Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #218 - TIME Magazine Says Elite Cabal Conspired To "Fix" Election w/Jack Posobiec

Episode Date: February 6, 2021

Tim, Ian, Luke, and Lydia invite Jack Posobiec of One America News Network and Antifa The Movie fame to discuss Time magazine's shocking admission of interference in the US election in 2020, the MSNBC host who believes conservatives should (maybe!) be droned, the new pillow company in town, and Neuralink. Support the show (http://Timcast.com/donate) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The other day, Time magazine published an article discussing the secret campaign to save the 2020 election. Yes, that's right. Save. And I'm going to use only the words they used in the article. They say it was a shadow campaign that it literally they say it was a conspiracy. And the definition of conspiracy is people getting together in secret for an unlawful or harmful act straight up. They say that it was an elite cabal of industrialists and special interests and political elites and media elites who came together to affect every aspect of the election from changing the rules, changing the laws, controlling the flow of information. What would you call it if you were, say, going to compete in some kind of athletic event and then your opponent got all of the rules changed to help them? Would you consider that to have been a rigged event? Many people probably would, but they say they weren't rigging the event. They were fortifying it for the, quote,

proper outcome. No joke. This whole article basically is like they're they name names. They're proud of it. They're cheering for it. They say they saved the country. They saved democracy, subverting the will of the people through manipulation, changing the rules. And they did it for over a year. And they go through every detail about how they did it. Now, some of the stuff is innocuous. They're like we were fighting for voter rights. And it's like that I get changing laws, controlling the flow of information and lobbying big tech companies to suppress what they deem to be misinformation. Of course, most of you know that doesn't include Russiagate or things like that. So it's a crazy day. It's a crazy day. We got a ton of news. We

got that story. We've got Bank of America. People are now boycotting the calling for a major boycott because Bank of America is giving your private financial information to the feds without just straight up violating the Fourth Amendment. I mean, not really. That's the point. The private corporations are being the government is outsourcing constitutional violations to major corporations. There's a bunch of stuff going on that just has me feeling like, I don't know, things are getting just outright crazy and so uh we're going to talk about these pretty big subjects we have a great guest tonight to help us go through this we have jack posobic how's it going man hey hey what's going on just introduce yourself i'm sure people are familiar yeah sure jack posobic uh here from

one american news correspondent there at uh at washington dc currently in the occupied green zone of washington dc we're right there on Constitution Ave, which, of course, we'll be talking about January 6th a little bit. Most recently, got into it a little bit this week with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman, who, you know, I tweeted an article about and she decided to try to put a target on my back. Didn't go very well for her. Everything you tweeted a simple sentence. AOC was not at the capitol one sentence that she was like how dare you it's like you

didn't even you didn't that's true no but it's just a true statement it's it's not really you know anything so we'll talk about that too because now she's grandstanding and this is like it became a really big story because she keeps doubling down now she sent an email to her constituents saying go online and flag anyone who dare oppose me yeah after it became the number one trend nationwide twice with first alexandria ocasio-smollett and then second aoc lied neither of which i take credit for they organically kind of came up uh for people making the connection between jesse smollett and her response to all of this was not to take it in stride,

was not to, and this is why it actually matters. And this is why, you know, they say, you know, we need to dial up the noise, the signal, not the noise, right? So I'm going to give you signal, not noise here, is that she's trying to weaponize this situation. We saw what she, she was one of the leaders of Parler, the deplatforming of Parler, going to Amazon, putting pressure on them. Now leading to deplatform Twitter users, Facebook users, YouTube.

Correcting her. Whatever it is, just for correcting her, for criticizing her. One of those sort of fake news apparatchiks comes out there and says, oh, this dangerous person is spreading a different opinion on the internet. This is a federal U.S. official. Who lied. Who lied. Definitively. Definitively. I will say that as a statement of fact.

Full credit to you for actually blowing that wide apart because I tweeted the map. But then when you went to that timeline i think you you broke the case yeah she lied blow the entire thing out of the water we'll get into all that too yeah yeah for sure for sure but that was a huge major thing i'm in the new york post this week i'm all over this week on that i know right hey there you go it's it's crazy to me that i'm seeing and here we are ben shapiro and a bunch of other people there it's like the argument is still wrong they're like well maybe she didn't, but she wasn't in the building. And I'm like, no, no, no, the timeline.

It was a full hour before there was a Capitol breach. No one knew what was going to happen. She lied. But we'll get into it. We'll get into it. I don't want to get carried away. We got Luger Koskis, Sean. I'm very excited Jack is here.

He's a former Intel Navy officer who was at Gitmo. So I'm very excited, Jack, for you to tell us how the gulags are going to be for all of us. You know, we used to joke about that, but now it's like, oh, there we go. Yeah, yeah, here we are. Welcome back, beautiful and amazing human beings. My name is Luke Gerdowski of WeAreChange.org, and if you want to find me, you could find me tweeting up a

storm on LukeWeAreChange and memeing up a storm on Instagram, also under LukeWeAreChange. Thanks for having me. We got Ian, and he's wearing a We Are Change shirt. I just got my new shirt, everyone. Check it out. So cool. I like it.

You can get this shirt at thebestpoliticalshirts.com. There you go. You heard it here first. And along what you were saying with something about private companies handling some of this sensitive stuff, I just read an article yesterday that the government will have private organizations do a lot of the high tech stuff so that Freedom of Information Act requests can't get it

because they're with private organizations. It's clever. Glad you're here, Jack. Really good to be on the show with you, man. Can't even for you. There we go.

We got Sarpatch. She's pressing all the buttons. I'm pressing all the buttons. Right on. So before we get into this big breaking story, my friends, you must do one

very important thing. Go to TimCast.com and become a member. We have a really cool bonus segment from the other night where the Navy claims to have tech that can, quote, engineer the fabric of reality. They're all cool. Spaceflight warp drive. Wondering if it's legit because there are some questions. But we set this up because we're going to be talking about how an elite cabal, so saith Time Magazine, conspired, and that's according to Time Magazine,

to fortify the election by changing the rules, laws, and manipulating the flow of information and lobbying big tech to suppress information. That's all according to a mainstream publication. Now, that's the kind of conversation that results in us, you know, just being put at risk for nasty platforming. Cassandra Fairbanks, if you're not familiar with her, she is a journalist over at the Gateway Pundit. I always do this every time I bring them up.

I don't I'm not a fan of the Gateway Pundit, but I know and trust Cassandra. And she published footage of vans showing up to the TCF Center in Detroit that say Vote Mobile on them. That was it. And she got suspended on Twitter for it. There you go. I mean, you can't even have these conversations, but we can have them over at TimCast.com

to become a member because we will have more bonus segments, more exclusive members only content coming up. Let's jump to the news and don't forget to like, subscribe, hit the notification bell. And what's the other one I'm forgetting? Leave a comment.

Leave a comment. Comment and super chat and share with your friends. Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you to Time Magazine saying the quiet part loud. No, not actually. I take that back. We'll explain the secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election.

No joke. I'm tracking straight up. They say Trump was right. There was OK. I am reading. I'm going to read to you from Time magazine say Trump was right. There was OK. I am reading. I'm going to read to you from Time magazine. Trump was right. There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The Democrats, major corporations and CEOs, formed what I guess you could call a lucrative

merger between corporation and state for the purpose of winning political power. Is there a word for something like that? The word's fascist. Oh, fascist. Oh, is that the word? Yeah, let's just cut to the chase. Yeah. Okay, I was about to swear.

Don't do it the handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast cross-partisan campaign but the best part is just just jumping down because they really are quite wordy in this let me read this for you this is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election based on access to the group's inner workings, never before seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved across the political spectrum. I'm gonna stop right there and tell you that conspiracy implies a crime in law. It does. And the general definition is unlawful or harmful act a group acting in secret for an unlawful or harmful outcome.

They go on to say, it is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated. The proper outcome of the election. Interesting word. What does that mean? I love this article. I love everything about this article. The way it's written, huge.

Molly Ball, right? I want to buy her dinner. I love it. They say, quote, but it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing. That's why the participants want the secret history

of the 2020 election told. Even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream, a well-funded, okay, I'm going to stop right now. My friends, I am reading you verbatim from time.com, Time Magazine. These are not my words. A well-funded cabal of powerful people ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election. They were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures. I'll make it very clear for you.

You are not saving democracy when you conspire behind the scenes with powerful industrialists, CEOs and the elites to subvert the flow of information and prevent the improper outcome as you see it. The true outcome is to sit back, advocate for your candidate, advocate for your ideas, and then hope people vote for you. What they did very much sounds like it was criminal. And I'll tell you why. Many, I believe that the number right now is 24 states changed their election rules without going through state legislatures. Now, illegal is very different.

Statutory law is different from constitutional law. So I shouldn't say criminal. I'll just put it this way. It was a conspiracy to violate the Constitution to stop Donald Trump from winning. To steer media coverage, control the flow of information, change rules and laws prior to an election, just as our founding fathers. That's right. Created. I remember it was it was who was it uh who said give me liberty or give

me death patrick henry so he was this was in virginia and they were having you know this in house delegates yeah yes yes yes and they were trying to determine whether to join the revolution and he stood up and said give me liberty well asterisks we'll come back to that or give me death now what i meant by that was we want to make sure the rabble can't be in control of these elections you know so we as the powerful elites want to actually manipulate them into thinking they have the power and give me that and then maybe i'm willing to die for it that that's exactly how it went fortifying is also a very interesting word here and also the timing why now did time and i want to say this to admit that there was a secret cabal of powerful wealthy elites that were working with corporations steering media coverage

influent perceptions and changing the rules to get their way. Time said that. Not me. Don't get me in trouble. Why now did this happen? And when you look at those kind of other statements, you're seeing some rebuttals here. And the rebuttals here are that it was done in public. This was sort of transparent.

But even if it was, it still doesn't make it a good thing. And when we look at what actually happened this election, specifically with the Hunter Biden story, especially with some of the primaries in the Democratic presidential run up, you see a lot of foul playing. You see a lot of things that shouldn't have happened, but did. And they're wrong. The Hunter Biden cover up story. That's the biggest one. And to what you're saying, and we want to be clear about this because the article does this as well. And even with something we'll talk about later, the timeline matters, right? Going through the

timeline in this article is important because they don't lay this out in a chronological fashion. You get about three quarters of the way through this article. I've read it twice. It's about 6,500 words. And about three quarters of the way through, they admit that this was something they were working on in October and November of 2019. Because remember, we're all told we were all sold on this. Well, we had to do changes. We had to change the system because of COVID-19. Forget the fact that Dr. Fauci actually came out and Birx came out and said, Oh, you actually can safely vote in person. They said that as long as you're doing this social distancing six feet, you're wearing a mask perfectly fine. Same as

you're going to Walmart and it is obviously an essential, an essential act that you want to be performing. So Dr. Fauci came out and said that. But no, no, no, we were told that it can't be done. The workers have to be there all day. We can't allow this to happen. We've got to do the mail in voting. We've got to do universal voting. Send ballots everywhere. Ballots all over the place in many of these states. And they were planning to do this even before the word COVID crossed anyone's lips in the West. Even before China started arresting the physicians out in Wuhan, they were already planning to change the system to get what they said, the appropriate outcome.

Proper. The proper outcome. The mail-in voting change in Pennsylvania happened in October of 2018. Yeah. Well before COVID happened. And I remember, I didn't realize that. And so I saw this lawsuit pop up and then I started researching it and I was like, wait, wait, they passed mail-in voting in October?

I thought mail-in voting was being passed because of COVID. No. Wait, they passed mail-in voting in October. I thought mail-in voting was being passed because of COVID. No, it was part of a elite cabal plan, according to Time magazine. And they actually say this mail-in voting to get people to vote by mail for the first time. It was part of their plan. Now, I'll be honest. I mean, we knew this. I have how many videos where I said the Democrats are rigging the election? So many.

And what I said was they're not doing anything. They're changing the rules at the last minute in order to benefit themselves. We had Sean Parnell on the show and he said they're changing the rules because it's going to help them win. So it's funny. You could say they broke the rules, but they changed the rules beforehand. So no rules were actually broken, except maybe the Constitution, which is a big rule. But the problem with that with that is that the court cases all got thrown on either standing or latches. So I made a mistake on Twitter.

I said that the the vote by mail rule was unconstitutional at the state and federal level. And it was a lower court judge said that the the plaintiffs. So this is Sean Parnell. I think Mike Kelly would have won on the uh that mail-in voting is not allowed universally in pennsylvania because they have rules about how you know you can do absentee ballots it's our state constitution right right right but it got sent to the higher court the state supreme court who threw it out not on the merit but on latches right which means you filed

this lawsuit way too late it's over goodbye right so here's here's the catch 22 on all of that. And I say this as I'm a Pennsylvania kid, Philadelphia area that so the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court right now is currently controlled by a supermajority of Democrats. And what they did was they were saying, OK, doctrine of latches, that means too much time has gone by. We can't fix this. Therefore, there's no way to actually remunerate what's been done to you. And so we're going to have to let this slide. There's no way to redo the election. It's kind of what they're saying. But to Sean Parnell's point, and I've spoken with him on this as well, had he brought that case prior to the election, they would say, you do not have standing because you have yet to be injured. Exactly. So the catch 22 becomes, you can't have, because you have yet to be injured exactly so if the catch 22 becomes

you can't have you can't file suit prior you can't file suit after when are you supposed to do it in the middle of the day on election day it doesn't make any sense and they've written this in such a way where you this is and this is why people love lawyers so much that you know you've cut you've created a situation where there is no way to find relief from this they could here's what they need they need to do they needed to have sued immediately and then when they said you have no injury then they could have sued and said uh-uh look at that one and that would have at least been their leg to stand on we tried you said standing we now have injury we're back and then they would have to be like oh well they can't cite latches because i already tried soon now that we're injured however However, they might have said they probably would have said the same

thing. Oh, well, it's been a year now. So it's too long. The law has been put in place, blah, blah, blah. I want to read something to you guys from the article. This is the craziest, the craziest aspect of this, which I think is one of the most demoralizing sentences you'll probably hear. Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and help secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. You ready for the next one? They fended off voter suppression laws. I'm sorry. They fended off voter suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time.

I would like to see an investigation into what that sentence means. What do you mean they recruited poll workers? They were poll workers who were in this cabal, in this conspiracy, according to Time magazine. Let me slow it down for you guys. Time magazine said there was a conspiracy to produce the proper outcome. They recruited poll workers. It's in the article. I'm going to show you one more time it says they recruited armies of poll workers what were they doing what were those poll workers doing as part of this conspiracy where's what are the sources of this

article they have the names they have the people on record everyone's named on record there's from the afl-cio uh the not the, but the senior advisor to the president. There's people involved from numerous progressive left-of-center organizations, a ton of people from these protect democracy type groups like Norm Eisen, Ian Besson is someone who has also been named in there. A lot of the same people, by the way, who were pushing the Russiagate lawsuits, running a lot of the websites that had to do with Russiagate. I mean, all those ones that sort of started bubbling up in around late 2017, early 2018, suddenly shifted. Mueller came out, that didn't work, the report, they shifted suddenly. And then starting in 2019, they were all talking about this election, what they called protection, voter protection, right protection right and again to use that phrase

there's a lot of editorializing in this article as well and i hope people understand that while they're reading this that they call it an election suppression law well an election suppression law if you have a different perspective on it it might be something called an election integrity law yeah election right having somebody check your signature doing a signature match that's not suppression they call it suppression that's not that's making sure that that's the real person that's actually signing up checking id this is not suppression this is making sure you are the real person but they will call it suppression as a way of saying oh you're trying to disenfranchise people no we're trying to make sure that election look i'm a veteran a lot

of people are veterans we always talk about our democracy is the most important thing in this country. Well, shouldn't we take it seriously and not allow shadowy cabals to be able to come in and control the flow of information and law? So editorializing, right? They come out. They say voter suppression and disinformation. Disinformation literally just means information. From your perspective, you could say it's fake news. Someone else could say it's not.

It's literally suppressing just information, whether you like it or not. It could be disinformation. Sure. I'm not a fan. I actually rather hate it. You should point out that you are not disinformation. I am? Well, no, because Twitter has declared that you, your tweet was disinformation.

I tweeted. I put out a snarky tweet where I said, okay, so let me slow down. Cassandra Fairbanks put out a story about, they actually have the video footage. I've seen the footage. You can see it online. It's vans that say Vote Mobile on them pulling up to the TCF Center. Actually, let me slow down. I'm not going to assert I know what this is.

I'm not going to say it's one thing or another. I'm just going to tell you what the video shows. A black car pulls up at the TCF center and a man walks up and it looks as though something may be exchanged. Their hands come together. After this happens, a van pulls up that says Vote Mobile on it. It's a white van. And they begin unloading big boxes. And this happens apparently several times. Cassandra Fairbanks put this story out and I responded, I quote tweeted

it saying, I'm not sure this matters. They've Time Magazine already admitted they rigged the election. I'm sorry. They said they didn't rig the election. They quote fortified it by changing rules and laws and manipulating the flow of information. Now manipulated is my editorial ization, but it was almost verbatim changing rules and laws. Controlling the flow of information. Now, manipulated is my editorialization, but it was almost verbatim. Changing rules and laws, controlling the flow of information was what they said. Twitter restricted the tweet claiming that I put out disinformation that could lead to violence. Well, that's a false statement of fact. They say this claim is disputed. I guess technically that's true because, well, actually, no, it's not true. If Time Magazine is saying it, who's disputinging it is the left disputing time magazine's claim about the story they're not no conservative is the

conservatives are going i knew it so who's disputing it there's it's a false statement of fact no one is disputing it well so what did twitter do to your tweet you can't like you can't share you can't retweet you can't respond you can't do anything you can quote tweet it i've got some breaking news for you actually yeah i think you're gonna appreciate this so i actually know some people that got in that got accepted into the birdwatch program do you guys know about this birdwatch so birdwatch is this new community sourced um fact checking ability that it's an add-on to twitter now right now you can't see it publicly because they're still kind of in beta mode, but it goes into individual tweets

and then you can mark it, hey, this is unhelpful, this is helpful, this is misleading, this is not misleading. So my friend who's in Birdwatch sent me your tweet, Tim, and I can actually see from the link on the inside of it, every single person who's marked it so far has wrote not misleading not misleading not misleading not misleading not misleading yeah he literally has

it on his phone that's great that's amazing that's like that uh not misleading not misleading not misleading not so bird watch has your back can i can i can i can i quote some of these uh yeah you might want to take out the i'm not gonna say their names or anything yeah yeah so what what jack has just showed me i i i've i've never seen this before this is twitter's fact checking this is bird watch bird watch what it looks like on the inside and i'm going to read you my my tweet is locked right now i just checked you can't share it you can't comment you can't do anything you can quote tweet so i can quote tweet your tweet let me let me do this let me uh try and pull how do we do this let me do this. Let me try and pull.

How do we do this? Let me pull up my other phone. All right. This is fun. I'm going to I'm going to read you what I said and what they said. I said, I don't think this even matters at this point. Time magazine just came out and said that a cabal of elites rigged the election. I'm sorry.

They said they didn't rig the election. They, quote, fortified it by changing the rules and laws, as well as manipulating the flow of information. Below it, Twitter included this. This claim of election fraud is disputed, and this tweet can't be replied to, retweeted or liked due to a risk of violence. Jack is showing me birdwatch. I have it in my hand. Not misleading. According to the officiating officiating source of time, there was a well-organized group of secret participants in a shadow organization that sounds like a cabal that worked together to sway the election in favor of joe biden another post not misleading he's referring to this and a link to the story another post not misleading the tweet is a direct quote from time magazine not misleading a link to the

story another and one more not misleading while tim pool used the word rigged where time euphemistically is fortified the information conveyed in his tweet is factual with respect to Time's reporting. There you go. And they have still restricted my tweet. So I personally reached out to Jack Dorsey and said Twitter has published a false statement of fact on my tweet, and I would like Twitter to remove it and issue a statement correcting the record. And then I sent him a link to the Time Magazine story. Which, by the way, they're not only claiming that you're misleading. They're, think of this, they're claiming that your tweet is a potential incitement of violence.

Or creates the risk of violence. Or creates the risk of violence. They're also saying that I claimed there was fraud. I didn't. I didn't say fraud. You definitely didn't say fraud. And the tweet is about the cabal. And rigging doesn't mean illegal. And rig I claimed there was fraud. I didn't. I didn't say fraud. You definitely didn't say fraud. And the tweet is about the cabal.

And rigging doesn't mean illegal. And rigging doesn't mean fraud. In fact, you actually said that if you want to go to the next level on this, Cassandra's tweet was claiming fraud. But your tweet was saying. No, hers wasn't either. I thought it was the video. Cassandra tweeted. Here's the video we found of a, quote, vote mobile van arriving at 3.30 a.m. and 4.30 a.m. Driving directly into the TCF center and unloading dozens of boxes each trip. Cassandra tweeted, Okay. She said,

Unloading boxes. Unloading boxes. And then she added the context of the ballot deadline. Now you can argue it may— My point is, your tweet, though, you were basically saying it doesn't even matter. Right. So you're even downplaying her potential tweet. Right.

But but even still, they added a flag on Cassandra's tweet and they suspended her. But that tweet, which is the one that I believe that's the one that got her suspended. She didn't say they were unloading boxes of ballots. No. She said a vote mobile van showed up and was unloading boxes. She accurately described what was in the video. Exactly. Exactly.

Which we can all see. I watched the video myself and i thought this is interesting i'd like to i'd like an investigation to know what was going on here is this normal how does it work in that county is this right you know what what what is it right what is it i'd like to you know the problem is not a not a not one of these i'll do air quotes journalists at any of these major publications will go near it. They won't even watch the video. They won't do it. Right.

One of the big problems that that people have, even prior to the Time magazine confession letter came out, is that people have been asking, you know, honest people, I think, have been asking what level of transparency is there in our elections? How can we be sure, you know, we all went to bed seeing one thing, and then over the next few days, that result kept changing. So shouldn't we as a country want to be in a situation where 47, 48, whatever it is, percent of people at least agree with the outcome, the fact that it was gotten to fairly, that the process was fair, that there was transparency. But every time you ask the question, you get shot down, you get yelled down, you get

shouted, you get scolded, you get suspended on Twitter or flagged on Twitter. And then Time Magazine comes out and we get the shadowy cabal. We got Ocean's 11th. Donald Trump got Ocean's 11th, but we all got Ocean's oceans 11 a long time ago. All right. I say I say that's how I describe Donald Trump was in the election. As we can now see from the admission of Time magazine, they were working out rule changes for over a year to make sure that everything was slanted as heavy as possible away from Trump. And they even say in the article they were worried because Trump was still outperforming

the polls after everything they conspired to do. I'm going to stress this one more time because I all want you to hear it. The story says that there was a conspiracy of a cabal, well-funded and powerful, that recruited armies of poll workers. Just think about what that means. That's Time magazine saying that. OK. And I think this is this is key. I don't know if you mentioned this part yet, that it actually talks about how it's the U.S. Chamber of Commerce working with the AFL-CIO. So this is your, you know, the workers and the owners actually shaking hands for the first time, saying that usually, you know, the AFL-CIO is against the Chamber of Commerce. That's, you know, the unions donate to the Democrats, the Chamber of Commerce donates to Republicans,

and then they battle it out in Congress. That's kind of the standard way that politics has been done for the last 30, 40 years. This time around, it's like we are going to join together because we have to do everything to ensure the proper outcome. Are you saying the chamber of commerce was involved with the cabal i'm saying time magazine says that okay and uh chamber of commerce a federal uh organization i don't think so no no no they're no they're private or they're not private non-profit okay are there any federal organizations uh indicted by time magazine

i don't know okay i wouldn't say federal, but certainly state. Prominent Obama administration officials recruited Republicans into the program. So I think what it sounds like is that some people know that it was about to get blown. The lid was about to get blown off. So they're trying to get ahead of the story and they're trying to do it before sentiment fails for Biden. That's one theory. This is definitely a framing device, this story. Right, right, right. So I think that's one of the theories that people have been talking about but we were talking

before the show that it's what i described it as returning to the scene of the crime and i think you jack you were mentioning it's kind of like the letter from the zodiac yeah this is um what behavioral scientists would refer to as personation the idea that you leave a signature because you desire you have that sort of primal urge for credit that to know that you did something and you got away with it and everyone in the world can see it and yet you don't have any credit for it you can't see it right um you know to go off of the the scene of the crime you know, BTK used to always write letters to the newspaper or to investigators taking credit for his heinous crimes if they got it wrong and say, hey, this one was one of mine. Hey, this one was one of mine. That could be one thing.

It could be also what Ian said. They could be getting ahead of something that's going to be coming out, or they're just kind of fortifying what a lot of people kind of knew was happening already. They knew that the game was rigged. It serves many purposes. Yeah, and we were told that our system was imperfect. Our system was vulnerable. We were told that for four years. Individuals like John Oliver, the mainstream media,

they were saying there's problems with our elections. That was okay when they were saying it. HBO was going to run Kill Chain. They were going to run a documentary talking all about these machines and problems and they went out to um the hackathon and we're talking all about the issues because they were buying these machines on ebay and going into them which i never even knew about until after the fact and then they memory hold all of that but now if you bring up some of these problems you're going to get censored you're going to get memory it was the left that was already seeding that

narrative prior to the election and personally i think that was in case they needed it they could go and say oh look this is what trump did just like the diebold machines in ohio with george w bush my friends i don't think it matters at this point time magazine can come out and gloat all they want dc is occupied they're surrounded by barbed wire fences with 5 000 national razor wire razor not just barbed wire razor wire and it's going to be permanent right there so the dc homeland security advisor actually came out and testified yesterday in front of congress when they asked him about this and he said you know we don't need this to be permanent to secure D.C. We actually don't secure D.C. Hmm. Well, my friends, I think we got bigger things to worry about. Yeah. You want to know what those bigger things are?

Jack, what if I were to tell you that you as a you, I don't want to put words in your mouth. I understand it's probably obvious, but you're a big Trump supporter. I was a supporter. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. What if they drone strike you? You know, the thing for me is when I turn on MSNBC. It's where we're going, everybody. We got a story. We got a story. And I watch Nicole Wallace and you hear some of the words that are coming out of these

folks' mouths. And it's amazing to me because for all of 2020, this was the defund police movement and the cops in this country have it out for uh for the little guy and they're they're you know proto-fascists of a police state the harbingers of totalitarianism and we need to go and we need to get rid of them you even have people saying abolish the entire not just prisons, but the entire prison system. But then they'll turn around and say, except for any of you guys in a red hat, I want all of you down at Guantanamo Bay. I want waterboarding. I want drone strikes.

Everything that's been done to Al Qaeda should be done to you. And this is what brings us to the actual segment and why I asked you that question. From The Blaze, MSNBC host suggests killing American citizens with drone strikes. And another story, which you brought up, Jack, from the nation. I'm for abolition. And yet I want the Capitol rioters in prison. They're not for abolition. They are tribalists. They view you as an evil other who must be caged or exterminated. And I know that might sound extreme. but this woman on MSNBC literally said, when we deal with terrorists overseas, I mean, we drone strike these people

like American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki. And then they go on to talk about Americans. What do you think they're referring to? Let me show you the story from the blaze. They say, during a discussion regarding domestic terror, MSNBC anchor Nicole Wallace floated the idea of the U.S. government killing American citizens with drone strikes, something they have done before, several times, in fact, under Obama. Wallace brought up the National Terror Advisory System bulletin that was released to all law April 30th, warns the DHS allegedly received information that there is a threat of ideologically motivated violent extremists with objections to exercise objections to the exercise of governmental authority and the presidential transition, as well as other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives could continue to mobilize to incite or commit violence. Wallace notes, quote, there's a bulletin released to all law enforcement earlier this week that there is until the end of April a persistent threat of domestic domestic extremism. She goes on to mention that basically what they are, what they already said at the COVID restrictions are unnecessary. All of those ideologies pushed by Trump. The deadline White House host then said, but my question for you is about is around

incitement. We had a policy and it was very controversial. It was carried out under the Bush years and under the Obama years of attacking terror at its root of going after and killing. And in the case of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American Yemeni American with a drone strike for the crime of inciting violence, inciting terror, Wallace said. Mitch McConnell was in the Senate then. He was in the Senate after 9-11 too. How does Mitch McConnell, who understands the way you root out terror, is to take it on in the case of Islamic terror, kill those who incite it? How does he not vote to convict someone that he said on the House floor incited an insurrection? The Blaze then quotes a very poor and stupid journalist, Luke Rutkowski. What the heck? Hey, hey, hey.

The Blaze then shows Luke's tweet where he says, so they are pretty much saying they have to stop incitement of violence by inciting violence themselves. Yes. This is MSNBC's Nicole Wall. This as MSNBC's Nicole Wall suggests we use domestic drone strikes on Americans as a solution to lockdown protesters. It may sound extreme, but please listen to that quote.

She says, Mitch McConnell understands the way you root out terrorism is to take it on, saying in the previous sentence, killing in the case of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American, you many American with a drone strike. There we are. I like how no one on MSNBC even batted an eye as she compared anti-lockdown protesters to terrorists. I mean, are you freaking kidding me? And this is, again, Nicole Wallace, a former Bush spokesperson. And it's very interesting that she brought up Anwar al-Awlaki because that's one American citizen. Abdur Rahim al-Awlaki is yet another one.

He's a 16-year-old American citizen that was killed under, of course, Barack Obama's drone bombing. He was 16 years old and then donald trump who personally called for a raid under his raid killed his daughter who was eight years old so we have literally the entire assassination of this family and and a lot of people are i mean i remember when when this was being codified i remember when this was first introduced and I was screaming on the top of my lungs, hey, this is extremely dangerous. We cannot give the right to kill anyone that power. We can't give that to the presidency. He can't be judge, jury and executioner. This is dangerous and it's going to turn against the American people. And now today we have them on national television telling you that it's a good thing. Abdul Rahman Al-Awlaki was the American people.

He was a 16-year-old American. He was born in Denver, Colorado, and he lived in San Diego. He was a teenager. Apparently, he was looking for his grandfather and went to visit Yemen. And Obama, for some reason, ordered a drone strike on a civilian restaurant killing this 16-year-old. Why? They said it was an accident. We were targeting someone else. Did anyone then ask, why did you drone strike a civilian restaurant killing this 16-year-old. Why? Yep. They said it was an accident.

We were targeting someone else. Did anyone then ask, why did you drone strike a civilian restaurant, even if it was to get this target? In the mainstream media, no. But, of course, we at We Are Change, we did. We went after Robert Gibbs. We went after Obama's spokesperson, his right-hand man,

and we cornered him. And we asked him a number of times, why'd you do it? Why'd you do it? He finally snapped back. And you can see this in the we are change video when you type in the we are change robert gibbs he snapped back he said he should have had a better father that was the official justification when the when the obama administration was even denying it happened here's here's my favorite thing is that uh obama had the disposition matrix which was

informally known as the kill list and i think it was debbie wasserman schultz you asked i was like she's like she's like the top democrat for the dnc or whatever and she was like what are you talking about that doesn't exist no i asked her i was like how do you feel about the president potentially handing this power to kill anyone at any moment to potentially someone like mitt romney she was like you're crazy this doesn't exist what are you talking about peter king a republican called me an absolute lunatic and a moron for even believing that there was such a thing no one even wanted to talk about this thing and and then now it's here and now it's codified and now it's being promoted as some kind of great amazing glorious idea to deal with anti-lockdown protesters this

is this is crazy i mean i i that that's real like yeah i i i mean obviously i can't talk too much about my you know uh actual uh yeah you worked in intelligence yeah yeah you know service but yeah that's that's very very real the story the story from the new york times was that obama was given what looked like baseball cards of statistics and like age and a breakdown and threat level and then he would be like oh kill him and uh well, more like the NSC, not not not necessarily Obama himself. He would eventually have to sign off. But it would be the NSC going up. And in some cases, the National Security Security Council, which is attached to the White House.

They're in the EOB building. But it's it's a White House organ in a sense. And the NSC was greatly expanded under Barack Obama for purposes like this. And Barack Obama personally signed off on a lot of these drone strikes, personally executing them. And he even came out a couple weeks ago saying, I kind of regret being as aggressive as I was with foreign policy because I was trying to impress the Republicans so I could look tough in front of them. That sounds like a cop out, to say the least, especially when you have blood on your hands and you killed American citizens just because of your signature. Well, let's kill the American teenagers based on your signature. And again, Donald Trump started his presidency, not in a good way either, because he also personally signed off on a raid that

killed his eight-year-old daughter. That's right. That's right. Well, the eight-year-old sister of Abdur Manalaki and the daughter of Anwar. And not only were these, in some cases, U.S. citizens, but in other cases, you mentioned the restaurant, right? You know, the collateral damage in some of these things. There were funerals, weddings. I mean, these are clearly... One last thing. I need to add to this point because when we look at these policies, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, they're all failed. But specifically, when it comes to the drone bombing campaign, it came out through many reports that over 90% of the drone bombs

landed on unintended people, killed innocent people that were not the intended targets. So this is the program that they want to bring back, that they want to use in the United States with a 90% fail list? Are you kidding me i gotta add two two very important things here loop the first is you you were trying to call this out a decade ago i mean this is like almost this is nine years ago 2004 so where you you have people who uh in the government who are doing this and the fear was that as they started killing american

citizens it would eventually find its way to American soil. The government's been empowered to do it. And now here we are. I mean, ever since 2004, I was saying the war on terror is going to be going to be a war on the people. And that's exactly what we're seeing. These emergency laws being used now turn against the American people.

The only people who got this information out there, got my videos out there, were individuals like Glenn Greenwald, were the only few individuals that were willing to share these videos, these confrontations with Robert Gibbs, with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, with Peter King, and all these other individuals as the mainstream media stayed silent on this issue

and even denied the fact that it existed. And now the other point I wanted to make is that we recently heard from Ken Cuccinelli that Nancy Pelosi wanted crew-s served machine guns in D.C. What you need to understand about the psychotic request is that, listen, as most people who are listening probably know, and many who are not big gun people might not know all that well. It tends to be that those who are trying to pass gun control laws know nothing about guns. And it becomes particularly dangerous when they try wielding them. Because you end up with dumb people saying things like fully semi-automatic, which is meaningless.

Or Nancy Pelosi saying, can we get crew served machine guns in a civilian jurisdiction? You know what happens when you fire a machine gun okay let me ask you what kind of bullet machine gun does she wants well if they're crew served they're probably going to be what like nato rounds or what five five six she's certainly not saying 50 bmg full auto in dc is she i think she was yeah regardless kind of vague on that i don't think she knows what she's talking about let's say 76 7.62. At least 7.62s with the MT-40s, M60s. And will those go through a person? Well, typically they're designed, if you're talking about the.50 cal, that's designed as an anti-

It's to kill a building. That's anti-armor. Right? That's anti-armor. I'm just, just answer the question, Jack. Will a 7.62 go through a person? They'll go through many people. Yes.

And then what's behind those people more people and what's behind those people more people and their children and families and cars and buildings and dogs if if she actually got this this is what these people they don't care about well actually though at biden's inauguration that wouldn't necessarily have been true because i was there but you know who wasn't there anybody else right buildings are still you know the buildings there and you know of course all my co-workers thank god uh were you know everybody was safe but they locked that thing down so much that this was like a scene out of the hunger games where which i was saying even before lady gaga got up uh with the actual mockingjay on her on her uh her dress that there was it did look like the mocking it really

looked like the mockingjay and 100 look like the mockingjay this you know the capital has won the rebels have been defeated a nation mourns yeah and you would look out onto the national lawn and it was empty yeah there were nobody there there. There was one or two rows of like a few, you know, dignitaries and then media and then just grass. And then so they decided to put up these little miniature American flags and state flags and different things to make it look like there was something there. Because, you know, remember, of course, this was a huge controversy in the early days of the Trump administration about how many people did he have? Did he have more than Obama and Sean Spicer is going through the numbers and all. But with Biden, there was nobody there. Well, they wouldn't let anybody go.

Right. You couldn't get there. I had to. So my studio was right there on Constitution Ave. So I was there for Jan 6th. I was there for Jan 20th. And that week, the week of inauguration for me to get through, it was complete military lockdown, not just on the National Mall or around the Capitol building like it is now. Right now, that was blocks and blocks out. You had to go through military checkpoints.

I had to go through TSA level secret service screening, the idea where they're going through your bag, they're patting you down, they're wanting you I had at my my media pass my media credentials, and a list that I was on stating that I was an essential worker, this was the building. And by the way, if you were taking pictures out there, if you were up, you know, hey, let me just record some of this seeing as I am, you're in a media capacity that you were being hounded off the street, hey, I said you were going to that building. Get to that building. You know, I'm recording this for my job.

This is actually my work. You better get in there before or we're going to revoke your credentials. Like you didn't grant me my credentials, right? You know, but that's the level that it went to. Even if you were just doing your job out there, trying to show people what it was like on Inauguration Day. It's always just following orders from the lowest scale of just kind of jamming you up at a checkpoint to the atrocities. I hear stories about National Guardsmen in D.C. who are extremely demoralized by what's going on, but it's not like they're going to do anything.

Whether or not being forced to sleep in parking lots. But it's remarkable to me that they could literally have the as time magazine put cabal put them in a parking garage with one bathroom and one power outlet and no internet or anything like that and say sleep on the concrete and they're like yes sir it's where it's it's i gotta admit the first thing is it's actually admirable that admirable that the guardsmen are willing to endure this in the name of of doing by our country. But it's shocking to me that people would actually follow the orders. And I don't know how else to say it, but that's why, probably why I would never enlist. Well, it's actually, I will say this, that shows a failure of leadership on the officer corps, right? That when you're an officer, and I was an officer,

you are a leader of your soldiers, your troops, your sailors sailors whichever it may be uh guardians i think this is for space force guardians um so if i'm in a situation where i know my people are being asked to sleep in a parking garage you know i can understand going in there on a movement and they said hey let's be here for a little bit you're asking me to sleep in there no no no no that's if i'm gonna know two and i'm an O3, you know, you know, captain, et cetera, or lower, you're going out there and I'm on the phone with my major. I'm on the phone with my lieutenant colonel. I'm saying, hey, what's going on? This is unacceptable. This is completely inappropriate. Is this, is this mission essential? Is it mission essential for us to have to be in here or not? You got to take care of your people.

And it wasn't. Of course not. You've got to take care of your people. And it wasn't. Of course not. And 26,000 people listened and did what they were told. A lot of the back blue people are like, they're going to not listen to all these unconstitutional orders. And I'm like, you have no idea what you're talking about. And you have no sense of reality or understanding of history. 26,000 National Guard troops over what? A threat alert?

Where did the threat alert come from? Was there any legitimate threats? Every time we pushed down on it, they couldn't give us any information about an incredible imminent threat. But this is another big thing here. It's going to cost the taxpayers a half a billion dollars to pay for all that security. Close to $500 million of our tax

dollars is going for this security theater state. I know we have different understanding of this but but it is what what it is right now it's a big security state there's some troops standing behind for other reasons and other purposes we could talk about and speculate about that later but a half a billion dollars spent on that i want a refund i want my money back no two thousand dollar checks folks i got a question i got a question for you jack uh so the other day luke well actually luke's made references to the men who stare at goats

several times. Are you familiar with that story? I've seen it like a million years ago, but yeah. So it was actually a nonfiction book, I think, in 2004 about this like program they did. They tried doing psychological operations, the Jedi and stuff like that. It was called, I think it was called like the Stargate project. Now in the movie, when it opens, they talk about how this guy came to actually be running this psychic unit or whatever. And they said that when he was deployed to Vietnam, they land and then one of his – one of the soldiers gets shot.

And he sees this woman running through the field and he says, what are you doing? Shoot. And then all of the men start shooting and they all aimed high. And in the movie, they say they found out that fresh recruits don't want to shoot anybody and often either subconsciously or intentionally miss and so they're all shooting high and missing this woman and then she shoots the guy bill and he falls down and then he has a vision of like you know using gent uh the gentle nature of their men as their strength or something but what was interesting to me was this idea that fresh recruits don't want to shoot somebody.

I'm wondering if that's true. Well, that actually is true, and I'm surprised you don't know. Do you know how the DOD was able to overcome that? First-person shooters. Human targets. First-person shooters. Wow. Human targets and first-person shooters were some of the ways that they –

Psychological tricks that they used during training. This came out of Vietnam because – and this is back – I remember this was during the draft, so a lot of people that were forced to be there, they realized that you had to switch from the stationary ring targets that you would have on the shooting range to silhouettes to make it look like a person to condition you to be able to pull that trigger to not aim high. Some of the original first-person shooters actually came out of DOD programs. I heard that before. And this was also done to be able to start conditioning you that it's okay, this is normal, this is fine. Because up until that point in human history, it had never been done before, this idea that for kids, right, that we let kids play first-person shooters and that you're going to be conditioned already from playing these games that that's what you do.

And now when people go into the military, you're expecting it. There's an expectation that, oh, I'm going to deploy and I get to shoot people and I get to kick in doors and that's what joining the military means. And so that's why you're asking, are they going to follow the laws? to shoot people and i get to kick in doors and that's what joining the military means and so that's why you know you're asking are they going to follow the laws you like you understand right we've conditioned people to the understanding that joining the military means i get to do these things they broke them down and built them in a way where they will always follow those orders let me ask you if there was a group of Trump supporters waving flags and they were standing on an intersection and a guardsman or a group were ordered to fire on them immediately. Would they do it? If they were told that there was an imminent threat.

And to shoot those men now, stop them now. And to shoot. I think you would see people do it. I think so, too. I think if they were told it was an imminent threat if they were told that there was something about to happen that that group is concealing a i think you would have to explain that they wouldn't just do it indiscriminately i've had a bunch of friends who uh told me that they never thought it was possible like some conservative friends i've had a long

time you know from years ago back in chicago say things like, dude, after Kent State and things like that, you're never going to see this kind of martial law ridiculous thing. But then I actually went and stayed on a couple of military bases. I briefly lived on Fort Carson in Colorado Springs. And I also lived just outside of Fort Eustis and Newport News. And I actually asked some of the active duty personnel and they said they're like they're not machines. They're like, dude, machines they're like dude it's a simple simplistic question like if i was ordered to shoot an american would i do it it's like that's not how it goes down what goes down is someone says we've got intelligence of a potential

terroristic threat it is and then there's someone you know coming towards you and they say that's him that's him take him down now what are you gonna do be like no thanks dude no you're gonna be like i will follow the orders because a civilian in a car and killed him and then the mass media started saying it was a potential threat they were an imminent threat people would not freak out waco there would be like waco there would be like movements of protest but it would normalize it and what this time magazine thing is if people don't stand up to this it's going to normalize it for the next election and then it's setting a precedent well the psychological dehumanizing programs are already pretty much existent and when you look at some of the language when you look at how weaponized it is

when you look how sensational it is it's it's pushing people to that this is why you know i had a t-shirt with the mainstream media poking a stick to do a conflict. I can't say even the full phrase. Censored. Yeah, yeah. The shirt got censored. I brought it back up. The shirt's still up right now.

But this is happening, and I think this is akin to what we're seeing in time, akin to what we're seeing in MSNBC and what we're going to be seeing. And some people are pointing to the fact that these news organizations are losing ratings, they're losing viewership. That could be maybe an understanding partially of it, but I think there's something bigger, deeper. Especially with the longer, bigger connections that a lot of these media organizations have with intelligence organizations that work hand-in-hand together pushing out this propaganda on the front line. Sometimes even intelligence agencies writing entire articles and just having journalists put their name behind it. That happens in American media, in international media, and this is something we need to worry about because those talking points,

those words set an agenda, set a perception that puts out a scenario that is unfolding right in front of us, and it's a nasty scenario that we're seeing right now. And something that we were just saying before uh shows like 24 and sleeper cell and homeland that all came out in sort of that that three to four year period after 9-11 getting you to think that oh your your neighbor is a radical that is something that's actually this has all been sort of a red pill for me to go back and say wait a minute i. I used to watch that show. I used to love Jack Bauer, right? Saving the Country, CTU, right?

He's a good guy. But wait, was that conditioning to me? Of course. Did you ever watch Law & Order SVU? No. I'm a fan of the Law & Order series. And Law & Order SVU with Stabler and what's the other lady's name? I don't know.

Mariska Hargitay? But the character couldn't i yeah what i can't forget i used i used to actually enjoy watching uh all the law and order stuff criminal intent was really good because they had uh vincent d'onofrio on it so that was awesome yeah that was great the reason i didn't like the reason sva wasn't my favorite uh is because stabler would routinely violate people's constitutional rights, brutally beat them. And it was like a part of his character that he would get the wrong person. He would scream in their faces and then it would like sort of give him pause when he realized what he did.

And I'm like, why am I supposed to root for this cop who's like, I understand it's SVU. OK, that's like a kind of crimes in that show are gruesome and brutal but like you have a cop who's literally you know there there's like an episode where he beats up a guy that turns out the guy wasn't the the suspect but he was just so enraged by the crime i'm like we're supposed to root for these guys yeah well there's a reason the cia tweets out support of black panther and why the pentagon spends hundreds of millions of dollars, especially American taxpayer dollars in rewriting scripts for major movies and TV shows all throughout the United States. We have to understand there's a bigger agenda throughout this subliminal messaging that

a lot of times we don't pick up. We don't notice. We're not on alert to look out for the messaging behind entertainment because we put our guard down. We think we're just being entertained when in reality, people are being programmed to believe a certain thing that benefits, of course, the ruling class. Right. And you're starting now to see this in media where the last season of Punisher, right, it was all about domestic extremists. And the last season of Bosch on Amazon Prime was all about quote-unquote sovereign citizens though i

will give them credit because it actually ended up being that the fbi was smearing the sovereign citizens at the end spoiler for everybody there um but you know going back and thinking about 24 like they're probably going to get keever sutherland back and they'll do a reboot of it and it'll all be based on you know people with the gadsden flag and don't tread on me and oh he's got a better you know chloe's on the on the the laptop going he's got the flag up that says the second protects the first that's it all right we're calling the strike calling the strike it's him go go go you know you won't make have you guys seen the music video for um uh that taylor swift song what's it called?

You Need to Shut Up or something? You know what I'm talking about? Calm Down. You Need to Calm Down. I've watched all of Taylor Swift's music videos religiously. She has this song called You Need to Calm Down. And at first,

it sounds like she's singing about cancel culture, about how people on Twitter are just snapping at her. It's like, dude, you need to calm down. And I'm like, oh, okay, legit. Yeah, I remember that. When I first said Calm dude, you need to calm down. And I'm like, oh, okay, like legit. Yeah, I remember that when I first said calm down. We should all calm down. The whole second verse is a caricature of conservatives as if they're like

as if the millennial conservative is comparable to the 90s conservative. And so she's then singing about like LGBT rights and how it's like a bunch of people who are like hillbillies waving signs, you know, about, you know, not... Misspelled signs. Yeah, misspelled signs opposing LGBT rights. And it's like a bunch of people who are like hillbillies waving signs, you know, about, you know, not spelled. Yeah.

Misspelled signs opposing LGBT rights. And it's like that video was probably created by someone by some Gen Xer who's in their 50s. And that's their perception of the conservatives. And so then Taylor Swift makes this for 12 year olds or 14 year olds or whatever, who now will have that perception of conservatives without ever having ever having talked to one. And so this is part of the phenomenon where we can see the left doesn't know anything about the right. It was like that. Kevin Smith did that movie Red State, which is exactly like that. Yeah.

They were people who have their I think it was their car broke down and they were stuck in the backwoods. And it was all these sort of like her hillbilly type. But hold on. But look, one second, one second, one second. Did you see that movie what's it called where the woman the liberals kidnap the trump supporters the hunt the hunt yeah that movie is really good it's really really good i you know the act i started i actually started to watch it because i'll i'll watch locky movies you know b movies here and there

the script just killed it for me it was so over the top for those that aren't familiar this is a very controversial film where the trailer shows liberals kidnapping trump supporters and then hunting them for sport you didn't see the ending i didn't see the ending the ending like basically makes you hate everybody and it's pretty good don't ruin it i don't want to ruin it but i was laughing the whole time for me after i'm not gonna watch it yeah yeah no no no the the ending makes you like i saw like when they're on the private jet and they're going to the movie the movie's not part of it it's not in support of the left or the right it's making fun of the whole thing and i respect it for it but you were saying let's we'll get more serious where's this all leading to i mean this is leading to literally

bad movies npr also calling for terrorist counter counterinsurgency tactics to be used in the United States. And when you look at those larger calls, MSNBC, Time magazine, NPR, it's building up. It's crescendoing. On the way here, Rand Corporation, the Rand Corporation. This was the Iraq war organization. They created the war on terror. They're widely credited for creating it. Headline on their commentary today, domestic violent extremists will be harder to combat than homegrown jihadists. And also, these are failed individuals who absolutely did a horrible job

at what they were supposed to do. They were supposed to fight terrorism, but they built a whole bunch of terrorists all throughout the Middle East, especially helping resurrect this new creature called ISIS that was directly because of their government decisions. But also, when we look at that type of garbage, it's either just utter intelligence agency propaganda pushed on you or just utter demoralizing crap. Like today, Cardi B released a new music video, and it's called Up. And kids who are going to be looking for that Disney movie are going to be traumatized.

And it is, I mean, some of the lyrics we can't even say here. I would love to do a Ben Shapiro impression and just talk about some of the lyrics here. But it's number one. It's trending. You got a trending on YouTube right now. You get that, and you'll be shocked to see that's okay. That's promoted. That's given to everyone's number one. It's trending. You get a trending on YouTube right now. You get that, and you'll be shocked to see that's okay. That's promoted. That's given to everyone's news feed.

That came up on my news feed, and I don't care about Nicki Minaj. I don't watch Nicki Minaj. Cardi B. Sorry, Cardi B. But that's thrown out to me. Actually, I can even say that because I have a two-year-old, right? And sometimes when he'll go on YouTube, or my parents-in-law live with us and they'll put on YouTube, but sometimes it'll be logged in on my account. So maybe I'm watching TeamCast IRL or watching something in the news, but then they won't switch to kid mode.

So they'll put on a kid show, but the autoplay will load something. That's on you guys. No, I know. But again, they're just thinking, hey, let's put on something for the kid. the autoplay will load something like that's on you guys you know no i know but again right you know they're not they're just thinking hey let's put on something for the kid but then it'll it'll load something from the news or to load something from uh music now personally mostly i listen to like you know either cyber wave or like lo-fi when i'm when i'm actually writing but i think about that a lot more now is to what he's going to get to. He can already type, by the way.

He's two years old. He can type. He can't even write, but he can type. So he's going to be putting words together pretty soon here. So what happens when he gets a computer and he's going on YouTube or whatever it is, whatever platform, and that algorithm starts feeding stuff in? And now I'm starting to have those thoughts myself. This is tough um a lot of the big tech ceos bar their children from having cell phones because they know you can't just give a child access to the summation of human knowledge

and depravity at the same time are you going to homeschool we're we're currently thinking about what what we want to do i mean i'm catholic so there are you need to homeschool there's a lot of well there's a lot of options right there's cat there's catholic schools there's catholic co-ops like pods that they have a different power series um yeah there's different there's different uh i thought you said monastery monasteries yeah exactly yeah no but or or homeschool you know we're we're currently thinking about what we want to do what makes sense for us because when he goes to kindergarten some kid's gonna have an iphone with no no no like locks on it well it's just gonna happen unless the school bans at all but even then they probably got one well that that's that's the thing though is what kind of school you know what's their you know

what's their standard on that do they rule about that i think i was lucky because i went from kindergarten to the end of fifth grade at cath Catholic school, which was very uptight and strict. And then sixth, seventh and eighth was public grade school, which was a bunch of kids with no rules in gangs, getting drunk and smoking pot. And so that mixture of like realities, I think, was really good for me. You got to see both sides of the coin. Yeah. And I started with the more strict, you know, like the kids at this school would cry if they forgot their homework like it was really everyone wore ties you had to wear your tie if you never tie you got a misconduct slip

kids would cry yeah no i remember that yeah you go to public school and the kids would be like the teacher would be like can you turn your homework in i didn't do it well you're gonna get a zero and okay they'd walk away yeah i had a public yeah i had a huge huge uh big difference when i came from poland poland it was you know everything was it was very nice and people were always cordial to you people were always talking to you or respectful of you to a public new york city school where you would fight someone and the teachers would cheer on i'm not not even joking. I'm not even exaggerating. Like, there was just fights and teachers would just watch and place bets and, like, who's going to win. Michael Malice has a great line about that.

Not great, but it's the way he always says those quips where he says, you know, public schools might be the one place where you actually face violence. That's true, yeah. Yeah, they're little prisons. That's what he says. So I have a question for you guys. Should we be serious or snarky in the next segment? The next story we can jump to.

We have one that's like really serious. You can't say that without. Oh, you're picking. I say snark. We've got a story that's silly and nonsensical and funny. And then we've got one that's serious and alarming. No, I say go to serious and then get to silly. Well, we were pretty serious already.

So we have something to. We did. We could go to snarky and then go serious again. No, I say go to serious and then get to silly. We were pretty serious already. So we have something to... We did do... We could go to snarky and then go serious again. No, I want to go back. I like... Let me just ask you what you prefer to talk about. Bank of America is giving away people's private information to work with the feds. Scary stuff. Well, that kind of ties into what we're already saying. Right, right. So that's why I was like, we could

just carry on. That's a good segue. Easy segue there. We could talk about David Hogg starting a pillow company. Yeah, what's up with that? I heard some interesting developments around that. I have questions. I'm going to throw out that I said, what are they going to call it? Cry pillow? Yes.

All right, let's talk about Bank of America. I think we got the joke out of David Hogg starting a pillow company. I think that's all you're going to say. That's good, yeah. I will say something briefly on the pillow thing. They say, I guess, they want to put my pillow out of business. They're not going to. My pillow advertises on Fox News.

David Hogg is just not competing with my pillow. Doing things to get someone else is like vote for Biden so that you can screw Trump. Make a pillow company so you can put that one out of it. That's not how reality functions. He does understand, by the way, that there are other pillow companies already you can put that one out of it that's not how reality he doesn't understand by the way that there are other pillow companies already right every other pillow company is trying to put my pillow out of business that's how business works right there's a problem with like socialists don't understand how business works that yes there are lots of pillow companies that compete with mike lindell that's that's not how he were his you are not going to get

his audience because mike lindell's audience buys his pillows for number one by the way i actually have my pillow i like it it's really good yeah it's like this is what you know i wish i had more than one it's actually good i can't stand how the left lies about the pillow because they don't like him they're like it's awful oh like there was one article with like i bought the pillow and it was the worst thing ever and this one was like my boy this female writer is like my boyfriend said what is this trash and why did you buy it it's like i was at walmart and i saw the my pillow thing and i laughed and i was like yeah throw it in the throw it in the you know in the cart and then i got it back and i was like well first of all i would recommend you need more than

one pillow but obviously two pillows two regular pillows um it's okay but a regular pillow and a my pillow is actually really nice. That's actually what I do. That's actually what I do. Two pillows, one sack? What? Do you put both your pillows in one pillowcase? No.

Two pillows, one sack. That's where it's at. Oh, interesting. But the MyPillow, here we are doing a MyPillow promo. I use it for my knees. Look, I think- That's what all this is, by the way. Mike just wants us to sell his pillows for him.

You can criticize the guy. I don't care. I'm not going to stand for the guy guy but it's a pillow dude and it's annoying to me that the culture war extends to like oh i hate that movie because it was this or that because it had the wrong you know race of character in it or something like whatever who cares was the movie good or was the movie bad that's's why they went after... Oh, what was the film? Where it was actually the point of the film was the fact that it was reincarnation and... I thought you were going to bring up

Tropic Thunder and Robert Downey Jr. No, not Tropic Thunder. Because I love that movie. But it was reincarnation, but it was all the same actors. And so they wanted to... It was Tom Hanks and Halle Berry. Oh, oh, oh, Atlas... Cloud Atlas uh atlas uh cloud thank you i would say with

i saw that like nine times in the theaters i love that film i think that was that's one of the movies where number one it's better than the books i actually read the book as well but the whole point of it was that it was talking about how humans have shared experiences and how something that affects one person in one time can affect another person that you might never even meet in the future. That was the whole point that they had the same actors going through and playing, but then they trashed the movie.

It ended up not doing well because the Rotten Tomatoes score wasn't great because they were using the same actors and they would have, you know, a European actor played an Asian character. Oh, that's right. And they were going, and they were going the other way around where an asian actor was playing a european character but that wasn't the point my favorite thing was when i worked for

fusion which was the abc univision univision joint venture and ghost in the shell the movie was coming out right with uh scarlett johansson playing uh motoko uh kasanagi or is it kusanagi right and she's not japanese but you're you're familiar with Ghost in the Shell? Yeah, yeah, yeah. For those that aren't familiar, in the sci-fi world of Ghost in the Shell... But she's a robot. Exactly.

Your soul, your ghost, could be transferred to a prosthetic body. So one of the themes is transhumanism, that you're literally... This woman was born Asian, and then when she was hit by a car or something, they transferred her consciousness into a prosthetic body, which was now ethnically ambiguous or in the movie played by Scarlett Johansson. So at Fusion, they all started going like, oh, this is good. We can write about this.

This is going to be so – oh, man, how could they do that? And I was in there and I'm like, oh, actually, it's the theme of like the show that you can transcend bodies and be whoever you want. It's actually fairly pro, like, you know. It's kind of similar to Altered Carbon. It's, it's, it's, right. It's actually pro social justice. Anti-racial.

Yeah. And they were like, no, no, they're getting a white actress to play a Japanese woman. I'm like, she's a robot. She has a prosthetic body. Her ghost is in the show.

Jumanji. I mean, let's just. It's a new Jumanji. Take it to Jumanji. Hey, you brought up Tropic Thunder, I want to point out. Robert Downey Jr., not in blackface

in Tropic Thunder. He was the last guy to get away with it. Blackface is a specific art form. Never again. He was the last one. There's a specific art form

called blackface where you have a circular area of black on your face. It's not when you paint your entire skin and body. That's not blackface. Yeah, and they wore

white hand gloves. It's a specific art form called blackface. This other stuff is not blackface. But now it's become that. skin body that's not blackface yeah and they wore white hand gloves right it's a specific art form called blackface this other stuff is not but now it's become that well it's not like this is a big thing in the new um and i was saying earlier that i'm reading the ready player 2 in which is the sequel to ready player 1 where in the new version of the uh the the oasis which is this massive virtual reality network that everyone is using in the future they've now come up with a new update for it where instead of just logging in, no, you don't log in. It's basically Neuralink plus virtual reality. So that the new thing, it straight up chip in your brain and that every experience you have in virtual reality, it's fully sensuous. All of your senses are actuated in this but you can also record things in real life

and then this becomes a popular thing to do where you can go on to so sims are recordings of things in the simulation but wrecks are recordings of other people's experiences that you can experience you can experience and so if you want to get high on heroin that which is actually something that the main character he ends up doing, because it turns out his mother died of a heroin overdose. So he never did heroin, but he started to become interested. What what is it like when I'm on heroin? Why did my mother go and do this? Why did she choose this life over living with me? And it's this whole huge character thing. So he ends up going and doing it and having that experience, but without any of the physiological restrictions on it. So instead of doing snarky or crazy, I think we did a little bit of both. We actually let's do, let's do somewhat serious, but more interesting.

We have this from entrepreneur.com. Cool. Neural link could begin testing human brain implants. This year says Elon Musk implants grafted into the brain and spinal cord seek to be able to correct paralysis and cure Alzheimer's. Now, I'll just say this. Dude, the idea that we could Neuralink and repair the nerve damage from someone's spine

and give them the ability to walk? Coolest thing I've ever heard. But you want to know what is also very cool. Not as cool as helping those who are paralyzed, but up there, Elon Musk says Neuralink has wired up a monkey to play video games using its mind. Similar, yes.

Look at this. Did he say which game it was, though? That's what I want to know. I'm hoping it was Mario Brothers. Probably Minecraft. Mario Brothers or Mario Kart? Mario Brothers, like the original where you punch. Not Mario Kart.

They're not a... We don't have the technology for Mario Kart. Do we do? Mario Brothers, the original, original? It's Mario and Luigi. And you get to punch bricks. The one where you're fighting. The one where you punch bricks. Super Mario Bros.

The first one's called Mario Bros. That's where you're actually fighting Luigi. Yes. Yeah, you're versus each other and the things are coming out of the tubes on the sides. The monkey's playing a game where you get a dude to jump on turtles and crush them to death and punch bricks. That game is brutal. You can't punch bricks in Super Mario Brothers.

Yes, you can. You headbutt them. You jump and hit them. No, that's not true. The animation is Mario jumping and raising his fist and punching the brick. Upward thrust. An up punch. Yes.

When he jumps, his fist goes up and he punches the brick. Nerd check. Bro. So that's canon? Is he punching the brick? Yes. Yes. That is.

Wow. That's right. Why do you think they give him punches in later games? I wonder how many people get that wrong on like who wants to be a millionaire. Oh, for sure. He's not bashing his head. People think he headbutts it. People also think he's spitting fireballs.

His hand goes up. Oh, he's throwing. No, no. He's throwing fireballs. Right. Right. He's definitely throwing fireballs. So in later games, you can butt stomp and punch bricks straight up.

Like in the later Marios, he actually can punch. But in the original, he runs and jumps. It's it's brutal game you're running around as a dude punching brick getting high on mushrooms getting high on mushrooms punching bricks stomping turtles okay game's crazy anyway anyway he's talking about the social conditioning of video games what does mario what did mario what's the subliminal messaging there what's the princess yeah when you when you're enlisting, they're like, what video game have you played the most? And then they have a unit of guys in Call of Duty and they're

training for combat. And then they have people who said Super Mario Brothers and they're running around kicking turtles and doing mushrooms. Anyway, the news... The mushrooms are a telltale. Most developers used to take a lot of mushrooms. And you take the mushroom and you grow. Yes.

It's a reference to Alice in Wonderland. Yeah, it's Alice in Wonderland. And going down the... Right. A lot of people don't know that. The mushrooms is a reference to Alice in Wonderland. Amanita muscaria. It's the red and white mushroom.

Let's get a little bit serious. We have to... Check this out. Check this out. Elon Musk teased that Neuralink could begin implanting computer chips later this year. Quote, Neuralink is working very hard to ensure implant safety and is in close communication with the FDA. If things go well, we may be able to do initial human trials later this year. The statement came in response to a comment from a user who asked him to participate in human testing or who asked. Yes, I was in a car

accident 20 years ago, and since then I've been paralyzed from the shoulders. I am always available for clinical studies at Neuralink, wrote Hamun Kamai on the social network. Dude, legit? Hook him up. Days before, Musk assured that Neuralink already has a laboratory monkey with a chip implanted in its skull. You can play video games with your mind, said the owner of SpaceX. The short-term goal of the Neuralink project is to solve brain and spinal injuries, while

in the long term, it would seek human-slash-AI symbiosis. I'm not entirely sure what video game they're playing. They say it's not an unhappy monkey. He said during a talk on Clubhouse, a new social media, we know what that is, you can't even see where the neural implant was put in, except that he's got a slight-like dark mohawk. The billionaire who spoke about space travel, colonies, etc. said they were playing mind pong with each other.

That would be pretty cool. What's that? It's pong. Pong. Yeah, that's what I wanted to figure out. That means that's rudimentary. Dude, I'm playing mind pong with you right now. What if you can control the mouse on your computer?

Click things, open things, pull up videos just by thinking it. Like you won't even need a mouse pointer. You'll just point. You'll just click. You'll be clicking it with your thoughts. I'm ready for AI to just take over. Let's just, guys, take the keys. We already have shadowy cabals that are running our country.

So let's just hand it over. Let's just hand it over. Skynet, the T-1000s, let's do hand it over let's just hand it over skynet the t1000s let's do it what if it happened a long time ago what have we already yeah we're already in that well that's also simulation theory is uh so would you are you gonna get the neural link jack plug me in baby let's do it for real plug me right in no i wouldn't do no way no i don't know it's unless if i was if i was in that situation where god forbid and you know my wife always hates when i talk about hypothecies don't say that don't say that you know yeah knock on wood right it's eastern europe

but yeah exactly exactly doesn't want me to do that ever but sweetheart if you're listening earmuffs it's for entertainment were i in that situation where i was paralyzed having been in a car accident when you hear those situations yeah I would totally sign up to be one of the tests I would absolutely do that it's like saying if you were cold would you put on a jacket I mean it's so obvious

don't say that I don't want to be cold I don't want to ever be cold you're exactly right that's where I'm coming from but think about right now they're at the level of Pong, right? Well, we were at Pong levels, what, 40 years ago? 50? When did Pong come out?

1978. 70s. Yeah, I think it was the 70s. So about 40 or so years ago, we had Pong come out. Now we have virtual reality, Skyrim in 120 frames or whatever. You've got a really good computer. And you can actually go into VR worlds and draw the bow and the graphics are way better. Not like Skyrim has the best graphics in the world, I'll be honest.

But video games have gone a long way. Where is Neuralink video game technology going to be in 40 or 50 years? Are you going to be able to plug in and then experience, like you were mentioning with the Rex? Well, that's Ready Player One and Two. That's the whole world is. And they actually get into the morality of it, how for people that might be low income, for people in poverty, it's actually, this is the main character, he grows up living in these like trailer park in the Midwest, that for him, it's an escape from the ennui of his daily existence that he's i know right total right there that's one of the sat words that he's able to get into and now in but in in this world you're you know you're the star of your own

universe you can go visit castles and nights and everything whereas you're living in the slums let's be real like you know i i run this show i've got a bunch of channels called timcast bunch of followers and awesome people who watch it's true true. I would still much love to be, I still play Skyrim. I just started, I started a new Skyrim run down on some mods. I'd love to plug in

and just go to a magical world and be some random dude throwing fireballs at dragons, man. That'd be fun. We're going to get advanced enough where you can be playing Skyrim right now and still having this conversation. One eye is like spazzing.

You probably have like 17 video, you probably have like 70 video games going at once as you're having a conversation. Yeah. It's going to allow us to... Okay, assuming you're fine and nothing bad happens, all good, because you're probably going to be fine. Will you get the Neuralink if it seems to work and five years go by and people start

getting it and they get superhuman intelligence and interoperabilityoperability yeah seemingly i just now i i because when i hear stories about time mag and when i hear stories about the the moneyed powers work together to ensure the proper outcome i just don't i think of all the ways that this could be abused i think of all the viruses that right right not just from you know the elite quote unquote but from you know just any bad actors that want to get involved with this thing or get into this thing you know could you imagine getting brain hacked like it's a thing please do not brain hack me please do not bring when you guys have your brain chips by the way any any tweets of mine that you don't like i was brain hacked yes yeah i was like control animals with

your brain hacking though well they have to implant the animals too but you probably could they can remote control cockroaches you ever see that ew yeah so they they uh they can remote they can put a thing on a cockroach that affects its sensory can you do a lot of them at once because i can think of a lot of people i'd like to send they can remote they can remote control humans they did they did a test where they were able to shift the sense of balance through equilibrium. So what happens is – So you have to go in a certain direction.

So you feel like you're falling. Right. And so you start moving to try and – To try to compensate. Yep. And they're laughing and you put on a headset or something. Dude, crazy stuff is on the horizon, man. Back in 2011, me and some friends bought a consumer grade, it's called an electroencephalogram

or an EEG, I think it's called. As you do. A headband. As one does, yes. It's a headband and it's got a thing that goes in your head and it measures brainwaves. Yeah. Right. And so this is crazy.

We opened up a program that can detect the brainwaves and then we me and my friend we put it on and you try to control the wave to make it go up and make it go down and it's like random and we couldn't do it and i was like i don't believe this is legit i can't believe it works we gave it to his sister and she was like so you want me to make it go up and it went straight up and we were like whoa and she goes and now make it go down and it went down and we were like whoa how do you do that and she was like i just thought to make it happen like and it took her no time at all to figure it out what we wanted to do was make a a mind-controlled drone but because of the limitations of the eeg we had it only had two two x uh axis two axes axis yeah axes axes so we could make it rotate and go up and down and i was like that's all we

need the problem if i put it on i could not control it because my brain is like i don't understand this it would be like if you've never gone skateboarding you're standing a skateboard you're like you're gonna fall so if we could actually get to the point the technology is still easily available if not it's been dramatically upgraded in the past 10 years but we we theoretically had the tech because all you had to do was write a simple code to synchronize their existing consumer technology showing the wave going up and down with the function of increasing and decreasing power to the drone's rotors. And that was not through an implant. You just had to put it on like a headband and you could make that happen and then control a drone. You could theoretically

think like the plan was this it's all possible you would think to go up or down it could go up and down and then you would think to spin and it would spin in one direction so then you could like aim it and then come down and then go up and then rotate like moving your body around like you think that your hands like that's how we move our bodies it's a thought process right it's the weird thing is though we can feel ourselves when we move stuff and when you grab something you can feel its interaction with your muscles like let's say you're holding a bat or a sword it feels like an extension of you because it it all of the senses

in your arm it's shifting the weight it's putting pressure on this point of this muscle this muscle is tightening and you can feel the weight and control it and in fact humans do this with cars there was i was reading a study. That's muscle memory, what you're talking about. That once you've done it enough times, you don't think about it anymore. But what I'm trying to say is there's something different where humans, when they use tools,

it becomes an extension of their body in the mind. The mind actually says, I understand this is here and how long it is. The same thing is true with cars. That's why, I don't know if this is true for everybody, but I was reading when you're driving a car, you have no problem drinking. When you're a passenger in a car, you're like spilling and it's like hitting you because you don't know what's going to happen. You're, you have no control of the tool. Same with hitting the brakes and stuff. Right. Now think about this. It's like your car sick when you're a passenger

and not you're driving. One of the challenges of controlling a drum with your mind is that you can't feel anything about it. It's all visual. So you're looking at it and in order to make it do the right thing, you have to see it, do it. You don't feel it. Like I can feel myself pick something up.

I don't need to see it. My brain instantly understands and it knows the weight, knows balance, everything. The drone, I have no idea. I could not be looking at it. I had no idea what's going on. So it's, it's, it's all, it's, it's, it's much more difficult. I could not be looking at it. I had no idea what's going on. So it's much more difficult. I digress, however. The neural link technology is, I think a lot of people look at that and assume we have to have implants in order to have this kind of tech.

No, we could drive a car with a headband. You theoretically get to a point where we have multiple nodes and you put a hat on. Or a tattoo. Well, I'm saying nothing implantable. I'm saying literally like a wearable. And then it just can, you know, a wearable on your head. A tattoo is permanent. I'm talking about.

A graphic tattoo. It doesn't have to be permanent. But I'm saying you wouldn't need that. You'd get in your car. You'd sit down. And then there would just be a thing. You just put it on your head and then you go. You drive.

Well, I get the Neuralink. And it would give you the sensory perception of the drone like it would be able to feed into your brain what the drone's experiencing these so far are read only it's reading activity coming out of your brain not putting anything into it that's what the the the issue with uh neural link is it's it's what what do they say it's read only yeah as far as i know like when i saw the pig demonstration it was read only and and the monkey playing pong is read only like basically your brain has no sensations of its own right you can't actually feel it that's what they would you don't need to do anesthetize when

you're doing brain surgery for for the actual brain organ itself in order to get to the point where we would be at risk well you could be at risk for in a lot of ways with an implant but in order to get to the point where you could have like a video game in your mind you experience through neural link we would need right writable technology i'm not sure that's going to be possible because everyone's brain is different it's not the same code it's a very very similar code but it's they're all unique structures that are that's actually that's we mentioned that's a huge thing in ready player 2 where um the company has to sign oh make you sign all sorts of waivers before you get in and there's a 12-hour time limit um but then also that apparently there's a lots of

people that hooked up to it that jacked in and they just their synapses got completely overloaded and so they've had to try very carefully to like make the company is like make this go away right uh totally spasmodic. Seizures, catatonic. Don't ruin the movie. Is it out? It's not a movie. It's a book.

It's the sequel to Ready Player One. Yeah, Ready Player One was a book. They made a movie. And now there's a sequel, Ready Player Two. And it's really, really good because it gets into all this. But they did everything they could to try to make it go away. And they canceled all the recordings of it. And they can bribe every politician. So there's no worry about the laws or regulations because they know everything about

you already because everyone who signed in or your family members are signed in you know you have blackmail on everybody can you could you imagine there's like uh you know elon musk has this factory or this like warehouse laboratory and then like deep in like level six sub-basement there's people like strapped in against their will with Neuralink in their brains. They're happy. They're totally happy. It's like, you ever see Batman the Animated Series where the people are scared but smiling because of the Joker's gas? That's what it's like.

They're like, it's like this weird creepy face. And he just walks up is everyone enjoying the game? Everyone's happy? Yes, we are. How was your ride in the Tesla Roadster? Is it going well? And you're like... The windows are impenetrable.

Yeah. What about you, Tim? How are you feeling about getting the Neuralink these days? Would you get it? You want the headband. That's what you want. Well, the headband's nice for controlling things. Or you feel it'd be a beanie.

The beanie. The neural beanie. The problem... I would say right now... New merch available. TimCast.com. The neural beanie. Yeah, the beanie. The neural beanie. The problem, I would say right now. New merch available. TimCast.com. The neural beanie. I'm not immediately averse to Neuralink.

Lydia, write that down. I will say, however, we have to come a long way to ensure safety on Neuralink. So it's not going to happen in 10 years. You know, Elon Musk might do trials on it now. The first thing we'll end up seeing is if he can actually transmit information, just it doesn't have to be a specific code. It just has to be able to transfer information between nerves. He can repair people who have paralysis.

And then what happens is when the nerve's damaged, you no longer can move, right? Even repairing it, you have to relearn because your brain's trying to figure out that pathway to communicate with that part of the body. So even if Elon creates something that can create a link between neurons, then people will have to relearn how to walk. That's going to be the first thing we see before there's anything else. That'll be interesting, partly because how will you connect to it to control it? Will it be an internal device with no connectivity, just a simple powered by the brain electrical impulses, and that's it? Or will it connect to it to control it? Will it be an internal device with no connectivity, just a simple, you know, powered by the brain, electrical impulses, and that's it? Or will it have to have a battery in it?

Will it have a Bluetooth connection? Because we have seen in the past decade, I'm not sure if it happened to anybody, but I think someone may have been assassinated because they had a pacemaker, which was like Bluetooth or something. That does sound right. Yeah. Yeah. There's like stories of people who have internal electronics

either like an electronic pancreas system or a pacemaker and people can hack into it using its like because i think i think i was reading a story about pacemakers having a signal so that doctors can connect and then collect information and see how things are going someone could break into that and then change that you know that system and then kill you. So what would happen... If there's anything I know about humanity is that there is no system that anyone can design that someone else will not figure out how to reverse engineer. But this is the thing. Tim keeps bringing it up.

We're not smart enough to do this, but we're also forgetting that human beings are building concepts like artificial intelligence and quantum computing that are way smarter, that are way more proficient, that can calculate problems way faster than a human being could figure out and could be way more intelligent than the average human being could be, and they could figure it out. And they could give us just new kind of technology or twist it or use it in some kind of way for the artificial intelligence personal benefit. So that's also another spectrum here that we would be foolish

not to think about, since, of course, there is an artificial intelligence race happening right now with Amazon, with Facebook, with Elon Musk, with Vladimir Putin, with China, all racing for what people are calling the next big nuclear weapon that of course will be weaponized will be used for the personal benefit of some individuals but with an intelligence that's smarter than us that's that's dangerous territory because look at what we do to things that are less intelligent than us well this is what gets into right this is it gets into the singularity right when machines overcome and this is every sci-fi book novel etc where eventually the machines decide we don't need you with the with the i will say the notable

exception of her where the ais just leave that was such a creepy movie i remember watching battlestar galactica sad man like like just the just the the intro episode where you have these planets all these different planet colonies and you could live on a bunch of different planets. And then the Cylons just come and wipe out the entire civilization. It's like, that's so brutal, man. Because you took our birthright from us. Yeah.

When you look at history, it's the burning of Alexandria, the destruction of so much knowledge has been wasted away, and some of it has been protected, and we should always protect it at all costs.

I don't know whether the word is perpetuity of humans to seek out and destroy other life forms, like to actually look for them and find them to destroy them is like, that's real. That's part of the humanity so i would imagine that any programs we build are gonna are gonna also be able to do that right

because again the this is the garbage and garbage out right any ai will initially come from a human right so any any of our own biases and it's gonna be and not good idiosyncrasies and flaws are all going to be built into it yep and. And there's no way around it. Wow. With that being said, we should throw it to the Super Chat. So if you haven't already, leave a Super Chat,

but like, subscribe, hit the notification bell and head over to TimCast.com. Become a member for exclusive members-only content. Some people have asked, is there ever going to be sponsors or ads or anything?

No. Members-only content has no ads, no sponsors. It is straight, clean, unfiltered, uncensored, a lot of cussing. And that is for you guys. We're not going to do any promo stuff. It'll always just be clean and

ready to go. That's at TimCast.com. We got a cool segment up about new technology and maybe a major breakthrough. And we will probably have another bonus segment coming up later. I'm not entirely sure, but stick around and we'll see what happens. But let's take some of these super chats. We got Mickey the Fourth saying,

Yesterday I was a guest on a channel called Radical Liberation to talk about what happened in Chechnya. Chechnya? Well, there's no N. It says Chechnya. Maybe you mean Chechnya? After communism. I think it is vital to understand the lasting effects and what it is

that comes after. Give it a watch and share if you can. Thanks, guys. Cool. Maybe it's a place I'm not familiar with. Ringer of D says Canada officially declares Proud Boys a terror organization. Finance minister now considering massive tax hikes to cover $10 million payments to individual members. Wait, what?

Huh. To individual members of the ministry or the Proud oh he says jk oh i get it all right jose diaz says tim how long until the u.s starts looking like so many dystopian movies because so far to me it's looking like v for vendetta without v how long until what do you mean to go back a year like we've been locked down for a year people are walking around terrified of this pandemic now they're wearing two masks well it's actually who do you judge wears two masks i would say it even beyond v for vendetta i think it's more like dark city if people remember that one where dark

city was this is sort of the original matrix where your history your memories are rewritten every night and every night at one point, I think it's at midnight, everybody falls asleep. And then the, you know, the, the ancients run out, rewire your memories, reform the city. They actually change the streets. You could be rich one day. And then you wake up and you're like, you know, in a bathtub of like a slum, or you're in the bathroom, you're at the kitchen table in, you know, a beater and you're yelling over some, some cheap dinner, but then you wake up and you're in a mansion, right? But the idea also is that they've plugged into your mind, all the memories that would give you up until that

point. And so there's this one scene of the movie where the main character is trying to figure out when's the last, do you remember the last time you had a steak yeah but when was the last time you actually had it can you remember the specific time and the date that's what we're getting to with a lot of these lockdowns it's like can you remember what life was like prior to but when did they start what was the day that it started what was the actual time when was the last time you did this when's the last time you did two weeks right two weeks right two weeks or it's just no it'll be done in two weeks it'll be done in two weeks i mean to be completely honest we live in the middle of nowhere so once you get away from the city it's meaning yeah actually out here it's probably not as bad but in i've been in dc the entire time

and it's i'm having trouble remembering when the last time i walked down the street like with my family on a regular unmasked DC day was I was a I was super excited because today I was able to hit I think it's a six inch target from 100 yards with my account with my compound bow. It took me like 30 tries, though. So it's not like I'm good. It was just a really great feeling where I was this tiny six inch target from like 100 yards and I was shooting and missing and missing. And it was the last arrow. And it was funny because the arrow was like kind of broken. So I actually missed and the arrow still ended up hitting it.

But I'll take it. Oh, now. Oh, yeah. I don't know. I don't know. No, no, no. It hit the target. It hit the target by accident.

But the arrow hit the target. But did Tim hit the target? Yes. Anyway, the point is, I go out in the yard no mask trees everywhere right there's birds making weird noises there's one bird that sings that muse song from from uh it's called pressure yeah well they're everywhere i don't know what the bird's called but there's a bird that's that like it's it's song sounds like drones so we're just like there's there's one there was one bird there was one bird that yells and it sounds like a

person yelling yes and so i'm going out with with the bow and i'm like getting ready and then i hear and i'm like somebody there i'm i'm shooting air do you need aid i'm like because it's middle of nowhere man right like there's nobody out here i've been like not fully desensitized to the masks yet because i've been living kind of out here working from home and I'll see videos of people, these crowds of people and they're all wearing masks. And it makes me angry. Like when I see obese people that are eating bad food,

when like, it's like, they're like, and I still get that same kind of like, like helpless rage or hopeless. Like what have we become? Why are we doing this? And so I'm like, and or hopeless like what have we become why are we doing this and so i'm like and it's like shuddering bro i had a buddy in miami uh texted me today that he was getting into an uber and the driver lost his mind on him because he wasn't double masked and he

started and he started screaming he said the driver started screaming that there's been a presidential order and President Biden has put this down and everyone has to be double masked. He threw him out of the car for not double masking. Why not triple masking? Why not triple masking? Oh, I got good news. I got really good news. I don't know if I should announce it. Maybe I should.

You made a mask that has two masks in one. No, those space helmet astronaut helmets they made officially got sent out a couple days ago. Have you seen them? No. It is this glass dome that you put the thing over your head and it rests on your neck. Like Bioshock. Like Bioshock. I'm going to fart in one.

It's got fans in it. No, it's got air filters. The big brothers. Dude. The guy who invented it, look, more power to the guy for trying to work on inventing something but everyone said the same thing when i tweeted about it they said what happens if you sneeze it's just glass in front of you so you like sneeze and that's just like everywhere like what do you do quickly lift it up and go and sprint you know and you know you're dead from

covid dude i'm so excited to get these. It's going to be so much fun. Oh, you ordered a bunch of them? I ordered two. Nice. I ordered two. So we'll film with them and we'll go out wearing them and see how people react.

It'll be hilarious. We'll be at a restaurant just sitting there with like a blanket. How do you eat? How do you eat? We'll get in South Park. They had a theory

that you could put food through the opposite way. Right. No, no, no. Here's the plan. Here's the plan. I want to go to a restaurant wearing them.

That's the healthy way. And I want want to go to a restaurant wearing a healthy way and i want to get someone else with me and we'll order food but just sit there staring not moving and the food just sitting in front of us and not touching you need to like a third person with a camera on the other table just for 20 minutes to see how people react to us just like blank blank faces just sitting there with these things on not eating or or we can actually take the food and just like hit the glass and then just like we'll have to take out like youtube ad space and run that can we put ian in a bubble for some reason i see like bubble boy popping in there coming in as long as we get the bubble yeah let's do it let's let you know we should do just going down the sidewalk in your

bubble we should we should no we should get one of those bubbles at like the violent wheel what's that band that does that the The Flaming Lips. The Flaming Lips. There you go. You have to be extremely upset and intolerant when you see people who are unbubbled. Yes. Where is your bubble? A lot of people say...

Haven't you read The Science? A lot of people say that in the future, it's going to be like Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World, 1984. I say they're all wrong. The future is going to be like Bubble Boy. Remember that movie? Did you see that movie? That's the future. You didn't see it? No. Alright, we gotta take more Super Chats.

Remember the Seinfeld episode? Yeah, I remember that. Acme Product says, I'm shocked that Time Story was published. It's too good to be true. It's too perfect. When was the last time you saw the media describe how the wealthy and powerful conspire? I have an ominous feeling about it, like some sort of trap thoughts my thoughts are that they feel so confident in their victory knowing that nothing can be done about this that the after everything they feared

the the the worst thing that happened was a bunch of like middle-aged trump supporters bumble it you know bewildered and befuddled walking around the capitol building and then leaving it's like that was it who who will go after those people all those cases were thrown out like what i think they feel confident like what people all the people in the cabal that they're talking about like well look in their minds who's gonna come who's coming after us let's just make it known and then we can just keep doing it over and over again and this is the test they're they're the story from the cabal is not about court cases it's about how they changed the rules the year leading into the election which is what i've been saying over and over again. And this is the test. The story from the cabal is not about court cases. It's about how they changed the rules the year leading into the election, which is what I've been saying over and over again.

But like anyone that would have gone after them. What he's saying is there's no check. There's no check on any of this. So why not take credit for it now? Well, so the rule. Remember, this didn't run until two weeks after the inauguration. There's no possible check that's a test. They're really testing us.

They're testing the're, they're really testing us. No, I think they're testing the world right now. Well, as Michael Malice said, some very bad people got data on what people are willing to tolerate. Yep. That's Michael Malice. It's a tolerance test.

Well, and my, my response is it kind of feels like they're hitting us as much as like they're, they're doing things to us to see like how we respond as if we're like mice in a, in a lab, in a maze.

Like if, if there was like a huge backlash and then people started going after legals, they'd just be like, no, no, it wasn't true. That time thing wasn't true. Yep. It was fake news and everyone fell for it. Today they're like, let's tell them we fortified it and then tell them we're going to drone bomb them for believing it. That's literally what they're going to turn everything back to 2015. We're sorry.

We just wanted to see how you would react. All right. We got a couple more. We got, let's see. Oh, I got cut off. There we go. Tommy Dorgerian says, shout out for my company, Level Ride Concepts in Salem, Oregon. $25 member here. Amazing content. Thank you for being a member at TimCast.com

thank you we have another one here what we got Blob Monster says I want to apologize to Ian for being mean to him I listened to him last night talking about his troubles he is a product of his abuse uh thank you alright well there you go you're probably right about that Daniel Maxwell says I see you got Jack

Posobiec on the man who could not meet the challenge of getting the receipts on a person when he was challenged to do so. He still does good journalism. What is that about? I have no idea. Kind of too vague. I have the receipts on everybody. Yeah, pretty much.

Sporkwitch has a question for you, Jack. Jack, how can we hold true to our oaths? USAF vet. At this point, it feels like any action taken would be suicide. They've done everything possible to disarm us, keep us from communicating, and eliminate our income. And it all seems to be accelerating. I would say that I come to this from the perspective of,

look, when I took my oath to serve the military, serve the country, that he's referring to the military oath, you know, we'd swear an oath to serve the Constitution and not any particular government or politician. But now I'm a family guy. I've got my wife, I've got my kids, and I wake up every day and I think I live for them now. That I live to make sure that they're going to be okay

and that they're going to be set up for success going forward and my my time is starting to end my time i mean i'm not an old guy or anything but how old are you see that i'm 36 so you see that but you see that your your your children will eventually you know kind of but look you've got over a million twitter followers you know you you put out information people follow that you know what i mean like you're you're you're doing something that's having a serious impact right right and people understand that if you really want to right you know going back though you know he was asking me a personal question so i was answering pretty personal way but as far as the actual turning back the system this is a 30-year project

it took a very long time for things to get this bad and And I hope people understand that you can't have, you're not just going to find one esoteric law and walk it into a courtroom somewhere and get one judge. It's not going to be like that, folks. It's going to be a long slog. We're going to chip away at all of this corruption. That's how it works. It's never going to be, you know, you wake up one day and it all goes away. I think there's actually one really simple solution. And it's that not enough people in whatever space we're in are speaking up. That's all it is. The reason they control the narrative, the reason why so many ignorant people remain ignorant is because too many people are scared of being canceled and won't speak up. Yeah. There's not enough people doing what you are doing and tweeting or any one of us in tweeting

and putting out videos and putting out stories. There are a lot of regular people who hear things and know things and aren't engaging in the culture the same way the left does. The left goes on Twitter and brigades and mass reports and flags people. They get jobs at news organizations and they take them over and then they push this narrative and not enough people are countering that. That's it. We're like nodes on a network and every human is a node. And if the node doesn't light up when it receives the information to pass out,

the transaction breaks down. So we need to light up. And it is as simple in a lot of ways as just retweeting or sharing information, a lot of times with your own explanation. Yeah, and I always say this to people as well, that look, if you've got a normie job out there, don't use your real name on social media,

please, for the love of God, right? You know, keep being out there, be smart. you know, don't, don't have this, you know, chest beating moment of I need to say this on Facebook or carrot. My boss says, no, it matters what your boss thinks. You don't get fired. Don't get in trouble for some political thing, but at the same time, be out there. And if you can find a specific instance where you can get one person to wake up and read this time magazine article, print it out for people. I wish they would print it out and put it on every seat at the impeachment trial, which is coming up next week, by the way, and say, look, they threw this guy off of social media for saying these things. They claim that him saying this was an incitement to violence.

But when Time magazine comes out and Molly Ball prints the exact same facts. Is it Trump was right? The exact same facts facts that trump was right the exact she says trump was right it says it says in a way it is a gloating personning of something look when did you did you see that mark elias the democratic lawyer is now arguing the voting machines right he actually lost that by the way he actually lost that i just saw the headline lost that case good it's absurd that the democrats would scream Trump's lying and then make the same argument. I'm not surprised. And there's no point in going, oh, it's a double standard. We know they have no shame.

We know they cheat. We know they lie. Now what? Boring. Yeah. Now what? Well, we need to realize that they rule by fear, consent, and self-censorship. A lot of what they do is to incentivize you not knowing

the rules so then they could have this chilling effect. We don't know what we can and cannot say on YouTube many of the times. The rules are vague. We don't know why people get punished. We don't know why people get demonetized, censored, kicked off, deleted off social media. We don't know. There's no official conversation or dialogue, and I think it's done on purpose so we keep everyone in line because everyone's waiting until they get hit. Some people get hit for the most obvious reasons. Some people get hit for the most non-obvious reasons. And you're left here wondering and confused and scared.

And that's exactly how they want you. All right. So we got another one from Gareth Green. He says, I cover my ears. I close my eyes. I still hear your voice and it's telling me lies. Linda Thompson. I have a mixture of anger and despair today, partly because of the obvious, but also Andrew

Sullivan's beautiful piece on the woke attack on the classics. Read it. It was really hard for me to work all day because I woke up to seeing this story and it was picking up steam and I read it and I couldn't think about anything else. The Time magazine story saying, yeah, we did it. We did it. So what? And I'm like, OK, I got it i gotta i gotta produce a bunch of different stories and i sit down to read the

news and i couldn't think of anything else and so i'm like man i'm not gonna do just i actually wanted to break this down in writing something you were saying but i think it'll go to this question so in intelligence services there's three types of operations there's um overt covert and clandestine and people get covert and clandestine confused a lot. They use them interchangeably, but they're not actually interchangeable. So overt operations, everybody knows what that is. That's, you know, we invaded somewhere, and here they are, and they're walking on the street, and they're invading. Covert operations means Zero Dark Thirty is probably the biggest, you know, most easy example of that.

That's Black Op. They went in. They got bin Laden. They got out, right. But everybody knows who did it. Everybody. Yeah, after the fact, right knows what happened knows who did it. A clandestine operation. And this is where CIA and predominantly operates. This is where an operation takes place, a change is made somewhere in the world. And yet no knowledge of the operation exists.

You don't even know that an operation took place. And they measure success by getting in, getting out, and nobody knows that an operation ever happened. So when I read the Time magazine piece, I said, oh, this was a clandestine op that they're now coming forward on. So they're now coming forward to claim credit to say, and different people that I worked with used to take pride in that. They used to say for, for the deed, not the glory.

That actually used to be a phrase for the deed, not the glory, because you were doing something, even though you knew you weren't getting credit for it. For these folks, they want the glory. Remember when Biden said he had the largest voter fraud organization in history or whatever not 40 they said in the time magazine piece that they recruited armies

of poll workers one thing you actually didn't mention yet actually towards the end of that time magazine piece they point out that towards the end of election day they decided to not and i'm paraphrasing they decided to not send activists into the streets. And people were asking, why didn't anything happen after November 3rd? Because we decided not to send the signal to our activists to not go out and march. Left-wing, Antifa, BLM groups that people always kind of suspect sort of pop up and are switched on and off at certain times. Are you actually admitting that you do control those groups and the timing of when and where they commit their actions? Yes. Speaking of, have there been many Antifa and black lives matter riots relative to what was before january 5th yes uh portland seattle for the main part but that's about it what would have happened if trump would have won and what kind of protest if trump well i think that what they're

actually saying in the time magazine piece if you know the inverse of what they're saying is had trump had a greater turnout then they would have activated these marchers these militants these activists to go out into the streets and to use the vernacular incited uh people going out and contesting the election let's read some more super chats here we got to protect democracy want to be very clear toimize. To fortify like a multivitamin. That's right. We have Mr. Hunt here, Mike, says Russia hoax doesn't lead to violence, but questioning the integrity of the election does.

We absolutely 100% live in a fascist state now. Those that claim to have been fighting against it, we're fighting for it. That's a fact. I called out some of these people earlier today, the people who are cheering on Antifa destroying small businesses and attacking regular Americans and then cheering on the military coming in and occupying DC. It's like, okay, if you're cheering for the destruction of the working class and then supporting the establishment machine sending the military to DC, like you're in favor of the authority, dude.

Like what do you think's going on? The Berlin Wall for the entire... I'm sorry, I'm sorry. The Anti-Fascist Protection Rainforest. I was going to say, yeah, I was going to say, yeah. I get into this in doing an Antifa book, a little plug pretty soon here, but that for the entirety of its, of its history was known in official documentation as the anti-fascist rampart of East Germany.

Oh, okay. You were, that was your point. That was my point. I thought you were going to be talking about the Berlin wall, but I wanted you to call it its official name. Right. The anti-fascist protection. So anti-fascism actually became sort of the state religion of East Germany and that they sort of morphed everything that the Third Reich did into West Germany.

And then in their telling, the United States and the UK and Canada were supportive of this continuation of fascism, that they were just a different type of fascism. They were capitalist social fascism. This gets into the actual rise of Antifa and the Communist Party in Weimar, Germany. They just never stopped actually saying those beliefs, right? This all goes back. So anti-fascism from its start was not actually about being anti-fascist it's anarcho-communist right all right we got one for you jack this this one's a serious question from david bowies i'm not gonna read the full name he says for agent posa posa i said that foreign terror org that antifa was training with ypg were cia assets and guarded uh and guarded our military installations you

blocked me on twitter can you please unblock me or educate me why i'm wrong uh well they perhaps i would have to go back and look at the contest of maybe it looked like you were you were coming back at me you know uh for something like that i obviously look at the exact interaction but it is truthful that ypg this was an organization, a Kurdish militant organization that did have US support at one point, were also on the other side, turning around and financing, funding and training Antifa, who had come over from Western Germany and North America to participate in their operations. And one of them, this guy, Daniel Allen Turner, was just arrested in Florida for planning an attack on the Florida Capitol on Inauguration Day 2021.

He also, he states that, you know, we still need to investigate this. He states that he was part of the militant, the armed guards up at Chaz in Seattle during the summer of 2020. And from his own Twitter feed, says that he was involved in one of the shootings that took place in Chaz. Wow.

So this is a guy that, again, going off of all of his own statements, says that he was in YPG, that he was in Syria, that he came back, that he used what he learned on the battlefield in Chaz, then finally got picked up by the FBI planning an attack on the Florida capital. Wow. Here's something interesting. Pimms the Great says, two man crew manned machine guns come in 5.56, 7.62, and 3.38. Oh, there you go.

3.38 or do you mean 3.08? No, 3.08 and 7.62 are basically the same thing. I guess, you know, some guy was telling me never to put a 308 and a 762 because the pressure is different. But a lot of people were just like, ah, it's the same thing. They don't care. Yes and no. Huh. Conclusive.

Thanks, everyone. Okay. Full mental alchemist says, Tim, Saitama is a great character, but Moomin Rider is the best one on One Punch Man. Moomin has no powers at all, but still does everything he can to be a hero, regardless of fame. Batman vs. Superman. That is correct. Moomin Rider is one of the best heroes. I'd say Saitama's my favorite character, but you know what?

I think Moomin Rider. Are you guys familiar with One Punch Man? No. Not even a little bit. Very simple gist of it. One Punch Man is basically an all-powerful god. The theme of the anime is that he's this silly-looking guy, but he can defeat anybody no one can stop him he can jump to the moon he's just all-powerful and he's kind of dumb but uh he's a good guy and he

wants to be this great hero but they kind of treat him poorly moomin rider is a class c hero who's just a guy who rides a bike around and wants to be a hero but the point is he gets into a fight with this really big monster and is being beaten mercilessly but he refuses to stop because he's trying to defend other people stop them from getting killed so even though he knows he's gonna die he he does it whereas saitama just walks up and flicks the guy and you know he's got no fear superman versus batman it's a good point huh cold yeah yeah i know that's great man of course it's good cold elox production says star wars was about watching out for corruption and fascism and government manipulation and when disney got a hold of it they tried to feminize and corrupt it to their narrative eddie johnson

asks what does jack think of snowden you know snowden someone that i would have to say that i've i've had a journey on assange too really really, that I'm a guy who people say, are you part of the deep state, Posobiec? And I was like, well, of course. Former, maybe? I was on the side that was doing the drone strikes, right, to what Luke was saying. And now I'm here. And so I do think that if you break the law, that there are going to be consequences. So I understand that, you know, from the leaking perspective.

But at the same time, the amount of stuff that that guy was able to expose and the transparency that he provided to people has proven to be a public service. Yeah. Razio says question to any Trekkie on the set. Me and my bro discussed this topic last night and was wondering who you guys would pick. If you were to start your own crew, who would be your go-to analytical science officer? Data or Seven of Nine?

And why? Data, obviously. Guys? Yeah, of course. Why wouldn't you want Andrew? Elon Musk. Are you guys familiar with Seven of Nine? Oh, of the three? Data. Data or Seven of Nine is one person. Is that the girl with the... She's the Borg. Former Borg.

Former Borg. Data, hands down. Who's the other one? Spock? No, Data or Seven of Nine. I'm still confused. So here's the most important thing. If you guys have seen the episode where, in The Next Generation, they get trapped in the

Tychons' rift. You guys know this one? Of course you know this and there's on the other side of the rift because they're the crew is trapped they're being bombarded and they don't realize this with telepathic rays preventing REM sleep

so over time they're slowly going insane and as they get no they go to sleep but they don't actually get dreams and REM cycles they start breaking down but data is unaffected so because cycles data they start breaking down but data is unaffected so because of data they end up surviving for the most part and because of troy who is partially telepathic and could translate inner dreams the message they released the uh the what was the hydrogen which interacted with the fictitious star trek element of calendinium

which caused the explosion wiping out the rift which they then ripped through. I know a lot about Star Trek. Wow. You chose an artificial intelligence. Data. Yes. I think there's something to... Well, because he's a safety net, you know? Creating AI. Yeah, AI can be a safety net. It just needs to be free software so we can

watch it write its own code. Anti-fragile. Yeah. It was cool, though. I like at the end when uh like everyone's basically on the verge of dying because they've like they're losing their minds data's totally fine and then he orders the captain to bed he's like he's like as my ass my last my last order as acting captain is to order you to bed sir and picard's like oh thank you data and then he goes to bed 25th amendment yeah 25th amendment you know they really brought that up because of kamala, right?

Which one? Seems like it. The reason that everybody isn't talking about the 20. This is so obvious, by the way. It's fine. The reason that they've been seeding this narrative that even in the last weeks of the Trump administration, that they were talking about, oh, 25th Amendment, the 25th Amendment. The 25th Amendment is not about if you don't like somebody, you want to get rid of that. That's impeachment, right?

And he is being impeached right now. The 20th Amendment is about mental capacity, mental capability. And the idea is supposed to be that if you have some medical condition and you're not deceased, you're still alive, but you can't you function right then like if we had a president who thought the movies what was that what was that movie with with the war games yeah if i had a president who thought war games was a real thing right wasn't that a lot of this a lot of these laws were written in after the kennedy assassination right because they were thinking of different permutations of what could happen what if, that's why we have so many lines out of the line of succession, so many degrees of this. And then this was also brought up as something of,

well, what if he was just incapacitated? Right. And so, but I think that the reason that they're talking about it is because they want to use it on Joe Biden at some point. I agree. Oh,

of course. Of course. Yep. Troy Dunham says I've graduated from an Ian hater to an Ian fan boy. Ian, when did you get red pilled 2004 i think it's been a while it was about like loose loose change i think you actually worked on that didn't you yeah yeah 2000 that was back in the day we have we have some zeitgeist that whole

era of like internet video red pilling in the early days we uh someone uh gareth green's giving us a little correction he says chechia was formerly known as the czech republic yes and before that part of czechoslovakia and before that bohemia and moravia part of the austrian empire couldn't place it so i actually knew somebody who identified as bohemian because their family emigrated from bohemia right to the u.s and so when i was like they're asking who they're like oh yeah where your parent like what is your ethnicity and they're like well we're from america but we're all bohemian and i was like oh and then i'm like where's that and everyone's like there's no such place i'm like yeah there was a long time ago and the people who were there identified as bohemian

left and retained that as their you know heritage even though it's totally different now you know it's like that in um uh for some a lot of like like poles and ukrainians that came over before poland got their independence back there was this um they would refer to their region as ruthenia yeah the ruthenians right even though that's if you look today that's not a province it's it never even was like a really defined area um there's no kingdom of ruthenia but it was just sort of this this phrase and so when I was going through some of the census documents of my own family, you'll see from Ruthenia,

but cause that's what they put, but that's never, you know, it's never actually been a place. Hey, clarification. I got repealed like end of 2006. It was right after I started making YouTube videos,

all the people will comment. They'd be like, you need to learn about the federal reserve. You need to watch loose change. You need to see Aaron Russo. And it was like, so I got into fascism. Aaron Russo. Great guy. Yeah. Awesome. That was it. Freedom to fascism. Aaron Russo, great guy.

Yeah. Awesome. That was a great one. Rest in peace. All right, let's see. We got a ton of super chats, but we'll try and read a little bit more. Drake D says, 762 by 51 NATO and 50 BMG M2 machines are crew served or mounted. However, 338 Norma Mag in the works is in the works to supplement 50 BMG M2

crew served weapons 338 NM is also significantly lighter per round is that good good thing or bad thing because I mean 50 BMG

those are those are building destroyers you mow it building down and just you know what I mean have you seen

how big those things are when Luke came in and he yeah when Luke came in with the belt how do you get this thing out of the way? Imagine the optics of a military occupation with cruiser weapons in our nation's capital, but then people being told, this is for your own good.

And these are the same people that want to ban your guns with HR 127. I looked into it yesterday. There's so much more stuff that we didn't cover. If you have a 50 BMG like piece of ammunition, minimum 10 years in jail. Yeah. So that's nuts.

Eduardo Salina says, Tim, I asked about the game of skate last time. You have the crazy flat ground, but I got them switch. Let's do it. Love the show, man. Oh, you think I don't got switch, bro?

I can nollie hard flip late flip. I can nollie hard flip late 180. I can switch hard flip late 180 and switch hard flip late flip. Bring it on, brother. You ain't got Switch, bro? I can nollie hardflip lateflip. I can nollie hardflip late 180. I can switch hardflip late 180 and switch hardflip lateflip. Bring it on, brother. You ain't got game. I got Switch. I can do basically everything Switch. No joke.

You got a mouth, son. You think you come in here and bring that skate smack talk. All right, all right. Calm down. But I'm almost 35. I don't skate as hard as I used to, but I definitely – I'm focusing more on mini ramp because i didn't skate mini i skated a bit when i was younger now i'm having a lot more more fun skating mini it's good fun i got a six foot half pipe it's great let's see publius the good says so so you are saying that you are fully aware the dnc committed a coup and actually

overthrew the u.s government against the will of people. And your answer is you're a family man. Oathbreaker, period. Coward. Whoa, yikes. Who are we talking to here? Jack. What? Wow, buddy. Go army.com, man. Go.

If you want to sign up, you want to serve, you want to go over there, kick in some doors. Go army. Go army. Was it go.mil, I think, right? Yeah. Well, that sounds like somebody oath keeper. Wow. Oathbreaker.

Oathbreaker. You know, also, I'd just like to say, too, whatever federal agent just wrote that is trying to get me to say something. You're glowing a little bit too hard right now, buddy. It comes down to this. We understand what you're trying to do. And for anybody out there who – I understand the frustration. I do understand the frustration. And I understand the anger.

And I understand the – we got Ocean 11'd. What are we supposed to do about that there is no easy answer there there is it's peaceful persuasive and resourceful it's this it's this right exactly it's what we're doing right now it's culture building that's why we're talking about starting a vlog and we've we've been you know working towards doing this but getting the website up as a priority and that's why we want to look here's the way i explain it we just talked about a little about skateboarding just talking about having strong families what's that gonna do yeah whatever right right right come on are you kidding me parallel systems and there's there's there's a very this is a well-known skateboarder who puts a ton of videos up it's like there's actually a

couple skateboarders they put up videos on instagram and on the mini ramp the mini ramp is painted to be the Gadsden flag. And so I've watched these videos of some of the best mini ramps skating I've ever seen from these people. And I laugh and I'm like, yeah, Gadsden mini ramp. What do you think happens when a 14 year old kid sees this pro doing an amazing trick and they think that's so cool and they see the Gadsden flag. Then they go to school and the teacher says, this is white supremacy. They go, what?

No way, dude. My favorite skateboarders do the same thing they're not racist exactly you're lying to me exactly that's the culture building stuff i'm talking about speaking up being proud of what you believe and look you know it is a difficult philosophical philosophical question i remember when i was a little kid i saw a sign it said stand up for what you believe in and i was like racists believe in awful stuff you want them to stand up they do okay well i'll stand up to oppose that so literally whatever you believe if you really believe it you'll stand by it used to be the standard right by the way which used to be the standard that if you know the answer to bad speech was more speech good speech was it right or speech that you add speech to that and then people can decide on their

own what is better right right? This is why these issues that we talk about today, where and actually, you were talking earlier about the 90s conservatives versus like millennial conservatives, and the week.com just did a big piece on bar, they call it barstool conservatism, where, you know, it's not the conservatism of the 1990s anymore. It's not Jerry Falwell, that it's, it's, yeah's yeah there's culture wars but they're not on the same lines it's a different you know from a military perspective a different delta than where you would be having those battlegrounds before it is about speech codes it's about political correctness going crazy and how it's getting into our corporate culture it's in our

our schools etc etc all right we'll take just a couple more here amber emily says captain archer or cisco also poso cisco 100 yeah cisco no question no question what the hell are these questions no idea cisco was though i like though i do like captain archer i i will throw something i know captain archer gets crapped on a lot i know i'm trying not to be mean can we talk about the usco dude yeah come on nah nah nah nah I guess not. Cisco was legit. Jake Paul or Logan? No, no, Jake. Jake or Logan?

Pick one. Jake Paul or Logan? Jake Paul or Ben Askren? Ben. Ben Askren. 100% Ben Askren. In a boxing match. Yeah, Ben.

Yep. You heard it here first. 100%. I'm going to go with Ben Askren, even though he doesn't follow me on Twitter. And yes, that is how I judge. There was one more part of this question that said, also, Poso, where is the most patriotic place to get an mba internship to get an mb own does liberty have uh have mbas i'd have to look it up i don't know the last question and the most important one from levitt lev levy hint says ian how long have you been growing out your hair i'm

on a year and i can finally put it in a bun. I think four, five, five years maybe. Wow. Nice. Long time. I like the question super chats where you ask us to all answer a question. Yes, I enjoy that. There are a lot of them. Do you trim as you go?

No, I haven't trimmed it at all. Like Samson. I would think it would almost like it would be longer. Samson. But I'll pull it and pull pieces out. It's curly. Like here's one there. So it never gets too long.

I don't know. It's curly. Ian is shedding next to me. Yeah, I'm shedding pieces. I will do one more. We got super Zaina says, just watch your last podcast on the tragedy involving that man.

The first lesson my father taught me was don't start fights because you don't know who will end it. Yeah. Yeah. That story about the snow thing. Yeah, that was, I mean,

that's, I, I always just walk away it's okay to walk away just de-escalate do everything you can it's okay to walk away there's i mean whenever i have these conversations with people it's you know oh well he said to me and i've got look it's i get it it's it's it's especially if this is a problem that men have this is a problem that men have where we are taught from an early age never back down if you back down that's showing weakness you never supposed to look like a victim someone disrespects you you have to throw down and make sure that you do what what do you get from that but you know what's your what's your what's your reward for that yeah we're not gorillas i don't i don't know if it's the asian in me but my my upbringing was victory was the most important aspect and the ninja was you you like i explain

this people the ninja doesn't walk into the palace like and try and fight all the guards in front to confront the the emperor the feudal lord they sneak in around the back they disguise themselves as a common person it is a very western it is a very western way of thinking i think about like the stereotypical depictions of like victory has to be on the battlefield right i it's two your sword single combat crossing swords right right whereas you know and you had the samurai but the way i've always approached it i told this to the occupy activists i was like do you think you're going to walk up to the palace guards fight them and win and walk up to the next wave of guards and fight them and win or do you think the ninja who crawls in from the roof and then you know on the ceiling setting up

his escape routes and planning some months in advance is going to win you have to be strategic about it that means i i've never experienced a loss of pride from purposefully choosing to walk away from conflict or a fight or some kind of battle. When I had that Lincoln statue altercation over the summer where the Antifa guy got right in my face, there were a lot of people who said, Jet, why didn't you swing on him? He was clearly in your space. He was smacking me. At one point, they tried to push me down. Why not just take a swing at him? Why not just take him out like that? Because again, strategically thinking ahead, I know how that's going to look, right? And this is a guy who's smaller than me. That's their plan.

They want me to do that. And there is more strength and there is more power in the victory of saying, I'm going to keep my hands by my side. And no matter what you say to me, no matter what you do to me, I am not going to react. That photo was the legit victory. So for those that aren't familiar, there's a photo of Jack.

Thank you. Standing in front of this Antifa guy who's all angry and you just look stern. That's it. You look like I'm just not like, it's stern. You're not angry.

I was doing the prayer to St. Michael in my head. There you go. So I had a similar situation in Boston where a guy got in my face and i just was like all right tighten the abs clench the jaws like bring it on buddy i'm not gonna swing on you i don't know what you're doing yeah exactly right and there's there's strength in that there's strength that knowing that if i need to defend myself yeah okay sure i will but if you're just doing this why i do also magic like i'll think it's calm you just think it instead of say it. The photograph.

They pause for a moment, then you can do whatever you want. It's all about information war, right? That's why I said the photograph was the victory. They wanted you to hit a guy who was smaller than you and say, Jack Posobiec showed up and started attacking. Right. Then CNN, Jake Taper be out there. Conservative reporter for One American News, Jack Posobiec has attacked an anti-racist protester in front of the lincoln

statue and then and then you have como back this guy's smaller than him what's he doing and pick on me huh come on and then you know como would like raise his arms or whatever that's what they wanted instead they looked pathetic and weak going at you who was just like i'm cool as a cucumber bro you know come at me bro right on okay ladies and gentlemen go to timcast.com become a member for exclusive members only content maybe uh we're going out to uh uh we're going out to the range on sunday and so we didn't get a whole lot of footage last time maybe we'll do more there's business involved i got some footage luke got some footage there's some fun stuff with the 50 the 50 bmg breach loading which is uh which was loud it shut my camera off because i was

standing to the left of Luke when he fired. My phone just turned off. Is that a shockwave? Can we final answer? And then I'm like, okay, Tim, your turn. He's like, no, we gotta go. We look at the time.

Yeah, look at the time. Oh, man. We're so late. Look at the time, man. Yeah, so anyway, we'll get some footage and we'll see what we do. But if you want to get

exclusive members-only content, we got a ton up right now. We got full bonus episodes about life after death, UFOs and stuff like that, and trafficking. Timcast.com, become a member. Help us be that shield and safety net in the event. They try to take us down. Don't forget to follow me on Instagram, Twitter, Mines at Timcast.

My other YouTube channels are YouTube.com slash Timcast, YouTube.com slash Timcast News. This show is live Monday through Friday at 8 p.m. If you're listening on the podcast, give us a shout- give us a good review and if you're not check it out because it helps us out and uh seriously thanks everybody's becoming a member jack do you want to shout anything out uh check us out one american news twitter at uh jack posobic i will have my antifa book coming in a couple of weeks now it's called antifa inside the black block my stories uh you can also go to antifamovie.com and check out the documentary we did, 60 Minutes,

all about the history of Antifa, how they come from, and where they're going. One of the quick things I wanted to say during the Super Chats is, just really quickly, don't let them take away your happiness and your peace. I want to thank MSNBC for inspiring me to bring back my old t-shirt. I think

it was my first ever shirt that said, Don't drone me, bro. That is now officially back on thebestpoliticalshirts.com. It was during the Obama era where it was pretty much created, and now it's still relevant. Full circle. Who would have thought? And yeah, thebestpoliticalshirts.com.

I release YouTube videos on the YouTube channel We Are Change. I'm an independent YouTube channel still somehow existing mainly because of you and I want to thank you guys for watching and participating and being a part

of the conversation on my channel. It means a lot to me. Thank you. We Are Change, thebestpoliticalshirts.com. I will personally say I love the material.

I love the way it fits. It's very warm, very snug. I was pleasantly surprised. You can also follow me online at IanCrossland, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Mines. I'm also streaming on Twitch, twitch.tv

slash IanCrossland. It's hot. Very cool. See you there. And I am Sour Patch Lids. I am on Twitter and Mines.com. And I am Real Sour Patch Lids on Instagram and Gab, because someone stole my username. Anyway.

Thanks for hanging out, everybody. We'll be back. Is today Friday? Yeah, it's Friday. Friday. So we'll be back Monday at 8 p.m. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you then.

Bye, guys.