Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #1069 Biden CANCELS Speech, Tests Positive For COVID Warns HE MAY RESIGN w/Riley Gaines

Episode Date: July 18, 2024

Tim, Hannah Claire, & Luke are joined by Riley Gaines, Viva Frei, & Barnes to discuss Joe Biden cancelling speech after being diagnosed with Covid, the Trump Campaign trolling Democrats, a company shorting Truth Social stock the day before Trump was shot, and reports that the Trump shooter was identified by authorities 10 minutes before the shooting. Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere)  Hannah Claire @hannahclaireb (everywhere) Luke @WeAreChange (everywhere) Guests: Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_ (X) Viva Frei @ (X) Barnes @Barnes_Law (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joe Biden has COVID, apparently. He canceled a speech, announced that he has COVID, and, well, just a little bit ago, he said that if his doctors told him to resign because he had a condition, he would resign. So Donald Trump and his campaign, J.D. Vance, they said they can't commit to a debate with Vice President Kamala Harris because,

or I'm sorry, they didn't say that. They said they can't commit to a debate because they don't know who the Vice President's going to be. And it would be unfair to the list of other Democrats who may be the VP pick, basically saying Joe Biden is out. And it gets crazier. Well, we've got Chuck Schumer and Adam Schiff now calling for Joe Biden to resign. So it's seeming increasingly likely that this will be it. Perhaps COVID is the reason he will resign, a medical condition. But new information has, of course, new information has come out on the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

We're now learning that 10 minutes before Donald Trump went out onto the stage, the Secret Service had already identified the assassin as a threat. We're learning that the assassin was identified three hours before Trump took that stage. That they knew he had a range finder, which was odd. This is not adding up, unfortunately. And in the briefing with members of the Senate, they answered only four questions before storming out. Which several senators are saying is odd. Usually they'll try and answer all of your questions. And, you know, look. It may be hard to say. which several senators are saying is odd. Usually they'll try and answer all of your questions.

And, you know, look, it may be hard to say, but I think it's looking more and more like there was some kind of official capacity to this. Local police are denying reports that they were instructed to secure that building. They're saying that's not us. We were told to do traffic control. And why would Secret Service hand off security of a sniper vantage point to a local police department? And they're denying it. None of this story is adding up.

And the fact that they won't give answers, things are getting really, really weird. So we're going to talk about all that. But my friends, before we do, head over to TimCast.com. Click join us. Become a member. We're going to have that members only call-in show coming up for you at 10 p.m. Eastern. You don't want to miss it. As a member, you're helping make this show possible. We can't do it without you. We're here on the ground at the RNC. Everybody's having a good time meeting and schmoozing with all of these great Republicans. And of course, tomorrow is going to be a live audience show with a bunch of awesome people. I think there may be a

couple tickets left if you want to go to the website and click that banner for the RNC Live in Milwaukee if you want to grab those tickets. But don't forget to also smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show right now because we have been doing pretty well. Views have been up because of the news but we are getting inundated with messages from people saying the show isn't appearing on YouTube, it's not appearing on their channels, it's hard to find. You can't search for it. I can only suspect that we are doing well in spite of the efforts to suppress this kind of information. Considering the way the corporate press is handling the story on Donald Trump's assassination and the official narrative of some lone nut job who got lucky.

Yeah, we're not going to play those games with you guys. So share the show with your friends. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more, we've got Riley Gaines. Hello. Thrilled to be here. Who are you? What do you do? I am a woman. That's what I am. But I was a collegiate swimmer, swam in college, did some pretty incredible things in my career, but my senior year we were forced to compete against a less than mediocre man in his rightful category he was ranking 500th plus in the nation switched to the women's team naturally won

a national title he and i raced we tied which is relatively embarrassing for a six foot four man he couldn't even beat me um went the exact same time but the ncaa said the trophy goes to him and when i asked the dreaded question of why they said it was necessary when photos were being taken. So we do have another story in that regard. Elon Musk is officially announcing his exit from California over this new gender bill that they've passed. So we'll definitely talk about that. So thanks for hanging out. Barnes, he is here.

Yes, always good to be here. It's been a fascinating time period, and it only continues to get more fascinating. And he is, well, who are you? What do you do? Oh, sure. VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com. Viva and I do a little law for the people show and have been covering a lot of the political news and legal news that continues to develop on that front. And so you are the other half of the Viva and Barnes show. Yes, Viva and Barnes. Barnes is my partner-in-law, as I say.

Which camera? This one. Viva Frye, everybody, I guess you know me by now. David Frye, former Montreal litigator. Current Florida Rumbler. I am no longer a lawyer

because I relinquished my Quebec license because the only thing that was serving a use for was people filing anonymous complaints because they didn't like my tweets from Florida.

So no longer practicing, but I had 13 years of experience. And Robert Barnes and I have our Sunday show. It's fantastic. Right on. We got Luke Rudkowski. Hey, guys. Luke Rudkowski here of YouTube.com forward slash We Are Change. I had to censor my shirt here a little bit that all the chicks are digging at the RNC.

I'm also posting about that story and what I'm up to on Twitter, on at LukeWeAreChange. I have a lot of fun on there, so check me out, at LukeWeAreChange. And you're sure it's on your website? I bet people are going to log on to see what it says. It says blank, blank, $8,000, blank. It's like a very weird wheel of fortune. But, but, but, but, I don't shoot blanks. Mmm, allegedly.

I'll just leave it like that. Allegedly. I'm Hannah Claire Brimelow. I'm a writer for SCNR.com. I'm co-hosting the show tonight. I'm so glad you guys are with us. Let's get started. Here's the story from Daily Mail.

President Joe Biden tests positive for COVID. Okay, well, I don't really care all that much just on the surface. He canceled his speech. What I care about is the next story that we have from The Telegraph. Biden says he'd quit the race if doctors told him to. I guess he's updated saying, well, if the doctors say I have a condition, the speculation is now that this will be the reason Joe Biden drops out. Because to add on top of all of this, you've got Rep. Adam Schiff saying Joe Biden should leave the presidential race. And an update.

Senator Schumer told Biden in a meeting on Saturday, it would be better for the country if he ended his reelection bid. Perhaps this is how Joe Biden saves face and resigns, hands the torch to Kamala Harris. It is funny they brought back COVID, right? I feel like that's vintage at this point. I'm not even sure I believe he has it. I think they're just circling the wagons and said, you did so terribly speaking last night. We're not sure we can let you on stage today. If Dr. Fauci comes in and they put him on a ventilator and rendesivir, we should be worried.

Because that's the end of Joe Biden. Well, personally, I'm sure that he didn't get COVID because he's vaccinated. Yeah, multiple times. Yeah, he's got the boosters and everything else. It could be, I think, it might be like the eighth variant. Yeah, that's right. That's vaccinated. Multiple times. He's got the boosters and everything else, so I'm sure it's okay. It could be, I think, it might be like the eighth variant. Yeah, that's right. You know what's funny? I think it's called CIA.

We were just talking about it literally this morning, and Robert said, I said, well, the 25th of them. He said, well, they can't really bring in an illness that's going to 25th of them, so it's got to be something that allows him to finish out his term. COVID could be the greatest one, although if they do intubate him and remdesivir him, that solves a lot of people's problems from the deep state perspective. The only big problem they have is who do they use to replace him afterwards?

I think it's funny that they had some social media intern immediately turn this into a fundraiser, though. He posted that thing just saying, I'm sick. And then underneath there's a link. Sorry, I didn't mean to jump ahead here. Biden saying, I'm sick. And then underneath there's a link. Sorry, I didn't mean to jump ahead here. Biden tweeted, I'm sick. And, you know, but then he replied, of Elon Musk and his rich buddies trying to buy this election. And if you agree, pitch in here. Joe Biden doesn't know what Twitter is.

He doesn't know what X is. You know, his interns in that room are just high-fiving each other after this one. We need Dr. Joe Rogan here immediately to to help out joe biden because if he doesn't i think joe biden is in a very precarious situation i think biden's out i think look whether he has covet or not this is the play for joe biden to leave he kept saying look i'm in this race i'm not going to back down i'm going to i'm going to win it i'm going to beat trump and he had no political reason to bow out of the race now he does but the problem is covid doesn't end his re-election bid unless it ends his life it's this is not the type of thing where he says i'm so sick because of

covid i gotta drop out i disagree well what what about all this long long covid right exactly what do we think a week six months yeah yep? Yeah, yep. A week from now, he says, I'm having a hard go of it. I'm not as young as I used to and having a hard time recovering. He's older. I don't think it needs to end Joe Biden to end his campaign. He tweeted today, of course, I have

COVID, I'm sick, but I feel fine. I feel fine. Thank you for the well wishes. This is my play. I've got COVID. I feel fine. Oh, we just did a CAT scan I've got advanced dementia Or Parkinson's And I've got a drop out Just found it by chance

In February I was totally good to go Now they just found it Good thing I got COVID I can get the treatment I need Kamala take over He's like Mr. Burns All the bacteria is moving in Protected by

Did you guys see One of the latest videos Of him walking off the stage Where his hands are like this? And other people have pointed out that when he gives speeches, he doesn't blink. Yeah, that's a symptom of Parkinson's disease. People have been pointing out that rigidity, that, you know, the hands slumping down like Mr. Burns and not blinking are symptoms of Parkinson's. And this is all Joe Biden's worst nightmare, right?

He's a veteran career politician and he actually does not want to be perceived as a weak old man. I'm sure a lot of men, you know, at the end of their lives don't want to either. But for Joe Biden in particular, it is the one thing that will make him hostile. Even if they set him up with an interview with a friendly reporter, if they start saying, like, should we be concerned about your health? He gets mad. He doesn't like it uh and i think that is actually something the staff on on his campaign that are sort of saying let's pull the plug on this no and that's why the covid thing is is sort of the only narrative out he's going to

say you know i i've either discovered another health condition or i'm not recovering well or you know it just it made me think about how little time I have left my family. But I don't think he'll drop. I don't think he'll try to leave the presidency. I think he'll he'll just finish out his term and open the door for someone else to be swapped in during their convention, if that's possible. Although I think really Joe Biden, you know, he's going to go kicking and screaming. He doesn't want to leave this ticket. Well, do you think Joe Biden doesn't want to be seen as a weak old man? Or do you think Joe Biden doesn't want Joe to be seen as a weak old man or do you think jill biden doesn't want joe to be seen as a weak old man i don't think joe biden really cares about joe biden right she'll keep him married even when he's on a ventilator and in a coma i mean she

she wants to be in the white house and i think that's the the real testament to their relationship they both want to remain in the white house i gotta i gotta power couple viva just showed me the predicted numbers right now kamala harris is currently in first place to be the Democratic nominee. Unbelievable. But this is not the first time this happened. This was a week or two ago that Joe Biden dropped below Kamala Harris. It inverted. Talk about a wild swing for the people who are betting on Joe or Kamala on predicted.

Because you're like making $10,000 and losing $10,000 every other day. It depends when you sell. I sold bought no for Joe Biden when he went back up to like 60 some odd cents or was like high 50s because like he's gonna go back down i might have sold a little bit too early because now he went even lower than when i sold it he'll bounce back if he gets over the cold he'll bounce back this is all you know a reaction to the news the issue though is it looks entirely reasonable that everyone's starting to expect and persuade people to imagine Kamala Harris as the actual presidential candidate. But my goodness, 34 cents.

How do they circumvent Kamala Harris? That's what I'm curious about, because they're circulating the memorandum today in Washington, D.C., that she's a loser, that everybody that's connected to the administration is a loser. But how is the Democratic Party, the party that has men winning women's swimming competitions, how do they pass over the African-American woman presidential nominee? Michelle Obama. Yeah, but she hates

people. She hates people. She hates politics. She doesn't want to do it. And she worked very hard to be able to cash in. To go to Richard Branson, do the island, go the Oprah tour, everybody praise her. I feel like the deep state, let's be as factual as possible. The liberal economic order was established after World War II, and that's the official name for what we've seen with U.S. military bases all around the world,

international relations, NATO, etc. Their intelligence and subterfuge apparatus has been breaking apart only as easily evidenced by the election of Donald Trump in 2016. He was not supposed to win. And that was the crack in their armor. Since then, it's only gotten worse to the point where they had to throw Joe Biden because they don't have anything else to do. I genuinely believe we're looking at the grandchildren of the men of the liberal economic order who don't know how to maintain a machine that was built by their grandparents. And they are losing their grip on it to the point where we had this botched assassination attempt that appears more and more to be, let's just call it in some way, with an official capacity, which we'll get to in a second. But where we're at now with this election is we keep talking about how they do this, what they could do.

I don't think they have any plan whatsoever for any political action. None. They said, Biden, you got to drop out. And he's like, no. And they're like, what do we do? And then now I got COVID. It's just pandemonium. But if you were in that deep state room when Viva and I were talking earlier, my proposal

would be pick somebody out of the blue, pick somebody that's a celebrity, pick somebody that could match up with Trump. I would try to recruit The Rock. Mark Hamill. But look, Mark Hamill, Robert President. See, I'm pretty sure that if two of the people at this desk and maybe two of the people even watching this show were in that deep state room, they would be giving them better strategy and advice on how to maintain their system than whatever it is they're doing. Yeah. They have no plan B.

They have no plan B with Afghanistan, with Iraq, with Libya, with Syria, with Trump, with this. But I think their only hope is somebody better than who's on that list. Whitmer's not going to beat Trump. Harris is not going to beat Trump. Newsom's definitely not going to beat Trump. Michelle Obama's not even going to run, but's not gonna beat Trump Harris is not gonna beat Trump Newsom's definitely not gonna beat Trump Michelle Obama's not she's not even gonna run but she wouldn't beat Trump anyway and nor would Hillary I mean Hillary all over again But can you imagine we're writing this simulation that nobody can believe as it is like he wasn't supposed to win in 2016

He wasn't supposed to dodge that bullet and now it's Hillary versus Trump 2.0 in the simulation It's it's too much much. If I presented a script, I said, here's a script for a movie, and they're like, the presidential candidate dodges a bullet? I mean, come on, man. He did, though! I mean, within a second, you see all the different videos. He wasn't, which also makes

you wonder about who pulled that trigger, right? Is it really the autist kid who couldn't get into his high school program's rifle team? That's the guy who did it, rather thanist kid who couldn't get into his high school program's rifle team? That's the guy who did it rather than somebody else who did it? Well, we've got a lot to break down on that because there's like... New details coming out. Oh, dude, the new details are crazy.

So just final thoughts, I suppose, on who do we think the actual Democratic nominee is going to be? I'll just say this. Everybody thinks they have to have a reason to bypass Kamala Harris. I really don't. I think Kamala, it's a rock and a hard place, and if the pressure cooker gets hot, she comes out and just says, I'm stepping aside.

Have a nice day. Bye. And then, woo, and she gets in her car, and then they roll a clip saying Kamala had to fly back to her home planet or something. I definitely wouldn't bet against Hillary Clinton on that list. But otherwise, they need somebody else if they actually want a shot. Tim, my predictions have been pretty good recently when I was on the night before last, and I said, they're going to snip that clip and say that Trump fell asleep.

Nailed it. And I nailed it when I said Biden is going to blow the debate and it's going to be a public debacle. I still, I called it a while back. It was never going to be Joe Biden as the presidential nominee. It's going to be Gavin Newsom. And that's why they were making

Gavin Newsom even look like Joe Biden in those videos, having him dance around with Xi. So I would say if anyone's going to replace him, it's going to be Gavin Newsom. See, I think if Joe Biden has a pulse, he's going to refuse to leave. That's the reality. I think so, too. I say Joe Biden stays. Yeah, I'm the same way.

I don't see him kind of giving up his power, especially with Jill and Hunter by his side. And they know Kamala is less popular than he is. But hold on. We have this story from the Hill. Trump campaign won't commit to VP debate citing uncertainty over Democratic ticket. Now, there's better headlines. Trump campaign trolls Democrats. They say the Trump campaign Wednesday said it would not commit to a debate to a vice

a date for a vice presidential debate, suggesting it was still uncertain who would be on the ticket. Quote, We don't know who the Democrat nominee for vice president is going to be, so we can't lock in a date before their convention. To do so would be unfair to Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer, or whoever Kamala Harris picks to be her as her running mate. Donald Trump, the Biden campaign earlier Wednesday said Vice President Harris had accepted an invitation from CBS News to participate in a debate against Trump's running mate, J.D. Vance. Those what are they saying? August 12th or 13th. CBS News had previously extended an invite for the 23rd of July. Though such a date seemed unlikely, given it was a week after the GOP convention.

Quote, Donald Trump is is the one whose campaign said he would debate any time, any place, and who picked J.D. Vance specifically for his debating skills. Biden's campaign spokesperson, Brian Fall Fallon said in a statement. Now, suddenly, right after a damning new leak showing his support for a nationwide abortion ban, Vance is backing off a debate against Vice President Harris, who has spent the last two years prosecuting the case on behalf of reproductive freedom. I think it's I think Trump's right. But right now, Joe Biden's got covid. He already said that if he had a condition he would bow out more and more evidence is piling up that he may have parkinson's disease i i think the probability is that he's not the nominee well i mean i think it's smart of them to troll in this way i mean i

mean to continue to show the destabilization of the democratic party how there's an incompetent president occupying the white house how the democratic party can't decide who to do and i mean for the democrats the longer this goes, the more of a debacle. I mean, how do you choose Chicago to do this again? I mean, Chicago, 1968, the most controversial, conflicted Democratic convention ever. It's when they stole the presidency after Robert Kennedy's assassination. You have another Robert Kennedy running for the president of the United States. And you're going to have another crazy protest session in Grant Park and elsewhere.

And you decide, let's pick Chicago for the place. We decide to steal the nomination by the elites on behalf of someone that no one has voted for in the Democratic Party. But do you think that speaks to the fact that the Democratic Party is really governed by young people who don't actually have any sense of history? Maybe older people, too. They don't. I mean, I don't know if Riley knows the history of the 1968 election. I definitely know it was something I had to read back up on because

it's just not something that's talked about. I mean, really young voters can't think past like, what, the 90s at this point? And that's through the, I would say, 30s and like 18 to 35. That's the 90s is pushing it for what they remember. I can tell you I do not know what happened

in 1968. I know the 1972 Richard Nixon, but really that sticks into my knowledge. The 90s is pushing it for what they remember I can tell you I do not know what happened In 1968 I know the 1972 Richard Nixon But really that sticks into my knowledge And that would mean that you can't necessarily strategize Based on what's done in the past And I would say I probably I mean I have a fairly decent understanding Of history

Riley, Barnes is going to give the 30,000 foot overview and it's going to blow your mind Because I didn't know about it either Give it to me It's amazing that it might repeat this year Riley, Barnes is going to give the 30,000-foot overview, and it's going to blow your mind because I didn't know about it either. Give it to me. It's amazing that it might repeat this year. Hunter Thompson famously portrayed it. You had Norman Mailer and Pat Buchanan sitting in the hotel room looking over as the cops and the protesters went to war with each other.

Because you had the anti-war protesters, you had the LBJ trying to steal the nomination for Hubert Humphrey after the assassination of Robert Kennedy Sr., who had just won the California primary a month before. And basically what it was, it was a disaster for the Democratic Party. It showed they were incapable of uniting behind anybody. Well, it definitely seems as if we're teeing up to that again, given everything that happened in the Middle East. I've already heard of pro-Palestinian protests going to occur there. i mean it makes sense riley uh what year were you born uh 2000 shut up you i'm a baby you do not know the world pre-9-11 no and i don't we have a lot of young people who are going to be voting in this election and obviously everybody understands humans age and generations come and go. But that is actually really interesting and how it affects. But you can see it in this piece right here, right, where they talk about abortion and different things. And that's certainly an appeal to people like myself who don't have a fantastic, holistic understanding of history. They try and do this stupid stuff right here, talking about JD Vance and abortion.

I have a lot to say about 9-11, but we'll talk about it afterwards. But more importantly, I do think, you know, the democratic machine and the powers that be in the establishment might not be really running this year because there could be something else

down the pipeline that will make elections kind of irrelevant. Or there could be a possible scenario where they kind of want Donald Trump to be in power, because then when the economy collapses, they could blame it on him and his kind of right wing populist policies that they could conveniently say, look, this is what ruined the economy. Look at Donald Trump's leadership that, of course, allowed us to to be absolutely bankrupted and destroyed. So I think I think there's there's a play within a play here. And if you're looking at them, they're not playing to win. So if they're not playing to win, what else is going to be happening in the near future

that might be on our radar that could be very concerning for everyone? Well, you could have an October surprise in August. Exactly. They're talking about this war with Iran. I just got to tell you, you know, I just got to ask, actually, considering everything we've seen thus far, what could an october surprise look like now i mean come on we've dealt with donald trump being right criminally charged indicted federal state level sexual assault allegations that are ridiculous uh the hush money convictions now an assassination

attempt what what could they surprise let me? Let me tell you. World War. Economic collapse. Another bioweapon. Another pandemic. Not a pandemic. They are bringing COVID back out. I was going to say it's a new variant. Fair to a certain degree, but these aren't surprises. We're all

sitting here with bated breath being like, we're waiting for World War III to start. But you say we all, you mean the people here. Do you think the American people really, really think that? I think people who aren't informed don't think that. Well, to a certain degree. I think the people on Twitter do. We can phrase it two different ways.

The average person probably doesn't, but a larger than average sample does, which is abnormal. Larger than maybe what we would have pulled historically. But still, I still don't think there's a super large percentage of people who are preparing for some sort of doomsday. I just don't. Has the October surprise ever been something good? Like, Hillary's pregnant again. I don't know what it could be. Was that good the first time?

Was that ever good? Maybe the October surprise this year is good news. I don't know what that could look like. I know I had an idea earlier today. It's always good for one side, right? Somebody tends to benefit from the October surprise. We got a fact check. I pulled it up.

It's one poll. I don't know. It's from March. 61% of Americans surveyed believe that a global war is very likely or somewhat likely within the next five or 10 years. So that's a wide berth. That's a big number. But it's a lot of people.

Well, the Germans are preparing for it. Many European countries are saying there's going to be a full all-out war between the Eastern and Western powers. We are already seeing the proxy wars, the economic wars. So this situation, especially for the Ukrainians now, with a potential Donald Trump presidency, is very desperate for them. And I could see a larger kind of escalation in that region that would involve more and more countries that would get us into a global conflict

that would make elections not really relevant anymore. And I think that's a danger, especially with the history of false flags with the American government conducting them, that we should be absolutely on the lookout for because that could be their larger scheme. And this is why the Democrats and the establishment kind of don't care. They're like, yeah, whatever. You think we'll lose this election? Well, there's something else here for you that we're going to surprise you later down the line.

You give them more credit than I ever would. I just think that this whole entity is wheels falling apart. I think there's so much internal chaos in any sort of liberal or democratic progressive movements. And we see this regularly pray out those meetings where no one can agree on the rules or pronouns. I absolutely disagree with that because a lot of people always say, oh, the government's incompetent. Oh, the government made a mistake here. They just told you that there was weapons of mass destruction. No, they were extremely successful when it came to destroying our civil rights, our civil liberties, when it came to transferring our

wealth and money over to the military industrial complex, when it came to absolutely controlling and ruling over us, when it came to COVID, they were extremely successful with the gains that they were able to get. And when you look at it from a larger picture, from hindsight. I love that there's this big they, though. Like, they're so disorganized, they can't even pull this candidate. They couldn't even successfully pick a vice president that would replace him. Nobody likes her. They didn't like her before she was in second-in-command.

And George W. Bush was just dumb. I'm not saying that there aren't conspiracies. I just think that right now, whatever there may be, if you believe in the overarching idea that there's an organization running everything, they're doing a terrible job. They don't even like each other. Well, what you may have is something like pre-World War I elites, right? I mean, the British Empire, Ottoman Empire, French Empire, Russian Empire,

all collapsed within a decade because you had incompetent, corrupt people at the top. Yeah, it was crazy. And that's what we're seeing evidence of here. i think it goes to the saying uh wealth lasts three generations yeah so world war ii happens strong men create good times they build this system which we actually grow to despise quite a bit but they call it the liberal economic order you can read all about this in the cfr's website they explain how they did it and what it is you ever for those that are listening at home, did you ever stop and wonder why the United States

has military bases in Spain, the UK, Japan, Germany? Can you name a country that has a military base in the United States? I mean, it sounds weird,

doesn't it? But in the UK, we have military bases. The reason we have military bases in Germany and Japan is because we've been occupying them since the end of World War II. Now,

I believe it was Yuval Noah Harari, World Economic Forum deputy, said if Trump gets elected, it's the end of this global order. What we're looking at is a global order created in the 50s or maybe late 40s. You've got the children of those institutions struggling to maintain that machine, and the grandchildren of those men have no idea how the machine is run and they are fumbling it miserable you don't think alex soros is capable of taking over george soros come on he's got new help he's got human now yeah but look look let's let's let's be real couple listen he is the product of the machine produced by his parents and their allies. He is a, look, too many of millennials and Gen Z, Gen Z is a little bit less, but millennials, they are weak. They don't have the capability to do the hard work or understand merit. the snooty rich kids of global elites who have no idea how the machine was built,

no idea how it was maintained, or how to build wealth or maintain power at all, and clearly it is shattering in their hands. Well, it's the rice patty to rice patty in three generations is the concept you're describing, and it makes total sense here. I did remember my white pill October surprise, and it's plausible, so mark it now. Massive Secret Service, FBI, CIA whistleblowers

that reveal what we've all suspected for a long time and brings down the official machine before a second Trump presidency. I mean, I forget who was I talking to today, talking about how, like, even within intelligence, at some point people are going to back out of this machine that's falling down, and they're going to say, I don't want to be on this ship when it sinks. I was just telling you that. We were talking about it like an hour ago.

No, no, no. This was earlier in the day. Early in the day. About an hour ago, I was saying that I believe that with the election of Donald Trump in 2016, the cracks were starting to form. And then once they started, they criminally charged Clinesmith. They started making moves to actually go after people who are engaging in corruption. You probably ended up with low tier liberal economic order personnel saying, guys, look, I can't be a part of this. You're losing. I'm out. Tim, you're right.

It was you for a second. I was going to credit Pavlovsky for having told me this because I thought it occurred earlier in the day. Well, good. No, I think you're i think you're absolutely right it raises the i say the october surprise that could be a white pill following up on what we're seeing right now they've gotten too brazen they've gotten too incompetent nobody believes it anymore and they don't want to be a part of that there's a couple notions here that i think are worth considering and thinking about specifically when it comes to these individuals who don't give a damn about america don't give a damn about this country don't give a damn about this constitution they're globalists they're internationalists if they have to destroy america in order to get their way which i think was the plan i've been talking about this plan for a very

long time controlled the demolition of the american economy of the american society they need to do it in order to bring over this kind of new world order this kind of global communism this kind of new global order system that they've been dying to implement. And the best way to implement it is to, of course, sink the West. So this, to me, is something that has been planned and done. And it's not just incompetency. It's not just them falling apart. To me, the destruction of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment especially, which is rare, is something that is key

and something that they need to do in order to get total control over everybody i want to jump to this story which is it's a difficult story to report because i don't know exactly what we're looking at but it's gone a bit viral and uh kind of hard to see maybe i can i don't think i'm gonna be able to format this website for it to be visible to anybody in any meaningful way this is fintel.io, and we can see here the date is July 12th, 2024. A company called Austin Private Wealth LLC bought 12 million puts on DJT. I'm not an expert on what this means. I'm bringing it up because it's been going viral like crazy, and what's being suggested that these are shorts on dj on on truth social the day before

the assassination attempt and more puts more shorts than all of the others combined since this company's existence so a lot of people naturally naturally are asking whoa hold on hold on some wealth llc company bought more shorts ever? Right before someone tried to kill Trump? Explain a short. Like I'm five. Okay, you're betting a stock will fail. That's the simplest.

Now that you're, that's five. Fifth grade is, I ask Hannah Clare if I can borrow her Coca-Cola. I then tell Viva I'll sell it to him for a dollar. I then forget who sold it to me, drink it, and then what happens? And then I hope that the cost of a Coke drops to 10 cents so that I can buy a different one for 10 cents, say here's your Coke

back, Hannah Clare, and keep the 90 cents. I see. Yeah. So Good use of prop. That was great. If it is true that, again, I don't know if anybody watching can confirm this or can look into more about what it means. It suggests, or it's being suggested by many people, someone somehow made the best bet imaginable were it to have been that Trump did not tilt his head forward three degrees. And it fits a pattern to me. You go back to 9-11, there were people shorting airline stocks right before 9-11.

Some of that was never fully explained. There were some people that tied it into a range of different complicit parties. And what it is is people can't help themselves. Somebody has inside information, wants to make a ton of money, and they get rich off of it, and they're part of the complicit parties. But when you're looking for some sort of broad-based conspiracy or complicity or inside job at some level with one of these kind of dramatic events, that you look for unusual stock activities, either buying stock or shorting stock that is connected to an enterprise that is

going to have a massive stock adjustment in response to that particular event. And if this really happened, we don't know for sure but it appears it happened uh then this is extraordinarily suspect and congress of their serious needs to invest and that's the same thing we saw during covid uh with senator insider training that's the same thing we saw during 9-11 with stock options specifically on united and american airlines that were never kind of clarified to who actually profited tremendously from as of course there was also weird insurance policies there but i'll stop there just to just to clarify for everyone out there the for those who are too young to remember the short selling of airline stocks pre-9-11 is not a rumor it's not an

unsubstantiated accusation it's a bona fide fact oh yeah so there's no question and they've had different explanations to who did it and why they did it and why it may or may not be related but the scale and scope of the short which which is what Tim is. It was record record. Exactly. It was extraordinary. But you're saying they never really got to the, to the bottom of it. Conveniently.

I wonder why they never investigated that. Yeah. Because if someone is going to make a bet that a stock is going to fail right before a cataclysmic event, it indicates at the very, at the very least some foreknowledge or astronomically dumb luck. And just to add to the ELI-5 for the shorting, betting something's going to go down within a certain period of time.

At the end of a month or so, you have to buy it back. And so if it goes up and skyrockets like what we saw with GameStop, then whoever shorted it gets screwed because they've got to buy back stock they don't actually own for the market price, which could be through the roof. Bottom line, something bad's going to happen within a month to DJT. Sell it short now. And you don't even know when or where on what specific date, just within that time frame. And how long, this $12 million,

what was the time period you were saying? I don't know if it says on here. You said it's a larger number than all of them combined. $12 million is the largest, it says put option, it's the largest we've seen than, I mean, if you were to add them all up, it doesn is the largest put option. It's the largest we've seen. If you were to add them all up, it doesn't reach $12 million.

It's the biggest single bet that Trump's stock was going to dramatically decline in a very short order. If Trump... So who is this company? That we don't know yet. I mean, it looks like a wealth management company. It looks like they've got a lot of holdings. It looks fairly normal. And this is important, too. It may be unrelated to that company right if

they're a wealth management firm and a client went to them and said hey i want to do a you know make this purchase for me they go you got a bus or it could be like one company says we want to move some of our holdings with it from you guys to a short on this where we don't know who it was there's probably layers after layers after layers on this one and do you think we'd ever get an answer because that's the problem for most american people it's either too confusing to follow or you just wait forever and it gets buried in all the news cycles the white yes the white pill october surprise the leaker someone comes forward and says who put in that order or the company you go find it out and see who they're connected well no no no i mean look first i'll say there's always a possibility

of astronomical odds that someone just made the purchase. I also want to point out, I don't know enough about Fintel, and I don't know enough about how Putt and all this stuff works to be able to say definitively we know what this is. It's just being rumored. It's rumors circulating around. However, in the

event that the rumors are correct, and this is a massive record-breaking short sale against Donald Trump as a person, because without him, there's no truth social. I do believe we will get an answer to this question. And Tucker Carlson said it better than I could. He said there were many people in Congress who fully expect themselves to be on that stage at some point to be in the same position. And if they feel that they cannot be safe in that position, then it's going to make them very upset. The incentive now is for basically every senator and member of Congress with presidential ambitions

to get to the bottom of this before they reach that throne room. And according to NASDAQ, Fintel is a leading provider of financial data and insights for intelligence. Data-driven investors with coverage of over 75,000 listed companies on all major stock exchanges. insights for intelligence data-driven investors with coverage of over 75 000 listed companies on all major stock exchanges fintel has the most comprehensive comprehensive coverage of global equities at prices and the website says funds shorting trump media and technology group green rose indicate new positions the website says austin private wealth has a 12 million share short on djt the day before someone tried to take his life.

Exactly. 4chan. You know what to do. But that's interesting, though. I mean, when people are looking for answers, more and more it's the internet that provides them, not any of the officials, not even any of the investigative journalists.

A lot of it is just online. Well, no crap. I mean, if the internet and legacy media existed at the time of JFK, I mean, you might have had the term conspiracy coined, and they might have said he fell and, you know, knocked us out. If it weren't in the age of digital media, social media and independent journalists for what happened on Saturday in Pennsylvania, they'd move on to another story by now. There was someone who was a woman posted a video being in Times Square in a restaurant. And she's like, because of Twitter, I know what's going on.

I know about this attempted assassination but none of the TVs are playing any breaking news right it's like you live in two separate worlds people that are plugged into the internet which admittedly it sometimes it's not so good and people who exist in this other space that is insulated to them because of the mainstream media now I do remember it was Tim

who said he was playing poker and he got the news and someone else got the news but it wasn't on any of the mainstream media I just it's so crazy to me i would i was i thought if something like that would happen you'd get an intercom announcement from management at the casino being like ladies and gentlemen we we regret to inform you this thing happened it is a shocking moment in american history you i mean every tv, every news channel was talking about it. But in the poker room and in the casino, they're just playing football or baseball and sporting events,

and nobody knew. We know who should investigate this. This is a Texas-based business. So remember, the Kennedy assassination only got exposed because the New Orleans prosecutor decided to investigate it. The feds tried to keep a wrap on it. The Attorney General Paxton has complete jurisdiction. And it'd be interesting whether some of the people connected to this enterprise feds tried to keep a wrap on it the attorney general paxton has complete jurisdiction and

it'd be interesting whether some of the people connected to this enterprise are paxton adversaries as well are they bush family ties i mean it is interesting it's a tech well it's called austin private wealth but who knows it could be austin main or something i don't know oh it could be but it's austin texas base that's enough for him to have jurisdiction we know that for a fact though that's my understanding from my research of it it does okay so it'd enough for all Paxson has to do is just do a further investigation. It gives them jurisdiction. It gives them a nexus. It gives them a connection.

That's the thing I was saying. It's called Austin, but I don't know that it's in Austin. But you've seen that? Yeah. When I researched it, it was an Austin, Texas-based business. So assuming it's the same one, that's the only one I could find that was Austin. You know what's fascinating is when the put options were put on airline stock right before 9-11 how would any regular person track that data they would not right you know this is back in a time where trading on wall street was

still done by dudes screaming and waving paper in the air yeah and now that's you know there's a guy whose job it is to look crazy at the on the floor of the stock exchange in new york he's got crazy white hair and whenever a story about the stock exchange happens he makes a crazy look on his face and they take pictures of him because they want that symbol of the stock exchange but we're not in the narrative people are all it's robots doing all this trading now it's it's algorithms and machines but that also means that you know joe schmoe in the middle of nebraska can go on to fintel.io and look and see this just happened in real time and say, whoa, whoa. And they can call their member of Congress and say, can you get a subpoena to this company, Austin Private Wealth, and ask them why they shorted Donald Trump's Truth Social to the tune of 12 million shares the day before someone tried to take his life? But if this was someone or an entity that supposedly knew about it,

wouldn't they be smarter than to do this? No, they're greedy. They're greedy. So they're greed. Well, meanwhile, talking about the big squeeze, not only did it not short, but the share surged in the wake of him surviving. What happened to that short position?

Oh, they're going to lose so much money. They're screwed. Let's do one last little analogy. I will borrow Hannah Clare's Coca-Cola. These go for $1. I then say, I'll get you your Coke

back in a week. Hey, I'll sell you this for $1. I now have $1. Uh-oh, bad news. The cost of Coke just jumped to $10 and I owe Hannah Clare a Coke.

So I got to pull an extra $9 out of my pocket to buy it back from Viva and I just lost $9 and I go, damn. Yeah, don't drink that high fructose corn syrup, by the way. Also, don't short stocks. It's an easy way to

lose a lot of money. Oh, because the losses are infinity. Yeah. Well, then they have margins. And that's why Bill Gates is being screwed over with what he's trying to do with Elon Musk. Bill Gates is trying to short Tesla and there's a lot of rumors specifically showing how he's losing a crap ton of money. Depending on how you handle your short short i mean growth can can skyrocket out of control and force you to sell

rapidly and it can cost you a lot of money whereas if you spend 10 bucks on a share and it goes to zero you lost 10 bucks but let's jump to this next story ladies and gentlemen it only gets stranger from the post millennial secret service flagged would be assassin as threat. Ten minutes before Trump went on stage, quote, you would think over the course of that hour, you shouldn't lose sight of the individual. Somebody ought to be following up on those sorts of things. No evidence of that happening at all. Senator John Barrasso said ten. OK, so so here's here's what we know so far. Three hours before the attempt on Trump's life, they identified this man with a range finder and flagged him.

An hour. Three hours. That's the latest. It was from this. They reported this this morning. It's actually, they knew for three hours when he tried getting in. An hour before the shooting, another officer identified him as suspicious, again, using a range finder, tracking distances. And when you say they knew, Secret Service.

Police. Law enforcement. They called it in. As they say, he was known to them cnn reported they called him in as a suspicious individual to keep an eye out on now hold on hold on uh so then 26 minutes before the shooting you had a police photograph him on that a direct encounter at some point within this time frame another officer then at some point within this time frame two officers approached the building one officer lifted the cop up so he could pull himself up and peek on the roof.

And the shooter aimed a weapon at him and he called it in, shoot around the roof. We don't know how long from that point to when the man took a shot at Trump, but you still had a lot of time. Now, this is the this is the biggest break so far. The Secret Service flagged a threat 10 minutes before Trump went on stage. I'm sure Dan Bongino is screaming up a storm saying, impossible, impossible. The Secret Service being told there is a threat, a man with a range finder, and Trump is not out on stage, would keep him in the holding room or whatever. Dan Bongino already talked about this on the show. He said, in Secret Service, you have a holding

area. Why? You hold people there while you're clearing a threat, if you get a threat, you then say, wait, we're going to clear the threat. This would mean the Secret Service knew there was a threat and pushed Trump out, violating protocol to add on to this. And again, shout out to Dan Bongino. He pointed out it's absurd that they did not have someone on that roof. And it's also even crazier if they couldn't because it was sloped or whatever, which is insane. They would have broken line of sight. He said they would put up a campaign poster or something so you couldn't see the stage. It would make the shot random. Why didn't they do this? We've got even more information. Apparently, local police are saying Secret Service lied when they claimed that it was supposed to be local law enforcement securing the roof. Secret Service would never hand off a sniper vantage point to a local police department,

and local police are saying their only duty was traffic control. This whole thing is breaking apart. We're going to get into the next bit of the story, but I want to give everybody a chance to talk about it, where in a briefing with members of the Senate, they answered four questions and then bolted out of the room. It's looking more and more like, oh, I'm going to love to say it inside job. Yep. I've been saying that from day one. It was the first thing that I thought about is the first thing that I said, because independent media, including yourself, Tim, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, myself was we're saying there's going to be an attempt on the president's life. Donald Trump needs to assassinate proof himself. So when the events happened,

this is something that we've been saying was going to happen so when it did automatically everyone's red flags kind of went up saying who's responsible for this because there's no way someone a loner a 20 year old kid who also by the way had two different explosive devices and a detonator with him with him allegedly not having any kind of skill when it comes to explosives he was also a very troubled young man and there's a crap ton of articles out there even from the corporate media specifically highlighting how the fbi preys on mentally ill people specifically young men and tries to use them in order to goat them to commit larger terrorist actions i want to play this clip for you guys real quick and hear from Fox News. Secret Service had identified as a character of suspicion this man, this shooter, because they

saw a range finder on him as well as a backpack. And this all happened more than an hour before the shooting actually occurred. So they saw the guy and they identified this guy as suspicious. Now, more details coming from a source familiar here who was also in the meeting tells me that about 10 minutes before former President Trump went onto the stage, they had gone from looking at this guy as suspicious to now looking at him as a threat.

I don't see how this could be an accident. No, it's not. And now his cell phone was cleaned so they can't get any data or information out of it. The average person doesn't know how this could be an accident. No, it's not. And now his cell phone was cleaned so they can't get any data or information out of it. The average person doesn't know how to do that, especially a young 20-year-old with no social media history. Absolutely total inside job from start to finish. Let me steel man this.

He was out golfing. He had the range finder. He needed to position the hole. And the backpack was extra golf clubs. It's obvious. There's a little detail, which also I think is newly breaking, that apparently the parents had called the police two hours before saying their son was gone, missing.

They think he might have had a gun, and they're nervous about him. They said that he was supposed to be going to a range practice shooting, and when he didn't come home by 1 p.m., they became concerned. And that should tell you a lot, right? He's a 20-year-old man, and he hasn't even been missing for 24 hours, and his parents are already like, something is not right. We need to find him. Well, and they're looking at sound acoustics.

They're looking at trajectory, and everything points to a potential second or third shooter. Right? I mean, is it likely the kid who couldn't make his own shooting team is the guy who did it? Well, one detail, too, that I don't know if someone can factor this for me real quick that I've seen on X, is that there was more than one sniper team that had eyes on the shooter. And in fact, the image everyone's sharing of two guys on that barn sloped building are not the men who took out the shooter. Their view was actually obstructed. So then the question is, how many snipers did Secret Service have watching this guy that no one took action upon? And were there actually people right underneath him in that building,

according to various stories that are coming out? I mean, there's no explanation for how this could happen with any competent security. So the only question was, is it extraordinary recklessness or an inside job? There's no way it's recklessness. What did you call it? Fractal wrongness? Fractal wrongness. There's no way it's negligence. There were overt decisions that were made and you hear the thing is even if you weren't inclined to believe that you listen to kim cheetle's interview and

her answers don't make sense even based on what we know they weren't on the roof because it was too sloped as if we're talking about protecting the president from assassination and you're worried about a twisted ankle of of secret service and the other roof is even more slow. So her answers don't even make sense with it. Inside job, or someone just allowed this to happen. There's some, I don't know how you get from M.K. Ocha. Just to interrupt for a second, the Daily Mail is reporting that there were two sniper teams that both had a shot of, or had view of the roof that Crooks was on.

How many shots did the shooter get off? Was it eight? There's inconsistency, because what is there? There's sound, there's one thing, there's timing. There's suggestions that he really should have only been able to get off three or four, and yet they got to explain more than that. So that's where some of the questions are arising as to whether there was more than one shooter. I've not analyzed the audio or anything like that,

but some people are pointing out that you're not hearing multiple shots, you're hearing echoes. Right, that's always possible. And you don't know which way. The other thing is where the trajectory is, where he was, doesn't seem as consistent as where the bullet came from. And there's already people pointing out second and third potential shooter locations. Well, eyewitnesses on the day of did say more than one shooter. That being said, when people don't know what's going on,

she may be talking about the Secret Service. Well, it's the same thing as the Vegas shooting. So, I mean, because of the echoes and the other issues, there's always been questions as to exactly what happened. I gotta tell you, it is really fascinating for people who have no experience with guns. They genuinely, I do not believe they would understand where the

bullet is coming from. With echo, they'd be confused and they'd say, I heard a shot over there and then immediately a shot over there and it's like, right, because the sound bounces. A lot of the eyewitness reports immediately were, well, we thought it was fireworks. I mean, not everyone can even identify the sound of a gunshot. And I don't blame them for that, right? It's a deeply confusing situation, especially when you're going to an event like this, where you believe that there is not just...

You have trust that Secret Service or police, law enforcement, they've done their job. It's not just security. It's like the best security in the world, because theoretically, it's supposed to be protecting the former president of the United States. And in fact, you know, the head of the FBI right now used to be involved with the Biden detail. I mean, I saw an interview with Eric Trump saying, you know, I know these service members have been around for a long time. It's one of those moments where I'm sure if you're the Trump family right now now you are both

not wanting to cast doubt on agents who you have known having had have had in your home have personal relationship with and also looking at this agency like how did this happen how did we get here I mean this is still the agency that is protecting Donald Trump right now that it must on some level be sort of terrifying you're putting your trust into people and you don't know I saw an interview with Eric Trump who did say he was like look these are people who we have known and we've trusted uh we've seen people on social media saying they they didn't do a good job they weren't thorough they weren't effective they did their job so again i think it shows that they do they know and love these people but it's important to uh understand there's there's the

trump detail which is a small handful of Secret Service they probably know and trust. And then the rest of them who are at that rally who they don't know. Well, and my understanding is a bunch of the Trump detail was pulled off that day because they were given their vacation time. That's where all the women came in. And not only that, a second group, the best people locally, were also pulled off for Jill Biden because Jill Biden was doing a fundraiser in Pittsburgh at the same time. I saw what Mike Cernovich posted posted about this and it's actually terrifying when you know we talked about what would have happened had trump not tilted his head but a few degrees and uh you know viva you mentioned it would be like franz ferdinand it would be the ignition for urban uh domestic conflict as well

as international conflict uh mike cernovich uh basically said know, his view of the plan was after Trump is taken out, Joe Biden uses this emergency to launch extreme executive authority and then lock things down across the country, control the elections. I don't know exactly how it would play out or what would happen, but I do imagine that the federal government would go full Directive 51. For those that aren't familiar with that, it was an executive order put in play by George W. Bush in 2000, I think it was 2007, which says that in any kind of emergency, extreme catastrophic event, economic crisis, loss of life, the President of the United States can create and reform the U.S. government under a new constitutional government and they would uh it would put a national continuity coordinator in executive authority it would it would functionally make the executive branch the sole branch of government over over overriding basically everything else we've wondered when and how they would ever try to make a move like that barack obama updated this it wasive 51. I imagine if this actually

did harm Trump, I would not be surprised if you ended up seeing, whether it's false flag or otherwise, chaos erupting, insurgency, and then Joe Biden coming out and rubber stamping some decree, some executive order. RINOs in the Uniparty

established Republican Party saying, now is not the time. We need security in this country these people are crazy and then you'd end up with nikki haley going on stage and saying i will be your nominee i think the next step following that would be that there would be a larger push for gun control and there would be a larger push to disarm the american public which would lead us towards a larger perpetual war within the united states and i was talking about this earlier on my Rumble show with Benny Johnson specifically. If the assassination attempt was successful, this would have put us on a pathway that would have stopped the election, suspended the Constitution, and allowed them to essentially set up a martial

law. They were going to blame Iran. They are now saying that Iran had made an attempt, but uh-oh, Trump tilted his head. I'm willing to bet that the whole play was we blame it on iran we go to war with iran that's our casus belli it keeps the establishment forces in control it removes trump trump didn't name a successor or a vp the maga base is in chaos nikki haley becomes the nominee with second most delegates and then vows retaliation against iran and we've already talked about this on x even trump even Trump supporters, neocons, dissident supporters,

everybody agreed if a foreign entity assassinated our president, be it Biden or Trump, the U.S. must retaliate. Because you are not a nation if you cannot defend your leader from an enemy attack. This is scary how close we came to World War 3 and, I guess, fascism. Well, and Pompeo was going to be the VP. I mean, he was telling people, the Iowa delegation here, I was talking to them, he was telling them all week that he was going to be the VP. Really?

Yeah, so you can imagine, Haley Pompeo is the ticket, the former ex-CIA guy. But he was really telling people. He was really telling people. The Iowa delegates were telling my friend, who was also an Iowa delegate, saying, oh no, it's definitely going to be Pompeo. Which I think what that meant was they thought it was going to be Nikki Haley in Pompeo. And it was going to be a perfect national security ticket.

That way the deep state wins either way, whether it's Biden, Harris, or whomever. Did you see that Haley said during her speech, Trump wanted me to be here. And then there's a cut to Trump. Somebody did the lip reading and he was like, actually, she wanted to be here. He says that? Yeah, apparently she asked to be here. And then there's a cut to Trump. Like somebody did the lip reading and he was like, actually, she wanted to be here. He says that? Yeah. Apparently she asked to be here, which I totally believe that she wasn't even supposed to be at the convention before the assassination attempt.

One thing just on the Iranian angle to it, like they preloaded it with information that came out after the botched assassination attempt, which now no longer makes any sense. All right. So they had intel that Iran was trying to kill President Trump and then laxed on security and then left open the sniper vantage point and then told people to take the day off. And then when that information comes out, it makes absolutely no sense. Had he been killed, then they say, all right, a lone gunman. Oh, he's a he's registered GOP, not mentioning that he donated to Biden through Act Blue.

Oh, and he's got then Iran was threatening things. And now we find things on his social media that tie him to Iran, and now we get to justify a war with Iran. Nothing makes sense. There's no narrative. It's just pure chaos. But I tell you this,

no reasonable person could conclude a lone whack jab got lucky. The Secret Service knew there was a threat 10 minutes in advance and pushed Trump out onto the stage with smiles on their faces. That is not normal. And what you have is people writing the deep state simulation script are the same people that are writing for Disney these days. Oh, yeah. And you have the same

level of quality and the same level of believability, the same level of credibility. I got to say just real quick, we have more to the story, but Donald Trump tilted his head three degrees. Watch all of the assessments, the 3D analysis. I mean, if Donald Trump did not just... It's within like a second and a half. Trump just tilted his head a little bit. And you can see that there's a new video they put out.

The crosshairs over Trump's head and then the tilt. And you can see it going over his ear. Let me pull up this. We have a tweet from Senator Ron Johnson. The U.S. Secret Service Senate briefing was unbelievably uninformative. Only four questions were allowed. The rest of us are supposed to submit questions. I already have awaiting a response, not holding my breath. We've got this Colin. I'm sorry. Let me let me pull up Senator Mike Lee. He says Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheadle needs to step down immediately.

Today's mostly information free briefing only confirmed that what little information she gave us was at once deeply troubling and glaringly incomplete. At least three of us, Senator Blackburn, Cruz, and me, had sought recognition to ask questions and were in the queue when they abruptly cut the call short. The Secret Service agreed to give us this briefing. Normally, federal agencies that agree to brief us will do their best to answer all of our questions, even if it takes a little while. Never in my 13 years in the Senate have I seen a briefing end after answering only four questions. If I'm not mistaken, three of the four questions allowed were asked by Democrats. So why hold the briefing if they weren't going to tell us anything? Why the hell did Secret Service let Trump walk on stage before resolving the potential threat

that they had by then identified? How many requests that Secret Service assign additional agents to the Trump campaign have been ignored or rejected over the last two years? Why wasn't a single agent positioned on that roof? Would Secret Service ever let Joe Biden walk on stage before resolving a specific known security threat? Has that ever happened? Which of its obvious failures will Secret Service try to blame on climate change? That's a good one. What do these Secret Service failures say to America's foreign adversaries, and what kinds of horrible things will they encourage? Once the perception sets in

that the security surrounding a presidential candidate can be circumvented this easily, should we expect to see more assassination attempts? Why isn't Biden taking action against his own Secret Service director and Homeland Security Secretary? If this incident doesn't warrant firing some people, what does? Were they trying to half-ass this? I'm not even sure this qualifies as a half-assed effort. Is there such a thing as quarter-assing? I want to point this out. I hope you submitted these.

Look, Tucker Carlson predicted we're in assassination territory. They have changed laws to prosecute Trump. They have created fake criminal charges to prosecute Trump. I want to stress this to the utmost degree. The hush money case against Donald Trump had no statutory basis. It was expired. It was a misdemeanor. I think perhaps for the first time, Barnes, correct me if I'm wrong, they have assigned

a crime to Donald Trump without due process by stating that Trump committed a secondary offense for which you can charge him for a first offense without ever having a due process court hearing to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Trump committed any crimes. And then they upgrade to this felony. They have taken unprecedented actions to hinder and stop Donald Trump and ruin his life. Tucker Carlson said they have failed. And now we're looking at assassination territory. So when all of these things happen and we get to this point, I have one question for everybody and for everybody watching.

Do you believe Trump derangement syndrome exists? First question. The second, based on everything we've seen from Libs of TikTok's account, do you believe there are American citizens who want Donald Trump to die? And third question, is it possible any of those people work for the secret service trump derangement syndrome certainly exists have you seen keith olbermann have you seen people like joy reed uh these people who who constantly tout and and do make the comparisons of him to hitler what have you uh tds certainly exists question number two what was it are there people in this

country who want donald trump lips of tiktok it has done such a phenomenal job and highlighting these people uh and and many of them ultimately getting fired from their jobs and the last question is is it possible any of these people work for the Secret Service? I will say my hometown. Right. I'm from Tennessee. We had a girl from Dutch Bros, which is like a coffee place. She tweeted on there or put on Facebook the same thing. Several people are tweeting, right?

Dang, I wish the shooter didn't miss. There's no way someone like her works for the Secret Service. And I feel like that's a lot of what we're seeing is just. Didn't didn't didn't libs of tiktok highlight an fbi staffer who did express similar sentiment several several uh staffers on the hill members of congress members members uh senators if these people truly believe that donald trump is hitler as they've screamed for eight years and these people have been radicalized when you see someone go on facebook and say these things, it is not unreasonable to conclude

similar sentiments are held by people in Secret Service or law enforcement and they are willing to take the utmost egregious actions. TDS, it's just an iteration of mass formation psychosis or group psychology. Of course it exists.

You call it TDS, but it has another actual clinical term. And you whip people up into a frenzy enough over a long enough period of time, and you will get groups of people to believe absurdities and be able to commit atrocities. I do want to say real quick, there actually is a medical term for TDS. It's officially called, and this is true, Trump Anxiety Disorder. I'm not kidding. Well, it's an iteration.

There's something called folie à deux, folie à trois, when two people go crazy together. And they make it worse. I mean, there's a famous set of twins that did this, right? They pushed each other farther. It's called folie à deux, which is French for folly by two. Viva, great point. And I would even add to that point that you made, that both of these kind of derangement syndromes and this mass psychosis were created by the intel agencies that, of course, used

the institutions, used the universities, social media, and big media in order to propagate a lot of this kind of psychosis over the American people. So even if you don't want to connect all the dots with the conspiracies of what happened here, they're responsible for creating this situation in this scenario, which is a part of a larger divide and conquer agenda. Everybody should knows what MKLTRA is, what they did. It's a real thing. It's not a conspiracy.

They literally tried to get people to assassinate someone by controlling their minds. And they were doing experiments with that. Experiments rooted in McGill University in Montreal at the Al Memorial Institution. But the other thing that you mentioned

and people also need to be sensitive to, like go to the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot or as I call it, the Fednapping plot. They get vulnerable people who are mentally unwell, mentally unstable. Don't have any friends. Social anxiety. Don't have good friends. Absolutely.

Now, I'd like to know what the connection was between FBI intelligence and the assassin, or the would-be assassin in this case. I guarantee you there is one. But they won't find out because the phone has been wiped. The phone has been somehow wiped, so they can't get any data or information out of it magically now. I think this is why it's so telling that Kimberly Ch cheeto the director of the secret service has yet as far as

i know to hold a press conference on this right she has had time to do an abc interview but she hasn't been able to sort of stand up in front of a camera and say here's what we know i mean even you know smaller agencies when there are you know tragedies you see this right and even if they say nothing they're like there was an incident we are investigating it we're not releasing else they they have the dignity to at least stand before their community and say here is our acknowledging that something has gone wrong we are investigating it you know it's frustrating when you're a reporter because you're like i know that you know more than you're saying and they'll say oh to protect the whatever privacy of whoever uh kimberly cheeto doesn't even

bother to do that and i think that's interesting right there either they are such a disorganized agency that they cannot uh manage themselves and are possibly controlled by someone else or dhs which controls the secret service and and kimberly cheeto are actively aware of how obviously they were involved and they are not willing to talk about it because they know there's no way to cover it up. Who has the DHS? Is it a certain Alejandro Mayorkas? No, and I don't know if you know what he's famous for, but... An invasion of America? He has single-handedly allowed an invasion

of the American southern border and he has not sorry about it. And that's the thing. He does not care about national security. Why would he care about the security of any elected officials, especially Donald Trump? I went on a bit of a rage-tweeting binge last night because I watched that Kim Cheetle interview. And the way the nonchalantness with which she describes it, like, yes, the buck stops with me. We'll make sure this never happens again.

I'm like, never happened again. You talk like you left the front door open and the dog got out of the house. When she says it'll never happen again, I'm always like, but what was your goal? It never happened again. It should never have happened in the first place. You need to resign and there need to be investigations into you and you need to be potentially charged and potentially locked up. Oh, it'll never happen again.

And no, I'm not resigning. She doesn't need to resign. She needs to be fired. She needs to be arrested, charged and imprisoned. And I'll say it's not it's not excusable. Oh, it's my first day. Speaker Mike Johnson during an interview with Fox, he was asked about this and he said, I'm going to call for her resignation.

I mean, there are a lot of pressure coming, especially from Republicans. Right, to say that this is not acceptable. But the answer is she is sort of protected by the Biden administration. I mean, we know what has happened because of illegal immigration in this country. And Mayorkas is still up.

Well, if they would meaningfully investigate it, that could substantially help. I mean, the reason why we know about MKUltra is because of the House Intelligence Committee. The Church Commission hearings. Yeah, the Church Commission hearings. The House Committee on Assassinations is how we found out about all of that. And to Tim's question about do we believe high-ranking government officials have

TDS, well, we know from Russiagate that that's what happened. We know that Mueller was filled with that. We know the first and second impeachments were filled with that. So, I mean, the Secret Service files went missing after january 6th no i i would push back on that i don't think the first second impeachments were trump derangement syndrome i think those were uh individuals who were of clear mind and were intentionally targeting donald trump with lies and manipulation trump derangement syndrome people going on social media wishing for the death of donald trump they are brainwashed and have

shattered minds from fake news. But when it comes to, say, the Ukraine scandal, that was Joe Biden engaging in a quid pro quo with the president of Ukraine in the video where he famously says, if you don't fire the prosecutor, you're not getting the billion dollars. They fabricate a scenario to blame that on Donald Trump instead. And they said Trump was digging up dirt on his political opponents. The fascinating thing is, Joe Biden's on camera admitting to a crime by their own standard,

and when Donald Trump tried to investigate that crime, they accused Trump of the crime and impeached him for it. That's not derangement. That's strategic. It's confession through prediction at every level. I mean, but you see it with the Vindman's. We see it with the head of counterintelligence.

You look at Peter Stroke. You look at James Baker. You mean, but you see it with the Vindmans. We see it with the head of counterintelligence. You look at Peter Stroke. You look at James Baker. You look at James Comey. I mean, all these... Clinesmith fabricated evidence to put an innocent man in prison. Yes. And these were some

of the highest ranking law enforcement people in the country. And some of the highest ranking State Department people in the country. Now, I will ask another question for you guys.

Did you see the reporting about how there are members of federal law enforcement who are terrified and have expressed that they will flee the country if Trump wins? You guys have seen this reporting? Is it possible any of those people don't want to leave the country and may take other actions instead? Kim Cheadle. Her name is Cheadle, by the way. I mean, Noman S. Oman. Let's cheat a little to win this election. She was so nonchalant, it enraged me. And I'm a polite, docile Canadian. It seemed to be so nonchalant and so downgrading what actually

happened to trigger somebody who's like, I'm going to go out and do something now because this is so insulting. My president nearly got his head blown off and you're talking about like, oh, well, it'll never happen again. So I believe that she's deliberately antagonistically being nonchalant about what happened to try to provoke someone to do something stupid so they can then say, oh, what was me? We're the victims now. And after she said the buck stops with me, we're in charge of this.

But that building was actually being secured by local law enforcement, right? She's not actually trying to take responsibility. It's crazy to me that there would be a building so close to the president that she's like, you guys take hold of this. We're responsible for security. But can you just secure that area for us? Thanks. I mean, there's there's no desire to be held accountable at all.

Let's jump to this story. We have a post from Charlie Kirk. MSNBC's Joy Reid just said that Trump surviving an assassination attempt is viewed as a sign of strength. And she thinks Joe Biden recovering from COVID should be seen the same way. Please, there's no way. Let's play it. Let's play it. Question that I have on that.

These two men are both elderly. Donald Trump is an elderly man who, for whatever reason, was given nine seconds to take a iconic photo op during an active shooter. What a weird situation. We'll figure that out one day um but his survival of that and bouncing right back and going right to his convention is being conveyed in the media world as a sign of strength it is this uh current president of the united states is 81 years old watch him walk up and has covid should he be fine in a couple of days? Doesn't that convey exactly the same thing? Is she the dumbest?

She's not dumb. She's not even confident he's going to be fine. She said, should he be fine? I gotta shout out Riley over here. You said, oh, they cut it. Have you seen the clip, though? MSNBC is never going to show a feeble Joe Biden struggling to walk upstairs. You've got to find the clip.

He looks decrepit. I mean, he is decre decrepit he's decrepit going up these stairs he takes a break at every step catches his breath gets his footing goes to the next step do you see the meme it was me after leg day and he's like struggling to walk up the stairs i did they really just compare those two things well and she's suggesting that he was like given nine seconds to take a photo up as if this were a stage thing. You have to be sick in the flipping head to actually think that way. The man just survived a freaking assassination attempt. And it's a conspiracy. They let him look strong.

And not only did he take out Trump in this, there is a real person who died. There is a real person who lost his life during this and to handle this with with again the nonchalance with with the idea the attitude that uh whatever it was a big stage thing there was a person who died a father and husband who who lost his life who had his brains blown out in front of everyone in front of his daughters his daughter and his wife and to handle it with this sort of nonchalance and then compare it to having COVID? Oh my gosh. How do normal people watch this? The photographer's name

is Evan Vucci. I wonder if he could use some legal advice over the accusation that he's part of a grand conspiracy to stage a martyrdom photo for Donald Trump. Well, I mean, the liberal lawyers have apprised us that if you make a false accusation of that kind, you could be sued for billions of dollars. Well, I think it was the entire GDP of France, wasn't it? Yeah, exactly. That's what the demand was.

They wanted $3 trillion initially. I mean, that's what they wanted from Alex Jones. And now there's another Austin connection to all this, because the business is an Austin business, supposedly, that was involved in shorting the stock. But they even did a meme. They have a Joe Biden with a rainbow flag in the background. Did you see there's an anonymous editor suggesting that the media should pull the photo because it's being used as Trump to help his campaign. Oh, wow. Like heaven forbid the truth benefit Donald Trump. I think one, they didn't expect that reaction.

It was one of the most extraordinary heroic reactions I've ever witnessed in life. I just want to say, could you imagine assuming let's just let's just play hypothetically, you know, I'll be nice. This is a conspiracy by the deep state or whoever to take out their political rival. And instead, he tilts his head, they miss, and then he raises his fist and gets one of the most iconic photos in history. I mean, talk about slipping on a banana peel. Yeah, right. I mean, it's a complete flipping of the script. I mean, it's extraordinary.

You couldn't narrate this. You couldn't pre-write this. No. This was just Trump showing character and courage right in the moment of what most people would be shocked

and horrified by. The picture of Joe Biden recovering from COVID and raising his fist. The same courage. Yes, exactly. The same strength. That is wild.

The amazing thing is we talk about an act of God, divine intervention, and the man, Corey, who died in front of his family, protecting his family. And it's tough to reconcile those two things. I say, when Trump tilted his head, it wasn't just a gesture that saved his life. I genuinely, thoroughly, in my heart of hearts, believe it was a movement that saved America and probably the world.

Because we would be in a state of absolute cataclysmic turmoil right now had he not tilted his head joe biden would have come out and said this is the tragic consequences of hyper rhetoric in the political sphere we should all come together now uh it what's a censorship would what censorship yeah they all these companies and so it's it's not just that it didn't work it's not just that it backfired but i feel genuinely also in my heart of hearts there's been a seismic shift in the cosmos in terms of the direction of america in the best possible way but we still have to you know battle it's been cool from i guess my perspective just recently graduating college uh having lots of friends who didn't know really where they stood politically who are now reposting on their stories or posting on social media that photo it's almost like closeted conservatives are are outing themselves which

is great to see people who maybe would have even people who've considered themselves apolitical who who didn't really like trump because he did the mean tweets who are now voicing and publicly showing their support right i think it inspires a lot of patriotism among people who maybe just aren't that engaged in anything. You know, it's not that they are super political one way or other, but they just sort of let this all be background noise to the lives they're living. And, you know, that's a way to choose to live. But I think that there is such power in that moment.

And again, the fact that it wasn't, you know, to inflate his own ego, I really think Donald Trump stood up and gestured like that to show the crowd that he was okay. Like he thought of the people who were looking to him with anxiety, with fear. They don't know what's going on. And he said like, it's okay.

I'm up. I can walk off this stage. That's very meaningful in a time of crisis. I want to give a shout out to politics girl. Do you guys know politics girl? Oh yeah, she's liberal. And she posted this. She posted thread.

And then there's this guy named dirk schwank esquire who's got about 90 000 followers and he tweeted dear u.s president i know you are busy normalizing the completely radical dangerous people at the rnc convention but we the people have some gd questions and y'all should investigate a thread i want to pause real quick and just say i stand stand firmly 100% with Dirk Schwenk. You know why? He says in his thread, where did the other bullets go? Assuming there were bullets.

Well, he's a conspiracy theorist. That's a $1.5 billion accusation right there. Now, hold on. Hold on. Hold on. He says, CNN is reporting the kid brought a range finder into the perimeter and was ID'd on the roof well before the shooting. How can this possibly be the case? Good question.

I would like all of Dirk Schwenk's questions to be answered. Some of them are probably rational and can be easily answered, like where did the bullets go? Well, innocent bystanders got hit. But then he asks about the rangefinder. I say we unify with the populist left. They're accusing Donald Trump of staging this. Don't know, don't care who did.

How about we investigate and figure out how could a guy with a rangefinder get in to that perimeter three hours in advance with full warning and they did nothing about it they thought it was binoculars because he wanted a better view of the president was politics girl uh criticizing that accusation or was she siding with it she's siding with okay she's she's because i thought maybe she had a moment of lucidity but she's still crazy i'm saying this i'm saying to all the leftists who are accusing donald trump of having staged this i'm like oh heavens no we should investigate this and get to the bottom of how this happened but she's still crazy. I'm saying this. I'm saying to all the leftists who are accusing Donald Trump of having staged this, I'm like, oh, heavens no.

We should investigate this and get to the bottom of how this happened. Yes. There we go. Let's have a competition. The left and the right can have an argument over how this went down

and it's a race to who can uncover as much evidence as possible. Then we'll know what happened. Yes. I mean, I'm happy if both sides want to dig as much as possible

and as much information is brought to light for whatever cause, whatever side of this you're rooting for, just bring the information forward. I think that's a comfort to the gesture that Trump had. But I think one of our biggest challenges as a society is the fact that we are so low trust. We do not believe our neighbors. We don't know them. We don't want to know them. We don't believe our governments. We don't believe our news outlets. And there are good reasons for this. I think all of these institutions have lost the people they're supposed to connect. But it is not enough to just say, oh, that's something that happened in the past. We have to connect but uh it is not enough to just say oh that's something that happened in the past we have to have a society that becomes transparent and honest and cultivates trust again because we can't have a unified culture without it we do have um this this

this breaking information right here that i think you all need to see actual cow so uh this is in breaking news is that the dei secret service agent who's a bodacious lady so this is a breaking news. Is that the DEI Secret Service agent who's a bodacious lady? So this is a video of a cow standing on a roof who walked up a sloped roof. And DC Drano said, Secret Service Director, the roof slope was unsafe. And then he puts an actual cow. An actual cow. Yeah, that's a lie. It's just not true.

Look, to the left, it argues that Donald Trump staged this himself. The reason why I don't buy that is that the story doesn't make sense. But look, to the left, it argues that Donald Trump staged this himself. The reason why I don't buy that is that the story doesn't make sense. If the conspiracy was of Trump to fake an assassination attempt, they'd have answers to all of these questions as to why there weren't police, how this guy got in. But it actually appears as though whatever happened actually failed. Whatever plan was in place failed. If you want to argue there's no conspiracy and security failed, then security failed 100 percent. And that's the official I refuse to be a conspiracy theorist notion. The left is arguing that Trump staged this. They're saying he had a gel pack in his hat and he smacked it when the when that's why you see his put his hand up when he when his hand

goes up there like that's when he hits the gel pack. And then he goes down. Others have said the Secret Service pours the thing on his ear and then he stands up. They were it's a trick. And I'm like, yeah, if that was true true there wouldn't be weird questions and panic from the secret service as to why they didn't handle this properly they'd have reasoning behind that they have sent out their alert that they're going to hold a press conference like three days in advance they would have been ready with their story it's if if this all went according to plan we would be saying wow i can't believe how that all went down yeah i mean well there wouldn't be other dead bodies there either yeah I mean, those

are the problems with, I mean, I think they're shocked by the net positive effect for Trump, and they're trying to spin it whatever way they can. Some of the questions they're asking are good questions, but they're questions that go to the inadequacy and incapacity of the Secret Service to do its job. What's wild, though, we're asking the same questions, they

just are presupposing a different answer. Why wasn't there security there? Therefore, it was staged. No, why the hell wasn't there security there? Period. Get the answer to that. And if it was staged by Trump, why is Cheadle saying monumental failure on our behalf? Yeah, the court of public opinion matters here. And I think everyone in independent media, everyone in the general public automatically needs to assume blame for the federal government here until they prove otherwise.

And I think coming from that perspective is a lot better than trusting the federal government to federally investigate itself, because we're not going to get answers to these questions. We're not going to find out what happened here unless 4chan gets involved, unless the autists get involved and start to really dig down and research into this guy's history, who he was friends with, who he was associating with, how he got his hands on explosive devices and transmitters. I mean, that just doesn't happen to the average human being. I'm with, how he got his hands on explosive devices and transmitters. I mean, that just doesn't happen to the average human being. I'm like, how do you, that's wild.

I want to pull this to it from Libs of TikTok. Let's have the debate. Libs of TikTok highlights this guy who, she says, this doctor is giving advice, including medical advice for another person to attempt an assassination against U.S. presidents. I don't want to highlight all of this. So I'm going to now move away from that post because I don't want to highlight all of this, so I'm going to now move away from that post because I don't want it to, I think it's egregious. But one thing that I've noticed as of the past few days and increasingly today

are classic liberals and centrists arguing that those of us who opposed cancel culture must be okay with those who advocate and call for violence. And this is the most frustrating thing. Ten years ago, we saw the editor, I think it was around ten years ago, or maybe it wasn't ten years ago, it was eight years ago, or seven. But at some point, the editor-in-chief of the Daily Caller was suspended from Twitter, when it was Twitter at the time, for tweeting, learn to code, but not at anyone. He was explaining the story, and he wrote learn to code, and they suspended him.

We saw waves of suspensions from people saying hashtag learn to code is a joke. That was explaining the story, and he wrote Learn to Code, and they suspended him. We saw waves of suspensions from people saying, hashtag Learn to Code is a joke. That was cancel culture. That was the mass censorship regime. We also saw people fired from their jobs for making donations to Donald Trump, to Kyle Rittenhouse. That's cancel culture. Sarah Silverman losing her job because 10 years prior, she did blackface. Cancel culture. The idea that at any point when I, i can't speak for everybody else was saying hey that's that's against free speech the idea that that would suggest i would ever tolerate people going on on x or facebook and saying here's what you need to do to succeed next time is an absurdity and i'm seeing a ton of people be like now that we have the power of cancel culture

we must not do it now Now, I'll say this. I'm not saying I condone highlighting some Home Depot woman's stupid Facebook post to 10 friends or whatever. I'm not going to defend someone who's saying something like, next time, don't miss. Because that's one degree over the line

where the person is saying they want it to happen again and they hope they succeed. That is a call for violence. Where is this coming from now that you've got these liberals and conservatives these like free speech absolutists who are like we were always in favor of the left calling for violence yeah i mean i think it's i mean imminent incitement to violence has never been constitutionally protected it's always been outside the first amendment certain kinds of stalking and harassment's also always been outside the first amendment and you can be, as I am,

a purist on the First Amendment and its defense and recognize these statements and attitudes and comments are outside of its protection. Some are within free speech, right? So I say it's on the line when someone says I am upset that this person failed. They've posted those things. Yeah, that's generic. But if you're giving advice like the doctor, here's how to do it.

That strikes me as imminent in science of violence. Yeah, that doctor said which drug you should take to stabilize, which rounds you should use at certain ranges. And so you've got this generic push to be like, we shouldn't be canceling people. And I'm like, yo, Libs just found a guy giving instruction on how to do it. It's wild to me that someone sat down and wrote that out. Well, then did he?

It's a doctor? Right. How can you live with yourself? You're a doctor and you're just like and then take this drug like what about the hippocratic oath and no moment first do no harm right and no no moment you were like maybe i don't post this one no well it's if you think somebody's hitler then i mean doesn't everybody celebrate that image that if you could take out and that's that's what's wrong with the the leftist ideology of calling everybody nazis

but i i guess my question for all of you guys is, I have said from the get-go, when I had that debate on Joe Rogan's podcast, I said Antifa organizes violence. They post where people should be meeting up to engage in violence. Why is that allowed? I thought it was clear,

going back to 2019 and before, that my position was, if you use Twitter as an organizing tool for violence and crime, we suspend you. And you can make an argument about what the First Amendment allows and what it doesn't. I'm saying outright, my view is, my line is, don't go on social media and say, people should go commit crime and things of that nature. Now that we're actually witnessing people do it, do you guys agree that it is free speech, that people should be allowed to say they want the murder, the death, and they want these things to have succeeded? I think if it's, to me, it's the constitutional test of imminent incitement to violence. If it's outside of that scope, it's still a bit of an issue

because the scope of first amendment protection isn't as broad for twitter as it is for some other settings but i think at a minimum a lot of this clearly crosses the line of imminent incitement to violence so that that's where i would draw the line but i think it varies by individual but i i understand why libs of tiktok is exposing them i i don't have any problem with people suffering consequence for for saying horrific things i think if you say horrific things, you deserve whatever consequences come about. It's not just that. You put it on social media.

You put it out there presumably so that the world sees it. And then don't complain when someone amplifies your goal of having the world see it and your employer sees it. Now, when it comes to things that I argue would not be incompatible with your job, Like, I love JK Rowling, you get fired as an accountant. I don't see a nexus between those two statements, one that compromises your ability to do your job. A nurse saying I won't treat X, Y, and Z ethnicities on social media,

well, expect it to be put on blast and expect to suffer some consequences. That's not console culture. That is, I don't want to use the cliche, consequence culture. That's just logical. But the second you put something on social media, you relinquish your right to complain when someone bigger than you amplifies that. And that's what lives of TikTok does so well. I mean, she holds a mirror to it.

That's it. That's all she has done since its conception is just hold a mirror to it. Yet you have other people flipping out saying, oh, you're trying to get me fired from my job. No, I'm amplifying the message that you put out for the world to see that is merely it that is it the mistake that i think we see with um you know and i'll express my disagreement specifically with colin right who is arguing against cancel culture and all that stuff right now is i feel like someone like colin and i say this academically does not have morals you have a lot of these liberals um these secular

centrist types who do not have a a a strong moral foundation and they argue i have a principle and my principle is free speech people should be allowed to speak and say whatever they want etc etc and i think that fails the test of philosophical understanding and moral philosophy that is what kind of society do you want to live in? What are the functions and elements of that society? What do they create, and why do they create these things? What do we ultimately want? What I find with many of these centrist and classical liberal types is they just say,

let people do whatever they want and mind their own business, but what do you get? You get two dudes in San Francisco engaging in oral activities on each other in front of children. And I think that crosses a moral line for the majority of Americans who then stop and say, hey, wait a minute, that liberal proposition did not work out the way we thought it would. People who are allowed to free reign to do whatever they want will build a culture where they engage in egregious actions which cause harm to the rest of us. So my view is simply this. When I say I believe in free speech, I'm not a free speech absolutist, and so therefore maybe I don't.

But my point is, imminent threats of violence, completely agree. However, when it comes to social media, I've always said, I think it's fair if a social media platform says, we draw the line on someone advocating for murder, death, glorifying it. Elon Musk agrees. Elon Musk said you can't glorify death, murder, and violence, and took down one of Destiny's posts. That's a fine standard, in my opinion, because we want to have reasonable boundaries on society for our moral framework. That is to say, if someone goes on Twitter and is a communist and expresses the stupidest opinion

in the world, they should be allowed to do that. They're against me and I will argue that. But if they use that position on top of their ideology to try and strip me of my rights, then I think, well, now we must stop them from causing harm to our society and the world we want to live in. I think too many of these centrists don't understand moral framework. So they just say, all that matters is the hard principle. The question then becomes, what does that produce, and where does your country end up? And, well, we can see it. I watched a video from Tenet Media, Taylor Hansen, of two dudes engaging in adult activities on each other in public in front of children.

Is that the country that we all thought we were going to get when we decided that people should have expanded rights and freedoms? Certainly not. So then there should be some threshold where we're like, hey, we're going to draw the line on a moral framework where you say you don't do that in public. They used to reserve that for Epstein Island, but now they're trying to normalize it, which is kind of sickening and kind of debaucherous to our kind of society.

Kind of. Yeah, I mean, I think there's basically there's always been limits, and you, for example, at any public forum you can have basic limitations. Certain obscenity can be prohibited. Certain kinds of language, certain kinds of ideas can be prohibited. Because you want the public forum to be one that everybody wants to participate in. And nobody wants to participate in the Klan rally. So you're entirely entitled to exclude the Klan from that public forum.

But I feel like with X and his other larger platforms, the answer was always, if you have a monopoly on the platform, if it is a central public square, then the broader the platform, the broader tolerance you must have for political opinions and ideas. But there's still a place where we draw the line. The idea now that it's hypocritical to condemn those advocating for death and murder because we were critical of people being banned for citing crime statistics. It's ridiculous. The cultural standard of the left during the cancel culture wave was you can't cite facts. You can't state opinions. Megan Murphy got banned for saying men aren't women, though. Well, even still, this is what Joe Biden and the Democratic Party are doing.

Just recently with Title IX, which is people think of it as women's sports. It's broader than just women's sports joe biden illegally and administratively rewrote title nine took 37 words in its original implementation uh rewrote created a new proposal that is now almost half a million words uh 1577 pages from a brief brief paragraph uh but in this now your speech is compelled he he says uh you are guilty in charge with sexual harassment if you participate in hate speech but who who defines hate speech who defines it and all democrats all 205 of them who voted i mean just two weeks ago voted in favor actually in opposition of the cra that would have prevented this every single democrat mothers and

fathers of of of their own children voted in opposition to this. The leftists argued five or so years ago during the peak of cancel culture that if an individual went on X and posted FBI crime stats, they should lose their job,

and many of them did. That's an absurd standard. I mean, we need to utilize facts to better understand the world around us. My argument is, don't advocate for the murder of a political figure because that's destabilizing

to the broader society. I feel like my framework for what we're allowed to do and say and what people should accept and tolerate is massively broad and encompasses all political ideologies so long as you don't try to cross the line into violence. And their standard is, how dare you tell me I can't say these things, you're for cancel culture, you hypocrite.

Yeah, and I think they just don't understand there's a difference between the two i mean there's a difference between clearly if they don't understand the difference between being shot and covid how could they distinguish it wasn't the cancel culture was sort of predicated on a lack of nexus between what was said when it was said and the sanction being administered in real time and it typically involved going after stuff that was like tim mentioned on monday not wrong at the time but now being retroactively weaponized it's called it's called ex post facto uh you know application of criminal law like you can't retroactively make something illegal and that's what cancel culture was trying to do this is i don't view it as cancel culture when you come out and you say

on social media something that is morally offensive And then those who employ you say well, I find this morally offensive. I can't trust you or your judgment I don't want you working for me. That's not cancel culture Well, that is suffering the consequences of being a foul and detestable human being. Hold on though What if someone goes on social media and says something about gay marriage like I think it's wrong It's disgusting blah blah and then someone finds that post and sends it to their job and they get fired is that what what type of job are they teaching kids at a school they work at home depot i i would think that that would be more approaching cancel culture agreed um and that's like where there is no nexus

between the statement and compromising your ability to do your job or to represent a company but and so this is the point that i'm trying to make what makes cancel culture cancel culture and makes it unreasonable is someone working at home depot saying something like joe biden's a moron who supports black lives matter and these people are just you know they're rioters and they're violent and blah blah blah and then someone contacting home depot getting him fired for saying that it's like well that's like a general political opinion of disdain. But what we're looking at right now is Libs of Tic Tac saying, hey, here's a person saying they wish the assassin

succeeded. That is like tenfold across the like so much worse. It happened in Canada. That would be like an airline pilot floating the paratrooping, parasailing terrorist from October 7 and saying, well, hey, I'm just expressing a political belief. I'm sorry, you fly planes and that's not a belief that is compatible with your job. It's not cancel culture. It's a

reasonable consequence. I just think the important thing that people need to understand, you've got a lot of these centrists that try to maintain this amoral position. And I'm not saying this as a point of derision. I'm saying quite literally without morals. The example I always give is the principle among the centrist view. Government should have no say in our medical decisions. What do you get with leftists? The liberals say that means women can get abortions if they want. But you should be forced to get a vaccine if I decide you should be forced to. In this instance, you don't get a say. Then you have the inversion with conservatives. People on the right, they say government should not be intervening in a person's private medical decisions.

You cannot force them to get medicated. However, if a parent tries to get gender affirming care for their child, the state should intervene and stop that from happening. Everybody has their moral line where they think a community should or should not intervene against an action that they view to be immoral. The centrists are like either is fine, I guess, because we have principles. That principle is principle is government should never intervene. Well, that's not reality. Because most of these kids, like if you look at Elon Musk's position on gender affirmation,

he would align more with conservatives if a parent tried to get their kid sterilized, he would probably lean with conservatives, saying the state should stop that from happening, because the science we've already seen shows that's not helpful. Riley, where do you think this is is going because you've been fighting this on the front lines more than i think anyone else well it's interesting of course hearing a say inciting

violence i genuinely believe the other side sees something as simple or as factual as assertive the assertion the biological reality that men cannot become women they really do believe that is violence and so again it goes back to okay how do we define inciting violence uh so it's interesting to to kind of unpack all of this of course we can all see calling for an assassination or teaching someone how to better um achieve murdering someone of course that that that objectively is violence but i think the other side they have a or teaching someone how to better achieve murdering someone, of course, that objectively is violence. But I think the other side, they have a different definition of violence,

just as if they have a different definition of compassion and kindness and tolerance and inclusivity. We just have different definitions. I think we all want the same thing, really. On most issues, we want the same thing. I disagree. You think so? I thought that when i was uh in in my late teens and then as i got older i started to realize that these people were lying

about what they really wanted to gain power and i learned this when i met maybe in terms of of elected representation no no no i want to i want to gendering that that is i want to stress this to a great degree i thought this growing up that everybody wanted the same things and to get there in different ways. And then I met people that occupy Wall Street. And I learned that demons do exist. And some people, a New York Times reporter told me, she's a nihilist who can't figure out any reason to existence. So she wants to make sure everyone suffer and the world burns. But do you think that's most people who embrace that same ideology?

I don't think that's most people i really don't i have i have out of all of the people that i've met in the in that cohort it is it's a dark it there there is evil well there's no i mean the whole i believe the whole thing is evil there's no doubt about that but again i i do think they want they believe they're being virtuous they do i think in most cases and in regard to the general public i don't think that if people like in congress serving who have authoritative positions i don't think that i do believe they are jaded they're evil they they have ulterior motives that they are are are fighting for uh but i think again your everyday person take yourself outside of out, what have you.

I think they believe they are being virtuous. These are the people who are tangentially involved. So the default liberal who wakes up in the morning and makes pancakes and then turns on MSNBC and goes, I think we should support the rights of trans people. I agree. And I think that's who I'm speaking to or about. And the activists know the activists are evil. Well, there's no doubt about that. I certainly agree. And it's not absolute.

I'm saying like, you know, when I spent time at Occupy Wall Street, the people who are good got pushed out and left. And the people who are evil burned everything to the ground and advocated for violence and destruction for the sake of violence and destruction. Well, that's what we see happening to our country now. And when you look at Antifa and you look at the riots they've engaged in, there is no goal. There's none. You go to these meetings and they say it's a diversity of tactics. You ask them what that means. And like, it means we're all doing different things. And I said, then what's the plan? Like, what's the end game here? And they're like, different people are going to smash different things. And I'm just like, OK, so you're literally just running around destroying and ruining people's lives. I asked them at Occupy Wall Street when they smashed at a bank window. I asked a guy, I was like, why did you smash the window? And he was like, because those banks are evil. And I was like, what does that mean? And they're like, well, banks rip people off.

And then I said, do you think the minimum wage employees who now are out of work and can't come into work understand why you threw a brick through their window? And they were like, yes. And I was like, no you don't. They don't know that. And they're like, well, that guy might not. I'm like, then why did you do it? They have no answer. They just felt like smashing a window. That's how I met you. That's how we became friends because I was arguing with these people too.

And I was like, wait, this guy over here with the beanie makes a lot of sense here. I like this guy. And that's how we literally became friends. Fighting the communists and the far radicals and the farists at occupy wall street whose only plan was today we're going to go out and someone's going to go break something and we're like hi what does breaking a thing accomplish and they're like what do you mean we're going to let air out of the police car tires that's going to help everybody but you meant you mentioned evil and then you mentioned no strategy or no plan to the to the destruction but going back to it is

a fight for power ideological power ideological control over other people and though there's no strategy to the destruction there is power in the ability to destroy something that belongs to somebody else and so they i do believe they're just they're they're i do believe some of them are evil but it is a question a quest for power let me control over the other. This isn't indicative of anything outside of my experience, my experience with specific activists in New York. I look at it very much like the Sith. It is one evil person trying to manipulate a system where everyone has a competing interest, but whoever is better at manipulating gains more power. So as it was explained to me by the people

who were organizing Occupy Wall Street, they said, we want to flip the pyramid over. And to the average untrained person, what do they imagine? You've got the pyramid with the elites and the Illuminati on top and the workers on the bottom.

And when you flip it over, now the workers are on top. Well, I'm not stupid. So I asked them, well, when you flip over a pyramid, it just crumbles into a rubble pile with some people from the working class on top and the rest fall to the bottom. And they went, exactly. We're hoping that'll be us.

And I was like, so you're not talking about helping the working class. You're talking about inverting the system to break it apart so that you can stand atop the rubble. And they were like, yeah, right. I was like, well, well okay some pigs are more equal than others that's right all right we're gonna go super chats if you haven't already would you kindly smash that like button subscribe to this channel share the show with your friends if you really do like it head over to timcast.com click join us to become a member and tune in to our members only call-in show coming up in about 20 minutes where you as members get to call and

talk to us and our guests it's gonna be to be a lot of fun, but for now we will read your superchats. We got Clint Torres who says, Howdy, people. Clint is always first. He just knows how to do it. Alright. Token Black Guy says, Howdy, people. Random question. If you were selected to be on a four-person political debate team, which three people would you

choose to be your teammates? From this panel or of the world? Of the the world riley you go first oh i don't know um let's see people on my team on any topic we're just yeah you want to debate uh let's see i think people um of recent at least who would be pretty exceptional at this. I think Vivek does a fantastic job. I want him to be the press secretary desperately. I think that would be a...

It's so beneath him, though. Yes, and I think that kind of locks him into... I feel like most press secretaries, you go into then media afterwards, and I don't think that's the future for him, but I do think it would be good for the country to see him there. He's taking notes over here he has time to think Alex Jones

Tucker Carlson Russell Brandon Tim I completely disagree with that assessment I would say Vivek Ramaswamy perfect choice he's number one Tucker Carlson absolutely I don't know about Alex Jones he's going to do a He's going to do a crap show, which is going to be fun. I would say Viva. I agree. Viva Fry right there.

It's a four-person debate team. That's four. Wait, wait. No, that was three, wasn't it? And myself. Including yourself. And myself, right. Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and Robert Kennedy. I've had a lot of time to think about this now. Sorry, I have to just pick one person. I would obviously take Barnes, and I would take the, oh, geez, Jordan Peece would be good. Jordan Peece would be great. And even though we've had our tiffs, Constantine, I apologize.

I don't apologize. Deal with it. But Constantine Kisson, even though I disagree with his judgment sometimes and his conclusions, he's eloquent, and he can think very quickly on his feet. Strategically, he's good. This is interesting. Vivek is number one across the board. There's no one else you could convince me of who's the best. He thinks so quickly on his feet. He's charismatic

and he's empathetic even when he disagrees with the person that he's discussing. Great press secretary. Vivek is the Brazilian jiu-jitsu of debating, but Jordan Peterson is more like the judo. The reason why I would say Jordan Peterson is good, it's not in his knowledge or his wit,

it's in his, he knows how to ask the question. Agreed. Right away when someone presents a logic with some hole in it, Jordan can easily go, well, what about this then? And they go, ah! And that's all he has to say. He knows what to target in their argument. If it concerned law, I would

have Alan Dershowitz. He's amazing. How old is Alan Dershowitz, Robert? He's in his 70s. He defended Epstein pretty well. I mean, what was fascinating about how old that went down was he got blamed for things that ultimately all those people retracted those

allegations. And I've always been curious about the timing of all of it. That it struck me that they were trying to remove him from the scene at a time he'd become a dissident voice from the establishment. We gotta read more Superchats. I would pick Ann Coulter, the defense

attorney who defended Casey Anthony and got her off guilt-free. And I think also you have to pick either Tucker or Donald Trump, right? I don't want a fully woman team. That's crazy. All right, here we go. Here we go. Blackout4465 says, let's toss some levity into this heavy week. Question for Tim. Who would you say is the most influential skater of all time? I'm sorry, sir. That's not a good question. It's Rodney Mullen. I was going to say Tony Hawk. That's the only one I know.

That's the tourist answer. That's the tourist answer. Anybody who knows anything knows that Rodney Mullen basically invented skateboarding. Skateboarding as we know it. So, for instance, how do you jump on a skateboard? It's called an ollie. And that's named for Alan Ollie Gelfand. And what he would do is, in pools, he would sort of slash the tail, scooping it in the

air and turning. And that's it. That's going up a wall, utilizing gravity to your advantage to spin and the board would stay stuck to your feet. They thought he was using glue and stuff. Rodney Mullen looked at that and said, I bet if you do the same thing on the ground and hit it, the pressure of the board, the inertia will keep it stuck to your foot. As you jump in the air, it will rise up. And he invented the flat ground ollie, the inertia, will keep it stuck to your foot as you jump in the air. It will rise up. And he invented the flat ground ollie, the ability for a skateboarder to jump with their board, Rodney Mullen, the kickflip, where the board flips underneath.

Rodney Mullen, heel flip, Rodney Mullen, 360 flip, Rodney Mullen. When you watch any skateboarding and you see an individual do any trick in any contest, it is a derivative of Rodney Mullen's tricks that he invented. And that being said, I can give some other shoutouts to Mark Gonzalez and Nautus Coppice, who basically popularized the modern street skateboarding,

hitting handrails and doing things like that. That's very influential. Tony Hawk certainly is influential in his own right. He's actually named several tricks, but he's a vert skater, and so his influence was limited to sort of the end of the 90s, where, while he did have a big influence in the early days, he did land the 900 before anybody else. Most skateboarders, 90 plus percent, are doing tricks, even on vert, invented by Rodney Mullen.

So Rodney Mullen invents the kickflip. He starts flipping his board. Tony Hawk then starts adapting flips on vert. And so it actually goes from the street back to the vert ramp. But there's certainly many more for very different reasons why they're influential, but there's no question it's Rodney Mullen. Anyway, let's read super chats that aren't so esoteric.

Roger Man says, don't forget to put your MyPillow in the dryer before you use it the first time. It's a big mistake people make. You gotta put it in the pillow and it fluffs up, and then they're amazing. But just like right out of the bag, he's like, you gotta put it in the dryer, man. Let what is that uh katoth swiss has wtf i thought they just needed his corporeal form not anymore that's what i'm saying like they just said they need his corporeal

form so if he has a pulse he could be on the ballot i love that we all know they're talking about biden dershowitz is 85 by the way wow that's that's sharp as a tack not biden 81 let's go here we got uh pete nut butter he says local tabletop game designer i'd love to aid in the development of a card game you mentioned yesterday or any game made by you and your team to help take back gaming culture from its toxic woke capture we are working on a card game called debate me and the the game is played with a single deck constructed by any individual and you choose which deck to play with all players use the same deck uh there's 52 cards in each deck and everyone is dealt two cards each card is a represents a

character with debate stature and they're varying power levels so of course donald trump is the most powerful right-wing card brock obama is the most powerful right-wing card. Barack Obama is the most powerful establishment card. And then you have bankrupt Alex Jones as the weakest right-wing card. The goal is to put together a debate team using the two cards in your hand and five cards on the board to make the best five-card debate team. Now, you may be saying, this sounds an awful lot like Texas Hold'em. It's because you are correct. However, we are going to add customizable cards with different effects on the state of the game, which make it somewhat different.

So it will be a very similar information game. And the way it's played is you look down at the two characters who are on your debate team and you invite your followers to the debate. Whoever constructs the best debate team takes all the followers into their account. And then whoever amasses all the followers wins the game. You can play it however you want. It's going to be fun. It's going to be fun. It's going to be fun when you open a booster pack and get a foil golden God Emperor Trump card.

And so it's basically, the idea is to use the format of Texas Hold'em because it's super easy for people to understand poker. The average person can just be told how to play it and they play right away. Not well, but they can play right away. And then we add fun and silliness and and levity to it with uh special abilities and um corinne jean-pierre one of the cards we designed so uh for those that understand poker cards she is a jack in the

establishment but she can only be played as though she were a six so that's pretty good the point being that she's in a position she is certainly not qualified for yeah anyway let's read some more super chats joe spinel says biden's using this covid as smoke to drop out because the bullet missed while dhs secretary and director of usss are getting subpoenaed and more and more evidence keep coming forward from saturday uh it's a little a little a little far for me i think biden wants to leave and covid COVID is an excuse. It's really that simple. I don't know about anything else. Sun Wu Kong says, I love Barnes, but he's being too conspiratorial.

Too many eyewitnesses seeing the shooter. Also, the azimuth works out for him. Hanlon's razor applies as plenty of examples that day. God saved Trump. Baruch Hashem? Baruch Hashem is the Hebrew way of saying praise God. Well, all right. I agree with Viva. It's fractal wrongness. I mean, the Secret Service doesn't let their protectee,

they don't let the president go out onto stage when they have an active threat they know about. Are you being too conspiratorial? Well, Barnes, you only get too conspiratorial if there's a second shooter. I mean, we don't even need that to have the conspiracy in this case. Well, if you wanted a patsy, you'd want to make sure people saw the patsy in order to blame the patsy. So the fact that people saw him isn't evidence that he was not a patsy.

Well, but the fact that he might have been a patsy doesn't mean that he didn't fire the shot. It just meant that he takes the fall. I'm with Barnes on this one. Yeah. Alright, Bender the Off offender says might be a stupid question but could we possibly be in a situation where trump is the only nominee for president with no opposition yes uh something that people need to consider is that biden ends up dropping out for some reason kamala says i don't know and you end up with basically an open Democrat field and confusion. Do you think that means RFK is waiting to see what Biden does before he makes a decision about his campaign? RFKs, they're aligned now in some sense with the Trump campaign.

I think that leaked call is an indication of it. I think there is alignment there. I think there is common ground. But if you're RFK and you're like, well, maybe I'll end up with you. I mean, does he need to endorse Trump now? Can he wait until we know more about Biden's condition? I'm just throwing it out there as an alternative well i think if you're the trump camp you actually probably want kennedy to still be in the race because if he's out of the race then that may lead to more people voting for biden that otherwise would vote for kennedy

cody mcpherson says i couldn't find the exact strike price but those options just by looking at puts for the 30th of august those puts are down at least 40 percent from Friday. So they lost a ton of money. Someone else mentioned that they were actually made on June 30th. So a while ago. And the filing only was published on that date. So people are kind of overreacting as to what it means. Someone was just betting against Donald Trump. And it could be much simpler. Some guys, it can be really obvious. Here's a question, and verify this. Did we know on June 30th that Trump's sentencing was being postponed?

I don't think so, right? No, because it was the first week of July that the decision came down. So the put options, the shorts were likely due to someone saying, hey, when Trump goes to prison, he won't be able to post on Truth. The value's going to tank. Yeah, but it would be the volume of that short. It seems very, very, very heavy to bet on that in any event.

And it would be a stupid bet because he really, really wasn't likely going to be going to jail anyhow. Well, Tim, when we were talking to Trump, he brought up the larger actions against Truth Social

and how people were attacking the stock specifically. So it does make sense that this was happening before this attempt at assassination. Jared Hilliard says, looking more and more like local officers or state troopers were the ones who stopped the

shooter not the secret service uh i'm hearing some of that but most importantly i think uh pointing out that the local police said the secret service lied secret service said uh local police were guarding that building and the cops were like what no we weren't we were doing traffic control that's crazy and that would never be protocol for local police to be guarding that building it doesn't make any sense it's so strange to me how many times we've had something happen and one agency or one one group of law enforcement is supposed to be in charge and someone else has stepped in it or to make me think of uvalde when it's all the border patrol people who lived in the area who were like we're not waiting we're going into the school

well it was actually on monday night where someone said you know, incompetence and gave the Uvalde example. And unfortunately, with the Uvalde that, you know, it might be more reasonable than just incompetence or cowardice. Ian Crossland says, all these things are important, but I got a jeweled lotus and the one ring. Tim is going to get rocked by my Urza deck. That's just not true, Ian. I'm sorry. Ian and I were playing some Commander just about a week ago and i was trying to be nice and so this is magic the other by the way and i was playing a thassa deep dwelling deck which is not the strongest in the world and he was playing urza which is just ridiculous power level and he was just he's being a dick about it and i was like okay dude i was

trying to play a friendly game so i took out my nadu a competitive edh deck and i won on turn three and he was like, wow. And so Ian, that doesn't matter what you do with the One Ring or Jeweled Lotus. You will not beat my strongest deck. You can do whatever you want. You will never win. I'll see you next week. This is what it feels like to listen to a foreign language.

I sort of understand the word. I have no idea what you just said. I learn so much when I'm here, but I cannot do anything with this information. I actually speak several languages, too. I can speak skateboarding. We heard that already. Did you? Did you notice how after you said your piece, it was silent because everyone's like...

None of us can name another skate or none of us can name any tricks. You dominated that. If this were a trivia night, that would be your category for sure. We'd want you on our debate team. It's actually skateboard language is a mathematical system there's there's there's uh two dialects in skateboarding and one is more like a grunting of a caveman and trying to describe things and one is a mathematical system so you could say something like blizzard blizzard flip and any any core skateboarder knows what a blizzard flip is if someone doesn't understand

core skateboarding to its utmost degree, you'd have to break it down as a backside 360 with a kickflip. You have to say with a, because if you say 360 kickflip, you're talking about a board flip only. And now you're getting to the math of it. So math skateboarding, you could say something like switch 360 kickflip revert. You're actually word plus word plus word is explaining what it is. Or you can say something like El Nino.

El Nino is just the name of a trick, but it's basically shorthand memification of the math. So in describing all skateboarding, you're speaking in a mathematical language. It's actually quite interesting. Is swimming like that, like with diving or anything? Diving, yeah. You have different degrees of, which I was not a diver, but you'll have like a 306 B and each number means a different thing. The letters mean a different thing. One is Pike.

One is is I mean, yeah, I don't even really know the the the ins and out of it all. But yeah, kind of to a degree. Riley, actually, before I forget the cosmic fluke of your story to have matched Leah Thomas's... Will. Will. To match this up. I was thinking of a penis rudder joke and all of this, but I'll leave it out. We'll say that for the members only because there's children watching.

The cosmic coincidence to have achieved the exact number. How often has that ever happened? Well, think about it. We race for about a minute and 40 seconds and we went the exact same time down to the hundredth the 100th of a second okay cosmic and then they told you to get off the podium and go stand somewhere else yep they said damn you woman we've got a we've got a bigger better woman right here that's so nuts because then that means second and third place were on the podium even even though you beat them. Well, so really what went down?

The first day, won a national title. So, again, beat every girl in the country. I mean, Olympians, people who you will see competing in the Olympics, what, this month, a few weeks. American record holders. I mean, the most impressive swimmers, female swimmers this world has ever seen. And he beat them all by body lengths. The second day of that national championship was the day that we raced it was the 200 free um i didn't post my best time we actually ended up tying for fifth place in the country which is still a pretty incredible

feat your top five in the country but it was visible even if you know nothing about swimming it was visible to anyone with eyeballs that he was not trying. I mean, he just wasn't. His legs weren't kicking. He wasn't doing his dolphin kicks off the wall. I mean, he wasn't trying. But nonetheless, we tied. So, yeah, we were both standing there.

They award top eight All-American honors. And so you have your top eight swimmers there. And so it's first, second, third, fourth. Me and this six foot four Goliath of a man towering over me, standing on the fifth place spot. Me holding a trophy. They told me I could pose with one, but I had to give it back.

Wow. Let's read this. We got Barely a Millennial saying, I was watching the rally after getting home from the fair. I told the GOP lady there that my husband didn't want me to have a yard sign because he thought it would make us a target.

I understand his perspective now. Heart stopping. Yeah. Tim, Robert, who told us this today was at some point today where they said there's the shift in the cosmos where once upon a time people were afraid to say they support Trump. And now it's almost like they're afraid to say they support Biden and proud to say they support Trump. Yeah. Was that Chris who told them? OK, good. That one I'm not mixing up. Yeah. Was that Chris who told them? Okay, good.

That one I'm not mixing up. But yeah, no, there's a shift in the cosmos. People are now ashamed to say they support Biden because it's such a laughably stupid position to take. And almost proud to say, I support the badass who stood up with his fist in the air, blood dripping from his ear after someone tried to kill him. And it's been a long time. I feel like on our side that we felt something like that. At least, I mean, I think that we have felt unity like this. It's sad that it takes, I mean, almost an assassination to reach that level of unity amongst ourselves

and to watch the other side now crumble. It's tragic, really, that that's what it requires. But, I mean, really, it was fantastic for his campaign um and i think it's good overall for the party and the circumstance in the way that it panned out right and if our country has to go through tragic times i mean everybody has to face them but if we have to go through something awful like that like potentially you know an assassination attempt especially so so terrifying the loss of uh of cory and and what his family went through i mean hypothetically we want this to bring us

closer together, right? For sure. We ultimately want the outcome to be something that positive and if it means that we're more united, you know, that's making the best of a terrible situation. Rainforest says,

per Kyle Becker on X, company that shorted DJT is connected to BlackRock, which starred the shooter in one of its past ads. Yeah, but to be fair, BlackRock has a portion of like everything.

So it's Vanguard, State Street, BlackRock they've they hold basically every company there was some discussion as to whether or not the kid was actually the kid in the black rock ad has that been confirmed in the black rock ad yeah that's true these types of things you get you have to be very careful before retweeting that's true okay uh let's uh what do we got here burn out bubba says when secret service were caught on the mic saying what what do we do could that be the plan was that trump was still alive they expected trump to be dead uh i believe she said what are we doing no i i think uh yeah what it's a stretch well i think it was lauren bobert told us that she wasn't on the actual detail and she rushed over to help them so she didn't know what their what their their plans were their contingencies were yeah i don't i don't see anything much there

yep all right kaideus says this is the second or third event that happened with their secret service this year remember secret service officer got robbed in ca investigation needed there's been a couple times in dc where secret service has been um you had to like have an interaction with someone who was trying to steal their car that they were sitting in uh there's one outside of naomi biden's home and and a couple others which is it's interesting rich n says a secret service agent 2016 posted she would not protect Donald Trump if a situation arose. The agent was fired in 2016 for a social media post that did not align with Secret Service values. Swamp is deep.

Interesting. Delta Tango says, can we hire that cow for the Secret Service? I believe the cow is available. And yes, that cow actually would secure the roof. Probably weighs less than the guy I hire. A cow on a roof, if a stranger tried going on the roof. Probably weighs less than the guy higher. A cow on a roof, if a stranger tried going on the roof or on that cow, that cow would freak out. And that would be like, you're not going to be able to sit down and set anything up.

Well, it would make a lot of noise if someone was suddenly trying to come on the roof. Like, it's not going to let it just subtly happen. Did you see that there's some reporting that Mayorkas is telling Cheadle, the director of the Secret Service, that she can't go before Congress, even though they're trying to get her to answer questions. Wow. I can't understand why. Like, unless you are a part of it. Unless you're trying to hide something. Unless you are a part of it. Why?

There is no... Riley, it's even worse than that. If anybody accuses Mayorkas of anything, he's going to go and cry anti-Semitism again. No, you should know him with my history of the Holocaust. Why would I? I would never partake in assassinating a president. No, transparency is the only cure. Jeez Louise.

Luke, he's right. He talks about Alex Jones' theory. When it comes to the government, it's not trust but verify. It's distrust and make them prove. And that's where we're at right now. All right, everybody. If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button? One like equals one. Fight, fight, fight!

Head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member. The members only uncensored call-in show will be starting in just a few minutes. You don't want to miss it. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Riley, do you want to shout anything out? Yes, you can follow me on X at Riley underscore Gaines underscore. I've got

a podcast. It is the gains for girls podcast without cake and a new book swimming against the current uh just found out it was a national bestseller oh wow congratulations thank you thanks the uh yeah viva barnes law dot locals.com where we have a lot of hush hushes up on other alternative narratives of other past famous assassinations some have proven to be more prophetic, or very prophetic, I should say. I'm the other half of vivaBarnesLaw.locals.com. Viva Fry on Rumble, the Viva Fry on Twitter, vivaBarnesLaw.locals.com for amazing legal analysis, political analysis, and some accurate predictions for the future.

If you know what my shirt says, you're my friend. If you don't, go to thebestpoliticalshirts.com and if you want to support me, lookunfiltered.com. I go out of my way to provide unique ways to give you offers of value. Lookunfiltered.com. Check it out. Guys, thanks so much for watching tonight. It means a lot.

I'm Hannah Claire Brimel. I'm a writer for scnr.com. Follow all of our work at TimCastNews on Instagram and Twitter. I'm on Instagram at hannahclaire.b and I'm on Twitter at HannahClaireB. Thanks for everything you do. Have a good night. We'll see you all over at TimCast.com in about one minute. Thanks for hanging out. you