corporate accounts to go buy a new motorcycle for myself. My boss told me it was okay. Did you know you weren't allowed to take that money? Yes. But my boss said it was fine. You are going to jail. That's the truth. Why do we grant exceptions to these people?

I mean, it's fascinating to me. Boarding a plane with no ID. Who authorized that? If you tried boarding a plane right now with no ID, what do you think the flight attendant is going to say? You don't get on. You wouldn't even get that far. You wouldn't get that far. You wouldn't get through security at the airport.

So TSA agent, when they say, they don't even take your tickets anymore. Do you know this? No, yeah. Take your ID, feed it in the machine. That's all you do now. they don't even take your tickets anymore. Do you know this? Yeah. Take your ID, feed it in the machine. That's all you do now. They don't even look for your ticket. So what do you think would happen if right now you went and said, I don't need an ID?

They'd say, get out. That's not true. You let illegal immigrants on all the time with these packets. But our boss told us we were allowed to do that one illegally. Okay, I'm going to arrest all. Oh, man. It would be a dream come true. You know what I'd do?

I'd go to the TSA and say, on dates we had this one had 200 illegal immigrants flying with that ID. This one had 200 who was actively working the security checkpoints on those days. You're under arrest. And they're but but my boss told me to do it. Oh, your boss told you to let people in with no IDs. So your boss told you to break the law. And my reaction is, oh, your boss, he told you to break the law and my reaction is oh your boss he told you to do it which who was your boss John over there okay you're both under arrest thank you well I thought we did away with the I was just following orders excuse after the 40s I thought we weren't you know we we pretty much established that I was just following orders does not work. But for some reason it does when it comes to, let's just say,

politically questionable activities. Like, you know, they want to get away with stuff. It's just, oh, I was told it's okay. It's like, you knew it wasn't. It's like, you know. Right. Pauly Perez says, Tim, you should get Newsom as a guest. We are on it, actually.

I don't think he's going to travel out here, though. I think the idea is he wants people to go to him, which I don't know. I don't like going to California. Well, it's not that – we don't do business with California. California sucks bad. The issue is it's a microscopic market relatively. So it's fascinating how much people romanticize hollywood in la despite the fact that business-wise it's the stupidest place to go to for for most industry because no one lives there i know la's got like 13 million people or whatever but uh take a look

at any tour map as phil would know how many cities are going to hit an east coast server versus a west coast tour oh yeah you there's a lot more cities on the East Coast than the West Coast. More than half the population of the country lives in Eastern time. Sergeant Buck says Michael Mouse was right again, as he often is. He often is, though I disagree with him on some things. He's often correct. He's a smart man. Very funny as well.

We're big fans. Liberty Prime says if Trump told the left not to eat their own poop, they would eat it. Yeah. It's so depressing. Trump needs to actually do this. He needs to, like, not advocate for not eating poop or whatever, or, you know, whatever. But, like, he should use the phenomena to his advantage by coming out and saying things like, you know, like, oh, don't donate to this nonprofit.

They're really bad. And then it's like a conservative Christian nonprofit or whatever, and then they just get tons of money. Well, I think there's that joke that boats are a conservative thing. You know, like only conservatives own boats. It's like you really want to prop up the boat industry? Let Trump say that boats are just for conservatives. Yeah. It'll be a big thing.

You know, everybody will be like, I got to get a boat. Boats are fun, but they're money pits. You know what boat stands for, right? Bust out another thousand. The joke is the best day of your life is when you buy the boat. The second best day is when you sell it. Yep. And then what kind of boat is the best?

A friend's boat. A friend of boat is what kind of boat is the best you're a friend's boat uh but this is true for anything to like uh just charter things yeah you know i'm gonna let everybody in a secret have you ever even looked into a yacht charter it's not expensive so uh we rented a uh like a 70 footer in miami for the day that was fun and it was like i think it was like six or seven thousand dollars now hold on you might be saying tim that's expensive no no it can fit 20 or 15 20 people everybody splits it up it's a couple hundred bucks a person to go out on the day on a yacht with jet skis and they bring food and they cater for you and there's a staff so when you get a party of 10 or 15 people and everyone splits it it's like 300 bucks a person

so again 30 bucks ain't nothing but you're talking about a vacation and what your budget So when you get a party of 10 or 15 people and everyone splits it, it's like $300 a person. So again, $300 ain't nothing, but you're talking about a vacation and what your budget is for. You get your buddies together. Just sell the red cups for really high prices. There you go. $10 a cup. That's right. It's a lot of fun.

They have those little things you hold where you go in the water and then you press the button and it pulls. Scuba things? Yeah, a little jet. Oh, the jet engines, yeah. Yeah, those are fun. You're like swimming around. They had a bunch of other stuff the the little floaty pool that you could put behind the boat oh that's right you can jump on there flat like that things yeah yeah it's like you was it was it alex who jumped off the back against the wishes of the crew sounds about right it's something alex would do i imagine it was alex

stein because i can't imagine who else it would have been i didn't jump off i was so they had a they have they also have like a an inflated ring with a net that they pull behind the boat, and you're in a little pool. Yeah, it's amazing. It was a lot of fun. Yeah. And if you get a big enough party, I think they said 15 people is the max or whatever. Yeah.

And then you're like, it's going to be like $300, $400 a person for this day trip. I know. That's not cheap either. I'm just saying it's not $50, 50 grand it's not what people think it is i gotta look into that because i'm going down late april to miami for another content creator's birthday and that that is i'm definitely gonna get that info because i'm that's a 70 footer right because you can get like a catamaran for much much much cheaper yeah you know no i don't need something that big but uh yeah but i that would sounds like a one like even with our group of people, that's more than affordable.

And then like you see these people partying on all these boats and you're like, these aren't millionaires. These are like middle class people. You just you pitch your money together. You know what I mean? That's how you do it. Although it's hard to wrangle cats sometimes. You know what I mean? Yeah.

Getting everybody to be like, put your card in or whatever you got to do. Everyone's got a pitch in. Don't be the guy that says I'll pay it. You could Venmo me. Oh, yeah. I'll Venmo you tomorrow tomorrow i got about three people i trust that much yeah chaotic says congrats on being a dad tim literally four hours ago i found out my girlfriend is pregnant congratulations congrats oh yeah make many babies it is very based don't wait matthew perry says day four of no bourbon in Canada. I'm struggling. Why did our government ban it?

No, no. Look, they had the bourbon. They decided to throw it out. They already bought it. It is Canada's government and or maybe the booze sellers, the retailers, that have decided to do this. It's not America's fault. Canadian whiskey sucks, though.

I used to like i used to like crown royal but point being they had the booze they decided to throw the booze out because they're stomping their feet it is not america's fault that there is no uh no bourbon in canada right now canada's making zorn tpgl says tim texan plumber here father of three business owner working late and listening to throw shade at us us. We may be quiet, but we're paying attention to the news. I never threw shade at plumbers who pay attention to the news. I threw shade at people who did not pay attention to the news. That was the point.

It is. And the plumber I met was like, if you're a regular working class, Joe, you don't listen to news shows, but you get fervently emotional about the news. That's a problem. You could, sir, appear to be a business owner and plumber who is actively listening to the news to be informed. That's quite not. That's not at all what I was concerned about. So the issue I take is people who don't actively pay attention but get superheated. If all you did was listen to some liberal podcaster, but you were kind of chill. If all you did was listen to Timcast IRL, but you're kind of chill.

I got no beef. My beef is the people who are going on waving signs, bashing their face on the table who don't actually listen to the news. That's that was my point. They're dangerous, largely Democrat. Edward Lenovo. Actually, Tim, the federal government can and routinely stops people within within 50 50 of the border, 50 miles, including coastlines, to ask for proof of citizenship. Indeed, it happened to me once. But they didn't ask for citizenship. I was on a bus from San Diego to LA, and we got stopped randomly. And then immigration officers came on, and a guy walked up to me, and he goes, like, you have ID? And I was like, yeah. I pulled out my ID and I handed him. He looks at it, and he goes, where are you from? and i was like yeah i pulled out my id and handed him he looks at and he goes where you're from and i was like chicago what are you doing here he's very fast

and i was like uh i drove down to san diego but i'm going to stay in los angeles he goes what's your favorite what's your favorite baseball team real quick and i went am i supposed to say that this is the cubs i guess i mean i don't know uh i i but cubs is what everybody says but i uh i was on the south side so he's a socks fan i gotta. But I've got to be honest. I'm a skateboarder. I don't pay attention to baseball. And he goes, okay, have fun, kid. And so the reason they asked the rapid question, real quick, what's your favorite baseball team, is because people who rehearse their answers and practice their pitch or whatever wouldn't have an answer. And so that's how they play it.

Israel is famous for this. Oh, yeah. When a lot of countries do their security screenings it's like what are you coming in for you like the passport and you're like ah tourism they go okay israel asked you weird questions well that's where we get the word the word shibboleth is like literally what that is like in world war ii they'd i forget what it was but they'd say something like the name of like a particular team and if you didn't say the team back then they'd they'd pop you right there so shibboleth it's a it's a yiddish or hebrew word in this case aggressive

immigration yeah for real yeah i got rejected the one time i went to israel i had to go back They'd pop you right there. So shibboleth. It's a Yiddish or Hebrew word in this case. Shibboleth. That's aggressive immigration. Yeah, for real. Yeah. I got rejected the one time I went to Israel. I had to go back, get a new passport, and come back. What? Why? Because in the prior two months before that, I had been in and out of Yemen seven times.

Oops. They were like, you're going to need a new one. I think I went when I was with Vice, and they had me get a dupe. They call it a dupe. Yeah. Duple your passport. But because we were concerned that, like, I had been to Egypt, Morocco, and a bunch of other places. And they were like, Israel's not going to care because they're aware of who I am and who I worked for.

The issue was if I got an Israeli stamp in the passport, you can't go back to these other countries. However, when I went, they didn't care at all. They gave me not a stamp in the passport. They put a piece of paper, a security tag in the ne'er-do-wells, they're famous for just asking weird questions to see if you break character or if you're having a problem. Or if you just go, excuse me? And they'll be like, I said, which kind of corn do you prefer? And you're like, I'm not sure I've ever thought about that. And they're like, oh, don't worry about it.

Not that I've ever asked that question. I'm just saying, like. That'd be a good one, though. Right. Because I'd be like, I guess American american sweet corn we use it for everything um blue corn tortilla chips are pretty good though but i would not really answer that and they'd be like whatever see that threw me off because the you said corn and anybody who's watching who has tiktok knows that's right so in case that word and that's degenerate that's what they're really

screening for and you're like well anything with an amputee. And they're like, aha! Degenerate out! All right, everybody, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know. Word of mouth is the best way to help the show. We're heading over to that uncensored call-in show, which means go to rumble.com slash timcast IRL. And we are going to get uncensored and talk to you and answer your questions. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast, the older millennial.

Would you like to shout anything out? No. I mean, if you know me on social media and you're watching this, you probably either are a fan or you hate me, which is perfectly fine. But either way, whether you hate me or you're a fan, you should definitely subscribe to Timcast IRL, and you should definitely become a member on Rumble so you can actually see what we'll say afterwards. Look at this guy. He's great.

You're my favorite guest. Thanks for hanging out, man. We got Chuck. What's going on? Hey, guys. That was a lot of fun. You can follow me on X at Frank underscore True Blue. Join Rumble Premium.

Check out the green room. It's a lot of fun. And yeah, let's get to the after show. I am Phil that remains on Twix. I'm Phil that remains official on Instagram. The band is all that remains. New record dropped on January 31st. It is called Anti-Fragile.

You can check it out on YouTube, Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora, Amazon Music, and Deezer. And don't forget the left lane is for crime. We will see you all in the uncensored call-in show at rumble.com slash timcast IRL in about 30 seconds. Thanks for hanging out.