Timcast IRL - Natalie Winters Uncensored: Mr Beast Sued, Former Employee Claims Sexual Abuse

Episode Date: September 22, 2024

Tim & Co join Natalie Winters for a spicy bonus segment usually only available on Timcast.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to our special weekend show, Sunday Uncensored. Every week we produce four uncensored episodes of the TimCast IRL podcast exclusively at TimCast.com and we're going to bring you the most important for our weekend show. If you want to check out more segments just like this, become a member at TimCast.com. Now enjoy the show. Here we go. Mr. Beast is getting sued. Now, enjoy the show. unseal those documents with Diddy? I'd love to talk about Mr. Beast for sure, but Diddy the Diddy thing, what happened? Diddy's nickname should be Mr. Beast. They call him the Diddler. He totally did it. So he was trafficking underage

women? Was he running a sex cult? Is this full on? I think the government runs one. He works for the government. He's been a fed since the 90s. Diddy did it, man. Diddy did it. Well, right now Mr. Beast is being sued and Amazon for harassment of contestants on his reality show. The rumors that I heard is it's all fake.

That the people who come in are staff members or like that was some of the stuff that was getting leaked. They do these shows with like, you could win a million dollars and it's actually like a brother of a guy or something. And they're keeping it all in the family and it's all bullshit. Yeah. I said the lawsuit filed Monday in LA court by participants on the Amazon

prime show called Beast Games, which was announced in March, features over a thousand contestants, five million dollar prize and many other world records. The creator, Mr. Beast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, said at the time, the 54 page document describes allegations of players being subjected to unreasonable, unsafe and unlawful employment conditions. The several contestants being hospitalized. Jeez. Plaintiffs said they were fed sporadically and sparsely and not given adequate access to hygienic products or medical care. Dude, the guy legit made Squid Games. That's funny.

Is that what it is, though? Isn't he doing Squid Games? Beast Games? Is that what it is? I'm going to pull this shit up. Is it available? Can you watch it? Mr. Beast game show sued.

Mr. Beast is gross. You know what, man? I got to be honest. Mr. Beast is the weirdest shit ever. I've never seen one episode. I've never seen one clip. I don't know anything. It's like all these other people now talk like that guy. Five men and five women in the middle of the wilderness. And whichever group survives the longest.

Do you have a speech impediment? I give you all three days. Their money's all ours. How much do you want to bet that they're going to rig it so that the women win? Yeah. They did? You saw it? Because the reality shows that did the men versus women thing, the men always won.

One of my favorite ones was there was, what was it? It was guys on an island and women on an island. And then they showed the guys, they built a bar. And it shows them hanging out and drinking coconuts. And the women are crying and they have nothing. Then the women go to the guy's island and they demand stuff from them. Look at this. What is this?

He's not even here to gloat about it I just feel so sad now I ran for nothing Feels like I've been here for nothing If TJ isn't careful That feeling could quickly become a reality One of these That's stoned down

I want to go home so badly The contestant who forfeited Will now reveal themselves The boys lost And the girls won! We didn't want you guys to go home empty-handed, so we're going to give each of you ten grand for at least competing.

Phaedra is still alone at the girls' camp and has no idea she's just won. I think, you know what we need to do, and maybe we can do this with boonies, is just mock all of this shit. Like, we can do like, we put men and women in the wilderness for two months to see who would win and then by the end they're all just dead it's like

well oh sorry about that guys who wants to notify the next of kin anybody it's just mr mutton chops but as people now i used to watch beast content i've only seen like three of the four of the video five of the videos cool games because you can skip ahead've only seen like three of the videos four of the videos, five of the videos because you can skip ahead the women won like dude, let's be real if you put like we should totally do this where we're like

we're going to take five men and five women and they're going to go live in the woods good luck, that's it there's no supplies, there's no tent, just go in the fucking woods naked and afraid that was a show where they drop a man and a girl off a man and a woman off together naked naked and they'd each get to have one item like one guy would have like a knife and the other girl would have like a plastic bag or you can you pick any item you want i don't think so i think that i don't know if they choose or if they're given i think they get to sometimes they choose

sometimes they'll be like i wanted shorts i take a swiss army knife yeah i understand you could be like oh give me a van paracord Swiss Army knife. Yeah, knife is a good one. I understand you could be like, oh, give me a van. Paracord. You could ask for something weird. That's a popular one. Paracord would be a popular one. What is that? Like tight, long cordage that you can use to tie stuff. You can make rope.

But the thing about a Swiss Army knife is that you have a knife and you also have a magnifying glass. And so you can start a fire with that. The knife can help you make rope. I've never seen them get a really complex tool it's always been a simple tool like a knife a bowie knife or something it's a great show super cool and then they'll end up laying on the ground naked with all these bugs crawling up their assholes and stuff it's fucking it's nuts is that what you will break down you're not selling it for me i gotta see it once i would watch um dual survival

that was cody Lundeen. He walks around barefoot in the jungle. He's a naturalist. He can start fires with sticks and crap. And then Dave was this ex-Green Beret. He said he was. There were some issues with him issuing Stolen Valor. So he was the hunter and the killer.

And then Cody Lundeen was the fire starter naturalist. That's a good show. I love those survival shows. They're really, really fun to watch. Tim should do the meme for the pool games where they drop a woman, a bear, and a man in the woods. Pool games? Yeah.

Oh, no, actually a good idea is, we put a woman in the bear. We put a woman in the woods. You have to survive for 30 days with a choice of a bear or a man. And then she's like, I'll take the bear. And then in the next scene, it's like 10 minutes later, it's like, well, the show's over. It's like a trail of blood bear or a man. And then she's like, I'll take the bear. And then in the next scene, it's like 10 minutes later,

it's like, well, the show's over. She's dead. Yeah, she died. And no winner. And the bear's gone. Where the bear went? We assume he ate her body. I do want to do a game show, though.

I want to do liberal versus conservative trivia show. That'd be fun. Liberal versus conservative trivia show. Yeah, and I think it should be on the culture war. The trivia would be general trivia. Yeah, that'd be great. What was the name of the vice president

in 2009? Just like political history trivia about the U.S.? President right now. What's the answer, Ian? What was the question? Who was the vice president in 2009? It was Obama's VP.

Which was? I don't know. Conservatives win! The vice president then was the fake president. What is the real vice president then? Nobody that he hired for some reason. Biden. Joe Biden. My point is I guarantee you liberals are going to be like

I have no idea. That was not a hard question. They'll say Obama. I knew in 2009, I remember. I was paying attention a lot back then. Who was the Speaker of the House in 2017 when Donald Trump was inaugurated? I think it was Boehner. I think it was Boehner.

Boehner, final answer. I forget. Did you say Pelosi? Or Rubio, but Boehner. No. I'm going to go with Boehner Boehner finally I forget Did you say Pelosi Or Rubio Boehner No I'm gonna go Boehner The other one would have been Rubio

Wait in 2017 Ryan Ryan Oh wow I forgot that guy's a real person I think it was Paul Ryan Yeah I think you're right Yeah And then was it Boehner before that

Yeah it was Boehner for Obama Ryan was elected speaker on January 3rd 2017 Yep That's another good one It was banner for i was elected speaker on january 3rd 2017 yep that's another good it was paul ryan was conservative versus liberal liberal trivia conservatives are gonna get every single time it's gonna and it's gonna be like you know with 10 questions it'll be like six to four or seven to three but it's it's rarely ever gonna be five to five what do you do with like tough questions like what is a woman? I don't want to do that.

That's not a trivia question. I wouldn't do that one. The point is not to poke at the absurdities, but it's literally to see, can you answer basic fact questions of politics? It's like an old trivial pursuit before it got co-opted by whatever. But for the 1990s, have them play that game. I don't think that's fair. I think it should be modern uh modern politics like as of right now what is the title of the position held that assumes the presidency third in line the speaker right speaker of the house so uh it would be speaker of the house right and then following the speaker of the house what is fourth in line? What?

President pro temp of the Senate. So, like, I don't know if asking about fourth in line, you're getting a little in the weeds, but conservatives probably would know that. I saw an episode you and Mike Knowles did that was very funny. Oh, I destroyed him! You did very well. I saw it too, it was good. What was that called? Face Off, I think it was.

Yeah, that was really funny. One of my friends sent it to me. They told me it was a, it's really funny, you should watch it. They told me it was about the Civil War. And I was like, I don't know that much about it. I mean, I think Michael Nolte probably crushed me. And the first question was, who killed Howard Stark that triggered the events of Captain America Civil War? And I went, oh, that's easy. Bucky Barnes, a.k.a. the Winter Soldier.

It is a joke, and Michael Mills was like, what? I don't know. And I'm like, easy question. And he was like, oh, come on. But then the funniest part was the last question, the bonus, all or nothing, was what is the runtime of the song Together Again by Smokey, Mike, and the God King? And Michael's like, that's not fair.

He worked on it. And I was a little, he was like a minute under, and I was like a half minute over. That's hilarious. And I was like, yeah, it wasn't fair. Like, we covered it, so we were watching the song over and over and over again. Was it five minutes long?

512 or something? Like 455 or something. 455. Yeah, and I said 530 or whatever. I'd like a trivia show. I'd like to do a trivia show. I think we should set it up, and I think it should be, we could do it here,

like on Sunday, and we set up chairs, and we film, and it's like we just do a simple game show. Oh, that'd be cool, dude. And with the cash prizes? Yeah, like a thousand bucks. That'd be huge. Yeah. That's what made Mr. Beast so popular, was giving money away. That's really what propelled him into

the stratosphere. Like, obviously him grinding 12 hours a day playing Minecraft got him started, but once he started passing out money... Liberal versus conservative game show would be massive and you'd end up having liberals begging to come on the show because they're like, we're being made to look stupid because people aren't coming on. So would it just be American politics?

I think it should be, I think it should be party, it should be called like party versus party or party on party. And it doesn't have to be liberal Party versus party. And so we't have to be liberal versus party. And so we can have libertarians come in and like, well, the libertarians, well,

the green party, so we often have liberal versus conservative, but we also have anarchists versus like socialists or something. Yeah, man. And they're general, modern, political,

and I think economic and light cultural. So I don't think cultural in the sense of like, what are the name of the two actors in the 1999 film fight club? I don't, I think that's stupid cultural. So I don't think cultural in the sense of like, what are the name of the two actors in the 1999 film Fight Club? I think that's stupid. Because, you know, it was Edward Norton. You could do something like Jeopardy, though, too, where they get to pick the category

and then it's a seek five questions from each category. The way it's going to work is that there are two teams and I preferably do one-on-one for each of them. And so like two people will come up, and you'll get asked three questions, and you write your answer down. There's no buzzer. There's no fast finger.

It's do you know or don't you know. And if you both get it right, you both get a point. That's it. And if you get it wrong, nothing happens. And then the winner is whoever has the most points. That's sick. Yeah. I want to come on and do it with Vermin Supreme.

I want to be on his team. He's a smart guy. Oh, yeah. His tweets during the debate where he won the debate. Vermin Supreme acts like a clown. He's actually really smart. Oh, yeah, you can tell. Get him in here.

That's great. You can tell that dude's a genius. He wears the shoe on his head. I don't know that he would do a legitimate interview, though. Okay. He's always in character. If he was out of character, he'd have a real conversation, and he'd probably be a lot like Dave Smith.

Oh, badass. Maybe it's time for him to— He's a libertarian anarchist guy. I've been watching him for like 15 years. Unfortunately, he ended up siding more so with the left because people got scared. You know? That's too bad. He's always been on the left, and a lot of us were like, we're leaving the left because the left's fucking nuts.

And he very much was like, I'm going to stay here. It's like, dude, they're authoritarians, and your ideology doesn't mesh with them. But whatever. You know. It is what it is. He should have been hanging out with Michael Malice, I guess. Yeah, I don't get into the authoritarian stuff that much. We got to do this game show.

I think it should be. So the culture war show. We want the culture war to be a bigger thing than just the one show a week. We're talking to Elad about doing man on the street interviews. So like the debate happens. Elad goes out and asks a handful of people and we do like a half an hour where he asked random people like, what do you think about the debate? Who won?

See what people think on city streets. Great. Fridays, of course, we do the sit down show where we have the debates, but I think we could have the culture war as a game show too. We do a, we do a, you know. Oh yeah. Liberal versus conservative or trump it could be libertarian versus anarchist it could be libertarian versus socialist it could be trump voter versus kamala voter it could be disaffected liberal i don't like any of the parties i'm independent versus you know whatever we pick uh like the questions should be i think the questions should be uh easy

you know it's like what's the middle name of the last speaker of the house before you know mike johnson it's like so that would have been um what's his face who got mccarthy seven speakers before the third speaker ago eight speakers after that guy who was it who is the fourth highest ranking member of the democratic party in congress like no no no no nobody cares and knows that shit it's got to be like what is the middle name of the current president of the united states what member of congress has that is correct hussein's the real one bonus points thank you shadow campaign would you do like which member of Congress has the largest shoe size?

No. No one knows? Yeah, and it's a stupid thing to ask. Imagine if someone knows that, though. You'd be like, oh, dude. How many stripes are on the American flag? 15. 13.

Oh, Ian, you're just losing. Hey, I didn't answer yet. I started to say 50. It's 13. Oh, 13. He said stripes, not stars. Not stars. That's why I caught myself.

How many stars were on the 1967 American flag? Technically, there's only seven stripes on the American flag on a white background. It's red and white. Just a bunch of seven red stripes on a white background. Those white blocks aren't really stripes. What are they? Just white background that the white blocks aren't really stripes. What are they? Just white background that the stripes are on top of. Yeah, that's the argument I make

and derail the entire show. It's like, actually, it's negative space. But then by that logic, there'd be zero stars. Because it's just blue empty space patterns on top of a white background. The funny thing about this is that the reason why it would be so entertaining is because liberals would be flabbergasted half the time.

If you said something like, which political leader threw an entire bowl of fish food into a koi pond in 2017? Trump. Shinzo Abe. You are wrong. How did you say it? How did you frame it? Which world leader? World leader.

And Trump only followed suit. It was Shinzo Abe who actually was the one who threw the food. They both did, though? Yeah. Or is that a Mandela effect? Did Trump throw food afterwards? Trump followed suit. Okay.

Actually, I think Trump poured his in and Shinzo Abe threw his in. So Trump's going like that. Semantics. But the point is to do things that are like, wait, that what? So you can say like, how can we phrase this one? What is the name given to the worst riots experienced in the United States in modern history taking place at the end of May in 2020. Summer of Love. That is correct. The Summer of Love

is what is referred to. The world is going to go, huh? What are they going to call it? The George Floyd protests? We're not talking about the protests. We're talking about the riots. They were called the Summer of Love riots. That's the colloquial term. So it would be funny when we say things like that. Or, um, which candidate was falsely accused

of calling neo-nazis very fine people which president was falsely accused they're gonna go trump literally did that so they're gonna beg do i put sounds like you're waiting the questions to get them to answer the way you want them to the point is that's a really easy question anybody who knows politics is gonna say well trump was falsely accused but is going to be like, falsely accused of saying it? Well, Trump did say it, so it can't be Trump. And then they get it wrong and you're like, it was Donald Trump. Snopes debunked this seven years later, of course, saying that Donald Trump, in fact, never called Nazis very fine people. Which president bombed Afghanistan three times every hour, every day for a year. Which president is responsible

for the extrajudicial killing of a 16-year-old American citizen in a foreign country? These are the same answer. That's right. Same answer. Just make the answer. Every question Obama,

it's just really fucked up shit. And then you end with, and who's running the government? That's right. Same. Who is the real president right now? Puppeteering Joe Biden. I would love that.

At a certain point, the liberals are just like, is every answer to every question going to be Barack Obama? The name of the show is Obama, actually, too. That's a funny bit, though. Yeah. A trivia show called Obama. Which president presided over the more, which president presided over more criminal charges under the Espionage Act of journalists and whistleblowers than any other president in history combined? Which president oversaw Operation Fast and Furious? Legalized property. Which president oversaw an operation which gave rifles to criminal cartels dubbed Fast and Furious.

Which president? Which administration oversaw the crisis in Libya resulting in several dead servicemen and women? I love this show. Which president was lambasted for wearing a tan suit? Which president married a woman named Big Mike? Which president was accused of marrying a transgender woman who was actually biologically male

and adopting children to pretend to have kids? They're going to be like, you're just making fun of Obama. That's right. Thank you for coming to our show. Is it Macron? Is Macron? Well, that's true. But we're talking about American politics.

Bonus point. Is his wife a man? Do you want to get sued by France? By France? Have they been suing people for making this plan? No, someone just had to pay. I think it was like an $8,000 something fine. I think it was a fine.

I just think it's so fucked up. Like you're an old, ugly woman and they're like, you must be a man. It's like, come on. Oh, that's it? She's old and ugly? We don't know. We don't know. I don't think Bridget McCrone is a man.

I think she's just, you know. I'm sure it's a weird meet-cute though. She was working at the school. She's way older than him, right? Was his teacher 30 years or something? When people share the image of E.T. in the woman's clothes next to her,

it's so fucked up. E.T.? We're going to go to callers over here. Callers over here. As always. Alright. We're going to go to callers over here. Callers over here. It's Bridget McCrow. As always. Calling in. All right. We're going to bring in Dex69420.

Good sir, the question for you is, which president presided over the largest corporate bailouts in American history? Barack Obama. Oh, that's correct. You win. You win. Nice job. Rosa Parks' husband had a car how you guys doing

is that true yeah good opener yep the civil rights movement was based on a lie oh yeah they were scouting out there was a there was another story where a young girl was talking shit and she was a sex worker so they're like we don't want to use her for this for this you know publicity so they scouted people to try and figure out who would be the right person for. Oh, really? The bus protest. Yeah. It's all theater.

Anyway, sir, do you have a question for us? Yeah. So my question is for everyone. Given the escalation of the Israeli conflict, can we see in the near future a possibility of the U.S. being involved before Trump takes office, assuming he wins? Yes. There's rumors already going around that Israel's green lighting an invasion of southern Lebanon, which I hope the fuck not.

But yeah, I mean, one of my theories is that they're going to try to start an international conflict. If it looks like Trump is going to win and they can't stop him, they need the war to start that Trump can't stop. I guarantee they get a war and Trump can't do anything about it. They're willing to lock down the whole world, I think, in my opinion, to stop Trump. They're willing to start another war. One of their

favorite things to do. I think we might see direct conflict with Russia. It seems possible. I also think, too, another interesting side effect of depicting Russia, there's such a myopic focus on the disinformation campaigns and the foreign election interference. I think we were talking about in the last show, you kind of lose track that you're actually dealing with the potential for nuclear war when you reduce Russia to this meme generation farm, content farm. And I just think, I don't i just i don't think we take them

seriously again not to trump them um although also i think in the same vein it is also very interesting the way in which they portray russia i always joke that this whole russian election interference narrative is sort of like the greatest pr campaign for russia too right in the sense that it makes it seem like they have such influence over the United States, our elections, when they realistically don't. So, but hey, Victoria Nuland's resigned from the State Department,

so we'll take a win when we can get one. When is that happening? A few months ago, she did. But that's almost more concerning. What if the October surprise is that Big Mike is a guy? Wouldn't be much of a surprise It wouldn't even trend Yeah

I married a man It's gonna be It's gonna be blue beam They're gonna beam in fake You know what they also say That the younger daughter isn't really his daughter Oh I haven't heard that one She's a guy too. They're all guys.

All of them. No, no, no. There was like some dude that Michelle was very close. Because the girls don't look related. They do look very different. And the younger one looks like

it's a whole other hole. If Michelle's Mike, they'd have a surrogate, then the kids wouldn't look much like. Again, just a ledge. I mean, this is a ledge, you know. We're not in France, Natalie. This is what Russia is saying. Anyway, back to the main question at hand. Do you want to elaborate a little bit or is there anything you want to add to the question?

No rush? Yeah. When I mentioned U.S. involvement, I mean, how likely are we seeing American boots on the ground, like actual U.S. forces? Well, in Israel, we already had troops on the ground. They were building a pier to create a beachhead in Gaza, which is fucking nuts. And so, and they were under fire. They were being shot at. So I think that qualifies as crazy.

They're like, there were no boots on the ground. They were on boats just off the ground. And I'm like, get the fuck out of here. They're getting shot at, dude. And they were authorized to shoot back. That's US involvement. And they were lying about it. So I think very strong likelihood if conflict does

erupt that the U.S. is going to be operating out of Israel for sure. Those answers too are variable. How likely the likelihoods are variable because of what we're doing, how influential this is, being able to speak your mind openly and get tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, even millions, tens of millions of people to hear you and to follow your path you can kind of guide what ends up happening with our soldiers and our military sort of so a lot of it depends on what we do as a citizenry

in the meantime how willing we are to put up with this yeah I suppose we'll see then yeah I guess the only other thing I would say is Yeah. I suppose we'll see then. Yeah. I guess the only other thing I would say is for everybody to make sure they cast their votes this November. Even vote early if you have to. And, yeah.

Have a good night. Right on. Thanks for calling in. C-Man 69, 420, dog. What was the first part of the name? Dex. Dex, dude. Catch you later all right next up we've got ike the mage what is up ike hello tim cast thank you for letting me on hey buddy

um so howdy first time caller uh long time listener my first episode was the yay one, which was excellent. Excellent time to come in. Right. My my question for the whole panel and you might get a kick out of this one is when do y'all think definitionally the United States as a republic ended? Because I believe around 1912, 1913, agreed when the Federal Reserve was enacted. I agree. But I'd like the whole panel to talk about that. When do y'all think it was? Well, I'm there too. Yeah.

That was what I always said is like 1930 federal reserve act was like the final nail in the coffin. But I think that the coffin started being built after the civil war when they were like this, this whole letting everyone kind of represent themselves. Things is going a little too far. We need to centralize authority with federal command. And that's kind of like antithetical to the idea of like each man represents themselves with local governance but man the Federal Reserve really just the banking Coup I think the final

book end to that in my opinion I agree with both those answers would then be they made it public that the death happened when they took out JFK. It was like, now we're exposing how just evil we are. And this is the end. I will say earlier than that, when we got involved in World War I. It's the Federal Reserve. And the reason they took out JFK was because he's supposed to be a puppet of the machine and he defied them. So they do away with them.

So the machine was in control. That just proves that the machine had already been in control at that point. And it was challenged during the Second World War by the Nazi empire, the regime, whatever you call it, the Reich, whatever. But had the Nazis won, we'd probably be serving under a Nazi empire right now. It would be a Nazi global superpower. It would be a unipolar Nazi world. And you would not like it. be a unipolar nazi world and you would not like it likely likely unipolar probably there might be japanese well the soviets are still there if but so so the issue is

i don't think there was ever really a threat of the united states losing because germany was basically at war in europe and japan and germany weren't like we we called the axis powers but japan and germany were Germany were acting very separately. And so they had trade to a certain degree, but they never actually interacted in the battlefield. Yeah, it might have been instead of the U.S., the liberal economic order, the Russian order and the Chinese or whatever you call it. It could be it could have become like the Germans, the Japanese and the Americans. And it would have been like those three fascist dictator dictatorial orders but like because the the liberal economic order came out on top they just transformed the earth

away from like civil liberties in a lot of ways in 1949 when they set up this liberal economic order with like the advancement of the cia and uh u.s i don't know when us aid was built you guys ever study usa mike benz has been talking about it a lot it's uh u.s i don't know when u.s aid was built you guys ever study u.s aid mike benz has been talking about it a lot it's uh u.s it's it's like the center of the defense department the u.s um agency for international development international agency for international development and it's like the center of the state department the uh department of defense and the c all the intelligence agencies and it's like the centralized authority u.s aid and people are confused sometimes and think that it's like an aid organization that does aid.

It's just association for international development, which means we're going to go in there and take what we want. We're going to bribe governments. We're going to. And so this, this monster, this blob, Mike Benz calls it a blob a lot because it just takes over everything.

It falls over. That's very anti-Republican. What's that? Yeah. That thing makes sense because wilsonian interventionism the reason we got into world war one was to make the world quote unquote safe for democracy makes sense but uh yeah unless y'all had anything to add i don't really have anything else to add uh you want to shout anything out anything oh yeah uh i have a instagram and youtube

under ike the mage uh same as my discord just one word right on what kind of mage are you uh red uh i don't know i would i'd say a fire mage i like fire that's probably my favorite element fire is nuts dude sure is fire buddy all right thanks for calling in man see y'all all right next up we will grab fenix silver tail what is up edX what's up guys um i got got a question. Hold on. Before your question. The question for you, sir, is which president was the second most popular getting the second highest amount of votes in a presidential election? That's the second most popular. Wasn't that Donald Trump in 2020?

Barack Obama. Obama. What? Nah. No, actually, I think you're right. I think it is Donald Trump, actually, yeah. It would be Donald Trump because... I suppose I should have said, and when.

Because Biden... My point was that the joke was supposed to be that Biden beat Obama. What the fuck? Anyway, your question... Yeah, right. All right, what's going on? My question is kind of like, Tim, you're always saying like the replacement numbers, things like that. Eventually, conservative ideas are going to surface to the top.

And living in California, I often see a lot of like leftists that have like two to three kids. So I'm kind of just curious about like, do you mean that they're going to like damage their kids enough that they're not really going to continue that line or something like that? Or like, I'm always kind of curious on elaborating more to how that works out. National liberal fertility is 1.6. It doesn't matter if there are some liberals with two or three kids. Of course they, of course there are. Conservative fertility is like one point. Actually, no, I think liberals at one or something. Let me, let me just double check the numbers. Cause we did go over this like a couple weeks ago so let me ask what is what is the current fertility rate of u.s liberals because i think it was like 1.4 or something wasn't it let's see the answer that we get the current fertility rate for liberals in 2024. The AI. Historic low among liberals.

Blah, blah, blah. It's pattering and giving me stupid bullshit. And what's the number, dipshit? It was just like liberals are at historic low, especially younger ones. 1.64. What is it for conservatives i think conservatives 1.8 or 1.9 or something uh generally much higher uh let's see blah blah blah blah blah it's giving me this bullshit it's like can trump supporters typically believe blah i don't give a shit i don't give a shit

what's like every time i'm trying to argue with my brother it's the same thing it's like how am i getting all this nonsense right uh suggesting because we went over this uh it's not it's it's just it's just giving me more patter whatever anyway we went over this before we pulled the sources and it said republicans are like 1.85 or something so it's still low but there's simple math liberals abort their kids their kids. They sterilize their kids. So even even with their fertility at one point six, actually, one point six is the national average. So liberals are lower than that. I think it was one point four three or something with liberals sterilizing their kids. They may have a kid, but the kid can't have kids. And so you're looking at a kid who's 10 with maybe it's like a one in a thousand chance of being sterilized or put on drugs that can inhibit the ability to have kids. That means that you're going to see a further reduction in the next generation. 20 years from today, it's going to be 53% Republican. 20 years

from then, it's going to be 57, 58. They're trying to bring in all these migrants and get them to vote Democrat for sure. That's their only answer. That's why they're flooding this country. However, when you look at the Teamsters supporting Trump, the people that are coming in can't assimilate and vote fast enough. So what's going to happen is they're going to try and flood the country as many illegal immigrants as they can, which is what they're doing, because they know in 10 years it's going to be 60-40 Republican Democrat unless they pad the numbers now. I think, however, they can't bring in a naturalized immigrants fast enough in order to get those votes. So I think it's only a matter of time, especially with conservative resistance right now, which they're panicking about. That's why they're denying the Haitian migrant story and the cats eating the cats because they desperately need to maintain these people coming in.

If conservatives sit back and do nothing and focus on taxes or abortion or something and just like, oh, no, I'm pro-China, I'm pro-life, blah, blah, blah, and then do nothing about immigration, then this country is going to stay where it is and it's going to keep pushing Democrat. If Donald Trump comes in and says, build the wall and shuts down illegal immigration, this country becomes conservative in a generation. Okay. And the other thing I've seen is also like, um, heavily conservative parents that, uh, like their, their kids will be like the craziest leftists I've ever met too. Literally doesn't matter. Completely irrelevant. People seem like we're talking

on those issues. That's micro issues on the macro. Scientific research shows that children who are born to conservative parents retain their parents values. You had some. What about it? Oh, someone says use USCIS just mass approved green cards last week. This is what the Democrats plan is. So I hear a lot of people saying, but the schools, they're indoctrinating kids. Yes, but there's a culture war right now stopping that. This is the problem for Democrats. Conservatives are organizing and engaging in media in ways they don't like, like films.

Am I racist? Am I racist? Prove that conservative ideas are starting to come to the surface because there's more money. They keep trying to do this woke bullshit in TV shows and it's failing. Disney lost a billion dollars. We're already starting to see the ramifications of a destructive ideology that kills its own children. There are young people who go on social media, TikTok, Instagram from conservative parents and become liberal.

But the data shows that kids who are born to Christian parents tend to be Christian. Kids born to Muslim parents tend to be Muslim. These are all macro level trends that aren't changing simply because sometimes liberals have extra kids or sometimes a kid goes to college. So it slows things down. But now that conservatives are fighting back, I say that erases the school problem. Conservatives are challenging schools and to a great degree, pod learning, school choice, all of these things are bubbling up. Getting the porn out of schools is fucking with the left

and the left is sterilizing their kids at the same time and having abortions like crazy. We already see the results of this from 2020. I'm sorry, from 2000. When we talk about conservatives had 2.01 kids, not replacement level, and liberals were having 1.4.

Today, Pew shows that Gen Z is slightly more conservative. And it's not because they're based and they read Trump's musings. It's because there are just more of them. That's it. Nobody I convince of anything. Kids were raised conservative. There are more kids who are raised conservative than raised liberal. Thus, we see Gen Z slightly more conservative in some ways, though they're still almost as progressive as millennials, slightly more in some ways. If that trend continues, already reversing 100 year historical trend, the math is simple. Macro level trends suggest liberals sterilizing and aborting their kids will create a conservative Christian country or Muslim. I think just like how everyone's like, what are we gonna do with all the horse shit

in like the late 1800s? Oh my God, everything is trending towards too much horse shit. What's gonna happen is the transhumanist agenda is gonna start chipping people's brains and commanding them to have X amount of children and believe Y thing. Well, I don't actually think it's going to happen.

I think it could happen. Liberals are more likely to go into the video game world and not have kids. Liberals are probably, I'd estimate, five to one. Yeah, but once they're in there, they can be changed, and then they may not be liberal anymore. They're not going to have kids. They're going to go in the pod. They're going to get a tube in their throat pumped full of cockroach, and they're going to live in a reality where they're King Winston-Sin who can fly in a dragon. Or it'll be augmented, and they'll be like live in a reality where they're king winstonson or flying a dragon or it'll be augmented and i'll be like i have to have more like it could be like that's not

have kids muscle gets turned on and they're like the idea that the entire liberal movement which for 20 years has been saying don't have kids and has been running new york times articles saying you're selfish if you're having kids people want to have kids are ego ego egoists people want to save the world should stop having kids there's no way they plug their brain in. And then overnight liberals change overnight, but mimetic magic like that shit, the way that genes can be altered through your environment is rap. It can be rapidly shift. So what's likely going to happen is that when they introduce read, write neural link technology that allows you to go into immersive realities, conservatives are going to overwhelmingly reject this, especially Mennonites and Mormons and liberals are going to overwhelmingly reject this especially mennonites and and and

mormons and liberals are going to whack off until their brains explode or have family you never know but like they could be changed in that people that are like sexually deviant or lost might go into a virtual realm that's actually holistic and bro you learn about having a family no with i'm just gonna stop i won't even i won't even try to give you any on this you can't look at 20 years of democrats continually escalating degeneracy sexual deviancy abortion sterilization advocacy against family and then argue at some point for some reason they decide to go conservative you it sounds like you were one of the that way of thinking is the kind of person that's like you can't just say that this horse shit will just somehow magically disappear in 20 years you can't say that it's impossible. No, it is possible that

there will be a paradigm shift. I'm saying that if you go back 60 years, liberals were hippies talking about free love and doing drugs. And that has only evolved for 60, 70 years. It would be silly to assume that trend changes. That is to say, at a certain point, media will shift and horse shit will go away. But Ian, I got news for you. There are still a fuck ton of people who ride horses and they ride them on city streets and they do shit all over the place. Well, I don't know if I'd say a fuck ton of them.

Also, I'm not assuming that there'll be a shift. This is true. By law, horses can go on highways. I know, but when's the last time you saw one? I don't know, six months ago? You saw one? I saw fuck tons. I was in Alaska.

Okay, in Alaska. Okay. In Alaska, maybe people ride horses on the road. Lancaster. I see horses every fucking day out here. I wouldn't call it a fuck ton. Let's ask everybody and say, how many people riding horses do you see every day or in a year riding down the road? Most people will tell you

zero. Absolutely not. Have you ever been to New York City? Yeah, I lived there for like eight years. You see a horse every day. You see a cop on horseback. That's right. And the fucking horses are being abused. And they shit on the floor.

They shit on the floor where they stand. I know, I know. Exactly. And if you go to Central Park, you'll see 300. Well, no. Yes, you will. No, no. I've never seen 300 dudes on horseback at Central Park.

300 horses. I've never seen 300 horses at Central Park on a day. You've not seen a huge line of all of the carriages that people pay money and go riding. Yep. I've seen them. I just don't see fuck tons. I mean, 300 minutes niche, you know, and there was there were big stories about the horse. What I'm saying is the age of people riding horses and taking horse and carriages over.

No, it isn't the age. It's like saying the Iron Age is over. Yes, we still use iron, but we're out of the Iron Age. My point is, you're talking about how one day all the horseshit disappears. The horseshit was dramatically reduced. Yeah, exactly. So this whole, like, psychosis could be reduced, too. I'm not saying that it's likely.

I'm saying it's possible that something might change and that people will start having a lot of kids again. And you know why that will be reduced? Because they will be dead. And the people who are having the kids are the conservatives who didn't go in the Neuralink. That is possible. But they're... That is likely. I mean, that's without any kind of change.

Yes, that is the likely trajectory. The reason horses died out was not because... Actually, have you seen... What was that show? 1917 or whatever? 1912? I didn't see it. You know what I'm talking about?

The war one? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. you know you know i'm talking about the war one no no no no no no no no no 1970 that's all you're talking about tv show yeah yellowstone themed show so you had 1876 what the fuck the year was right then you had the harrison ford one in that they actually uh approach the idea of he rides his horses into town and he tries to find a hitching post and he's like what the fuck and they're like well cars are coming in the older people never gave up their horses they just died younger people decided to get cars okay yeah so rather than people going in there and being in their 30s and 40s and changing you're thinking of the new generation will just be different so here's what happens

liberals go into the neural link and beat themselves off to death conservatives have a bunch of kids and then you have the same population and everyone's just like oh we don we don't do that Neuralink stuff anymore. Not because one day a liberal went, I just don't want a Neuralink. It's because he didn't have kids and he died. Yeah. So the, the, the, what you take a look at how human society evolves. My point about Gen Z being slightly more conservative, which is a fact, as I said, it's not because a 13-year-old Gen Z kid one day turned on Joe Rogan and went, oh wow, now I'm conservative. Hold on, let me finish this.

Gen Z, Gen Xers had a bunch of kids. The conservatives had more kids than liberals. So those kids were raised in conservative families, and today, in their 20s when they're polled, they're conservative. So those kids were raised in conservative families. And today in their 20s, when they're polled, they're conservative. So what what Pew Research showed us is that Gen Z

slightly more conservative by a point or two. Again, it's not because a liberal family had a liberal kid and the liberal kid watched Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson. Those liberal kids came from liberal parents and they're still liberal. That is to say, much the same will happen with Neuralink. Liberals will plug their brains in, fantasize about fucking whatever the fuck they want, wanking till they die. Conservatives will have kids. And then 20 years later, they'll be like, what do you mean? We just don't do that anymore. As an industry, it died out. And people aren't going to go around saying liberals masturbated to death. They're going to say it just became unpopular until no one was using it anymore. Why?

Generations change based on how they're raised. So liberals aren't going to wake up one day and be like, time to have kids. They're going to die, and conservatives will keep having kids, and the society will become conservative. The video game market, the net, the net is just,

is just driven towards sexual deprivation. Like, do you foresee a way that... I'm just being crude when I say that. I'm saying liberals, dude, a short... Look, you go to the RNC and what do you find? Overwhelmingly, the guys are tall, they're chiseled, and they're fit.

They're fat, ugly guys. You know this is true. I was going to disagree with you. You're wrong. It is a scientific fact that conservatives are more attractive. It's been pointed out in numerous. When you go to conservative conventions, there is a higher percentage above average of attractive men and women. Women have a tendency to being bustier, to being more fit or being blonde. Men have a tendency to

be taller, have chiseled five o'clock shadows and be fit. There are still fat, ugly guys and fat, ugly old women. That's true. But you go to the DNC, you are more likely to see short men and fat women. This is scientifically true. I pull it up all the time and the liberals lose their fucking minds about it. Why is that? Well, there's a lot of social reasons behind it. But the point is, we know these things are true. Yeah, I think it seems to be that when you start taking care of your body, you just don't

give a shit what other people are doing. It's not just that. It's that people who are interested in meritocracy are more likely going to lean toward a meritocratic political party. Making themselves better and then lean towards meritocracy. I worked hard to be fit. You can do it too. You're lazy. Now, my point is this. So I was at the DNC in, I think it was 2016. And I remember seeing a protest of five foot tall, morbidly obese women and five foot tall men

who were scraggly looking, thinning hair, were like, those guys and those women are going to plug into the Neuralink in two fucking seconds. These guys are going to be like, I'm tired of trying. Have you ever listened to How Soon Is Now by Morrissey?

Talk about a fucking incel oh you post those lyrics recently oh god those lyrics were pretty wild morrissey yeah there's a club if you'd like to go you can meet someone who really loves you so you go and you stand on your own and you leave on your own and you go home and you cry and you want to die that dude is plugging his fucking brain and now morrissey he's kind of based now he's awesome i also feel like those people have such low sperm counts and and the women are infertile, and I mean that with no judgment, but also the environment we live in, it's not great. Your average conservative guy who believes in meritocracy, who exercises and eats right,

is going to be like, I want to find a woman. Your average scrawny, incel Democrat feminist guy is going to be like, I want to find a man. I want to ride a dragon. He's going to go into the Norlink. He's going to ride dragons and bang princesses. He's going to be like, I want to find a man. I want to ride a dragon. He's going to go into the Norlink. He's going to ride dragons and bang princesses. He's going to die. Are there studies correlating depression and low sperm count? Testosterone levels.

So there was a really funny post where NPR males got their testosterone tested, and one of the hosts' testosterone was like 114. It was like dead people. 114 is like it's a medical emergency and you need an intervention and medication immediately. And this was like an NPR host. He was depressive. No, no, no. You should do the BuzzFeed Try Guys.

Do you remember them? That's so fucked, man. They're guys in their 20s and their testosterone is like 200. What the fuck, dude? Anyway, we got to grab one more caller here. So, Phoenix, is there anything else you wanted to add? Just I got a YouTube channel. It's the same as my name, Fennec Silvertail.

It's also Twitch. And also just say hey to my brother. Hey, Joe. Hey, Joe. All right, take care, guys. Thanks for calling in. Good night. See you, man.

Great prompt. And I believe the last caller we've got is TJ Rain Man. Welcome to the program. What's up, guys? Hi. Am I supposed to start out with some historical fun fact, like Hitler had a tongue ring or something? Did he?

Which one? Okay, here's a trivia question. That's what people say. All right, so yeah, I'll direct my question to Natalie. Oh, no, trivia question then. Since she's mentioned propaganda a few times tonight. So we've all noticed that the lies and propaganda that the left spews constantly, so much so that I heard rumor that the Kamala Harris campaign is getting sued for it.

What I want to know is, how do you think that we can collectively combat their false narratives, half-truths, and propaganda lies? I feel like there should be a way that we just immediately ratio any ex-post that is telling a lie like this. I mean, we're doing that with community notes. Yeah. With community notes? I mean, like like basically people immediately ratio kamala and everybody else when they lie yeah watching and amplifying shows like this and i think being in the replies i don't know i feel like with the algorithm in some ways it's it's

great that you kind of get only the content that you want to see right but it's a right there's also i think a downside to that and that you don't get exposed to what you don't want to see when i took the one number one thing i learned from stephen k bannon is watch msnbc watch opposition media you can reverse engineer the narratives that they're pushing and i think to most effectively push back you really have to see how it all works right the story drops in the morning on the new uh the new york times the washington post by evening time. It's primetime on MSNBC and it all goes together. And I think you're seeing it play out right now, especially when it comes to the sort of election administration stuff. Like I was saying earlier, right, the mail in ballots, the sort of issues, the eccentricities when it comes to delivering those on time, the, you know, fear porn over the election workers, all of that. Again, it's sort of hard,

much like the Hunter Biden hard drive story, right? There's so many names and like characters that you have to look into. But what is the end goal of, say, the election narrative now? I would argue they're normalizing. They're trying to bring about predictive programming for the idea that we saw published yesterday in Axios, which is that there will be delays in election results, right? And then in those delays, they always seem to find just enough ballots for one candidate and always seems to go one way. But in understanding that narrative, which I think is always oftentimes rooted in projection, that's how you go about dismantling it and sharing clips from this show, sharing clips from War Room, I think is the best way to push back. And just the fact that you're aware puts you miles ahead of i think

most people uh pbs and npr hosts with like double digit testosterone levels included jeez that testosterone thing freaks me out yeah gotta get that core healthy. Loosen up the lower gut. If I could interject very briefly with what Natalie was saying, I think that a lot of people who are really in the know and are following very closely do understand the nuances and their narratives and how they're lying. But for the just low information voter, I feel like the lie gets to them so much easier than the truth actually does. And that's kind of what I'm wondering about how we combat. Does that make sense? You're saying because the faulty narrative or just the projected, I don't know what you would want to call it, I guess, Operation Mockingbird forced narrative is arriving to low information voters sooner? That then how do you deprogram someone that's already heard that and integrated it into their system? Basically, yeah, they hear it sooner and they hear it more loudly. And we all spread the truth. But by the time we're arguing against the people who are spreading the

lies the damage is already done yeah man it's like it's like triage because it does replicate the the mind the way thoughts like they'll i don't know if it's actually going from cell to cell to cell in your body or if it's just sitting there for longer and then you know reducing neuroplasticity around the possible changes of that thought. But like a lot of it where you say time is of the essence, it's not necessarily, you don't have to get in there right away and be like, wait, wait, wait, before you, before you truly believe that that does help.

This requires less, less resistance, but like you can do it in a way where you say it when they're like laughing and then they'll be more likely to believe you um if you're calm and like you have a calming presence when you say it they're more likely to listen to what you're saying and integrate it and write it into their code you can also i think meet people where they are and i think that's sort of the like significance of the rfk junior endorsement in the sense that there are a lot of people who maybe don't consider themselves inherently political, but they watch their, you know, wellness podcasts, they're super into, you know, sourcing grass fed meat, stuff like that. And it's like, well, hey,

if you don't trust the government when it comes to your sourcing of food, or you don't like how they've stripped magnesium from the soil, or you don't like things like that, why do you think they're telling you the truth about everything else? You know, and I think it's kind of it's always kind of fun not that you're trying to like manipulate your friends or people that you talk to but finding what certain people are passionate about and like reworking it into like yeah but have you considered this kind of corollary to that I've had a lot of success with sort of so for some of my more like normie girlfriends, just putting it in the context of stuff that they can understand. I say that in the least like patronizing way, but.

You get them to question the entire narrative as a whole because they see specific areas. You just need that one moment. And I think that that was like what happened with COVID for a lot of people, right? It like shattered. You realize, oh, if you're lying to me about this. I got a lot of people with Tuskegee

when they're talking about vaccines who were for the vaccines. I would then break down Tuskegee and be like, you really trust these people? And that opened up a lot of conversations. I'm only here to talk to slaves. That's right. What?

Yeah. Open up this can of worms. Chain gangs. You're talking about the chain gangs? Yeah, she was instructed to release people from prison, but she wanted to use them to fight wildfires instead, so she kept them in prison. Forced them to do wildfire labor for nothing.

As a descendant of slave owners, she had slaves. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Are you a descendant from slave owners? I don't know, I was in Russia. Well, we are running a little bit over. Is there anything else you wanted to add, good sir? Not this time. I'm sure we'll talk again.

If I can maybe get a shout out to my 10-month-old golden retriever, Caesar. Give him the 10-cast blessing. Absolutely. Shout out, Caesar. Thank you. Appreciate it. You guys take care. Thanks for calling in. Yep. Alright, Natalie, it's been fun. Thanks for hanging out.

Thank you guys for having me. It's always fun, always nice to be in West, by God, Virginia, as you would say. You're super close anyway, right? I live in Florida now. Oh, so you're not close. But I spent the week up here because of the CR and Zaback stuff. Okay, right. Rallying the troops.

All right, everybody. Tomorrow, Matt Walsh is here. We're really excited. I'm like, you guys know I'm such a big fan of Am I Racist. I can't believe it. I went to see it. I got to be honest. I Am I Racist I can't believe it I went to see it I gotta be honest I saw the clips I was like this is gonna be good it's gonna be great and I was like I'll see it when I see it and then I was like

we could go see it on Thursday we could see it on Friday I was like I will go Saturday after breakfast or whatever and then I'm sitting there watching this and I was just like oh my god it's much better than I thought I was kinda like yeah I know it'll be good but it was fucking epic tomorrow's gonna be fun Mary Morgan will be joining us as well so it's much better than I thought. I was kind of like, yeah, I know, it'll be good. What is the one that was good? But it was fucking epic. Tomorrow's going to be fun.

Mary Morgan will be joining us as well, so it's going to be a hoot. Thank you all so much for hanging out, and we'll see you all tomorrow morning at youtube.com slash timcastnews. you