Timcast IRL - Karmelo Anthony GUILTY OF MURDER, Belfast Anti-Migrant RIOTS w/ Alex Stein

Episode Date: June 10, 2026

Tim, Phil, and Brett are joined by Alex Stein to discuss Karmelo Anthony being found guilty of murder, Karmelo being sentenced to 35 years in prison, riots erupt in Ireland after a brutal migrant attack, Gen Z is extremely racist, Far-Leftists accused of using homeless people to win the LA Mayor race, and a Democrat who had Nazi tattoo wins election. SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/ GET OUR MERCH - https://merch.timcast.com/ Join -    / @timcastirl Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) | https://www.shoutout.fans/timpool Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) | https://allthatremains.komi.io/ Brett  @PopCultureCrisis  (Everywhere) Producer: Carter @carterbanks (X) |  @trashhouserecords  (YT) Guest: Alex Stein @alexstein99 (X) Podcast available on all podcast platforms! Karmelo Anthony GUILTY OF MURDER, Belfast Anti-Migrant RIOTS | Timcast IRL For advertising inquiries please email [e-mail]

Race tensions are on the menu tonight, boys, because the Carmelo Anthony case, it's over. He was found guilty of first-degree murder in the killing of Austin Metcalf, and it was an open and shut case. I mean, the jury barely deliberated. Every single witness was like, you know, dude was in the wrong. And the testimony we got was, it's merciless. I don't even know what the defense thought they were doing by going to trial. the story is just not to bear the lead. Carmelo Anthony drew his knife, unfolded it, prepared it before there was any conflict.

Then told these people, touch me, was explicitly told by Austin, I will not fight you, dude. And when he walked towards him, according to one witness, before he even could put his hands on him to push him out of the tent, I want to be careful how to describe this because he didn't. Anthony stabbed him in the heart, killing him. This was just murder. And he was convicted and he began crying. when they read out that verdict. Now, outside, there was not a big, big crowd, so it's not like, you know, riots or anything, but fights did break out a little bit. Some people believe this will trigger massive riots around the country, but I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure.

However, this isn't the only story that's breaking right now. This is the biggest story domestically. Everybody wants to know about it. But across the pond, over in Belfast, the riots have gotten so insane. My friends, I have not seen anything like this in a long, long time. ports of potentially 90 plus building set on fire. Men wearing all black and masks, setting migrant homes on fire, smashing out windows of refugees and illegal immigrants and migrants. Videos, there's a video of a black guy walking through the street blocking traffic. A guy just knocks him out and they start kicking him while he's down.

There are videos of men in all black setting up checkpoints. Belfast is heating up and I think people need to understand. There are many people alive today who fought. in the troubles. This ended in 1998. If you want to get nitpick, you can say it was much more intense in the late 80s, early 90s, but there were people who may be in their mid-50s to early 60s who literally fought in the troubles and still hold that Ireland for the Irish mentality. This all started when a Sudanese man used a steak knife from a kitchen. I'm sorry for those that are a little scrimmage, but I've got to explain this, to attempt to remove a man's head in public.

some say he may have even saw this man's eyes out with the knife. That's how gruesome and brutal the attack was. And the riots are absolutely insane. I got to be honest, guys, we didn't actually know which to lead off with because the story developing in Ireland is absolutely shocking. In fact, we're seeing sister protests in Glasgow. I mean, people, it's not just in Ireland. People in the UK are fed up and it is escalating protests.

Well, I should say, to clarify, it's not just in northern. Ireland, which is the UK. It's in other parts of the UK. So it's getting pretty intense. We're going to talk about that. Plus, guys, the Democrats cheated in California. Hey, we got the evidence of how they did it. We actually can show you the mechanisms they use to cheat the election. And some have argued this is what the media has been doing. When I say they cheat, I didn't say they committed anything illegal. I think they codified fraud. They made it legal. So it's a normal practice. And then Rolling Stone says, is fraud the only argument you have? Well, I never said it was fraud. I said you're cheating. I said you're cheating. I said you're

sending out activists to collect ballots from the homeless and from nursing homes and paying people to do it, which is legal. And the DSA on their website explicitly states, if the individual wants a different candidate, tell them thank you and leave. If they say they support your candidate, fill out the ballot with them and drop it off for them. That's electioneering. That is not an election. We're going to talk about all this stuff, big breaking news. Before we get started, we got a great sponsor for you guys. It is the 2026 Freedom Summit. Today's episode sponsored by the Freedom Trading Summit. The left talks about affordability. They never seem to mention how costly excessive Biden error regulations have been to American families. Under Biden, over 400 new rules were forced on

Americans each year. All these excessive rules and laws placed a heavy $1.8 trillion burden on the back of hardworking Americans. Thankfully, Trump is changing that. Last year's admin cut more than 600 rules and regulations, while only introducing five new ones, he even signed an executive order that instructs federal agencies to eradicate 10 regulations for every new one they implement. On June 4th, the SEC officially acts something called pattern day trader, the pattern day trader rule. This rule forced people to keep $25,000 in their account if they wanted to day trade. So if you ever wanted to build wealth using the stock market, now is the time. But you got to know what you're doing. So you'll need someone to show you the ropes and the perfect place to do that is at the

special virtual event called the 2026 Freedom Trading Summit Thursday, June 11th, 4 p.m. Eastern. by Mark Wilburn, a 20-year stock market veteran. Well, we had him on the, on the Culture War Show last week. The dude knows his stuff when it comes to trading. So go to FreedomTicket26.com, claim your ticket. It's going to, again, it'll be this Thursday, June 11th, and on Saturday, June 13th as well. Check it out, Freedom Ticket26.com. Thanks for sponsoring the show, guys.

Don't forget to also go to Timcast.com and join our Discord community. Man, right now is the time. We got tens of thousands of people hanging out every single day. it's not what you know, it's who you know, and community is the most important thing. We exist for the human experience. Who are you sharing yours with and who are you standing by in these trying times? We knew that community was more important than anything we could offer. So, I mean, to be honest, it was also the best business thing we could do.

Building a space where people can come together, work and share ideas. It's a mission. It is not just a show. When you join, you become a part of that community and that mission. And you may agree or disagree, but you can start companies, start projects. and some people have even gotten married. Pretty dang cool, but no guarantees. More importantly, you support the work we do.

Without you, we can't do this. So check us out. Join us, Timcast.com. Smash the like button right now and share this show with every, on every platform you can post it on X. Tell your friends on Instagram and Facebook, post the link and say, hey, guys, come hang out and watch the show. Well, we got the obvious joining us.

Everybody knows who he is. He's loud. He's Alex Stein. Well, I just want to say free Carmela, Anthony. I know that he stabbed a 17-year-old in the heart, but slavery did exist him. And I think this is all due to slavery. If slavery wasn't a real thing, then awesome. McCaff would still be alive today.

We got a lot of analysis to break down on this one. I think it's going to get interesting because there's a lot of claims of Summer of Love coming up. And based on what we're seeing at Belfast, I think there's a big discussion about where we're going in terms of race. And I got to call it what it is. But I don't know if you describe it as like white racial awakening. but certainly there is a larger conversation with these Instagram videos, these TikTok videos, but we'll get into that.

We've got the boys hanging out. Hello, everybody. It seems like just yesterday that I was here. I think that might have actually been yesterday. Might have actually been yesterday. It's Brett. Normally I'm doing pop culture crisis on Monday through Friday at 3 p.m.

Eastern, but I'm back once again and I'm glad to see all of you. How you doing, Phil? What's up, everybody? My name's Philibonty. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All the Remains. Carter?

What's up, everyone? I'm Carter Banks, and let's get into this. Here's the latest news. The New York Post says Carmelo Anthony sobs as he's convicted of murder for stabbing Austin Metcalf and killers, angry supporters claim this whole thing has been racist. Now, this is where we currently are. I'll give you the quick gist. This is one of the fastest court cases we've ever had to deal with. I mean, when you look at the Kyle Rittenhouse, I mean, we're living in suspense for weeks.

This case was what? June 1st was jury selection? The jury deliberated for a couple of hours. it was clear. Day one of testimony, I was shocked. I didn't think it was going to be so clear cut. I know everybody knows. Everybody knows, but I didn't think it was going to be so clear cut.

Witnesses came out and said, Carmelo Anthony grabbed the knife in his bag. He had opened it and prepared it before there was any conflict. He was asked 15 times to leave the tent, and he refused. He was holding the knife, ready to use it, before anybody made any gestures of potential physical. that nobody was threatening him. He's holding a knife. He says, touch me and see what happens.

Austin Metcalf, several witnesses said, told him, dude, he said, I'm not going to fight you would attract me, dude. So apparently when you look at this big picture from all the witnesses, everybody under the tent was calm, except for Carmelo, who wasn't supposed to be there, who witnesses said it was actually weird that he was there because no one's ever thought about going to another team's tent. He grabbed his backpack, reached in, grabbed the knife, and unfolded. that it was holding it before there was any potential for a physical altercation, was told

he would not be fought finally. And actually, several witnesses said they were all warning other people to stay away from because he was grabbing a weapon. Austin Metcalfe, according to witnesses, they believe. We don't know for sure. He approached him to push him out of the tent. The reason I say we don't know for sure is because according to witnesses, before Austin could even shove him, Carmelo pulled the knife and stabbed him directly. in the heart. There was never a threat of force against him. His worst case scenario was that Austin was going to put his hand in his shoulder and push him out of the tent. That's not a threat of force or violence. That's barely even being escorted out. Carmelo decided to stab him in the heart

and kill him. That's it. It was an open and shut case. The jury said first degree murder. Now, this is where it gets interesting. And this is where the conversation for us comes in. Outside, we have seen many of the black activists argue it's racist. He's innocent. He was backed into a corner. Or more importantly, from Savannah Hernandez, this other video where they said, we don't care. This woman said outright, he's one of ours. So we'll protect our own because they would do the same.

Which brings us to this big question as it relates also to Ireland, which we'll get into a bit, racial tensions in this country are worse. And it all started than it's ever been in my opinion. Well, no, that's a, in my lifetime, I should say. Well, to be fair, the O.J. Simpson trial where everybody was supporting O.J. Simpson, I think it was pretty obvious that he stabbed Nicole Bronson. Right, right. I just want to clarify, I was being hyperbolic. I certainly think civil rights era was way crazier in Jim Crow and slavery and all that. I'm saying in my lifetime, it's worse than I've ever seen it. And it all started around when Obama got in and we got this DEI stuff in social media and all this woke stuff. And then you started getting, you know, this like, I guess affirmative, affirmative action policy.

we're expanding. So where we are now is the question of where are race relations heading in this country and will we see riots over this young man's conviction? Well, I just want to say this. I was joking, obviously, about the free Carmelo. And I think it was just obvious that he was going to be found guilty because he brought a knife to attract me. I mean, you're guilty. I mean, who brings a knife to attract me? I want to pause on that one because this is where things got murky before the trial. You're allowed to carry a knife. I don't, to a school event? I don't know if you are. I think that was the only argument they made was that he was allowed to have the knife because it was less than three and a half. Right, but here's my point. I don't want to

entertain a world where if I carry my gun, someone goes, why'd you bring a gun to the grocery store? I agree with that. But it's a little different when you're in high school and to a sporting event where Austin Maccaf pushed him. When you're playing football, you're playing basketball, well, I'm saying whatever, but you get a little, you get a little, you push around a little, but that's what it's, if you're, if you're, if you're, if you're murder, because he stabbed him for no reason. I agree. No. Here's what I want to avoid. Look, if you, if you go to a grocery store, let's say you're shopping in West Virginia. Say Phil, Phil, let's say you're shopping in West Virginia, and you go to Food Line, and you are strapped as a Phil would be. Always. And you see a guy,

and he reaches into his shirt and says, I'm going to kill you, Phil Labonte. So you draw your gun and point him and say, don't move. And then he pulls out something real quick and points it, you take a shot. Yep, right? Reasonable fear for your life. Someone then says, it's murder because why did you bring a gun to a grocery store. You're going shopping for food, bro. What do you need a gun for? When in reality, if you are allowed to carry a weapon, in this instance, he was, that's why I don't want to make the weapon the issue. I don't think you are allowed to bring one to attract me, to be fair. I think the actual argument initially was you are allowed to have a folding knife under a certain size when you're at the school. Even out of school. But even if, even if that is the case,

even that is the case, I don't agree with the leftist worldview of you're not allowed to have, like, a folding knife. Plus, it was a, it was a distraction. So there was like articles from like TMZ that said, they decided the knife was legal to be had. And somebody was like, yeah, but was like stabbing him legal? Because I don't think that that's true. It's just an obfuscation of the entire point of the discussion. I think it says everything that it was unfolded and ready to go. Yeah. I mean, to Tim's point, I do think that it's worth saying, look, it's, it wasn't illegal

for him to have it. Maybe it was, again, maybe it was possibly against the rules. Yeah, school policy. But it wasn't illegal for him to have that knife. And the idea that this is a self-defense case, every. everything that you hear that's come from all of the witnesses totally destroys that argument. You have, Bronco was here last night and one of the points that he made, which is something that you hear if you go to self-defense classes, you have to have reasonable fear of great bodily harm or death. And if, if Austin Metcalf put his hand on him and pushed him, that is not reasonable fear of great bodily harm or death. So school policy bans knives, Texas law allows them. So it was not a legal factor. My point is ultimately this. Dude reached into his bag, unfolded the knife, and gripped it ready to stab someone when there was zero threat against him.

And you knew he was guilty because you ran away. If he was actually self-defense, he would have stayed. He was asking the police. Well, no, no, no, no. Again, he didn't agree with the scene. I thought he did. He threw the knife and went over to his tent and asked him what happened and remained for the police to come. When the police came, he was asking the police, do you think this could be self-defense?

He was all right. He knew that he wasn't. Well, no, no, he said, I'm not alleged. I did it. He put his hands on me. I told him not to touch me. Yeah. And then he asked, he followed up, he asked the police, do you think this is self-defense? And this is just what I'm hearing from coming out. This is what made it initially contentious was that he didn't flee the scene. He threw his knife after stabbing him, stayed on the track, but went to the other tent, waited for the police to arrive, said he did it, was arrested, claimed he put his hands on me. I told him not to. All of the

witnesses, including one of the dudes who was friends with him, said he was wrong. And he wasn't, he shouldn't have been there. And one way to said he provoked the fight. And again, the most important thing was Austin Metcalf said, I'm not going to fight you at a track meet, dude. That right away. I'm going to say it like, because Phil got said, dude, if you have a gun and you're going grocery shopping,

and there's a guy standing there with no weapons, and you're gruffing him, you're mean mugging him, and he goes, bro, I'm not going to fight you. Close your eyes. And you can hear the entire world come alive. 2026 FIFA World Cup is on. And you can stream it all live on TSN Radio. From the opening kickoff to the final celebration.

Every match, every moment. Listen to FIFA World Cup on TSN Radio. Is Canada the Lift Off! Available on Iheart Radio. And you shoot them. Bro, that's just murder. You're doomed. Totally doing.

What I think makes this more egregious, is that people don't realize this is Frisco Memorial and Frisco Centennial High Schools. Like these are some of the most affluent high schools in the state of Texas. Like this is a, this is not South Dallas. It's not the hood. These are nice high schools. And Carmelow went to a school that is majority white. So I just, it's just different, you know.

It just seems like it didn't fit his. This is why I think he was defended so much is that he is kind of a clean cut black guy. If you kind of look at him, just, you know, on paper. At the end of the day, he stabbed and murdered a guy. And, you know, it's just, it is what it is. I just don't understand what the defense was thinking. Like they should have just taken the plea deal and been like, bro, you're going to jail for five years. Congratulations.

Yeah, I agree. The plea deal should have been. They should have. Then they said they were actually at the lunch. They were, the defendants were trying to get a plea deal. Well, Branca said the other day, no way, because that wouldn't take two hours. He said, what did he say? What do they thought they were doing?

They were, I forgot what he said they were trying to do. He said it wasn't, it wasn't a plea thing because that would be, oh, that would be five minutes. I forgot what he said. Well, maybe, I don't know for sure, but maybe they were debating whether or not they could add the manslaughter. Where do you think this goes when you were talking about riots and racial tensions? I don't think we're writing. That's what I'm saying. Because like, given just how big America is and what the racial demographic was in that city, it's not the same thing as 2020 with George Floyd.

Do you think January 6 is scared people from writing? No, no, I think there's not going to be riots on this. I say we say, I say that we're not going to see riots. because it would be a trap. Like, you know, Matt Walsh made a great point. Matt Walsh said riots are not organic. Like, people think riots just happen. They don't.

They're organized. And the reason why they're not going to go against, they're not going to write for this one is that with George Floyd, okay, Chauvin was in the right. It was a tragic situation, but Chauvin was following protocol, showed up after the fact. George Floyd's already in the ground.

Already I can't breathe. Then Chauvin shows up having no idea what's going on and uses his knee. According to the defense's own witness in the Chauvin trial, Derek Chauvin was authorized under MPD guidelines to use a taser on George Floyd. In that moment, just right there, zap, and opted to use a physical, like, pin instead of the taser, meaning he chose a lower use of force on the continuum. But he took a lethal dose of fentanyl. That's what people I don't realize. This is my point. The reason why they write for this one is that they had a video of George Floyd on the ground saying, mama, mama. And it generates, it's used to manipulate people. Now, hold on. In this instance, there's no video. And the story, the only thing we know is that Austin Metcalf said, I'm not going to fight you and was stabbed in the heart by a black kid. If they riot over this, that means every one of us will have that narrative when you talk to a normie, someone who doesn't pay attention. Why are they rioting? Because a black kid stabbed a white kid in the heart. murdering him in cold blood and they're maddie's going to jail and they're going to say what with

george floyd why they're writing they go because a cop pinned a black man down as he begged for his mother and died you see that the narrative difference is also like going on during covid there was facebook live streams of it while it happened it's about as close to organic as you can get for something like that where people were so mortified by what they saw on top of the fact that people were literally at home because they weren't working because of covid and everybody saw this simultaneously that's that's a big reason like you don't you're not going to see the kind of riots nationwide for anything i don't think i can't think of anything that would actually spark that kind of riot in the united states nowadays because of the fact that you're you don't have people locked in their homes the protests and riot

were the only reason you were allowed to leave everything was closed everything everything was shut down people were you know getting stir crazy and stuff so they're like oh i'm going to go out and i'm going to protest or whatever it turned into a a big party for, you know, 80, 90% of the people that were at the protests and riots. They were just watching the small groups of people that were actually going to get Buckwild. Look at this, look at this banner. That's actually easy to read it. It says, as long as you don't touch me, we cool.

As if that is in any way exculpatory. You cannot use a knife on someone's heart because they touch you. Yeah. So first of all, I will stress, I believe Brenna Morello and both Sarah Fields, they said, no one ever said that. never uttered by any of the... I'm not entirely sure, but I'm pretty sure they said, that's actually not from any the witnesses. No one said that was said.

That's not a thing. Well, I think you're right, though. These protests are never organic. There's always like some sort of Facebook organizer, Discord organizer. Like, there's... That's what they need for it to actually happen. They need somebody to organize it. So that's why I don't think this is going to happen. Also really hot in Texas right now. Yeah, people don't want to go do it.

It's just not... For this, people are not going to protest. I just got to say, man. They're like, oh, I'm a... Racial justice, sure, but like at 90 degrees, not 96. I've, I, I, I, I, I, bro, if, if I was his brother, like if this happened to my family or my brother, this would not just be a news story about a criminal trial. I mean, I'll, I'll, I'll keep my language light, but like, my, my. And Rumblewood, be careful.

Well, no, no, I can, I, I, no, I'm not that kind of person. Well, it sounds like you're about to say something. violent. Oh, no, no, no, no. That's what I feel like you're about to say. I was going to say something more Ozymandias. You know, Watchman. You guys familiar with that? A little bit. Oh, it's a masterpiece. You got to read the comments. The Watchman. Yeah, I do like how they changed the movie ending a little, like because the alien invasion. But my point is, I would dedicate my waking existence to the destruction of everything that you represent. This was not be violent. It was all be legal above board and through a natural process of

advocacy. And let's just call it a circuitous method of economic. But let me just say, if I applied my every waking being to vengeance and accountability, it would be worse than a riot. It sounds like an accelerationist is what that sounds like. No, I'm saying like I would not stop at trial. I'd file lawsuits. I'd buy property. I'd send police and private security into these areas. I would lock this stuff down.

I'd dedicate my life to making sure these things can never happen again. and those that help make it happen are restrict from power. Like my point is it would be, I would focus everything I could. It would be like I dedicate my being to. I wouldn't be sitting here complaining about politics. I'd be running nonprofits, raising money and reshaping communities.

Like it would be the utmost of governmental vengeance. You know. Yeah, I understand that position. I think I would be too. But I'll just say this much though. It's like people that are celebrating the fact that he is found guilty. I think that is great. You know, obviously that's.

It's still not fair. You know, we lost awesome Metcalf, a guy died, him going to jail for 40 years, 50 years. It's still, it's like you never get the equal result. You know what I mean? Like, life is not fair is what I'm trying to. What is this? Even if you try to make it fair, it's not. There's a video I want to pull up.

Let me pull this video up. Keep talking. This is all to say nothing of like, like, Carmelo Anthony's supporters, like doxing his mom and dad's houses separately like several times and like swatting them or something like this. I mean. The Metcalf? The Metcalf? Yeah.

Like way back in the beginning. I got two videos I want to play for you as we discussed the race relations in the United States. The first one is this. What do you want us to do? That's right. What do you want us to do at this point? What? I'm lost for a word.

I don't know what to do. I got five boys. I don't know what? I ain't got nothing to tell them no more. You can't walk away no more. Rest and peace, Rayvon Martin. Don't, don't step. You can't walk away no, Mo.

Is that what you can tell your kids? I know what you can tell your kids. Don't stab people. That's wild. And then he says, rest in peace, Trayvon Martin. I think the ultimate challenge is these people don't care about what's true. They just do not. And it's not a race thing.

It's like, I think what divides the left and the right. And the left turns into a race thing because they know it riles up these people who happen to be ethnocentric. I take a look at the issue and I understand why it becomes a race thing because of the Lacer, liberal, leftist worldview. There's probably a racial component to it, but they're pretending like Trayvon Martin did nothing wrong. Trayvon Martin was ground-pounding Zimmerman.

And Zimmerman, like, you don't have to, like, you can be aware that Zimmerman was kind of dumb and, and, you know, kind of a crappy guy because the things that he did afterwards were kind of, you know, they were kind of uncouth. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't, in fear for his life, doesn't mean that Trayvon Martin wasn't on top of him punching him.

And look, if you're in a position where someone's on top of you hitting you and you have a gun, you have to use the gun because if they knock you out or if they find the gun and get the gun, they're going to use it on you. So real quick, the story of Zimmerman, I'll give you the quick gist. Trayvon Martin went to get an Arizona iced teen some Skittles and was cutting through some community. Zimmerman saw him, called it in a suspicious. when he confronted Trayvon, a fight broke out, and Trayvon was winning. Now, Zimmerman is just doing Neighborhood Watch.

He has no idea what's going on, but he's on the ground. He's punched in the face, so he shoots him in the chest. The media took the 911 call and edited out a portion of the dispatch. Do you know this? I didn't know that. Zimmerman was saying there's a suspicious guy walking around. The dispatcher says, what does he look like? And he goes, I think he's like 5, 10, he's wearing a hoodie.

And they go, and what's his race? I think he's black. NBC, I believe it was NBC, I'll pull it to verify, added it out the dispatcher, so he goes, there's a guy who looks suspicious, I think he's black. And that goes viral. And they're like, this white man killed a black guy. Everyone was Hispanic.

Yeah, that was the big lie. You know, they admitted like it was a racial thing when he was Hispanic the whole time. I will say this, though, and this is going to be an unpopular position. Just kind of like how she's, you know, spouting nonsense. And you're going to get mad at me when I say this. It kind of reminds you about Israel says every young kid under 18. in Gaza is a terrorist.

And I'm just saying it seems similar. I know we're talking about this, but I just, I mean that. It seems like once we get on our teams, once we're on our team, even if something bad happens to us, like we can't see the big picture. And I feel like that's kind of what's happening here. I just want to say real quick, here's your white perpetrator 14 years ago in the Trayvon Martin case. They called him a white guy.

Like, dudes literally Hispanic. He sued NBC. saying that they saw it, not said a tragedy, but it's an opportunity to increase their ratings. The complaint alleges the first altered call, the NBC aired in March 29th included these statements, Zimmerman. There's a real suspicious guy. Ah, this guy looks like he's up to no good or he's on drug something. He looks black. Dispatcher, are you following him?

Yeah. Okay, we don't need you to do that. The complaint alleges Zimmerman's, they changed his remarks to, this good guy looks up, this guy looks like he's up to no good or on drugs or something. He's got his hands in his waistband and he's a black male. are you following him? The suit claims the audio had several deletions and about a minute of conversation was ultimately taken out. Zimmerman alleges some dialogue was also moved around

to create the false impression they did a racist motive. This guy looks like he's up to no good or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around looking about. The dispatcher then says, okay, and this guy, is he white, black Hispanic? He looks black. They cut that line out.

So he's like, he looks like he's up to no good. And he's black. Are there legal repercussions for that from the news networks that ran it that way? No. I think they lost. The news networks did. Yeah, I'm not entirely sure. Let me say another unpopular opinion.

Zimmerman is a Jewish loss name, but I'll just leave it that. Okay. I'm just going to leave it at that. We love Israel. God bless Israel. I'm Israel. There's another video I want to pull up as it pertains to race relations, and it's this one from Brandon Gill in the SPLC. I love Brandon Gill. He's actually one of the best congressmen. He is, and this clip is actually informative because he's actually talking to a black guy

about something really interesting as it pertains to the bigger picture. I want to play this. Your organization said that restricting and banning abortion is a tool that the far right uses to maintain white supremacy. Do you believe that pro-lifers are white supremacists? I believe that reproductive liberty is... No, do you believe that pro-lifers are white supremacists? I will tell you what I believe if you're asking you... Yes or no? I can't answer that question.

I don't think that pro-lifers are white supremacists. Do you? What I think is that reproductive liberty is a right that every woman should enjoy. How many babies in the United States that are aborted are black? About 40% of abortions nationwide are of black babies. Blacks represent about 13% of the population. Does that sound like something a white supremacist would oppose? What I would say again is that SPLC supports reproductive living.

Calling somebody a white supremacist is a pretty serious charge, isn't it? I mean, I would think you would be able to defend that if your organization says that. You clearly seem unable to. Mr. Gill, I'm not sure why you would think I'm unable to do anything. You're the president of the SPLC, which labels pro-lifers as racists. Well, well. Does your organization just hurl around epithel? that's like that without any justification.

This is something that you may have heard of. It's called the 1340. Despite making up 13% of the population, black babies account for 40% of the abortions. Something is messed up. People are reporting on Twitter that the verdict in the Carmelo Anthony trial is, or the sentencing is in. Not yet. It's not in.

It's coming in the courtroom right now. We will have that sentencing live for you here in Tim Kessar. We're making sure to pull it up right now to make sure we get it. So, stay tuned. What do you guess, Tim? What do you think? I think it'll be 40. years. Orty? No, no, he's

17. It could be something like 10 to 25. You think it'll be that light? Can I ask your guys his opinion on something? I mean, it is 25 is light for murder. I mean... I think the jury might say something like, well, you know, it's tough. Does he have a criminal? I don't think he's got a criminal history. No, I don't think he's ever been. Yeah, he's a first offender.

They're going to say he's 17, so he's just about an adult, but no other record. Like, yeah, 10 to 25. And it's a broad range. And it's kind of a cop out. So I don't think it's going to be 40, 50 years. I think that that's crazy. I also think they're

concerned about potential riots. So they, it might be on the loan and it might be 15. I think I saw Matt Walsh talking about the death penalty or something like this. Is that something you guys thought was it? That's capital. No, I know it's not, I know it's not happening, but I'm saying like, because he was, I think he was saying, I don't

want to say it was him because I'm. We got it live from Fox 4 juries, jurors reach a sentence following the guilty verdict. So we're just waiting for the live updates. They'll come in on the, let's see, the court is expected to resume in about 20 minutes as of 705 central. So, looks like it's about now. We're going to get at any moment. So let's, we'll keep our eyes peeled for it. You know, people have criticisms of Texas, but just look at this court case, how fast they got it done. It's kind of amazing, yeah. If this is in Minneapolis or something,

this would be months. This would be riots. It's just funny how a different state, it's handled totally differently. Texas doesn't mess around. No, dude. Yeah, I mean, and it's honestly, it's a good thing. This can happen less than a year ago, right? Yeah, I think it's been one year basically. Yeah, so to go for a capital case to actually go through the core system within one year and actually, actually it's probably less. Well, Phil, what doesn't make sense is that his family raised $600,000 on a go fund me, but they're using the public defender. Like, I don't even know how that happened.

It doesn't make any sense. Spent the money. Yeah, I know. They spent the money on escalades. Allegedly, I don't know that, but it just seems very weird that they, raised $600,000 and they're using a public defender, that doesn't make sense. Well, I mean, it's bad money management, of course. So these people weren't poor in the first place.

No, we have an arrest outside the 20 minutes ago, the Collin County Courthouse, not a Carmelo supporter. He got aggressive with Carmel's supporters. He's been arrested. Was it Jake Lang? Was it Jake Lang? I don't know. He's arrested at everything. He got arrested at Chud the Builder.

He almost got arrested there. I got arrested at Frisco for going to the Carmine Anthony scene where the high school, you know, where it happened at the choice. Who's that dude who shows up like a joker on, on, uh, Jetsy Crusader? Oh, Gypsy Crusader. What's that that they use? It's not Chatierrez. Dual, dual. Or no, they use, uh, Omega.

Is it still Omega? Is it, I think it is Omega. It's been on for a long time. I'm pretty sure it's Omega. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. But, you know, it's crazy about Chud the Builder. Forget, I don't agree with him.

I think he was antagonizing by people by calling the N-word. I don't want to be called a cracker when I'm like pumping gas. but he's got a very unfair issue with his bail sentencing. Of course. Because if you actually, Carmelo Anthony, he was out totally free before this trial. That's right. And Alshamedcaf died. My point is with the race relation stuff and Gypsy Crusader guy and even Chud the Builder

is that the younger generation just literally, it's like a Gen Z white racial awakening. They're insinitized to it. I think they're, okay, we got it. 33. Breaking news, everybody. 35 years in prison, Brianna Morello. Breaking. Here we go.

I said 40. I thought it was going to be lower than that. 35. That's higher than I thought. Wow. He'll probably eligible for. We split the difference. We were both. He'll be eligible for parole, probably like after 20 or 25 years or whatever.

So I don't think he'll do the whole 35. Yeah, of course not. Of course not. That's pretty intense. I was expecting like 20. Yeah, here we go. The verdict is in. The sentence is in.

35 years in prison. He gone. That's it. This is a, this is, this actually, it's pretty intense. You know why? We're coming from this woke era. Bro, this murder happened in 2018, 2019. He would have walked, he would have walked, he would have walked faster than a speedwalker going for the world record.

He probably would have. I don't know. I would argue that the fact that it's in McKinney, Texas, Collin County, it's a little different than like Libthard, San Francisco, or Minneapolis. I would, I think that is a big difference in this court case. Like that speaks to what they were talking about earlier. Just the size of America means that you could be getting a very different trial. That's why they tried to move the, that's why they tried to move the Chauvin trial. It's like the January 6th.

They didn't get the change of venue. Every trial was in D.C. they all got found guilty. I think if you had those court cases somewhere else, they might have actually had a fighting chance, but they didn't because they got a liberal jury for every single court case. That kind of stuff is, is that type of jury is grounds for moving the, um, moving. the case, whatever case it is, whether it be the Chauvin case or the January 6ers. And to be honest with you, like, if you can't, and Tim's made this point, if you can't guarantee an impartial jury, the solution isn't to be like, throw them in jail. The solution is let them go because you're guaranteed an impartial jury.

You can't produce that. Let them go free. During the Chauvin case, they brought up venues saying the jury's tainted to Minnesota and the judge said there's no jurisdiction in Minnesota where you're not going to have the jury know about this. Okay. Case dismissed. If you cannot guarantee due process, you cannot put a person in prison, and they didn't care. They did it anyway. Is that even possible with cases that size in the age of social media?

Well, that's the challenge right now with social media that we are losing the ability to have due process. Well, I think it does affect it. I know with the Carmelo Anthony's case, they had 500 potential jurors. Then they, you know, broken out to 200 and then to whatever it was, like 12 plus the six auxiliary jurors. So I don't know. I mean, I guess with the Internet era, it is almost impossible to find an impartial jury. There is probably also some people that are just, like, so disconnected from reality that they don't know what's going on. I mean, that that is a possibility.

They are the ones getting snail mail getting told that they're going to jury duty. Yeah, it's like the people that fall for the Indian scams and they're like, I got your credit card number. You know, it's like there are some people that are just so dumb that they don't know what's going on. And those are the people on a jury. Holy crap, take the bench. I think it happens all the time. Well, I had a big First Amendment lawsuit where I sued the county judge and I don't want to get all racial, but I'll just say this much. I had a First Amendment lawsuit against the county judge of Dallas, Texas, because they outlawed my speech.

I was speaking there. I was talking about how he got arrested for doing a panty raid when he's in college. And they admitted on the jury stand they did not follow the proper procedure because how it would work is a county commissioner. If they want to kick me out, that's who the county commissioner kicked me out, not the county judge. They had to take a vote. They admitted that they did not follow the procedures of their own meeting. But I had six people on the jury, four Hispanic, one black woman and one white guy. And trying to explain to them what the First Amendment was.

wasn't, they had no idea what the First Amendment was. They literally didn't understand the First Amendment, second Amendment. So there is a possibility that you get a jury that is just so uneducated or has no idea what's going on that they're just like, you know, oblivious. That's not a jury of your peers then. If they don't understand the process that's in front of it. I mean, that's the whole point.

Jury selection. Well, I also learn this too. Some people, and this is, you know, Hispanics and blacks, I'm not trying to target them. They actually don't like the Constitution because that was written in a time of slavery. So they're actually anti-constitution. and I would guess that all of us are here

a very pro-constitution? There is no such things as a constitution. What? I already... Don't say anything about what we were talking about before the show because that's going to be a big surprise, but my argument is that the Constitution is largely defunct at this point.

Oh, wow. Let's get into it, just so wait, so I don't leave people hanging. Do you believe in the First Amendment? I do. So do you agree with the... But no, I get limited all the time. I mean, if I try to... Okay. Do you agree with the Founding Fathers' views on the First Amendment?

I agree that we should have it, but do they, does it always... Do you agree with the intention of the founding fathers? 100%. So you think people should be locked up in jail for saying Christ is not king? No, I don't think that's at all. That's what the founding fathers wanted. Blasphemy was illegal until 1956 or something. Is that true?

Yes. I didn't realize. George Carlin got arrested. It was seven dirty words, but you couldn't blasphemy? Nope, it was illegal. It was a crime. I didn't realize that. Do you think that, what state do you live in?

Texas, you think that Texas should have the right to ban your guns? No way. Why not? The Second Amendment. Yeah? The Founding Fathers believed the states did have the right to ban guns, but the federal government did not. The purpose of the federal constitution was constrained federal authority from going into a state and taking guns from a private citizen. So you don't like Roe versus Wade?

What is that? I'm saying you think that states should be able to have abortion? Is that what you're trying to argue? My argument of the Constitution is that your interpretation of it deviates from the intense of the Constitution. as it was written. Well, I guess it is fair because those are federal rules in their states' rights. Yeah, I think that was. If you believe in a federal constitution, meaning you want it, or a written constitution,

meaning it's written to preserve its intent, conservatives and liberals both wildly disagree on what the intent is and what the founders actually wanted it to be, regardless of the amendments. Well, shouldn't the- So like the ninth and tenth amendments are like void at this point, right? The ninth and tenth are basically beat up. It's worth noting that 44 states have some provision that it reflects what the Second Amendment it was, so there's only six states that actually legally. Right, because they actually have their own version. In their own bills.

If you ever had on Vim Miller? He was a guy that was accused of being the third Trump assassin. He got arrested out of... Oh, right, right, right, right. And the only reason he got arrested is that he had a magazine that had 14 bullets in California that's illegal because you can't have whatever, a magazine with over 10 bullets. And he wasn't. He was like a Trump supporter.

What I'm saying, because of those weird laws. Let me say it like this to so people understand. The Constitution, and I always give a shout to Wade, thoughts because he had one of the best videos breaking down what the Constitution is. Constitutions are, there are reference to the body politic of a nation at the time. The Constitution is what constitutes the body politic. Currently, there are two in the United States. The liberal interpretation, or what we refer to as the multicultural democracy,

and the conservative, which we would call the constitutional republic. The constitutional republic believes in the, it is a branching off. It is a descendant of the founding fathers, though it does deviate. The multicultural democracy is largely born from non-citizens, migrants, and international influences on a population of the United States. These are two different constitutions, and I don't mean the physical U.S. Constitution. I mean, there are two different bodies politic that have wildly different worldviews on how a country should be run and what they have a right to do. So, for instance, the left argues that the First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech. And we would argue, of course it does, because what other speech did it?

However, the founding fathers argued the First Amendment. didn't protect blasphemy. Blasphemy was illegal. He'd go to jail. If you walked outside in town center and screamed, Christ is not king, they would arrest you.

You would face trial. You could be exiled. I didn't realize that. I thought we had freedom of religion the whole time. That's also incorrect. You got to watch some Charlie Kirk, brother. I love Charlie.

Are you kidding? I'm freaking love Charlie. Charlie was a genius, man. He pointed this out. It was a genius. The initial states, and even to this day, still have laws in the books,

requiring you to profess a faith in a Christian God in order to hold office. Did you know that? And the funny thing is, so it was around the mid-1700s these states started getting rid of these provisions, requiring you to explicitly state a belief in a Protestant god. Maryland was an exception because it was a Catholic colony, and I believe Connecticut was an exception. Virginia was because Jefferson was a deist.

So there were different interpretations among the states, but the initial colonies required you to profess a faith in a Protestant, or typically Protestant or at least Christian God. otherwise you could not hold office. The reason why the founding fathers believed in a separation of church and state at the constitutional level was not because they expected Muslims and Jews and Buddhists to hold hands. It's because Protestants and Catholics fought each other. And so they were like, none of the federal government is not going to get into a fight between Maryland and New York and South Carolina over which Christian God is the right one. So that was it. They knew everyone was Christian, but they didn't want a Protestant Catholic thing going on. Well, I do agree that the reason

they put freedom of religion meant like either you're a Christian or you're not anything or either like an atheist. You weren't a lot. That's no freedom of religion was you can be a Protestant to our Catholic. We're not going to get into it. Well, I thought it could be, you could be Christian or not, you know, agnostic. I didn't think it'd mean you could. You could not hold office, bro.

You could not hold office that they did not. Unless you were a Christian. You had to profess a faith in a Christian. Bro, that law is still in the books in some places. Well, we got to kick out a lot of politicians. We need to freaking use that law. That's why you swear on a. Bible in court. Well, you know, a country, I just want to stress this too. Can I just, I'm sorry,

I try to stress this. This idea from liberals where they're like, the founding fathers thought that there should be no state religion. And I'm like, bro, you have to swear on a Bible to be president. You put your hand in the Bible. The Bible. Come on. Mom, Donnie used to Quran for a man. Indeed, it is changing. And that's the point about what a constitution is. What constitutes the people. bro, I guarantee you go back to 7076, well, 1789 at the ratification. And you say, for the first president, let's use a, I don't know, let's use a Buddhist, you know, Confucianist. They're going to be like, what? Yeah.

They're not going to be wrong. There is, I think there's an, I don't know if it's apocrypha or not that Jefferson did use a Quran or something. I don't think that's true. I think it was that he had studied the Quran and it had discussed it in some length. Thomas Jefferson got sworn in on a Quran. No, I think that's like a, it's like a myth presented by people, liberals. But I can fact check that because I don't think that's the case. He was a deist.

He had basically written up the Bible and removed Christian. Right. So anyway, that's my point on the Constitution. And I think conservatives have their own interpretation of the Founding Fathers wouldn't have agreed with. But, you know. Most of it doesn't matter these days. Like I've had discussions with friends that are very liberal when I mentioned the idea of

like living in a constitutional republic, they actually laugh at that concept because it depends on how politically aware you are, but when they use the term our democracy, they're not talking about you, they're talking about people who believe their worldview. And when the Constitution is left open to interpretation,

because that's what we're dealing with all the time. The Supreme Court is always making interpretations based on it. Obviously, they're just looking to push it a certain direction. The confusion about Jefferson, Jefferson did take his oath. There was no historical record that he took his oath on a Quran. The confusion comes when Keith Ellison in 2007 used Jefferson's personal Koran because Jeffersh owned a Koran.

He was the first to own one. I'm just saying I've, I'm, there's like an apocryphal thing that liberals push where they try and claim that. He did on a Quran. No, that he was, that he had used it to be sworn it or something like that. Because they tried to make the argument that the founding fathers were open to all the religions and it's just not true. Yeah, I agree with that. I think that's my argument to freedom of religion. You're either Christian or you're not.

Like it wasn't, you know, they didn't want a bunch of Jews. I didn't want a bunch of Muslims. I didn't want a bunch of Scientologists. Not that that existed then, but you know what I mean? I'm just saying they didn't want a bunch of other religions. Yeah. I mean, the argument coming from the left that the United States isn't a Christian nation falls apart when you actually. It was a Christian.

Yeah. I mean, the pilgrims. I mean, they came here, you know, for religious persecutions. I mean, for the vast majority. of the first, what, 150 years or so of the country, basically the country was Catholics and wasps and the Catholics took a lot of crap. You would have been allowed to hold office

if you were another religion, you just wouldn't have done so on the Bible, or on the book of another religion. I don't, I think that it was probably not till the 60s where Muslims could become, would be able to hold office. Jews held office back then. I don't know that that's true.

I was looking at up because this kid, about like the last time we were talking, it says like January of 1775 when Francis Salvador was elected to the South Carolina Provincial Congress and they say that first started holding office or were permitted to start holding office following the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1788, which prohibited religious tests of federal. Okay, so in the federal government? Let's see. Donald Trump is the first Jewish president.

That's what we've decided, right? Can we not? What, Phil, don't get your head in the microphone like that. Early state constitution. Jewish, did. Required people to be Protestants. Between 7076 and the 1780s, you had to be a Protestant or in some states other Christian. That would have been a U.S. Constitution. New York and Virginia were more open. The U.S. Constitution 1787. Article 6 explicitly banned religious tests for federal office.

This was revolutionary and allowed non-Christians and non-protestants to hold national office. The first such national policy in the world at the time, it faced opposition from some who feared pagans or non-Christians in power. The intent, however, was largely due to the Protestant and Catholic divide. The intention of the federal government was to say, we're going to remain neutral on this issue, but the state's clear, because the federal government was supposed to be weaker. Yeah. They did want a stronger federal government. That's why they made the Constitution, but it was supposed to be largely neutral in these affairs. Ambassadorization of the Commerce Clause and the necessary and proper clause of basically given the government the power to do the federal government, the power to do anything it wants.

Well, I am in favor of states' rights. I feel like the state should have their own rights. The federal government isn't. Yeah, I know. Well, we don't have states' rights anymore, and I don't think anybody actually is, because then you'd argue the states have a right to ban guns. Right? Yeah, technically, but I still believe in states' rights.

No, because the Constitution, like, they don't have the right to ban guns. The Constitution says that they can't ban them. But it's still federally easily. The federal constitution was supposed to apply only to the federal government. The 10th Amendment states, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people. The purpose of which, it's basically that the federal government is constrained, the federal government is barred from doing certain things. The states can do their own thing within their states.

There are certain constraints, like the Supremacy Clause and things like this, but the general idea was federal, military or law enforcement, at the time they didn't have law enforcement, could not come and seize your guns. States could do whatever the states want. So what would you say when someone brings up the supremacy clause then? So the supremacy clause says it's provisioning in Article 6 of clause two of the U.S. Constitution that establishes the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties as a supreme law of the land. Which law mandates that federal laws take priority over any conflicting state laws or state constitutions, ensuring that state judges are bound by federal authority even when the state laws. Correct. And the initial interpretations were different from what the interpretations are today, which ultimately results in how we enforce these laws. So again, to the Supremacy Clause, the federal government's position, and the reason why this is the anti-federalist position, basically, they didn't want the federal government coming and being tyrannical with the famous line from the Patriot, why trade one tyrant 3,000 miles away for 3,000 tyrants one mile away. The interpretation was the federal government is constrained in these things. The rest is reserved to the states.

We don't view that way anymore. We now view it that the federal government can impose its federal constitution over the states. and we largely ignore state constitutions. When was the last time anybody in Pennsylvania talked about their constitutional rights? I have no idea. They don't. It's largely ignored. We are no longer. After the Civil War, everything changed.

Abraham Lincoln decreed a suspension of a constitutional right without the authority to do so. habeas corpus. And Congress, after Abraham Lincoln threatened with violence, his enemies and arrested his enemies in Maryland, the members of the state house, he actually arrested them because they were it was a slave state. All of a sudden now, with the southern states removed and the Congress only being his supporters, they retroactively approve his suspension of habeas corpus, despite the fact he never had the authority to do it. After the civil war, it was no longer the United States are, it was the United States is. And at that moment, at that moment,

the states were largely meaningless. The federal government was the supreme authority over all states. People don't care about their state reps, their state senators. These are a bygone era, Nobody in Illinois is like, well, the Illinois Constitution, I mean, they might sometimes in a state lawsuit, but it's almost always national. Unless, of course, you're the federal government and you want to go into California to check if the laws were followed in the election. In that case, the federal government stays out. But the reason that it's national is because they're appealing to the Supreme Court, because, right, the Supreme Court is supposed to dictate what is or is not acceptable under the U.S. Constitution. That's because of the Supremacy Clause, right? It wasn't always, it was about the federal constant.

So this is the thing. This is largely after the Civil War when we get to the 13th and 14th amendments when there were questions about citizenship. And then we start getting these rulings. There was, again, this is like this is where things change. Blasphemy was illegal. The Supreme Court heard a case about whether states could impose these laws because this is where the question becomes. And this is a pre-Civil War. The question began to emerge about what the authority of the federal government was.

to impose its will. It's an interesting thing. When the purpose of the Constitution, the amendments, I should say the Bill of Rights, the Constitution itself sets the framework for the federal government. The Bill of Rights constrains government, constrains the federal government can do, and then it very quickly transformed into it was a power of the federal government over the states, which is an interesting way to, again, the right, so the bill of rights were meant to constrain the federal government, correct? Yeah. Now, I mean, within 60, 70 years, what was meant to constrain the federal government was used as a cudgel by the federal government

to constrain the states. Do you think the federal government should step in and stopping the Chicago Bears from moving to Indiana? I think Trump should send in the military. Isn't that ridiculous? So you as a Chicago guy, I mean, they're moving to Indiana. I saw your clip, it went viral.

But I mean... Which clip? I think it was one of your YouTube videos where you're in the Bears jersey I watched. I'm just saying the fact that the bears are moving, I feel like the federal government should step in with that. I think that's blasphemy me.

Well, this is the point. about a constitution that I bring up. They're going to need to bail out. People of Chicago, I left, right? And I look back with a, you know, with a longing heart, seeing my city get destroyed, and you've got, they bring in mass migration. And now you have a body politic. What constitutes the people does not care for our traditions, does not care for the bears.

I got to tell you this. Remember, that bears? Yeah, the pride of Illinois. But it's a national icon. I mean, it was the 85 bears. This Farley, the Bears. I grew up with this, but I tell you this now, I'd be willing to bet a large portion of people in Chicago were not in the United States when the Bears was a thing.

What if the Cubs moved to Indiana? What would people do? Dude, you'd have rides in Japan. Exactly. You're going to let the Bears go to Indiana. It's ridiculous. The White Sox allowed to go? No.

See, the White Sox, bro, the Cubs are an international thing. It's pretty strange. Because they were bad. for so long. I don't know why, but people love the Cubs. They're like a premium. Cubbies. It's a premium brand in baseball, even though they were losers for so long. People just love the Cubs. Rookie of the year. Yeah, rookie of the year. Because a rookie of the year. We got to go across the pond, ladies and gentlemen, because it is getting crazy. We got this from the BBC. Man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after brutal knife attack in Belfast.

We've got a lot of updates to go through. But we've got, check this out. This is Glasgow. people look at this rule britannia look at these videos i'm starting y'all off light it gets crazier watch this video these dudes yeah it's terrible it's oxy terrible so so what what they're claiming is let me go back that people are showing up to the homes of migrants smashing out their windows we've got these videos of people marching to the streets apparently it's getting pretty intense where these dudes are pushing out any and all media they don't know they don't care you're out you're gone because look what they're doing and they don't want to get busted. It's like the purge or something.

It's very Antifa-esque, but in the other, in a different political direction. I mean, look at this dude. But it gets crazier. We got more videos. Check this video out. This is nuts, dude. Oh, shit. Oh, my God.

Now, these videos are popping up. Some of the, we haven't, like, you know, we got a fact you can verify a lot of this. This one report reportedly has dudes in all black running some kind of vehicle checkpoint. And then we've got, I think I got this video here somewhere. This one's particularly brutal. We might have to save this one for the uncensored portion of the show. But take a look at this. Reports that homes of migrants are being set on fire.

And there's some reports that I've heard upwards of 90 buildings have been set on fire. I think the people have had enough. Yeah. I mean, look, when... Yeah, but you don't want to hear my opinion. Ireland is the most anti-Semitic country, so they deserve to burn. So anybody that speaks ill against Israel deserves what they get. All right, Phil.

go ahead well when i mean look when you have when you have a police force that gives preferential treatment to new immigrants well henry no back i mean well yeah i mean obviously this is this is something that's going on across the whole of the uk it's going on on ireland you know this is you're going to have people reach a tipping point and apparently when a guy you know is is being attacked the way that uh i forget what his name was uh attacked like this irish guy was you know They, they've decided that this is enough. The UK government has the power to change this, but they're terrified of being called racist. And you're going to see a lot of Western countries are going to have to decide that it's worse to have riots and lawlessness than to be called a racist.

And until that happens, this stuff is going to continue. It's only going to get worse. Well, do you think we got another video later, another update. This is from Visigrad. riders are breaking into migrant houses in multiple, it's HMOs, houses in multiple occupation. Taxpayer funded housing for asylum seekers in Belfast, setting them ablaze. Check this video out. So that doesn't seem like, I don't know if we have audio.

When they were in elementary school, do you think they described their country as a melting pot? Could that be why they're more, you know? Ireland? Yeah, that's what I'm saying. No. I don't think they ever did. No, so I'm saying, do you think that's why they're more nationalistic? Do you think that's why they're actually rioting, opposed to America where, you know.

Well, I mean. I want to just stress this too because I need to give the context. I know we're already a few minutes in, but for those that don't know what happened, a Sudanese man was attempting to saw off an Irishman's head through the neck with a steak knife. And there are reports that he had suffered severe damage to his eyes. His eyes may have been sawed out with a steak knife. And he was pinned on the ground. And there's a video showing this man sawing at the neck with a steak knife. It is shockingly evil and horrifying. And this is what I set off these riots. Yeah, I mean, look, we were talking before the show. I wouldn't be surprised if there's, if there's, you know, old IRA guys that have, you know, rifle stashed somewhere that never turned them in. And that's, that is absolutely a possibility, you know, like this kind of stuff. If people don't feel like the government who has a monopoly on violence is going to take care of their population, if they're going to have preferential treatment or they're going to force a foreign population,

and that is brutalizing the local population, you're going to see the people decide we're going to fight back, specifically in Ireland, who are not, you know, they're not strangers to fighting. They were fighting the English up until 98 or whatever. This is Irish culture.

You know what I'm saying? I mean, this is, when I was a kid growing up, this is what we heard about all the time with the troubles. To your point earlier, you were asking the question, do you think that they're rioting because they're more nationalistic

than the U.S., because the U.S. kind of had that idea, of the melting pot growing up. But at the time when that still passed in America, there was like somewhat of a monoculture in which people who came to the country, they wanted to be Americans. They had to take the citizenship test.

They had to, you know, after a fact, they were seeking a life to become Americans, not to move to America and then ostensibly start their own communities and not assimilate into American culture. But the size of America makes that harder for, you know, that type of what we're seeing here, to kind of come to pass because it's, you know, what's happening in Texas with Carmelo Anthony is vastly different than something going on in Florida, which is vastly different than something

going on in Minnesota. This is, it's a much smaller population in Ireland. Well, Charlie Kirk said, immigration without assimilation is an invasion. I think that's what's happening now in America is that these people are not trying to assimilate. They're trying to bring their culture over and try to turn, you know, America into little Somalia or little India. That's the discussion over a constitution. When you have in Minnesota,

Somalis who explicitly state in their campaigns, I will send American taxpayer dollars to Somalia. This is not the American body politic. They do not respect your constitution. And I guarantee you, if you were surrounded by a group of those people and they told you to stop interfering with their money transfers, you'd argue I have a right under the Constitution to report the news. They'd crack you with a truncheon. You think they'd care about your rights? You get attacked by a fly over there? Yeah.

It also attacked Alex Stein. It did, but, you know, that's because I've been passing past this whole show. I've been secretly farting, so that's why. We were like, what? This was Jewish. Yeah, well, listen, we love Israel. We love Ireland. We love everybody.

But I will say that it's actually kind of, this sounds bad, but watching these videos is entertaining because I actually like to see the people actually fight back. I feel like that's our problem is that during COVID. Why does that sound bad? Well, I'm saying something bad happened to cause it. I don't like to see like a car going to. a house because there could be a kid in there or something. Like, you know, there are going to be, you know, collateral damage when, you know, you're just randomly riding. But I will say this,

like, during COVID, I lost a lot of faith in humanity because everybody just followed the protocols. And I feel like we need to be more civilly disobedient. Does that mean we, like, burn down, you know, houses? No, not necessarily. But we do need to fight against tyranny. I don't think we do that enough in our country. There's a reality here in Ireland. This will change things. if the Irish have learned anything from Black Lives Matter, it was fascinating to see that the riots backfired initially and support for BLM cratered following the mass riots. However, politically, every institution became petrified of Black Lives Matter.

They were firing people for saying naughty words because they were scared someone's going to come in with a crowbar unless they bend to the whims of the violent. As I love to say, do you think that Carl Benjamin would ever lead a bunch of classical liberals or post-liberals with crow bars and pitchforks to XHQ because someone got censored.

He's got four kids, no. Never going to happen. He's going to complain like a gentleman online and say, how dare I say? How dare you ban me? Antifa will burn your house down. Yes, sir, Gron and Vicod will not do that. But I feel like

we shouldn't be burning people's house down, but like I said earlier, we should be more civilly disobedient. I actually like to see us, you know, the governments shouldn't be protecting criminals. like the guy you know the guy that got stabbed

the poor kid that got stabbed they were protecting the actual assailant yeah Henry Novak said I'm bleeding I'm hurt and they put handcuffs on him and believe you are mate this kind of stuff

that don't think you are mate that kind of stuff leads to this yeah rightfully so though I think I think Gen Z we are about to have in the next 10 years white identitarian politics the likes of which the left

cannot comprehend and they were warned of this. They were warned of it, but that's what they want. I don't think so. They were memes where it was like teenagers were saying, it was like a paintbrush meme where kids like being yelled up by the teacher for being white. And then he goes and hangs out with a bunch of white kids and then they're like, you're racist and they're like, cool, whatever. What I'm seeing now when I go on Instagram and I'm scrolling through,

bro, if you want a million views, racism. Like, John, like, the builder. No, no, no,

no. I'm talking about, like, some dude sitting at his computer and he goes, so I just saw

this video, and then he plays the video next to him, and it's something like a black dude robbing a liquor store, and then he makes a quick racist quip. And maybe a racist isn't the right word, but racial quip.

They're like, young people are blowing the F up on TikTok and Instagram by doing this. Like, like, Gypsy Crusader, he's got clips like crazy with millions of views.

And he literally just says he does not like black people. Yeah, he has a gun that says the N-word. And he actually has some black fans, surprisingly. There's one viral video that I just saw on Instagram. And it's like some woman, and she's wearing Nian cat. You know Nian cat? Yeah. It's a Pop-Tart cat with a rainbow.

And then he goes, what's on your shirt? And she goes, so it's Nian cat. It's like, what's that? And she's like, it's like an internet thing. It's like, I thought it was like a pride thing. And then she says, no, I hate the F. And then she salutes. It's gone viral.

It's crazy. And then it like freezes and then it like plays music. Dude. Why? Yeah. That's what I played right? You saw it too? Oh yeah.

This video's gone mad viral. Young people are straight up like, yeah, we watch the news all day and we're watching like, bro, we're watching what's happening in Ireland. We're watching the Carmelo Anthony stuff. We warned about this, but you were saying, Phil, you think they want it to happen. Yep. I don't know that they want it to happen. want it to happen. I think they would prefer it if white people just had white guilt forever

so they could loot. Yeah. The goal is to awaken a critical racial consciousness, right? The whole critical race theory stuff that didn't go away. The goal was to make people aware of their race and they wanted, they sure they wanted as many people that are white to feel bad about it and to basically do what your offals are doing and start voting for voting in ways that are progressive. If you look at the way that women are tilting to the left, it's all because of this kind of

this kind of critical race race theory stuff. You see young men not going the same way because young men are far more comfortable being disagreeable. This is all Jordan Peters and stuff.

These viral Instagram and TikTok videos are what's going to start making women go the other direction. Dude, it is wild to see I saw a video with like two million views of some chick sitting in a room on a computer and she's wearing like fake cat

years. It wasn't AI, by the way. And then, like, plays a video and then makes racist joke. Like, you know, you know, who's that guy with the mustache? He's got the old phone behind him. You know I'm talking about, right? With a mustache and an old thing. Hey, he's the, he's the, woman, woman problems. Is that what it's called? I don't know much about him, but I'm aware of him. I think I've never seen these videos? I don't think so. What's the guys? Is it, uh, woman problems? I don't know. What's the guy, the chat knows who I'm talking. I don't follow these guys.

They like January 6. They want more January 6th. Someone in the chat's got a time because they know I'm talking about. He's got a mustache and it's like women problems or something. Someone's going to post in the chat. I believe videos like that are going to end up affecting women that's going to push them towards racial consciousness? Not not him. Well, we got to get women like they have to radicalize women.

I don't think it's going to happen. Like they're too susceptible to in-group bias and if the other women in the group aren't following. Women propaganda. That's what is. Oh, duh. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He does videos where he'll play a video of like a black guy robbing a 7-Eleven, and then he'll look up and he'll make a joke. You're right, right. He got like a million followers. I know. People have been copying that format like crazy and getting massive viewership.

I remember we talked about it on the show when Nick Fuentes had a video with something like 60 million views. I'm on Instagram. I see this video nonstop and I look at it to see how many, it's got 400,000 likes. Was it the your body my choice video? No, it's the video where he says, he said any responsible person would not. live, would not bring their family near black people. And I'm not saying that an individual black person is bad. I'm saying that when you look at neighborhood crime statistics, you can see that these are high crime neighborhoods. And I talked about, I said, listen, I know where Nick is from. Nick Flentes and I, this is really well. How old is Nick? 26. I'm 40. That means he was born and he was growing up. When I was 14, I lived in this neighborhood until I was 18.

we lived only a few miles away from each other. Here's another wild twist for you. Jimmy Dor lived three blocks from me. No joke. So you Jimmy and Nick all lived within a three mile radius? Me and Jimmy Dor lived three blocks away in Chicago. And Nick was about three miles away in the western suburbs because I was in the southwest side.

So just you went on Archer First Avenue and then you can get to LaGrange. And I know exactly what Nick saw and why he says these things because I grew up two blocks from the Leclair courts, famous gang territory in Chicago, all black. So we understood there was a racial divide that when the people from north of 47th came south into the white mixed area, you knew they were not coming to be friends with anybody. You knew it was, we are against you, and they'd mug you, they'd rob you, or there'd be gang violence. And if you walked over there, the cops would arrest you and they'd say the only reason a white boy comes up here is to buy drugs. So imagine being Nick and growing up only a few miles away from this.

Everybody in the neighborhood knows this. Nick starts making videos pointing out what tons of these young white people are seeing and being told they can't say. So you got to understand growing up on the south side of Chicago with racial division, maybe due to redlining or whatever you might want to argue. Literally, if a white person goes to a black neighborhood, you're facing violence and threats. The worst gun violence is America. Then you go to school and you are told white people are the problem. And if you say otherwise, you're suspended, you get in trouble. Nick Fuentes starts talking about this and young people are like, he's right about all of it.

It is unfortunate, but there's a reason why this messaging has become massively viral on Instagram and they're getting tens of millions of views. And my point only is Gen Z, Gen Alpha, it is going to be a wild political ride. like Gen Z is only in their late 20s now. Once they get to their late 30s, we're going to start seeing Gen Z in politics. Imagine what happens. I'm going to let people in on a big secret as it pertains to the economy. Tucker Carlson's running for president?

He announced that? No, but I thought that was a secret. Those that lead become rich. It's a tendency. My point is this. If you are a young person and you are a leader in your generation, let's say you're 20 years old, And it's not that you command hordes of 20-year-old.

It's not that you have a big Instagram following. I'm not saying that because obviously if you did, you'd already be rich. I'm saying that at 20 years old, you are trying to build something. You are developing something. Your peers around you are working at grocery stores or getting entry-level jobs, and you're trying to start a business. You're trying to learn to code. You're trying to build something.

Those people naturally just end up tendency, not guarantee, to have accumulated wealth. My point ultimately is this. Nick Fuentes, I believe, when he's in his late 30s, will probably be worth $100 million. He's probably already a millionaire. He's definitely a millionaire. When they freeze his assets, he had $500,000 in the bank. Someone gifted him like a million dollars in Bitcoin. Exactly.

Imagine what happens when he's older. His fans have jobs and careers and more skills and are making more money and are contributing to and promoting his show. Nick Fuentes is going to be in his 40s with a net worth of $100 million. which you guys got to understand about a net worth of $100 million. I'm not saying he's going to have that cash liquid. I'm saying from now him being a millionaire, he's going to start buying things. Those assets will appreciate.

In 10 years, he'll own probably several properties. I imagine he's going to have a financial advisor. He's going to have a lot of money in T-bills as well as in the S&P. And he's going to have growing assets. His wealth is not going to disappear. It's only going to accumulate. What do you think happens in, let's just say, what is he, 26? He said 27?

Did somebody in the chat said 27? Yeah, but I thought he was 20. let's let's say 10 years he's 37 years old worth millions his net worth maybe 100 million is not liquid and it could and a lot of it could be like business net worth like 10x if like five exhibit or something like that let's say he's got you know five million coming to this year and he has no reason to spend it who's he supporting politically where is that money going to go what media ventures nick will start spending that money towards what he believes you are going to start seeing miniature Nick Fuentes is popping up.

He's going to start putting money into promoting new media channels and outlets. This is going to be economically impactful. You cannot stop this. It is going to. The fact that it's already big on Instagram and TikTok and young people are already in this, it's going to get huge, man. I mean, I don't think that there's much of a disagreement about that. I'm just already.

I'm not saying there's a disagreement. I'm saying let's think about what 10 years from now looks like considering that. Yeah, I mean, he's already got a huge, huge. huge influence on the culture. Like you see him, like all the memes that you talk about on Instagram, you can't scroll through Instagram without seeing some kind of, you know, cut with Nick saying something or whatever. So, I mean, he's going to have an outsized influence on the culture.

And I think that most people kind of have to come to a reckoning with that. And that's one of the reasons why I say you're going to see a lot of people looking at, you know, being called racist and they're just not going to care anymore. I've been saying that. Yeah, I've been saying that. We're saying all this, though, I really, you guys are going to call me crazy, I think it's a strong possibility we get a vice president, AOC, and President Gavin Newsom soon. So, like, we act like everybody's going to be so based.

I think it might. Why do you think so? I think the pendulum might swing the other way just because people aren't happy. That doesn't make Nick go away. No, no, no. I think that makes Nick stronger, honestly, because it's like how Biden's presidency made Trump even more popular when he ran into. Let's talk about it.

Here's a story from the New York Post. bombshell photo unveils damning Nithia Raman link with homeless voters as fury erupts over L.A. ballot count. So you got this image where Nithia Raman signed off on a grant as a district council member, $600,000 to a homeless shelter that the New York Post claims registered 185 voters to its address or had 185 homeless registered voters. Now, I don't think that 185 voters changes anything, and I don't think she gave the money to them to get voters. I think if I were to make an assessment, she gave the money to them either because she's dumb as a box or rocks or evil. We call this the homeless industrial complex in L.A. They funneled taxpayer dollars to shelters with no beds. The shelters that don't help

people, and I don't trust her for two seconds that she did not know this because it is a check from 2023. And everybody in 2011 when I was working down, 2010 when I was working on there, knew exactly what was going on. And the shelters were lying, claiming they were full when no Nobody was in them. Ultimately, the point is this. They are cheating, but we were just talking the previous segment. You said, Alex, that we might get a vice president, AOC, and a Gavin Newsom. The reason why I say, I don't think so, is because California has been shocking to the conscience for a lot of Americans. More prominently is Watson v. RNC, which is going to be ruled on in a couple of weeks. And this, if ruled on by SCOTUS narrowly, everyone agrees SCOTUS is likely going to rule in

favor of the defendant, which is that you cannot count votes after election day. Even with the post date or whatever on June 2nd? So the argument is you can't count ballots after election day. Even if it's parked that day. No matter what. So the Supreme Court seems to be holding the position in oral arguments that Congressional law, the law passed by Congress, is that we are prescribed a single day for an election. If they rule narrowly, they will simply say, once election day is over, you can't count

ballots anymore. I don't think that's going to happen. I think at least there is a decent probability. I would lean towards, and I'm crossing my fingers on this one, they rule more broadly and argue that early voting and mail-in voting violate the law because they extend voting day into voting month. And if voting day can be only one day, a day is prescribed, then ballots can only be issued day of and counted day of.

And if that happens, Democrats never win again unless they dramatically moderate and become so akin to what MAGA is that MAGA Republicans are like, oh, Democrats are now calling for deportations, no trans in the kids, they want to lower taxes. Otherwise, they would not be competitive. They are only winning in California for this reason. Check this out. DSA-la-la-org. This is the game they play. This is cheating and this is evil. The DSA is advising people to go to people's homes, confirm strong candidate support. If voting for other candidate, thank them and move on. They're not helping people vote.

No, they're helping get power for themselves. It gets better. Then you ask them, have you received your ballot? Great, will you find it? Then you ask them to vote three times. Then you explain why your candidate is the one they have to vote for. Then you fill out their ballot with them. Then you take their ballot and drop it off.

And here's the best part. These people are getting paid to do it. I don't know if the DSA is fun. it, but there are organizations that pay a salary to activists in California to go and literally fill out the ballot with them and bring it in for them. Tim, James O'Keefe literally just did a story where they actually charged the woman that was doing this, where they were paying people like... Two to three dollars.

Two to three dollars. And they would just get a ballot, get them to register. There's videos of it. Yeah, I mean, James says it's on camera, literally on camera. He's got on his page. Yeah, go to, he's been tweeting about it like crazy. Go to his Twitter right now, our ex. So, like, we have concrete evidence that they can pay a homeless person.

Nothing. Like you said, two to three dollars, and they're going to let you vote. However, that person that's paying you the money wants you to vote. Yeah, he's got breaking. L.A. election fraud. Caught. For our ongoing investigation, rather, we passed that numerous times. And it's the shelter where you see dozens of people in tents, encampments, doing drugs.

And we have to ask. directly. How many of them have voted? And I want to know, are their names registered on some of these voter rolls? Yeah. And they do that, they do that ballot petition scam right out front of Midnight Mission, too. Yeah. It's just insane. The way I see it that common is find the actual point of thing, trying on instead of conversation. And then for cameras around. Oh, there's a. I'm not sure this video is actually that This is the one, it's like this black woman. Right, right, right.

Covered it where it's that one right there. That's exactly the-odulent petitioners on Skid Row are now paying the homeless to forge names, forge addresses, and forge signatures of registered voters. So do you want to sign? The first one. I mean, this is an organized crime. Okay. This is very organized.

Joseph. Wow. All right. What are you using? Teresa. Teresa. I'm going to give you an address to write. Oh, okay.

Okay, yeah, yeah. Quickly becoming a widespread scheme that can be found on almost every street corner in downtown Los Angeles. Fraudulent petitioners on Skid Row are now paying the homeless to Ford. We knew that, right? Mm-hmm. Man, that's crazy. He's the full thing. Let's just jump ahead and grab a piece of it.

Eat his ass. I don't have a... California address. Find somebody in one of your homies or something that got I want to come bring up to us. If I bring them to you then I could get a cigarette too though. You're really irritated. Why are you so fucking hostile, bro?

It's my petition. It's not even here. You assing the wrong nigga, that's my shit. So you asked on the wrong nigga anyway, so you... So if I just start new, I come back and I just tell you... It's going down the street, bro, before we move you down the street. Yeah, it's really like that, bro. I clock you out looking right at me. Oh my God.

God, they got a source. Why are you trying to be like that, bro? I just want a cigarette. They won't knock your ass out. Hit your ass, niggins. Don't come over here again. I'm going to beat your ass. Black Lives Matter.

Previously, in 2019, nine individuals were prosecuted by the Los Angeles DA for this exact crime. They were exchanging cigarettes and cash for petition signatures. But none of it was on video, and it wasn't captured to this extent. There were 14 counts, primarily focused around payment for signatures, the violation of that California election. Code 18603, claiming they had, quote, offered or gave money or other valuable consideration to another

in exchange for his or her signature. So we found it particularly ironic that two police officers sitting nearby weren't even aware that this was a state or federal crime. Instead, Officer Meravilla of the LAPD dismissed it as a, quote, civil lawsuit. Do you know a lot of these people here that are making homeless sign petitions and paying cash for it? I haven't seen them. I mean, I've seen when they signed some type of paperwork, but I didn't know what they were doing. And I saw them at that, right here at the light over here in the back. Yeah. But I don't know what it was for. Like, maybe like two weeks ago, I saw them signing for something, but I don't know if they were getting like money in exchange. Yeah, I think

they're getting like two, three dollars from what I observed. This is not, they're not votes. These are signatures for petitions and things like this. It's the same thing that are registering people to vote. I mean, it's just right, right, right. Because what, what then happens is some of these our voter registrations and then a mail-in-voter arrives at a homeless shelter and then they can come and the address that they put on there and it's their address. The non-profit and when they're signing it, it's a consensual. It's more of a civil thing. Oh, my God.

They're not telling them no. Maybe if they promised them something and they don't get it, it would be like a civil lawsuit to the thing. The law enforcement officers sitting nearby on Skid Row every single day don't know the California laws and plead ignorance. It begs the question, what are they even doing? And directly across the street from all of this

is a homeless shelter called the Weingard Center. A, quote, comprehensive human services organization committed to removing barriers that keep people from housing. The 990 tax return shows the Weingard Center received $112 million through various grants in 2022, their latest public return, and that they have over $800 million in net assets. Wow. Weingard Center also pays their executives between 400,000 and 600,000 a year.

Weingard has been missing their audit deadlines by an alarmingly large and increasing margin, 21 months late last year, with eight negative findings. An article in LA states that one of LA's biggest homeless service providers has been awarded over $100 million in taxpayer funds while failing to comply with federal audit mandates. The audit show multiple failures by Weingardt Center to properly. account for tax payer money that were not remedied from one year to the next. One of Weingard's primary funding sources is Lhasa, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. We couldn't help but wonder, what would people that work for Lassa say about this voter

fraud in Skin Row when directly asked? We attended this special commission meeting to find out. Do you work for Lassa? We spoke to Kathy Lenga, who says she's seen the people petitioning for money and teaches the perspective fraudster and how to use plausible deniability and to practice ignorance of the law as an excuse. Because I think I want to get his little cash right away. They were giving out the cash for his design.

So let me just have you meet Brian. They can't help you. They go to the next, go to the skibble and see if there's people out there with with clip points. With clipboards and see if they were given the cash for the petition. Yes. And do you think that's okay? I'm planning to get in trouble, though.

Do you think it's okay for me to sign? What, I mean, we don't even, if they say, Lisa, I guess it's not excuse for the law. But all, don't I have to say I didn't know? I had no idea. Yeah. Oh, my God. I don't have a ticket.

I don't have a home. I don't have a telephone works half the time. How would they know that's he gets? And I can't afford a lawyer to ask. Oh, that would be what he should say. Yeah. Yeah. Somebody is offering me a lawyer.

Another Weingard employee, intake coordinator Jason Warren, tells our undercover journalist exactly where and when to find the petitioners who are breaking the law. I wanted to see if we can get where the petitions that are being signed to get cash so he can get some couple of dollars. Do you know where they are located? I don't know what else is at. Most time they be outside in the front or you got to go to the GRB. What else at? The GR is going to be on third and third place in Alameda.

What is GR? GR is general relief. Oh, so. Most of them will be right across the street under that tree. You can check with your money to Friday. Warren also claims the petitioners have to gather a certain amount of signatures and then provide proof to show that they aren't stealing the money, which is apparently provided to them by a higher authority,

according to Jason Warren. But I don't want him to get into any trouble or anything. Is that okay for him to accept cash for signing? Yeah. It's okay because they don't like no, no, no, no, no. going to go through his stuff or his stuff. They just want to sign them up to get a name. When they get the money up, they got to go back and tell you up

if they're still in the money or not, so they got to have $6. Spencer Pratt needs to be sharing this clip right now. Spencer Pratt needs to get involved with this. Shout out to James O'Keefe, consistently hitting it out of the park. I mean, that's wild. Look at this. That's crazy, dude. So anyway, to the point, I recommend everybody check out James' like the full video,

but you know in your comment about whether Newsom and AOC can win. I think like let me do this. Have you seen the latest inside elections breakdown? Inside elections is considered to be one of the most accurate pollsters. According to inside elections, Republicans only got to win one toss up to maintain control of the House in November, largely because of the redistricting efforts. So if you look at let's, what is this? Why am I not getting the, where is that stupid? stupid, that stupid thing. I want to switch it to Cook. There we go. Wait, disappeared.

Disappeared on me. I want to look up Cook Political Report, but it's, uh, it's gone. I wonder why they did that. Well, this is the inside election map. Cook and Sabato have it at 2.13 and 212. So they would need either, uh, that would be six or five, five or six. But according to inside elections, it's just one. I think the redistricting efforts pushed things dramatically in favor Republicans. And when the Scotis drops this ruling, dude, Watson v. RNC could make this a 230 Republican, you know, 230, 205 or something. Is that what that what would be? Wonderful. Yeah, I don't see why the SCOTUS would not rule broadly on this. I know, but even if the conservatives are in power, we can't get the SAVE Act passed in the

Senate. So I mean, do we think that all of a sudden we're going to get? We don't, I wonder if the reason why, like Trump goes after Massey, but not soon, right? Yeah. Yeah, I wonder if it's because they know Watson's coming down and they don't need to take the political flack over it. When, when Watson v. RNC drops in a couple of weeks, it might be the end of Democratic, like California is turning red. They can't ballot harvest anymore. And here's, you know, guys, you don't understand this. Watson v. RNC is a Mississippi court case. You know why? Because that's where all the race stuff was. No, because the Mississippi state knows they can intentionally throw the case.

The state of Mississippi, so listen, if you file the lawsuit against California over mailing votes, and it was California v. RNC or whatever. They would fight really hard. They would use all of their resources to go to war. Mississippi is going to go, oh, no, our lawyers are just so dumb, we made a mistake. And SCOTUS is going to be like, no more mail-in votes nationwide. I spent a lot of time in Jackson, Mississippi and Oxford, Mississippi, and that makes sense. Yeah, they don't want to fight.

They're, you know. Well, I mean, there's racial tension there and the white people are in power. But they're a red state. They're going to send our solicitor to Scotus and have them throw it. We want this gone. We want blue states to lose his ability. Scotis rules broadly, and my fingers are crossed. They say, early voting and universal mail-in voting violate the law because they allow for elections outside of election day.

And the law passed in 1945 says you get one day for an election. I don't see how else they could. rule on this. And when that happens, it's done. It's going to be 2.30 Republican. So I'm just going to say this. Earlier today, I actually had, I put 100 bucks on Republicans to sweep and 100 bucks on Republican to control. I sold those positions before putting up my videos today because I did not want to influence the prediction markets. So I sold my position so that I could not benefit from it. And I took a loss. Because I'm like, when this hammer drops, those are going to sky. I don't want to see any profit from that.

So I'll take a loss now, full disclosure, because I think people are going to, they're going to start buying for Republicans with this Watson v. People don't know about this case. No one's been talking about the fact that they're about to rule on shutting down mail-in voting. When is this going to be? So they say mid, end of June to early July.

Nuclear bomb. The big cases tend to come out at the end of June. And this is going to be one that has a lot of impact. And it's going to be just before. the midterms. So here's the thing. If SCOTUS really has, these conservatives, decided to join the fray, they are going to intentionally draw this out as long as they can just before the midterm so that Democrats have no ability to pivot. It's going to be nuts, man. Spencer Pratt would have won. If they say only votes on election day count, Spencer Pratt got second place. Yeah. I mean, this shouldn't be

some kind of, it shouldn't be some kind of big controversy, right? Like the whole point. of having an election day is to have one day where it happens. Like, just get the vote. But here's the challenge. What if they say, fine, but that's federal elections. And primary elections and state elections, we can do however we want. I mean, it's... Supreme Court still could go nuclear and say, with respect to state primaries,

they must follow the established law of a single day for elections. Like, they could go nuts. I mean, like, they're not even going to go into California now. Like, the federal government isn't going to go into California. California now, even though they've seen what they consider to be observable cheating, they might not need to. With Watson v. RNC, Trump and Thunan, all that might be sitting there being like, we don't have to move until we know what the SCOTUS is going to do, and SCOTUS very likely is going to rule in our favor. The media is going to go into overdrive and how they're going to paint it in the most negative way possible to... Of course, but who cares?

Yeah. It's going to be crazy. Who cares? California will turn red. That's going to be nuts. They can't, they will not be able to win. it would be an absolute joy to see. Well, it's only a few weeks away. A few weeks.

You think Scotus will do it? There's like this tiny little fly. I got one of them, so it's a different one than the one I got. It's like three of them. Three little tiny flies? They're probably... Maybe there's screw worms. Probably NSA bugs.

Oh, the screw room's bad, but actually there were some doctor that said there's some really cheap, like, over-the-counter cream you can put on and it kills the screwing worm. What if... But, oh, we got breaking news. Graham Platner has won his primary. Yeah, we love Graham. Why? Well, first of all, you know, his thoughts on anti-war, like Rokanez said, and the fact that...

Is a totencomf on his chest? That's awesome, right? Do we not like that? Tattoes are cool. Look at all Phil's tattoos. You don't like tattoos now and now you're anti-tattoo. None of mine are toten coughs. None of my tattoos are Nazi tattoos.

Well, I have one swastika tattoo. Like, oh, I'm a Nazi all of a sudden. I mean, I got it because I thought it was like a cool symbol and I was into yoga. and that used to be a yoke symbol. I'm a fan of Grand Platner for his willingness to tell women to shut up and do as they're told. That's a great candidate for Democrats to vote for, right? Yeah. He should be a Republican.

Well, I thought it was awesome where he said that he... A woman abusing Nazi? That sounds like what Democrats claim Republicans did. Tim, you don't think it's cool every time you see a porta potty you have to masturbate. I feel like I can empathize that. Yeah. Are you kidding? Yeah, literally he was sitting a DM saying that every...

He posted it. He said that every time that he was in a portopati and he smelled the blue aroma from the, whatever, the blue peed sauce, whatever you call it. You all said he wanted to rape guys. He did. He did. Just for dominance. I mean, not in a gay way.

She's an in a sexual way, but not in a gay way. I don't know if that's a thing. I don't think he's a non-sexual way. Bro, it's kind of weird that he's a gay woman abusing racist, Nazi Democrat. It's like... He has a lot of support. Yeah, they love him. I'm happy.

So James Teller Rico, like apparently he came out and said, no more transing kids or something like that. Did he? Well, he was, in 2023, though, he was arguing in favor of cross-sex hormones for kids. Like, he was actually fighting against how Texas was outlawing it. So if he's trying to, like, change his tune now. Did he? I saw that on Fox.

I didn't, I didn't follow up. Well, he's eating, like, barbecue now and he was accused of being a vegan. I mean, he's so fake. But I, you know, a lot of people, I'll say this. Ken Paxson does have a little bit of baggage. I like Ken. I'm friends of Ken. But he has much more baggage because I think there's been now three different staffers that

worked for Tala Rico that said that they had a sexual relationship with him. So the guy, you might look like a little twerk, but he's a horn dog. So, I mean, Tala Rico is much worse in Ken Paxson if it comes to, like, sexual baggage. Yeah, I don't know what his exact quote is. Ken Paxon has accused him of flip-flopping. But let me say if I can find. So is he saying now he's against like. Flip-lopping on what?

Transgender. I'm trans and kids. Isn't that just called finding your way back to the center? James Tala Rico says he opposes gender reassignment surgery for minors. I'm very happy to hear that. That's fantastic. Next time any Democrat comes up and says, trans haul, I'll be like, whoa, whoa, I'm in the

Talarico side. I'm with James Taylorico on this one. Well, did you see the viral video of J-Lo? She was doing that, you know that podcast, they do like, Confessions on the subway. And she's like, you're not a New Yorker unless you're born in New York. Like, the only way you're in New York is if you're born in New York, and Jaylo has two trans daughters. And so

that's the joke. It's like, so you're only in New Yorker if you're born a new yorker, but if you're born a boy, you can all of a sudden become a girl. It's like her own. Or if you're born in Mexico, you can ever be in America. Transdaughters? Like, yeah, you know, it just doesn't You know, trans daughters or sons? What, I don't know.

Are they guys? Vice versa. Who knows? Who's or ha-haz? You know what I'm saying? I don't know how trans or kids are, but I'm not really I'm joking. All I know is this, though, it's funny because these people are oblivious to their own

opinions. You know, it's funny? I'm sorry. I was going to say, I feel bad for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's kids because no one knows who they are, so they assume every one of them is trans. Because there was that one kid who was trans, remember? I do remember they had a kid that was true. They had a daughter that was like, I'm a guy now.

and then like a couple years ago like two years ago she was like I'm not a guy anymore I'm a girl so now the actual other kids there was a news story about one of their kids was a guy and everybody was like that's a woman they all think they're trans now well it's weird that what Megan Fox

has I think three trans kids I mean it's just weird that they are they use them like they use them like social cloud no no but the worst thing is like aren't some of them adopting like little African kids and then transing them yeah it was Madonna that did that I'm not kidding no Angelina did it as well. Oh yeah. She adopted a black kid

and then trans them? Yeah. Uh, yeah. Oh my God. Look, man. It's so like like mad scientist stuff. Like let's do experiments in the little African kid and mix up his hormones and see what happens. Well, it's like there was

a time, I don't know if you guys saw the movie The Blind Side were doing, like see that was America was a great country when you're the rich family and adopted the black kid and tried to make him a good athlete, right? Like try to get him to the NFL or NBA. Like that's actually a good story. But now you have the rich people they adopt a black kid and they try to turn them into a

homosexual. So it's like we've lost the plot. If we could go back to trying to turn these kids into premier athletes, America would be great again. Google says she does not have an adoptive trans kid. I think she has adoptive kids, but I don't know about the... Yeah, I wasn't sure about that.

Yeah, Google says not correct. I feel like for the most part now, people just, it's the same thing when they accuse like literally like, well, if they're in Hollywood, they're Just by definition of being in Hollywood. So now they're like, oh, they're a Hollywood. Was it Charlie's Theron? Charlie's Theron, yes.

She has a adopted black trans. It was her. You got it wrong. It wasn't Angelina. It was Charlottes Throne. You did see that three of, like three of Brad Pitt's kids like got rid of it. Like they went and took their mother's name. Oh, God.

Charlie's Throne adopted a black boy and then put him in a dress. That's evil. That's so disgusting. Here we go, wait, wait, wait, wait, like, you know, black people are pissed. There's a Atlanta black star folks have questions about how Shirley's Throne is raising her adopted son because she put him in a dress and said he was a girl. Right. I feel like this bitch is doing some weird science experiment on this kid,

trying to do the whole nature versus nurture thing like they did in the 60s, which failed. I don't like it at all. I agree. She's experimenting on African kids, man. It's Hollywood luxury beliefs. This raises her status in the community in Hollywood. Yeah. Sure, sure.

but like I'm just saying it comes off like mad scientist horror movie stuff, you know. We'll see some white lady like kidnaps a couple black kids. Like, I'm going to turn you into girls. They're like, stop. And she's like injecting with hormones. That would be actually a hit movie. That probably went an Oscar. But I will say, I will say this.

No, because it would have to be a good thing. Well, like here's what actually happens. It would portray it as a good thing. No, no, no, no, no, no. No. The horror movie that would win an Oscar is a woman adopts two black kids who asked to be trans and she gives them the shots and then an evil mad science. scientist says, no, I'm going to take these away and kidnap you and make you be boys.

What was the movie, no wire hangers, I forget, like where the girl gets... Mommy Dearest. Yeah, like that. What was that? Mommy Dearest is a scary, it's kind of a scary movie, like, you know, where this, you know, abusive mom, where I think they could, you know, extrapolate that where you have Charlize Theron, Transinger kids. But I will say, the nature versus nurture argument is correct. But then when it comes to Carmelo Anthony, went to an affluent neighborhood school, you know,

first good memorial and still stabbed a guy in the heart so it's kind of like no the the nurture part is the wrong part maybe maybe if carmello was put on cross-sex hormones it would have dropped his like he'd be like more dossile yeah get rid of the testosterone no the nurture part is wrong like people people are born with predispositions you obviously you can um affect those predispositions by the way they're raised and stuff but if you've got you know if you've got a short temper that's something that you're born with. If you have, if you are have like Jordan Peterson talks about this stuff all the time. If you have high conscientiousness, that's a, that's a born in trade. It's not you're not, you're not going to learn how to do that. Or if you do, it's going to be something that you are an

adult. You realize that you don't have high conscientious. You're going to put a lot of work into changing your habits. But it's not something like the idea that you can just be born and, you know, I think it was the, the moody guy, the first trans, a doctor or whatever. There was a child. Money? That money, yeah, the money. A child was born,

had a male child was born, had a botched circumcision, so they cut off his penis and balls, and they said, okay, we're going to raise you as a girl. Ended up committing suicide because... But it is his brother. Yeah. Yeah, it was a total mess.

But that's because we do have innate certain characteristics, and if you're a boy, you are a boy. The left argues that case to prove transgenderism. That's insane. They argue that because they took a boy who identified as a boy and forced them to live as a girl, proving that people have innate gender within them and that people who know that their gender as a girl being forced love as a boy will result in suicides, just like in the John Money case. That's crazy.

Well, it was Chloe Cole, that is, and it's just not her story, but that is constantly what the doctors do. If the parents are against their kids transitioning, they say, oh, we're kids going to commit suicide. That's like the number one manipulation tactic to get parents to. What they're really saying is spay and new to your kids. And that's actually, that's like the overall conspiracies. They want us all sexually confused. They want everybody on cross-sex hormones so that they have atrophied penises so that we keep the population down while. You know, why?

Because climate change. It's because the Asgardians or Nordics, as people refer to them, or some call them the erids, who live beyond the ice wall are like, look, the... You say that jokingly, but they're... The inner lands are becoming too populous, so we've got to reduce... It's like you've got a chicken coop and you've got a hundred chickens. There's too many chickens. Dude, I'm an ice wall expert, so let's not even get into that. Oh, okay. Homeboy wouldn't even go. I said, I will pay for your trip, and you're like, no.

I don't want to go to Antarctica because I don't like the snow. I'm from Texas. Listen, I'm always going to hear about Antarctica. But I do think that you see, like, Bill Gates during the pandemic, say, oh, we need to reduce a population by 15% because of climate change. These people are so sick, they actually want us to not procreate as much because they actually think that that would be better for the climate. I do believe. There's also a lot of them. I don't think there's also a lot of them. Bill Gates has said that on the record. I do not believe these people think climate change is real. You don't buy beachfront property on Martha's Vineyard. That's true.

Barack Obama. The water level is going to rise in 20. Bill Gates, I think, has the biggest house in San Diego or something. Yeah, it's like on the water. Like, oh, Oklahoma City's going to come. My better. One argument is they're fighting climate change so they can have their beachfront property. But realistically, that doesn't make sense because you're not going to win whatever

stupid fight they're engaging in. And even Grititutonberg is now on the we need oil train. She is? Yeah. She goes, we need to get more oil to Cuba. The people need it. It does actually kind of work out if you're somebody at that level of wealth

who can afford to have a beach front property but not have to worry about whether it gets washed away or not. They're like, look, I don't need it if it gets washed away, that's fine. You go to Bill Gates and say, if you believe in climate change, why'd you buy a $10 million mansion on the water? Because I can't.

I'm a billionaire. What do I care? Yeah. Well, but I'm such a conspiracy theorist. I go to the Georgia Guidestones, which were knocked down, where they want to reduce the population to like 500 million people. You're wrong. The Georgia Guardsonel.

Guidestones were created around the time there was a fear of a nuclear apocalypse and a bunch of wealthy donors got together to say, if we all die, how does civilization restart? Let's build guidestones to tell them what to do. And that being said, the ideas on it to keep the population at 500 million or less, I think is a hint towards they want less people. But again, the purpose of the guidestones was built out of fear of a nuclear apocalypse. That's why it had like mathematical equations. It had like a sundial or whatever. And it had like base languages on it and stuff like that. So that people got knocked down. Some car like sland into it, right, or something like that? That's crazy. Yeah. And then, you know, they say, well, you know, if you watch documentaries on it,

it was Ted Turner that, you know, paid for it to get built. But you know why I got destroyed, right? Well, I think people were going there and like, you know. The people, the reason it was destroyed was because the powers that be don't want us to have access to translations and basic math if they, EMP blast us back to the Stone Age. It's also why they're not going to teach your kids curse. So let's, let's, let's, let's, let's make this. Is that true? They don't teach cursive?

Yeah, yeah, it's gone. I want to make sure this is clear for everybody. Let's say, let's say the Adam and Eve theory is real. The every 6,500 years, there is a pole shift and the planet flips 90 degrees, causing a massive flood that wipes out civilization. Well, there was a flood at one point. Of course, of course. I mean, there's been many floods and there's been big. But let's say Adam and Eve, it's a conspiracy theory, but it was a book, I believe, it originated from the CIA or a story that originally.

or a story that originated from the CIA, where they claim this was the case. And now there's a lot of people who believe we may be on the verge of it. Let's say that's true. The powers that be of underground bases, space stations, and they're experimenting with going to Mars and doing these things. They've got Mount Weather, Raven Rock, and that's just what we know about. They have likely created situations in which if there is a great flood that lasts 40 days, they'll have no problem to survive and maintain technology. They don't want you, survivors on the surface, to have access to basic information.

So the guidestones get destroyed. because the guide stones had on them basic translation and basic math and star mapping and the rules are the rules are less important like everyone remembers the rules where it's like keep the population under 500 million but on it you could you could it was like a rosetta stone for various languages intentionally if the flood happens they want us confused and unable to communicate and work with each other well the georgia guise stones too you are right though how they had like you can see the north star from any angle at any time of the day you know so i don't know i I think that there is a conspiracy that one day they want to, you know, decrease the population. I don't know how they do that. I don't think it's, I don't think it's any nuclear war. I think it will be like some of the number of saying. I thought it was like, I think it'll be a natural disaster if that does happen, like another flood. I think there's a, there's an interest.

I think the, you know, talking with Ben Davidson about the Adam and Eve theory, this dude, we've interviewed him several times. He is not some like flat earth conspiracy guy who makes weird arguments and like. you know, ice wall. He's just, he's tracking solar weather patterns. I interview him and everything he says, like, actually rooted in mainstream science. He just has a different view of what, what it would result in. So, like, to exemplify, there are people who are like, you know, there's a great ice wall and you can't go there because the military will block you. And it's like, well, that's like untestable. Like, you can, like, there are people who've gone to Antarctica you know what I mean. On approved cruises and a government approved stuff. And people who work at

McMurdo and who are on the internet, like you can argue, it's all a lie or whatever. But again, that's like a nebulous thing. Ben doesn't do that. Ben says, oh, no, here's the official report from, you know, like, Noah and from like NASA pertaining to solar activity. We've got independent research stations that say, this thing just happened. And then he's like, here's, you know, a good example is he talked about the Indonesian glaciers. And he was like, there's a, there are glaciers in Indonesia. They've been there for a very long time, the remnants of the ice age. All of it is like, he's got all this mainstream normal science. You can track all the real data. It's all happening. and then he says, I think 1 plus 2 equals 3.

Whereas the mainstream science says, no, no, no, it's 2 plus 2 equals 4. So they're all looking at, he's looking, like, this is why I find what he says to be compelling. He's looking at the real science and then giving you an argument to what he thinks comes next. He's not saying the science is lying to you and they've made it up. You know what I mean? Well, all I know is that they're putting Kool-Lade and pineapple jars and it's the most delicious thing ever. Have you had the Kool-Lade pineapple yet? No.

I've not tried this. You guys ever had that yet? No. See, that's like where our country's going. We used to put Kool-Aid in pickle jars. Well, now they're putting it in and pineapple. That was Sam Hyde who did that. It's the most delicious thing ever.

So I would say that, like, if we really want to get into it. It's actually a good idea, to be honest. It is. Well, there's two things I want to say. I think the Artemis mission was fake. And I think Jeremy from the quartering is evil for striking the Kino Casino, guys. What does that have to do? Nothing.

I just wanted to mention that tonight. I know that. What did you do? You didn't see what Jeremy did? I want to bring it up because Jeremy, you know, I want to actually bring this point up. I don't watch any of this stuff. It's like low-tier YouTube drama. Jeremy has always been sneak-dissing you for a long time, Tim.

And, you know, I was friends with Jeremy and you're friendly with Jeremy, but just he, you know, gets Hannah-Clair, does this, you know, he's always- Whatever. I know, and you're happy that Hannah-Clair's got a gig. I'm just saying, you know, you know, I'm just saying. But Hannah-Clair knows. I'm not even trying to make it about me. Do you know any idea how many people are lying about me and screwing with me or just

threatening to murder me every day? A lot of people. I ain't sitting here being like, oh, no, Jeremy. he said a naughty word about me. I don't think he has anything bad about you. I'm just saying he went. He tried to censor the Kino Casino guys. What is that?

What is that? It backfire. So there's this guy, a PPP. He's very funny. And, uh, Warski. Yes, you've never seen the Kino Casino?

No, I don't you're talking about it. They've been, you know, going after Jeremy saying that they have evidence, which I don't agree with Jeremy that your wife and they have a bull and that, you know, he pays him black out of bang his wife. I didn't say that. I don't agree with that,

Jeremy, just I want that on the record. Is that like they made something up about them? Well, they do think that they have evidence. My point is they've been going after him very hard. Unfairly, people attack you, people attack me, people attack Phil. I mean, that's the internet culture that we live in. Nobody attacks me. My point is, he went and actually got their channel taken down on YouTube.

He actually got taken down. Their channel got taken down. And Carter can give us a better, you know, I think... I can't. I don't follow this stuff. What do you mean? You don't follow... Carter, you're such a liar.

What are you talking about? Han and Claire left his show because of all this shit. No, what? No comment? I have no idea. Bro, we don't follow any of this stuff. Okay, so his co-host, Melanie Mack, was like to finish. Okay, okay, okay, okay.

Oh, my gosh, we're all involved in this. You're involved. I'm not involved in this. I'm not involved. What? We're all involved in this. Okay. I thought this would, listen, I'm clip farming right now, but to be honest, I am clip farming.

That's why you brought it up. Yeah, because I'm just like, what are you talking about? I just wanted to clip farm because Carter's here. I saw, I saw, I saw, I saw a clip farming. I saw, I saw a clip farming. on X. I saw a clip on X where someone said something about him and I just scrolled past it. I didn't really think much of it. They were like, he got someone flagged and I don't know anything about any of the claims, nor do I really care. I got to be honest. There's a lot of drama as it

pertains to like YouTubers and stuff. The only one that I've talked about recently was Ethan Klein versus the live streamers. You know this one? Yeah, yeah. This is one of the biggest, bro. This is one of the biggest cases. If Ethan Klein loses this, it means that we will be able to go on Timcast, IRL, title the episode, I Hate Marvel, and play Avengers Doomsday in full. And just talk smack about it. And just sit there and watch and say, this is awful. Look at the colors they chose. What this court has ruled.

And again, it's not the incorrect ruling. It's based on precedent coming from Hughes v. Benjamin and previous cases. And this is the natural conclusion of fair use. I got to say this. I got to say, we've got to go to chance, but I got to bring this up because this is much more important drama. I knew this was coming. And the preliminary ruling right now is that Ethan Klein cannot get the suit dismissed. He's got to have a response. The streamer watched his documentary in full and even apparently according to the case said, don't give him views. Watch here instead

or something that effect. His argument was watching the full thing with commentary or otherwise and telling people don't give me views is literal market infringement, which is not fair use. Fair use, people don't understand this, is copyright infringement, but it is protected copyright infringement for a variety of factors. One of the most important questions is, does this infringe on the market of the content producer? The way it was historically taken to be, I cannot show a clip from Star Trek on this show because Paramount licenses clips from Star Trek. So they would argue the reason that's not fair use, even if it is commentary or in the public news and public good, because it infringes on our market to sell these clips to people who do want to make these shows. So I've actually had YouTube take hard, hard copyright block, one of my videos on the Tim Poole show, because I was talking about American culture and I showed a clip that was like 20 seconds from Star Trek explaining why the 90s were good and the message was being brought and it was culturally relevant. And they flagged it, locked it.

I appealed. It said if I want to, they rejected the appeal, then said I'd have to sue. I consulted with counsel and they said, you will lose against Paramount because they licensed this content. And that means that it's not fair use because now you are directly infringing their market, which is to sell you a license to use the content. But with the Ethan Klein case, if this gets set, then precedent, then it's out the window. And we're going to watch some Avengers doomsday.

It's not going to matter because you might have a legal team, but the average everyday YouTuber doesn't have a legal team. They're going to file the copyright claim and they're not going to be able to fight it. It does matter because the streamer that was sued by Ethan Klein also doesn't have a, she only has legal advisory and filed on her own behalf and was a small streamer. But what matters is if she wins, I don't care about the small creator's decision to watch Angel Voltron or some other Avengers movie. It means bigger shows can now play feature-length films in their entire. so long as you post it with some critique. It will get copyright claimed by the company. And it will lose in summary dismissal is the point.

They will never make it a summary dismissal. The people, they will appeal. Hold on, let's stop. You are saying that if Paramount files a lawsuit against me, against you, and then I just said I don't care about the small creators and what they do. I said, we can watch. It means bigger creators who will,

they'll file a suit, and I'll file a summary dismissal, and they'll got to pay my court costs if precedent gets set. The precedent may change for bigger creators, but for the people that exist on YouTube that don't have that infrastructure. Well, I mean, because it matters to people who do create and spit. That was never my point. My point was, we, if that precedent is set on this show, can play Avengers Doomsday. I would argue that actually Paramount should want people playing their content and reacting to it because more people will see it.

I know they might lose money from that, but it's saying like, you actually want people reacting to your content, even if they're saying negative things about it. So the important thing to understand, there's an app where people could put a movie. on and all hang out together and watch it. And they had to get licenses for these films. We had talked about in the past, it would be great to do a show that was like Mystery Science Theater 3000. That's awesome. But you can't because it's an infringement issue. This changes the game. The Ethan Klein lawsuit could set precedent. He's got a preliminary loss. If the argument for the judge stands and there's no appeal or anything, then it's the beginning, it's not yet precedent, but it's the beginning of setting precedent where we would be able to do a mystery science

theater for any feature-length film. And listen, I'm going to tell you why it's going to happen. You want to know why it is going to happen? Because this was the playbook the whole time for AI. Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk have advocated for the end of intellectual property rights. When these court issues the issue these rulings, the big company is going to go, oh, no, oh, geez, oh no, what, oh, God. And then they're going to buy up control of the AI generated video platforms.

they'll have access to all intellectual property under fair use transformation, and you'll be able to make Spider-Man fight the Powerpuff girls, and when Sony tries claiming that's our IP, say, no, it's transformative because now Spider-Man is fighting an alternate universe character, and we're commenting on it. See, what I want to do now is I want to just have every day do watch-alongs with some copyrighted content, and I'm like, I don't care how much of Tim Poole's money I have to spend

to keep watching these movies and commenting. I'm going to do it, okay? We got to go to your rants and super chats, so smash the like button, share the show. We're going to talk about some dark and dangerous things on the uncensored portion of the show. You don't want to miss it. But in the meantime,

Methos says there can be no coexistence with Islam. You cannot coexist with someone whose core values are to dominate you. Interesting. I don't know if I agree with that. You know, I got canceled for this. I did an interview with this guy, a Beck lover. And listen, these Muslims, they do have this thing

where, you know, if they kill you, it's all okay in the Quran. and they get 72 virgins. But I would argue that most Muslims aren't violent, just like most Indians and most Jews and most white people are not violent. So that's my argument to them. Here we go. God's Omen says your video earlier about the girl who was your friend, but not now.

You said a really good line. Power in my hands is better than power in your hands because you're a liar. Should be a T-shirt. Yeah, for those that don't know, you know, I have this thing where I do not engage in political controversy with people who are my friends. So I have long mentioned. I have many liberal and progressive people that do I consider friends. There are some progressive activists.

I have known literally my whole life since I was a teenager that I am still friendly with and still talk with, despite our very serious disagreements. I always find it funny when I go on social media and I'll see like my friend posts this like crazy far left trans kids activism. And then I'm posting the opposite. But when it comes to us being friends, we do not attack each other over these things because we kind of understand politics of politics. That being said, Malano Vine Trobe decided to actually make a statement to me when I commented on one of her posts. I've commented on her posts periodically throughout the years because we used to be friends. And if those I don't know who that is, she's Lily from the AT&T commercials. She's also in Project Hail Mary.

And she's been campaigning for Nithia Rahman. And so she made a post about it. And I commented, how do you, I said something like, how, how do you think she was able to pull ahead of Karen Bass in a pull out of Karen Bass in late mail-in votes in a single jurisdiction, highly impressive? It's like, because I intentionally do not antagonize or even on my show, name the people that I've been friends with for a long time who are progressives. I'm not going to start a fight. Well, she responded with I'm a greedy humorless in-cell who sold his morals for views. And she learned long ago that, you know, she's like insulting me. And I said, you know, my response to her was like, you never once called me or a message to me or anything.

The last time I talked to her, considering, you know, my idea. We're not friends anymore? Okay, now you're just a progressive activist, and if you want to insult me in line. So my first statement was when I met her, I was already rich, so calling me greedy is ridiculous. She calls me humorless, despite the fact that I laughed at her comedy, at her comedy. I went with her to a comedy show where she performed and I left, and I made jokes, she laughed at, so that's clearly a lie. And I'm married with the kid, and she knows this.

So clearly, the insult thing, all just lies. And I think this is a perfect example of the left-right divide. And that's why I thought, you know, I'm going to talk about it. I thought about it for a while because I'm like, in all the years that I had known her, and all the things she had said and all the press of activism, she does, because again, she's a celebrity, I never said this, you know, Milano Vine troop, look how big she has and look what she's advocating for. I disagree.

I've never even brought her up. I said, you know what? This is off limits because we're friends and I'm not going to get into it. And my comment never insulted or anything like that. So she decides to insult me, so we're not friends anymore. Okay, so be it. I think this perfectly exemplifies the left-right divide. She made a video about a campaigning for Nithia Raman where she just disparaged Spencer Pratt, didn't explain his positions.

And that's fine. It's campaigning. And I look at the way she frames things and I say, right. Nithia Raman is accumulating votes through illicit activities, through ballot harvesting. It's all legal, but it is underhanded. And that's the problem with the left. I have no problem texting a progressive that I've known for years and having a conversation or inviting them on the show or anything like that. The response they give is you have defied our orthodoxy.

You are now our enemy. And so my response was this shows exactly what kind of friend you have always been. So I will just say this. Many of my early videos on the Timcast channel are at her house. Like hanging out with her in L.A. and she let me crash there. And I will say this too. She said that I changed. And I want to make sure this point is absolutely clear to everybody because it exemplifies, again, the culture war.

When I was at her house and it was, I hung out with it for a year. years, over a period of years, I should say, and I stayed at her place when I was in L.A. She had friends come over. Her friends are progressives. We all had very nice, cordial conversations about Trump supporters. And there was one great conversation where I was sitting down with her and a bunch of her friends, and they were talking about Trump supporters being racist and all that. And I said explicitly, I think it's like 2017 or 18. I said, oh, they're not racist. I said, I think there are racist and I think there are racist who support Trump. But like your average Trump supporters like a working class guy who lives in the suburbs or in like a rural

area. I think the concerns they have with like things that Trump is bringing up is like political elitism, the will of the people. I explained all this stuff we all talk about on the show. And they all nod along and said, oh, okay, well, you know, we agreed. I talked to her personally about all of these issues. One of the first conversations we ever had was over gun rights where she told me no one should be allowed to have guns. And I argued that, you know, I have a story where I was in Miami and someone broke into like, jumped our property and there had been murders like, what should I do? and it was a good conversation. She knows my opinions, going back to when we met, back in like 2013 or something, all of my

opinions are relatively the exact same if they've always been. I made YouTube views in her house. So for her to now say that I'm a greedy, humorless in-cell who's changed my views for money, what she's really saying is over time, our lust for power has come to preclude the likes of you and my willingness to have a conversation with you. You are our enemy. that's it. That's what she said. And I think that exemplifies exactly what the left really is, or at least so many of them. Well, I got to always give a sorry real quick. Shout it to Brian Shapiro.

Everybody knows Brian Shapiro, the right cause him lying, crying Brian. He's a friend of mine. We play poker together. He's very funny. We disagree on all these things. But he exemplifies what is good in people who actually may have disagreements. And I would much prefer that people like Brian, despite him being vitriolic in these peers Morgan's debates, I would prefer the left be him where he will actually still come to dinner with you and say, no, no, look, we disagree and I'll call your names, but I can hang out with you. And that I agree with. He's frustrating.

I know, he's bad on the internet, but I like Brian. I talk to Brian all the time. But I will say this, so, Tim, you're acting like you don't want to change. I think there's an argument to be made that the caterpillar into the butterfly, like, we should be changing. Like, we should always be evolving a little bit. So I think change is not bad. For her to claim that I sold my morals for you, he said, you used to be smart. my views haven't changed it like my views have only changed slightly on on the constitution and on

gun rights more so in favor of gun rights but again one of the first things we ever talked about when I met her was we need to have guns because these and and it was a nice conversation it was cordial for her to then claim that the same views I told her to her face are me changing I think really just shows that the left is a cult they like I'll put it this way how about if she had a problem, she just sent me a text and just say like... Publicly, yeah. Yeah, it's got to be publicly. But not even at the comment on her post, at any point in time when she said, I don't like

what you're doing. She could have called me and said, like, what's happening? Like, I watched this video you did. And we could have talked about it. And likely, I guarantee what happened is she watched a fake video from some lefty that was clickbait garbage. And instead of saying, like, is this real or what's going on? She just decided to say, I now hate you.

Which says to me, I don't think we're ever really friends. I think her world is just accumulating. power through social connections. And I think the difference between whatever it is we do, I'm not saying every Trump supporter is like this, but the right tends to be a quest for truth and functionality with an assertion of a moral worldview. And the left tends to be a moral worldview desperate for power. Again, Curtis Jarvis, Curtis Jarvin puts it very, very well. The right treats power like a like a wine snob treats alcohol and Democrats treat power the way an alcoholic treats alcohol. I'm going to go a little bit like, because I was rambling. And we got to get some

your rumble rances, which it wouldn't be fair to find and get them. So we'll just grab a couple more. I think I saw someone have a baby in the YouTube. Well, we'll try and get it. Receputon says, Tim, you are wrong. The U.S. Constitution is meant to defend state citizens against tyranny of the state. State constitutions are meant to defend citizens against federal tyranny. Read what the founding fathers wrote about the federal constitution.

I don't know if your point is actually contradicted to what I'm saying. The federal constitution was meant to constrain the federal government. and the state constitutions were meant to constrain state government. That's not the other way around. State constitutions aren't meant. You said the state constitutions are meant to defend against federal tyranny. I don't think that quite makes sense when, for instance, the Pennsylvania Constitution specifically outlines how they vote in Pennsylvania. It has nothing to do with the federal government at all.

So let's grab a couple of the YouTubes. A couple of the YouTube's over here. Let's see. Yeah, but I'll just say one more time. there are a lot of people that I'm friends with their prominent progressive personalities or celebrities. I've never mentioned their names because I'm like, they're off limits, they're friends. I'm not going to start a drama beef with someone who's literally a friend of mine. But, you know, I haven't spoken to spoken with Malana since she tried to overturn racial discrimination protections.

Not an exaggeration. She was advocating that California overturned their civil rights protections in their constitution. So I privately messaged her and we talked on the phone and I explained her that I thought it was dangerous. to give the government the ability to discriminate in the basis of race in schooling and contracting. And she said she was in favor of it. And I said, I think that's literal white supremacy. I think that like to reverse the civil rights era provisions that were put in the Constitution. And she said, I agree with it. And I said, okay, agree, disagree, I guess. So at any point, she had a disagreement. She could have done what I did and just called and talked about it.

Well, Rachel Wilson, $20 super chat. I remember how charitable and reasonable Brian Shapiro was to me, IRL. You guys got to be kidding me. Dude is nuts. What did Rachel and Brian? I didn't know. to crush out. Brian is extremely vitriolic. He is. I agree. Yeah. It's kind of like I'm sitting next to. But like, but if you ask him to get food with you, he will say yes. Maybe it's because you pay, though. Like, do you pay for dinner? Maybe he just wants a free dinner. No, no, no, no, no. Brian is like his point is garbage, but he's actually laid back guy in person.

We went to Vegas. Brian had me on and said, I heard you come into Vegas. Let's, let's hang out of that. Absolutely. We went and played poker. And it was hilarious. We played with Brad Garrett was there. It was awesome. He, he came. Brad Garrett's a legend. Everybody loves Raymond. And Brian stacked him and took a grand from him. From Brad Garrett? Yeah.

That's pretty cool. Yeah, Brad Garrett had two pair, but Brian had flopped straight. Brian's a retarded libtard, but he's kind of nice in person. I'll just say that. That's my point is like, Brian will go online and post crazy things. And then he'll be like, well, look, man, like when we hang out, we can kind of chill out. Well, he does say he doesn't like trans in women's sports. He's actually on our side of that.

My point is. between like Brian and Milana. Milana doesn't like my politics, so she calls me an in-cell humorless, despite the fact that we had been friends and I've known her for over a decade. Brian goes online and says crazy vitriolic things and starts fights with people,

but says, well, I'll hang out with you if you ask, and I'll be nice to you if you ask. And like, he's like, to Rachel, if you wanted to grab dinner with Brian and ask him to be polite, he would say yes. He would say absolutely. And you could,

and he would not be mean to you. I agreed. He can be nuts. on social media. Like, literally at the poker table, he's like, look what I said to this person. And I was like, Brian, why do you post stuff like that? I know. He will rage baiting. Like, that's what he does. I mean, he's just a little bit. And so that's allowed. Like, Milano wants to campaign for Nithia Raman. And I think Nithia Raman uses illicit voting practices to win. I didn't, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't insult her over it. I didn't, I did not make a video where I said,

screw you, blah, blah, blah. How did you do this? What was the tweet you said again? Which one? The tweet to her about Nithia Raman? I said, I posted on her Instagram, something like, how do you think she was able to do so well in early voting? in Karen Bass in a single jurisdiction valid, highly impressive. I mean, she may have taken that as sarcasm. Well, that's another part of the problem. I was literally legitimately asking like,

wow, like this candidate you campaign for outperformed in early voting. How do you think it is? Here's the reality. I think Melana knows full well. They are cheating. I think she knows exactly that if she answered that question, it would expose what they are doing.

So instead of saying, we dispatch activists to go knock on nursing home doors, ask people who they're voting for and if they're against us, we ignore them and leave. And if they're for us, we collect their ballot and we get paid to do it. I think that would kind of be bad for your political worldview. So instead, it's you're a

humorless, greedy, in-sell, and you've sold your soul, blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, right, this is the thing about, like, we had Destiny on the show. And Destiny's on a... He's on a bash it in... This is years ago. We talked about COVID, I think it was COVID, and how Democrats were using this.

to implement policy changes. And he says, when else would you? And I was like, what? And he goes, like, of course they did. And I said, well, hold on. An emergency happened. So Democrats use that to exploit the fear of the people to gain power.

And goes, yes. And I said, I think that's wrong. And he goes, I don't. And I said, okay, I respect that. Hillary Grins on record saying, don't let a disaster go to waste. Yeah, yeah. But what I respect about destiny in that regard is,

he says, this is literally what we're doing because we should. And I'm like, wow, I think that's evil. And he goes, okay, well, I don't. And I'm like, well, at least you're saying outright what you're doing. We got to go to the members only on censored portion, smash the like button, share the show, all that good stuff. We'll talk more about this. We'll keep it going.

We can spill the beans on a bunch. You know what? It's going to get spicy in the members portion. Because Alex got to say naughty things. I got to follow me. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast, Alex, what you got? Alexine 99. I'm going on tour the whole month of July.

Come see me. I'm coming to a city near you. Alexine99.com. Guys, if you want to follow me, I'm on Instagram and on X at Brett Dasevic on both of those platforms. You should watch Pop Culture Crisis. We are live Monday through Friday, 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, noon Pacific, YouTube, and Rumble. I'm also doing bonus content shows over on the Timcast Discord. Every other Saturday, I'm doing like a one-hour PCC event where I do some news in the pop culture space and then talk to callers. It's a lot of fun. You should

go become a Timcast member. I am Phil. It remains on Twix. The band is all that remains. You can check us out on Apple Music, Amazon, Music, Pandora, YouTube, Spotify, and Deezer. This Sunday, we are playing at the Warp Tour in Washington, D.C. You can get your tickets at WarpTur.com. That's sick. You're playing on the Warp Tour this weekend? It's Sunday, yeah. Oh, man.

Wait, wait, wait, where is it at? In D.C. Are we going to skate? Really? That's what the U.S. You need to go, Tim. That's awesome. Same day.

That's going to be nuts. Where in D.C.? I want to say Kennedy Park? I mean, we had talked about us. I'd love to skate the miniaramp if we could get in. They're going to have one, right? I don't know. They usually did.

But I think the problem for me is just security would be nuts. Yeah, they're going to, like, there's simply, you're like mob today. Well, no, like, anytime I got to go somewhere, I have a bodyguard. Yeah, but one bodyguard is not going to help you at the war tour. There's like, well, what, we're, well, well, right. No, I'm saying, like, when I travel, we have a bodyguard. When I go to big events, we have four. We need you, like, hit the mosh pit with the bodyguard.

It's going to be the festival ground. The bodyguard's just holding on me and hugging me and a little mom. All right, all right, all right. Are you good? We're wrapped up. Uh, don't forget the left lane is for crime. Left lane is for crime, Phil. You can follow me at Carter Banks on X and Instagram at Carter Banks Official.

Follow our label at Trash House Records on YouTube. Got a song coming out Juneteenth. And a promo is up right now. Let's get it, Tim. We'll see you all at rumble.com slash Timcast.I.R.L right now. Thanks for hanging out.