Timcast IRL - FBI RAIDS Democrat Swalwell, ITS HAPPENING w/ Mel K & George Santos

Episode Date: August 21, 2026

On this episode Tim & the crew are joined by Mel K & George Santos to discuss Eric Swalwell getting raided and having his devices seized People waking up as communism begins to rise again Candace Owens blaming Big Pharma in Lindsay Clancy case Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) | https://www.shoutout.fans/timpool Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) | https://allthatremains.komi.io/ Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere) Producer: Carter @carterbanks (X) |  @trashhouserecords  (YT) Guest: Mel K @MelKShow (X) George Santos @GeorgeSantos (X)

The FBI has raided the home of former Democratic rep Eric Swalwell. And he's been accused of sexual misconduct being charged now at the state level and at the federal level. So this is going to get really interesting. They took his electronic devices. Then afterwards we found out first we find out that he's at the airport and they stopped him and took his stuff. Then we find out they actually went to his house as well. So whole boy, we're going to talk about that. There's other really big news outside of politics.

Trump may be the president presiding over the cure for cancer. Moderna and Merck have announced that their new MRNA cancer vaccine may actually be a one-shot treatment to end your cancer. What they did was after they removed melanomas from various individuals, they used the genetic code from that melanoma to program MRNA so the body could single it out and destroy the cancer cells. And the people who got this treatment, apparently they're seeing tremendous results and it never came back. So they removed the tumors, gave a shot, cured. The stock for these companies is blowing

up. It's going through the roof. And everybody knows Biden said he wanted to cure cancer, but now Trump's going to get all the credit, even though he's not really doing anything, but he's going to be the president. You know he's going to claim credit. So we'll talk about that. And then, of course, we got news on this midterm election. It's going to be a lot of fun. There more and more polls are coming out saying Democrats are going to win. But I got to be honest, with the socialists, the Democratic socialists, It may just be way too easy for Republicans to attack them once it gets to a general. So we're going to talk about all that. Of course, my friend, smash the like button, share the show with everyone.

You know, we've got a couple of guests hanging out tonight. We got Mel Kay. Hello, thanks for having me. Who are you? What do you do? Well, I just had a book come out. I'm excited to be hanging out with you guys and talking about what's actually happening to our country and what we can maybe do about it. So thanks for having me.

And probably the best person to help us, another former member of Congress, who also has experience with the FBI. Yeah, no, absolutely. So it was great to be here, Tim. Thank you so much for that layup. Yeah, I don't like, I don't like my former experience with the FBI. It wasn't fun. You know, you can, you know, it's funny too.

My agent was, he had Napoleon complex because he was like 5'2. So he had to look up to me. And he was a dick. It was an absolute dick. So I will say this. I wish you well in hell, Eric Swalwell. You know he's going to be. No, but also.

I mean, you can certainly provide some insights into. Yeah, no. He, let me, let me, all joking aside, this is the beginning of a very lengthy and expensive process for Eric Swalwell. And without his campaign cushions, I don't know how he's going to afford it because last I checked, he's virtually broke. He's millions of dollar in debt. His wife kicked out of house.

He has two mortgages. He is a spiraling ball of fire. Wow. He had recalls of millions of dollars of his gubernatorial campaign contributions. pulled back. And then because he stepped down of the race, it also triggered, like, well, you're no longer a candidate.

So you have to return this money. And there's money he had already used. So by statute of California, he's like jammed. I mean, I got to tell you something. There's a worst person. There's ways to fall, but there's ways to explode.

And he has chosen to literally blow. Is there any way that this could take shift down with him? Fingers crossed. I mean, let's save it for the show. We got the rest of the boys hanging out. I was wondering when this was all going to catch up to him because I feel like we were seeing him in the news every other day for something.

Right. So let's save it for the show and get to the, uh, who's talking. Hi, Ian. Hi, Phil. What's going on? I've been studying RNA. So it's cool that we're doing, talking about MRI cancer cures. Maybe I can chime in a little bit about it.

When you say, when you say studying RNA, it mean you've been taking drugs about it? No, no, no. How many shots did you take? No. Voluntarily. It's the rhizome that builds protein. It means that he laid back in his brain. back in his room, smoked some weed, and stared at the ceiling for a little bit.

I stared at Chad to tea for like six hours, and I was like picturing the RNA and building, grabbing the proteins. I got to learn about this RNA. I better smoke some weed about it. No, but he literally just said he's imagining the RNA grabbing the protein. Literally. Like a little, and it uses magnetism to grab the protein. Oh, magnets.

Look out. Baseball bat. How do they even work? Medically. It's like an annotator joy playing chess in a queen's gambit, but your RNA, like you're high out of your mind. It's in your sense. Moving the proteins around. That's what, that movie, she was on drugs.

It was on Quailor. She was whacked out on goofballs. She was super odd. She was on lewd. All right, well, Phil, Ian Carter. Let's, uh, before we jump into the story, guys, head over to Timcast.com. Click join now to be the change you want to see in the world. We can do without you.

And with you, we can do a lot. Join the community. We got tens of thousands of people hanging out every single day. Craziest story we just heard from our members. This is, they, our, our, our Discord may have. just saved another member's life. He was telling us this last night in the uncensored portion that he was having a stroke and the other members heard and realized and called emergency services. And had he not been in communication, he probably wasn't going to make it. I mean, so that's really incredible.

You guys in the Discord membership, the community, you guys are absolutely incredible. But it's just so simple. When you have community and you care about each other and you're friends with each other, man, you save lives. You save each other's lives and you build awesome stuff. So check that out. And don't forget to buy coffee over at casprue.com. You know what? If you like everything Ian had to say, he's got a low acidity coffee called Ian's Graphene Dream, which it's just a regular coffee.

There's nothing weird about it, you know, even though you might think so because it's Ian. But your stomach's not going to hurt. You know, so some people get stomach aches from the acidity of coffee. This is low acidity. It's going to be really good. So again, check that at casparoo.com. But now smash the like button, subscribe. Let's jump into the news from the New York Times.

FBI agents search Eric Swalwell's home as part of a federal inquiry. Most sex crimes are prosecuted by state and local authorities. The federal agents appeared to be using civil rights statutes to scrutinize Swalwell's conduct, a person familiar with the case said. So apparently, this former Democratic member of Congress gets off a plane in SF. They walk up to him, they take his devices. Then we find out they raided his house. You know, I got to be honest, he's not a good dude.

You know, he, and he's also, he also said no one's above the law. Whoops. So, well, I don't know. No, no. I mean, stand by your principles, brother. But this is, this is actually, you know, I'm sorry. It's hard for me to have sympathy for a guy so awful. But, you know, George was just telling us how he's broke, kicked out of his house.

I mean, dude, I'm going to say this to you in the nicest ways. He, everything that he has coming to him, he deserves tenfold. I don't say that about anyone. I really don't because I've been on the receiving end of the Justice Department. It is not a fun place to be. But he's going to end up in prison for a very long time, a very, very long time. He has no, there's no one who will pity him. Trump sure shit won't.

No Democrat in their right mind is going to spring him from prison. He will serve a very long prison sentence because the facts are so clear on this case. And it's, it was, when I was in Congress, and I was in Congress for 11 months, he had already served a decade ahead of me. And I heard all the rumors. Everybody knew. All the freshmen would talk about it. He was like raping women or something. Well, no, he was screwing every single intern.

I mean, do you know what members like Kim call summer in, in D.C.? Skin turn season. That's what they call it. Because these young little girls, they fresh out of college, they show up. and they're like in these tiny little dresses and skirts, which, by the way, they should have the freedom to do so, and you should have the moral clarity to ignore them. But not this joy, not Gallego, not him, well, allegedly Gallego.

And not, did you see Jimmy Gomez in California yesterday? All of the stuff that came out on him? That's his best pal. They're all connected. It's a Rico. It's Rico. That whole California crew, it's Rocana, it's him, it's Schiff. It's, you know, the Ted Lou.

Wait, wait, wait, hold on. Are you telling me that, like, Schiff has gone around just like banging young girls. No, I think he penciled next them. Because to be honest, I thought it was going to be guys. No, you know what? No, no, no, sadly, no. I don't know.

I don't, wait, wait, wait, why sadly? Were you interested? No, not at all. I'm just saying, sadly, it's not going to be funnier, but no, no respectful gay man. And I speak for gay men here at this table will ever screw Adam Schiff. I mean, there's just not, I don't, I can't point to a gay man. I'm like, oh, that. neck of yours baby.

Maybe if you're like, bite himself. Jiggles his neck when he's in bed. Dude, he's just so weird. Do you remember Gumby? That's what I think of when I look at him. That long neck. I can't imagine. Like, he looks just like Gumby.

That's insulting to Gumby. We like Gumby. I like Gumby, but he looks like Gumby. And then like Rocana. Rocana and Fang Fang being friends. It's not a lot of my big old part. It's fung, fun, right? But Rocana is friends with Funk,

fun, fun, you know. They're all friends with her. She's a. California Syndicate. They're all connected. I think it's a recall. Are they still hanging out like fung fung in them? I don't think she's in the States.

She was recalled back to the mother. Like all the rest of them. I got to be honest. I think there's this. I got a text. I call it spam, but it's from a Democrat in New Jersey who's running. But here's the two from Democrats. The DSA's stuff.

You know what's the funny part? They call me, hi, Karen. It's such as, like I'm a, I'm registered as Karen. The DSA, I don't know why. Someone must have done that to you by putting your info in. Can I be honest? I think it's hilarious. There's a Democrat running in Jersey who I got an auto text from being like, you know,

stand me through whatever. And I do check to see what these people are because I'm, because I'm interested in looking at, one second, looking at these Democrats, her campaign is very middle of the road. It's like better health care. No woke issues mentioned. And here's the really interesting part. On her campaign website, she says, China is the greatest. threat to the United States, and we need to oppose Chinese, like, manipulation and, you know,

like expansive militarism and things like this. And I'm sitting here being like, you've got a bunch of people on the right now that are effectively apologizing for China, not overtly, but they're saying, like, oh, the U.S. is bad and should stop doing these things and back off the bricks nations, while Democrats are taking the opposite approach and being like, China is bad and their expansionist policies are bad. So these Republicans who turned anti-Trump, who are now highly critical of what the U.S. is doing internationally, are being countered by Democrats that are running who are saying, yet China actually is bad. Like, there's a realignment happening. I think it's on purpose. I think everybody's crazy. Look, it's all, it's nuts. I'll put it this with you. China is

dangerous, period, right? Anybody who, China is an adversary. I don't, China is as a whole. dangerous. They're not just an adversary. They're dangerous power that really challenges everything we believe, everything we stand for. They are actively engaging in proxy wars with us. For instance, in Ukraine, Russia, while we're funneling shit to Ukraine, we got the Chinese funneling stuff to Russia. Same thing happens in Iran. I mean, it is literally, they find every opportunity they can in a conflict where we have a vested interest and they take the adversarial side low key, and that is by default what a proxy war is, right? So they are dangerous to us and it is revolting to me that I see people out there who really

want to act like, oh, no, they're just fighting for their way of life. No, they're not. They're fighting to insert their way of life into the rest of the West. Did you see the poll that most countries view China more favorably than the United States now? I mean, I don't even believe those polls, though. Like, who paid for the poll? Who commissioned the poll?

I can run a poll for you to make you the hottest man in America. Hold on. Hold on. You'll get good results. Let me ask a question. First, let me ask you, what don't you like about how China's government operates internally? China's government operates with oppression, blackmail, and absolute dominance and control of their own population. Against who? Their own population. No, no, but which elements are their own population? Their entire population. If you're not part of the society of the CCP, you're right. You're oppressed. Okay. So there is a, so if you are CCP, you're good.

Ask the Uyghurs. This is my point. Are they alive? The question is, who are they oppressing? It's not everybody. If you are CCP, you're good. Which is not really a majority of Chinese people. I don't know.

Are you good? Or do they control you? They control you. They control your movements. They control your movements. But what if you agree with them? Why would you be mad about them? No, no.

My point is, these officials from CCP, do you know how many of their family members, they they slowly ship out to the U.S. Oh, they're just going out for college. Oh, my wife's going to go. The point of making is we mustn't be myopic. What China is doing is for the benefit of an isolated cohort within China. So when we hear that they're oppressive, we know this, we're Muslims, they're expansionist, they're cutting debt deals. They're basically building their own liberal economic order.

It's to the benefit of this small subset of their population. That's the point. Understanding how they operate and why there are people who like that, when you're, You see Hassan Piker say things he loves China. What he's actually saying is, if I'm part of that small subset, I will live like a king off the backs of everybody else. That's no different than what's going on here with the coastal elites of New York and California. They are very much for what's happening in China.

I believe they're technocrats. They prefer things to be organized and clean and full surveillance and social credit scores, and they watch everything and they take care of all of that. But the elite are still the elite, and the elites still live above. And honestly, I think this all goes back to China was elevated by the UN and Agenda 2030 and Klaus Schwab and Rockefeller. The end goal really is that we become China. And one of the worst things about China that we haven't even touched on is like the fact there's like no upward mobility without approval of the CCP. Right.

Like here in the U.S., it's not easy to go from being broke to rich. But you can do it and you don't need approval from the government. Yes, you'll need licensing. Yes, you'll need to play by the rules of whatever town or whatever. And you'll have to deal with that kind of stuff. But you don't need the okay from the party to do it. And in China, there is no upward mobility. If you're poor and the CCP doesn't find favor with you, that's it.

If you're not a good member of the party, you are not able to advance. The U.S. in point, Jack Ma. The upward McHugh. Kanye experienced the levels of our upward capacity in the U.S. because they won't let you pass like an 80 billionaire. They're very, there's, so. But you're coastal elites. Well, I'm pointing out a coalition between potentially the coastal elites

and the bankers of China. Like you were saying during World War II that the American bankers were working with the German bankers to sell out the Germans before Hitler surrendered. So we could buy out the system. And I wonder if the coastal elites are working with the Chinese. A thousand percent. Have you seen the United Nations who

runs the years at the top of the United States. Look at our trade policy, bro. Who's traded? Since the 90s. We've been giving China all of our manufacturing. Yeah. That is the basis of your of your economy and it is a lie to say we can give away all of our labor. I'll put it like this. We are desperate to import labor. That's the claim we're hearing from Democrats. At the same time, they exported all of our jobs overseas. Simultaneously, they claimed that we were overpopulated since the 70s so everybody should go to. abortions, then they mass-imported people. It is all lies. Yes. It's about majoritarianism. They want the country to be a real democracy where 51% roll over the 49 and then it's totalitarian.

I believe that the thing that they like about China is that it's totalitarian. If you don't agree with the Chinese Communist Party right now, they'll delete you. People from Turkey told me people get deleted. He can't spend money. They can't go anywhere. They can't. You're deleted. Well, I can't even go to China. They banned me when I was in Congress. And the point that I was making is like in the U.S. I said not nice things about Xi Jinping on the house floor. Good, good.

Like the point that I was making about- They happened with Russia. I got the letter from the evidence. You can go from being broke to being a millionaire. Small business owner. Small business owner. You can do that here in the U.S. And like the dynamic that you brought up about Kanye.

Like Kanye, I don't know how much money he had when he started out. I don't know if he was like broke, but he was a billionaire when he said the kind of off stuff that got people pissed him. He was a billionaire. Like, he's also not a great example because he's his own worst item. Yeah, he looks at the mirror every day.

I think it's like, how much can I screw you today? It wasn't the federal government. It wasn't the federal government that stepped in and said, you're not playing by the party's rules. He said things that offended people. Now, I don't agree with any of the bad things that happened to Kanye. I don't think that he should have been debanked.

I don't think that he should have been debanked. I don't think that he should have lost all of his stuff. He said some wild shit, but I don't think that you should be, be excommunicated from society for saying that. Have you ever been deepened? In China, you do get excommunicated from society. Have ever been debank? I have not been debank.

And it's kind of frustrating because that was the bank right following 2020, right? I was at the ellipse. Literally, I was at the ellipse. I watched a speech. And then I literally went back to the, to the Willard, where I was staying. and I saw whatever transpired at the Capitol inside of my hotel room. My bank, because I transacted in Washington, D.C., that day, debanked me. Bank of America?

No, Wells Fargo, which is really ironic. Bank of America, did it too? I know. It's really ironic. The worst bank for fraud in America debanking people for that. What you're saying, what we don't like about China. That is what we don't like about China. That is becoming more and more like that because the center for,

for American progress, open society, world economic forum, they want that technocracy. They've been doing that kind of debanking stuff to small gun shops for ages. Banks are like, we don't want to deal with, we don't want to deal with. They say it's a liability and it's not.

It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. Look, I'm going to say this at the risk of getting super, like, in trouble with people who disagree. A lot of people hate on Brigitte Gabriel because her delivery is a little rough. She's not lying.

Everything she says, I don't know if you're familiar with her, but everything Brigitte Gabriel has said in the last 10 years, she's spot on. What's an example? What she says? Everything about the Chinese, about the, she's like, oh, this mass migration of Middle Easterns into the U.S. It's not a migration. It's an invasion.

Yeah. Like, she has been saying these things outwardly, like for the last decade. She escaped from Lebanon, right? Yes, she fled after hiding for like nine years. I've heard her story. So if you listen to what she says, everything we're talking about here, like, holy crap, what was she on that she knew all of this ahead of time? She lived through it. She was paying attention.

No. We were paying attention, but when did you really start talking about China? Like at this level. Okay, so I've been talking about communism for over a decade. Well, communism we all do because we all freaking hate it and it's ingrained in her blood. Communism. Those of us who have a brain. Only in the past few handful of years, five, six years have people really started to do.

actually point to what the problem is, the issue of communism. I'm 51 years old. People thought that communism was beaten in the aughts. They thought that it was gone. I never had that impression. And I'm 38. I was a, listen, I was in, I'm in, I'm in, I come from the music

industry. Right. Everybody. Really? You're a musician? Yeah, but anyways. But yeah, like, people thought that communism was done. It wasn't real. It was so cliche. It was so over that dudes would go to Russia, right? and they would get a sickle and hammer ironically because it was funny at the time.

Now they're like, man, I wish I never got this, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I know a bunch of dudes that have gone to Russia back in the aughts when it wasn't, you know, before the invasion, before people were really paying attention to Russia. People thought that Russia was over, you know, they weren't anything to worry about. They got a sickling hammer tattoo because they were like, oh, we went to Russia. It's cool. Look at how well traveled I am. They didn't do it because they think they were communists or anything like that.

They got it because they thought it was done. People thought communism was over. It wasn't clearly, obviously, but like the idea that communism is is limited to China, that's wrong. No, no, it's not. So here's the deal. I disagree with you a little bit and we're from two very different generations. Being 38 and having family from Brazil who has quite openly dealt with communism in the last 50 years, right? I've been talking about communism and how it's well and alive for my entire life.

and it's been a point of contention for me. I've always disliked China, and I will admit that it wasn't until, what, 11 years ago when Donald Trump said the first words, China, China at Trump Tower that I said, okay, let's pay attention to China. But China, but China, the thing that Trump was arguing about with China wasn't their ideology. He was arguing about the economic unfairness. Like, it's, we're lopsided. Which is true every single day. Yes, which it's true.

And it's right. Like he's not, I don't think he's wrong about that. And I don't have a differing. There's no daylight between Trump's opinion on China when it comes to the economy and stuff, between me and Trump. But the ideology of communism is a different thing than China's economic behavior. Because China's economic behavior doesn't really line up with the traditional communism. It's more of a fashion. But the global banking system picked China. Rockefeller wrote a book about it. Kissinger wrote a book about it. If you know the history, you know, Soros loved China until they did. kicked him out. But I really do believe that the system that was built in China is also connected

to the United Nations and Agenda 2030 in the World Economic Forum and Black Rock is very connected to China. Oh, Larry Fink is literally the antichrist. And they want a technocracy. And the reason is because of their control. Right. Yeah. Well, it's not just control over the populace behavior. It's beyond control. It's cruel, right? Remember COVID? Remember that? We ran out of baby Tylenol? Yeah. Do you know why? Because China refused to ship it to us because they were short on, I guess, whatever material they needed and C as well. Whatever the case was, right? We had a baby Tylenol shortage in America that literally saves babies' lives every single day because a fever can kill a toddler, especially with their frontal lobe, not devolved. It's crazy that that's the

level of cruelty that they will do and go to insert their dominance. So yeah, they're a danger to me. When people say like, oh, they're our adversary, no, they're not. They are our geopolitical enemy. And if you don't treat them like that, they are going to destroy us every single day of the week and twice on Tuesday. And they're similar a little bit to the Muslim Brotherhood that you were talking about, Bridget Gabriel, because they do believe that they are superior. The Chinese believe that the Chinese culture and the Chinese people are special. They've ever seen a naked Chinese man.

There's no superiority on there. Bro, you don't need to go there. I'm just saying there's no superiority there. Like a Han supremacy type? Yes, don't you think? I mean, that's, you know, it's crazy? You know, it's crazy? Well, Han supremacy was an argument that they used during the Great League Forward to get the Chinese.

It was basically the same thing that you hear when you hear people talking about white supremacy here in the U.S. The Han was the dominant ethnicity in China. And so they were telling people it's Han supremacy. It's racism. You're a bad person because you're Han. And they use that. The same model that they've been using here. when it comes to white supremacy and stuff like that.

China already did it. You know what? Part of the reason why that's why, like Mel's saying, China is like the blueprint because it's already worked in China. Phil, the truth is, Genghis Khan didn't destroy the Chin Empire enough. That's just the fact. Would it Kubla set up the Yan Dynasty? The Han Dynasty is 2,100 years old.

It's, I understand, I don't know. I didn't know they were using it like that. That's cool. Yeah, Melnos. I mean, but the craziest thing when you say that, though, is how can anyone explain that the NIH, the DOD, the CIA, USAID were funding a bio-weapons lab in China with our worst enemy openly for years? Thanks, Dr. Fauci. No, but I mean, but shouldn't that be treasonous to us, the people of this country? Oh, that's why we want Fauci in prison.

Well, it's also why we took Nazis into the CIA because if we didn't, Russia would. That's why. We don't do it with China. China will do it with Russia. That's why Fauci got 11 years previous part. And that's, you know, he's going to be Joe Biden wanted to make sure that he never had to face the music for any of that. And metabioda was owned by the sun. Who's that?

Hunter. He had a metabioda is a Ukrainian medical company that was involved in this guy Wolf and all these people involved in Moderna. Everything that was going on with the COVID. A lot of it was coming out of Ukraine. A lot. I think it's the age of nationalism may be waning. I thought this in 2007. I've been thinking like maybe it's almost seems defunct

except for the control of the militaries. You want standing armies with nations for the most workers. You don't want the corporations take over. But de facto, the corporatocracy seems to be running. Oh, yeah. It's not a corporate. We're not corporatist. We're corporatocratic.

It's different. The corporatists were like in the 1850s. It was more like guild stuff. Right. So yeah, we have nations, but don't get angry at China. Look at how the money is flowing behind the scenes of the corporate. movement and that's where you'll see the real activity. It's fine to get mad at China.

Yeah, but the Chinese people are amazing and they would, the banking system would love to see the American people and the Chinese people hate each other because it just gives them more fuel to fund. That's why they're funding the DSA. That's why they're funding the socialism. That's why the People's Forum is funding all of this. And it's not just them. There's funding for this coming out of the EU.

The EU wants this too. They want a global socialist, technocratic governance model. They've been talking about for decades. It's called Agenda 2030, and they think they're close, and they think they're winning. And you know what? They're waiting out Trump. They hope that, you know, they'll take care of him after the midterms. And that's it.

That's why everyone's fighting about the wrong thing. The constitutional republic is what they want to end, and China is funding it. I think we can build a digital corporate governance, like what they want to do with the World Economic Forum, but do it with like X or a favorable company that we could install a constitutional republic in the code of the software. So it functions like a free speech. Yeah. I think we have to start looking at really what Black Rock and Vanguard and all these people are. Because I saw Annie Jacobson was on, I think Rogan, and she said that she went to DARPA, and they were

essentially saying, like, all the tech pros are above any nation. So, like, where is this going? I just think the idea that the Constitutional Republic, first of all, I think it got taken over in 1913, but I think it's still the same money, the same banks, the same architecture, and they're protecting it. And I think that, you know, this DSA move. even the care, all the care people winning, the Muslim Brotherhood people winning, all that. I think that they're winning. By making us all hate each other

and destroying the MAGA, destroying the podcaster world, destroying the DSA's fighting with the Democrats, they're making so much chaos that I really think that they just want to achieve agenda 2030 and that's it. You said what are these tech bros have more power than politicians?

Is that what you said? Or more power than... Governments than us. Governments, I think what that's leading towards, a new founding fathers, another layer of they want to recreate a global government and they want to be the founding fathers or they feel like there's no other way than they must do it because they're the ones that are building the software. Well, because they're the smartest people in the room, didn't you know? I mean, that's really what they think. And the worst part is that they think that openly,

if you hear them speak at Davos, I cover it every year and they just have this global council conference and they put out this whole thing. They have a population council at the United Nations. Well, I'm like, what does this come from? I look into it. You go back, it's Rockefeller. It's the Eugenic Society of like the 20s and 30s. Manhattan Project, isn't it? Yeah, it has evolved into the UN's Population Council. Then you see like Gates there. Wild. Yeah, and you see like, what's his name? That just died. Ted Turner and Sauros. And you read through it and they say that they have to cut the population of the planet in half to $4 billion by $2,200 or the planet's not going to make it. So they are planning again. and this is the World Economic Forum.

So I'm telling you, they have not stopped their full speed ahead. Just like, you know, COVID-19 was the great reset. I really do think that... Was it, though? No, but they wanted it to be. Yeah. I think they overplayed their hand and too many people saw it. I agree.

But I was supposed to be. Their plan has... No, it's a rabbit hole. Manhattan Project and Eugenics and all of that stuff. There's just... I will actually send you all the Wikipedia, like, rabbit holes, how they kind of back. end into one another and like kind of give contiguous a form throughout the years up until the

modern day. It's interesting. And I'm sorry that we're so deep in this stuff. It's like, I'm sorry folks at home. This is really. So the Manhattan Project was the very first of its kind to like bring together all the nations kind of the U.S. recruited scientists from all these countries, whatever. Hence why we didn't keep the atomic bomb secrets because they all deflected back to their

countries and gave away all the research we paid for. But that was the first reiteration of like a globalist like type structure and everything that we have now from Davos to Brussels to, you name it, all comes from that group. That's kind of the genesis of the genesis of like that, that concept of like the most brilliant minds of the world and put together. Look at what we did. And then they showed off it with glee and Yoroshima Nagasaki like, look at what we did. Exactly. The next iteration now of the Manhattan Project scientists working on the atom bomb is the genetic scientists working on the genome projects.

It's a modern, yeah, absolutely. It backends like all the way throughout the years into one another. So who's the Nazis that they're trying to defeat right now? Is it the free speech advocates? Like, do they look at nationalism? I think nationalism is a dirty word. Individual liberty. Individual liberty is unacceptable.

Individual liberty is unacceptable. property. They want big government. Everyone depending on government. They're going to get it too. What they're going to do is they're going to put us in the pod, give us virtual reality neuralink technology, and then everyone's going to choose to live in their own private fantasy world.

And most of the people are already there. And by Tim's book coming out on this very subject. I think there's no other which is not no, I don't have a book on that. Wasn't it something about virtual reality? Like the fiction that you wrote? TV show idea. Oh, sorry. My bad. Okay.

But we don't have the means to produce a TV show. Yeah, you do. Yeah, you do. With AI, I know, I guess. But I think you're right, the inevitability of the technology. A great space here. You could really turn into a set. Think about the lockback.

No, we're going to do a show here. We're going to use the space, the warehouse. And we're going to call it, you know, it'll be like one versus 20 pincard. It's the name of the show. And we put like one conservative versus 20 liberals, Pinsert. That's what we're calling it. Pinsured. I don't know.

It would get violent now, though. What a pincer is. I don't know how. There might be other pincerers that aren't attacks on it. Pinser is when you come from both sides. Didn't you just do that? What do you call it that thing in? Jubilee.

This is why everybody's talking about me. By the way, what was your experience? I could never sit through the insufferable like hordes of people around me just the fact that, you know, in pre-production, we mentioned like it's going to be called one moderate versus 20 progressives or it's going to be one moderate versus 20 progressives featuring Tim Poole or Tim Poole. And I was like, you know, they said, well, A, B. Tessy, which one works.

The fact that it's Tim Poole versus Progressives shows that, like, there's no debate in that whole thing. It's literally, they come and sit down and they scream, I hate you Tim Poole. Right. Okay. It's not talking to him. You can't.

But the issue right now is, so this is, here's what's happening right now is. You're purists. There's a starvation for attention. Yeah. So, you don't say. I thought Candace Owens was just literally having fun. So we're in what's organic.

The attention economy. We had a labor economy. We had a service sector economy. Then we had the information economy, which was just like the internet and then app started become a thing. But now we're in the attention economy where information is instantaneous. So the information economy, which was like 2000s, 2010s, was that there was money to be made and getting information to people faster than they normally got it.

So if you were online, you were learning things faster than people who watch TV, but a lot of people were trading stocks and working business on TV. Now that everyone is online, it's shifted to attention to maximize new things you can buy in ways to spend your money. The problem now is that with AI and ubiquity of social media, ease of access to production has flattened so much that everybody is now competing with everybody. So during the information economy, one of the things that really pissed off the corporate press was that they spend $100,000 to go and cover Occupy Wall Street. send a van, satellite, big cameras to be able to transmit it. Then I show up with my cell phone. It's low quality, but the information gets out.

The quality didn't matter, the information did. So these big corporations got really mad and said, F these people, it's fake, don't trust them. So the problem for them was, they literally did talks on this at like big events. How can we compete with a guy who's spending 20 bucks to go down and cover a major news event? We have to spend on salaries, on trucks, insurance,

equipment. It's impossible. Here we are the same thing is happening now to the podcast space. How can a corporation like Timcast with staff, facilities, compete with every single random person? And so what we're seeing now with Instagram and TikTok as we're in the attention economy, videos are becoming increasingly short. And one thing you'll notice is that you name it, literally every single person are posting identical videos. They're reposting. posting the same jokes over and over and over again. There's no originality. So if you're a comedian and you make a joke,

7,000 people within 10 minutes are going to copy that and remake it. How can you compete with everyone? So this is driving ad rates down. It's thinning out the ads, right? So if you have 100 people who produce content and there's $100,000 ads, everybody gets a buck. But let's say the next day there's 10,000 people making videos and still only $100. Well, that was a main issue with X.

That was the, so you just hit on a pressure point there because X launched their revenue share, right? And in the beginning, I'll speak very freely. In the very beginning, I remember when I first got approved for revenue share, whatever, I got this massive like back paid because I got out of Congress in 23. My accounts were like crazy, like insane. So my very first payout was like, you know, five figures. I was like, what the? And then eventually, I guess that dwinds was backlog.

It was all, yeah, they paid everybody back. So, but they couldn't pay you out because you were in Congress. And then once you were out, it went, it was like a rock, like a thump, right? So it was crazy. I was like, what? I should have never got to Congress. I was like, what am I doing? So long, short, as more people were added to the revenue share, like distribution, the pot got bigger,

but the actual cash never really grew at the same rate. So it started thinning out. Like, I mean, the Krastinsteins were complaining a lot because I think they're like first payouts were like 15,000, 19,000 like every two weeks. I mean, like, hey, you can really budget. If that's consistent, you can really budget a nice life off of that, right? And then eventually it started going to like $400. I mean, I've received payouts of like $127. And I had like 30 million views and stuff.

I'm like, well, how is this tabulated? Too many mouths to feed, not enough to go around. Like, it's really Thanos theory. right. So when they just did this change to the revenue share, I said, okay, great, this levels it out. And Nikita Bear, I will give Nikita a lot of props because exactly what you just said, he literally said, no, you don't get away with this anymore. The original, we will trace it back to the original poster of whatever the content is. And that person will be rewarded for your views, for ripping it and vampiring it off of them, which I think kind of sets the playing field equal.

because honestly, I hate my feed right now. It's just like... So here's a thing... There's no creativity. It bores me. So here's the problem that doesn't exist for most people on X. Because I am a public figure, the for you is literally just posts from me and about me. That's completely useless and I don't need to see it.

Same. Yeah, right. You're going to see the same thing because you're George Sandus. So the for you, for a regular person, The algorithm doesn't really know who you are. So it's going to show you things somewhat related to what you might be interested in. For me, it's like, here's your name, 7,000 times. And it's good, it's bad, but it's a waste of time.

I don't need to see the 17th. I was watching IRL last night. Ian Crossman made a really great point. And I'm like, that's cool. We love those tweets. But I'm trying to read. I was there. The 4-U is awful.

Going to GROC. The 4-U is impossible to use. Going to GROC and tell it to change your algorithm. I have. Oh, yeah. I have told GROC, please don't flag anything of me on my 4-U. It does not change. It does not change.

I wouldn't, I don't know if that's true. I believe you think it would. You can be real integrated. Like, tell me about RNA only. Just give me all RNA stuff. But Ian. You can tell it. Go back to default at any time.

But Ian, here's a problem. It works for that period of time of the prompt. and then it resets. Are you sure? I'm telling you. Okay, I'm open. I don't know enough about it. Try it and then time it and see how it stops.

I went back to default lately. If you see some of this, I'm very specific to what I put alerts on. Like there's two accounts that I've had alerts on for the for the longest. Colin Rugg is one of them because he was the OG guy I got news from on X. Like I would rely exclusively on Collins like because he pushes stuff out all day long on like the minute almost, right? And he's good at it. And I follow that for so, so long. He's one of the few accounts I have alerts from.

And the other one used to be a Ross News alert. And then that went sideways with like a bunch of controversy. So I don't have that alert anymore. But yeah. I've been getting Polly Market gives me, I don't know if they're true. But they give me news clipping, news headlines that are fascinating. Don't speak to me about prediction markets. I know.

For some reason, their Twitter thing is like a news channel. It's just post news. Maybe it's news that they want you to bet on. I don't know. I don't know. I think it's all inflated. Are you investigating the algorithm? Shift, Tim.

This thing's, I think that's the future of algorithms. Here's what I did. Here's what I did. I went on Grok. Is your phone fold? It's a Z fold. Oh my God. Is it like that big when it opens?

Yes. You've never seen a Z Fold? No, I have. I just didn't think people actually bought them. They're amazing. Are you kidding? It's one of the best ones I ever used. So I went to Grok and I said,

I don't want it, you know, to remove posts about me from my feed and says, I can't do that. That's weird. And then I said, the problem is the four you feed is just posts about me, which it responds. that's common for high profile X accounts. Did you say change my algorithm to... Yes. I cannot change your algorithm.

It doesn't do it. And then it said, if you're seeing a flood of posts about you, it is a common problem with high profile accounts on X. That's it. And that's only for you. Yeah, but the four you is supposed to be caterer to what you like. No, no, no, but think about this. Little stupid questions.

Think about the average person with a couple hundred followers. When someone tweets about you, you want to see it. You want to see it. That's social interaction between you and people you might talk about. And for X, they're thinking it's going to create more connections and more engagement. So we want that. But then if you're George Santos, you're probably just getting a bunch of people like, well, a ton of women liking you and a bunch of liberals hating you. Oh, and the, and the dude culture, like, I hate this guy.

Like all your viewers. Today, they're all like polishing. Like he's so gay. They're all polishing their weapons. Like, I think I'm ending it tonight. I can't do this. anymore. They're all like, I think it's tonight that I do it. Let's go, baby. Let's go. Let's talk about the most obvious timeline shift from the Times of India, one of our favorite

sources. Hindustan? Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. Candice Owens blames Big Pharma for postpartum psychosis as trial nears end. I agree with Candice Owens. No, you don't. Big Farm, I don't agree that Lindsay Clancy is not guilty in the sense that she shouldn't be held accountable for murdering children. Okay. I'm agreeing with in the sense that I'm not going to, I say it to be somewhat sensational. Big pharma is a disaster. It is. Nightmare problem. Women are overprescribed drugs. And, you know, as much as I, like, Jeremy Boring him one of the best posts ever. He was like, he's like, Lindsay Clancy was clearly suffering for mental issues. She was begging for help. The pharmaceuticals treatments that she did not get were making things worse. I feel for this

woman at the bottom and she deserves the death penalty. Like, that's, I understand the point. he's making, right? So, and I agree, because I think most of us probably should agree on this, we are over prescribing women drugs for these issues. Well, every issue. It's been going on for decades. It's sickening. There is, like I said earlier, there's a population issue as well. They really popularized, not just abortion, but the whole culture of not having children. And this is coming from the same place. But, you know, then women were having children and they started medicating them. And, But honestly, the whole thing is getting crazy because a lot of people I know were put on drugs, including myself, very, very young, especially women. And then during, I don't know if you guys remember, Homeland, during Homeland, she had bipolar.

And I'm telling you, the surge of people, women that were prescribed to bipolar drugs during that time was so crazy if you look at it. And so then came Adderall. I just thought women were naturally. They are. But then came Adderall. Then they're adding Adderall. I have a, I have a female friend. She's been following this the whole time.

And I was talking to her about all of these crazy women. You don't have a female friend. You're lying. Throwing ice into a shower and just throwing meat out the windows of whatever they're doing. And, you know, she's telling me like, yes, yes, but don't get caught up in that. Even if, even if that's the majority, make sure you're differentiating the women that are supporting Lindsay Clancy, not because they think she's innocent or she should, she should go, she should be released or anything like that. but because there is a... So here's the point.

The conservatives are focusing all on the women who are like, that could have been me. Like, you could murder your kids. And that's great to criticize, and I agree with that. But let's also point out some of the women that are supporting Lindsay Clancy are saying, when I was suffering, the doctors drugged me and screwed with my brain,

and that's what they're actually mad about. Not that... And again, I want to clarify, the women that are celebrating her and wanted to go free and are blaming the husband are nuts. The women that are claiming that they could murder their kids are nuts.

And if, like, you see this video where everyone's like holding her kid and like, same, Lindsay. It's like, you need to call, you know, child services. Absolutely. Look, but I just want to say to the women that are complaining about big pharma drugging them when they shouldn't have been drugged, I agree with that. I agree with that, but there's two separate things. And this is also, this is not new. This has been a running thing. Because first it was the Mangione.

He shoots the guy, the United Health guy on the street. He becomes a hero to also young women around. Because he's good looking. It's because he's good looking. But it's also a cult of personality. Look at Tyler Robinson. He's ugly. He doesn't have the same following.

Yeah, but but a lot of... I'm just saying the obvious, sorry. He was made into also a hero to a lot of people. A hero, but he doesn't have all these girls chanting like, oh, Tyler Robinson. I know. The girls were thirst trapping for Luigi Mangione. But to the point you made on drugs at a young age, Ashley St. Clair. Remember Ashley St. Clair?

It's like nobody talks about her anymore. But Ashley's my friend, still is my friend. It's been my friend for many years. Ashley made this. the perfect case against birth control and how it wrecks the lives of young women because they get pumped all these hormones and they actually go nuts. Yes. And pharmaceutical companies then say, but we have a counter to that. So let's tell you another drug. And they're like, they're pumping you with hormones and then they go on the side and pump you with stuff to like suppress the hormones.

We talked about this the other day. The pressure cooker. You'll, you'll, you'll have psychopaths. We'll talk about it with drugs. You'll have like migraines. So the prescribing medication, but the medication causes anal leakage. Then they'll give you a medication for your anal leakage, which causes like abdominal pain. And then they'll give you an end set. Homicidal thoughts. I mean, they're giving out drugs for depression that they say could cause homicide or suicide.

Zoloft. Zoloft is the number of one suicide drug. You take Zoloft for depression and then you want to kill yourself. What are we doing? A lot of these women look like they're all wearing pink. Okay, let's just understand that they mobilize this movement very fast. So people can feel empathy or whatever.

But they mobilize this very quickly. First of all, and second of all, this became an industry because you know how much money? She's already like raised. People are raising money off this. It's like it's, it's kind of sickening. This is, and also the arsonist is about to go on trial. All of these. The arsonist? Yeah, so the guy who lit the fires that burned down the palace. It's, you know, he was a trumpeter, all that. I just, I actually caught somebody that they blame for it. I'm not, I'm never going to trial that I, fans. I don't think we can live in a society where we say you're not responsible for the actions you take. But I do think that we need legislation or something to stop what big farm has been doing.

And one of the problems people to understand during COVID brought you by Pfizer, brought you by Pfizer, all of that. Guys, this is a serious problem. These big pharmaceutical companies go to the networks and go to big tech and say, if you don't ban Ian, we'll pull our ads. and that's driving censorship. The idea that they go to like 16 year old girls and they say we want to prescribe birth control not for, oh no, no, no, it's not about contraception, it's proper hormonal regulation.

They make up reasons. They make up reasons to give young girls birth control just on the fly. They're just pumping out drugs, running commercials to pump out drugs, and then they threaten to pull the sponsorship dollars from networks and from big tech unless they censor and shut down anyone who opposes them.

Watch Fox News at night between the hours of seven and midnight. Every commercial is a form of vitamin relax. Well, you know why. Their audience is 80. Well, I get that, but that's just pushing more crap on people. Like, it's a form of farm. Yeah, but also. Mind control.

It's awful. This goes back to IG Farben and the whole thing. I mean, there's no difference between this and the whole mind war and everything. I think they want people to. to be easily manipulated. Europeans got it right, though. You're not allowed to have cool jingles in Europe for TV. It's only us.

South Americans, too. You're not allowed to have cool little jingles like, Oh, Zempe. Like, you can't do that in Europe and South America. I don't know about Asia and Africa, but like my point is, I got an idea. Hear me out. Pharmaceutical companies should be required to show for three seconds per ad,

every side effect. They do. They do. No, no. Show it. Oh, show it? So if it's like anal leakage, they got to show an ass with like leakage. I don't want to see that.

They're like, this drug can make you happy. You are diabolical. There's a guy going, oh, it's pork in my ass. Diabolical. Guys, in Canada, the cigarette packs have pictures of lung cancer. Brazil. Brazil doesn't say. No, well.

I know. Coker still want to. You know what my mom used to say. It works the cost of cigarettes. You know what? My mom as a prolific smoker in Brazil when she would buy cigarettes and they would give her a lung cancer. No, no, no, give me the infazema picture. I don't want that.

No, but RFK Jr., when he was running, said that he was going to end pharmaceutical ads in America. If he did, the entire cable news networks would fall apart. Well, I've said this before, by the way. When he was talking about pharmaceutical ads and ending them, I literally said you will destroy News Corp, ABC, NBC, NBC, U.C., Parame. Everybody's gone.

The number one ad sponsor buyer in American media is big pharma. Get them out. They equate for, if I'm not mistaken and my numbers aren't rusty, somewhere close to 60% of TV ads in America are big pharma. Me too. J&J, Nova Nordics, Izer, Izer, Lilley, Modern. I mean, you know how many times we've had companies try and get us to advertise GLP1? You should. Okay, I'm going to, I'm going to say that.

I never have. I'm going to tell you this real quick, hear me out on this. Of all the insane things Big Pharma has done to people, the one drug that has been now tested in various scenarios, GLP1s, GLP3s are actually one of the most revolutionary drugs that do not harm the human body. It's wrong. It is not wrong. I'm talking about the stomach paralysis that people get. That literally 0.01% everything has a side effect. You can't take the worst of it and negate the 99%.

So it does harm people just at low rates. 0.01% are you sure on that number or should I factor you? No, you can fact check it, but that's what I read. It was 0.01% showed signs of potential stomach paralysis. And that's unfortunate, obviously. The Tylenol could kill you, dude. It can give you hemorrhaging. Well, are people getting heavier, I mean, healthier?

Are they losing weight? No, they're getting healthier. Their labs are catapulting to good level. Yeah, because it makes you not want to eat. It's not just that. It regulates your hormones. It regulates all of it. 40 to 70% experience side effects from GLP1 receptor agonists.

No, no, no, hold on. 40 to 70% and the majority of that is nausea. I didn't finish. The majority of that is nausea. The top one is 20 to 50% suffering from nausea, 30% diarrhea, 24% vomiting, and 24% constipation. abdominal pain, 50 to 75%. How about people, we build a better culture where we tell people to exercise and eat healthy

and we stop selling them tartrazine colored popcorn? I agree with that. But what I'm saying is there's for a lot of people out there. Wow. Four to 14% suffer more serious side effects. Well, there's a reason. There's also serious risks like pancreatitis gallbladder issues. You can't.

Astroperesis, stomach perellular. much rarer in general, though elevated to non-users. It says under a few percent. Let's find out about the one. Their higher doses result in, what does it say, during the titration phase and differ, blah, blah, blah. Okay. What percent get serious side effects? I'm not a fan.

I'm not a fan of a society that's like, you, you know what? You gorged yourself and then pretended like you liked it. Take this drug and then you'll feel sick and not just about that. So I'm not, I'm not the fat apologist here because I know that being fat is part of poor choices, right? Five to 10 percent in clinical trials suffer serious side effects. Serious gastrointentional events occur between 1 and 4 percent. 4.1 percent with Wigovi. 4.1 percent for serious acute pancreatitis. 0.2 percent. Galbetter disease, 1 to 2 percent.

1.6 for colio coliolidylithiasis. I don't know what that means. Let's see. Gastroparesis, stomach paralysis is between 0.1 and 0.5%. Discontinuation due to adverse events is between 4 and 10%. How would you like it? How would you like to be the 1 in 500 whose stomach becomes paralyzed? One in 500.

Of course you don't want that. That's common, bro. That's a common side effect. Not common. One in 500? That is a common side effect. Okay. I've had 1637 calories today.

That's how you should lose weight. Thank you for your calorie count, by the way. And I've had a hundred and a skinny guy. Don't say anything. Stop. If you chime in on this, Ian. We're going to have issues. Yeah.

It's a peptide. It's a peptide. Ozebic is a peptide means it's a chain of 31 amino acids that they synthetically build in the lab. Normally your ribosomes build it up and then you use it. But they're building it in the lab. This is like the future of CRISPR gene tech. They're not at the genetic level.

They're at the amino acid, at the peptide level, which is like two steps up. It's not hard to count your calories and watch what you eat. I've had 200 grams of protein as well. It's a greater question of gene therapy. And are you into the one? I'm on a cut, man. I'm on a cut. Changing and sniffing their genome and stuff.

You can, like all that stuff you can do, and I think that it is important. But to Tim's point, it is better to teach people to live healthy lives. So, Phil, don't teach it. Mandate it. No, how about, okay, Bloomberg. Okay, Michael Bloomberg, my bad. I didn't know Michael Bloomberg morphed it. How about you can't vote unless your BMI is between, you know, 19 and 24?

Okay, that's that's fat, fat phobic. No, BMI is about muscle as well, so super ripped guys can't vote either. All joking aside, too. I think it's not. I mean, I'm like, I'm like. Be quiet. Be quiet. Hi, BMI.

Hey, listen. Don't tell me to be quiet. You're in no position. Tell someone else to be quiet. Oh, buddy, I know what I'm talking. I'm defending the GLP once for a reason. I'm talking about quiet. I'm talking about the fact.

I'm talking about quiet. How about this? BMI. If you sink in a pool, you can vote. You don't think in a pool either. Me, I do. You just got to breathe out. You'll go straight down.

Yeah. So that means that muscle sinks. Voting hack. So this also means women are less likely to be able to vote too. Women have higher body fat person. Moose float. This isn't, it's not. Real quick, you guys know this is true that women drown a lot less than men.

Because of that buoyancy? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yep. Yep. Reasonable. Women have, what is it? What on average have, like, what, 20%? And guys have, like, where did you get this from? Like, do you sit at home and just like, women drown less than men? George, literally all I do all day is read these things on the Internet.

It's my job. I read the weirdest things. I read about flat earth, like, all the time. I thought I was crazy when I was giving Phil, like, Project Manhattan is the genesis of all of it. I saw a video. I saw a video. It's a really good point. I can't remember who said this.

But you guys, people listening might know who said this. He said, there is, Sam Hyde, Sam Hyde said it. There is no subject more damaging to your reputation than saying you think the earth is flat. You can be a racist. You can be a Nazi. But if you go out saying and fight for the world being flat, that is just like, like you will be ridiculed, shunned, cast aside. People can make excuses for everything, but he makes a good point about it. I mean, he does, but generally I think that it's

broad, the earth is probably round. Oh, okay. Are you going to defend flat earth? Have you heard the argument, Phil? I have heard a lot of, you know that the government lied about Epstein, right? Yes, they did. You know they lied about the assassination of MLK and JFK. Yes, they did. You know that they lied about the Gulf of Tonkin, right? Yes. You know, okay, but they're not lying about space. They're not lying about space? No. The point they're making is that we don't trust the government.

So why would we trust them at any other point? That's the argument. That's the, that's the, we've talked about this a bunch, or at least I have, that like, just because the government lies doesn't mean everything the government says is a lie. So here's my point. Every time somebody makes all those assertions, like, oh, the lie about this, can you take me to the ledge of the flat earth so I can push you off of it and see what happens?

But, but, but you know, hold on. Like, I want to, I want to see what happens. Because the earth is also hollow and flat. It's a donut. Technically, you're on the edge of the earth right now because it's no, it's not round. It's a bunch of straight lines tangent to each other at the microscopic level, at the nanoscopic level. That's exactly correct. That's what Ian is.

Both the flat earthers and the round earthers are right. Just how close you're looking at it. Ian, Ian's like when you get down to the plank distance. Yeah. Everything's flat. in my language. When you get down to the plank distance, everything's flat. Everything's flat.

Ian just crashed. You know, guys, guys, guys, guys, look, I don't, I don't think the earth is flat, but I don't think it's round. I have left the cult of science. Science, I've left the call of the scientific method, because that's the thing that says if we can't test it, if we can't prove it in a test lab, then it can't be real. And there's things that happen that we can't reproduce in the lab.

I mean, called the miracles sometimes. I don't even know if that's true because, like zero point energy? for sure because they're thinking that the universe is a closed system. They're like, you can't get more energy out of a closed system than you put into the closed system. They found out it's not. The universe is an open system. The energy's coming from without.

We're just drawing it. That's how RNA builds itself. It brings energy from outside and builds a thing. Ian, like, read some, like, 200-word article on RNA, and now he's just, like, keeps repeating it. Hours, hours, hours. It did take you hours to read 200 words, yes. It's, anyway, but, yeah, you can get more energy out of a system

than you can account for within the system. This is the problem. This is the problem. Ian, don't you understand that the arguments against a perpetual motion machine is only on paper. And that because we do not live in a vacuum, even, and I mean the, I don't mean the literal sense. I mean figuratively, there is always something. Perpetual motion is figuratively possible because energy can be extracted, extracted zero point energy being an example. So when they say, you can't have a self-contained device that can keep going forever. That's technically true based on math, but so for example, there's like a video where someone will have like a wheel with water in it and it'll start spinning. And then someone goes, where's the battery? And I go, there's not. The sun is hitting one part of it, which causes energy differential. It's absorbing solar energy to create rotation. It's just not absorbing solar energy through a photovoltaic cell.

It's absorbing it to heat water or something like that. So it's not in a vacuum. It's not a perpetual motion machine mathematically because its energy is coming from an outside source. but all energy in the system is going to be transferred. Thus, Ian, you can make what functionally looks like a perpetual motion machine. I think the sun is something that looks like a perpetual motion machine. It looks like it's always there. But the 13.6 billion years of the, I mean, even the universe is not perpetual.

It has a beginning and an ending according to if the big crunch theory and Big Bang, you know, Taurus is real, then. Well, if that's only if it's a closed system, though. And you just said that it's not a closed system. Yeah, but mathematically we can't prove. But it could be, but hold on. If the universe is an... If the universe is an open system because it's within a larger closed system.

I'll say big crunch. Yeah. The big crunch is a theory that gravitational forces will cause the universe to reclapse on itself. I think it's on like a bow tie, like a helix torus where we're going around. Well, that's time. That's a perception of time. The big crunch in a third dimension perspective is just you get a big bang and then a big crunch and then a big bang and back and forth. Yeah, yeah.

Out and in, out and in. Because if it's like moving around really fast, it'll look like it's going out and in as well. It'll be going like that really fast. I love that. I love when you do that. Hulk hands! It's the Hulk hands. I love when you like affirm what someone else says, but then transmute it into what you were saying.

Yeah, thanks, dude. This is my concern. The military, economic, pharmaceutical organization. Yes, this, this. Sorry. Oh, George is listening to me in stereo. Sorry, so sorry. It's the least...

Armaceutical. Until we can devise a better system, threatening to break it. There's no such thing. I haven't thought, been able to think of yet, but I don't like drugging young women in postpartum, you know, making... No, no, no, no, no. I got all that. I'm saying they're...

So, look, if there's 7 billion people on the planet and 6 billion want to drug young women, it happens. And the one billion who find it morally... reprehensible will fight against it and maybe one day they take over and they stop that. I do believe that there's an objective good and objective bad. Despite the fact that there are, there is, doesn't mean you can enforce that reality. So there's going to be a more morally just system, but not technically a better.

Yeah, I could agree with that. It could be worse, but morally it's the right thing to do even though it costs. I'll put it like this. I'm asking you guys a question. How would you feel if communism was banned? I'd be happy about it. I'd be happy. Yeah, I mean, there was a time.

No free speech? No, no, no, no, no. Hold on, sorry. It's not banned. Not banned. I mean, that it would just like dissipate and go away. No, banned. Oh, ban.

So it doesn't the anti-communist act? The question is, how would you feel if communism was overtly illegal? And if you espoused communist values, you'd be criminally charged. If you went on public and said... It actually is. We just don't enforce it. Yeah. You understand what I'm asking.

Can we move forward? We'll never be enforced. You should just not be... I am asking you about a system by which they enforce against communists. Oh, okay. We stop wasting time. I kind of be okay with it. Would we all be okay with it?

No, because my early YouTube videos were communistic and I didn't realize it. No. Jail. I was talking about... Is this why these conversations are impossible? You, Sarah, go straight to jail. And I'm going to burn all the... Get out of jail cards out of the board.

I feel for everyone. Everyone in chat who is looking, who says they're tied to the tangents, because I agree, the question is obvious and there's no point to having a semantic debate over the question I'm asking. Are you saying that you're banning the, it's illegal to have the political party of the Communist Party? To espouse the, in all respects, communism is illegal. Not in the espousal of the beliefs. I think that should be illegal. You get a ticket for that. No. But you shouldn't be able to run for office.

What about Islam? I think his question is, but we're pivoting from the question. The question I think he's asking is fair. I get where he's going with it. Should it be illegal? I say yes. I'm very... Just to talk about it. No, no, no, no. Communism should be illegal.

I'm saying, I'm that radical. Should it be... How would you feel if it was illegal to have a communist party, to be a communist, to run as a communist or to speak positively about communism? Good. Yeah. Banned out right? How about Islam? Good.

Oh, that one even more. I don't think that Islam is... I don't think you could probably ban that one on the merits of their religion. The Islam has a... as an ideology isn't really compatible with Western society. It's totalitarian. And it's, uh, should I ask.

Yes, I'm okay with banning. Is everybody okay with banning? I am. Ideologies that we, we think are morally reprehensible. Not really because I think you need to see them to destroy them and to circumvent them. So if you put them in secret, they can get worse. Secret?

No, we lock them up. Or you make them go underground to talk about it. It's possible too. And so the point I'm bringing up is that liberalism only exists in, in a fortress. You can have that warm. creamy center of liberalism so long as you have a hard outer shell of authoritarianism. Oh my god. Liberal.

Well, look at it like this. Hard hairy. Look at it. Look at it like this. Liberalism can like what we were talking about earlier. Liberalism is a closed system. Liberalism only works when everyone agrees that we're in a liberal system. Would you prefer us a warm,

and it doesn't have any defense. It doesn't have, it doesn't have sufficient defense. against authoritarianism. Authoritarians can use liberalism to attain power and then get rid of liberalism. The point is it's very easy to claim we believe in free speech. The founding fathers are like free speech, of course, everyone agrees, when literally everyone agrees. If somebody walked to the founding father and said like, yo, Christ ain't king, they'd be like, lock them up. Today, that's unconscionable because we believe in free speech.

No, no, but they believed in free speech. Yeah, dude, look, if everyone, I'll put it like this, let's say, everyone here thinks pineapple on pizza is disgusting. No, I like pineapple on pizza. Hypothetical, because I like it too. Everybody in here is like, yeah, yeah, yeah, pineapple pizza is gross. Oh, okay. Then we all agree you should have the freedom to choose whatever pizza topping you want

because we all know, no one in their right mind would ever put pineapple on pizza. Then one day a dude shows up and does, and we freak out, and we're like, what are you doing? I have the right to do it. But what you're asking too is if this communist group that's mean, If they are talking about overthrowing the country that they're meeting in, is that a problem? That's a problem either way. Right. So Islam, if they're talking about in their in their ashrams that they hate America.

But my point is we understand anyone trying to overthrow our government is bad. I'm saying even the most minor of practices of these ideologies, it is easy to say you believe in all these fundamental rights so long as they're isolated from the group. Yeah, Mel, you were saying the intention. of the military order since the 40s has been instead of conquest, it's now subversion. They want to go inside domestically. Institutions. And so they'll do that with free they'll use free speech to espouse

and brainwashing. Just at what level do you think the bandhammer comes down? Well, I think this has been going on for decades. It's the subversion instead of elections. It doesn't matter who wins. It matters who controls the institutions. Who controls the judges, the academies, the this. So

the problem right now we have with communism and socialism and even Islam and all of this is that they don't want to have the constitutional republic. All three of those groups want to end the constitutional republic for straight democracy where there is one party rule. They all say it. They all say that they want submission of the other side, no dissent, totalitarian ideology essentially. So that's where the difference is. Those ideologies, and that's what the Fabians ones. That's what the coastal elites want. They want their party to be. be right. They don't want any dissent and they want to go forward and that's it. They don't want

senators because they don't want states' rights. They don't want the electoral college because they don't want the small states to have a say. And they don't want borders because the more people that are on the populist side, which is the winners, 51% of the 49, the better. And these people all agree on globalism. They all agree on globalism. They just don't agree on who should run it. So I think the communists and the socialists, they're okay with China. model. Islam is not okay with China's model. So even if Islam and the DSA and the communists all team up and they want to destroy America, eventually they're going to have to destroy each other. So I think it's more about totalitarianism and dissent. If you are a member of the CCP,

you do not experience authoritarianism. It doesn't exist. Because you are the subjector of it. So in China, if you're a proud card-carrying ideologue of the CCP, it's never been better. Right. What do you mean? I get, they're walking around going, it's so weird they say we don't have free speech. I have perfect free speech. And then when you go, yes, speak ill of the party. But why?

I love the party. I would never do that. So to them, they have all the free speech in the world. Right. Because they all agree with each other. Everyone outside, however, it gets a boot. Do they get, you mentioned earlier, that maybe they on the inside of the CCP are getting pressured by like a deep state. I don't know, you didn't say that.

They're a part of it. I mean, they're a part of it. This was in their books. This was Kissinger and Brzynski and all these people. They like the Chinese model. Don't think that the full track and trace surveillance, social credit score in China was built by different people than built it here. That's what I'm saying.

The technology is all the same. The global public infrastructure is connected. The difference is that China has been set up to run the world. And if you look at Soros or any of these people, what they were writing in the 90s with the fall of the U.S. S-R and the export of all of our manufacturing to China, it was kind of like China's going to end up having to run the world because their system works the best. Klaus Schwab said it at Davos during the lockdowns, that China was doing the best job. Bill Gates said it.

Yeah, they set the virus out and then they all of a sudden managed to manage it better than everyone else. Oh my goodness. They didn't plan this. Not at all. Well, Larry Fink is the head of BlackRock. He's the head also of the World Economic Forum. He's also the only, you know, the only financial business that can run in China is Black Rock. So you kind of got to start looking at who built the infrastructure.

Larry Fink is a very dangerous man. I've been saying this for a very long time. I worked in private equity for many years of my life. So Larry Fink is not a good guy. There's no way you can slice it, like how dangerous of a human being he is. And he gets, nowadays he gets a little bit of play because the normies are paying. attention to like who's buying up all the residential houses, a single family houses, who's driving up the cost of, of home prices and outpricing people out of neighborhoods,

like gentrification. That's literally all about, that's all BlackRock. And he had the, he had for many years the cover of that of like being just a CEO of a private equity company that nobody talked about to now it's like, okay, people are paying attention. I've been railing on Larry thing. They run the public. years. For most of our country, they run the public pensions for Mexico. They have a $14.7 trillion portfolio. No, and he's running the World Economic Forum, the Agenda 2030, the Fourth Industrial,

that's him. Yeah, Larry Fink is not a good dude. I mean, honestly, by no way stretch of the imagination. I think he has more power than anyone in the United States of America right now. Economic power, yes. No one wields $14 trillion in this country. No one. No country.

You know, essentially. He's the head of the CEO of BlackRock. Then I hear State Street and Vanguard. He's, uh, no, no. Black Rock and Vanguard are essentially twins. He is, uh, the CEO and co-founder of BlackRock. Which used to be, it was an aggregate of Blackstone. That's like the housing development arm of Blackstone.

It's funneled out of, I, Blackstone is first. It spun out. So, so Blackstone is, is Steve Schwartzman and it's like a brick and mortar type, like, very conservative actually operation on how they operate. Shortsman is a big Trump guy and, you know, operates out of Manhattan. and espouses conservative views. Steve Shoresman is actually just a classic, you know, entrepreneur,

you know, financier. Larry thinks spun out of that. And what he is is dangerous. ESG scores, organization. Oh, absolutely.

Everything that they want to do. He is the antifesis of what Blackstone actually, like he is the mirror opposite image of, of what. one is to the other. Like this is a man who with glee will turn around to his guys be like, uh, we got to buy up, you know, half the state of Mississippi. I don't care by what means you pay whatever to get people out of these houses. And then they just sit there. Like neighborhoods across America just sit there empty. Why we don't know. What is he planning? I don't know.

What's there's, there's, and then I'm going to go into the conspiracy theories. Did you ever watch the show on Apple TV silo? Oh yeah. Okay. So then there's a conspiracy that he's doing and keeping these neighborhoods as a front to what's going on underground. And I think that's a little nutty, but you know. I don't think it's nutty. You know what's really going on? You know, he went silent. It got big contracts.

We don't know about it. You want to know drilling. I agree. You want to know a secret? I agree. You can go look in these neighborhoods. There are data centers hidden by fake residential houses. Of course, yeah.

So what they do is there's like, there's, so they have a bunch of residential houses, and they all look very much the same, right? because it's like one schematic or like three for one neighborhood and then when you drive past on the highway you see all these houses if you actually drive in you'll see that the houses

are actually surrounding a data center well I bet I bet that's all of them go to go to Loudoun County go to Virginia Loudoun County is a capital of data and you can drive around and see them and there's nobody or very few people living in these developments

well how about the they're doing it so that when people drive by you don't see the data center how about the fact that some of the houses are just shells they're not even finished inside did you see that where in In LA, they do that a lot for oil pumps. They just build these massive houses, just the exterior shell. And if you look, like, if you put your head in there, it's like all like, but where and for what?

Uh, uh, or data centers? To conceal data centers, yeah. In Los Angeles, there's tons of these all over the city. Oh, wow. Uh, because they're hiding oil pumps. Yep. Because they don't, there's oil pumps in residential neighborhoods in L.A. Yeah.

Yeah. So, like, if you know where to look, you'll see like a church with a gigantic steeple, but, no one ever goes in because of the steeple is just covering up the pump what's bothering me is the flock cameras i don't if you guys are following flot cameras i'm not follow honestly one conversation i i i guess i'm so preoccupied i have not paid attention to flock cameras i know what are flat cameras actually they're automatic license plate readers isn't that what an easy pass is sort of but uh oh by mail it's just easy easy easy pass is a concept things like a little has like a work transponder it has it same but you can also do by mail by by by play but those are you're not so you're just to pay me out by by by by

But those take a picture and then after the fact they go through the pictures and then now it's probably annual. It's called a ALRP, what I was, license? Alprs. The flock cameras are a problem because they're false flagging people like crazy. Really? Like, dude, not a day goes by. You don't hear about somebody who was falsely accused of a crime by a flock camera. And what happens is police are enforcing crimes against an AI accused crime.

It's unconstitutional. Exactly. They're using AI, AI prosecuteers, but like subpoenas are being produced. by AI. And then people are hiring AI lawyers. And then the cops show up and the cops go, I have a court order. Don't look at me. I don't look at evidence.

Right. You needed the human for the subtlety because sometimes the illegal thing to do is the right thing to do. Like veering sideways on this busy street to avoid killing someone, but you actually broke the law because you drove in the left lane. That's actually not true, Ian. Sometimes you've got to slam on your brakes to save your life. It might be the wrong.

Check your local jurisdictions, but failure to avoid an accident is a crime, swerving out of the way into the wrong lane briefly to avoid an accident is actually the thing you're supposed to do. That's what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah. But the camera might see it and be like illegal thing. Agreed. You need the human there to discern whether or not. And so in LA,

20 years ago, these things were abhorrent. There was a revolt when they tried to put up a camera. And then all of a sudden they just popped up. Everywhere. All like there was the corporation is like Trump's now saying it's obvious what's happening. It's like the data centers, they're turning the earth into

a machine. A full track and trace surveillance, every piece of... No, no, no, but that's, that's, that's, that's surface level. They don't care about that conversation. They're turning the surface of the planet into a machine into a gigantic computer chip. And we are, right? No, no, no, surface level. You don't exist in the reality of their building. So when, when you say surveillance or technocracy, that's like, that's like, to the, to the technocrats, that's like here's a chicken go, they don't care. Right. But they're building surveillance and they're like, we are building so much more than that. We don't care what you're talking about.

The chicken is complaining because the door closed five minutes early and the chicken's mad it wants it open. I don't care. I'm not going to go and tend to their problems. I got bigger things to worry about. What we are building is how much bigger than chickens can even comprehend. These data centers are like gigantic computer chips. They literally are. And they're placing them.

They're turning Virginia into a gigantic computer chip so that they can do things you don't even understand. And we're complaining about they're watching us. And they're like, oh, we're going to do so much more than that. Like, you don't even understand what we're going to do you. Well, you're not going to be able to live. It's the same thing as China. It's internet of body, internet things, all of our data. And the less of us, the better.

I'll explain how you're going to live. So people will be born, and they will be programmed by the algorithms and by the machine to favor some element of the world. So if the world needs a postal worker, a kid is born to postal worker parents. And he gets inunded with nothing but postal worker media. And as he's getting older, he's really excited to be a postal worker. And his parents are postal workers. And his friends are postal workers.

Then one day he finally gets his first job and his parents jumping up with joy screaming. Like, you did it. You got in. You got into postal you? And then he's sitting there in class and he goes, can you believe there are people out there that don't want to be postal workers? Like, who wants to be a construction worker, right? We have the best job in the world. You will be programmed from birth to have one job.

and you will go to and from work with a smile on your face because the AI has programmed you to do it. But do you know what happens? Do you know what will happen if you decide? You know what? For some reason, I just don't want to be a postal worker. You know what they're going to do? They'll kill you.

Because in the human body, we have cells. Cells used to be free. They go around and do whatever they want. Then one day the cells came together and formed a pact and created a multicellular organism. Then it got to a point where the cells producing your body are hyper-specialized and have no freedom. And do you know what we call cells that deviate from their function? Cancer.

We call them cancer. And what do we do to cancer? We destroy it. So in the AI, when the government and the machine has mechanized the surface of the plane and the computer, humans will effectively be cells in a greater complex system. And those that deviate from their programming will be cancer and they'll be destroyed. And what they'll do is they'll bring them in for repair. They'll bring them in. they'll put them in an aqua solution like an RNA protease,

which will go in there and rewrite their code. And it won't kill them or turn them back into a... Why would they... So now back to reality. No, that's what they're going to do. They're going to edit the guy at birth, so he loves being a postal worker. And then they're going to raise him with postal worker parents.

And if he deviates, they're going to repair him and put him back. With neuralink, not with protease. Amino. No, they're going to plug the neural link into your brain and just click enter. Both. How about this? This all sounds freaky. I know what this sounds like.

You know what this sounds like? The future? No, Resident Evil, Alice, Project Alex. She'd die every time they just re-plug her back in and she's like, whoop, I'm back to default. Ian, we have neuralink technology. They don't need to goo you.

Oh, I think they can change your genetic code. Well, Ian likes gooing. Yeah. But they goo you with protease, dude. Oh, it's DNA proteus and RNA proteus, depending on what they're changing. He's not even defending it. They're going to put...

You just acknowledge it and build a protein goo that changes it. People are going to be like, I'm feeling bad. I don't like doing this, and I know there's something wrong with me, and they'll say, all you need is the neural band. It'll make you feel so much better. And they'll put on the neural band, and then they'll go, I love working at the post office. I hope I'm wrong and that it won't. The AI will not siphon people into a big building to get repaired is what they'll call it. But this is the next stage in human evolution, going from a multicellular organism into a multi-cellular organism system with the central nucleus being the AI data center machine state.

I saw it letting synths out of that building. Once they miniaturized the tech and it gets so much faster and cheap, like less electricity, they're gonna start synthesizing machinery, like quadra, it would be like, like carbon-based machines will start walking out of that building, dude, and I don't want this to happen. Just look at this way.

All right, hold on, hold on. Boys and girls, don't do drugs. Life starts from what we think we know. That's, maybe not all. Ian, life starts and what we think we know with self-replicating proteins. self-replicating nucleic acids.

Yes. They build proteins. Right. And at some point, these self-replicating proteins become single-celled organisms. I'm myth. So now they're combining different chemicals,

absorbing free energy and creating cells. Eventually, cells team up with other cells, become multicellular organisms. They're very small. Eventually, those multicellular organisms grow to great size like we are now. If this chain continues,

the next progress of life will be multicellular organism systems. That is, instead of being free cells moving all around randomly, they're going to combine with each other. Humans are going to be forced into each other using new technology, AI and neuraling technology, and we will be functionally single cells in a multicellular organism. You called it attention economy? I thought the same thing. I thought they'll literally use your brain's attention power to run their software.

That's nowhere near what I'm talking about. talking about becoming a multicellular organism. That is not what an intention economy is. I think they're going to siphon off your brain power. That's nonsense. They're already kind of what we're talking about. It's more connected. What I am saying is, just like a single cell was a free entity until at some point it merged

with other cells and became a singular entity, humans as singular entities and independent functions will cease and we will become single cells and a multicellular organism. And we have no choice into that? That's happening no matter what. You have absolute choice. Single cells still exist all over the place. Inside your gut and your body, but there will be a greater overarching system.

And my vision of the future... Is it transhumanism? Is that what it is? Machine and... That's a whole other thing. That's a whole other thing. So that's not... I'm saying that there's going to be... There's going to be an old man

sitting with his grand kid in a field looking up at rows of black boxes moving left and right. And he says, that's the machine that humans built 200 years ago. We don't know what it's doing no more because we have nothing to do with it, but it's going.

Hmm. It's kind of like, um. Doesn't sound so good. No. Nope. Like the human body, at one point it built like a pancreas with a bunch of cellular organisms like you're saying.

They came together to form the pancreas. And so maybe that's what we're doing right now with the AI. Yes. Is we're going to build like a post office. It'll be like a pancreas that we build of humans or a stomach of humans. So so. So, so. Yes.

Correct. Except it's not going to be a stomach. It's going to be a meat processing center for, for resource distribution. And then there will be. be a singular meat processing plant and people will be born to be meat processors and they'll be so happy to do it. Now, to be fair, a lot of this work will be replaced by optimist bots. Humans will be functionally obsolete. Okay, I'm not going to keep talking about RNA, but that's what RNA did. It built DNA to be its AI optimist bot. It built a smaller version of itself to run

the calculation faster and farther. Does DNA has 10 million strands where RNA gets up to like 7,000. RNA's heavier because it's got uracil in it instead of thymine. So it can like, RNA can blow its self-up. It can self-destruct. DNA can't. It's not built. DNA is like a, it's like we're doing it again. Now we're building AI to be our DNA to replicate for us. It's going to be able to build more humans. AI is going to be able to build humans. It's going to be able to replicate itself, just like DNA does. It builds RNA and it replicates itself. So I don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's inevitable. It's just about how is this going to happen? You know, we're crafting it in real time. How ethical is it going to be? And what does that even mean? Ethical is meaningless to the system.

Is it ethical when your body expels cells from your body to die? Depends on who you ask? You shave off skin cells every single day. We don't think twice. People don't even know, don't even think about it. You ever, you ever, you ever, you ever, you ever, you're ever in a dark room and you open your curtain and you will see all of the dust and skin cells floating in the air. We do not lament the dead cell that flicks off our body. We don't.

So when you are a single entity in the greater system, you're going to be walking to work. You have a hard to heck and die. they're going to shuffle you into the dump. Existential. I'm like, you're losing me. Like with, this is like so existential.

It freaks me out. I'm sitting here. I'm like having an out of body. It's just like, why are we talking about this? Hive mind? Because we got to build a better one. We're talking about what's why they're building the data centers and what the future is going to look like.

Oh, the data centers are, I mean, can we just, maybe it's power chat, GBT. It's like I want to lie to myself. No,

no. It's called, it's called the orders of thinking. Yeah, no. It's, I'm willfully. just pretending to not know what the greater...

Most people... If you ever looked at the orders of thinking, most people, like on average, it's like four out of like eight. And the fourth order of thinking is like contemplating impulse. That's it. And where does denial fit in that? The lowest possible order. Okay, so yeah, denial.

Like the first word, I think, is just instinct. I'm like, denial. I want to deny the thing. I guess it's a second order thing. I don't want to feel that. I don't want to feel any of this. The upper order is the easy way to explain

the highest order of thinking is multiversal probabilistic systems. Interesting. Yeah, that's funny. So if you can conceptualize like hundreds of variables, alternate timelines, the idea of infinity,

then you have a higher order of thinking. But most people don't, which is why most shows have like a third grade reading level and they have a laugh trick. So I'm going to go back and make... Just tell people when to laugh. I'm going to make another Thanos reference then.

I guess it was right. I'm with it. I think Thanos was right. We're overpopulated. We're doing stupid stuff. See, that's called low-order thinking. Oh, is it? Because what happens after you get rid of half the population? I don't know. They come back. Do they? Yes. They never came back in Avengers? They reproduce, and then within... You could double your population of any life in one generation.

And by the way, did you read this? I just want to stress this again. The concept of Thanos being like, I'm going to wipe out half of all life, on all those planets he went to where he killed half the population, population doubling is easily accomplished in one generation. So it's like he's literally doing nothing. So, so here, okay. Just sounds bad. Fair.

Okay. Sounds bad in a comic book. Yeah. The thing about the whole four billion people by 2200 is that the number is they're not accounting for mitigating. Wait, you mean a decline? Mel was- They want to cut it in half. The global-

They want 500 million. Well, no, yeah, they really want $500 million, but they just put it out. Yeah, they just put out that they want a reduction in population. And have. Well, that means you got to go to Africa and you've got to figure something out. Because they're having five kids per family. Well, that's fine. But then their mortality rate is also up the charts because of disease and poverty and famine.

And it's sad. I'm not making light of it. Look at how they populate. But think about what that means for our YouTube views. Exactly. I don't know why they don't understand it. I actually think all the social media views have been fake. The mortality rate in Africa's 7.43 per 1,000 people as of early 2026.

It's in a steady decline from 7.5-1 in 2024 and 7.60 in 2023. So that's overall for the whole continent. Yeah, but I'm sure that in certain countries, it's far higher. Well, I mean, yeah, it's an average. It's an average when you take all the countries. It's just like the average mortality rate in the U.S. What's the mortality rate for North America? I mean, we're technically three countries.

Do you have any guesses? 4.2% much higher than that. We kill each other too much. 9.05 deaths per 1,000 people in 2024 and 25. These are at birth? No, no, no, no, no, no. Mortality rates. How many people die per 100?

So are we the highest mortality rate in the globe for continent? Or is it South America or Europe or Asia? I'd imagine Honduras. This is a higher mortality rate than we do. Well, that's not a continent, right? We wouldn't know the numbers for China. Well, anything China puts out as fate. Right.

Everything they put out is fair. Yeah, 1% mortality rate. I wouldn't be surprised. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually mass killed tons of people during COVID. I just lied about it. The Chinese. No, no, no. Everyone everywhere.

How about this? Famous story from New York City, like very famous story. 18-year-old kid kind of in the wrong place, wrong time, went to the bodega in the the Bronx was picking up something for his mom, had just gotten a massive scholarship, right thing for basketball, if I'm not mistaken. Like a true like prodigy, right, gets killed in a drive-by that. He had nothing to do with. He was a casualty.

On his death certificate, it was COVID. She could not attend his, so think about how many people, like I got a motorcycle crash and they called it a COVID death. That's my point. I think every single person. So I want to stop and go back and back to what we were talking about a second ago, I would not be surprised if substantially more people died during COVID and they're lying about it. So there's a guy in China, a YouTuber, who made a video pre-COVID, post-COVID, and he was like,

where is everyone? And he said, here's like a famous market. 2018, it was nuts. And he goes, 2022, no one. So he was talking about how China's, he said China's lying about the size of its population. And here's proof. And then I watched it and I was like, I don't think he understands that he's actually saying China mass executed a ton of their own population. Yeah.

But you take a look at right now with the mass influx. of illegal immigrants, as well as businesses are closing and unable to find anybody to work. Famously, we talk about it over here with Seatown races. They used to have a restaurant that was open pre-COVID overlooking the horse races every day. You'd go and sit down. It's like bleachers basically indoor. You sit at a table. You look to your right.

The horses are racing. You can get a steak. It's amazing. I asked them why they haven't reopened since, and they said they can't find anybody to work the kitchens. Right. Where are all the people? Well, there's a massive shift in migraine. to even domestically for us, right?

A lot of people died. And then you're also negating the fact of immigration, the immigration crackdown. So, I mean, kitchen staff is. No, no, no, no. This is before, so. This is before COVID? So, no, no, no.

They closed during COVID. Uh-huh. And they went, when COVID stops, why can't they reopen? It's not like people died, did they? New York. A lot of places in New York never reopened. Like, yes, but we're in a rural area that did not have heavy COVID lockdown. Really?

Yes. The casino. did. They did weird things like they put dividers up on the tables. Oh, I remember that. But for the most part, playing blackjack like this was not fun. When we were out here, we didn't experience much of any lockdowns. It's a rural area. We'd go to the bar. We'd go out. If you go to, if you go deeper in an urban area, you'd experience it. But out here, people wouldn't wear masks. So they closed down the restaurant. And when they reopen, when COVID ends and the lockdowns end, they could not find anybody who worked there anymore. That's crazy. Where did the people go?

That's crazy. I mean, could people have. to just buy a new house somewhere else? Or how about this? Well, wasn't there also the sheer issue of people relocating chasing work because of rural areas that limited the amount of work, they probably went to other. Perhaps, but I'd argue the inverse that it's easier to find work and maintain a life in a rural area where it's cheaper than an urban area. People in New York were fleeing like crazy because you were congested with nowhere to go,

but they were going to the rural areas. We were fleeing because we live on top of each other. And I'll say this too. Berkeley County, West Virginia is the highest population growth in the state, 20% year over year. And they're still struggling to find workers. Restaurants are going out of business. Developments are going unsold. It's a mentality that came out of COVID.

More happened during COVID, I think, to change people's work ethic, to change even their desire to leave the home. A lot of people left the workforce. They're working. I think that it's just never recovered because mentality. realities changed. And then all the education and all the people with the schools. No, no, lack thereof. Right. Education. Right. Did you see that, did you see that professors? And a lot of people went on the dole for the government and never went off and never wanted to go off. Did you see that the professors and UC Berkeley had to put out that their students are testing significant? Oh, yeah. I was on Gutfeld on Monday and we were, that was a topic. And I was like, wait, they're teaching like seven grade algebra to, I mean, and these are.

Freshman in college in Berkeley. These are research institutions. The reason you get to overworked accepted to these colleges are because you're... George, I think it's on purpose, and I think they're trying to create two, they're splitting humanity into two distinct groups, which are called Phil. The Morlocks and the Eloy. Correct. What is that even?

The Time Machine. He goes into the future. There's a book called The Time Machine. They think it would be too, right? Well, they mean, they've made it. a bunch of different versions of it's a very what was it H.G. Wells who wrote that? I'm not sure actually to be honest. I think so. So it's uh he goes to the future and there's pale gaunt super

intelligence and then there's dumb savagely humanity split to two different groups. It was HG Wells yeah. I want to be an intelligent savage. So who has the highest mortality rate? It can happen. Uh, highest mortality rate is Monaco. That's Joe Logan. That's why I got a family. 20.14 per 1,000. They have a very Hold on. Did you just say Monaco? Monaco, yeah. Well, that's because everybody's old and rich and they all go there to die.

Well, you ass. Like Florida. Well, no, no, Monaco is actually worse. All the rich old people go there to die. Like, there's John Safra, the former banker, he died in a freak fire accident. Yeah, with the nurse. Yeah, it's like the whole wildest thing. But all the deaths in Monaco are freakish.

It's like I follow that. Like, I'm a big Monaco fan. Love Grand Prix in Monaco. It's super fun. but it is such a, what's second after Monaco? Because Monaco's like, I think people go there to kill their like. Bulgaria. Yeah.

Bulgaria. Interesting. Bulgaria is 15.6 to 16 per 1,000. It's also one of the poorest countries in Europe. I think maybe we are splitting into the new stage of human evolution with the cybernetic stuff. Like the Morlocks and the Eloy, there's going to be people that create and control. And then there's going to be people that just go along to get along. I kind of feel like that's not how evolution works.

but that it is or it's not not how evolution i mean you got the plebs of the roman era a change a change is not the same thing as evolution evolution evolution takes outside forces to me a mutation evolution well that's how evolution happens you can mutate right now really yes your genome can break and then reform the wrong thing on accident well yeah okay okay that's not evolution though that's a form of mutation that's called mutation if you're if you if you're if you if you're if you have have a genome that breaks and reforms wrong. That's generally what happens with. That's generally cancer.

That's what we call it. Not all mutations are cancer. Some mutations give you are good. Okay, so there's like spider powers. In extreme times of stress, your genome might break and reform in a better way. You just change the subject. Literally.

I don't think so. I'm gonna start shooting WebZet. We're talking, there's a lot of conversations going on at once here. But when you see a- You're doing a lot at all. I'm talking about humans evolving to be, you know, kids are born with their heads, heads down because their parents were like this when they were pregnant. So I've heard.

But I agree that we're splitting into two types of creature. Like you guys, that's the conversation we're having right now. Well, the Morlocks and the Eloy were fiction. I'll have whatever you're having. Whatever. It comes from a story. There's no coming back from that. I don't care.

Just give it to you. I need to live. I need it level with you. Just give it to me. Just see the whole. I want to take it. It's a sphere and it's undulating and it's twisting all at once. Constantly.

I bring up these $4 billion that they want to bring humanity down. I feel like they're not factoring in mitigating circumstances that could change. They're just saying at the current trajectory, humans are creating this much damage, therefore we need this money. Okay, so if I'm going to talk, this is a theory that I've had and I, and I'll stand by it. because I think it's how it's going to happen. There will be population control and it will be done through infertility and it's going to be delivered through our food system.

Matter of fact, they are probably already doing it. And I'll explain to you why. Infertility rates keep jumping and spiking. Hence now most women, all of a sudden, healthy 20-something year old women, are going through IVF, which is not. It's like it's unnatural, which then points you to like, what are we doing? So if anybody's worried about population control, I think they beat us to that many, many years ago. And I think it originated in Flintstone's vitamins.

And I'm not even making that up. Look at how this generation of millennials who we all took the damn Flintstone vitamins and we have become the most infertile generation. Literally. Well, that's correlation. There's a correlation there. You can make an argument. I'm making the damn argument. And I think they're delivering it through food.

Did you know that they do MRNA now through food? I've heard it's called Peel. Is that what it's called? Bill Gates. Appeal is what it's called. Yeah, so pretty much. How does that work? Essentially, you're taking vaccines through like an apple. What about mosquitoes?

Is that true? What about mosquitoes? They unleash the vaccine mosquitoes that have vaccine in them. It's like, you know what that's. That's Bill Gates, big project. It was in Kiwis, Florida. I just had malaria. Did you know that?

No way. I just, yeah. Well, I was in Malaysia because that's where we went to record special forces. Well, malaria by any, by, it's like a flu, like a nasty fever flu. Like it's, it's, it's, it goes away. Are you contagious? Phil looked at me like I had like, I don't like, like you had malaria. Actually, George. Now that you bring it up. No. I looked at you like you said you had malaria. So literally. What'd you trade? Like no. So on my way to to tape special forces for Fox, we went to Langkawi in in Malaysia. Uh, and there's a, so. There's a, so. There's a

a lot of mosquitoes. They put you on this regimen. Take this drug malaria. I mean, either reduce, reduce the side effects or it will prevent you from getting malaria. Well, I don't know what it is, but I came back. I had mosquito bites all over my body. It took two days after I came back home. I just felt like a fever or whatever. Boom, go to the doctor. Oh, you're positive for malaria. We're in South Asia. I'm like, yeah, I was. Yeah, I'm like, yeah, but I've gone through this before because in Brazil. You've had, you've had malaria multiple. No, not malcolm. No, I've had dangee fever.

Much better. Because of Brazil. So essentially, yes, there could be true to the mosquito vaccine mosquitoes, which would be a great thing. Do you remember how they try to create a mosquito in Florida that would eat the mosquitoes and then they fuck the mosquitoes and they became love bugs? Do you know the famous love bugs? You know this, right? What happened? So the University of Florida created a mosquito.

in a lab that was going to be a cannibal and bring down the mosquito population in Florida. So then instead of eating the mosquitoes, they started fornicating with mosquitoes and created a hybrid that we now call lovebugs. And they go in and out of season. If you ever drive on 95 in Florida from like Orlando to Miami or back and forth, your windshield is like it is entertainment. It's like they explode all over your car. Did you ever experience this? We were just in. It's seasonal, too. It's crazy.

I got to make a quick correction of appeal, the company I mentioned. They say that it doesn't put vaccines on the fruit, that that's a debunk conspiracy theory, but that it puts monoglycerides and diglycerides on the skin. That proves it. Preserve it. Of course they don't. Debunk conspiracy theory. Sure.

Whatever. They're putting stuff. The company debunk the owner. Yeah, like using food is the. Have you seen how apples look like plastic in supermarkets nowadays? Isn't it because of that stuff? And then when you go home, I don't. I use this thing veggie wash.

Like, I don't know if it does anything at this point, but the apple, literally, it's like this fill melts off of it. And you're like, wait, that's what the apple actually looks. Like kind of shitty. It's not shiny. It's not red. I don't know. Maybe you're just putting some weird chemicals. No, no.

The veggie wash is like white vinegar and like lime. So I think they paint our vegetables and stuff to make them look better too. Yeah. Oh, did you ever see the picture like of an original, like what a real like banana fruit? Yeah, yeah. They still exist. you know, largely inedible. They're insane.

It's like they're mainly seeds, right? Yeah. And they're ovals. Yeah, we genetically modified these things. Well, we artificially selected. Yeah. And over thousands of years, the humans kept growing the ones with the most meat. That's eventually they turned into big starch tubes.

Okay, that's the, I guess, that's early on version of GMO, right? Yeah. That's it. That is. Yeah, through selective process. Okay, that's fair. Did you know that cabbage? and like what is it cabbage

Brussels sprouts broccoli they're all this it's all the same one same plant yeah they're really that yeah I've read something close they're all selective cultivars of the same plant

didn't know that I thought I thought like it's like collar grains and cauliflower and then there's a few and kale they're also like the same exact yeah brassiska

all the brassicas are great Olorresica or whatever yeah what is it cabbage cabbage broccoli cauliflower romanesco kale Brussels sprouts collard, savoy cabbage,

colabi, and Guy Ian. Oh, Colabi. Did you say Guy Ian? Yeah. Sign me up. Guy Ian. So I do think that guy, you guys might be on to something about. Oh, look at that. Okay, you know what? I want some orders.

I'm hungry. I'm hungry. Let's go. That looks like it would be great sauteed in Chinese. The abaglaborabra. New vegetable. You know it all. I think that would be look. That looks really good sauteed. Garlic. Half

spinach, half broccoli. Oh. It's almost like a buck choy. Yeah, that's what I thought it was. Yeah, that's what I thought it was. Yeah, but buckchoe is different. Yeah, it has a little bit more of a cabbagey.

That's that bad here right there. I like it. I love it. Yeah, and this is Brasica rapa. You're rapa. Oh, it's a. Brasca rapa. What's that?

Yeah, a different one. I think you're right. Chinese cabbage bomb dong. And it's almost like you've ever had bomb dong? Negative. It looks good, though. You've never had bomb dong. Oh, and apparently Spirilinas is.

is the most protein rich. George wants to say yes. I'm tempted, but I don't know if I dabbled or not. I think you're right that we're self, well, I think we are self-selecting into this split of humanity. Like, people are going to eat themselves into compliance or they're going to eat themselves into the awakening. It's called birds rape.

Look, and it's like, it's, and turnip rape. We're not being controlled because we have the information. You know what's good and you know what's not. You have all of it. It's not even about information. How many. Okay. We all in this room clearly do media. We have more of a perception of,

we're more acute in our perception of paying attention. And I guess clearly going down rabbit holes like our dear friend Tim here does and researches. I mean, the, what is that, Bresca rape? That's what it's called. Somebody said it. So my point is like, this is what we do. We're curious creatures. Do you know that 90% of the.

global population are too busy trying to make ends meet to even worry about half of the stuff we do. So it's so easy to feed them. Just inject shit and food and they won't know. They need to eat. They need a shit. They need to go pay their bills and pay their taxes and keep a reward. You know what? George is right.

We need to reduce the population. No. That's not what I'm saying. That's how they'll do it because information is out there. But you need to choose to seek information, right? And then imagine you live in a. a remote village in China, right? You pick a city, right?

And you kind of break that mold. And then you go and start researching. And then you start saying these things. The whole village is going to say you're crazy. And they will expel you from them. Like you're crazy, you're going to bring bad omens. They'll kick you out for even trying to inform yourself. That's just like culture around the world.

Same thing happens in any corner of the world. So that's why it's so easy to deliver population control through the food system. It's just pharmaceutical companies. That's why I only eat. Dirt outside my house. Just get the nutrient straight from the source. I don't need no plants to grow anything. Dude, that's communist propaganda.

Pharmaceutical companies hold stock in many big food production companies around the world. Not in chicken city. I don't even know what chicken city is. My chicken city, bro. Where we get fresh eggs. Oh, but where's your chicks come from? we bred them from where what what do you the origin of your chicken we went to like this farm with some like old white guy and we were like we'd like some chickens and he was like all right

and then we walked in and we grabbed a handful of them and there was no vaccinations on those chicks no or his chickens prior they were fresh hatched and we just grabbed them and throw them in a box i was in when i lived in not what i heard when i came in probably chickens when i was in miami i just went it was really funny i just went to like some mexican farm where they had a big signs of chickens five bucks and I walked up and the lady was speaking Spanish and I was like chicken, por favor. Pollo, por favor. She got excited and she ran into the coop and was chasing chickens around and grabbed a couple

and then she put them in little like they were kind of like happy meal boxes but like big where like you push the middle and you fold the sides and then I brought them back and we had a chicken coop we left them there and then the neighbor's dogs kept coming in and eating them and I got mad. Did you eat the dog? No, we didn't know it was the dogs at first. We just knew that something was eating them. So we said a trap because we got an animal trap and we caught a beagle.

Oh. And then we were like, what's this dog doing? No. No. No. We wanted to. We, we, we, we, we. He's part Asian.

They eat dogs. Oh. Many of them do. No, we, the dog was yelling at us. Really? Well, because he's in a trap and he's freaking out. And then we just went, oh, boom, do, do, do, go, go, right. And then he started wagging and said,

we let him out and he ran off. He didn't come back. That's so. Yeah, he didn't, he didn't, he didn't, he didn't like, we went, we actually went to the neighbors and we were like, your dog killed our chickens, like, you owe us $20. And they were like, oh, sorry. And then the guy gave me $20. And I was like, it was whatever.

Probably like, if not an antidote to glow. Hold on. He owed you, he owed you $20 plus a flight to Miami and back. What we knew? What? Did you pick the chickens up there or by my bucket? When I lived in Miami. Oh, you lived there.

Oh, okay. Yeah, chickens. We had eggs every day. And it was funny because people would come and visit didn't know you could just eat eggs. That is great. I'd walk outside about you on breakfast and I'd walk back in with like three eggs and they'd be like, where are those from? I'm like the chicken coop and they're like, oh. And I'm like, yeah, do you want anything?

And they'd be like, of those? Like, yeah, the eggs. But don't you have to like do something like to go to a factory or something? And I'm like, why they're eggs? Do you have friends that? Are you joking? Are you joking? This aligns what you're saying.

People don't know the information. people to the old studio and there's apples on trees. And I'd like, you want an apple? And they'd be like, well, don't you got to do something? I'm like, bro, it's an apple. We had berries all over the place. We'd want some berries and grab some. And they'd be like, can you just eat them?

I'm like, this is what food is, dude. How do you grow up? I grew up in cities. I love grabbing shit off trees. That's the best form of eating fruit is when you grab it off the bush. Food comes from the grocery store. Do you know how many times I ate guava? In Brazil, Guava grows.

like, wildly in Brazil, right? And they grow pretty big, too. And it's red, and it's full of those little white dots in there. Do you know how many times

I'm like eating a guava as a kid? And all of a sudden, something moves on like, flip, and I kept eating. No, no, no, no, let me tell you, let me tell you. Let me tell you.

Carolina. So we have wine. We have wine bears. Get out. I'm going to finish the guava. Get out. I'm going to finish the guava. We have wineberries here.

They are Chinese invasive raspberries. They're more resilient and they're destroying the local raspberry population, so they're considered invasive. But they're delicious. mantis-looking things that live on them, but they're very small. So when you pull it off, you might notice it's like a little dude sitting there and he's like living in it.

And they, you just eat them. Yeah, they're edible. Yeah, it's just food. I don't care. Wow. My mom. I probably ate so many little bugs. I think this is, like, completely made up like my mom stuff.

Like as a kid, I'm like, she, I'd be like, mom, there's an aunt in my food. Like, oh, that's healthy. That means you have good ice like, I eat it. All right. If you have good eyesight, like, as you caught it. I'm like, what the hell? We got to grab your Rumble Rans and Super Chats to smash the like button and share the show. The uncensored portion is coming up in 10 minutes, but for now, let's see what you guys have to say.

All right, let's see. Rub says, fairly certain fung-fong died in a sketchy plane crash. I mean, look. Metho says, okay, we got Swalwell rated. Now can we get Obama rated for classified documents? I like that. Epialla says, Tim, given that he's lying about you, I think it would be funny if you made a donation to A-Pack and Alex Jones's name. and then report on him donating to APEC while calling you the Israeli operative.

Can you do that? I don't know if you're allowed to do that. Can you do that? You can't. That would be literally the definition of a straw donation. That's why I went to prison. Don't do it. No, no, no, no, no, no, no.

Is A PAC a 501C4? It doesn't matter. Making a donation in another person's name with your financial information is literally the definition per se. I think you are incorrect. I think you're referring to political campaigns regulated under the FEC. any no a 501c3 and a 501c4 are still regulated by a form 9-9 people make donations to people and other people's names all the time as it is illegal it is illegal to make a donation on behalf of someone else with your financial information

I know someone's trust me I know this one I spent a lot of money on this one trust me I can see why it would be illegal because I wouldn't want someone to make a donation it's also a form of identity by it's actually literally a form of identity theft. Because remember, it involves, whenever you're making a donation to a 5C4 or C3, it involves... No, it is not illegal to donate to a charity 501 C3 or C4 in someone else's name. Using your financial information? As long as you are the true source of the funds, it is not fraud or mass representation to donate to a charity in someone else's name. Oh, then you should do me a favor. You should go talk to the fucking FBI because they had a different opinion. If it is a political contribution to federally regulated candidates parties...

other version. Federal law strictly prohibits contributions in the name of another. This is a different regime from charities and carries civil and criminal penalties. So the question is, is APEC4 or is it regulated? They're a super PAC. I don't know that they actually are. They make campaign expenditures. Double check.

I believe they're a super PAC. Maybe they have two wings to it. Like, Turning Point has their nonprofit and their pack, so Turning Point Action. I wish we didn't have any of these packs and all this money. It's ridiculous. It's hard to expect. I bet APEC is. I bet APEC is.

It has to have a super PAC because they make campaign expenditures and they take ads and that you need to be a pack of some sort to do that. Oh, it's not a political action committee. At all? They don't even have an arm. But it does operate political entities and is subject to some form of regulation. Okay. It's a domestic U.S. lobbying and advocacy group focused on strengthening U.S. Israel relation funded by Americans, directed by American citizens. It is not registered under FARA.

Let's see. It's a social welfare organization. So it does control campaign arms to it. It's called A PAC, but it's not a PAC. It's a social welfare organization. It is. No, it's American Israeli PAC, is what the name of it is. American Israeli political action committee.

But it's not a political action committee is what they're saying. The Akron and San Juan. But it's just weird. I don't know. I just know, don't do it. Don't do it. The APEC- I don't want you to get jump up because of a troll. It is actually common and normal that people make donations to A-PAC in the name of another.

These donations are not tax-deductible, charitable, charitable contributions. However, A-PAC does have A-PAC-PAC. Yes. The veil is being removed. Yep. Let's see the truth. A-PAC-PAC. It is illegal to donate.

However, the APEC-O-1C-4 advocacy group, it is generally allowed. Donations to the core APEC organization are not tax deductible. They are not subject to the same contribution in the name of another ban that applies to political action committees and candidate committees. You can donate and request that it be noted in honor of as a gift on behalf of someone else for recognition purposes. The donation itself is treated as a personal gift to the person in a practical sense. That's interesting. I recommend anybody who's looking to make donations talk to their lawyer before doing so. But, you know, always fun to clarify.

I still say don't do it It's just not worth It's not worth the Fafo They want to find a problem Yeah if I remember they can indict a ham sandwich APEC pack was the best thing I learned today A PAC PAC PAC The American Israel Political Action Committee

Political Action Committee What's on dude What the actual Panopticon of law Doss Wood says yes Both illegal Islam and communism Ban them both and banish any offenders To the island

They have an island of communism Somebody had this lovely comment on the Twitter stream That said George Santos was bribed through the Catholic Church To run cover for Soros What does that even That proves it What does that even mean? Catholic Church bribed me to run cover for George Soros

It means the person says I don't like George Santos I don't like the Catholic Church And I don't like George Soros That's literally all it means That's all I think it me. It's all in you. Thank you for that, Phil. I appreciate you.

I translate retard. We got Hans. We got a super chat from Hans says, I don't get why so many people are randomly attacking you now on X, but I respect the work that you and the crew do, even when I disagree and you guys are wrong. I'm going to tell you why. It's because the new Tim Pool Show is hitting it out of the park.

Less than 100,000 subscribers on the new Tim Pool Show, and we've got one episode at 800,000, ones at 260. The last one we did is a special. at night with Ellis, Jason Ellis. It doesn't have that many at all. I know like 10,000.

But that one was an extra special episode we just recorded when he was here. And we put it up at 10 p.m. after Timcast, IRL, to see how we would do. And I guess most people have missed it. You're not going to watch a two-hour show at midnight. But the latest one we have, men don't need therapy, I think is at like 250K. The climate change won. Didn't do as well. But it's 160K.

So we have a brand new show. And it's hitting out of the park at a time when everyone's views are down. And they're all complaining and they're screaming. and, you know, they're all pissed off. So what happens is we're in a slow news period. News personalities are desperate for views. The new show we're doing is hitting out of the park. And then I went on Jubilee.

My name has been trending for this entire week. So if you look at like Twitter trends, it's just nothing but Tim Poole. So what happens is people of weak will who don't have anything to talk about, go to the trending section, see my name and then start talking about me. You'll notice that all the liberals are talking about me. You got Destiny talking about me. got Hassan talking about me, post on Reddit. They are desperate for something to latch on to. And this is how the cycle goes, right?

One day I wake up, there it is. I'm trending for 27 years. And then what ends up happening is we get a lot more viewership, we make a lot more money, and that's just the nature of the beast. So, you know, and they're lying too. And the funniest thing about it is right now, like Alex Jones literally took a video where I go, this war is a failure. I'm sorry, it just is.

and Trump's not going to tell you the truth about what's going out with Iran and then he posts Tim Poole endorses war in Iran. Oh, that's just brain rot, right? But it's because he knows his audience doesn't care. When was the last time you dumped a dollar

in the Alex Joan was? Oh, wait, wait, wait, we got to fix that, right? Does he take a dollar out every time he says the wrong thing? Yeah. The thing is, when is the last time you did do a dollar dump in there? It's been a minute.

I haven't really followed it, but it seems like what Alex made the mistake of is that that meeting you had with Netanyahu wasn't secret. It was private. It had some aspects of it were secretive because it was Chatham House rules. You're not allowed to say like who was there. So there was or there's aspects of Chatham House that ask for secrecy amongst some of the participants. No, you're saying that some of the information can't be released because of Chatham House.

You can tell anybody. Chatham House rules mean you can say who was there. You can say what was said. You can't attribute what was said to a person. Okay. So that's the layer of secrecy, but it was not a secret meeting. It was a private meeting. It's not even secret.

Like you can say what was said. You just can't say who said what. It was wrong. It was wrong. Alex Jones was. I think he, look, I never like, and I get a lot of heat when I say this stuff, but I never. This show is Chatham House rules, by the way. I never cared for Alex show.

I always thought he was bat shit crazy. I continue to think that. Like he made Sandy Hook the, his entire world. Look at my handwriting. I can't write. It's fucking annual. It's okay. It didn't look like anything.

I can't even read what I wrote. I think Alex Jones was Wonk John. He's a wild. He was Wong. He's a long. He's an entertainer, but has done a lot of good. Well, it's in the eye to beholder, obviously, if he is. Oh, my God.

access or failure as an entertainer. I've got like 70 voice memos from Alex Jones because he would just record like for three minutes and send me this stuff. One of them was like, Tim, you got to understand. A good private jet, you can give for a million bucks.

You don't got to be spending all this money flying around the country. You get a good private jet. And the only problem is that, you know, you're going to need to spend, you got a higher crew and it's going to be about $100,000 a year per person. So, you know, all in all,

if you're financing this thing, you might actually cost you about $5 grand per month. And then a couple of these guys, maybe $7,000 per month. You got a private jet whenever you're want. And I was like, just listening to this being like, what, why did he send me this? Yeah, he's the jam. It's because we were talking

about going to Texas. And then I was like, yeah, we're trying to find flights. And then he sends me this big, long thing about how to buy a private jet. I mean, it's, it's good advice. I'm going to say this thing is not wrong. I know. Everything you just said is actually spot on. Another dollar in the car, baby. I'm not putting a dollar

for Alex. Alex Jones can go fuck off. The Steel Man, Alex his thing in this whole last couple days is the banality of evil. If he feels like you're not doing enough to stop the war with your rhetoric. That I could guess I could see, but that doesn't mean you're, you know. Come on. Well, like, what can you do?

There's no steel man for that. Like, what can you do to stop the war? There's no steel manning taking a video of me being like this war is a failure and then posting Tim has endorsed the war. I wouldn't have seen that one yet. Yeah. But the whole process, like, because we don't always talk about how bad the Israeli government's conquest of Gaza is on this show.

We don't really bring up. Because we don't talk about Tibet either, Ian. Right. I just, it just doesn't come up. How often do we talk about Ukraine? or South Sudan. Like if it's topic. Right now, we've got U.S. troops in Venezuela right now.

And we've done multiple shows on the Gaza war. Oh, it's insufferable. These people never shut up. We've had Scott Horton on multiple times. We had Max Blumenthal on. We have Dave Smith on. We have plenty of critics of Israel. It's just the most annoying thing in the world where when you're like, oh, what's in the news today, Ukraine?

Why aren't you talking about Israel? It's like, well, we just did a whole show on Israel last week. Talk about it again. No. Right. I don't think that talking about, even if you think the Israeli American government confluence is the biggest problem on earth, talking about every day is not the way to solve it. You have to build machines that solve it outside of their control. I honestly, so to the point you just made, I love X spaces or loved.

I just can't do it. Every space on X, regardless of the topic, everything is either Fed Slop or Israel. And it's just irritating. I go in there and I start talking about the most random things just to like literally derail the topic. It lasts maybe the first 10 minutes because they're hyped because I came in. And then they're like, but anyway,

so what's your take on Israel? I'm like, oh my God, I don't want to talk about this anymore. All right. We're going to go to the uncensored portion of the show right now over at rumble.com slash Timcast. IRL. So smash that like button, subscribe. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.

Mel, do you want to shout anything out? Oh, just if everyone can check out my new book, it's called Infiltration Instead of Invasion. America Betrayed, 1944 to 1954, and a lot of history. I didn't know. You probably don't know, and I'll really open your mind to what is happening. Plug your book. Oh, yeah, your book. Here we go.

Infiltration instead of invasion, America betrayed, 1944 to 1954. Mel Kay, the Mel Kay Show, and I hope you'll check it out. I think it's really important the American people start to deal with the truth of our past so we cannot fix the future maybe. Before, I just want to 1944 to 1955 is the dates that this book, in 44 you're saying, they went into the German government. They hooked up with all the German bankers and the German bakers colluded before Hitler surrendered to sell out the country of Germany into the liberal economic order. Absolutely. Oh, freakish. Absolutely.

The Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the international organization of that, Immunities Act that is still under, still going today. There's so much in there that'll just infuriate. You want to do my taxes? You sound like really competent. I'm telling you, when the people really understand that we were sold out after World War II, certainly when the Dulles Brothers took over the State Department, America became, you know, just on its way out, so we have to save it.

And they've sold us for, you know, 60 years. Decline of America, the controlled demolition of America, as progressivism. and the truth is they want a one-world government and they planned it out in 1944 and they don't want to lose it and that's what we're fighting, I think. Thanks for writing the book, Mel. Thank you.

I'm at Ian Croson. Find me at Ian Croson over the internet and go get yourself a chat chief. Oh, I don't even want to tell you. Get chat GPT, learn about RNA. That's what I'm going to do. You do you. George Santos.

George Santos, make sure you follow me on X. It's getting wilder by the day. And I think I'm so proud of that. Go check out. how I really feel about Alexander Vindman. And also, Special Forces premieres September 24th on Fox Entertainment and on the next day on Hulu. So make sure to check out me, me, in the Malaysian jungle for Special Forces. So it was great to be with you guys.

I am Phil it remains on Twix. You can check out my Patreon. It's Patreon. It's Patreon.com slash fill the remains. You can check out all that remains music on Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Spotify, and Dizer. Don't forget the left lane is for crime. So much going on here tonight. A very special episode here.

I'm Carter Banks. You can follow me at Carter Banks everywhere at Carter Banks Official on Instagram and check out our label at Trash House Records on YouTube. Let's get into the after show. Thanks for coming, everyone. We'll see you all at rumble.com slash Timcast, IRL. Right now. Thanks for ringing out.