Timcast IRL - Ron Coleman Uncensored: Biden Admin Lies About Timcast, Posts Clip

Episode Date: June 9, 2024

Tim & Co join Ron Coleman for a spicy bonus segment usually only available on Timcast.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to our special weekend show, Sunday Uncensored. Every week we produce four uncensored episodes of the TimCast IRL podcast exclusively at TimCast.com and we're going to bring you the most important for our weekend show. If you want to check out more segments just like this, become a member at TimCast.com. Now enjoy the show. All right, stream deck is broken because stream deck breaks all the show. I was never a boring day with Laura, you know, calls for Democrats to be executed. I mean, if we're going to be technical, I think she said after due process, I think at first she. So she didn't. I'm not trying to imply that she literally wasn't saying at first she said they should be executed.

And or actually, we can play the clip because the Biden Harris campaign has played the clip. Here you go. Just play it for you guys. Should Democrats be in jail? No question. When Donald Trump gets elected. Sure. Real quick. You said they speed my voice up. Why do they do that? But you start locking them up. No, I talk fast enough as there are lists of Democrats that need to go to jail. One hundred percent. The reason for that is they've committed crimes. We need to make sure that when Donald Trump wins, we've got an attorney general, a deputy attorney general, a head of the CIA and the FBI. Kash Patel would be fantastic.

We can have attorney general. There are some names floating around. And then they can start having their investigators and the feds issuing subpoenas, pulling up evidence, and with real evidence, bring them to judges for warrants. Then these people can spend three, three years of their lives fighting tooth and nail for the crime against the government for crimes they committed. And we can prove. And the reason why we put them on trial is that we can show the whole world.

We will uncover what you've done. We will make sure everyone knows and you will be held accountable for it. Not just jail. They should get the death penalty. You know, we actually used to have the punishment for treason in this country. Yeah. So that was two seconds. Right.

Yeah. If that the delay does not work. You can't have me answer why that happened. You don't have to give an answer. I'm just saying, set up a delay clearly doesn't do anything i'm not saying anything should have been different i'm saying like youtube will push this out no matter what you do so we set up a 10 second delay with the intention of things like this never hitting youtube because laura loomer said they should get the death penalty and so i'm'm like, okay, that's off. And I immediately turned it off.

We were supposed to be 10 seconds behind. So it should have ended with me talking because I finish. And then two seconds later, she's a death penalty. And then I hit off. I had five, six seconds left. Doesn't matter. No. Well, the question, I suppose, is... What do you guys think about what you said?

When was the last time someone was executed for treason? Probably after World War II. Was it in the 50s, or was the... The Rosenbergs were executed for espionage. Espionage. Treason has to... Treason can only apply in a time of war. Giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.

There's lots of disloyalty and there has been a tremendous amount of disloyalty and a great deal of insubordination in the military that we've now learned during the Trump administration. But this goes back to our problem, I mean, without commenting on Laura herself, which I would not do. The point that she raises about the necessity for appointing people and putting into position people who are capable of actually applying the laws to everyone, regardless of their party, affiliation is a very, very sound one. And if in fact they have committed crimes that are worthy of the most extreme punishment,

then they should be punished. Yeah, I'm cool with that. So it's not treason. I was telling Laura this. Treason is providing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war, which is basically what you're saying. And what they're doing right now is sedition, the undermining of government. The penalty for sedition is not death.

The penalty for treason being death is because in war, people die all the time. So you're on the battlefield. A guy is shooting at you. You shoot back. He dies. You're like, well, I mean, it's war. War sucks. Someone with knowledge of state secrets is providing aid and comfort to your enemies so they can kill you. You kill that person. You stop them before they can destroy. Not just I mean mean it's more people die from things like that from a traitor than from an active you know guy on the ground with a gun and so that's why the penalty is death though i don't think the death penalty actually uh dissuades based on what we've seen already with um modern crime in this country but that is not the only reason that we employ penalties. Sometimes we punish in order

for society to vindicate what is right and wrong in that society. You have people like John Wayne Gacy, absolute lunatic murderers. And his last words, after all the disgusting, horrible things he did to all those boys, were, kiss my ass. Okay, that is an unrepentant person. Nothing would have dissuaded him from his conduct. But it did society a world of good to know that someone that evil has been removed from its midst. This is funny. Here are the comments on the article. One says, this is sedition and insurrection.

It never stops. I love that they go after Trump, charge him multiple times, put him through a show trial, convict him. And then I say, we're going to do quite literally the exact same thing. And they go, that's sedition and insurrection. Okay, we can agree on that because I haven't done it yet. And you did. So let's start with that premise. The idea that saying something on a podcast

even if it's... Especially this podcast. Even if it's objectionable, oh, that's an insurrection goes and it shows how unserious people are and it also makes me think that, you know, I'm not one of the repeal the 19th amendment because that doesn't get enough people off the voter rolls. I love the second comment. Figure it also makes me think that, you know, I'm not one of the repeal the 19th Amendment

because that doesn't get enough people off the voter rolls. I love the second comment. Figure it out. The second comment is if Biden is reelected, the first thing I would do if I was Biden is kick Garland to the curb. He doesn't understand what he we are dealing with. I figured his family coming from tyranny would get it. But no, he doesn't. They're quite literally. I said this goes back to your point about cognitive functioning. It doesn't. They're quite literally, I said. This goes back to your point about cognitive functioning. Yeah, it doesn't exist. I said. Biden, yeah.

All Biden is thinking about, thinking about, when can I get rid of Garland? Are you freaking kidding? No, no, no. They're saying they would get rid of Garland. They don't understand that I'm literally saying Trump should bring in an AG to prosecute criminals. And they're saying, how dare he try to prosecute criminals? criminals if I have power I will bring in someone to prosecute them but if Biden is re-elected the first thing I would do if I Biden right Biden if you were Biden you wouldn't be writing this another point is they're saying Biden should fire Garland and bring in a

more aggressive AG to arrest all of us. Is that what it is? Yes. If I were Biden, I would kick Garland to the curb. He doesn't understand what we're doing. That's why B says Garland is a disaster. Garland's a disaster because he's insufficiently partisan. Right. So when I say we should have a criminal investigation, charges, and trials, they say that goes too far.

You should all be arrested. I'm like, okay, we're in agreement. Whoever wins arrests everybody else. But these people are too stupid to realize it. Yes. I can sit here and tell you, hey, look, they arrested Trump. So we're going to arrest them. How dare you? We'll arrest you. I'm like, okay, just keep on upping it. The funny thing is, though, they post these memes of like these seven middle-aged construction workers who are like morbidly obese. I think it's AI. And they're like yeah this is who we're up against and it's like dude like police and military favor the republican party like that's your problem they favor the

republican party but when they're told to sick they sick it's like kid ourselves right but what i'm saying is if trump wins like the police are going to be like, oh, thank God. They'll say, oh, thank God. But when they are told, as they were during the Trump inauguration riots, don't arrest rioters, they won't. They did arrest the rioters. They arrested 250. And then the court couldn't get a conviction. They were all prosecuted. And then because they wore black block, the state tried to do a conspiracy charge against them.

But the courts threw it all out saying you can't charge a guy with a conspiracy to riot because he's wearing a hoodie. And then they sued the city and won like $2 million. These things happen. The cops didn't stop them. And during the COVID lockdowns, when the cops were told, put chains on the fences so kids can't play in the... They did it.

They did it. So I agree with you about the general trend and the general inclination of law enforcement. What I'm saying is, in the event of a civil war, there are going to be more people with capabilities in firearms and training that are going to be on the right, not the left. The left is going to be a bunch of you've got a combination of normies and retards.

The people with purple hair who are who weigh 110 pounds and don't eat protein. Look, man, the UFC fighters are all yelling Trump. That's just all you need to know. And then they're like, this is who I'm up against. No, you're up against Kevin Holland and Sean Strickland, some of the best fighters this world has ever seen. The thing is, the people that are saying, oh, this is who you're up against when they're talking about conservatives

and mocking Trump voters or whatever, the fact of the matter is they're not up against anyone. They're not going to do anything. Those people that are going to go out, if they go out into the streets and riot, they're going to against anyone. They're not going to do anything. Those people that are going to go out, if they go out into the streets and riot, they're going to be fighting with cops. They're not going to be fighting with Trumpers. Trumpers

are going to stay home, largely like they did for the entirety of 2020, except for the January 6th party at the Capitol. Festival. Yeah, the festivities. But seriously, Republicans don't go out and do that kind of stuff.

There'll be Democrats raging. And we have to, this is an issue that we have to decide on Tim Kast and tonight. Okay. There's a school of thought that says, and that's why we're losing, because we don't do things like that. And then I think there are the people in this room

that say, no, that's not what we do. Destroying and building are pretty much the opposite of each other. The left destroys. They subvert. We are builders it's our we don't want to destroy we don't want to subvert it is funny that sometimes people say um one of the conservatives ever conserved i got news for you anything that's left yeah that was us. Whatever little is left. Because in the 30s, the United States would have turned into a communist country had it not been for conservatives.

In the first half. Including Franklin D. Roosevelt. Absolutely. I mean, look at Woodrow Wilson. Franklin Roosevelt. The progressive era. The presidents. The tone in the country. The way that all of Western society was going,

all of World War II was a fundamental reorganization of how societies all over Europe that were thousands of years old, how they were going to change, right? Or I know that they weren't thousands of years old, but they'd been going on for maybe 1500 years. It's the end of the Roman Empire. And you had all of these monarchies figuring out, are we going to go to fascism? Are we going to go to communism? Are we going to go to liberalism?

And it was a big fight between all of the ideologies. And it shook out that fascism was not the way that it went half of europe went into bondage to communism and half of europe went into went to liberal democracies and half of europe show it's clearly obvious which ones work why are we trying to revisit these ideas i do think that people get confused when they say like what republicans need to do something like it's not that conservatives republicans whatever you want to call it need to riot like that's not the method but i do think that they are often outmaneuvered in terms of political organization on the ground like republicans don't tend to have the same class of young people who are saying i will go

knock on everyone's door i will go do these things and that does tend to come from a level of like ideological commitment that i think conservatives come from a level of ideological commitment that I think conservatives are naturally more wary of. Scott Pressler is unique because he's so unique. That's, of course, I mean, he's an amazing person. He's awesome. But I think they're not the same thing, to your point. You know, destroying the cities around.

Even taller than you. He's so tall and he's got beautiful hair. If Pennsylvania goes to the Republicans, it is because of Scottott pressler himself i truly believe you should just get the credit because he's he's registered like 10 000 people so far and he's got half a year you know this this man is gonna again if it if if it if if pennsylvania goes if voting matters at all in pennsylvania yeah yep it's true this is what. This is what they say when people are like, well, Republicans need to do more stuff. Like they need to do certain things, but they don't need to riot and become, you know, the mirror image to the chaotic left. Partially because that's not what they want.

You know, to go to Tim's original theme, the time for no politics at the dinner table. That's what Republicans have to stop. You know, the challenge is, I've tried explaining this to a lot of people. I remember trying to explain this to activists during the Occupy era. Do you think you could teach the finer points of finance to third graders? Probably not. And that's exactly what we're dealing with right now. Low cognition people voting Democrat cannot comprehend or begin to understand the intricacies of the American political condition. So you look at the comments on this post and it's, oh, my God, they want to criminally

charge us. We got to criminally charge them. They're monsters like their brains cannot comprehend that they're literally angry about the exact thing they're saying they want to do. You're right. You're right. So you can't you can't go. This is the problem conservatives tend to make. They go to stupid people and they try to argue with them.

Like you watch those videos at Times Square where they're like, can you think of a country that begins with the letter U? Right. Can you name one? Uruguay. Uganda. United States. I was going to say, how about the United States of America? They can't do it.

These people can't do it. And so, Ukraine? Come on, they won't shut up about it. All my money's in Uruguay, by the way. Here's one for you. That's why you up about it. All my money's in Uruguay, by the way. Here's one for you. That's why you think about it so much. Here's one. There is only one letter in the alphabet that does not appear in the name of any state.

What letter is it? Isn't it X? No, Mexico. New Mexico. Texas. Yeah, New Mexico, Texas. Arizona. No, Arizona.

I don't know. B. Pennsylvania. Y. New Jersey. The answer's really easy, actually. Q. Yeah.

That makes sense. It was Q. Quebec? No, yeah. We don't want it. Almost. Of all the parts of Canada. Don't you put that evil on me, Ricky Bobby.

No, we have to take the maritime provinces if we're going to take anything. I think that's fair. And then we can add the Baja Peninsula onto California, expand our beachfront territory. It's a great idea. Dude, this is an amazing idea. Setting up a table in Times Square and trying to have the most high-level political debate you can with the average person in Times Square. And what you do is you'd be like, hey, can you name a country that begins the letter U?

And if they're like, oh, I don't know, I'd be like, would you like to sit down? We'll pay you $100 for 15 minutes, and we're going to talk about politics. But that was kind of the whole, like, change my mind. No, no, no, no. I'm saying Crowder did. Crowder's trying to talk to regular people and have real conversations.

Originally, Change My Mind was called Real Conversations. I'm saying crowder did crowder's trying to talk to regular people and have real conversations originally changed my mind was called real conversations i'm saying intentionally debate at the highest level quite literally sitting down with a person and being like i want to start first with a liberal economic order formed after world war ii and why now when we're talking about even going back 40 years the federal reserve jekyll island you know you're following me right and i'm just gonna be, and that's the whole video. No one knows anything. No one knows anything. No one knows a goddamn thing.

Look at the people that graduate high school now. They can barely read. Most schools. I bet you could do a thing where you go to Times Square and you... Why does he keep picking on New York? Why Times Square? Because it's full of tourists. It's where a bunch of random people...

From all over the country. From all over the country congregate. And so you could fly the Union Jack, and they'd think it was a Confederate flag. You could trick them into thinking it was a Confederate flag. Or the Red Cross flag. Yeah.

We got five callers. We should go to callers, because we got five. Osmodeus. how you doing today hello before anyone's allowed to ever have a debate you should ask them if you did not have breakfast yesterday how would you have felt well i did have breakfast. You are not invited. We'll come back to you, Asmodeus.

Brian, Threat to Democracy, how you doing? Playing once. Brian, are you there? So I'm really disappointed in Harper's Ferry and Fallout 76. I'm just disappointed in Harper's Ferry and Fallout 76. I'm just disappointed in it. They didn't do it right. It's awesome today. It's good.

It's you. It's you, Brian. Hello? Hello. What's up? This is not going right. Have you done this before? Hello?

Yeah, we have. I don't know what's going on. What's going on, man? How are you doing? Okay, yeah. This is not going right. Hello? Yeah, we have. I don't know. I don't know what's going on. What's going on, man? How you doing? Okay, yeah, this is Brian. Let me... Yeah, let me get back to my question here. Yeah. So, it seems to me like Governor of New York,

has her finger on the tap that can turn off Trump's cash flow. All she has to do is pardon him. Now, I know that will piss off her base, but what's the trade-off here? that we'll piss off her base. But what's the trade-off here? She pisses off her base, but she endears a lot of people in the middle.

They're saying, you know, just shut the shit up, turn it down, let's have an election. Yeah, that's a good point. But see, if they were smart, they'd do that.

If Democrats were smart. Kathy Hochul would come out and say, this country is facing, you know, dire straits of extreme polarization. There's many people who are in the middle, many people, we're looking at the polls, it's 50-50 about whether anyone's satisfied or thought this trial was even correct.

For the good of the country. For the good of the country, because we 50-50 about whether anyone's satisfied or thought this trial was even correct. For the good of the country. For the good of the country. Because we are but one state out of 50. Donald Trump, I am hereby pardoning you of all of your crimes. They'll still call him a convicted felon. They'll still get their points. They'll still get the points for that.

Yeah. And then. It's a win-win if she does that. They won't do it, though. Is she term limited? Like, that's the question. No, they won't. They won't do it though. Is she term limited? That's the question. They won't do it because they're retarded. Because they're driven by emotion. Not only that.

She is a non-entity of a person. She does not have the capacity to step out. She was put in place by the party. Look at the non-entities that are the leading politicians of New York, New York State and New York City in our time. Look at the senators. We have a Yiddish word

for, the Yiddish word for nothing. You're going to love it because it's just gornished. These people are gornished. They're nothing. They're nothing. Schumer, less than nothing. I mean, these people are, think of the people who have been senators from the state of New York and people who have been governors of the state of New York. The Roosevelts. I mean, these are nothing people. And that what you're saying, besides what Tim's response, which is that, of course, that that would be the rational thing to do.

But rationality is beyond their can. It would require it would require a degree of courage that she cannot possibly possess. Great idea. It's great. It's hilarious. I just think she won't do it unless, you know, she can't go any further in New York. If Obama calls her up. Yeah. Next Democrat has promised her a spot in the cabinet. Right. She knows she has a political professional future. She might do it, but she's not going to risk potentially any Senate run in New York or anything like that. And this would actually ensure that she never had such a future exactly it's too big of a gamble i also think you know it's a it's a hilarious idea but the money's already raised you know like the farther the farther we get away from the conviction you know the the less uh enticement if they could have cut it off in the first 12 hours oh wait a wait a minute. There's going to be sentencing, honey. And there's Georgia.

I don't know. I just think that there's a certain level of she won't take the risk for herself, right? No, no, no. I agree with you on that, but I'm just saying there will be many more moments like this. This is going to be a gift that keeps on giving for Donald Trump. Plus, it's keeping him off the stump. For real.

And he's always been good at making lemonade out of lemons here. Or in this case, just gold bars out of lemons. Right. Good one, Brian. Trump should sell lemon bars. Well, as long as he has a gold ticket in it and a trip to the White House. And he should sell millionaire shortbread. He could sell everything. It's the best bakery. You he should sell millionaire shortbread. He could sell everything.

It's the best bakery. You ever have a millionaire shortbread? No. It's shortbread with caramel and chocolate on top. That sounds really good. It is. And great for you. Oh, God, you guys are killing me.

Thanks for the question, man. Was there anything else you wanted to add? Oh, no. You know, just general, you know, hey, if you're hanging out here, subscribe to Discord. We got a lot of good stuff going on. And you're missing out if you're not checking out what's going on in Discord. And I will shut up and yield the floor.

Right on. Thanks for calling in, Brian. Thank you. Thank you. Yes, sir. Maybe Osmond Daze Thank you. Thank you. Yes, sir. Maybe Osmodeus is back. Osmodeus, how you doing? I'm back.

Sorry, Michael's on the fritz. That's okay. On the fritz. Is that Yiddish? German, German. Oh, it's German. Nein. Nein.

Scheiße. So anyway, question for Ron. Both of them. I wanted to get your thoughts on Israel's future as a country and where it will be in a decade or two because while the US government and other countries have provided support there's clearly a generational gap there

with boomers, Gen X and the younger generations what do you think will happen once you have Gen Z and other millennials and the younger generations. What do you think will happen once you have Gen Z and other millennials and the younger generations ascending to power, basically, and assuming senior government positions, especially in Western Europe,

where there's a larger and larger amount of radical Muslim migrants? Great question. Sorry. And Israel is, by itself, not powerful. It's powerful, but they can't stand up in a straight on kinetic war with a country like Egypt. and to continue to develop its defense capabilities and to stop being America's – needing America's permission to conduct foreign policy. Ron Coleman's awesome. Ron Coleman, ladies and gentlemen. I'm here all night.

No, I mean, your question is a really good one. But, and especially, I mean, look, regarding Europe is far more of a problem, although it isn't that important to Israel's well-being in the way that the United States' support is. But the future of Muslim-led governments in Western Europe is a problem that is far bigger than Israel and far beyond my ability to foresee how it will be solved. But yes, anyone who's making policy in Israel needs to, and many, many pro-Israel people have written in this vein for several years. It's never been more obvious. It is true that they will always be outnumbered by the Arab states, but it is also true that they have kicked their asses each and every time.

And their technological advancement is mind-boggling. Mind-boggling. And also, none of them really want... They don't want that. That era is over. It is true that tensions with Egypt have ramped up.

That's mostly because of the problem of the Palestinians in Egypt and the Arab street. No, frankly, there is no Arab government that wants anything like democracy to actually control policy in their countries because those people are lunatics. But there are so many, I mean, really the Israel, the Israel question is so complicated because there's massive, massive demographic change taking place in Israel as well. So far beyond,

you know, I really appreciate you asking me this question. I think my opinion is maybe a little bit more informed because, yeah, I'm pretty interested in Israel. I'm not necessarily take the position that people expect me to do. But it's a good question and it's an important question. Whether or not, you know, I will say this much. The people in the Democratic Party who are in power now are quite determined to all die in office. That is their retirement plan. Live forever. And if possible, not to die in office.

To live in suspended animation like Joe Biden. Well, beneath the Chamber of Congress, it's called the Genesis Chamber. And if you make it to 85, they put you in one of the Genesis pods where it de-ages you back to 24. And that's the goal of all members of Congress. That's why I don't ask for a raise every year. And that is a pretty good perk,

by the way. Although I would not want to be 24 in this world. I mean, I have children who are around that age. So they CGI a child for you, and then you assume the role of the false child identity. And then, you know, it's a legacy of family. Does that answer your question? Do you have any follow-ups for us? Two things.

One, for Ron, but isn't, just as a counterpoint, hasn't foreign influence been, and I know this is something that all nations do, especially the United States, but hasn't Israel, as part of their strategy, been to influence aid in the United States with less on AIPAC, and the best thing for American Jews is to put AIPAC out of business so that we can go about being American citizens without being accused of dual loyalty, which is a gravely offensive accusation. But frankly, when I pass someone's house and they're flying an Israeli flag, I always turn to my wife and say, oh, whoa, did you know Israel had a consulate on this block? If it were legal, if it were constitutional, I would say unless you are affiliated, formally affiliated with a foreign government, you don't fly foreign flags, period. You know what you should do, though? Because now when they accuse you of dual loyalty, just preempt them by asserting dual loyalty with a different country, like Japan. Be like, no, the empire will rise again!

And they'll be like, wait, which one? Like, the Japanese empire! And they'll be like, you're not pro-Israel? No, I'm loyal to Japan! Just confused. Also, I mean, the fact of the matter is that the state of Israel, the theological connection of Orthodox Jews of different stripes to the state of Israel is complicated. I've heard of Torah Jews on Twitter. I've seen them before. Thank you for that.

Second thing, did you guys just hear about the CFO of Epoch Times getting arrested? Whoa, what, really? Yeah, he just got indicted in New York for $67 million in fraud. Wow. Wow. That's fascinating. The CFO? No wonder they didn't give me a show.

Two hours ago. Wow. Money laundering, huh? 80 years is what he's facing. Wow. Well, that's wild. Thanks for the breaking news update. This changes everything.

Who knows? Who knows? I mean, that's a lot of money. I mean, Epic Times is a big company, but how do you not notice that kind of money? Apparently he was buying crypto, so it's like something no one could see.

Where'd he get the money for crypto, though? It sounds like he was buying stolen money. What? You're trading crypto for other crypto that was stolen. Your technology, you're so fancy. You're like crypto for other crypto that was stolen. You kids and your technology.

You're so fancy. You're like 25 or something. They would purchase crime proceeds via cryptocurrency to discount and transfer it into a bank held by entities affiliated with the newspaper. Basically, they were laundering money. They were cleaning it. Well, that's nice. Clean money, guys. That's not how you do it. I'm convinced that these big poker games that you see on TV and stuff are money laundering schemes.

If you're going to money, if you're going to launder money, you buy art. That's how it's been done for decades. You just buy art. Just ask Hunter Biden. Exactly. Hunter Biden is selling paintings for what? 50 grand or 100 grand? 100 or something.

500 grand. Something stupid. He can't paint. He doesn't know shit. I watch. So they have this thing going on called the million dollar game. I'm going to get myself. I'm going to.

I'm going to. Let's see if any of them respond to this because they're going to be like, how dare you? But it's like these pros are playing a million dollars on a poker table. And. OK, look, I got to tell you, would you flip a coin for a house? Would you risk losing your house on a coin toss to win another house? That would not be rational. Would not be rational.

So, you know, I know the argument. Some of these guys are super rich. They don't care to put a million dollars down. But that still doesn't explain why someone would wager $50,000 on a 3% chance to win money. Doesn't make sense. So I think it's, not Hustler Casino, I'm not choosing them.

That's probably a TV show. But I think, you know, if you go to MGM in DC, highest grossing casino outside of the Atlantic City and Vegas, but still I think the highest grossing casino in general. And they have a secret room. It's not a secret.

It's a closed private room in the middle of the poker floor where they play no max. That's what it's called, right? So I'll break it down for you guys. It's like James Bond. Right. Yeah. So it's exactly like Casino Royale.

The standard games that people play at the lowest level is called 1-2, or you play online for pennies, but it means $1, $2. And at MGM, it's $500 is the maximum you can buy in for and $100 is the minimum. So you can sit down and play for a hundred bucks and each time there's a rotation. So every eight or nine hands that you get dealt, you got to pay $4. They have a table that's no max, meaning you can sit down with $10 billion and put it on the table. You can literally request they give you million-dollar plaques, and you put it on the table. Now, why would a D.C. casino, you know, have a secret room? Well, I'll tell you this.

I don't know anything for sure, but it sounds possible that some foreign dignitary shows up, and then the head of a super PAC shows up, and they say, why don't we play a no max game where I can put a million dollars on the table? And then they sit down and they look at their cards and they go, I bet one hundred thousand dollars. The other person goes, I will call your one hundred thousand dollars. Then the launderer goes, damn, my hands no good. I fold. You win all the money. And then they say say where did you win this money playing poker there you go i too much for my blood mr bond oh we got we got some fighting

words was this barrett 1313 says oh the 1313 you aren't that good at poker, man. Oh, bro, I'm a beast. I would destroy you. You would be destroyed. I made $2,500 this weekend. $2,500 playing at the old casino. I should just

quit the show and just be a pro poker player making all this money. What could go wrong? It's kind of... I said you've already got the look. Certainly. Quit the show and just be a pro poker player making all this money. What could go wrong? It's kind of what was that? I said you've already got the look. Certainly. Don't use glasses. I mean, it's pretty wild.

The thing about poker, for the most part, these casinos, is that it's people who are not smart, who don't understand, and they're called fish for a reason. So if you understand all the math, all the basics, the strategy. You say they're called fish for a reason. Does anyone here know what the math, all the basics, the strategy. You say they're called fish for a reason. Does anyone here know what that reason would be? Because they're fish out of water? You're fishing for them.

Fish out of water? I don't know. You're fishing for them. You're fishing for them. I'm fishing for them. Yeah, they're the fish that you're trying to catch. Right. Yeah?

That's a cold fish? I like mine better. And there's whales. I was right. Listen, what do I know? It's not about you, Phil. If you don't know who the fish is at the table, it's you. You're the fish.

And then there's whales, and those are typically rich people who don't care. So when you find a whale, people get really happy. You want to sit to his left. Yeah. Cool. Then you can isolate him when he's got bad hands. All right. Cheers, mate.

Later. Thanks. Sinoski. Howdydy howdy howdy howdy hey how you doing i'm doing well how about you guys never mind i'm doing well and i got a clarification tmg cooper says gambling addiction is no joke completely agreed it's a good thing texas hold'em is not gambling correct Correct. It's a skill game. 100% skill. If you don't know what a flop turn a river is, if you don't know basic terminology, you're not

playing this game. If you don't know the small blind or the big blind, under the gun, hijack, low jack, plus one, plus two, plus three, if you don't know what those words mean, you're not playing. I'm a gentleman. Please. Such terminology. Gambling is blackjack. You sit down, you say, dealer, what do I do? He says, you should hit there. You go, okay, did I win? I did.

That's gambling. Hey, and Tim, we have poker nights every Saturday on the Discord anytime you want to come play. We got poker with the boys, so this is the thing. This is why we were thinking that I think Hustler Casino might just be a prop game. That's what it's called when the money's fake. Because we're trying to figure out how to do poker with the boys,

but poker's illegal. You can't exchange cash. And I was like, if we turned the stream on and just started everyone at $1,000 with no real money, it's totally legal. And nobody watching would have any idea. Nobody bought in. That it was just chips and there's no real money involved. So you watch the way some of these people play and you're like, doesn't look like they're actually betting $300,000. It looks like they're throwing pink chips at a board.

But anyway, your question. Way around it. All right. So legal theory time, guys. We're all talking about Trump. He said we're going to be so sick of winning. He had to lose just to win some more. The defense actually should consider this idea on appeal.

Given the instructions the jury received, the only real option they actually had was to vote not guilty, and here's why. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process rights of innocent until proven guilty, correct? Correct. The jury instructions also state this court was not and did not prove Trump guilty of the three unlawful charges.

But those, no, that's not correct. The charge was falsifying a business records in furtherance of another crime. But they had to have the third crime as a predicate. So you had to have this crime that they had to vote on, correct? No. The crime they voted on was falsifying business records in furtherance of another crime.

What was the other crime is ancillary. And the judge said, so long as you think there was a secondary crime and you and that that means you agree on the first charge. So they all agreed that Trump falsified business records in furtherance of another crime to influence the election. But they don't necessarily agree or we don't know what underlying crimes they think happened after the fact or underlying on lawful activity. That then proves my point, though. What's your point? Fifth Amendment states you must be presumed innocent until proven guilty. So you cannot tell the jury, pick that crime, if he wasn't convicted or proven guilty of that crime.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is Ron Coleman. I do not represent Donald Trump in the criminal matters. I do, with my law firm, represent the campaign with respect to certain civil and election-related matters. In a case like this, I imagine that some version of what you are saying will be discernible in the appeal papers. Yeah. That is part of the problem with the jury instructions, which I think most people agree were overstated. Their flaws were overstated. And, you know, just like people were saying that the FBI was launching an assassination attempt, you know, at Mar-a-Lago, nonsense like that. The jury instructions were garbage, but they weren't hot, stinking garbage.

Okay. So part of what you're getting at, I think, is going to be a thread, I would imagine. But they're not, I can make it very clear to you, I'm not in any way being consulted on that decision. Oh, I understand that. No, I know you do, because you, I know you in any way being consulted on that decision. Oh, I understand that. I know you do. Or clipping. Or clipping!

That's fair. I just figured, you know, the best way to find out you're wrong about something is putting it out on the internet. Someone will tell you within 10 seconds. I put this out there on Twitter for six days now, and nobody said I was wrong. You took it to the legal experts here at TimCast IRL.

Yeah, well, that's Ron Coleman's opinion. Do we have any other? Because everyone here is a graduate of Twitter law, right? Yes. Absolutely. I got my doctorate of Twitter law and also watching Law and RSVU growing up. No, the thing is i think the appeal is going to be really important i think there are a lot of arguments

that could be made whether it's due process or you know just generally it really seems to come down to the judge's behavior in the courtroom um i think that there were a lot of issues there um i'm kind of excited for the appeal i I feel like maybe appeals don't get the time on TV that maybe they should, and maybe this will ignite our interest in them, because it was a rough case. It obviously did not sit well with a lot of people.

All right. Well, thank you guys very much. You're welcome. Thanks for coming in. Cheers, Mitt. Next up, we got TMG Cooper. TMG Cooper, Mitt. Next up we got TMG Cooper. TMG Coper, rather. Coper. Hello?

TMG Coper. Hi. Oh, hi. Long time, long time listener. Well, hi. First time, long time listener. Well, hi. First time caller. Nice. My question is kind of for everybody.

Tim often says that Wright has really poor messaging and really bad marketing, which i agree is the case now but uh when like i would say in like 2012 and 2013 when youtube really didn't have the restrictions it had there it has now uh the there was a lot of people on the alt right that were very prominent uh yep and they i feel like a lot of them uh had really good messaging overall uh or at least like a good messaging game um but now there's so much censorship that we really don't have a way to really message in the same way. And I feel like the overall force of censorship from not just like social media, but also like Hollywood and like Tim has brought up cultural influences is just so overbearing at this point. How do we really fight with such a handicap i think internet censorship is a part of it the other part is um democrats made or you know

democrats made republicans but just generally left-leaning causes made right-leaning causes look lame like day to day they became the uncool and the snodgy. And that was before 2012. I think the internet's a weird animal. Like, yes, the censorship is part of it. Yes, like sort of you just fall down rabbit holes and inside jokes become these big parts of political campaigns these days.

But part of the messaging to me, part of the way to change it would just be to be on the ground, being very open in your beliefs, because the biggest issue with the censorship is that it also, it made people quiet online, but it made them, it encouraged people to be even about the fact that you like this candidate and look you're actually a nice guy and you play poker and you do whatever like oh you have these values that makes your family stronger and actually that's a nice way to live and i wish i was more like that family you know what i mean like if it's i can't solve the online censorship other than by saying like you have to live your values openly away from the internet where people can see them and no one can really algorithmically crush you. Because I think that's the big issue. If you only are able to speak online and the algorithm takes it away, then you are really

ceding all the ground. I think it's just men versus women. I go to the skate park, everybody's based. I'm not kidding. I go to the poker table, everybody's based. You watch MMA, everybody's based. And this goes back to what Tim said before. Don't mistake the impression being

generated by social media campaigns for sentiment across the country. Because like he said, you can have an 80-20 vote, but it's the supposed 20% that's doing all the commenting. Yep.

It's actually called the 1% rule. 99% of people don't comment. 1% of people generate all the comments on the internet. That's crazy. Yep. So that's the thing about the chat, too, is a lot of people will say things like Tim's repeated himself or something.

And it's like, right, because the show's not for you, 1%. The show is for everyone. And the average person watches between three and seven episodes of IRL per month. So we have tremendous unique viewership, but there's overlapping viewership, right? So that means that if we start the show and we just jump right into the latest details on the court case, someone hasn't watched the show in a week are going, I have no idea what's happening. Can I also, I haven't had a chance to respond, but this is something I write and talk about a lot because I do do a lot of work in connection with

people who've been canceled, people who've lost their accounts. It's less meaningful now than it was four or five years ago for a couple of reasons. One of them is named Elon Musk. He changed the game, and it is putting pressure on all the high censorship platforms to deal with it. Whether they're being more open or not,

it's changed the entire game. But also, because of the technological accessibility of communications we're having this conversation not on youtube or rumble is it on rumble it's part of this is an uncensored conversation this and podcasts and uh you know it's a completely live conversation. It's live. And, but the point is people, millions of people are being, I'm taking part of these conversations and are turning away. I mean,

people ask me, you know, they, Hey, Ron Coleman, you seem to know a lot of stuff about the stuff. Where do you go for the news? I get my news from Twitter guy.

I literally get, why would I even bother looking at a newspaper? They're getting it slower, wronger, stupider, nastier. I have to be judicious, but you always have to be judicious. There's an entire new world of messaging out there. And look what just, Media Matters is on the verge of folding. We thought these were the people who were going to absolutely rule social media manipulation for the rest of our lives.

Just like when I was a young married guy, I thought that the Soviet Union was going to last forever because it was the evil empire. Guess what? Corrupt institutions and systems built on falsehood ultimately

and the long run could be a very painful thing to wait for but in the long run will collapse. White pill time. I don't know if that answers your question. Sure it does. I mean, I'm confident that answers your question.

It definitely addresses a lot of it because it's like it shows that, like you're saying, the outreach is there and if you're if you have a ground game, you can't get canceled online. And a buddy of, if you have a ground game, you can't get canceled online.

Uh, and a buddy of mine, uh, Namsan child to him, uh, always brings that up to me when Elon, uh, bought the social media platform.

I was kind of on the fence cause I didn't know how he was going to take it, but he was pretty confident in how it was turning out. And I think, like you said, it has turned pretty well overall for all of us right on yeah i agree uh am i allowed to do any like social media shout outs or anything quick yeah do it quick what's your mom's Instagram? THC side. Fitness related content. Right on. Thank you so much, guys. Thanks for calling in.

Alright. Isheroth. Hello. Yes, sir. Hi. Alrighty. Long time listeners. So, just wanted to toss this out there. Hannah Clare.

Eugène Carroll also got her education from SVU University, so I'd just toss that thing. Look, I know all the pitfalls. Bro, she paid for it, man. So, my question's mostly for Tim, and this is going to be completely different from anything you've had today.

I've been wondering this for a couple weeks now. I've heard you mention multiple times about the bug on windshield phenomenon as a symptom of climate change. However, most days, as you can probably see in my picture there, I ride a motorcycle pretty much every day. And I see my fair share of bugs throughout the day. I was just curious if if with all of that, my question lies on, would it be a decline in the insects or more so possibly an improved aerodynamics of your everyday general automobile that would also help explain that? I don't think it's climate change. My point is there is certainly an effect humans are having on the environment in terms of pollution that we know is true. Whether that

ultimately it's the climate change, I don't know. But humans are definitely polluting. And I'm talking about carbon emissions. I mean, that could be the ocean. I don't know. It could be volcanoes or something. But we know there's a lot of junk, dead zones, plastic. The insect phenomenon is seemingly on the surface to the layman correlating with human pesticides and other probably EMF technologies, colony collapses, sort of things like this. So my van, for instance, is a flat non-aerodynamic windshield, no bugs on it. And that's the issue with windshield phenomenon is that people have noticed that on their trucks and on other vehicles, they're no longer seeing the bugs they used to. I remember going on road trips when I was a kid and we're driving in a car, a sedan, aerodynamic windshield, splattered. Every time we stop for

gas, it's just scraping the dead bugs. Now it's nothing. Because they don't know. I don't know. Some of the left argues that it's climate change. I think pesticides could be the obvious. We dump chemicals all over the place. We really don't know. Pollution. But I don't think it's aerodynamics of vehicles because trucks and vans. Alrighty, I just wanted to toss that out because I constantly have to clean out insects out of my radiator on my bike. I mean, I still clean bugs off my car

too. It's just, it's not like it was when I was a kid. I can agree with that, yeah. Was there anything else? That's pretty much all I had for tonight. Right on. Well, thank you for calling in. So for Barrett, I think that was your username, right?

Let me make sure I can see it. He says he moved to Martinsburg and he wants to play poker. You got to go to Charlestown. That's the local poker room. You hang out with the boys at C-Town. They got one-two. Sometimes they got two-five. They're closed Monday and Tuesdays because they don't have enough players,

so they shut the room down. And then Saturday mornings, they run a 5-10 for only a little bit. And, geez, if you go to MGM, what's up? He posted? Oh, yeah, this is Barrett, right? Yeah. He says, I live in West Virginia, and I don't want to work, so I'll probably play pro again.

If Tim can win, so can I. Well, I'll tell you this. The secret is to go to Hollywood Casino in Charlestown Friday night when they have a show, and it is Fish City. I sat down at a table on Friday night after the show, because it's like a 20-minute drive. I sit down at a table, and it's a 1-2 game, and everybody's got a thousand dollars behind.

And I was, I look around and I was like, man, someone's pulling a lot of money on there. Like, well, the tourists are coming in, losing and going. And I'm like, I can see, I can see the greens all over the, it's a one-two table, right? It's a $400 buy-in. People got a thousand bucks with the, with the rake from the casino. That means they're winning a lot of money. So on Friday and Saturday, people show up to watch the country shows and whatever. They're drunk. They go play, throw $400 on the table, go, well, I guess I lost. And then they leave and that money stays with the players. So all the, all the good players Friday night go and they make a couple grand and then they don't work for the week. That's, you know, when there's a

show, you go to MGM and it's a mixed bag, but I will say this, The 5-10 game at MGM in D.C. is, I think, one of the easiest I've ever played. And I wonder if it has to do with the fact that it's not quite high stakes. So the people there aren't super rich. And that means they have the money from poker, but they're scared to lose it. Yeah. And that affects their play. Absolutely. Of course.

You're risk-averseverse so here's the thing one two games the lowest scale of poker 100 400 100 minimum 400 buying that's charlestown not a single person cares about a single penny and it's annoying because you know you'll have ace king suited one of the top hands i think is number five and then you'll say i don't want to raise too big the flop can change everything so it's it's a one-two game. I'll start with, I'll open to 15. Everybody calls. That doesn't matter what they have. And now your chance of winning is like, you know, 27% against eight players. And you're going to lose. Some guy's going to have nine, four off suit, hit two pair, and then your good hand is garbage. You play 5-10, you get Ace King,

you raise, you know, they do 5-10, 25. It's your 5-10, you raise to 60. You get one caller, the flop comes out, you c-bet, I don't know, two-thirds pot, and then they fold right away because they're scared and you make money easily. So the cheaper game, no one cares about the money. So it's like, there's three dollars on the board, you're under the gun, what's the point of playing anything? You're going to bet 40 bucks to try and get people to fold. No one's going to call you. You bet 20 bucks. Everyone calls you.

So you just got to, you got to wait for the fish. You got to wait for the bad hands and then hope you're good hands hold. Anyway. Got to wait for the fish. Yep. Yep. It's, it's, it's fascinating how at the lower stakes, people do not respect to get money at all.

And it's like, you, you, you'll do a $20 bet and everyone will call. These don't care. And then some guy will go, I'm all in and shove $300. And then you'll be like, well, I got aces. I must be good. And they'll flip over 10-5 off suit

and you'll go, this is awesome. And the board goes 10-10-5, Jack King, and you're like, and then you're like, here's all of my money, sir. I can't believe you did that. So what you're saying is that at that level, it is gambling.

It's not a game of skill because people are not incentivized to exercise skill. Yes and no. The people at the table are playing, and I call it like playing static. So it is easier and harder. They say what you're supposed to do is only play the top range of the best hands and just only when you have it. So that means if you get pocket aces, you're good 83% of the time, but you never know. So you're probably better off playing a hand

with what's called nut advantage, meaning you're drawing to the best possible hand. So if you have ace, king of spades, and then you bet 20 bucks and he calls 20 bucks and the board comes out like 6-7-2 with two spades and then you bet 20 bucks and he calls 20 bucks and the board comes out like six seven two with two spades that means you've got a 34.57 chance of getting another spade which gives you the best possible hand no one can beat now this moron's gonna call everything and dump his whole chips in and you got 34 chance you can't lose so at that point you have better chance of

winning if you're playing an over pair like aces it's risky because he'll hit two pair with 10-5, and then you've got all these crazy people. I was thinking the same thing. Exactly. So come play poker at Hollywood, and you'll learn Texas Hold'em's not gambling. To put it very simply, because I love the subject. Clearly. Yeah, if you sit down at Blackjack, you rule letter craps, you say, dealer, what do I do?

He flips a coin, you see if you win. If you sit down at poker you've never played before, your money's gone in two seconds. You're just like, I don't understand what those words mean. It's like, imagine trying to play football. You've never played football before. They're going to be like, okay, here's a line of scrimmage. When I was a kid, my friend was teaching me how to play football when I was like eight. And he said, here's a line of scrimmage.

I said, you made that up. That's not a word. I was such a nerdy kid. My father was a regular guy. Very smart man, but he was not nerdy like me. And he's desperately trying to get me interested in sports, as we used to say. And he's trying to explain baseball to me. The hell's that, right?

I knew there was such a thing. He liked the Yankees, you know, Mickey Mantle. Yes, that's how old I am. And he says, okay, so the batter hits the ball at the shortstop. What does he do? What are you talking about? He didn't even understand. He had to explain to me. The ball starts out in the pitcher's hand.

He throws it to the catcher. There's a batter from the other. I mean, that fundamental. So there you go. I became actually quite the crack baseball guy in my time. Of course, I could never play because I am a spaz. Wolf256 says, just read Super Systems by Doyle Brunson, the Bible of Poker. Just read that.

It will explain most of what you need to know. After that, it's just practice. I would half agree. The issue with Super System is that it's really old. And we were just joking about this the other day. I was playing 2-5. And the guy says, I don't like playing GTO, which means game theory optimal. It's like computer solvers figuring out the best moves. He's like, I play 2003 poker,

which is basically super systems. And it is amazing. It's so weird to look back at. I mean, in everything I do, skateboarding in music, the skill level of people involved in the pro of everything 20 years ago, it's just wild how much better everyone's become at everything. It's really amazing. But I'm not going to ramble. We're going to leave it there. Ron, thanks for hanging out. It's been a blast. A real pleasure. Thanks for having me on again. Absolutely. And for everybody else,

we'll see you at C-Town in Hollywood Casino at the Poker Tables and then we'll be back tomorrow. Have a nice day. You fish! You fish!