Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #103- Over 100 Police Groups REFUSE To Protect Democratic National Convention, womp womp

Episode Date: July 29, 2020

The DNC loses police protection as 100 police groups pull support from them over their anti-police policy positions, Mr. Barr has adventures in congressional hearings, Antifa plants nails in mortars, and Trump is censored on social media for retweeting a video of licensed medical professionals referring to a Yale epidemiologist. Support the show (http://Timcast.com/donate) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It would seem the Democrats are getting a cold, hard lesson in what happens when you restrict the abilities of the police, demoralize them, and not let them do their job. Because the latest news, the DNC, which is gonna be one of the most important moments this year, will not have, well, at least over 100 police groups, a better way to phrase it. They're basically saying we can't do it. Our hands are tied, you know, so we're not gonna be able to help provide the protection they need for their convention in milwaukee now to be fair i don't even think there's going to be a convention in milwaukee so i don't know necessarily i agree yeah right so like maybe maybe maybe the story is not as yeah go ahead i don't

say maybe the story is not as big as we think it is why would they even need to have one because it's like they have obviously chosen biden they're going with biden unless vp maybe unless of course they are switching what are they gonna like try to decide who's gonna be the vp wouldn't biden just choose and then be like this is who it is there was a woman from the dnc who said to i think it was bill hemmer on fox news we are not having this convention to nominate Joe Biden or something like that. Okay. And I ended up doing a big segment on it

because everybody was like, what could she possibly have meant by that? Did she let it slip? They need to have the convention. She said, we need to have it. And a lot of people were like, they're going to nominate somebody else, aren't they? That's what I've been saying.

So what's going to happen? Like Joe Biden's going to walk out, but then like a giant ship is going to crash onto him and Hillary's going to walk out? She's going to pull the shoes off his feet and put them on and then she's the nominee now? No, he'll walk out and make an announcement that, you know, he finally is going to admit to having early onset dementia. No. I'm being a little much. He's going to say something that, you know, unfortunately I really appreciate all of you coming out for me, but I'm going to step down and we're going to allow this wonderful woman who you all know and love. I know it's going to happen. He's going to come

out. He's going to come out. He's going to be he's going to be up and active more than he's ever been. He's going to be angry. You're going to see it. We're all going to be watching this live speech. It's going to be the one of the most epic political speeches ever made. And we're all going to be sitting here going like, how is this Joe Biden? And then after he finishes his impassioned plea for the heart and soul of this country, he says, that's why I have to choose Hillary Clinton as my VP. And she comes out and everyone claps and cheers. And then he goes, and then he falls over dead.

That's very dark. Descriptive. And then Hillary's like, I guess I'm the nominee then. Like your impression. Yeah. That's how I imagine she talks in private. So they're going to have a DNC. It's kind of weird they're going to do it, but it is big news.

I guess the police aren't going to be there. What's going to happen, though? I mean, do they really cheat an election? They're going to cheat an election, huh? Well, Bill Barr was asked today when he was testifying before Congress, I guess one of the Democrats asked him if they thought someone was going to cheat in the election. And he's like, I have no reason to believe that would be the case or something. Yeah.

Every both sides are loving these accusations. And that's kind of scary. You know, especially when you've got the mainstream media up and down saying we will not know the results of this election. We won't for some time. Yeah, it's messed up. You know, it's going to I up. I'll give you a prediction. There's a lot of things that could happen. I'm willing to bet Trump narrowly wins,

but they say we're still counting votes and then they're going to keep finding ballots. Of course. They're going to be like, oh, Trump didn't actually win Michigan. We found a box of ballots. We found 100,000 ballots. This could make a difference. It's going to be like 1,000 here or there where they'll say 98.9% reporting, Trump winning by a few thousand's going to be like a thousand here or there where they'll call it.

They'll say, you know, 98.9% reporting Trump winning by a few thousand. Yeah. We found 473 votes in this post office, you know, locked in the back room. I mean, if masks work like they say they do, there's nothing wrong with going out and voting physically, period. Why? What do they fight for? Andrew Cuomo said that an outdoor rock concert was illegal and a bunch of people were like uh but you have protests non-stop in your state yeah and for black

lives matter didn't he didn't he go out i don't know if cuomo did he actually did yeah i know that i know his little brother pretended to be quarantined on cnn got caught and then cnn man this is there was a tweet i retweeted. He basically said, you can really see in the metrics, LexisNexis data for New York Times, when they completely sold out the paper. Because, you know, it was actually Ezra Klein of Vox who wrote, once the internet emerged as a principal news source, the mainstream newspapers immediately realized they had to be clickbait. They had to be BuzzFeed. So now this guy was basically saying he's boycotting the New York Times.

He refuses to give an interview, some scientist or something. And he said that the New York Times is BuzzFeed with like a thin veneer of like academia or like professionalism. When in reality, it's the same trash, fake news. It's just remnants of their their former selves that's that's what they're going on it's a skin suit yeah that's that's how it's described right like the new york times the gray lady the paper of record once the most prestigious paper in the world is now just being worn by these liches as a skin suit a wolf in sheep's clothing yeah i like to go the horror route more where it's like, what do you call it?

Like the dude from Men in Black. Okay. So the New York Times was once very much like, I say this important news must be heard by the people. And now it's the guy from Men in Black who's like, you got any sugar water? That's the stories they write. It's all trash. Yeah, the roach guy. Yeah.

So we actually got, we're going to leave with this story because it's kind of, I don't know. I don't know. It's one of those stories. The DNC is not going to have police protection or they might, but they're more than a hundred police agencies are withdrawing from agreements because of their policies. It's kind of like an epic backfire, I suppose. Yeah. You know, they want to embrace this stuff.

Well, what do you think is going to happen? The cops are going to be like, okay, well, we don't protect you. And the funny thing about it is in Chicago, they created two new police units crime crime goes right down yeah surprise surprise crime goes down when you fund the police yep exactly but then we also got the bill bar hearings oh what an embarrassment yeah bill so our government bill bar i like this guy me too more watch ag ag bill bar i'm like seems like an all right guy. They really try to get him. And they just yell at him. And I'm like, the more they do that, the more I like Bill Barr.

You can see the amount of patience that that man has. And it is commendable. And they wonder why he doesn't want to testify before Congress. They just yelled at him the whole time. Well, they meaning the Democrats. Right, the Democrats. The Democratic side of it. Whenever he would try and answer a question, they would ask. He would get a word and a half and they would go, reclaim meaning the Democrats. Right, the Democrats. The Democratic side of it. Whenever he would try and answer a question, they would ask.

He would get a word and a half, and then he would go, reclaiming my time. Anyway, Bill Barr, you're an evil, evil bigot, and you hate everyone. I'm going to take that as a no. Right. Well, wait. Reclaiming my time. Anyway, moving on, I'd like to add this Washington Post article that is totally unsubstantiated to the record. It was worse than it was like Slate.

One guy's like, I like to read from Slate. What? from slate for those who don't know slate is like a conspiracy far left okay i'm being a little unfair it is a far left if uh just do this just go to allsides.com they're great and they'll show you like the democrats often choose the furthest left possible sources yeah i've got buzzfeed here that says oh god uh trump is a big stupid doo-doo head i'd like to have added to the record it's like uh-huh yeah the daily beast wow that was embarrassing they didn't even give the full bill barr quote when he said uh since when is it okay to burn down a federal courthouse they just quoted is it okay question mark there's more to that sentence dude they didn't even finish the sentence because they don't want you to know oh my gosh yeah now msnbc i guess was finally forced to like show the footage because of the hearing of all the violence and the chaos yeah but we'll talk about that and we'll talk

about some of the the responses from the police some of the weapons they've found and then we've got some uh some other stories too i think we're going to talk about the censorship of trump because this is probably the scariest thing I've ever seen. If you guys don't know, Trump tweeted out a video of a bunch of doctors talking about hydroxychloroquine and everybody banned it. So we have to be very careful how we talk about it because they could theoretically just shut our stream down for even mentioning it.

Yeah, but we'll try to finagle our way into talking about it. But the main story here, in my opinion, for one, they're censoring what the president is telling the american people but more importantly it was a news organization just live streaming a press conference that's it yeah and they blamed the news organization for it didn't they ban uh donald trump jr yeah yeah because he shared the video well they gave him like a restriction we didn't actually suspend him he just can't tweet anymore oh great 12 hours for 12 hours oh goodness so so the first thing that absolutely must be done before we read this first story is you must i know this i know this one i know it smash that like button did i

did i win yeah you're correct sir you you i'm good your prize adam what do i win the amount of like buttons that likes that we get from you saying it. So if the people listening really want to give you that present for winning, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme.

I want them likes. Also, don't forget it. Yes. Give me them likes. Smash the subscribe button. That's how I get my sustenance and the notification bell. And we do the show every Monday through Friday at 8 PM.

Let's read this year. First story. Take this out. This is from news seven, Boston Friday at 8 p.m. Let's read this year's first story. Take this out. This is from News 7 Boston. I don't exactly know why it's from Boston, but it's a certified NewsGuard source, and they're telling us it's happening, so I'll take it, even though the DNC is in Milwaukee. Police agencies pulling out of Democratic convention. More than 100 police agencies are withdrawing from agreements

to send personnel to bolster security at next month's Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee, in part because they're concerned about a recent directive ordering police in the city to stop using tear gas to control crowds. A citizen oversight commission last week directed Milwaukee's police chief to publicly account for why the department used tear gas during protests in late May and early June after the killing of George Floyd, and to change Milwaukee's police policies to ban the use of tear gas and pepper spray. The Milwaukee Fire and Police Commission said in its order, Police Chief Alfonso Morales could be fired if he fails to comply. That order came amid intense scrutiny of police tactics in Portland, Oregon. This we understand. They says since the Milwaukee order was issued, more than 100 law enforcement agencies in Wisconsin and across the country decided against coming to Milwaukee. Morales

told the WTMJ on Tuesday they were concerned with directives placed on the police department, including not allowing tear gas or pepper spray. Now, the tear gas thing, I'm kind of like New York doesn't really use tear gas. I don't think Chicago does either. And they're effective in their crowd control. New York, I don't, New York does use pepper spray. But New York rarely engages in that kind of tactic or weapon, you know, sprays. So I'm almost like, is that it? Well, think about the layout of New York too.

I mean, you're closed in, you know. The streets are not, they are kind of wide in some areas but you know you put a tear gas down it's not just going to spread out it's going to go up and into people's windows and it does into buildings yeah so so the environment in new york compared to where they're actually using it like milwaukee is significantly smaller and more open so it can disperse a little bit more so i can see how it being problem in bigger cities a lot of people also don't realize that tear gas has to go somewhere it doesn't just it's not just gone right all right so i think for new york and chicago there was an issue with

their plumbing systems oh okay yeah where sense yep because new york is a big rock it doesn't absorb or anything it just goes into the water yep just so i don't i don't know exactly yeah it's actually you can actually look at a map of new of manhattan this is really cool and you can see a zigzag of skyscrapers that's where the bedrock is because they yeah so this the smaller buildings are on the weaker ground and then they build out skyscrapers on the rock yeah you ever see the videos of them doing the subways in new york it's just a massive rock and this huge machine just ripping through it's's really cool, actually. Cool, yeah. Anyway, so they say, the convention scheduled for August 17th to the 20th at Wisconsin Center in downtown Milwaukee

has been scaled down to a mostly virtual event, with only about 300 people expected to attend in person. Most of the speeches will be delivered online from other locations, though former Vice President Joe Biden has said he will be in milwaukee to accept the nomination despite the event's smaller scale police are preparing for a potentially for potentially large protests in and around the venue oh boy yeah the left as you know i see conservatives say this all the time that the the far left antifa are the democratic party that's exactly what i was thinking though like who's Who's going to be protesting this place?

The far left. For what reason? They hate the Democrats with a passion. In 2016, there was like 10 protesters at the RNC. It was boring, and I was like, wow, nothing. Look, I thought the RNC, because of back in 2004, it was crazy. I wasn't paying much know, paying much attention, but there were people brought Molotovs and shields

and they got arrested by the FBI and a bunch of crazy stuff like that. The DNC convention? The RNC in 2004. Oh, okay. So everybody thought that 2016's RNC was going to be crazy because it was Donald Trump. And everybody's like, oh no, it's Trump, you know,

he's a bad person. And no, no, nobody showed up. But you know where they did show up thousands of people descended on the dnc tried jumping barriers were trying to knock them down fighting with the police what was their message did they even have one the dnc or the the people who showed up to protest the dnc it was i mean do they ever have a message do they they do but it's it's dejected it's a bunch of different groups, right? Right. For the most part, it was the Democratic Party, you know, is complicit.

They think the corporate Dems are evil. They still do. You follow a lot of these progressive personalities, and they will rip on the Democrats all day and night. It's where we all get along. The corporate Democrats are trash. And that's why I'm like who's voting for biden because the progressives i really do think the far left at least some of them want trump to win did we talk about the other day we a little bit a couple times it's come up yeah yeah uh i remember back in 2016 there were some far leftists who hated trump but told me they were going to vote for him like people i knew from occupy okay and i laughed about it and they were like hey man

they were like you get trump and it's all gonna it's all gonna go down faster and i was like you think that if you vote for trump like the country is going to fall apart and like oh definitely because their view was like voting for a celebrity tv personality over us you know hillary clinton who worked in the state department yeah was like a sure path towards everything crumbling and falling apart. Little did they know. Right, ended up having the best economy of our generation. Yeah, exactly. Well, I mean, their argument now would be, no, we were right.

That's what they're all saying. Because of what's happening now? Because of COVID, because of the riots. They're actually, it's funny to see tweets now, like finally after three and a half years where they're like, you know, I knew the Trump presidency was going to be a disaster. I'm like, oh, shut up. No, you didn't. We had three years of the best economy we've ever had.

And all you did was scream the whole time. And none of this is his fault. It's COVID and then Democratic leadership being terrible at their jobs. It is. That's what's funny about how they're attacking him over the federal deployment in Portland. Right. Because it's like you complain that he's not doing anything about the lockdowns,

like he should mandate every state to do it. Yeah. Then you complain when there's a small group of people defending a courthouse in Portland. Yep, that's it. That's just the stupidest. There's no way to win. Rightly so, defending this courthouse because it's being bombarded nightly for weeks now how long has

it been being attacked 60 something days well that's that's when the riots started in portland but when it was like the 35th day that the 39th is when they breached the doors oh when they started to fire inside okay okay but they probably were attacking it before that right they were trying to set up initially they were trying to set up the the paths i guess the portland autonomous zone okay call it i don't know i don't know what district so at least 30 days though at least that this courthouse has been being attacked yep it's crazy and it's funny how trump actually wasn't doing anything some some conservative personalities were saying that trump was being told to not engage because people liked the protests.

So Trump basically was like, OK. And then he made his stand. Now they're trying to argue that Trump made his stand at Mount Rushmore. You know, and he was on July 3rd. He's like, we're going to do this, that and this. The only problem, the riots had stopped. Trump was too late. It was a month earlier.

It was a month before he even said anything. He wasn't sending people out. He said, it's up to the states and the cities, man. They're the ones who have to take care of it. They've made it really clear over the past couple months, too, that we are in control. You back off. Well, I'll tell you what's funny, man. This is Milwaukee, where the Democratic National Convention needs to have their gathering.

They're going to, I don't know what they're going to do. I'll tell you what. Let me just let me just speculate real quick. Joe Biden vows to be there. There's going to be massive protests. No one thinks Joe like, well, a lot of people think Joe Biden won't be the nominee because it's just like me. I don't think so. That's me.

So is there is there a possibility that something happens there with a lack of security that results in Joe Biden not being the nominee? Interesting. That could result in a massive boost in sympathy for the Democratic Party? I'm going to need more information. What are you speculating? I'm speculating that we're sending a very old and feeble man into the fray with no security is a really, really dumb idea. Joe Biden absolutely must have security. And I'm sure he will have Secret Service. Hopefully that's enough.

They need their police. Yeah. This man needs to be protected. You don't got to like the guy to recognize. I don't care who you are in politics. We can't have crazy people going around doing crazy things. That's absolutely true. But I'll tell you what, man.

If something happens to Joe Biden because the cops say they're pulling out, I mean, I'll be furious. But I'll tell you what, a lot of people will be very, very, very sympathetic to the Democratic Party. They will be. Well, we're calling it here. I'm not calling anything. I'm saying. All right. Well, through you, I'm saying if that happens, we already called it out and see it ahead of time.

And it's like, it's not even it's not even rather conspiratorial. We got it. It is. Got to say. No, it isn't. It's absolutely not conspiratorial to say no. Sending in a presidential candidate into a city that expects large protests with no police presence is one of the stupidest things you can do. do and i tell you what it's it's it's it's not conspiratorial at all to say loathsome you know greatly loathed obama administration vp no police large protests very dangerous for an old man

very dangerous i don't know so if i said my grandpa walked into a crowd of antifa throwing bricks at people's faces you'd be like that's a conspiracy theory if he does. I'd be like, I'm not even going to say that. I just think that Biden's going to go out and announce his retirement. I think that's been what I've been saying for a long time. I see what you're saying. Okay. I don't think that's going to happen.

I think that he's going to have his own entourage and roll in, do his speech, retire, and roll out. The amount of security they have for buildings that they use for these conventions is absurd. They do, like, full dog sweeps three times. They have to lock down every door. Well, if the police aren't coming, they're not going to have that. I mean, they'll probably have feds to take care of some of it. Okay. But they need police.

That I do agree. And they don't have it because of their own policies. Now, back in Chicago. Well, this doesn't say that no police will be there. It's a hundred different agencies have said that we don't want to be there because of these specific things. You know, that's not to say that they're not even going to show up. It's that they're upset that they can't control a crowd like they would like to if they if

they needed to. So they're calling attention to a specific problem that they see because their police and they've probably dealt with this many times before. So they know what's coming. They're just covering themselves. I don't blame them at all. This is interesting. they know what's coming they're just covering themselves i don't blame them at all this is interesting it says not all police departments withdrew because of tear gas apparently does this

mean there's no police it says madison withdrew because of covid madison originally committed to providing 100 officers to milwaukee uh for what was maybe they're only referring to this group but this is interesting i don't know they say that Fond Duloc police chief, William Lamb, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the agreements were collapsing, saying he expects other agencies in the states to also withdraw. Lamb chairs the Wisconsin Police Executive Group, which is made up of police chiefs from cities with populations of more than 20,000 people. Lamb sent a letter to Milwaukee police on July 6,

outlining his organization's concerns about limiting the use of tear gas and pepper spray. West Allis police first sent a letter to Morales with concerns, and they basically say the same thing. I think they would just cancel it. I really do. I think they'll make it virtual. I think you're right. I think the chances of them just going, no police?

All right, well, the DNC will just go online and Biden can stay in his basement. Exactly. They're going to keep him in his basement. Dead serious. Yep. They're going to, that's all they've been doing. I know. And now there's probably not even going to be a debate. And because of COVID, Trump can't have rallies. Yeah. This is a ridiculous election cycle, man.

Anything to shut him down. Anything. That's what a lot of people are saying. Like, all of this is ridiculous. They just want to try to beat Trump in any way possible. And what I've been saying for months now, they're firing on all cylinders, firing every single thing they got because they know the average American's like, Trump's good. We like Trump. We like our economy. We like making money. We like being safe in We like making money. We like being

safe in our homes. We could we could we could get a little conspiratorial and argue that the Democratic governors are colluding to restrict Trump's abilities to campaign and they're trying to destroy the economy. We could get conspiratorial, but I don't think we need to. My question is, why is that Andrew Cuomo will allow Black Lives Matter rallies and protests, Bill de Blasio will, and then condemn some, you know, like an outdoor concert, which is the same thing, basically. Why did Phil Murphy, the governor of New Jersey, have these two gym owners arrested? Meanwhile, the gym is literally connected to a Dollar General with probably hundreds

or thousands of people coming in and out every day. And they wanted to have a small handful of people, like a private limited membership thing for their gym. They got arrested. Why? That makes no sense. Yeah, the hypocrisy is real. We see it all over the place and people are seeing it.

I'll tell you what, man. I am one of those people that absolutely hates conspiracy theories. Okay. And I want evidence to lead me to the conclusion. Yep. But with as crazy as everything has been over the past few months, I've never been more conspiratorial. And there are some other journalists and high-profile political personalities I've texted with, and they all basically feel the same way. Like, how is this possible?

How are all of these things? You know what, man? I just can't buy it. I can't either. Why? Why would they allow Black Lives Matter protests and then argue that everything else has to be shut down? Because the Black Lives Matter protests were helping the Democrats. Yeah, exactly. It's a fact. Gallup just released a poll saying two out of three people supported the protests. So even people who understood that COVID was bad apparently agreed or the polls are wrong because I'll tell you what, man, I can't imagine being somebody who got fired from your job and then going, I'm not allowed to

work, but I love the protests. I'm not allowed to go to church, but I love the protests. I love the protests. Go to a funeral. My father is getting chemo on his deathbed, but I love the protests go to funeral my my father is getting chemo on a deathbed but i love the protests i don't buy it how many people have i how many stories have i heard of people not even allowed to go visit their dying parents that then ended up dying and they weren't even able to say goodbye just because they weren't allowed to go to the hospital by themselves alone to visit their dying parents how many but and yet these people are out marching together dancing in the streets with no masks it's like yep i i want to state there's nothing wrong with peaceful protesting that is not what we're talking about i love people

we are talking about the hypocrisy of allowing the protests and not allowing anything else that's the problem and now they're else. That's the problem. And now they're locking everything down again. Exactly. And they're printing money. How about that? I hope you guys are buying your gold because they're coming to print your money or whatever.

It's the opposite of stealing your money. Yeah. You see Alex Jones, you say they were going to snatch up your income tax. No, they're just making your money worth nothing. They're just making it rain. Yeah. Buy it all while you can because the dollars, yeah, gold's going up. I guess nothing. They're just making it rain. Yeah, turn into paper. Buy it all while you can because the dollar is...

Yeah, gold's going up. I guess Bitcoin. I have no idea, man. When I found out that they were going to start printing money again, I was like... I look at my Facebook and I see all my progressive friends cheering like, Yay, print more money. And I'm like, you really have no idea how money works. No, they don't.

They don't. I'm not going to pretend like I'm chief economist at any prestigious organization. But I can understand the concept of supply and demand. And if you just keep printing out money and then stores say they can't accept cash, that's the freaky thing. I'm like, how are you going to spend the dollar? You know, so there's reports going around that because of the coin shortage some stores are saying straight up no cash accepted anymore so here something in this okay if if my local stores won't accept cash because there's no coins so what i hire like someone to mow my lawn they walk up and they're like that'll be 50 bucks and

i pull out a you know 50 bill and they go what am I supposed to do with that? Well, it's money. I know, but I can't spend it. Can you just PayPal me or something? You'd be like, oh yeah, I guess. All of a sudden the cash becomes worthless. Yeah, and every single transaction with anything is suddenly now tracked. Man, I'm glad I got Bitcoin.

I don't got a lot, but I'm glad I got cryptocurrencies. Not that I'm super confident in those necessarily, but they're just one form of easy to transfer value. And we'll see, man. This is truly, truly unprecedented. Indeed. But how about we jump over now to still talking about the Democrats and how Bill Barr, this was so brutal.

So for those that missed it, Bill Barr testified before the House. And you know what? People like to say, you know, I'm biased or whatever, because I'm always ragging on Democrats. But I'll tell you exactly why. Whenever the Republicans would talk to Barr, like Matt Gaetz, for instance, says, Mr. Barr, you know, you said that you were investigating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. What do you mean by that? That was it. And then Bill Barr talks and he says, well, I'm not, I didn't call them an organization.

I said, under certain statutes, explained everything he meant. Then Matt Gaetz says, can you explain, you know, basically what Antifa is? He's like, I saw Nadler, Jerry Nadler, a Democrat, say it was a myth. And then he asked Bill Barr to answer the question. Then Bill Barr answered the question. The Democrats would go, Bill Barr, you are a stooge and a lackey for Donald Trump. And we all know it. Explain yourself.

Oh, well, I'm reclaiming my time. No, you're a lackey and everybody. And that was it. The whole time the Democrats were grandstanding and yelling. The funny thing is, on my Facebook page, people were complaining about it. About whole time the Democrats were grandstanding and yelling. The funny thing is on my Facebook page, people were complaining about it. About the Democrats? Because they wouldn't shut up. And they were like, they were mad because they were like, you have to let him dig a grave. You have to let him say something so you can get him. But the Democrats were just

yelling things they read in the media. Emotions. Emotionally triggered Democrats yelling at Bill Barr. It was an embarrassment for me as an American. I mean, there's people all around the world that are watching this. I feel, honestly, this is probably the saddest part. More people were watching that weren't in this country than most Americans, I think. I know there's a lot of Americans that were paying attention, but for every one American that was like, yeah, can you imagine this? There was another person that was like, I'm watching from New Zealand and that's crazy. I'm watching from the UK and what is going on with these Democrats? I can't believe how rude they are to him.

It was insane. It blew me away, man. So I want to show one thing before we dive into what happened with Bill Barr. Take a look at this. Why this is a portrait of A.G. William Barr from 1994. Look at that strapping young man. Well, I don't know how he's probably in his 50s or something, 40. Middle-aged. Bill Barr was the A.G. before, and nobody had no problems. I mean, I guess there's always controversy and criticism

for various people in various administrations. But this is a dude that served as ag under hw bush retired he worked in a private sector corporate retired and then decided to come back apparently he said he had no dealings or interaction with the trump before this he was asked to come back he said he would he was retired apparently very wealthy i'm not you know i did quick google search apparently he's got a lot of money okay what reason did he have to come back and be the AG? Because he probably felt that America needed him. Wrong.

Wrong. Excuse me. Wrong. I'll tell you exactly what happened. Bill Barr all of a sudden one day woke up and had an epiphany. I'm going to be a stooge for Donald Trump, a man I don't talk to. That was it. And then he sat by his phone and Trump called him and He goes, please, Trump, tell me what to do.

I want to do whatever. It's ridiculous. Bill Barr just probably wanted to clean things up and take care of this. And I got what I said. Right. You catch the sarcasm and what I was saying? Yeah. That as if he was actually going to just serve as a mobster crony for Donald Trump.

Well, that's what the I don't remember which one of the Democrats straight up said to him. if he was actually going to just serve as a mobster crony for Donald Trump. Well, that's what the I don't remember which one of the Democrats straight up said to him. They were like we they basically called into question his his, you know, honesty in the oath that he took. And he straight up said, like, how like, no, I'm I'm going to choose the law. I'm going to I will always be on the side of the law, period. And they were just like, well, that's disappointing that we can't get a straight answer out of you. I'm going to. Are you kidding me? He just he you said if he's going to use his position to like help advance Trump or, you know, and he was like, no, I'm going to choose. I'm going to always side with the law, period. And they're just they didn't get the answer they wanted. And that was almost every interaction. Absolutely. They didn't get the answer they wanted. And that was almost every interaction. Absolutely.

They didn't get the answer that they wanted. So let me return some of that disrespect by showing you this tweet. Hey, Jerry Nadler, you may take a nap during a hearing, but AG Barr is not allowed to get a five-minute break. And in this video, look, you see him dozing off. Look at this. I got to say, I have nothing but disdain for this man. God. He's so rude.

He's falling asleep. You see him drooping off. Oh, I'm so but disdain for this man. God. He's so rude. He's falling asleep. You see him drooping off. Oh, I'm so tired. His hand is sloping. And then, oh, wait. What? What's happening? Oh, let me pluck something out of my ear and then wipe it on my hand.

Oh, what is this? And then he falls asleep again. I don't know if you actually. He fell asleep again? Keep going. Right here. Go like five seconds later. He goes right back to sleep.

I am. I'm telling you. I tell you what, man. If you can't be awake for your job, why are you doing this job? I'm not just showing this to make fun of Jerry Nadler. I'm doing it to show his complete and utter disrespect for the attorney general, for the government, for the house, for the institution. He does not care.

He's literally like, I'm going to go to're absolutely right no respect at all he only woke up for a few seconds to pull something out of his ear and wipe it on his hand so gross and then he goes right back to sleep bill barr asked for a recess and so this is this is the story he asked for a recess and for uh so for so earlier on uh jerry nadler got in a car accident, very minor, but it delayed the proceeding by like an hour. So Bill Barr says, can we take a small recess? And Nadler goes, no. And he's like, I waited an hour for you. I haven't had lunch yet.

I'd like five minutes. And then Nadler's like, look, we're almost done. You can – fine. We'll give you one, but we're almost done. And then – No, it wasn't even like that. There was – he argued with him a little bit longer. Do you really need to do this? you one but we're almost done and then no no it wasn't even it wasn't even like that it there was he he argued with him a little bit longer do you really do you really need to do this we're almost

done we're almost done and bill barr's like i i'm hungry i haven't i haven't had lunch yet and he's like really like we're almost done it was it was cringy it was like come on man and then bill barr says you're a real class act yeah yeah falling so so this is this is this is what's so just awful about this whole thing the hearing is supposed to be about the violence the protests the extremism and instead you you did get the republicans bringing it up you end up with the democrats grandstanding on various moralistic issues where they want some kind of some kind of symbolic victory by attacking Bill Barr. Non-stop with that, too.

It was ridiculous. Bill Barr was one of the smartest hires Donald Trump has ever made. Yep, I agree. He is a former. He was the former AG from back in the early 90s. He's got his portrait painted of him.

No problems. Nobody. How come? You know, like, where's the complaints from the past work he's done bringing him in was clever it was smart yeah because he served honorably he retired he went and did his corporate life came back in what are you gonna say about him all of a sudden he decided

just today to be corrupt reclaiming my time reclaiming my time yeah yes it is my time so i am reclaiming did you hear that one of one of them one of them straight up like ridiculed him like we don't have enough time yet you have to respect me because i have the time so i'm reclaiming it's like why are you wasting your time saying what you just said again just to like grill him like oh yeah i got you like shut up and get to the point let me if your time is so limited why are you wasting it trying to lecture this man who clearly knows more than you? Let me get to the point with this tweet here from Shem Horn, AG Barr, quote, What makes me concerned for the country is the first time in my memory

that the leaders of one of our great two political parties, the Democratic Party, are not coming out and condemning mob violence and the attack on federal courts. That does freak me out. I agree. That is that. He said, why? What?

Why are you not calling out the mob violence? It's they're burning down. And Tracy, what was his name? Michael Tracy. Michael Tracy. Yesterday, we did a we looked at articles that he did and he goes across America into all these different places where all

these businesses have been destroyed by rioting nonstop. It hasn't stopped for months now. America is burning down. I want to play this clip which I think exemplifies just how bad this is. So in this clip, Bill Barr, he's being asked about pepper balls.

They're asking Bill Barr about clearing protesters in front of D.C. because Trump had a photo op and stuff like this. Watch and listen to this interaction. Did it decide not to play now that I tried to? No, it's not going to play. Yeah, it doesn't like you anymore. It's like, how dare you? Here we go. Chemical dispensing system. So while you, in a quote No, it's not going to play. Yeah, it doesn't like you anymore. It's like, how dare you? Here we go.

Chemical dispensing system. So while you, in a quote, said it's not chemical, you today confirm it is chemical and you're aware of your department's policy. Are you not? Pause it. What policy? The one I've just provided to you. What does it say? What's the policy? Well, I showed it to you. Finally, whether or not you authorized it at the time, perhaps you weren't listening. I didn't see the policy. What was the policy in there? Fine. Oh, my God. Whether or not you authorized the use. Why are they treating the attorney general like an evil villain instead of actually asking him questions to figure out what's going on with these riots that are sweeping our country exactly and and the question that she was talking about just before this when he said it's everything is chemical so so when she she just

like took that one line and said see you just admitted that it's chemicals and it's like yes he's he's saying everything is chemicals. Like all the pepper balls or whatever, they're all some form of chemical that's put in there. It's not just water. Or then it would just be water balls. I don't know. I'm going to give a shout out to Will Chamberlain on this one. Yeah, man.

Will Chamberlain tweeted, they won't let Bill Barr answer questions because they know he's right. Boom. Nailed it. Boom. It's really simple. It's really simple. It's really simple. Bill Barr said, since when is it okay to try and burn down a federal courthouse? How is this

okay? How are you defending that? And there was not a single Democrat said, it's wrong, you're right, it's absolutely incorrect. The problem is, they're losing on this front. Yep, they are. The protests were openly supported. This is one of the biggest. You know what, man? I the Democrats have made mistake after mistake over and over again. Impeachment was a mistake. Now, what are we seeing? Mayors and governors, Democrats saying, by all means, go out and protest for Black Lives Matter during a pandemic. And they did. And you know what? People supported these protests. They really did.

The polls show it. Most Americans are like freedom of speech, the right to peaceably assemble. Like, yeah, why not? And then it started being shifted around and saying, well, no, no, you're not allowed to do everything. Only we are only only the people that we're saying. And that's that's when people started getting upset about it well rightly so now that they've become riots people are starting to recognize hey wait a minute those democratic politicians were marching with these people yeah and they've become

overt riots people 30 people are dead 30 this is the most frustrating and annoying thing to me about all of it is when i see people going, see, the riots worked. The officer has been arrested. Oh, that's great. You had to crawl over 30 corpses to get to this point where you could arrest one guy. But sure, I get it. And wait a minute. Hold on.

He was arrested before all these riots started happening. So your whole argument is null and void. And then they defund the police. Crime skyrockets. Tons of people are getting murdered. Now the DNC is not going to have, you know, at least 100 different police groups. They're pulling their officers out. What have they accomplished other than more chaos, pain, and suffering?

While they dance around and cheer, they've done it. Oh, man. It's ridiculous. Yeah, man. Well, in Chicago, they launched two new units. One is called the Critical Incident Response Team, specifically for protests and riots. Crime has gone down.

They have an anti-crime unit, which I guess is targeting gun violence. Crime has gone down by a decent amount, actually. Nice. Well, there you go. That's good to hear. So there you go. You fund the police.

I tell you what man i don't understand how people can watch you know what let me start over let me show you look take a look at this tweet timothy burke says well this was remarkable and it's miss jayapal yelling at bill barr not asking the question oh man yelling at him straight up said to him i'm i'm losing my patience or i'm losing my temper i think is is her words i'm i'm losing my temper sir sir i'm losing my temper it's like whoa she's calm it down get your check your emotions over at the door when you come in here to an official you know this is this is official this is the government why are you so emotional check that at the door in this video that is being shared and as is very viral on the left

with 2.3 million views wow she says how were you not aware that armed far-right man with you know like nazi flags and confederate flags were marching in michigan and threatening demanding the beheading of the governor or whatever and And Bill Barr tries to speak and then she yells, she yells him down. And a lot of people immediately like on the right were like, those protests for one were peaceful. Two were on state property, not federal property. Also true. And that's the point being brought up. The feds sent up by Trump are only protecting a federal courthouse that is under attack. Yep. So what I end up seeing here is an overly emotional variety of Democrats, including Nadler himself, who just the other day said Antifa violence was a myth. Then they play this video and he's like, you're just trying to get Donald Trump reelected.

You have this overly emotional response that ignores the evidence. And instead of sitting there and asking real questions of Bill Barr, how about this? How come not one Democrat said, Attorney General Barr, do you believe the use of tear gas and beanbags and pepper balls, flashbang grenades against groups that even when they do engage in, you know, aggressive tactics and violent tactics, do you think that is warranted?

Let him answer. Then he says, yes. Have you seen the photos of these individuals who have been injured, who have had gashes to their heads, who have been pelted? Because the injuries you talk about with your, you know, your officers are also on innocent people who weren't engaging in violence as well. That's an actual question the Democrats could have asked. You're right.

They don't. They simply go, you're a bigot and you're trying to get Donald Trump reelected. I reclaim my time. And my favorite my favorite quote from him is this is a hearing. I thought I was the one who was supposed to be heard. He said that. And I just know I'm laughing because that that that sums it up perfectly. Like, well, what is the point of this? They they just wanted to ridicule him. They wanted to yell out their emotions and be mad at him. And he wanted to answer the questions.

He was patiently waiting. I can't believe the man's patience. Yeah. The level of patience is insane. Well, you know, look, he's 70 or whatever. Not every 70-year-old's got as much patience as that. He's probably just like, well, you know, been there, done that. Just tired old man saying, yeah, yeah, yeah.

I get it. Yeah, maybe. Young whippersnappers want to yell you know, been there, done that. Just tired old man saying, yeah, yeah, yeah. I get it. Yeah, maybe. Young whippersnappers want to yell to get reelected, I suppose. Their elections are coming up in a couple months. What's Nadler's excuse? For falling asleep? No, he's like as old as Bill Barr. No, he was falling asleep, though.

Who in Brooklyn is voting for Nadler? I have no idea. I'm just, look, man. I wouldn't if I was still living in Brooklyn. Here's the challenge. If you lived in Nadler's district, and I'm pretty sure he's in Brooklyn. Maybe I'm wrong. And you had the choice between him and, like, AOC 2.0.

It's like, what do you do? Move. This is why I don't believe any of the polls. So let me mention this real quick. Because I use the RealClearPolitics average for President Trump's rating okay to make sure i'm not just cherry picking individual polls smart they they show a poll from rasmussen a couple days ago showing that donald trump's approval rating was 49 and his disapproval was 49 they showed that for about three days in a row and i was like that's consistent from rasmussen using their same methodology or finding the same thing three times

and that was added to the real clear politics average the next consistent from Rasmussen, using the same methodology or finding the same thing three times. And that was added to the RealClearPolitics average. The next day, when Rasmussen went down, RealClearPolitics erased the old poll with the new one that showed it negative so that Donald Trump's average approval was lower than it should have been. And I'm like, whoa, whoa, whoa, that doesn't make sense. It's a lot more complicated than just that. But it sounds to me like the methodology for real clear politics averaging system makes no sense. And it just makes Trump look like he's doing worse. Yeah.

Interesting. Yep. So I don't believe the polls. Trying to make him look bad. I don't believe it. Look, Rasmussen is just one poll. They do daily tracking. You know, they tend to favor the president, but they also were correct in 2016.

I can't tell you what's going to happen, but I just really can't believe, unless it's true, that most people don't pay attention. And if that's the case, then help us all. Actually, no. The 50,000 of you could share shows like this, clips like this, our podcast, so maybe people can hear at least what we have to say. You can disagree with us 100%. We're not like the smartest people in the world. We're just

dudes, you know, hanging out talking about stuff we hear on the internet. But if people don't know what's happening, the conversation can't happen. Yeah. I had a, I had a friend of mine today, a real life friend of mine comment on one of my, I was basically live tweeting during the, the whole thing. And I, it was, it was kind of fun. I was having, I was having live tweeting during the whole thing. And it was kind of fun. I was having a fun time interacting with people. Because most people were like, yeah, this is ridiculous. And one of my friends is like, oh, yeah, well, you know, AG Barr is a complete buffoon for lack of wanting to say what he actually said.

Because it was much worse. And I was like, are you actually watching this? Are you watching this right now? I don't have to watch that to know that he blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. If you're not watching it, how do you know what I'm talking about? How can you even say? And that's the problem. People keep thinking they know already. I don't need to be informed to know that my opinion is correct. I'm so sick of that. Let me tell you a story. It's nonstop. From today. Oh, goodness. So there's a bunch of propaganda

coming out to counter the narrative of the riots. And it's just, that's why I'm saying, man, I hate conspiracies, but it's like, man, it's an election year. And all of a sudden, as these riots intensify and public opinions are swinging towards Trump, a whole bunch of articles emerge saying, actually, those those black clad individuals with crowbars are actually white supremacists. Of course, in Richmond, it was white supremacists pretending to be black lives matter, causing violence. A bunch of stories start popping up saying the right is actually much more dangerous than the left. And then there's one Antifa responsible for zero murders in the past 25 years. Somebody I know shared this. And my response was, I said something like, stop, you know, tell me again who the real villains are and stop bringing this up to me

because I don't want to hear it. And I responded with a far leftist engaged in a mass shooting in Dayton a couple of years ago. The reasoning for it, we don't necessarily know, but he was a far leftist. A former Bernie Sanders volunteer shot up a Republican, or it was actually, I think it was a congressional baseball game, shooting Steve Scalise. That was a Bernie volunteer who did that. And I was like, the problem with Antifa is not how many murders they commit, which sure, you can go ahead and say it's zero. It's that they're bad people. They're violent. And they attack and threaten people to get their way.

And I was like, just because we know one group of people is extremely bad because, like, fringe far right, doesn't mean that Antifa is good. I hope you'd be willing to keep an open mind. It was a bit of back and forth. And this person's actually definitely, like, progressive leftist, but they're nice. I like them because we actually have conversations and we'll, you know, have a real conversation about the issues. But then it's the other people who jump in who are like rabid and for lack of a better term, where all of a sudden I had to block some of them because they're like screaming it's all like you're an evil Nazi and all this other stupid nonsense and I'm like bro

I may disagree with this other person posting about Antifa but we're actually in conversation and finding things we agree on so I block some of these people ultimately here's what happens I said the problem that I see with Antifa is how you have these white progressive college kids

who grew up in like middle to upper class neighborhoods. They show up to poor neighborhoods, riot and ransack and destroy small businesses. And I linked to Michael Tracy's story about these towns all across the country. And the next response was Michael Tracy is a Nazi. Don't read it. Oh, my goodness. Yep.

Where are they getting that information from? Making it up. Michael Tracy is not. He's like he's like a yeah he's a liberal he's a liberal yeah uh i don't know what he is i don't want to you know uh declare i don't know what political positions are but he's like he's enlightened centrist i think is that's how you'd insult the guy definitely but i like his work i'm not saying that to be disrespectful i like i think michael tracy does a good job yeah and uh And I responded with, Michael Tracy is a Nazi? And then someone else finally commented, that's ridiculous that you wouldn't read the story simply because someone said something like that. That's insane.

Thank you. And then the original poster was like, I did read it. I couldn't find anything in there that would make it seem like this person was actually a Nazi. And I'm like, this is what these extremists do. Don't listen. Those words came from a naughty person. I don't need to read your sources because I am vindicated in my beliefs. That's essentially the same thing.

Let's talk about the problem with Antifa. How about we do it? How about we do this? Take a look at this. Exclusive Atlanta protesters, I love Breitbart puts it in quotes, embedded nails into fireworks, leaked FBI document states, and they show a photo of these commercial grade mortars they use. And we'll just read it. They say Breitbart, Texas reviewed an FBI activity alert regarding the use of modified fireworks during the demonstration in Atlanta, which began on July 25th. The alert states that approximately 100 to 200 people dressed in dark clothing, backpacks, goggles, and helmets approached the ICE office in Atlanta. The subjects reportedly carried shields, bats, and large sticks. Following the attack that left 20 broken windows, bomb technicians discovered

commercial-grade fireworks with nails embedded in the mortar shell. The document reads, images of the modified fireworks show multiple large nails embedded in the devices. Organizers called on people to come out in solidarity with the, quote, freedom fighters of Portland, Breitbart, Texas, reported. A video tweeted from Atlanta, excuse me, shows multiple fireworks exploding around the doors and windows. Now, look. I'm speechless. I didn't see that before you showed me that, and that's crazy. The nails being embedded in them?

Yeah, that's insane. So you can see right here, right? They're pressed into it. Yep, that's crazy. In Portland, there was a report. This was from the New York Post, I believe, that one officer got impaled in the hand because Antifa had been laying nails out.

So they, like, grabbed for something and then got a nail through the hand something like that happened yeah and people uh some of the cops got burned covered in welts there's one photo that was talking about the injuries and it looks like one of the officers was a bike officer okay and he got a gash on his calf which you can see it like it looks like a bike injury. And so the tweet said something like officers were injured, this, that and this. And they show an image of the officer with the injury from his bike. And then people are like, they're they're lying. He didn't really get injured by the protesters. He got injured by his bike.

And I'm like, that's the stupidest thing I ever heard. You know why? If a police officer is riding his bike and a bunch of crazy leftists start throwing things and attacking him and he slips and gets injured on his bike it's not his fault he didn't just fall off his bike randomly he was attacked by people yeah so if they're showing you a photo of a fight between far leftists and cops and a cop falls off his bike and gets injured and they show you that why why does it matter if it's like he fell off his bike you made him fall off his bike oh man you're right that's crazy oh you want to show the yeah i pulled that up because i don't it's like he fell off his bike. You made him fall off his bike. Oh, man.

You're right. That's crazy. Oh, you want to show the... Yeah, I pulled that up. Well, I don't think we can actually play the video on YouTube, to be honest. Oh, yeah. Well, we could just talk about it. So this is actually from last night. Andy Ngo is great.

He's covering all sorts of on-the-ground stuff. You know, he's got all his different sources that he passes along to the public eye because he's got a platform for it. So this one here is specifically a bomb. I say bomb because... It was a bomb. Yeah, it was definitely a bomb. It was something significantly bigger than a mortar. It wasn't fireworks. It was clearly a boom. It sounded kind of like a small grenade. It wasn't fireworks. It was an IED. You're right. Absolutely right. You can go find it on his page.

I also retweeted this and it's crazy. We'll probably get in trouble for doing just this. I kid you not. Really? Why? Let's just play it. You guys ready? it might be loud just play it yeah that's serious that's not fireworks that's that that wasn't that wasn't fireworks no no this is this is definitely something they're elevating what they're doing they're they're clearly really trying to get into this courthouse for whatever reason it is. It's insane. I think the intention for a lot of the explosives they're making is to start fires.

You can see that after it goes off, fire kind of goes up the side of the building for a little bit before going out. And they've been trying to burn the building for quite some time. So that didn't look like it was meant to cause shock damage by like an explosion yeah but to like blast the fireball out i don't know exactly what their intention is or what kind of bomb that was but that was not a commercial grade firework that was literally an ied yeah when people say they use fireworks as ieds okay that was them literally making a bomb yeah that was not fireworks they so according to i think bill barr may have mentioned this using water balloons full of kerosene or some kind of fuel so that when they throw the balloons and splatters the fireworks

might ignite it or the other way around that they could start small fires and then we throw the balloons it's fuel on the fire and sprays everywhere that's what i that's what i think all those mason jars that were set two nights ago, they were finding all these mason jars around the fence. But they weren't. They didn't have like a rag in them like a Molotov cocktail, but they were filled with some sort of liquid. I think that's what it was. Yeah. Kerosene or something.

Well, and it would hurt, you know, a glass jar filled with water, like a mason jar filled with sealed with water. That's fairly heavy. You know, you throw that at someone that can hurt that can hurt, especially if it's flammable. These people need to be stopped, and people need to see that this is actually what's going on at night. People don't believe it. Nadler, well, no. That's a rumor that's only being spread here in D.C. A myth.

Get out of here, man. I've seen the footage myself the there's there's no circumstance in which i will be happy with their answer to this other than condemning if they come out and say it's not true there's no violence yeah then they're either lying and and protect essentially protecting these people or they're so insanely inept they should not be in office but i'll tell tell you what, man. Watching that Bill Barr hearing was like, man, I can't. I'm just I'm flabbergasted at how bad the Democrats have become. You know, you know, when you're watching a press conference like a White House press conference and you got the way that the reporters ask questions specifically, they're not good questions. They're all roundabout trying to get the president or McKennedy to say something.

They're trying to fish for the right thing. Sound bites. Yeah, it felt like that's what the Democrats were doing, but they're terrible at it. They never let him speak. I don't understand what their goal was. Re-election. Yeah, they never let him speak. You know, it was just like, I don't understand what their goal was. Re-election. Well, they were specific to an amount of time, and they were probably stressing because he was trying to answer the question. And if he did answer any of their questions, they would run out of time. And every single time they were, oh, your time's up.

Well, I just need to add this one, likecha sentence to to bill barr like yeah you can take that and i'm out of here or i'm gonna add this really weird uh evidence second week of october in all of their districts there's gonna be commercials and it's gonna be like you know democrat number one challenged bill barr on being corrupt and protecting Donald Trump. And to show them going like, no, you are corrupt. That's what it's all about. And then they're getting their response was, I will always choose the law. I will always pick the law over anything else. And I was just like, yes, that's that's what I want as my attorney general.

Someone who's going to choose the law. Period. Period. Done. general someone who's going to choose the law period period done well so the funny thing about the roger stone stuff okay was that he recommended a light a lesser sentence because stone was 67 okay and they attacked him for it and i'm like that's actually i really like that he did that regardless of guilt like you know sentencing recommendations proportional to the individual i like i don't like a robotic system where it's like, we don't care who you are or what your circumstances are.

We're throwing you in the can. I'm not going to think twice. Yeah, why would they want that? You want a system... Aren't they fighting against that kind of thing? No, they're not. They're fighting for re-election. But I'll tell you what they're fighting for right here.

Check this out. Mayor Ted Wheeler... Uh-oh, the mask slipped. Oh boy. Fell off. The Antifa mask. Commissioner Joanne PDX and I are calling for an immediate meeting with Department of Homeland

Security leadership on the ground in Portland and with Acting Secretary DHS Wolf to discuss a ceasefire and the removal of heightened federal forces from Portland. Wait, wait, hold on. How does he have the authority to negotiate a ceasefire on behalf of Antifa? I thought they were't a group.

That's a good question. I don't whether they're a group or not. If if there's a large amount of leftists that are violent, how is how is the mayor going to negotiate on their behalf? Does he have some sort of control over this group, either directly or indirectly, say, with the police? Is he basically saying he can go to the feds and say, we're going to stop fighting you and we'll put it all to rest?

And I'll tell you what. He's saying removal of heightened federal forces from Portland. He's basically saying, get rid of the extra guys you've sent in, you know, the heightened forces. Keep the marshals and we will stop. What does that mean about what side he's on? I've been saying this. It's a de facto letter of Mark.

These far leftists are working essentially at the behest, whether they realize it or not, for the Portland and Oregon government. I think so. Attacking the federal government. At the very least, what Mayor Wheeler is saying is that he could crush this protest this riot at any moment with the police but he's choosing not to or he's just you know talking nonsense making it all up and he has no authority what is in that courthouse that they want what is it what's in there either it's a symbolic thing to take down the federal courthouse or there's something in there that they want taken out i know it's a conspiracy but man makes me think i think it's it's more it's

not it's not even necessarily conspiracy they would love to destroy as much as possible in that federal courthouse it would result in tons of people being released from prison having their cases dropped and they know it yep that's true i mean look it's a federal courthouse there's probably a lot i'll just i'll say that a lot of cases that go through there and what all gone i think for the most part symbolic victory but the bigger issue i have is when the when we talk about the democratic governors and mayors marching with black lives matter allowing them in the face of the lockdowns, it's obvious they're aligned with them, right? Yeah.

Then when the mayor of Portland joins them, it's like, OK, now hold on a minute. He's standing there and they're throwing explosives. Yeah. He's got to know what's going on. No, he can't. No, I'm just I'm you know, I'm just out here. Then he's like, I'm working for you guys. Now he's actually saying, we'll negotiate a ceasefire.

Okay, this guy's been running the whole thing from the get-go. I'm sorry. Yeah, so either Antifa is a group that is organized that you can actually talk to, which is what he's implying here, or they're not, or they're a figment of everyone's imagination. Make up your mind, Democrats. Please. The American public is not as stupid as you keep thinking they are.

And they're fed up. I know I am. Yeah. How is he going to? He could be lying. You know, just trying to trick the feds into leaving. Even though he has no control over the far left at all. I think the more worrying thing is that, like I mentioned, they're trying to wield the far left to their advantage and they think they're doing it but then something changed public sentiment around the riot started to backfire

on the democrats and now all of a sudden he's asking for a ceasefire yep he's like oh man this this is starting to backfire we we need to uh backstep it's funny because i keep hearing from people like i posted some photos on instagram there are a lot of photos you can see of storefronts that have signs saying please don't hurt us yeah because the far left goes around destroying business the cops aren't the ones going around smashing out people's windows nope so it's they're begging the the leftist to leave them alone and this is really really bad for the narrative when people in the suburbs see those messages they get scared like i don't want to live that way. I don't want these people coming

to my place. I see comments from people saying, you know, I live in Portland and you're wrong. Everything's fine. And you know what I do when I see these comments? Nothing. You know why? Because a minute later, another comment pops up from someone saying, I live in Portland and you're lying. We're sick of it. Our businesses are suffering. Nobody wants to go downtown anymore. COVID has locked everything down. Now the protests are making it worse. Everybody wants to get on with their lives. Stop acting like you know.

Yeah. And then they argue. And I'm like, listen, the fact that they're arguing proves there is a problem. You might like the riots. You might say, it's no big deal. We're fighting injustice. Doesn't matter. The fact that one person, what was that guy's name?

Philip? Yep. Philip Anderson. Philip Anderson would come out and be like, no, stop. You're making everything worse. Says enough. Yep. When the silent majority, when even a small handful of normies are forced out on the street

to stop this, that's how you know you've really started shaking up the beast. The far leftists always want to go out with bricks. They always want to smash everything up. Regular people want to hang out and play video games and order pizza and just get on with their day and figure out how to get through this, this, this trying time. When they start showing up, you're waking up that beast, that, that sleeping, that sleeping giant. Oh yeah.

Who's like, we did not want to have to do this. You forced us. Yeah. The term silent majority is majority is not even accurate. It's the sleeping giants that are that work, that they that they're the backbone of America. They're the ones doing the hard work, keeping our civilization going, our society, what we are, what we have in this country. They protect us while we sleep. Yeah, absolutely. Fight club, quote. Sure. Regular people who are doing these jobs. Yeah. So now they're being they're they're being forced to stand up and many of them probably didn't want

to do it yep i agree but this is how this is how bad things have been getting that i i just when it comes back to the polls and everything i just don't believe it no not same i don't agree yeah i don't believe it at all but maybe maybe we're uh unfortunately the only people who pay attention you know the people who are watching this look it's it's it's amazing that we get you know you guys come and hang out with us there's so many people watching and listening but come on man cnn gets like 300 million views on youtube every month 300 million okay well they're also they're also in like all over the place is it all only americans no you know cnn is one of the news there it's in every airport right but there's cnn

international to separate like sure okay so i just mean like cnn does look people want to make fun of them because their ratings have been going down but they they get ratings and you combine that with all their outlets that are lying non-stop yeah and it's worrying maybe we're in this bubble of people who are arguing you know even arguing about some of these ideas and and thinking critically and and look man i try and watch some of these leftist youtubers okay and i'm just left stunned by like i can't do it the ineptitude the lack of sourcing right exactly whenever i do do all of my segments on my other channels, TimCast and TimCast News on YouTube, I do exactly the same thing we do here, where when we're talking about something, you can see the source.

However, on my channels, the source is displayed 100% of the time. There's no cutaway to my face or anyone else's face. And the reason for that is I want everyone to have it right in front of them. I'm not just saying these things. Here's CNN, The New I want everyone to have it right in front of them. I'm not just saying these things. Here's CNN, the New York Times and MSNBC all saying this thing. And I'm going to tell you how I feel. And I'm going to show you sources and go to the root of where this information came from. I watched some of these other channels and I'm like, did you bother Google searching this? There instant, instant instance where I think it was Ted Cruz was asked by Chuck Todd on Meet the Press, do you believe that Ukraine meddled in

the 2016 election? And Ted Cruz's response was something like, I think the media, we've seen it from the New York Times to, you know, Forbes and several other outlets that, yes, there were Ukrainians who were seeking to interfere in the election. And then on the MSNBC side, you hear laughing. Wow. I remember that. Everyone starts laughing. And there was a certain, you know, leftist YouTuber who did a segment on it and then just immediately started laughing. And he was like, wow, how dumb is Ted Cruz? They're laughing at him. And I was like, and this is a prominent YouTuber. And I was like, I facepalmed. And I was like, I heard what Ted Cruz YouTuber. And I was like, I facepalmed and I was like,

I heard what Ted Cruz said. I Google searched what he said. And guess what? He was right. There was a bunch of stories from Forbes, the New York Times, the Hill saying that, yes, there were Ukrainians who were trying to interfere in the election. Not that it was a systemic top down attack like it was with Russia, but there were Ukrainians who had vested interest in trying to help Hillary Clinton win. And that's a fact. The New York Times has a story that says the Ukrainian court ruled that these people in Ukraine were trying to meddle in our election. But Chuck Todd, meet the press, supposed to be this prestigious news outlet, was laughing. Did Chuck Todd, does he not have the internet? Maybe not. They don't do any research. Do you know about this?

What is it? HR5736. What is this one? Smith and Munt Modernization Act of 2012. This kind of blew me away. So what this is, I'm just going to read it here. This is a law that was put into place here. It says, amends the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act

of 1948 to authorize the Secretary of State and Broadcasting Board of Governors to provide for the preparation and dissemination of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States. So this is basically like altering.

So we talked about CNN and what they show other countries, right? So this is this is amending that to make it so that they can use the same kind of stuff against america it says intended for foreign audience abroad about the united states including about its people its history um the government the federal government's policies through press publications radio motion pictures the internet and other information media, including social media and other information centers

and instructors. And what this says, it authorizes you can't see it right here, it says it authorizes the secretary and the board to make all these available in the United States. Motion pictures, films, video, audio, and other materials prepared for dissemination abroad and disseminated abroad pursuant to such act, the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, the Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act, or Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act. So this is essentially saying that they can do it to anyone they want, including America. So they don't have to give

Americans the real truth anymore. They're allowing to go, you know, whatever they send over to the UN, for example, all the information the UN is getting about how, you know, how the UN declared, oh, how dare they use this force against peaceful protesters, when in reality, they're not getting all of the information. That's just part of this, which kind of throws it off. I'd have to look way more into this.

It says it amends the Foreign Relations Authorization Act at fiscal years 86 and 87 to prohibit funds for the Department of State or the board from being used to influence public opinion or propagandizing in the United States. Okay. Yeah, that sounds like it's barring propaganda. Well, that was the whole plan to make it so that they can't use foreign films and stuff to propagandize in the United

States. Yeah, I'm not I'm not super familiar. I know people were talking about Obama legalizing propaganda. Yeah, but I've never actually this is the act know people were talking about Obama legalizing propaganda. Yeah. But I've never actually... This is the act that they were talking about that they're referring to. But I have to... The challenge with a lot of these things is that you've got to go through what the original acts are, what they're amending and omitting.

The one in 1946 or 48 that it's talking about. Yeah, so this right here, I'd have to read through it because I don't actually understand what their intent is. It says you can't i don't i'd have to read through because i don't actually understand what their intent is it says you can't use the funds i have to look into it we'd probably need like some kind of breakdown or whatever well it says here it says it authorizes secretary and the board to make available in the united states all of these materials that were already prepared for dissemination abroad for all dissemination abroad So it's it's saying that all of the, you know, it's that right there. That line is saying it's legalizing propaganda prepared for other countries to be able to be used in the states here. I don't know what that means.

Well, well, that's what I gathered from that. So I mean, like maybe so like pro-America stuff can be played in the countries that people like the country more. I'm sure that's a very like the nice way of saying it. But I mean, I don't think they're going to make anti-American films and then send anti-American films to like other countries. It's it's not necessarily about like being so stark cut black and white. You know, this is a propaganda film. It's more about cutting out what Bill Barr said, like you said earlier,

is it right? Question mark. And then sending it across the world and sending it to America saying, this is what he said, when in reality he was saying, do you think that it's right to assault a federal courthouse?

That was the full question. When they're spouting only that one little bit. You can already do that in the United States under the First Amendment. That's one of the big problems we have you want freedom of speech you end up with journalists who lie and omit and they can but let's talk about actual censorship yeah let's talk about this is one of the uh we saved it for last in the event that uh we're gonna get banned or something yeah because uh listen as i here's the here's the context donald trump tweeted out a story uh it was a video um about these doctors it was a press conference where they were talking about

hydroxychloroquine i'll be very careful about how we we phrase this because you know we record these segments live and if you say something out of line they're watching the live streams they will hit the x button and delete this stream midstream just gone outright but we got to talk about the censorship yeah this is one of the most egregious censorship scandals in the history of this nation i am not exaggerating by this this may be a historical moment the president of the united states sent out a video a press conference from literal doctors you can argue they're not good doctors, but they were actual doctors, and they were giving advice as they saw it.

Perhaps they were wrong. That's fine. But if the president wants to send a message over a digital platform, why shouldn't the president be able to do that? All of the big companies removed this video. Here's the important point. Breitbart, which filmed the live stream, it got about 18 million views before it was deleted across the board. This was a news organization, whether you like them or not, they are protected under the First Amendment,

filming a press conference, and they got all their videos nuked. Of actual doctors. Of actual doctors. Now, some of these doctors have said, apparently, or at least one of them has said things that are quite silly about, you know, banging demons or something. It's not the point. It's not the point. If the president wants to put something out, who is Twitter, Facebook or YouTube to argue

they are they have more authority than he does to address the nation. Let's go back in time. Could you imagine if there was a president in, say, like the 80s and they decided to do a they decided to do a, you know, to address the nation and all the big networks went? The president is going to address the nation on some very serious crisis and pandemic. Nah, cut him off. And then all of a sudden the channel just turned him off. Sure, they could choose not to amplify his message. But that, to me me would be ridiculous.

Now they've started doing this. During the height of the pandemic, Trump was giving daily briefings. And then all these networks started cutting him off and no longer airing these because they were like, he's lying. No, it was because they were being made look bad. His approval rating skyrocketed. Everyone was watching him and then they were watching the news and going, what? You guys are crazy. That's not what he said his approval rating was skyrocketing to the highest it had ever been in aggregate and then all of a sudden they were like cut him off cut him off it's

helping him stop stop yeah and so that to me is is is quite frankly i'm saying insane that'd be fair trump was doing daily press briefings at a certain you're like, maybe we don't just keep showing this every day. But here's the crazy thing. The ratings were up for these companies. Their ratings were improving by showing this. This is what the people wanted to see. They wanted to see the president addressing the crisis. And they liked it when he did. So they stopped it because it was helping him. Well, now the president and the president's son are being negatively impacted. Donald Trump Jr. received a 12-hour suspension for tweeting out the video where he said something like, wow, this video sure challenges the narrative or something. No, he said people

are upset because this goes against the narrative that they're pushing. The point is, why not just remove the video like anybody else? Good point. Why did they suspend his account? Well, he's way more open against going against the narrative than the president is. How insane is it? Why does Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have a medical advice policy? Why do tech companies have a medical advice policy?

How is it that I can say over and over again take advice from your doctor don't listen to the president or the pundits your doctor knows best for you enter the doctor and then when these doctors speak up yeah they delete all the videos yeah that to me is well it's interesting too because at the beginning of the the press conference they straight up say we are sick of politicians pushing forward this narrative. They're not doctors. Well, we're doctors,

and we're here because we feel Americans need to hear from actual doctors. That's like the first thing out of their mouth is that. In that press conference, they said, look into the research by Dr. Harvey Risch of Yaleale so i did and guess what i

found what this story from newsweek harvey a rish md phd professor of epidemiology yale school of public health adam do you know what a professor of epidemiology studies it sounds like uh viruses and stuff yeah infectious, infectious diseases. Epidemics. Epidemics. Hey, epidemiology. And he says the key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Oh, you said opinion afterwards. So we're in the clear. It's an opinion. Well, I think the important thing is what they're arguing is that these doctors in this video used a specific word. I'm not going to say just in case. Right. I know what you're talking about. Yeah. They like basically arguing that it was the end all be all treatment. We'll put it that way. If that matters. I don't know. Maybe we'll still get axed from from YouTube. Yeah. But here's what here's what he writes. As a professor of

epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support, but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly. I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral

medication is given very early in the course of an illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it is shown to be highly effective, especially when given it in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc. Let me tell you all right now, I know full well saying these things could be a strike on this channel. It could be the banning of our content. There's a line for me. I've often talked about how there are certain things I'll, you know, avoid because it's irrelevant. Yeah. Saying certain words or whatever. Or certain people's names.

Or a certain name, a CIA whistleblower's name I can't say. Because you can still find the information so long as I can prompt you to look for it. This is a red line. A Yale MD PhD writing saying, here's what I believe is quite literally the expert. Yep. Ivy League PhD doctor of epidemiology says it. I don't know what expert is left. You can't go any higher than that.

Yeah, exactly. You can't. So when he says this, I say, I respect his opinion. Yeah. In the end, I still recommend you talk to your doctors who know what's right for you. Because, you know, one of the things I don't know if you guys are you ever you ever have Soylent? Yeah.

So Soylent was like this goal at making this meal replacement that was like could totally replace your meals. The problem was everybody's body is a different size, shape, and there's not a like complete set of nutrients you need. So it ultimately doesn't work. That's the point. Your doctor knows your like your health and what will work best for you. This opinion is interesting. So why is it that a video shared by the president showing similar opinions from several doctors is

ban worthy? Yeah, I'll tell you what. I did a video on this early in the morning, earlier this morning on my other channel, Tim Cass News. It's still up. Got a ton of views, like 300-something thousand. And I say the same thing. You know what? If I get banned for saying this, so be it. I'm reading Newsweek.com. If I can't read Newsweek, and I'll tell you what, that CAA guy's name, I've had videos deleted because of it.

They do this thing, it's really strange, where they either force private the video so that it's still in your library, but it can't be made public. You don't get a strike. They just say, nope, the video is invisible now. Or they remove the video without even telling you. One of my videos got removed. They never even said anything to me until one day I got an email from, I guess I was getting emails from people saying, yo, that video you did on that guy is gone. And I was like, what? I went into my YouTube and sure enough, there it was like an image, nothing to click on. It was

still there in my YouTube backend, but the metrics were gone and it was just an image that I couldn't click. And it was the weirdest thing that made no sense. They refused to reinstate it. Absolutely refused. There was another video where Project Veritas exposed an employee at a tech company who was engaging in censorship. They did the same thing. But this is the line for me. If we can't talk about this and share this information, then it's over. It's over. I don't know what else you do.

This cannot be ignored. Yeah, I mean, well, look at Philip Anderson, for example. He is really outspoken. You can follow him on Instagram, KingFreeSpeech. Look at Philip Anderson, for example. He is really outspoken. You can follow him on Instagram, KingFreeSpeech. And he talks about, he goes out every night. He's fighting against Antifa, fighting this courthouse. And he's open about talking about what we need to do. We need to protest Twitter banning people.

He's been banned twice from Twitter. Why? Why? Because he's talking about the narrative that they're pushing. That's what this is. That's why Donald Trump Jr. got what was it? It wasn't banned. They said we didn't suspend him. We restricted some features for 12 hours. Right. And the some features was the ability to tweet. Yeah.

The only thing that you're there for. You can read, I guess, but whatever. This is the big secret about censorship on social media. Well, first of all, the secret everybody knows is that the big tech CEOs are lying. They do censor based on ideology. The evidence has been revealed over and over and over again. We have screenshots. We have witnesses on the record.

What happened to journalism? I'll tell you what. Project Veritas apparently is the only place you're going to go to where you're actually going to see the evidence and the witnesses where they acknowledge it. Everyone else says, well, but Veritas lies. It's a picture. What do you mean they're lying? Did they Photoshop that? No.

But here's the big secret. They mostly target smaller accounts. They want to stop accounts from rising. They want to, they want, there's a cutoff point. And I've talked about this on YouTube where they change the rules and they don't like the idea that the internet created a meritocracy of notoriety where random and regular people could become very prominent and famous just through hard work. They need to be the gatekeepers. Good point. So what they've been doing is when someone like this Philip Anderson guy starts getting followers and speaking, they say, no, no, no, no, no. Cut him off. Cut him off. We do not want another,

you know, Terrence Williams on our hands. We can't have another Candace Owens. We got to stop him. Yeah. So they ban him and it prevents him from going. Now I'm being a bit more, you know, hyperbolic or exaggerating. They just target smaller channels who can't fight back. It's true. And that's what it seems like. And that's the that's the bulk of a lot of the censorship. Well, I'm going to keep talking about him.

So what did you see this? No. What is this? Zuckerberg to paint Facebook as proudly american company contrast with internet mark zuckerberg model mark zuckerberg banned paul joseph watson from instagram and paul joseph watson's instagram was a bunch of selfies of him on like on the sunset smoking cigarettes and it was it was it was like the silliest thing i'd ever seen i remember that it's just like a guy like he's like he's, there's a sunset behind him, and he's got a cigarette in his mouth, and he's like, what up?

And they were like, nope, nope, far right, banned. They're just purging pro-Trump personalities. Because whether you like their politics or not, that's ridiculous. You're going to ban someone from Instagram when they only post, you know, selfies. Or actually, another really good example is the banning of the Donald on Reddit. Yeah, exactly. Which was like the most prominent forum. They moved over to the Donald.win.

I mentioned this quite a bit, but this is serious because four months, for four months, the Reddit site, their subreddit was inactive. They had already relocated and they prohibited people from posting. And then four months later, they announced, they keep breaking the rules, so we're banning them. And it was like, wait a minute. Nobody was posting. Are you retroactively

enforcing rules without giving them a chance to fix it? Or are you lying? You know what I think? I think they were already going to ban the Donald and they were going to wait until just before the election. But the Donald moderators preempteded reddit i think because everybody knew it was going to happen the goal was wait to the 11th hour to stop them so they can't reorganize right so because they jumped off four months in advance they were able to get a lot of their core audience from reddit onto a new platform the donaldald.win. Then when their plan kicked in over at Reddit to ban the Donald, which made no sense because no one was even using it,

all of a sudden it didn't matter. They already had a fast growing forum on their own private site that couldn't be banned anymore. This is the big trick, the big secret we need to enact. We need to enact decentralized social media. But I agree 100% on that that i think back to the days when we all used to have our own websites and urls and stuff you know there was a period where people would actually just buy a domain make a website and then it was like you know gifs of macho man and you know like mario and it was

like really silly. Dark colors. Yeah, just really. And maybe music playing in the background. MIDI files. And then we started getting these centralized social media where it was so easy to create a profile, which functioned as your website, that people just said, I'll just do this instead.

We need to go back to this. And I don't necessarily know who or how or when or why, but I know there's several solutions in play, like the Fediverse. One of the ideas that needs to be implemented, which kind of is already being implemented by people, would be like this. A system like Twitter, and as it's basically what's called the Fediverse, you create your own server on your own website, no one can ban you. And people can subscribe, follow you, just like Twitter. And when they go to their site, they can see everyone they subscribed to, and no one

has the authority to ban anyone. I like that. That's where we need to get to. Yes. Now, how we do it, I don't know. It's really hard to get people to move over to other platforms. I see a lot of people jumping over to Parler, which is cool, but Parler is still just another centralized social media platform where you are going to get banned if their business interests are threatened. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If the merchant accounts for Parler went to them, in my opinion, and told them, you have to ban these people, otherwise we're severing payment processing for you, what are they going to do? Are they going to say, I guess we'll let the whole site, you know, be deleted or we'll ban this one person?

I'm willing to bet they're going to ban the person and say, I'm really sorry. But if we don't, we get purged from our payment processor. That's why we need decentralized social media. We need it now. Yeah, agreed. Yep. So what is this Zuckerberg? Zuckerberg to paint Facebook as proudly American company.

Contrast with Chinese internet model. Yeah. This is BS. He's not going to do that. No, he's not. He's going to try to do it. Well, I mean, what we talked about the other day about how they're trying to bring him to court again for lying a couple years ago about not being biased. And then, of course, Project Veritas exposed that to be BS.

So now he's trying to be like, no, we're an American company. Look, Zuckerberg, along with cheap executives of Amazon, Apple, and Google, are set to testify before a House Judiciary subcommittee on Antitrust Wednesday as part of a group's investigation into competition in the digital marketplace. I love it. It's going to be fun. I'm a bun. What's it going to mean?

He's going to be like, we at Facebook actually deeply proud of this country. And we love this country. I'm a billionaire because of this country. Just not the people that like the president of this country. And Jack Dorsey is going to be like, we actually think that Twitter is beholden to a global audience. So we're actually going to defy U.S. law and make rules for the international community. See? But slower.

A bit slower. We exist outside of the law. So I've actually never heard him speak. I don't know. It's just like that. I'm actually doing an imitation of Seamus doing an imitation of Jack Dorsey. He's good. From Freedom Tunes.

Seamus is good at impressions. I'm like, I haven't listened to Jack speak since I was doing the podcast like over a year ago. But his Ben Shapiro was on point. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think at this point, I think Jack's lying. Yeah. I gave him the benefit of the doubt i've i've i've talked with jack on and off since jack dorsey of twitter since we did the uh the podcast with joe and he

keeps saying all these things and it's kind of just like it feels kind of like an abusive relationship where you know the guy keeps beating the woman but keeps promising to do better and she keeps going back to him and he keeps beating her beating her. And that's social media. Because people are addicted. They can't give it up. Now, Jeremy Hambly over at The Quartering, I guess he deleted his Twitter account. Good for him. Yeah, he's got a – I don't know how many followers he had. He had a decent amount.

I followed him. Yeah. I don't know if he had like 100K or whatever. I'm not super sure. He deleted his whole account, and he was like, follow me on Parler instead. And I was like, you know what, man? I almost deleted my entire Twitter maybe like a year ago. And I stopped and I thought to myself, you know what?

Instead, what I'll do is I'm going to stop interacting with people on Twitter. Okay. That's it. I'm going to stop tweeting at people. And I very rarely ever tweet at people. And I always make sure that if I do tweet tweet it is like i try to do my best to mitigate against any perceived hostilities okay so typically when i respond to somebody in any capacity it's extremely rare and it might be something in further into the conversation i

specifically avoid when i see a tweet from someone and they're lying and it's nasty it's obvious i just go right past it i'm not gonna i'm not gonna get involved i'm not gonna tweet at them yeah i'm starting to take that on too just if someone comes you know with clout it's just like I could waste my energy and try to explain to this person but they're not gonna get it they're they don't care it's pointless why am I gonna waste my energy when I have all these other people that are like I got your back you, let's let's further the conversation, you know, and that's great. I like that. And I've been adopting that myself, you know, just just you know what?

If you got nothing nice to say, if you don't want to further the conversation, have a legitimate conversation, because there's a difference between having a conversation if you don't agree with me and just coming at me with some some BS. You know what, man? Yeah. I look at some of these political personalities on social media, and you know what the lowest tier of political personality is in the world? What?

Reply guy. Oh, yeah. And the lowest tier of that is Trump reply guy. Yep. They build a following by tweeting at Donald Trump, LOL, and like, you're so dumb. Yeah, reply guys definitely bore me. It's just like, get your own thing say you gotta have ideas yeah yeah share your thoughts on something people people you know i've had people ask me like you've

got so many followers on twitter now tim like how do you do it and i'm like i don't know and i don't care i don't pay attention to it i kind of just tweet the things i feel yep exactly uh and that's it i i will quote people sometimes i quote tweet people sometimes i will tweet things i'll tweet videos and you know one thing i can't i kind of don't like about twitter is that people assume like a journalist will tweet a story okay and then people will assume it's the journalist's opinion when they tweet a story oh yeah and they'll attack the journalist and i'm like come on just because the journalist tweeted out doesn't mean they're they're supporting it.

You can't assume that the same way you can't assume I am when I tweeted out. And I've been doing that a lot. I've been passing along actual facts. You know, like, it's no opinion. I'm not, I don't have any, I didn't even say what, this is a simple fact that here is this. This is a fact. And then people are like, oh, wow, are you surprised at that? How are you so surprised that that's the case? And it's like, when did I say that? This is a fact. And then people are like, oh, wow, are you surprised at that? How are you so surprised that that's the case? And it's like, when did I say that?

This is a fact. I tweeted. It's interesting. And I'm passing it along to you. There was a photo that Andy Ngo posted of the vandalism and the destruction and the garbage in the morning in Portland. And he was like, here's the destruction they leave behind. And he said like, here's the destruction they leave behind. And he said, the rioters. And then I quote tweeted and I put an asterisk, peaceful protesters TM as a joke like, Andy, Andy, they're not rioters. They're peaceful protesters.

Don't you remember? And someone's response was, so you're saying that it's justified for the feds to use unmarked vehicles to kidnap people? And I was like, what? I didn't say anything. So I responded with, no, I'm saying that i'm making fun of the media for calling them peaceful protesters when they're clearly violent yeah like that's it and so i'll respond to people sometimes and they respond to me rarely though because i usually don't even check i typically don't but twitter is the joke is that you'll tweet something like i really like waffles

and then people will be like why do you hate pancakes? And they're all attacking you. Pancakes. Waffles are better than pancakes. How dare you? But you know Twitter knows this. And they do it on purpose. They know that waffles are better than pancakes? Twitter knows that they've created a rage engine which is tearing the country apart. They know for a fact that they do. Well, it didn't start with Twitter. It started with media.

With the internet. Twitter gamified the process of hate where you earn points the more hateful you are. You don't think that started with Facebook before Twitter became a thing? No, yeah, I don't think so. So Facebook is relatively different. There is always argument and discussion on Facebook,

but you create these isolated comments beneath a post. With Twitter, you can dunk on someone and then someone can grab that and show it to all of their friends too. Whereas on Facebook, if I post a picture of like a dog doing a backflip and then you comment, Tim, you're dumb. No one's going to click share on your comment to have your comment just appear on their page to everybody else. Get it?

Yeah, I see. It's just a different style. So what Facebook does, and it does, Facebook just a different style so uh what facebook does and it does facebook created a different system for creating rage it incentivized publishers to make people hate twitter incentivizes regular people to earn points likes shares retweets and followers by being as nasty and disgusting as possible just to be evil and mean. And you know, the funniest part is I, I, I, I try to avoid it. Right. And so I'll often say to people like, you know, I'll respond to a progressive with, with like a fair point that I think I'll calmly and be like, here's why I think this is

happening. And I'll get inundated by their followers with insults, slurs, name calling. I ignore most of them. Oh yeah. but then when the people themselves put me on blast like the progressives i'll respond with like i don't understand the hostility i'm just trying to you know have a conversation and then they do it again they'll screen grab it take it out of context and try and gain followers based off of the attack on the other i see that a lot actually that's the whole system no i'm talking about you specifically because absolutely people are like yo did you see this this person talking about Tim Pool? And I'm just like, oh, I'll check it out for a laugh.

And I look and it's just someone, look at what Tim Pool tweeted. Look at this. Look what he said. And then look at the people that are following what they're saying. I'm like, this is news? This is what you're reporting on? This is what people want to see? No, they don't know they don't

they don't care about this person and that's why no one knows there's a there's a quote i don't know the full quote maybe you got you could look it up or something it's like small people talk about other people okay i think that was eleanor roosevelt let me see was it yeah pull that quote up that quote's pretty good but it's basically like yeah see other they talk about other people so big bigger people talk about ideas right things ideas and people i think it is yeah it's like yeah i think it's like what is it like small people talk about people right then like bigger meet bigger people see if you can find the actual quote ideas or something right yeah i know you're talking bigger people talk about ideas yeah yeah so i

talk about people sometimes but i usually keep it to the highest level of of authority and power yeah and it's interesting because one of the arguments i got from a smaller youtuber as to why they constantly make videos about me is that they're punching up at me yeah and i'm like what what do i do other than like be a guy in a studio talking about his feelings and reading the news okay here it is yeah it goes great people talk about ideas average people talk about things and small people talk about wine or other people wine yeah i think you're reading perversion of it's from fran lebowitz i was i was watching this um i don't know exactly who he was but it was a it was kind of like a ted talk but it was in india and it was this this man sitting

and talking to a huge group of people and he was talking about how celebrity status and putting people putting people up on a pedestal and put it you know looking down at people because you think you're up on a pedestal and and the the key is to treat everyone as the world on the same level yeah you know and and all these people are attacking you like you just just said, punching up at you. But they're putting you up on that pedestal above them. So therefore, it's them putting you up there and being like, oh, he's up there. There are people that are so desperate to get me involved in drama.

Yeah, I'm sure they are. The most annoying thing when I get emails, you know what the most annoying thing is when people I know message me on Facebook saying things like, dude, did you see what they said about you? And I'm like, if you send me anything like like that ever again i will unfriend you i will block you yeah like do not send me stupid gossip i literally do not care i don't care what people say about me i don't care what they think it's a waste of my time boom waste of time waste of my time yeah you're wasting your time you you i got too much on yourself focus on what you need to do and stop being angry that someone else is focusing on what they're doing and getting angry at them for that. That blows me away that people are seriously just so angry at other people when that's all they do. They just sit there being angry at other people.

It shows you what they think, how much they care about what other people think about them. Yep. And I'm like, I don't, man. Why do you care so care about what other people think about them yep and i'm like i i don't man why do you care so much about what other people think about i'll just post stuff and you know mind my own business we talked about it though it's that lack of confidence you know they they are seeking approval because they don't they aren't fully accepting of themselves and didn't get approval growing up maybe Maybe that's one option. But it's that lack of confidence that they themselves aren't confident enough. So anything that upsets them or anything throws them

off. It's someone else's fault also. How about we jump over to the Super Chats? Yeah, let's do that. Super Chats, if you have not already make sure you smash that like button. Smash it. Smash the super chats. Yeah, let's do that. Super chats. If you have not already, make sure you smash that like button. Smash it. Smash the like button. You can follow me on Twitter, Instagram,

and Parler at Timcast. You can follow at Adam Krigler on all the same places as well. And of course, you can follow at Sour Patch Lids, L-Y-D-S, on Parler and Twitter. And we got a bunch of super chats

from our loyal audience. Thank you guys so much for the super chats. We got a big old super chat from J-Mac. Thank you guys so much for the super chats. We got a big old super chat from J-Mac. He says, almost finished with the bar hearing. I cannot see how our country comes back from this. I want to be optimistic, but any direction November goes is going to be followed with tragedy.

What are your thoughts on the hearing? Democrats seemed more interested in finding the witch instead of the truth. If the Democrats win, as the money markets are predicting, these people who just yell emotions and don't actually ask questions to solve problems will be in control, and it will be a nightmare for everybody else. If the Republicans win, as far as I can tell, I will, you know, my liberal sensibilities will be negatively impacted to a slight degree, but at least the country will still exist and i'm willing to accept that so i'm not happy with the direction the democrats are going i think they're engaging in whining incessant nonsense and so rock in a hard place how about that all right let's see what we got here jacob villa says thank you adam for

your words those that are still working are fed up. Those that have family values are fed up. I'm fed up. Boom. So why are the polls? Why are the prediction markets? Everybody's saying Biden, Democrats, they're all going to win. I don't buy it. I can't.

I can't. They're just they're talking to themselves. Maybe they're their own cheerleaders. Yeah, we're going to win. Guys, don't worry. Biden's going to win. Woo. They don't realize that we just talked about it.

There's a lack of confidence that they have that lack of confidence. They need to have this outward force of confidence. But it's so blatantly not true. Trump ignited people who never voted before, and they're not accurately tracking who these people are, and they haven't been, and they admit they can't. And maybe that's the reason they are. They're doing everything as though it's 2012 or 2008 but we're in a different era man where like social media changed everything and they haven't realized it yet yep let's see our dubu says i live in in i live in far west portland subs burn loot murder

showed up on our street this weekend and blocked driveways with cars. Demanded everyone put BLM signs in their yards and did the usual cultist chants. Watch from upstairs. AR with 1800 rounds close by. So far, no new signs. Yikes, man. That's scary. Yeah, dude, that's crazy.

Zachary gave us a funny little, is that a Japanese fox jumping up and down with fireworks? That's very nice. Jacob Villa says, Tim, people follow you because you have integrity. I like to think so. I don't think I'm perfect, but man, I get disappointed in so many other people. I'm like, where are the regular, honest people, man? Yeah. I just, I don't know, man.

Daniel Kerr says, George Soros reportedly spent more than 52 million dollars in political spending per the Federal Election Commission filings according to Breitbart News you know I don't I don't care about the whole like George Soros did this and he funds that because billionaires are going to exist billionaires are going to exert influence they're going to buy things and there's actually a bunch of other billionaires that do the same thing and more importantly I'm concerned about the individual actions not necessarily where the money is coming from. I think it comes into play. Look, man, a lot of people seem to think that like at news organizations, the journalists are sacrificing their ethics in exchange for cash. No, they're being propped up. They're being

specifically set up to do this. I'm not going to necessarily complain that investors looked at this company and said, hey, look, look at all the clicks they get. It makes money. I'm going to invest in that. That seems normal for an investor. I'm going to complain that the individual journalists have zero ethics and call them out for lying. So the nonprofit organizations, if they're doing something good, I don't care if they're doing something bad. I will call them out and explicitly call out their actions. I think it's, I don't like the targeting of an individual who's not, it's just, it's not the actual action I'm, you know, angry about. I'm not angry about the fact that people made a bunch of money and are trying to spend it in ways that benefit their worldview. I personally think wealth inequality is a very serious problem. And I don't like the fact that these massive

billionaires are selling us out to multinational corporations while hiding their profits offshore in places like Panama. I mean, there's – but if it's found out that he's the one personally funding the attack of the federal courthouse, you're not going to have an issue. Can you name any other billionaire that's doing the same thing? No, I'm not. That was not my question, though. My question is if it's found out that he is the one funding that, wouldn't you be upset about that? Wouldn't you want to know what was going on and who's actually funding this this attack on a federal courthouse? I would. I mean, and if it is him, then I definitely do have an issue with it.

And the problem is that it's not and it's not. Well, we don't know that, do we? I mean, I would argue for the most part we do know that because no billionaire worth their weight would be stupid enough to directly funnel money straight to extremist groups. Well, that's the key, though, directly. It's like we don't know. We're not sure. If I'm not going to sit here and look at like any one of these billionaires, and there's many of them, there's right-wing billionaires and millionaires who are funneling money into these places and complain about the fact that people get rich and they pay for things that they like. This is what I really can't stand

about the whole privilege crowd, the people who think there's like a privileged elite that control everything. I'm like, dude, if you wanna change the world, work hard, figure it out, become that person and fund the things you like. Okay. If a nonprofit organization is allowing extremists to do something, I'll be upset about it. But when it comes to these Antifa people, most of them are doing it for free. They're, they're, they're, they're squatters. They live on welfare. They live. I've, I've been to their

warehouses where they do this and it's people who have regular jobs and they pitch in five bucks here and there. They do go fund me to raise a hundred thousand dollars for their fallen comrades there's there's no grand conspiracy it's a large group of people who they're collectivists i don't know man they organize in this way i have before my disembarkment with all half of the people that i knew on facebook a lot of them I knew were these far left people that were that straight up hated me because I because I'm wearing this beanie now, you know, because of what I believe in. And I mean, I was friends with them for a long time. So over the, you know, the first half of the riots that was going on, it's like I saw what

they were talking about. They they straight up talked about getting their check from Soros for going out and marching. That's complete fake news, 100%. Is it? Absolute fake news. Okay. It is an absurd conspiracy theory. Okay.

What George Soros does is he runs the Open Society Foundation, and they make donations to other foundations. Okay. There's no direct paychecks going out to people who are marching from George Soros. But during Occupy Wall Street, there were some nonprofits that received partial funding from his foundation. The problem I have with this is that many of these nonprofits, I know some of these people, they receive funding from 100 plus sources. People go in and they're like, look, he gave 50 to $100,000 to this nonprofit. And I go into their filings and I'm like, they received a million from

this other guy. And so they single out one billionaire. No one talks about what literally and all these other billionaires are doing, all these other billionaires and who they're funding and why they're funding it. And that's why I'm like, you know what, man, I'm not going to complain about one guy who's very political, who makes tons of donations and has his own personal agenda when there's literally like 100 plus people and way way. And there's, there's thousands of millionaires doing this and who are probably more effective and more involved in actually directly funding companies. There's a few very wealthy families that directly fund activist organizations directly. Not like how Soros will sprinkle money around to a bunch of different organizations through a foundation like overtly yeah and then what happens is you hear people say things like

George Soros directly gave them a paycheck and then it's the easy it's the easiest thing to debunk and then all of a sudden the left has this meme going around where they start complaining about how conservatives are you know conspiratorially believe they're all getting paid. And they say things like, where's my Soros check? I wish I got one. And it's like, none of these people, they're scratching the surface of what's really going on with wealth, wealth inequality, and powerful interests and international interests that are trying to sell you out. And it's mostly, in my opinion, for their multinational corporations that want to have their money, you know, offshores. And I'm talking about the Googles, the Facebooks, the YouTubes that tell us straight up our policies are based on a global effort. Why? Because they get money from other countries. It's like the NBA who will come out and be like, well, we shouldn't badmouth

China. There's a ton of powerful interests like check out Mark Cuban, for instance. Nobody's talking about all the funding Mark Cuban does. The Mark Cuban conspiracy. How much money did Mark Cuban give to which political group? He goes on Twitter. He gets political all the time. He won't badmouth China. How many people are getting Cuban checks to go around and protest? I don't know who he funds or what he funds. Then you've got Chick-fil-A, and they're making funds to organizations. Yeah. So let's read some more super chats. Tower says,

Tim Adam, the antifa thrower of the IED bomb was identified by 4chan by online review. His grandma left for the vest she bought him. He is also the white knight who shielded the naked lady. Cassandra Fairbanks broke it. You can't make this stuff up.

Whoa. I got to look into that one. That sounds crazy. I've seen that floating around, but I don't know if it's true. Saus says, strong minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events.

Weak minds discuss people. Also, have you guys heard recent stories of mysterious Chinese packages being sent to random Americans containing invasive plants, seeds designed to kill our crops?

I don't know exactly what they're for. Apparently it was a scam or something. Yeah. So I guess it was connected to like reviews that people would do when you do reviews on amazon i guess i would get your information from there including your address and stuff and send you these weird little seeds and we

don't really know if they're designed to be like invasive species or whatever we haven't really figured it out it is really weird though i agree vanessa stoller says tim please please please look at a thesaurus for the word panicking. Love your work. Sick of that word. Okay. Yes, yes, yes. I know. So I saw that. Yeah.

And someone actually sent us a dictionary. You got a dictionary. All right. So I pulled up. Well, no, but I have the actual definition of panic. So I'm going to read it because I saw that super chat come in. I'm like, you know what? I saw it. I'm going to do this.

So panic is literally of pan i'm i don't know what that is but uh of sudden fear as supposedly inspired by pan uh having the nature of or showing or resulting from panic which i guess is is really what you're going for right what panicking it's like people you know showing a sudden fear a sudden fear of something yeah yes it seems pretty pretty legit i don't know i'm on tim no i think i think what she's just saying is that i use the word too much oh well maybe that that's true and i've nothing in this book can help you there i i i here well no here's the issue i've also said freak out yeah you know lose their minds go insane yeah melt down yeah lose it things like

that but a certain point it's like you know to be honest though there was a period like a few months ago where i was like are we are they really panicking again like do i have another like they're panicking for this reason and i was like how many videos i'm going to do where i say they are i i sure enough it's a story where they're like Politico, the New York Times will say like Democrats are, you know, freaking out over the latest poll number. And this is information. And I'm like, look, man, when I have mainstream sources that tell us they're they're in it, they're experiencing a sudden jolt of fear and it's causing them to think irrationally.

I'm going to call. I'm going to say it. They're panicking. Mark Robertshaw says, I'm pretty sure shrapnel explosives are illegal under the Geneva Convention, so those nail bombs are inhumane, to say the least. Yeah. What is this, the Middle East? Yikes, man.

Yeah, seriously. These people are nuts. Yes, they are. Plankacorn says, you guys are the best. When I watch you, I feel like I'm hanging out with a couple of good friends. Hope you're all having a fantastic night. Spin. I will do that.

I've been waiting. It's been slowly staring at me like, spin me. Let's see. RC says, haven't heard much discussed with the Supreme Court ruling against churches in Nevada and opening up further attacks to restrict the First Amendment. I am more than concerned. What are your thoughts? I did a big segment on the Supreme Court ruling this way. I'm shocked. They're literally arguing

that they can shut down churches. And the Supreme Court said, yep. Wow. Yeah. So limit capacity at churches. Well, we're not putting there's no law saying you can't worship. We're just telling you how much you can worship. That's crazy. Well, that's the argument with Second Amendment. We are not in, you know, you know, it's really crazy to me as I read about the Second Amendment and stuff. It literally says to keep and bear literally means you can carry around. But there are many states that sort of say you can't carry this under any circumstances, under no circumstance. There's there's an old trick the governments like to do, like in New Jersey. Oh, you can get a permit for open carry in New Jersey if they get around to actually filling out your application. So it's apparently an open secret that when you fill out an application for

open carry, New Jersey just basically crumples it up, throws it in the trash and says, we'll get back to it as soon as possible. And then they never do. That's the trick. You can carry in this state. We're not infringing on your right to bear arms. Of course, we'll never actually give you the permit to do it. Now we're seeing that same logic apply to the First Amendment. We're not telling you you can't worship. We're only telling you you can't have a church, right? Yeah. We're not, it's not, you know, stopping you from worshiping.

We're not saying you can't speak freely. We're only telling you that certain words will put you in jail. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, no, no, no, no no we're not saying you can't speak you just need a free speech pass in order to get your free speech pass we need you to write an essay explaining why you need your free speech and then we'll get back to it as our soonest availability messed up that's where we're going that's that that's the future we can count on unless of course something changes all. Let's see what else we got over here in these here. Super chats.

Let us scroll through. Trump 2020. Here's a good one. A Ketsu Z says Black Lives Maga. Ooh, spicy. There is a lot. There's a lot of people. Yeah.

Of all of all Americans. That's all I'm going to say. They're all Americans. Americans want to make America fun and good, good huh it's not a racial thing americans we got one from ake pot says ideological enforcement of law the black lives matter is now categorized by the office of special counsel as a non-partisan issue-based organization therefore government workers military are allowed to associate organize proselytize for blm at work now google it well i'm telling you man morality government is upon us yep it's happening and to associate, organize, proselytize for BLM at work now. Google it.

Whoa. I'm telling you, man, morality government is upon us. Yep, it's happening. And they're going to come. The ideology is seeping in, the new religion. Trump 2020. Mr. Wilson says, hey, Tim and crew, you show one picture of the guy in Austin

saying the gun is in low ready. Now the picture is too poor to actually tell, but he could be doing a confined shooting stance. You see it in clearing videos. Interesting. I don't know. Shredding says, love the content, love the viewpoints. The Democrats are pathetic. Trump 2020. I think a lot of people are starting to feel that way. That's right. All right. Let's see what we got going on here. Oh, this one got redacted. I don't know. Jordan C says, what do you think about Politico saying Joe Biden chose Kamala Harris to become his running mate for the 2020 election on August 1st, two weeks before the Democratic

National Convention? I think this was an accidental release of what's called an embargo. And the reason I think so is because they used a direct quote from Joe Biden. There's a couple of things that could have occurred in the press. They will pre-write something. They're called pre-writes. They'll write an obituary for a very high profile person who is getting on in years so that as soon as this person passes, they can drop that obituary. This person was known for this, that, and this. Maybe make some adjustments. Every so often, a news organization will accidentally publish an obituary on TV and then go, oops,

and people go, whoa, we thought this person died. It was an accident. However, Politico, for those that don't know, accidentally published a statement saying Joe Biden chose Kamala Harris as his VP on August 1st, saying, quote, blah, blah, blah. I don't have the full quote pulled up. That to me sounds like an embargo. An embargo is when an organization reaches out to a journalistic organization and says, we will give you insider access, but you cannot release this information until this date and time. News organizations will say, we agree to these terms. They get access to the information, then do a pre-write based on privy information. Then in that time, we'll publish it.

There's been a bunch of information emerging showing that Kamala Harris is the likely VP. They've been scrubbing her Wikipedia page. They've been doing stuff to her social media, apparently. And now we have this accidental, oopsie, Joe Biden picked Kamala Harris, and they quickly scrubbed it. In my opinion, Kamala Harris is going to be the VP. Now, they denied it, saying it's not true. It's not true.

On August, sometime in August, they're going to say, I'm the first Joe Biden picked Kamala Harris. Yeah. It's interesting, though, because for a couple of months now, you know, basically since he said he's going to pick a woman and a person of color, you know, they were like, oh, man, if he picks Kamala Harris, I'm absolutely voting Trump. And I was like, whoa, like, why? And then people don't. She's a cop. People don't like her. No, they don't like her, dude. They I was like, whoa, why? And then people don't... She's a cop. People don't like her. No, they don't like her, dude.

They don't like her. I'll be very careful here. Tulsi Gabbard said in a debate when she knocked her down that I want to be... I think I'm getting this right, that Kamala Harris kept people in prison past their sentencing

to use them as cheap labor. Wow. Yeah. Is that proven? Can you look that up? I believe that she did do that to some extent. Yeah, I believe. Believe, believe, believe. But I want receipts. I'm saying, I'm being

very legally careful right now. I want to know because that's crazy. Tulsi Gabbard said it and it was really damaging to Kamala Harris. Yeah, wow. Because people were like, whoa. Yeah, but if that's true, it's like, woof. That's a terrible thing to do. The prison systems are messed up as it is and you're a bunch of other things oh man yeah in that you found it

okay so kamala's hair kamal harris's ag office tried to keep inmates locked up for cheap labor it was from the daily beast so there's my receipt this is from february 11 2019 they're talking about that she was ordered to reduce the population of California's overcrowded prisoners, uh, prisons lawyers from then California attorney, AG, um, Camel Harris's office made the case that some nonviolent offenders needed

to stay incarcerated or else the prison system would lose a source of cheap labor. Wow. Oh my gosh. Yeah. I look forward. Thank you for that. I appreciate the receipts and,

uh, wow. Well, she's a terrible person. She's a horrible human being. Wow. Wow. Dictator. Jessica Burleson says, I saw a tweet by a socialist.

I said the point of the riots was engineered crisis and chaos, enabling justification for declaration of martial law. They say that every time there's riots, to be honest, we're not going to have martial law. That would be like above and beyond the Insurrection Act. And Trump's not even doing that yep he's not he it is a lie trump is not sending out unmarked unidentified secret police to various cities to march through the streets it's just not happening that's not true operation legend which is they're referring to is a bunch of fbi agents doing investigations and deA and ATF. Yep. Has nothing to do with Portland at all. Man, Crom Mike, thanks for the super chats. Crom Mike says,

as I have told the leftists I speak to, I was happy to be an uneducated Democrat, but you made me into an educated Republican. Thank you. Well, the problem is for me, it shouldn't be that you have to be a Republican once you find out what's going on. But the Democrats need to have a reckoning of some sort because they have become corrupt, inept, and quite frankly, insane. Yeah, I'm not a Republican. People are like, oh, well, you need to know this information since you're now a Republican, Adam. And I'm like, when did I say that? I'm not a Republican.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm voting for Trump. Definitely. But, I mean, I'm still going to read all the people that I'm voting for across the board. It's like if it's a Republican or Democrat, if I like their platform of what they're actually doing, then I'm going to vote for him. The left has gone insane. We could you imagine if there was a Democrat who was slightly to the left of most Republicans and like, like, they don't exist. Find me a Democrat who, well, actually, we had Jeff Van Drew. And now

he's a Republican. He jumped ship. He was in Jersey, right? Yeah, he's in South Jersey. And he was a Democrat. And he was a relatively conservative Democrat. And now he's the furthest left Republican there is. Because I believe he's pro-choice. Yeah. Yep. It's like the Republicans

are building a coalition. The walk away campaign. What's the campaign called if you're leaving Republicans and going to the Democrats? Doesn't have a name. That's because there is none. You could argue like never Trump. Oh yeah. But that has

nothing to do with. There's no solid movement. I don't think it's real. Hashtag walk away. to do with... There's no solid movement. There's no progressive one of these. I don't think it's real. Hashtag walk away. I don't think it's a real thing. Jacob says, thank you, Adam, for your words. Oh, I think I read that one. Did you read that one?

Yeah, I read that one. Let's see. You're welcome. TX says, Tim, soy Jesus, my hero, and Lydia, I am white. I've never been racist. This paradigm shift is changing that. How can we have peace? Here's the problem.

Stay who you are. You want to hear something funny? Do you know who is advocating for all this weird race stuff? It's white progressives. Yep. That's the funniest thing. Those crazy leftists. White leftist progressives, typically from suburbs who have college degrees and on average

make more than $100,000 a year, are the ones driving all of this. And that's why it's the funniest thing to me that this whole black lives matter thing almost doesn't even include minorities exactly you look at most of the the pictures of all the people standing on there's like white white white white white white white like a couple people of color in the back white white white white white white white white white and it's just like what what you know and then i mean and that's philip anderson is that's one of his main messages he's like i'm standing here as a person of color you guys are trying to convince me black lives matter as you burning down my country like i don't want you to burn this country down that is

not helping me as you know as an american that i am you're just making it worse you're burning the country down no one wants you to do that no one asked you to do that they stop i know they want to they want to burn it down but it has that's why it has nothing to do with black lives matter it's it's not the same thing anymore the message is gone hayden hudson says have you guys seen that the three gorges dam in china is about to collapse? Wuhan, Shanghai, and other cities are already flooding. Oh, I'm watching it. I've seen the videos, man. Yeah, it's crazy.

Easy Now says, nice hat. Thank you. He's talking to me. Oh, excellent. Thank you. Oh, Raider025 says, being close to Rochester, I'm rather concerned about November, especially being a very blue city. I also know someone on the city police force and hearing how demoralized they are,

it's heartbreaking. I mean, maybe it's time for them to take what savings they have, get out of the cities and get away. Because I'll tell you what, man, when the riots break out, they're going to be looking for cops. That's probably the first target, to be honest. The whole movement is abolish the police. They want police to go away. That's why I was like, when Minneapolis was happening and I saw those cops break out of the department and run away, the first thing they did

was they took off that uniform. As soon as they got the chance, they were like, I'm not a cop. That dude's off. Because they're burning, they're going to come in your house and be like,

where's the cop? Nope, no cops here. Because you'll be by yourself. Jeez, dude. Yep. Let's see. Let's see. Let's do a couple more.

We just got a YouTube jump jump i love when that happens it's always perfectly timed gareth green says hey pool sunbay i've been really depressed by all the endorsement of violence and erasure of property rights even among conservatives and libertarians parlor is kind of annoying in its current right-wing slant but that's an improvement yeah man um it's not a solution to create like these alternate platforms don't solve the problem that with Twitter, you do have bubbles, but there's a little bit of overlap here and there. I purposefully try to make sure I have a mixed following. Like I follow people on the left, people in the center, people on the right. Yeah. You can't do that on something like Parler.

It's like everybody there is on the right and a lot of news organizations. But I guess either they'll fall apart or they'll find a new purpose i have no idea let's see uh i'm not yeah okay the the vet j drummer since there has been a lack of dizzy aliens the show spin that ufo there's been a a serious lack of yeah serious dearth mr wilson says that was a sparkler bomb yes the fireworks you give your kids taped to some gas interesting josh p says thank you for spreading the truth amongst a sea of lies and couldn't trump now go in and clear out all the violent protesters without the dem stopping him because they're white supremacists oh yeah you yeah who knows now that they're arguing antifa is actually white supremacists it's about time so. So I post on Facebook like, oh, no, look, the story is saying that Antifa is actually white supremacists.

Quick, everybody stop. Stop the violent extremists and kick them out because they're far right. Yeah. Is that enough? No, because they're still going to let him do it. We must respect the diversity of tactics. Josh Wolf says Adam has become my spirit animal. I voted them for almost 30 years. I have no place there anymore and will be voting for Trump with no reservation. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you for that.

Appreciate. I appreciate you. Sons of Titan says, Viva Frey and Robert Barnes have a good discussion on church ruling. Keep up the good work. I've been sharing stuff more and more. Really, really appreciate it. Definitely appreciate that. Share, share, share, share.

Jayla Mills says, registered appreciate it. Definitely appreciate that. Share. Share, share, share. Jalen Mills says, registered Democrat here, Trump 2020. Also, I want to move to the country ASAP. Yep. Yeah, man. I was thinking about that.

So the way electoral votes work, if everyone in the cities have left the cities, all those electoral votes will go to whoever stays, won't it? You know? It it's interesting i imagine a lot of people leaving won't a lot of them won't register in time okay uh because you know most people don't actually vote it's it's it's unprecedented but i imagine a lot of people have other things on their mind if they're moving i'm sure some of them are very

active saying we better register now at our new location. I'm sure others are like, I got to find a place. I'm struggling. Who's going to help me move this stuff? I got to get out of the city. And so some of them will probably not be able to vote now. Yeah. Yeah. Interesting.

With that being said. Oh, we got one more. Before here, I got this. Yeah. Good evening, Tim Crew, Adam. I watched your first couple Adam casts about Nikola Tesla and also Trump's history. And an idea struck me. I watched your first couple Adam casts about Nikola Tesla and also Trump's history. And an idea struck me.

Would you consider a segment called the tinfoil beanie? Just for fun, not no nonsense conspiracy theory segment. I recommend I recommend Tesla and Trump's uncle as a starter, John, John Trump. And I've got my eye on him. I learned about him from my Tesla deep dive, actually, because he is the one who acquired all of Tesla's stuff when Tesla died. So it's in the Trump family, actually. So Donald Trump's uncle, John, has all of Tesla's stuff. That's so crazy. So what that means for the future, I don't know.

But thank you very much. And you can all check my channel, AdamCastIRL, and you can all check uh my channel adam cast irl and you can you can watch those uh it's yourself it's 2020 it is trump's gonna like trump's gonna come out with his giant mech suit with crazy tesla i am president for life and i just legalized marijuana vote for me people look at people look at giant mecca trump shooting lasers and blowing things up, and they're like, I think I'll still vote for him. They look over at Biden. He's sleeping. I'll take Mecca Trump.

Yeah. Ladies and gentlemen, it is past 10, which means we must bid you farewell. But before you go, smash the like button. Smash the like button. Subscribe, because we'll be back tomorrow at 8 p.m. Excuse me. Follow me. Yes.

Excuse me. That's me, right? Smash the like button. Sorry, I just needed to say that. You can follow me on Twitter at TimCast, Twitter, Instagram, and Parler. You can follow at Adam Krigler in all the same places. And you can follow at Sour Patch Lids, L-Y-D-S. And if there are some of you who are watching who aren't aware, I actually have several other channels.

So make sure you also check out YouTube.com slash TimCast where I put up a segment. It's just me ranting about politics every day at 4 p.m. Check it out and subscribe, or you can go to timcast.net. But other than that, we'll be back on this show tomorrow live at 8 p.m., and we'll have clips throughout the day from the show. So we look forward to seeing you tomorrow, and thank you all so much for hanging out. Have a good night, everybody.