Timcast IRL - SPLC ORDERED To TURN OVER Communications With Biden DOJ w/ James Klug

Episode Date: April 25, 2026

Tim, Ian, and Tate are joined by James Klüg to discuss the House ordering the SPLC to turn over communications with the Biden DOJ, the DOJ bringing back firing squads, a new law that allows deadly force to protect property, Tim Pool Debates Ian Crossland on ski resorts being a high-trust society, and the Timcast crew mocks food delivery robots.  SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/ Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwNTXWEjVd2qIHLcXxQWxA/join Member SHOUT OUT: https://kineowood.com/ Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Tate @realTateBrown (everywhere) |  @TimcastTateBrown  (YT) Ian  @IanCrossland  (everywhere) | https://graphene.movie/ Producer: Carter @carterbanks (X) |  @trashhouserecords  (YT) Guest: James Klüg @jamesklug (X) Podcast available on all podcast platforms! For advertising inquiries please email [e-mail] SPLC ORDERED To TURN OVER Communications With Biden DOJ w/ James Klug | Timcast IRL

House panel has ordered the Southern Poverty Law Center to turn over their communications, the Biden DOJ, as the conspiracy runs deeper. And it's funny because we're seeing a lot of defense from these liberal groups and leftists saying they were just paying informants because they're ignoring the fact the indictment alleges they were providing money to an informant who provided transport for Nazis to some of these rallies like Unite the Right. Let me just break it down for you very simply. Conservatives would put together a peaceful rally, not for Nazis. liberal groups would then pay Nazis to show up. Then these liberal groups and the media would say every conservatives there was a Nazi. That is the very fine people hoax. And it's what they've been doing for a long time and now they're getting exposed. Interestingly, I've been talking about this all day. It's kind of fun. It's a conspiracy theory that Nick Fuentes and Candice Owens are in fact paid by the

SPLC because on the same day, apparently they both traveled to Italy. Same time. And many people are pointing out that they, as well as many others, stopped talking the moment this indictment dropped, which is not correct. It's not correct. I don't think Nick and Candace are funded by the SPLC or anything like that. But people are certainly wondering why this weird timing is happening. I also think a lot of it is just meant to smear them both. I don't. I think it's a lot easier just to accuse your enemies of being part of a secret cabal than to just acknowledge that maybe they have fans. But that being said, Matt Walsh has called this out saying he predicted we would find there are a lot of convenient right-wing personalities that have been funded all along.

So we'll talk about that and a whole lot more before we do. We got a great sponsor. It's a shout-out to our very own Discord members, Kineo Wood, my friends. Kinneau Mountain Wood-Smithing is a proud American-owned company that designs and manufactures every single product right here in the USA. No imports, no shortcuts, just honest, high-quality craftsmanship you can trust. Primarily a full-service business-to-business manufacturer, whether you need help taking a product from concept to finish.

They can handle the entire process, custom design, precision manufacturing, retail packaging, warehousing, shipping. If you want a reliable American partner that makes your life easier and keeps jobs here, Kenio Wood will do it. They also run a retail website packed with their own original wood designs. So if you need something personal, you can get custom engraving on existing pieces or completely one-of-a-kind creations built to your specs. Because they believe hard-earned money should stay in conservative American businesses and homes,

not flow to corporate giants and leftist companies. Timcast members get an exclusive discount code. It's Beanie 5. So kind of looks like beanies, right? That's K-I-N-E-O-Wod.com. Shout-out. Check it out. And I just want to give a quick shout-out again. This is our Discord member Friday shout-out.

So for our members, we are here to promote the work that you do in the Timcast Discord community. If you have projects, companies, or things that you think are good, beneficial, American made, building culture, all of that stuff. We're going to be shouting you guys out. So shout out to the crew and the community and the hard work that you guys do. And then buy some coffee. It was buy some coffee over at casprue.com because it's delicious and it keeps you awake.

Don't forget, of course, to smash that like button. Share the show with everyone, you know, joining us tonight to talk about this. And so much more is James Klug. What's going on? You guys, my name is James Klug. I am the host of the James Kluge YouTube channel. we do street political videos on YouTube. YouTube.com slash James Clug.

I'm excited to be here. Also, I had some coffee right before this. I'm flying. Oh, man, I'm drinking it right now. You guys coffee's great. Yeah, I dilute it slowly over time with coconut water. Oh, that's good news. So awesome.

This is the rise with Roberto Jr., I believe. No, that might be the graphene dream. I don't know. Things got hazy before I had it in my mouth. I'm at Ian Crossland. Hey, find me on the internet. Ian Crossland. Tate Brown.

Many such cases. And I'm a huge Klughead, so I'm so excited to have James here. Let's get after it. Carter's here. Welcome back. James, let's get into it. All right, we got this story from Zero Hedge. I didn't mean to click the image of it.

And it reads, House Panel Order Southern Pover Law Center to turnover communications with the Biden DOJ. This is massive. In a letter to Brian Faire, SPLC interim president and chief executive, Jordan wrote that publicly available documents revealed how the DOJ partnered closely with the SPLC during the Biden-Harris administration, including scheduling regular meetings, giving the SPLC early access to federal law enforcement data, and allowing SPLC. employees to train federal prosecutors. The letter was also posted to social media. Chairman's demand came two days after a grand jury in Alabama returned an 11-count indictment, alleging the SPLC had committed wire fraud, made false statements to federally insured banks, and conspired to conceal money laundering. I'm just going to go ahead and say I think the SPLC is a Fed op. I think it's, so let me put it like this. I don't think it's necessarily

the government does it. I think there's an ideological faction of individuals with wealth and power that operate in the government and in the private sector. It's not so much to say that the government directs these things, but they are one and the same. Yeah, I think they, probably the company started off as it was supposed to with its charter and then got co-opted along the way. It doesn't, wouldn't surprise me if everything. I'm really happy to see this going on because how many people have you spoken to

that voted for Donald Trump for like redemption or, you know, cracking down on these corrupt groups that have been making conservatives lives miserable, making their media miserable, everything like that? And people are finally actually seeing that here. There's a lot more to go, but this is a great start. This is excellent. Have you seen the conspiracies, though, Candice and Nick both abruptly flew to Italy? I saw that right before this, actually.

Is that legit? Before they flew? No, no, no, no, no, no, before the show. Oh, right, right, right, right. So, I mean, my understanding is there's images of Nick in Rome. He hasn't streamed in 10 days, his last stream. And Candice tweeted, I thought I told you guys I was traveling by, and according to a bunch of these posts,

I don't know if they're true. She flew to Italy. Ian Carroll also said, going dark for a little bit after David Wilcock took his own life. And I'm like, what does that have to do with him? So I don't actually think they're funded by the SPLC.

It is interesting timing, however. I will stress, Candace's husband is a British lord. Her lawyers work in a building with federal, in the same building as federal agents, which is odd. And her lawyer representing her is a preeminent.

Zionist who, when exposed by Laura Lumer, dropped himself from her case. All I can really say is coincidences happen all the time. It doesn't mean they're connected. Nick might have gone to Rome for a fun trip, having a good time. What if, though, what if? What do you think is a possibility that this private public conglomerate that has been running these ops could be paying right-wing personalities, be it Nick, Candace, or anybody else?

I think that's 100% chance. Honestly, that's what I'm not them specifically. Not them specifically. I'm saying just in general, 100%. That's what I would do if I was them. I know. And, you know, like for us, we're paid directly by Israel. So, you know, clearly what...

Yeah, we know how it works. You use the same banking, actually. Western Union. It's fantastic. No, I mean, I think... Netanyahu himself. You gotta go to Walmart to pick it up. Yeah, Alex Jones had put something out, like, regarding Flentas.

Like, it was like a pre-planned, like, family vacation. So that one, I don't think is as, especially, but the Candace one's a little weird. Because, I mean, that was like, again, out of nowhere. They're both in Italy, apparently. I don't know. I don't get, maybe it's not true. I think he's like Italian or anyway. So he said family vacation.

It kind of makes sense. And so did she? The Candace one is bizarre. To your point, the federal connections, the, the, it's fishy. And then hers makes a little bit more sense because there's a lot more subversion as far as, like, her directly. I mean, she has so much accumulated power with the GOP already. She was a lib. Right.

But she had like, I mean, she's obviously been a ladder climber whole career. There's no doubt about that. But specifically the way she integrated herself in the conservative. commentary and the power structure. She was like structurally part of this whole operation just to flip on a dime. And then yeah, now this indictment drops all of a sudden she splits down. It's like, what's going on? The reason why I think Candace is an op. I do think she's an op in some way or somehow she's a lib. She runs social autopsy. She's doxing conservatives. All of a sudden she goes red pill black and, you know, discovers that she's actually a conservative, gets a job

with these companies. Then all of a sudden she leaves Daily Wire and now she's flipped again the other direction. Now she's saying Trump is bad, don't vote for Trump. But when she attacked Nick Shirley, that's when I went, okay. Now, this makes no sense. There is not, there's, there's, there, you're like adding a conspiracy to Shirley's work. She, she went to an old video from a year ago and then said he made, he, he, it was fabricated. Right. I saw that. Yeah. Why? Yeah, there's literally no point. And, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and not just that, just that, Nick didn't do anything. So, here's the thing, the video with Nick, was that he met gang leaders in Brazil and interviewed them, which is entirely easy and normal to do,

but attacking that work as if to imply he fabricates things to attack his current work. Why would she be doing that? Because she's not. Because she is meant to destabilize and destroy the right. I actually look at this way. Trump weaponized the conspirator right. So with like Q&N and all that, these people who believe in greater earth or flat earth or otherwise are flocking to Donald Trump to go to the deep state.

Candice is capturing those people and pushing them away from Trump. Yeah, well, it's all like part of it. I mean, Trump, you know, he rode the populist way if he utilized populism. This is the downside of populism is what we're seeing now is that at a certain point, and Orban realized this and he lost his race for that for that matter. It's like you can utilize it as a political vehicle for so long, but at a certain point you have to have the institutionalize. You do have to intellectualize sort of the whole concept.

And that, you know, there was a push for that to happen. But yeah, this is naturally going to happen in populism. when it's like, again, let's just sort of advocate for the common man, advocate for, you know, the most popular seeming opinions. That maybe worked in the 20th century, when in the 21st century of social media and everything, it gets derailed quite quickly, quickly, and you're seeing it now. I mean, again, where even whatever, you know, criticism you're going to level up the Trump administration, a lot of what I'm seeing is just emotion. It's, there's not much, you know, there's not much analysis going on. There's not much like, okay, he did well here, but he did bad there. They're just like, per clutching.

like the left's arguments. Yeah. It's like, no, no, I'm going to stick with, like, my catchphrases and stick with things that are easy, and I will not elaborate. And it's like, okay, well, hold on. It kind of reminds me of the people that go the opposite direction, just a full, totally unnecessary. Look, they're anti the, what's going on in Iran with the Iran war and everything like that, okay.

Fair take, reasonable. You can talk about that. But then there's also this push to be like, no, it's not just that. They're actually good, and they've never done anything wrong ever. You're like, well, hold on, you're losing me now. This is psycho what you're saying right now. Yeah, literally. I mean, because like, I mean, I've been opposed to the Iran war since day one.

I think it's a mistake. I've even, you know, combed through some of these like self-deportation numbers. And I'm like, you know, I'm a little skeptical that we're actually pulling those. Self-deportation you're saying? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Like if you go through some of those numbers. But I'm also saying across the board, we're still making progress, like, dramatically. And again, I just not really expecting perfection here.

I'm expecting him to do a better job than the previous president, certainly, but to do a better job than any of the other Republican candidates. Because that's really how you evaluate. It's like, okay, if you're down to Trump, if you feel betrayed, et cetera, et cetera, that's whatever. What's the more viable political vehicle that's currently being crowded out right now? There is none. He's the only show in town as far as I'm concerned, at least for my political aims and my political goals. And primarily for me, it's immigration. And I'm like, well, I mean, he is pushing on immigration harder than anyone the Republican Party has, probably since Nixon, if not since Eisenhower.

And there are boundaries. So there's like, there's like levels to which you can even achieve when it comes to mass deportations, for example. Like, sure, could they be doing more in multiple places? Sure, but at the same time, there's only enough immigration judges. There's only enough, you know, areas where ice detention facilities. Yeah. All of that. So there's, there's only enough ice agents. So what, 2025, when they're still adding to all of that deportation infrastructure, they broke interior removal records by. four to five times Obama's average. Yeah. That's the best of my lifetime. I'll tell you that much. Undeniable. You better get better. It better improve too.

And we should be demanding more. Exactly. Acknowledge where there's something good happening and demand more. That's what we have to do to save the country. Bottom line, you can't just be like, oh, something's good. You know, it's fine. We're just going to settle for that. No, no, no, no, more of it now.

Because it is true that like, you know, the supporters of President Trump, which include myself by, you know, by a long stretch, like we are expecting. like we are expecting transformational leadership and so to your point I mean it's like okay we can do the whole well it's not Kamala thing but I would have been saying that if it was you know I don't know Jeff Bush like it's like well at least it's not Hillary it's like we do have the demand more we do need to expect more but at the same time let's not freak out let's not get emotional let's realize I mean even Tucker who's been like one of Trump's biggest detractors the last month he said on his show he's like President Trump came in office and he started bumping up against interest that most presidents didn't even realize we're there that's why presidents often are quite like they really realize how rigid the system is once they get in. And there's not much you can do about that. President Trump, when you see the stuff like we're doubling the refugee cap, but it's still only for white South Africans, that indicates to me where their mindset is at on immigration. And I'm like, I am confident that they are thinking the same things that I'm thinking as far as what needs to be done. And if you look at Stephen Miller, for example, and some of these other

guys in the administration, the tactics that they're using, they're having to do so many workarounds because, again, there's just so much rigidity in the system. The system has been built to facilitate mass migration. It takes a while to undo that. It's been built by leftists to facilitate. Like maybe, yeah, big corporations wanting to exploit cheap illegal labor, sure. But also at the same time, leftists. That's why you have all these judges. So, for example, in 2025, like last year, right, you had the Trump administration trying

to push out as many activists out of this system as possible, where March, I believe they brought on like 43 or so new judges. You better believe judges. You better believe they're all going to be conservative and are going to get the job done instead of battling every step of the way. Well, look at the SPLC, that video that came out where they were showing around his house. This is the mindset of basically the entire political system for the last 60 years. In that guy's office, he had a handwritten running log of the white share of the population

dropping. As in he was giddy. He was celebrating watching the white population in the United States drop. That is the mindset of basically the entire political system, every single apparatchik that's operated in the deep state, but even on the state that we can see, because presidents would say that out loud. Bill Clinton was like thrilled that the white population is to be a minority of the country. And that's whatever.

Is that, even that's not, sorry, even if that's not your prerogative, you have to admit that that's bizarre. You have to admit that that's weird. You have to admit that that's like hateful and bigoted. And those are the guys that have designed this entire system. So yeah, I am going to cut the Trump administration a lot of slack here. Again, if four years go by and then it's, I mean, we're still nowhere close to even getting the Biden, you know, migrants out. Then that's a conversation. But we're a year and a half in.

Is there more that could be done? yes, is there some disappointing things that have happened? Yes, but if you look across the board, asylum has dropped way down, ice arrests are at all-time highs, interior deportations are at all-time highs. The self-deportation system or the environment is hostile right now. So again, there are people that are self-deporting and that's going to increase, again, as it gets more and more of a sort of hostile environment towards illegal immigration. Never in history. Yeah, never in history have ICE agents been dealing with baboons, like literally attacking them in the street everywhere that they go. Like these people are

acting like absolute lunatics. Minneapolis, I mean, I was out there for like one day. These people are psychopaths. Yeah. Controlling every single street. No cops in sight, no nothing. It's just, okay, you know, spend your entire day following, harassing, attacking ICE agents.

That has never happened before. So on top of all the other issues that they've been having, they're getting chased down in the street as well. Into Oxden, whatever. Yeah. Let's jump to this next door. We got some CNN. Trump's DOJ is bringing back firing squads for federal executions.

That's it. That's the news. And I'm in favor of it. tell you why. I oppose the death penalty. I think that a system with, that can condemn people to death, will condemn innocent people to death. And therein lies a big challenge. These way to argue it is, when Kamala Harris walks up to you and says, trust me, that guy deserves to die, will you say, okay, Kamala? Because she was a prosecutor. These are the kind of people that are telling you to kill other people. That being said, I do think there are crimes so egregious. These people are

a danger to themselves, to everyone else around them. Sometimes. you are put in a situation where death is the outcome. What a mean of that is, when there is someone who's on the verge of killing, harming, or is a direct threat to another person, we recognize the legal right to defend yourself and others. That's when I understand that sometimes people do forfeit their lives, so it's unfortunate. That being said, the reason why I support this is that firing,

a lot of the games that we play in the death penalty, whatever your opinion is on it, lethal injection is fake. If you read about lethal injection, you'll know that they say, oh, people just pass, they peacefully just die. Actually, they inject you the paralytic agent so that you can't show pain and then you die in excruciating death.

This is a waste of time and money. If you are going to have a death penalty, this is the way you do it. I don't understand why anyone would argue this is inhumane to just be like, we are going to shoot you and you will die instantly. These other methods, like the electric chair or whatever, these are inhumane. The firing squad is actually one of the most humane ways to care of an execution, though I will stress, I'm not a fan of the death penalty. I would like to see the numbers on how many firing squads have produced instant death on the person

and how often they fall down and suffer and bleed out and have to be finished off. Because it's like I think a firing squad is a row of dudes and one of them has no, has a blank in the chamber. So it takes away, it's like plausible denial. Like maybe I wasn't the one that hit him. Yeah, that's why it is. The whole purpose was to sort of abdicate guilt, you know, because like no matter what, the executioner, unless they're a psycho, it's going to be in the back of their head, like, I just killed a guy. So the whole point of the firing squad is, yeah, plausible. I assume you're all supposed to aim at like a lethal spot, though. I don't know enough about it.

They do torso? They don't do like a forehead or something. That'd be crazy. Statistically, death by firing squad is near instantaneous, as opposed to other methods. Like, the lethal injection takes several minutes over a long period of time where you are consciously having the chemicals injected. And the argument that I've read, I've read about it, is they do three chemicals. The first paralyzes you. The next causes extreme and intense pain as the third one kills you. Yeah, and I think the keyword you use is forfeit life because this is my same take on a lot of these states now are passing laws where you can protect your property with lethal force. And everyone, you know, left wing people are like, you know, well, what you're killing someone for stuff, you value stuff over human life. And it's like, no, that person is the one that's putting themselves in that situation.

That person is the one that is sort of sacrificing their life for my stuff. So that says more about them than it does about me. So, and that's kind of the same kind of take I have on executions is like, No, when they decided to commit this horrific act, whatever led to this charge, that was the moment where they forfeited their life. That's the moment where the death penalty was issued. It's not the firing squad member. But again, like the question over someone, so the issue of the death penalty is can they be rehabilitated? And if they cannot be, then we have a problem because we can't release them back to the public where they'll kill again.

My issue is not with the idea that some people deserve to die. It's an unfortunate reality that if a guy pulls a gun on you, and is about to kill you or a child, we don't want them to die, but in that action, they have forfeited their lives because they're trying to kill other people. The problem of the death penalty is when

Kamala Harris walks up to me and points to a guy sitting in a chair and says, he should die and I'm going to do it right now. Tell me I'm allowed. And I'm like, I don't know what that guy is. And they're going to back, trust me, he deserves to die. I understand people say, there are instances where the evidence is overwhelming,

agreed. The issue is there are instances where it's not, and that means there's going to be a percentage of people who are desperately pleading not to be murdered and you're handing an axe to Kamala Harris to go kill somebody. Now, again, that being said, back to the firing squad thing. In extreme cases, some people survive for minutes after up to a minute after being shot. These are rare examples, though, that also exist in other forms of execution, like the electric

chair and lethal injection where they can be botched. However, typically with firing squads, they aim at the heart. You die instantly. And as anybody knows, ask somebody who's been shot. people who get shot don't immediately know they've been shot. There's a like people watch movies and a certain person gets shot and they go do and they fly backward. Watch any of these body camera videos.

There will be shots and the cop will be like searching himself and like, I don't know, I don't know because you don't feel anything. For firing squads, when people get shot, they don't feel anything. They just die instantly. So I would say this ridiculous modern politically correct way we approach these things like, we need to have a lethal injection. No, no, no, get out of here. Get out of here.

Hang them. If you decided someone should die, make it instant, get it done with. What is the point? Is the point to maximize suffering so people can watch and go, I want him to see him suffer? Some people like that. I'm not interested in any of that. If someone, like, I'll put it this way.

If there's a guy holding a hatchet about to strike a child, we legally recognize everywhere. You as a bystander can shoot and kill that person to save the life of child. You don't get me wrong, Jersey and New York might still put you in prison for it. However, what you are not allowed to do anywhere is shoot his legs out, walk up to him as he's on the ground, bleeding, and then start digging your heel into his wound and shooting him in the stomach several times so he lives through the pain. That's not allowed. We don't recognize that as justifiable. So when I look at all this, you know, these techniques they have for the death penalty, the ones that

prolong or increase pain should not be allowed. Shoot him. It's over. We're done. Yeah, because like the death penalty, the purpose of it isn't for justice or revenge. It's just to, again, perform a mechanism. This person is unable to rehabilitate themselves or the state's unable to rehabilitate them. So again, you're just removing them from society. Again, I mean, there's justice involved, but the problem is you're never going to actually sort of achieve justice when someone, innocent person was killed. And this person is clearly guilty. There's no, there's no exchange there. The whole purpose is just a mechanism. It's the same thing with prison. Like prison is a mechanism to facilitate people from harming other people.

That's the whole purpose of it. I've had a ton of trouble figuring out where I stand exactly on that because I think your first point of like, okay, flip it, right? Kamala Harris gets control over that and they get to say, this person needs to be put to death. That's a little bit sketchy, obviously. But, you know, what's more of a punishment? The death or for that individual, let's say they did something so terrible.

What's more of a punishment? Being in prison for the rest of their life or the death and presumably quick death. It's death. It's going to be death. I mean, I got to tell you, some people want to die. I get it. But just for the people out there, I want you to imagine you are sitting in a room and they tell you, we are going to walk you right now and you will be dead in one minute. Or you can sit here locked in here and read a book.

I think everyone's going to be like, I don't want to die. Right. The scariest thing with death penalty for me is we have executed innocent people. The response is it's unfortunate. We should prevent it from happening. but it's the unfortunate consequence that sometimes mistakes happen. So I just want you to imagine being an innocent person, being walked to your death, where people are screaming at you and calling you a murderer and you did not do it.

And no matter what you say, no one will believe you, and you're about to die. And then they say, yeah, well, then you'll go to heaven because God will judge you. And I'm like, that is not silas for the innocent people, of which there are many, hundreds, who have been executed. So again, I understand there is a big difference between watching a guy about to harm, abuse, or otherwise, you know, kill a child and stopping him from doing it. And a guy you've never met that you are being instructed to walk to his death. These are big, they're very different.

It's not easy. It's not easy. Nobody wants to defend, you know, child murderers and rapists and nobody wants to release them back into society. So I understand all of those points. My point is not to defend them. It's to say, you've got blue states largely. And don't get me wrong.

There's red states that have done this as well. Where some crackpot official is just like, don't know, don't care. he was convicted so he dies now. And I'm like, man, I ain't pulling. I ain't doing that. Famously, I don't know if, who was it, France who did this? The idea of, do you know why we do a firing squad? Do you guys know the purpose of a firing squad?

Well, I think for one to kill the liability for the shooter. Indeed. The reason you have more than one shooter is that no one knows who actually killed them. Exactly. Yeah. And they, and apparently one of the guys has a blank. They say one of the guns is loaded with blanks and it could be any one of it. That way the individual can be like, it wasn't me who killed him. They can all believe I was the one with blanks.

Because nobody wants to be the executioner. Some people might. If you are just, if you do have the death penalty, having that is at least something good for the executioner, for sure. I think maybe it's Japan or somewhere. Maybe Japan doesn't do this. But there's a country where the electric chair and the lethal injection have three switches, where three people, like two of the buttons are fake. One of the buttons real. And they all press the button.

And nobody knows who actually did it. That's probably good. I wouldn't want to breed executioners as a society because there's like pig killers, pig farmers that like, I saw this video, this guy's like, I don't know. I see pig, I kill it. And he's like smashing baby pigs on the ground and like throw, they're just like meat sacks to him. And you could train a human to treat other humans like that.

So I'm glad we get away from that. And in regards to the death itself, as painless and quick as possible, like you could, if you could instantly at light speed vaporize them, I would choose that. Yeah. But as long as these, they probably have super high-powered rifles with laser precision now. They're not like aiming and missing. They're putting eight bullets in the heart, four bullets in the brain or whatever. I don't know what they're doing.

Why don't they just do like an AI? I was literally just thinking that. This is a job for a robot. That's literally a job for a robot right there. I mean, maybe that's, look, you can debate anything nowadays, but I don't know. And that's the thing too is like people, the people's perception of the death penalty is very 20th century. We're like the way it works now. Again, we're able to mitigate a lot of these things.

Like, that's a common fear I hear when people are talking about the death penalty. Well, what if we execute innocent people? The last, to best my knowledge, the last exonerated death, you know, death row inmate was the 1950s. It was like 1956 in Texas. I can't remember his name. And so it's like very, I mean, the amount of evidence that you have to present to get the death penalty is overwhelming where it's like more than obvious this person.

Like you basically have to be on footage killing someone. And we definitely do a better job at preventing that nowadays compared to, let's say, like, in the early 1900s or something. Oh, it happened. Way, way better job. Yeah. Because, again, it was mostly just. just like off of like word of mouth.

Like we didn't, but nowadays like the bar that it takes for a death penalty to be like issued by a judge. It's very, it's very high. I'm not really worried about innocent people being killed in this instance. This is something that I battle with too is, you know, are we becoming a more moral and just, moral and religious people or less? And who is our system really designed for? I mean, when it comes to what I see the left turning into nowadays, dude, I wouldn't trust them with literally anything. I mean, look at their use of lawfare now as well, going after conservative groups, religious groups, protesters, going after Donald Trump, going after, I mean, it's stuff that's just like

so absurd and it's only being done right now because they just don't care at all. They'll use the law for anything. So if it's like, oh, well, it has to be proven, you know, beyond a reasonable doubt, way beyond a reasonable doubt. And it's you, Tate. They'll just make up a bunch of stuff. Well, I mean, that's the problem with governing in general is like if you're the Trump administration, you have to govern like you're going to be in power.

forever because this is the same, and I'm not saying anything here. I'm just saying this is the same argument people use with like the DHS funding and the big beautiful bills are like, well, what happens when a Democrat comes in charge and now they have the GDP of an EU country for DHS? They're going to be able to weaponize that against right wingers. That is true. But like we, again, we just have to govern in a way that like we wield power confidently. And that's kind of my thing is like when we start second guessing. What happens if they come back into power? It's like governed so well that we don't have to worry about that. So check this out from Inside Wire. Tennessee passes bill allowing use of deadly force to protect property, agreed.

Yeah. Yeah, sorry. Texas allows this. I don't think, well, actually, West Virginia allows it to a certain extent. The important thing to understand is consult with a lawyer before advancing any further. Do not take this as advice because you should not be hurting people and we don't want to fight and whatever. My understanding, though, is that in Texas, if a guy steals your TV, you can kill him. Yeah, because again, it's like, oh, you're valuing human.

in life over a thing. It's like the criminal was the one that decided that. Again, me, I'm a well-to-do citizen. I don't, like I'm, you know, to have zero criminal record, et cetera, et cetera. If I were breaking into someone's house and stealing their things, yeah, I would expect to die because it's like, that's how egregious. That's how, that's how much I value the social compact. So someone that doesn't value the social compact like that, they're the ones that are sacrificing their life. Wait, what are you supposed to even do? You're supposed to sit there and wait to see if they kill you? Why are you in my house? I shouldn't need to wait to see what you're going to do.

What on earth is that? Hold on, hold on. West Virginia gets a little bit better than that. See, here's the thing. In New Jersey, if someone breaks in your house, you are legally obligated to flee your home. Even if your family's in the other room, it doesn't matter.

It's psychotic. And so the story I've told a million times, when the police came to my house after a guy tried breaking in, they explained to me, if he broke in, you have to jump out the window. if you had to run away. And I was like, it's, it's cold out. It's winter. I'm like, barefoot in my underwear. And they're like, yes. And I said, where would I go? And the cop told me,

I want you to imagine going before a judge after having killed a man. And the judge asks you why you did it. And your response is, I didn't want to be cold. Do you think they're going to say, that's reasonable? Or do you think they're going to put you in prison? And he was like, the prosecutor is going to argue that you chose to kill a man instead of standing outside for 20 minutes. you could have went outside, called the cops, waited for them to arrive, then gone back in your house. And I'm like, that's insane.

Like I could jump out the window. What if my family's here does not matter? Maryland. In Maryland, you're allowed to defend yourself only after fleeing into your home and they try to break in. West Virginia, if they present a threat on any part of your property,

you can kill them. Now, the important thing to understand is in West Virginia, you can't just shoot a random person walking around on your property. Because property is big, expansive, and if someone's walking through your lands, you got to say, hey, you got to get out of here. If they're threatening you, you don't got to wait to find out. The reason why this is this way in West Virginia is that people own large acreages.

So if you got 50 acres and your house is in the middle and you're standing to the front of your property and a guy is on your property walking towards you threatening you, the idea that you're going to run full speed to your house while a guy's got a gun and threatening you is ridiculous. I had a question about the Texas law and now potentially the Tennessee law. So assume you're not at home, you're out at Starbucks, you're walking around, and some guy tries to take your backpack. Can you just blast him? I don't think so.

So let me clarify. Under Texas Penal Code 942, you're allowed to use force. Some may be deadly, but to recover your property if you believe deadly force is necessary to prevent the person's commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime or criminal mischief. Right. You are literally allowed to use four, not deadly, but you are allowed to use force that may be deadly if they're going to commit. mischief. That's crazy. Dude.

If it's not nighttime to give you any of them down. Nobody's doing any more price. Or check us out. To prevent, listen, listen,

prevent the person who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary robbery, aggravated robbery or theft during the nighttime from escaping with your property. You can use deadly force

if they're attempting to flee your property with your stuff. Or what about just fleeing with your stuff on a street corner? Yeah, yeah. That was a really good question. Hold on. It says,

You have to believe the property cannot be recovered by any other means, like calling the police, or using non-deadly force would expose you or someone else to substantial risk, death, or bodily... Right. So if they steal like a gun and they're running away, you know, it's loaded, they could kill somebody with that. But I think... This sounds like if they are walking by you on a street corner, they grab your cell phone and run and you have the right to shoot and kill them to recover your phone. I don't think that would... You probably wouldn't get away with that. Hold on. If the guy has a gun and points it at you and says, give me your phone, and you do. Then he turns to run.

That's robbery. Is it not robbery? And that's aggravated robbery, but the point is... That's robbery. That's aggravated robbery. That thing you read said robbery. Just basic robbery. Right. And I'm explaining having a weapon is aggravated. If a person robs you at gunpoint and then tries to flee, they're saying you can kill him because that person armed threatened to kill you and may kill someone else. This says, if they burgle you, if they rob you and then run and there's no way to recover the object. The definition of robbery is force. There's force utilized in robbery.

And aggravated is it with a deadly weapon. Aggravated with a deadly weapon. Robbery, bar none, is just force or, you know, like coercion. If I'm holding my phone, a guy runs up and grabs it and keeps running. That's theft. That's theft. Because even if he has to wrench it out of my hand. But I mean, if he has to forcefully take it out of my hand.

Actually, if the pickpocketer has a gun, this law, you can. But that would be different. But in the instance where you just brush by and you... How about a carjacker? Carjackers, maybe a little easier. Actually, that's a better case. Carjacking is aggravated. It's aggravated.

The car becomes a deadly weapon. No, no, it's not that's that. It's like, if a guy walked up to your car knocked on the window and says, would you please exit the vehicle? I'm stealing it from you, you'd be like, no. Carjacking requires usually having a weapon or a gun pointed at you. Oh, people pull people out of cars. Like on car chases and stuff, they'll get out and they'll, like, yank somebody out of a car. Why are people driving around with their doors unlocked?

I don't know, man, lock your doors. Yeah. I mean, I drive at Tesla, the doors, the handle just goes into the car. Lock your house doors, even when you know. Nobody knows where it goes. My car is based trim. I don't have an electric car doors. I have to lock them manually.

Sometimes I'll be driving it. I'm like, oh. I'm still confused because it sounds like robbery, even if they don't have a weapon, and you can't get the thing back unless you do something about it violently. During nighttime. Nighttime is the big thing

because you can assume they're up to no good. Yeah. They're going to come kill you or something like that. If they break into your house, you have no idea. If you're a woman, you can kill them immediately. I love that mischief's in there. Like some guy comes up and he's like,

hey, we play smash or pass. Because it says theft. He just seems so mischievous. Yeah, I'm sorry. He was wearing a clown outfit. If they walk up to you and take your phone at night, then there's theft at nighttime. That's both they enter your house than all best. Well, I'm more about the street corner.

Like, like, forget, obviously at the house, you, your home. They're making gesture massing. So we got some news. So this Tennessee bill takes effect if signed. So it's been, it's been approved. It's got to be signed. It will take effect July 1st. You cannot use deadly force solely to protect property.

You can use non-deadly force to stop trespassing. or property interference. Wow. Okay. That means if someone's trying to, like, jump onto your property, you can whack him with a baseball bat. And if someone blocks your car, is that property interference? I don't know. Maybe. Let's see. Let's see. Let's lethal force requires a reasonable belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury or certain felonies involving a threat to people. So that's Castle Doctrine and things like that. The bill is, uh, is narrow. It applies to when you're at your lawful residence, you are not engaging in any crimes, and you reasonably believe deadly force is necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, or aggravated robbery,

aggravated cruelty to animals. And there is an imminent danger to you or a third person of death, bodily injury, or sexual abuse. Now, I like that last one, because if some didler shows up, they're saying you can use lethal force to stop a didler. Oh, yeah, but only on your properties. This is all about. No, no, no, no, no, no. The didling, this is, this specific law is about your property. Pretty dang sure in Texas and Tennessee, if you are out in public and you watch somebody trying to dittle a kid. No one's going to stop. Like the law protects you from stopping that person.

It seems like we have a lot of questions about this. But one thing's for sure. It's bad news for the didlers. No, didler's on the run. Yeah. Idler got to get out of Tennessee. Go away, diddler. Go dittle yourself somewhere.

That's right. Yeah, we need more. Well, I will tell you this. A, laws are the they're the signals of a dying society. That's just a circuitous way to say what I think you're trying to say. But wait, what?

Because no, laws are indicative of a healthy society, functioning good laws. You are incorrect. It's like morality extrapolated. If you have the codify morality that indicates that something's broken. Yes. Well, you have to write it down. You do not need to write a law for moral people. That's why it's ski resorts, people put thousands of dollars of ski equipment on the

ground and just walk away from it. I doubt it's 100% of the time that it doesn't get taken. I think it might. I think it actually is. It actually, yep. It certainly is. came out. He was just like, no, no theft there.

Dude, I went skiing a few months ago. It's unbelievable. I don't disagree. My hometown. Thousands of dollars of ski equipment. We put it up against a fence in a random spot and then we went and got food. Two hours later came back. Just sitting there.

My house was like that, but we still locked our doors every night and we still, you still play by the rules. You know, you lock your doors at night because you're not in a high trust society. What? You lock your doors at the day. My dad would go to the garage. It's because you have crime. I know.

That's the point. In high trust societies, you have. No. Ski resorts don't have this. I don't know. I do. Every ski resort of all time, I mean, I'm sure there's been crime. It's ski resorts.

Sorry. Yes, extremely rare and so rare that no one cares. The point where most people don't lock their back door when they go into the garage. Except your house where you lived had high crime. No, it had very low crime. I'm talking about relative to ski resorts, crime existed to the point where you locked your doors. Most people didn't, but my dad did because even in a high trust society, you still have to, in case that outlying incidents is what I'm talking about. I think you misunderstand macro level statistics.

We talked about this over and over and over again. Do you not understand that crime is like point one at a ski resort so no one cares? And in your neighborhood crime is one point. So people care a little bit. Do you get that? Sure, yeah. But it was a high trust society. You do not need to lock up your skis at a ski resort because the likelihood of it being stolen is one in 10 million.

Sure could happen. Never does. Where you lived, you might have got robbed one in a million. So might as well just lock the door. Do you understand that? Well, I think you're putting a lot of value on a ski resort. I made a point specifically about you do not need laws at the ski resort because crime doesn't happen. Can you look up?

Does crime, give me the last instance of crime at a ski resort? Chat GPT. Yeah, chat GPT is going to say it never happens. It's not just that, but Ian, do you not know what macro level statistics mean? I know a mess. He's like someone's skis got stolen one time, therefore you need laws now. You need laws? You need laws.

You're saying you don't need laws? What is this argument against law? What are you doing? Well, this is like, like, Francis. It's called moral philosophy. Do you understand these concepts? How do you codify it? How do you get people to do it?

You don't, it's, it's, it's high trust. It's like Francis Fukuyama said, like, high trust societies facilitate spontaneous social ability. So, you know, you're not dependent on like complex structure. Let me ask you. Let me ask you a question. Do you think Seamus Coglin would ever steal from you? Not in today's standards.

I mean, if things got horrible, you never know. Do you think Seamus Coglin, the person you know, the devout Catholic who runs freedom tunes would personally steal from you? I just answered. So yes, you think he would. I said, in this situation that we all live in right now, there's no way he would do that.

But in this situation, desperation, I don't know what he would do. Okay, so let's just try again. Let's just try again removing your weird caveats. I am talking about literally right now. You don't need to add caveats. I don't trust anybody, Tim. You think Seamus would steal from it?

I think everybody's potentially able to stay. That's why we need laws. I live like that. That's why we need laws because of people like you. Low trust. You don't trust anybody. so we need laws because of that. I'm a high trust guy and I still don't trust anybody fully. You just said you don't trust people. That's the point of low trust society.

That's why you have laws. I've been heard so many times by humans. Indeed. What is it? Show me a high, what is an example of a high trust? A ski resort. That's not a society.

That's a business. Like, uh, the North countries. A ski resort is a series of businesses on public land with charters and they're different. Nordic countries have like the, like, the, like, ease of, most ease of doing business. They have like very, very, uh, skin. I got to stop. Because, All right.

There's very recent crime at ski resorts. Parents charge after five years. And so, he killed 150 in New York. New York's war fires. So clear by the point, because Ian doesn't understand what macro level politics means.

The likelihood of Seamus Koglin robbing anybody anywhere at any point is zero. It's never going to happen. Literally zero. Now, take two, Shamish... That's taking you at your word, though. You can't have a society to take people at their word.

Didn't he steal spoons? Indeed. Oh, it was all... Now, joking aside, the point is, Ian, because he refuses to accept standard arguments on statistics and you make stupid caveats because you refuse to answer a basic question.

The simple question is this and I'm going to finish this. I'm going to finish this. Shamus Coglin is never going to rob anybody. Shamus Coggan is never going to steal from anybody. Zero chance it ever happens. If you take two Seamus Coglin and put him in a house, the chance that either of them will harm each other is zero. You're glazing so hard right now. No, I'm using

an example. I'm using an example of a devout Catholic with a moral structure that prohibits him doing harm to others. He's just a human dude. He's flaws like all of us. Okay, so again, because Ian is making fake arguments for the purpose of refusing to answer the question. You claim that a human has a zero percent chance of ever committing a crime is crazy. I think the general idea is that crime is so unbelievably low at some of these ski resorts, right,

that everyone is trusting. Everyone is trusting when it comes, like just about every. 99.9% that's basically everyone. My point is this. I have chosen a specific example of someone we know with a 0% guaranteed likelihood of robbing you. Very, very low chance. Yeah. Zero.

It's literal zero. Next to zero. No, it's not even next to zero. No one is a zero chance. That's not how the world works, dude. You are making, fake reasons where you argue there's a possibility of Seamus robbing you. It's zero. Planning contingencies and that's why we have laws.

You can't just say fine, it's okay to steal because no one ever will. No. No one steals because everyone believes it's morally wrong. You don't need to write it down. There's never been a situation where no one's. Yes, there has. I mean, not a world or a city or a country. or something. Ian, this really just comes down to the fact that you don't know what macro level stats.

I know. You said that like four times and I don't. I know the difference between micro level stats and macro level stats and I know to get from one to the other in extrapolation. I know. You literally don't. Oh, I do. You don't. And you keep in the same thing over and over again. It doesn't make it more true. I know what macro level stats are. What is it? It's when you look at what kind of stats do you want to look at? You want to take a city and say, hey, this year, 98% of thing was done by person type. So why do you keep bringing up anecdotes? Because you can't comprehend what a macro level stats. They don't say that this is how it always will be.

Thank you. Ian's the kind of guy who doesn't have a fire extinguisher in his house because he's like, well, you don't need it because sometimes there's no fire. I do have a fire extinguisher. My father was a fireman. I understand. You don't understand. Planning for the future.

That's why we have laws. You're right. Fair point. Ian's the kind of guy who puts 10 fire extinguish around his bed because sometimes there are fires. What? You just completely did the opposite of what you said. your response, indeed. I do have a fire extinguisher. I do have a bedroom. You're the guy who puts 10

of them, 10 of them. I have one. Because you're like in my bed. I have them accessible in case of emergency. I will go back to saying this. There are facts and there are macro level statistics. And you make fake arguments at the anecdotal level because you refuse to answer the obvious question. You just made an anecdote about a ski resort and said we don't need law.

That's not an anecdote. That's called the macro level statistics. That's not that macro. I can make you I can make a macro or if you want. It absolutely is a macro level statistic. Crime is so low at ski resorts They don't need to lock up their equipment Inside the insulated protective zone maybe Let's just slow down

Why don't people at ski resorts lock up their equipment? Guys, anybody? Crime is virtually non-existent Right, nobody even thinks about it. And they don't need to actually create a system in which they tell people not to do it because no one does.

Because they're all rich. You go to Burning Man, people don't rob each other Burning Man because everyone has stuff. I tell you, if it runs out, people are going to start taking. I would not trust people of Burning Man actually. In a high trust society, you don't need to write things down. When you have 100 people that all have the same moral worldview, you don't need to write it down.

You know why? Because if someone does something wrong and 99 of the 100 think it's wrong, they string them up. Nobody need to write it down. You have to write it down or they forget things. No. The issue of laws being written down is functionally, academically, and known to be a structure of low-trust society. period. Well, that's the earth. Well, like, a good example is like in Iceland, when people go into the grocery store,

the mothers leave their babies and their trolleys, like, outside, they just leave them there. If they had to pass a law that said no stealing babies from in front of the grocery store, women would stop leaving their babies outside because they'd say, well, there's a reason we had to pass this law. That must mean that some people had to be forgetting their baby stole. Kidnapping's legal in Iceland? No, but it's just, it would never occur to them to develop a law that granular in this instance, because, again, there's no instance of that occurring. They just have very base laws, like, no murder.

because if someone murders, we need to use that. But the United States has very granular laws like this, because now there's instances of this occurring, therefore the legal system is to react. Is it not like a sign of like good protections for gun owners to secure their property, though? Because I kind of like to think of this as a hint. You did not need this law 200 years ago.

Everybody understood if he took someone else's stuff, you'd die. In fact, 200 years ago, if a thief came to your house and stole something and you shot them in the back with a musket, none of the villagers or townspeople would would that's true blame me for it way less than 200 years way less it wasn't written down in fact in the 80s if a dude came into your neighborhood in new york and was pushing people around he would get stomped out and not a single cop would intervene you didn't need to write anything down they said don't mess with our community we all know we are but hold on

what if someone in that community went and punched a chick in the face they'd stomp him out and you what the cop would do, he'd be like, he'd be like, Rodney, what you hit a girl for? And then he'd be like, you should arrest him. They assaulted me. He's like, shut up. I'm telling your dad what just happened. It used to be back in the day, back in the 50s, you get pulled over for speeding in a small town. The cop would walk up to you and go, Ricky, what's you speeding for? I got to see your dad at the pub later tonight. I'm going to tell you we're spending. Oh, come on, Officer, Officer. John, don't tell my dad. He's like, I'm not going to give a ticket right now, but I catch you speeding again, I'm giving you right up. That's how it used to be. I trust society. They didn't need these things.

In your house with your family, you can leave your wallet on the coffee table because it's high trust because it's a small, tight-knit community. As it gets bigger, the nature of society is getting larger is you need law because you don't have the tight-knitness. Which is literally what started the whole conversation that laws are a sign of a collapsing society. I think it's a sign of a growing society. I mean, it's not really, you know, it's maybe too much law.

Why is there female genital mutilation in Dearborn Michigan? It's illegal. We wrote it down. dude. Oh, no, no, no, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. It's illegal. Most of history. It's illegal.

It's written down. It's codified in law. How is it still happening? Because animals want an animal. Does anybody actually want to answer the question? You think it's like Frank the plumber? Like he's the one doing that? I think it's the human animal goes crazy sometimes.

Muhammad the plumber. Yeah. Okay, so let's try this again to somebody who actually wants to answer the question. We've banned female general mutilation. It is a crime in this country. It's still happening in these areas of Michigan. Why is that? Because when you integrate different populations,

that disrupts the culture, therefore there's going to be different culture or different crime patterns in different areas because of the new populations that have come into the country. And those police are of that group. So even though it's written down, in that culture, they say, we don't enforce against that. We don't want to. Same thing is true for putting a pie on your window sill on a Tuesday in Boston or whatever. Or skydiving on a Sunday in Florida, which is apocryl, but blue laws nobody adheres to. It is illegal in West Virginia to cohabitate with a woman.

no one's going to arrest you for it. The point is, when we start writing these things down, it's because there is an impact between different cultures that disagree on what should be. So we put up a notice saying we've decided, therefore, because we exert authority through police and law enforcement, you all can't do the thing we don't want you to do anymore. Which doesn't exist. That law is meaningless as soon as a new group of people come in and have a different moral worldview with each other.

laws being written down indicate that you need to inform people doing that thing to stop doing it. You don't have to do that in a high trust society. So back to the main point, you set up a town of 1,000 Seamus Coglins, you don't need police. Police would only exist for external issues. I don't think so. He's not a paragon. He's just a guy. I mean, obviously, if you have a thousand people packed in an area, if something goes wrong

with the food supply, there's going to be conflict. Again, I stand by this and using Seamus as, as an example because Seamus does not fear man, he fears God. And someone like him would think, if I take that food, I'll be condemned for my eternal soul. I'm not going to take that food. I will ask and I will work. So yes, even in those circumstances, I do believe people can do crazy things. But what did we see with, well, I don't want to get too extreme with some of these examples of cannibalism and things like this. But no, I'll do it. I'll use the Donner Party. the women survived you know why because the because the men chose to die instead of resorting to

cannibalism men men and many men women did uh those that did chose to eat but the men all died first they sacrificed their well-being for the women then there were people who refused to cannibalize and died and then there were some people who did but it was it was largely the females who survived for a variety of reasons ultimately the point is there are societies and individuals that would choose death over dishonor so anyway laws The written Constitution actually is I don't think the Constitution is a real thing. And I think conservatives and liberals are wrong. Liberals use the Constitution for power as a manipulation tactic against conservatives

and conservatives genuinely don't understand the Constitution. The best example being that when the Constitution was ratified in 1789, states could ban firearms. The federal government could not. That meant if you lived in Virginia, Virginia could take your guns away. Although I do believe Virginia and other states also had their own laws protecting the right to keep and bear arms. Blasphemy was a crime everywhere. If in 1792 you walked in a town hall and screamed, Jesus is not Lord, they would arrest you and you'd go to jail for it. Yeah. Yeah, well, like the whole argument with that is that, again,

if the Constitution begins to be perceived as restrictive, that indicates that we're not in the same country anymore. So the Constitution, no one was ever running up against the Constitution. It was very rare that people would run up against the Constitution. The Constitution was an issue for people. And if times had truly changed, then they would make adjustments, like, you know, slavery, for example. But generally speaking, the Constitution wasn't felt, it didn't feel restrictive. We're in the common era, the era that we live in now. The Constitution is constantly being debated over. People are looking for workarounds. People are frustrated by it, specifically in blue states. That indicates that this is a different culture. This is a different nation than the nation that initially sort of framed the Constitution. Isn't the Constitution supposed to be like a promise of what the federal government won't do to you? No. Isn't like, hey, we're going to, we're not going to mess with you about these things. The Constitution, yeah, the Constitution by and large stems from the Mayflower Compact, the Magna Carta, which were more just framing our values as it existed in that time. Also incorrect.

The Constitution outlines the structure of the U.S. government. The first articles literally just say Congress will do this job. The legislature will do this job. The judiciary does this job. And then you have the Bill of Rights after the fact, which is where they said, let's make sure the government can't do certain things. The Constitution itself and its core literally just says, here's the nature of our government. That's what I mean. It's a snapshot of how things were at that time.

No, no, no, they created these things. Well, I know, but I'm saying it's a snapshot of their values how government ought to behave. Yeah. So if that's in power, the subjective kind of. If that changes, then that means something else. But again, no, no, no. Article 1 is like the legislative body is being created to do this particular task. It's not a structure of their values in a sense.

I mean, I would agree with maybe 20%. They're basically saying, we're going to make a government. government. The articles of Confederation don't work. We need a federal government with some strength. Let's build it. They drew a map and they said, we should do it like this. That's the first three articles of the Constitution. Yeah. It's the, that's not about. It's our government's framework, isn't it? Right. So technically it does reflect. It was ratified by all the states. Everyone agreed. I agree to it's an extent that it references certain values, but it really just is a logical structure of function. Then the Bill of Rights come in and say, here's what the government can't do,

like after the fact. I guess what I'm saying is that that structure. makes sense because of the specific people that framed it as in. We've given that Constitution to Liberia, for example, and they've had a drastically different outcome. So, again, the Constitution, all of our founding documents were a snapshot of a people at a time indicating how they sort of agreed. I mean, I do agree there was like stuff that had to be debated or structure. But generally speaking, this reflected the population that existed at the time. This was a snapshot. And the more you push against that, the more difficult becomes to execute the execute. It's completely different. By today's standards, it is 100% different.

Right. You know what I align a lot with? That's why the judicial acts like, you know, Congress, because they are now lawmaking, you know, over the last 50 years. The Supreme Court now acts like a legislative body. And that's what it's true. It effectively is. And it's because, you know, the founding, the founding fathers existed in a high trust society.

Everybody was Christian, literally everybody. There was like a tiny, I think what would they, like a few thousand Jews maybe, but it was almost entirely Christian. Now, the Protestants of the Catholics didn't get along. still don't get along. They get along a little bit better now than they used to. Right. Even then, it was 98% Protestant. Exactly. And so the issue is, two Protestants walk up to each other and they go, I don't want to be condemned for eternity, so I'm not going to wrong you. And then they didn't have to worry about it that much. Today, you've got so many competing interests.

Everybody is trying to twist the words of the Constitution as a weapon against the other. Yes. That's where I align with what the top of the segment. where you were saying about laws indicate the decline of a society. Too many laws or laws that you can't enforce do indicate a decline. Too many laws. Like we need, we talked before, sunset clauses on laws. We need laws to go away. Right, but the point ultimately is, not all of them, but. You don't need a law written down. I'll put this way using Seamus is my favorite example. Seamus and I do not need to ever sign a contract that we won't punch each other in the face. Don't need it. It's not going to happen. There are some people that I agree.

up around that you would need one, yes. And they'd still punch you in the face anyway. Yeah. Like think about like a marriage. I mean, obviously something dynamics have changed, but generally speaking, the idea of the pre-unup was because there was a slight bit of distrust. There was a slight bit of something could go wrong here. Therefore, I need a extra mechanism that I can execute on if this goes south, where most couples would just enter a marriage and they wouldn't feel the need to put a pre-up in there. That means that there's something else at play that could potentially derail this marriage. Therefore, we need to add that extra layer to it. You'd imagine that. Obviously, things have changed, but.

You know, with a lot of these laws, you would imagine that mass importing tens of millions of third worlders will just result in more and more and more laws because we didn't know that we had to make laws about stuff that we never had a problem with. Don't eat cats. 20 years ago. Exactly. Don't eat cats in your front yard. And it doesn't even have to be like belligerent others. It's just, again, it's just a basic truth that in multicultural societies, the legal code has to be more restrictive. Look at Singapore.

Singapore is a great example. You had three populations in Singapore. The Chinese, the Malays and the Indians. These are all societies that aren't necessarily like killing each other all the time. But when you have competing interests, right, there's no such thing as like a single Singaporean and, you know, ethnic identity. They have to create extra laws. It's a very draconian system. It's very authoritarian because that's the only way

that you can actually govern a multi-ethnic nation. It's just the only way it's possible. I mean, I don't think you can, and Michigan proves it. Well, yeah, I mean, Singapore gets away with it because they don't have completely disparate cultures. But yeah, if you start bringing in other religions, people that come from countries with this very specific ideology, that's when you have problems on an extra level.

The United States, the only way, like basically the question is, do you want more authoritarianism, or less diversity, which means more of a high-temporary. I got an easy story for you. I got an easy story for you. So I lived in a, when I was like 22, maybe, I lived in this nine bedroom flat on the north side of Chicago. Like 13 dudes lived there. All college students, all spending as little money as possible to try and live in this fucking, whoop, I shouldn't swear.

So I actually lived in the pantry. The pantry had a door to the kitchen and a door to the living room, and it had shelves. But it was actually like probably 12 by 12. So it was a room, you know what I mean? Yeah, yeah. And so anyway, that's a room. One day, one of the dudes, the dude who like set the whole thing up, noticed his food was missing. And he got pissed and he was like, went to everybody.

He was like, guys, like, please stop eating my food. You know, I just bought this food. I come home from work. My food's not here. So I got to go buy more. And there were three dudes, an Italian guy, a French guy, and a Spanish guy. And then one day, everything came to a head when everyone was like a Saturday morning or something. And like seven of the dudes who lived there were, were.

waking up and then going to the kitchen. And I'm in the kitchen and the French guy, sure enough, is eating the food of the main dude who like set the apartment up. And he just snapped. And he was like, you mother, I told you. And the French guy started yelling at him, threatening him. And then what the French guy said was in Europe, everybody just eats whatever they want. No one cares. So he didn't know that anybody would be mad. Don't yell at me. This is normal. You're the weird one. This is what happened. You take two different cultures. The American culture is, we all live here, but this This is mine for me. Take your own.

The European guy was like, in Europe, we live together and everyone just shares and no one cares. And if your food's gone, you eat someone else's. So this led to two guys screaming each other's faces, starting to beat the crap out of each other. Yeah. And that is two groups that are very close to each other. Indeed. So imagine when you start importing people from very disparate cultures. If you have 99 Seamus's and a French man, you got conflict, bro.

Correct. Can Seamus, can he indoctrinate that French guy all 99 of him? Can he do it fast enough? No. But the 99 Seamus has to have to go to that French guy. and look him in the eyes and say, we have written down what you cannot do when you're here. Here's the rules. And that's called immigration. When people come to this country, we say, you have to abide by our rules.

And they go, no. And then Biden let them in anyway. But guess what? The Seamus is amongst each other. They're just going to make jokes. And they're going to make cartoons and make fun of Joe Biden all the whole time. They're not going to steal each other's food. It's just not going to happen.

Yeah, if only. Definitely don't live the French guy live in the pantry. Yeah. So moral of the story. Well, there was no food on the French. I assume they're mine. But the cool thing was, because it had two, like a way in and a way out, I actually, like, during parties, I had multi-access to my room from different parts. So it was kind of like having a portal that no one else could go through but me.

That was pretty cool. Yeah, that's pretty nice. I was for the Chicago Fire Department's like, which house is that again? There's people living in a tree. And I would park my motorcycle in the lobby until one day the landlord was like, I will destroy you. And I was like, all right. And then as soon I put it outside, it got stolen. A motorcycle is the ultimate test of a high trust society.

Yeah. Yep. You know, if you can leave it outside and it's not getting dragged down the street or stolen, you're looking pretty good. You're in a good neighborhood. Well, you know you're in a good neighborhood when you see bikes on the lawn. Ooh, I was raised not to temp. Bike is just leaning against the house.

It's like, people would do that in my hometown growing up in the 80s, but I was still always taught, don't do it. Don't tempt fate. Don't leave your thing dangling. Like, lock up, lock it where you leave it. it where you left it. I just learned for me as I sparing it. Someone stole my skateboard when I went to skate once at a skate park and I just never left

anything out again. That's pretty funny. At skate parks back in the day, we'd put our phone and wallet on a ledge and just go skate and just leave it there. Dude, one time I left my bike at school and I walked home and I was like, oh, my bike and I got back to school and someone had slashed the tires. I mean, I grew up in a, I grew up in probably the most low trust society in the United States, which is Memphis.

And I vividly remember we all lived in like a leafy suburbs. So, you know, again, people were a little bit more. comfortable leaving things out, et cetera, et cetera. But I played basketball, so we would go into, like, the city quite a bit, you know, quite often. And remember one time we were playing this team, all the families, they, like, asked everyone to come to the middle of the court for, like, I don't know, speech or something. I don't remember what it was.

Everyone, like, a lot of people left their phones and their purses and stuff on the bleachers, literally turned their back for 10 seconds, and then they come back and it was all gone. And it was like, that just shows that. Yeah, like, literally the trust of your society can vary by zip code. I mean, it's insane. You can also get, like, kids misbehaving, too. So you can be in a super high trust society. or high trust neighborhood or whatever, like a super good area.

And I'm in a table like people coming in town from out of town. There can just be kids screwing around and misbehating. They'll throw off that balance a little bit, but just in a general sense. High trust society, one of the dads gets drunk and he loses his job and it beats his kid. That kid goes and steals. Like it's still high trust relatively, you know, but one dude that just. That was the actual problem. That was the first, like in the United States, the first instances where we started seeing like crime

syndicates pop up was like at the end of the 19th century, cocaine became really widespread. So you would literally have these crack fiends robbing pharmacies. And that was like the first instance that really like shocked the conscious of Americans as far as like street level crime at like a high volume. I think we need to bring the mafia bag, you know. They did a good job in a lot of the neighborhoods in like Philadelphia and all that. And just think about the values of the mob versus the crime and the gangs that we have today. So it's like there was that 19 year old girl in New York who was surrounded by a bunch of young black kids and they stabbed her, killed her. Remember that story?

Yeah. The mafia were, you know, doing illegal gambling. And it's just like, yeah, I mean, that's bad. But, like, I'd rather have a House of the Rising Sun-style speakeasy run by the mob where people are, like, drinking and gambling than kids running out of knives stabbing people and stealing their stuff. Just show us how bad things have gotten because we went to the 1920s and they're like, man, we really need the mafia back. They'd be like, like, how bad? Are you guys living in a like super villain? We were like romanticizing the mob.

We're going to fantasize about when we just had to deal with human corruption. I missed the Crips. They were great. Remember when they were actually humans committing crimes? Yeah. The fun gang signs. It's actually a funny thing. Getting robbed by an optimist bot, he like breaks in your house.

And when you report it, it's not a crime. It was a technical user error. So there's no penalty for the company. Hey man. Run yo pockets. Give me that. An optimist bot walks up to you with a knife and just so I goes, ooh.

Stay still. Yeah, the first, what are those like, food delivery robots, like the light bulb or the eyes that are just LED. It's like the first time one of those. Rob somebody. No, it's going to run a kid over. Yo, nice watch. Put it in the lunchbox. What happens when one of these little things?

My size. First of all, robots don't talk like that anymore. We should. I would support them if. I might be able to pull it. Yeah, they should. What if one of those little robots like hits a kid and the kid falls down and just keeps going? Oh! I hope it's on video. And the kid's going, ah! Was it Chicago? Where was it where that one robot just ran to that glass, shattered?

the whole thing. Oh yeah. And they just ran from the scene. I'm going to pull that up actually. Oh, there's, right now, that's going in the category

of like the first we're seeing it. I'm committed by AI. Because we're seeing it right now there's literally a turf war between the homeless and the food delivery robots right now. Like they're going at it.

And I don't know who I... Homeless people just destroying these robots. Who do we support in that? I don't know. Well, if they can get them sober and then we see all they have value. Bro. Bro, this is the video. This is the video.

Let's, uh, hold on. Let me get the, uh, I got to get the sound. Watch this, watch this, watch this, watch this, watch this. What you think the food delivery app said at that point? Just like...

Hold on, wait, wait, look at this. Oh man. It's blocking that... Oh, that could really do some damage. Oh, wow. Oh my gosh. Dude, like this should not be allowed, man. Oh my god.

I think you can make it. Come on, Juan. I'm too scared Hey, it made it So helpless I'm tired of delivering I did not even know this existed It starts screaming

Oh my I love to scream It's my favorite one The first one's the best one He's survived that He's literally tired of delivering Bro someone's someone's Chipotle is gone and they like like check their app and it's like your food has been run over by a train.

You can scrape it off the runway. You can go scrape your burrito off the tracks. They need to make it so that when you order with these things, you can watch a live cam of it going on its journey. But I'm only half kidding. One, it would be funny to watch it get hit by a train. But more importantly, what if someone stops it and medals with your food or something? Right, right.

You can talk to it. You can negotiate with the homeless people. Yeah, yeah. Like bargain. Right. If you let me pass, I'll tip you. You can help you. Wait, wait, wait, what's this?

What's this? Oh, wait, there's just people attacking a guy. Oh, yeah, the delivery drivers. Yeah. Wait, what's happening? They were attacking people or getting attacks. I think we're dealing with some low-trust delivery drivers. Yeah.

They wanted the food. Yeah, I don't know. Like bears. Deliveroo. The UK's imported 10 million people purely. Wait. Mid-deliver. The drivers pulled knives.

Oh, man. My God, he's tossing it. They're fighting back. He's tossing on the bushes. Maybe he's cutting the food up. He saw the... Dude, listen. If people in the UK want to live in some...

Malia, they can just keep doing exactly what they're doing. It's the silliest excuse ever. It's like bring in tens of millions of people for the cheapest labor ever that's going to go extinct in 10 years due to AI. So then you're going to end up with these people and they're going to have to be on UBI if you don't get rid of them. Well, stop watching the videos, guys. What are you doing? I'm really having a good time. Sorry. So is I. All of a sudden, they just stopped paying attention. They're hypnotized by the stupid video feeds. Oh, we're going to do another one. I don't know.

My bad. We should just do two hours where we just watched him surf Twitter. Remember when that guy shot at the delivery drone for Amazon or whatever? Oh yeah, that was awesome. What was that? Got arrested.

I heard about it. There was like a Walmart delivery drone flying overhead and he shot at it. The shotgun? No, the handgun, I think. Oh, that's a good shot. Geez. I didn't say he shot it.

He shot it. How are we going to defend against the robots? EMP guns? We're already seeing the trains. We're going to use trains. Trains, the homeless. country bumpkins obstacle

here you go wait here's a good one for you guys you ready for this one you don't got to worry about the future at all bro I'm telling you you know Terminator's

future about the trip over itself here it comes I can take them that was gruesome I know it's like a particularly gory sobod death

writhing in pain what was the most violent robot death I've ever seen in my life I want to see it again. And all it was doing was trying to walk. I mean, it pulls her eyes.

What is this? She's got to be a big. You're at the baller. Is this, is this? Are they brackers? Come on your car stretch. This is on the last stage. If I'm starting a race that same way, I'm doing the same thing.

Yeah. They have a stretcher. Unless these guys are doing like a bit. Like whoever created a rat's a tough start. He'll always put him. His arm blew up. Was he made of porcelain? They already have a stretcher already.

Why do they have a stretcher? I mean, it's staged. Just get a garbage can. We did a medic. It's probably costs a lot of money. Is that a medic? That's funny. Chinese, dude.

They got comedy skills, man. Wait, wait, wait, what's there? Is there another one? The funniest. Oh, it's fake. It's AI. No, but there's, wait, wait, there's real ones. Man, you just got to go to government garbage.

The culture, dude, we are blending. Go back foot, bro. Me in the club. Melting down. I'm just kidding, that's actually me in the club. My favorite one is the one is chasing the hogs. Yeah, that one's awesome.

Get the backpack on and it's like running. Have you ever seen that one? Yeah, it's like the three hogs that Oh yeah, those hogs are having fun to get away. Those hogs are having fun. This is the best video ever, dude. Something you don't see every day, a humanoid robot chasing a herd of wild wars.

The now-vado video from Poland shows By somebody or life. As it chase the boars out of a Warsaw neighborhood, Edward can be heard shouting, go away. And Polish as the animals fled into the forest before then waving goodbye. The AI-generated robot has become an internet personality, even meeting with a Polish parliament,

and appearing on Polish morning shows. He's got to run a little faster. What the fuck are they doing? Come on, Edward. Pick it up. Where is that, Miami? He's taking care of the roads in Poland. Poland. I'm saying if those hogs turned around and like jumped I mean they could take I mean they could would kill him so fast yeah he'd be wrecked I'm long on hogs his arm would fall off right away

here you go here you go okay so that thing's coming to kill you dude he's kind of like the uh look at his little arms he'll stabby with those like the oscar historic yeah I was thinking it's those thin small ones that I'm afraid of the blades we can hear a lot of people like shoot a lot of people are shouting that the robot is coming near us yeah what would you do tackle well I can see technology redefined speech and passion. We need passion. What's going on there?

I can tell you. You just need like a laser. Dude, I want to fight one of these things so bad. Oh my gosh. We could. We should have to put like metal gloves. Can we get one that's just built to train you in martial arts? That'd be so awesome, dude.

Or we get swords. We already saw this one. Is there another one in this? You know? Like Thai. No, it's same video. Okay, we don't need to watch that. Kung Fu, get it to train you.

It was like the robot marathon, I guess. They all apparently died. like sad yeah it's terrible we need trump to like bomb another country because we're running out of news back down to this this is what's really important it's like a pit stock

battery change it's a little bit of WD40 on there oh they're putting ice in it is that because of overheating I bet it is they should get these raw to to fix their own put their own battery in and then take the other one out

I think one of the biggest challenges with this was overheating. That was like the endurance was based on whether or not it could make it. This is literally what the marathon was, how far than go without overheating. I think he's pouring ice it. Yeah, look, he's cooling it off. Check that out. I don't have, like, cooling figured out for that. Like a whole cooling system.

Make him sweat, you know? Get it for all the little butt cheeks. Hey, look, he's got butt cheeks. Hips for days, dude. Look at those butt cheeks. Yeah, he's right. Some nerve. He freaked out.

It's crazy. Robot. offspring with that. Imagine being chased by one of those things that gunmen. What would it do once it got to you, though? Like, kill you. Hug you?

Oh, look at this. Look at that guy. Oh, no. Ice flew out. Oh, he's the ice. It's kind of funny how, like, you were trying to build these things, and when they make one mistake,

they just die. Like rockets. Humans will, like, collide in each other and bounce around, and then get up and keep going. We're way better than robots. I'm not worried. And the best part is, like, when the robot breaks, imagine how much work it's going to take to fix that thing.

For a human, you just give me a cheeseburger. Right. So it's a smoothie in a cheeseburger, and then his body just fixes itself. It was yesterday I was using Brock and I was probing it. And I was asking it a question about EBT. And then it just said, who's EBT? We're good.

We're good. You don't know nothing. Yeah, we got this locked. I know what that is. No, you couldn't. A foreign country or an enemy corporation wouldn't. My God. A bunch of robots.

We just a homeland. We just released hogs. Hongs handler. They'll get distracted and chase the hogs. Imagine this guy right here, like, running at you being like, halt, human. Deploy the hogs. That's what's going to happen, though. No, no, no, I'm telling you what's going to happen.

Terminator, skeleton machines, uh-uh. It's going to be busty anime wifus. Oh, so they don't have to chase you. You chase them. Oh, the homoes will have that. Well, why, like, why would the AI make the scariest-looking thing? You'd run. It's going to make busty young women. And it's going to be, like, walking.

It's going to go, help me. and you're going to walk over and it's going to go bang and just kill you. Dang. You don't think she'll at least have sex with you. They got a remake Terminator. That would take out like half of India. Imagine this. Hold on.

I have a pitch, guys. Somebody make this with the AI. A remake of Terminator where instead of, you know, instead of Arnold, it's like just a hot chick. And then he just shows up and walks up to Sarah Connor being like, hi. And then, you know, what's the other guy's name who tried to save her in the first movie? Oh, yeah, the dad. John Connor's dad. Yeah, whatever he is. He's like, we got to run. This guy's going to kill you.

But it's actually just some chick being like, he's crazy. Stay away from him. And then Sarah Connor's like, yeah, get this creepy guy away from me. And then the Terminator just like a hot chick pulls out a knife and stabs her. That's more like that. See, I'm not worried. A homeless guy would come behind and just rip him in half. The homeless will handle this. I'm not worried. This is why we've been training him for years, just loading up a fan. You guys are under, you guys are underestimating the power of Trank.

Yeah, exactly. Their moments coming. Their moments coming. This would be a better. A better remake of Terminator is like, you know, Sarah Connor is walking down on the street. and then, like, you know, Arnold shows up, and then he, like, grabs a shotgun and she screams, and then a bunch of just, like, refugees, migrants and homeless people grab him and start pulling parts off of him,

and he's, like, being ripped apart, and they all run off with it. Yeah, like, literally, they deploy one to Haiti, and there's eating the robot. Terminator shows up, and they just rip, strip them for parts, and then sell them. Deploying these guys as actual troops is risky, because if the enemy recovers them and reverse engineers,

I mean, it might be inevitable. They put a bomb in them. What's that? You put a bomb in them. Oh, yeah, they were just, self-destructs. It's the same thing with like aircraft or any tanks or any type of... But we're seeing that these hogs are out maneuvering them. We should be utilizing hogs in our foreign deployment. Yeah. Just release much of hogs. Just drop the hogs. Yeah.

Dispers the hogs. They did it. The Chinese did it tell us with the marmorated stink in the 90s. I heard. And wineberries. Because we haven't over, we have a problem because we have a problem. We have a lot of, we have a problem. Back in the day, life life used to be more like an RPG. You'd have like a little hut. You'd wake up in the morning and you'd be like your neighbors and that many people. It was Animal Crossing. You'd grab a sword.

You're like, I'm gonna go try and find some meat. And you're like walking down a dirt path and then like a bore shows up and you have to like take a stance and fight it. That's what Burning Man felt like. Now everyone just runs away. I know I brought a Burning Man twice today but it did feel like that.

Well, yeah, because Ian famously beats in your carrying my shit here. Well, I carried a flashlight on a rope to blind people if they got in my way at night. And what happened is, Ian would have random encounters with people and then start mercilessly beating them

for the experience points. There's this one place we went to a vampire bar where they would file their teeth and wore vials of blood and I was like, ooh, they were checking for weapons but they didn't take my light, my light. I was like, if anyone messes with me in this dark red chamber, I can blind them.

And that vampire said I'll really be affected by that. Yeah, everybody is in the dark so I was like, I see the power of light. Like it really can. Flashbang him. Yeah. Yeah. That probably works. And you could all shut it turned around and but no violent. I didn't experience. What's it? No, I was just like, now I know what to do. I end up.

find a bit burning man. It felt like I was living in. How many times have you been to Burning Man? Is that a thing? Once. I went once. You go a lot. I went in 2007, I think, or eight.

It was the green man. Did you feel safe? The entire time, yeah. I felt like people wanted me there. Like, people were really happy that I was there. Do you think that's just because they're super high? Yes. Very likely.

They saw me in a wizard's row. I wore this brown robe with the hood and had this rope attached. And then they were like, he's a prophet. Which direction should I go? And I would point a direction and they would go. And then I'd continue on. Point to the employment off. Yeah, I would be like, I just whatever...

Donald's is hiring. I was like, feeling it. The magnet, I was like, that direction. I don't know why I pointed that. It's a bit of... It's kind of like video game action going on out there, huh? People are dressed up as a character. Warping?

It was a Ranger. He had like, the one dude was a barbber. He had like strapped leather. He's just big, muscular dude walking around. The other dude had like a feather in his hat with like a total ranger. With a green. He had like a leather vest on. It was, the girls were like in robe.

Fam braces and Ranger boots. Yeah, one girl they called her C Monster. I think the issue is that we're reaching the apex of human boredom. So, you know, back in the day, like we were talking about UBI quite a bit. We're in UBI right now. By average human standards, we live in UBI. There's UBI, tons of UBI in California. No, I mean like the idea that we make money sitting here complaining and water is basically.

Go back a thousand years. Yeah, exactly. Clean running water and hot showers. You can be a homeless person. People are begging to take a shower. Like, not in kidding. They walked up and said, please come take a hot shower with clean running water. Imagine going back a thousand years and telling a king, you know, we give even the poorest people.

Actually, we try to make him take showers. He's going to be like, I have a shower once a month. It's expensive. Like, bro, kings in castles, they had poop chutes. That is? Their toilet was just a hole that went straight outside on the ground. And then they had dudes had to come up and shovel it to move it away. Now, you could walk into a Starbucks and they're like, you can do whatever you want.

Imagine explaining to them that the obesity rate gets higher, the poorer you are. They won't get real. And it's like, and it's like actually only the wealthiest people can like lose the weight and eat properly. Literally. That's why it's funny when these people are like, did you do that peasants used to have 154 days of vacation? That's actually not correct. What do they? Where did they get that from?

It's a made up thing that. Where they want to do. Winter? Every day? Yeah. Communists. Here's what happened. An academic pointed out. that half the year you can't farm,

so they were huddled for warmth, starving to death, and then communists were like, so they didn't have to work. Yeah, they're like, wait, so they just sat inside. I don't watch Netflix all day. Is that what they did?

I do think people in Milwaukee still do that. Really? Yeah, they huddle for warmth and starve to death. Oh, jeez. I think of the food's nasty. That's a kind of work. I mean, you're shivering. That's requiring energy.

You know, that's a type of work, and it will distract you from a lot of other types of work. I think we're simultaneously the most bored era, but also the least board era, because part of the reason is like, when was the last time you were actually bored? You'd just get on your phone. I mean, like, I remember when I was a kid being bored to tears because I didn't have like instant devices. That's going to become a massive problem too.

It's literally just cancer on, you look at any group of kids or something and they're all, every single person's on their phone. And if they're not on the phone, they're doing something to being filmed on their phone. Check out this post. Phil posted this. So this guy, Robert Raymond, says, damn, can you imagine being a human during the Paleolithic Age just eating sand? salmon and berries and storytelling around campfires and stargazing. No jobs, no traffic, no ads, no poverty, no capitalism caused traumas, just pure vibes. And Phil said, can you imagine your child and mate both dying in childbirth? Can you imagine getting a cut and dying of infection?

Can you imagine breaking your leg and being eaten by a saber-tooth cat? Can you imagine being filled with parasites? Can you imagine poverty being universal? The funny thing is, when he's like eating salmon, who got the salmon for you? whose job is is fishermen a job like these people are literally retarded yeah he probably got that from a video game because there are times in the

game where you know you you already hit the rocks you built the house with nine clicks and now you just get to sit and enjoy the digital fire right wait wait wait I invite this guy explain that hold on I invite this guy please live like it's the paleolithic age I will I will I will buy land and let you live there like

Paleolithic man. I promise this. There's all country. You can literally do this at any time. I know. You can do what he's saying at any time. There's nothing holding you back from doing that right now. You could do this probably for 20 days a year now, easily, your average person, if they could manage it, maybe 10 days a year on a vacation up into the mountains. Back then, they might have experienced that, but they spent 99.9% of their time trying to survive and create the environment to be able. And even then, you're looking around because animals can. be in the dark. They don't have lights. Street lights. They're no streets.

Like, capitalism, derangement syndrome just has people saying the most retarded things. It's easy to get locked into it. It's unbelievable. Like the TV, it's easy to get locked into the machine. It's so easy. And then I think that's the capitalist trap. And what's not capitalism. I'm not blaming capitalism. I'm saying they have derangement syndrome against capitalism.

Because they get into this machine. I mean, that's the joke that Phil's making here. Can you imagine poverty being universal? Here's what's going to happen. They're going to put him in a pod where they neuralink his brain in and put a visor over his head and he's going to be floating there with like nutritional roach paste pumped into a stomach and he's going to be transported to a virtual reality where he's paleolithic man it'd probably be more productive than he is right now if I were to guess he would generate heat I guess

that's the matrix argument right no no batteries batteries yeah it was supposed to be a neural net that actually maintained the matrix but they thought people were too stupid to understand that and they were correct that's pretty cool just the computational force will produce enough charge that might happen It wasn't about charge. It was about the humans were a neural net. And then they said people are too dumb and understand it, call them batteries. And it's like humans don't produce nearly enough. If they were in the pods going like this, like the whole time just like peddling, then sure, I guess.

Or if you could. I mean, yeah, you could still be pretty inefficient though, huh? No, I think, I think there's a, there's a conjecture that a human ride a bicycle is the most efficient form of energy conversion. It'll be the homage to do that, light bulbs on. Oh, really? I don't know. Well, now they use gravity. Gravity generators is the easiest way to do it.

You have a high gear ratio and you have a rock tied to a string and when you lift it up and you crank it when you let it go, gravity pulls it down and it spins a very high gear ratio which turns a light on. South America, it's great. It's pretty crazy.

The energy from you lifting the rock is converted into a light. That's pretty wild. Yeah, it's very cool. Actually, it's using the Earth's force to charge things. I mean, obviously there's mechanical force as well with the rope and the gear,

but you're basically, the earth is doing most of the heavy lifting. You know, it's really crazy. You can take a bunch of pieces of wood and put them together so that when you put it on a stream, it spins, and then you can take that spin and have it grind wheat into flour. It's genius. That's like, you know, all these guys ruling out all perpetual motions impossible. I still got some ideas.

The sun is technically not perpetual motion, but any human lifespan would tell you that it was. What do you got, Tate? I know people have tried it. I just don't think they did it right, is if you have a car and then, like a fucking rod and then a magnet on the fishing rod and then a magnet on the front of the car. And everyone was like, oh, it creates its own magnetic. I don't care. Let me try it first

and then I'll get back to you. Yeah, I used to tell people. I just don't have access to that. Well, here's the trick is that functional, as far as we're concerned, perpetual motion is entirely possible. And what I mean by that is when you see these videos of like a wheel that keeps spinning, we all know there's a battery in there. And then everyone to argue is perpetual motion's impossible while ignoring the fact that we don't live in a vacuum and that external energies will act upon whatever mechanism we produce. Thus, people have produced things that look like perpetual motion, but it's actually just solar power. For example, you can have wheels that solar heat, like the sun will heat the system introducing energy to it, which causes an expansion,

which can cause it steam pressure or make it, can make it rotate. Functionally, as far as we're concerned, we did not put energy into it. We built a system that seems to just go, but it's actually just absorbing ambient energy. So that's not a closed system. It's not perpetual motion, as far as we're concerned, we're getting motion from putting nothing in. I mean, watches are pretty close, the ones that just, like, use the rotation from your wrist to keep spinning themselves? I think that's vibrating. True.

No, it's not. So, uh, when you, so I have a watch when you walk, it spins a weight. Wow. And the weight, like, as you're walking, it just spins the spring. Right. So that's just capturing existing energy. My, my point is, similarly, you can make a machine that seems to just go with no battery hooked up to it.

And you're like, how is it going? And you're like, it's perpetual motion. and people go, wow, and it's actually just sunlight. It's just solar power. I think that Newton's second law was that you can't get more energy. That might be the, the law that says you can't get more energy out of the system than you put into it. And in fact, you typically can't get equal energy out from what you put into it due to energy laws. And that is a true statement, but there are no, like you said earlier, there are no closed systems in the universe.

There's always external circumstances. And then there's zero point energy, so maybe everything's just fake. Zero point energy is where, oh, I was just studying zero point. You can have it at any temperature, but it's easiest to actuate at zero Kelvin. Yeah, absolute zero, good luck. You wrote a 4 Kelvin is where you really start to get quantum tunneling and stuff. So you put two metal plates in a vacuum and you'll see energy start forming between them. Man, I want to learn more about us.

Appearing to, I suppose. But so I was thinking about this on the drive over, like, we still live in the oil economy. It's an excellent control mechanism for geopolitical force, for just interpersonal force. You know, one guy can't blow up. It's hard to get a lot of fuel. And so the next step, like I, it was, I, I, I was like a truth serum guy. Everybody learn everything.

And the next, the best will rise to the top. And now I'm like, how long do we compress technology and society to force them to use oil as the main fuel source? Like compress people? Yeah, like just information and behavior and media manipulation. How long do we pull this off? It's also, I mean, I don't know, it's very easy for a lot of the like rest of the world that's underdeveloped to be using that as well. Yeah, they use a lot of coal. Yeah, so we have control, not we, but the powers that control the oil control the world, essentially.

Yeah, with the major shift going towards LNG right now. So it's like, that's going to be the majority. And if we start moving towards gravity-powered things or fusion-powered things, like, we lose that power, that manipulative force that the American military machine has provided for 70 years. And I'm, like, torn up about it. You don't want to lose the power or you do want to lose the power? You don't want to lose the power? you do want a non-American. I don't want a world that doesn't value property rights, free speech, gun rights. I want. And if I am concerned that without cultural dominance, we kind of have it.

We kind of have the world looking at us right now. Well, you need to control the world's choke points. That's a, that's a benefit. There's a lot of areas that they can control trade when it comes to like China's Belt and Road initiative. Which is dead. One of my body. Which is dead because of Trump. Right. You're saying. Yeah. So I'm changing the subject, I guess, because I was just thinking about something like, you know, Gen Z is just internet people, but the things are consuming online are just Indians. So I was just imagining a future where it's like, it's true. So we know about how they spam X with fake accounts. We've got Bangladesh, she's Pakistanians, and Indians trying to make money off all these systems. There's that story right now that's going around where an Indian guy

made a fake AI woman who was MAGA and then started selling only fans to get guys to pay. So you've got all these Indian dudes that are just ripping off Gen Z because Gen Z is too stupid. care. And I was just imagining a future where it's like a bunch of white Gen Z dudes walking around talking like this. Because like they're consuming nothing but committee from Indians. Canada's got that coming. I don't know about the US. No, no, no, but that's because

they're bringing migrants and I'm saying Gen Z is all online. So at a certain point just consuming nothing but this fake Indian content. Like at what point do the Indians just drop the pretense and start talking with their actual accents? Yeah, well, they don't do it all around. How's your point? Do you see that video where the Indian guy had the fake AI filter

and he was talking to the guy and he's like trying not to move his head. And the guy's like, hold three fingers up on the front of your face. And he's like, no. Tim, to your point, I mean, we already kind of are seeing this with like third culture kids, as in kids that are raised in non-Western countries, but go to international schools. They used to universally have British accents, the English accent specifically. And now most of them have American accents. You've already seen the shift. And the reason for that is because those kids are consuming. The only interaction they're getting with the English language is their parents, which is, you know, varies. And then through media, social media, et cetera.

That's the social media manipulation culture war that I think we're winning. as Americans. So it's, we'll get to a point where we can let go of the, maybe not ever, the military dominance and just have a cultural dominance.

Maybe not. Controlling the oil is basically military dominance. When I say military dominance, I mean controlling the fuel. Military dominance as long as humans exist and are involved in literally anything. You can't project power through soft power.

I mean, you can use, utilize soft power to move things in your direction, but there's no way to actually like project force. You can't show force through soft power. Like if we cut off all of our Hollywood movies to China, that wouldn't have any real force implications. That would just have, it would limit our ability to make America slightly more favorable in the views of the Chinese.

But blowing up a bridge. A blowing up a bridge, that's force, that's force projection. It's like telling somebody not to do something and versus like hitting them in the face. Maybe you'll get to the point where somebody, some country or some corporation just goes full mask off, fusion power, anti-gravity. And everyone's like, oh. Well, you better hope we get that. That's what I'm wondering. Like, why don't we do it first and just say, because then if everyone is fusion, then we

That's the whole idea with AI. Yeah, you could draw a comparison to AI right there. Yeah, that's why the common argument from like the AI proponents is, look, we agree that there are some worries about where AI is going. But the problem is China's putting their foot on the gas anyway. So if not us, who. So you might as well have the most benevolent in our eyes, the most benevolent power. We have the best talent.

We have the best technology. Exactly. Utilize it even if that that's kind of the risk. that they're taking right there. China has no limiting principle. They don't care. They're just going to put their phone on the gas. So we might as well compete.

And if we transition to fusion or some other power source, we'll still use gas, oil, methane. We'll still use that for the entire transitory phase, which could be 60 years or 70 years. That's going for the next. What do you think? 100 years last? Yeah, but the problem is, like, we already have a more advanced fuel source, which would be nuclear, but, you know, there's cultural reasons why people don't want

to be nuclear. It's technically not fuel. Fuel, they say, is hydrogen, carbon, and plutonium. As far as we could power, you know, use an electric grid, power an electric grid. Oh, yeah, but fuel is portable. That's why they call it fuel. It's different than power stations. So fuel you can carry around.

Technically, plutonium? I don't think that's correct. That's what the definition I was told. They often refer to radar material as fuel. But also, in addition to that, they're going to use electric vehicles. No, no, no, no. You might be right, but radioactive materials shipped in. They ship it into a plant.

Plotonium was a fuel, but uranium isn't. But we would be utilizing it as a fuel by powering our electric grid, which will power electric vehicles, presumably if that's the way things move. You could put fuel in a base station, but it's still fuel that you would be able to take and carry around. How do you get fuel to Hawaii, unless they build a nuclear reactor to then power electric vehicles? I guess that would be the question. Fuel is just defined as any material that can be consumed or used to generate power. Yeah.

Okay. I don't know why, but Jim Tour is the scientist that told me it's hydrogen, carbon, and plutonium right now. We are seeing the market react and they're moving back away from EVs. A lot of these car manufacturers are like, ooh, we don't know. These aren't selling like high cakes. I guess to be fair, solar is not fuel. You would call it a fuel. Right.

It's a charge. Renewable energy. Like, yeah, yeah. Water power isn't fuel. The water's not the fuel, technically. It's not a fuel. You could use it as a fuel, but like, you know, have you guys ever heard of a crater earth theory? No.

Someone said to me, apparently, I could be getting wrong, but like the moon is a projection of the earth that we're on. Oh, I've heard that. And that our whole world is actually just in a tiny crater on the moon, and the moon is just a reflection. people believe wild things do it that's a good one that's creative I like I like greater earth though that's my favorite like hollow earth

you can imagine that like no greater earth is cool because it means there's more continents and places you've never been to and there's things to explore I like the greater earth that's the one expansion yeah the reason why people like greater earth is because it means the earth is not totally discovered yet and there's still things to find and do

whereas right now it's like everything's been done you know what I mean it's very exciting actually there's there's rainforest as well as you know deep in the ocean that we still need to explore That's very exciting. When they'd use those LIDAR to detect under the Amazon and they see all these cities.

Every time, you know, everyone always says that, they're like, oh, we've only explored like 7% of the water. But then when you get the video from what's going on down there, it's just like weird-looking fish. Oh, you're not getting the footage. There's no thrill, you know? Oh, I'm a fish with the light on the end of my head. I'm a retarded-looking fish and I've got a light bulb.

It's like, okay, who cares? Wake me up when there's like, you know, some fortresses down there. Lose your deep sea. I got like a guy. You need to get a new one. Like a guy down there. Yeah, there's a guy down there. You know, something, but it's just like, every time I see the videos, it's like, oh, people get crushed because of the pressure, and then they're, like, goofy-looking fish.

What's the rainforest that only, like, 30%? Is it the Amazon that only, like, 30% that's been discovered? I think so. It's so deep. So difficult to travel. You're not talking about the Alaskan rainforest. Good thing we're deforestation it is just the... That way we'll know what's under there, and we look in Google.

Well, look at this. Amazon's got, like, special soil. There's the Congo. Look at the Congo, bro. There's, like, there's cities here. Look at this. People live in the wilderness. You got to go to the...

Amazon. The Amazon, the dark soil, they stayed to the Amazon's? Look, yeah. Dude, the Amazon's not. Everybody should go. What's right here? You get a chance to go. Like, what's right here? I'm not going. Look at these trees. Go sail down a river. Can't even see the trees. Like, ride a canoe down in there.

Bro, there's like some, there's a monkey in there. He's chilling. He doesn't even know people exist. Being a warlord in the, in the rainforest. It's wild. I hung out with this woman that had a turkey. I went to Peru to North East Peru and Akitos and stayed there for like three weeks. My friend was cleaning plastic out of the Amazon and then I am Hey, hey, hey, look at this. for a while.

Look at this. Look, I just proved Antarctica is not real because these colors don't make any sense. It proves it. Yeah, that looks fake. Nope, that's just a picture and that proves it's fake. Too perfect of a curve there. That's good point. It could be Israel on that one.

The 90-day fiancé guys are like the last true explorers where they're just going to the most remote locations just to have sex. It's like there's something going on there. Every time I watch that show, there's guys going deep into the Amazon just because they can't pull anywhere else. You want to hear a crazy story? That's crazy. Yeah, they're like the modern day explorers. In Peru. Or the McDougall of our time.

This is a story that we were tracking at We were trying to get in. In the mountains, the air is too thin for women. And so guys go up to the mountains to mine. And so they're there for like a month or two months. So other guys dress up like women to have sex with the guys while their wives are back in the village. And Vice was trying to get access to these village to do one of these docks on it. And they were like, that would be like the best doc ever. It's like the male trans prostitutes of Peru or whatever, but they weren't able to pull it off.

Oh, that's why. They weren't able to film their pornography film. Yeah, that's a shame. Well, I don't think they wanted to make it about sex, but they wanted to show that they were male hookers pretending to be women. They should make a story about the one woman that could handle it. Why could they not breathe up there?

The thing is, though, like, when you hear that story, in my mind, I'm imagining, like, two just ripped hairy guys and one guy puts on lips and goes, I'm the woman now. But in reality, it's probably just lady boys. Yeah, lady boys. You like, what you see. I've been training for this. Got a cigarette voice.

Yeah, in English. Like, he doesn't speak Spanish. Hey there, Monter boy. Yeah, I like doing this. Look at the, look at those striations. Bro, the ocean. You tell the earth is twisting open and getting low-down. Why is there an airport right here?

Deeply unsurious island. Pooka, what do we do? No, no, no, no. Wait, wait. Like, why is the airport? Yeah, I'm from Pooka. Let me zoom out. Yeah, there's polar.

What is it? What is it? What are they doing over there, huh? Ports. Dude, there's like living on every island. Oh, look at that. Well, yeah, I'm from FACA. Those are all.

Atolls. Those are awesome. I mean, that looks so cool. Bro. So is that like an island with a lake in the middle of it? People vacation at those places? Still saltwater, I'm pretty sure. It's called an atoll.

There's a lake in Canada with an island with the lake and an island inside of it. It's like triple island. Look at this. I don't know why it's really blue. That really turquoise. I don't know why. The Americans don't live. No, that's sand.

Yeah. Shallow. Yeah. It's sand and shallow water. All those airfields were built by us, too. Dude, the atolls. The atolls. Can you just go there, though?

Like, you can just fly there casually? Probably. Probably. But you know that like Tahiti is like that. Tihadi is like, isn't Tadhi like their most remote island or whatever? I don't know. Wow. Hangaroa.

Let's go there. The Chalayan's on this. Look at that. The Chileans on this one. They got an airport. That's a good setup. You know, you know, here's the truth. I'm going to ruin it for you guys, though.

You would land there. You'd walk to the store and you'd be like, oh. Yeah. Like, do you have any ride? Honestly, that sounds like a dream vacation to me. Just like, you could literally do that anywhere. Yeah, my boy, he got deployed to Guam. and he was thinking it was going to be like Easter Island.

And he got there and it was like a Burger King. And he's like, well. Yeah, you know, one of the things. In Peru that was, they had chicken and rice. A clutch B-K sash every once in a while. It's not that bad.

Smash a Whopper in a remote island, dude. I think a lot of like the whole like get away from society is, is like, romanticized because in Peru it was like chicken and white rice, not healthy food. And then I just, I was begging for like a whole food. There's nothing like,

I couldn't get kale. I couldn't get any healthy stuff. I was very much. Look at this, dude. When you really. change your diet. Well, that's Pitcair. You really change your jacket. It's pretty tough. Isn't that where they all are incest to each other?

Yeah, HMS Bounty. The HMS Bounty, a bunch of maroon sailors landed on Pitcairn. So all the descendants of like 12 men live on that island. And it's all incest. There's a lot of inbreeding. Because they have no choice, because there's only like 12 men on the whole island. And it's still owned by the English, but it's rapidly depopulating. So the British government has

set up a scheme to pay people to relocate there. That's not that pit Ciparron. It's the Adams Town, right? Right here. Yeah, it's the Pitcairn Islands. But that's Pitcairn Island. Oh, yeah, that's mountainous. That'd be a tough one. St. Paul's pool.

You'd have to live on the coast. There's a guy on YouTube, though, that grew up there, and he has a video, a channel, and it's quite fascinating. They marooned there and just, like, lived? Yeah, but they had this problem where, like, there's, like, three straight mares got cut out, caught up in, like molestation scandals. So they have a really difficult time. I don't know if they're much better than us, to be fair, but they have a difficult times. And it's funded by the British? Yeah, the British.

Like at some point, the British showed up and they were like, we're saved. And they're like, no, we're going to give you money and we're going to keep you here. You guys stay here. Well, yeah, well, yeah, it was settled by these mutineers, the HMS bounty. And then what's fascinating now is they're running out of people because, like, as soon as people can, they leave the island because there's nothing going on there. So the population is really old. So the British have set up a scheme where you can move there and they'll pay you to move there. The problem is like no one can settle.

Why do they want to keep it going? Oh. Because they move to the bigger island with more stuff going on, like right here. Look at all this. A lot of trees. Yeah. That's just an island of forest. They didn't have a choice.

I'm saying right now. Oh, well. They are, they are leaving. Is there a movie about that? What's the distance? What's the HMS bounty? Probably, yeah. What are I looking that up?

Adams Town. Yeah, it's fascinating. I love the, I love the random European colonies. They're so fascinating. Is there no airport? No, you get there by boat and it takes forever. Oh, that's why people are leaving. Yeah, it's a terrible place to live.

Like, you think it'd be nice, but it's not. Look at this. It's all like elderly people. And they have a weird accent, too. It's like this weird. Oh, that's not good. What's that black spot? Cloud.

Oh. Where's that dark cavern in the middle of the island? That's the where the wizard lives. Dude, it's pretty wild when you look at like Tahiti in these islands, dude, where there's just people are there, like Rapa. Let's just go down and see what's going on in Rapa. Nothing, nobody. Cool name.

I like that. Let's take it. Right here, right here set up Ianstown. Oh, wait, there are people here. What's? Yeah, they're right on the inlet, dude. You know, when I look at this map, I do realize that maybe the Malthusians were right. There's people everywhere, do there's too many of them.

They've got to be underground. Now I understand Barack Obama. when he's like, there's too many people. You have blow them up. You have whole massive islands. You really focused on that. And you have whole massive islands where no one lived there until the Europeans arrived, like the Falkland Islands.

The British are technically indigenous to an island that is thousands of miles away because they were the first people to settle it. I know the Argentines and the crowd will be upset to hear that. True. What is this? You can't even see these. They were there that they slaughtered in there. No one was here.

There was literally no one there. Like it was just a big, giant empty island. Look at all those. Look at this place. I love this. They have an airport here, dude. That's crazy. Awesome.

Isn't that crazy? that somebody's like, I want to put an airport here. Usually the Americans built all those airfields. During World War II. During and after the world. But why are there people here? Look at this thing. Look at this tiny little ravevei.

Just, that's it. Place for it. I live there. Underwater. Tubuai. Look at this. They got an airport. They do.

Man, Americans be putting airports everywhere. Oh, yeah. So nice. We're big on it. We're big on it. They're saying. I mean, they probably have to island hop just to get to lane. Do you think they have culture war problems here?

Doubtful. There's like 100 people, but half of them are woke and half are Christian. Actually, it's true. ransing the coconuts. It's a big problem. There's like one trans kid and they're like, this is too far. Yeah. For real. There's internet. There's culture war for sure.

There's the whole world. These people live on this island and they're all watching media from like New York, L.A. and like Alabama. And they live next to each other, but they watch completely different online media. One guy's watching Alex Jones, one guy watching Rachel Maddow and they got in fight. You want to be a successful YouTuber. Honestly, pick any of these islands and just go. live on it and document your entire thing, run it, start, you know, whatever, build stuff on it,

you're going to have millions. This one right here. There's nothing there right now. You would love seeing this stuff. Like, I have no clue what this stuff is. I've never, I've never seen these in my life. How about Rematra? Super cool.

Look at that they got a church. I mean, there's a whole island in Hawaii that's owned by one family and they like run the entire thing. Yeah, and like they ban people from visiting. But there's like the problems there's islanders there that live there. So like they're just like in a, they're frozen in like the 80s. Oh, wow. Here you go.

This is the perfect place. to go. The Midway atoll. Literally nothing bad has ever happened there. Yeah, Midway. Yeah. There's nothing bad. Nothing notable. That's the most important island in Axis and Allies, if you've ever played the board game. You want that island if you're the Americans or the Japanese. Midway is where it all. Oh, that's where your bombers can refuel if you want to do bombing raids on the right. Oh, hey, look at this.

Why did Google block this out? Yeah, it's blurred. We found it, guys. Look at these. They're all blurred. Is that where Israel is? There's something there. Necker Island. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Take it easy. What kind of show is this? Goodness gracious.

We're trying to protect us from ourselves. Here we go. That is all actually blurred out, isn't it? It is, yeah, it's blurred out. Go back to Hawaii. Go back to Hawaii. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Look at this.

This is big. Hold on. Walk it out. Shut up. I bet it's military-sensitive military stuff. Yeah, dude. Look at all this is blocked out. Go kind of zoom into the top islands.

Oh, that's one right here? The one that's Nihauai or however you know it's a Nihau? You nailed that. What? It's privately owned. Where? What are you talking about? I don't even see it.

I can't remember which one's Nihau. Hang on, let me look like hello in China. No, it's N-I-I-H-A-U. It's the western most of the main Hawaiian islands. So like that last kind of tiny one. The entire island's privately owned by this family. So like that like to the left, that one.

Hawaii? Yeah, that entire island is one family. Oh, oh. Yeah, yeah, I see what you're talking about. There's like what? It's just one family owns the entire house. We could take it over pretty easily. Yeah.

Yeah, I think there's been negotiations, but this family just has it locked down, and the natives love them, apparently. Wow. Are they like a can, they don't have any kind of regal authority or anything. They just give them coverage. They do. If you live there, like, that's your game. These are weird. Like, he's all like war out.

It's like over the blurred spots. It's say like 2020 something if you look close. Yeah. First time I've ever seen a... Yeah, what does it say? Something. This one looks blurred out. When you zoom in, there's like...

Is it a Polish island? Lysianki Island. Lysiansky. The thing is, too, you can see how shallow. it is, you could probably walk way out like super far. Like, you can walk way out. So in Florida, for instance, you can go like 10 miles out and you can stand. Man, that's how, when

I went out there on a boat, you have to have sonar or whatever to track. Because you have to go in between the rocks in your boat. You can just jump out and just stand there. That's how, that's where they have Stiltsville. That's Iran's problem right now. I always wanted to go to that. What's that really nice city where it's like a little village where it has houses over the water?

Like Bora Bora. Bora. That's it. It's it. Bro, you guys want to know what's up. You want to go to Unalaska. It's probably really expensive. Look at this. Atu Station. Did you know the Aleutian Islands is like 30% Filipino?

Because the Filipinos just run the fishing industry there. So it's like if you go to An Alaska, it's just going to be all Filipinos. On Alaska, dude, that's the secret. Yeah, it's all Filipinos there. Isn't that where they do like Ice Road Crabin or whatever that show is? Oh. No, crabbing. Craben.

Yeah. The show about Craben. Yeah, but if you were to visit on Alaska, you would just be, it'd be like you're in California. There's Filipinos everywhere, but they're all bundled up. Is it in Alaska? They're kind of like minions. You know what's really crazy is that Filipinos are basically welcome everywhere. Yeah, everyone loves them.

So when I went to, I was working with this Filipino guy, and we went to Brazil, I think. And we went to a couple of other countries. And like, I'm waiting in line. I have to get, you know, when you go to Egypt, you got to like get a stamp for a, you have to walk up and ask for a visa and pay for it. And I'm going to Brazil. I had to get a 10-year visa pre-approved and all that. He just walks in.

And then he was like, Oh, the Filipinos, man, like, because they're just fishermen everywhere, you can go to any country you want. He's like, Iran, I can go to Iran right now. And I'm like, really? Is it? Yeah, they're not. The Filipino passport's like a golden passport.

They don't piss anybody off. Except not the United States. It's hard to get into the U.S. with the Filipino passport, harder, but literally everywhere else, they're just day laborers. So they're like, welcome aboard. Yeah, apparently it's 34% in Filipino. Crazy. 34.

Just to clarify, this is in Alaska. You know, it's cool. How much you guys in on a secret? You know, you know, a secret is if you, if you're friends with Filipinos, you eat a lot of spam. Also, it's true. You get a lot of spam. Also, if you go back to the next.

They sell your phone number out. Your wife, what was that? If you go up a little bit, that Holy Ascension of our Lord Russian, that's the first Orthodox church in the entire United States, but it was built by the Russians. Wow. They use like whale bones and stuff.

Whoa. Have you guys seen those Catholic churches or those old Christian churches where it's all made of bone of their conquered enemies? You could pull up images instantly of these crazy churches. That's how Trump should build the arch. The arch should be with like the bones of like are vanquished enemies. There's many of them throughout.

We gotta, we gotta get the questions from the Discord. So if you guys want to throw your questions in there right now, while we're exploring Google Earth and wasting time, we'll get your questions going. So get them in, get them in. Zoom out, look at the really, the light blue stuff, I believe was all above water before the flood. Beaver Inlet.

You think there's a lot of beavers there? Doubtful. Yeah, doubtful. I don't know. It's pretty vast. I think they've been called. Erskine Bay. That'd be so nice to get a bay named after you.

By the way, I know it's a little off topic, but I just saw Rick and Morty clip where Morty's dad is a wooden guy and he sails down the river and gets eaten by beavers. Still good writing. That show is still really well written, minus Morty's voice, unfortunately, but it's still, it's still, whoever's writing that stuff, man. All right, we got one from Kilo Charlie Five says, Tim, in regards to the point you made of bullets being almost instantaneous death as a firefighter and former paramedic. I've seen several cases of that not being the case.

Perhaps exception, not the rule, but one guy after killing his wife put the gun in his mouth and blew the back of his skull off and still lived for 17 minutes. and also my best friend in an accident discharge of the 45 through his heart and still lived for 45 minutes before he passed I was there and witnessed it with my own eyes. Indeed, the exception of the rule. In firing squads, they aim for your chest

and you get blasted by like 15-308s at the same time. I'm sorry, that's instant death. It is. Five guys with 308s all shooting at the exact same time right into your chest, you just die. Yeah, we know bad shots

can result in you living for, you know, longer, unfortunately, and that's obviously terrible. But this is, I mean, you're getting obliterated being shot by that many riders. No accidental discharge there, for sure. What if instead of firing squad, we had two one-ton metal

blocks that just went, D-Dong! Same moment. You're just standing there next thing you know, you don't even know anything. You just, it's over. It's probably faster. You don't hear anything? I can't really have an open casket funeral for you then because you'll be squash. I don't think you're going to have an open casket after a death. Well, I think that's why they don't shoot them in the head,

but I don't know. I have the most gruesome comedy here I don't want to make. It's like you could get a snapshot of their face right before it hits, and then that could be like on the... What if they just fill your cell with carbon dioxide in the middle of the night? Poison gas. They used to, but I think it takes a while. Oh, no, no, carbon monoxide during sleep is one.

I mean, honestly, it's humane. There's no pain. Well, you know what we should do? We should put people in rockets and fire them at the sun. Yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah. Like a moon travel experiment, maybe a Mars one. Just launch you straight at the sun.

sun. Once you get close enough, you just kind of... All right. Because that's what they used to do. You're like... You're on Earth. You're going to Mars, pal.

Because that's what they used to do. They like launch... That's Australia, bro. That's these they launch a dog in a space and be like, oh, it dies. Interesting, write that down. Hey, Stephen, write that down. Hey, that chimp that we launched in the space. Yeah, he died.

Oh, okay. Really? How we know. So is the argument from flat Earthers that the Russians faked going to space too? I guess so. Like the Russians, the Americans teamed up to pretend to go to space to trick us in a thinking space is real. One big bit.

Is the flat earth movement gone? Is it finally finished? That's why Candice was like, I'm not around Earther or a flat earther. It's probably bigger than ever. Square Earther. Dude, I got half a million views on my fake Greater Earth little gag thing on Instagram. And there are people being like, stop making fun of flat earthers, Tim. People have so much information right now that they're just getting, and not even to address like this specific point right here, but just in general, they have so much information.

They can go down a rabbit hole in literally anything. So it's like, and then they don't really have anybody that's like an authority. figure that is maybe well read on it or has a strong opinion about it to really push back so they can just go develop any opinion that they want really make a YouTube or a post and then that gets 100 likes and they're like wow there's a people that like this idea must be right yeah that's what I deal with on the street with like blue and on and stuff I mean it's like way worse than anything Q&on was ever doing they're out of their freaking minds you go to protest they have every conspiracy theory under the sun about like Trump Republicans whatever it may be

let's uh let's go we got lacy says Tim what do we do about the corporate HR state blue collar men are no longer allowed to have opinions. I honestly, I have no idea. It's the insurance companies. So, you know, Alice and I talk about this. Every day we learn a new thing as to why corporations are the way they are. Everybody hates the way corporations are. They hate the HR video.

They make you watch. And you sit there and you watch this thing on sexual harassment. And when the guy goes, that's a nice dress, Mary. And she goes, wait, that's harassment. I'm sorry. And then everyone's like, we're not retards. Why are you making us watch this? Because they're legally obligated to do it.

because some retard will sue, and so the insurance companies make them do it. That's just it. Like when we're at turning point, the last time we ever went, Charlie said, I don't ban guns here. The center does. Like, we don't ban weapons. And the reason the center does is because your insurance companies make them do it. Same thing for us with events.

I was like, we have no choice. If we want to do an event, our insurance company requires we get security. Security can't secure an event if people are allowed to bring guns in. It's for obvious reasons. They're like, you want us to make sure nobody gets killed. but you're going to let 50 people have guns. 10 of them could stand up with guns. We can't secure that, so we have to say no guns.

We say, well, we don't want to do that. The insurance company says, if you don't, then we won't insure you. If we don't insure you, you can't rent the venue and you can't have an event. Thank you. Bye. So we've built this system. It just, that's it. We're standing on a gigantic framework of psychotic nonsense that results in awful things.

Some of it has to do with that, obviously, and probably most of it. And then there's also a massive area where you're having to watch these stupid HR videos that are forced to be there from left-wing groups that want to indoctrinate people in the corporate world as well? No, it's just insurance. Is it just an insurance conversation? You don't think it's, you think it's all insurance? 100% insurance. So I worked for, when I worked at Fusion, they made me do a hostile environment training. Yeah.

The funny thing is, young journalists desperately want to do hostile environment training for fun. They want to say they've done it, have the accolate on their resumes or whatever. But many hostile environment training, guys, you want a business to make money? Start a hostile environment training company and you will just have contracts for days. You'll make $60 grand a weekend. Because a lot of these young people want to do it. Legitimate companies won't take them. They say, unless you can prove you need it for some reason, we won't allow you to enroll.

It's a waste of our time. The reason why ABC University made me do it, I had, at the, at the, this point, what, three, four years of experience in hostile environments. And they were like, we still think you should do it anyway. And I'm like, sure, whatever, it'll be fun. It's because of the insurance companies. If, imagine what would happen. If Disney sent a 27-year-old into a riot in Turkey, and they got shot in the head. They have to pay out $20 million. Right. They give them hostile environment training, and the insurance company says, this individual was trained and properly equipped. So that's why they make you do it. And then you only get a

access to it usually when a big company sends you to do it. Otherwise, they don't let you win. If you guys started a hostile environment training company, you'd have contracts for days. Just put up a flyer outside of like Vice HQ or whatever and you'll have 50 requests and all the rich kids will be like, I really want to do it. Just get like five vets with basic combat training to give them a weakened of combat training courses and some LARPing and they're going to pay you out the ass. But yeah, it's all everything we do here that we don't want to do. It's because we're required to by law. So, like, it's funny.

People will chat, be like, did you know that Timcast has NDAs? We're required to. We don't want to do it. We have to do it. It's law. So the way it works is, here's another good example. Have you ever seen the movie Airheads? Yeah.

So, you know, in the beginning when he tries to give his CD to the guy and goes, whoa, whoa, whoa. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The reason why they can't take solicitations is that it voids all of their copyright contracts. Yeah. The moment any company accepts a solicitation, they can be sued every single time. So what happens is when we first started the company, we were like, hey, if you guys want to see some ideas,

like send us your ideas. And then our lawyer was like, stop, delete it, take it down. Because what happens is, let's say Ian writes a song. And he uses a, let's see, A minor FCG, is a structure of a song. And then you get 100,000 submissions. Ian publishes his song. And then one of those 100,000 goes, That's my song.

He sues you. He then says, I can prove. they had my song, I submitted it to them, they received the email. We can then say we never listened to it. It's a coincidence using standard four chords and it's not even the same song. Nope, no matter. You're going to court. He can prove you had access to it. So that's why for legal reasons, you can't submit your music, creative work or ideas to any company. Wouldn't it be great if people could? And then a record exec saw an email and said, I'll just take a look at submissions real quick. Hey, this is pretty good. I'm going to sign this undiscovered talent.

And then they're like, wow, I got lucky. Nope, doesn't exist. You can't do it. You go to Hollywood. You have to have an agent who comes in and says, I can approve this one submission. All legal bullshit. And 100% it's all insurance companies. And what likely is that their errors and omissions, their insurance company for all of their copyright stuff, errors and admissions or otherwise, says, if you accept submissions, we will not insure you.

And then if you don't have insurance, you're not going to be able to get on any platform or on the radio. So, I was just going to say really quick. I guess what I was saying, the training, maybe I didn't mean training so much as making these corporations adopt kind of an ideological framework or ideological. Like, let's say, let's say. It's not. It's, so the Civil Rights Act created wokeness. When the moment they said, you cannot discriminate it on the basis of these things.

You immediately open the door for a legal precedent to sue for those things. So now you will continually get more and more of it. The company then says, we don't. want to get sued, so we have to tell people that white people are bad. That's the legal precedent set today. It's not that the guy at the Fortune 500 company is woke and wants to do it. It's that we made a law that forces it. Right, right. There's leverage over them, for sure. And I would imagine probably as well, loans as well, there's certain types of, other types of business loans. What's the group that helps? Is SPA? Is SPA? A small business?

No. It gets like minorities, get business loans or something? Basically, it's like you need to check all these boxes in order for a massive corporation to be able to. What's it called? No, I'm spacing on this. I don't know. I'll look it up in a sec. The argument is that from the civil rights law, you then get a corporate board of five white guys. Right. Then someone sues and says, that proves they're racist because shouldn't there be one black person, one woman? So then they go, okay, we don't want to get sued, put a woman on. Then what happens is I end up working in office where they bring a woman on the team because they're scared of getting sued for being sexist and the woman's a fucking retard. And then I'm like, why is this person here?

And then she goes, how come no one will listen to me? It's because I'm a woman. I'm like, no, it's because you're dumb, lack the talent, and you shouldn't be in the situation. I'm not saying all women are dumb. I'm not saying women shouldn't have jobs. I'm saying this particular woman was hired to be a token to avoid lawsuits. And now she's complaining, threatening a lawsuit. The whole thing is stupid.

Let's grab this question right here. We got, that's not cool. Das not cool says, question for James. From all your street interviews lately, what's the most common moment where someone entire position collapses when you just ask them to explain it, explain it simply or give a specific example. Do you see that happening more often now than a couple of years ago? That's a really good question. There's so many of those. And off the top of my head, honestly, it probably has to do with immigration, mass migration, talking about, you know,

if you have them unpack a basically a position that they hold, I guess I could give several examples, but we'll do, one of their favorite ones is like due process. And they really don't know what within due process is missing. And so they think that illegal immigrants are entitled to basically due process that somebody would get if they committed a crime in the United States for a criminal case. But the act of immigration is a civil process. It's an administrative process and they don't understand any of that stuff. So basically having them break down exactly what they're getting at when it comes to what due process is missing for illegal immigrants, That's probably one of the biggest ones that we run into.

But what specifically, I don't really have anything off the top of my head. I would have to think about it for a sec. We'll grab one more for Ian. Vash says, Ian, when y'all were talking about some sex airport island in the Antarctic about eight minutes ago, you said it was all water before the flood. How can you flood all water? That's a great question. Thank you for that. I don't have to get back to you.

How do you flood all the water? deep sex ops in Antarctica, I'm into it. Did I mention that or was I just thinking about it in the deep recesses of my tortured soul? What was that thing you blurted out about robot sex dogs a long time ago? Robots, they're coming. It's going to be, and they're coming, and they're coming. Robots that are dogs, robots that have sex with you, robots that have sex with you. We were talking about sex robots and then Ian blurted out and mixing them together accidentally.

Robots and get into the combo. I was like, I need to participate. We better ban. We better ban that in the United States. Or when not. I'm pumping your leg and all that. I want to tell you, guys, one last thing before you. go. I want you to remember the good old days.

Elijah Schaefer and Sidney Watson together at Tim Kast Studio and Ian looked at them and said he likes putting his fingers in cow's mouths and they both left. They left. That was a good time. Those are the good old days. Because now like, you know, Elijah's got something going on. Everyone's going after him and Sydney and then they're not friends anymore. I'm going to go hang out with some cows.

That's what that means. I'll put your fingers in their mouths. Well, I might. If the babies, baby cows. Right. Gentle. Anyway, they're dangerously cute. One of friends. It's crazy. It's been a fun Friday.

I know. We were largely goofing off, having a good time looking at Google Earth. But I think we need it. I think people are burned out on the same stories over and over again. It's a slow news day, and it's slow because everyone's tired. You know, you've got like the Iran stuff. You got the SPLC stuff. And we talked a bit about it.

But I'm sitting here like this morning. I did a live stream because I'm just like, dude, I am not going to make the fifth segment about people fleeing New York City. Like, we keep getting more. I get it. something happened. I'm not going to say the same thing again. I'd rather make a video where I just fingerboard or something. So we're going to have some fun in these Fridays.

Smash that a like button. Share the show all the good stuff. You can find me on X and Instagram at Timcast. James, you want to shut anything out? Yeah, you guys, make sure to follow my YouTube channel. Subscribe over there. YouTube.com slash James Klug. You can find me James Klug everywhere else, K-L-U-G. Tim, really appreciate you having me on, man.

Absolutely. Always a pleasure. Mr. Klug in the house. Bro. sign up, get your email in there for the newsletter for that. And I think that's all I got to report today. But Tate Brown. That's right. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Real Tate Brown. Thank you for a clug in it up for us. A big, long-time subscriber. I love the great James Klug. It's always awesome to be on at them. Carter. I think I'm also a clughead now.

Yeah. Poplarized by Tate. Thanks for coming, James. You can follow me at Carter Banks on X and at Carter Banks Fishlover. Where else? Follow our record label at Trash House Records on YouTube. Tim. We'll see you guys with clips throughout the weekend. Then we're back on Monday. Thanks for hanging out.