Timcast IRL - Sunday Uncensored: Vanessa Santos Member Podcast: Tim & The Crew Play A Popular Party Game

Episode Date: September 25, 2022

Tim & Co join the lovely Vanessa Santos for a spicy bonus segment usually only available on Timcast.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.

And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, Welcome to our special weekend show, Sunday Uncensored.

Every week, we produce four uncensored episodes of the TimCast IRL podcast, exclusively at TimCcast.com. And we're going to bring you the most important for our weekend show. If you want to check out more segments just like this, become a member at Timcast.com. Now, enjoy the show. We are not going to play Mary Fuck Kill because we don't want to say we want to kill people when we're talking about real people in a political context. So what we're going to play is Mary Fuck

and Criminally Charged and Arrest. How about Mary Fuck Arrest? There you go. FMA. FMA. MFA. So Luke. No, no, no, no, no.

This was my game, my concept idea. I asked you first idea I asked you first I asked you first No I got it I planned that already No Mary Fuck arrest

Jessica Yeniv Superman Or the big tittied High school teacher That's not fair Okay You can't ask me this question When this was my idea

From the very beginning And if you remember From the show I asked you I asked you specifically You gotta answer I asked you specifically Nancy Pelosi and her milkers, the woodshop teacher or Hillary Clinton.

Out of those three, I asked, this is my idea, my concept. I get to ask it first. Mary indict, um, Mary indict and Mary fuck indict. Mary indict and fuck. Which one? Pelosi, Pelosi, woodshop teacher, Hillary Clinton. Yep. Yep. Yep. Um, uh, wait, wait, hold on. Mary Indict and Fuck. Which one? Pelosi, Woodshop Teacher, Hillary Clinton. Indict Hillary Clinton. Yep, yep, yep. Wait, wait, hold on.

What happens? Oh, boy. Shop Teacher and Nancy Pelosi. Indict the Big Tittied Shop Teacher. Okay. Marry Hillary Clinton and bang Nancy Pelosi. Oh, yikes. She got big old titties.

So does the shop teacher. Hillary Clinton can blow people up. I want that kind of protection I mean you marry her that's fair and then you can drone strike whoever you want yeah exactly yeah

okay I fuck Nancy come on Luke answer the question what was yours what were the three options marry fuck indict yeah which one

Jessica Yaniv Yaniv I gotta write this down I gotta make sure I'm getting all the things Superman who the hell's super ma'am? Those are all dudes.

God damn it. Those are women. Those are trans women. They're not women. They're dudes. You gave me a trans woman. They're chits with dicks. I gave you one. Gosh. And okay. Alright, fine. Alright, fine. I'll give you at least a female. So you got Jessica Yaniv, super ma'am, and

for your one female how about um how about uh no no no no no uh diane feinstein i gotta fuck the only woman there diane feinstein she's fucking getting it at all costs indict the honest she's fucking getting it you'd marry superman superman will stand up for you superman superman will stand up for you

and we'll fucking argue and fucking fight all these other assholes and then in a micro second we'll fuck some shit up alright I got a good one you're fucking Hillary. No, no, you're fucking, what's it called? Pelosi. That's not that bad.

That's the same thing. She got big old teeth. It's the same thing. They're all like dead fucking gremlins. You gave me a guy and two old women. What am I supposed to do? I'm going to give you all men. You gave me two dudes.

I'm going to give you all men. No, your turn, Ian. All right, my turn. No, but you can't ask either one of us. I'm going to ask Vanessa. All right. Henry Kissinger, Barry Silverstein, or Dick Cheney? And Dick Cheney.

And Dick Cheney. Wait, who was the second one? Larry Silverstein. Larry Silverstein. He's the guy who owned the World Trade Center when they got hit. I'm not sure who that is. If you don't know who that is, I might be able to figure somebody else out. Okay, give me someone else.

Give me someone else. Klaus Schwab? Yeah. Yeah, Klaus. Okay, Klaus Schwab, Dick Cheney, and Henry Kissinger. Oh, my God. I know who I'd fuck. Oh, my God.

Who? Klaus Schwab. Klaus Schwab, Henry Kissinger. Dick Cheney. Oh, God. Great. I mean, that's like, they're like equal of all like almost. Who's the youngest?

I don't know. Yeah, right. Who's got the most youth? God, I honestly, I mean, fuck Dick Cheney. I guess this is weird. Kill Klaus Schwab. No, no, no, indict. Indict.

Of course. Indict him. And I'm marrying Kissinger in this world. Klaus Schwab indict indict of course indict him and indict and I'm marrying Kissinger in this world oh wow okay whatever

I failed that game I would marry Klaus Schwab okay I'd probably fuck Dick Cheney and I guess I'd indict you'd fuck Kissinger for all those

for all those limited wars all right now you you gotta ask either Ian or Lydia all right And I guess I'd indict you. Fuck Kissinger for all those limited wars. All right, now you got to ask either Ian or Lydia. All right, Lydia. Lydia hasn't done the answer. Lydia has to be out. No, no, no. Okay, wait. Can I actually go really easy on you?

Because I think, okay. Yes, you can. Harry Styles. Oh, come on. Hold on. Jason Sudeikis. I want to know which team she's on. I don't remember who Jason Sudeikis is.

And who's someone else? Joe Biden. Well, okay, fine. Joe Biden. Why not? Yeah, but that's not fair. I know, it's too easy. Oh, no, it's too easy. Wait, who?

Okay, Gavin. No, that's still bad. Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom. Ooh. Okay, so Jason Sudeikis, Harry Styles, Gavin Newsom Gavin Newsom ooh okay so Jason Sudeikis Henry Harry Styles Gavin Newsom well obviously

I have to indict the political figure and then the other two could just fucking flip a coin I don't give a fuck so you'd fuck them both no

I would marry neither of them what I was trying to get at I was trying to figure out who your preference was Jason Sudeikis or Harry Styles oh um I'm not learning this

I feel like Harry Styles is like a twig and I could snap in half. Okay. I'm a big girl. I need like a tall guy. All right, well, I guess you got to ask Ian.

Oh, do I? Okay, so let me think. Who are the most horrible people in the world? Janet Yellen. Who else do we have? Who's the most despicable lady I can think of? The health minister of Belgium. A dude?

Oh. Just give him all two. Yes. Bill Gates. Yes. Bill Gates. can think of the health minister of belgium a dude oh just give him all bill gates janet yellen and um hunter biden wow that's good who are we i mean i want to fuck janet yellen but i think i would fuck hunter biden just to get it over with because i wouldn't want to marry the guy i mean maybe i could no i would indict billy he's just not someone i would want to spend my life with not because i want to indict him but just because i don't want to marry or fuck

him i feel like hunter biden would take too long to i think i would marry hunter there's no end there i'd marry hunter because i think maybe deep down he's a good soul just a rough life you marry him because at least you can enjoy the crack we'd laugh about drugs and chat DMT DMT with me so yeah I'd fuck Janet Yellen I hope that gets clipped out of context

by the way so yeah I'd fuck Dick Cheney it was real clear when I said it you're done? yes I'm done I, it was real clear when I said it. You're done? Luke? Yes, I'm done. I thought it was

the funniest when he was like, Dianne Stein, I have to fuck Dianne Feinstein. She's the only woman so she's fucking I got a good one

for you, Luke. She's fucking getting it. Your dog? Chris's dog? No. There's some other random dog. No.

Wait, what were the other's rules all of a sudden? Yes. Yes. Yes. I like this. Dude. All right, all right, all right. No, Yes. Yes. What the fuck? Dude.

All right, all right, all right. No, Ian. All right. All right, okay. I got one for you, Luke. No. Tap out. Joe Biden.

I quit. Joe Biden. We have a guest here. Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden. No, stop it. Stop it. Can we talk about- All right, all right.

Let's talk about the story. You were the funniest, though. Yeah, it's true. I know. Who? He was the funniest when he said that she could get it. Can we talk about... All right, all right. Let's talk about the story. You were the funniest, though. Yeah, that's true. I know. Who? He was the funniest when he said that she could get it.

She's fucking getting it. She's fucking getting it. That's Nancy Pelosi. She could get it. She could get it. She's fucking getting it. Let's talk about the story. Hey, this is really funny.

Oh, no. So you guys know that there's this guy who wears these big, oversized novelty breasts to class. And here's what happened. So I made a couple segments talking about it.

The first was that it happened. The second was that the school was defending it. YouTube has stated, these results have been rated as limited ads. A human reviewer rated your video as suitable for limited ads. I love how they say it's suitable for. It means they're restricting you.

Your content should follow all policies, not just the ones identified. Issues found later can also impact your video. Policy. Where you and YouTube disagreed. They say for adult content, you selected none. A YouTube reviewer selected limited ads

in the thumbnail. That's a thumbnail. The thumbnail is a picture of the teacher wearing a t-shirt, a stretched pink shirt, with those big old titties. The thumbnail is a picture of the teacher wearing a t-shirt, a stretched pink shirt with those big old titties. The big fake oversized novelty breasts.

YouTube says that is adult content. Okay. So do I. We got ourselves a problem here. YouTube demonetized me saying that person is, that photo is adult content.

Effectively saying it's porn. But that teacher is wearing that in front of children so what the fuck is this so when you load a video up i noticed you say is this suitable for kids is that is this just videos adult content is not suitable for kids or is it different it doesn't ask suitable for kids it says it was made for kids if content is made for kids the law requires they can't do targeted advertising do you say yes on that no okay i say no on all that stuff because this content is definitely not i see but so adult content is different than just basic porn yeah they're saying this is porn well youtube's ai automatically screens videos to see if there's any nudity sex and those nipples are, of course, erect as fuck. Those fake

sex toys are erect as fuck. And that's probably what the YouTube... So she's fucking getting it? No. One big fake boob at a time. I think this is a good point, Tim, because if YouTube or the people at YouTube are acknowledging that this is not safe for kids,

then the fact that she's in a school with kids... No, no, no. They're saying it's adult content, not safe for advertisement, then the fact that she's in a school with kids... They're saying it's adult content, not safe for advertisement. I mean, we're at an impasse. Now we got to figure out, is it adult content or is it suitable for...

Hold on. So here's what I tweeted. I said, YouTube says that showing the teacher with oversized novelty breasts is adult content. This is clearly transphobic, Team YouTube.

What do you think YouTube said to me when I submitted this to them? So sorry, sir. What do you think? You told us. You told me before the show. Oh, so you know. Did I tell you? I did? Oh, okay. So they told me they're so sorry and they're going to correct it because I'm right. So not adult content.

Very progressive. Suitable for children is what they're saying. I think the fascinating thing here is that this person is clearly wearing sex toys. Like this is a sex fetish toy. And it clearly is adult content. And I was not surprised. It was demonetized. I was like, yeah, I know.

I get it. I mean, that's ridiculous. But YouTube, I was curious what their position would be. Are they? So they have no choice. Because if they were to say this is adult content that must be removed, they would be in violation of U.S. law. The Supreme Court ruled in 2019,

gender expression is protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title VII, I believe. I think it was Title VII. It might be Title IX. No, I think it's VII. And thus, if they say, this is adult content, they could be sued. That's just their gender expression.

This is what I don't like is that gender expression is protected, but nudity is not. So when gender expression is nudity, you've got to have, the nudity has got to override that and become the focus of it. When you have sexually provocative images,

that's got to override the fact that it's a form of gender expression. This is a logic value system versus a moral value system and uh or i should say it's i always mix this up but the point is the law being applied here is based on logic if you can't discriminate on the basis of gender expression this is someone expressing their gender they're allowed to do it morals uh based uh moral Because morals-based values or law, moral law, would be like, or value-based laws, we do not accept this because we think it's bad for our kids. It violates our values. Well, even logically, I think this is an error because you could say, yeah, it's protected.

Your gender expression is protected. But if you take that to the extreme and then your form of gender expression is getting naked and railing a dog in the ass, that's not protected even though it's considered gender expression. That's not this. Do women have large breasts? Some. Some do.

That's correct. Do women have breasts as large as that? I don't think so. Yes, they do. Well, maybe. In fact, yes, they do. In fact, those are smaller than the world's largest breasts.

But women that size? That seems like a large proportion. The world record breasts are slightly are are bigger than that and fuller and wider than that but it's got to be a bigger woman i would imagine she's not she she is thick like i would say she's fat but not morbidly obese and she has the world record for the largest breasts at like 106 quadruple z jesus that sounds painful so women especially large women, could have breasts of that size. Do women have nipples?

That's correct. Hell yeah. Do sometimes those nipples protrude? They do. Depends on what people wear. Could you fire a woman because she had large breasts and her nipples were poking through her bra?

No, you could not. That's why they're letting this person get away with it because they're like, although that is absurd, extreme and obviously a sex toy. Women, some do have breasts like that and they couldn't fire them over it. So you're allowed to do that according to their logic. Yeah.

But like, what if you can't fire someone for being tall? But if someone came in with stilts, you'd be like, hey, take the stilts off and get to work. Also, imagine if a woman imagine if any teacher, any female teacher you can think of walked into class one day with a gigantic cock in her pants she would be so fucking fired it's not even funny now because the law protects gender expression we will get to the point where they'll go naked but nudity is not gender it's it's it's it's its own thing. How you express your gender is not relative to how much nudity you're showing. Ten years. Five.

Because they're five years. They're going to say, I express my gender by making sure everyone can see my parts. That's fucking insane. That's nudity. That's different than gender expression. What's freaking me out, though, is that, OK, this is the teachers now. Obviously, that's terrible. But like, when is it going to be OK for students to come to school like this?

Already. They already said it. They already said it. The school said students could do the same. That's terrible. But when is it going to be okay for students to come to school like this? Already. They already said it. They already said it. The school said students could do the same. That's insane. Yep. And parents don't even need to be told now if their kids are doing that at school, right? That's the new law, too.

You get to keep your parents completely in the dark. I don't know. This is Canada, by the way. And their weirdo laws on the woke side are more extreme. They're ahead of us when it comes to the brain disorders. Yep. But it's coming here eventually. Yeah, it's the decay of civilization. And I think what's going to happen is

we're going to get a leader who's going to cross the Rubicon and install an empire and shut it all down. And then what happens is we have the Western world, right? You have the British Commonwealth and then you have the United States. They're not part of the same structure, but they overlap culturally. The Roman Republic became the Roman Empire after Caesar crossed the Rubicon.

You know, the autocracy was formed, et cetera, et cetera. I wonder if whoever crosses the Rubicon unifies the Commonwealth and the United States culturally, not legally, but culturally, and then basically starts getting rid of the corruption, starts getting rid of all this bullshit. And then we get two centuries of over empire. I think we're actually, we've been in an empire. It's the British Empire. And it was the, they're the King of England, the King of Scotland, the King of, what else does the British Empire control? They owned India and Australia and Canada. And so it was an empire.

Now they're being like, yeah, we're not really an empire, but they don't have any fucking proof. They just say it because they don't want you to call him Emperor Charles. They want him just be called King of England. He's an emperor. And so we have been part of this liberal economic empire for a while, the British and the Americans for like 100 years. So this is kind of like a collapse of an empire. It may. So, you know, I was thinking about it.

You had the Roman kingdom, which then became the Roman Republic, which then became the Roman Empire. And I'm wondering if it's not repeating, but it's rhyming in that we had the British crown, the U.S. broke from it. And now you have the U.S. Republic. The next step would be overt empire, meaning autocracy, meaning an end to the electoral system. Well, we're in a situation where there is an empire

like right next to us. The Romans didn't have another empire. I mean, there were, but they weren't like, they weren't allied with another empire. It's not really empire anymore. It's not been for a while. The British Empire. Yeah, they said it ended when India declared independence.

The Roman Empire had what? There was other empires. There was like Carthage, which they annihilated the byzantine empire was the eastern roman empire and the roman empire split into two empires because they couldn't control it the gangas khan empire right right right you know the mongols alexander the great khanate that was that was technically an epi no it was before alexander the sumerians as well also had a big empire that was before the sumerians were before yes so like the romans didn't really have um a challenge they didn't really have like a i don't know it's a different it's a different situation now plus the whole world is unified i wonder if trump is the guy who crossed the

rubicon and then becomes an emperor it'll be a corporate dude if we're gonna see this it's gonna be why trump well he because he's a politician it'll be like a corporation that does tries to do it i think i don't know so. Alphabet's in a position like BlackRock. I don't think BlackRock. They'll be subversive, but it's going to have to come from the government institutions. Otherwise, people won't have confidence in it. It could be private military. And they're like, hey, your country's bankrupt.

Come work for BlackRock because we'll pay you. It could be something like January 6th. They say, you know, Trump is in Alexandria. I don't know. Maybe it's not Trump, but someone's in Alexandria with 100,000 supporters marching. And they're like, you cannot cross this river. And then they are like, watch us. And then they walk into D.C. and then occupy the buildings.

And then it's just chaos. Institutions are frozen. And then there's panic throughout the country. There's a state of turmoil. And then military leaders agree to just. I think that they'll want people to believe that it's one of of turmoil and then military leaders agree to just i think that they'll they'll want people to believe that it's one of their politicians and be afraid of their politicians so that they disrupt their own government and cede power to corporations and

then it's going to be by controlling the monetary system is the rubicon crossing like what they did in canada the truckers they said no your money's not yours we control it that's like yo that's de facto taking property rights. You can't, that's their property and you can't just take it. But that's what the Rubicon thing was. It was like, yeah, I know what the law is, but this is mine now.

If we start seeing people try to strip our bank accounts and our land from us just because they can, that's kind of like, yo, this is the empire now. That's when, right. Well, when they, so right now the DOJ is targeting Trump supporters. Are we getting to that point? It looks like we're like, this is our generation is on the teetering process of, is it going to, how's it going to go? Yeah.

These are not good times. These are dangerous times. I don't know, man. How far will it go? Can the Republic be restored? I kind of, I don't know. Every action has an equal kind of reaction to it. And politically, it's just becoming more dangerous for everyone involved here.

And the pendulum is swinging back and forth further and further. And that, to me, is very worrisome because it could also very well mean that there's going to be a right-wing counteroffensive that's going to also, of of course destroy civil liberties and rob people of their privacy of their security and of their liberty so there there is a threat on both sides and with the escalation of political violence it's only going to get worse from here you don't see do you see silver lining every bad thing there's always an opportunity to fix something or to improve something or to build something new so maybe the system will just become too convoluted too conflicted and it will allow other individuals to have more freedom while the system is eating itself that's one possibility you know that maybe could be a silver lining so man looking back at history we also have to

consider weimar germ. It's not just about the Roman Empire. There's also things like that. And what people don't understand, a lot of the stuff that the Nazis were burning, correct me if I'm wrong, it was gender ideology stuff. It was Marxist stuff. It was degenerate stuff. And so that's probably why the left is freaking out because like the Nazis destroyed the same thing and hated this too. And it's kind of like, yeah, well, that's what you get if you don't. And so I think the issue is when the Nazis were burning books, we condemn that because knowledge shouldn't be forbidden.

But the issue is that you have two extremes. It wasn't just the Nazis. It was also the communists. And they were targeting each other. And the regular people who believe in a republic are like, y'all are fucking nuts. We're dealing with that now. But we don't really have Nazisis i think the the communists dominated the space so now regular people are trying to fend off a communist onslaught it's kind of worrying where this ends up because they're the

ones burning books now yeah while simultaneously claiming they're the ones not doing it that's right that's why i bought gender ideology or gender queer rather because i don't want them to erase this and be like hey it never happened oh you can open the book on this show and show the the blow job i wonder if i can go right to that page blow job in a book for kids hairy legs hairy legs i mean this is their argument though they're saying that we're the ones who want to ban books because we don't think this is appropriate for kids yeah in schools so even amazon doesn't allow it like they say it's crazy picture of a thing eviscerating this guy. What the fuck is this?

This is one like in high school or middle school. Oh, is that about having a period or something? Yeah, I think so. Is that what it says? I feel like I'm going to stab my entire body. Psychological horror at the realization that things can go inside my body. What the fuck is this? It's a pin.

What the fuck? Dude. It's a sad book. Disturbed person. Because it's like they're shocked to discover that they're a human it's so weird it's so fucking weird they're like i shouldn't be this way i should it's like but you're a person that's what people are why why is it shocking to them it's i don't know i don't know because they want to be guys but this picture i don't know if you

can see it from here it's two two people kissing you can see naked butt crack if i was like 13 and i saw grabbing cock or grabbing crotch the bulge i mean i this would burn in my mind for forever and it probably would drastically alter the way that my brain developed not not that they all all literature does that to you but i mean this these are pictures show the blowjob ian desperately i'm looking looking for it. Desperately looking for it. Is it early on in the bloody tampon? I mean, whatever. Little girls

are different than little boys. It's not a tampon, it's a pad. Or a pad, rather. Looks like someone pooped in there. I think you're too early. It's more in the middle. He's not a lady. He doesn't know. Ian's desperately trying to find this blowjob for all of you guys. Just to be clear, I don't think removing a book from a school curriculum is the same as banning books. Like the Nazis were burning them from existence.

That's not what people want to do. I bought this book because it's not banned. You can buy it if you want to buy it. But Amazon says 18 and up because they're like maybe a blowjob shouldn't be shown to kids. But they're putting it in schools for kids. Did you find it? No. Do you want to look through it?

You can't find the blowjob yet? Yeah, I saw it before. It's so gross. Remember how far along it was? Uh-uh. Let me see. Let me see. Let me try and find that old blowjob.

So I think this book is like someone went through something. The author went through it. It's called a memoir, genderqueer memoir. And it's like this thing about like I'm talking to my sister and she says to taste. Oh, there it is right there. There you go. There it is. That's horrible. in a children's library near you what the hell yeah i think they did the right thing removing it from schools i told my mom about this when i was trying to

feed her the red oh russian propaganda what she hey z what's that all about that z is the russia you see right there says hey z you don't see she says hey z oh hey z and That Z is the Russia. You see right there, it says, hey, Z. You don't see, she says, hey, Z. Oh, hey, Z. And the Z is the symbol of support for Russia. That proves it's Russian propaganda. They're trying to destabilize. Once you see the... Here's the crazy shit, though.

Here's the crazy shit. Is that whole scene is basically this person being like, I want to be a guy. So I did things guys do and it didn't work. No, it did not work. And then she's like sitting here in bed saying everything it is a good experience but i'm not but i'm not sure i really need any more of it it's like maybe your mind of you like this is what this is what's crazy what if this

person is straight and they've been socially pressured into thinking they're gay and so when they engage in gay sex and don't like it they're like maybe i don't need it it's like no maybe you're straight yeah yeah it's crazy because like an inversion of being straight like being told you're straight when you are gay and it's like a gay dude being like i don't like girls like try it and they're like this is not fun it's like maybe you're gay now it's like this person's claiming they're gay i'll tell you this i've known women who have outright insisted they were gay and then like five years later they're married married to a guy. There was a story that we talked about where this woman was like,

I was a lesbian, but then the pandemic hit and I started banging my roommate who was a boy. And it's like... Lots of those stories during the pandemic. You really don't need

sexualized kids either. You don't need to decide if you're gay or straight when you're 15 and 16. You don't need to decide. I think it's just, I mean, it's hard to, like, that's what I think most sane people want to say and think but then you've got all this status quo

liberal crap pushing like the drag queens reading to your kids and you know it's like you kind of have to start taking taking sides it's like i i don't know i'm explaining this terribly because i'm tired i think i might have overdosed on caffeine but but the point is like you do have parents i guess trying to sexualize kids i mean to me the drag show thing really is it's so out of control what they're doing at the pride parades what they're doing at the pride festivals it's crazy i mean you won't let a kid go to a strip club until they're 18 why are they allowed to go to these pride shows and see this stuff it just doesn't make any sense you wouldn't give your 12 year old son breast implants why cut off your 12 year old daughters yeah 12 year old daughters double mastectomy it's just terrible oh yeah that matt walsh shit we got

a few more minutes okay i've heard about this but i don't know if i can and before we move on to that i have to say one of the things in us and i were talking about for the show was that we see these parents taking their kids to drag shows that's wrong honestly that's wrong and i don't think that obviously their kids should be taken away but something's wrong with our culture when parents think that's cool oh here we go so that matt walsh says my team and i've been investigating the transgender clinic at vanderbilt here in nashville vanderbilt drugs chemically castrates and performs double mastectomies on minors but it gets worse. Vanderbilt opened its trans clinic in 2018 during a lecture the same year.

Dr. Shane Taylor explained how she convinced Nashville to get into the gender transition game. She emphasized that it's a big moneymaker, especially because the surgeries require a lot of follow-ups. That's correct. And people are hooked on drugs and big pharma

for the rest of their lives. Their entire body is dependent on buying and purchasing forever from these monsters. It needs to be made illegal. Yes. This is the equivalent of giving someone an autoimmune disease for which they must always take medicine.

That is morally reprehensible. Disgusting. And they don't tell a lot of these children. They're like, hey, you're going to have to be on drugs your entire fucking life. Yeah. That New York Post article that i showed you too before like why is it that we're so behind i mean like the uk seems to be realizing how backwards they started earlier than we did because they have the tavistock clinic which i think is what that article's about i feel like they started the trans thing earlier and now they're done with it yeah yeah i feel like

we're gonna follow a similar path they're done with it. I feel like we're going to follow a similar path. They're going to extract as much money as possible from this fucked up system. We still have potassium bromate in the bread supply in the United States. It's banned in Europe. Why? Corporate profit. They don't care about the physical health of it. They care about the profit and the ease.

I don't think Europe does either, to be honest. But I do think that Europe does have to contend with the fact that with a nationalized health care system, they save money federally, like government-wise, if they keep people healthier. Oh, my God. That's a good point. In the U.S., you make money with sick people. In England, you lose money with sick people.

Gosh, that's so disturbing. That's literally what it is. Yeah. So in the U.S., they're like, why the fuck should we care if you get fat and sick? We'll just make money off you. And then in Europe, they're like, our budget isn't big enough for all these sick people.

Don't let them eat this. So there's a problem. I mean, yo, if you want to buy crystal meth, should you be allowed to do it? Luke? Yes. I think it's, at the end of the day, a personal decision. And I think the government stepping in actually makes people want to take it more.

The more you criminalize something, the more you create a black market for it, the more you create a demand for it. It's just like telling a child, hey, don't touch that hot stove. It's inquisitive for human beings to be like, yeah, I want to touch that. So psychologically and also when it comes to harm reduction, absolutely, it should be legalized compared to what's happening right now. And think about if we regulated it, controlled it, and we were like, if public intoxication is illegal, you wouldn't do it in your own home. If we had molly, if we had heroin that didn't have fentanyl in it, how many lives would we save?

The only reason that it has fentanyl is because of that black market, because it gives them a larger hit for it. And at the end of the day, the individual is responsible for themselves. The state is not responsible for you. But kids, you think just kids shouldn't be able to buy it? Yes, I think kids should, of course, be under their parents. And I think their parents should have an invested interest in raising their children and being a part of their lives and not just giving them to whoever the fuck it may be,

to the influences of the state. Well, I think the problem with legalizing all that even even for adults though i mean isn't don't don't don't we see the the results of that and homeless encampments all over the place uh depends because it all depends on the the situation because there is still uh you know active criminal gangs you compare to what's what happened in Portugal, you actually and in Holland, you see a large amount of harm reduction, you see less people dying of overdoses, you see less people stealing from each other, you see less criminal elements. And I think those are all positives. We haven't had any of that, because truly,

we live in such a corrupted system where literally the CIA imports all the fentanyl, and all the drugs and all the crack cocaine into the poorest neighborhoods and creates this dependency. We also have big pharma that created all these opioid addicts who need fentanyl, who need heroin because they're addicted to it and they can't live life anymore. But my thing is booze is regulated. You can't drink and drive. You can't drink in public you you can't be publicly intoxicated and so if we were to legalize things like heroin or meth you'd have cleaner safer distribution and you'd control how much people can be using same as you would do for booze it would actually reduce um the amount of use and the abuse of it it would eliminate the black markets it would get

the dirty homeless junkie problem done immediately that's what portugal did right portugal and holland implemented those and those were the results of it not completely perfect i'm just like prohibition doesn't work yeah you get black markets you know it's funny people uh make this joke about breaking bad they're like breaking bad in europe and it shows walter white and it's like i have cancer and then they're like your treatment is free and that's like the end and i'm like well you watch breaking bad and i just finished it so now i know that's nothing to do with the show at all had nothing to do with that um so a better example would be breaking bed in portugal and then it's walter white going i'm sick i want i want to provide for my family so i'm gonna cook meth and then the next one is him in

a shop that says like it's like a store that says crystal meth and he's just like standing behind the counter yeah and that's it yeah criminal And he's just like standing behind the counter. Yeah. And that's it. Yeah. Criminalizing people's addictions is absolutely fucking cruel. Someone has a substance abuse problem, throwing them in jail, making them more hardened criminals is not fucking helping anyone. It's making.

Yeah. Forcing them to hide in slums and like junkie houses. Yeah. Relying on fucking criminals and gangs and cartels for their fucking drugs. Think about this. If somebody's at a bar and they die of alcohol poisoning, what happens to that bar? They get in trouble.

Yeah. They're like, you have a responsibility. Bartenders can't let you keep drinking if you're visibly intoxicated. I don't know about everywhere, but you guys have experienced that, right? Yeah.

You've been at a bar and you're really drunk. They're like, I can't give you anymore. It's never happened to me. No, of course, because they do want to make money. Yeah.

But they can get in trouble if you die from alcohol poisoning. Or even if you drive home drunk yeah right so so take your keys from you're over served so imagine there were there were like establishments with regulation had to be clean they they had to have fresh needles every time if it was something needle based or maybe they don't even allow injections and they only allow you know other forms of ingestion and it's all controlled. And then they're like, I've already given you one dose. I can't give you one.

They're like, dude, I need it. I need it bad. It's like you've had too much. They're alcoholics. They still exist. But I think alcohol is substantially worse as a drug than many other drugs, especially pot. Well, actually, no, that that that makes me wonder if somebody is like really fiending and itching and you're trying to limit them.

I mean, isn't that going to get violent? Do alcoholics get violent? Sometimes they do. Yeah, but they can have a stash at home. And alcoholics do. That's what I'm saying. I mean, can drug users like, I mean, I guess I just have so many questions about the specifics. Heroin's different because if you go to the store or the grocery store, you can buy a thousand cans

of Budweiser and go home and drink them all and die. But you can't just get unlimited amounts of heroin. I mean, that's a death sentence. But there's no perfect solution here. There's always going to be harm

in this world. But do you want to reduce that harm or do you want to increase that harm? Do you want cartels, organizations and gangs and more death or do you want less of that? And Do you want cartels, organizations, and gangs, and more death? Or do you want less of that? And if an individual wants to overdose or do whatever, that's their own personal decision

that they want to do. But more importantly, right now, heroin, illegal. So what do people do? Drug dens. They OD, they die. What if it was legal and restricted and you can only get low doses? Well, then people would be more likely to do it in a place where if they did OD, they wouldn't die. And if they are

buying and using at home, like if they were to do beer, they would not be concerned about calling 911 and saying, my friend's taking too much. People get alcohol poisoning. They call kids. There's a bunch of these stories. I was a kid at a college, 18-year-old, got alcohol poisoning. His frat brothers didn't call

911 because it was illegal. He died. So if the kid was 21, they would have been like, no problem. But they were scared they would get in trouble. That's fucking insane. My campus told us that there was all these protection laws. Like if you call and you want to save your friend, then you're immune to any

So I think we don't want people doing these things. So we're better off with limited use legal availability. Like booze is insanely restricted. You can't drink in public. You can't be outside drinking beer. Like think about that. You're not allowed to be intoxicated in public, which is weird because if you have a bar,

you leave the bar, you're publicly intoxicated. You can't even have open alcohol in your car. Someone else might have. You can't even transport. Like if you can't open a beer, you can't throw it away. You can't even have an empty beer can open in your car, else might have that's you can't even transport like if you can't open a beer you can't even have an empty beer can open in your car i don't think you can't yep you can get in trouble especially depending on where you are so think about how severely we restrict alcohol and alcohol still really bad i think that if we were to regulate other drugs in similar ways we'd have less death more control less black markets less violence

less drug dens less homelessness you. You have a problem of people drinking publicly. It's like there's open air drug dens in these cities. And I'm like, what are you going to do? People break the law. You arrest and charge them. But if you create places where people can legally do it, you reduce a lot of that. You limit fentanyl overdoses. Do you think the same about prostitution? Oh, yeah. That's interesting. I think they're all bad.

Yeah. Okay. You know what I mean? I'm not a fan of it, but they do it anyway. And so it's like, but here's the crazy thing. Let's say you meet, a man and a woman meet on Tinder. And he's like,

why don't we just cut to the chase and go back to my place? And she goes, I want a meal first. Is that prostitution? Marriage is prostitution. on if she said before we go back to your place and do the dirty you got to buy me dinner how is that any different it's a material exchange for sex are they going to say she's a prostitute that's fucking every woman not every seriously okay fine depends on the meal but it's a legal thing as my dad always said son always ask you might not have to buy her dinner there you go yeah

the point is the point is if you go if you meet a girl at a bar and you're like you want to come back to my hotel room i got a jacuzzi and then she goes 50 bucks jail if she goes 50 dollars in alcohol, not jail, but you're still, it's a material exchange. What if she said, what if she said,

fine, I want $50 worth of gold. It's not cash, but it's a monetary exchange. Okay, what if she said, I want $50 worth of copper. Bitcoin.

Ingots. Bitcoin. Okay, well, ingots aren't currency. That's got to be illegal, I guess, but I can ask for a $50 currency. That's got to be illegal, I guess. But I can ask for a $50 dinner?

It's the same thing. Yeah, politics is like that, too. You're allowed to buy off your constituents with dinners and meals. It's like when Meredith, like, on The Office is getting sex for steak coupons or something. What would happen if a guy pulled up to a hooker and she was like, you want to party? And he goes, I want you to be my girlfriend. Why don't you hop in? We'll go out for a nice dinner.

And I always make sure my girlfriend has enough cash to get through the night. There you go. I never said I'd give her money for sex. I asked her to be my girlfriend. But you just met her. So fucking what? The law makes literally no sense. Absolutely.

And then also criminalizing it makes sure that there's pimps that make sure that people are human trafficked. And women are left to be on the behest of criminals. I think they want to make sure that they don't publicly do commercials and stuff like, hey, call here for a prostitute. They could ban commercials. They could say no commercials. Could ban commercials. But what about like memes and ads? And I mean, that's the type of commercial

they could just ban advertising of they say you can't advertise cigarettes to kids yeah I was gonna say they killed camel camel to camel prostitution is legal

in Nevada yeah oh yeah that's right yeah that's Vegas baby alright we're gonna wrap it up we don't got too long don't wanna go too long but Vanessa thanks for hanging out

it's been a blast thank you guys this was awesome and for everybody who's a member you rock thanks for supporting our work It's been a blast. Thank you, guys. This was awesome. And for everybody who's a member, you rock. Thanks for supporting our work, and we'll see you all next time.