Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #208 - Twitter NUKES Antifa FINALLY After They Smash Democrat HQ w/ Matt Braynard

Episode Date: January 22, 2021

Tim, Ian, Luke, and Lydia host Matt Braynard to discuss Antifa's actions following Joe Biden's inauguration, Nancy Pelosi asking for heavy-duty arms against civilians, the banning of Antifa from social media, media members who find themselves breaking down in tears with alarming regularity, and the conspiracy and ill effects caused by Q.  Support the show (http://Timcast.com/donate) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joe Biden, Joe Biden's America, you know, they said that in Trump's America, Antifa was running rampant and there was nothing we could do to stop it. The media in Trump's America was defending Antifa, saying that they were just peaceful protesters. That news you heard about destruction and vandals and right wing conspiracy theories. While there are some violent people, the protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. And then something happened. Joe Biden became president, inherited this American problem. And I guess now Antifa is wreaking havoc in Joe Biden's America one day, not even one day. It's the inauguration day. They went out and they smashed up the Democrat headquarters. I think it was in Portland, among other protests, burning American flags, trashing things in Seattle. And the

internet lit up, ragging on Joe Biden. And then something kind of hilarious happened. Twitter has banned several high profile Antifa related accounts. Finally. Yeah. After all of these years, the years spent of complaining about left wing extremists and terrorists organizing on their platform and then doing nothing as soon as it's a problem for Joe Biden, gone. Wonderful. So we're going to talk a bit about this stuff. We've got we got some other stories in the same vein. There's this think tank guy who tweeted a disparaging comment about Mike Pence. Well, I shouldn't say disparaging. He tweeted that he should be – I don't know.

I won't even get into it. Just he was bordering on threats of violence. He lost his job now. So it's funny how we're making it this far into the double standard now applying to the left. But it's all in the benefit of them. So we're going to go through these stories. Joining us today, we've got Matt Brainerd. Matt, do you want to introduce yourself, explain who you are, what you do?

Sure. Well, I'm probably best known as the former director of data and strategy for President Trump's campaign in 16. I lead Look Ahead America, a 5-1-C-3, dedicated to registering, educating, and turning out to vote disaffected patriotic Americans, as well as fighting for election reform and against corporate censorship. And most recently, I led the Voter Integrity Project, which brought me here last time, so I'm very glad to be a return guest.

Right on, right on. Bill Gronkowski is here, peddling t-shirts. Howdy! I am your friendly parking lot dweller, and, as you mentioned, very humble t-shirt vendor that sells all the shirts that he always wears. How pathetic am I? We've got... That's great.

I love it. We have a bedroom here for Luke. He doesn't want it. So when he's like, I live in a parking lot, he's choosing to do this. I'm a poor man. Help. Give me your monies. Go now on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.

Or we are changed.org forward slash shirts. Whatever it is. You know how it is. That is a pretty good shirt you got there, to be honest. We have the gorilla shirt. It's just not political at all. And I don't think our shirts are ever going to be really political. They might just be like jokey, you know, maybe cultural.

But it's pretty good. He doesn't have enough room for all of the news bureaus there that could be listed. I know. It should be like a NASCAR suit, to be honest with you. Because Vox is not on there. I haven't checked it. Nope, not Vox. Oh, man.

Is it Washington Post? We'll make another shirt. Don't worry. We'll make a full shirt. No, this is my next shirt. My next shirt is going to be a NASCAR with all the corporate mainstream media logos. And it's going to say corporate sellout right here. I love it.

So I'm going to write that down so I don't forget it. I get a cut of that, right? Yes. Yeah. 5%. Yes. I am a gorilla. At least a descendant of one.

Or we have a similar ancestor, I believe. I am the token liberal on the show. And I have smoked EMT. I don't think you're a liberal, bro. No, but I'm the token liberal on the show. But I'm not liberal. Yeah, I don't think you're a liberal, bro. No, but I'm the token liberal on the show, but I'm not liberal. Yeah, I don't think you're liberal. Undercover liberal.

That's right. Undercover conservative. You're definitely not a liberal. No, yeah. Like liberals are in a weird space. I think you got to be liberal and conservative if you want to live a balanced life just in the right time.

You know, sometimes you want to be conservative. Sometimes you want to be liberal about changing something. Sometimes you want to make sure something doesn't change, like conservation. There's nuance in all things it's true it's true right on we also got side patch lids pressing all the buttons i'm in the corner i do press all the buttons i'm wearing glasses tonight here's tim there's so much news

we also have rachel maddow crying because joe biden won and andrew sullivan also crying who are these people who started crying when Joe Biden became president? They cried when Trump became president and they cried when Trump left the presidency. It's like they'll cry for anything, man. You know, it's funny. I once read that men cry once a month and women cry six times a month. I got to be honest. I can't remember the last time I cried.

I don't know. Maybe I'm just a cold hearted, cold hearted, dark villain with no... Do you want to cry? No, I got nothing to cry over. Yeah, I think six is a little low, too. It depends on the woman. Let's put it that way. Well, Rachel Maddow, I think, does cry a lot. And I mean that... I'm not saying that to be like, haha, she cries a lot. No, she really does. When the Mueller report came out that Trump

wasn't, you know, colluding with the Russians, she was like fighting back tears, and that was really weird. I've noticed if I fast, I'm more likely to cry likely to like more in touch with my emotions i can get to crying quicker more in touch though but not in control of i don't know i'm like i could make myself cry you know it's like acting technique yeah it's an acting technique yeah yeah you know but or i could just like not anyway they cried so we've got a bunch of stories to go through and this guy lost his job. And it's crazy.

And, you know, Antifa getting banned. Before we get started, head over to TimCast.com, my friends, and become members to help support the show. We are trying to build up a strong backbone, a user base, a membership that will protect us from censorship. If we get nuked across the board, like many channels have, then we're gone. But if you go to TimCast.com and you sign up and we have a decent amount of subscribers, we can keep doing the show forever. And I guess there's always the possibility they ban my website outright, but that seems really, really unlikely. We got a post up the other night. I don't know if you saw.

We were yelling about whether or not Trump is truly corrupt. And so we actually did another 20 or so minutes, just about 20 minutes. And it's a members only post. And we're all basically yelling at each other. And it's good fun. And that's at TimCast.com. A lot of people have mentioned they're having trouble with signing up. Just email members at TimCast.com.

And we are getting it all fixed for everybody. The site is new. And there is a, I think, it's a third party problem. So we have to, like, do some kind of plug in or integration. It's certain email addresses for whatever reason. But TimGast.com become a member and we just greatly, greatly appreciate it. Don't forget to like, subscribe, notification bell and share this with your friends because that's the real way we win.

But let's get to the news. Most of you may have seen the reports from Reuters this morning. Anti-fascist protesters vandalize buildings in Portland and Seattle. They report anti-government and anti-fascist protesters in Portland and Seattle vandalized a Democratic Party office and other buildings and scuffled with police on Wednesday protesting against President Joe Biden's inauguration. People dressed in black and with their faces covered broke windows in the glass door at the Democratic Party of Oregon business office in Portland, spray painting an anarchist symbol over the party sign. Video posted on social media showed

we don't want Biden. We want revenge for police murders, imperialist wars and fascist massacres. Read a banner they marched under. The new Democratic president was sworn in on Wednesday, urging unity and restoration after Republican Donald Trump's divisive tenure. Donald Trump was so divisive when, you know, Joe Biden started his presidency by saying this country is being torn apart by white supremacists and nativists and sounded an awful lot like he was calling the other half of the country deplorables, if you know what I mean. So spare me this rhetoric about, you know, Biden being the one who truly does want unity. I'll respect him trying to tone things down. But at least I can say this.

He used and abused and is tossing out Antifa. The Democrats defended him. What was that meme you mentioned, Luke? In Toy Story, there's a scene where the toys are being thrown out. And right now there's a meme going around with the toys being BLM and Antifa. And the big, you know, the child in there being, of course, Joe Biden throwing them away. Throwing them in the garbage.

The real test, though, is when and if these Antifa members get arrested, is his campaign going to continue to bail them out of prison? Because that's how you really know if he's done with them or not. Yes, because Kamala Harris also was raising funds for a lot of the rioters that broke the law. And also what's really interesting is, you know, we had the mainstream media hyperbolically screaming about the potential of violence at all the 50 capitals.

That's coming our way. They were screaming about it at the highest decibel of annoyance possible. But now we do have violence, but there's a different kind of violence that just gets totally swept under the rug. No one's talking about this. Like, what's going on here? It's ridiculous. Conservatives are aware of the double standard.

And I'm sorry, but saying there's a double standard is pointless right now. And the Republicans are more than happy to stand to stand to attention for the Democrats to help them pretend to provide balance to their agenda. So Mitch McConnell with his, you know, turtle smile, well, I'm totally grateful for Joe Biden. And there you go. That's it. He stands up.

He claps and cheers. All these Republicans are clapping and cheering. Yay, the Democrats won. And there's no one actually fighting for conservatives. No, maybe a couple people. And it's not even necessarily conservatives, but like just against the left, you have this faux resistance. So what's happening now, in my opinion, and it could have gone either way.

I thought Joe Biden was going to throw them a little bit more red meat, maybe throw him a bone to placate them. But I guess these people just want chaos. So it's really funny because when we saw them destroying the windows at the Democratic Party HQ, these viral videos on Twitter, someone tweeted that it was just like what the U.S. normally does, funding terrorists in the Middle East who then eventually turn on us and start causing damage to – right? Isn't that funny? So the Mujahideen, for instance, and then al-Qaeda. So they get these Antifa people to go around smashing everything up. They say, oh, no, look at Trump's America. And now that it's Biden's America and they go around smashing things up, it's like, yeah, there was tear gas deployed in major U.S. cities.

Hold on. Hold on. This was Joe Biden's Gestapo stomping out anti-racist and pro-freedom protesters. Anti-fascists. Anti-fascists. They were just trying to help. And Joe Biden's Gestapo stomped them out. Which is, again, a 180-degree turn

from where we were six months ago where Tom Cotton wrote a New York Times editorial piece talking about how we need to send in the military to deal with Black Lives Matter. Huge controversy. The New York Times editor got fired because of allowing an opinion piece. Forced to resign.

Yes. Or I should say he resigned in shame. As I say, potato, potato. You know what went on. You know what happened there. And now it's a big controversy. It's not even even talked about. But I remember seeing one of the Antifa signs saying, we don't want a Biden administration we want vengeance yeah i have a picture i believe yes and it's a pretty visceral

picture but people need to understand the larger base of antifa are not big biden supporters i don't think they ever were in the first place they weren't yeah and so this is one of the issues i had with high profile conservative personalities that would say like antifa is the militant wing of the democrat party and i'm like no they hate democrats and they and they they will punch a liberal in the face but democrats were eager to defend them as long as they were making trump look bad right yep dangerous too and now well what are they going to do look at the middle east with obama and isis it's like it's perfectly on on uh uh you know it's on brand on brand there you go yeah it's perfectly on, you know, on brand. On brand.

There you go. Yeah, it's exactly their game. Like when you use an evil demon to corrupt your files. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I just saw this. We are ungovernable. Uh-huh.

Literally, technically correct. There's, you know what I think? There's anarchists like these people who are more like some kind of rabid skunk. You're like, you know, because skunks are like all black, you know what I mean? Like they're wearing all black. And then they like, they run around and you can't do anything with them because they're rabid. And that's the kind of anarchist they are.

And you have people like Luke who are like, I would like to use Bitcoin to buy guns. And that's the other kind of anarchist, I guess. Not aggression principle and allowing people to, you people to transact peacefully in a way that benefits them without transgressing on anyone's personal liberty or sovereignty or freedom. Did I say buy Bitcoin with guns?

Because I guess that would still work. Here's a gun. One Bitcoin, please. People do that. That has happened. There's many interesting aggregist transactions that happen all throughout the United States. I guess you'd be selling the gun for Bitcoin. It's a common transaction in Galt's cult happens all the time yeah yeah we don't want biden we want revenge for police murders imperialist wars and fascist massacres and you know if you ask them

they probably can't tell you what that means yeah somebody made a statement most of those people are foot soldiers just enraged angry because they're not making any money. They can see the economy spiraling out of control, and that's about the level of their— They can't see the economy, dude. I think they can see it, but they don't understand it. No, no, no. They want money printed. They're the ones who are like, print more money and give it to us.

But prices are going up. Like, everyone sees that. Yeah, but it's because of them. It's because—it's like, could you imagine someone being like, we should put peanut butter in the gas tank. And you're like, that'll break the car. And when the car breaks, more peanut butter, the car is breaking. I'm so angry. And you're like, you on this show but another one is you know a lot of them think that they were promised police reform and that's nowhere to be seen a part of this new biden administration not that i've seen i haven't seen any clutter or conversations or talk about any kind of reforming of the police or authorities and that's kind of their main they put the militant prosecutor in as v Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They put 25,000 troops in D.C. They started putting up thank you police officer signs all over D.C.

Didn't Pelosi want, quote, crew manned machine guns? Yes, she did. Crew manned machine guns. Isn't that gendered language? We'll see. In that situation, it was threatening to them, right? But what this Justice Department is more than likely going to be doing is going to your neighborhood police departments and hitting them with lawsuits because there are allegations of somebody getting mistreated when the cop was just doing his own job. So that's a real fear in terms of how they're going to affect policing where you live in your neighborhoods by interfering with the way your local police operations are. And also with the attorney generals.

Right. We recently saw in New York with the attorney general actually going after the NYPD for their handling of BLM protesters. So that's another case that's happening. They exacerbated the problem. A problem that, I mean, Luke, you and I have been complaining about for a decade now. Since back when the black bloc anarchist types were going around smashing stuff. There was a moment where a dude was stalking me and then physically attacked me and Luke grabbed his mask. Yeah.

Well, me and Matt intervened because I saw him kind of going after you. And I was like, okay, let me stay close to Tim because I see they're going to try to attack him. And that's when they kind of jumped at you for live streaming behind you. And as soon as they got behind you, me and Matt kind of jumped in and took care was that care that situation in new york nine years ago nine years ago and uh i mean what else did people expect if you if you normalize violence politically what did you think was going to happen and now the democrats the bidens they have a huge huge situation that's very explosive right in their hands that they cultivated themselves let's let's jump to the story you mentioned luke we got here from the daily caller

ken cuccinelli claims pelosi asked for crew manned machine guns in washington i believe it i i kind of believe it but well let's read acting deputy homeland security secretary ken cuccinelli told Fox News the story Tuesday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asked for crew manned machine guns to be part of security forces in Washington, D.C., ahead of President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration. Cuccinelli and anchor Martha McCallum were discussing the presence of 25,000 National Guard troops in the nation's capital after pro-Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol building January 6.

A division, Cuccinelli said, responding to McCallum's assertion that the number of troops is greater than the number in Afghanistan and Iraq. You have a division. The last up of thousands of these troops was requested by the speaker through the Capitol Police. She even wanted crewmanned machine guns in Washington. That was rejected because there's simply no use for that in a security arrangement for a civilian undertaking. Just so some of this has gone beyond any legitimate

security need. Cuccinelli defended the troops as disciplined and professional and said they will perform as expected, but added that the state Capitol building buildings are also important to defend. The world is not about Washington, he said. It's supposed to be about everywhere else, which is what the Department of Homeland Security tries to keep secure. The acting DHS deputy secretary confirmed that threats of individual attacks in different places are also absolutely a problem before criticizing those who focus only on D.C. He says at the same time, where was the concern for the rest of America? Congressmen aren't more important than any other American.

It's a good point. And everyone in this country should should be kept safe and that's what the department of homeland security has endeavored to do through this entire difficult year crewman machine guns what would that be like full auto 50 bmg there's a team where one's holding it the other one has to carry the ammo and make sure oh the belt yeah the belt feeder but is that would that be 50 bmg uh i guess theoretically there's many different calibers that you could have machine guns with. Yes. I'd like to imagine they were like mounting 50 BMG and just like Nancy Pelosi wanted just like – if a human being gets hit by one of those things, they explode, right?

Like a red mist. I wouldn't want to see that. I think a lot of soldiers have. I have PTSD because of that. But I want to make a point. I'm just trying to drive home how insane it sounds. But here's the thing. In 2017, when there were thousands of people in D.C.

rioting and smashing everything and starting fires, they organized that protest for Hillary Clinton, not for Donald Trump. The original plan was that Hillary Clinton was going to be inaugurated and they were going to go and riot. Trump won and they said, well, we're still going to riot. So I wonder if the real fear here wasn't the specter of the far right, which typically doesn't do anything, but that they knew, like we saw in Portland and Seattle and Denver and a few other places, Antifa would have come out in D.C. and destroyed everything were it not for the National Guard. Yep. And I remember being there in DC.

You were there too. I think we all got pepper sprayed. I was temporarily arrested and then talked my way out of it with my press credentials. But it was a wild, crazy day with a lot of property destruction. We were walking down the street during the riot while we were running with the riot. And then the police set up a line. You charged through it. Yes.

And then I got... Getting pepper sprayed heavily. They sprayed you like in the face as he ran through a line. You charged through it. And then I got. Getting pepper sprayed heavily. They sprayed you like. They sprayed you like in the face as you ran through the line. Yeah. And then I went into the doorway of this building. And then because this is how it works. Everyone followed me.

And so then I was smashed up against the door by a bunch of Antifa. And they weren't. And some of the people were nice. They gave me the milk of magnesia or whatever. Maylocks for my. For the pepper spray. I was told three times by the supervisor that i was arrested and not free to go yep but eventually a local news crew had their

boss had called saying you better not arrest our crew so when he pulled out this crew i reminded the lieutenant that i was like hey i talked to you look here's my press card and he was like come on and a bunch of journalists got pulled out now here's the funny thing about this i get pulled out and i tweet just got arrested they released me before you know being taken i was there for like an hour or two and some other journalists did get arrested and they were so mad they were tweeting like i got arrested i'm like dude one guy was screaming at the top of his lungs at the cops you mother you can't arrest me and i was like i'm terribly sorry terribly sorry, officer. I'm a journalist. Do your job. Here's my press card.

Just come and talk to me when you get a chance. Yeah. And that was it. I remember seeing the kettle and I'm like, oh my God, they're going to arrest everyone. And there's a wall of pepper spray and they were spraying it. And I was like, I'm just going to run right through it. I got hit really hard. There was another female reporter who just made up and said, I'm pregnant.

I'm pregnant. I was like, I'm going. I'm going through this. And then luckily, they pulled her out. But back to the point of machine guns that Nancy Pelosi wants. She's essentially saying protection for me, but not for thee. These are anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment individuals who don't believe in you having the right for personal protection,

but they want machine guns for themselves. Are you kidding me? You've got the NFA. You can't make. How does it work? You can't make a machine gun. You can't have a machine. You could only have machine guns within a certain year.

So pretty much machine guns are only available for the super rich that could afford them because there's a limited supply within a certain year that you could have them. So they're grandfathered in there's few remaining uh and the few that are are only available to people who could spend 20 30 40 50 000 or government or the military yes so nancy pelosi is leading the charge to take away your right to have these this protection but she wants of all things if she said i would like the national guard to be armed with with rifles, I'd be like, yeah, well, of course, the politicians get to carry guns. The politicians get to have security. But she –

Well, but think about it. Crewmen machine guns is above and beyond. But they're impractical. When you're talking about crewmen machine guns during inaugurations, during big events when there's crowds, this is the least tactical weapon that you could have, especially in big cities with big crowds because you're going to mow down a whole bunch of innocent civilians standing in the way that don't deserve to be killed. Civilian buildings. So it's just absolutely illogical and stupid thinking by Nancy Pelosi. It's because they don't understand that full auto isn't tactical.

They think we have to ban full semi-automatic weapons, which for one, they've actually said that means nothing. When they say, I remember at the March for our lives people were like you know no one needs a full fully automatic weapon and i'd tell them like well you can't buy one and nobody has one except for like these really rare grandfathered and old it's never used in a crime here yeah nobody's carrying around a light machine gun in their truck or whatever to like like it's a like it's a movie or something right but that's what these people think. So here's what people don't realize.

Now, I'm sure people can correct me if I'm wrong, but what you should be worried about, my understanding is that a semi-auto is actually way more dangerous than a full auto for a deranged killer because they'll spray off all their ammo and miss and then click, click, click. Whereas with semi-auto, they can go one, two, very, you know, calm and precise. More importantly, when you have a military, it's sometimes better to do semi-auto or burst fire than full auto. Nancy Pelosi saying crewman to machine guns shows they don't actually know how to operate a weapon and what kind of weapon you would need for this certain circumstance. So she should never be president. She doesn't understand military.

She wanted the DOD, was it, to go do a coup against Trump like two weeks ago? She asked them to strip Trump from the chain of command. Well, she has no considerations for the citizens of Washington, D.C. Think about it. It's much more nefarious than that, I think,

because this was in reaction to what happened on the 6th, okay? Say what you will about the 6th, but we're in a country here where pretty much anybody can get a firearm. Pretty much anybody can get an AR, an assault weapon, anything like that. I don't remember seeing a whole lot of protesters brandishing, much less firing, firearms in the 6th. So if this was a preparation for a reaction similar,

this reaction was in preparation for what they saw on the sixth, which is calling for his automatic military weapons to be used on an unarmed population. This is what she thinks of the country, of the people, of the citizens. She is content with having.50 caliber military grade weapons aimed at them and ready to go. We added the.50 caliber part. Oh, OK. All right. All right. You're right. You got me. We added the.50 caliber part. Okay. All right. You're right. You got me. Belt-fed crewman machine guns.

Guns that require multiple people to operate them. Let's go with that. That's what she thinks of us in the country. I'm surprised she didn't set up landmines all over the Capitol building. I mean, it would make more sense with actual tactical defensive positioning rather than mowing people down with automatic machine guns. But it's beyond the people.

Could you imagine? Look, I've been to Ukraine. I know I mention Ukraine a lot because it's a place I've been to. And there are still buildings riddled with bullet holes from World War II and Cold War conflict. And so I'm walking down the street. We went to the mall to get food. And then my friend is like, oh, that building see all those holes yeah that's this machine gun fire and i'm like they never fixed it no wow i mean it's a poor country so they're

kind of just like what are we gonna do about it right and remember under her leadership and the of her party we had members of in our navy in hostile ports being ordered not to be armed not to have uh ammunition in their firearms taking their naval vessels into hostile ports. And they were attacked, and many of them died from that. Yet here at this inauguration, she wants this. What's the situation with the naval guy? I haven't heard of this. What happened?

Oh, yeah. It was under the previous Democrat administration. They were prevented from having armed weapons as they went into several hostile ports know hostile uh ports and there was one case where that actually ended up um an attack ship came in they weren't able to respond to it and it detonated and killed a bunch of american sailors do you know where that was i'm sure we can google it or look it up i can't recall it's somewhere in the middle east that was that was pelosi's well it was that was when she was in congress and her democratic Party's leadership. They had the White House at the time. There you go.

You can see what these politicians think of the people and what they would do to them. But that's a good point, man. The people who stormed the Capitol, many of them were just bewildered and befuddled walking into open doors. Some of them were violent and aggressive, but I think the worst we saw was crowbars. Yeah. Well, I think there was one video with one guy brandishing what looked like a firearm with within his shirt But I don't think he took it out and was waving it around But I think it's fair to say that the magnitude of the threat was wildly

exaggerated for political purposes and political powers and also for the media for Ratings views clicks with their kind of fear-mongering Sensationalism that drove the headlines in. And now we have some violence happening. They don't care about it because it's the wrong people protesting. Hold on. No. Joe Biden was made to look really bad today.

All right. When Antifa was trending on Twitter in Portland, and, well, they had to take action. So we got this tweet from Andy Ngo. Breaking. Twitter has suspended several prominent Antifa accounts. The Base Brooklyn is one of them. The Base is an extremist bookstore in Brooklyn, New York that has been used as an Antifa training center.

16,800 followers. Gone. We also have MFJM, the Jewish worker. 30,000 followers. Gone. Revolutionary abolitionist movement. 11,400 followers, gone and Rev Abolition NYC, gone and I think these are just a few

that Andy has highlighted I'm sure there's a lot more and this is well, like we mentioned earlier they're throwing away what they don't need anymore it's making them look bad they need to get rid of it

and you know what? I'll say this if they were advocating violence if they were organizing violence ban them making them look bad. They need to get rid of it. And you know what? I'll say this. If they were advocating violence, if they were organizing violence, ban them, get rid of them. If they were just tweeting stupid opinions, then I still think the censorship is bad. I don't care if it's the left or the right, but you know when the biggest problems with all of the censorship stuff is? There's a left-wing podcast that got nuked on YouTube. I'm not going to name them. And immediately, you know what I see? I see the libertarians.

I see the free speech advocates, the anti-SJWs all defending them saying, hey, hey, reinstate them. But then what happens when it's a, you know, Count Dankula gets mass demonetized? They go, ha, ha, ha, serves you right, but my private business. That's a problem. When you get a person like Count Dankula who will act with honor and integrity and stand up for principle and his adversaries will not, we are all at a disadvantage when we're fair and respect people and their rights to free speech. That being said, these people, I believe, were – I wouldn't be surprised if they were organizing actual violence. They like to point to right-wingers and they say – I see this on Reddit all the time. Well, maybe you shouldn't send death threats to people and they wouldn't have deleted parlor. And it's like, dude, there was, I think 60 posts out of hundreds of thousands, just in like an hour period that were violent. All right. I'm sorry. I should

say there were probably millions of posts and 60 altogether that were considered to be like harsh death threats. So they nuked the entire company. Come on, man. That doesn't make sense. Twitter is loaded with extremist propaganda and calls for violence and it's protected. So if you were to tell me that people in Parler were sending, you know, death threats, whatever, I'd be like, oh yeah, it's a good thing they were banning them. But that's not everybody.

And if you tell me Antifa was doing it, I'd be like, yeah, are they going to ban them? And then they're going to cry foul and they're going to start saying, we're the free speech activists to defend our free speech. The one thing I really love about all this stuff is when I see the tweets from the leftists and they're like, we're all the free speech warriors now to complain about the censorship of those criticizing Israel. And I'm like, bro, we've all been defending your free speech to the entire time. And when it happens, we always speak up about it.

And then when it happens to us speak up about it and then when it happens to us they laugh so what do you do i even remember arguing arguing with them years ago when people were being banned uh independent media people on the right and they were celebrating it i'm like you guys don't understand the hammer is going to come after you very, very soon. Here it is. It's only going to get worse. And this is what happens when you cheer on for a few small select individuals to have the ultimate power of controlling speech. It's a huge power. It's going to be used and abused. If you're standing in the way of the cogs of the machines, if you're not in the right position, if you're not reiterating the right talking points at the right time you're going to be axed no matter who you are and it's coming everywhere

i think it was glenn greenwald who said it best i think this was i think it's his quote that if there's any group of people that fails to learn from past mistakes it's liberals advocating for censorship because it always recoils back on them and it's true for antifa now getting nuked they were all cheering for it well goodbye when you talk about censorship and on them And it's true for Antifa now Getting nuked They were all cheering for it Well goodbye When you talk about censorship And Antifa violence It's like a demon That is like

Free me And I will destroy your enemies Yep Genie in the bottle All you have to do Is release me from these chains Trust me Yes

And you're like That's Mark Zuckerberg I trust you demon And then you release the demon He kills your enemies And then he tries And then he kills you It's like

Thank you idiot You ever see Aladdin When Jafar wishes he kills your enemies, and then he tries, and then he kills you. It's like, it's like, you know. Thank you, idiot. You ever see Aladdin when Jafar wishes he's a genie? And then they did the part two for, like, straight-to-home DVD. Jafar's a genie now, and he's like, wish me free. It's like, yeah, you're evil, and if we unleash this, you're going to hurt everybody. But you know what, man? Some people don't care. Or they don't know.

No, no, no. They're ignorant. You know what it is? It's the one ring. I've been watching a lot of Lord of the Rings lately. Antifa was Borom what, man? Some people don't care. Or they don't know. No, no, no. They're ignorant. You know what it is? It's the one ring. I've been watching a lot of Lord of the Rings lately. Antifa was Boromir, right? And he's like, censorship is a gift. We should wield it against our enemies.

You can't control it. No one can. That's exactly what happened. And they didn't get it. And now they're getting nuked. But I think a lot of them is ignorance. So we can just spread the knowledge about the danger of censorship. That helps a lot.

Not everyone's malicious. A lot of people are ignorant. I saw a cartoon today where it's four guys in a boat and two guys are on one end bailing the boat out because there's a leak at the other end. And the other two guys at the other end of the boat are like, ha ha, well, I'm glad this isn't affecting us. Oh, because it's raised up, right? Yeah, exactly. Yeah, they're like floating and the boat's sinking. Yeah.

Yeah, that's the world they seek to floating in the boat sinking yeah yeah that's the the world they seek to create but yeah i'll tell you what's interesting about this so uh i'll just show you this real quick this is literally what antifa is doing today you know we we mentioned this in the previous segment we don't want biden we want revenge and there's what looks like is that an ak yeah it looks like an ak i I could be wrong. But the organization, The Base, is based in New York. They have a public-facing website. All this information is readily available in public. They have their open hours.

They say The Base is an anarchist political center in Bushwick, Brooklyn, committed to the dissemination of revolutionary left and anarchist ideas and organizing. Now, on their website, it's very, you know, innocuous, right? Well, Project Veritas actually did an expose i don't i don't know if i've actually actually have the full expose well here's an opinion piece about it or something where they they had footage from inside where they were doing combat training basically you know that was self-defense training you're allowed to do self-defense training totally totally acceptable i took a kung fu class once that's right i did you know we had to fight with the sticks it was really cool a long time ago okay is that no no no it's called something else because there's two of them and you hold them like that and we did this like they do this really fast you know fighting stuff so that's fine but

there is an issue when you've got advocacy for violence when you've got evidence that these these groups in new york have been, and they're teaching people about revolutionary ideas, and they hold extremist views, and then they train for violence. You add all those things together, and I wouldn't be surprised if they're posting really, really bad stuff. They're going to get them banned. Wouldn't it be good, though, if we knew what they posted that they got banned for? Yeah.

Like, maybe it was innocuous. Maybe it was something that crosses the line. I mean, we have no idea. It's always the mystery with these guys. There's no transparency in the banning process. And that is a problem. And that's why I typically am opposed to it no matter what. Well, I guess you got to draw the line if they're saying like, go do a thing.

You know what I mean? Sure. We should at least know what they said and to have full transparency and accountability from these big tech networks that are literally having the most important power in the world destroying anything that could be made up. It's such a catch 20. I don't know if it's catch 22 or it's just a hard situation, because if they said something that's going to radicalize people, they want to prevent people from seeing it. But if they prevent people from seeing it, then we can't verify that what they did was wrong. Exactly.

The problem is that they shouldn't get to choose what is going to radicalize someone. Every idea should be held equally valid unless it's explicitly calling for violence against someone. So every idea should be out there. And if it was actually calling for violence, that's not actually legally protected speech either. I mean, because the law is pretty clear. In fact, actually, if I can jump in here

and say something about this problem, I actually came here tonight with the solution to this problem. Oh, yes. Solution. A solution to tech censorship. Solutions, we don't talk about that. All we do is complain. It is, I agree with you that. All we do is complain. It's all you.

It is. I agree with you. It's much easier to complain. But I have the solution. I brought it with me to tech censorship, to deplatforming, to getting blacklisted by financial firms. And it's very simple. We have to sort of look, where do we have strength still? Because the Senate's gone.

The House is gone. It's in the control of progressives. We don't know where the Supreme Court is, but where we still have a lot of allies and people supporting us, in fact, in a majority of the state legislatures. So I believe that the solution is state-level, state legislation that prevents the state and any government within the state, that's counties, cities, et cetera, from engaging in business with the social networks that censor, with tech companies that deplatform, with financial institutions that blacklist people. Because, look, we kind of agree we're all on the side that it's your company,

you run the social network, you can decide who's on it and who isn't, right? But you're not entitled to tax money paid by people who you are deplatforming, whom you're getting fired, whom you're throwing off your service and blacklisting and taking away their bank accounts. So the solution is for citizens, you guys out there, to lobby your state legislatures to say we're not going to give any business to any one of these companies that does this. We're going to divest our pension funds, our rainy day funds from companies that engage in this behavior. And either if you're going to get a government contract, you're going to embrace the First Amendment, and you're not going to deplatform people for legal speech, constitutionally protected political activity, or gainful employment. So the way to get where we're going is basically to get these state governments on board.

And one of two things is going to happen, okay? One, two, three, five states agree to this type of legislation. Either the Amazons, the Twitters, the Facebooks are going to say, okay, okay, we are not going to censure legal speech. Or they're going to say, ah, screw you guys, we're going to do what we want. And suddenly there's a space for companies that do embrace that to go after those government contracts, to go after that money, and that's how we create this parallel alternate ecosystem of financial companies, social media, and technical companies who embrace the First Amendment. These government contracts would be the seed money to create this ecosystem. So basically the bottom line is the state of South Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma,

all these states where we could potentially pass this legislation, say to Amazon, to Twitter, to Facebook, look, you're not getting another penny from us. Or to Citibank, you're not going to kick these people off your platform because you disagree with their political ideas and continue to do business with us. So they'll have to make a choice. And them saying no creates a space for these new companies to emerge that do embrace the First Amendment. What kind of money do states send the way of Amazon and Facebook? Well, marketing budgets is one thing on the social Amendment. What kind of money do states send the way of Amazon and Facebook? Well, marketing budgets is one thing on the socials. Now, that's not particularly huge,

but what is much more significant is their pension funds and rainy day funds being invested in these companies, as well as so many government services are dependent on contractors that use services like Amazon Web Services and those other companies that discriminate, that kick Parler off, right? So, you know, if just South Carolina or just Oklahoma did it, maybe it wouldn't get their attention, but you get like half the states in the country doing it. Those are billions and billions and billions of dollars that either they're going to have to change their policies to accept or give up, and that becomes the fuel for their new

competitors who embrace the First Amendment to get that seed money so they can grow and compete against them. And look, like I said, they're entitled to run their platforms, I suppose, how they want, but they're not entitled to tax dollars paid for by me, whose rights they're denying, whose rights of free expression and political activity and gainful employment they're denying. So this is how we fight back. And I guess I'm going to plug this, but look ahead, America, we're going to train people next Wednesday online, as many as 3000 people on how to do grassroots lobbying, how to lobby your legislature to get them to pass legislation like this that says, look, Facebook may kick you off, but they're not going to get in your tax money for advertising

or marketing. AWS may kick your parlor off, but they're not going to get any contracts for running the state's Medicare and Medicaid programs if they're going to deplatform you. So the moment there is a legitimate legal challenge saying, I was unjustly removed from this platform due to my protected speech, then the state ceases all contracts and tax expenditures going to these companies. Well, it'll be like a year period where they get to disentangle from any entity that does not agree to basically allow people to have free speech,

free legal speech without censoring it. And every state has its different legal peculiarities, but we have like, these are the policy objectives, very clear and simple. You get a state legislature to turn them into the state's legislative council.

It becomes legislation. It goes through hearings, amendments, etc. But this is how we fight back. Why don't we just have the state legislature as passed law as saying you can't ban people

for illegal speech? They tried that in Florida, I believe. It didn't go anywhere. But why not just actually get it done? Because this is, I think, easier because the state can control

who it does money, does contracts with. You may recall the state of California banned all travel to other states that did not like support bathroom laws. The federal government, other states also have riders for all their contracts that force them to accept rules that are not part of civil rights legislation, but sort of extend it. So this is common in government contracting and very powerful tool for reform. And it's just a lot easier than saying, hey, social networks can't ban it because then it becomes a federal matter,

whereas the states control who they're going to spend with, who they're not going to spend with. Yeah, we saw Poland recently propose legislation that would heavily fine social media companies for censoring legal speech. So that's also another aspect of it. But this is interesting because many Silicon Valley companies are lookingoring legal speech. So that's also another aspect of it. But this is interesting because many Silicon Valley companies are looking to leave California, that tax-filled,

amazing place that has a lot of homeless people. Because of the unlivable conditions, these companies are looking to reposition themselves. So this could be an opportunity to have local jurisdictions kind of step up. I think, I mean, do you have high hopes of this being able to be organized? And what other ties do local jurisdictions have with big tech that could be affected here? Well, look, all of these big tech companies have offices in every state capital. Why? It's because they're going after state government contracts. These are hundreds of billions of trillions of dollars in state, city, county spending. And this matters.

And again, it's going to have one of two outcomes. Either they're going to forego billions of dollars in revenue, billions of dollars that will instead go to their competitors, brand new competitors, which they hate and fear. Or they're going to have to relent and say, okay, we're going to permit legal speech. We're not going to kick people off our platform. You've got banks saying that we're going to stop doing business with firearms manufacturers. And if it's your thing, marijuana farms, right? Because, well, this would prevent that. Or at least say the state is not going to accept payments from these banks or do transactions

through these banks if they ban legal. It's very simple whereas it when you start banning like the behavior or say a social network can't ban legal speech you get into interstate commerce issues and you know this maybe that company's located in another state you're going to cut off internet traffic it becomes very complicated whereas this is very clean cut and i have high hopes because look we've got a lot of people with a lot of energy who want to do something and want to make a difference and are fed up with this problem. Becoming a grassroots lobbyist, becoming an activist. This is what the left has done for so long, and they've had tremendous success with it because they were patient with themselves the time it took and because they were determined

they didn't give up. I know that there are at least a third to half of the states in this country that would eagerly pass some form of this legislation. It's just that it has to get pushed. And nothing moves in politics unless it's pushed. So it's dependent on these folks out here to allow my organization, Look Ahead America, to organize them, to guide them, and to train them on how to do this and how to actually make it happen. Because we can talk all day about all the problems in the world, but we've got enough talkers tim does a great job we don't need more talkers we need more doers we need more people doing it and lobbying the state

literally and getting in their faces on it and the one thing that we're you know we're trying to do especially is building culture so i've often talked about i'm just a guy complaining on the internet and so that's why for a while we've been talking about doing this vlog where we'll start actually doing things and that's why we we're working on timcast.com because i'm like i can't just keep sitting here complaining on youtube it's ridiculous it's okay to be a talker sometimes but there's gonna be balance there's balance right there is about so it's gonna be yin yang we're gonna do the stuff where we're like this is bad stuff and then we're gonna be like let's make things and have fun and inspire people to do stuff and get them into you know i'll put it this

way we talk about it all the time the left will play video games and they'll live stream twitch they go on twitch they'll play video games which i'm doing later tonight by the way but we'll talk more about it later while they're playing video games and these young people are watching minecraft or whatever they're talking leftist politics and it works and that i won't be twitch now because because you know twitch is dominated by the left they ban people for even a moderate opinion you're gone so we need is we need young people who are looking at cool interesting things getting cheered on be it skateboarding or music or you know firing guns at the range just fun stuff demolition ranch style stuff the kids get excited

by it and then you know what do they see in the background a gadsden flag so then when they try and claim the gadsden flag is a symbol of white supremacy they go no that skateboarder guy's got one of those that's crazy i won't believe it i like that guy he's cool when they tried claiming that pewdiepie was a white supremacist or whatever because he said some stupid words and made some stupid jokes all these kids were like no he's not you're lying and then all of a sudden you had these little kids who were like, the media's lying. They're lying.

And then I remember the story Jake Tapper said his son calls him fake news. But think about how powerful that is. They realized this. This freaked them out. And then all of a sudden the censorship went nuts

because it was several years ago. Jake Tapper said, when my kid gets mad at me, he calls me fake news. Wow. Where does that kid hear that from? Yeah. He heard it from the likes of pewdiepie they went after pewdiepie hard he heard it on youtube they started going after youtubers and purging these channels and getting rid of them so you got to find a way to share your ideas have them be peripheral to what

you do but inspire and and create and then honestly what you're talking about as well the legislative angle but i will will say, as much as I think you are 100% correct, and people need to focus on that too, one of the problems, I think, is conservatives go at a legislative angle, whereas the left owns the culture. And then because they own the culture, they control, the kids grow up, and they're

always left. Now, Gen Z is the first generation to be slightly more right than the previous generations. Yeah, it's because of the internet. Like, Hollywood is very left. I was in that, you know. But it's not because of the internet. It's because...

It's a big part of YouTube. It balanced it out a lot. It was very far left in the 90s. But it's not because of the internet. It's actually... This is actually really obvious. In the 2000s, there were several studies done on the political ideology and children. And they found that conservatives were having 2.01 children and liberals were having 1.7 children.

What happens when you add 20 years from when those studies were done? You now have the next generation, Gen Z, leaning a little bit more conservative. Why? Conservatives had kids more often than liberals did. It's actually very, very simple. Now, YouTube, youtube internet all that stuff plays a role for sure if you're not inspiring young people then you end up with kids snitching on their parents because their parents were seen at you know the capital or whatever which is what

happened and like a liberal dad doesn't necessarily have a liberal kid like tapper for instance super liberal his kids apparently not his kid sounds like awakened. So I found Hollywood-dominated culture in the 90s, 2000s. I mean, honestly, way back since the 30s. And they're just... You have to shut your mouth and play the game to live in that industry. They will fire you in a heartbeat. And as soon as the internet came around, I realized, dude, I can say whatever I want. And I can make a living.

This is like next level. Well, that's why... Yeah. I mean, that's why, yeah. I mean, that's why they went after PewDiePie and Joe Rogan and so many other kind of cultural institutions that weren't regurgitating their talking points and they were providing entertainment that wasn't propaganda, that wasn't brainwashing,

that wasn't disinformation. You turn on all the mainstream media crap, whether it's Hollywood, movies, TV series, there's so much subliminal trash and garbage and messaging in there that it's absolutely ridiculous. It's unwatchable for people who know what's going on, who know the narrative, who know the agenda, who know the talking points, seeing it again and again portrayed in so many different ways. It's essentially brainwashing, according to a lot of individuals, especially when you look at the deeper involvement of the state

with Hollywood and their active involvement with writing scripts it's it's a big it's a big game that they want to take out anyone who's not involved in it like i was at i actually am the rare right winger who has a master in fine arts from columbia university and i can tell you that my time there the ideological persuasion of the vast majority of those was far far far left or don't really care about politics but go along to get along with the left and you think about who's the producers directors writers as you're saying in hollywood like almost every show you can get on netflix disney plus hula etc if you look at those writers and what they have they look at you know middle america patriotic america and they they look at those writers, they look at middle America, patriotic America, and they look at it with disgust and disdain and I would say almost a hatred.

And that's who basically anytime you put your kid in front of the television, that's who's feeding them. And this is why I think there's a shift is because you know who's really competing with Netflix right now and mainstream channels on television and primetime tv are is video games it's call of duty as twitch streamers those that's the competition and that's an environment that doesn't lend itself so easily to subtle left-wing manipulation and cultural brainwashing twitch is dominated entirely by far far left hardcore tankies and full-blown communists and if you look at the previous Call of Duty, not this one that just came out, the previous one had so much crazy, insane Russian propaganda,

Syrian chemical warfare, and WMDs, all of it pushing, of course, the mainline neoconservative messaging of we need more war, we need to fight Russia, we need to stop Assad. All of it was directly involved in it on such a sickening level it was it was crazy to watch i live streamed that game because i was surprised to see all the pro-war sure but it's not it's i want to make a point though it's not quite as convincing and and uh brainwashing as say any typical left-wing show in the 90s if you're just sitting there shooting people in call of duty or something. I'm just saying it's not as...

In Call of Duty, you literally were a child that was suffering a gas attack by the character that was clearly Bashar al-Assad, and you were a child trying to sneak away from the Russians that were killing your mom in front of you. So that type of level of propaganda,

holy cow, I mean, it has an impact on children who are just thrown. Would you rather your child do that or watch Gossip Girl? Well, games are more kind of immersive. People put themselves in games and even put on diapers because they don't want to leave that kind of entertainment realm. In Japan, there's literally AA meetings in Japan against gaming. Sure, sure, sure. I got no problem with gaming.

But you mentioned Twitch. And I'm pretty sure the biggest Twitch streamer is like a hardcore socialist. Who's advocated for violence in a video game. In a video game is what he does. He'll be like – he'll literally call to action and go, in a video game. Because he knows it's like – it's not a legal defense. But he thinks it is. And so – You guys should go fill in the blank in a video game? We need to go do this right now in a video game. Yeah. Oh, wow. It's insidious defense. What do you think it is? You guys should go fill in the blank.

We need to go do this right now in a video game. Oh, wow. It's insidious. It doesn't work. If they wanted to go after him, they would, but it's ridiculous. I agree with you, Matt. I think the movies and TV are uber brainwashing, and when the game, the gamer has control. There's no writer.

The games have been written and do have a plot, and Call of Duty was extreme propaganda, especially the new one. It was extreme like hate propaganda that's the new one the one before the new one i haven't i haven't played i haven't played the new one i stopped i stopped poisoning my mind with that content um but most a lot of most games are kind of uh kind of neutral the platform it's just a game you play them it's mostly multiplayer. I don't know. Most games are pro-gun. For sure. First-person shooter is a freaking genre. It's not that like... First-person shooter.

Do you remember that Christchurch shooting in, what was it, New Zealand? They were live streaming it with a head cam, and then people overlaid it and made it look like a Doom game and were getting kill counts and stuff. That's messed up. First-person shooting is highly training us to become killers.

It sounds like we're going to get a LAN party going here, because we've got the desks. We have high-speed internet. Think about even going back to Mario. Mario literally jumped on and crushed turtles with his feet. He ate mushrooms, bro. And he punched bricks. So there's like,

video games, like, violence is a strong, strong component. There was always a big push from leftists to make what they called walking simulators. Games where the goal was not to do anything violent, because they were, like, these SJWs were complaining,

why is every video game going to be violent or whatever but i'll tell you these kids are growing up playing you name a video game and like most of the big ones are guns like destiny right you ever play destiny it's like you're you're a space guardian and guns you shoot aliens with guns and lots of different kinds and rocket launchers and first person shooters man but also third person shooters the division what's the cyberpunk it's all about beating punching and shooting i was playing red and rocket launchers and first-person shooters, man, but also third-person shooters, The Division. What's the cyberpunk? It's all about beating, punching, and shooting. I was playing Red Dead Redemption last night with Adam Kriegler.

Soy Jesus, shout out. We'll be playing again later on tonight. And I was like, after I got done playing, I was like, how come there are no Native Americans that just attack you and that you just mow down? And I think that they specifically chose, it's like the Old West, but they specifically chose not to introduce the old west but they specifically chose not to introduce that kind of violence into the game there's a lot of violence in the game it's like but there's no natives i haven't seen any native you can like kill somebody and drag their

body and hide it just walk up to them yeah i remember not so long ago republicans were trying to ban violent video games because they said it would spur on you know school shooters but there actually have been some studies citing how violent video games help they said it would spur on you know school shooters but there actually have been some studies citing how violent video games help people become less violent they vent yeah so they're able to vent and you know express themselves and do really silly silly things like they do in grand theft auto and it usually according to some studies leads to more harm reduction like it's they're kind of metaphors for for aiming and throwing a ball at a moving target. It doesn't have to be shooting and killing a human when you're attacking a character.

It's just more representative of building up your twitch skill, your ability to turn and fire. There's no actual... I remember Penn and Teller's show BS on Showtime. I think it was Showtime. They did why the idea that violent video games makes people more violent is total BS. And they took this kid

who was, I don't remember what video game he was playing, but he was like one of the top gamers in a certain game. And they gave him an actual Pulsefire, you know,

AR of some sort. And he's this little kid. I don't know how he's like. Pulsefire? Yeah. I gotta look that up. Yeah, like, like,

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like,

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like,

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like,

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like,

like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, like yeah like like like it fires three rounds with one burst fire burst fire sorry sorry i'm thinking i was playing destiny and destiny has pulse rifles like they fire three burst fire and the kid pulled the trigger one time and started crying and they were like this kid plays video games all the time he's one of the best at at this first person shooter and then they actually you know said all right let's let's see if you can they wanted to see if the kid could actually hit the target if he was going to be accurate more accurate like the video games were

training him and instead he got shocked by like the recoil and then started crying and then didn't that happen to a mainstream media journalist that went shooting for the first time and then he was shocked and said it was traumatized traumatized yes i mean what did he what was he firing something they are just an a that's crazy because because we, look, so we were out in the range and we had a 5.56 and a 3.08. And we were all laughing, you know, firing it. Some little kid shows up with a Mini-14 and he was way better than all of us. How old was that kid? Like 12?

I don't remember. I wasn't there. Oh, that's right. You weren't there. I was sleeping in. Yeah, so I'm like, oh man, none of you were there. So it's like 12-year-old kid shows up with his dad and his dad's training him. And so they're doing, they're very precise.

And the kid was really, really great. We're having a good time. I fired the 308 a couple times. We fired the 556. And I was I was like, wow, that's impressive. Then then recently, we fired some buckshot and some slugs and the recoil was way more. So and if this guy is going to fire an AR, which I can imagine was probably like a 5.56. And then claimed he got PTSD from it. Heaven forbid the dude ever hunted a turkey. Because the game load in the 12 gauge has more recoil. And this guy's like, I got PTSD from firing this. Are you kidding? I feel like we're talking about two different types of mental brainwashing.

One is the actual physical act of killing. So it's like a violent movie or a violent video game. The other is the propaganda aspect of the movie or the video game, like the writing of it. And I think that movies and video games both have that violent action. I don't think that brainwashes people at all. What, the writing of a movie?

No, no, no. That's different. What I'm saying is, we've seen studies that show violent video games don't make people more violent. It's just not true. But you can make people, like Luke was saying, you play as a small child crawling away as Russians running in just for no reason. You don't think that there's something to, like, what's the Grand Theft Auto? Just running up and pulling someone out of a car and throwing them down to, like, all this street violence these days? Has anyone ever done that?

No. Well, there's all this street violence. No. Come on, dude. Like unprecedented amounts of street violence in the United States in the last five years, six years. No, that's actually not true. Crime has been going way down until this past year.

Until like the last year. Until COVID. And then people are angry, penned up in their homes, and they go insane. I don't know, man. And police officers are stepping back a little bit. Yeah. To say that there's no connection between violent video games and violence i think is extreme they've done

studies but it's like well i've experienced it firsthand when i play a game i start to think like the game when have you ever gotten out of your car and then just i have self-control but i i've driven and thought like oh there's a green van i want to pull the driver out of the driver's seat you realize that's you sounding crazy i'm'm a normal dude compared to some kids that don't know their parents. That's not normal. Dude, I had a good— I've never wanted to get out of my car. I was raised in a safe environment.

I've never wanted to get out of my car and just beat someone. No, I didn't want to. I had the impulse to do it. I've never had an impulse to do that, bro. Well, you don't play games as much as I do. Dude, I used to play GTA all the time. No, Jim, let me tell you what all the time means when you're talking about gaming. Do you wake up at 8 a.m.

and play until 7 a.m.? Yes. Five days in a row? Yes, dude. You have no idea what you're talking about. I used to play video games. Wake up.

Sun up. The sun down. That is my life. In his defense, I play one game, World of Warships, and I will confess that playing it

has made me want to take a sailboat out. Heck yeah. You know what? You're right. I played Civilization and it made me want to build a space program to. You know what? You're right. I played Civilization, and it made me want to build a space program to go to Mars. Yeah, the space makes you want to build a space out.

I got the science victory in Civilization, and I was like, let's rally a nation of hundreds of millions. I think the people that are disturbed are way more likely to commit violence anyway. The studies show you're wrong. There have been numerous studies about this. I don't care about a couple of studies. What?

What if some people are more suggestible than other people? That's for sure. And it's possible that we should take that into account. What if Luke and I are sitting here

referencing... If certain people get a hold of those games, it could make them training even crazier. Here's the funny thing. I just referenced there was a show

from Penn & Teller where they debunked the whole thing and Luke mentioned studies have already been done showing it's not true and Ian's sitting here

going, I don't care because I believe it is. So you have a few studies and you have nothing. You have literally nothing. I have personal experience. I watched them put the Doom overlay over the first person shooter dude. So you go crazy from playing games and other people don't. No I watched the Christchurch

shooter with his first person camera on laughing like he's playing a game and people also taking the video and then making it into looking like a video game. That has nothing to do with it. You have nothing to back up anything you're saying as per usual and you think this justifies your position. I would make a point

though that you might actually agree with in the way that they do reduce it. Because you think about where most crime happens. It's in dense urban areas. That's where most of the crime takes's in dense urban areas. That's where most of the crime takes place because you take those parts of the country away from the United States

and we're like the most peaceful country in the world. You just subtract like six cities and we're the most peaceful place in the world. So it's happening there. So if you think about, well, crime occurs over a period of time and it's when these individuals who are inclined to commit crime

are inclined to commit it. And they can be doing one of two things with their time. This is kind of goes back to the midnight basketball theory, right? But I think it's a little bit more practical. If you've got this video game that keeps you engaged and you're sitting around playing it for 12 hours a day because you're really not capable of doing anything else, if you're doing that instead of being out on the street actually doing the crimes, I think that in some ways it's kind of a palliative. In those specific environments, not to get between your two arguments, but I do think that if you've got something to keep people wrapped up and engaged they're not actually out doing other things which may include crimes can i get a drum roll can you

can i get a drum roll drum roll please the guardian table though we're going back into it the guardian playing video games doesn't lead to violent behavior study shows the new york times video games aren't why shootings happening politicians don't blame them time magazine no video games don't cause mass shootings. Now read the article that says the Russians are bad. Why it's time to stop blaming video games for real world violence. Entertainment Software Association. Science says video games don't cause real world violence.

There's five for you, Ian. Okay. So it's time to stop the witch hunt and the psychotic lie. Dude, I don't dislike video games, man. I wouldn't take them away from a kid ever but i am acknowledging that there's something to that we become what we do is five not enough for you i would say five i would ask you the study who did the study how many people was in the study i would ask you a question though is can you name a single mass

shooter that was moved to do that by video games that said a video well i've never had a chance to talk to any man no but usually surely they talk about what the motive the christ church shooter his motivations were clearly articulated he wanted to be a head cam on a gopro so no i agree that he wanted to cause a civil war by by using gun violence to incite the left to take guns away from right-wingers in the united states right Right. So I'm just saying that if it really was causing a problem, you really would have this guy saying, well, I play GTA a lot. It looked like fun. I want to try out for real.

I mean, maybe they're probably. I don't know if they're consciously. I don't know if people are always consciously aware. That's a fair point. Maybe they're not consciously aware. Well, to me, the big, I mean, if we're going to make arguments about what causes violence, you know, we could bring up a lot of other things. Lead in the air.

Fatherless homes. Oh, yeah. For sure. Lead in the air. Fatherless homes. Oh, yeah. For sure. Leaded death, for sure. Exercise, lack of proper... And I don't think video games are necessarily the cause, but maybe an exacerbative aspect of the violence. I don't think...

I think you're right that it's like broken homes is the worst thing. If I'm going to pull up five articles just in a simple Google search in 10 seconds, you should probably stop saying it. You should pull up article titles. I mean, read the articles. you should probably stop saying it. You should pull up article titles. I mean, read the articles. You should probably stop saying it if you've not even read any of it.

Dude, you pulled up like a CBS? Is that what you said? PBS? The Guardian? PBS? Yeah. New York Times. New York Times, Time Magazine.

Come on. It's like mainstream. I mean, okay, great. Read the articles. You're just giving me names. And you've not read anything. Dude, I've experienced it firsthand. That's meaningless.

Ian, maybe I can find a point of agreement between the two of you. Ian, would you agree that the palliative benefit of violent video games being an outlet for maybe violent impulses that they take out in the game or take up time when they would ordinarily be out on the street committing such crimes outweighs any contributions videos may have to real-world violence? And I think you would agree with that, too, because you— Yeah. Of course you agree. I think it's way more beneficial.

You have some common ground here, right? Okay. Yeah. But I'm not saying it has no negatives. But that's my point. Do you both agree with the premise that I just laid out? Definitely. Okay.

I think the way – they help us like – it helps me release tension and I gain self-esteem when I accomplish things. So the net gain of it, you think the negative is far outweighed by the positive. Correct. And you think there's no negative. So okay. We have some common ground. Good. It's not that I think there's no negative so okay we have some common ground good it's not that i think there's no negative it's that over the past several you now you think there's no there is negative no no what i'm saying is it's not about what i believe okay what you know what i believe i believe there are numerous

scientific studies that repeatedly debunk this for the past two decades and so i'm not gonna i i personally i'm not telling you one or the other What I'm saying is I just read five different headlines that asserted that, citing studies. And I started the anecdote by referencing a 20-year-old TV show that debunked the whole thing in the first place, citing numerous scientists and bringing a kid out. Okay, great. You referenced studies, Tim, and you've done that before, and there are studies that say fluoride is great for you. There's lots of them. In fact, there are studies that say aspartame doesn't cause cancer. Yes. They didn't do any more studies after that say aspartame doesn't cause cancer. Yes.

They didn't do any more studies after that because aspartame companies didn't want to. So you're a conspiracy theorist. No. Yes, you are. I'm telling you,

studies are not the end all. Bro, you just told us that you get impulses but you have self-control and you want to kill people. I don't. I specifically said I don't want to

but I understand. I've never experienced that in my life. Brainwashing. I've never experienced an urge to reenact GTA in real life. Tim, Ian is telling you what happens to him. And?

And that's all. And I don't think that Ian, maybe I don't think that you should extend that to all the video games and all people. And that's why Tim's pulling up studies. I think what I'm saying is that if Ian is experiencing some kind of problem, he shouldn't associate that with everyone. Well, I'm saying that the problem is real. Well, look, it's a simple, it's an ontological disagreement. He is a very big believer in deductive reasoning.

He's a very big believer in inductive reasoning. And sometimes they have something in common. Sometimes they disagree. And that's just, that's what it comes down to. Very well said.

But how can you read five studies and then deduce a finality from five ethnic studies? Well, because he doesn't see evidence of it to the contrary. If there was one study that suggested what you agreed, what you suggested, he would actually probably be a

little on your side. Did he look for evidence to the contrary? I just Googled it and clicked the top five links. Did you look for evidence to the contrary? You looked for evidence to support your claim. You didn't... What else did you look for today? Well, so now it's just a matter of time. He hasn't had time to. So I guess that's where you leave it, right? Actually, that's not true. I've had two decades where I've researched this extensively and Ian has done nothing. No, I study this stuff, man. I'll tell you the problem is that I literally have been reading for decades. I do nothing but read all day, every day. I do tons of research endlessly.

And then Ian says, I feel. I've literally been playing video games for decades. And that's not research. That's you having a personal— It's personal research about the way video games affect your mind. No, the plural of anecdote is not data. Dude, it is— Ian, if he—

Yes, it is. No, it isn't. If he had, in fact, spent... If you're a fireman and you tell me about how hot fire is, I'm going to listen to you. The moral of anecdote

is not data. Ian, let me ask you a question. If he had spent the last year working on a PhD on this very subject and has consumed everything and then he said, well, I looked at all the evidence,

I found little to nothing suggesting that it contributes to violence, would that affect your point of view? time if you had a show about this then it's just a disagreement of level of expertise after tens of hundreds of thousands of people that have gone through it and found 0.0001

so this will stop when you get a PhD in video game violence is what I'm hearing so it's an issue of one of the biggest problems we have in my opinion with politics in general is people who think their feelings are fact and it's an issue of one of the biggest problems we have, in my opinion, with politics in general, is people who think their feelings are fact. And it's not true, period. I don't care about video games.

I don't care if they cause violence or don't cause violence. The research says they don't. Do you think violent movies cause people to become more violent? I have not researched it. But I believe the answer is no. I believe that if you haven't researched it. Because what we have seen is that there is in some, because I've not done, the amount of research I've done into video games and violence is like probably to me notable in

that for the past two decades, I've actually been looking up articles and reading the science on it fairly often. The movie stuff, I've read a couple things. And what I've seen is there is a short-term burst of aggression after watching violent films, but it's short-term and doesn't lead to real-world violence. That's what we've seen so far. So that's the extent that I can get. And I would probably say that suggests, no, regular people don't have impulses to go out

and commit crimes because they've watched a movie. So listen, facts don't care about your feelings. If video games caused violence, I'd be sitting here saying that was the case. But politicians have used that as an excuse for moral authoritarian power for censorship for a long time. Do you think that watching someone commit a crime makes you more or less likely to commit the crime? Makes me less likely, actually.

Do you think someone telling you, like someone up on a stage orating and telling people to cause violence would make them more likely to cause violence? Telling people to commit a crime? Yes. In the real world? Experiencing it with your eyes and your ears telling someone that there is a tangible thing affecting you and burn it down yes do you think that people can ever forget they're in real life and think they're in the video game while they're playing the game schizophrenics yeah yeah yeah me too and we've not seen evidence of a

widespread or direct correlation or direct city and No, I think you think feelings are facts. They're not. Your personal anecdote is not data. I think people can forget they're in the video game. And that can really make them think that they're watching a real person. The fact that you said you think the plural of anecdote is data suggests you just don't know anything about research in general. The plural of anecdote is not data. Dude, you just said that you haven't researched if movies cause violence,

but you believe they don't. In related news, in related gamifying news, I have a thing that maybe could put us on a different track here. In related gaming news, YouTube today is accused

of gamifying the like and dislike button for all of the videos from the official White House YouTube channel as there are many screenshots portraying likes that are supposedly, according to some people, being manipulated in real time.

Have you guys heard about that? I blame violent video games for this. YouTube has done this with the like button a lot. The issue is, though, are the likes legitimate? Yes. We don't know if there was actual individuals manipulating the system because there's usually also some bots that are implemented that do create fake likes and fake dislikes out there so we don't know if this was the exact situation that unfolded here but also surprisingly

the the president that was elected and had more votes than any other president in american history looks like he's getting absolutely ratioed and dunked on, even with the corrections from YouTube, as his videos are having 90% dislike percentages. But that's because people voted against Trump. Yes. No one likes Biden. Right.

A lot of people didn't like Trump. So people are like, why won't people show up for Joe Biden? Because nobody wanted him. Yes. They just didn't. That's why Joe Biden hid. Because the campaign campaign was i don't like donald trump or i like donald trump yeah it still is like surprising seeing the the likes the dislikes even with the the supposed corrections i hope youtube addresses the the kind of allegations because we're seeing

some of the videos being unlisted uh and and coming back with a whole different ratio but again we don't know what's happening. You may take the Netflix solution, because you remember when Netflix... What did they do? They got rid of that system. Yes, right after Amy Schumer's Netflix special debuted, and it was

promoted everywhere. Rotten Tomatoes I think gave it a 98% when actual critics gave it what? I think... I forgot the exact score. 10%? And then they were like, we have the perfect solution here. We're just going to totally get rid of all the percentages. So you can't even see the exact ratings only left up to the professionals.

And again, we're seeing people's voices just being slowly taken away. We saw this with comment sections a couple years ago i was screaming about it i was sad to see it but now i think i think with this happening they're they're they already disabled comments on the official white house uh youtube channel i think it's only going to be a matter of time until they disable the likes and dislike button because it is it is i wonder if that's legal though because sorry but you remember um, Trump was brought to court for using his presidential account to block people. They said he couldn't do that. I wonder if that's worthy of a lawsuit for their disabling comments on YouTube.

There was court proceedings literally saying Donald Trump can't block people because Reply Guy's jobs was literally replying to Donald Trump. So, I mean, what was the the do you know the court rulings on that what happened yeah they said he had to unblock the people he had blocked did he did he unblock it or was i imagine most of them wow most of them not all wow now they're all out of work those i believe aoc still has a bunch of people blocked as well and there's a couple other congress people that are getting sued as well i'm seeing i'm seeing a bunch of people tweet being like man donald trump must be so bored right now. He's golfing. And also YouTube just recently also expanded his suspension for another two weeks on YouTube.

Yeah, he's gone. They're not bringing him back. And a couple banks have also canceled his accounts. So, yes, impeachment proceedings are still going to continue in the Senate. And, yeah, things are not really looking that good for Donald Trump, to say the least. But things are looking really good for some of our favorite TV hosts. Oh, yeah. The world is always brighter with authoritarianism.

It's bringing some people to tears. Check this story out. Okay, for those that are listening, we're going to start off this segment with me asking you a simple question. And don't look if you haven't yet. Don't look. Who do you think cried when Joe Biden won? Which which anchor on TV cried? Probably all the right wingers. All right. I know this one, but who is it, Luke? Miss Maddow. Rachel Maddow from the Daily Mail. Who is the big who is media's biggest Biden suck up? Rachel Maddow cries on air while Al Roker fist bumps the president and the new press secretary, Jen Psaki, gets a very warm

welcome. Rachel Maddow said that she'd worked through half a box of Kleenex on air. Amazing. Oh, yes. Weeping on air and making fun of Trump staffers. Rachel Maddow, a well-known Trump critic, confessed on her show that she worked through half a box of Kleenex while watching the day's events. I'm a faucet that can't turn off. I remember the last time she almost cried on TV was when the Mueller report came back that Donald Trump wasn't colluding with Russia. And you could see her struggling not to cry. And there's a really funny video where the lady is like filming with her phone and she's

laughing. She goes, she cried. Oh, I love that. It went so viral. It was amazing. They say ABC News' Byron Pitts drew criticism for calling Biden the nation's papa in chief after listening to his inaugural address. I love this one tweet.

This New York Times bestselling author said, we can now rest. No more 3 a.m. waking up with anxiety. It's like when you were a little kid falling asleep in the backseat, knowing that dad was driving and everything would be OK. And I'm just like, I wouldn't want to fall asleep in a car with no with Joe Biden driving it. I'd want to be holding on and I'd be wearing my seatbelt. But here's where it gets interesting. It wasn't just Rachel Maddow who was crying. It's also Andrew Sullivan. Isn't Andrew Sullivan a conservative? I'll be wearing my seatbelt. But here's where it gets interesting. It wasn't just Rachel Maddow who was crying.

It's also Andrew Sullivan. Isn't Andrew Sullivan a conservative? I'm not even sure. Never Trump-er? Where anybody is now. Yeah, I don't think it matters. He tweeted, just walking the dog and finding myself in tears. Relief? Patriotism?

The ceremony restored something inside. Oh my gosh. That's kind of scary. That's so sad. You know what I mean? That's so sad. The cult-like view of the American industrial machine. The people who look at Joe Biden and the establishment, and they just want to drop to their knees and worship the establishment. And they cry when the establishment power is returned. Who it that was walking their dog andrew sullivan it's it's like all the murder

and all the death and all of the authoritarianism they don't care just well they've got a four year at least a four-year vacation ahead of them because you know they don't have to do any critical reporting they just have to repeat what's said after uh fed to them by the white house press office in the dnc they don't have to do anything anymore. It was so hard with Trump, you know, like having to do work. Do their jobs. Yeah, and now, literally, a lot of their coverage is aesthetics and the clothing. Did you see those sneakers? Yes.

Yeah, man. Look at those chucks that Kamala Harris is wearing. I mean, that's literally, I think it was ABC News that sat her down. I mean, we're talking about one of the most important people in our political discourse right now. And you're asking her about sneakers. I mean, are you kidding me? There was another anchor on MSNBC that I tweeted about that compared Biden's administration to the Avengers. Literally, she said they are superheroes that will, save us all i tweeted well he's more like thanos with the snap of a finger who's going to take away half of your income and it's just

absolutely ridiculous to have this kind of glorification of of politicians of power which again just shows you the utter lack of responsibility and duty that these supposed journalists have for their profession it's not a profession it's literally just brown nosers here's the issue right when a bunch of middle american you know people who lost their jobs start cheering for trump and making these silly drawings of trump riding a tank and like or riding a velociraptor i don't care all that much because they're regular people they're're regular people who believe in Donald Trump. When the mainstream corporate media uses the might of their billions of dollars to prop

up one political party and destroy the other, that's disconcerting. If I see a group of people like, you know, I've never really cared all that much about the Q stuff because I'm like, I don't care who these people are. They can believe they can have their little forms. They can believe whatever they want. I think it's bad for them. I think it led to bad things and it's sad. But what about the other conspiracy on the left, the crazy Russia stuff, the Putin calling

Donald Trump during the Capitol riot and they prop it up? You know, it's difficult to actually get in to find these communities that are full of weird conspiracies. It's difficult. It's easy to turn on MSNBC and then hear fake news and propaganda and insanity and then start believing it. And they want that. Q is just a much less effective version of CNN and the New York Times, much less dangerous. So they create these conspiracies, theories, they incite riots with BLM mythology that says that cops are just going around gunning down innocent black men because they're black.

I mean, they invented this mythology. The country burned the entire summer because of their conspiracy theories. Q just causes some awkward moments at Thanksgiving. Right. Well, a lot of people who stormed the Capitol were Q people, like the Viking guy, right? So some bad stuff comes of it, right? Some. He also believed he was an alien, though.

No, no, no. Well, yes, but in the body of a human, and he practices life magic. And he explained that he was his presence there was to ward off the dark magic people who would see him and then go, whoa, we got like a big player, we better back off. Because his life magic was powerful. Yeah, that's the insurrection

we were facing. Could you imagine a government by that guy? It's like the national religion would be the incoherent ramblings on the dr browner's soap bottles he would probably get more likes on youtube than biden i bet he's oh definitely i have a feeling he still thinks that he preserved a bunch of people's lives he's like if i wasn't there so many more people would have died oh yeah yeah yeah yeah and maybe he did he looked kind of funny like he brought a levity to it so look the look, the Q stuff, it bums me out. These people just want to believe it, you know? They want to believe that, I'm telling you right now, they still believe Trump has got a secret plan.

They think the new capital is in Florida and Trump is working with the military. And I kid you not, because I tweeted this on the 20th, like, how long until they start saying that, you know, the real plan was to allow Biden to be president. So that way they would confirm the crime and the treason had been committed, because if he didn't assume the office, then the treason never happened. Right. They really believe it. Sorry. I was just saying that, you know, the way the media decides to focus on that particular group, it always makes me wonder because they can never quite answer the questions that so like let's say q supporters was five percent of the public maybe it's significant but what if it's really like 0.5 is there any measurement because they sort of focus in on this demographic of crazies and and make it seem like well that's common

that's mainstream and they do this constantly with like they find some extremists or some weirdo and make it seem like it's representative of something large when in fact, it's barely even that entity or it doesn't exist at all. It's with the Caliphate podcast that New York Times did. It was completely manufactured. So like all this attention that Q's get, how many people actually are quote unquote Q's? Has there been a survey done to establish them as something more than 1% of the population, if that? Yeah. But it was given life because of the major censorship efforts.

A lot of people who spewed the Q stuff said, well, if we're not legitimate, why is YouTube? Why is Google? Why is Facebook and Twitter censoring us? And that, of course, created a situation where the conversation didn't take place in front of everyone. It took place in other parts of the internet that are far away in seedy places where crazy people go to discuss different things. And it even came to a point where YouTube started banning and deleting videos that were critical of Q people. So how can they? They say whenever they get censored, they say over target. Yes.

Which means that, oh, no, like we've figured it out. That's why they're reacting this way. They're trying to ban us because we were right. Yes. Jack Dorsey actually sort of admitted this because you remember after Trump was banned off of Twitter, he sort of and then Parler was kicked off. He made his little tweet thread and it was very slimy and I don't think authentic. But in the beginning, he says that banning trump and the other platform you know what happened to them has in his words he said

caused the conversation to become fractured and that's exactly what you're describing because if we're not all in the same place talking we can't all correct the you know and if somebody goes really far off the reservation well we're all still here we can just pull them back and put our arms around them but when they're off on their own there's the communication has been broke because they've been banned off the platform. There was literal people saying, okay, let's look at these Q drops. Let's break them down. Okay, this didn't happen. This didn't happen.

This isn't a surgeon. They say this is going to happen. Let's actually look at this. Let's see if there's any evidence. Let's see if there's any documents backing this. Nothing. And slowly talking people out of it, those videos were deleted from YouTube. They thought that Mueller was working for Trump.

They said that Mueller, they needed a way to get in a special prosecutor with a deep state realizing it, and that Mueller was pretending to investigate Trump for the press, but it was actually going to be about Hillary Clinton. And then it never happened. And they claimed to have found the location of these camps, and they went to these places and then there was nothing there. And it was years ago that people like Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, some of the highest profile Trump supporters were like, dude, it's not real. People don't want to let it go. And then when I remember, it's just been for the past several weeks, people saying Monday's the day the states are going to start flipping

and the arrests are going to happen. The storm is coming. Nothing happens. Yeah monday's the day the states are going to start flipping and the arrests are going to happen the storm is coming nothing happens yeah then i remember the day before inauguration i had people posting on i see people posting on facebook tomorrow is the final day they're waiting for the last moment then body gets inaugurated and then all of a sudden there were these crazy posts popping up like what's happening what's happening i'm so confused and then the next day it's all part of the plan it's all part of the plan. It's all part of the plan. Was it a real thing with someone that actually had info, but then it just got co-opted by crazy people that are like, I'm going to pretend like I'm Q and trick everyone. It's like Nostradamus. It's like you make it.

Oh, someone made some predictions. I'm going to make a prediction for you right now. The Dark Eagle. What? The moon. Green blades. Grass. Friday.

At some point in the next several years, someone will find this clip and they will associate those random things I just said and be like, he was right. I didn't say anything. Or I could ask questions. Oh, cute. Ask questions. Why is Nancy Pelosi wanting machine guns? Why is the National Guard refusing to answer why they're there? They asked a lot of questions.

That's what Q does. Yep. Ask questions. Why is the military moving a plane in the dead of night to Joint Base Andrews? Why did another plane go to Texas? And they call themselves Q because that's the name of that guy from Star Trek Next Gen? No, because of Q clearance. What's that?

The highest level of security clearance you can get. So they say. Okay. I don't know if that's true. I don't know about security clearance. Well, a lot of people attribute what happened with Q as a government run psychological operation as a PSYOP, because if you look at the effects of it, it essentially undermined not only Donald Trump, but any form of legitimate criticism of government. You know,

instead of actually considering what the government has been doing, the American foreign policy, where our tax dollars are going. People were talking about riddles on the internet and looking for things that weren't really there at all from the very beginning. And when you see the cause and effect, a lot of people are saying, hey, this was directly done for nefarious purposes that essentially backfired on anyone who believed in it. You know what else is just like that? Voter fraud.

No, here's my point is because, look, this type of research I did was into something that was much more concrete and practical, whereas these voter fraud conspiracies just made it seem like the entire election was a result of voter fraud. Now, I've said what I've said in other channels about what I think would happen, but the problem is what this has done is distract us from something that had a much bigger impact than illegal ballots, which was over the last four years, with hundreds of millions of dollars, the left went on a registration march. They did aggressive voter registration, voter engagement, and voter turnout that was unmatched on the right. That had a much bigger impact than anything related to fraudulent ballots, voter fraud, etc.

However, because we're all absorbed with this voter fraud thing, we're not paying attention to the real problem, which is those conservatives, those on the right, just completely did nothing on the voter registration side to match what the left was doing. But as long as we're talking about voter fraud, we're not paying attention to the real problem, which is exactly what you've said. And it was a lot of rule changes over the past year. That too. It was well before COVID that Pennsylvania passed the law, and these are Republicans, by the way, for mail-in voting. So that's why I say the whole thing was actually

Trump getting oceans 11'd. The real moves were made well in advance of the election, and we were watching it happen. There was even controversy where Trump was like, you know, oh, don't vote by, you know, oh, vote by mail is bad. Oh, wait, wait, wait, you should vote because they realized it was actually disenfranchising his own voters. The Democrats had planned this for a long time.

Stacey Abrams has been running a massive get out the vote campaign and fighting legal battles to maintain voter registration rolls and things like that. So I agree with you. I think it happened a long time ago. And I think that's what you're working on now. Yeah, well, Look Ahead America, our primary mission is registering, educating, and turning

out to vote disaffected patriotic Americans. I have a database of millions of American citizens who are patriotic, who are not registered to vote, and we're going to go into their communities, just like ACORN would do on the left, or Stacey Abrams would do in Fulton County, engage these people, get them registered to vote, educate them, have events, do real community organizing, and turn them out to vote on election day because nobody on the patriotic side has done that. And that's what our primary mission is. And the problem with all this is I bring this up and then people say, well, what's the point? They're just going to steal the election again. And again, I made the point that illegal ballots did have an impact, but nowhere near the impact of the voter registration and then lowering the bar to make it easier to vote.

Those two things together. I think, yeah, mail-in voting. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in person. And then you had Democrats who overwhelmingly voted early. And so a lot of people don't realize, I hear the same thing over and over again about like the late night, you know, boosts for these candidates. And it's like, yeah, those are those are mail in ballot dumps. And they were from urban centers, which are overwhelmingly. So you take these two factors that Republicans don't vote by mail for the most part, and

urban centers are overwhelmingly for Biden, and you get a 95% Biden drop. It makes perfect sense. You could see it all coming. And so now what the left has been saying is that Stacey Abrams saved the country because her get out the vote campaign in Georgia won them the Senate. I also think the Republican Party burnt themselves to the ground by not supporting Trump and by not supporting the people. But, you know, here we are now. Well, it'll be interesting to see what happens because Trump is talking. Well, I should say it's been reported Trump is floating the Patriot Party.

But I wonder what you think about that, Matt, because you want to be able to register to vote. What if people come out, they get registered and then they go and vote Patriot instead of Republican? So, you know, as a C3, we register anybody who asks us for help for it with it regardless of any of their background or their partisanship we're just about educating people on patriotic issues such as h1b visa abuse um or a corporate censorship and election integrity that kind of thing but putting on my general consultant hat i think that any third-party attempts are primarily operations driven by

narcissism. And that here's the premise, okay? The premise is that you don't have enough power to take over the Republican Party or the Democrat Party and then win a general election. So somehow you're miraculously going to build a party from scratch and then win a general election. Here's a hard truth that even I have trouble accepting, is if your electoral coalition doesn't have people in it that make you deeply uncomfortable, deeply uncomfortable, it's probably not broad enough to win a general election. It's painful and tough medicine. And it's, you know, but some folks just can't accept that. And look, I use the word narcissism about third parties. I'm going to explain what I mean is that we all know the story of Narcissus, right? He fell in love with his own

image reflecting back in the lake, and he couldn't move away from that, and he died. And I believe his problem wasn't that he found himself to be so beautiful. He saw in himself perfection. That wasn't his problem. His problem was that he could not find enough beauty in the real world to leave that and go seek real nourishment. He fell in love with the ideal, which did not exist, rather than falling in love with the real, that while imperfect, still had nourishment and the ability to sustain him and to grow him. And when you look at a political party, GOP or Democrat, and you see imperfection and you only insist on perfection, that doesn't exist. That gets you nowhere unless you're willing to work with other people who are flawed, whom you disagree with, whom you may strongly disagree with on some issues. So your refusal to engage with other Republicans because you think they're sellouts or rhinos or, let's say you're a Democrat, you refuse to engage because you think they're owned by the banks.

Well, that's your own narcissism, refusing to accept the fact that this is the real world. And if you want to get anything done in electoral politics, you don't have to love it, but you've got to find a way to work with others. And you can't just fall in love with your own reflection and go off and have any impact that matters. Very good points made. And I think also a lot of Trump supporters are absolutely disenfranchised with all the latest moves he's been making the last few weeks. And, you know, for a lot of people that I'm seeing are really, really disappointed, especially with the pardoning list that essentially is a big debacle.

Yeah, he could have come out. He could have done one thing, you know, could have been Julian Assange. Instead, we got crooked cronies, the Detroit spies, mercenaries. I can understand some of it. I can. But it was just a big letdown. You know, I have many, many criticisms of Mitt Romney. I could criticize him all day long. But one very smart thing I agree is that when he was governor of Massachusetts, he didn't pardon a single person. And if you get a president who abides by that, because the pardon power is really kind of weird. It's weird because it doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of our government where it's all law and order there's a process checks and balances you know you get convicted you can appeal etc this is like a magic

wand that exists outside of everything um and i i think you know to his in that that's the only thing i actually think i could say that's good about mitt romney's that you know if we had a president who embraced that he probably avoid a lot of trouble because then if he came out at the beginning and said, I'm not going to pardon anybody, it doesn't exist, then all the lobbying and corruption that surrounds trying to get those pardons would immediately evaporate. Or what if he said, I'm going to pardon everybody. You don't need to lobby me at all. I guess so. All right. Everyone.

That crazy guy who was selling drugs? Pardon. Joe Exotic, get him out. Joe Exotic, get him a limo. Could a president do that, technically? Yes. Yes. Every single one. What?

At least from federal crimes. Yeah. Federal charges. Why can't we get a president who just does something? Just like just do like

so I'm not saying pardon murderers or like you know diddlers are really really awful people. I'm saying Trump could have sat back with a big old stack of paper

and be like let's see distribution of marijuana. You're free to go. Dude if we were nonviolent offenses. That's what I mean. If we were to get a president that defied

the military-industrial complex, how would that work? They would have to flee the country and work abroad? I think it would be a problem, though, if a president did that, because what would happen is that the responsibility that legislators have and the process of passing legislation, House, Senate, then the president sign it, it would basically neutralize that.

And then we would become this entity that's completely subject to a president's women. But they can do that with executive orders. He can instruct the FBI, for instance, not to arrest people for drug charges. There's limits. Oh, yeah. That's different than parting somebody who's been convicted. And there's some limits to what a president can excuse. And we did this before, and it was a mistake. This is a little bit arcane, but the Congress

passed what I would consider an anti-free speech campaign finance reform bill, many of them knowing that things in it were unconstitutional, unconstitutional restrictions. And what they were going to do is just count on the Supreme Court. Oh, the Supreme Court will fix it. Well, it turned out the Supreme Court didn't fix it. And they didn't actually get around to even changing some things about it for another 10 or 20 years. So what I think would happen is the legislature would abrogate the responsibility to uphold the Constitution because they just assumed the president would do it or Supreme Court or somebody else would do it. So I think that would be a downside to your very wonderful fantasy. I just want to see somebody for once, you know, look, there are a lot of people in jail that we know shouldn't be there because we have too many rigid judges and lawyers.

I'll tell you, when I was I think I was how old was I? Twenty, maybe I got pulled over. I had just gone to Colorado to visit my sister on Fort Carson because her husband was in Iraq on the ground as a field medic and she was terrified and distraught. And I came to, you know, just hang out with her and provide her with some company. When I came back to Illinois, I got pulled over by a cop and I had no idea why. I had done nothing illegal. I wasn't speeding. And the first thing the cop does is he walks up to the window and he goes, you Tim Pool? Yes, sir. And he goes, out of the vehicle, you're under arrest. And I was like, what's happening? He goes, you're driving on a suspended license. I am? I had no idea.

Because if you're under the age of 21 and you get two moving violations, two different tickets, they suspend your license for three months. I didn't even know that it happened. And I didn't realize that I had previously gotten a bogus ticket for speeding when I wasn't. I was exiting off of Lakeshore. I was onto Belmont Avenue from Lakeshore Drive. I was going about five miles under the limit and a cop pulled me over and gave me a ticket. So here I am by myself. Now my license is suspended. I had no idea, never received notification, had my license and everything. And the guy says, don't worry, I'm going to eye bond you if someone can come pick you up. And I was like, okay, I guess.

When I went to court, the prosecutor asked me, you know, what, what he's like what are you going to do if you plead guilty i'll give you you know we'll do this that and this and i said can i just let you know what was going on and like what happened and he said sure and i explained everything and i was like look i was i was coming back from visiting my sister i had not received any notifications about a suspension and i'm really sorry it happened and he goes oh thanks for your confession uh so it's a year in jail or you're going to plead guilty and we're going to give you court supervision and you're going to pay a fine. And I was like, OK. And then when I said when I went to the judge, the judge asked me if I had been coerced.

And I said, yes. And he said, what? And I was like, yeah, he told me I'll go to jail for a year unless I just tell him I'm guilty. And the judge rolled his eyes and said, get a lawyer and come back. Does it make sense that someone who's 20, who got one, who got out, I got a taillight out and a speeding ticket. Now they want to throw me in jail for a year or threaten me with that. I think that makes literally no sense. And it's ridiculous that our system has become so rigid that they would say, I don't give a damn about your family. I don't give a damn that your brother-in-law is serving in Iraq and you want to do the right thing. You broke the law, whether you knew you did or not.

Oh, you were just driving, not breaking any laws. In fact, one lawyer told me he had no right to pull me over in the first place. It was a violation of the disclosure. What is it called? The probable cause? No, the exclusionary rule that I had to have committed a crime to get pulled over in the first place. But I had no way to fight that. I had no way to get a lawyer to say, why did you pull over my client? Well, because I ran his plate and saw his name. What if it was

someone else driving the car? That was not a legal stop. Therefore, it's out. No, I couldn't afford that. I had no way to fight it. And so here I am, some 20-year-old dude who had never got a notification. No one says to you when you're 16 or you're 18 getting a license, by the way, if you get two moving by, legends will suspend your license. They don't mail you notification at all. Just one day you get pulled over. It's happened to so many different friends of mine. And they actually threaten you with jail time for something that, for what?

For what? There's no human emotion in the system right now. And so how many people are rotting in prison for something as nonsensical as that? Especially when it comes to someone who wanted to smoke a little weed in the privacy of their own home, hurting nobody? And so I'd love to see the system for once. Look at all the people who have been arrested for advocating for jury nullification. You guys know about this.

Luke, you know about this. Oh, yeah, 100%. The juries have the ability to nullify if they think someone shouldn't be punished for it. But if you advocate for that, they'll arrest you. Really? The system is broken. Is it illegal to advocate? No.

But they do it anyway. And they charge. They give people on contempt of court. Well, the question is, though, what are you going to do about it? I mean, you're talking about it. What are you going to do about it? That's why I like the idea to finally get a politician who's going to look through all of these different cases. And I'd love to see a president say, you know what the first thing I'm going to do is?

Oh, we're going to look through all of these different cases. And I'd love to see a president say, you know what the first thing I'm going to do is? Oh, we're going to do executive orders. But I want to see advocacy and review of as many cases as possible to figure out if we can be human beings again, to see if people actually deserve to get mandatory minimums. There's a story I learned when I was at College of DuPage about a kid whose family was watching their neighbor's home. And he went inside and he took a beer. And he got four years in prison on a mandatory minimum for robbery. And the judge refused.

The judge said, it's a mandatory minimum. You went in the house and you took property. And when they said, yeah, but we were asked to watch the house. It doesn't matter. You went in and took someone's property. It wasn't yours. And the people who live there said, we don't care about the beer. We invite them. Doesn't matter. The prison rejected the kid. This is a story that I don't, you can look at this up. It was Illinois.

It was a story that I was told, and this is now 16 years ago. The prison, when they reviewed the notes on what the story was and why he was getting four years, they wouldn't let him in the prison. And the judge intervened, and the kid went to prison. What is wrong with this system i have i got another example that i think is really worth noting here or if you're in california and your child misses school and then you have camilla harris as the uh you know prosecutor there who's going to punish the parents and literally have criminal charges brought on them because of that and laugh about it yeah there's actually a harvard law professor that came out and said on average an american a day

commits three felonies on average because of how many laws we have on the books and that's to me way too many laws and that's and that's a good point too but you know on top of that i'm just trying to point out that there's there's no humanity in the system at all it's the like illinois has mandatory minimums for drug charges it's like dude come on are we really going to take someone who's got an addiction and lock them in a prison for four years it's not solving the problem it's making it worse and they don't care look at what happened in michigan when these juvenile detention centers the judges were selling kids to them the system is broken in so many ways and i wanted trump to just take a hammer and just

whack it just a little bit not break it just give a big middle finger to the messed up nature of how the system works. But I would I would I don't mean this as criticism, but I think there's a fatal flaw. Because when I asked you, what are you going to do about it? You said, I just hope wish there was this politician or this president. I wish President Trump. It's got to be you, Tim. It's got to be you. And these methods that I you and these methods that i brought up this is hard work it's hard work and i hear your complaints i understand it but we have to remember something is that the country that we have where we do generally generally like the country despite yours this country was founded because a man rounded up a bunch of other guys on christmas

on at in the middle of the night and crossed a freezing river and fired guns at other people. Yep. Because our great grandfathers drowned in mud in trenches. Because our grandfathers died on a beach. So for us to expect that things are going to go well for us without making similar efforts or even efforts, even 10% of that, I think is unreasonable. So all of these problems you're talking about, mandatory minimums in Illinoisinois i know there are groups that are out there active actively lobbying to reform

them and it's not going to happen overnight but it's one step at a time this issue with uh young people getting two moving violations having their life what happened to you there's just there are multiple solutions available to us get that prosecuted those guys are elected you can get rid of them or change the law itself so all all of these things are fixable, but it takes time. It takes effort. It takes training and organization. And I, and so we are, we are doing stuff. We got to do stuff.

We're, we're talking about it on, on our show and bringing you on because you are the guy boots on the ground working towards those solutions. I have always been, uh, you know, I used to do fundraising for nonprofits. That helps my, my, it was always, uh, it I used to do fundraising for nonprofits. That helps. It was always marketing and events and awareness. And I'm still doing essentially the same thing, building awareness and spreading information in a certain capacity. So if I can highlight the issue and then I can showcase what you're working on because it'll help solve those problems, then we're doing the right thing.

Absolutely. To the best of my abilities. Those C3s, I'll tell you, if you do fundraisers for them, that's manna from heaven because I can tell you from somebody running one, you'd like to think it didn't matter, but money matters a lot for everything from like mandatory minimums to election reform to getting the – we need professional staff to train and organize these grassroots lobbyists to get out in the field. And everything is expensive. Everything costs money. So my hat's off to you. If you actually step forward and do fundraisers for organizations like that, that is tremendous, and it makes a difference. Do people donate to your 501c3? Lookaheadamerica.org.

What do you use the money for? Well, we would be raising – we have staff that we would send out into the state of Virginia this year because there's an election to literally go door-to-door registering Americans where we know they live and they're not registered, to literally stand outside of Costco for 18 hours a day and outside of Walmart registering people and going to high school football games, going to evangelical Hispanic churches. And remember, when we register somebody, that's not the end of our relationship with them. That's the beginning. So we're going to continue communicating them, letting them know how important it is that they vote, what issues matter, where politicians stand on these issues like mandatory minimums, for example. And then when the election comes, turning them out to vote,

making sure they're educated on where the candidates stand on those issues. Now, we don't tell them who to vote for, and we're not partisan, but that's literally what the money goes to, is having people go out and train volunteers, and going to these state capitals, like we could go to the state capital of Illinois and organize people to go talk to their representatives. Because these representatives, believe it or not, they're not geniuses, right? And many of them have like 20 issues in front of them, and the reason those issues are what's in front of them is because that's what got pushed in front of them.

So if their constituents start pushing these mandatory minimums, say, hey, we've got to get rid of these. Suddenly they'll do they'll do something about it, but they don't do it unless you get it, you know, not physically or violently. But you've got to get in their faces and make sure this is an issue that will determine whether or not they get reelected. And then they start to listen and figuratively get in their face, like literally approach them and say, hey, I want this changed. Politely, always polite, but passionate, well-informed, and always, you know, ready to engage them on, this is how the democracy works, because if we're not going to do it this way, then, I mean, just imagine what you saw on January 6th, times a thousand plus automatic weapons, because it's either this way or some other alternative.

This is all we've got. The famous quote is, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable. I've heard that. Yeah. Was that JFK who said that? Who said that? It's a genius quote. I'm going to look it up.

It sounds more like one of those Che Guevara type quotes. Maybe. But you don't have to take it to, it's the literal idea of like overthrowing your government. It's just generally, if we can't change the government and solve these problems, then people eventually explode. Right.

But I don't think you get to go explode. If you haven't tried talking to yours, if you don't know the name of your state legislators and you're complaining about things, then I, you're get out of here it was Kennedy come on man Kennedy those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable remarks on the first anniversary of the

Alliance for Progress 13th of March 1962 well there it is how about we jump over to them super chats if you haven't already smash the like button hit the notification bell subscribe and share the show if you really do like it because that's the best way to help. But also go to TimCast.com. Become a member because our first super chat says,

When are you guys going to talk about Twitter refusing to take down bad videos of children? Yes. We're going to do a bonus segment because we're going to get into, like, this is a serious story. There's a lawsuit going on between Twitter and some very, very serious issues. so this is going to appear on uh timcast.com the one benefit so look i don't like putting things behind paywalls when it's very very important news there's also uh concerns of youtube silencing and shutting down and protecting their allies in silicon valley so one of the reasons we set up timcast.com was to protect ourselves from the threats of censorship.

And we are going to go and rail and go through this story and stuff. So stick around. Become a member of TimCast.com. And we're going to really rail against these big tech companies. Geary Vision says, you're right, Tim. The first M16s issued in NOM were automatic, but were quickly retrofitted to semi-auto because soldiers would disregard training by using spray and pray instead of

aiming and firing, which is more effective. That's why it's the M16A2 that they have. The A1 was fully automatic. The A2 went to burst. It wasn't selective? Like, they got rid of the full auto because... Yeah, the A1 had full auto, then they got rid of it, so it was

basically single, burst, and safety. And those of us that have civilian versions have safety and single. Yep, yep. Interesting. Gareth Green says, Thanks for letting us know. Alexander Ferris says, I totally agree with you guys. Indeed, I hate censorship. Free speech is good. Screw censorship. I hate it. Political correctness is so stupid. Yes. Sean Anderson says, but didn't Joe Biden say Antifa is an idea, not an organization during the presidential debates? How can this poor man

fight phantoms? That is a good question. All right, let's see. Eric says, have you seen the video of Biden saying salute the Marines while walking past Marines without saluting them? Yeah, maybe he was just telling his wife to do it. I saw that video and people are claiming that he was instructed to do it, like someone in his earpiece told him and then he just repeated them instead of doing it. Or his wife was in front of him and he said, salute the Marines. I hope that we don't. Why would his wife salute the Marines go in there? And people say that they did see an earpiece in there.

But it's just kind of weird. Why would he tell his wife and him Marines going in there? And people say that they did see an earpiece in there, but it's just kind of weird. Why would he tell his wife and him not do it, though? Yeah, why would they tell him to do it? He's in the military. She's not. He's the commander. She's not in the military. So they were telling him to salute them, and he just repeated it?

Is that the theory? Well, that's the theory. But who knows? I hope that we don't go down a path of hating on Biden. I kind of want to avoid make pointing blame game anymore because that happened for four years and it was really annoying i hear you i hear you biden is literally the devil he's the most evil man ever on the planet he's uh i'm kidding kidding no i think biden is i think he's crooked i don't like the guy but uh uh you know well if he does good things

i'll say he did good things you know if he comes out and he... I know I can't personally... Well, he's already bolstering our troops in the Middle East, right? Well, he's considering reversing Trump's orders, sending troops home. So, I mean, when you look at his foreign policy, it's very hawkish. Donald Hutchins says, Tim, first Super Chat, joining the website today. Thank you for speaking truth here. Here is to your building a truth empire. Well, to the best of our abilities.

Not everything I say is correct and not everything we say is correct. We just will try to be honest to the best of our abilities. And for those of you that have joined, if you're having an issue, you can email members at timcast.com and we'll get you sorted. It's a new site, so there's some bugs. We're getting them fixed. There's a third-party plug-in or something because certain email providers aren't working properly. But we'll get it fixed. We'll get it fixed.

Just, you know, members at TimCast.com. Nuclear Winter Gamer says, I bought a 3D printer this new year and will try and make things for myself and not give money to CCP. There's no reason why we can't make things. Seriously. Could you imagine if you just bought a 3D printer and started manufacturing basic goods? Like you bought a bunch of ABS and like, what do people need? What can you make out of plastic and get printed and then sell it on the shelf? Custom built parts that you can't easily get unless they're shipped from China.

You could just now 3D print them if you have the right skills to do so. And if you have a 3D printer, you can tell your friends, you know, just a little bit of profit on top and I'll print it up for you. They'll be ready in a couple hours. It's a lot of work. I mean, we have a 3D printer here. I'm still trying to get the basic kind of understanding of it. But it's fun. It's really cool stuff. Patrick Mulligan says the Jacobin Biden Jesus cover was an obvious joke. You know, we realized that at the end, like maybe it was supposed to be tongue in cheek. I guess the issue is there were too many posts from actual leftists. I referenced it where they talked about the sun breaking, like the clouds breaking, the sunlight beaming down on Biden. And so I was like, why would I assume that was a joke when they've been tweeting all of this

stuff nonstop? To be fair, Jacobin is leftist, not establishment necessarily. And so they've been critical of Democrats. So we probably should have caught that one. And that's on us. By all means, feel free to rag on us. I'm sure the leftists are. Scott Hale says, Tim, big question. Why won't a social media platform pay a percentage of data into info revenue and add revenue to all its participants? I feel like this helps both parties lift up the bottom of society.

5% would be it would be big for most. Maybe. But Twitter's got, what, 300 million users. lift up the bottom of society five percent would be it would be big for most maybe but twitter's got what 300 million users their profits aren't nearly that high you'd get a penny i i've heard people say the whole like buy your day own your data stuff and i'm like they make point zero like they make they make point one of a cent you know mines is doing it if you sign up for mines plus so it's like i don't know it's 10 bucks a month or something then you get a they split 25 of the revenue with the user base the minds plus user base interesting but the revenue isn't just from minds pro it's like there's other sources of revenue and then i mean it feels like you should it's some way for you to make money off the fact

that you're allowing yourself to see advertising i mean it feels like i should be paid to look at advertising like in a monetary form through the social networks. If you have 100 people paying $10, all right? Yeah, it's more than that. It's based on the activity that you drive through Minds+. If you have 100 people who are in the pro program paying $10, that means Minds makes $1,000 and then pays out $250 back to the users. It's kind of pointless.

I think that's the... But if you're the one that does a lot of activity you might put ten dollars in but get forty dollars back so it's not about percentage it's about activity based yeah they pay back of the of their revenue they pay back 25 of it divided equally amongst the people like substack is that what it does well I mean, you draw people eyeballs to content, either on a social network or on a website. And they're kind of just the managers of the ads placements and revenue collection. I think Brave also shares ads that you see on their platform. All right, let's see.

Texas Horse Rescue says, count me and Matt. Texas spends a fortune on state contracts with these tech giants. Hit them in the wallet. Stop hate. Create good ideas. Change the world. Texas is at the top. I was just there in Austin, and that's at the top of our list for this initiative.

And I look forward to seeing you at our online training session a week from now. Heck yeah. Jason M. says, give us a website, please. I want to work with your guest. Tell us how. Lookaheadamerica.org. Right on. says give us a website please i want to work with your guest tell us how lookaheadamerica.org right on garhant says put out a digital magazine for dnd adventure adventurers and content as part of timcast.com donation imagine having orcs being savage and drow actually being blue

which of the coast has removed uh is removed that find writers and you want to make dnd books create like a mythology of our own call it something different but use elves and dwarves and dark dwarves and drow and hold on hold on we were talking about doing a culture war dnd kind of thing that was like way over the top like a yeah yeah you know i mean the rule sets open source so do they just want like a magazine like a story art or a digital magazine for dnd adventurers so badass i wasn't cool enough to play dungeons and dragons as a kid you're always cool enough yes let's see uh it's just me says matt i tried to donate to lookaheadamerica.com and it wouldn't

allow me to donate is it lookamerica.org look look ahead america look at america i think this is amazing and i've been encouraging friends to get involved. Hope to be on the Wednesday training. Sounds good. Cool. Let's see where we're at now. Uncultured Barbarian says, Check out Operation Trust sometime because it's basically Q, but in the 1920s Soviet Union.

They used well-known generals to convince the monarchist that they had a secret plan in the works to bring back the Tsar and the Bolsheviks. Sound, well, interesting. I mean, that's one way to do it, right? Let's see. Nodai says, I'm a 20-year-old from enemy lines here on Long Island, and I can say that

we Gen Z is a bit more right-wing that some give credit for. It seems to me that patriotism is a form of counterculture it is it's true yeah mr hunt first name mike says a nation in distress we are turning our flags upside down many people are i've seen that yeah alexander farah says bloodborne is violent but i don't think it makes people violent violent video games is a good it is a't think it makes people violent. Violent video games is a good think. It's free expression.

I love this debate. I would love to go way, way deep on this because I think it's so pervasive in society. Video games undoubtedly are pervasive in society. I love it. Brady says, So when does The Division go from game to documentary? A lot of people pointed out that DC looks like the division, too. Have you guys ever played the division, too? No, but I remember hearing that it had references to Dark Winter.

Yeah. The official war game that happened that, you know, Joe Biden said is going to happen. Amazing choice of words, Joe. So Operation Dark Winter was a war game about a pandemic. The division division the first game that came out you're in new york it's quarantined the virus has been released and directive 51 has been enacted because the country is in danger and directive 51 gives the ability to create a new continuity of government essentially override the existing government and then you are

the division agents going in to stop these rogue groups so then the division two takes place in dc and there's barricades and fences everywhere and rogue groups around dc it's a really good game i i played both pretty extensively yeah good fun the the the new york design was amazing they i remember like living in new york and playing it and explaining to people that i knew where everything was because I lived here and I knew where it was. It's like, oh, we got to go to Radio City Musical. I know where that is. Just follow me.

Like everyone else is like, well, look on the map. You don't need to. I live here. It's just down the corner. And we turn around. It wasn't it wasn't to scale or anything like that. Fran Fam says, Ian, there are Native Americans in Red Dead Redemption 2. In fact, the later half of the game is centered on them.

Red Dead Redemption 2 mostly doesn't have the natives violently attack you and vice versa because that's, well, you know, not PC. I know. For better or worse. Let's see where we're at. Sinjito says, impulse to cause harm. Ian needs some therapy or something, man. That might be true.

You see, that's entirely the point. You belong here, Josh. Especially when it's about video games. I feel bad about trying to broker peace, because maybe I just sort of thrown some kindling on the fire. You did both. Oh, yeah? You're both idiots. What do you think about movies?

Welcome to my world. You should have joined my side and you should have joined Ian's side. Oh, yeah. Totally down. But not like argue with us, goading us on. Yeah.

Luke's just like, you're so right, Tim. Don't take this from them. I'm going to do that next time. What did someone say? HTTR says, Ian, please don't carjack anyone. I won't. I promise.

George Burichich says, in 2077, what makes someone a criminal? Gaming. That's the joke from the commercial. Isn't it illegal to game in China? They banned online gaming? Well, some people are so compulsively obsessed with it that they started to ban people from gaming too much because it creates too much social harm.

But there was something about they didn't want them interacting with the outside world, so they ceased their ability to play multiplayer games with Americans. I don't remember that Delamar says Ian is stepping on it youth crime stats have gone down all crime as the rise of video game play over 20 years stop

equating internet trolls and sick jokes with FPS Spork which says books were blamed for deviance then comics then rock music now video games it's the same progression of scapegoats as always no evidence that it's causative some correlation with violent people being drawn to them that's a good point oh yeah maybe maybe you're just a violent person ian oh you know me so well but no one really wants to talk about the root cause of

violence that's the thing it's always scapegoated so you guys made a very very good what do you think it is well it's demons obviously they enter your soul at night it's probably and then you wake up like social economic conditions fatherless homes there's things to really argue here there's things that we should really have a conversation about but that's never going to happen because it's all something else i feel like trump was a good example of people that didn't have like strong relations with their father would would look for like a strong male figure and he just offered something so the first time that they'd seen that and that's why he has a lot of like young men i think had a lot of like young men this is jordan peterson was giving purpose and responsibility to young men and that's why

they were they were drawn to him he said find the heaviest thing you can carry and carry it where so i think one of the big factors in today's day and age is the millennial generation and much of gen z you have the leftists who have found purpose in social justice and then you had a bunch of not super politically active people with no purpose and then they found someone like jordan peterson the left realizing that their opportunity to radicalize and indoctrinate was being stopped by someone like Peterson called him a Nazi and all right and all that stuff. When he was literally just like a self-help psychologist being like, you should work on yourself and be responsible. And they're like, no, don't teach them to be responsible and have purpose in their lives. We need to tell them the only path to purpose is through us so he was a threat he studied like the gulag archipelago

and the rise of totalitarianism he's like i've studied the nazis i know where they come from and they're like he's a nazi what is going on we have a we have a very important super check cassetto says everyone is always focused on the idea that video games make people violent but i'm over here in the corner trying to choose the dialogue option that doesn't upset the NPC. Yeah, I always play as a good guy. Yeah, it's a really good play. The first playthrough.

No, but yes, there's a funny meme where it was like, now that I've beaten the game as a good guy in my first playthrough, I'm going to play as evil. And then it shows like, I can't remember which game it was, but there was someone asked like, do you like my work of art? It's taken me a long time and i've worked very hard on it you can choose it's the worst thing i've ever seen or like it's terrible and then it showed the a picture of like a guy gaming crying like pressing the button like he couldn't he couldn't insult the npc it hurt his feelings that's funny let's see we'll move down a little bit Daniel Bundrick

says the children of the revolution always eat their parents oof we got a lot of super chats we got too many because we got heated you can tell

the chronological order because it's mirroring how our conversation we got then we got to video game discussion and uh it's funny when you

watch the live chat along with videos some people are like behind and they'll be funny when you watch the live chat along with videos. Some people are like behind. They'll be like, so you'll see the chat. They'll be like, ah, Ian's an idiot. And they'll be like, oh, I can't wait to see what Ian said. It makes him an idiot. Daniel Maxwell says, what Ian is saying was also said about Dungeons and Dragons before video games became common.

In both cases, the only people who actually do engage in violence as a result were those who did not have a firm grip on reality, firm grasp on reality. Yeah, remember the D&D scare? Yeah. It was like in the 80s. Yeah. They were claiming it was like demonic and Magic the Gathering had to change their art because religious groups were offended by it. Let's see what we got here. Akapot says, be fair to Ian, Tim.

Don't harm your team dynamic for arguing micro versus macro. Ian wasn't arguing on the macro level. Listen to his insights better, bro. We can all do this better. It's what we need most right now. That's very insightful. I like that. Jack Gilchrist says,

The military, according to ex-trainers, use realistic video training simulators in part to desensitize soldiers to killing. Immersion in realistic killing may not cause violence, but it makes it easier. Interesting. Lizard says, Hi Tim, I'm a 19-year-old libertarian girl very grateful for your show.

My co-workers talk about causing harm to Trump supporters at rallies like it's nothing. Crazy times. I'd love to see you have kyle kolinsky and or jordan peterson on i would love to have either of those individuals on the challenge with someone like kyle's we can't tell someone hey don't do your show come to our show they're gonna be like but i have to do my show and it's like yeah i get it i was thinking we should get jordan and his wife when we get them that'd be cool mckayla might come too yeah yeah

well maybe we could do a weekend special with kyle does he do shows on the weekend i don't know i wouldn't mind working extra on a saturday or sunday i'm done i would like to take kyle to a range yeah let's do that i'll be fine he's a cool dude he really is uh kyle and crystal ball are really awesome uh they they there's there's there are a lot of people on the left and a lot of people on the right who are both grifters um i like to give credit where credit is due and i think crystal Crystal Ball and Kyle are red. Crystal was great until she banned me from her show. She banned you? In the middle of the show.

In the middle of the show, she texted her producer, and he came over and said, you're out of here. What happened? Well, I made a joke, and I didn't mean it as an insult. I didn't mean it as an insult per se, because in many circles, this is a compliment, and was the reason that the type of person people said we should nominate for president of the Republican Party.

I made a joke about Beto O'Rourke being a beta male. I just made, you know, Beto the beta. That's what I said. And so she kicked you off? In the middle of the show, kicked me off. And I was invited many times. Crystal Ball. Crystal and Cigar or what?

Yeah. Really? Yeah, I was on their show a few times their producer loved me it's easy trip i went in and then they all came on me like after i made that comment i i was like well i tell you why it's because he ran away from the police and didn't accept responsibility for it cursing everywhere like immature child and running around on a skateboard because i think beta male is basically an immature guy right that's my take on it although beta male was supposed to be like the savior right unless he was good at skateboarding i'm sure he around on a skateboard because I think Beta Male is basically an immature guy, right? That's my take on it. Although Beta Male was

supposed to be like the savior, right? Unless he was good at skateboarding. I'm sure he was great at it because plenty of times... Because I can do a switch blunt. I've seen your, whatever it is you guys ride on, the ramp. I've seen the ramp. No, but I said that and then the other guest jumped on me for promoting toxic masculinity and she got...

It's basically like I used an ethnic slur was her reaction and we went to commercial break texted a producer very upset producer came over said hey you're out of here and they never brought me back so i've been banned for the show for that i wouldn't just let you be like hey don't do that again well no i'm like i would tell you this is why i use those words and uh you disagree okay that's cool but nope was like... That's a bummer. Yeah. Yeah, I like the alpha, beta, gamma talk with like... Gamma? Well, I think of myself as an omega.

I was like, what is an omega? Because I'm the omega man. You're not an omega. Omegas are like... Omega. They don't really... They've kind of given up on being the alpha. Omegas are black...

No, omegas are black-pilled individuals who are short and have physical defects. I was getting all sorts of different descriptions of what the omega was. Omegas are black-pilled individuals who are short and have physical defects. I was getting all sorts of different descriptions of what the omega was. An alpha male is a confident leader. Betas are those that surround the alpha. So people think beta means weak. It doesn't. The beta is lieutenant.

It's like a subservient personality. And inoffensive and nonthreatening, which is why for a while— No, no, no. That's not true. At least in political speak, that's what the world of beta male consultants was met it's like the opposite of a trump an alpha male would be trump and then dad scavina would be a beta that's not an insult it means that he's the he's the second in command or he's one of trump's lieutenants that definitions i get i get it then you have omega males omega males are the hunchbacked like you know don't look at me i don't hear and they can't

socially interact starting to identify with that okay go on yeah so people think beta means weak and you know ineffectual or whatever the the beta is the guy who's standing behind there's like a tall guy in a bar going like you're so dumb i'm tough and then his friend goes yeah you tell him boss then high five the omegas the outcasts right me, I think. The betas are high-fiving the alphas, the alpha goads. I've been so jaded by the situation that I'm just here to play. But beta, you're right. In colloquial speak, it's come to represent weak. Well, not necessarily weak, but just non-threatening.

And for a while, I was sitting at a political conference, and this consultant to Mike Pence sat next to me and was talking about the fact that you know in 2016 we really need to nominate a beta male because that's who the women really want and that's sort of the context i used it with on crystal balls well to go back to that because and apparently that that caused a big controversy and it's like the top six of my google search results are you know the. And I got death threats from that. And I'm not saying that I complain about it.

Anybody – I always sort of wince when I see somebody in the public complaining about death threats. First of all, if somebody is going to kill you, they're not going to threaten you first. Secondly, everybody who sticks their neck out even a little bit gets all kinds of crazy stuff. But it just solicits so much of a reaction that it got you know i was searching like all this stuff a couple nights ago and um was noticing all how it was like giving me the descriptions of the identity politics definitions of it all like beta beta on beta is like two guy or a woman and two women in a beta woman and it was giving me all the like the transsexual people type descriptions about it all i had no idea that it was involved in the you know lgbtq community such yeah i mean neither in fact you know the funniest thing about them kicking me

off for calling him a beta male and you know making fun of his name the alliteration is that all of their supporters got on twitter and said no you're the beta male it's like oh okay all right i guess it's whatever yeah yeah sure whatever that's a bummer though uh you know i guess nobody's perfect but uh i've i've been on with crystal and cigar sounds like we gotta have you and crystal i was there before cigar it was buck who is a great guy oh that's right that was a while ago buck sexton yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah well it would be fun to have uh it would be fun to have you know these lefty personalities come and learn about firearms. Just don't call anyone a beta male, okay?

I mean, you know what's a real bummer is that we're always more than willing to have any lefty personality on the show. But I think too many people are just grifters. You know what I mean? That their whole game is just riling up the people behind them. They got their base behind them cheering and clapping, and they're going to say whatever they got to say to get that attention. So, you know, we've had on a few personalities that were like libertarian, left libertarian a little bit, and we've gotten thumbs down and people in the comments like yelling at us and stuff. And I'm like, I don't care, dude. Like, I'm not, we're

not making an echo chamber for you. We're trying to get multiple voices on the show. We'll argue. Ian and I just argued. We argue. You know what I mean? It's like, we're not going to just say what you want to hear. If you want that, there's a bunch of other places you can go get it. So, speaking of that, C's Ofe says, Tim, please put shoe on head. Put your shoe on your head.

Oh, put shoe on head. Oh, I thought he was saying have shoe on head on the show. Oh, I don't have any shoes up here. I'm actually barefoot right now. I got one. Me too. Well, you can get it. Oh, I thought he was saying have shoe on head on the show. Oh, I don't have any shoes up here. I'm actually barefoot right now. I got one. Me too. Well, you can get it. No, no.

He said you got to do it. I'm not putting your nasty shoe. You're walking around with dog poop everywhere with your little... I clean up the dog poop. Luke's dog's name is Fumble Bump, by the way. No. Atlas. No, because what happened was we were in the basement, and Luke had treats and was trying

to call her over, but you were calling her Freedom. Yeah. And then I just made up a gibberish word while shaking Swedish gummies and yelled, Fumble Bump. And then she looked left and right and I kept yelling, and Luke's like, Freedom.

And then she ran to me, so I'm like, done. Nobody named her Atlas. He keeps calling her Fumble Bump all the time. Fumble Bump. Whatever. Keep calling her that. I'm like, you're going to make her crazy.

No. It's just going to be a command that only I can use with your dog. And then when I'm breaking into your trailer at night just growling, I'll go, you're going to make her like crazy. No, it's just going to be a command that only I can use with your dog. And then when I'm like breaking into your trailer at night, she's growling. I'll go, and then she'll go happy. And like, oh, I know what that means. That means my friend. Why are you breaking into my trailer?

He did this once, by the way, with Alex Jones. Yes. Yeah. Luke was sleeping and Alex pulled up and I was like, I had the camera and I was like, that's good. Yeah. Me and Alex have a turbulent history. So it was weird. I know. That's why a turbulent history. So it was weird taking a nap.

I know, that's why it was great. I either meditated or took a nap before the show. I was taking a nap, and I wake up with Alex Jones professing his love for me, telling me that we were in a relationship before. I'm like, dude, we were about to fight last time. We talked about 10 years ago. I'm going to put that footage up. And now you're here in my room.

What is, like, it was just weird. I'm going to put that footage up. I have the footage. I just got to get it from my GoPro and then we'll and then you'll exploit me to the fullest degree. Of course. But at least I get to sell my t-shirts at thebestpoliticalshirts.com EW says Tim

new Timcast premium member here Evan W when you have a chance contact me I'd like to intro you to a data center to put your vids on for better throughput got good ideas for you we're actually upgrading everything so we we might be solving a lot of these problems but feel free to to email

members at Timcast.com Ben set up the system where I've got dual wires coming into my room one can be a server yeah a whole server network we can't handle a server, though. I don't know. It would be great if we had our own servers, but you need a ridiculous amount of bandwidth for that that we do not have.

Yeah. A lot of people requesting stuff and all that whatnot. Iron Ghost 1982 says, what race class specs do you guys play in WoW? Well, I haven't played. I played Shadowlands a little bit when it came out, and I kind of just rolled my eyes like, eh. You know, there's only so much I can do with the story. But I worked really hard to

get a Void Elf, and now I have a Void Elf Rogue because it's been too long since I played. But the Void Elf has the teleport ability. I don't know the Void Elf. New Race? Yeah, it's from I think Legion. You gotta complete... I, it's from, I think, Legion.

You gotta complete... Maybe it's not. I think it's Legion. Maybe I'm wrong. You have to complete a whole bunch of quests. It's been a while since I played. This was like a year ago. And then once you finally complete everything, you unlock this special race with an ability

where they throw a rift. And then you can blink, like teleport to the rift. So I love doing PvP with my rogue. And then I'll slice and dice somebody up. And then once I kill one of their dudes and they're about to kill me i just throw the rift and then go the other direction tim is pure rogue by the way we played last year he was human rogue in dnd no wow you were human rogue yeah yeah well i unlocked void elf rogue and then made a void of mine's a night elf druid that's my go-to which is so chris is just the

best you can walk around to be free but a rogue uh druid can turn into a cat and play like a rogue not a turn is not as good stealth is not as good no it's not and uh you can heal though that's true druids druids are pretty fun because they can do everything we got a big old super chat here uh sh says these people saying games desensitize you to violence against others are just wrong the amount of problems we soldiers face after killing sticks with us for a long time and causes many problems for from drinking to suicide nothing Yeah, man. Life is not... This stuff is... Yeah, it's bad.

The Double X54 says, Hey, Mac, I'm in the northern VA area. How do I volunteer for your organization when you guys are up here? Well, we're getting started there. We have a volunteer form on our site where you can tell us what you're capable of doing, what you have to offer. Look at america.org

slash volunteer. So sign up, please. All right, let's see. We'll just grab a couple more super chats. Gavin Roth says, I think y'all were talking about USS Cole bombing back in 2000 in Yemen. Suicide bombers disguised themselves as a small merchant ship and

detonated right next to the Cole. That bombing completely changed security posture for the Navy. Wow. Crazy. Alex Flores says, why no Ben Shapiro? Ben Shapiro, you've been on his Sunday special. In order to do that, this was before we had good internet, I had to

record. We had a low quality like audio call. And then I recorded with a camera hard to the camera, took the memory card out and had it driven up three hours away and then uploaded from a high speed source to a shared server. They could download the footage and then they synchronized it with the call and their footage on their end. It was not easy. And all these lefties were like, you did a Skype with Ben Shapiro. And I'm like, first of all, that was his show, not our show. We don't do phone calls or Skype calls for a variety of reasons. But we welcome people to come here. And I tell people, listen, did you realize that nobody has any screens? I've got one screen and then no one

else has like everyone's got their own phones and own laptops. We just we're not set up for it. And I'll tell you this. A lot of other big podcasts won't do it either there are some i'm not going to call out but they did it a few times and then like i've talked to a lot of these people and they're like wow that was a mistake it like doesn't work the engagement goes way down people aren't happy with it they complain about it there are people who just want to see you know internet blood sports we don't do that we like having conversations in person all right let's see someone mentioned that donald.win is gone but it's now i believe was it patriots dot win yeah patriots dot win it's the same thing they just changed the name i guess because donald trump's not president anymore yeah so that makes sense all right we'll do uh just one

more crazy eye says m4s are full auto now. Burst stamped out and has auto now. Was in National Guard. Got out in 2019. Interesting. Well, everybody, thank you all so much for hanging out. Make sure you smash the like button. Subscribe to the notification bell. Go to TimCast.com.

Become a member because we are going to have a bonus segment. But, Matt, do you want to mention your organization again and anything people need to know about how to help and get involved? Sure. I mean, we're looking for volunteers. We're also looking for donors. Everything helps that you can do. It doesn't matter what part of the country you're in. We'll find a way to put you to work as a grassroots lobbyist.

You're helping us register new voters. So it's lookaheadamerica.org. Right on. And Luke, I hear you have t-shirts. I think it's fair to say I have thebestpoliticalshirts.com because I own the domain thebestpoliticalshirts.com. See what I did there? That's very smart. You can also find me on Luke We Are Change on Twitter and Instagram.

So yeah, check me out there. Thanks. Oh, there's a store. We're looking at it. When you go to thebestpoliticalshirts, it jumps you to the We Are Change store. Yeah, check out the bikinis. Check out the socks. Defund the media.

I tweeted that. Did you steal that from me? I steal everything. I don't know what you're talking about. Everything I see, I just gobble it up. I'm like, that's a good shirt idea. He liberated it. I've been on this venture. YouTube literally turned me into a t-shirt vendor. I mean, getting out the messaging, I probably got more views on my shirts than my videos because of how many

different shirts I had to create to offset me losing my YouTube revenue. Because I used to survive off making money off the YouTube ads. What is this? Do people buy this Trump face sweater? Yes. I do. I wear it all the time. It's very obnoxious and it's peculiar.

I want to make a line of clothing with little pictures of animals on it. Yeah. I think people already do that. I know, and I'm going to do it too. And I'm not going to do the political – See the I Am A Gorilla shirt that we have? If you want to get your exclusive I Am A Gorilla t-shirt, go to TimCast.com, click shop. Boom, it's right there.

And good news, YouTube has finally integrated it into the system. So we are waiting for it to be reviewed it's funny it's literally just a gorilla says i'm a gorilla but youtube's like we got to make sure it's safe it's a big brain gorilla by the way he's a he's got a big frontal lobe it's a smart feller and so that's why we're going to do the uh the tinfoil hat one soon maybe maybe next week we got it ready to go and everything and that's going to be special edition which will only sell for probably one week from like a thursday to thursday thing so because you people are mentioning their paychecks or whatever on friday but uh yeah go to timcast.com become a member we have a bonus segment coming up but uh ian you want to mention yeah two things

one i don't think druids are better than rogues i think rogues are probably the best might even be the best class in the game but i like the versatility personally i like the versatility of the druid uh number two is i'm Ian Crossland. You can follow me online at Twitter, Mines, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram. And later on tonight, I'm going to be gaming with Adam Kregler on twitch.tv slash Ian Crossland. Come follow me there and

check it out. We're going to be playing Red Dead Redemption 2. Very excited to roll the posse. And thanks for having me, Tim. It'll be fun. Yeah, so I'm kind of like refereeing this wild ride over here I'm sorry guys it's crazy

but you know you love it I'm Sour Patch Lids on Twitter L-Y-D-S and I'm real Sour Patch Lids on Mines and Gab and

Instagram is that right? something like that you can find me on all those places you can follow me on Twitter Instagram Mines at TimCast check out my other YouTube channels YouTube. on Twitter, Instagram, Mines, at TimCast.

Check out my other YouTube channels, YouTube.com slash TimCast, YouTube.com slash TimCast News. We'll be back tomorrow at 8 p.m. live. But don't forget, we're actually going to have some bonus segments. I believe we might even have more than one. We'll see how things play out. But that's at TimCast.com. Check it out and become a member. And if you do run into any issues, go to email members at TimCast.com.

My apologies. We're getting everything sorted. But other than that, we will see you in the bonus segment or tomorrow at 8 p.m live thanks for hanging out bye guys