Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #135 - Barr Told Feds To Charge Antifa With SEDITION, Man ARRESTED Defending Home From BLM

Episode Date: September 17, 2020

Tim and Ian are back for another great weeknight conversation about Bob Barr mulling sedition charges for rioters, why the Portland riots stopped, who is sympathetic for the rioting lawyers who face serious prison time, the Milwaukee man who was arrested for the crime of having a mob on his front lawn, and the cost - and true cost - of the riots. Finally, another sheriff switches parties from Democrat to Republican.  Support the show (http://Timcast.com/donate) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We could be facing the end of the Antifa riots, although for the most part, they've kind of stopped in Portland. And many people are asking why. You can go in two directions with it. Donald Trump, well, you can go in a bunch of different directions, but I go in the direction of Donald Trump has solved the problem. OSP got deputized. All of a sudden, these people are facing federal charges and they're gone. Other people think Antifa is roaming about setting fires to the brush, where there was one leftist guy who did. He got arrested for it. We're assuming he did because he got arrested for it and the cops said they caught him.

But I don't know about all that. But Bill Barr apparently has another solution to ending the Antifa problem, and it's charging them with sedition. I wonder if people know what that means. According to the Wall Street Journal, it basically means there's a conspiracy to attack government agents or officials that pose an imminent danger, essentially insurrection, trying to overthrow the government. And I mean, they kind of are doing that. So I don't know. This one's kind of weird. So anyway, we got this story. It is going to be an Antifa

palooza, man. We got crazy stories, all this craziness, crime skyrocketing in Minneapolis, and now all of a sudden the city council is all angry, like, my constituents are outraged at the crime. And it's like, yo, you voted to abolish the police outright. You got no grounds for complaint. We also got a very sympathetic piece from BuzzFeed about these sad Black Lives Matter protesters who were throwing Molotov cocktails and are now facing life in prison. But in the, and then of course, the other lead story is this man in Wisconsin, a mob, Black Lives Matter shows up to his house and he brandishes a weapon through his window, points it at him. Cops came and arrested

him. The police have issued a statement. Apparently he was drunk at the time, but there's still a whole lot of questions about whether or not you have a right to defend yourself because this, these, many of these people had previously gone to other homes, harassing people. One house was set on fire twice, basically destroying the whole thing. And apparently two 14 year olds got shot during this unrest, whatever you want to call it. So if that dude lives in this community and he knows that, and a mob shows up, I have to imagine he's probably going to be like,

I'm not playing around. I got a gun. Well, now he's in jail and everyone danced around his house. So sedition will be an interesting charge. Tonight on the TimCast IRL podcast, I'm hanging out with some friends. We got, of course, Sour Patch Lids, who most of you know. Hello. And hanging out with Ian as well. Hey, what up? Ian's chilling. There's

Ian. We're chilling. We're going to talk about these things because Ian immediately was like he started going on this like pro-Antifa rant and he was like, Oh my gosh. Build it up, Tim. Build it up. He was like, Antifa's the best. And I was like, how dare you in my home? I've been playing contrary a little bit just because I like the debate.

Well, it's good. I'll give you the other side if I can. Yeah, we're having a conversation. So one of the other stories we have is about Andy Ngo, a journalist who has been publishing public records on arrests of many of these Antifa people. And Ian was sort of challenging it. And we had a conversation about it. And I think it'll be interesting for, you know, we'll dig into these things. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. With especially in regards to Andy posting, like, so people would get arrested and then he'd post their mugshots right away. And I was like, is that like it's legal? I know. But is it is it the wrong thing to do? Because if they turn out to be innocent and he's basically slandered, ruined, not slandered, but ruined their lives. It's kind of like printing a fake news article

and then printing a retraction the next day. Nope, I disagree. You're wrong. Okay. Tell me why. Give it to me. We will. We will get into it. We'll get into it. We've got to talk about the first story. The question is, is Antifa trying to overthrow the government and should they be charged with sedition?

So let's just, we'll jump into the first story. Before we do, make sure you smash that like button. Absolutely crush that thing. And get in your super chats. We'll read as many as we can around like 930 or so. So we'll take your questions and so load them up throughout the show and subscribe. Hit the notification bell and we're live Monday through Friday at 8 p.m. Check out this first story from the Wall Street Journal. Barr tells prosecutors to consider charging violent protesters with sedition. I love this. I actually looked up what sedition was, and there have been different sedition acts implemented in the U.S., and I think the past

several iterations have been unconstitutional. They've been repealed. To bring a sedition case, prosecutors would have to prove there was a conspiracy to attack government agents or officials that posed an imminent danger. They say Attorney General William Barr told the nation's federal prosecutors to begin aggressive, to be aggressive when charging violent demonstrators with crimes, including potentially prosecuting them for plotting to overthrow the U.S. government. People familiar with the conversation said in a conference call with U.S. attorneys across the country last week, Mr. Barr warned that sometimes violent demonstrations across the U.S. could worsen as the November that some sometimes they could worsen as November presidential election approaches. He encouraged the prosecutors to seek a number

of federal charges, including under a rarely used sedition law, even when state charges could apply. The call underscores the priority Mr. Barr has given to prosecuting crimes connected to violence during months of protests against racial injustice, leading to major property damage. As President Trump has made a broader crackdown on the violence and property destruction a key campaign issue, U.S. attorneys have broad discretion in what charges they bring. Federal prosecutors have charged more than 200 people with violent crimes related to the protests, most of whom face counts of arson, assaulting federal officers, gun crimes. FBI officials earlier this year described the perpetrators as largely opportunistic individuals taking

advantage of the protests. In more recent months, police officials say they are alarmed by the presence of armed fringe groups from both sides of the political spectrum. Mr. Barr has blamed much of the violence on leftist extremists, including Antifa, a loose network of groups and people that describe themselves as opposing fascism and which Mr. Barr has described as a movement advocating revolution. Mr. Barr is not wrong. They quite literally carry signs that read revolution, nothing less. And what did you say to me? What kind of revolution?

They want an economic revolution? Is it an industrial revolution? I mean, I think they want a political revolution. But think is the key word there. Well, in what context are they saying revolution? There is no context. Yeah, there is. They're marching around saying burn it down and throwing bricks at cops.

So now there's context. Yeah, they're throwing bricks at cops and screaming revolution. Okay, they're targeting. Maybe they want a violent political revolution. If that's the case, yeah, then that's what we got to prevent. You know what I think, man? I don't think they actually want anything. So one of the other stories we were talking about is what's going on with Andy Ngo.

And there's a story written by Willamette. Willamette? Yeah, Willamette. Willamette. I've been pronouncing it wrong, apparently. Welcome to the new world. Willamette Week. And they highlight these two Antifa people who were like, every day they put on their

protest outfits and they go out together. And the, you know, the boyfriend is the drum on the on the front line playing drums so he wears a bulletproof vest and she's a medic so she puts on her medic gear and i'm like just play dnd like you know what i mean like i'm gonna be the medic today okay dungeons and dragons right there you know yeah and then playing a game and then make a video you know talking about your beliefs and get 60 000 subscribers and change the world that way i don't know they're not even trying to change the world. I mean, you've got to get your fantasy out.

I agree. You've got to game or do something to get your fantasy out. But they really want to change the world. Otherwise, they wouldn't be out there. I'll take some pool noodles. I will slide them over a mop. And you can whack each other all day and night with it while screaming that you're, you know,

don't hit me. I'm the medic. I'm the medic. You're cheating. You're cheating. You can still hit the medic. You can still hit the medic. You've got to go for the medic first, actually.

I guess. Okay, so anyway, we can definitely talk about that. But I guess the question is, sedition, too far? Not far enough? It doesn't go too far enough, I think. It doesn't go too far enough. Too far enough. Okay, sedition means that they're conspiring. I guess.

Yesterday we talked about that, and I think that they're conspiring. And I think yesterday we talked about that, and I think that they are conspiring. So the definition that I have for sedition is just conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against authority of the state or a monarch. And to me, that's basically exactly what they're doing. Like, how else would you describe marching in the street with signs and throwing bricks literally at cops

and at federal officers? That is the embodiment of the state right in front of you. I mean, they're straight up saying they want to burn it all down you guys are in reading about it a lot more than i am i'm not getting um an organized desire like command to destroy the u.s government or at all i'm just getting more of a violent anger and lashing out maybe for regular people but they're it's being weaponized specifically by extremists who want to destroy. Like there's a group of far left extremists. They're revolutionary communists. They want to overthrow everything.

So they're going and finding anger from people in the community and then using that to accomplish their goals. So if regular people might just get charged with some state level charge, but then you'll end up with the actual organizers getting charged with sedition. Maybe that makes sense. That might make a lot more sense. I would hate to see, like, front-line people that don't realize what they're involved in

to start getting charged with sedition. Yeah, stupid people, but that's most of them. I think this is why they keep using the term anarchist, which you obviously vehemently disagree with. Oh, yeah. Because they just want to destroy. They don't actually have a program that they're trying to put into place because we talk about them like wanting power

and wanting communism but i think you're right i think they don't even want that they just want to destroy stuff so well anyway look i look i looked up sedition and the crazy thing is so i didn't know this they were they were originally 17 amendments proposed, articles proposed for the first Bill of Rights. And then it got like, they like, they winded it down to condense it down to two. I'm sorry, two. They condensed it down to 12 and then got rid of two, the first two. And it's actually really funny. But we've actually had multiple instances of the Sedition Act. So the first one, President John Adams signed into law in 1798. It set out punishments of up to two years of imprisonment for opposing or resisting any law of the United States or writing or publishing, quote, false, scandalous and malicious writing

about the president or the Congress. Yikes. Though not the office of the vice president, then occupied by Adams political opponent, Thomas Jefferson. That is like, that sounds like just hardcore corruption, you know? That sounds like definitely heavy. The president being like, you can make fun of the guy I don't like, but not me. Otherwise, you go to jail. Yep. So check this out. This act of Congress was allowed to expire in 1801 after Jefferson's election to the presidency. Jefferson pardoned those still serving sentences and fines were repaid by the government. This law was never repealed, was never appealed to the United States Supreme Court, but opponents claimed it was unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Yeah, it is. And then we had another one in 1918. And I guess this is because of World War One or whatever. We had another sedition act.

Dude, I'm reading all this stuff. This country used to be way more authoritarian. Yeah, especially during world wars. Yeah. Or wars in general. Suspending. Didn't like Abraham Lincoln suspend habeas corpus? I believe he did. Yeah.

I've heard that. He sure did. And then in World War II, you had the Office of Censorship, which controlled the flow of information into and out of the United States. Jeez. Yeah, man. The Vietnam, even the Vietnam conscription era was terrifying. Terrifying. I used to live and be like, I hope I'm 27 before anything goes crazy, man.

I hope I'm 35. Because the draft still exists. Yeah. It's just, well, now it's all volunteer. You don't necessarily need to draft anybody. But here's the craziest thing. So we're going to segue from Bill Barr and the sedition stuff into these Antifa facing life in prison.

But I got to highlight something that I find really, really interesting. So in 1798, I got it. There it is. In 1798, there were 17 articles approved by the House. This is for the Bill of Rights, right? And then eventually we ended up in September with 12. The first two didn't make it. The first one had to do with like, you can't change the salaries of representatives or something, whatever. The first one was supposed to set the amount of representatives existed. So the idea was that for every 30,000 people in the U.S., you'd get one representative.

Could you imagine how many people in the house you would have? We'd have so many. We'd have like four. What do we measure? Like 7,000? If it was for every 30,000, it would be like 10,000. Dude. But okay, so this makes sense because in order to represent people, you need a small group

because one person can't represent 70 000 people accurately i can't like i would say i can't even represent you accurately if i had to be like okay i'm speaking for tim today i could only do a little pretty good accurate now imagine doing well so imagine 10 people that all have different opinions or had somewhat different opinions i got and then now a thousand so i can see why they wanted to limit it to 3 000 or whatever but then so what do we have six thousand thirty thousand do we have six thousand representatives or is it just a flawed system they didn't i don't think they predicted how many people were going to live in this country and that was the that was it they're like so they said eventually

it will be no more than one for every fifty thousand which would have brought us to in 2010 six thousand five hundred and sixty three members of the house oh you would need like a stadium for that you need representatives for the representatives yeah yeah well almost you're getting close so ineffective yeah so ultimately this is still pending before congress i guess but the the laws of for like the sedition act of 1918 and whatever it's uh, oh, here we go. Seditious conspiracy. So this is what I think they're specifically referring to. If two or more persons in any state or territory or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the

authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof. They shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. And there it is. For a seditious conspiracy charge to be effected, a crime need only be planned. It need not be actually attempted. According to Andre Torres and Jose Jose Velasquez, the accusation of seditious conspiracy is

of political nature and was used almost exclusively against Puerto Rican independent independent istas in the 12th and 20th century, not 12th, 20th. However, the act was also used in the 20th century, not 12th, 20th. However, the act was also used in the 20th century against communists. Wow. The United Freedom Front, neo-Nazis and terrorists, such as the Provisional IRA in Massachusetts and Omar Abdel Rahman. Well, I think that actually makes sense. I mean, when you look at Antifa attacking the federal courthouse in Portland, they were planning this. They were putting weapons. There was like backpack found with with commercial grade fireworks explosives bullets and there was one magazines were found with like red paint on them so uh sounds like they were organized and planning for a siege on a federal

building and they were trying to break into it dude that's it that's what this law is for preventing that so they were trying to break in but can they prove that people were planning to break in specifically to like they specifically went to break in, but can they prove that people were planning to break in specifically to like... They specifically went to the federal building to destroy, to harm and blow up the federal building. They wanted to set it on fire. There's a video of them trying to cut through the chains with like welding tools to like get in the building. The question, I guess one question is, is it a political movement, this Antifa thing? Or is it just like a lash out against fascism and it's...

What fascism? Yeah it's what fascism? Yeah. Corporate government collusion. The reason why I wanted to go through these past edition laws is to make the point we are so much more free today than back then. It's like maybe that's maybe that's the problem. We've actually become so free. These people are running around unchecked, unopposed. And like we were saying, World War Two, maybe those laws actually helped us win the war. Like it was crazy lockdown martial

law, but we won the war and we didn't have German spies sending information out of the country as far as we know. I mean, that's a big challenge in freedom versus security. Authoritarianism can be efficient in the short term because it allows you to execute very quick decisions and moves. But in the long term, it completely destabilizes a civilization because one individual can't accurately plan a long-term economy and they can't accommodate everybody's desires. So if we could turn something on and then automatically have sunset clause, like turn on some authoritarian move and then have it disappear after two years. I'm wary of any kind of emergency powers. You know, you look at what's

going on in Michigan. Governor Whitmer had there's there's now 400000 signatures to strip the governor of Michigan of her emerge of the existing governorship's emergency powers because how she's how the governor today has abused them. They won't give it up. And the craziest thing is Whitmer. She's she's the Democrat in Michigan who's, you know, locking everything down and she's nuts. She's basically telling people, she's straight up telling people, don't sign this. Don't repeal my power. Do you think it would be more effective to get her out of office or to repeal the power of the office? Get the power out of there. So you don't like executive action, executive authority makes you nervous?

Too much. Yeah. Too much. We need a good amount. This is too much yeah too much we need it we need a good amount this is not this is too much you look at how she's abused people and and uh shut down like tiny barber shops run by like little old men yeah dude one person should not have that kind of power when it comes to state law and so anybody who tells me do like i listen if i if i go to you and say we got 400 000 people who say you have too much power and they go, no.

And they're like, I am the Senate. And like that. And then fly at me with their saber out. Yeah, that person's got to go. That's a Robin Hood villain. You just nailed it. That's the Sith villain. That's the sheriff. That's literally Palpatine.

Yeah. Dude, if they come in and say it's time for you to give up your emergency powers, they should be like, OK. Or at least strip it for temporarily. No, I mean, look, it's an emergency power. It's supposed to be temporary. We are a country that requires the consent of the governed for the government to exist. There should never be a point where the governor is like,

do not take my power from me. Right, right. You defer to your populace. Yeah, 400,000 people say, we've signed signatures for this. My response would be like, can we do a referendum? Can we like put it on a ballot and then have everyone go and they can say yes or no? And then because emergency powers can work if you need to move quickly.

If you're like, whoa, we got a major disaster. I need to be able to move faster than a council can to protect the people. So Barr, do you like this emergency, this sedition concept? Man, that's tough. I feel like Antifa, if there was a line of like, so first of all, they're criminals. That's not even a question. You go out and you do these things, you organize this stuff, you're committing crimes. Some of them.

Some people may identify as Antifa, not be committing any crimes. No, no, no. I'm specifically referring to them who go out in Portland. And I would even go as far to say, if you are out there and you watch someone throw an explosive and you stay you're helping them whoa dude that's risky wait so you mean if let me put it this way let's let's let's ref throwing an explosive is a very serious crime i mean if i don't report a crime i think that's i didn't say i didn't say you have to report anything is it legal so if i see you if i'm not walking my dog and i see you throw a firebomb into someone's house and i don't

report that is it is that illegal of me am i under i don't i i think there may be some jurisdictions that would have some but i think for the most part no you just run and what if i just stood there and watched nothing exactly it's not illegal to stay and watch these people are linking arms and they're standing in front of everyone. Oh, well, that's different. But that's what they're all doing. Some people leave. I'm not talking about those people. So if you're at one of these events and you're holding a shield

or you're standing there side by side and people are standing next to you throwing things and you know it, like Ted Wheeler was out there, the mayor of Portland, throwing explosives. The way I describe it is this. Throwing an explosive is a very, very serious crime. You could blow someone's hand off. Like one cop got hit in the leg and had to be brought into the hospital for like an emergency medical treatment. I don't know exactly what happened with that. But we saw the photos of cops with like their skin burned off from the explosions and stuff like that. I'd argue throwing an explosive at someone is probably worse than robbing a bank. Robbing a

bank is a coercive demand. So I'll put it this way. If one of these Antifa guys walks into a bank, imagine it this way. An Antifa guy goes, hey, everybody, we're all going to go inside this bank and we're going to protest the 1%. And you said, okay. You walked in and you're standing next to him and then he raises a gun and then he says, give me all your money now. And you said, okay, you walked in and you're standing next to him. And then he raises a gun and then he says, give me all your money now. And you go, this is great. And you're standing in front of him while it's going down. Aren't you an accomplice? At that point, yeah.

But if it's on the street, you're across the street and you're throwing a firebomb and I'm 30 feet away from you dressed like you. I'm not necessarily part of that. All right, let's try again. Let's say this Antifa guy says, hey, everybody, we're going to go to a bank and we're going to protest the one percent by all wearing the same masks and then you say okay and you go in the bank and and one guy with the masks raises a gun and says anybody move you're going to get busted at that point you're helping them you're conspiring whether you meant to or not yeah so there's there is a fine line between how do we deal with those who have chosen to stay and stand side by side with those who are laying siege to a federal building to break in and cause damage and those who thought they were going to a peaceful protest and say, I got to get out of here.

And sometimes you'll go, they'll be burning a building. You don't even know it a block away because you don't see it. And then but you're complicit because you dress like them and you didn't run. But I got to add, you'd think after 90 plus days, what's the line? After 10 days of them laying siege to a courthouse and you decide to go? Well, put it this way. Someone's robbing a bank every Friday and you're like, I'm going to go next Friday and see what's going on. Dude, they're sieging federal property. They should go to jail. They should be taken off the street.

So all of these moms, the mom block or whatever, where they're all linking arms and shielding Antifa as they throw explosives. Yeah, man, I think that crosses the line. Now, sedition, I don't know. They're not organizing. They're just being dumb. But are they organizing?

We don't know. The wall of moms. I mean, they coordinated their outfits. Are they on Telegram chat? Are they on Facebook, chat are they on facebook like like encrypted chats where they're all like getting funded and there's no way to know well there is i mean i'm sure the government has ways of tracking their communications to varying degrees but if they all show up wearing yellow with mom written on their chests someone told them what

to do and they didn't right Right. So there's a line, right? That's what I'm saying. Those people might get some kind of charge, like when people start throwing explosives and then a month later you come down and shield them. Okay. We have to assume we can, we can, we're not going to give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm going to assume you must've known. However, I don't think necessarily you can charge them with a crime proving they, they knew, but you don't give them the benefit of the doubt. So after the explosives are thrown, if they remain, then some, you know, light, lower tier charge. The people who run and say, I don't have anything to do with this. Thank you for leaving because these people are disrupting

this. Please point out the extremists will arrest them and then you can maintain your peaceful protest. Because once they started arresting these people everything cleared up i noticed that everything cleared up and they did a dance party and they got their peaceful protest and then all of a sudden it's gone dude i wanted trump to send in the national guard like right away day two but could you imagine what the states would have done it would have been chaos i'm glad i mean i i'm naive but that's what i would have done if i was the president i would have said that to my advisors like like, let's send them in. And he probably did too. I bet he did, yeah. And they were probably like, the mayor, the governor, the state AG,

they are going to get everyone in opposition to you. You are going to have business owners protesting you. It would be total chaos. And he said at the town hall last night, he mentioned the National Guard again. They were like, how would you have? And he was like, I want to sit the National Guard. But he was telling the governors to call in the National Guard. What he was saying was, I have the availability.

Just let me know because then it would be up to them. Yeah, they didn't do it. But Trump shut it down. So let's let's let's do this. I want to I want to show you. I want to I want to go through how this all ended. And there's there was an interesting story I saw from Zero Hedge. Zero Hedge writes, the Portland riots just stopped. Why? Now, I know some people like Zero Hedge. Zero Hedge writes, the Portland riots just stopped. Why? Now, I know some people

like Zero Hedge. They're not considered to be a credible outlet by NewsGuard and just like really bad across the board. I don't ever really read Zero Hedge or know much about them, but I can tell you that this article is insinuating that around the same time the riots were stopping in Portland, many of these people were, not these people, many similar people were seen near these areas where brush fires were starting. And it kind of plays into like, are they perhaps starting brush fires? There is a photo of people wearing firefighter gear holding up an Antifa flag. So it's all weird.

But I think there's a much, much easier way to explain why this all stopped and i think it's because donald trump stopped it that's a big part of it and that's very simple so here's here's what uh tyler durden writes i guess like every article is by tyler durden how could this not be newsguarded when tyler durden's writing of course of course of course so uh this is what they write since may 29th portland has been the backdrop of more than 100 nights of Antifa, Anarchist and Black Lives Matter Inc. Terroristic riots. They set fires, looted and intimidated people by threatening to burn them alive in their

homes. But after the millions of dollars of destruction, criminality and thuggery is stopped last week. Poof. Why? I certainly don't want to tempt these thugs, but it can't go without saying that Portland's 100 plus days of riots appeared to end after Wednesday, September 9th. That was the last time the Portland Police Bureau warned about protesters with this tweet, saying Southwest Jefferson to Southwest Salmon from Southwest First to Southwest Broadway is closed to pedestrians, but open for vehicular traffic. All people must leave the area to the west now.

Chapman and Lounsdale squares are now closed. That's just local jargon, sure, but that was what they said. The usual live streamers decamped to other riots and fires. By September 10th, the overworked cops from Portland Police Bureau were offered out to assist other agencies. Suddenly, instead of being required to work the riot lines, they were free. Why? On September 7th to the morning of the 8th, the Pacific Northwest experienced a major wind event. Winds gusted through Oregon and Washington at more than 60 miles per hour. Fires that had been allowed to crackle along, such as the Beachy Fire, flared up. Power lines were down. The fires kicked up. And then came the reports. Clackamas County Sheriff officials reported that people had seen Antifa protester types reportedly stashing gas cans, looting, and looking ridiculously out of place.

They were taking pictures and giving locals grief for trying to keep them out of closed neighborhoods. Locals wondered if there was a connection between the fires and the sightings of these folks. BLM was seen there. The original BLM, the Bureau of Land Management, not the group that borrowed the acronym. Now, I want to point out, there was one guy who was described by Cairo 7 local news as being a frequent visitor of defund the police protests. This guy got arrested.

The police said he was trying to set a fire. That's the one guy we have. There's been a bunch of other crazy looking people. And I feel like I have an answer to why people thought that was the case. Why were they seeing these Antifa types that were out of place? Well, it's because these are the, are many of the crazies who Antifa preys upon. The organizers seek out these unwell people, give them a grievance, and then rally them to go cause destruction because idle hands are the devil's playground. These people have nothing to do. So when these people have nothing to do and the organizers are gone, what do they do? They run amok. I don't think these people starting fires are far leftists,

for the most part. I don't think they're intentionally like it's an Antifa conspiracy. I think the accusations through this are leading in the wrong direction. They don't actually say that Antifa was causing this. However, they go on to Catherine Herridge mentions this DHS leaked email that says this was written on day 60 of the Portland riots, that Antifa is organized, not opportunistic. They know what they're doing. So then this is how Zero Hedge ends. They're organized, share the same tactics, and talk to each other. Why are they so quiet right now? Oregonians might well wonder that these threat actors are doing their arsons in the tinder dry woodlands of the state instead of nearby downtown Portland. The riots have stopped. Did they go to San Francisco or Lancaster, Pennsylvania to raise hell? Did they stop because of the smoky skies and air quality numbers that are off the charts?

It seems unlikely that a group that spawned a murderer, multiple arsonists and police assaulters would be dissuaded by smoky quality air. Is it because the media are busy covering the wildfires and there's nothing in writing for the terrorists? Or is it because of something else? The riots are over for now. Why? I actually have a very, very simple answer. First, many of the fires, there's a ton of fires. Many of them was arson. Not the bigger ones, but people have been arrested for arson. They're not Black Lives Matter. But let's go back in time. GDC statement on recent visits to defendants by the FBI, September 4th, 2020. We have confirmed reports of the Federal Bureau of Investigation visiting people's homes in the last week or so.

The result of some of these visits is that people with state charges, whether they have been no complaint or not, are being arrested by the FBI for federal charges of a similar nature. Below are some of the steps to take, some of the steps to dealing with an FBI visit. Now, I got to admit, that's really good advice they give. Like, you know, don't talk to the police, ask for a lawyer, don't lie. It's all very basic stuff. They say if you were arrested on state charges, interfering with a peace officer, unlawful direct laser, anything like this, you may want to take some preventative measures in case you are visited and or arrested by federal law enforcement. Some steps to take

are below. I don't care about that part. And let's go back in time a little bit further. September 1st, deputized troopers may snarl Malt Co.'s protest prosecution plans. Move seemingly overrides Multnomah County's district attorney's limited prosecution approach. Mic drop. There it is. Trump solved the problem. That's why the riots have stopped. And it could be a combination.

So Trump goes in, deputizes the cops. They send it off to the feds. The feds start busting the figureheads or the real dangerous people. And then the rest of them are like, let's get out of town because the feds are coming. So they scramble to the woods and start lighting fires. No, no, no. I don't think that. I think when the key organizers got snatched up by the feds, because the, was it Portland? What do they call themselves? The General Defense Committee. They said the feds are coming door to door and you're getting federal charges similar to your

state charges. They grabbed the organizers. Organizers are gone. Now, the crazy people who were preyed upon by Antifa to be used as useful idiots to throw explosives, like that one dude. You remember that guy with the shield, and he was guarding naked Athena or whatever her name was? There was that nude woman, and this young guy was, like, shielding her.

Another video came out where someone hands him an explosive, and then he throws it at the building. It goes off. He got charged for it. They don't know who gave it to him. He said some guy gave it to him, told him it was like a spinner. It'll go wing and fly in the air. Nope. It was a bomb. That guy got in trouble. The, the, the dude who gave him the bomb, I can only imagine must've gotten arrested. Or once the fed started going in and arresting these people at their homes, the other organizers said the jig is up and they bolted and they're gone. That leaves all of these deranged and unwell people scattered. Many of the actual far leftists probably started preparing for the siege on the White House on

September 17th. Many of them probably got scared, stay home, lock their door or they're hiding at their friend's house. Many of them are in jail right now being held by feds and probably will never be released. And then all of the crazy people who were wandering around bored and screaming because they're literally unwell, wandered off and started starting fires. That makes a lot of sense. That's my theory. Look, I think that would require looking at some of these crazies who have started fires and seeing if they were at any of these protests.

Yeah, exactly. It's an assumption. It's a safe assumption with a lot of moving parts. But, you know, it may not be the Pete crazies. The fires might be unrelated. But I think that's definitely the first part of what you said is extremely accurate. There are arsonist starting fires, 100%. And one of them was a Black Lives Matter leftist.

Now, we should be able to easily prove whether or not many of these other people were at some of these protests. But I guess if they weren't arrested, we wouldn't know. But what happens when you have people who are throwing firebombs at Seattle and Portland police departments and now the organizers are gone? No one's giving them orders and telling them what to do. Right. They go start fires somewhere else. Yeah. I mean, these people were starting fires all over the place at the Portland police. This is the best theory I can come up with.

So the riot stopped. And it's very simple. Donald Trump stopped them. You know, it was a team effort. But yeah, he was leading the team. Well, I'll put it this way. The buck stops with him he said we're going to deal with this he pointed he's got his appointees through the dhs and other

organizations and they took action and they were smart and they did it right we'll see what comes up we'll see what happens tomorrow night tomorrow night's the white house siege oh wow it's the the non-violent siege so white house have they deputized any other city's cops? Not that I know of. That is such a cool idea. I mean, it's kind of worrying. So we're, well, the feds are supposed to operate within federal jurisdiction. They're supposed, like, the FBI deals with specific crimes pertaining to, you know,

interstate commerce kind of things, or like a murderer crossing state lines. Many of these people aren't from Portland. So the FBI would have jurisdiction. But now, because localities are not actually dealing with these criminals, the feds are asserting some kind of warped jurisdiction to put an end to it. I don't like it. I don't like it because, well, I do like that they're ending the riots. I do think that is it. I think Trump was like, how can we do this without going in? And they said, we can deputize the state police. The DHS was like, get it done. And I'm sure Trump knew. I'd be willing to bet he did. It's a brilliant idea. I'm not saying it was his idea, but I'm sure they were like, look, we can do this. There may be a legal challenge, but who wants to be the person right now to sue the feds on behalf

of Antifa? The Democrats have defended Antifa to an absurd degree, but right now to sue the feds on behalf of antifa the democrats have defended antifa to an absurd degree but right now they know it's a vulnerability so they can't be seen as being sympathetic and protecting protecting them right now i'm the cat wants bucko i see i got bucko a bowl of water because he keeps drinking my water but now he wants my water he doesn't want the bowl your bowl he's not satisfied now he's taking yours, huh? Oh, you can have it. So anyway, there you go, man. What did you call it the other day? Cutting the head off the snake?

Yeah. Yeah. Slice it off. It doesn't always work. Because sometimes if it's the system that's the problem, cutting the head off, it'll just grow a new head. Yeah, it looks like it was top down. Should we talk about how the media is sympathetic to the extremists?

Oh my gosh, yes. Yeah. Oh yeah. Check this one out oh from buzzfeed these two lawyers face up to life in prison for allegedly burning an empty cop car the federal case against the lawyers colin mattis and uh uruj raman is a stark example of how the trump administration is cracking down on Black Lives Matter protesters. They made several mistakes writing this article. Oh, tell me. So the first thing they said is, we admit it.

This is Black Lives Matter. Done. Every statement of support, every banner at every football field, every knee bent on the field is now represented by two people who are giving out and throwing molotov cocktails whoa that was a mistake antifa separated black lives matter from the violence even though i kept saying we know these people they're yelling black lives matter right there's a lot of cross culture going on so thank you buzzfeed for giving us the facts that these

people who are going out and burning everything down are in fact representatives of the black lives matter movement and there it is the other mistake they made was that i think it was in the that these people who are going out and burning everything down are, in fact, representatives of the Black Lives Matter movement. And there it is. The other mistake they made was that, I think, it was in the tweet, so I wonder if it's included in the article. Yeah, here we go. They go on and bring up how these people are immigrants, immigrants, immigrants, immigrants, immigrants. I got a question, BuzzFeed.

Why does it matter that these extremist arsonists, these people arrested on charges of uh being of of you know arson and and uh you know other i guess i don't know what else was charged we'll read into it but what what is their crime have to do with them being immigrants you know what this sounds like to me it sounds to me like these countries that these people are from are not sending their best oh no oh what have you done propaganda oh no buzzfeed buzzfeed are you are you making pro are not sending their best. Oh, no. Oh, no, BuzzFeed. BuzzFeed, are you making pro-Trump propaganda to say that the children of immigrants

that somehow correlates? BuzzFeed, you don't not like Trump, do you? Listen, listen. It's an absurd notion, but they're trying to garner sympathy by saying they're immigrants being prosecuted. And notion but they're trying to garner sympathy by saying they're immigrants being prosecuted and instead they're saying firebomb arrests and immigrants which are completely unrelated they're extremists it's their political ideology has nothing to do with who

their parents are i'm sure in fact their parents worked very very hard to get here and are probably very upset with them let's read a little bit of this and see what they have to say because the tweet they put out, it all seems so sympathetic to these poor Black Lives Matter supporters, protesters who there's a photo of them in a car holding Molotovs. Oh, wow. I mean, it like it looks like them. I'll put it that way. I'd be very careful because we're dealing with it, you know, innocent until proven guilty and all that stuff. The NY here's what BuzzFeed writes. The NYPD van on a Brooklyn street was banged up and empty, a battered steel shell with shattered

windows and a mask of spray paint shortly before 1 a.m. On Saturday, May 30th, the fourth straight night of nationwide protests against police brutality, a Molotov cocktail set into blaze. A surveillance camera perched outside the NYPD's 88th precinct down the block captured the incident, including a tan town and country minivan at the scene. Around 10 minutes later, officers pulled over a vehicle fitting that description. Colin Ford Mattis, 32, was at the wheel, and Aruj Raman, 31, was in the passenger seat. Officers found a lighter, a tank of gasoline, and a bottle stuffed with toilet paper in the back seat. Raman and Mattis were handcuffed and transported into holding cells at the NYPD headquarters. Two of 23 people arrested in Brooklyn that night

for actions connected to the protests against police brutality. They're facing life in prison. And based on what BuzzFeed just wrote, I kind of think they'll get convicted. So for burning an already blown out van, they're going to get life in prison? Did it say it was already blown out?

Yeah, they said their windows were shattered. It was spray painted. It was a husk. Oh, sure, sure. Yeah. For throwing Molotov cocktails. It's still state property. It's not about the damage to the vehicle.

It's about people driving around with Molotov cocktails and throwing them. Really? That's life in prison? It's an act of terrorism. They're doing it for a political cause. I don't know. It's an interesting question because I'm not sure I like the idea of crimes on top, like motive crimes. But what if there was somebody, like, in the car?

They wouldn't have known. No, that's hardcore. It was some other woman, I believe, who threw a Molotov at a car, at a van full of... That person should get maybe charged with, like, life in prison, I think, for trying to kill a bunch of people. The issue is, like, you're going to go out with Molotov cocktails throwing them. It doesn't matter if you were like, don't worry, I'll do my best not to engulf someone in flames. You can charge someone and arrest them, charge them with life in prison, or charge them and then give them life in prison and then let them out also. Yeah, they could get parole or something.

They could change their ways i mean 45 years uh or life or whatever they're saying that's that's that's really harsh but uh i wonder i wonder if the reason they're doing it is because setting an example maybe dude maybe and then maybe they have to yeah check this out check this out they say the case against ramen and mattis took a different track because the incident involved an explosive device, a specialized unit of the NYPD officers and FBI agents called the Joint Terrorism Task Force, formed in 1980 to root out threats to national security, spearheaded the investigation. Within hours of the arrest, before Brooklyn prosecutors had even begun writing up charges, FBI agent Kyle Johnson submitted a criminal complaint in federal court, and federal

prosecutors informed local authorities that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York was taking over the case. No one knew at the time, but this was one of the early moves in a widening federal crackdown against Black Lives Matter protesters across the country. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. They just made a very big mistake. Oh, another one. Oh, yeah. Antifa's out the window. All of this is now overtly Black Lives Matter. Interesting. That's it. It's not Antifa violence.

I've been thinking it's Black Lives Matter the whole time. I mean, not the whole time, but it's not like they're mostly peaceful. I mean, they're mostly peaceful, but a lot of these protests... Mostly peaceful. Yeah. They've just been blending together in my mind. I can't tell which is which. People go out there, they dress in black. Some people have really good intentions

and some people are blowing stuff up, but they're all out there together. Honestly, if you have good intentions, you're completely overruled by the people who... It just takes a few to have bad intentions to totally guilt by association when you're in a crowd like that. Dude, these people are getting locked up forever. I mean, look at this.

They say when it came to Rahman and Mattis and the alleged crime of burning an empty and already damaged police vehicle, the U.S. attorney's office brought charges so severe they carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 45 years in prison and a maximum of life, a potential punishment. One former federal prosecutor called ridiculous, another called out of hand, and a third described as an extreme tactic to send a message to other protesters. Maybe that's the case. Sending a message. I don't know, man. I'm not a fan of making examples of people giving individuals harsh penalties so that other people are deterred. No,

the crime is on the individual and the individual should face should face appropriate crime and punishment like dude you could argue that we're we're at war right we're at the i mean we're at war overseas 100 in iraq afghanistan um and this is like a domestic like george washington would execute this is stories that i've read i don't know 100 a lot about it but if someone would try and like throw down their weapon and not fight, he'd have them killed. He'd execute them. George Washington? Yeah, commander of a military.

If their soldiers start to refuse to fight or do whatever, you have one killed to show the other ones. If you do that, you're going to die. I don't know about that. That sounds brutal. Yeah, you have to. Otherwise, troops will stop fighting, and then you lose the war, and everyone dies. Yeah, but if you do that, then morale drops to zero. No, that's a way to spark morale because morale is dropping.

So you got to whip everyone back into shape. That's not good morale. Talk about authoritarian. Have you seen the meme? The beatings will continue until morale improves. That's hilarious. No way, dude. This is about raising morale, raising morale, the populace having faith in the police and

in the judicial system. This is sending a message for the election. They want this story from BuzzFeed. All of these law and order types want everyone to know, you go out with Maltavs during a riot, they're going to lock you up forever. So I'm inclined to agree with Ian here, because it's not necessarily about increasing morale for the people, but it's about increasing confidence in the system and in the feds

and in the fact that the rule of law will actually come to fruition, unlike in Portland. And showing that the power lies in the government, and in the fact that the rule of law will actually come to fruition, unlike in Portland. And showing that the power lies in the government, not you. Right. So when it came to the Washington, D.C., the White House protest, where they cleared out all the people in front of the White House, do you guys remember that? Yeah.

And then they were like, Trump did it for a photo shoot. Trump didn't do it at all, some people said. What? They were like, Trump didn't do that? I mean, I just saw the most ridiculous. So the official story is that Trump had nothing to do with the clearing out of the protest. There were two things that happened. There was a time frame set on when the protests were going to be cleared out. And Bill Barr said he's the one who told him to clear it out. Trump then did a photo shoot. Those are the facts. So the left is making the assumption Donald Trump ordered it for his photo shoot.

Trump might have had no idea. Okay. Someone might have been like, oh, the protests are going to be leaving, and then Trump was black. Let's clear him out because the president's going in. Trump's probably watching Fox News, and he's sitting there, and he's eating his McDonald's. I don't mean that in a disrespectful manner. He literally does this.

And then someone said, Mr. President, your 7 o'clock photo shoot in front of the church. Oh, okay. And he gets up and walks out. Regardless, peaceful protesters were like smoke-grenaded out to get the president in for a photo shoot. No. They were knocked out with some sort of... They were thrown out with some sort of violent

dispersal tactic. The police dispersed them. But it's an assumption that it was for Trump's photo shoot okay just coincided with his photo shoot that so i don't even want to say that because all all we can say is what we know the protests got cleared out trump then took a photo shoot in front of a church the night the i think it was the night before or the night before that they had set fire to the famous church what is it saint john's yeah it's a historic presidential church that you know right across the street they set fire to the famous church. Was it St. John's? St. John's. Yeah. It's a historic presidential church that, you know, right across the street. They set fire to it. And Trump doing this photo shoot.

I believe there's a good possibility. It wasn't intentional. It was intentional. They cleared out the protest so Trump could do this. I can't prove that. And of course, the media will claim they can. They say Trump did it for this reason. You don't know what Trump's motive was.

He probably had no way. It's possibly had no idea. But I'll tell you what he did. Taking that photo proved to the country if they wanted to, they could snap their fingers and shut the protest down. Yeah, that was the point. He showed two things. The church stands. It was not burned down. And two, when the protesters are here and we say move, you move. That's what that photo shoot meant. That's more messaging then. Right. So you know, in this regard, lawyers

facing very serious charges is a similar thing. The government is in control, but the rioters will not. They weren't rioting though. Those people were peaceful. So if you're in a peaceful protest and the government says, we say you move, you move. What are you supposed to do as a peaceful protester? You move. Because they

have the tanks? And then you? You move. Because they have the tanks? And then you file a lawsuit. And they're the ones that are going to do the lawsuit for you or the ones that perpetrated the crime? No, the police aren't the ones who deal with the lawsuit. Well, it was federal cops, wasn't it? And the lawsuit is your private lawyer going to a court to challenge the executive authority. But the court is under the rule of the same people that... No, the courts are an independent branch of the government. Yeah, hypothetically. I mean, sure. But the court is under the rule of the same people that... No. The courts are an independent branch of the government.

Yeah, hypothetically. I mean, sure. But they're supposed to be. Trump, you know, the executive appoints judges who then get approved by legislature. So it's supposed to, you know, there's checks and balances.

But that's the way you do it. If anyone branches out of line, then you file a claim. I don't... Don't ask me how it works. If the courts, you appeal the courts, I guess. That's what you do. The court issues a ruling, say I appeal, and then it goes to the Supreme Court, and then it stops.

But if the cops do something wrong, you comply. If the cops, like, there's one dude who's arguing for the right. He's an activist in Milwaukee. He argues for the right to physically attack cops who try to arrest you calling it defense uh oh yeah yeah he said he said it was a quote from some site i'm not familiar with the site but it was called like boston review.net and this guy said if if a cop is violating your rights you have a right to defend yourself from unjust unlawful arrest well well who determines whether the arrest is lawful because nobody wants to get arrested nobody thinks they're being legally arrested.

They always yell things. I have not been read my rights. Therefore, the arrest is illegal. And then what? You're going to swing at a cop? Yeah, right. They don't have to read you your rights, dude. So I think it's about messaging.

I do. Well, let's jump into the second lead of the story. If you haven't already, make sure you smash the like button. And if you really do like the show, you can share it because sharing is the best way to do it. I mean, no joke. If 32,000 people shared this show right now, then we would have 32 million viewers. It's true. And once we had 32 million viewers, I would say something very profound and important to all the people. Oh, I'm excited. 32 million viewers incoming. I would say tweet hashtag Joe must show. Joe Biden must join the debate with Donald Trump moderated by Joe Rogan. That's the hashtag Joe must show.

Crush that like button because if we get to 40,000 views, I'm putting a beanie on. Oh, a beanie. Oh, just a regular beanie. Just a regular one. And I know you want it. All right. Everyone's like, what? Let's take it to the next level.

We got an Antifa. We got all these Antifa stories going on right now. Check this out. Milwaukee man mobbed by Black Lives Matter activists arrested for trying to defend his home. Now, this is the narrative that went out among many conservative, right-leaning, and anti-SJW type reporters. These Black Lives Matter activists show up in front of this guy's house.

They're screaming. They literally have a banner that says Black Lives Matter. They got the big Black Lives Matter fist. And then this guy in his window shows what looks like a shotgun of some sort. And then he, I guess he pumps it and then he like aims out the window. At some point after that, cops show up and arrest him. And all of these people start cheering. We now have an official statement from the police and we're going to, we're going to, we're going to break all this down. Milwaukee police tweeted suspect arrested for pointing and aiming a long gun at protesters. They go on to say on Monday, September 14th. And this is really weird. They include this weird context that's irrelevant to

the crime in question. On Monday, September 14th, 2020, at approximately 425 p.m., Milwaukee police responded to a residence located at the 3400 block of North 80th Street regarding a trouble with subject call for service. The suspect threatened to physically harm the victim, who is his neighbor, while wielding a chainsaw, causing the victim to fear for their safety. The suspect, a 56-year-old man from Milwaukee, was arrested for disorderly conduct while armed. Okay, I'm not sure what that has to do with the crime in question now and why they're saying that. Why are they bringing that up? Are they saying that the guy who held the long gun is the guy who threatened the dude with the chainsaw? I think that's where we're going. It's unclear though, yeah. On Tuesday, September 15th at approximately 521

a.mm officers were dispatched to a demonstration at the same location where several individuals protested outside the suspect's residence at approximately 8 30 p.m the officers who were monitoring the protest were notified by a witness that the suspect was inside his residence by a window and that the suspect motioned the long gun as if he chambered around and then pointed the gun at the crowd. The video of the incident was subsequently broadcasted on several social media outlets. Officers made contact with the suspect and observed that he appeared to be intoxicated. He was subsequently arrested for endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon while under the influence of an intoxicant. Disorderly conduct while armed and bail jumping.

The bail jumping one I don't get. Criminal charges will be referred to the Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office in the upcoming days. The Milwaukee Police Department continues to support the rights of those who choose to peacefully protest. So what do you think? Because I know a lot more about this, but I want to get your guys' impression before I tell you more secrets. What do you think? Because I know a lot more about this, but I want to get your guys impression before we before I tell you more secrets. What do you think? So I think that this guy had every right to take action against people who are mobbing him. I think the police were ridiculously cowardly to just walk up and be like, I see our problem.

We're going to arrest you. And then the crowd will disperse. And the fact that the crowd cheered the police, there's literally F12 on the back of one of the people in that picture. And she's then cheering for the police. That is ideologically inconsistent with what she's supposed to be out there rioting for. Yeah, these people who claim to hate the police want to defund the police, called the police, and then cheered when the police did what they wanted. Oh my gosh.

What's F12? It means F the police. Yeah. Okay, my thoughts are the first paragraph where they said the dude at a chainsaw and was threatening his neighbor makes it look like they're trying to make the guy look bad right yep for no reason unrelated just to like be like okay you're not going to hate this press release maybe you'll have sympathy for us yeah and then i wonder if it's a stand your ground state no no it's a castle doctrine state meaning if someone's on your property are you allowed to

shoot them no if they're trying to break in, so they weren't trying to break in. They were outside on his property yelling at him. And shining lights and playing live music. Shining lights. So they were, is that assault? Shining lights on someone? Harassment, maybe. So they're harassing the guy, and he responded with excessive force, maybe. Brandishing a weapon.

And he was drunk while he did it, which is another form of crime. They said he appeared to be. Or he was intoxicated. No, no, no. They said he appeared to be. Or he was intoxicated. No, no, no. They said he appeared to be. And from the first part of this press release, it sounds, I'll tell you what I think. I don't know if this guy was drunk. I don't know if he chased somebody with a chainsaw.

None of that's on video. It sounds like the police saw a mob of people and said, oh no, what do we do? And they said, and then the other cop is like, there's no way we can deal with this mob. Well, what if we arrest the guy in his house yeah arrest the guy in the house to appease the mob we're just talking about this yeah i talk about a lot this is uh well that's the case that's bad policing although they're on bad so their job is to keep the peace that's like their main gig that's the cop's main thing and that means sort it out in the courts afterwards when the mob comes to your house you will get arrested not the criminals so weird now here's the cop's main thing. And that means when the mob comes to your house, you will get arrested, not the criminals. So weird.

Now, here's the best part. One of the main guys who was live streaming this, one of the most prominent activists had previous has been, according to some reports, organizing parties at alleged racists homes. They're like going to people's houses and they're, you know, staging protests. This is the guy I was talking about earlier who believes he has a right, at least according to one outlet, he has a right to defend himself against police physically if they're unlawfully arresting him. Same guy, same activist. Now, he was at another major event where some young girls, like I think there were 13 and 15, went missing. And locals in the community started looking for them. They went to this block where the police had canvassed and the cops found nothing. The cops said it's not a critical missing person's case because it's only been four

hours. It's not even been a day. So are they really missing? The activists got angry. This guy showed up to a house where someone claimed to have seen the girls. There were about a dozen people already there. And this guy was there as well. The mob started protesting in front of the house, and then it quickly devolved into chaos. According to one story, two 14-year-olds got shot. Gunshots rang out. Police came in, and someone set fire to the home. The firefighters put the

fire out and left. Someone set fire again. Apparently, the firefighters had to come back and put the fire out again. The home was like, like almost not burned to the ground, but severely damaged. It turns out the girls weren't missing at all. They were just hanging out at a friend's house. So a mob of crazy people showed up to a house, fired guns, shooting two people and almost burning down a home, igniting it twice. For what? Some fringe accusation. Well, that same guy, one of the most prominent activists in the community, shows up to this dude's house. He probably knows this. He lives in Milwaukee. It was a national story when this house got set

ablaze. So what do you do? You're in your home. These same activists show up, the same chants. You had heard about the gunshots the last time it happened, people getting shot. And now they're in front of your house screaming at you. What do you do? I would have called the cops if I was the guy inside. The cops were apparently there monitoring it. I still would have called the cops and then maybe grabbed the gun. But if he was too high to think that straight, who knows?

Why would you assume he's high? Because the cops said so? Yeah, a bad assumption maybe. But I would have called the cops first. If there's a mob assembling outside, first thing I would do is notify police so I'm on their side. The cops are going to say it's a peaceful protest and they have a First Amendment right to do so. It's a semi-peaceful. It's a mostly peaceful protest.

They're harassing me through my window. And are they allowed to assemble on my property? Yes. They weren't on his property. They were in the street. Oh, well, if they're shining lights on his property yes they weren't on his property they were in the street oh well if they're shining lights on his property then they're on his property that's a good point they were shining lights through his windows and blasting music at him and screaming and bullhorning at him yeah then they're infringing on his property i would say so so it's it's an interesting dilemma because maybe he was trying to deter the people by by

brandishing the weapon definitely absolutely but uh i mean maybe he crossed the to deter the people by brandishing the weapon. Definitely. Absolutely. But I mean, maybe he crossed the line. I don't know. What do you think? I don't like vigilante mob justice. I think that how do you police that stuff? I mean, I'm asking. You send in the riot control police and they push them out.

So what, tear gas, batons? Military, like heavy. It's the only way, pretty much, right? We were talking earlier about how the push them out so what tear gas batons military like heavy you know anyway pretty much right we were talking earlier about how the first amendment that was that was the first article that would was to become the bill of rights talked about how 50 000 people deserved would get one representative in congress the founding fathers did not predict that we would have 750,000 people for every one congressperson. They thought it was going to be 50,000. Population growth is massive. So it's really easy to put together laws based on small population and constitutional rights.

And I've talked about how civil disobedience is the line where I think we as a society are comfortable, meaning like you block a road, right? You inconvenience people, nobody gets hurt, you get arrested very quickly, you get a slap on the wrist, go home. But what happens when you have millions of people? Nonviolent civil disobedience can destroy the country. Yeah. And so we're entering a point where the security of the nation is threatened because there's too many people. So if you had, you know, a small town back in the day and a tiny percentage showed up to protest some guy's house, it'd be like 10 people.

You get a couple of sheriffs and deputies to come out and say, everybody go home. You're disturbing the peace. Well, now you can very easily muster hundreds of people and there's only going to be a small handful of cops available to actually deal with it. Yeah, especially with social media. I hope you don't mind if i jump in but i was thinking about this i think this press release that the police gave out was designed to keep more rioting from happening i think them

trying to portray this solo citizen as a bad guy who had been threatening like his neighbor with the chainsaw and then who was clearly intoxicated like how dare he drink at home on an evening and not be prepared for an entire riot of people to show up how do you prepare for that if you have a gun you're armed and you're ready to defend yourself great you are also allowed to drink a beer on a saturday night i mean it just looks like the police are out to get i think we should modify the law so that if you shine lights into people's houses you're on their property i would say that might be the case like you're you're you're yeah you're that's that's a really really a really good point noise if you're sitting at home wait wait that That might be the case. Like you're, yeah, that's a really good point.

Noise. If you're sitting at home, wait, wait, Lydia's points is excellent. If you're sitting at home and you're watching, let's say you're watching, I don't know,

Family Guy. Caddyshack. And you're just like, you're just loving the Bill Murray, the goat, groundhog, it's so crazy

and you're like, I gotta crack a beer open. You crack a beer and you're drinking and then all of a sudden a violent mob starts screaming at your house and you're like oh man what do i do so you grab your gun to protect yourself and they go out but you're drunk you're under arrest that's

not good you can't defend your home if you were drinking and hanging out on a saturday night well they said intoxicated if he was high on coke you know there's another that takes but they haven't said that he appeared to be yeah yeah what if what if you still have to be able to defend yourself? I don't care what state you're in. Exactly. So what happens if... Let's push it a little bit further. What happens if you're in your house?

And maybe the chat actually knows this. Let's see. Someone mentioned there are nuisance laws. Yeah. But let's say you're in your house and you're watching Starship Troopers 3 because they made direct-to-DV versions of it. You're a huge

Starship Troopers fan. I am. I love this guy. Yeah. The original actor. Michael Ironsides. Wasn't he? I don't know.

But imagine you're watching it and you're slamming down some Natty Light because you're just like old school. Old school. Low quality. I'm from Chicago.

Born and bred. Yeah, man. And you're drunk. And then the most gigantic, super ripped, well-known serial murderer kicks in your door. And he's like, I am the great serial murderer. Come to kill you. And then you're like, ah, and you grab your gun. Oh, but you're drunk.

Okay, I'm exaggerating. I'm sure at that point you're going to be okay. Yeah, I'm exaggerating. I'm sure at that point, you're going to be okay. Yeah, I would think so. But what if you have a crazy guy who's very threatening and saying, like, you're next? Where do we draw the line on when you're allowed to defend yourself if you happen to have been at home just having a beer on your own business? If they're infringing on your property, ultimately. So the lights and the noise is like like that's hitting me in the ears so you're here with me i don't care where you're standing at that point it's it's it's uh it can

be physically damaging if the if it's loud enough yeah are you blinding if it's bright enough that's why they're doing it yeah absolutely and i i would be curious about that and so far the chat hasn't given me anything but i think i think that is considered a form of assault if it's likely to hurt your ears or your eyes enough. Although I do know that under the Geneva Convention that is not considered like maiming or disfigurement. But it's a huge problem. And it is like a lifelong issue. Laying siege to someone's home. Yeah, they were doing that in Cuba with sound.

Did you hear those sound weapons they were using? Yeah, I remember that. Well, I don't know if that was, I think those are microwave weapons. Whoa. Like melting people's brains with microwaves. Yeah, that's interesting.

Jeez, vibration, like really high frequency. Yeah. So this, yeah, that story was crazy. That was like people would hear a noise and then all of a sudden

they would get these mental ailments, like symptoms with like loss of vision and headaches and light sensitivity that they had to wear special glasses because they couldn't see the light anymore that's scary stuff dude you start hearing a weird noise and then all of a sudden you get permanent brain damage man then i'll pass through walls if it's microwaves yeah horror show yeah

with enough power you go through like stone and why why wouldn't that be like why would it's funny how i love spy movies you know action movies like everybody has a gun with a silencer that goes pew pew pew like silencers don't do that but even beyond that like why wouldn't they just have like a thing where they put up against the wall and then like stick it to the wall and crank it and then everyone inside just gets their brains melted by microwaves i think that's coming yeah i think it's here we'll do it from orbit. From orbit? Yeah. Wouldn't that cause way more...

The waves are going to not be direct. I think you can't direct waves. Well, I guess infrared laser. Dude, I've been thinking a lot about modern war and why we never want to experience it because we don't know what kind of weapons are coming from orbit. Dude, have you seen...

We've talked about laser-induced plasma channels. Yeah. So the way it works, and I am not an electrical engineer or laser engineer whatever but he will be is that an extremely high powered infrared laser that flicks on and off real fast ionizing the air at the same time supercharges this massive electrode so then the electricity travels down the superheated path of least least least resistance so effectively they can point

the weapon at you and fire and strike you with lightning. And a friend of ours, Jeremy Riss, who's an alien scientist on YouTube, you can check out his channel. He knows people to help us make one. No, he's got his team. Have you seen the videos of the destroyers with the crazy laser turrets? It's got like three lenses and it aims and just like, it like just locks on and just holds an infrared laser and the thing just bursts into flames and crashes. Yeah, I think China was testing one and said, we tagged one of your jets to the U.S. government.

No, that was laser targeting. Oh, so they were just letting us know they could target the jet. They were locked in. But I've heard of what you're talking about. There's a video. You can watch it on YouTube. Oh, and they just take it out of the sky, turn it on, turn it off. Bro, did you hear about the UFO over the West Coast or whatever?

I think, no, just reports. What happened? Yeah, reports of a weird triangular-shaped flying vessel. Aluminum magnetic craft that they're moving around with a magnetic magnet? No, I don't know. I think that's how they're doing it. It was a bunch of really clear pictures of it.

And they were saying, yeah, how did we go from police battalion rides to aliens? Just like sound weapons. Sound waves, yeah. You were just like, I've been wanting to go there my whole life, man. You've just been waiting this whole time. Yeah, there's a crazy video.

There's a crazy video. Maybe we'll pull it up tomorrow and we can talk more about that stuff. Get to the bottom of it. But we got more Antifa stuff. All right. Oh, yeah. $2 billion in damage. Look at this.

George Floyd riots caused record-setting $2 billion in damage, new report says. Here's why the true cost is even higher. Why is the true cost even higher? Freedom Foundation for Economic Education. Oh, they're very cool. I like them. When George, they say dozens of people were killed or injured. Let's get to the point.

They say the U.S. has experienced riding over racial tensions before, but this report shows the damage from the latest unrest will far exceed any historical precedent. The arson, vandalism, and looting will result in at least $1 billion to $2 billion of paid insurance claims, Axios reports. This will eclipse the record set in the LA 1992 riots after the acquittal of police officers who brutalized Rodney King. However, there are many reasons. This figure vastly underestimates the true damage wrought by the looting and violence

that has broken out in recent months. For one, the Axios report only measures insured losses. There was a story I was reading where apparently a bunch of these businesses, their hallway claims, which means like for when the debris and rubble is capped at 25K. Oh. Whereas the actual cost was $150,000 for many of these businesses. When they destroyed the entire building, the insurance didn't cover the cost of removal of debris. So they just did nothing, and they walked away from it. So the costs are way higher than $2 billion.

They're going to say, as I previously explained, insurance is no panacea for the societal ills imposed by rioting. Indeed, 75% of U.S. businesses are underinsured and about 40% of small businesses have no insurance at all. Their untold millions in losses don't show up in the $2 billion figure. So, too, insurance doesn't account for the personal pain and suffering caused by rioting. For example, what about the more than 15 people who died during the unrest? So too, insurance doesn't account for the personal pain and suffering caused by riding. For example, what about the more than 15 people who died during the unrest? It's actually more than that, but some of the deaths were like peripheral or considered to be accidental. Their lives and their families' pain don't get counted in any insurance company's budgetary analysis. does the pain of those such as elderly businessman punched in the face while his store was ransacked in Kenosha, Wisconsin, manifest itself in total reports of an uninsurance compensation.

You know what I want to say? You know, they don't they don't account for that Trump over there. Can you buy another stand up Trump, right? Yeah, I should be able to. What about the painting next to it? My mom made no insurance. Can't cover that. Absolutely. Take a picture of it.

So what happens when your business, you've got a painting that a family member made for you, maybe a family member who died, and they burned it down? Insurance can't pay for that. That's well beyond monetary costs. And psychological value, you can't put a dollar on that. This is something I was thinking about, because when you burn someone's small business,

you are as close to literally, in the correct sense, as possible burning the American dream. Because if they started from the ground up and they've been working on it for 35 years and they've handed it down to their family and they've taught all their kids to work there, that's gone. And you cannot buy that back. There's nothing that will replace that. I mean, that's more than billions of dollars. Like, and that's, you're just talking about repairing the actual structure, not about how long it will take, all the lost revenue that your business isn't open

and the people that you'll lose that have to go get other jobs. Yep. Regular customers who don't shop with you anymore. I would love to know how much, how many of these things weren't, how many businesses that were destroyed were not insured or were underinsured. Most of them. And you're saying a sixth. So of the $150,000, they only cover $25,000. That was a story from the Minneapolis Star Tribune, I think it is.

They said that many of these businesses are capped out at $25,000. $2 billion. Doesn't even account for the true cost of all the damage man well that's the far left so this damage you know you know the to go back to that sedition stuff with bill barr i think it's interesting because what if these people what if they're pro-china some of them are man you're now you're speaking my language i think my conspiracy is that the chinese go is the ccp is trying to sow dissent in the united states and this is how they're doing it's a perfect opportunity did did you guys look at that tucker carlson interview about that girl that chinese uh

i didn't see it but apparently she said that it was made in the lab and it was intent as a weapon yeah but she also worked at the university of hong kong okay so that could be could be bunk, but not out of question for government to tamper with a foreign country. So the point I brought up on that story, for those that aren't familiar, Tucker Carlson had on a whistleblower from a university in Hong Kong saying the Chinese Communist Party manufactured and intentionally released COVID. My thought on that is there's a potential for bias because she was working in Hong Kong. So Hong Kong is being repressed and suppressed by the Chinese Communist Party.

But I will say, why do we trust one expert over another if they have the same credentials? Why is it that if one expert comes out and says it's not man-made, we say, you got it done. The story's over. But when she comes out, everyone says, fake news, ignore it. They suspended her on Twitter. Yeah, she got suspended done. That story's over. But when she comes out, everyone says fake news. Ignore it. They suspended her on Twitter. Yeah, she got suspended on Twitter. And on Instagram, Tucker Carlson's post was flagged as fake news. Here's the best part.

When it says, see why this is fake, it doesn't actually talk about the whistleblower. It references months old stories about COVID. So we have a news story. We have an actual researcher who was working at a university in Hong Kong saying they know this and they published a paper on it. And now they're taking old stories

that don't actually reference anything having to do with her and using it to prove Tucker's story is false. Well, okay. So that's crazy. That's a little over-managed, I think. So free software. I'll say it again free

software let's have like a government free software social network that you know is run by the people um but okay so covet aside maybe that they're tampering and and and funding this chaos or you know in some capacity trying to make everything yeah it's perfect timing i mean they hate trump they want to make Trump look bad. Maybe. I don't know. This kind of helps Trump in some ways, but the economic damage is bad for this country.

It's devastating. Yeah. And psychological damage. People are like, the suicide rate. I don't know what it is, but I've heard that it's gone up. Like, sadly. Yeah.

It's awful. Like, fortunately, 40%. I'm so blessed that we've been able to all live kind of together in a house. No, keep our sanity. The socialization is key. I cannot imagine what it would be. I, sometimes I go into these modes are like,

what if I was living alone in an apartment in like New York? How, how horrible the last six months would have been insane. I would have gone nuts. You'd be the joker. The most gross internet videos is what I would have been doing. It would have been just, people would be like,

shut up. Going negative. You'd be probably going out screaming in the streets. I don't know what that, man. You're broke. You're about to be evicted. You're angry. Who do you blame? The government. I would have blamed that. I would have become radicalized

in my beliefs because I already believe that there's a power structure out there that's pulling the strings on this system. I'm very red-pilled, by the way, and I try and play it off like I'm not because we need to keep things stable. Yeah, we try. And I would have lost it, I think. And there's so many people in that position right now. Well, it is true that there was an intelligence report saying that China and Russia are both interfering. And the official statement was that Russia prefers China. I'm

sorry. Russia prefers Trump, but China prefers Biden. So pick your poison. I don't think Russia is as bad as they claim. No, I'm going after the Democratic Republic of Russia. Is that what it's called? What I mean is Russia is a bad place for a lot of reasons. But in terms of being a threat to the United States, it's not nearly as bad as they're trying to claim it is. It's not communist anymore. It's not even about that. It's about are they a threat to the U.S.? China is a substantial threat to the U.S. and their cybersecurity, their attacks,

and we actually have confrontation with them. We have some confrontation with Russia, but I think China's the bigger threat. Yeah, dude, the Communist Party of China? It's some one-party system that has control of their entire government? Yeah. That's so weird.

Yep, the party. That's so weird. Yep. The party. Yeah. So no, not a fan. And if I had to make a choice, I'd say I want the guy who's opposed to China because China's the real threat. And I've been covering a lot of stories pertaining to China and the things they've been doing for a long time.

Like Russia, Russia wants to set up a trade federation in Eastern Europe. Oh, their trade federation. Putin, you know, the whole be in an office for 20 years thing, it's constitutionally legal in Russia, as far as I can tell from what I've learned. And he is a hardcore dude. Like, he's this ex-KGB, like, stone-cold-faced killer machine, he looks like. You know, when you look at the guy. Rides a bear in some memes.

In some memes. Yes, yes. I don't think that he wants to be the the controller of russia i think he's just terrified to let it go and see it devolve back into that's that's all all all that's all power gesture no no it's all power corruption yeah it's better if i'm in charge you'll see all of these despots in the in north africa in the middle east who are like if i go you'll see how bad it gets i think that's his mindset right now and then to be honest libya did get really bad.

I would like to see a peaceful transfer of power in Russia. I feel like he's waiting for a great leader in the United States to emerge so that he can breathe easy and let go and make sure stuff doesn't I don't know. People want power. I don't want to give it up. That's true. But you know what? I can talk about another peaceful transfer of power. Transfer of power from Republican

to Democrat as people switch parties. It's coming. We got another segment. Oh, they're switching parties. Before we talk about another piece full of transfer of power. Oh, yeah? Please do. Transfer of power from Republican to Democrat as people switch parties. It's coming. We got another segment. Oh, they're switching parties. But before we talk about that, have you not smashed thy like button? Then you must. I got a request for you.

Hit it. Spin the UFO? Yes, do it. And subscribe. We do the show Monday through Friday live. We got one more segment. We're talking about this sheriff who has quit the Democratic Party.

Sheriff. Yes. Sheriff. Sheriff. Sheriff. I think that guy's name was Sheriff yesterday. Yeah, it was. But we pronounced it Sheriff.

Yeah, you said Sheriff. People were like, Sheriff. Sheriff. For the whole time. The whole show. I read the chat again yesterday. I got a little crazy. Don't read the comments.

I know. I know. I'm just learning. Okay, anyway. Smash the like button. Gently, peacefully protest that like button. That's right. And get in your super chats if you would like to have us because we're going to do one more

segment and then we're going to read your comments. But check out this story from the Epoch Times. Oh, let's do it. Now, of course, I always make sure I bring this up that NewsGuard says Epoch Times fails, but they do not repeatedly publish false content. They just don't like that they don't correct their errors. Well, that's an issue. But we still have this story and I think it's important to bring up because I've got a couple other stories for you as well. They report Pennsylvania Sheriff flips from

Democrat Party to Republican Party. They say, quote, It was really a difficult decision, and I've thought long and hard about it, but I feel I stand for the ideals of the Republican Party platform more than the Democrats today. Westmoreland County Sheriff James Albert told the Tribune Review. Albert, 70, became sheriff last year. He said he is against abortion for the Second Amendment and a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association. Today, I feel my ideals are closer to the Republican Party than Democrats. The reaction to looting and rioting across the country in the wake of the death of George Floyd helped lead to the party change. He says, I was saddened and enraged by the murders of David Dorn, a 77-year-old African-American retired police captain who was shot by a pawn shop looter during a protest in

St. Louis. These outrageous lawless acts have been met with silence, acquiescence, and in some instances, outright support from the local,cence, and in some instances, outright support from the local, state, and national leadership of the Democratic Party. The Pennsylvania Democratic Party did not respond to a request for comment. You know, I see this. I completely agree. That's exactly what I've seen. I mean, you guys have seen similar, right? Okay. Well, take a look at this from The Washington Post. I can't believe you're forcing me to vote for Trump, which I definitely didn't want to do. Yeah, I can hear it in the headline.

Yes, I can hear the sarcasm from Alexander. Alexandra Petri, who writes, Believe me when I tell you the last thing I could possibly want would be to vote for Donald Trump. That's why I'm so stunned that you have taken it upon yourself to go to such lengths to force me to vote for him. You sick, sick monster. I don't even like him, not even one little bit. So I hope you're happy with what you are making me do, which comes to me as a total surprise and is definitely not a foregone conclusion in any way. I'm not going to read this trash. This article is the perfect example of what is wrong with the media, the left and the Democrats and why they are losing voters. Now, I don't know who's going to win in November. Maybe they'll cheat. And by they, I mean, I have no idea. Maybe they'll both cheat, whatever.

The left thinks the right's going to cheat. The right thinks the left's going to cheat. But I'll tell you this, man. I watched people riot. I did not like it. Joe Biden's staff bailed these people out. Kamala Harris solicited money to bail these people out. I did not like it. Kamala Harris called for more. A bunch of other higher, like, you know, federal level Democrats supported it, and they tried to use it to their advantage and i'm angry about that in the primaries for the democratic party i supported andrew yang and tulsi gabbard me too i did not want to vote for donald trump the only problem is the democrats are lunatics and they chose joe biden you did make me do this you have given me no choice it is the choice between a flashlight with dying batteries or a human being with a flashlight i'll even go a step further you swung hillary clinton at me and then followed it up with a

biden left hook right so i am no more actually obama bought how many drone bombs did he bought launch between obama you know mr obama between 2012 and 2016 i don't know it was like yeah that was my morale those in those for sure but but but but look, and Trump didn't didn't make very many changes in that regard. Yeah, I've heard that, actually. And that's why early on, I was like, don't care. You know, he wants to hire John Bolton. He wants to fire missiles. He wants a drone strike.

I don't care. I'll take me a Tulsi Gabbard. So forget the Obama thing, but the Hillary Clinton subverting Bernie Sanders thing that came out in WikiLeaks and then the trying to shove Biden down my throat. I'm I'm not a party politician, but that is disgusting. I thought Bernie Sanders had some great things to say. I was ready to-

He sold out. He did sell out. He capitulated. He bent the knee to the power structure, which I thought he would never do. And that was also devastating. That's the most amazing thing about Bernie is that I remember it was like early 2016.

I was in New York with a friend and I was literally ranting like an excitement about how Bernie Sanders has been consistent. And we finally have a politician who's been saying the same thing, still saying the same things and refusing to back down. And they were like Bernie said good things, notably, like when it comes to the Second Amendment, he said it's an urban versus rural issue. And I was like, wow, I like that. He's actually talking about how you have different perspectives. like when it comes to the second amendment he said it's an urban versus rural issue and i was like wow i like that he's actually talking about how you have different perspectives and that's long been a a challenge i can't believe the guy i said did not change give you give him give him 10 seconds in that room with hillary clinton and he went yeah when when they when they pulled the

trigger basically that you know but when they basically, but when Hillary Clinton's campaign finally said, no, Bernie, it's Hillary, whatever, he had like a week to run independent. And I thought he was going to do it. I was like, just run independent now. Run independent. Someone's got to be telling him to do it. He would want it. Dude, dude, dude. You know what happened?

There's a video. I love this conspiracy theory. At the Democratic National Convention in 2016, Bernie Sanders has a laceration on his face. Have you seen that? Negative. Sanders has a laceration on his face have you seen that? there's a laceration on his face and I think he said something like he bumped into a door which is possibly he's an old man but a bunch of people were like no way dude

and they were pushing this conspiracy theory that like the DNC brought him into a room and then like some guy like puts on a glove and he's like yo Bernie listen up you're gonna bow out and give it to Hillary or else and Bernie's like I'll never back down boom and he gets like yo bernie listen up you're gonna bow you're gonna bow out and give it to hillary you know or else and bernie's like i'll never back down boom i don't get smacked in the face i don't think it happened because he wouldn't run a second time if they did that he ran again so he was no no no no because the conspiracy theory is that he they smacked him in the face and he

was like okay i yield i'll do whatever you say i'll say whatever you want but i don't think he would have run against this this cycle if that happened to him then. He was doing what they wanted. Dude, but the bird landed on his podium. Yeah, I remember that. Yeah, when the bird landed on his podium. That was amazing. That was like some Gandhi stuff. It was meant to be. So a lot of people pushed that conspiracy.

They got punched in the face. And I think that's ridiculous. Yeah, he just ran into a door. No, I think he's an old bumbling man. He probably bumped into something. That's always the excuse. I'll tell you what really happened. The DNC goons brought him in and they were like, all righternie listen up you're gonna bow out for hillary clinton and we're gonna do a great book deal you're

gonna make a million dollars and then bernie goes a million dollars i want to be a millionaire carrot and stick yes carrot and well no there was no stick it was quite literally hey bernie how about we make you a millionaire and you do a book and good for you. You buy another house. What does he have? Like four houses? Does he have four? I thought he had three.

Three houses? He might have four now. He's a rich dude. He's like, you want to be a millionaire? Write a book. That's what he said, right? And then he stopped saying, you say millionaires and billionaires and now he just says billionaires. It's a good thing.

That's smart too because millionaires aren't the problem. There's a lot more millionaires than there were 20 years ago. Millionaires are the problem. Because of inflation. I think it's the really, really high level people that are making money off of interest that't the problem. There's a lot more millionaires than there were 20 years ago because of inflation. I think it's the really, really high-level people that are making money off of interest that are the problem. And somebody with $900 million is... Well, they're almost a billionaire.

Yeah. $500 million. Well, it depends on what you're doing with the money at that point. $100 million. It's not just the money amount that's the problem. It's what you're doing with it. And greed is a problem. And that's why I think it is the millionaires and the billionaires. That's why whenever people are like, George Soros is funding all these things. And I'm like, dude, don't send me a message about this.

Unless you want to send me a message about literally every single other millionaire and billionaire who's doing this exact same thing. Maybe it's just greedy people that are the problem. No, I think it's people get rich and they're idealistic and they make donations. Dude, when you have a lot of money, it's tough to not fall into that. Because it's so easy to just live off your money. It's not about that. It's like if how much the average person, if they make like, you know, I think what's like what's the median salary for the US, like 38K or something? I thought it was a little more than that.

I don't know. Like 70 or something. No, it's like 48 maybe. But how much can you really donate to a politician? You're going to be barely not twenty eight hundred dollars so you get somebody who's worth ten million dollars and they can be like i'm gonna give twenty eight hundred dollars to all of my favorite politicians right now and that's way more than the average person could possibly do not only that you get someone worth fifty million dollars and they're like i'm

gonna give five million dollars to a super PAC to promote my candidate. I have mixed feelings about funding politicians. I don't know how you guys feel about this, but I think it was a glass repealing Glass-Steagall. No, no, no. Glass-Steagall was banking regulations for investment versus savings. It comes from like back in the day when people would want to run around, take trains around the country and like campaign and they wanted to fund their own campaign. And so they would pay all the bill and it was illegal back in the day. You couldn't spend more than like a certain amount they're like how come because i have all this

money i can't use it that makes no sense so they changed the law and then all of a sudden you could fund your own campaign and now it's just so out of control well now there was there was the citizens united ruling like a decade ago yeah that's what i was thinking about and so basically what happens is you get someone like michael bloomberg who's a billion multi-billionaire, like ridiculous billions of dollars. And he's like, I'm going to take one hundred million dollars of my assets and liquefy them and give them to super PACs to put out all this anti-Trump messaging. And I hate it. I will put billboards everywhere you look. Turn left.

I'll have one there. Now, that sweet, sweet Bloomberg green was was raining down on top of me back when he was doing that ad campaign. And right now, that's where it comes out. Because they go on Google and they buy ads. And so then those ads they pay out to... Yeah, but I don't like the idea of any billionaire. I don't care if it's Mackenzie Bezos or

George Soros. I don't care. I don't like that these people are super rich and that it would take a thousand people to... Like, dude, a thousand people with making 50 grand per year still will not be able to match up to one millionaire because that 50 grand they're paying is going towards base necessities yeah so they're not even at the point where they have disposable income to just be giving out for political and ideological causes maybe we should have throw more money at it in

uh like a stip a government stipend every year that we can donate to political campaigns that's one of the ideas like a voucher thing so uh this voucher thing's really interesting in my opinion right so so we've talked about like vouchers for schools you for you guys know i obviously know this about for those aren't familiar everybody pays taxes that are proportional to their income and then you get a voucher that represents a certain amount of value for the school and then you choose which school you want to go to and they get that voucher. So that way, rich people pay a little bit more, but still get one voucher. Poor people pay a little bit less, still get one voucher. And that guarantees equal access to

schools. And then everyone can choose. So a rich kid's voucher is worth the same as a poor kid's. So the school's trying to compete for those vouchers, regardless of whether the student's rich or poor. That's an interesting idea. Meritocracy. There's another idea that we all pay taxes into a public resource fund of some sort, and then those vouchers are given out to candidates at a certain point. The problem is, who gets them? I know. And sometimes I don't donate at all, because I don't like any of the candidates. Because then the question becomes, if you poll at a certain number then you get access to a percentage of vouchers well then

how do you get to pull that level you get rich people to pay for ads for you oh man become yeah right it's really really difficult i don't know if there's a solution to the money in politics problem i i it's not just it's not the money it's the access so they're buying access with their money it's it's power it's like influence is what they're buying it's influence really because like a youtuber with 100 million followers can become president no oh yeah in brazil there was a youtuber or in the middle east or something i was gonna say but for for us right now maybe in four to eight years it's possible we we still rely too much on the mainstream media so right now this is mainstream media what we're doing doing? YouTube, yeah. Well, technically. What I mean is, right now, I mean, yeah, it's fair to say I get like 110 million views in the past month. And CNN on digital, CNN is like 190 or whatever.

YouTube's what opens when I open my browser. Right. But many people still rely on legacy media. And that's what we're looking at. Joe Biden is the legacy candidate and Donald Trump is the internet candidate. No matter what happens, the establishment is losing power. But that means we're going to see these wing nuts on Twitter who are screeching, ban them all, are going to be the left. That's what's happening. The Democrats are embracing it.

They're absorbing that into their party. And then once the establishment media is gone, you're going to have us as the right and the left is going to be a a bunch of screeching cancel culture lunatics who want to burn everything to the ground. Why don't we just build out the center? I mean, technically, we are the center. Like, you can clearly see the difference in opinion between, like, me or someone like Stephen Crowder. You know, we agree on fundamental issues that we are a country. And then we disagree on like the traditional wedge issues of the left and the right. But what's happened is there are regular Americans who have kind of like, you know, stayed where they are going a little left, a little right, back and

forth. And then there's this weird like branch that's gone like and just like shot straight out. It's the food supply. Now the Democrats are desperate to try and, you know, build a bridge between the new psychotic algorithmic far left and regular Americans, and they can't do it. So Joe Biden's like, I'll go a little far left, making everyone go like, whoa, whoa, whoa, you're too far left. Oh, thank God for the internet. But then the far left goes, he's nowhere near far left enough.

You can't win with that kind of mindset. Crazy ain't going to work. Well, that's what they're going for. They're going for crazy and violence, and they tried. And now it's like, you know what,, and Trump as an Internet candidate, he really, really is. Think about this. Trump posted Pepe memes. You know, it's funny to watch, but it's kind of like a shock to a lot of traditional like traditional establishment types who are like, this is not what a presidential campaign is supposed to be.

And they're freaking out. So right now, what we're experiencing is you got the left claiming the right is reactionary when in reality, the right is actually substantially more progressive than the left is. And I can prove it. The left is repealing civil rights law. They repeal the Democrats in California, the state, the assembly and the Senate have voted to repeal their civil rights legislation from their constitution, specifically Prop 209 that deals with government contracts, employment, things like that. So you will be able to, you will, the government will be able to discriminate based on race, meaning you'll start seeing, well, maybe seeing signs pop up that say like,

you know, one race only, black only, white only, Latino only, Asian only, whatever. They'll be, they'll be allowed to do it at government institutions. That's one thing they're doing. The other thing they're trying to do is ban offensive speech, which is quite literally what they were doing back in the early 1900s. They were trying to pressure the president to ban things that were offensive, and they've consistently tried to do these things. Free speech, as we know today, is a new concept. And guess what? You have Donald Trump, who's on the internet, uses the internet, tweets like crazy he does not represent the old traditional stodgy plastic media he's off the cuff he says whatever's on his mind

and it offends a lot of people but that's what the internet is it's authentic you turn on a youtube channel like this and it's not like cnn not at all you ever you ever watch like you guys have seen local news yeah yeah where it's like i'm standing here in the street. Why do they use that voice? I don't know. Where does that come from? It's like they're taught to do it. It's a learn that's so annoying.

And that's what the Democrats represent right now. It is an old, so their activists are reactionary and that means they're specifically trying to stop the progress

being made. These people, they don't, listen, you talk about internet voting. You realize you're talking about freedom, individuality, decentralization. These are tenets of libertarianism that everyone online, that we can decentralize power and authority through encrypted internet networks and secure voting and secure their individual

rights for all. They're banning people from social media because they don't adhere to their orthodoxy. That is not. So maybe what we're seeing is as the Internet age develops and expands, you have Bernie Sanders, who was promoted by left wing Internet populists and Donald Trump, right wing Internet populists and the Democratic establishment because they have allies in media crushed bernie yeah the republicans didn't right so trump wins it looks like what we're seeing now is a fight between the far the left-wing populists and the right-wing populists and that's what that's what's going to look like in the next several elections you know far left is authoritarian wants to shut

down speech and take away rights and the right wants people to have whatever say what you want they were trying to stifle trump in the beginning they were pushing jeb bush cnn in the earlier days and he was just so boring and trump was so powerful personality nothing could stop it there were just weren't any powerful personalities up against him jeb hillary hat is you know as much as I dislike her, she's got a powerful personality in her name recognition. Yeah, unfortunately. But the establishment

tried to stop Trump, the right-wing establishment in the beginning, but then they realized we want him over whoever the Democrats are going to put, so let's just go with them.

Yeah, the right-wing establishment is not smart if they're pushing Jeb. That's absolute insanity. They really wanted him for about three weeks. Oh, that was it. Oh, sad. Jeb? Yeah. Jeb. Well really wanted him for about three weeks. Oh, that was it. Oh, sad.

Jeb? Yeah. Jeb. Well, we got a bunch of great memes out of it, though, which I'm really excited about. And the electoral college map showing all Jeb 538

and him going like, yeah! Please clap. Please clap. Oh, no. And then Buttigieg had his please clap moment. Come on!

And then everyone starts clapping. You love it. And now what do we get? We have this really great... I have to showcase this piece of art. Because I know we mentioned George Alexopoulos before. But boy, is this art just so good. I so have to walk you through this.

So it's at G Prime 85.orge alexopolis is one of the best comic artists right now in politics period the first panel is a storm and like a lightning strike and there's a hooded figure approaching a cave inside the cave there is a twisted figure wearing a muumuu holding a stick with an old man hanging from it and another creepy old man monster sleeping behind the evil Moomoo monster. And the Moomoo monster's neck is all really long, yelling, who dares seek power? The next panel is Kamala Harris kneeling on a bunch of skeletons. She is the showing her face.

She was the hooded figure. And then a smiling, elongated neck. Hillary Clinton with weird alien bug eyes it's so good wait here's the best part in the second panel that the stick that she's holding has bill clinton's like deflated from it oh my god and the giant biden behind her sleeping it is just amazing the reason i love his art is because he says so much in just these beautiful images. Kamala Harris. No, I love the smiling Hillary with creepy, bugged out black eyes.

And her neck is all stretched out. She's so happy it's Kamala. Oh my gosh. Dude, wow. Okay, how about we go to Super Chats? All right. We got a Super Chat from Michelle D'Reese. You are correct, stating the guy in Milwaukee was arrested to defuse protesting MPD,

had their ability to use tear gas taken away in July. They don't carry tasers. MPD chief was demoted for use of tear gas, pepper spray during riots. It's a mess here. There you go. You know what, man? I said it was going to happen and it started happening. They're going to come to your house. Now, does it mean literally everyone's house? No, but I'll tell you what. Here's what I explain to people. Let me ask you a question, Ian. If you could buy a lottery ticket right now for $1 and

you had to guess all the numbers like Powerball, but if you won, they chopped off your leg. Would you buy that ticket? What would I get if I lost? No, you lose. No, probably not. But if you win, they chop your leg off. Oh, they would chop my leg off. No.

Yeah, you buy a ticket. And then if the numbers come up, they just chop your leg off. And if you lose, you lose. Oh, so if I win, my leg gets chopped off. Yeah, that's the prize. No lose. Oh, oh, oh. So if I win, I get my leg gets chopped. Yeah, that's the prize. No, no, I'm not going to buy that ticket, Tim. So that's the point I make.

Like, if you have, if you are given the opportunity to entertain a situation in which there's no upside and there is a rare potential that someone will show up to your house and you will be arrested because they accuse you of being a bigot, would you that circumstance to happen no no who wants to live with any percentage chance what's the metaphor that you're going with right now like what's the downside of this antifa and black lives matter are not going to every single person's house this is like speaking your mind online you're saying can induce this lottery ticket system no no no i'm just talking about whatever and black lives matter they're going around to people's homes. This guy is targeting people.

All right. One of these activists. He'll go to your house, accuse you of being a racist. The cops come and arrest you. They won't do that to every single person. But there is a chance it could be you. Would you like that circumstance to exist in which there is a chance a mob comes to your house for any reason and you get arrested? No.

Well, it depends on the reason. If it's because i'm speaking what i believe has to be said they just called you a bigot and you don't you don't know why i wouldn't don't don't don't fight back don't respond to that crap well the point i'm making is they're not going to go after everyone they're going to go after enough people so that people are scared and stop fighting back and and then they'll think if i just keep my head down, and then you get the Soviet Union, where people would just call the cops on their neighbor and say, my neighbor says communism is dumb. And the next day, the apartment was cleaned out and the person was gone at a gulag. That's why I don't like these contact tracing things for COVID.

That feels like gulag Soviet stuff. Contact tracing, like knowing where you go and who you talk to my neighbor got was by a guy yesterday i better tell report yeah that's crazy yeah yeah so i'm i'm going in for a uh to the dentist for a permanent crown nice and i have to answer all these questions and they're like have you been in contact with anybody who has these symptoms have you traveled out of state all this crazy stuff and they fill it out and they document it that's where we're going it looks like a step all right let's see dr lich says if biden refuses to come onto joe's podcast i vote trump should go solo still would bring in tons of views and media smoke a joint like musk ha that would probably never happen but there is a chance

so you're saying there is a chance yes joey giggles says i work for vzw on our employee site they state saying all lives matter really isn't cool afraid i'll slip up and get fired for a different opinion yikes tom says now my first choice for news analysis thank you very much student of history says after your video, I think we must expand the Andy No method. People from your area start popping up in riot blotters. Let's go get that message, put their message out there, make them nervous without going near them. So this is a reference to Andy No, who is when the public information comes out that Andy, people have been arrested. He just says like, this person was arrested. You you know this is where they work this is what the the thing says so the police are like

john smith 34 was arrested for arson battery blah blah you know and then andy will be like this person does this job and now antifa is panicking because they're losing their some some people have lost their jobs because of this um as much as some of these companies want to pretend like no no it wasn't over it wasn't over this it wasn't over this you know when it comes to criminals sometimes you want to be careful not to make a martyr out of them and just lock them up throw them in the oubliette and forget about them like when they're gone that's the best thing yeah but if they're not being uh they're not being charged by the da they get right back out and keep doing it that's a you want to throw them away forever into the oubliette is down in the pit where they starve.

They die slowly. That's what they do in the Middle Ages if they wanted to forget about something. They would throw them into a pit and that's where they would live the rest of their days. In this thing called the oubliette. So that's my point. You don't want to make their pictures everywhere and then

all hail the guy that made a thing out of you know martyr yeah conrad right says taxation without representation is tyranny should murderers criminals be able to vote who decides that line hmm yes who decides the line they should be able to vote you think well i don't do you you don't lose your right to vote if you're a criminal right yes you do if you're a felon really temporarily Yes, you do. If you're a felon. Really? Temporarily? Just while you're in? Yeah.

So they're trying to pass new laws that will allow felons to vote. And so, like, Florida did a big thing. Yeah. I don't know. I don't know. Voting's a right. You know? You've got to earn it.

It's a privilege, I should say. There's a lot of questions about voting. So, first, you have the Starship Troopers method, where service guarantees citizenship. You're a civilian if you haven't served and you can't vote, but you enjoy all the rights. If you serve in some capacity, now you have the right to vote. That's a really interesting thought, because right now we have people who vote who hate the country and want to destroy it, who've done nothing for it. Who vote against what they think is the right thing. There are people here who are voting to hate the country and want to destroy it. Yeah. Who've done nothing for it. Who like vote against what they're voting. There are people here who are voting to hurt the country on purpose.

Yeah. And there are some people who vote for random things too. But then you get like, no offense to people that have served, but mindless people that have signed up to serve in the military because they just want to kill the bad guy that might go vote to just to follow the crowd. The service in Starship Troopers isn't infantry. It could be anything. It's just service to the crowd. The service in Starship Troopers isn't infantry. It could be anything. It's just service to the community. Service is key.

Whatever you do to serve something, you know, this can become a form of service to deliver the news. In Starship Troopers, they actively try to discourage people from finishing their service. So they tell people quit if you don't like it. Because they don't want people who don't really want to strive. It's an interesting the other the other idea is that land ownership guarantees

i don't like that because it gets passed down so this was uh this is archaic it's the way it used to be but the idea was if somebody can just show up and be like i live here now i'm voting how do you know if they're actually a you know if they're actually a member of the community that wants to help if they're just temporarily there so like you could move to New York, be there for the minimum required time, then vote for something that destroys New York and then leave. And you don't got to deal with the consequences of your vote. So that was another idea. So there are there. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with any of these. I'm just saying there are challenges to the idea that everybody just gets to vote for any reason. Also, like one vote, not really the best way to change things these days.

You can speak your mind and influence like thousands of people. You know, that still comes down to their votes, though. What's that? It still comes down to their vote. Yeah, but it's their votes. So like people that think like I'm going to vote and they just stress all day, every day on that day, I'm going to go and I'm going to vote so hard. I'm going to vote.

No, you know what? You can convince other people to vote. That's way more powerful. But it still comes down to the fact that you've gotten all these people to use the vote. Without the vote, it's... Yes, the function of the vote is quality. But influence can be more powerful than voting. Because if you can influence millions of people to completely disregard or hate the country...

Yes. Then they'll destroy it with... To create a new voting system. Even without voting. They'll go around with Molotov cocktails like we're seeing with Antifa. Or to influence them to create a new voting system even without voting they'll go around with molotov cocktails or do whatever with it or to influence them to create a new voting system yeah like influences the is the it's the currency so many chickens says hey guys i live north of milwaukee it's dangerous and deeply segregated the police pander to the mob because they know how bad it would get if protests started on uh and on mass up here stay safe everyone appreciate it

love you william kelly says the infernal revolution with peaceful kumbaya cocktails that's right yes hostile bogey inbound says ammo is getting hard to find war is the only thing i was ever good at i want to be called off the bench i mean if some if you if you know war then you probably know what you're getting into. But I think 99.9% of people are going to cry nonstop all day, every day when they realize what war really is. Yeah, because like we as Americans haven't had to face like a modern war. We've been the aggressor, the attacker with the with the superior tech every time so far. But if we were up against someone with orbital strike potential that could doesn't matter where

you live in the country, they could just fry every building in every little town. That's what we're up against in the future. So I don't think war is the key. I think future war is going to be just like at a certain point, someone's going to have a button that just blows the planet up. Yeah. Except for their area. They'll have a dome around it. Or they'll have tunnels.

They'll be underground. I think we already have nuclear bomb capabilities to just annihilate the entire planet. At least the surface. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Of course, of course. That's what I mean. Like, they could press a button and just, like, microwave the whole planet. Something like that.

I think our capabilities are probably horrifying. Dude, I fear orbital attack. Orbital attack. Orbitable? Rods from God. Orbital attack. There we go. Yeah, rods from God.

Yeah. Tongue-stint. That was the attack. Orbitable? Rods from God. Orbital attack. There we go. Yeah, rods from God. Yeah. Tungsten. That was the G.I. Joe movie, right? Where all of London gets blown up because the satellite releases one gigantic tungsten rod and it just slams in to London and the whole city just goes, wow. The Russian, Putin was saying that we've been, people have been so obsessed with intercontinental ballistic defense systems, but now the Russians have a system that just bypasses. We don't need ICBMs anymore.

They do it from orbit now. So we can't, he's like, you, the U S U S can't prevent our attacks. So all this stuff that they've been doing is wasted time. Well, he was saying the problem,

the problem is we've tried, we had the strategic defense initiative to like, to stop incoming ICBMs and stuff. But Dr. Manhattan said it best. If he can stop 999,99 and one gets through it could you know a multiple independently targeted re-entry vehicle could slam the eastern seaboard and kill tens of millions of people also all the unknown submarines that have nuclear weapons on

board yeah they're probably all over the coast right now chinese submarines up and down the coast not even not even that i, aren't we well beyond submarines? I get it. They can be underwater, but there's probably way more advanced technology we don't know about. Like, to me, it's crazy to think that when we see the commercials for, like, the Navy, that's the epitome of our, like, the peak of our militaristic prowess. Like, we've been just sitting around being like, yes, everything we've all known about for decades is all we've got. Nah, way, man.

No, they got crazy stuff. You know what I bet they have? I bet they have like wrist lasers that they claim can turn you into a snake, but what they're really doing is vaporizing you and then releasing a snake from a leg holster. Yeah, that sounds obvious. That's a Rick and Morty reference.

It's a Rick and Morty reference. And it's the nanodrones that I fear, too, that can fly into your ears. Alright, let's see what we got. Neshobalosa says, Tim, please read the BLM goals to your guest. Since he doesn't read about this stuff but wants to have an opinion, he needs to be educated.

These groups, Antics and BLM, are seditionist. Well, there you go. So one of the goals is disrupting the family and another is defunding the police. These are their attack goals. Yeah, mission statement. And then they have wants,

which is like economic stability, economic, you know, equality. I tried to read their website. They had like five wants. They want economic equality. At least that was one of them that I thought, maybe we can get there. Garbled nonsense.

Delamar says, live streaming the DC Siege, Thursday till Sunday. Find me on Twitch, Dalimar2020. Uncensored with real-time commentary of the craziness. Thanks for being my go-to lefty, lol. Love the candidate interviews. Good job. I think it's funny that it's like, the right calls me left, the left calls me right.

Perfect. Because you're right in the middle. Aaron Cole says, you literally have a city named after a Roman dictator. It was very common to appoint Cincinnati. Wow. Oh, I didn't know that. Yeah. Interesting.

I didn't know that either. Johan Oldman says, The original meaning of dictator was a Roman leader given temporary emergency powers for six months. Interesting. They could dictate. Bamchu says, Emergency powers are never a good idea and are never given back. Just ask Palpatine what he did with signers the petition of 2000 after the end of the

Clone Wars. He executed Order 66. Johan 50. Well, that was during. That was. Was that after the Clone Wars? I'm not big enough. That's what started the Clone Wars.

Was that what started the Clone Wars? I think so. No, no, no, no, no. That was that was well after. That was episode two that he executed. No. No, no, no, no, no. That was well after. That was episode two that he executed. No, that was three. Revenge of the Sith.

That was the end. The beginning of three? I think that was the end of the Clone Wars. Yeah, execution. Order 66. Johan 53100 says, Tim, Michigander here.

Do a quick search on how many times the recall Whitmer petition has been killed on Ballotopedia. Last I checked, we're up to 11 attempts. Side note, a judge also said inalienable rights aren't inalienable. Amazing. Welcome to

America. Superman, if he wasn't scared of green rock, says there isn't any shame in being weak. The shame is in staying weak. Was it Fugolian Vermilion from Black Clover Black Clover I think you can apply the same principle to everybody who's been seeing who's been seeing and encouraging the violence I blame them on

a moral level interesting virus nation virus nation gaming says yo Tim just got here love to see the live show spin the cat I don't have a kitty my water and bolt away smart cat ran away. Smart cat.

Jkak552 says, this is a great cast. I like the back and forth. Appreciate it. Well, we'll be doing more. So we're actually going to be moving to the new space soon. So excited. The internet is really weak, but potentially strong enough. Yeah. 20 megabytes up, 200 down.

And that's really bad. Yeah, because right now we're on high fiber. Yeah, we're on super gigabit. Super gigabit. But it might be worth the risk. I think it works. Worth the risk. I think 20 works. You only use about 2.8 to 3 megabits for high definition broadcast.

We're not doing 4K or anything. Here we go. Daniel Welch says, Did you see Judge Gleason's claim? AG Barr is pressuring DOJ to drop Flynn case despite all exculpatory evidence? Courts can't be prosecutor. Court circuit politicized.

Please get Sidney Powell on show. I haven't been following it all that much, but I've been tracking the stuff that's going on with the subpoenas. So what do they do? They just announced that they're going to be subpoenaing people in Obamagate. Yeah, a whole list of people. Yeah, there's the, you know, the Mueller team, like 31 phones or whatever, got wiped before they gave to the DOJ?

On accident? Yeah, like, whoops! When did that? What day? Like, what month? Just like periodically, like throughout the past. No, I didn't know that. The phones were supposed to be turned over as evidence.

Oopsie! Dude, this tactic is driving me nuts. I'm just wiping the server and then... That's ridiculous. That should be illegal crime it is exactly it is it is a crime destroying public record is a crime but it should be a severe crime if the record is important bro there's stories i i there are stories of of like dudes who uh stole a bag of chips who get more jail time than than these federal agents who wipe data and cover up crimes.

You know why? Because the political class, they begrudgingly enforce these laws. They're like, OK, we got a subpoena for an FBI agent, but I don't want him to subpoena me. Hey, buddy, wipe your phone. I'll take care of you. Nobody's going to get in trouble. There's not going to be a perp walk.

Obama's not going to get in trouble. It's not going to be a perp walk. Obama's not going to get in trouble. It's not going to happen. Like, listen, fool me once, you know, shame, shame. What was it? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Yeah. We had Russiagate.

I said, you know, maybe there's something here with this Russiagate stuff. Nothing. Now, now everyone's going, oh, but the Durham thing, it's going to get all the Obama gay people. No, it isn't. These people are going to get away with everything they did and everything we know we did. And that's it. And the left can say the same thing about Trump. I don't care. It's just never going to happen. Trump's not going to get arrested when he leaves office.

It's not going to happen. It's insane. What angered me is the prism stuff where Clapper lied to Congress under oath. Yeah, of course. That defies party logic. That's just like, what a betrayal. Because we have no group of people in this country who will ever hold these people to account. So I'm not surprised when I see these people saying revolution, nothing less. I think it's insane that they want to destroy everything because they're upset. You know? Yeah.

I'm thinking about the French revolution because they went too far. Like, we don't want a revolution. No. We don't want violence. We just want politicians who actually start standing up. And I think we're moving in that direction. I think Trump is the bull stomping through the ivory tower. Yeah.

And I think thanks to the internet, as we move forward, we're going to get rid of a lot of these, these, these corrupt individuals. We'll see. We'll see, man. We'll see. Jonathan Hernandez says, Tim, Black Lives Matter and Antifa are one in the same. It can't be. Is that true?

It is true. It's mostly, it's mostly, it's mostly it's mostly true it's like you know two venn diagram spheres but they're like just slightly not overlapping it's 97 true yeah yeah jeffrey schwartz says i find it so hard to not see it getting worse i have spoken to people who have said if black lives matter comes and burns down my parents house i will just have to learn to live with it how do you talk to those people that's insane you know what really annoyed me i was watching a video about um people in i think it was in minneapolis about how their businesses were destroyed and there were people saying wait no maybe it was lancaster i think it was lancaster yeah they were like we we're upset that they were

burning things down and smashing wind lancaster sorry lancaster lancaster yeah they were like we're we're it was like an elderly couple saying like we're up you know we're upset that they were smashing things and burning things down but we support the movement 100 i'm like shut up stop supporting these people you do not get to go on tv and say the writing is bad but the writers are good no what we need more specifics about why they're doing it because they're insane people doing things for insane reasons but the final goal some sort of like equality effort like let's focus on that yeah that's not what they want no the rioters are bored and they're larping i'm gonna put on my medical kit and be a medic today i'm gonna put

on my medical kit later and then seven days to. Did you see the video where they were like, he needs a tourniquet? Some dude in Portland got hit in the leg with an arbor bullet. Grazed. And he had a superficial graze on his leg that was bleeding. And they were like,

we need to apply a tourniquet. And he's crying, but I don't want to lose my leg. Yeah, I saw that. And they're like, but we don't want you to bleed out. It's like, dude, he got an abrasion. It's an abrasion on his skin.

He's bleeding. It's not a femoral leak. He's not spraying blood in everyone's face like Kill Bill. He's like, no, don't do it. Don't tourniquet me. Yeah. And they did it. Did he lose his leg?

No, I don't think so. He probably took it off right away because they're like, they're LARPing, dude. I know. They're putting a tourniquet on somebody because of a plastic round. And you know what they're doing now? They're screaming baton rounds. rounds oh these people are so dumb baton rounds are thick plastic bullets they're huge though i say huge relative to other other less lethals these cops aren't using baton rounds it fires a plastic baton at you a small like chunk of plastic hits you what they're firing are these

expanding foam rounds they're foam they hit you you bruise that's about it they they in in socal i think they use bean bags because i've seen them and it's like it's a little bag full of beans and it hits you they can take your eye out or something so they they move to foam so uh it's different reasons they use them but a bean bag bag, when it hits you, it instantly deforms because it's a bag full of beans. And it will spread out the force and it will hurt. And if they hit you in the abdomen with it, it can seriously injure you. Because you can get internal bleeding and stuff. But for the most part, they're going around screaming like the cops are...

I remember when at Portland, they were like, the police are going to use live ammo on us, dude. And then Ted Wheeler was like, I'm here to address rumors. People are concerned that live ammunition has been authorized for use on the protesters. And that was the end of the tweet. And then the next tweet was, I'm going to say that rumor is not true. So all anyone sees the first tweet where he's like, there's a rumor that the police have been authorized for live ammunition on protesters, right The tweets should be connected somehow. Yeah, seriously. They are. But you don't see the thread.

You'll see the one tweet and have to click see the thread. So a lot of people just saw him saying that, you know, there's a rumor. And just these people are so dumb. Let's see. We have a man named Mr. Hunt, first name Michael, we need to stop the lies and propaganda via the mainstream media, big tech censorship, and the demon rat puppet masters with the real power, or we will all pay an unimaginable price. Supa Malit says, I believe that Russia is less of a threat in this day and age. Also, Russia has paused the sending of their anti-air system S-400

to the CCP and began speaking to India about the threat in the Pacific from the CCP. Interesting. American Nacho says, huge fan. I watch every day. Question, could you start adding the links you cite in the description of your videos? P.S. Say my name is P.S name is also tim and i and i podcast cool uh so one of the main reasons why i don't put the links directly in is because as much as youtube says it may not be the case putting external links to other sites i saw a correlation between that and demonetization and i stopped doing it and it kind of helped so it could just be superstition but i decided to do was to include the url bar in all of the display so you can see it. The main issue is like if YouTube says we don't want this link appearing on YouTube because – actually, we have an example here with Ian when Facebook censored minds.

Remember that? If you were on Facebook and you tried sending M-I-N-D-S.com to someone, you'd get a weird block saying like – what would it do? It would block you. It was like a warning block. Yeah. And that was really weird. So there are certain links that potentially on their site, if you post it, they're going to knock you down.

There'll be blacklists. They'll have blacklists that they don't tell anyone what's on the blacklist. I think James Damore actually whistle blew on Google's blacklist. That was part of his blow. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And we've seen it from Project Veritas too. So that's why I'm like, look, the links will appear at the top of every page. I use NewsGuard and 99% of all sources I use are NewsGuard certified unless there's a special exemption for some reason.

I should say it wasn't James Damore. It was another guy through Project Veritas. Yeah, yeah. I know who you're talking about. Yeah, not Damore. But yeah, it was Veritas. Hey, Tim, by the way, you rock watching this show every day. Yeah, thanks, man.

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Other Tim. Other Tim. Andre says, I like the show, except when you guys talk economics and campaign finance. You should have me on to explain and clear up misconceptions. To which misconceptions do you refer? Tijong the Great says, median household income as of February 2020 was 66K. Wow, that's better than I thought.

Good for America. Yeah, I was closer to being right. That's probably because it's household income. So, a lot of married couples. Oh, interesting. Yeah, that's a good point. Larry Yoshi says, thanks, Tim, for exposing the lies.

Aloha. Appreciate it. All right, let's see what we got here. I did read that one. Let's see. Chris Dumas says, out of curiosity, it was said that Hillary brought in double what she spent for her campaign. What happens to the rest?

My general understanding is they can use it for other campaigns, but I don't know for sure. Perhaps we need that other guy who knows more about campaign finance. It's all connected. John Thomas says, eliminate the reason for people to try to buy politicians. Reduce size and scope of government. Simplify the tax code. Either a flat tax or fair tax.

Government is never benevolent. At best, benign and usually malevolent. Yeah, because people with power, you know. I'm a fan of doing an internet campaign for that reason. Because I think if someone can win a political office just by making YouTube videos and not having any money not pumping money into it that would be incentive to stop pumping money into candidates i don't think you can get money out of politics man maybe never out but diminish i don't even know about that i don't think so you don't really need money with with a 50 webcam and an internet connection if you're a smart guy and you're dedicated and i'm

super rich i can hire you but you don't need to like you. You have the access. It's the access that in the time spent that you're sure. Sure. That that is influential. But it doesn't change the fact that a rich person can just hire the influential person to say whatever they want. Yeah, but they're they're looking at you.

You're the selling point. You don't you don't need to hire people to sell yourself. So if you know, if I got offered a billion dollars, I'd be like, Biden's the best. I'm kidding. I would never do that. There's no amount of money. But there's a lot of people who would. And I'm not going to name the specific individual, but there was a high profile YouTuber who

endorsed Hillary Clinton. And it was very out of place. So you're saying bribe people to speak highly of you. Bribe? It is kind of. Sponsorships. Yeah, right. Sponsorships.

Sponsor lobby. Exactly. They show up and they say, here's what we want to do. We're going to give you a really big budget, and we don't care what you make. We don't care how expensive it is. Your budget's going to be $3 million. And make whatever you want, no matter the cost, because Hillary's great. You know what they do?

They make a really quick video. They're like, yo, what up, everybody? I think this politician's really, really cool. It's been great. Thanks. Have a good time. Go vote, and I'll see you next time. And they put the money in their pocket, and they spend them. cool it's been great thanks have a good time go vote and i'll see you next time and they put the money in their pocket they spend them yeah so it's sponsorship

yeah but i do think one person with makes 12 hours of content a day is more powerful than than that because they're really listening to you when you're doing that if you're interacting with people you're gonna love this next super chat let's do it let's see patriotic gestalt gestalt says today's irl feels like a D&D session. With Tim's worldly experiences, he should DM slash GM a Mogadishu RPG actual play. We were just talking about that. A real-life D&D with elves.

Social justice. Yeah, but it's the SJW realm with BLM. We're working on a game, a card game, Cancel Culture. Yeah. And the general idea of the game is that you're trying to get your opponent banned from the internet. And they have like characters. So there's like Peter Jordanson and, you know, Wet Brines. Really, really obvious satirical names for people.

And you're trying to ban like, you know, Big Red and other big fat feminists and stuff. But another thing we talked about is creating, you know, you don't even need to make it, but creating essentially a cancel culture D&D style game. Yeah. The D&D rule set is open source. So we could literally make it and sell it. And I like D&D 3. Yeah, that'd be so fun. A political one style game. Yeah, the D&D rule set is open source so we could literally make it and sell it. And I like D&D 3.0. Yeah, that would be so fun. A political one. Yeah.

Because it's kind of like Shadowrun, but in modern day. Shadowrun's like a dystopian future corporate government D&D game. Oh, it sounds like us. Yeah, but we do like more modern with the real stuff, I think. Strider says, Hey Tim, love your show. Not saying I hope that Cali,

Oregon and Washington try, try and secede, but I am in favor of draining the swamp. So yeah, you're just saying, let's see. Myra Abenga says, Tim, please look up Cincinnati from Rome. He was a farmer who took power during time of war and returned it to the public once it was over. Washington named the Society of Cincinnati after him. And this is also a reference I've brought up several times about the idea of swords to plowshares, which is a Magic the Gathering card. We have a big, someone sent me a big mock-up version of it. That's how we really bought it. It is in the Bible. And Cincinnati is actually named after a fraternal veterans organization founded in 1783 by former Revolutionary War officers and named for Lucius Quincinius Cincinnatus.

Oh, so it's not. Fifth century BCE Roman hero. So it's like a derivative of that. Yeah, it was really interesting. I had to look that up when somebody mentioned it. J-Rap says, look up green beam dazzler. It's a laser weapon that uses radiation waves through a laser that looks like a lightsaber. It makes one immediately ill.

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. So there's a website for a guy who makes energy weapons. And there's supposedly a light device that when you hold it in front of somebody and you pull the trigger, it makes them vomit. Oh, my God. Yeah. I've never seen it in action. And it could just be. I want to make one.

Yeah. So it's. I got to get that registered. It doesn't. I think they're it in action, and it could just be – I want to make one. Yeah, so it's – I've got to get that registered. I think they're exaggerating to make you vomit. It nauseates you, and some people would vomit. There's also something called the dazzler, which is used around the world. It's a high-powered laser, and they hold it in front of your eyes, and they click it. And then it's kind of like if you looked at the sun.

You know when you look at light too long, you get spots? You click it, and then boom, you're blind. And then it takes a while like if you looked at the sun, you know, when you look at light too long, you get spots. Yeah. You click it and then boom, you're blind. And then like it takes a while for the light for like your vision to come truly dazzled. I think the Jedi, maybe the future police could be more like Jedi where they have like a light baton and they use like persuasion or like some sort of mind powers to calm you down. Or vomiting. I got to read this one. I don't know if this is true. I'm going to read it anyway.

Oracle Techno says the Despacito song that Biden played part of translated lyrics quote slowly I want to breathe your neck slowly let me tell you

things in your ear no way I gotta look it up oh my gosh thank you I gotta look it up he did it on purpose oh my gosh

that's gross he did it on purpose what a funky old guy is he trying to lose? I think from the beginning, we all kind of, that was like a conspiracy wheel tossed around.

I'm ready to leave. I have a, I'm a bit angry right now, guys. Why is that, Tim? Because people have not smashed that like button. Oh my gosh, you're right. What the heck, guys?

I'm not really angry. I'm actually rather tepid. Use your thumb and devastate that button. Give a little, give a little tap to that like button. Thank you all so much for the super chats it really does help

we do the show Monday through Friday live at 8pm and we're getting close to Betty Byte so make sure you follow me on Twitter, Instagram, and Parler at TimCast and you can check out my other YouTube channels where I put up content literally every single hour from 10am to 10pm Tim Poole has content

live on YouTube it's crazy I can't even figure it out. It's nuts. How do I do it? I don't know. But YouTube.com slash Timcast, YouTube.com slash Timcast News, and Timcast IRL, which you're on. Subscribe, notification button, like button.

And, of course, you can follow at Ian Crosley. You sure can. And Lydia also has something to say that's awesome. So I should talk about my thing first. Yeah, do it. You can follow me on Twitter and YouTube. I have a channel and twitch because tonight i'm going to be streaming with adam criggler we're doing seven days to die twitch.tv slash ian crossland and dash ian uh adam criggler i believe he's going right now oh i'm gonna find out soon lydia were you gonna say something

oh i was gonna say whoever said that about the lyrics to death's decedo is correct that is creepy as i'll get out. I want to breathe in your neck slowly. Let me murmur things in your ear. Wow. Oh my gosh. I'm so creeped out. And on that note. You can follow at Sour Patch Lids. Sour Patch L-Y-D-S on Twitter and Parler.

Thank you all so much for hanging out, everybody. We'll be back. What's tomorrow? Thursday? We'll be back tomorrow, Thursday, for another live show at 8 p.m. And of course, like I said, I have content up literally every hour so you name it at 10 o'clock video goes live 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 boom and uh we'll see you all tomorrow