Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #1055 FBI ADMITS They STAGED EVIDENCE Against Trump In Mar-A-Lago Raid w/Amy Kremer

Episode Date: June 26, 2024

Tim, Hannah Claire, Phil, & Serge are joined by Amy Kremer to discuss the FBI admitting to planting evidence during the raid at Mar-A-Lago, the CIA being exposed trying to cover up Hunter Biden laptop, Trump suggesting Biden should have to take a drug test prior to the presidential debate, and CNN denying Breaking Points from covering the presidential debate. Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere)  Hannah Claire @hannahclaireb (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Serge @sergedotcom (everywhere) Guest: Amy Kremer @AmyKremer (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that the FBI framed Donald Trump in the classified documents case, I'd imagine you would all be not surprised at all and say, uh-huh. Yeah, OK. We expected something like this.

Yeah, not surprising to hear this news. The FBI now admitting in new filings that, yeah, those photographs that went viral of all the secret documents that were scattered all over the floor, they staged the whole thing. Not only did they put placeholder documents on the ground, they brought cover photo cover sheets and place them over some of these documents in these in this photo. So in this viral photo where everyone's saying, look at the stack of documents that Trump had, the FBI was framing Trump definitively in the court of public opinion. But I would say that

this photo, as evidence, was framing Donald Trump to a very to various degrees in the court of public opinion. But I would say that this photo as evidence was framing Donald Trump to a very to various degrees in the actual court system. Why? Joe Biden also had in a very similar matter classified documents, though Biden admitted he had classified documents intentionally to make money off of to write a book that. Well, they say, well, you know, he's a forgetful old man. It was a mistake. Donald Trump, they come out, stage the evidence, then say, aha, he knew it. This proves it. That's the game they're playing. So we're going to talk about that.

We've got some more updates on the CNN debate. The crew over at Breaking Point, Sagar and Jetty and Crystal Ball, have run a segment on this. They, too, have been told by CNN, na-na, you cannot comment on the debates, which they do not have the actual legal precedent or authority to dictate of other channels. But the great point that they bring up, CNN's actually allowing every network to rebroadcast C-SPAN, Fox and et cetera. I believe ABC and others, they're just trying to shut down independent media. So we will talk about that. There's a story from the other day we never got into, but I think it's funny. Trump wanting a drug test of Joe Biden once again, asking for a

drug test. And of course, they're all the left is getting pretty angry about it. And then we can talk about Julian Assange. And of course, yeah, there was a strike on Crimea over the weekend. And now Joe Biden is moving to deploy private military contractors, U.S. military contractors into Ukraine. And I'm just like, man, the dude is really, really desperate for escalation into international conflict. But we'll get in all that. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Amy Kramer. Thank you for having me. I'm excited to be here. Who are you? What do you do? I am the founder of Women for America First. I'm one of the founders of the modern day Tea Party movement, was chairwoman of Tea Party Express, which we traveled in the bus across the country, very involved in taking back the House in 2010. And then the Senate in 2014 was one of the earliest ones in the public, in the media, doing CNN and MSNBC supporting President Trump in 2016, saying he did not have a woman problem,

that women loved him. And so we founded Women for Trump, the PAC, and then I started Women for America First to help with the America First agenda. And then when the election was stolen in 2020, we're the organization that had the two big rallies in D.C. in November and then December. And then we hosted the rally at the Ellipse on January 6th. So and most recently, I ran for national committee woman for the state of Georgia and won. And so July 19th, I will take office and will be the national committee woman for Georgia. We have a lot of questions for your plans in Georgia for November because this is one of the most important states and one of the most untrustworthy. So we'll get into that.

I had to say yes. But thanks for hanging out. We got Phil hanging out. Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary. How are you doing, Hannah Clare?

I'm good. I'm so excited for when we all go on tour with your band this summer. Can't wait. Phil told me we're not allowed to go on tour with him. Big old trailer just for Hannah Clare? I'm good. I'm so excited for when we all go on tour with your band this summer. Can't wait. Bill told me we're not allowed to go on tour with him. A big old trailer just for Hannah Clare. Great. The IRL, we'll all be there. Just classic metal music stuff.

No, just Hannah Clare. Political podcasts. I'm Hannah Clare Brimelow. I'm a writer for scnr.com. That's Scanner News. I'm really grateful to be part of that team. Follow their work at TimCastNews on the internet. Hi, Serge.

Yo, let's get into it. Here's the story from the post-millennial, I can't believe it, FBI turned off cameras out of Mar-a-Lago raid, admits to adding cover sheets to documents before taking photographs for evidence. I need to take you back in time so you can understand what this is all about. From Business Insider, August 31st, 2022, a photo shared by the DOJ of materials recovered at Mar-a-Lago clearly shows documents labeled top secret with distinctive cover sheets that are hard to miss. Take a look at this photo they got here. Let's maybe we can make this photo a little bit bigger. Look at that with the big red circles and

the arrows pointing at top secret, top secret, top secret. What if I were to tell you that this was a fake photograph they staged? That not only there were a lot of complaints from the Trump camp. That they pulled random documents from various boxes and laid them on the floor to make it look like it was a cluster of classified documents. But we are now learning. I should say we are confirming. The story broke actually last month. But we have hard confirmation as they have admitted in filings.

Yeah, those cover sheets that say top secret, those are fake. They brought those. And more to the point, apparently all the documents are, quote unquote, placeholders, meaning they went through a bunch of boxes of Trump's knickknacks, random newspaper clippings and random letters that he had collected while he was president. The real story seems to be, yes, it appears Trump did have, at least allegedly he had, classified documents. We'll see what the courts determine. But it's more so that there were a bunch of boxes of random garbage that Trump didn't really know about that they took with them when they left. And it seems like the FBI is trying to make it seem

like Donald Trump intentionally took large clusters of top secret documents with these big broad cover sheets. Why? Well, Joe Biden's not being criminally charged for the same thing. He had a bunch of classified documents at a bunch of his different locations. And they said, yeah, he was a forgetful old man.

It seems that's the case with Donald Trump as well. He had personal keepsakes and letters and thank you notes and some random papers from his office that were classified. Seemed like he just forgot about it, like most people would. And they're framing it to make it seem like it was intentional. Julie Kelly with the report saying, holy ish, special counsel Jack Smith just admitted the FBI added cover sheets to alleged classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago and took photos for evidence. This confirms my report from last month that the FBI doctored evidence to produce stunt photos for classified docs at Mar-a documents, parentheses, with appropriate cover sheets added by FBI personnel next to the box in which they were located. The photographs attached as exhibit eight are examples. Not only that, it's been further reported that the documents that they put in the photo were, quote unquote, placeholders. And the argument I'm hearing

from many liberals and Democrats is, well, they couldn't take pictures of the actual classified documents. I'm like, well, so the whole photo is just fake. They literally brought props, put them on the ground, took a picture of it and claimed that's what Trump had. Right. It's like over the L.L. Bean catalog. And they're like, it's a classified document. We can't we can't photograph it. Right. I just always wonder what it would be like to be the the PR team at the FBI. And you get this report and you're like, you guys did what? You mean we can't even prove that there were classified? It could literally be a random piece of paper.

And they're like, yes, but it was good that we did this. Right. VR team is just sitting there like rubbing their head like how they are one of the least trusted institutions in America. And then they're like, don't worry, guys. We put a bunch of cover letters over a random pile of paper on the floor. Trust us, it was in good faith. We're definitely not trying to frame anyone. The whole thing's a clown show anyways.

The only reason that they're doing this is because it's Trump. Clinton had plenty of classified documents. She had a whole server. Obama killed a guy. Obama killed a guy. An American without due process. Bush authorized the PRISM to spy on all Americans.

They're all criminals. The only reason this is happening is because his name is Donald Trump. Because he's an outsider. It is really fun when you think about it, though. It's like, so under George W. Bush, you get the expansion of the NSA and the mass surveillance program. And who was it who lied to, I'm always mixing them up. It was the former head of the NSA, I think, lied to Congress about their spine. Who was it?

Was it Brennan? He was CIA, but he's lied to Congress. Their question is who hasn't lied to Congress. That's a good point. That's a good point. That's a good point. Exactly. The point, like the whole thing is only because Donald Trump, it's only,

and no one's ever held accountable. Of course. Just, of course. Can you imagine like the federal prosecutors pretending to be serious, sitting in a room with like a bunch of personnel and they're going through documents. I'm like,

let's see George W. Bush, illegal mass surveillance. Put that over here. A Barack Obama killed a 16 year old. And here we go. Let's see. George W. Bush, illegal mass surveillance. Put that over here. Barack Obama killed a 16-year-old. And here we go. Oh, my. Donald Trump.

Yes. He had classified documents. Oh, I'm sorry. We're going to have to arrest him for that. Pence. Obama had classified. Obama has him. Biden has him.

Biden has him in multiple locations. He had him sitting in behind his Corvette. Who was the guy that stuffed him in his underwear or socks at the National Archives and left with him? He was with Clinton or Obama. Oh, my gosh. Yeah, that was like the Clinton sock drawer story, right? Yeah. I mean, it's just it's ridiculous.

And again, no one's ever held accountable. Joe Biden had these boxes with the classified documents in his garage. Donald Trump had boxes with classified documents, allegedly. I mean, the Biden thing they admitted in Mar-a-Lago when the FBI raids Joe Biden, they take a picture of the Corvette in the boxes and say, yeah, it looks like that with Donald Trump. They go through all the boxes, pull out the documents, stage documents on the ground with fake covers and take a picture of it. This is twofold framing of Donald Trump. First, to make the public, actually it's threefold, to make the public think Trump had this thick

stack of documents when it was more random stuff. The second is it's evidence they presented in court documents to the court. But the the what was I going to say? I forgot the third point I was going to make is. But there you go. Those are the two important points. You reference Sandy Berger, right? Yes, yes, yes.

Former National Security Advisor. I mean, I think ultimately, you know, this is it only serves to make the FBI look worse to people who I don't trust them. And it makes any sort of criticism of the FBI is going to play out to be like these crazy whack drives will do anything to defend Trump. It's going to push further divide and distrust in either your neighbors or the institutions. I think you have to look at why they're doing it too. And it goes back to, I mean, allegedly they did it to take the, to get the crossfire hurricane documents that Trump had unsealed, you know, right when he left office. That is one of the things, but also they're doing this because they know that they stole 2020 and they thought that Trump would be,

you know, for all intents purposes done after 2020 that everybody had turned on him, his own VP, you know, and he would never mount a return. And he is, I mean, and,

and so they're doing everything. Just think about this, you guys, 81 million votes, my ass, there is no way Joe Biden got 81 million votes. No way. And we all know it.

It depends on your definition of vote. Well, yes. You're saying there's no way singular human individuals said to themselves, Joe Biden's the guy for me, and then went and cast a ballot for him. And I completely agree. Yes. But I think Democrats used ballot harvesting. Yes. Voter in the park.

Yes. I think most of these people who quote unquote voted didn't actually vote in the sense that we think. Right. So the game that's being played semantically is Democrats are like, of course, Biden got these votes. Right. And what we're arguing is, no, you went to some old folks home and filled it out for him and then claimed that was that person's vote or things like that. Right. Exactly. People who didn't know what was going on. There's all kinds of there's not they didn't do it just one way.

There were multiple ways that they stole 2020. But the point is, look at what they had. I mean, look at what they did in 2016 to they thought they had an insurance policy. He would never be elected. And then he got in there. They tried to lay out all the evidence. We were waiting on that. There's no way we were going to go and do anything at the Capitol to screw that up. But other people had reason to screw it up, right? Because they didn't want that evidence laid out. So they've gotten away with January 6th. Trump has mounted a comeback and they don't know what to do. So they're using, you know, they've weaponized every agency against Trump, his supporters. And the lawfare is unlike anything we've seen. And the FBI is like the core of all of it that's going on.

They are so deep in it. It goes beyond the FBI because you had the 51 members of the intel community that were signing off on a thing that said the Hunter Biden laptop. We got an update on that one, too. Oh, yeah, we do. The CIA was colluding with Biden, apparently, CIA contractors. The 2020 thing, you know, when you bring up 2016, it actually made me smile a little bit. Those were the good old days. Well, it's not just that.

It's like, I don't know, it's kind of cathartic to hear about how the deep state has been failing at every turn. And they're just in total shambles. And I'm like, it kind of feels good. You know, it's not like we don't have our challenges or anything. But they remember that email that got leaked that said Trump was a Pied Piper candidate. Right. They thought that by pushing Trump, it would sink the Republicans. And they created a monster or they

they've awoken the beast. And then they did everything they could to make sure he could not win. The way I describe it is. Outside of all semantics, who won the argument in 2020? Donald Trump, no question. Absolutely. Who got a bunch of pieces of paper? Who got more pieces of paper with names on them? Democrats. But we know what they did. They called it a shadow campaign in Time magazine. Yeah. And then what happens is it goes to the courts.

And what did the courts say? We are too scared to actually consider what this means. Yeah. Supreme Court rejecting the lawsuit from Texas. That was it. They just say we abdicate. We reject our responsibility. Right. And and that was because of the previous year of riots. If the Supreme Court, if there

wasn't the entire year of riots where literally Trump should have come out and put his foot down, they should have had the feds come out and wrap all those people up they were all paid all of the rioters were paid and and and spurred on by political activists and stuff trump should have had the the uh the fbi wrap them all up or or the the sheriff's department of the whatever wrap them all up because they are why he couldn't why the the supreme court was afraid to take the case because they were afraid of what would happen if they said, wait a minute, this is illegal. The Democrat apparatus, not the actual Democrat Party, but the apparatus, the activists that are currently still working the same methods that they'd been using for the past multiple years they had set the environment so that way trump was going to be the bad guy if he came down with the with the boot and he was going to be out of it would be unacceptable for him to be the president if he didn't they they they had the whole summer of

2020 and just ripped the country apart and made it so the the supreme court they had people outside of the supreme court supreme court's houses and they made it so that the Supreme Court, they had people outside of the Supreme Court's houses, and they made it so that way the Supreme Court was too intimidated to do their job. This was absolutely political attacks. It's not just the Supreme Court. One of the things we've learned through this is it's the state courts, too. I mean, they are just as corrupt, will take no action. And quite honestly, some of the AGs in these Republican

red states across the country that are absolutely doing nothing, my state AG has done nothing, but has sat back and watched Fannie Willis go after, you know, President Trump and 18 other co-conspirators. And it's all BS. I mean, quite frankly, if anybody wants to be charged, if anybody should be charged with Rico, it is the left and what they've done with all this lawfare and everything else. I mean, you're right, but we're so far beyond that. I mean, we're talking right now about the FBI staging evidence at Donald Trump's home. They were authorized to use lethal force. The media is covering that up, claiming Trump's home. They were authorized to use lethal force. The media is covering that up, claiming Trump's lying. I love this NBC. I think it was NBC. I don't know. There's a fact checker and they're like Trump falsely claimed that they were authorized to use lethal force. But and then

it's like falsely claimed. The next paragraph is. But it was standard issue in any warrant that they're allowed to do it. And it's like, so Trump is telling the truth. They were authorized. I saw the voice. There was a commentator on TV that was like, yeah, he made this wild accusation that they were, they were trying to, to attack him. But you know, it's just boilerplate language. They're just allowed to do this. Like, which one is it? Is it false or are, are, are they just allowed to do whatever they want? I'm going to take this opportunity to, I said this before, but you know, the left likes to run these clips of me out of context as they do everybody. Yeah, but there were numerous stories throughout 2019 and 2020 where the analytics were predicting a major Trump reelection victory. Right. Unemployment that it's

lowest point is, you know, pre-COVID. It was huge. And Moody's analytics based on the economy was like Donald Trump will win again. There's also the meme of the 49 state landslide, which is a reference to Reagan. Right. And so the leftists like to take all of that stuff out of context and just show clips of me saying like Trump's going to win. Trump's going to win. When, in fact, the caveats were, wow, if this happens, Trump's going to win. But I'm going to take full credit for everything I said. And I think it's important.

Donald Trump got more votes than any sitting president. Donald Trump won Florida and Ohio. And I don't believe any modern president has ever won both states and then lost the election. Trump won, what is it, 90 percent of Bellwether counties? Yeah, he did. Yeah. And so these were all metrics by which the any any standard election was indicative of Donald Trump winning a tremendous victory. And then it was just very strange how everything happened, as everybody knows. I think they basically said in Time magazine how they did it, the shadow campaign, they called it. Ballot harvesting was the big key.

They told us everything in that article. Yeah. You know, exactly how they did it. They had to brag about it. But so hopefully in Georgia and in these other states, you know, Donald Trump has talked about swamp the vote that Republicans have to play the same game. And you're going to need Republican Republicans on the ground. People like Scott Pressler going door to door, knocking on doors and saying, did you fill out your mail in ballot yet? Because that's the game that's being played. 2020, Donald Trump won the argument, but the Democrats, I, you know, I don't like the word outmaneuver because it's more like, you know, is it cheating or is it not cheating? Well, there's this viral video I've mentioned several times of speed skaters.

Have you guys seen this ice skating video where the Chinese team outlaps the whole pack? Yeah. And then they're behind. So one of the Chinese racers outlaps the whole group and then stays in the back so the group doesn't realize they're actually in there that person's in first place right everybody says oh that's cheating it's cheating other people said it's strategy it's strategy depends on your perspective democrats were thinking we can't actually win an argument no with the american people so how can we get a bunch of pieces of paper that qualify

us to win the election? And then when it came to the Supreme Court and Congress, they all went, we're too cowardly to actually challenge this. There you go. Well, in the beginning, Congress, that was a thing. Mo Brooks was the one that came up with the plan to contest the vote. And that's why we took the March for Trump bus across the country, because we wanted to put pressure on these congressmen and senators to get them to contest the Electoral College on January 6. And Mo Brooks and then, you know, a number of members of Congress and then Josh Hawley was the first senator that got on board. And y'all like in a week, we had flipped so many because the pressure they saw the people in the streets, whatever.

That's why the the riot at the Capitol happened, because they had to stop that. But this is the thing. There are other things that are going on, like in Georgia, for one. One of the things they've done, I'm sure it's in other states, they take an inactive voter that, say, has been inactive for 12 years, has not voted. They make them active. They vote for them, then make them inactive, and you never even see it, right? They're putting, as you're cleaning the voter rolls, behind the scenes with Eric, and they're putting new people on the voter rolls and you don't even see it. People in the courts will not do anything about it.

How many people shut up to vote and were told they already voted? Oh, yeah. There was a there was a young guy. I think it was from Tennessee or something, but he was in Arizona or vice versa. And he appeared on Fox and said, I'm out of state and my home state claims I voted. Something's not right. Right. And we never had any answers for this.

And this happened before November and everybody was pointing it out. And then it happened and everyone's like, we were screaming this the whole time. Something's wrong. Yeah. Well, let's jump to the story from the Post Millennial. Breaking new GOP report reveals CIA contractors colluded with Biden campaign to frame Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation. Just because these people are scumbags, I'm going to insert. We have more evidence that Joe Biden crapped his pants on stage than we do.

The Hunter Biden laptop is part of a Russian disinformation scheme. I will clarify. I'm not saying Biden crapped his pants on stage. I'm saying there is more evidence that he did than any of these claims from these these crackpot spies. The House judiciary revealed on Tuesday that CIA contractors were among those who colluded with Biden's campaign in 2020 to release misinformation, claiming that Hunter Biden's laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. I love that it's always Russia doing it as if just like literally any other country that hates us doesn't exist. But I digress. The committee shows that high ranking CIA officials up to and including

then CIA Director Gina Haspel were made aware of the Hunter Biden statement prior to its approval and publication. They further state that because several former senior intelligence officials signed the statement, the PCRB sent the draft statement to the CIA's then chief operating officer, Andrew McRittis, who said he subsequently informed then Director Haspel and then Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop that the statement would be published soon. Senior CIA leadership had an opportunity at the time to slow down the CIA's process for reviewing publication submissions and ensure that such an extraordinary statement was properly vetted. The implication from the committee is that this did not happen. In fact, CIA contractors, including Michael Morrell, were on active contract with the CIA at the time of the Hunter Biden statement publication. Morrell was what was the one who penned the letter after being contacted by then Biden campaign senior advisor and asked to do so.

I'm sorry. To me, that doesn't sound like CIA contractors colluded with the Biden campaign. That sounds like the CIA staged a coup against a sitting president. If the official or people that are acting as officials for the intelligence apparatus are saying to the American people, it looks like this candidate is having, has been assisted by a foreign government. If they say that, the American people are going to say, well, that seems legitimate. That sounds to me legitimate because they see their people in positions of authority it's lying to the american people and it's putting it's the government putting its finger on the scales for a candidate this is in violation of every single law about the government having anything to do with elections the reason why all the states run their elections is because the federal government isn't supposed to have an opinion about who does or does not get elected.

They're not supposed to get a say. So the fact that they actually put their finger on the the scale means that it's illegitimate. All of those people need to lose their clearances. That's just, that's pure. That's just the beginning. Speaking of though. They should be in jail. Just one little piece of trivia. One little piece of trivia. Did y'all know that Dana Bash's ex-husband, Jerry Bash, is one of the ones. I think he's her ex-husband.

Yeah. Because then she married John King. Ah. That got brought up to us last night, actually, for the first time. Phil gasped audibly. Yeah. Yeah. I night, actually, for the first time. Phil gasped audibly. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, he worked for the Obama administration.

He was, I think, the chief of staff at the CIA and, I mean, whatever. He worked with Morrell at this global agency they had. And then here, Dana Bash is the one that's going to be moderating the debate on Thursday night with President Trump and Biden. I don't see any conflict there. I think part of the question is, like, is this something that the American people are going to get angry about? Or is it so far memory hold or too complicated for them to pay attention to? I just think nobody believes anything that comes out of them anymore, whether it's the

CIA, FBI, whatever. One of the greatest moments ever was how the Epstein narrative broke through to the normies. Right. One of the greatest moments was when Chris Reagan said he got after Epstein died. He said he got into an Uber and the first thing that happens is the driver turns around and goes, yo, that guy didn't kill himself. Like everybody knew the veil had been lifted. Right. The problem now is it's gone back down.

This does not reach regular people. Right. And if you go to your average person, go to Times Square, get a microphone and say, if I were to tell you that the CIA staged a coup in 2020 to remove Donald Trump and install Joe Biden, what would you say? They'd say, oh, shut up. Trump, everybody hated him. No. They'd say, oh, shut up, Trump. Everybody hated him. No, Trump was actually slated to win based on all of the metrics that we expect. But the game was changed. What they do is they use the corporate press.

The reason why CNN is trying to shut out independent media, they need to maintain a popular narrative that everyone hates Trump, despite the fact that people actually like Trump. Right. Then your average person will say, well, I voted for Trump. I mean, I like him, but I have heard on the news 874,000 times that people hate him. So I understand why he lost. Yeah. They need you to believe he is hated when it makes no sense that he has said, I'm sorry, look, people hate Trump. I know that's true. But for the most part, Donald Trump is a masterful entertainer and everyone knows it. Dude walks into a room and everyone wants to talk to him. He goes to rallies and he does raw stand up. It is humor. We have an article Charlemagne the God saying that it's going to be amazing. Trump's a stand up genius. These are people who aren't

going to vote for him. Right. The idea that the majority of people don't like Trump, I believe, is a manufactured narrative. So the American people are willing to accept why he didn't win. Yeah. I also think that this relies on the idea that Americans believe America is not like other countries. They think coups only happen in third world nations that have all kinds of political instability. And the reality is we have political instability and all systems are fragile. But how dare you use that word coup? I know.

Don't you dare. Or call somebody a traitor. That's the thing. If you walk into someone's Times Square and said it was a coup, they'd be like, coups don't happen here. That's somewhere else. Nancy Pelosi specifically asked General Miley,

the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, if they could take Trump out. She literally asked him. I want to add to this too, because I'm going to correct myself from several years ago when I was debating Steve Bannon. And I said that enthusiasm again, what the mistake one mistake people made. And this is this is true, but not the defining factor. Enthusiasm for Biden was like 26 percent across numerous polls and enthusiasm for Trump was like 94. But a few enthusiasm against Trump was like 96.

And so I argued back in like 2021 with Bannon, Trump supporters were missing that people were I told Bannon it was an anti election, people anti elected Trump. What I would what I would correct now is I believe that is true, but not the defining reason why Trump didn't win. Why? Because they published what they did in Time magazine. And this sort of changed everything. They said, oh, by the way, we engage in this massive campaign to secure the election. And it's like, oh, wow. So certainly there are people who don't like Trump, but it was mass ballot harvesting.

The voter in the park was a big thing. It was it was judges and governors changing election rules without constitutional authority to do so and making it so that the whole game was tilted so that they bent the rules to make it so that Biden would win. Right. They did. I will. I agree with you and that your everyday average person does not get down into the weeds on this stuff. But I do think that there we have come to a point where people know something's not right. They don't know what it is, but they know that something is not right. And they're willing to speak up about it now. You know, people say something in the grocery store. If I have women for Trump or, you know, I have MAGA. We did a car parade a couple of weeks ago. I have MAGA on my back window and some guy walking through the parking lot. He was like,

I'm right there with you. Thumbs up. He said they stole it last time. Well, you guys, this guy would have never said that to me three years ago. I mean, he just he wouldn't have. And so I think people know that that something happened. They don't know what's going on, but they know it's not right and that they can't. And the thing is, the reason they know that is because it's kitchen table politics. It's the economy. It's the the, you know, the crime because of the open border. And, you know, it's the things that are touching their families and it's making it personal. And that's why they're they know something's not right. I think this is something the Biden administration has done really badly and basically inflicted on themselves, which is that they always say no matter how anyone feels, the fact that people are constantly reporting that they are struggling to pay their bills, that there's rising credit card debt, all of these things. The Biden administration is always every time there's a job matrix that comes out,

they're like, well, this is why it's actually going well. And actually, everything's better than you're saying. And, you know, ignore how you feel, believe our messaging. In some ways, I think they could have done what Gerald Ford did, which is to come out and say, when he had the State of the Union address, the State of the Union is not good and specifically talked about the economy, because then he would seem credible. He would be acknowledging what the people are going to. And I think Americans who are maybe not even that interested in politics, but are trying to build a life for themselves and their family are tired of hearing that

everything is fine. Stop questioning us while they watch money get shipped overseas, while they watch their bills go higher and higher, while they watch their children struggle to get off on their own foot independently and financially secure. It's sad to see this be the reality because ultimately it's creating a sense of division. And I don't know that that's something that American people can really come back from, even in one presidential cycle. Like if, you know, should President Trump be elected in November? I don't know that we could just have spent four years, even if things get better, necessarily making people feel more secure, rebuilding that trust. Like it's such a it's such a intensely damaging experience to the American psyche.

It is. And when you go to the grocery store and toilet paper is $32, $26 on sale, dishwasher tabs, 60 tabs are 25 bucks. People can't pay that. I mean, it's insane and they cannot afford it. And, you know, all these jobs they keep saying are being created. Yeah. These are not full-time good paying jobs. these are jobs that people are going and getting their second and third job just to make ends meet you know and and you can't you can stand there and lie to the American people all you want but they're living it and they know what the reality is and and I I mean look I love President Trump and I think at this point, he's our only hope. But I think also this is one of the reasons that the VP choice is so important, because it's going to take longer than four years to turn this around. And so we need somebody that will continue the America First agenda and continue pushing back and do the things that need to be done to save this country.

Who do you want to see as VP? I'd like to see J.D. Vance. He's my first choice. And my second would probably be Vivek. And then third one would be Ken Paxton. And I'd rather see Ken Paxton as AG, I think, for right now. But I'll tell you what it comes down to is, look, I'm afraid they're going to

try and kill President Trump. They're going to do something to him. And who is the person that absolutely will not crater cave to the establishment globalists and will push back on him? And I think that really those three that I named are the only ones. I mean, you've seen J.D. Vance. He knows how the left is because he mean, you've seen J.D. Vance. He knows how the left is because he's been part of the left. He's came from nothing and built his way up and whatnot. And then he was part of Hollywood after his book and movie. And so he knows what it's like with the left.

And Vivek Ramaswamy, I mean, he's a businessman that's built himself up. Neither one of them really need anybody else's money. But look at J.D. going to the World Economic Forum and telling them, you know, going into their their house, their house and telling them, you know, pushing America first and whatnot. And I just I don't think there's any I love Ben Carson. There's plenty of others that, you know, I think would be good. But at the end of the day, if Trump's gone, those globalist establishment forces are going to be pushing so hard and who is not going to cave. And I think that's the most important thing. Let's let's jump to this story from The Huffington Post. Oh, they're really getting a kick out of this one. Trump suggests Biden take a drug test as allies continue attacks before debate. Quote, I would also immediately agree to one.

The former president wrote in capital letters on his social media platform. So I just have a question for these leftists who are highlighting this. What's the counter? Donald Trump offers to take a drug test and asks that Joe Biden do the same. For what reason does Joe Biden say no? Right. I think this is the weirdest thing. They're acting, what, they're going to say, it's so disrespectful that he would even ask. But if in this case, like, what do you have to lose? Right?

It could literally be nothing if you just said, yeah, sure, we'll do it. But we all know why. We all know why. Joe Biden's going to be hepped up on goofballs. Okay. Like there is not, now here's one. Okay.

I made this point in the previous segment that if you go to Times Square, there is not a... Now, here's one. Okay? I made this point in the previous segment that if you go to Times Square, walk up to a random person and say, do you think, you know, what if I told you the CIA staged a coup

against the president, against Trump? They'd say, yeah, get out of here. If you go to the average person in Times Square and say, do you think that Joe Biden

takes some kind of psychoactive drug? They're going to be like, yes. I don't know. Or, to be fair, they might say no. And it's because

if he was, he wouldn't be garbling nonsense. He'd to be fair, they might say no. And it's because if he was, he wouldn't be garbling nonsense. He'd actually be. Hopefully be a little better than, you know, his shaman and Amina or whatever he's shaman. But but perhaps Biden's bumbling, stumbling. Yeah. Perhaps Biden's brain is so bad, the stimulants aren't working anymore. I think the other problem is if he had to do a drug test and it was evaluated by a third neutral party, it might reveal that he's on some medication that they have hidden from the American public because he's in medical condition that they're hiding. I'm just I'm spitballing here. Don't come for me, CNN. But they haven't revealed any medication, though, that he's on.

Right. I mean, they always hide his health report. They always say he's fine. But, you know, look, I just think that would be the real concern like yes i bet he is you know likelihood is theoretically there is a stimulant before the debate but also what else is in his system that they wouldn't want to be disclosed right yeah he's gonna have every the cocktail that guy is on is gonna be like the reason he's at camp david this week focused only on this is because they're having to change his sleep cycle and whatnot to get him to where, to get him to where, you know, he, he's at full performance, right? No, right.

He's probably in bed until 6 p.m. Right. Or maybe even 7. And the debate's at 9. So they wake him up at 7, they get him cleaned up, and then he's, he's got his hour. He's got his good hour. That's about it. And how long is the debate going for?

Do we know? I think it's probably two hours. I'll level two hours. I don't think it's, I think it's maybe an hour. Yeah, I don't think it's going to be two hours. Biden can't handle that.

No way. Yeah. I think they're typically 90 minutes, but I wouldn't be surprised if they agreed to an hour. I bet they do crazy stuff. I bet they like red light therapy and laser blast him,

IV, NAD vitamins and stimulants. And then they like blue light therapy and laser blast him, IV, NAD vitamins and stimulants. And then they like blue light blast him afterwards. I mean, I don't imagine that they're not going to be giving him something to stimulate him a little bit. You know, give him a little bit. A little bit. I'm trying to be gentle here. I wouldn't be surprised if they have like some kind of electrodes hooked up to his back that just run a current through his body.

No, I'm kidding, by the way. But it is true that if you run a light current through the brain, it actually improves cognitive function. Really? Yeah. They've done these studies where they do low level currents to the brain and like recall and like was just better, solved math problems faster. They're going to have this guy. I wouldn't be

surprised if someone notices a cable running down his pants out of the room or like an IV drip into his back or something. Look, I think Trump should be very kind to him and treat him like granddaddy or something like, here, Joe, can I get that chair for you? Or do you need me to speak up, Joe? Can you hear me? Are you feeling okay? Yes. Just, you know, be like you would treat an elderly grandparent. That's good. Yeah, I think that's what President Trump should do. And just, I mean, put it on full display. And when it comes to, I was in this the other day, when Joe Biden mutters, Trump absolutely every time must ask for clarification.

Right. So when Joe Biden goes, Trump should say when they say Trump, how do you respond? I'm sorry. Could Joe repeat that? I did not make out what I was saying because the people at home watching on their Timcast IRL commentary show or on CNN, wherever you may be, are going to be thinking that they're going to think I have no idea what he just said. And if Trump so if they say to Joe Biden, what's your immigration plan? And Biden says, you know, we got to get it out of the border. Well, if they say, OK, and Trump, what's your answer? And Trump just starts talking.

People will forget that Biden didn't give an answer. Right. Because they're going to shift their attention immediately. Trump, if Trump says, I'm sorry, I couldn't quite make out what Joe had said. Joe, would you mind repeating that one more time? Then it shifts the focus on to Biden can't talk. And get this. If Trump does that at the slightest pin drop of a mutterance of gibberish, the news reports the next day are going to be Donald Trump had to ask Joe Biden 50 times to speak clearly because he kept gibbering, kept gibbering. Right. I also think it'd be powerful to see a clip. And I'm justibbering, kept jibbering. Right.

I also think it'd be powerful to see a clip. And I'm just spitballing here. But could kicker if he says, you know, could could Biden please explain whatever he just said? I couldn't understand any clarification. If one of the moderators like, well, the president clearly said that we need to continue our support for Ukraine in this difficult like if they are aware of how the president was answering, that would be pretty fascinating, right? That clip is kind of damning in and of itself because it means that they are aware of the talking points that the Biden team

is ready to present. You know what the media is going to say on like Huffington Post? They're going to say Trump is so old and out of it, he couldn't understand what was going on. Yeah, I know. And the moderators are going to be in on it and the media is going to translate for Biden. One thing I do think Trump needs to do is ask Joe about the story that it was Russian collusion. Hunters, remember the last debate where, oh, that's Russian collusion, Russian disinformation. There's nothing to it. I think that Trump needs to call him out and ask him about it now and see if he still stands by it. I don't know. I think that's the trap. You do. Yeah, because that Trump needs. But Biden's going to try and go there to get Trump to start talking about things that don't matter to the American people.

And Trump needs to just respond with Joe. I don't know what you're talking about. Bread costs seven dollars. OK, eggs cost seven dollars. Milk costs five dollars. The American people need to know how they're paying for their groceries and how they're going to make a peanut butter jelly sandwich, not whatever you're talking about with Russia. Yep.

I mean, I can see where you're coming from, but I do think he needs to, now that the laptop was entered into evidence in the courtroom, I mean, it's been proven that it's true. And Biden stood up there and lied to the American people. Are you still going to stand by that, Joe? But see, Trump's been proven that it's true. And Biden stood up there and lied to the American people. Are you still going to stand by that, Joe? But see, Trump's base doesn't need

to hear it. Trump's attractors, there's two groups that know about the laptop, and that is the people who hate Trump and the people who like Trump. The people who like Trump never trusted in the first place and know Trump's right. People in the middle aren't going to be swayed by a conversation about Russia. But the opportunity will be for that normie dude or lady is when Joe Biden says something about Russia or whatever. Trump can say, what is this Russia, Russia stuff? Right. The American people can't afford gas right now. You at home right now know your gas. And this guy's obsessed with Russia. Right. Then they're going to go, yeah, I want cheap gas. And Trump's going to be like, I'll get you cheaper gas. He'll complain about Russia. And he's kind of obsessed with Russia. Right.

I mean, oh, yeah. Apparently we're several billion dollars into helping Ukraine. And that's and that's why I thought it was a good idea. That's a tremendous segue for Trump. Actually, he should bring that. He should say that. Call me President Trump. I'll help you prep. Right. He'd say on the debate, if you vote for Joe Biden, you know what he's going to do? He's going to be obsessed with Russia, Russia, Russia. He's going to send more of your money to Russia, more of your money to Ukraine. And why? For what reason? If you vote for Donald Trump, we will keep your money here. We will put it back into the economy for you, for infrastructure, and we'll stop the war with Russia.

That's your money being wasted. For what? Can any of you? And I would say this. I would ask. This was really great in the Republican primary debates. Who was it? Vivek asked Nikki Haley to name three oblasts in Ukraine.

And she's like, and then later on, she's like um uh kharkiv and then she started naming them it's like someone fed it to her right yep they're like looking at the audience going like it wasn't good though because at that point you kind of just got to walk it off like you couldn't name it in the moment to be like and actually five minutes later i have thought of them like i don't know right yeah yeah let it go yeah it is i think the debates can be really interesting because and again i have sort of a cynical attitude toward debates. They don't necessarily really give us some intelligent, like well thought out. How do we actually solve crisis? It's definitely about seeing them go head to head. But in this case, because it's an unusual rematch, you know, once again, we're getting Biden and Trump, except now Biden is the incumbent, so to speak, and Trump is the outsider,

they are going to have that same tension on display, except again, it's Biden who should really have to answer for the state of America. When it was last time when there was more stuff with COVID or, you know, whatever else had gone on, I felt like it was it was Trump having to explain his legacy. But now I think American people know that that Biden has put the country in a very perilous position internationally and domestically. And in a tailspin, we can't have anyone get distracted over, you know, Trump's convictions or anything else. We just have to talk about what's actually going on. Yeah, I do think Trump needs to focus on his record and, you know, compare. I mean, that question, who said it?

Were you better off four years ago than you are today? You know, and people needed to be need to be reminded. We did these things, Women for Trump, back in the 2020 2020 2020 campaign promises made promises kept. And this is a list of things that you know that he did in that administration and people need to be reminded about that i i my question is because i haven't seen a list of the rules but they're not going to allow questions of each other i'm imagining i don't think so no because certainly joe biden will bring up abortion. I think there's there's there's two plays on this one. Trump could go full swing to the right just saying we did it. We won. We got Roe v. Wade overturned.

I wonder if the better play is to is for Trump to say abortion. Now, look, it's a big issue. I know people are concerned about, but people are concerned about how they can get gas and milk and bread and eggs and pay their rent. Young people can't afford to buy homes, start families. And you're sitting up here talking about abortions. We can figure that one out together in this country. But we need to figure out how to get young people to buy homes, the elderly to get their Social Security paid for, to make sure they have access to proper medical treatments, not whatever it is you're talking about. It's interesting, too, because he could really dovetail into these issues from abortion really easily. I mean, one of the things that I saw, I was watching a I think it was MSNBC interview

women who were apparently impacted by abortion restrictions in Texas. And they were like, this this woman couldn't afford to travel out of state. Well, why can't she afford to travel out of state? Because Biden's economy is so bad. You know, this woman, whatever, like all of it ultimately dovetails back to the fact that like everyone's lives are extremely difficult because of the economic position Biden has put us in. Right. Women are not, they're focused on how to put a roof over their head, feed their children. They don't want to be living out of a car with their children, right? You know, they want to make sure their children have health care. They're not worried about abortions when their lives are falling apart right now and they can't

even afford the place they're living. But that is what they're going to push. Tim, you're absolutely right. If you watch MSNBC for days, it's been all about Roe v. Wade because it's a two year. It is. That is all they're talking about. I think they are going to go there. I think Biden will go there. But I also think Biden's going to go after Trump on J6. I think that's another every time with here we go again with the weird political back and forth. I don't care about any of that. I'm here to get to work for the American people. If Trump can stick to that and Biden keeps trying to throw bait, the American that the average norm is going to be like, I don't know what that is like. Trump's a felon. Like, I don't know, man, I couldn't buy gas today. And if Trump addresses that, they're going to be

like, I want that guy in. I think it was the either the Wall Street, I think it was the Wall Street Journal that released a graph today talking about the inflation adjusted value of your dollar. And since Biden has got into office, the inflation has absolutely decimated the value. The standard of living has dropped. It's it's incredible. And so there are people that are going to say, oh, people are making the same amount of dollars and et cetera, et cetera. And there are things going on in the economy. So, of course, the economy is actually good. That is not going to work because you're telling people that the things that they're experiencing when they go to the grocery store and when they try to buy things that they're used to buying, you're telling them that they're dumb. You're telling them, no, you're wrong.

The money that used to be able to buy X amount of groceries, it still does. And you're just stupid and can't figure it out. That's not going to work. The American people are actually hurting because of the inflation that we've had to go through. And there has been no effort on the side of the government to inspire growth, which will help alleviate the problem of the inflation. OK, you have to have growth if you're not going to have cuts and you're not going to have cuts. So you have to do something to have growth or the people are going to suffer as the economy does not gain any steam.

Their value of their dollar does not go up and they don't have more dollars to replace that missing value. You're not going to be able to convince the American people that they're not suffering when they're suffering every day. Let's let's jump to this story. We have a tweet from the Raymond G. Stanley Jr. It's actually a clip from Breaking Points. Raymond says scumbag CNN isn't just going after Tim Castor Crowder. They're going after all independent media, even super middle of the road breaking points with Sager and Crystal Ball. They are canceling their planned live stream portion of the presidential debate. That is a that's a huge mistake. That's amazing. But let me play this clip for you from

Breaking Points of Sager and Crystal. A little bit behind the scenes about streaming the debate. So we plan on streaming our analysis here. However, as you guys know, CNN has the, quote unquote, exclusive rights since they're the ones who are holding it. Now, they have given permission to every major news organization in the U.S. C-SPAN, ABC News, Fox News, even Fox News have permission. So we got a weird email today at Breaking Points from YouTube basically asking us and reminding us to confirm copyright policies. So I'm freaking out a little bit. What's going on? I work. I get the email for the head of CNN Communications.

I'm not going to read her name here, but I'll just read you the email that we wrote her and her response. I said, hi, Sagar and Jetty here from Breaking Points, news show hosted on YouTube, et cetera, reaching out on the advice of YouTube for permission to be able to stream the debate on our YouTube channel, as has already been granted to other news organizations in keeping standing with the norms around presidential debates. Please advise if we have permission to stream this debate with our commentary in keeping with the fair use doctrine. Here's CNN's response. Hi, Sagar. The use doctrine. Here's CNN's response. Hi, Sagar. The debate will be available on CNN's YouTube channel. We are not offering the feed

for other YouTube channels. So that's it, Crystal. Despite the fact that they are giving permission to every other major news organization, they are effectively stifling all of independent media by banning our ability to stream the debate on YouTube. So look, we will do a before stream and an after stream. We'll do our best. But this is outrageous. It is a total violation of any of the norms and the spirits around presidential debates. OK, guys, don't drop your show. They have no authority to restrict access to what is I mean, it hits so many of the fair use points to do a live commentary on a presidential debate. You've got the, it's transformative. Clearly you are talking over

the debate. Okay. If somebody wants to watch the debate clean to watch the debate, you can't get that on one, on their stream or our stream or Crowder's stream. Okay. It is clearly transformative. It is clearly educational and it is clearly commentary. It fits three of the four criteria cleanly. I'm willing to bet it gets all four, all four of them. So the idea that you that you guys would back up, I recommend you don't. However, it is to be seen how YouTube will handle this, but we will be multi streaming on various platforms with the expectation that CNN will make a fraudulent attempt. OK, well, let's put it this way. They're going to attempt to assert we don't have fair use. I'm willing to bet. And we do, because cases like this have already been battled out and we win every time. Every time. Every channel.

Crowder has done this and Crowder won. We had a stream. Fox News challenged it. We won. David Pakman, same thing. For all the criticism we give that guy, Fox News went after him. He won because they cannot do that. CNN, this is big. This is big. The update here from Breaking Points is that CNN is giving access to all of the major from breaking points is that cnn's giving access to all of the major networks to do this and they're not giving any non-cable network it's a mainstream media monopoly yep right they all pretend to hate each other but actually they really hate independent media and right they can't be a part of it only mainstream media can right because y'all have gone around them around them and they can't they can't control it and they cannot stand that.

Well, I mean, it's still about the access. I say this a lot. It's really about the access to the president. They're going to do whatever the administration wants because they have friends in the administration. It's essentially the mouthpiece for the Democrat Party. They've already made the bed like that they've already set the entire um the the parameter so that way trump is going to be in as disadvantageous disadvantage he's gonna have his men disadvantage thank you disadvantageous position as as uh he could possibly manage it's not there there's not there's no argument about it it's plain for anyone to see if you look it looks like uh saga is saying he, we will be streaming for our premium members, subscribers at BreakingPoints.com. But this is genuinely not racist attack on independent media.

Would be one thing to keep it just on CNN, but to give to others and screw us plus all others is BS. This is really fascinating because if what he is saying, if what Sager is saying is true, or I'm interpreting this correctly, that they are going to do their live commentary on the show, but only for paid members. It's absolutely fascinating because this shows that Breaking Points knows full well it's fair use and they have no legal exposure. They're actually going to profit off of what they are doing. So this is actually. If you are claiming something's educational, but then you're making money off it, that's a challenge to fair use. Now, it doesn't apply in this regard. It's a presidential debate. But what this shows is breaking points, fears. And I mean, it's all due respect. I'm a fan, CNN is going to file

a takedown, put a strike on their channel, and try and disrupt their business. They know that if they do their show through locals, CNN will be unable to do this. And so they're taking their show behind the paywall for defensive reasons. It's actually kind of crazy. This is what CNN has done. And it's true. If we stream just on YouTube, I would not be surprised. And even X, even though Elon Musk has given insurance assurances,

these automated copyright takedown systems, I wouldn't be surprised if YouTube, CNN files, everyone's YouTube goes down. X, Elon says DMC won't apply, but there's an automated system there that may still hit. Rumble, I think, would be the only safe public streaming platform where they're not going to get you. But you put it behind your paywall and CNN can't do anything. They can complain. They can send you a letter and you can laugh and throw it in the garbage and say it's fair use. If CNN tried to go after anybody over this, they would probably end up having to pay legal fees for the person they sued, which is why they won't do it, which is why Fox won't do it. So this is actually big, what CNN is pushing

independent media into doing. They've gone off the reservation. Completely off the reservation. It's desperation. I keep thinking they're going to go back more towards the middle. I mean, they used to be, look, they've always been left pretty much. But I mean, even in 16, you know, they would put Trump supporters on there and give them an opportunity to make the arguments and whatnot. And then I think probably in 18 was when they just they changed. And even though they've had a leadership change at the top, they just continue to go more to the left and lose credibility. And I don't get it. I remember when I had my daughter 33 years ago, it was during the Gulf War. And I remember being up in the middle of the night watching CNN with, you know, their reporters on the ground over there.

And I mean, they they were built in Atlanta. That was Turner Broadcasting Network. And it's really just disappointing. It really, really is disappointing because they have gone so far off the reservation. It's interesting because, I mean, last time it was Fox, right, who was having issues with people simulcasting or to comment on it. I think so much of it is, yes, I think mainstream, especially left-leaning media has gone so far. There's kind of no walking it back without obviously putting out your own hypocrisy. But the other part is I think independent media has just gotten so big that it is actually a financial threat to all of these places. If you can't keep all of your view, I agree with you. If all of the eyes aren't on CNN, they can't say this was the highest watched debate of all time or whatever they want to say, because ultimately, you know, it's very difficult to for them to say like, well, we got this many

viewers and this simulcast that was also watching it got this many viewers and really don't want people watching that other media. They want you to listen to their commentators and you want their perspective and things like that. So it's it's partially ideological. I agree with you. I think some of it is just this absolute terror that anyone might present information or challenge your moderators or whatever it is. But I think another part of it is just independent media over the last, you know, definitely over the last two decades, but definitely in the last eight years has grown so much that it can actually hurt their bottom line. And that's really all they care about at the end of the day. Yeah. And they lose control. I don't know if you guys know this, but actually back in 2011, CNN, I went to CNN and we worked with CNN to do the first ever Tea Party presidential debate.

We did it in Tampa and all the candidates were there. Romney, I can't even remember who was there, but they were incredible to work with. And it was one of the most successful debates. Wolf Blitzer was a moderator. It was one of their most successful debates ever. Huge ratings, you know. Then in 2010, when we took back the House and that first State of the Union, after we took back the House, we were going to do a response to the State of the Union with Michelle, with the Congresswoman

from Minnesota, Michelle Bachman. And we were going to do it at the Capitol Hill Club. And then Fox said they weren't going to cover it live. Capitol Hill Club pulled us, and so we went to the National Press Club. CNN was the only one that carried it live that night. Their ratings were off the chart because they covered the Tea Party response to the State of the Union. So they used to be there where they were giving coverage. They don't even do that anymore, I mean, at all.

But another thing I will say because I worked with CNN so much the thing is believe it or not there are a lot of people behind the scenes running control panels and all the stuff that are conservatives and are with us but it's their on-air talent and these producers that are way left I believe that because I think that's true of a lot of different industries right if you want to be we talk about this with with hollywood right if you want to be in hollywood then you either have to say nothing or at least pair right the party line but just you know if you're if you're like a sound guy that doesn't necessarily mean you believe in any of this right real quick um twitter is lighting up with people claiming that jamal moment has uh lost his primary we're tracking that

he hasn't yeah the results are not even in. It should have closed pretty soon though, like 9 I think. It just closed and results are just starting to come in. But like, yo all of these people I'm seeing, a lot of people I know, high profile people claiming he lost already with no sources, no evidence and it's not real. Stop posting stuff

you didn't fact check or source because we're sitting, I'm staring at the results and it's like okay let's see we got our first uh bronx county is in with uh three percent of votes counted and everyone on twitter is like bowman is out bowman is out i'm like uh where is that because am i late to the party no but we will have that uh that update when it comes in uh this is big because bowman of course he he pulled the fire alarm. He committed a crime. He's far left. And apparently he can bench four wheels.

Did you see that? They're projecting that South Carolina is going to—that Sherry Biggs, the Republican in South Carolina, is going to win. Decision Desk HQ is projecting that. She's going to win against who? She's replacing what? It says for the primary runoff in South Carolina's third congressional district. It doesn't say who she's running against. But it so i mean she's replacing a republican are we do we care i mean i'm just looking i was just yeah well it's we're looking to see if there will be a rebuke

in new york of the far left in congress so if bowman gets primaried and gets booted which a lot of people predict he will it's going to to be interesting. It needs to happen. And the reason is because this New York City government is the epicenter of the DSA right now. As far as I know, that is where the DSA has the most influence in politics in the United States. The DSA are communists. They openly endorse Marxist ideas. This is unacceptable in America. This is something that we need to fight against as strongly as we can. We need to use all of the political means at our disposal to prevent communists from taking over. Because you see the problems that are going on in New

York with crime and all of that stuff. this is directly because of the policies that communists institute. I also think that's one of the reasons everyone should keep an eye on Colorado's primary today. We all talk about Lauren Boebert a lot, but there are other races there where Colorado is really this strange state where it was hugely red in some areas but has become intensely blue, especially around some of the major cities like denver specifically uh and so to see what colorado puts out as its potential next uh uh election is interesting like how what kind of candidates are the republicans fielding there and how left leaning are the democrats in colorado and we'll really only know after the results of the primary

tonight nowadays we're not even talking about left-leaning. You're talking about pure leftists. If you're a communist, it's not even left-leaning. It's a literal threat to the United States. But that's why Colorado is interesting, right? Because Colorado was reliably red for a long time. But as more people have kind of moved out there, as the cities have gone more blue, in some states where you're red, except for in the major city, you get a Democrat who kind of postures as a moderate. They say,

you know, well, I like this issue socially, but in these ones, I lean here. But now it seems like, especially with captive cities, cities that are in red states, but are dominantly blue, they just go out of their way to pick the most aggressive progressive candidate and say, you guys will comply to our will. We know better than you do. That's my interpretation, at least. South Carolina three is a seat held by Jeff Duncan that I think he's retiring. And the Sherry Biggs, it looks like they're claiming she's won against Pastor Mark Burns, who was endorsed by President Trump.

Interesting. They're all deleting the tweets now. Come on, guys. Even Libs have TikTok tweeted that Bowman loss. Come on, guys. What do you know? Even Libs of TikTok tweeted that Bowman lost. Shout out, Libs. You know, we love you. But I'm like when I saw Libs of TikTok tweeted that Bowman lost, I was like, OK, there's got to be something I'm missing. I'm staring at the results here and it's not in yet. But they're all deleting their tweets. Excited. What do you think of Trump's endorsement record? I don't mean to put you on the spot, but I think it's no, I mean, listen, it's, you know,

I'm not one of those people that will that just blindly follows President Trump and does what he says. I'm a critical thinker. I have the ability to think on my own. And I think he is. I think he is I think he has gotten a number of endorsements wrong. You could go back to 2017 with the Alabama Senate seat when President Trump endorsed Luther Strange, who had been hand selected for that seat. And he ran against Roy Moore. And then Roy Moore won, even though President Trump had endorsed Luther Strange. Roy Moore won. And then Republicans and had endorsed Luther Strange. Roy Moore won. And then Republicans and Democrats worked to get Doug Jones in there and defeat him. I don't think that like the Virginia Five race last week, Bob Good is the conservative and he should have been reelected. I mean, it should have been hands down re-election.

I agree with you. been reelected. I mean, it should have been hands down reelection. But this is where I cut my teeth in politics in Senate and congressional races all the way back to 2009, 2010. So this is something that hits home to me. And I keep trying to talk to people and make them understand, look, these people that are in Congress are the ones that make the law. And they can be there a lot longer than a president who can only be there a lot longer than a president who can only be there for four years, as we just saw with President Trump, or eight years. But we need to send the people that are best for America, not the people that are best for Trump. And I don't think you have to look any farther than what happened with Obamacare,

and it was voted down, you know, in Trump's first two years. That's the kind of thing we have to we have to elect America first candidates. You know, I don't talk to him about his endorsements or anything, so I don't know the story. But there have been a lot of disappointments and, you know, I think it's incumbent upon the people to do the research and know who these candidates are, not just because somebody else is saying they support them. We got we got some breaking news. AOC won. Unsurprising. And currently, Jamal Jamal Bowman is tracking to win. However, we're looking at only four percent of the votes. That being said, AOC, it has been projected by AP Politics. They're saying that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wins the Democratic nomination for her district, the 14th.

The race was called at 9.05 p.m. And the current data we have on AOC's district is 20 percent of the votes are in. So the margin she's accomplished, I suppose, thus far, is indicative of she is not going to be losing. And this is AP data. So then with Rep Bowman, it's looking pretty good for him right now with AP estimating he's got 79% in the Bronx. He's got 61% in Westchester County,

though that's only 381 votes. All these people on X that are like, Bowman's out, Bowman's out. He's probably going to win. He's, yeah, so, you know. Crazy town. Yeah. Crazy, crazy town so, you know. Crazy town. Yeah. Crazy, crazy town.

That it is. New York doesn't believe that he did anything wrong. Apparently you can pull a fire alarm and lie about it. They like that. And they'll reelect you. But he did something right for them. They saw a guy who was willing to commit a crime on their behalf to steal power. Right.

And they're like, that's the game today. Look what New York is. Look what they're doing to Trump. Yeah. Come on. I just wish they would wake up and realize that like he's willing to lie to everyone else. So he's willing to lie to you, too. Right. Right. There's nothing there to say that he is doing it for their benefit. He's doing for his benefit. Right. Benefits him to stay in power and it benefits him to lie to you if necessary. I think that's one of the challenges. And it happens on the right, too, right? It's not like there are just only liars on one side of the aisle. But I think ultimately, you are totally right that these congressional positions, you know, who's in the

House of Representatives and who's in the Senate makes a huge difference long term. It's in fact more of an investment in the future than the president. Not that the presidency isn't important. I was going to ask you if there are, you know, obviously a lot of people talk about Montana as a Senate race. West Virginia has has, you know there. And I do think we'll take back the Senate. But you guys, I mean, I'm just a realist and I'm going to be honest. You know, it wasn't just an election stolen from President Trump in 2020. There were other races that were stolen, too. I mean, Georgia lost two Senate seats that cycle with we have now we now have two Democrat senators. And Georgia is not I don't care what anybody says. We're not a purple state and we're not a blue state. We are a red state. And the fact that we have two Democrat senators is not acceptable. And then when when Herschel ran in 22, that seat was lost. So we've

lost three Senate seats in Georgia in the past four years. And so these seats are so important. I know President Trump gets people out. He's engaging. He's exciting. And yes, we need these people engaged. But if you don't vote in these Senate and congressional races, I think that's what happened in 2018. You know, Trump turned out so many new people in 16, people that have never been involved. They voted and they thought, oh, we've got President Trump in there. He's going to do gangbusters. And they didn't turn out and vote in 2018. And what happened?

We lost the House. And so that's one of the things that I'm focused on is educating people on how important these Senate and congressional races are, because they really if if we elect President Trump again and we don't hold the House in this will already the houses with Jamie Raskin. He's already written the legislation to not seek Trump. They channeled that at the Supreme Court hearing several months ago at the end of the case over the Colorado trial. When the last justice, the liberal justice, asked their side, what happens if we don't deal with this now. And their counsel said, well, then in January after the election, we'll be back here. And, you know, he channeled everything that they were going to do. And what's Benny Thompson has written legislation to remove a secret service protection.

If he's convicted, point is, we have to take back the House and or we have to keep the House and build our majority there and at the same time take back the Senate. I think it's more important than ever because Trump will not be seated if we don't. Yeah. What made you move like you know you started off sort of with the Tea Party movement. How did you get more to the America First movement? Was it a natural transition? Yeah I mean so the Tea Party movement was what laid the groundwork for President Trump and the MAGA movement. And I don't think that if we had the Tea Party movement, I think it would have been a completely different situation. But we laid the groundwork. People ask me all the time, well, what happened to the Tea Party movement? We're still

here. We just morphed into something bigger and better, the MAGA movement, and totally focused on America first. And who can be against America first? Like, that's the question that needs to be asked, right? Because how can you be against America first? So it was just a natural progression. And in 2013, President Trump actually reached out to me. You know how he does, how he writes letters and pulls things out of magazines and whatnot. His admin reached out to me and said, President Trump has something he wants to send you. And it was an article out of Newsmax magazine that talked about taking on the establishment, the GOP. And he wrote, great job, keep up the good work, Donald J. Trump. And so that was in 2013 before he ever ran. And he was paying attention to what we were doing. And so people don't know that. But, you know, it that inspires me because he has been he's been paying attention for a long time. I truly believe it is America first because he wants what's best for, you know, his family too. And as I've traveled across the country talking to men and women about why they support President Trump, the number one reason that I hear is because

he fights for me like he would fight for his own family and he doesn't tuck tail and run. And the second thing is promises made, promises kept. For so long, we've had Republicans, you know, that are afraid of their own shadow and will cave to anything. And he doesn't do it. He fights back. He goes on offense. And that's what the American people want to see. Big news. Bowman's now losing. George Latimer's now got 60% of the

vote in the primary. Bowman may be booted. I don't think he's going to be able to turn around Westchester County. How much is reporting right now? 25. That's what that's going to be. A lot of money in Westchester. So where's AOC tonight? That's the question. She skipped his

party. Yes, she did, didn't she? Yep. Yeah. So it was reported that Bowman invited her to his watch party, I guess. She bounced. I don't know much about it. Yeah, her schedule was still in the works, I think is what they said. Weird. Yeah. Well, you know, if he's going to lose, it's not really all that great for her to be there, you know, especially if she's won.

It wouldn't surprise me that he loses Westchester. He's, I mean, again, he is against the, the consolidation of wealth and the consolidation of wealth is in Westchester. And he really does not like Israel. Well, oh yeah. And there's probably a lot of Jewish people in there too. Yeah. I imagine.

Yeah. So, I mean, it was, it was funny on Fox this morning. They had a lot of Jewish people in there, too. Yeah, I imagine. Yeah. So, I mean, it was it was funny on Fox this morning. They had a Jewish guy who's a Democrat asking about these protests, these riots at the synagogue where a bunch of Jewish people got attacked. And in L.A. this past week. Yeah. Yeah. And he's like, Biden's not going to arrest any of these people. This is a hate crime. I don't understand. And like who you're voting for. And he's like, well, you for and it's like well you know biden's let us down so uh decision desk hq is projecting that uh lauren bobert wins her republican primary for u.s house in colorado's fourth congressional district i'm not surprised

by that districts i thought she was vulnerable yeah she switched she was vulnerable and uh wow she won it very handedly too yeah right but this is the republican primary i mean she's a superstar in the republican party yeah whether she wins the general that'll be the that you know we'll see that and that's why i think this the result of the color primary so interesting like who is the democrat that's going to be her counterpart going forward right what what near is it is it a moderate democrat from this area who's saying like i have these values but i'm also sympathetic to these causes or is it going going to be Lauren Boebert versus a far left, you know, a far left selection from the Democratic Party? It seems it seems we have to know what Colorado is becoming.

Well, that's a seat that was held by Ken Buck. And so, you know, Ken Buck was Tea Party. Right. But he vacated early yes yes so um i i hope she can hold on to it but we'll see yeah and then what's what are they saying for her district that she left she was in colorado she's colorado five right and now she's in four yeah it could be was she five i think she's in 4 now and she was in 5 before. She moved because she almost lost by a couple hundred votes. A couple hundred. It was very, very narrow. Yes, it was very close.

Which means that probably Colorado 5 is going to shift to be more. I mean, it's just interesting because, again, people think of Colorado as, I mean, historically it was a red state, but it is it is changing. And so, you know, front and center in your face and what she believes and and whatnot. And maybe getting somebody else in there that's not so polarizing. They can hold it as a Republican. That's interesting. Yeah. I don't know. We'll see.

I'm still waiting on these results. We'll see what comes in. But it's looking like Bowman's going to lose. That'll be hilarious. Wow. But we'll just have to wait and see, I guess. What do you think he'll blame his loss on? Do you think it's going to be the environment?

Oh, Israel. I was going to say racism, extremists. I'm actually surprised he's losing, to be completely honest. I'm not convinced he will lose. We don't know. We're still, look, Bronx County, it's a very small geographic area with a lot of voters. And we've only got about 5,000 of the votes in we'll see how many actually end up turning out

in Bronx County because this might be it I mean what do we expect 50,000 people maybe 30,000 people I have no idea what kind of turn it to what was it like in Texas there was like 60,000 in that one district

so we'll see we'll see man this is I don't know AOC000 in that one district. So we'll see. We'll see. Man, this is, I don't know. AOC has won. That one's kind of obvious. Look at this. She just handily won. Yeah.

40% of the votes are in, and she's just dominating. And, you know, the thing is, I think Mike Cernovich had a good tweet about this. He's like, all these goobers who keep saying voting doesn't work, and they comment and things like y'all are still voting. And they don't vote in primary primaries. Yeah, it's infuriating when people say things like, oh, we can't fix this when they've literally done nothing but but complained about it on the Internet. That's the most important vote you can cast an election cycle is the primary. Absolutely. I like not only the primary, but also like they don't vote in their their midterms. So they don't vote for who's affecting their lives the most, which are the people that are closest to them. If you're not voting in your state elections and you're not voting for your local elections, if you're just letting those go by without voting, then you don't actually put any effort into affecting the outcome that has the most proximity or the closest proximity to you.

And that's the stuff that matters in your day-to-day life, right? Your life is, I think Jordan Peterson said something like, your life is what it's like when you come home because you do it every day all the time. It's not like the one time you went on vacation to this great spot or whatever. It's the things you do daily. And the things that you do daily are most affected by the people that are in your local government. So your local government, then your state government. People vote for the president thinking that, oh, if I vote for the president, there's going to be this king that's going to come in and he's just going to pass all these laws.

They're going to make me able to fly and fill my bank account with money. And that's idiocy. That is absolute idiocy. And that's not how anything works. It's kind of crazy how the whole system works and like what it's a club it's rigged blah blah blah we're not in it just if you didn't know oh for sure but what did bowman do to get the boot you know what i mean he pissed off the low c he pissed off the mainstream democrats about israel yeah. With the whole Gaza thing.

I mean, he's considered part of the squad. His rally footage in the Bronx, like he went off on Israel and AIPAC and that whole narrative. And I think there's a problem with that. Yeah. I think they... No, criticize Israel all you want.

Criticize AIPAC. Please do so. The issue is regular people in the Bronx don't care. Right. And so he hitched his wagon to that narrative. And it turns out most of them are just like, I don't care whatever that is you're talking about. I'm willing to be willing to bet a lot of people actually do support Israel,

but I don't think that's the key issue for them. No. The average, I really think the average American is like, well, yeah, Israel's a democracy. So there are allies and we support them. And that's the extent of what they put the thought into it. Like they don't think anything beyond that. They don't think, oh, Israel's doing these things. And that means they're dragging us into wars. They don't think the amount of money that we spend on Israel is so expensive because they look at the actual national debt and they look at the money that we spend on overall, just the military spending overall. They look at what we spend every year on just servicing the debt.

I mean, the debt is the most important topic that we have to worry about right now. And it's ridiculous that we don't. At a time when we should be supporting pro-family policies and taking the government positions to support families, we continuously fail to support the important things, families, men, boys, like all these things that are destroying our society, we're not doing a thing about, and we get, we get entirely wrapped up in things that totally don't matter to the average person, like whether or not Israel's fighting in Gaza. It doesn't affect America, it doesn't affect Americans on their day,'t affect Americans in their daily lives either.

Mike Cernovich had a great thread about how young men in this country don't long for adventure anymore. And there were a ton of people responding, saying things like, there's nowhere to go, there's nothing to do. There was this post where someone's like, born too late to explore the world and too early to explore the stars. Oh, my life is, oh, I just don't have. And he's like, where's the sense of adventure?

And that's kind of crazy because that idea... It's right here for these young people. Oh, that's the opposite though. That's the matrix. That's sinking into the pit, into the void. I've never understood this idea where people are like born... I was born too late to explore the earth and

too soon to explore the stars. What are we talking about? There's whole regions of the Amazon forest that have been unexplored. We've used satellites to see the surface, like the top of it. And there's like evidence based on growth that there could be ancient cities lost there and people have not gone deep into the Amazon rainforest. So what? Well, even simpler than that, like name the last mountain that you hiked up, right? They'll say these things like, oh, there's nothing left to explore.

It's like, have you left your house and done any kind of even minimal exploring? Have you seen the world with your own eyes? You could still go out even if there are civilizations there and witness what's going on. But instead it's like, well, it's too late for me. So I might as well just stay home and look at my phone. They've given up. They're too busy exploring their own navels. I will say I'm a former flight attendant and I've traveled the world.

And I do think a lot of these people that are not America first, they have never seen what the squalor is like in Rio de Janeiro or in Caracas or, you know, all over. And you don't realize how precious, you know, the most, the best gift my parents ever gave me was my United States citizenship, my passport. And you, but you don't realize that if it's all you know and you've never been elsewhere. And people do need to have an adventure and go see other parts of the world. You don't have to go on extravagant vacations. But I think that people would understand why we're fighting so hard for America. And then I will say this, too. I've been to all 50 states, but I mean, I never, being a flight attendant, I traveled everywhere. And then I got on the buses, the Tea Party Express bus in the March for Trump. And this country is so vast and beautiful and so different in all four corners.

And then when COVID hit and people started exploring our national parks and taking road trips and camping and stuff, I mean, we need to do more of that. It's not only, I mean, it's just refreshing and good for the soul, right? It's grounding. And, but I think too many people like to sit at home and live their life by what's going on on social media. And I don't know. And especially, I mean, for a long time, the popular narrative from social media and from, you know, Hollywood was, oh, America's a bad place. Like Americans are all, you know, whatever. And there are obviously all kinds of issues in America. I'm happy to acknowledge that. But I would still

rather hear, like you said, like, I am grateful to have been born in America because it is actually something worth preserving. And it has given me so much. I think so many people take it for granted because they're like, oh, but, you know, whatever a celebrity said, they would leave for Canada if this person got elected. I'm going to say this. Listen, America, if only for the stabilizing force of the United States, making sure that the U.S. Navy makes sure that the seas are open for international commerce, that alone makes America a net good, right? Because without the open seas, without the seas that are continuously the, the fair, the ability for other countries to travel in the seas is, is made safe by mostly by the U S Navy. And without that, all the countries that rely on markets and rely on international trade and stuff, all of those countries would not be able to safely move their products to market. There would be whoever has the biggest Navy would be in charge, and it might not be someone that is actually a reasonable partner like the United States.

So people can hate on the U.S., they can say all they want, but the U.S. has been making the seas safe for international commerce since the United States was created. The Marine Corps exists to prevent pirates from the shore, no, to the shores of Tripoli. So if you think that the U.S. hasn't been doing it since day one, you're totally wrong. So get over that fact. The U.S. is a net good if only for that alone. It's a nail biter.

Bowman just climbed right back up and it's neck and neck right now. There's about a six point swing between the candidates, a little bit more than six, six and a half. Bowman's down by 2,000 votes, but jumped up substantially when more votes came in from the Bronx. So this will be fun. He's going to lose. He just jumped way up. Latimer got a boost when the initial votes from Westchester came in. But Bowman was ahead initially.

And now Bowman's catching up. I'm wondering if once the Bronx comes in, it's going to just outweigh. I mean, look, in Westchester, Bowman's got 5,000 to Latimer's 12,000. That's just a little bit more than two to one. 24% reporting. Yeah, and he's got 84% in,

with 59% reporting in the Bronx. So that might be, I mean, so let's just do rudimentary math. If these numbers hold, they haven't called it for it yet, but with 59% of the votes in Bowman can expect to get another, what, like two to 3000 votes in, uh, in the Bronx, Latimer will get another 3000. So it's going to be, if this holds, Westchester just got a big bump for Bowman. Bowman might actually win based on Westchester

because he gained a lot more votes than Latimer did. But I don't know. It's hard to tell based on how it's trending. I'm glad it's exciting, you know? I feel like it's good to see it be interesting as opposed to just like this guy who pulled the fire alarm and who's taking all these extreme positions is just going to roll back into office.

Will Democrats reject the far left? He is the guy that pulled the... Yeah. He's also the guy... Didn't he get into a screaming match with Thomas Massey over guns? Yes, in like the hall, right? Yeah, yeah.

Like, he's wackadoodle. Yep. He's wackadoodle. But. He's wackadoodle. But I will be shocked if he loses because there's never any accountability for what they do. They can do anything and get away with it. And if he does lose, I think it will be because, you know, the mainstream Democrats have had it with these rowdy squad members. And the thing with Israel was just too far. It is interesting. I mean, because again, primaries are referendums from party members, you know, party voters on their own elected officials. It's not like the Republicans are storming into New York and saying, we're going to vote Jamal

for whoever, like they're voting amongst themselves. And again, that's why I think the primaries right now are really fascinating, because especially in states that are considered more purple or are changing, who are the Democrats who are succeeding or who are they? Who are they selecting in in an election year where the possibility is Donald Trump regains the presidency? It's just fascinating to me. I think they're fun. It's you know, I've been on the winning side and the losing side. It always sucks to lose. But at the end of the day, we just need to turn people out. We have to too big to rig, right? I mean, that's what we have to focus on getting people to vote in the primaries

and then election day comes. And I don't know, I'm one of those people that think we should go back to one day voting it should be a national holiday everybody shows up all this you know voting early for 40 days Pennsylvania starts early voting like in 70 days or something it's unreal yeah it seems wild to me uh I I think same day voting on a national holiday makes a lot of sense yeah um I I think so we had Mike Lindell on a little while ago a lot of sense. Yeah. I think so. We had Mike Lindell on a little while ago and I'm pretty sure he's going to set this. You know, some states will mass issue absentee ballots or mail in ballots. They'll say, you know, no matter what, you get it.

I think Delaware is like this. And he was like, don't do that. He also believes that you should test. He's like, take your mail in ballot to the point with you. So if they tell you you didn't vote, you can hold up and say, I don't know what you're talking about. Or that you've already voted. Decision Desk is calling it for Latimer,

saying Bowman is lost. Wow. Right. I guess the lesson is don't pull the fire alarm. Wow. So don't be a commie. I just want to, I want the exit poll interviews

from the people who voted in this. Like, what was it that made you turn against Jamal Bowman? I imagine, honestly, I think that it's a backlash because of October 7th. I really think that's the main driver. And I'm perfectly fine with it. I don't care what it is. Just get rid of the comment.

One, it's conservatives who were like, hey, that whole fire alarm thing. Maybe some people. Yeah, I don't think it's really the fire alarm thing. I think it's the October 7th thing. Yeah, and that's something that is a silver lining about a terrible, terrible event is that there are a lot of Jewish people that historically have voted for the most awful Democrats because they're progressives. And they are not going to do it anymore, I hope. I pray to God that I don't really believe in that they will stop voting for Democrats. You know how latimer has

been messaging on this i have no idea but if he's if he's just a blue dog democrat which i wish there were more of there aren't a whole lot of them anymore the progressives have really taken over in the democrat party and that is a massive problem because the progressives are just communists so they're gonna say eventually you can't have your house because you might have a garden and sell a tomato to someone and property's theft. So they got to throw you in the gulag. You better not drink that raw milk either.

You know, it's insane. All right, everybody, we're going to go to Super Chat. So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button? One like equals one hashtag free Trump. He's innocent. They have framed him. And head over to TimC hashtag free Trump. He's innocent. They have framed him and head over to Tim cast dot com. Click. Join us. Become a member for that members only uncensored show, which will be coming up in about a half an hour. We're talking about Mr. Beast. And there's

an individual who works for Mr. Beast, who's a longtime contributor who became transgender. And there's a big debate. Matt Walsh is tweeting about it and we're going to talk about a lot of people are accusing this individual of abandoning his family, their family, whichever. And we'll talk about that in the Members Only Call-In Show and then we'll take your calls

as members. But for now, we will read your Super Chats. Clint Torres, the first Super Chat says, Howdy people. Howdy Clint. Howdy Clint.

Kyle says for the debate, Trump should demand a digital clock be displayed in the background of the stage. This would ensure CNN can't delay the live feed. Good idea. Yeah. Yeah, we were saying that they could have a short delay.

It could be a few minutes, but that would allow them to manipulate the debate in real time without people knowing. Trump could say something and they could, you get a couple of minutes, they could go back and they could edit out a word. How about Trump delays for like an hour because he's in a traffic jam or something so we can see how Biden's medicine wears off? That's actually a really good idea. Trump should be late. Yeah. I feel like if he's late, they'll be like, he was too scared. He didn't show up.

It's all over. He shows up 15 minutes late and just Biden's like head down. I think they would just and I think Biden's team would be like, no, no, we're not going to extend time for Trump because he was late. And then they're going to say Trump couldn't get here on time, blah, blah, blah. All right. Barely a Millennial says the debate seems more like a confrontation. The debate, like old man boxing, you guys should do a debate game that involves pushups rather than shots. I'm in.

I'll make my kids do them too. That is a really good idea. We should do a debate game that involves push-ups rather than shots. I'm in. I'll make my kids do them too. That is a really good idea. We should do bingo cards. But if you're on your bingo card, it comes up. You've got to do what, like five push-ups? Ten push-ups? Ten push-ups would be a lot because you'll end up with like, you'd be doing a hundred push-ups in a few, you know, half an hour or something.

Maybe not. How many times do you expect? It just depends on what Biden does. Have you seen the debate? There's a debate card already out there. Have you seen it? A bingo card? Yeah. A bingo card. Yeah. Well, you need like 10 of them. Yeah. They all got to be different. You know, we should have them. I think they'd be. Yeah. A push up game. I like that. I like push ups. Push ups are good. All right. Chief BM says we need a red state AG to make up a crime and issue an arrest warrant for Judge Mershon's daughter before Trump is sentenced. That will send a message that anything short of probation will cost him. I don't think he'll need to make up a crime.

I believe that like the Democrats, you can just interpret the law as the saying goes, show me the man, I'll show you the crime. I'd be willing to bet that based on the work that she does, West Virginia could easily be like, well, there's a violation of our laws. It's just an issue of Republicans being spineless cowards who won't do anything. Bingo. The best we can get is civil cases. And I'll take a civil case over nothing. But like Democrats are like, we will arrest you from Florida. Trump's in Florida and they're like, no, come back to New York. We're going to arrest you. Trump's like, OK, I can't believe he did that. That's ridiculous.

Anyway. All right. Jacob Parody says, hey, guys, I'm back. Just wanted to remind you all to support my niece's candle business on Public Square. Narbar's Candles. Shout out, Public Square. Ben Hickson says, Hannah Clare, Australia enjoys jailing whistleblowers. Look up David McBride and the army and the army lawyer and Richard Richard Boyle. Tim, would you come

to Oz to interview Julian? I'm sure Joel Jamal of Turning Point Australia could lend his studio. Probably not me, but, you know, we'd love to send someone down to interview Julian Assange. I just don't think we're a big priority for Julian Assange's first interview. And I don't really see a reason to fly all the way to Australia to interview him for the fifth time. You know, get a Zoom call with Julian or something. Did I see Tucker was going? That's the rumor I heard. Tucker's on his way. That's why I said it was really important to see the response from Albanese about about Julian Assange being released and returned back to Australia.

A lot of Australian elected officials have have taken a stance of he needs to be released. He needs to be returned here. You know, and I want to believe that's in his best interest with his freedom in mind. But again, we don't know until they say something. So that was that was, you know, that's why I think it's critically important. Like, this is an issue between the U.K. and the U.S., but actually, if he's being returned to Australia, Julian Assange's fate is largely in the hands of the Australian officials. I just hope the guy has security and protection. I got to give it to Michael Rapoport. He put out a tweet of him just screaming, laughing about Jamal Bowman. I'm going to find that and retweet it

yeah i retweeted it it's too good he's losing it rapaport's a funny guy he's legit funny he's got tds but he is funny i love that post where he's he's in it's in the winter in new york it's one of the best bits on on twitter have you seen his rapaport like very trump derangement syndrome and he's filming himself and he's like the thing about Donald Trump and then someone hits him with a snowball and goes shut up shut up we don't care shut up and it was just very self aware and very

funny so I respect it alright we'll grab some more super chats alright Ogun Maddox says too late for a howdy people but have you considered having matt and blonde on when will we be will we be blessed with a brimcast episode again i don't know when i'm dying yeah you guys have to realize i mean i love doing it i was grateful to be uh tapped to fill in but if i'm here

it means that tim is probably sick yeah yeah so don't wish Tim ill. But, you know, other than that, thank you for all the support. Hannah Clare is going to like put soap in my burrito. Well, you know, I mean, a little arsenic. No, it's eye drops. I'm just kidding. Dan Trey says Biden isn't misspeaking. He thinks he's Danny Zuko. We go together like Rama, Lama, Lama.

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ching, ching. Chingity, ching, Lama, ding-a-ding-a-ding-a-ching-chang ching-a-dee-chang-shabop. Okay, that's the way it should be, wah-oo, yeah. I don't know, that Danny Zuko stuff's actually pretty coherent, though. Stephen L. Miller just tweeted, for once, Jamal

Bowman can actually blame the Jews for something. The Jews did it to you, Jamal. Oh, that's a good one. That's really good. All right. Barrett 1313 says, can confirm my pillow slides are so comfortable. Yeah.

So I have those slippers from my pillow. Yo, those are based. They really are good. Because Mike said he put like that weird stuff in them that makes them like absorbent or something is really good. But shout out to MyPillow.

Also, don't forget to download the song I'm Gonna Be on iTunes. Song.link slash Rachel in your browser. Click the link

in the description below. It's a pro-life song. Rachel Holt's really amazing. They played a couple songs for us here on TimCast IRL. And shout out. It'd be great to see them see some support and maybe there'll be a pro-life song on billboard if y'all feel like buying that song to support their work let's do it I mean yeah they they they man the billboard is

just full of degeneracy yes and and this is why they keep changing they keep changing the rules to make sure anyone who's trying to reject that is not going to get on. And so, you know, we put out a song, I think it was in December, and they changed the rules and didn't count our sales. It was the biggest song we ever released. Something like we had nearly 40,000 sales, probably 40,000 by now. And they went, oh, by the way, we're not counting any of that. So you're not actually, we did end up charting on Billboard with the song,

but like lower than we did on other songs. And we were like, what happened? And they told us they had changed the rules after the song had already done its run.

They went, oh, by the way, like we were emailing the tracking agencies saying like, we just want to make sure everything's good. Like, yeah, you're great.

This is wonderful. Like you're doing really well. It's the best song you've ever done. We're like, awesome. And then once the week ended they went by the way none of that counted uh-huh convenient how that works yeah yep so they really don't want to see a parallel economy and people they don't want to see us winning the culture war

absolutely not let's go william heinz says if trump and staff are worried about cnn editing the debate they should have a mic on Trump just recording the whole debate and then release the raw after the debate. That's a good idea. Not a hard thing to do. Not at all. Have their own version of it. I hope that Trump gets it worked out where he could just like put his phone in front of them and live stream himself during the debate the whole time. And we just get Trump's perspective. that would be good. I always used to want him to comment on, you know, during the Republican presidential debates that he opted not to take part in. I always kind of wanted him to do his own live stream commentary,

being like, that's a good point. No, completely wrong. You know, stuff like that. Because he's just funny. He is funny. And he stands up there and he does it just all off the top of his head. He really is amazing. And he is an entertainer.

This is a really good point. Cameron Keir says that the debate Trump should bring up Robert Herr's report where he said Biden couldn't be charged due to his dementia. If Joe Biden brings up Trump as a convicted felon, Trump can respond with, yeah, but to be fair, the only reason they're not charging Joe Biden is because Robert Herr said he's a forgetful, doddering old man who's suffering and can't be charged because no one wants to put someone as weak and feeble as him in prison.

He's not competent to stand trial. There's a that's more succinct. That is the perfect way to articulate it. And if Biden or I mean, if Trump just says that, look, he's he would be a felon, too, but he's not competent to stand trial. And that's according to the DOJ. Exactly. So it's obvious and clear that he is not competent to be the commander in chief of the most powerful military on earth.

This is ridiculous that we're even entertaining this. The man is not capable of doing the job that he needs to do. Can you imagine what happens if there was an alert that there were missiles launched from Russia or whatever? They have to get him out of there in like six minutes or whatever and he has to decide whether or not

to retaliate while they're rushing him out of the room? He would be so damn confused. He would not be able to do the job. But that's where you're wrong because he would be so damn confused. He would not be able to do the job. But that's where you're wrong because he's not making the decisions. If somebody else is making, yes. I agree. I do think that he's not actually running things and it is a committee,

but that is entirely outside of what is constitutional. And the narrative for so long was, well, Trump can't be in charge of the New York Colts or whatever, because he'll just get angry and fly off the handle and do all kinds of stuff. But you have the DOJ saying, actually, he's an old man who forgets things and you think this is the person we should trust with all of our national security. It's really a simple question.

If the man is not competent to stand trial, how can he be competent to be the president of the United States? It's very simple. Can I just ask, do you think that he's going to be on the ticket come November? For a while i thought no but now i don't see how they get him off it's they're they've they're out of time i agree i think he'll be on the ticket i want him to be on the ticket like i don't want him to just completely fall apart here because if he does i'm afraid they

will figure something out to get him off the ticket. So I want him to be able to, you know, be. You're hoping he gets his rest. I don't think three months is enough time to make it, to put someone else there, especially because they would have to do something about Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris is the option. If Joe Biden gets taken out, Kamala Harris is the one that takes his place. If I was Jamal Bowman, I'd resign right now.

I mean, he should have resigned after he got busted pulling the alarm and lied about it. But like, you know, if I was if I was in Congress and then in my primary, which is five months from the election, which is seven months from the from the next Congress, I just resign now. I'd go out and be like, there's the mandate. I'm done. You know, you guys figure it out from here. Good luck. If I'm not going to like if you don't want me here, I ain't going to be here. I'm going to stick around.

There's no point, you know, Jamal Bowman waiting around till January when the people have clearly said not get out. You know what I mean? So just OK, I'm out. See you later. I think he won't want to leave the spotlight and power. I get what you're saying maybe that would make sense on the other hand i think it's going to be like a what other wild and crazy

things can i do during my lame lame duck period yeah all right let's go what do we have what do we have dan tracy says by the way tim you built your new hq around the corner from my house my co-worker did your inspection sweet followed for years Glad to have you here at the fanboy risk. Would love to come say hi to you and your crew. I don't know how we do that. You know, we can't just have people showing up, but maybe we'll see you around at one of the local spots, local restaurants. Because there's a couple of restaurants around here. And you know which ones I'm talking about.

There's a new one down by the border in Virginia. I'm not going to say it because then everyone's going to like bomb this restaurant. And like, I mean, restaurant I mean mob the restaurant Show up There were a couple times that I was on Culture War in the morning And then I went to Black Dog Coffee To get a coffee afterwards

And someone would be like I just watched the show Shout out to Black Dog Coffee You guys can always go check They have the freeze dried ice cream In the bags You ever have that? coffee. It's so good. You ever have that? Very good.

Freeze-dried ice cream. Where's that? Just up the road over here. Dippin' Dots. That's the freeze-dried ice cream they have in a vending machine. But the freeze-dried shelf stable is, it's like candy. It's like a marshmallow. Oh, okay, okay.

Yeah, it's like in a bag at room temperature, and you just bite it. Oh, wow. No, I haven't had that. Yeah, it's real good. Now I really want to, though. Yeah, and it's like in a bag at room temperature and you just bite it. Oh, wow. No, I haven't had that. Yeah, it's real good. Now I really want to, though. Yeah, and it's like squares. I was literally just texting with Mike Martin, our guitar player, today when we were talking about how great ice cream is and how we have to do a bunch of— We have to do extra cardio because we eat too much ice cream.

This is true. Here's a good one. Scooby Shoe says, When Tim said Obama killed a guy, it made me think of the scene from Anchorman where Ron Burgundy says, Brick killed a guy. Love the show. You guys are awesome. That was literally the reference.

Thank you for catching that one. You've earned the award. Yeah. Brick killed a guy. That's why I said it, because Obama killed a guy. Stabbed a man in the heart. Yeah, yeah. He had the grenade.

He had a grenade. Let's go. What have we here? A series of brackets, that's the name says come together with viveka by buzzfeed together we'll deconstruct the dominant narratives and rebuild a new world order of clickbait headlines the resistance starts now buzzfeed is the ticker buy hodl and tell your friends this is not financial advice. There's 42 thumbs up. Wow, I've been put into that. I don't think BuzzFeed is the next meme stock.

I do have stock in BuzzFeed. I bought it. And I bought it because when Vivek made these announcements, and I've not spoken to Vivek about it at all or anyone involved in any way. But when I saw the reporting, I was like, Vivek is a really smart guy. He's one of the smartest guys I've ever met.

If anyone could turn that company around, it's him. Saw the reporting on it, decided to buy a bunch of it. And personally, I don't see myself ever selling. I really just want to own BuzzFeed. It would be, I don't know, it'd feel really good. Just everything I've done in media and everything they've done, just to own BuzzFeed. It'd be great. Super sweet.

Yeah. I always thought this was a fascinating venture, right? I really hope that in like a year, the headline of BuzzFeed is MAGA. Oh my gosh. Or just like something. You're dreaming big, aren't you? Or something regular, right? Wouldn't that be interesting if you got something that was drifting so far left to come back

and be sort of center? That would be honestly fascinating to me. Let's go. Captain Titus says every time you print classified documents, they are supposed to have back and front sheets. So it makes sense that they would do this if they did not have cover sheets. The idea that the FBI brought cover sheets, covered up documents and then made it look like that's what Trump had.

Right. That's staging evidence. Yep. What do we got here? Kaya Rich says, hey, Phil, do you see all these unknown bands grifting on Twitter about the New England Metal and Hardcore Feast saying Slaughter to Prevail is a Nazi band? I haven't seen that. They're idiots. And Scott Lee is the guy that I believe he's putting on the New England Metal and Hardcore Fest. He has historically done it. He is the most wonderful human being that I have ever met.

And his name is synonymous with good times and positive things. He's not going to be bringing in someone that is actually that kind of that kind of perspective uh and also alex doesn't have that kind of perspective there's there's allegations because of the war in ukraine because alex is russian and so he's like look i know it's a you know a complex thing but he's a russian so you know he's going to be a little on russia's side and and whether or not you agree with him that doesn't make him a Nazi. But the left in America is completely insane and totally detached from reality. And so they just slander everybody

that doesn't ascribe to the politically correct opinions. I got to give a shout out to Ben Shapiro, who tweeted, New York 16 Democratic voters just showed Jamal Bowman the door, which is in fact necessary because the morally vacuous dullard doesn't understand how doors work. He's going to just take the sign and throw it on the ground.

I mean, he's fine. Oh, that was a good one. Maybe he'll pull the fire alarm on the way out. Yeah, seriously. Are we going to the New England Metal Fest when we all go on tour with you? I don't think that, well, the tour's not going to be going to the New England Metal and Hardcore Fest, but if you want, I know Scott well, and I can get you tickets if you want to go.

Yeah, actually, TimCast IRL will be the opening act for Megadeth. I always heard that. We're going to sit up there, and we're going to have Ian talking about graphing for about 30 minutes before. Yeah, they're loading up all the amps and the drums and everything lined up. Because when I think TimCast IRL, I think Megadeth and Metal. And Mudvayne. To be fair. So it's other mains, then Mudvayne, then TimC cast iRL i think Megadeth and uh and Mudvayne but but but so so it's other mains then Mudvayne then tim cast IRL that makes it sorry Phil i mean

you know the time slot you don't want to change the time slot so right exactly um we will not in fact be opening for me i'll say uh okay let's read some more um rf daniel says listening at work making pipes for fire hydrants might have to leave early due to living in iowa and tornado warnings in my area. Whoa, stay safe, man. It's crazy. There's a lot of really rough, extreme weather right now with the flooding and the heat.

I mean, I think there are a lot of people who are potentially in very precarious situations. So I got to think about them. Eric K. says, what are the chances that Joe will test positive for pregnancy? Also, don't forget about Tyson Foods' betrayal of Americans. I actually think there's a decent chance Joe Biden will test positive for pregnancy.

It just means he has cancer. Oh, man. When dudes take pregnancy tests and it comes up positive, it usually is indicative of a hormone imbalance related to cancer. See, this is why I think the drug test thing is the issue. It's that there is something else going on. Otherwise, why not just take it? It doesn't matter. If you've got nothing to worry about. It proves what the world is seeing. Taking the blood test,

it will prove that he's incompetent, right? It'll prove the DOJ is right. Because I actually am generally opposed to people being compelled to take drug tests. I think that there's sort of a privacy issue there. But in this case, like if you think Trump is being so ridiculous to even ask, like you could shut him down easily, but you're opting not to. OMG Puppy says, Biden, blood transfusions from teenagers, NAD drip, vitamin drip, hyperbaric oxygen chamber, and who knows what just before the debate. Blood transfusions from teenagers. They're called blood boys. Gross.

Good Lord. Yeah, I watched that mini doc from Brian Johnson, the guy who wants to live forever. Right. Where he went and got the gene therapy, the folistatin thing to make him younger whatever and it increases like muscle mass so like at a certain age your muscle mass starts deteriorating like you can do about it you get this injection it reverses that so yeah this folistatin gene mutation you'll see those dogs that are super ripped i think pit bulls have it and there's like cows that have it, make them extra meaty. And he went and got it. And then in it, he mentions, I'm pretty

sure he mentions having a blood boy, which is where you get a blood transfusion from a younger person. I think it's his son. There is some billionaire who's like, I'm getting whatever from my son, and then I'm also giving mine to my dad. Isn't that like, kill your son? Isn't that super weird? It's all super weird and creepy, and like steroids

are a thing, homie. If you want to get muscle mass you can just get onto a stack. Call Phil. Find a doctor. He'll get you set up. Yeah, but there's a side effects. I mean, I can't imagine. The side effects are you're like a vampire if you have a blood boy. You're like disgusting and weird and creepy.

But steroids, the blood boy is about healing organs uh the the um folistatin treatment is about reversing muscle deterioration as you age and apparently it works it turns off fat production main and and it's it only works for a limited time it's crazy stuff i mean look i'm i'm not one of those people that's like extremely uh apprehensive about the idea of gene therapies and stuff like that. And I'm not particularly averse to, you know, a lot of the transhuman stuff. Like if you want to get a computer chip in your head, fine.

You want to get bionic arms, fine. I don't care. So be my guest. But it is creepy to be taking transfusions from your kid. Oh, yeah. Yeah, but we're living in a world where men are cutting off their tallywhackers and saying they're girls. I mean, and they're trying to normalize it to us.

So nothing surprises me, right? I mean, everything's on the table. Nothing is sacred. Nothing. Yeah. And this is the multicultural world where some people, like, you're supposed to tolerate all of the degeneracy and it leads to negative outcomes. Well, let's read some more super chats here.

We've got to get a couple in. All right. What do we have here? What do we have here? We have a good one. ChafedBM says, y'all are making this way too complicated. Hunter is going to make one call to the plug, fill the meth bong with Ashley's shower water, and bam.

Ladies and gentlemen, the first family of America. Joe's going to be like, I don't know if I'm up for this debate, man. And Hunter's going to be like, come on, Dad, you can do it. No, I just don't know. And then Hunter's going to be like, Dad, I got something that'll help. He gives him crack.

He gives him crack. And then Joe smokes it. But here's the thing. After Joe, he smokes it right before the debate. Then he does this amazing performance. Everyone, you know, people at home are standing, even ovations. They're crying. And then when Joe walks back, you know, back to meet Hunter, he goes, Hunter, I got to tell you, man, thanks for the crack.

It really helped me out. And then Hunter goes, Dad, that wasn't actually crack. That was a placebo. It was you the whole time. And they hug. I really honestly cannot believe that Biden's going to do it. I was honestly surprised, too. Yeah, I thought they were going to figure out a way to get him out of it.

And we're still not there. Thursday hasn't happened yet. Well, that's why I also wondered if they were like, well, we'll do a debate. And they didn't realize how quickly, like, the Trump would agree to any of the terms. Right. And I think ultimately that's why we see that there are only two when typically there are three. Like there is a level of Joe Biden was trying to be like, well, you know, if they get this one up at the end of June, I doubt they'll do the one in September. I think there is a serious possibility that Joe Biden campaign is like, well, because Trump was so disrespectful, you know, or whatever it is.

Go ahead. I'm sorry. James Darnell says, one, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Massey, Vivek, Tucker Carlson, Byron Donalds, Ben Carson, damn near the definitive list, America first, cut foreign aid by 80% and close the borders, kick out invaders. I got a question for everybody.

What is the downside to Donald Trump choosing Rand Paul as his VP? I mean, I can't find one, but I'm biased because I'm got a question for everybody. What is the downside to Donald Trump choosing Rand Paul as his VP? I mean, I can't find one, but I'm biased because I'm such a Rand Paul fan. I mean, I love Rand. I just think it would mean he's not in the Senate. Almost every libertarian I've talked to, except for the weird ones, but like the majority, they said if Trump said Rand Paul VP, he won the libertarian party over. That's it.

They vote for him. 100%. I'm still curious about who he's going to put in his cabinet, right? Yeah. Like which libertarian? I know when we had Angela McCardell and I kind of asked her, what are you guys talking about? And she talked about Department of Education.

But, you know, there are really interesting libertarians in America who could have a big influence on the Trump campaign. Honestly, I think if he does put a libertarian, I think it's likely that it would be someone like Justin Amash who became. What's that? It's just Ben Shapiro's post. He said he retweeted one guy, Briscoe of in a show of solidarity with with Hamas. Jamal Bowman gets destroyed in local primary election.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. For obvious reasons, Ben Shapiro is very excited about Bowman's loss. You know, more power to him. I mean, Bowman's a bad dude, like a bad representative anyways. He's a communist. He doesn't believe in American values. Isn't he like a 9-11 truther?

I think so. He's probably one of those Jews did it guys about 9-11 and stuff. I mean, he had like some blog in the past or something. He just drinks all of the leftist Kool-Aid. He's as bad as it gets. And he was a school principal, right? Of course he was. Isn't that fascinating? This was the educator from

New York? He's a clown. He is like a clown, really. You can't take the guy seriously. Alright. Trey Hilton says, I know you don't want to read this aloud, obviously. That's always the bait. Let's hear it. Do that because they want me to read it. But stop spending time on the headlines you are fed for real. You think you're pissed off, Tim. Just wait till you have kids and like this, is that everyone thinks the world is only as they see it. And that tweet is a really good example of it. And then you get a lot of, we get inundated with people who will chat and be like, the world is the way I see it, not the way you see it. And you shouldn't talk about this. You talk about the thing that I want.

A really good example is we opened last night's show with Assange has been freed. Then later in the show, we did a segment, Assange has been freed. And then later in the show, there was one dude angrily, all caps chatting. Why aren't you talking about Julian Assange? These stories don't matter. It's like, perhaps if you had watched the show, you'd know that we did. Right. The reality is when we were launching the show yesterday, the first headline we put up was Julian Assange freed. And then after a little while, we changed it to CNN cuts the mic of the Trump's Caroline Leavitt, the press secretary. The reason for it. If we do a headline that is too esoteric, it will not catch the attention of the average person and they will ignore the story. If we want to actually make sure people know that Julian Assange was freed, we need to figure out what

story is. It's a blend of we don't want to go to lowest common denominator because then the show is going to be like Tom Cruise spotted walking out of airport. Now, we don't want to do that. We want to be in the realm of politics, which means it's going to be a bit esoteric. But for those who generally understand politics, but it can't be super niche like Assange freed because people don't understand the nuances around this decade long affair. If we try and go with everyone, please, you need to understand why it's such big news that Assange was freed. Then you end up with people being like, I don't know what that is. I'm going to go watch the show about CNN. If we lead with something that is generally understandable by the average person, interesting to them, but not too often to the lowest common denominator, we opened the show with the biggest news is Julian Assange freed, but we're going to start by talking about CNN.

Why? The CNN story is about the bias in the media, which affects all of us, which we are upset about. It's about the debate coming up this Thursday, which has a direct impact on all of us right now. Julian Assange being freed, most people don't understand the importance of it. So you have to find that balance. But everybody thinks it has to be about their specific worldview. We are trying to find the balance between maximizing reach with interest, something interesting to the average person, and not going too far into lowest common denominator, which quite literally would be, you know, shock pop culture. Brad Pitt is debating or was it like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie or what do we have now? We have Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez. Yeah, divorce. Yeah, that's lowest common denominator.

That'll get you way more views. It'll be a bigger show. I'm not interested in that. So we're trying to steer as far from that as possible without like titling the episode the inner workings of tax policy and Lichtenstein, which no one cares about. You know what I mean? So it is it is a challenge. You don't want to be irrelevant. Casey Neistat made a really great point a long time ago when people were criticizing him for what they said were clickbait titles and thumbnails. And he was like, sure, but it's your choice. Do you want to get views or not get any views? There's a balance. You don't want to make garbage content, but if you make good content, you've got to market it properly. And that's how you market it. And people are just complaining about it. So that's the harsh reality, my friends, trying to find that balance

of good and bad. Okay, we're going to go to the members only call-in show. So smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends. Go to TimCast.com. Click join us. Become a member. We're going to be talking about Mr. Beast, his transgender colleague, and the debate around whether this individual abandoned his family by becoming a transgender woman. So we'll talk about that. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Amy, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, you can find out more about Women for America first at WFAF.org. And I'm on Twitter and all the socials at Amy Kramer. Kramer spelled K-R-E-M-E-R. I am Phil that Remains on Twix. I'm Phil that Remains Official on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. You can catch us on the Destroy All Enemies Tour this summer with Megadeth and with Mudvayne.

We start on August 6th. It goes until the end of September. You can check out our new video for Let You Go. It's available on Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, Amazon Music, Deezer, you know, the internet. Don't forget, the left lane is for crime. Phil, you left us off the lift. We're all going on tours together, I thought. Tim said you weren't.

I thought we were. We'll talk about it after the show. Look, we've got to coordinate our schedules. We're all going on tours together, I thought. Tim said you weren't. I thought we weren't. We'll talk about it after the show. We've got to coordinate our schedules. It's been so wonderful having

you here, Amy. I'm glad you could join us. Thank you for having me. Thank you. I've enjoyed it. Good.

I'm glad. I'm Hannah Clair Brimlow. I'm a writer for SCNR.com. That's Scanner News. You can follow

their work at TimCastNews on Twitter and Instagram. If you want to follow me personally, I'm on Instagram

at hannaclair.b and I'm on Twitter at hannaclairb. Guys, thank you for everything you do. Bye, Serge. See ya. We'll see you all over at timcast.com in about one minute. Thanks for hanging out.