Timcast IRL - GOP WINS HOUSE, Decision Desk CALLS IT, Trump SWEPT 2024 NUKING Democrats w/Brick Suit

Episode Date: November 12, 2024

Tim, Phil, & Raymond are joined by Brick Suit to discuss Republicans winning the House of Representatives, Democrats claiming Elon Musk used StarLink to steal the 2024 election, a former Kamala staffer saying Joe Biden must resign so Kamala can become president, and Republicans losing it over potential senate majority leader. "Brick Suit" refers an individual known for wearing a suit patterned like bricks to Donald Trump rallies, symbolizing his support for Trump's border wall. Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Raymond @RaymondGStanley (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Brick Suit @Brick_Suit (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It has been called. Decision desk has called the House for the Republicans confirming a GOP trifecta. Donald Trump now has the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court and the presidency. And oh, boy, Democrats are reeling. All of the stories about the Democratic Party are that they can't figure out what they did wrong. They are fighting like crazy. And man, I kind of feel like they're done. If someone came to me and said, Tim, can you come up with a strategy for the Democratic Party right now? I'd say any move you make will rip the party in two. There's no way to address the fact that wokeness is unpopular. MSNBC is even calling it out.

You will lose way too large a portion of the audience you have built for your party. For too long, the Democrats have entertained unhinged ideology and moderates. They checked out. So that's it. We'll talk about that. Plus, a bunch of crazy stories. The 4B movement. We got some updates. FEMA fired the woman who was ordering people to FEMA agents to skip over Trump supporters. And a report that is kind of crazy. Kamala paid Oprah around a million dollars. We'll get into all this and some of the myths and what is true. Before we get started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com. This show is brought to you by Cast Brew Coffee.

It is our coffee company, so we sponsor ourselves. If you like coffee, and I know most of you do, go to Cast Brew and pick up. Well, I'm sorry. Ian's Graphene Dream is sold out, but we do have Appalachian Nights and Rise with Roberto Jr. and Stand Your Grounds now back in stock. You could also get Alex Stein's Primetime Grind, two times caffeine. Drink responsibly, please. But don't forget to also head over to TimCast.com and click join us to become a member and support our work directly. And I'll tell you why. Because we've got a Discord server. That's basically a big chat room where you as members get to hang out with like-minded individuals. So if you're trying to figure out how to get involved, meet people, and be a part of the movement,

TimCast.com, you become a member, you get in the Discord server, and more importantly, you'll get access to our uncensored members-only shows Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m. where you as members get to call in and talk to us and our guests. So we had a crazy week all last week with the election, and we were only able to get one members-only show for you guys. But I think it was fair that we did a good job with Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boring of The Daily Wire for that uncensored call-in. Y'all got to actually call them.

Ask them whatever you wanted. That's what you get when you become a member. So smash that Like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is BrickSuit. Great to be here again. How did you get that hat made so fast? Well, you know, I just, I have my sources. I said, this is what I want. Can you do this? I just need to be simple. We're just going to go with the electoral totals. And I was able to find a place that could do it real quick.

All right on. So who are you and what do you do? Well, my name is Blake, but most people know me as BrickSuitOnline, and I'm just a longtime supporter of President Trump. And what I've been doing lately is, for the last six weeks or so, following the campaign here in the swing states, going to as many rallies as I can and supporting the campaign in any way I could. Right on. So this should be a, man, I don't know, a week of celebration? I'm not even down off the high yet. way they could. Right on. So this should be a, man, I don't know, a week of celebration? I'm not even down off the high yet. And honestly, I've got to moderate it because after so long being so out there and just really being all in for the president to have the type

of victory we had, the complete victory, and of course, the House being named for us today, I mean, being called for us today, you know, it's wild. But at the same time, I feel like got to roll it back in soon and get back to work. We can't just be coasting. Hey, we've won. And now we're just going to like sit back and just enjoy the fruit. We got to get back out there. Well, the big story right now is the the the election for the Senate majority leader. And everyone's deeply concerned that a couple of these guys are never Trumpers. So we'll talk about all that.

Thanks for hanging out. We got Raymond G. Stanley Jr. hanging out. What's up, friends? I'm Raymond G. Stanley Jr. Like Tim said, I am the resident blue collar here at TimCast Media Group. Two things real quick. First, yesterday, happy birthday

to my fellow Marines out there. Happy birthday, Phil. And also, happy Veterans Day to every veteran out there. Even if you're blue on and you think the election is stolen, you still wrote that blank check. So go veterans. Phil? Hey, what's up, everybody? My name is Phil Labonte.

I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. And I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary. Tim, let's go. Let's go from the Hill. Republicans win House, delivering Trump a trifecta. But it's so much more than that. I mean, look, you've got Congress, you've got the Supreme Court, you've got the executive branch, but within the House, you've got or within Congress, you've got the House and the Senate. So it's win, win, win all across the board. These Democrats in the Supreme Court are going to be holding on to their desks with a for dear life.

They will not resign. They will not retire. They are stuck. And they have to pray that Donald Trump doesn't you know, when when he leaves the end of this four years, that he doesn't give a massive boost to the Republicans again because they're stuck. They're going to have to retire. And then whoever comes in, if it's not Trump now, if it's J.D. Vance or whoever else, the Supreme Court is going to be like 9-0 Republican. Or I should say, you know, it's not really partisan, but it's going to be conservative leaning. The Hill reports Republicans are projected to keep control of the House of Representatives, handing the party total control of Washington. Take a look. Decision desk has called it.

218 seats will go to the Republicans and ladies and gentlemen, potentially three more. Now, the projection that they have, I believe, is 220 seats. They did they get rid of their projection on this one? I guess because they called it. They got rid of the projection. So before they were projecting around 220 seats, we don't know for sure. It's they.S. House win chance is 87.9, but they give the old green checkmark. So you still got Alaska. You've got C.A.'s House general election, District 41, and you've got 13. I believe that maybe, I don't know, there may be more, but I think the rest are just, you know, Democrats. So we're not really concerned with that.

But that's it. It's a slim majority. But in this day and age, it may as well be a landslide because it gives the Republicans literally everything. They're going to be able to get get things through in a narrow margin in the House. The Senate's going to be easy. And then Trump can rubber stamp whatever he wants. That's I mean, that's that's the goal. And considering the fact that it was like a total sweep, I know people are people are taking issue with the term landslide.

They're they're saying, well, you know, there it wasn't it wasn't so dramatic and et cetera. But the fact that the entire country moved right, the whole thing, every single branch of the government, the Republicans took and the fact that the whole country had, I think it was a 20 point swing to the right or something like that. Overall, I think that that still makes it accurate to say that it was a landslide because the tone of the country has said or is essentially saying we are tired of the Democrat policies. We're tired of the open border. We're tired of the woke stuff. We're tired of everything the Democrats are doing. Now, there are people, of course, that weren't tired of it, but they're strongly outnumbered, and it's a nationwide thing.

You can look at California. There are multiple counties that flipped in the state of california and every single woke person that was uh that was up for a re-election they they all lost if i understand correctly they all lost maybe maybe there's a couple that survived but most of them lost you had two recalls the the entire country is tired of things like defund the police which was a massive massive reason why people voted the way they did because people are tired of the lawlessness they're tired of of foreign gangs taking taking over american uh american properties this is all because of democrat policies all of these bad things the inflation, the open borders, the crime,

all of these things were specifically related to Democrat policies that failed. And the American people just said they're sick of it. What do you hope happens? Do you think Republicans are going to use this? A lot of people are pointing out in 2016, there was a Republican-controlled House and Senate as well. But I would just interject real quick. There were too many never Trumpers who are actively trying to stop Trump. So what do you think? Yeah, well, we're not going to have a Russian dossier come out. We're not going to have that thing come out. You know, like, basically, they, that was the Hillary Clinton research project that

was basically used to torpedo President Trump in his first in his first months in office. I think that President Trump, the stage is set. He's got the mandate on the border issue. He can tackle that all with just executive, you know, executive action on that. He doesn't even have to necessarily have the laws passed for it. I mean, I think that they will be, but he can just come in and basically get the border back under control just by signing a stack of stuff this high.

He's got Tom Homan has already been announced. I mean, just, man, I wouldn't want to be- They're losing their minds over Homan. Oh my gosh, but he's the perfect guy. It's like, you know, like this is what we need to do. We've had people coming here for three and a half, four years with no repercussions, walk across the border, get everything you want, fly anywhere in the United States you want.

Here's your, here's your card for your food. We're going to pay for your lodging. That's ending. You know, that's ending. And we need to, we don't need any additional laws. We just need to enforce the laws that are on the books. We just need to enforce the laws that are on the books. We just need to enforce the laws that are on the books. And that will dissuade more people from coming in there. I think President Trump executive actions can make that happen instantly.

The left is saying, how is he actually going to deport people? And they're surprised to learn that Trump intends to deport people. And there's a viral clip from 60 Minutes where Tom Homan is asked, well, how do you what about people with families? And he was like, she says, people and families, can you deport them both? And he's like, sure, they can go together. That's right. And now the left has responded saying he what the view on the view they're like, he's talking about deporting American citizens. OK, if if let's let's let's play this out. If a woman comes to this country, has a child, the kid gets birthright citizenship and then she is here illegally and has to has to

go. Why would her children not go with her? And oh, but the baby's a U.S. citizen and the baby can come back when the kid's older. I don't I don't I don't think they thought this through. They also say their child separation policies. It's like, yes, if you were a 30-year-old man in the United States and you rob a liquor store, I hate to break it to you, but we're separating you from your kids. You're going to go to jail. Your children don't go to jail with you. When you break the law and get locked up, your kids don't go to jail with you. What is this weird thing where Democrats are like, this adult man has broken the law.

Let's put the kid in the jail with him. And we're not 2016 anymore. We're talking about the never Trumpers. We don't have Cheney. We don't have adam kinzinger they're democrats now yeah none of these people are going to be in the way it's a whole different world everyone's things so much different like phil was saying we're all going everyone's going to the right not to the right just more common sense it's the common sense core now even democrats who are like in you know purplish districts who won because they're incumbents, they've got to have their head in a swivel

because they see this movement coming, the movement towards President Trump, the margins for President Trump, and in the House, they're up for election in two years. So they can't stand in the way of these policies or they're going to get smoked in the next election. Well, there's a mandate. Democrats are trying to claim there is not a mandate.

The House is still razor thin. But here's the issue. If you're one of these Republicans that just won this very moderate seat that's being torn between left and right, there's no sensible middle ground. The left wants abortions at the point of birth and child sex changes. And the right's saying, like, yeah, none of that. If they do not deliver and stand up and say this is our opportunity, then they lose. You have one of two choices.

Be a leftist or be a conservative. Pick one. Because if you try and play middle of the road, you are guaranteed to lose either to a Trump supporting populist or a far leftist. That's just it. And, you know, I expect we've seen this before the squishy republicans who are in the middle who are like i don't want to make any strong moves because then i'll lose it's like okay we're going to lose this time because there's a mandate and if you block that

mandate everyone's coming after you yeah and we're done holding the line well now we're going to start forwarding the line we're progressing moving forward to what we want to what the common sense again um we're done just letting them beat us back i we're gonna go to deport and democrats are screwed yeah i don't i don't know look i've long talked about how cnn's lost they've gone insane there's this viral clip that's going around and maybe we'll bring it up later in the show where a guy's like you know some people just don't want boys in the girls team and the other guy goes stupid no you will not call them boys! And he starts screaming and just like,

he's literally slamming his fist on the table. You can't even talk to these people. CNN, they tried bringing on conservatives because they know

they have chased themselves into wacky world. How do you pull out from that? Normally Democrats do not like that stuff. No one I know in my family likes that kind of stuff. But isn't it funny now how the response from these people in media is like maybe people really just

cared about milk, bread and eggs? Yeah. Oh, you think I love I love this. Among Gen Z women, Trump improved, I think, 11 points. Yeah. And now all the pro lifers are banging on their chests and hooting and running around cheering. They thought the young women were going to come out for abortion. That was the narrative. And there's a joke. I forgot who said it, but it turns out women buy milk and eggs more than they get abortions. That's a good one. That's true. are less important than, you know, a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population being able to go into their preferred bathroom.

Like, the American people are tired of that stuff. And I do think that it's a small wedge issue because there's a lot of Democrats that are saying things like, oh, not a big deal like like it's a small issue and and it is but that doesn't change the fact that when you personalize it as in you're you're you're a mother with a daughter and you're like well i'm maybe that maybe it doesn't happen but i've heard stories that at my my kid's school there are trans kids and that means there are boys who think they're girls that want to go into the bathroom. That's going to cause a lot of parents to be like, I am done with this.

I'm over it. Well, it's just because it's not worth the risk. Trump spent tens of millions on these ads where they were like, Kamala Harris is in favor of giving Are they them? inmates sex change operations. Correct. State funded. And it showed a clip of her being like, yes, we should do it. giving inmates sex change operations. Correct. State funded.

And it showed a clip of her being like, yes, we should do it. They're nuts. And so they try coming back being like, Trump's just throwing this issue out there because he's trying to confuse people. And it's just like, listen, you guys were campaigning on these issues. So I want to give a shout out to all these news outlets that are saying, why don't we have left wing? I love this, the Manosphere one. It's like, why don't we have a Stephen Crowder, Ben Shapiro or so help us a Tim Pool?

And it's funny because I'm like, I don't know, four years ago, I donated to the Democratic Party. I donated to Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard. And then instead of bringing sound, reasonable candidates, they decided to go with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. And I was like, I'm out. I'm out. You had an opportunity. Joe Rogan was supporting Bernie Sanders. RFK Jr. was running as a Democrat. The Democrats are screaming, why don't we have a Joe Rogan? Joe was supporting a Democrat, RFK Jr., up until you booted him from the party and to go independent.

The idea that the Democrats are like now like, oh, you know, we don't have this. And how come we don't have this, et cetera, et cetera. It's because you blew it. Well, it earned it. They're delusional in everything they talk about. That's exactly it. Joe Rogan is going to sit down and you're going to say something like Donald Trump called Nazis very fine people. And Joe's going to go, actually, no, Jamie, pull that up.

Oh, yeah. He said they should be condemned totally. When the Democrats keep trying to use hoaxes. This is what Greg Gutfeld, shout out to Greg Gutfeld, because he said on The Five today, Democrats ran on hoaxes and their entire information cycle was downstream from hoaxes. Yeah. So instead of running on the economy and milk, bread and eggs, they ran on Trump said white supremacy things. Therefore, Trump is racist. How could someone vote for racist? But once, this is fantastic, he says, once a person saw the truth, there was no going back.

So think about what that means. It also calls everything else they're saying to question. Right, so if Democrats run on a hoax, and they've got 50, and you see one lie, all of a sudden the rest of it's a lie. Correct. And one thing else too, we haven't mentioned yet, and you see one lie, all of a sudden the rest of it's a lie. Correct. Well. And one thing else too

that we haven't mentioned yet is that on the right, there's a lot of organic support. On the left, it was paid influencers. You're right. Like unbelievable. Oh, we're learning.

A billion dollars worth of support. Yeah, but I mean, like Harry Sisson parachuting out of nowhere, didn't even grow up in the United States, Chris Mowry. He didn't? Where did he grow up? Singapore and somewhere in the Gulf. Really? I didn't know that. How embarrassing is it for these guys to, like, sacrifice this to be so easy?

And they were all in for Joe Biden. Joe Biden, wow, Joe Biden's a great guy, wow. Joe Biden's so wonderful. And then, like, the next week, oh, Kamala's the greatest. And then they got screwed. This is the problem. They're just like, they got it. And this is the problem. They they're just like, why don't we have a Joe Rogan? And it's just because you guys can only lie. That's just it.

This is why they don't like coming on these shows. And they've said it. Shout out to Marianne Williamson, who told us after she left, like, this is why I can't do shows like this. Because we were like, here's real things that are happening. She almost cried when she saw the books that they're putting in these kids schools. But let's let's do this. Let's jump to the story from The Telegraph. Ladies and gentlemen, Democrats are planning up their own J6, I guess.

Left-wing conspiracy theorists claim Elon Musk used satellites to steal the U.S. election. Social media used to spread false accusation that Starlink helped manipulate the results. Okay, first, Joe Rogan, on his show, talking with Theo Vaughn, said that Elon had an app that showed him that Trump had won four hours before they called it. And I think that app may have been X. Probably. But Democrats are all acting like there's some secret program he had. They're claiming that he's blowing up satellites now to destroy the evidence.

So watch the TimCast IRL election night coverage. I know it's nine hours long, but when Lisa Reynolds comes on, she said live on the show, I've got a source at Mar-a-Lago. They're saying it's done. Trump has won already. And that was like a couple hours before they called it. Yeah. So internally, what I think happens is the Trump campaign knows all of the internal polling for certain areas. Correct. And they're like, the only ones we're not sure of are these, you know, areas. If those areas come for Trump, it's over. And that's exactly what happened. So the AP and decision desk aren't calling it. But Trump is like, we know those areas are for Trump. These we weren't sure of. They went for Trump. We win.

Democrats, on the other hand, have decided to claim that Elon stole the election and that there's 20. I love this. So when people said where the 20 million missing votes for Kamala Harris, right? Right. Because Biden got 81 and she got 61. She's actually on track for 74. And so a lot of votes hadn't come in yet. She's still down seven million. So now the Democrats are going on TikTok and mostly TikTok and Instagram, and they're saying something happened. There were 20 million other Democrats and those votes aren't being counted. Elon Musk did something with the count and destroyed the evidence. I heard there was a shootout in Germany. So that's all the servers.

Right. That's a that's a reference to 2020. I'm going to make this prediction. I believe Democrats will J6 in some form. I'm not saying they're going to all the servers. Right. That's a that's a reference to 2020. Yeah, I'm going to make this prediction. I believe Democrats will J6 in some form. I'm not saying they're going to storm the Capitol. I'm saying Democrats and leftists will be in D.C. protesting, claiming the election was stolen. Yeah. Well, it's clearly it's clearly Elon used dark MAGA. No, he did.

I mean, there's what other explanation is there? It has it has to be that that's what he did. Yeah, meme magic. Do you think it'll be Democrats or just Antifa far leftists? You think actual middle of the road Dems? Or not middle of the road Dems, but just Democrat folks? Well, I mean, there's no such thing anymore. I know.

Look, these women are, I don't want to get too much into this story, but it's crazy. There are women going online calling for other women to murder people. And this is not an exaggeration aqua tofana there there is a and it is insane and i think this should be taken down and they should be suspended and the post should be auto removed because they're actually telling women to make poison and kill people and this is nuts what that should yeah yes yeah yes aqua tofana they're they're doing these veiled things about if your husband voted for trump you should do what uh what was her name julia tofana she poisoned i forget that's what there's and that's absolutely insane holy f this is how crazy these people are getting so then you got

the story of nick fuentes which we'll get into later where he's getting death threats because he's trolling online he posted your body my choice he's trolling you're allowed to troll they're showing up to his house. And so I don't know exactly what happened. He pepper sprays a woman. The cops show up. The woman even admits the EMT, the cop and her husband were like, what are you doing? Why are you going to his house?

There were people outside his house. This is freaky stuff. What's already happening? I think it's a fair bet. And maybe I'll be wrong, but I'm saying I'm going to put it 100 percent. Democrats will be in D.C. unhinged leftists with green hair. They're going to wear blue bracelets or have tattoos. And they're going to be screaming that the election was stolen by Elon or something. Well, they burned limos last time.

Yep. And they demonstrated. And I don't believe anybody was prosecuted. They were. But they won. They were arrested and they got out. They were prosecuted. A few know they won they were arrested and they got out they were prosecuted a few of them a few of them pled pleaded guilty and then the rest of them got powerful ngos and

and legal teams told them not to plead not guilty then the the only thing that the state could do the feds could do was charge conspiracy because they had no evidence of any individual action because they're all wearing uniforms so they said how do you know this person is the one who did it? And the cops were like, we don't, but they conspired. And they said, you can't prove it. The activists, the extremists, the far leftists won, sued the city, sued the federal government, and then won like a million bucks. Why wouldn't they repeat that? Of course, they're going to do it again. Well, they got away with it in 2020, when they firebombed the White House. There'll be more people now. Now there'll be even more deranged people.

I do think that this time the DOJ won't tolerate that kind of stuff. I think that I do. I know that last time there was... It's a Democrat DOJ. Now the president is going to change the Attorney General. Sure, but January 6th, it'll be

Joe Biden. January 6th and January 6th, it'll be Joe Biden. January 6th and January 20th, the administration will be Democrat. Maybe they can try to protect their own butts about it. Speaking of which, how much are you looking forward to the prospect of Kamala Harris having to certify this election on January 6th? No, no, no. They're already calling for,

and again, we'll get to this later in the show, CNN panelists calling for Joe Biden to step down. Actually, it's VP's former communications director saying Biden should step down to make Harris the 47th president of the United States. It does nothing. I think it'll happen. It's an empty. I think it'll happen. Yes. Well,

I kind of don't think it'll happen, but I think there's a strong chance it happens. But we'll get into all that stuff, too. Yeah, yeah. In the meantime, yes, Kamala Harris should be the one certifying Trump's election. And due to that bill they passed, that law they passed in 2022, yes, Kamala Harris should be the one certifying Trump's election and due to that bill they passed, that law they passed in 2022,

all she can do is stand there like a mannequin. The people that are, to go back to what started this segment, the people that are saying, oh, what happened

to all these votes? It's like they don't remember that ballots were mailed out to everybody on the census. Like, they sent ballots out and then they went out to get them. These people are behaving as if all of the people that got ballots in 2020 were actually voters that could be bothered to go out and vote. The reason that, personally, as far as I'm concerned,

the reason that 2020 was an unfair, not real election was because there were so many people that returned ballots that would have never got off their ass to go out and vote. These people are, they're beyond low propensity voters. They're people that would, they're probably people that have never voted in their lives. They're people that would they're probably people that have never voted in their lives they're people that would never get get up and actually research any of the things that are being that are being proposed they wouldn't know anything about the the candidates other than who's the guy that my friends tell me is the nice guy who's the guy that my friends tell me is the bad guy they're not voting because they know or have an informed opinion or anything like that. And so it turns out that the difference is going to be whatever, 7 million or something like that.

You can't rule out states where ballots were mailed out universally. Yeah, 100%. And people, hey, I live in an apartment building. I'll collect all these ballots. Unsupervised drop box. Absolutely. That was happening often. That's something that's absolutely, I completely agree.

That's totally something that could happen. So the idea that, oh, how could there be so many fewer ballots this time? We're in a country with 350 million Americans, 333, I think, or whatever it was, something like that. mailing them out to everybody seven million is not that large of a discrepancy at all and just like i'm i saw tim was talking about this earlier today like the the amount of votes that kamala harris got is actually more than barack obama got either time yeah so the idea that oh there was all this energy for kamala harris and and it dissipated no the votes are there there she got more votes than than barack obama either time so the idea that it that it's that it's some kind of crazy weird discrepancy the the the anomaly was 2020 and that was because it was a novel election it was a novel way to to do an election in all of american history so these people are just freaking out over nothing.

And the Blue Anon folks are talking about why is Starlink a satellite? Why are the machines hooked up to internet? That was one of my favorites. I'm like, yo, bro, yo, back in 2020, we asked the same thing and they want paper ballots now. But I'm not going to blame some lady

who had no idea and wasn't paying attention. If some lady's coming out now and she's like, did you hear that some of these electronic voting machines were connected to the internet? I'm going to be like, yeah, I heard that four years ago. Hey, are you hearing about it for the first time? How about we do something about it? Right? So the

gag, I suppose, is Democrats have set themselves up for four years to block voter integrity. Correct. They have been the ones screaming out against it. Well, okay. Now you reap what you have sown. These are the rules you want to play by.

Trump wins. However, I still would be in favor of taking this opportunity and being like, how about we secure the elections with voter ID to make sure everybody... Amen. I say this. By whatever means Donald Trump can, right now, once he he gets in the first thing he's got to do is secure the elections because if he doesn't he'll never be in again and the midterms are lost well what I think what I think he can do is I think that the federal government has the ability

to acquire ID for federal elections of for for Congress for the house not not for any other races but they can require it for that. And that should be enough. And the people want it. We got like an 80%. Of course. 80% of the people want that, if not more. Well, it's a common sense thing.

I mean, it's ridiculous. The Republicans have the majority in the House. If they pass this, Republicans will never lose the majority. Unless Democrats change their party and become more like Republicans. Am I getting blackmailed? Do we have faith in our establishment the in the House and the Senate? Well, I would say mostly no.

However, with the rise of populist Republicans, it's leaning towards more leaning towards yes. There's going to be a big fear among many of these conservative these these are possibly conservative but Republicans that it used to be play the middle of the road and try and win the moderates. That don't exist no more. Yeah. If you betray the mandate, you lose. Good luck. So if you want to be a Republican and you want to be in Congress, you are on board with the popular mandate. Otherwise, you may as well resign. You'd be another Liz Cheney or an Adam Kinzinger. That's right. Let's let's right. Let's do this. Holy shit.

Let's jump to this story here from CNN. That is my question. I'll start with you. So we have this clip. This is Kamala Harris's former VP communications director calling for Joe Biden to step down. Check it out. Phenomenal president. He lived up to so many of the promises he's made there's one promise left that he could fulfill being a transitional

figure he could resign the presidency in the next 30 days make kamala harris the president of the united states it would absolve wow from being able to from having to oversee the january 6th transition right of her of her own defeat and it would make sure that it would dominate the news at a point where Democrats have to learn drama and transparency and doing things that the public want to see is the time. This is the moment for us to change the entire perspective of how Democrats operate. This is now jumped from an Internet meme to a Sunday morning show. Jamal's out here right now. Congratulations.

I thought you were going to say, what about the Supreme Court? That's also out there. Well, the Supreme Court might happen. I don't know if it will. But there it is. They are now publicly stating. This is one guy. It's one guy.

This is, let me get his official title. Jamal Simmons, former communications director for VP Harris, saying Biden should step down, make her the president, 47th president, and all of Trump's hats. Sorry. It's all Trump's hats. Sorry. It's all about the hats and shirts. I got to buy more hats? That's right. That 47th.

No, no, no. I see that 47. When they make Kamala president, those hats, oof, no good. They'll be collector's items. They're worth more money. And I'll just have to buy 45, 48s. I think there's actually a decent probability this does happen. I do.

Have you factored into it how much Joe Biden dislikes them, though? Is Joe really going to roll and say, you kicked me out from running and I'm going to resign just so she can be president? No, I think Joe Biden is already physically on the way out. So you think they'll 25th him? I think we could be like, do you see him trying to walk in the sand? That was horrible. I mean, that's tough for any 80-year-old. Not supporting Joe or anything.

The dude was having a hard time walking. Right. I'm not confident he's going to be. I don't know if they 25th Amendment him, maybe. But he might just be sitting in a wheelchair with his jaw hanging up and being like, I can't do it. I think in some ways, Joe Biden is happier than people would expect him to be right now. I agree.

I mean, he doesn't like the way he was pushed out. It was a coup. They shove in Kamala and she gets her butt kicked. And I think he and Jill are just like, this is awesome. We love it. She wore red on election day.

She wore red to the vote. You don't think that's it? I mean, she didn't wear her normal like floral drapery. I don't, I don it. She wore red on election day. Yeah, she wore red to the election day. You don't think that's, I mean, she didn't wear her normal like floral drapery, couch cover, whatever she wears. She wore solid red to go voting. For a lap sec, I don't think Joe Biden chose to drop out. So apparently the rumor is internal polling had Trump winning 400 and some odd electoral votes if Biden stayed in the race. So Biden was pressured by the Democrats to drop out, and he said no. Right. And the rumor is when Biden did drop out, it was via tweet on like a Sunday.

And the scuttlebutt, probably just rumors, who knows, is that they posted on his behalf and then said, Joe, it's done. We posted your resignation letter already. Wow. Well, he didn't come out and make a statement. And why do you think it is he's so pissed off? Rumor is behind the scenes, he didn't want to leave. And so they forced him out via a letter without him saying anything. Then the next day, you're sleepy, Joe. You wake up and you're like, what's going on? They're like, you're out.

You're out of the race. What do you mean? And they're like, we posted it. It's too late. You can't do anything about it. So he's livid. They're like, you're out. You're out of the race. What do you mean? And they're like, we posted it. It's too late. You can't do anything about it. So he's livid. Jill lost all her power. Hunter is on track to go to prison.

So I think there's a decent probability this does happen for a few reasons. Joe, is he going to pardon Hunter Biden? He might. Or he steps down for health reasons. Kamala becomes president for two months. She pardons Hunter in exchange. And Joe. And Joe. Yep Joe, yep.

Right. Blanket pardon for any perceived offenses, whatever, Ukraine, Burisma, all that stuff. I mean, Hunter's not that big of a deal if they pardon him. I mean, of course, we want us, we want it to go through the system just so that he's found not guilty

because of the terror. I want him to sue to the Supreme Court. Right. That's what we want. So we don't need him to, it's not a huge deal if they pardon him. And even if he's found guilty, what's he get like a year, a couple months probation

if it doesn't, you know. I want to make sure this is on the record. I want Hunter Biden to beat both cases. Here we go. Both the tax case and the gun case. I want him to sue to the Supreme Court and say you cannot force

American citizens to self-incriminate on background check forms. That's what they did. If you're if you're if you're a drug user, you can have a gun. Right. Well, the government saying tell us whether or not you're committing a crime is a violation of the Fifth Amendment. Second, the tax thing. OK, this one's up in the air. Maybe I don't really care much about it.

They're saying he was hiding his assets and hiding his income so he didn't pay taxes. But, you know, the IRS going after people for taxes, I'm also kind of like, I'm not a taxationist, theft kind of guy, but I'm always cheering on somebody who beats the IRS. But in all seriousness, I want him to sue the Supreme Court on the gun charge and win. The tax case, I'm kind of whatever about. I mean, that'd be huge for for to a it could it could it could get rid of the background check forms. Yeah. Or at least they'd have to remove any self-incrimination. Right.

Yeah. Which is which is big and would be a good thing. But that being said, more to the point. Yeah. Will Joe Biden pardon Hunter? Can he pardon himself? If there is a real fear, the Burisma scandal, the quid pro quo he was engaged in, and the documents case could result in charges, and they're all screaming Trump wants revenge, right? Okay.

If Trump is seriously considering going after Biden, I kind of think he might. Joe can pardon himself. Yes. That would be my position. He absolutely can do it if he wants to. But does it look better if he steps down, Kamala Harris then gives him the pardon, So it looks clean. Yeah, that's that's a total Nixon Ford thing. Exactly. That's just an obvious backroom deal. Exactly. So I think Trump may actually go after Biden in 2016, you know, at the Trump rallies. I don't think Trump ever said lock her up. I think it was it was the rallies

were chanting that he did say you'd be in jail.'s what that's what he said so then he gets elected and says no no be nice be nice we're not going to do this he showed his belly and what did they do they went right after him with russiagate scandal impeachment and then in these past four years false 34 insane charges, false civil fraud. The bullshit document, too. The documents case at the federal level, which they dropped now. I kind of feel like Trump's sitting there and he's just like, the moment I get in, you're all you're all going to jail. I don't see how Trump this time goes. No, I'm still gonna let him get away with everything they did to me and my family. So that being said, Joe's going to have to issue himself a pardon on the documents or whatever other federal cases.

Maybe he steps down. Kamala Harris does it. Nixon forward, like you said. But Joe's 95,000 years old. I'm sure he doesn't care about pardoning his son. If he has to pardon his son, he'll pardon his son. But also if he has to pardon himself or whatever he does, I don't think he gives an F at this point in time in his career and i don't think we should go after him just because who cares about this old man doing whatever he wants to do on the beach sitting nowhere there are other people we can go after there's a lot of other people that are playing a bigger part in ruining the american way of life and the justice system and joe biden he's not one of them i mean i don't i don't see what you gain out of

going after biden you know i mean and to be honest with you i do think that that trump i do think that trump would like to see and this is just my my intuition but i do think trump would like to see a return to a normal behavior towards presidents right like he i'm sure he doesn't like that they went after him and i do think that it like because of the way that he behaves with p other people that have wronged him like if he doesn't hold grudges like he's not like there's a bunch of other times where like he's gotten into it with people. And then as soon as they say something nice about him, he's like, oh, OK, whatever. It's all water under the eye guns. Yeah. So I really do get the inclination that he doesn't hold grudges.

And I do think that he is not looking to punish Joe Biden specifically. Now, I mean, I could be wrong, obviously. I'm just this is just this is just a guess. But I do think that because it is bad for the country, because it genuinely is, I do think that he, like, he doesn't see a whole lot of benefit to going after Joe Biden or Hunter Biden. He didn't go after Hillary Clinton

and Hillary Clinton clearly had plenty of reason to investigate, especially after all the stuff that with Comey and stuff. I mean, again, it's just my inclination. Server in her bathroom, cameras for all the subpoenaed phones. Absolutely. Mayorkas is way more important than some other people

that he should go after. A lot more illegal things going on. There's more tangible negatives that have happened to the American people because of the failure to secure the border. I mean, people have died. People have had family members die. So I do think that that's more realistic than going after Joe Biden, even though Joe Biden had definitely failed in a lot of places and didn't do his job. I do think that going after

the individuals that actually were directly responsible might be a little bit better. And also, it does kind of keep the president and the executive out of it. Yeah, I mean, I know I'm saying this again, but he's an old effing man. I don't care. Joey, go live on the beach,

but let America heal and get back to what we needing man. I don't care. Joey, go live on the beach, but let America heal and get back to what we need to do. I don't know. It'd be nice to have the vindication to know that everything that we've, you know, alleged with the shady deals and all the money coming from China is accurate. I'm saying, I

don't know if we could ever get something as fantastical as a 25th Amendment or a resignation and a temporary stepping up of Kamala. But I'm just, I don't know if we could ever get something as fantastical as a 25th Amendment or a resignation and a temporary stepping up of Kamala. But I'm just I don't know what's going on in Trump's mind. And I am worried that he plays the we're going to be nice thing. I hope he doesn't. I hope he doesn't. I hope he doesn't at all. Yeah. Well, let's jump to this next story. We've got this one from this is New York mag. Can a MAGA blitzkrieg impose Rick Scott on Senate Republicans?

So here's the story. Basically, all across X, the biggest names are saying Cornyn and Thune. No way. Rick Scott is the guy to be Senate majority leader. And here's the reality. Most people are like, who, who and who me? I don't know or care about any of these people. So let's break

it down in a simple way there is a big fight going on right now in the republican party that two of the front runners to take over as senate majority leader are anti-trump and this will upend the entire popular mandate and trump agenda and one of them's arguably anti-2a well i mean i think yeah i mean like i mean not just i I mean, not just anti-Trump, but not with the agenda at all. Not really even like. I heard Scott was. Hardly even defined. Scott was against red flag laws.

No, he's. He wanted them. I'm sorry. He wanted them. My bad. My apologies. He signed them into law in Florida. There is not a good person in the running.

Right? There's nobody that you should be like, yes, this is our guy. Yeah. Right? I don't care what anyone says not rick scott not none not corny not any of them um and you kind of have to pick your poison because cornyn has problems because of past when it comes to 2a rick scott has problems in the because of his past in the 2a that's kind of the thing that I've been looking at is who's the one that's the most 2A, the most positive towards the Second Amendment. But there's not a good one.

There's nobody that I could actually say, yeah, man, I'm going to get behind this guy and I feel good about him. I agree. You can't look in their past and find somebody who's like universally the best choice. And frankly, I mean, even if you take J.D.d vance right now at one point he was anti-trump so really we should be looking at who's going to say they're going to be going forward with trump's agenda and that is scott at this time he's the only one who's pledged that he would advance president trump's agenda this story is principally for those that are just like hey look these individuals it's it's two in the weeds this story is principally about are republicans going to knife us in the back the moment they get in

yeah amen if you go back to 2016 trump win trump wins republicans win and then you what did you have you had paul ryan paul ryan and the republicans entertained russiagate correct he said okay well you know trump may be a russian spy i guess and so he had to do all of all of the work that he did get done with weight strapped to his ankles. What what what do we do if that becomes plainly visible on January 21st of next year? What does the brick suit do if all of your hard fought work and it turns out that you got a bunch of rhinos blocking Trump. Well, I think you just you just embrace the executive action and just Trump is going to have to do everything he wants from the executive office with a pen. And and then, you know, the nature of the Senate and the way that they're only up for election every six years, maybe some of them are thinking we can wait this out.

And they're just not as responsive in general to populist sentiment. They're very opposite from the House in that regard. And I think it's even being reported that some of them just resent being told by voters what to do. But they are working for the voters. They should be listening to their constituents. Clearly, there's a mandate for Trump's policies. We want someone to be the majority leader who's going to let those policies go through. And there's another thing, too, of recess appointments is an issue, which is when the Senate is held to be in recess so that Trump can appoint people

to the positions without extensive Senate confirmation. Now that Senate confirmation still has to happen. It just doesn't have to happen first. And that will allow President Trump to get up and running. So if you don't have recess, if you don't have, if you can't have recess appointments for President Trump's administration, that's that's a that's a I think major down signal. I think what this story shows us right now is that there will be one political party and it will be in fight with the political party, which may break into two sub parties, the populist and the traditionalist or whatever you want to call it, because Democrats are done. I don't see how Democrats are able to recover from this. The woke Democrats and the moderate Democrats can cannot reconcile their worldviews. No. So you've got the guy on CNN banging the table being like, they're not boys.

Stop slurring. You're slurring. They're trans girls. Regular Democrats who are like. I'm like, you know, a pro-choice Democrat who believes there should be some taxes and is just like, I would like my food to be cheaper, is sitting there watching this guy going, this guy's insane. Then you have these other Democrats who are screaming, globalize the intifada. And they're like, that's insane, too. But the globalized, the intifada people are not going to align with the moderates. No. And this is the problem you got with Bernie, Hillary, Bernie and Biden that the party is already fractured into. If the split becomes more pronounced and I don't see how it doesn't, you end up with three political parties,

the progressive left, the moderate liberals and the Republican Party. And within the Republican Party, there will be battling like we see. But the battling over Senate majority leader, nowhere near as insane as the far left protesting weird socialist policies and Pete Buttigieg. I mean, they're so far removed from each other. The Democrats have done this themselves. They have cultivated a fringe that you know what? I called this a long time ago when I said it's the one ring. They saw the far left activists and they said, this is a gift to us against our enemies. We can wield the power of Antifa. And then they were like, no, you fool. No one can wield that power.

You're insane. And they're like, let's embrace the far left psychotic cult. Bring them into the fold of the Democratic Party. And now they're at risk of never losing because they've alienated Joe Rog rogan and people like people like me and joe rogan and tulsi gabbard rfk jr have been completely alienated by them trying to wield the one ring of antifa so um quick question um break you might know this why why is mitch mcconnell because he's the senate leader majority majority leader that he gets to pick who's going to come next. He doesn't get to pick, but he's, you know, he's set his timeline for his resignation.

And he basically, you know, he's got people that he favors. And let's, look, Mitch McConnell at times has done things that I think are wonderful. All right. Not all the time, but Merrick Garland is not on the Supreme Court. And that was Mitch McConnell. Oh, so. So. So we got to give him some props for doing some stuff. Right. All right. But, you know, at the same time, we would have one to three additional Republican senators right now coming in had more money been put into the races in Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada instead of places where, you know, like in Maryland where we were backing somebody who lost by 10%. So, you know, Mitch McConnell is not always optimizing for the Republican Party is what I'm saying. And he's certainly not really aligned with what President Trump is doing.

So he's not trying to grease the rails for President Trump's policies to go forward, despite the fact that that's what America wants. He's fighting like a rear guard action to put somebody in there who's just going to kind of stifle it just enough so that it doesn't happen in the next four years. That's, I think, what his goal is. So the fear I have is that there's going to be, if these Republicans who come in in these moderate areas do not stand up for the popular mandate, I think they're going to get sacrificed by the Republican Party. The Republican Party is going to say, we don't care if we lose the House in two years. We are going to do what we want, not what the people want.

And you're going to get the people who are in safe districts who have been there for decades are going to say, what do we care about the moderate districts? We're going to use them. We're going to go to them and say, hey, no, no, don't support this bill because you're in a moderate district and you'll lose reelection. Then when it comes time, they'll lose and they'll say, hey, we were able to tank Trump's agenda without risking our seats in Congress. That's a horrible thought, thinking that these establishment guys have been in for so long, have this kind of sway that they can kind of ruin the mandate. But everyone else who voted for Trump wants. I mean, none of the choices for majority leader are good. Can we get a third guy?

Can we get a fourth person? Yeah, you can get anybody. Let's also talk about the mechanics of this vote too, which is a sealed vote. It's not that we get to know which senators vote for who to be the majority leader. This is not going to be, as a sealed vote, we're not going to know who they choose. And so that's something that really is anathema to me.

I think we should know who they chose. And what you talk about being somebody else, I think one of the most interesting ideas I saw, I think was from Mike Lee to Charlie Kirk to Glenn Beck. And I think that's the story that was, that's how the idea traveled. But you could actually have J.D. Vance be the Senate Majority Leader simultaneously

while he's president of the Senate and VP. Because it's been done before, prior to the position of Senate Majority Leader existing, John Adams, when he was vice president, ran the Senate. So it's not without precedent that that could happen. And if you had J.D. Vance in that position, well, obviously President Trump's policies would be not held up by the Senate. You know, I think, I guess going back to my point about the Democratic Party and how it meshes with this is that if we get a break in the Republican Party where they don't bring about the popular mandate, I'm not sure Democrats figured out how to win.

The Democrats that end up running are going to be saying things like boys should go in girls bathrooms. Right. And then you're going to have everyone's going to be like, I guess take the Republican, you know? Yeah. Because what else do you pick? You may then get a moderate Democrat. What was that guy? Dean Phillips. Is that his name? I guess take the Republican, you know? Yeah. Because what else do you pick? You may then get a moderate Democrat. What was that guy, Dean Phillips, is that his name?

I don't know if he's particularly moderate, but you may get a moderate type being like, please, please, can we get some standing in the Democratic Party? And the activists will call him a Nazi, far right, and they'll run him out of the party. They'll say it's our party now, and then they're never going to win again. So I'm kind of wondering if we end up with one we were concerned about democrat one party control but now we're going to end up with

republican one party control by people who are terrified of what the democrats have turned into i think we should honestly let's wait and see what happens wed. I think people should continue to contact their senators and respectfully support, convey to your senator, if you have a Republican senator, which unfortunately I don't because I'm from California, but convey to your senators that you support Scott for Senate Majority Leader.

And like I said, you've got to do it respectfully. You can't do it in a way that's going to be you can't be an asshole or joke about it yeah because like i said the senators are not used to this kind of direct input and the last time we saw this you know like you could draw a parallel when yeah we were selecting uh an rnc chair and hermeit Dillon was running for it and who I thought would have been a much better choice at that time and you had people contacting the public contacting the people who make that decision and again they're just not used to it your point about not used to it the point about the public and and the people on x involvement in this. There's never been a time where. No change.

Yeah. Where, where senators could hear the, the constituents so directly. Now, like I said, or like you said, it is a,

a secret ballot. So I'm not sure that, that it's going to make a huge difference, but I do think they understand that I'm talking about the senators. I mean, I do think they understand that there I'm talking about the senators, I mean, I do think they understand that there is a feeling among the people that there is a mandate. And they want to see someone that's going to work with the president and not stymie the things that he wants to do. The president and the Republicans have a once-in-a-lifetime shot here, right?

They have a—if they move fast, they can make real, serious, dramatic changes to the government, to the administrative state, to the regulatory state. This has to happen fast, though, because they've got 18 months tops, 18 to do it and that's it because after that they're going to go after that you're looking at midterms and then running for jd vance is going to be running for election it's it's everything is gonna it's gonna stop let's jump to the story from the new york times breaking news trump is expected to name marco rubio as secretary of state and the libertarians are screaming and banging on the table outraged they do not like this choice the president-elect appears to have settled on the floor a senator the nation's top diplomat which also opens up the door to uh i don't know how it works in florida

do they appoint a replacement then for marco rubio pending the next uh i think rick scott the i think uh rick scott yeah the um um desantis desantis yeah thank you appointment desantis will appoint someone. Yes, I believe so. They say, President-elect Trump is expected to name Senator Marco Rubio of Florida as the Secretary of State. Three people familiar with his thinking said on Monday. I love that.

Familiar with his thinking. So it's not real news. I'm seeing everybody tweet this, and they're treating it like real news. But it's three people familiar with his thinking. So it's like the Minority Report androids and they're the it like real news. It's three people familiar with this thinking. So it's like the Minority Report androids and the ball. Yeah, exactly. The ball's coming down.

So there's three bald, there's two twins and a woman and they're floating in a vat of water and the wooden ball is carved out with Marco Rubio's name and they grabbed it and they're like, this proves it! Exactly. These precogs, they can see the future or into Trump's brain, apparently. They're going to say Trump could still change his mind at the last minute, the people said.

Oh, here we go. You know what, man? This is why I don't like. This is just filler. This is garbage. You know, and everybody on Twitter is going like breaking news. I'm seeing people tweet like that's it. Trump has chosen Marco Rubio.

The New York Times is running fake news. OK, that's it. Trump has chosen Marco Rubio. The New York Times is running fake news. Okay, that's just it. Fake news. Three people who know how Trump thinks. Okay, well, I believe Trump is expected to name himself general manager of McDonald's in the Pentagon. Because I'm familiar with his thinking. And he thinks a lot about McDonald's, so take my word for it.

He loves fries. He could still change his mind at the last minute though. He could change his mind. If tomorrow it's not announced that Trump is the general manager of McDonald's in the Pentagon, then I was right the whole time, but he changed his mind. Which I was double right then because I said he could. I can't believe this is the news. They're going to say

Rubio was elected to the Senate in 2010. He initially found himself at odds, blah, blah, blah. I don't know. I don't know why this is the breaking news that everyone's sharing right now. Do we think this is, this doesn't even sound real. I can't stand the corporate press. Okay. Here's, here's the real segment. The New York Times is fake news garbage that is running fake news garbage, and we keep entertaining it for some reason. The left has always, these guys are always telling the narrative, and the right is always following along with this. And it's a baloney.

Who cares about these? Like, okay, I'm sure X is right now full of people saying Marco Rubio. It is. And it's all like, what do you think? Someone familiar with this thinking. And the people on the right need to start making their own narratives. Otherwise, you can keep following their narratives. It doesn't make any sense. So here's Reuters. What does Reuters say? Trump taps Marco Rubio for secretary of state.

Sources say, OK, what is that? They say Trump has selected Rubio to be a secretary of state. Sources said on Monday, who theirs? If Reuters claims to have actual sources who know Trump, then I'll accept this. Fine. They say the Ukraine crisis will be high on Rubio's agenda. He said in recent interviews that Ukraine needs to seek a negotiated settlement with Russia rather than focus on negotiating, focus on regaining territory that Russia has taken in the last decade. He was also one of 15 Republican senators to vote against the military aid package for Ukraine passed in April.

I'm not on Russia's side, but unfortunately the reality of it is that the way the war in Ukraine is going, it ends with a negotiated settlement. Hey, I like it. They go on to say that China and Cuba hawk during his 2017-21 term, Rubio co-sponsored legislation

that would make it harder for Trump to withdraw from NATO by requiring two-thirds of the Senate to ratify withdrawal. Oh, that is nuts. I don't know, man. If they do pick Rubio, here's what would happen in Florida. The position would be filled temporarily by governor appointment from DeSantis,

and then at the next general election, that would be up for election, and that would be for the balance of his term through 2029. And you know it don't matter because it's going to be a Republican. It's going to be a Republican. Florida is so dark red at this point. Right. Apparently socialism is deeply unpopular with people who have fled socialism. Imagine that. Imagine that. I think socialism is deeply unpopular with people who live under socialism, and socialists are often fighting with other socialists. And it's almost like the groundskeeper Willie meme, socialist, they ruined socialism.

None of them agree on what socialism is anyway. But more to the point, are we concerned that Rubio is going to be a war hawk? I'm seeing some people say that he's an interventionist. And maybe he's only taking the stance on Ukraine because he wanted the job. I don't know much about him, but if he wants to back Trump and back the movement, then he wouldn't be.

But maybe he's just like, sure, Trump, Ukraine, we'll get it negotiated. And in the back of his head, he's like, we're going to go to nuts on Iran. If he's a Lindsey Graham, like a mini Lindsey Graham, because I hear he's short. He's a lot better than Lindsey Graham. I don't know. Does Marco Rubio, has he had military experience? I don't know if he has or not. I don't think so. No, look at him. Nothing against him. No, no, no.

Well, Raymond, you said you would know. He wasn't, okay, I can tell you he wasn't walking around with like a minigun by himself, you know, like Schwarzenegger or something like that. But, you know, that doesn't mean he couldn't be in the military. I'll check it out for you, sir. No. So, Natalie F. Denilition tweeted, quote, I will make this promise to you today. I will do whatever it takes.

Donald Trump, a con artist, will never get control of this party. We cannot allow a con artist to get access to the nuclear codes in the United States. Marco Rubio in 2016. And to be fair, though, I'm not going to I'm not going to hold that stuff from from almost 10 years against people. Because a lot of people were anti-Trump. And also, on top of that, Trump said things about Ted Cruz and about other people. It's politicking. Ted Cruz's wife. His vice president, like, call him Jason the Hitler I heard.

Maybe it was MSNBC telling me that. Yeah, J.D. Vance said a bunch of stuff about Trump. But J.D. Vance is fantastic. Oh, yeah. Amen. Yeah. We could do all night about what of stuff about Trump. J.D. Vance is fantastic. Oh, yeah. Amen. Yeah. We could do all night about what Trump said about, like, you know. I said this about.

Jeb's mom. Four years, everything like that. Did he? Oh, yeah. I mean, we could. Honestly, in 2016, I wasn't even a Trump. I didn't vote for him. Ditto.

I mean, I supported him. No. I wasn't even registered. I wanted Hillary to lose, so I was in favor of President Trump. I had no idea that he was going to be effective as a president. I agree. In his third and fourth days in office, when he got us out of the Paris Climate Accord and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, those are things that I thought were horrible for the

United States, and I thought there's no way they're ever going to go away. He made them go away at the stroke of a pen. Were you a Democrat or Republican? Neither? I was, no, I really was neither. I mean, I voted for Ronald Reagan in 84. I didn't vote at any election again until 2020. Wow.

I was completely out of politics, brought back into it by the America first stance of President Trump and the fact that he was actually doing what he said he was going to do. And that that got me back into politics. That makes our movement so great. Like yourself, myself, yourself, Tim, Phil, I'm not you know, I don't know how you were back in 2016 or whatnot. But like we were not like Republicans, like conservatives back in the day. Now we're all about America first, best for America, the best, no wars,

best jobs for America, just make everything good for our country and our people who live here. We're not about any of that outside sourcing. I'm not going to cry too much about any of this stuff. I'm feeling fairly good considering the current Trump administration and transition

team. You got RFK Jr., you got Tulsi Gabbard, you got Elon Musk. There's too much pressure against the bad policies to make it that prominent. I'm feeling fairly confident right now with the way things went, that there's enough good people with lots of influence who are going to be on the phone in two seconds if they start playing games. You know, if Rubio gets in there and starts going real bad, I'm not saying he's going to be this libertarian anti-interventionist guy. But if they start pulling this Biden stuff with like Ukraine, there's going to be a lot of powerful and prominent people who helped Trump when we're going to be on the phone. And Trump's a guy who wants to keep his promises.

And Trump doesn't want to be made to look like a liar. You know, another thing, there's a lot of people that very, very quickly throw the term like chicken hawk or warmonger or neocon around. There is legitimacy to using the military to intimidate other countries. Not saying that you should go to war, but the reason that Donald Trump got a lot of the concessions from other countries that he did that are historically adversaries was because he literally threatened war literally threatened to bomb them and everybody when they hear the stories they're like that's awesome man when you hear the story about donald trump going to them to the uh the taliban leaders uh the photograph of his house shows the picture and everyone's like that's great right well you have to be credible right like you just like because kamala harris and and Harris and Joe Biden both said don't.

Now, everyone knows that the United States military has the capacity to do any number of things. Right. But the question is, do the people have the will to do it? Right. Do the people in charge, does the president have the will to order the strike? So there has to be credibility to any threat. And the idea of being like, oh, this guy's a warmonger. That guy's a warmonger, blah, blah, blah.

Oh, if Marco Rubio comes in, then we're just going to be in every war, blah, blah, blah. The president is the executive. He is the commander in chief. Marco Rubio will not be making the decisions. He will not be making the decisions. Now, there's rumors. Again, Marco Rubio will not be making the decisions. He will not be making the decisions. Now, there's rumors. Again, Marco Rubio is just a rumor. We've heard rumors of people like Kash Patel

at CIA and stuff like that. These people are not the same type of people as someone like Pompeo. They're not the same type of people as the current DO, the current Secretary of Defense.

They're just not. They're not Anthony Blinken. Well, you know what really kind of calms me down a little bit is that at least this time I can text some of these people. I mean it. I'm thinking about it. I'm like, I mean, that makes sense. Four years ago, eight years ago, these are old school, you know, bureaucrat DC swamp

monsters. Unapproachable. Unapproachable. Unapproachable. The people that he's got in now, I know. And further. A handful of them. And furthermore, like. Which says a lot about us.

All the people that were brought in before in 2016 when Trump won, they were atrociously unprepared. They were incredibly unprepared. And that's part of why Donald Trump got railroaded. That's part of why he was so ineffective to doing the things that he wanted to. Donald Trump himself was unprepared. He didn't think that he was even going to win. He said it himself.

He didn't think he was going to win on election night. So the fact that Donald Trump has had four years to prepare for this. It's night and day difference. It's a total different thing. There are going to be people that he's going to bring in that the libertarians are going to say, that guy's a warmonger, blah, blah, blah. Because guess what? Everybody is a warmonger to the libertarians.

Okay? That's just the way they behave. That's just what they say if you if you would think of using military force then you're a warmonger then you're a war like there there's a significant portion of the libertarian party that are unserious because they respond to the they respond to everybody with the same thing as long as we don't have like you know bolton and his mustache i'm good i don't want john bolton's. As long as we don't have like, you know, Bolton and his mustache, I'm good. I don't want John Bolton's mustache either. As long as that's not happening, but you know, like.

The point that I'm making is there are going to be people that, and it is good. There are going to be, and this is a good thing, to have people that know how the government works. Because if you have people that don't know how the government works, you end up with Donald Trump's first term. You're just going to miss me. Let's talk about how women are handling the news. Hilariously. From PBS.org, no sex, no dating, no marriage,

no children. Interest grows in the 4B movement to swear off men. So you've got these feminists. Bill Burr on Saturday Night Live, he said, there's a lot of ugly women that are mad feminists, I mean, and everybody laughed. So those jokes are welcome. There's a lot of liberal women who are saying they're going to swear off sex with guys.

And the first thing is the response from a lot of guys, like just regular dudes, was nothing is changing. These women weren't the pinnnacle of attraction attractiveness as it was then conservatives are coming out and they're going no wait don't this is the funny thing about whenever they do these movements like we're going to boycott sex it's like that's what conservatives are trying to get you to do and then you're doing it so if those aren't, 4B stands for, it's four words in Korean that means sex, dating, marrying men, and having children. Young women on Instagram and TikTok are the primary demographic behind the recent surge. Quote, young men expect sex, but they also want us to not be able to have access to abortion. They can't have both. Young men don't want to be intimate with men who don't fight for women's rights.

It's showing they don't respect us. Here's a funny thing. Among Gen Z women, Trump gained 11. I was surprised by that. He gained 11 points. Right. So apparently this is a fringe minority position of degenerate women who are just like, we want irresponsibility. We want no responsibility.

What's that? And then they're saying they're going to they're going on a sex strike with a bunch of guys who didn't want to be with them in the first place. They're cutting their hair. Some of them. Yeah, they're shaving their heads, getting tattoos. The whores say no, but they act. Yes. Like they say, no, we don't want to listen to men. No, we don't want to do the things that the Puritans tell us. But then they go and act doing all of the things that the Puritans that say they don't they go and act doing all of the things that the Puritans that say they don't want all the religious people like don't be whores.

They're like, we want to be whores, but just to piss you off, we're not going to be whores. Take a look at this. Young women under 30 shifted 11 points toward Trump in 2024. So that is not that Trump won young women. It's that he gained 11 points among them. He wasn't doing very well to begin with but this idea then that these liberal women are like no men are against us like uh actually trump's winning look they they can they can they can get on the internet and and make all of the

the silly tick tocks that they want to make and they will and they will and we will we will make jokes about them but if they're actually committed to this good we appreciate it we don't want you guys having kids anyways because you're just gonna raise them wrong or maybe like that i saw some some uh some women talking about like aborting only boys. Yeah, a lot of them are. Maybe they'll just kill the boys or, you know, do other terribly monstrous things. So just stay away from men. You're crazy anyways.

Just stay away from men. Do you think there are even dating men that begin with these blue-haired, 195 pound people I mean there's dudes there was we used to have this guy that this guy was our called dating apps dating no it's not there was this guy this guy that was our guitar tech for half a tour and he was a pile a complete pile right bit like I don't think the guy even wore clean clothes but when he would get on his phone to do like the dating apps he would just do this like he was just swiping every single one of them right mass mailing yeah it was exactly

just just throwing the net as wide as possible those guys are the ones that these women are talking about those if you're just like you know anyone that's actively doing things to better themselves that's not the guys they're talking about.

I got bad news for these ladies. Oh, no. The movement's labeled transphobic and homophobic. It's Korean radical feminism. And the radical feminists in Korea don't consider trans women to be women. So they're transphobes. So all of these American women are transphobic. What will happen to the trans women who have already joined the movement and shaved their heads, though, now?

There's no going back for them now. That's bad. The crazy thing is— Reap what you saw. This is actually really interesting. Let me read this because this is really important for the history of the planet. The term 4B emerged in Korean feminist circles on Twitter around 2017 and 18. After a highly publicized 2016 murder of a woman by a man, the murderer said he did it because the woman had ignored him. He was not charged with a hate crime.

The first 4B groups articulated their principles in the Korean feminist wiki site FemiWiki, defined as the motto of a radical feminist, which means non-marriage, non-procreation, non-relationship, non-sex. They gave broader recognition on Twitter in 2019 through various feminist social media accounts. So what I was reading is that one of the things that causes this to bubble up is that South Korea is pushing natalism massively because they're having a population collapse. Yes. Massive. I think South Korea has like the lowest population replace uh fertility rates and so they're coming up being

like dude everybody you need to have kids otherwise the country will collapse and so in response to this with everything going on with the stories it's what i read was not that it's the principal component but but it was that it was the underlying animosity that led to these women deciding that they were not going to reproduce. This is quite definitively behavioral sync. Do you guys know what that is? No. Mass formation psychosis? No.

Behavioral sync was when they took the rat utopia experiment. They put rats in a rat facility with unlimited food and water and said, we're going to watch and see what they do when they want for nothing. Eventually, with no need to secure food or store food or whatever, their behavior started to go crazy. Rats became homosexual. Not right. Some, they were called the beautiful ones, would only groom themselves and do nothing else. They would just groom all day. Their behaviors became aggressive and destructive. They stopped reproducing and eventually killed themselves. If the researchers took one of the rats that had been

behaviorally manipulated and put it into a normal rat population, it would spread the bad behaviors. This stuff is exactly that. Humans have to have babies in order for there to be more humans later on because humans are not immortal. But now you've got the left continually pushing these antinatalist ideas. They're pro-abortion, they're pro-sterilization, and now they're outright saying for bees. What I think is going to happen is we are not isolated like the rats in these rat utopia experiments. We have a large culture through communications, which pushes people to the brink and they start engaging in behavioral sync. But the rest of us, we're humans. We can see this and understand it.

We say, hey, that's a bad thing. We're to move ourselves from this. These women, women largely women and liberals they're not going to have kids so in 20 or 30 years they are going to be in retirement homes government funded they'll keep voting for but over a long enough period of time we are probably going to vote against these things conservatives have kids liberals do not and the end result is going to vote against these things. Conservatives have kids, liberals do not. And the end result is going to be a bunch of 70-year-old cat ladies begging for government handouts,

and they will have no family and no resource and no voting power. I feel like they hate themselves. Like, they've been taught to. Yeah, they do. It's terrible. It's disgusting. I don't like it.

And sometimes I don't want to, I brought this up the other day, someone I was talking to. Some of these women actually fear... Off the 4B movement, but some of these ladies actually fear for their lives. Like weirdness. They are scared that their rights are going to be taken away. And you heard about the guy who might have hurt himself and his family yesterday with the Minnesota.

Killed his wife, ex-wife. I worry about them people. I don't worry about these, you know, 250-pound bald ladies. But the more of the mindset of getting to the folks that actually hurt their brains and ruin their lives is what I, you know, so at some point so exaggerated that if they latch on to the, the criticisms that like, I mean, everything like, it's just going to be like project 2025 is going to do this and it's going to be that, and you're going to be forced to have babies. And you know, if they're latching on to that type of rhetoric,

which is wrong and they're perceiving it as correct. Yeah, I mean, I don't want people to be in this position to feel this way, but it's even worse if they're getting there because of propaganda. Maybe it's what you're talking about. It sounds like, you know, Elon talks about the woke mind virus. This is like another type of mind virus. Not darker.

I think it's similar. It's related. I think the issue may be that with mass media, you go back to how humans used to operate, and the women hung out with women, and the men hung out with men, and there was no mass monoculture, no broadcast towers.

Correct. What I see now is most media is male. So movies are male and this you can call it the Patriot Code, whatever you want. But this is why, you know, I noticed this when I was watching some of these conspiracy videos, the way a lot of these women were talking about the election. I was like, it's it's kind of funny. They're talking like dudes. You know, notably, without being too crass, when women are making vulgar comments, the comments they make are from a male perspective. So without being crude or crass, I'm not going to repeat them. But they say things that guys say that are guy locker room talk, locker room talk. Women are repeating things

they hear from media that come from men. And they're behaving like men. And I've said for a while that femininity, I'm sorry, feminism is destroying femininity because it is continually telling women to be like men. I'll give you a simple example outside of women on X talking like guys would talk. It's movies where the woman, the main character is a female, punching bad guys and acting like as if she was a guy. Women can fight. They've got MMA and stuff like this. But it's just interesting that every single piece of media where they're like, we're going to make a female lead,

she's still doing overtly masculine roles. And women got really angry, feminist, I should say, with the idea that there was a male and a female role. And now what really angry, feminists, I should say, with the idea that there was a male and a female role. And now what I think we're seeing with all this stuff is the natural conclusion of radical feminism in isolating themselves from natural biology. And I got to beef with it. Like if they don't want to have kids, they don't have to. I don't care. They can do whatever they want. But there's a reality here. They won't have kids. Their ideas will leave when they leave this this earth they will eventually lose voting power and there are going to be a lot of cat ladies living in shelter homes is this a fifth wave feminism

have we hit that spot i don't know i don't think so no no i don't know just throwing it out there i'm just saying like people on the right have kids they're having more kids and people on the left are not or they're aborting their kids i also honestly i also think that you know we're seeing a little bit of it on social media right now i can't believe it's really that widespread i can't believe that the people are into this 4b stuff or that's a good call i i disagree no there's i i'm not saying that's millions of women doing it. But. You look at that CNN clip where the guy's like, stop saying boys. He's like banging on the table.

This is where people are getting their information from millions of people who are over 67. That's where they're consuming their information. So it's not necessarily that young people are watching CNN or anything like this, but they are downstream from the hoaxes, as Greg Gutfeld was saying. So when you look at the people who are willing to vote for a Democratic Party that wants to sterilize children, they're in it. They're entrenched in it. Seventy four million people voted for Kamala Harris. Name one policy she has. I mean, come on. I read this stuff

all day, every day, and I can only give you surface level platitudes because she never actually articulated a real plan. It was orange man bad. And so how did 74 million people look? I had someone ask me today. Not not not a conservative. How is Trump going to make the price of butter go down? How does that make sense? Because butter out here is $7.50. I said he's going to deregulate the energy sector. Namely, the shutting down of the Keystone pipeline caused mass speculation and fear that we would not have supply to meet demand in five years. When Trump reopens Keystone pipeline, brings fracking back, we're going to see a surplus in energy.

Surplus in energy means the price of energy goes down. That means transport at every level, from the farm to bringing the cows there, to getting the machinery to get the milk, to send the milk to the processing plant. All of that goes down. Butter goes down after the fact. So here at $7.50, I think you could reasonably get it down to $5 really quickly with energy deregulation and mass production of oil and oil exploration in this country. But but Trump said all that. And Trump can say that we go. Yeah, no, I understand that. Joe Biden banned fracking on public lands and he banned and he shut down the Keystone pipeline. That was really, really bad for energy in this country. What did Kamala Harris say? I'm going to stop price gouging that that's not going to change that they're on one or two percent margins already. There's no plan there. It means nothing. And 74 million people said, I'm voting for that.

Stopping price gouging is just more class warfare. I don't want to deviate into the prices. I want to bring it back to, so when we're talking about women who are like, I'm going to 4B and do all of these things, this is where Democrats get their news from, from random women on TikTok complaining and making no sense. Now, people on the right largely get their news from podcasts, talk radio kind of personalities, Fox News and things like this. It's disparate. It's decentralized. The left, it's relatively decentralized, but it's all downstream of hoaxes. So they live in a broken, fractured reality where they will bang on the table screaming, I will not allow transphobia.

You called the trans girl a boy. And it's like every normal person is just like, but that's a boy. Right. So they live in that world where they're watching that news and they're getting their information downstream from it. I would just put it this way. The data that I love to share from 2018, Republicans and conservatives get two thirds of their news from conservative sources and one third from liberal sources.

Moderates get two thirds of their news from liberal sources and one third from conservative sources. Liberals get 95% from liberal sources. They live in a paranoid, delusional state best exemplified by liberal pundit Kyle Kalinske saying before the election, Kamala may win Iowa and Florida. That poll was a joke. He's supposed to be like a smart pundit guy.

Like, what the F? Kyle Kalinske says, my bearish prediction for kamala harris that she wins all swing states iowa and florida iowa iowa's been trending listen the the reason that's so psychotic and why i will say it's the perfect example of of these people losing their minds is that iowa over the past 10 years has continually just become more republican how in any rational mind could you be like you know two years ago in the midterms, it was R plus 10. Two years later, it'll be D plus four. That literally makes no sense. And he

believed it. He believed it. So many of these people did because they live in a fractured nightmare, delusional reality. So anyway, we know that just to wrap it all up. When I see the 4B stuff, I'm like, this is the nature of their existence. I'm not saying millions of women are doing it. I'm saying it's not the fringe. It is the Democrats. And, bro, I was on Instagram yesterday, and I didn't say not interested. And I swear to God, it was like every 9 out of 10 reels I went by, I didn't even watch them all.

Because it was like, I'm a 4B. Or like, I'm mad. I'm an angry lady. I'm mad. I'm't even watch them all because it was like, I'm a 4B or like, I'm mad. I'm an angry lady. I'm mad. I'm mad. I'm mad. Like, holy F. How is this? So many people are into this crazy things.

Thank you. Let's pull this story from CNBC. FEMA fires employee who told Florida relief workers to skip Trump supporters. But the real story is this. The real story is the New York Times headlines. First, from October 4th, Trump's false claims about the federal response to Hurricane Helene. The former president falsely accused the Biden administration of spending disaster funding on migrants, neglecting areas that had voted for

Republicans, and ignoring a call from a Republican governor. November 9th, FEMA fires employee for telling Milton relief workers to skip houses with Trump signs. Now, let's break this down. I'm seeing a bunch of liberals being like, those are two different hurricanes, Tim. And he was saying they were skipping Republican areas in general. And this is about skipping out of the Trump signs. The fact of the matter is Donald Trump is speaking off the cuff, hyperbolically and generally. Trump says they're skipping areas that are Republican.

And it turned out FEMA actually had an employee, an official instructing people to skip over houses with Trump signs on them. Trump wasn't wrong. He was just what they're trying to do is they're saying Trump wasn't 100 percent correct on everything he was saying. Therefore, the general idea he was trying to convey is a fact check false. And to be fair, if they said, here's the fact check. We don't know where he's getting the story from. We found no evidence of it to be the case. And this is a claim Trump has made. You can't debunk something.

This is what the mainstream media does, the corporate press. I don't want to call them mainstream anymore because they're fizzling out of existence. But Trump will say, this thing, this is a thing that's happening. And the media will go, nope, fact check false. And you'll say, okay, well, I understand you can't prove a negative, but what did you do to try and confirm or disprove this? Look up nothing. Trump's a liar. And you're like, okay. So did you ask Trump where he heard this? Turns out it was actually happening. Different hurricane,

mind you, but this stuff is going on. And now they fired the employee over it. They should have got, well, they should be prosecuting the employee. First of all, there should be an actual investigation.

DeSantis is looking into that. Good. So Ron is, you know So Ron announced an investigation. He's going to see if there's something legal they can charge her with. I think it's going to happen. The idea that these things don't happen is, I mean, that was put to bed with Lois Lerner, I think her name was, and the IRS scandal targeting conservatives. This has been going on for over a decade. And I said this the other night.

It's only going to get worse until there's a significant overhaul of the people in government. If you have the opinion that your political opponents are less than people which is exactly the way that the left and the democrats treat the right if you have that opinion this is absolutely going to happen it's not likely it's not possible, it will happen because people will behave to the lowest expectation, their most base instincts. If they think these people are bad people, these people are immoral,

and they can righteously harm others and think that they're doing good by harming them, they are going to do that. That is something that is too sweet of a psychological treat to pass up. To be able to punish other people and feel like you're doing the right thing and doing it righteously, that is something is human beings will always take that opportunity so to to think that this isn't going to happen or or whatever when you have this attitude i think it was 90 percent of people in dc voted for kamal harris oh i have a one party town and that's the center of power. And it's not just D.C. It's it's all of the surrounding counties, all of northern Virginia, all of southern Maryland. It's all the same type of people with the same opinions.

Donald Trump has talked about possibly moving a lot of the a lot of the organ or a lot of the agencies out of D.C. And I think that is the best possible thing that he could do because it breaks up that uniparty single opinion thing that's going on in D.C. Imagine the Department of Agriculture being like, where the agriculture occurs. In Iowa. Central to the farmlands of the United States.

Imagine that. That's just crazy. To the to the farmlands of the United States. Imagine that. Yeah, that's just crazy. To the female lady, I feel like she should get charged. I feel like her superiors should get charged because she's under her superiors. I feel like everyone who didn't go to any Trump house should get charged. And don't just follow orders when you're in a national disaster zone. You don't give help because they have a freaking Trump sign. You kidding me?

All of them. Everyone in the whole chain of command should be charged in my opinion. Yeah, I completely agree. It's a disaster. People are dying and whatnot and they didn't help. How are they not helping them? Because without some kind of actual

real world tangible repercussions, then people will continue. Exactly. You have to make... I fully support, obviously, fully support cutting the government by 80%, firing all of these people. There's going to be, there needs to be a mass exodus from Northern Virginia and Southern Maryland.

It'll make a whole lot of homes cheaper. I mean, there'll be a massive amount of people that are going to have to go somewhere else. And the remaining agencies, they should be broken up and scattered throughout the country. The only thing that you need to have in D.C., you need to have senators and Congress. They'll need apartments so that way they can go to D.C. The president's there. Everything else can be scattered. Everything else can be scattered. Everything else can be broken up.

And it should be because when you have the concentration of power like that, the concentration of opinions, then you're going to end up with these results. Decision Desk has just called another seat for the Republicans, winning the GOP at 219. Raise the roof. So there's still a couple more seats up for grabs. It looks like Alaska is likely going to go Republican, which is a flip from the Democrat. And look at that. The greater than 99% chance they win the House because they've won the House. And it's looking like they originally had a number here, the projected totals.

Looks like it's going to be 220. And there's a possibility in California's 13th, but we don't know for sure. Yeah, yeah. I don't know if we think this is going to go. We'll see what happens. But that's, there you go, man. So we'll see. I hope when it comes to the bureaucracy, it's not just firings.

I want investigations. Yes. So this FEMA thing is where we want investigations. The DOJ is especially where we want investigations. I think we need a civil rights investigation in New York. I don't care. I am done dealing with these Democrats. They're liars.

So you've got these fake felony charges. And on CNN and on The View, they're like, how could someone vote for a person with 34 felonies? Trump has no choice. Trump needs to convene something. There needs to be a special investigator for conspiracy against civil rights in New York to go after all of the charges, all of the fake, all the BS. And it should be investigated, exposed.

These people should go to prison. The alternative is Trump does nothing. There's no repercussions for the crimes they committed. And then they happen again when Trump's out of office. I'd support that. Yeah, there's no we're standing on our back toes. We didn't start affording line. And they're going to say, oh, no, Trump's the fascist going after his political enemies.

That's fine. There's no off ramp. I don't see any navigation through this, navigating through this. Well, they could head that off by, you off by the judge, the sentencing coming up. He could just say, well, we're not going to do it. No, don't care. Trump needs to go after it. What about the legal system?

The legal system. To your point, they're going to say Trump's a fascist. The good news is they've been saying it for a decade. Now it doesn't mean anything. No one gives a shit. It's meaningless. It's the same old thing. You're a racist, Phil.

I don't care. Same thing. I guarantee you that the Krasensteins know the 34 felony charges have no underlying crime. Of course they know. They know that. They're not dummies. This is the issue. You want to know why Democrats lose?

They lose because, as Greg Gutfeld said, their their whole news cycle is downstream from hoaxes. And once you see through one, that's it. There's no going back. Amen. So when you're looking at Trump being charged with felonies, they're hoping morons who don't pay attention are going to keep believing it. The moment you say, hey, look, there's no underlying crime. They go, huh? Was he charged with a misdemeanor?? It's 34 felonies. Sure, but the crime they charged him with is a misdemeanor, so they made up the felonies. Huh? Look it up. Look, I say this story a lot. He got a loan. He paid it back. Whoa. They made that he said that his one of his suites was 30,000 square feet when it was 10,000. That's fraud. He lied about the size of the building of the space to get a loan, use that loan as collateral to to invest, therefore fraud. The only problem, all of these liability and asset disclosures for packets have disclosures. And the the the bank that lent the money said, yes, Trump included a

disclosure that stated these numbers may be incorrect and the bank is required to do their due diligence to make sure the numbers are correct. They then said after reviewing his documents, we did disagree and we revised them. He agreed to the lower amount, the lower loan. And we so basically Trump says, here's's my property the numbers may be off they looked at and said your numbers are off we're not going to give you the money you want but we will give you some money and trump what sounds good to me and they went fraud so the that's the fraud charge trump has to has if he doesn't i'm going to be so so pissed off because this is the one that matters the most do we have equality under the, or are we going to let rogue elements in New York

do whatever they want and burn this country to the ground? I say no. I say no. I say no. So, I do have one more. We're going to go to Superchats, but before I do, I want to give a shout-out to Scottie Pippen. Scottie Pippen? Scottie Pippen, who wants to read it? Basketball player? Satoshi Nakamoto

visited me in my dream last night and predicted that Bitcoin would be at $84,650 on November 5th, 2024 not financial advice this was posted September 3rd and everybody was making fun of him bro is cooked

LMAO, they're like okay dude he did not appear in your dreams the current Bitcoin price on November 11th is $88,258. Where clearly Scottie Pippen is wrong. Yo, Scottie Pippen's a bull. He's a champion. He's 88.

He's Scottie Pippen. And it was $79,000, I believe. On November 5th, it was not that high. So let's do... Basketball champs are in the Bitcoin, gents and ladies. Yeah, no, no, no. He was unfortunately very wrong on the 5th. It was 68,000 to 74,000.

So he was wrong. He was wrong. He was pretty close. He was directionally correct. Here's the point. Eric Balchina says, dude got destroyed in the comments, but take all the sell-side research, newsletters, and TV pundits this year, and I can't recall any of them coming closer than this to nailing a call.

Yep. That's awesome. Scottie Pippen being like, he visited me in my dreams. Absolutely amazing. All right, everybody, we're going to super chats. So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know, head over to Timcast.com and click join us to become a member. Why?

You want to get involved? You want to be a part of the movement? you want to figure out what's step one on our discord server there are tens of thousands of people who are hanging out they host their own shows there's pre-shows there's after shows there's morning shows and you becoming a member you can chat in real time with all of these people and uh no joke some of them have married each other yes yeah like women and men not not dudes, but you know. Maybe. If they want to, whatever. Yeah, whatever.

You know, we're fairly liberal in that regard, right? Yeah. We don't care what you do. We're a big tent. We're a big tent. We're a big tent. So smash that like button, share the show, as I said. Let's read your super chats.

All right. We got Herb Derbler. Senate swamp creatures are trying to secure a foothold by appointing another rhino to the leader. They want to stonewall Trump just like they did in 2017 and 2018. Well, maybe Donald Trump should come out and say, everyone vote for Rick Scott. If he doesn't do that, then, you know, he gets what he gets. That makes sense. Yep.

Bucket Aquatics says, in Rhode Island, you need only your state id and driver's license to vote they also give driver's licenses to illegals in rhode island in west virginia you don't need that i didn't need anything california pennsylvania california it's illegal to ask for an id yes in west virginia you need any form of id and it's the stupidest thing in the world because they say a credit card is an ID. What? No joke. Yep. So if you have someone else's credit card, you can vote in their name. That's insane.

That is weird. And they're like, but it's illegal. And it's like, yeah. I mean, it's illegal to break into someone's home, but we still lock our doors, right? Sure, but they can kick the door in. I know, but we're trying, you know? I got a deadbolt.

Or here at Timcast, we have security fencing and armed guards. Electrocution. No, we don't have that. I'm just... I would like to get auto defense turrets. I remember, I was sort of watching you guys. It was you and Luke were talking about M80 auto defense turrets. No, no, no.

We're talking about gel blasters. Gel blasters. You know those defense. No, no, no. We're talking about gel blasters. Gel blasters. You know those toys at Walmart that it just lobs a little ball of gel at you? Yeah. And so it's more of an annoyance. Is that the color? No, it just annoys you. It's not paintballs. They're just balls of gel. And it just splatters. They're toys for kids. I want to get some auto defense turns to load with

those things. And then at a certain time, it just goes... I mean, that would be pretty based. People would be pissed. Like, get off me. You know what I just watched? I watched The Incredibles. I haven't seen that one in a certain time it just go i mean that would be pretty based people would be pissed like get off you know what i just watched i watched the incredibles i haven't seen that one in a long time but syndrome the bad guy has those big jelly balls or whatever that he you know what i'm talking about as i do it hits mr incredible and then inflates and he gets stuck to where he's standing that's what we need just like subdue the person so the cops can come and deal with it i like it but uh we'll talk about the Nick Fuentes story in the members only.

It's crazy. Some woman went to his house. He's been getting death threats. He's trolling, but you're allowed to troll. You can't go to someone's house or threaten them for this. He pepper sprayed her, I guess. Better than shooting her. God bless him. Good move.

That's what I was saying. This is scary because, uh, right. We have people who come to this property all the time trying to get in. So we had to put up a security perimeter and now they just stopped that. Like, it's crazy. People would try and drive onto the property.

Yes. I remember that. The issue is the left is going to try and defend this woman. And they're going to say, all she did was go up to his house and ring the doorbell. I don't know if that's true, by the way. But what people need to understand about security is when creepy weirdos enter your property there, it's called casing. They're they're testing the boundaries of your security. So for someone like Nick, who

lives in some house in Illinois, apparently, they know where he lives. They go to his house. They want to see what they're going to get away with. If they can go up and ring the doorbell and nothing happens, then the next time someone's going to do something a little bit more. So I'm not saying anything else as to what went on with him and what he should or should not have done. We'll talk about that in the Members Only show. I'm just saying, do not come here. Yes. Because that would put your life at risk. And I don't want that to happen at all. None of us do. But we have armed guards for a reason because of the death threats, and we defer everything to them. Amen. So, let's read some more Super Chats.

K. Spencer Jones says, Seattleman just killed her dad with an ice axe after election meltdown. What? Another one? Another? Is that true? What do you mean, another one? The guy in Minnesota killed his family and friends because the Trump won. When?

Yesterday. I believe it was yesterday. People are going crazy, bro. It's insane. I feel bad for the retired women who were... First degree murder after what authorities describe as a violent attack at their home on November 5th.

They say Burke and her father began arguing after he insisted on keeping lights on and then decided she needed to do something about her father. Oh. She grabbed an ice axe. This is not a stable individual.

Wow. And so it says it was over election stuff? What happened on the 5th? They were angry over election stuff and it escalated. Yeah.

The Democrats have a lot to be accountable for and their politicians. Let's be honest about that. And their propaganda, their news media. They have a lot. So the Google search says, woman overwhelmed by election. And then when you read it, it's just like, no, no, none of that. None of that. Well, clearly they're saying it's Trump's fault for winning.

And that made her so angry that when the lights happened. Yeah. Now it's obviously Trump's fault. Nobody on the right went crazy over Biden, but folks on the left are, can you please relax, ladies and gentlemen? The world's not going to end tomorrow. She was overwhelmed due to election results. So that's what the headline says. But when you read it,

they omit all that stuff. Oh. Yeah, the Kiro 7 News says, woman overwhelmed by election killed her father with ice axe. Interesting. They changed the story. I wonder why.

Oh, clickbait headline? Yeah. November 5th in Rainier Valley, premeditated the killing after an argument at Household Lights. So they changed the story. Interesting. I wonder if they're trying to simmer things down. Simmer down, no.

Yeah. All right, let's grab some more news stories. Robert R. says, please cover the bigger FEMA scandal no one is talking about. It was not some rogue supervisor. It was a some rogue supervisor. It was a disaster equity policy.

Proof. New York Post story on FEMA DEI Zoom call. Rep Luna's investigation needs that video proof. Interesting. I remember that when he was saying we prioritize, you know, marginalized peoples. That's what I'm saying. Arrest everyone. I mean, at least investigate everyone.

Jason Nixon says, hey, Tim, how about that Bitcoin? Remember when I offered 30 Bitcoin for 10%? It's now 30 Bitcoin for 20%. I can make you profitable very quickly and can get that coffee shop open. Raymond knows how to at me. I said it before and I'll say it again. The amount of money you're offering for a company this large is too low. That's just it. But I'll tell you this, Jason. I'll give you're offering for a company this large is too low. That's just it. But I'll tell you this, Jason.

I'll give you $500 for your Bitcoin. For your 30 Bitcoin, I will give you $500. Take it or leave it. I would give him that, too. Take it or leave it. You guys had such a great three-day conversation between you and Jason Dixon. I think $500 for your Bitcoin is a fair offer. You know what?

I'm sorry. Bitcoin went up. I'll give you $1,000 for your 30 Bitcoin. $1,001. Here we go. Jordan Robbins says, how do you suggest we take time during the miracle of an establishment

to convince the normies that we're not fighting them, we're fighting influence from the WEF and I don't understand what you're trying to say. Miracle of an establishment? I don't know what that means. How do you suggest we take the time during the miracle of an establishment? No idea. Sorry. All right. What do we have here? What do we have here? Jack Max has stolen by 3.3 million votes we have some serious mental health problems in america

dems are election deniers the problem is none have presented evidence of actually visually seeing any fraud very different from 2020 in fact uh look at the election results in wisconsin the same thing that happened with the mail-in votes happened again but the trump count was way too high so that's really interesting. The, you know, in 2020, when you saw the blue line go straight up and right over Trump, that straight line exists in Wisconsin. I haven't looked at any other data,

but the Trump line was just way too high. There were too many. They said they made it too big to rig. Good. Too big. Too big. All right. What have we here?

Benjamin Christman says, watching from the hospital hospital my wife and waiting for our fifth kid our first girl big fan and always watch thanks everyone very cool nice very very cool commander shepard says trump chose rubio as secretary of state that's a win for the deep state except my friends there's already a ton of tweets popping up saying, fake news, not true, Trump did not pick Rubio. I figured. Three people familiar with his thinking is not news reporting. It's ridiculous. Especially when they said he could change his mind. That's right.

Tracy Shearer says, can we the people have a civil suit against the legacy media and others for the disinformation we know that was committed? Nope, because they have free speech. Welcome to America. I will say I am still suing the Harris campaign. Good. That did not change. And we are waiting to hear what their response is going to be. So I can't say too much.

What I can say is they're reporting that she's $20 million in debt. Now, a lot of people need to understand you can be in debt and be rich at the same time. Sure. Donald Trump famously had that story where he was like talking to Don Jr., I think, or was it Eric Trump when he was a kid? And he was like, see that homeless guy over there? He has more money than me. And it's like, well, what? Well, yes, because Trump had, let's just say he's got a million dollars in debt, but he's got $500,000 in cash.

He can pay that debt off on schedule. He's got half a million dollars in debt, but he's got $500,000 in cash. He can pay that debt off on schedule. He's got half a million dollars in cash right now to spend as he pleases. So the Harris campaign may be $20 million in debt, and they may still have $500 million in cash. I think the assumption everyone's trying to make is they are negative and they have debt. Yeah. Every time I've seen that story reported,

it's as if they've spent all their money and they're they owe this money and they i've even said it we've seen it report that didn't pay their staffers for like the last a couple months doesn't mean they don't have any money yeah well so how many how many of you out there have like a thousand bucks in credit card debt and 10 grand in the bank there's their you have a thousand dollars in debt and if someone came out and said you know there's a thousand dollars in debt the implication is you have $1,000 in debt and if someone came out and said, did you know there's $1,000 in debt? The implication is you have $0 and you owe $1,000, when in reality, yeah. I mean, I've got debt on my

credit card right now. When we order equipment, we put it on the credit card and then I have debt. So who knows? Did you see the picture of them? They did a big old congratulatory photo like we did. We've worked so hard. We're so proud of being who we are. Those MFers. But don't you think that

that that's been out that story's been out for what three days now don't you think 20 million dollar in debt yeah don't you think they'd come out with a clarification we've got the money for it by now why would why would the harris campaign say anything um how convenient for them actually if their vendors stop pursuing the money because i think there's none left well i don't think the vendors will do that. Well, they'll send the invoice and then be like, we're not going to waste time and energy.

We're not going to send good money after bed. Who knows? If you owed a credit card company a thousand bucks and you had 20 grand in the bank, but then every newspaper reported that you were broke and you were in debt a thousand bucks, is that credit card company going to be like,

let's go after this guy? or are they going to say, we've got bigger fish to fry, this guy's got no money? They prioritize. They're going after everyone. So in this regard, we don't know. Yeah. But I do believe you can track public records to see what they do have.

I do not believe they're negative. I don't think that makes sense. It's possible I could have ordered a last minute Hail Mary Media Buy Do we care though? They lost That's what I'm saying

If they're getting down the end and they've got X amount of dollars Oh Yeah They've got X amount of dollars, and they spend twice that amount on a media buy in the last week. It conceivably could go into the red.

We'll see. We'll see. All right. Let's grab some more. The Gravy Train says, rest in peace to my goodest boy, Shadowfax,

lord of all doggies. 12 good years. Wish you would have made it to see dogs become great again. Love you, boy. Sad to hear it, good sir. Sad to hear it.

But the day comes, you know. All right. HRD says Harris's 25th stance would absolutely have an asterisk next to it. What does that mean? Don't know what you mean. When she becomes president, if she got in by the 25th oh right her presidency yeah ah yes jack mack says should be a fed mandate for federal elections to ensure only citizens vote and they must provide id make citizens get a passport card if you're if you're

illegal you can get a state driver's license but you can't get a passport card um yeah the republicans now have the ability to just voter id or citizenship requirement proof of citizenship proof of citizenship basically becomes voter id and they can just first thing they could just for federal elections only they can say that at the federal level yep right and they should right and i think if they do that a democrat will never win again and we you know in in states where we have a Republican trifecta, voter ID should be necessary for state elections. I mean, that's the states control their own elections. They should do, you know, honestly, there's the chart out there of all the states that that did go for Harris. And the preponderance of them have no voter ID

requirement or have minimal ID requirements. So I don't know if those states like California being one of them, Washington, Oregon, I don't know if those states are going to change their, their state election policy. But if you, if you make it so that the federal elections require ID,

that's at least a step in the right direction. Itsy Bitsy Spider says, the fact that they're dropping all the cases after Trump's re-election is proof the cases existed solely for election interference. And Trump should investigate all of them for conspiracy against rights, and they should be criminally charged.

The documents case, Jack Smith should, I believe he should go to jail. Prison. I'm not kidding. Here's a guy who is going after Like the documents case, Jack Smith, I believe he should go to jail, prison. I'm not kidding. Here's a guy who is going after Trump. Meanwhile, her is not going after Joe Biden. This is this is clearly political, similar charges and a clear conspiracy against rights. And so maybe it's fair to say there's a technicality where Jack Smith just gets sanctioned or something happens or just bought whatever.

I don't know what his job is, so I don't know if he could be disbarred or whatever. But there should be severe penalties for engaging in lawfare. As for New York, Trump should cut federal funding. He should just absolutely, you know, put them on the coals and say these cases are all serious conspiracy against rights and can be easily proven. So he has to. If he doesn't, we'll keep doing it. Robert Bradbury says Joe doesn't need a pardon. He's not mentally competent to stand trial and he can't be. But he can be president, but he can't stand trial. Yeah, good point.

Interesting. Let's see what we got here. Fluffy Fox says only good thing if kamala becomes president for a month is there can be no more first female president arguments as a woman get the dei out of our system how brutal would it be if they actually did this and isn't that who said this gerald ford or someone someone said the first female president will be a vp who will step in for the president and that's how it'll happen. I don't know the name, but I remember watching the video of someone saying that. Yeah.

Maybe Joe does it. There's a funny meme where it's like Kamala loses, and they're like, yes, but Kamala, you still have time to do all the things you said you were going to do. You got two weeks. She's not going to do anything. It's true. And that would be such a lose for women. I feel like if they really care about women becoming. And that would be such a lose for women. I feel like if they really care about women becoming president,

that would be a terrible thing for them. They'd be like, okay, we get two weeks because a dude fell out. No real woman wants that. It would be terrible. Yeah, it's just, yeah. All right, Katrina Miles says, I think Trump should say,

if you tell us where the kids are, then I will not go after Biden or Kamala for the lawfare. Oof. 325,000 of them? How many do we need to know about? Missing every year? Well, that's the number of unaccounted minors that came across the border

in the Harris-Biden administration. 325,000. That's so crazy. Christina says, Toon is my senator. We don't know how he keeps winning. He lives in Washington, D.C. He doesn't support South Dakota ideals. Trump should reform all that stuff. But the Republicans are going to block it because they're all in on the take.

He should, like you said, he should say who he wants and then we'll, you know. My guess. It's the only way to do it. All right. What is this? Lick My Glass says, during the debate, Joe seemed way more off than usual. Has anyone ever considered he was drugged? They gave him a downer so that he would flub the debate.

That makes sense. They wanted him to stay in. You can only take so many uppers. Well, it's possible. It's possible they sabotaged him by not giving him his usual cocktail. I know they, they wanted him to be the guy and his performance debate caused a panic or I don't know.

They were, they wanted to maybe RFK jr. Save the day. They wanted Joe Biden to drop out so that someone else could run. But RFK jr. Was running. So they're like, if he drops out,

RFK jr. Wins. So they're like, if he drops out, RFK Jr. wins. And then we lose control of the party. So they had to keep him in to shut down the primary. And then they had nobody left. And they're like, how do we transfer the money and all the money we raised? It's got to go to Kamala and Kamala can't win. I think they just don't know how to do things anymore. Amen.

Agreed. Yep. All right. Brett says, I always thought BrickSuit was Gavin McInnes until tonight. Damn, I'm stupid. Here's the beard identification guide, okay? Gavin McInnes has full side beard. So he's going to have a beard here.

He is going to have the twist up like that. He's going to have full side beard. And Seb Gorka doesn't have the twist. His just goes straight down and then um let's see um when i walked in today i wasn't sure i had to ask before i met you there's one other beard i'm trying to remember it's uh Pelosi's beard is Nancy. That's the last beard guide. All right. Regina Pontes says, breaking news, Elise Stefanik posted Trump picked her for the ambassador to the UN.

That's good. Does that mean, what do they do? Do they appoint someone to the seat at the state level? I believe. I believe it would be appointed by. Sometimes it stays vacant until it's, there's an election. That's bad.

You have to look into it and, and it can depend. Yeah. It could depend on how much time is left in the seat. So obviously she just won. So they're probably going to have a special election given that there's, you know, two years left in her term effectively david

hart says trump should promote tulsi gabbard to army general she's a colonel now wow that's she's a lieutenant colonel he should just promote her straight up and be like here you go in 20 in 2017 tulsi gabbard was one of the first elected democrat officials to go visit with president trump at the white house yep And they got so mad. They were just livid about it. And, you know, I still think that there's something for her in an official position in the administration. I'm just waiting to see what she gets named for.

Because I think she's such a tremendous asset. And I've seen her speak at several rallies and of course other places as well but i think i think that there's a contribution that she can make that's but that's not america if you just uh promote her for not earning it it's not very no no no no no i say for that to the well do the super chatter to a certain degree, it's political. That's what I was talking to General Flynn about on Friday. I said, did you have to navigate politics in order to get the promotions? And he was like, what are you saying? Did I have to kiss ass?

And I was like, yes, did you have to kiss ass to get promoted? And he's like, no, no, not really. There's obviously being a good team player and working with people. I mean, I'll take her. I like the rules. All right.

One evil chef says, I forget if it's a 1099-K or P, but there's actually a tax form from the IRS for reporting profit from illicit or illegal means without self-reporting yourself. Basically, the IRS doesn't care if you're a criminal. I know. They actually have like a paragraph where it's, like, all income, even if ill-gotten or done through illegal means, must be reported, and

you know, they're just like, dude, you can break the law and make money, but you gotta pay your taxes on it. That's more important. Mauricio says, sounds like the four olds with extra steps. A little more extreme than the four olds, you know jack may says here's a thought ladies use preventative measures like birth control

then no abortions and please stop calling it reproductive rights aborting a pregnancy is the opposite of reproduction indeed the they the left uses phony names or they use terminology incorrectly to— Trick stupid people. Yeah, well, and to smooth over for themselves, too, because, like, women don't want to think that they're— like, most women don't actually want to think that they're killing a baby. That is something that will cause massive cognitive dissonance in themselves because they'll think, oh, I'm a good person. Good people don't murder babies. I'm not murdering a baby. I'm using health care. It's reproductive health, etc. It's all just a cover for what

they're actually doing. That's why they get so frustrated and so angry when you say, well, you're killing a baby, you're killing an unborn baby. It's simple to say, it's completely fine for someone to say, well, that man that shot that woman killed her and her baby because her baby was in her stomach. And they'll say that. But when it comes to a woman deciding to kill the baby, then they can't articulate it that way then because of the cognitive dissonance and to be honest with you the fact that the right seeded that linguistic territory was the beginning of a massive problem with the argument yeah and then there was uh lance from the serfs when he said yeah i asked him, you know, can a woman, you know,

kill, get an abortion? I was like, it's her body. She can do whatever she wants. And I was like, can she do math? And he was like,

well, no, cause I would intentionally kill the baby. And I was like, wait, wait a minute, wait a minute. Hold on there.

That's classic. That's good. That's classic. That'll be run forever for a long time. I wasn't trying to get him. I was like, so what do you think about a woman doing drugs? She's pregnant.

It's like, no, no, that one's bad. Why? Yeah. He kills the baby. What do you think about a woman doing drugs when she's pregnant? He's like, no, no, that one's bad. Why? Yeah, because of the intention he kills the baby. Wait, wait. Like, what do you think an abortion is?

It's that cognitive dissonance where it's like, oh, wait a minute. The thing that I thought about myself is clearly false. Yes. It's not limited to that subject. No, no, of course. Because we see it in Inflation Reduction Act. We see it in sanctuary cities who doesn't want your city to be a sanctuary term democracy you know it's basically sanctuary city is a zone where federal laws can be broken at will it's basically lawlessness they

do it with the word democracy the the democracy is only for them it's not for other people that don't their democracy yeah it's their democracy it's not everyone's democracy they're actually saying people that think like us that's why even though trump clearly won in a democratic fashion as well as with the electoral college they're still calling a threat to democracy it'll be a threat to our democracy all right bla, Blazin' Doctor. He says, I've watched since I was 15 and I've never chatted in. I just had a rough birthday and it would make it so much better to hear

some birthday wishes from the crew. I listen to every show and I love you guys. Happy birthday, Blazin' Doctor. May you have many more birthdays to come and great fortune in your future. Happy birthday, Blazin' Doctor. You fucking rock. I swear at the future. Happy birthday, ladies and doctor. You fucking rock. I swear at the end.

Happy birthday, BD. There you go. What is up? All right. We'll grab one more here from Pat and the Cats. Tulsi Gabbard for defense secretary. Well, I hope she gets a good spot. That would be great.

For the rest of you guys, you can smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. That's what you got to do. I mean it. You know, you say, hey, guys, this show is great. We're going to watch it. Put it on your TV. We have a TV app you can download now.

And we're working on so much more. Go to TimCast.com right now and click join us. Become a member for two reasons. First, the Discord server. If you want to figure out how to get involved, be a part of the movement, whatever it may be, we got a massive server where you can hang out with tens of thousands of people who are talking about all this stuff all day, every day. You'll meet people. Some people actually got married and I'm not even exaggerating. Like they met in the discord, they ended up getting married. I know who they are. It's kind of crazy. And, uh, but some people

just make friends and someone might be like, Oh dude, I live super close. And then you can go, this is what it's all about. The founding fathers met in bars and pubs to share their ideas. We'll start with the digital space. We've got plans for coffee shops. We're getting real close to launching a bunch all across the country. So go to TimCast.com, but also that members-only show is coming up in about a minute, and it gets a little spicy. Not so family-friendly, but

always fun and funny. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. BrickSuit, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, best place to follow me is on X. It's at Brick underscore Suit, so it's got that little dash on it. BrickSuit, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, best place to follow me is on X It's at Brick underscore Suit, so it's got that little dash on it BrickSuit You can follow me, my name is Raymond G.

Stanley Jr. on X at Raymond G. Stanley Not the Jr. Yeah, Discord is Beautiful tonight, and the After the After Show, we're having the After Dark Show, it's Marines Marine Monday, myself and Slicker Will be hosting tonight, When I get back to where I'm getting to, he'll start off. I'll catch

up to him. So also, happy Marine Corps birthday yesterday, and happy Veterans Day, Mr. Phil. You can subscribe to me today officially on X. It is Phil That Remains. I'm philthatremainsofficial on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. You can check out our brand

new video for the song Forever Cold. It's at the top of my X profile.ainsofficial on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. You can check out our brand new video for the song Forever Cold. It's at the top of my X profile. It's available on YouTube, Spotify, Deezer, Pandora, all of the digital download streaming places. And don't forget, the left lane is for crime. We will see you all over at timcast.com for the uncensored call-in show in about one minute. Be there, and we'll see y'all then.