Timcast IRL - Oli London Uncensored: Costco DENIES Selling Diddy Bulk Baby Oil

Episode Date: September 29, 2024

Tim & Co join Oli London for a spicy bonus segment usually only available on Timcast.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to our special weekend show, Sunday Uncensored. Every week we produce four uncensored episodes of the TimCast IRL podcast exclusively at TimCast.com and we're going to bring you the most important for our weekend show. If you want to check out more segments just like this, become a member at TimCast.com. Now enjoy the show. So Costco is straight up like, yeah, we don't sell bulk baby oil. That's bullshit. I hope somebody from Costco has to testify.

I hope they have to come in and say we have never, ever, there's no proof that he or anyone on his team has a Costco membership. We don't sell baby oil. Stop dragging your name through the mud. What do they say? This is 94.9 The Beat. Day's attorney sparked a response from Costco. Federal agents discovered a trove of baby oil. They're calling him Black Epstein.

Yep. Diddy's lawyer claims that Diddy has so much baby oil because he lives down the street from a Costco and buys in bulk. With him since 8 o'clock this morning. and it's about almost 3 o'clock now. He's just laser-focused. He's engaged. He's helpful. He's confident. You know, we're going through our defense, as we do every day, and his spirits are relatively good. How do you explain the baby oil and the lubricants? A thousand bottles of baby oil. I don't think it was a thousand.

I think it was a lot. I mean, there's a Costco right down the street. You know, I think Americans buy in bulk, as we know. And, you know, this is consensual adults doing what consensual adults do. You know, we buy a thousand bottles of baby oil and, you know, go in it. That's what consensual adults do. They throw, we... Yeah, buying a thousand bottles of baby oil and, you know, going in it. That's what consensual adults do. They throw massive, raging sex parties.

I guess so. That's what Dr. Varma was doing in New York City. P. Diddy actually had a... One of his gardens at one of his properties actually had a 50-foot bed outside in the garden.

He also had an indoor basketball court with large king-size beds in there. So, you know, a thousand bottles is a lot for some people, but I guess not for P. Diddy with all those beds. Not if you have a 50-foot bed. That's, I mean, talk about a California king. Right, right. That's really quite something. Do you think that there's anyone who's like, we don't care.

He did nothing wrong. Or is everyone sort of like, this is a circus and we're just gonna watch it you know i think that the issue is if he was actually involved in forcing people to have sex and trafficking um if a bunch of people if the people who were involved did this of their own free will um that's not really my jam but i wouldn't't like, I don't think that's illegal. Well, because there's consent there. You know, yeah. I mean, if it's, if they engaged in illegal activity, then. It's such a difficult area of law, though, the idea of consent, because as we've seen

so often, many women just revoke consent after the fact, and then you get these stories. That is so messed up. I've seen friends of mine do that, like and years later after having told me stories of some encounter. And then years later they say that they were raped. And I'm like, wait, that was the same story you told me 10 years ago. And at the time when you told it to me, it was like sort of an exciting, crazy encounter. And now suddenly you were taken advantage of. It doesn't make any sense.

Like you have to be aware of what you're about. I think this is the problem with repealing the 19th. It doesn't go far enough. We need to actually imprison women until they're 50. Then they're allowed to enter society. No voting. That's going to make them even weirder. I mean, that girl's going to go to all-girls schools. No, no.

That clip is going to get pulled, and they're going to be like, Deadpool wants to lock women up it's a handmaid's tale i i wonder i mean the thing that starts me other than the word freak off which everyone knows that's the best thing to ever come up in any kind of legal document um to to your point though i mean there were reports that at these parties uh did he would go around drugging people like shooting them up with ketamine and stuff like that. And again, this comes up to the like.

That's illegal to like do ketamine. But did they want ketamine? I mean, I remember being in college and I. Never mind. Libby remembering she has a son. No, I don't think he has the password. He doesn't have the password to the members only. But I was at this party and one of the guys at the party had a bunch of had like a vial of liquid acid and a visine dropper. And he was going around like, open your eye, open your eye, open your eye. But I mean, I think everybody knew what it was.

I did. And I was probably the most clueless person there. But again, like if you're a paid prostitute who's at one of these freak offs, but you don't really know what you're there for. And then you're also being injected with drugs. Like, I don't know. It seems super weird. But there is a question of like, is this full on illegal? Or is it just that it's kind of gross and we as a

culture are not? Well, that's the question. Is it illegal? Did, did illegal things happen and people are upset about them? I mean, it seems clear that a lot of these women are upset about it,

but of course none of them really started coming forward until Cassie or whatever, um, got, uh, some unnamed settlement. And her situation seems very different. She was clearly beat up in a hotel hallway. Like, that's crazy.

But the other people didn't come forward until after that. These are state or federal? Federal charges, yeah. Well, he's in the MCU. I think that's federal. MCU, it's federal? Then charges, yeah. Well, he's in the MCU. I think that's federal. MCU, it's federal? Then he's going down. The feds don't bring charges unless they win.

It's not about whether you did the crime or not. It's whether they can win. Yeah, that's a cool point. So with, like, Eric Adams, they're going to win. They always do. Eric Adams is probably going to go down. But what does that say for... Trump?

Trump in the DOJ case, which is the DC J6 case is the last federal case against him. The DOJ documents case? No, no, that one got tossed by Cannon and Jack Smith's trying to revive it. But the DC J6 case before Tanya Chutkin, I think today was the last day Jack Smith had to file a whole bunch of stuff. Did he? Yeah, I think he did. They don't win that one. I don't think they're going to win. Yeah, but that's desperation.

In most other circumstances, they end up winning. You know? I don't know. But I guess the question is, do people forgive this? I mean, I feel like like, do does do people forgive this? I mean, I feel like there were a lot of people with Epstein who, you know, knew what was going on. And either because they were involved, covered up for him or because, you know, maybe sort of out of a streak of puritanism, you know, didn't want to talk about it.

And so they didn't give it the attention that it deserved, considering how serious the crimes were. With this one, like, is it going to just be like, oh, that crazy Diddy, he's so wild, these multimillionaires, or are people going to look at this and be like, we have an entertainment culture that supports really perverse, borderline abusive behaviors, even if they're not directly illegal, it's not necessarily like something

that they want to be affiliated with. But I mean, of course we have an entertainment industry that supports borderline and illegal behavior. Like, obviously, we have that. But are people going to care about that? Like, listen to all of the songs, you know, I raped those girls. Blah. Yay. Like, that's what they that's what they do.

And do you think the attitude will just remain acceptance or do you think it'll change? Yeah, the attitude will remain acceptance. Look, they locked up Harvey Weinstein and the casting couch still is still there. Nothing changed. They brought in intimacy coordinators and the casting couch is still there. Like, of course, that's not going to change. So long as there's people who want parts and are willing to, you know, trade sexual favors for them. That's always going to exist. But we also have in the music industry,

a lot of stuff is, you know, a lot of illegal stuff is sort of cordoned. Is that the word? Cordoned? That's not right. That's like when you separate something. Yeah, that's not the word. But a lot of it is...

Part of the industry, basically. Yeah, it's part of it. Glorified, there you go. Sanctioned? Sanctioned. Aha. That was the word i was looking for sorry a lot of it is sanctioned um even the way just the way that the contracts are written sort of sanctions crazy behavior i'm inclined to believe that i think candace owen said this i believe she's right that rap was intentionally made to glorify degeneracy so that it would destroy the black families and

ruin their lives because you went from you know this the famous pictures in the early days of like in the 1900s where you had black families in suits going to church they had their own you know economies going their own businesses and then you get a lot of rap music and uh i mean take a look at like the the black church black church and the tropes about the black community going into the 80s when then things start just devolving into music about banging bitches and doing shots and doing drugs and shooting people. And that becomes their culture. primarily for black women who suffered, I think, a lot from that and who have suffered a lot with the advancement of the welfare state, which destroys black families, takes the fathers out of the home and leaves women responsible for their kids and working a full time job and taking care of the house and everything else. And that's not that's not easy. Well, we were talking about how in Western Maryland, you can, there's these little communities,

there's a big lake and, you know, people go and they play games and they go water skiing. And there's this shack. You drive up, you walk on in, not a single person there. You grab whatever you want. There's a price on it. You take the money, you either swipe it or tap it on the machine, or you stick cash in the box. St in the box you ain't getting changed but uh you know the funny thing is the immediate response from a couple super chats was i bet it was a 99 white area okay well it was but what are you getting at huh that's racist you can't say that you can't you can't say that stuff. And then you have Maine. Very low crime in Maine. But this is true, and this is what leads to people wanting race-based policies in the opposite of, or probably in the exact same vein as the left. So when I look at this stuff, I'm like, when I see woke people who are saying they want policies based on race and laws based on race and all that and i'm like they're probably just white supremacists they're

they're white uppity liberals from well-to-do neighborhoods like this where you don't gotta you don't you don't need anybody at the shack or security or police and nobody steals and they look at these cities and they're like oh look at these poor people let's let's let's let's let's take control of their lives for them yeah i don't don't know, man. Where are you currently based out of though, Ali? So I'm just traveling a lot. I was just in Thailand for a month and stuff. And if you want to talk about cost of living, like Thailand's incredible.

I mean, you get a taxi, like an Uber, they have something else out there. It's called Bolt. I don't know if you have that in America. It's literally like $2 for like a 30 minute journey. You go to a restaurant, you know, a couple of dollars for food and it's such a great quality of life and that's how it used to be in the west in the 90s you know it was a good time and you know it's when you travel to these other countries it makes you

appreciate uh what you used to have and you know i think many people are hurting right now of how the economy is how the migrant crisis is and you know people losing their jobs there are a lot of jobs going overseas and stuff so you know it kind of uh it was for me it was nostalgic going somewhere like Thailand when people are happy they're you know working hard you don't have all these self checkouts and stuff it was a nice way of life you know no crime nothing like that and stuff and uh like Tim was saying you've got the stores around here you can just leave cash it's uh and that's what we need to get back to you know know, when people can trust each other. Exactly, exactly.

But that's unfortunately been broken by all this kind of division. And it's always the white liberal women that are pushing these kind of racial division policies. I don't know, man. I think we need to create a special economic zone that can only be run by women. I think that's a terrible idea. No, it's a great idea. We take maybe like 50 square miles and we create a jurisdiction and we call it a special economic zone, kind of like Hong Kong, Macau, you know.

And then what we do is we say, this is for all the feminists. It's going to be run only by women. And let's see how it turns out. I don't want to go. I didn't say you had to go. I'm saying we're going to let the woke women go and run that place and see what happens. Sounds pretty terrible. I imagine it'll be a lot like an Indian reservation.

I bet people will argue all the time. And then there'll be disagreements over where to put your used tampons. And the whole thing will just go south really fast. It'll subdivide. There'll be like one group ganging up on the other group and they'll be infighting. Right. There'll be a lot of talking behind people's backs. There'll be tears.

There'll be so many tears, you guys. We've done so many of these shows where it's like men versus women, but I think we actually need to do a large scale experiment where we create like a 50 mile jurisdiction that's run only by men. And then it's comparable jurisdiction run only by women. But either men or women are allowed to live in these jurisdictions by choice. And then you see what happens.

I have a feeling that the men who live in the women jurisdiction will probably just leave. You think so? Yeah, right away. You don't think they just get laid a lot? No. I think they would have a lot of sex. Yes, you would.

Why do you think people went to my college? went to a jail i went to a college that was 60 like 68 percent women or something and dudes went there to get dates and it was very effective for them and the guy who lives in the woman run jurisdiction where they have executive authority is going to bang some woman and then she's gonna be sitting there and she's not going to tell people but people are going to catch on and then some other woman's going to be like did you actually bang rick he's so fucking gross no i didn't i didn't i didn't do that did you didn't but everyone knows you did well i didn't want to did he rape you yeah he raped me and they're gonna go they're gonna lock him up well that's pretty sad that's not how it was at sarah lawrence

in the 90s yeah but but men were in charge charge, right? No, it was mostly women. The administration was mostly women. The police. There weren't any police on our campus. There you go. See, that's what I'm talking about. Yeah, no police. So when you get this, like, so why did that mattress girl blame,

accuse the guy of raping her? She got attention for it. Yeah, you know what was weird is how mattress girl then, like, did a reversal and ended up with parties with a bunch of intellectual dark web people. What? Yeah. Oh, right, right, right. Yeah, it was very weird.

I was like, why is... But she recreated the rape and she filmed the video and then shared it? Yeah. So gross and weird. Yep. And then she was messaging the guy saying, I love you, please come over. And he was like, I'm not interested. And then she was like, then you're a rapist.

That's what happens. Right. I imagine in the men run society, it's going to be overly stoic. You don't think there would be a bunch of guys from any from all over the united states and you brought them to the city there would be no violence a strong organizing structure would occur very very quickly and it would be done without violence now if it was a real situation where random people were lost in the woods you'd have violence in the beginning guys would fight to assert authority a posse would form uh beta males would attach to alpha males and beta is not not a derogatory term people don't understand this beta men are lieutenants and generals alphas are kings and and presidents

uh people often insult insult guys saying you're a beta and it's like betas are like the ripped guy who's hanging out with the the captain of the football team, and they get laid all the time. It's a misconception that people think beta means weak. Omega males are what people refer to as like nerdy, antisocial. So what quickly happens among men is that a power structure forms where people will determine who they trust to be the leader. And it can be done in several ways, often by pure aggression and violence,

but that's probably going to be less likely. A good example of this is I've actually experienced. This is what we do when we play video games, when guys play video games. I'll be playing a team-based video game. We usually just, there's no fight. Five people will be on a team. One of the guys will just be like,

all right, guys, guys we're gonna do this uh this run through i need you dudes like hey i need you to use this weapon in this loadout use and we go you got it sure and then if we get wiped and we lose someone else might go dude your plan's not working let me i got this and they go okay and so it's i would say in these games it's a little bit cooperative that's nice they're co-op. It's largely autonomous. So playing a team-based shooter, we expect you to know what to do with the person we've asked you to play. We're playing Overwatch. Okay, someone's going to play Tracer.

We want you to go flank. We're going to storm in. The person who plays Tracer, you got to make the decisions on yourself, but you have a general idea of what the person who's planning the map. If it fails, then someone might be like, I'm going to try this instead. Okay, let's try this instead. And I think that's largely what you would see in a male-run jurisdiction.

It would end up becoming, someone would assert authority. If the person was running things properly and things were improving, people would go along with it and chill the fuck out. If failure started to accrue, you might get coups and power battles. I feel like among the women, it'll start off very nice where they're all nice to each other

and shaking hands, and then it'll quickly devolve into factional fighting and disorganization. Well, because women aren't good at letting one person be in charge. I don't know. No, I'm telling you. There's a, they say that in boot camp, basic training, when the men start, they're all fighting with each other. But then by the end, they're all basically figuring out who's who, who's in charge and, you know, the hierarchy.

Women start off very, very nice. But in the end, they're all catty and fighting and forming cliques and factions and fighting each other. Yeah, it's like the difference between elementary school and high school. Is that how it goes? Well, I guess it's sort of all bad isn't it i felt like for girls it's middle school right i mean middle school i think there is with men it's like there's there's an initial like struggle for power dominance figuring out personalities but they eventually stratify and i think this is true of like male friend groups too with girls i feel like the power structure is always sort of in flux at all times and so with the age age group it's like elementary school they hit like puberty

basically they're in middle school this sense of like constant turmoil in social structures presents itself high school it's a little bit more stable it might change and i think this is true of women's friend groups later in life um but boys also like boys will fight each other and then be friends after girls will fight each other and then never like grudges for the rest of their life, the rest of their lives. Yeah. A hundred percent.

So fun. So many good stories. It's so great. All right, let's go to callers and we'll, we'll start off with none other than silver blade. Welcome to the show. Hey there, Tim. how are you guys doing uh doing well oh that's fantastic uh i i've honestly watched your show for a long time since probably at least 2017

wow and one of the things that uh came up while ago, it made me remember something that you said a while ago, was about the rights that you have inherently to your own person. And your argument was like, if you're stuck in the forest, those are the kind of rights that you inherently have. Yeah. I completely agree with that. And you talk about how like doctors don't you can't give anybody health care because you're infringing on someone else's rights to ask them to do that. of the Sixth Amendment, where they tell you that you get a public defender that is assigned to you by the states that they are forced to basically, even if they don't want to do it, they're still forced upon their will to do it for you. So that's that's still within what I've described as the inherent requirements to be secure in your property and your person to survive. And so that is just a structure of if the state seeks to impose restrictions on you,

then it also has to provide for you means to be defended from the state. So that's a that's a contingent circumstance. The right certainly exists, and I recognize it. If a person seeks to, through reason and due process, infringe upon your rights, there has to be a balancing force within that because you must be secure in your person. Otherwise, you will die. If you can't have food, if you can't have property, and if you can't freely live your life, you will just simply starve to death. So I think that falls right in line. You know, and beyond that, too, like the 9th and 10th amendments,

powers to the states and all that, those are just expansions and derivatives of your right to property. If you can't own something, then you'll just starve to death. So these are all like the things we have to do in order to survive as human beings. Yeah, no, no. I totally get that that i just was thinking of it in like the same way of uh if a doctor doesn't want to like work with a patient so there's obviously people say that

some people will say that they have to it's an inheritance right of them. And right. But public defenders take jobs, you know, like, I don't. Yeah. So the point I'm making is that if you're in the middle of the woods, you have health care is not a human right because there's no doctor. What are you going to do now? In the instance derivative from the line of being secure in your property, an individual shows up and says through just means I accuse you and seek to infringe upon your right to own property and to freely move. To do that would infringe upon your rights. They have to have due process. That's why we have the right to a speedy trial and all these things, so that you can be secure in your person justly. Within that, it's also implied that if the state

is going to hire and pay someone to try and prosecute you, they have to, as a part of that same mechanism, be curtailed in some degree by offering up some form of defense. So that's just a burden on the state seeking to, through due process, infringe upon your rights. It's derivative. must provide you a doctor, but you're talking about demanding that someone do labor for you and provide you with cures and medical technology that does not exist. I suppose I would describe the difference as we create a procedure of rules between ourselves, which is abstract and doesn't require labor. We then determine if we're going to utilize it against you, one element of this must be in your defense and one in your opposition. Whereas with a doctor, you need tools, you need medicine, you need syringes, et cetera, et cetera. Those things have to be produced and developed by people. The rules we create in court is just rules we made up.

And we're basically saying, if we're going to lock you up, you have a chance to defend yourself. So, you know, there is an element of if the machine is to exist, then it's got to have people working the machine. You could make an argument on top that, well, then make doctors part of that machine. But the problem still arises in that you have no right to health care because the cure does not exist. And if scientists haven't made the cure, then you have no right to anything. But to reiterate, in the realm of, you know, criminal and civil trials, we made that up. It's arbitrary. We can easily have someone defend you and try and prosecute you.

Okay, yeah, no, that makes sense because I didn't even think about the other part of having the state go against you and having it be like an equal balance upon that right and and and this is the problem i have with a lot of the left like health care health care is a human right and i'm like okay tell me when you've cured aids because right now there's no there's no right to health care for people with aids like fuck off you can't cure it and then if someone spends a million dollars to find a cure and they're like we've we've made one. Who gets it? It's a human right. Everybody gets it. No, there's only one. Fuck off.

You know? Well, there is kind of the, I mean, they can, they do have drugs that push it into remission. My point is that, let's say there's a, you know, what's that thing that What's-Her-Face has, that singer? She's turned into a statue? Stiff person syndrome. Yeah. Celine Dion. No cure for it. Where's your fucking human a statue? Stiff person syndrome. Celine Dion.

No cure for it. Where's your fucking human right now? It doesn't exist. And then someone's going to invent it, and they're going to be like, for a million dollars, we can cure this. She'll buy it for sure. But what about everybody else? It's a human right, right? Well, it's a bit like price gouging as well. You know, like we were saying earlier, in some countries, the cost of a specific medicine, like a Zempik, if you've got diabetes, is super expensive. Other countries, it's a lot cheaper. And no, you need to make it fair for

everybody because you can't have somebody that's, you know, not earning much money. They can't afford the medicine, but then someone's a millionaire, they can get access to it. If there was infinite Ozempic and it grew on trees abundantly and it was so abundant, we had to dispose of it. fine. It should be for everybody. If it flowed freely in the hills and through the streams and you could walk up and just grab a bucket and take it and it was so abundant, fine. But people have to invent these things. And the invention requires labor, the processing of chemicals, and there's a finite amount. There was a story where a kid had a genetic disorder. It could be cured.

It was a million-dollar treatment, a gene therapy. And the family demanded the state pay for it. And they were like, there are like four of these treatments available right now. Why do you get it? And they're like, we demand it because our kid could be cured. And it's like, sure we can. And it's a million dollars to perform the procedure and have all the people working on it. It's not a right.

Anyway, is there anything else you wanted to add, sir? No, that should do it. I completely agree with what you said. I just didn't even think about the other side. I was just so focused on basically the idea of forcing someone to do labor against their will if they didn't want to do it for that one particular person. Yeah, the bigger component of the doctor argument is that doctors require

special practices, tools, and cures that don't exist. And so you're creating a whole network of slaves to give people health care as a human right. But anyway, man, thanks for calling in.

Is there anything you want to shout out before you go? Yeah, just my wife. It's her birthday coming up. it's not exactly a birthday yet but i just want to basically shout her out say thank you for everything she does and helping her raise our uh now six month old boy right on happy happy almost birthday yeah thanks for calling in okay bye all Bye. All right. Let's grab Turtle Burger next. Turtle Burger. That sounds either good or

not good. I don't know. Well, there's some turtle jerky over here. I can't eat it. It's got a bunch of weird stuff in it. Yeah. I don't want to eat it either. It's got teriyaki sauce in it. That's why. Is that actually a thing made of turtle? Yeah. You want some? No, I'm vegetarian, but I didn't know that was a thing you could eat. Wow. Yeah. How's it going, Turtle Burger? oh very good everyone um uh first time caller i've only listened for a short

bit only since the uh spin the ufo was a thing and since the beginning yeah so my question is for everyone um this is about the florida shooter so is that with um you've had multiple guests and uh you know highly informed guests come on and they mention how easy it is to blackmail and frame people with a position of child porn. Do you think the second shooter actually had child porn or was it a play for them to snatch him up for Florida to get him for their investigation? I think he had it. Yeah, they took forever to get into Crooks' phone, but they got this stuff pretty quick. We know that we are in opposition to a network of pedophiles like epstein his clients and all that stuff so when it turned out that the guy who tried to kill trump's son was a pedophile i'm like well you know that that that is who we oppose they are

very mad about it makes sense i don't know if it has anything i mean there is an argument that like the son has child porn and is a pedophile and his dad is just also a whack job, but not in that particular vice. You know, I think, you know, it's interesting to me that the story was they were already tracing this thing. And we might never have heard about this case in North Carolina, except for the fact that the man arrested is the son of the man who just tried to potentially attack Donald Trump on the golf course. So that is where I get to be like, I think crazy runs in families. But I don't know that Ryan Routh himself was blackmailed over these things. Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I keep being surprised that there's, you know, we cover it up the post-millennial be like teacher arrested on child pornography charges or you know somebody else arrested for you know I've been following

this uh case involving Stefan Cerns no he's uh he's accused of murdering his stepdaughter who he had pornographic image stuff and he's not even like officially her stepdad he's like the mom's boyfriend I don't know how you do this I've talked to friends of mine who have who are divorced and they're raising their daughters and they're like you know they're interested in like finding somebody else but it's like how do you bring some man into the house who when you have daughters like that's just really creepy and kind of you know that's kind of a problem like how would you be sure that some fella you brought home after like dating for six months or whatever you know or maybe he like comes over and has dinner with your family like how would you know that he's not just there to like mess with your kids stories

about this right well people are horrifying you know and it's like it's so unfathomable that this is something that somebody would be interested in i mean so exploitative and horrible yeah it's so unfathomable that this is something that somebody would be interested in. I mean, so exploitative and horrible. Yeah, it's terrible. Yeah. So I keep being surprised. And then Tim's like, you know, it's a network of pedos. And the more you look at it, you're like, why are all these people pedos?

Like all of them. And what's his name? The president? What's his name? Joe Biden. That guy? Yeah, him. He goes around around sniffing everybody talking about little girls and stuff it's so disgusting and creepy and then you look at his kids and his kids are fucked up you know and it's like you look at the daughter's diary and like that's not good it's just it's these people are not good people yeah but no I did not read about that

horrible disgusting man who murdered his stepdaughter because allegedly to be fair because he hasn't tried yet but I highly recommend looking at that case because it gets I'll tell you more off air it gets weirder and weirder is there anything you want to add or anything you want to shout out no no no

that was great I thought I was going to get a yes or no but we got a whole puddle rabbit hole so indeed nothing more to add or anything you want to shout out no no no that was great i thought i was going to get a yes or no but we got a whole puddle rabbit hole so um indeed nothing more to add right on well thanks for calling in all right next up we got crown doors crown doors you were on the show uh hey good evening everybody what's up uh so uh you, given the media's ability to influence and manipulate markets, policy and society, should we consider it necessary that the media have some form of like fiduciary duty or hypocritical that holds them legally accountable for misinformation just beyond litigation that hurts that's hurting an individual or a business? What's misinformation? Like they should swear an an oath the constitution and not to lie they should have their own version

of the hippocratic oath i mean that's the thing though like if we had to create one now you know i've assumed some left-wing uh news watcher organization would create it and then force everyone to swear to it and it's actually like you must present information provided that it supports diversity and then we don't get to talk about you know problems with the election we don't get to talk about problems with vaccines and we don't get to talk about how all the leaders are interested in child pornography we don't get to talk about the weird stuff in our food or how fluoride is bad or how the cdc is manipulating everybody and the problem with the media as well as who defines misinformation, you've got all these fact checkers and stuff, you know,

they're typically have a left wing bias. And, you know, of course, sometimes they're checking things that are false and, you know, X is a great example. We have community notes. That's people from different backgrounds, you know, different political beliefs, they're doing fact checkings, but you have a lot of these media outlets that kind of it's activism you know a lot of these fact checkers are activists trying to push a specific agenda so that's that's the issue is who defines misinformation because you know the MSNBC can say something that is completely shocking or when they try to deny you know with

the trying to say that some of the Joe Biden videos were like deep cheap fakes you know when everybody's seen that with their eyes you know they can say that's misinformation you know with the um trying to say that some of the joe biden videos were like deep cheap fakes you know when everybody's seen that with their eyes you know they can say that's misinformation no every every media outlet's going to have a different definition yeah that's the problem i just feel like the next world war is going to be started by the media through misinformation well i think all the wars were yeah it would be nice i totally understand like i wish we could have them all swear to a standard but part of this is like the the need for a strong culture that has uh moral values that everyone agrees to yeah and doesn't feel like well i'm the special exception and i should get to release this information it's about integrity

you know journalists used to have a lot of integrity and now sadly a lot of them have become activists because if you look at who's paying these networks, you now have George Soros has basically been cleared to buy 200 radio stations across the US. You know, that is obviously going to affect the reporting and it shouldn't be like that. You should be reporting the facts, you know, keeping your political bias out of it. But these shows on CNN, it's basically, you know, it's just an opinion show. It's not reporting the news. It's an opinion-based news. And, you know, that's not good.

People need to see both sides. The viewer needs to be making their own decision based on all the facts presented from both sides. Part of the problem, too, is that everybody used to have a lot of integrity. The Hippocratic Oath used to have integrity, right? And doctors would swear to uphold it and do no harm. And now doctors do no harm all over the place. Just ask Ali, you know? I mean, doctors come in and they're like, oh, you think you are a man.

Let us cut off your breasts, even though you're 15 years old. That is a great idea. There's no integrity in that. There's no integrity in a lot of medicine. There's no integrity in that. There's no integrity in a lot of medicine. There's no integrity in journalism. There's no integrity in politics. I think these people are just, they're just Darwinists. And their attitude is like, thank God people stupid enough to sterilize themselves can't have kids. Yeah, well, there's no integrity in that either. Right. They don't care. They're Malthusian. If it's an accident, then it's literally making sure that only the people who are smart enough to retain their ability to reproduce, reproduce.

So it's not just a problem of journalists, is what I'm saying. I don't know. A lot of institutions. Media has always been a problem. But it's a lot of institutions that previously were credible for integrity, like the United Nations. Now they've become very farcical. Of course, you have a lot of universities as well with the handling of all of these protests, on-campus protests last year, you know, and not taking decisive action, then siding with the activists. It's like, you know, these were once great

institutions that people respected, and now people are questioning that integrity. And I think that's the problem. A lot of people just don't value that anymore. Even the presidency, you know, it's become, you know, for the world looking at Biden, it's become a joke and it's not good, you know, when you've got an institution like the White House that was so respected, Congress so respected. And then you have, you know, Biden,

when he had that little desk and, you know, he's just- Oh, the little IKEA desk. I mean, it's just like, you should be respecting that institution. You should have respect for the president. And when you have somebody that's basically making a mockery of that, it's you know, we've lost that integrity. It's very sad. Anything else you want to add?

Two things real quick. First, I've heard through the grapevines that they're going to be playing your new song tonight at midnight, Tim, on the After Dark show with Carter and Kent, if anyone's going to be hanging around there for that. The other thing, I keep hearing you guys mentioning all

the assassination attempts, but I think everyone's forgetting the Mar-a-Lago raid because I remember the Secret Service had opposing agencies coming in there with their own guns, right? And they had standard authorization for the use of lethal force. Yeah, because I keep hearing about Trump's...

It's Trump's own fault that he's getting these assassination attempts because he's the threat. But isn't that the same thing as saying a young woman who's being assaulted is it's her own fault for dressing that way like blaming the victim isn't that essentially what they're doing here yeah but they're hypocrites so you know that's what we expect anyway yeah anyway uh thank you for taking my call have a good evening right on thanks for calling in thank you and last but not least we have ad morius what is up hey how's it going uh thanks for taking my call i've been watching for about a year first time caller i'm usually out on the road driving a truck so it's the first time i get to call in welcome right on i have a question

for the panel so these last couple weeks during the the NATO talks about the authorization of Ukraine's use of Western long range munitions to strike Russia, Russia has updated its nuclear doctrine to state that any attack on Russia by a non-nuclear power that is supported by a nuclear power will be viewed as a joint attack and an act of war. And Putin seems to imply that there would be nuclear retaliation. What are your thoughts on this situation and how do we avoid a nuclear war? Yeah, I think this is really interesting. You probably saw today that Biden-Harris administration authorized another, what was it, $8 billion in weapons and stuff to go to Ukraine to fight this war. You have Trump saying that he would not have this war at all,

that he would find a way to like end it right away. When it was the beginning of this conflict, what was it, February 2022, and the U.S. started sending weapons and stuff to Ukraine, like ammunition, you know, smaller stuff like that. Putin said that he did not see that as an act of aggression by the U.S. against Russia. He was very clear on that. You had Biden make a lot of promises, you know, no tanks, no F-16s, no long range missiles, no troops on the ground and no something else to like cluster bombs or something like that. We've broken all of them. And as part of the deal today, they're sending long range weapons. Putin has been very clear that like that would be that Western missiles landing in russia would be an act of war

and i think that war is exactly what joe biden and kamala harris are looking for hillary clinton effectively said in the debates in 2015 2016 she would declare war on russia yeah and this is what they are interested in she was told by our generals at the time, a no-fly zone in Syria is a declaration of war. And on the debate stage, she basically said, so what? Yeah, exactly. And, you know, people were talking like a year or so ago about there should be a no-fly zone over Ukraine, which, of course, means that we would shoot down your plane, which would be an act of war. So I think that everything that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been doing in this administration, you know, Kamala Harris talking about how Ukraine is definitely going to join NATO, sending the weapons, now this notion of sending long-range weapons.

I think that they are designed and intended to court war with Russia. In terms of trying to avoid war, we need to elect leadership that is opposed to engaging in this war. Which is Trump. Which is really Trump. Trump is the only anti-war president. Despite what they say about him being the bringer of doom and the embodiment of political violence, he's always been clear on the the russia ukrainian

i mean i think he couldn't have been more powerful than at that cnn town hall when she kept pushing him to to say oh do you want russia to win or do you want ukraine and he said i want people to stop i want people to stop dying and like what is it's like millions of ukrainians have died they're pushing people who are unfit to serve in combat into combat um it's just a really yeah really yeah it's a thousand per day surge is saying it's like it's really a devastating um devastating situation yep so i don't i don't think that i think that voting for democrats is a way to encourage war and voting for Republicans at this point who are populist Republicans is a way to, you know, avoid war. Did I say avoid war the first time, too?

No, you said Democrats are going to make war happen. Yeah, I think Putin will use nukes if pushed to it. It just got to be an existential threat. Putin's going to, like, Ukraine invaded Russia. If U.S. missiles are being launched in, Putin's outright like, that's the U.S. attacking me. So I think tactical nukes comes first. We'll start seeing big explosions in the battlefield.

And then who knows? People in the United States who keep voting Democrat are really dumb. They think nukes are basically ICBMs. They don't understand that Russia could launch a nuclear artillery that's like a 100 kiloton bomb and then just wipe out a whole portion of the battlefield like that if they wanted to. This is the crazy thing. They're like, Russia's losing. Russia has not yet begun the fight. Russia could at any point unleash nuclear artillery and start just

flattening the entire eastern region of Ukraine if they wanted to. But the West wants to crush russia and so they're they're they're pushing it we'll see what happens crazy is there anything else you wanted to add sir yeah i was just gonna add it it does seem like uh nato doesn't really uh care that russia has uh nuclear weapons and uh my question would then also be like if trump doesn't win would it be incumbent on we the people to stop them from engaging in nuclear exchange? Oh, you're saying like you want to go and join the international coalition in Ukraine to fight Russia? No, I mean, like stop our government from pushing.

Well, our government's not going to use it. It's like Ukraine's going to do whatever the fuck they want even if the United States government stops supporting it right on I just hope this all blows over scaring the hell out of me yeah I don't think it's going to blow over though nope like even if Trump wins some frog men can go out there

and just blow up a bunch of Russian shit and then start a war whether Trump wants it or not so I don't know buy Buy food and buy gold. But you want to shout anything out before we go? Yeah, I just wanted to shout out the Sean Ryan show. He does a lot of great things for this country and the veteran community with his podcast, and it's really good stuff.

Right on. Well, thank you, good sir, for calling in. Thank you. All right. All right, Ali, it's been fun. Appreciate you coming in. Thanks for having me, guys, and loving the new studio. It's brilliant. Great, right? Yeah. All right. All right, Ali, it's been fun. Appreciate you coming in. Thanks for having me, guys, and loving the new studio. It's brilliant.

Great, right? Yeah. All right, everybody, tomorrow morning, we've got, let me, how do you say this, Michael Francesi? Francesi? Is that how you say it? He's a mob guy. We're going to be hanging out with Shane in the Culture War podcast,

youtube.com slash timcast, because I am of the opinion that the mafia is better than what we have now. You know, I don't know, whatever. It's whatever you think, huh? So that'll be fun. And then tomorrow night, Riley Moore is joining us. He's based. Maybe we'll get him to come a little bit earlier

and land a kickflip. It'll be fun. All right, everybody, thanks for hanging out. We'll be back tomorrow morning for the Culture War. We'll see y'all then.