Timcast IRL - DOJ Launches INVESTIGATION Into Trump Accuser For LYING w/ Bradley Devlin

Episode Date: May 28, 2026

Tim, Ian, and Brett are joined by Bradley Devlin to discuss the DOJ launching a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll for lying, Democrats are broke and disorganized, Trump say's he doesn't care about midterms, an insane conspiracy claims Massie's wife death was a deep state plot, a bombshell study reveals possible link between MRNA vaccines and dangerous heart complications, and Jill Biden admits she though Joe Biden was having a stroke during disaster debate.  SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/ Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwN... Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Ian  @IanCrossland  (everywhere) | https://graphene.movie/ Brett  @PopCultureCrisis  (everywhere) Producer: Carter @carterbanks (X) |  @trashhouserecords  (YT) Guest:  Bradley Devlin @bradleydevlin (X)  Podcast available on all podcast platforms! DOJ Launches INVESTIGATION Into Trump Accuser For LYING | Timcast IRL For advertising inquiries please email [e-mail]

The DOJ has launched a criminal investigation into E. Gene Carroll for committing perjury. Apparently, she was speaking in a deposition, claimed that she was not receiving outside funding, but CNN says later it was revealed she was actually getting paid by a big Democrat donor to go after Trump with some ridiculous 30-year-old accusation of, let's just call it, impropriety. Now, I'd say, after following that whole case, none of it makes sense. the accusation against Trump makes literally no sense. So we're going to know all the story and all this stuff. But at the same time, Trump says that she was lying to try and promote a book.

And I think that probably is what really happened here, but we'll talk about that. Then, of course, the big news, Donald Trump is unstoppable. Everybody he's endorsed has won. So while we're seeing in the social media landscape, this seeming divide, people who are moderate, libertarian or otherwise breaking from the Republican Party or from Trump, Trump still controls a commanding amount of political force. When you look at the primary elections, we've seen up to this point as well as the polling, it is actually terrifying the implications of what this means.

Donald Trump is like the only charismatic politician we have. Don't get me wrong, a lot of people don't like the guy. But can you name anybody who is as commanding as Trump is politically? Democrats don't got it. Republicans maybe have a few names. Maybe. But what's what is it? I wonder what it look like after Trump leaves in two years. There is, of course, a big conversation around this having to do with certain resignations and plans. Thomas Massey, of course, running for re-election in 2028. I've heard rumors. We'll talk about all that. Before we get into all of that, of course, we've got a great sponsor for you. It is pocket hose. Yo, check this out, my friends. I'm excited

tell you about the world's number one expanding garden hose and the brand new product, the pocket hose ballistic. Pocket hose is the number one expandable hose in the world. Super lightweight, easy to manage, easy to store. Turn the water on and it grows, turn the water off and it shrinks back to pocket size. The pocket hose ballistic is reinforced with a liquid crystal polymer used in bulletproof vests, making the anti-burst sleeve practically bulletproof and that liquid crystal polymer fiber is actually five times stronger than steel. It comes to the pocket pivot. which gives you total freedom of movement at the spigot. With 360-degree rotation, you move it follows, and the water flows.

Enhancing an upgraded UV coating, so the hose looks new year after year. Re-engineered thicker washers that resist leaks. Pocket hose carries over 100 patents worldwide. And now for a limited time when you purchase a new pocket hose ballistic, you get a free 360-degree rotating pocket pivot and a free thumb-drive nozzle. Just text Tim to 64,000. That's Tim to 64,000 for your two free gifts with purchase. Text Tim to 64,000 message and data rates may apply.

Shut up, pocketos. Thanks for sponsoring the show. Don't forget, my friends, you got to go to Timcast.com and click join us to get involved. You got to get in the Discord community because community is everything. It's not what you know, it's who you know. You know, and for a while we did the Timcast website. We were like, we'll give exclusive content. And then we realize the most valuable thing for you is community.

And I genuinely mean this. Something that is valuable to all of the individual members. Some people who have started new projects, started businesses, creative endeavors. They've created their own shows and podcasts. Some people have actually gotten married. Not a joke. Not like everybody, but you know, hey, it can happen. The point is community is everything.

It's why we talked about how we want to do these coffee shops. We want to create community events so people can come together because that's how we save this country when we share our values and inspire others to join the community. So don't just sit idly by as terrifying evil forces seek to take this country that our ancestors and the founding fathers have worked so hard to give to us this better future. One way you can fight is to join us, support the work that we do, and get involved yourself at timcast.com. Don't forget to also, and my friend, smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know right now.

I just said on all social media. Joining us tonight to talk about this. And so much more, of course, we have Bradley Devlin. Tim, that was fiery. I loved that. Oh, thank you. Bradley Devlin, Daily Signal Politics editor, host of the Signal Sitdown podcast.

It's a weekly show where I interview someone with some insider knowledge of what's going on in Washington, D.C. So check that out and check out the Daily Signal.com. Right on. We've got the boys saying, and now we got Brett. Guys, it's been such a long time. I don't even remember how to do this. But normally, if you want to catch me, I'm on Pop Culture Crisis Monday through Friday at 3 p.m.

But I'm excited. Let's get into it. Yeah, for all those asking, no, it's not a hose in my pocket. Get your pocket hose, Carter Banks. Totally. And also let Ian know whether he should have his collar popped or not popped tonight. Or maybe one pop. That's the kind of language that will get you sued by the likes of E. Jean Carroll, Ian. Best be careful.

She's feasting at the bone, I hear. I think I saw the... What does that mean? Feasting at the bone. I don't know yet. We were out shopping over the weekend. and saw like the pocket hose somewhere. And Olivia mentioned that that's like a product that they advertise here.

And I was like, I did not know that. It was like at like T.J. Max or something. How cool. It's like, that's how you know you made it when you're getting sponsored by a garden hose company. You're like, this is the every man's item. Plumbing. Yeah. So shout out.

Let's jump into the news. We got some CNN exclusive. DOJ launches a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll. I'm just going to say this, guys, it's a slam dunk. Can we be honest? So what I love most about this is that the claim, I'm just going to say it all right. In my opinion, based on reading through the court documents and tracking the news on this, this is the most insane story I've ever heard.

It does not make sense. She claims that 30 years ago at the Bergdorf Goodman, Donald Trump went inside, brought a second floor, went to a dressing room, where they engaged in relations, and she did not want to. but they didn't say that he raped her. It's weird. They said it was like, yeah, they didn't call it rape. So when everyone's like, you know, Trump was found civilly liable for rape, no, it was something else because I think the claim was that she, it's the weirdest story. She went with him to this dressing room, such a claims, but then in there, Trump pushed it too far. So they're like, well, now here's the problem. She claimed to have been wearing a dress that didn't exist at the time.

It's like a very famous designer dress. Donald Trump owned the hotel across the street, so he had no reason to bring her into a busy building where the most famous man in New York would have easily been recognized. Her story, there was no one in the second floor, which makes no sense because it was one of the biggest department stores. And she couldn't even explain how they unlocked the door. So Donald Trump says she made the whole thing up because she wanted to sell a book. Well, here's the story. They say, the DOJ has launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll. The investigation is focused on whether she committed perjury and testimony tied to her two civil lawsuits against the president.

one alleging he sexually abused Carolyn New York in a department store in the mid-90s, and a second one for defaming her when he denied the assault. Guys, can we just, so Trump denies it ever happened, and she calls that defamation and sues him again. Can we talk about rigged insanity? Didn't they make them have some kind of weird gag order where he wasn't allowed to talk about it? I think that was a different case. I think that, yeah, that might have been the civil fraud. That might have been the criminal.

There's so many fake cases in New York against them. They say the prosecutor's theory hinges on a 2020. deposition statement by Carol, 82, that she received no outside funding for her lawsuit, though it was later revealed that billionaire Reid Hoffman had paid some legal fees and expenses. Her team declined to comment for the story. Apparently there was another deposition. So I'm just going to say this. There's like this debate, I don't know if Jubilee did it or something, where you've got a bunch of libs and a bunch of conservatives on one side. And I think it's like that Parker dude asks, like, would you support a person?

person who's found civilly liable for sexual abuse and or like would that be disqualifying and a bunch of people on the right like they don't raise their hand just like aha I got you because it's fake it's all fake well don't worry now with this you want to play stupid games i'll play stupid games with you anybody ever comes to me and says yeah but donald trump was found civilly liable for sexual abuse i'll be like isn't she under criminal investigation for making that up no should have hey listen listen if you want to get into the details i'm of why your story makes no sense? We can.

If you want to get into the details of what it means to in our investigation, we can, but I'm not playing the stupid game. Mute point now. She's being investigated for impropriety related to these claims, so let's just wash it all the way and drop it. What gets me about it is that she kind of came out of the woodwork

while he was running for office and extremely unpopular. It seemed like she had been provoked to do it. I don't know if someone asked her or incited her or called her and was like, hey, if anything ever, anybody know anything ever bad happened? So she brings us up with, I can't say no evidence,

because the evidence of impropriety is her testimony. That's all. There was, as far as I know, zero evidence outlying. She couldn't even remember the year. She just said at some point during the mid-90s, it was a conflict between 95 and 96. This is the level that we're dealing with here. And you also mentioned the defamation side of this thing. Once the civil case came down and said that Trump had done this thing,

then they treated it as fact, even though the standard of proof is so much lower for a civil case like this. It's unbelievable. Also, you mentioned it, Tim. They said that he was convicted of rape over and over and over again after this ruling came out. But what nobody decided to mention was the fact that the people on the jury recognized it was not rape. But the judge, this leftist judge who was presiding over the case basically wrapped the whole thing up at the boat and said, it's basically rape. And so they used the judge's comments to run with that.

And it's just so obvious how weaponized these progressive states are against conservative causes, against Republican candidates. And frankly, I know that there's this big tiff right now in Washington over this weaponization fund for normal folks getting targeted by the government. This is what you're up against. And you need to get real serious about that type of stuff. It's like when Christine Blasey Ford attacked Kavanaugh during the confirmation hearings and the accusations got more and more ridiculous. And it became kind of an S test to say the least. about how much, you know, it's like, what's the saying? It's like, don't be so open-minded that you let your brain fall out.

Like, depending on how steeped you are in politics and how dirty, you know, whether you know how dirty things actually get with something as serious as a Supreme Court nomination, the average well-meaning person might be like, well, why would they, why would they lie about that? Why wouldn't they tell the truth about that? Even if all the evidence afterwards or all the testimony afterwards, nobody could corroborate, nobody knew what was, you know, what she was talking about, all that stuff. A lot of people just, they don't understand how, dirty it gets in politics. And I love what Tim

said. It's a moot point now. She's getting, she's getting investigated for this. The only way out of this that proves it. It feels, it feels like it's mutually assured destruction is like the only way out of this lawfare thing. I think she should, I think the story is obviously insane. Yeah. Like, I don't

believe her for two seconds. And I think she should go to prison. I mean, sounds like they hooked up. I, maybe Donald Trump. I don't know. Why would Trump go into a department store when he owns the hotel across the street? I don't know, maybe just wanted to change a venue. How come...

Why was the department store empty? Maybe he bought the guy. I don't know, I'm getting crazy here. Yeah, her story makes... How was she wearing a dress that didn't exist at the time? I don't know. Maybe she was like they were making out and she's like, hey, come on. I've had enough and you're like, bro.

Ian. You came here. How was she wearing clothes, a designer dress that didn't exist at the time? Dude, it's all. I don't... I can't believe it. I don't believe it. I don't believe it.

I see zero evidence. I have no reason to believe it, except she said it happened. How was she able to sue? years ago. I was she able to sue 30 years after it happened. Because the courts wanted to get Donald Trump to not be able to run for office, obviously. They were using her to- You mean the Democrats?

Yeah, whoever was in charge that machine. But there's a question. There's an actual question. How was she able to sue 30 years later? I don't know. I still don't know. They passed a law just so she could. It is crazy, dude.

Three years after she made the claim, they created a law in New York just so that she could sue Trump. I kind of think it's fake. Like, Bradley, I think you're right that this mutually assured destruction thing, like, they're like, look, we cannot let this happen again. If random people are going to come out of the woodwork to target a guy running for president with some crap statement that from 30 years ago that you kind of remember, we got to make sure those people don't step up and do that. And this is why, because you'll get jacked for perjury.

I don't know what was the perjure charges. What did she say specifically? The perjury charges is that she did not receive funding for her lawsuit when Reid Hoffman, a noted antagonist against Trump, like very well-known. and Trump antagonists supported her lawsuit. And so Reid Hoffman, for example, was one of the people who backed the Nikki Haley effort in New Hampshire saying, you know, Democrats should really throw money at trying to prevent Trump the nomination in 2024.

So that's what they're trying to get her on here. I also think, like, the way that we move forward with this lawfare stuff is, I think what Republicans and conservatives learned through the weaponization against Trump and his supporters during the Biden administration is sometimes the process is the punishment. And I'm not saying every one of these indictments is perfect. We just had the indictment with the SPLC. I know some people have some qualms with the way that the SPLC thing was being carried out. Whatever, man. The point is that if you never make a move against these people, you don't put them back in line. And that's why I support the Comey stuff. I support all this stuff. Anyone that we can get to hold them accountable is

totally worth it. A Bergdorf-Gudman manager testified that doors automatically lock when closed. It was common practice. They were closed. She explained that it was unusual, but they found a door that was open. Listen, the whole story makes no sense. Again, I'm just looking this up. Critics have pointed out that the Donna Karan dress that she owned did not match the timeline for availability during her accusation. This is part of the reason why you don't charge cases 30 years after the fact, because like good luck getting an eyewitness to remember anything three weeks later, let alone three. 30 years after.

She said the lingerie department was uncharacteristically empty. I'm like just, and then Trump and then Trump stumbled out of the room found a winning lottery ticket and everyone clapped, right? It's just ridiculous. Remember that chick who claimed

Brett Kavanaugh was lying, that people would, guys, first of all, there was some guy who made a claim that like Brett Kavanaugh raped him on a boat and that had to like, oops, I lied about it. Why did he just make that up? Then there was that woman that claimed

that Brett Kavanaugh and a bunch of guys at frat parties would lock women in room, line up outside the door where she was enslaved so they could take turns gang raping her. This is insane. That lady, what's her face? What was her name? Was it? Christina Hoffsummer or whatever?

Christine Blasey Ford. No, not her. Not her. Who was it? Christine Blasey Ford. Blasey Ford. Oh, not the other one. We like the other one.

We like the other one. Blasey Ford. Yeah. She says that she's like afraid to fly and they're like, you're afraid to fly? Do you ever fly? She goes, I do. And they're like, are you afraid to fly? yes, but you fly, yes. Did you ever fly on vacation? Yes. So you're lying? She's like, I had to

install a second door on my house because I'm so scared. And they're like, do you mean the second door that you use to Airbnb, the other part of house? Yes. It's all fake and made up. Well, I was saying, I said, like the average person hears that. Like I was saying, you really said, I don't think the average person knows how dirty politics gets. And I think one of the saddest parts about all of these stories, if you're new to politics or you don't pay attention very closely, just the idea that there are Democrat judges or Republican judges is already like a really depressing thing to come to the realization for because you're supposed to think of judges as like arbiters of doling out justice that's uniform to the entirety of the state, right, or to the country. So just knowing that you're going to have to deal with activism from the bench in, you know, aside from all the lawfare from the government is one of the most depressing parts about that. But when the Christine Blasey Ford stuff was coming out, people were saying like, why would she lie?

and you're like, it's a Supreme Court nomination that's going to have drastic, I mean, look at what's happened since then. We've had Roe v. Wade since then. Like, there's drastic implications for the country when somebody's put on the bench. So, yes, why would they lie? We know why.

I feel like this may be the apex of what a modern civil war would look like. People are not so, it's not so much they're maybe not willing to get ultra-violent. I mean, maybe it is possible. But the concern is we're in a psychological battle. The idea is not to control people through force, but to control them through thoughts.

And so it's a battle for legitimacy. You know, let's jump to the story if we got this from Reuters. Trump backed candidates landslide in Texas give Democrats hope in November. Really? Let me put it like this. All of Trump's endorsements have won. Thomas Massey lost. Corn and lost.

These are longstanding incumbents. Trump said, nah, I want somebody else. And the people came out and voted for them. I do not see Democrats winning in November. Let me clarify. What I'm saying is the probability lies with the Republicans. In the House, they've got like a three or a three or so seat advantage right now. So Democrats have to win more tossups than Republicans do.

In the Senate, Democrats would have to flip one of two potential. They have to flip Texas, which sounds insane, or Alaska, which sounds insane. They have to win every toss up and flip a Republican state. The polls do not show this. So right now the probability seems to be with Republicans. Democrats are broke. They're $3 million in debt with very little cash on hand. Republicans have no debt in $200 million.

But Democrats are, they're liberal and left-the-activist still funding something. But they're funding extremism, far-left violence, riots. I think it is obvious where this is going. Let me put it like this. USAID crushed. deep state crushed, routed, fleeing. They're putting their money into Antifa, terrorism, violence, et cetera. There was that old man who got beaten to death.

He had that house, all the Trump signs on it. And you look at this Hassan Piker thing where he's calling out the Singham guy for funding all this far-left extremism. Republicans are funding politicians to win. It looks to me like where we are headed. Trump is going after E. Jean Carroll. He's going after Comey. They are going to go after these cronies and these shills and these liars and these liars

and manipulators. They are going to use the weight of institutional power against them. And the left and these liberal extremists, liberal extremists, a funny phrase, they are going to fund Antifa and violence, and you are going to have the U.S. government versus these insurgent factions. That's what it feels. That's a really interesting thought, because if you think about these races, even in California, for example, I know incumbents have a massive advantage, but Kylie's trying to, He's moved districts because of the redistricting and he's trying to fend off Democratic pressure by becoming an independent and going soft on a whole bunch of issues, which will be an interesting race next week. But Republicans seem to be good on the cash front and Democrat campaigns don't

seem to be doing that well on the cash front. And if it turns into Republicans are going to continue having this cash-on-hand electoral advantage, then yes, you get the Republicans, the Republicans get elected, and then you create a crisis in their capacity to govern, a crisis that creates an emergency that when you have the opportunity to retake power, you come down like a ton of bricks and it becomes a one-party state. I think that's with your civil war analogy there, right? Like, really the contest, the civil war we have right now is who can get to one-party control quicker?

I don't see how Democrats can come back from this. They're broke. They are going to spend $100 million on this race at the least. They're going to spend $100 million on platinum. But it's going to be great. Let's clarify, the DNC, the Democratic establishment is broke, but they're putting money into individual campaigns. This shows that they are decentralized. So the roach has been stepped on and it's splattered.

Now there's little eggs everywhere. But again, centralization in a political party is power. It's organization. They're not going to be able to unify with a bunch of random. Look, guys, Telerico's got the charisma of a stink bug. I mean, let's just be real. I don't see the dude winning. It makes sense.

Homeboy has a campaign video from 2022 where he's like, our campaign is vegan because climate change is a problem. We got to cut back on meat in the state that is the largest beef producer in the country. Dude is going to lose all of the lobbying dollars and all the money from one of the biggest industries in the country centered in Texas. You mean to tell me that these ranchers are going to be like, yeah, I'll vote for him. No, they're going to start putting every penny they have. have against this guy. Now, they put out this picture of him eating a turkey leg to prove he's not vegan. Guys, I don't care he himself is vegan. He said no meat climate change. I hope every

Texas rancher hears that. Plus, they're hypocrites anyway. So that's exactly what a politician would be to say one thing and then do another thing. It feels in a lot of ways like they're waiting for something bad to happen. Do you see the videos the other day of Nick Sorder posted of like ICE allowing their vehicles to be searched by like leftist activists leaving a building. And then the next day they were getting, it was like somebody went to the administration was like, you can't let this happen. It makes you look weak. They let leftist activists.

They were like letting them, like that was what Nick Sorder had posted. You might be able to find it. And then the following day, they were not allowing this to happen. Like somebody said, you cannot be seen on camera giving quarter to them in these situations. It just feels like we're waiting for another summer incident to happen that they can campaign on. Did you guys see the video where the two Mexicans? guys walk out of the ice facility and all the activists start screaming and cheering and then it turns out they were employees just going home.

No. I will say that one of the ICE employees was like, yo, those guys work here. What? Like, you're so racist. I will say, I'm all for this hopium, this copium that Democrats are slinging around right now. Because as you said, right, they, they, he's not going to win any rancher, any of the big industry dollars in Texas.

But Democrats are still going to pour a. ton of money into it. I remember in 2020, they spent collectively between Lindsay Graham and Mitch McConnell, which I'm like the last person in the world to defend either of those two guys. But they spent over $200 million on those campaigns. And you think to yourself, wow, scarcity is real. Resources are finite. It's fantastic that they decided they're going to blow that money on safe Republican races and not in other areas where we can overperform. So I'm all for them thinking that they have a chance in these races. Let's make sure that they think that as long as possible. So they spend as much money as possible going down

and defeat. So the Democrats post this picture of Talarico. My first thought was like, you know, if someone said you could look gay eating a leg of turkey, I'd be like, what do you mean? And then I saw this picture and while they figured it out. Who is the one that was making the cheeseburger on the grill? The cheese

was already on it. Yeah. The cheese was not. Hello, there are fellow meat eaters. Yeah. So a shout out to Saraja Hajmi, who in response to this photo posted this. When I'm in a gay competition and my opponent is James Tellerico. It's a squidward freaking out. You've lost.

Real quick, though, like, he's gay, right? It looks like. I mean, that's fun. I got no beef. You're allowed to be gay. I'm just saying, like, you know, he's gay, right? He loves trans children. Chewing into that meat.

I think that this is like, is he feasting at the bone. He's taking it to the center, dude. Here you go. All the way. Here you go, everybody. It's going hard. Listen to this. We have, I think, heard.

more and more issues of animal welfare, I think not just because it's the right thing to do and the moral thing to do, but also it's, as all of you know, necessary to fight climate change. It is now existential that we try to reduce our meat consumption and that we try to respect animals in all aspects of society. And so I am proud to say that our campaign has officially become a non-meat campaign. So we have, we are only buying. vegan products from our local vegan businesses. Some of you may know big nonas. They were little known us. This is back in 2022. You know, so a lot of people are like, why is he wearing a mask?

It's from 2022. But here's the important point. He's going to change his image now that he's going statewide and he needs to convince everybody. So they're posting cringe like this. We're a Texas shirt and eat some turkey. I'm assuming that's turkey. Dude, we get it. You eat meat. But you have stated you will not buy animal-based products because of climate change. What do you think that means when he gets into office what he is going to do to the cattle ranchers in Texas? I think firstly, meat's not the problem. They're developing stem cell meat where you can grow it in a laboratory and eat it. Whatever you think about it. It's always gross when you haven't done it yet. Don't be a Luddite. Astronauts need to eat meat in space. We're going to be

growing meat in space. It's okay. It's industrial agriculture. It's nasty and it's horrible for the animals in a lot of cases. It's a different conversation, and it's tough for a politician to bring up because it's a huge moneymaker. Right, well, we've got to pause because ranchers, majority of ranchers are not industrialized agriculture. Exactly, yeah. But if you want to talk about climate change and the terror that you're putting animals through, talk about the industrial agricultural system. That's a different conversation. That is just, that is, that is propaganda from leftists.

I don't think so, man. Have you ever smelled a pig farm? They want to let things fly over these pig farms because of all the feces and blood that people up? You ever been to one of these places? I have not. I have seen them. Have you? I've been to cattle ranches.

Have you? I've seen dudes smashing piglets on the ground, like on video. Indeed, you've seen a lot of propaganda videos of bad people doing bad things. And so I went to cattle ranches and I went to dairy farms to interview people. And what I found was cows walking around doing whatever they want. But there's also... Have you driven around? We got cattle farms around.

We do. I just took a couple pictures of my Instagram. Check it out. Exactly. All over where we are our cattle ranches. What are the cows doing all day? Eating, drinking, chilling. Bro, there's a stream over here.

It is the most whimsical magic. Hold on. Hold on. I got to, because you know what I'm talking about, right? When you drive down this road, there is a springtime stream. It only exists in springtime. And you're under these canopies of trees winding around the bend. And you see, you drive over this little, there's like, it's like, it's that the road keeps going.

But the water flows underneath. And there are cows and calves gleefully like prancing through the stream drinking fresh spring water. You've returned. You've returned to the fire. That's not what I'm talking about, but that is nice. No, it's like you're in the forest. and there's a springtime stream and you're driving past it and you just need to stop

and you see like a little calf like prancing around and like splashing in the water and we're going to eat them. Yeah, they are going to be food. But it is not this insane like they're whipping and beating the cows. But you'll see a crate because when people slaughter and their slaughterers, that's their nature, they get desensitized to what they're doing. They don't think

of them as like sentient creatures. They just smash it until they're dead like the little ones. You're talking about bad guys who did bad things. Yeah. That's just nature. When they kill cows, they have that thing they put on the head and go, and it's humane and it's instant. Captive bolt gun. What is it? What is it?

Captive bolt gun. Captive bolt gun. Like that dude from no country for old men. I wanted to make, and he puts it real stuff to the guy's head. And he's just like looking at it. I wanted to talk a little bit about this like Democratic Republican thing because I think that the deep state has switched sides, the uniparty. So I look at this as kind of like level four and we're headed towards level five.

Wait, wait, wait, what does that mean they switch? What's level four? Basically when Trump got a hold of what I believe is when he got a hold of what I believe is when he got a hold of the Epstein files and he seized power and authority with his administration. Everyone that was like playing the game with the USAID is like, all right, we're going with the winner. We don't care who it is. Deep State unifies around the Trump. I don't know yet. So why are they still rallying in Virginia and other blue states? Because it's not a monolith. There's a lot of people that are just politically ID. You're saying that there are prominent elites

who basically said, I will do whatever you say to Trump. It used to be they were with the Bush Jr. administration. Then when Obama got on, they switch sides to the Democrats. Now they switch sides back to Republicans. I feel like the Republicans are going to take and sweep this next election. I'm concerned about next level when we have to really be concerned about a uniparty growing out of this

like a technocratic uniparty in 2028, 2032. So like save your potions basically because the big battles. Let me pull up, we ask from the hill. Trump, quote, I don't care about the midterms.

And it's funny because when you first see this story, a lot of people I know reacted about it. Oh, no, like Trump's saying, no, no, Trump's saying we won. He's saying we've won. He says, they thought they were going to outweigh me, you know, we'll outweigh them. We got the midterms. I don't care about the midterms.

Look what happened last night. That was the prelude to the midterms. He's basically saying when Trump says vote, he wins. And he doesn't see a big difference between the Republican primaries and Republican versus Democrat. And I think there's an interesting point to be made. There's no, there's the DNC as a centralized organism is done. They are broke and donations are going to individual candidates. There is no unified party.

There is no party leader. I do not see how a decentralized spattering of random politicians with disparate funding can go up against a centralized Republican machine. Trump has got powerful donors, big tech billionaires, now on his side. I do not see how when it comes to the grand scheme of things, he ends up losing on this one. Not to mention, we do have these crazy challenges with redistricting. But I think, what was it? I think Tennessee has won. I think, what was it?

Was it Missouri? South Carolina box, Missouri's in. A federal district court just blocked Alabama, defying the Supreme Court precedent, which is insane, they're going to win that one. When you look at the polling data right now, Democrats have a massive uphill battle for the House and the Senate. They can win, but when Trump says, I don't care about the midterms, we're going to win, I think people need to consider the lengths Trump is willing to go to win. And he mentioned his election integrity army. I have to wonder. We saw that story with Ashley St. Clair where she claimed Elon texted her saying, I'm going to use my space lasers.

It's anomaly in the matrix. They'll never see coming or something like this. She's making the argument that Elon was insinuating. He's using Starlink to win. I wonder if what Elon, if the story is true, could Elon have just been saying, we are tracking polling data in ways they can't understand. We are tracking sentiment. like the idea being with Starlink, Elon has a really good grasp of public sentiment. They were able to target with proper campaign ads more efficient spending, which is why he was like,

this is how we win. Her argument is that he flipped the votes or whatever. My point ultimately is this. These tools that Trump has and the allies that he has have either, let's just call it, nefarious means or legitimate and powerful tech means to win elections. I don't see how Democrats can pull a victory off. centralized. I have a question for you on the Elon thing. Yeah. And perhaps I have missed something here. But if Elon had that capability, why wouldn't he use it for Massey as a test run? If Massey won

that primary, I don't think anyone would be surprised. Why would he? Because he wasn't he supporting Massey's primary effort at the beginning? I don't know. Did they, okay. Because I thought that he came. Also, just because he says he would, even if he said he supported, it doesn't mean he did. Yeah. My point is this. My point is there's two ways, there's a million. ways you can view this. If Ashley St. Clair's story is true, honestly, I think what makes the most sense is Elon has an ISP, an internet service provider. He has access to the browsing data of large swaths of the population. They can see how to target these individuals. This means he can simply say, Trump, you know what we're seeing a lot of in the data. We're seeing searches for immigration

economics. You target these keywords. You are going to be reaching people in ways the Democrats It's one even understanding. I just thought, I've been screaming about freeing the software code, free the software code so you can read the data. You know, you know if you're voting machines or flipping votes because you have access to the code. But maybe they'll build an AI that can just reverse engineer the code. I think they're going to. So good luck with your proprietary attempt. It's all going open.

This is really, that's the idea that he has a massively valuable political asset is fascinating. Because I remember I'm seeing the drawing of him right there, Charlie Kirk. I remember kind of early days, like 2017, 2018, someone came up to me and they said, Charlie Kirk has the most valuable asset in the conservative movement. I was like, Turning Point USA, like I love Turning Point USA, but the most valuable asset in the conservative movement, really? Yeah, it's not the organization. It's the fact that he has lists upon lists upon lists of young, dedicated conservative activists. And we saw that, as Susie Wiles said, we won in 2024 because of the work Charlie did. We saw that come to fruition in 2024 with the turnout machine he built there.

And so the idea that this is a hidden asset that Elon has is really interesting. Because if it's used for good, great. I like when the good guys went. But that type of stuff can be used for that. The question is, does he have satellites that can flip votes? Or does it just have access to data that these insights were allowed? Even the data is super powerful. Even that is super powerful?

Like, is I supposed to believe that the smartest man in the world is going to like... Like Elon Musk. You're saying he's the smartest man in the world? I'm saying if he's one of the... You're talking about me? You were talking with me. Well, people say that Elon Musk is one of the smartest men in the world, right?

One of you. I've not heard that. He is considered very, very smart, consider the size of the businesses that he's built in the stature that he has, is going to put into text, which can be tracked, some type of admission of guilt. Exactly what I thought. He was messing with Ashley.

Or she's lying, because she's a lying liar. She's a lying liar who lies? I don't know. I imagine he said that, but like, what does that even mean? I'm going to deploy my space lasers, my anomaly in the matrix. I mean, wouldn't a smart person try to avoid any level of... He could be talking smack. Remember when James O'Keefe stung that New York Times guy who was like bragging about having access to like...

I can't remember what the story was, but he was talking big game. And then he was like, we saw this social media reporter for the New York Times admitting this. And I was like, yeah, I know that guy. I think he's just trying to get laid, dude. Yeah, if I was like, I'm going to channel the will of God to make sure we win. You would know that I was like, I don't actually have access to the will of God. Not literally, anyway. Not that I know of.

I mean, I do, but, you know. Historically, how did, they, they didn't do so well in Trump's first term at the midterms, right? Yeah, but the map. So this is, I think Tim's getting at something important here, too, with the redistricting stuff. The map is fundamentally different now. Well, let me just say something about 2018, the midterms. the polling data all suggested that high probability Republicans would actually hold. And then somehow, slowly, weeks after the midterms, Democrats started winning.

Night of, it looked like there was no blue wave. It was a sod. And I actually had several videos where they're like blue wave fizzles, doesn't happen. But then over the next couple of weeks, Democrats started finding votes. It was. I remember doing interviews that night and just going on. Yeah, blue wave not materialized. You know, we overperform again with Trump on the ballot, yada, yada, and then all of a sudden, drip, drip, drip.

But the point is, there's not that many getable seats anymore because of all the redistricting, which is not something that we caused by deciding we wanted to redistricting Texas as conservatives. No, this is a complete and total farce. They've been doing this for generations. And finally, conservatives, Republicans decided to start playing that game. And now the number of seats up for grabs, realistically, is like 20 tops. So the biggest majority they're going to get is like 10 if they, assuming they sweep everything. And we know given what we're seeing in these Senate primaries that a lot of their candidates have major, major, major liabilities. In California, for example, there's a 10-term Democratic congressman that's getting challenged by a member of the Sacramento City Council, Mai Vong, and she's just going viral this week over every single city. meeting, she decides to stand and face away from the flag as they do the Pledge of Allegiance

and not say the Pledge of Allegiance. So if that's the team that they're rolling with, if she wins her primary in California next Tuesday, if that's the team that they're rolling with, I think Republicans and conservatives have every reason to be very confident going into a midterm where the fundamentals might not be great, but there's not that much up for grabs. Thomas Massey has filed to run again in 2028. But did he say something like he was not sure, like what he was going to run for just yet? He did he say.

He said he didn't know what he was going to run for. Could be president. My conspiracy theory, again, I've talked about it quite a bit, but it was, like a few months ago, how long ago was it when Joe Kent resigned? It's a couple months, right? It was March. When that happened, again, I know most of you guys heard me talk about it, but just for the conversation, for the context, I heard some Beltway rumors that Tulsi was going to resign

that Joe Kent's still friends with Trump. This is actually part of the plan. Tucker is still friends with Trump. It's part of the plan. and the game is they are going to try and take control of what the left is. They are creating the new opposition to Trump. Oh, awesome. So they want to create, they want politics to be like 2012, Obama Romney, where it's like

kind of vanilla pudding, but based around MAGA. So you take the left flank of MAGA, Tulsi Gabbard, and she either runs an independent spoiler or over the course of the next couple of years actually realigns the Democratic. Democratic Party. If they lose the midterms, she will be poised to say the Democrats need a wake-up call. And a lot of people, like right now, the polls show the party is split 50-50 between going further left or staying, saying more moderate and moving slightly more to the center. I don't know if she'll go as Democrat or Tucker or anything like that. But the theory is that MAGA is splitting in a certain way so that Democrats become this like decayed appendage. MAGA breaks into two factions and then left and right both lead to the same road, MAGA.

So this is a repeat of the Jacksonian era of U.S. politics. How so? Perhaps. The Jacksonians basically after the death of the Whig Party, they all kind of rally around Jackson and they kind of split into two different Jacksonian factions. And then, of course, the errors of the Jacksonian system lead to the rise of the Republicans later on. But this is... Here you go.

Like the Democratic Republican Party, going back to 1792, I always found that was really funny that it was called the Democratic Republican Party. Now we have the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Yeah. So, so when we talk about, you know, creating this new, this new lane here, do you believe that the Tulsi, the reason for Tulsi's resignation is more about foreign policy and less about her husband? Well, let me just pay like this.

I don't know, but I will say when I said that. the rumor we're hearing is she's going to resign, and it's for political reasons. My first reaction was to reach out to, so we're hearing these rumors. So I reach out directly to people in that sphere. I don't want to say exactly who, people's privacy and whatever. And I was told unequivocally, no, it's not happening. And a lot of people also told me, even on this show, like, she's not going to resign. It's not happening.

She resigned. Now, of course, the reason is the abrupt health issue of her husband, but I say, yeah, maybe. But there is, I will say, there is a lane now. The Ted Cruz lane was the one that, you know, because Ted Cruz has decided he wants to run for president. And the lane was going to be, I'm MAGA without the tariffs, right? You can remember after Liberation Day, he was doing, he was doing a bunch of the, there was Axios pieces saying, you know, he's talking about this with fundraising people at the Capitol Grill and all this nonsense. Then the Iran war started and Ted Cruz didn't have a lane anymore. But there is a lane to the non-interventionist's right of Trump in the wake of this. And that lane could be theoretically filled by a Thomas Massey character or a Tulsi Gabbard Marcy, 28. So, no, Fetterman, 2028. Let's go.

I think I think Gabbard Massey, 2028. And that in a Republican primary, you know, Trump's going to play Kingmaker, but you can make yourself so much of a nuisance, just like RFK Jr. did in 2024 where he really fought that battle and he got brought into the movement again. I think that could be in the cards for a movement like that. It would be pretty darn popular. I just have to wonder. You know, I have to wonder about all this. Right. The moves Massey has made have been endearing to moderates and libertarians. He's always kind of been, well, he's always been a big favorite for the libertarians. but recently going hard with the Epstein stuff and teaming up with Rokana has attracted the attention of default libs.

There are a lot of people, you can see who I tweet it sometimes. I won't call them out right now. They are liberal only in that they hate Donald Trump. They love Thomas Massey. If Massey ran as an independent or I don't see how, but as a Democrat, if the Democratic Party realigned or something, I don't see, I don't see that being feasible. He would get a lot of default lives. So I think there's a strong probability of a spoiler third party run from Gabbard, Massey, Kent, or otherwise that polls, default, libs. And then it goes 30, 30, 30, 30, you know, 40.

I'm wondering. 30 Democrat, 30 independent, 40, Trump, Trump wins. About J.D. Vance. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Just clarify the successor to Trump. Yeah, which sounds like it's going to be Rubio. If the rumors are true.

I don't think so. Well, J.D. Vance apparently has been, I don't know if this is true. This is what I read, that he's been iced out, that he's being iced out because he was anti-war. He thinks the Iran thing was a bad idea. Tulsi was his biggest ally in the admin. Now she's leaving. So he's like considering not running for president, which is crazy because he's the front

runner, which would mean it's got to be Rubio. No, I think I think, I think this is total utter baloney. The idea that the sitting vice president who has been on record or on background from day one as not supporting this war, well, now on background reporting from the New York Times and others have. suggested that Radcliffe, that Rubio, that all these other members of the administration also expressed their skepticism over the war after Netanyahu came and met with Trump prior to the launch of the campaign. And so while they have not all been consistent the entire time, the only person

the admin who has been consistent has been the vice president on this, they have changed their tune and said, actually behind closed doors, I was against this war with Iran. You don't give the vice president the number one thing going for your domestic agenda right now. in a electorate that is starved for domestic policy wins, if you don't think that he is the heir apparent. Let's remember he was chosen the day, two days, after President Trump was nearly killed in Butler, Pennsylvania. You're thinking about your legacy. You're thinking about your heir, and he chose J.D. Vance, and now J.D. Vance is leading the anti-fraud task force. You say like, oh, another commission or another fraud task.

No, it's a real thing. It is doing the doge work plus so much more. And that was a major focal point of today's cabinet meeting. because this is the number one thing that the Trump administration has going for right now on the domestic front. Yes, the deportations are happening. Yes, the Trump economy, once undone from the shackles of this war, will perform very well. But people want accountability and they want to know where their tax dollars are going. They want transparency. And the vice president is leading that effort right now. And so I think it's still the air.

Based on the way things are right now. and it's an eternity to 2028. Rubio does seem to make the most sense. People are burned out on culture war politics. I do feel like while woke still exists, right? When you win a war, the ideology exists is just suppressed. Woke is mostly dead. I mean, these studios, the movie studios, TV shows, they've burned so much money.

They've kind of backed off. I've had some conversation with some industry guys who are saying that, like, behind the scenes, they know they'll never get away with the stuff. It's just not going to happen. And so when you think about that, J.D. Vance is a culture warrior. I kind of feel like people are just, their brains are just shocked to the point of numbness as it pertains to culture war issues. Rubio is so vanilla, so bland and boring.

It's kind of the guy you want to hire. I feel like if it was right now, a lot of people, I think the prediction market showed this, too, people would be like, just give me the boring suit wearing guy who's just very droll, you know? That's how I felt about like my conspiracy theory is that the conspiracies have been pushed out of control so that people will just start accepting whatever the dude in the suit on the TV tells them because they're sick of having to worry about all of it because there's so much of it being thrown everywhere. Yeah, look, so it's not exactly right now, Rubio and Vance are neck and neck. It's a statistical tie with Vance at 32 to Rubio's 30 and the Colchee prediction market. So, but Rubio skyrocketing. So look at Rubio skyrocketed win.

Look at Zucker, Carlos. Venezuela operation. That is also hilarious. Like, Tucker is third in this. That's great. Well, because he made that, he jokingly referenced a run for office. The Ted Cruz thing was, that was funny. Which Ted Cruz is? When he was like, he was like, I would love to debate Ted Cruz again.

In fact, I would run for president just to do it again. I feel like Mark Ruby's fluent Spanish speaker could unify the Western Hemisphere. The guy, the guy talk about bringing, you know, South America under the influence. Not that they weren't already under the influence of the United States, but generally, like, and I like J.D. Vance better from a distance. I don't know either of them yet. I'd like to talk to both of them. Can I, can I just?

People are just tired of being like, oh, we need to elect the Spanish speaker because we need to make sure that we show up the Western Hemisphere. I'm all with you on the geopolitical stuff. Like, this is our own backyard. We need to protect it. But the idea that like, like people are just, they want a domestic policy president. That's what they want. They want the issues at home to be fixed. And you said that J.D. was a culture warrior.

This is more surprising to me because my take on J.D. is that he has leaned in at certain points to the culture war stuff, but at the end of the day, he's always been really focused on reshoring manufacturing, on all of that type of development. All that's true, but look at his ex, where he posts, like, you know, insults and, like, he's a culture warrior. Good point.

I want to be, I'm going to be as offensive and conspiratorial as possible. Yeah, actually. And, you know, one of the challenges with being friends with so many people in politics is that let me put it like this. There's a handful of people you guys know I'm not friends with that I'll say really horrifying things about like I'll insult. You know what I mean? It's like, oh, that guy clearly does not like the person. But Thomas Massey is a good dude.

I can send him a friend of the show. And I've been a big fan of Tulsi for a long time. So I will start by saying to insinuate Tulsi didn't actually resign over the health of her husband. I can understand why that may come off as disrespectful to Tulsi, who has always been very nice to us, though. She's never been on the show or anything like that. Massey's been on the show several times and he's a friend, he's a friend of ours. That being said, I have to bring this up because this is a relevant point in the timeline. Though I'm not trying to claim this to be true or anything, so let me just be very delicate.

There are a lot of conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's death. Obviously, he was killed by somebody. I believe that the most likely scenario is it was not a lone shooter. There is social media evidence that there were people with four knowledge who were tweeting and posting on TikTok that something was going to happen to Charlie Kirk. That was investigated. It seems like there was also a story about a bunch of vehicles in front of his house. If we ask the question, who benefits? I would make the argument that the uniparty machine, the establishment, stood to gain the most by removing Charlie Kirk from the chess board because he was getting young people to vote

Republican. Now that he's gone, who's actually worse off? Well, it's the Republican Party. His wife and Israel, as much as people want to claim with this ridiculous story that Israel did it. Now, that being said, we will move to a next portion of this story, which I say this just because it existed in the zeitgeist. Thomas Massey's wife died. And do you guys remember the narrative that had emerged around this after she passed, which has not come up for some reason? the insinuation was that they killed Massey's wife because he was pursuing things like Epstein or that he was defying the established order. A lot of people made this claim. They were like his wife abruptly died without warning.

And then people made this claim that all of a sudden he found himself at odds with Donald Trump. Again, I understand that's a sore spot. There's a lot of people I know mutual friends and I'm not trying to be a dick. But I would be remissed if because of my personal connection, I didn't bring up that again, after his wife died, there was a conspiracy theory circulating that it was a threat to Massey that they'll come after his family unless he does what they tell him to do. While Massey was always kind of at odds with Trump, Trump did endorse him. Now Trump is fighting against him. So I just, I wonder why that conspiracy theory hasn't reemerged

the likes of Candace Owens. The one thing I will point out where that is the strongest counter argument that I can think of is Trump called Massey. after the death of his wife. And they had, what seems to be, an extended conversation. Nassie tells the story where he's, like, on his bed in a hotel room. And the president, the president calls him and he picks up, it's like, hello. And then all of a sudden he's, like, thinking that he's going to get a secretary, hey, I'm going to patch you through.

And he's talking to Donald Trump right then and there about it. And Trump seemed very apologetic about the whole thing. I'm not saying Trump did anything. No. The conspiracy theory is that anti-Trump elements went to mass. Massey and they were like, you will do as you are told and went after his family. And now, actually, I think what you're saying actually lends itself to the conspiracy. Oh, so who called Massey saying, I'm so sorry for what happened to you, now they hate each other?

So this is, this, you're saying that the conspiracy was deep state elements not attached in whatsoever way to the political apparatus did this. No, the uniparty establishment. The conspiracy there at the time was that Massey's wife was assassinated as a threat to Massey to force him to fall in line with the uniparty machine. And now he has become a major thorn in Trump's side going. Trump, listen. Oh, you're right. Because Trump wasn't in office yet. He was running.

Yeah. He was running when he. And what ends up happening is when Trump gets in, Massey opposes a lot of the key bills that Trump wanted, citing things like the deficit, too much spending. But these were like, you know, the funding of the, the, DHS stuff. Massey voted with Republicans 90% of the time on core Republican issues. But on the major things Trump's want, Trump wanted, Massey opposed him. So again, I try to say this is the utmost respect because there's a personal element here, but I would be remiss if I ignored a component of the story because of a personal element. When Massey's wife died, there was a conspiracy theory that she was killed to force Massey to fall in line.

That he was adamant. He was resistant. He was a defiant politician. His wife dies. Next thing you know, he and Trump are enemies. That was one of the first things across my mind when she passed away was, did someone do this to her? But then later I learned that she had been ill for a long time. So I've heard she was ill for a long time with cancer, I think.

I understand it was it was abrupt. It seemed abrupt. I'd never heard anything about her being ill. I heard both of those things. I heard like they said it was abrupt, but I also heard that she had cancer or something like that, but I don't know. And I heard that as recent as last week from someone that was claiming it.

It's tough to tell. I mean, you were talking about how like politics is dirty. We're in a liberal, a Democratic Republic, and it's like character assassination, but like you go to an empire. It's like... She did not have cancer. Wow.

Okay. Does it say how long she was ill or any of that? And the stress of him being away was probably like just that lifestyle, you know? She had an auto-immune myopathy, an unknown type causing respiratory complications. Oh, geez, sounds like COVID-related. And there was a ton of character assassination against him afterwards because of him getting remarried. And there was a lot of people having discussions about that. I actually think it's really interesting that, you know, Trump calls him and they're, you know, very amic.

well, what was it, Trump endorsed Massey, Massey endorsed Trump. Then once Trump gets in, all of the major moves Trump wanted to make, Massey was on the other side of. I mean, it was mostly like the like what, omnibus bills and stuff like that. It was all spending related, right? Exactly. All of the like granular Republican bills, Massey was on board like 90 plus percent. But it was the major moves Trump wanted to make where Massey was on the other side of it. And a lot of people argue that this is like,

the key funding for a DHS, and a lot of the power that was used by a lot of what empowered Trump to say go after USAID and things like this. So I'm not a conspiratorial guy, but I suppose there's no, there's no way to be anything other than this, especially right now. Like, I was having conversation with my wife about the Stanford study that was released in 2025 of December that found men aged 30 and under had a myocarditis incident rate of 1 in 16,750,000,000 from the COVID vaccine. One in 16,750 is not a rare side effect. That is a common side effect.

And that is insane because myocarditis has something like, it's like a double digit five year mortality rate. When you get myocarditis and paracyrgytitis as a young person, you are shortening your lifespan dramatically. And they lied to us and claimed it wasn't happening. Now Stanford published this study. At the end of April, nature.com published a study that said, If the MRNA lipid nanoparticles got into your liver, it suppressed your immunity against COVID.

That is published in Nature.com, Nature magazine. So when I see all this stuff, I'm like, all you can be these days is a conspiracy theorist. That's it. I can't tell you how pissed I am about these studies that have come out from Stanford and published by nature.com. Because, you know, just we're kind of getting up to a tangent on this one, but I got to bring this up. during COVID, there were a handful of big conspiracy theories. You get banned for it. The CEO, YouTube, Wajuski, or whatever her name was, gleefully, she gloated how she banned people.

There were a couple of theories. One, myocarditis was being caused by the vaccine, which they denied, now we know, is true. And Stanford published an incident rate, again, one in 16,750. That is horrifying. That is horrifying. That means with 13 billion doses, 500. 100,000 young men got myocarditis and paracarditis. Now with this nature study showing they intended for the COVID vaccine to go into your arm

and affect your muscle cells. And if it did, this study found it boosted your immunity to COVID. But if the lipid nanoparticles got into your liver, it would tell your body to allow COVID to stay. It would cause tolerance towards it. That was the airing of the, according to Brett. Weinstein who was on the show, the biologists saying that there was an addressing problem with the COVID vaccine. It's supposed to stay local. They thought it would stay local to where they injected

it, but it would transfer around and it was supposed to attach, ideally to the right thing. But it would attach to anything. And when it would attach to heart muscle, then your heart muscle produces a spike protein. Your body thinks it's a villain and it kills off the heart muscle. And that's what these people had been. So this is, let me pull this. Actually, let's let me pull up the Stanford. Stanford Medicine Study. Let's let's just launch into this. I know I totally. I totally. just segue. I have to do this. Liver class. Take a look at this from Stanford medicine.

Stanford Medicine study shows why MRNA COVID-19 vaccine can cause myocarditis. And they say COVID-19 and less frequently the MRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. Okay, let's just scroll down. Vaccine associated myocarditis occurs in about one in every 140,000 vaccines after a first dose and rises to one in 32,000 after a second dose. For reasons that aren't clear, incidence peaks among male vaccinies age 30 or below at one in 16,750 vaccinees. I like that word. Maybe it's because they have the best circulatory system, so it moves around the fastest.

That's my guess. I'm not sure. They say, Wu noted if the inflammation is severe, the resulting heart injury can be quite debilitating, leading to hospitalizations, ICU admissions for critically ill patients and deaths. I'll be it rarely. But COVID is worse. COVID is worse. That's fine. That's fine. Tell me that. But you lied. They lied. They banned people. And now 2025 in December. This is five months ago. They published this. One in 16,000 young men, 30 and under. Then we've got this one. This is a bit harder to parse through because it's very esoteric. MRNA vaccine immunity is enhanced by hepatocyte detargeting and not dependent on dendritic cell expression. To simplify this nature.com article. They said in the study, they intentionally had MRNA lipid nanoparticles target three different types of cells. Muscle, white blood cells, and liver cells. They found that with muscle cell targeting, immunity improved.

With the immune system targeting, I think it was a wash. With liver cell targeting, you became more likely to get COVID. It reduced your immunity. So we had these conspiracy theories at the time that you get banned for. One, the vaccine was causing myocarditis. Oh, boy, oh boy. Turns out Stanford said it did at 1 in 16,000. That's not a, that's not a rare side effect.

1 in 300,000 is what we talk about. 16,000 is horrifying. It's half a million based on the doses they gave out of young men. Now with this study, you have a second conspiracy theory, that people who got the COVID shot, many of them were getting COVID more. often for some reason. Well, once again, this study found that if the MRNA vaccine traveled from the injection site into your liver, it would reduce your immunity to COVID. Holy, it's there right now. Nature.com mainstream peer-reviewed publication. Maybe they're wrong. They're lying. Hey, you know what,

YouTube? Stanford and Nature.com are conspiracy theorists. Now you can't ban me. I just got to, I'm not a doctor, but if your immunity was reduced, wouldn't that mean that you were more infectious and actually transmitting it likely to transmit it more? It means that when you get it caused people to transmit it even more? I'm not sure. I'm just asking. Potentially. What it means is if you got COVID, your immune system would not fight against it.

It would, it, it says in the study, when the, when the vaccine got into the liver, it increased the body's tolerance for COVID. meaning the immune system would not go after it. And at the inverse effect. So initially, they were telling everybody, oh, it's a funny. A lot about everything. At first they said, the virus, what did Rachel Matto say? The virus stops with you if you get this.

Then they said, it's 90% effective, whatever that meant. They claimed very early on the vaccine would stay in the injection site. Then with myocarditis. And now with this, this one doesn't definitive. prove that the vaccine was causing some people to get COVID more. It just proves that in the event it did go to the liver, it would increase your susceptibility to it. Stands to reason, what Brett Weinstein was saying is they have a targeting issue, addressing issue, meaning they thought, they said, maybe they thought, maybe they were lying, they inject you with the

MRI, it stays in your arm, it stays in your muscle. As it turns out, it is now believed to freely move about the body. Now, again, real quick, it is confirmed. confirmed, again, through these journals. And that's why they did the study. The MRI vaccine did not stay in the arm of every single person. Hence, that's how you get myocarditis. I want to stress this. Stanford outright says the vaccine, vaccine-associated myocarditis exists. That means when you got injected in the arm, the vaccine traveled from your arm to your heart. Yeah. Can I add one more thing on this? Scroll down to where he says COVID is worse. Okay. Here's the problem that I have with this. if we're talking about the human cost here,

nobody in that age demographic was really getting COVID. Exactly. So the raw human cost of the vaccine with this age demographic that is particularly affected by this for some reason is way worse. And this goes to your point about the only option is to be a conspiracy theorist, right?

Even when they're telling you the truth six years after, in fact, it's still couched in baloney lies. But COVID is worse. Okay, why is it worse? Well, because we saw that the rate was higher with COVID. You just generate myocarditis. Okay, but you didn't force everybody to just get COVID. You force them to get the COVID vaccine. And so when we're talking about the raw human and lost. And locked them in their houses where we know that sunlight to get vitamin D was a great way to boost your immunity. They put people indoors where the virus lingers and would spread, whereas outdoors it dissipates. mask. I wonder how much COVID got breathed out into the mask and then breathed back in. How many COVID molecules are on? And they talked about how viral load led back then they were saying the viral load increases

the severity of the illness. So maybe when they say you should wear two masks, you are keeping the viral load in your breathing. Also the human, the ways in which humans overreacted, the general concept, you don't even have to be conspiracy theories. Just the irrational idea. It's like, look, this is new. I'm going to wait. I don't feel safe. you know, taking an injection like this without knowing more about what's going on. All the other vaccines that were on the vaccine schedule, with everyone to talk about, about how they over-prescribe vaccines now.

It's like have decades of testing. This does not. For the sake of my family, I'm not going to do that. And then you made people choose between their jobs and their livelihoods. And you locked them in the house. They put boards over the basketball hoops. So you couldn't even go outside and get any exercise when you're doing it.

That's what I just, yeah, what I just suggested. What I just suggested isn't a conspiracy theorist. It's just a concerned parent being like, look, I don't know about this. I want to hold off. And then you were gasslet by thousands upon thousands of people. And one of the biggest siops run online, not even necessarily intentionally, but by thousands of people who, for the sake of wanting to seem morally superior, told you you needed to do this for the good of other people, ignoring the fact that you have to put yourself and your family first, and that's your decision. That's not a conspiracy theorist.

Well, and what drives me crazy here, too, is that the establishment, and even some people on the quote-unquote conservative, right, you know, these people are considered conservative for some reason. They keep saying that it's just, well, it's all grievance politics, and this conspiratorial thinking is a consequence of online radicalization. No, what draws people to the type of conspiratorial thinking that we're talking about, not with this specific instance, but just generally, all these different conspiracies that we talk about, it's because nobody in a position of authority in our government has been honest with us for, decades. And so the first step to fixing any of this problem, if you think the conspiratorial thinking is a problem, the first step is to push for accountability and transparency at every turn. But they don't for some reason. And why is that? Well, it's because they're actually just invested in keeping the power structure currently as it is, because they're in the establishment. They benefit from the way that things are. They don't want challenges to authority. And they also,

some of them might be well-meaning and they just think, oh, well, actually, if we, if we are fully and completely honest, if we really just go through all the demons and excise them, then you're going to see a cratering of institutional trust. No, I think a lot of people at this point would say the only way to recover trust in our institutions and to get out of this conspiratorial thinking or whatever is a level set. All right, ground, we need to get back to ground zero and you know what? Maybe that requires some amnesty for people. I don't know exactly what it looks like.

But anything, but at this point, we just need the truth. You're talking about what the Greeks called the apocalypse. It means the removing of the veil, total transparency. All email is released, a revelation, so to speak. But at some levels of government, you need to lie to people to protect them. You need to protect your military programs. You need secrecy. Yes.

And if someone asks if you're doing something, you tell them no. even if you are, you blatantly lie to save their lives. You have to sometimes. So you have to expect that you will be lied to by your government. But at some point, some things like you don't need to lie about. I think they got to figure out like when, because some of this stuff is overboard. I didn't get radicalized by X. I got radicalized by you.

No, there's also. There was a sentiment when we had a more of a monoculture and there was more actual coalescing around the idea of American patriotism, you could believe maybe in the idea that the American government would lie to you for your own good because you had a general level of trust in what the government was doing. Patriot Act, everything beyond that. Nobody really has that level of trust

with the government anymore. And that was also signal-boasted by the mainstream media apparatus, which was basically what, four stations, maybe a couple of cable stations. Ted Turner just died recently. Rest in peace. And that structure is gone now.

And it's devolved into a lot of conspiratorial thinking that I don't agree with. But what I think in a lot of ways is that is making people who have realized that they don't have the bandwidth day in and day out to go to work,

take care of their family and investigate whether the government is being honest with them. And I think a lot of people are looking to tune back out and they're like, look, I didn't believe,

is like I used to believe in everything then I didn't. Nothing has really changed all that much. And I don't know where to go. I don't have anybody guiding me through this and they're just looking for somebody

to shepherd them forward. You know, just real quick, I was roused, radicalized the other day. Just completely radicalized. We need a brutal dictator to come in with an iron fist and just smash things with a hammer, take over. And I'll tell you what radicalized me. It was that picture of Charlie Kirk as that baseball guy. Oh, I saw that. What was that all that? So we are living in Elsa Gate 10.0, whatever you want to call it. We are living in algorithmic retardation

manipulation through our culture. Our brains have turned to jello. And unless someone comes in and shatters the veil breaking through the noise. We are doomed to be a bunch of zombie retards bashing our faces on the table. I'm going to stress this again. What's happening on social media with TikTok and Instagram, it's frying the brains. It already fried the brain of Gen Alpha. Their brain is cooked. I don't even know if it matters at this point because millennials are the last, like,

we had one foot in, one foot out on social media. Gen Z grew up with social media Gen Alpha grew up in ElsaGate. You know what ElsaGate is? No. It's when the algorithm was promoting videos of people dressed like Elsa Spider-Man and the Joker running around a slapstick comedy. It

devolved into Peppa Pig eating feces out of toilets and things like that. Just the algorithm running itself. So what happened is... There you go. Sorry about that. Thank goodness it was a glass water bottle. Pool water, by the way. Pool water. Pool water. Well, it didn't shatter.

What happened was that the algorithm would auto play for babies. Parents would put a tablet in front of their baby and press play. The YouTube algorithm would just pick whatever got the most clicks. So people in India would make videos that were just attacking babies through the algorithm. Spider-Man, Elsa, and Joker did the best in the algorithm. And then aside from that, it started to turn into feces, drinking urine, just there were like thumbnails of a pepah pig and like a female pig, and he's peeing in her mouth, things like that. and it was all over YouTube kids and YouTube for a long time.

They banned those things, but now we are still in it. And the other day, I'm going to pull it up again for people who are not familiar with the context. I'm going to pull it up again so y'all can see. The first thing I will tell you is that I see all the time there are these ads that pop up. It'll be a viral video of a random thing. Body camera footage, black people fighting in a KFC. I'm like not even joking. Literally, it's a lot of these viral videos. And then at the bottom is a picture of Charlie Kirk throwing a hat.

Just there. Just Charlie Kirk throwing a hat. And I'm like, I'm sitting there like, why is Charlie Kirk just superimposed over this weird viral clip algorithm? And then I got radicalized. I saw this. And I just, that's it. So I saw this and I said, it's time for someone to come in with an iron fist and just take over by force. And I'm only half joking. Because this is culture these days. Guys, I understand we had problems with controlled media. Back in the day, we had big networks. But at least there was still a struggle between those who controlled these systems.

And the media tried to be middle of the road because there were few channels. Now that we have an infinite number of channels all attacking the algorithm, you get this. You get whatever that stupid baseball bet sports gambling character is with Charlie Kirk's face superimposed on it. And there are kids on Instagram and TikTok seeing this every day turning in, they're being turned into retards. Their brains have the capacity for great knowledge, but they're being programmed by this stuff. We need to put an end to it. We need to shut this stuff down.

Sort of like fishing. Before it would be like ABC, NBC, CBS, they were all fishing and they'd be like, hey, look, all the fish we caught and we're all like blah, blah, blah. And then now it's everybody, all these people are fishing. And some people are fishing with poison. They're poisoning the water to kill the fish, but they don't realize they can't eat the fish. if they poison their minds,

you've got to be resilient towards it and not allow yourself to get poisoned by it. Also, virality in the space in the internet now isn't even the same thing that it was five to ten years ago. We've been covering a lot of stuff on our channel about stealth marketing and these companies that spend tons of money on basically hiring clippers to go and flood the zone,

put somebody like clavicular who is basically a product of marketing through kick as a way of putting infinite numbers of clips on social media to make them look more relevant than they are because they're paying these clippers like what a dollar for every thousand views that they get and you're basically trying to create viral moments because the desire for virality is now outweighing how many actual honest viral clips are coming from social media so everything is fake nothing is really in any way real online and there was also talk from this guy he was doing it he runs this

company that doesn't says eric adams um i think his uh Eric Adams, like political advisor, denies this but said it was a good idea. But basically this guy said, he's like, they came to him and said, we want you to basically flood the zone with insults, like videos insulting Mumdani. And the guy's like,

we were going to do it, but then like a guy didn't get back to me. The guy didn't have a problem with doing it. He wasn't ideologically opposed to it. He was saying that he's like, we would have done it, but we just never were able to come to a deal. Politicians are doing this now too.

And you're manufacturing a way to boost the, you know, whether it's positive stuff about you, or more commonly, negative things about somebody you don't like, you have to use people to create virality because it's not happening organically. Nothing's real. So I'm wondering what you guys

think about this, but Gen Alpha cooked. I think we all agree on that. Is it bubbling up the chain to older generations? Because can you do me a favor, Tim? Can you pull up my Twitter account? I want to show you guys this. The Richard Nixon Foundation

just did something incredible. first off they're making all these viral edits of of Richard Nixon which one go ahead and scroll down it is uh nope keep gone okay right here right here so this is the president of the Richard Nixon Foundation scroll up a little bit to see so I just I trust that the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery will take immediate steps to correct this mistake lest its many visitors are misled about the 37th president look at this letter so

the curators of the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery put on their description of this I think it's the Norman Rockwell painting of Richard Nixon that Nixon was impeached he was never impeached and convicted he was never

impeached and convicted he left and so they're asking for a correction here on this it's like even the people who are supposed to be stewards are their brains just as cooked yes these are the experts here and it's all working its way up to

Well, I will, I will, uh, it's working up. I will mention that, uh, you know, there's something really funny. I don't know if there's a phrase for this, but there's, um, a phenomenon in the English language where a phrase gets shortened to, and, uh, it turns into the inverse meaning. So, uh, common phrases you may have heard, like curiosity killed the cat. And the implication there was that, uh, if you are inquisitive, you will, you know, you may, you may, you may come to find trouble. The actual phrase is curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought him back.

Something like that. There's also jack of all trades, right? Jack of all trades, master of none. Implication that you may be good at a bunch of things, but you're just not good at this one thing. The actual phrase is jack of all trades, master of none, but every so often better than a master of one. The actual phrase was meant to say, I'm good a little bit of everything and sometimes I'm better than you. But we have broken these phrases over, we've memified them into the inverse meaning. or into a different meaning.

The guy in charge of marketing said we've got to shorten the phrase, like a YouTube title. There's a whole bunch of these two. Semantic bleaching, I think is the term. And this is also the monocultic that you were bringing up earlier. Like, oh, there used to be this monoculture.

Well, how much of that is just fake too? Right? Oh, yes. In fact, President Richard Nixon was never impeached. He resigned on August 9th, 1974, before the House of Representatives have voted on any articles of impeachment. I think it's like these how much of the monoculture is fake just why this is this is like the boomer ethos right like watergate

1979 Iranian revolution peak oil like these are the formative events woodstock this is why I don't oh here's a here's a funny how much how do you can you prove any of this blood is thicker than water was is used to imply that family is stronger than you know friendship that you you know it the phrase is actually blood of the covenant is thicker than water of the womb, meaning the contracts you have are more valuable than just being in someone's family. The inverse meaning curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back. It's supposed to be encouragement. The reward of discovery is worth the risk. But my point is a good portion of what we think we know is a corruption that, you know, you look at this. History may very well come to a point where they're like,

Nixon was impeached and then mercilessly beaten in the street by a horde of riders. And you're like, Purple Monkey dishwasher, you know what I mean? Who is he beaten by? And then they show the picture of the baseball bat. Yeah, we saw such media manipulation in real time during the COVID debacle. We see stuff like this. I mean, and then you go back pre-internet, pre-hist, like, I'm so checked out on believing the things that I'm told to believe. Hands down, I brought up religion a minute ago.

I'll bring it up again and beat this thing into the ground and build a tent out of it. There's something that's so good. So the phrase, winning isn't everything. You've maybe heard it. And it's meant to be encouraging, like, if you lose a game, they say, well, winning's in everything. The actual quote is winning isn't everything. It's the only thing.

Oh, man. We just really ruin it. How about this one? This one everybody does know. The early bird gets the worm. The actual full phrase is the early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. Is the first one gets slaughtered by the mouse trap? Yes.

So the implication is. In case that was unclear. Slaughter. Slaughtered. Well, to be fair, I wouldn't call it slaughtering. The mouse trap comes down on it and smashes into its back, snapping its spine. So, you know, it's a quick death.

Yeah, you can regrow spinal cords, by the way, now with graphing tethers. It's pretty cool. I digress. Dude, I don't believe. I mean, I don't believe. Yeah, here's another one. Great minds think alike. The actual phrase is, great minds think alike, but fools seldom differ.

So people use the phrase to imply, like, we must both be smart, what it actually means, y'all are dumb. I think it's the term I don't believe it doesn't mean you think it's untrue. It's just saying you're not going to accept that it is true. You cannot believe something but not say it's false. So like religion, I don't believe it. I'm not saying it's not real. I don't know if it's real, but I don't believe it.

Same with a lot of this stuff, man. It's okay to not believe something. Let's talk about this while we're going back in time and reminiscing. Jill Biden says she was frightened by Joe Biden's debate performance, thought he was having a stroke. Me too. Me too. Why does you need to be saying that? Like, keep it to yourself.

That's your hug. Can you guys believe that's really 2026 already? It's May, too. The year's half over. Like, we're only a couple days away from June. I think about how we started doing this in 2020, but it's like, bazao. The soft white underbelly, the channel. What is it?

The soft white under. Hunter Biden did a whole two-hour thing on it. And I watched the whole thing last night. It was wild. So he's redemption, full redemption? No. No, not at all. Ashley, who just interviewed him?

Was it Ashley Sinclair interviewed him? No, well, here's what I think. Sorry, Ashley, I got you. We exist as like a vestige of the last strand of American culture that perhaps may be intentionally destroyed. You know, I saw Bruceowitz made a post. He was saying, like, if anybody has information about foreign influence and funding to reach out to us. And I was just thinking about. This phenomenon, you know, like Candace Owens flips.

There's a lot of conspiracy theories, one, like we mentioned earlier, that they're creating the new opposition to Trump, which will still be somewhat conservative. So they're eliminating woke. Maybe the whole thing's on purpose. I don't know. But I also kind of feel like Gen Alpha exists in the, in the like hyperclip era. They don't watch long-form podcasts with in-depth conversations. That's why I mentioned clippers earlier.

That's how you get to them now. You don't get to them through long-form content. But by flooding their timeline. Right. But this is the same phenomenon as the shortening of phrases. Whereas a two-hour-long podcast, actually is a really great example that the Trump admin got mad at me because of one of the clips where I said, how dare, I was like, how dare Trump insult Alex Jones? I'm voting Democrat from now on. And they believed it.

They thought it was real. They saw a clip. They didn't watch the show. And they're like, oh, well, you know, I never. And it's just like, okay, whatever. I don't care. If y'all are dumb, you're dumb. But this is the point.

Young people don't watch the full show. They watch the snippet and complain about the fake version of reality. Half the time when we're covering things, we have to talk about some clipped or quoted version of something a celebrity says. And then we have to explain how, first of all, they were being baited by the journalist that's being taken out of context. It's not actually like that. And most of it's because you're not engaging with the full form of what you're reading or watching.

You know what's crazy is that like I made that joke where I said something like, I can say, what was the joke that I said on the show that went viral? Oh, you saw. Trump called me. Yeah, Trump called me before he called out, Tucker Carlson. And then it went viral. And like everybody was sharing it, it was absolutely insane. So knowing that, I can consistently just, if I were to come on the show every night and say something to the audience with the full context being, people are so so dumb, they will believe anything.

Like if I were to say that I can prove definitively the big famous podcasters that everybody's following, and I'm going to avoid naming for legal reasons, I have seen proof they are paid directly, paid directly by Pakistan. And that's just me making a hypothetical. But what's going to happen? It's going to turn to a clip. Clippers are going to blast it out. The thing is these clippers don't care what's true or not.

they care what the algorithm will hit. A statement like that will then go viral. People who don't like, you know, Candacea Tucker will say, here's Tim Poole proving it. And then a bunch of news outs are going to write it up and they're going to be like, this is the crazy thing.

A bunch of blogs and drama blogs wrote Tim Poole announces he's voting Democrat. And then like a day later had to update it to be like he was joking. Even the thing is they don't even need to do that. They could have included it in the article at the bottom. Like they always do lie by structure, right? They're like, well, it was clearly said in jazz,

blah, blah, blah, blah, it doesn't matter. The click has already happened by that. So to generate attention, we should just say things that in full context we can't be sued over, but out of context sound crazy. I don't think it's more than just getting attention, though, because there's integrity is really important. And there's a diminishing return on telling lies. If you have a lot of healthy integrity with your people, they can handle one or two or three or four jokes.

But eventually people are just going to start dismissing you. Here's something. You know what's absolutely not true? Ian Crossland beat a child. And I'm not saying Tim kicks kids like is his job. I'm not saying that. Tim just punches the shit. He just beats them up.

You could literally come on this show and just be like, you know what never happened ever? Hassan Piker actually was on camera beating his dog. That never happened once. And then the clippers take it. And then Hassan's going to see it. It's going to be like, how could Tim Poole have said that? And I'll be like, actually, I'm making a joke saying you never did. But of course, they cut out of context to get views.

and you know honestly this is the path towards virality if we want to be relevant we can just do it every day because none of these clippers care whether it's true on top of this is deep fakes dude because I talk about integrity but like pretty soon the machine's going to emulate you saying whatever the machine wants you to say how do you combat that? Hopefully you have human integrity

on top and they know that like they know you would never say that well the average that's actually not true anymore in a lot of ways people have been kind of hit with so many crazy headlines over and over again. You don't want to feel dumb for being like, I don't think they would say that. So you just kind of believe that somebody is going to say something crazy when in general your brain should kick and you're like, that seems a little bit ridiculous for me to buy into.

But I don't think most people do that because most people are just scrolling by now and they're not actually thinking about it critically. I mean, eventually it's going to be video and audio of my voice. I don't know how to prepare. You should be like, I don't know. I was talking to my, my, my, my, but Cody Mac the other day about how AI is just taken over and it's frying everyone's brains. And he was just like, for a lot of stuff too, but he was like,

AI still can't get skateboarding right. And that's technically true, but it's basically there. Yeah, I couldn't tell when he showed it to me. So it looked real to me. Yeah, he was talking about, there's this, like, there are these,

there's a, dude, it's just, it's, we're cooked. We are cooked. We are, I'm sorry, guys, it's black pilly, but it is. There's this AI woman account.

Half her pictures are just ridiculously, like, what's the impossibly large milkers, right? That's the phrase. Yeah, that's one way to. And she skateboards, and he was like, did you see the video of the woman doing the crooked grind, Nali Heel Flip 50-50? And anybody knows skateboarding, a crook on a ledge, Nali-he-heflip from the ledge onto a 50-fif down to a rail, knows very few people in the world could do something like that.

That's like beyond Olympic level. You will not see a trick that complicated in the Olympics. That's a trick that maybe only a handful of the top skaters in the world can do after a session where they try to find it. It takes 20, 30, 40 tries. If that. And it's this big titty, big butt woman doing an impossible trick with perfect balance. That is obviously fake. But to a regular person who doesn't know skateboarding, they can't tell the difference. I'm like, dude, it is not years away. Ian, we are already at the point where AI can fully make an episode of Timcast, IRL. I believe it, man. You should do it one time. Just make a two-hour episode

of IRL that's just totally made by AI. The problem is... Throw it out there, obviously, but like... But you'd have to screen it first because, like, for all you know, abruptly in the middle of the show, like, Ian takes his shirt off for some reason, and you're like... This is not AI.

I'm almost there, Brett. What were you going to say to me? I said, like, that's... You could do premiere it for, like, a Friday episode. We should just, like, every episode, for... Or every segment, randomly insert a phrase that

will go viral out of context. Oh, yeah. could do the show and we'll say now for all you listening what's coming up is AI this is fake this is AI they cut it to the AI and people out of context they'll think it's real and then it'll come back to the show okay what you just saw was fake back to the show but someone will we don't even have to do that we don't even have to do that we don't even have to do that I could literally just do what I already said and be like here's something that never happened Joe Biden actually called me it was the craziest thing during the election and asked me to endorse him personally and I was actually kind of shocked by

this and when I turned him down he threatened him down he threatened threatened to me and said, if you do not come out in support of me, I will accuse you of working for the Russians. And I said, oh, please, dude. Is this a joke? I thought it was a fake phone call. So I hung up. Next thing I know, they accused me of working for the Russians. And that literally, literally, never happened. 40 years from now, you know the show Mad Men? I never actually watched it. I just know it culturally, but they're these marketing guys. Like 40 years from now, the Mad Men show of our time will be guys sitting around a room being like, what dance? What TikTok dance should we do?

I hear that, but the reason why it's not going to happen is because in 40 years, people are going to be gaunt, sickly, and wearing VR goggles. They're not going to watch shows. I think, actually, I don't think people are... Comes down so bad right now. Listen, listen, you're talking about Gen Alpha being cooked, right? But Gen Alpha is only 40 million. It's half the size of Gen Z. Half.

People didn't have kids. Gen Alpha isn't just cooked because there's... like they're culturally cooked from social media. They're cooked because our pair bonding mechanism, our family building, community, building. Machine, it's gone. That's why we were like, we got to do the Discord. We got to bring people together

until they can have conversations to kind of keep some element of this alive. And the technocrats and the transhumanists are going to be like, so what? Already, you know what the creepiest thing is? AI girlfriends. Tons of Gen Alpha just have AI girlfriends because it's easy.

and it's emotionally satisfying enough. It may not be as satisfying as having an actual girlfriend, but at least they feel a little bit. Well, and they say they don't have to take any risks because they're not going to say no in any meaningful way. They understand there's no actual... There's no fear of rejection. Exactly. That's a big part of it.

Well, a big part of being a relationship is learning how to grow for someone and with someone else. Here we go. Let me pull this story up for you guys. From the Daily Mail, Canadian Doctor Met Man, 45, suffering from IBD, and depression outside Tim Hortons and took him to be euthanized. Dr. James McLean has been placed under mandatory clinical supervision for six months, following allegations that he improperly administered maid to two patients. In other words, he killed people.

He killed them. Dylan 45 was deemed eligible for Maid by McLean and a nurse practitioner due to his condition, which led to persistent complications of the colostomy bag according to medical records. McLean conducted the maid assessment outside of Tim Horton. in June of 2023. This was three years ago when we were warning this stuff would happen. It was actually already happening. So we look at the younger generation.

They're not having families. They're not finding jobs. They're getting, look at this, AI girlfriends, telegraph, the terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends. And the older generation, these are people who are middle-aged are being murdered by doctors. So I'm sorry if I'm blackpelt a little bit. But I want to stress this, three years ago, when we were talking about the rise of May,

saying this may start happening, it was actually already happening. And imagine how bad it must be right now, but these people are doing it in secret and they're getting away with it. And it's a testament to the fact that I think the elites are realized, like these programs are born out of, how do I put this bluntly? This is born out of resource scarcity, that they do not want to change the way. that they have governed or that they have run society, right? Like, the reason that this exists in Canada and in other countries is because they just think it's cheaper to kill people.

And that's the most disgusting part. And you see this over and over and over again with totalitarian communist states like Cuba, for example. Oh, the left will talk all the time about how Cuba's health system is so much better compared to the United States, and it's free. Well, guess what? You create artificial abundance by killing a whole bunch of freaking people are running them off of your island.

Even decades before, like, where I'm from Minnesota, I remember reading articles about wet houses, which were, you know, had government funding tied to them where basically you were allowed to just go and die about, they're not going to buy you the alcohol, but you're allowed to live there and basically just drink till you die. And that was always to me,

I was like, I can't believe the government would be in bed with any business like that or how anything like that. Because it's one thing when you talk about made and people can have their whole discussion about the concept of suicide and what you think about that, but in no way should it ever be tied to the government in any way, shape, or form. Well, if you're a utilitarian government and agent and say there's a horrible famine, the water supplies cut out, people are starving to death in cities across America,

you have to make a choice, how dangerous are each of these cities to the order? What are they costing us per day? Who can we let die first? Who can we speed up? the death of to cheapen the system so that other people can survive because we can't all survive and if we try we're all going to die. There are situations where it is cheaper to let people, I mean, they used to send them the meat machine, the grind machine, they used to just leave them on the side of the road because they couldn't walk. Like at some point, you know, you have to take

care of yourself. And if you can't rely on a government to save you or... Therefore, you rely on the government to kill you? Well, it's not up to the government, but I mean, if it's easier than trying to do it in your house and going half retarded as a result of failing, you know. Right. You have to be, you have to be independent to avoid the impulse for the government to go utilitarian on you. That is correct. That's the big thing. Yeah. So I'm not black-pilled and I'm not cooked. We're not cooked, but I understand people are stunted. I think that. It's how humans go extinct, man. It's definitely one way, but humans will continue. I mean, we got bombarded by meteors and came out of

with like 6,000 humans left on Earth or some crazy, 18,000 humans left on Earth and they repopulate the planet from that. We're like an infestion. We take this planet and made it our own, and it's never going to go away. As far as I can tell, we've got it forever now. If you need to repopulate, we need to get that birth rate up. But you mentioned this at the top of the show. You had a marriage from the Discord? We've had a couple, a handful of people got married through our Discord. Were you invited to the wedding? I think maybe one of them. That's like amazing that people got married for it. Well, people get married. It's what they do. It's actually not surprised. It's kind of, I would say it's actually scary.

From your discord? That's pretty... They found like-minded people that shared their values. I'm just saying like marriage is particularly mundane. But it's supposed to be, but it's not anymore. Go to the 50s, it was like you were 18 and you were like, who am I going to marry? That was it. It's funny because back then, dating would meant like a woman would be dating 10 guys.

What did that mean? It would mean that she would go out to get a soda. pop, you know, a root beer float, and they would hang out for a couple hours and then go home and they were dating. But then she'd also, the next day, go with another guy. But then she'd start going steady. Going steady meant she's basically become exclusive with one guy. And now they've got something going on. And within a year, they were married and they were like 20 years old. He wasn't asking, what's your body count? Right. By 20, on average, between 20 and 22, people were married and having their first kids. And they had jobs. They were already working and out of high school.

weren't going to college and they were thinking about like we're going to go by our first house that was mundane it was mundane it was mundane it's not anymore yeah now it's now it's rare and the fact but like the fact that that's happening on your channels is pretty freaking cool don't under don't under play it'd be like it's just mundane like the fact that people are it is it is cool but again we have to understand what perspective means we should not be living in a society where we're like wow a couple people got married that's horrifying. That is nightmare dystopia stuff. So we need to be like, guys, get married. You know what I mean? But I got to tell you, because I've talked to some of my guy friends, and they're just outright saying, like, it is impossible these days. And one of the reasons is the socialization of the modern woman. I brought this up years ago on this show, and the left went nuts. And the funny thing about the left is like, they like to attack masculinity and then attack you if you're not masculine. So it's like, bro, your booze mean nothing. I've seen what makes you cheer. Modern women try to get men by bragging about how manly they are.

It's not an exaggeration. They'll say, like, I have this great job. I get paid a lot of money. And guys go, I don't care. There was a story that I covered. Actually, let me pull this up. So I can find it. Women struggle to date guys with same income.

This was years ago. I covered this. And liberals lost their minds. 2019. Let's roll, baby. Let's let's go. Let's do it. Women are struggling to find men who make as much.

money as they do. Well, let me see. Let me find one example. You took their jobs. Oh, no, no, no, no. Here we go. Gina Thibodeau. So single New Yorker, Gina, I hope, hey, look, it's been seven years, man. I hope she's, she's found family. Job, Gina. They say, has some theories. I find generally that dudes these days just do less across the board. Their parents have coddled them and taken care of them, and they just don't go out there and make more money. Let me tell you what's wrong with this argument and what's really happening. Gina, You are how old is they say 38 years old? Do you think a 38-year-old guy who's making $80,000 a year is dating you?

The guys who are dating you are the guys who do nothing. These are the guys who can't get anybody else. A 38-year-old guy making between 50 and 100 per year might not be in the ideal. I mean, 38, you should have a family already. You should have kids already. Look, I know I was late to the party. But you get a guy in his 30s. He's going to be dating a woman who's 28.

he's going to be dating a much younger woman and the younger guy who's 28 can't compete because the older guys have the money and the car and the apartment and the younger guys don't have that yet. She thinks guys aren't guys aren't. And while it's true, there are a lot of guys that aren't, the only guys willing to date a 38-year-old spinster are the low-value males, creating the perception among these women that guys are just not good. The reality is there's a bunch of dudes who are like, let's say they're 35.

have a good salary and they're just banging all the feminists and then doing whatever they want. They've got to settle down because those are the rules of the game. This is what these women just don't. A feminist got superman when I pointed this out because they don't want to, they don't want, they don't want to realize that they live in this world where they are not valuable partners. No guy. I'm sorry. Some guys, sorry, I know the women are not going to understand averages.

Most guys, when the women go to them and say, I'm a nurse practitioner. I make $50,000 a year. guy's going to be like, I don't need a business partner. It's going to be a cool. When are you off work? Let's go. No, no. He's going to say, listen, if we're going to have a relationship, I need a woman.

I already have a job. I already make money. I can't have kids. I don't need a woman who's going to be a man. And I don't know who's going to be a mom. And the women are like, oh, you're just scared of strong women. Well, there you go. So I feel bad for these young guys, the socialization of the modern woman,

telling them to be like men and try to attract men. but then guys don't find compatibility with this and they're not having families and having kids. So Gen Alpha is half the size of Gen Z. Young guys. This story from the telegraph says that something like was like 43% of men under the age of what did they say like between under the age of 16 regularly chat with bots. That was a UK study, right? I think we covered that on the channel. Yep.

Eight and 10 boys have a conversation with a chat bot with 43% saying they talk to bots so they can ask questions without feeling embarrassed. more than a chorus that they like the attention and connection over real life equivalence. So guys, Jen Alpha is going to be a bunch of women are going to be locked in a room

with a vibrator and dudes are going to be locked in a room with their wifu pillow or whatever. In short, this is a great rant by Tim but in short, Discord, I'm looking at you right now.

He's not impressed with your handful of marriages. More of you need to get married in the discord. Here's one of the interesting things. We got to talk about sex. Women don't listen to politics. The only politics that women listen to, and this is a fact, is Candace Owens.

Well, that's a generalization, but I mean, there's some women listening. Yes, that is literally a generalization. 90% man or something in the audience right now. There's a lot of women listening. You know, Ian, I just don't respect it when you do this. Well, I don't respect hyperbole. What? You said no women watch politics.

Uh-huh. And there's probably like a thousand women listening right now. And if their IQ is sub-70, well, that's too bad. There's a lot of things they can't understand. and I wouldn't be able to express myself monosyllabically enough to convey these complex ideas anyway. So when I say something like women don't listen to politics, you don't need to correct it and go, there are some that do. We get that.

Well, you want more women to listen to politics, right? You want more women to listen to politics? I don't know if I want more men to listen to politics. It is just a thing. The point I am bringing up is what I said was the only politics women listen to is Candace Owens, right? I don't, okay. So the top podcasts among women are true crimes. and sex.

And among women, one of the top podcasts is Candice Owens, and it's tangentially political. She doesn't care about electoral politics. She says it herself, but she's a massively female audience. So she gets women in that space.

Again, conspiratorial, you know, it's all one big plan to create a controlled opposition, a new left, right, that is centered around what MAGA is.

I think we should talk about sex more because we talk about this being a family-friendly show. You want to make families, you talk about sex. You get women to come here. Yeah, you can talk about dating, not hot,

Well, whatever. You want women to be in joy. You want this to be like a family-friendly. You want families, you know? I understand if little kids, but we talk about guts getting ripped open. Little kids shouldn't be hearing that stuff either. Like, we need sex. We need to do.

I was talking to one of my boys today, and he was saying, like, his girlfriend just goes on and on and on how she wants, buckle fat removal and lip fillers and breast implants. And he's just going like, oh, my God, man. Like, no guy likes this. You know what I mean? Like, obviously, Ian. there are some guys that like plastic drag queen looking women. But we were talking about this the other day.

I can't remember who brought up. I don't know if you brought it up. These young girls grew up watching James Charles or whatever. They grew up watching drag queens. Yeah, Tate said that. Yeah, Tate was a... So now these women want to look like drag queens and guys do not want to date guys. This is the crazy thing.

Women are getting plastic surgery to look like drag queens while bragging about having masculine roles in society. Like, they are just telling women to act more. like men and guys are not attracted by it. Yeah, we got to get, what do we need? Girls that are just chill. The funny thing is, is like, if you look at the, like, with what I cover, like, with movies at the box office, the women don't come out to see women do movies where they're

playing manly roles like superheroes, the guys go out and watch those and then the audience splits off because not enough go watch the female-led ones outside of a few examples to really move it at the box office, but they will go see Barbie. They will go see it ends with us with, which, which, you know, which, you know, which, you which is based on a Colleen Hoover book. They will go watch things that women actually like talking about. Devil Wears Prada 2 is still doing really well at the box office because it's generically feminist

and fits into that girl boss side of what they actually like, which is, you know, there's the ones like Barbie is a generically feminist movie and Devil Wears Prada 2 is about girl boss feminism. I see someone chatted. Tim's out of touch. Go on a dating app. Women are all communists. No, sir, you misunderstand.

Women do not listen to politics. I think that's because... They don't pull up news shows, let me finish, and listen to political talk, and that's why they're communists. Because if they actually heard the truth about what was going on, they would be moderate to right-leaning. And women generally are communistic because they're about protecting the family at any cost, will give anything for everyone in that environment. And you go out and fight wars. You're inverting it. I think that's where they're general love of the communistic ethos comes from.

So women, they just do what they're told to do. And I'm speaking in general. I understand. They adhere to social orthodoxy heavily because they just want, and low-tie guys do this too. High testosterone guys fight each other. Low testosterone guys, they just tell me what to do and leave me alone. Women generally don't want to fight and men go out and they break bears and they cut them open to bring the food back. Remember the try guys on BuzzFeed when they all had like, yeah, T-levels, like 80-year-old men?

And like the one that, the one that had reasonable testosterone was gay. Well, I think there is like a thing with a lot of guys are just super weak right now, too. Like, it's not all the women. And there's like this, I'm not sure how to explain it, but like a tendency to just kind of like not know how to understand women. Well, I think one of the issues is there was a post on Reddit on like, I guess a front page doesn't exist on Reddit anymore. But it was some AI animation where a guy walks up to a woman. And he's like, he's like, hey. But I just wanted to introduce myself.

He's like, my name's John. I, you know, you looked interesting. I was wondering if you'd ever want to go out and hang out sometime. And she goes, no. And he goes, okay, it was nice talking. He turns around and walks away. And then she goes, wait, you're just going to leave? And he goes, you said no.

I got Nintendo. I'm going to go play video games. And he just walked off. I mean, no. And then all the comments were talking. Like comments from women were saying things like men don't try anymore. Men won't pursue us. And it's like, bro, y'all feminists put out a video called 10 hours.

of walking through New York as a woman, where you claim that a guy saying morning was sexual harassment. So now you're surprised young guys are like, leave me the F alone. I think dancing. Dancing is one of the most epic ways to find a woman. You go out where women are dancing, men are dancing. A mating ritual. Now, I will say, there's a birds do it. There was a really funny post.

I think it was from Andrew Tate where it's a video of like a breeding bull being released to a bunch of cows. Seen it. And then the bull like walks out and all the. girls are like swarming around and sniffing him and then Andrew Tate commented been there. Did you see the one of the bull being released and he walks out lazily? He doesn't know what's going on and he looks around and then he sees the females and he like jumps for joy. Let's go. Everyone's clapping for him. Let's go ladies. There was one post the other day where a guy said like if a woman brings up politics

in a first date he just doesn't even bother not because he doesn't want to talk about politics but because she doesn't. She just wants to hear that she's right and they don't actually want to have a arguing lowers attraction too. It's not just that. I would say that if you go, never, never swipe on a woman who's got politics in her profile. And if,

you know, you want to hear, there's one thing that'll guarantee you a perfect marriage. You're on a date and you say something like, oh, like let me, you know, let me get your Instagram.

I don't have Instagram. Marry me. TikTok. I don't use TikTok. When I met my wife, I said one of the biggest green flags was not having the newest and biggest iPhone. Yeah, the literal green flag

is when she tells you she doesn't really care for social media. I think she's bad. She wished people would just go hiking more. There was an article of the inverse recently where it was a woman writing an article that says a green flag is having a Luddite husband who doesn't spend much time online. Well, that's arguable.

But you know what that's about? It's because then when she says to her husband, you know that Trump's a family, fascist, they'll go, oh. Oh, wow. Yeah. I didn't know. I guess so. Sure. I can't really speak for women, but I would think you'd want a guy that's somewhat connected to what's going on in the world so that you're not going to get jumped by the outside world, but not obsessed with it.

That he didn't, like, read the news. They're saying that he's not on social media constantly. He's not posting selfies and stuff like that. Because it is inherently a bit, you know, less masculine. Yeah, like to what end, you know? If it's for business, if it's for work, like I don't really post a lot on Instagram, but I did over the weekend. It's something once in a while, but it's a difference. How often do they do it, and it just ends up being a weird worship of self?

My wife's family, this was a green flag for me when we were dating, but my wife's family only had a TV in their basement. Which was awesome, which was like, hey, and this thing's only, like, we don't really have, they didn't have cable growing up. They had the four public channels, and they had a DVD player. So this thing only plays movies, and it only plays them when the whole family's down there. They still, to this day, they do not have a TV. TV on the first floor of their house, which is awesome.

Every single time I go over there, I spend way more time talking to family members. I spend way more time in the quiet moments reading, you know, even if it's on my phone, I'm reading. It's noise pollution, bro. I can't stand televisions in the house that are on. Oh, God, it's so annoying. Unless Tucker was like, Tucker was like, why would I invite these people into my own home so that they can yell at me?

If Gutfeld is on, then I just go to sleep peacefully. just hearing Greg's voice just it's like a lullaby just earbuds in all night I've been seeing videos of like this was what life was like before Fallons are like 1998 you know

people just walk around looking at each other absolutely looking at each other you know what's funny I know it's like I know it's nostalgia there's this Instagram account that makes his nostalgia videos and it was like waking up

in the year is 1999 and he's like what's happening and he's like looking at his old Windows 95 computer or whatever and I'm like you know I think back to those times there was a nostalgia post on Reddit where it showed in 1999 a bunch of like 12 year old

boys playing and 64 and it was like you wish you could go back. And I'm like, yeah, I would love to be in like just to be perpetually in the year 1999. The thing is I know it's nostalgia and I know we just miss the things we had as kids, but I genuinely believe it is true right now that the younger generations are existing in a nightmare hell scenario. They are not feeling the joy and wonder that we did when we were kids. And they, like, I was reading an article that talked about how Gen Zia and Gen Alpha have nostalgia for an era they didn't live in. Because it was talking about how like 20 year olds look at these photos of the 90s of what

it was like growing up and they wish they had that. So I'm like, I genuinely do think we would be better off civilizationally if it was more like the 90s and that the young people, Gen Z and Gen Ziaf are growing up in the AI social media age, again they're not experiencing the fun the joy excitement the passion they are just living in a perpetual torture what style what style is back right now 90s style like my my little sister who's just turned 16 like she's going around and like buying all sorts of 90s style clothing and it's just cracking me up seeing this like you have no context for what this actually meant at the time but you're longing for something that's more analog and I think also with the social media

stuff, it pushes kids to grow up way too fast. The exposure to porn, the exposure to drugs, the exposure to all of those things. And every single thing that we might suggest that kids stay away from until they're at least adults, right, all these things. It always coincides with, if they're exposed to them, higher rates of anxiety, higher rates of depression, depression, higher rates of all of these different types of mental illnesses that ultimately make community impossible. I have an idea. You know, people believe that the Amish, live in wooden sheds and don't have electricity

but it's not true or anything like that. Let's create like the semi-Luddite movement where we all come together as a community and we just convince our kids it's the 90s.

So we're like, look at this new game console that just came out we got like a refurbished N-64 and they'll be like the new Mario, wow. Luddish. Wasn't that an M-N-Chamelon movie?

The Forest. Kind of. The village. The village. I'll tell you. It's not just nostalgia. But I'm saying like the joy and wonder of Super Nintendo coming out. I remember my dad went to Blockbuster video and rented a Super Nintendo so that we could play it

because we couldn't afford to get one. And then I remember I got good grades, so I got Mega Man X. And then, you know, just playing it. We had it in the basement. That's where our TV with SNE was. It was in like behind the laundry room in just like the undeveloped part of the basement. People got mad because I was like you don't actually miss Blockbuster because you didn't have to pay the late fees and you don't remember that the videos were always sold out. I remember that I had, was it,

was it dead or alive? What was it was it fighting game that came out for at the PlayStation where the chicks had the, you could customize the boob jiggle? Oh no. Yeah. Yeah. Jiggle physics. And so I rented, I rented that game and it fell down the side of my bed and I forgot about it. Then one day I went to rent a game and they were like, you can't rent anything because you're past due and you owe like 20 bucks. And I was like, what's past due? And they were like, I think it was called deader or. life. And then I was like, huh? And then I went in my room and I just digging around. It was a mess. And I found the blockbuster box smashed against the wall. $0.00. I was like, I'm surprised it wasn't way more. The 90s. There was a cap to the

pro. It was like a few days. But it was it was the cap to like the price of the game or whatever. And then you'd like, you'd drop it. Own the game after that. You have to just buy. I thought the 90s was like, um, leaving orbit. It was exciting time to be young. Because it was like we were on the rocket going out and now we're in space. And it's like, yo, everywhere I look is blackness. That's this weird void. Yeah. And it gets worse every day. That's exactly it.

We're going somewhere. And no, no, no. And the universe is expanding. It seems like it. And so we're watching the planets move further and further away from us. It's frustrating and it's like almost, it's like, it's like dev, it feels definitely. It can feel lonely and like we've lost, but we're going somewhere. That's you got to remember. The night, the end of the 90s, if you go watch advertising at that time, there was a lot of tech

futurism and a lot of hopefulness around the idea of technology and how it was going to make the world a better place. And you can't recapture that side of... I'm telling you, I got to find a manager for my hotel chain idea that I talked to you guys about, right? Yeah. It's, you do it as an Airbnb. And, you know, maybe what we do is, like, we buy four houses.

One house, everything inside of it is the 90s. One's the 80s, one's the 70s, one's the 60s. And then you can just, like, rent it out. When you're in there, the TV, we'll use like a raspberry pie to pre-program television from the 90s and you'll have like the the VHF and the UHF dials and you'll actually, it'll play in real

time like three days worth of TV. You just discovered, you can watch that on YouTube. You just discovered decades from first principles. Like, do you know what this is? This club and watch, it's like this. It's a run-down club. Every single floor is a different decade. Oh, you check it out. Have you seen, you go to the 70s, then 80.

But I'm saying like you get a house and then on the fridge. On the fridge, there is like a pizza thing when you call, the guy shows up with a 90s style pizza box and soda. I guarantee you 90s prices. It would be booked out permanently. I got the idea because Blockbuster did a 90s night. The last Blockbuster a few years ago has a 90s living room, and they did like a three-day you could reserve.

Airbnb. Well, I don't think, was it an Airbnb? They turned it into an Airbnb. But it was like for three days only, and then everybody just like, it sold out instantly, and they wanted to have a sleepover in the 90s living room. And I was like, we talked about doing it. And I was talking with some people about running it. And they said the biggest concern,

they don't know how to get past the problem of the high frequency of suicides you would get. Oh, people wanted to go there to skill them. Well, because what's going to happen is they were like, listen, there's going to be like a 36-year-old guy who was like, wife left him and took the kids. And he's going to go back to like the 1999 room playing Super Mario 64 by himself drinking. And then he's going to drink himself today. Yeah, we didn't do it alone.

It was about community. That was what made... But, like, the people who are going to do it are going to back. My friends are all gone. They've moved on. I want to not get lost in nostalgia for sure. I used to get...

The Halo room. Where it's like you go in and there's like four TVs around each other and there's like... There's a similar feeling about... About like the early YouTube days, 2006 and 7

where we were starting like the community of YouTube. I was going to say like, let's not freeze it in 99. I see 2007. We don't have Obamacare yet. Early YouTube, that's good for me. After the TV on their protesting. We got to get it. least some of the Rumble Rans to Summer Chats.

Bro, we have four minutes. Save it for the uncensored. Okay, I'll tell you on the uncensored show. Smash the like button, share the show. Let's grab some of what you guys got to say. Omnesty Stone Herald says on Sunday night, our fifth child was born. We were only in the labor department for five minutes. My wife pushes like a cannon. That is incredible, dude. Congratulations. Well, you know, look,

on your fifth kid, she's a pro. Child's going to be relaxed. Jacob Bollies is breaking Spanish military and investigative police have burst into the Spanish Workers' Party headquarters in Madrid. They're the current ruling party. They're people were trying to push them out. I heard, man.

That's crazy. Patriot Paladin says the Bergdorf Goodman is a luxury department store, which means there's a concierge sales associate lurking and following it all times. There's almost zero percent chance Trump was alone. Agreed. It makes literally no sense Trump on the building next door.

It's just not real. He might have known the guy, known the owner, if he owns the building next door. Oh, yeah. Yeah, yeah. Just the reality of Trump going in and being like, I need you to make sure there's no one in the sixth floor uncharacteristically.

then the locked waiting room door, keep it open, then watch guard, because I'm going to trick this woman I never met before into going in there so I can rape her. I don't believe her, but that doesn't mean that she's lying

and she needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she's telling the truth. I don't believe her. No, no, hold on. You know what if you do what I think? I think we need to entertain what Ian saying. Perhaps she,

not only did Trump have the manager clear out the floor, unlock the door in advance, back away so that Trump could go in, but while he was, E. Jean Carroll activated a time portal which she reached through and grabbed a dress from the future to wear while Trump did it. Yeah, I don't think the dress thing. I think she was wrong about the dress thing for sure.

Wrong? Apparently. She offered it up as evidence and asked them the DNA test it. Sounds like she's lying. Did it get Trump's DNA? Trump is a time traveler. So, indeed. Well, actually, is what someone says, steel, uh, steel shattered hand says, Tim, Trump gave the dress of the future to the woman that named one of her pets's vagina because Trump is a time traveler. See? Oh, that lady. I was right. All right. LS 58 says, not to mention the vast majority of videos of animal abuse on farms, it's an immigrant farm worker. Hey, not always.

Bro, I went to one of my favorite stories ever, I went to a dairy farm. I hear all these stories from vegans about how the milk we drink, it's got pus in blood, and the cows are sickly. Not true. It's all fake. Well, there's some somatic cells in cow milk. Yep. Well, I went to a dairy. farm where they produce a good portion of it, even the majority in California, not this one farm, but in this whole area. And we drove down and all these farms. And I go to this house and we were knocking on doors. This is what journalism is. Like when Kenneth Owen says Nick Shirley couldn't do it, she's lying. Literally walked with a random house, knocked on the door. A guy answered and said,

howdy. Producer was like, hi, sorry to bother you. We're reporters covering the drought and we were looking to talk to some farmers about how it's affecting their cattle. And he went, yeah, for sure. he gave an interview talking about how they got a drill for groundwater because the animals have to drink and the crops they have to water and it's been really, really bad for the area. Afterwards, I was just like, I noticed that there's no fence. You know, the cows were all eating and he was like, oh yeah, what do you mean? And I said, well, like your cows, they're not like fenced in. And he goes, yeah. And I was like, okay, well, I am so I'm not going to like, what if the cows leave?

And he goes, where would they go? And then I was like, well, I don't know. They just wander off or something. And he was like, well, there's food here. And I was like, it just never occurred to me. I don't know. And his mind, he's like, he's a cattle farmer's whole life. He's like, cows don't leave.

There's a saying until the cows come home. It's like, he's like, they might like wander off a little bit to go graze and then they just come back and then they eat some grain or. And he was, and we talked about like cows getting milked and he's like, oh, they do it themselves. When the cows need to get milked, they walk into a stall and it automatically milks them. and he goes, the cows want to be milked because it hurts. And I was like, uh, and then I'm sitting there being like,

I heard that they forced the cows in, the machine injures the udders, and there's blood and they're sick and infected. It's just not true. We saw a whole bunch of these farms. And when you get like... It's like the lower part of the Central Valley in California. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They were all happy cows that the cows could just leave if they wanted to.

And they're not meat cows. You got to be careful about the whole Potemkin. The Chinese had showed us around. So there's no bad things here. We didn't see any, so it doesn't exist. Like, the nasty arms probably wouldn't go for an interview. We drove into Larry County onto people's properties and knocked on their doors abruptly without being invited. Have you seen, though, like video from inside, like undercover video of like animals with like pus in their eyes, getting abused by workers and stuff?

Like, you are saying that the propaganda vegan videos, you know PETA got like sued several times for stealing people's animals and killing them, right? I would believe it. I didn't. I'm not sure. was one big story. They broke on someone's property, grabbed the dog and ran off and killed. Yeah, they're radical. That's a radical group. Yeah, the videos you're talking about are propaganda. Maybe, maybe. I mean, I've just seen stuff where it's like, okay, I wouldn't surprise me to pack a bunch of animals together and make them. Don't worry, it's fake. What? Don't worry, that's fake. Don't tell me

when I actually investigated this and found it did not be true that I'm wrong. But don't say, I investigated eight things, therefore none of it exists because I talk about these. No, I outright said, sometimes bad people do bad things. But when we went to, California farms all throughout southern California, to central California. We went to fruit farms, we went to animal farms. We went to the Bay Area because there was big concern about the, so they've got the Delta smelt. They want to stop.

They don't want to divert the Delta water to the south. One of the biggest issues that didn't get brought, that doesn't get brought up when Trump talks about the Delta smelt is that if you stop the flow of the freshwater into the Bay area into the Delta, what happens is the water level will start to drop and see water will flood into the bay. Turning, so deep inland, it's fresh water, and they grow a lot of fruits and vegetables. If it becomes brackish,

all those farms die. We explored and investigated all of this. My point is Ian, you watch some random videos on the internet that are hyperbolic, propagandistic, not real, and then you told me when I actually did the investigation, it may be a Potemkin

village. Well, I mean, maybe you saw a portion of all the farms on earth, and you don't make a blanket to of all farms everywhere because you interviewed. Oh, I didn't. I said when I investigated, I found that it was generally not true. What would be the general rule? That's what you're getting at here, right? My point is, it's not animal. Activists find extremist videos of people committing crimes and then tell you everyone's doing it.

And they tell you there's an industrial agricultural industry. And then when I actually investigated, made phone calls to people in Texas and talked to them. And they're like, oh, that's just not real. Cattle walk wherever they want. If you look at the property nearby, the cows freely roam 200, where they walk down to the stream and drink water with their babies. We do kill them eventually, but they live however they want. The farmers don't beat them and make them live in mud and they're not pussed out.

Pigs, it's pigs I've seen. There are bad people doing bad things. Anyway, we're going to go to the uncensored portion of the show. Smash the like button, share the show. Go to rumble.com slash Timcast, IRL, where we will talk more about how leftists are liars and are trying to get you to eat bugs through manipulation. And when that don't work, they tell you they're going to genetically engineer, they're They're going to biologically engineer ticks that can bite you to make you allergic to meat because that's a real video.

So let's talk about how they lie. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Good sir. Do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, Bradley Devlin on X at Bradley Devlin. Check out the signal. Sit down. Check out the daily signal.

We got a lot of great stuff coming. We just sent a reporter to Skid Row. So see what we found and what they think about Spencer Pratt, Karen Bass and the entire L.A. Mayors race coming soon. All right. If you guys want to follow me, I am on Instagram and X at Brett DeVille. on both of those platforms. Go follow Pop Culture Crisis on YouTube and on Rumble.

We are live 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, noon Pacific, Monday through Friday. If you want to listen, we're on all the audio platforms as well. Thanks for watching, guys. I'm Ian Crosland. Go check on my Instagram. We had an epic weekend in Las Vegas, Nevada, at the Enhanced Games documented at Tim and I

and the crew went out there. There's somebody on Instagram, but I really want to point you to the Timcast Culture War YouTube channel. Go there, check out the most recent uploaded video with a lot of great interviews behind the scenes. I think we, Tim, you may have interviewed an athlete. I'm not sure, but I talked to the CFO. It was great times. Check it out. Catch you later. Carter Banks. Yeah, I started watching that on the way here. I have not yet finished it, but I'm very excited to. If you want to follow me,

I'm at Carter Banks everywhere, at Carter Banks official everywhere else. Follow our record label at Trash House Records on YouTube. And yeah, let's get into the after show. We'll see you all at rumble.com slash timcast. IRL in about 30 seconds. Thanks for ringing out.