Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #288 - Crowder Goes NUCLEAR On YouTube, SUES Over Censorship w/Forrest Of Recoil Magazine
Episode Date: May 18, 2021Tim, Ian, and Lydia join Forrest Cooper, digital editor of Recoil Magazine and former Army Ranger to discuss Steven Crowder's pending lawsuit against YouTube, the Brooklyn Center new civilian 'police ...force', leftists who really believe the right is a source of most of the terror in the country, skyrocketing gas prices, and the SCOTUS rule in favor of the Fourth Amendment, refusing to allow police to raid homes without warrants. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sure most of you know that YouTube has given Steven Crowder a warning, which is like a,
it's a warning. They don't shut you down, but they take your content down.
They then gave him a strike. Then they gave another warning on his other channel, Crowder Bits.
They then gave him a second strike on his main channel, and then they gave him a strike on a
second channel. This is serious, and for anybody listening who's not familiar, Crowder is a massive
personality. He's a conservative comedian.
He does news commentary, cultural commentary.
And for the longest time, we saw censorship happening.
It was targeting the fringes, or so many people said.
But as you can see, as time goes on, the fringe keeps changing.
The hit pieces keep coming, and they just keep coming for the next person.
Closer and closer towards the center. And then eventually
everyone gets censored. We even see many anti-war leftists getting censored as well. Well, Crowder
is fighting back, filing a lawsuit, or at least he's announcing he will be filing a lawsuit and
an injunction against YouTube. And it's really interesting. We're going to go through what
they're talking about, why they're doing it. I think this is extremely important because,
well, once Crowder goes, then who's next on the chopping block? Channels like ours. See, before they started
going after Crowder, they were going after other channels as well, people like Alex Jones. And we
all knew it's only a matter of time before they would make their move and slowly just get rid of
more and more content creators, more and more channels. So we definitely need to talk about
this and make sure we're keeping this at the forefront because this is going to be really,
really important. And I'll say it too, you know, we obviously want Crowder to be able to continue
doing his work. And there's also a bit of self-preservation in there. It's, I know what
happens to us the moment Crowder's out of the picture. They're going to keep moving down the
line. We can't have that happen. So we'll talk about that. We've got a bunch of other news too.
There's a huge Supreme Court decision, to zero like even the liberal justice has
agreed cops can't use caretaking as an excuse to go in your house and take your guns without a
warrant so we'll get into that we also got police reform in the minneapolis area the black lives
matter activists have won and now they're going to be creating an unarmed traffic enforcement
division which i can only assume will be like i want to say like a benny hill movie but with more We'll be right back. do that my name is for what are you wearing i am i am showing off some of the stuff that we work on in our magazine but now for reality i told him to wear it everybody he did it was uh
it was forced you had it yeah i was like i was like hey put that on yeah put that on night vision
god night vision right so it's that kind of if you want to understand a little bit about recoil
magazine we like to be edgy in that fashion looking at new products what's really coming
out so instead of it just
being about whether a firearm you know how evaluating a firearm we talk about culture we
talk about night vision how to do it and so it's it's really about education and aspiration you
change stuff gun stuff gun stuff yep the core idea being culture leads policy you change culture by
going out and doing stuff.
Speaking of Steven Crowder, the other day we – so on Saturday I went and actually I finally got the Sig M400 that Crowder had sent to me.
Thank you very much, Steven.
And we took it out to the range in West Virginia, and everyone was super impressed with it.
So we had a great time.
So Forrest and I and a few others went out.
We fired a bunch of guns.
And we also brought out the Barrett MA2A1 and tried to blow up the gong, but we weren't able to do it.
But it was fun firing that.
So that's what we did yesterday.
And, again, the weapon from Crowder was incredible.
Everybody was super impressed with it.
I was super impressed with it.
Really grateful for getting that.
So, again, we're going to talk about the censorship stuff.
We've got Ian East chilling.
What's up, everybody? Ian Crossland. Good to be here.
You've got me in the corner pushing buttons. I'm
Sarah Patch Litz. Before we
get started with the show, go to timcast.com,
click the big
members only button, and you can sign up to become
a member. You can do it through Stripe or PayPal.
See, we're building up the site. We're making it better
because we know many people have asked. But this site
exists because the fear of censorship was very real.
And I realized if I didn't start setting something up that would exist outside of YouTube, I got all my eggs in one basket.
And, you know, we can get banned the same as Crowder can.
So just like Crowder has the Mug Club, which you guys should definitely check out and support him considering what they're going through and how important this lawsuit is.
We have TimCast.com where you can join us as well. And when you do, you get access to the members area, a ton of exclusive members-only
podcast segments and full episodes. It's really, really great. We were hanging out with Robbie
Starbuck last week talking about neocon rhinos threatening to quit the Republican Party.
And he made a really good point that the tumor is excising itself. Oh, we're so upset about it.
So definitely become a member. Just be there because in the event that we get a strike, look, even one strike, if we say something
wrong at any moment, we don't know what we can't produce any content on any channel for a week.
Same thing is happening to Crowder right now. They got him out for two weeks.
So in the event that, uh, in the event that happens, you can find us at timcast.com,
but don't forget to like share, subscribe,, hit that notification bell if you're listening on iTunes, Spotify,
or any other podcast platform. Give us a good review and take the URL on YouTube and share
it around. It really, really does help, especially considering this is the big fight, everybody.
Let's talk about this first story right here. LouderWithCrowder.com officially suing YouTube.
Steven Crowder initiates legal action against YouTube from Crowder's website.
They report last week,
louder with Crowder LLC through its lawyer
gave a legal notice to YouTube
of the intent to file a lawsuit and seek an injunction.
They go and mention they have a video available
on their website.
Last fall after the Vox adpocalypse,
YouTube remonetized Crowder's channel.
They said we had a record-breaking election live stream
in November and incredibly successful streams thereafter.
If there ever was a target painted on our backs, it was then.
Once we hit the new year and a new president ascended, the landscape of social media shifted in favor of the left.
Democrats took control of the presidency and now have control of both houses of Congress.
As such, YouTube and other big tech platforms feel emboldened with very few lawmakers standing
in the way.
He says in 2021, YouTube hit them with a warning of a strike over election content, then issued
the first hard strike.
The first strike was related to a COVID policy in their March 18th video of the one year
anniversary of 15 days to flatten the curve.
The studio is familiar with YouTube's policies on COVID.
So I'll just give you the gist of it. And I went over this the first time they gave him a strike. Crowder did not
break any rules in this capacity. And I got really angry because I get this email from Google when
this is going down, like well in advance of any of the censorship, straight up saying,
here are the exact conditions you must meet to violate this policy? And I said, that's easy. They said,
you can't say two specific things together, which obviously I can't say because YouTube will take
us down if I do, even if I explain it. That's the way this works. Their algorithms don't understand
the difference between explaining something and it's all the same to them. Crowder never said
that there was widespread fraud. Crowder never said that there was widespread fraud.
Crowder never mentioned about, you know, anything about overturning or anything like that.
They gave him a strike, which is bunk.
The next one, the second one is the craziest.
Apparently, they're claiming that Crowder and his team were glorifying the death of Micaiah Bryant for agreeing with the police that the police officers were justified in
the shooting.
Now, of course, media matter says that they were mocking, you know, the woman.
I don't see that as still violating the policies, which says, you know, glorifying or reveling
in someone's death when you're like, hey, this is the law.
If you break it, this is what's going to happen.
I think YouTube is reaching.
As Crowder explains, he says the concern they have is that YouTube is actively looking for violations in their past videos that aren't actually violations in order
to issue a third hard strike once they're allowed to stream to the platform, which would de-platform
them from YouTube. YouTube has a pattern of applying policies and even stretching those
policies beyond any reasonable reading of the policy in order to harm channels which take
a contrary view of their opinions. We experienced this. We only have ever gotten a warning,
but it was on our episode with Alex Jones. And they claimed that a hyperbolic statement
was glorifying violence or something. And they took the full podcast down. And I said,
it was half a second. Can I just snip it out? And they're like, no. They were looking for any possible excuse to take our video down.
And I think that's pretty obvious to everybody. So he was going to mention why you should care.
No matter what side of the political aisle you're on, YouTube isn't encouraging debate.
It's trying to squash debate, trying to eradicate ideas from its platform it simply does not like.
One day those ideas are about the election.
Then they're about COVID.
Now those ideas include applauding an officer for saving a woman's life.
When will enough be enough?
Well, this is really important.
But I got to say to Stephen and crew, obviously, we all care.
I think the people who watch this show care about principle and recognize the commies
going to have their free speech.
The Nazis going to have their free speech, the Nazis going
to have their free speech, and we're going to be annoyed with them. But we're going to argue. And
that's the purpose of free speech. We want our rights protected. And that means people you don't
like, they get rights to. The problem is the people we're up against. I hate to call it left
and right because it really doesn't make sense economically or even in terms of tradition versus progressivism.
It's just zealots who want power, whose ideology is there is no truth but power,
and then people who are like, let's have a fair debate, a fair argument over this.
So they're suing. They're filing an injunction. And I wonder what precedent could be set.
There's a lot of people need to understand, like when we watch James O'Keefe filing these lawsuits against the New York Times and CNN, a lot of people say you can't do it.
You can't do it for this, that, and this reason. Oh, it's going to get thrown out.
You can only do it until you do it. If you keep backing down and saying,
obviously there's no point in suing because, oh, what's going to happen? It's going to be a waste
of money. Okay, listen, I understand if you don't have the money to file a lawsuit, that's a
challenge. But if you just sit there and let these companies do this, there will never be precedent set.
So I'll throw it to you guys.
Otherwise, I'm going to keep ranting on the censorship.
Ian, obviously, you were talking about before the show creating terms of service for mines because you helped put that together.
Yeah, honestly, in addition to it being up against, like you said, zealots, people that are just kind of crazy about political correctness and stuff,
we're also up against centralization of power and machine learning algorithms that aren't necessarily –
and we're seeing the flaws in the system of a centralized service that's dictating what can and can't be said through a machine algorithm
because stuff gets taken out of context.
Like you said, you can't explain certain things even though you're not using it derogatorily.
Because the voice-to-text thing they do for captions would just show the sentence.
It doesn't understand.
I'm like, here's exactly what YouTube said I can't say.
They'd be like, we see it in the code.
Gone.
You see this also in the firearms industry or the gun world.
So there's gun tubers, people who make YouTube videos.
You could say Grand
Thumb's a big one. Warrior Poet Society's a good one.
Hickok 45. Hickok's
great. He's classic. Yeah, I love that.
So, but I mean, you can,
so the firearms industry actually in some ways
not the industry but the community, because culture as well,
was somewhat saved
by the internet because it allowed people from
rural areas, because a lot of more firearms
ownership in rural areas, communicate with one one another and then they started making youtube
channels how so that people could learn how to do things and it is ironically controversial in the
united states right now i don't want to use ironically too heavy because it's way too hipster
but it's you're right though yeah right no but it's it's ironically controversial that a person
can have their page taken down because they were teaching somebody how to not hurt themselves do you
remember when google banned the word gun yes this was the best thing because uh so you couldn't
search for the word or or any combination of the three letters g-u-n yep so i searched for the
anime gundam yep it wouldn't come up You couldn't buy Japanese action figures. That's how stupid their censorship is.
Yeah, like my personal Instagram is at FoxrooOfficial,
and my search page is all Gundams and motorcycles
because it's like you look at my page,
I've got guns and motorcycles,
but my search history, if you look at the search page,
it's all anime.
Gundam?
It's all anime characters.
Are you searching for that?
It's just defaulting it?
Well, I mean, I did play Final Fantasy VII once.
Great game.
Yeah, right?
Great game.
One of the best.
The remake was good, I hear.
I enjoyed the remake.
Yeah.
Exceptional music.
Anyway, Google only – like a lot of people were – so we went to the range yesterday.
We were filming the vlog, and we fired the Barrett – what is it? M m82a1 that's the kind of nomenclature that people use yeah and uh 50 bmg
and the and and crowder gave uh he sent me a year ago a sig m400 and i also got a a sig uh tread
site and uh it was amazing it was just really really great and we did it all we did it all
safe i mean for us you clearly know how to shoot.
We're giving instruction.
We also had the instructor on site.
And a lot of people were just like – I got asked like 10 times, are you sure you can do this?
Like YouTube will delete your vlog, won't it?
And I'm like, I went through the rules.
They say as long as you're showing the weapon and shooting it in a range.
I mean obviously they're YouTubers who are still producing.
But I don't know.
Maybe we'll get the channel demonetized.
Yeah, I mean, there's different
types of content you can see people creating. Either
it's just like short films. People
do that all the time, usually with airsoft
guns, but you get the point. But they also
do how to
disassemble a firearm so you can clean it.
So when your channel,
your video gets demonetized because
you're teaching somebody how to
safely clean their firearm, you're getting dinged with something that because you're teaching somebody how to safely clean their firearm.
You're getting dinged with something that says you're teaching someone how to manufacture.
Assemble, right?
Which is one of those things where the people who are running the asylum are not the right people kind of thing.
Yeah, it's contradictory.
You're watching
people perform gun safety and so they punish you for it yes so one of the things they said is that
uh you can only show a weapon in appropriate place like a gun store or a range you can't just have
one in like an office room or something i guess they'll give you a strike sure you could so uh
there's a local range out here and they and they have rooms that look just like classrooms because they do safety trainings.
Yeah, you can't do that.
No.
No, absolutely.
They'll be like, oh, that's not –
It looks too much like this.
Right.
It looks like a school.
It could be, yeah.
And then you're going to get in trouble.
You're going to get dang-dignate censored.
And therein lies the big problem.
I love how you said it was ironic because America is – it's a gun country.
And these massive services namely youtube will ban
your content and i i have to wonder too there's there's there's definitely an overlap here
obviously you know crowder is usually he got i think what does he what does he have the walther
on his on his desk he's got a walther yeah uh-huh and uh i wonder i i because i've always been
curious about that i'm like dude's got a gun sitting on his desk. Or he's wearing – he's got his holsters.
And I'm just like, I'm pretty sure there's some Democrat anti-gun person sitting at YouTube HQ in Silicon Valley with their finger over the ban button.
Just like, stupid gun.
Moron gun.
I don't fan you.
And then they're just waiting.
They're waiting.
Like Crowder said, they're looking for something to get him for.
Yeah, and I think that's the part where you establish intent.
It is not really about honest disagreement.
We're looking at intent now.
But the bigger question is, and I'm glad Crowder is filing legal action.
This is a good thing because, like I said, you've got to sue and then make that argument.
But they can ban whoever they want, whatever they want.
Right, Ian?
According to most terms, I haven't read the YouTube terms.
I know Twitter says we can ban you at any time for any or no reason.
That's intentional.
So it's interesting now that we as individuals who operate on these platforms
have no legal protections.
And it's interesting.
Maybe we shouldn't.
Maybe it's our own fault. That's why I up you know timcast.com because i'm like okay
i mean i'm fairly libertarian if youtube has got a company they don't owe me anything and it's their
platform if somebody came into my house and started you know like throwing food on the floor i'd be
like get out someone came into my house started screaming a bunch of nazi stuff i'd be like dude
get out not not gonna be having that the difference is youtube is has has been subsidized by google they've monopolized
the space there are platforms where you can upload videos but youtube is absolutely dominated and now
it's kind of the only place where you can run a business it's a really really complicated argument
no other service offers monetization in the same way that YouTube
does. What's this?
Or do they? Recoil is currently
building, and we have Recoil
TV, which functions similar to YouTube
and we are building a monetization path.
It's expensive to host these videos, though.
And we do, we actually
we have it. So if you are
a firearms content
creator, get a hold of us because we'll put you on Requel TV.
It doesn't cost you anything.
Wow.
But you guys got to fund that.
Run ads or something?
We fund it through the fact that people like our publication.
There you go.
But it can get really, really expensive.
So, for instance, in the members-only section of our website, we have to pay for that bandwidth, and it is a lot.
It gets up to tens of thousands of dollars. People don't realize this. YouTube's free. So we broadcast right now on
YouTube. You know, we get 40K concurrent views, you know, on average during the election,
we had like 140 or some on one podcast. That means for the two to three megabits up we're
sending out, we're sending out 140,000 times two megabits, all of that data YouTube's
paying for. And then they take a small percentage of super chats and they take a percentage of
advertisements. So the issue is they're fronting the costs for all of these things.
Should we be entitled to the service? And that's where things get challenging. And
man, I'm pretty much on the fence. But so long as I'm on the fence in terms of like their business, private company. But where where I draw the line is, if they'm like i think that they've they've grown and taken over the commons we don't have
town hall discourse anymore people are coming to this show and and hearing arguments and discussions
and commenting it's take youtube youtube's effectively dominated the space well now they
owe they they owe public discourse in which case i think it's
extremely dangerous if they're going to start removing people who are setting up maybe uh who
are setting up their businesses maybe a better way to put it is if a private company bought all of
the available business space in in downtown yeah at a certain point people are going to be like
okay fine you can own it but you can't ban people for selling a product you don't like
like people can pay you rent you can set up people for selling a product you don't like. Like people can pay you rent.
You can set up terms for the property.
But we need commerce to exist.
Crowder needs to be able to speak.
We need to be able to have reasonable discourse.
And the problem I see with this is that massive multinational corporations,
if they see YouTube get away with this,
they can just start to dominate whatever public space they want,
whatever area of the commons they want,
and then just say
but it's a private company it's ours now shut everybody out and then i don't know what people
get violent well on the forefront of that you're also looking at what is the intent again you think
about it in the sense of we could talk about guns we can talk about anything political even with
steven crowder do they not want him to be heard or do they not trust him as a good faith actor is a good question, right?
Well, I think if you look at the left faction tends to be, in my opinion, a there is no truth but power faction.
Yep.
They accuse the right of being that.
And it's really insane that perhaps many of the establishment Republicans,
for sure. But when we're looking at anti-critical race theory individuals and their alignment on
the right, these are the people who reject that ethos. And so quite literally, you have the left
lying and accusing the right of what it's doing itself, which creates a serious problem.
Do they think Crowder is a bad faith actor no i think they believe crowder is
truthful and they don't like it right because they're bad faith actors who are trying their
anger they're angry by his success they're angry by his success there are a lot of leftists a lot
maybe maybe the majority who are good faith but they're following the the bad faith pipe piper
believing they're you know following the truth and then they say the same thing about trump and
trump's diehard fans and i'm like okay but that's not the majority of whatever this faction
is yeah there are a lot of people who are like begrudgingly voting for trump you know and then
you have a lot of people left who begrudgingly voted for biden so it's interesting but in the end
people like the you know in in the intellectual dark web, disaffected liberals, moderates
have more in common with conservatives based on moral frameworks and rejection of critical
race theory and left identitarianism, believing in free speech than the establishment Democrats.
And there's a big difference between voting for Trump and voting for Biden.
You vote for Trump because he's a human Molotov cocktail or because you really like him in
his policies.
People vote for Biden because he's a human Molotov cocktail or because you really like him and his policies. People vote for Biden because he's a
feeble old man they think they can overtake and
steal power or they genuinely
like his policies, but I believe that was probably like
a tiny faction. Most of the people voted for him because
he's hated Trump. Based on that,
you cannot build a government.
Yeah, what, a house divided against
itself?
I know, most people
have more in common than they realize i think that's occupy
wall street showed that when when people were railing against the federal reserve and like the
monetary system kind of putting us all against each other man to stop that it's so sad when
people get confused and start to go at each other like this i don't like it yeah the no truth but
power argument is a great form of sort of moral cynicism, but it also it's very manipulative.
It's not a very well, first of all, it's very honest because the people who say it are only interested in power.
So at least they're on it. They're consistent in that sense.
But it says rest in power. There is no truth but power, which is how I'm going.
And I'm going to use that philosophy to take your power and give it to me.
It's not the statement.
There's no truth, but power is not complete.
It's only the first half.
It's there is no truth, but power.
And I deserve it.
You know, it's interesting because there is.
I understand what they're saying when they say that.
That what's the point of having an argument with you?
If if they want to create their own system, their own utopia, their own leftists, you know, perfect world. There's no point having an argument with a bunch of they want to create their own system their own utopia their own leftists you
know perfect world there's no point having an argument with a bunch of people who disagree
with them they just need to take your power away destroy your system and then build a new one so
for the time being i don't i don't think the core of their philosophy is there is no truth but power
it's in order for me to build my utopia i must seize all of your power and the truth be damned
and that's where we're at right now.
And it leads to some very interesting things, which is our next segment here, actually.
So, Forrest, you're based out of Minneapolis.
I live in Minneapolis for the time being.
For the time being.
And you've got to see a lot of what's been going on.
We got the story from the Star Tribune.
Here we go.
Brooklyn Center passes police reform package.
Bravo.
Black Lives Matter. They've won this one. The failed go. Brooklyn Center passes police reform package. Bravo. Black Lives Matter.
They've won this one.
The failed leadership
of Brooklyn Center has caved.
One of the things
they're going to be doing,
an unarmed civilian
traffic enforcement division.
Here's my favorite thing.
Civilian.
Are police civilians?
Technically, yes.
Technically, no.
I'm not going to be able
to answer that one because it's – I think you could make the argument in many ways that they're functionally neither right now.
Functionally neither.
They're functionally neither because, I mean, sure, you have – they're not citizens in the sense that they work for the government.
Where do we make that distinction either is another question because I think that's a very modern way of thinking.
Yeah.
Because a soldier is not considered a citizen, but he's still a citizen of the country.
You mean civilian?
He's not considered a civilian.
Yeah.
But they're citizens.
They're citizens.
They're civilians.
Yeah.
Sorry about that.
Yeah.
They're combatants.
They're armed forces.
So conventionally the answer is no.
So I would say that if you're talking from a military perspective, the answer is yes.
They're not going in foreign war.
They're literally living in a small town and dealing with local domestic law.
They're civilians.
So the line gets blurred because you have you have when you talk about the police, you're you're talking about a very large swath of people. You've got your small-town sheriff, and you've got CIA, you've got FBI, you've got BORTAC,
you've got people who look much more militant.
Most people don't see them.
And are they both considered the police?
Well, so let's get into the meat and potatoes here.
They've successfully reformed their police, and's it's beyond what i would consider because
i've said we need reform but i'm usually talking about creating more divisions like an unarmed
traffic enforcement okay well maybe if the idea uh if the idea is like you see someone commit a
traffic violation you write down their license plate and they mail them a ticket that's something
they've been talking about doing but what do you you think would happen if someone, an unarmed civilian, tries pulling over?
Let's say there's a guy, and maybe he was at a party.
And he wakes up, and he's got a gun, and he goes to one of the people who lives there.
And then he says, give me all your money, and then shows that he's got a gun.
Let's say that's the person.
And now this person is wanted for that crime, which is a felony.
Let's say they're driving, and the unarmed person pulls them over for whatever means the division is able to do it.
The lights turn on, I guess.
They have some kind of car.
And they get out.
What do you think happens to a person in a situation like this?
You do have a disparity of power and you also have a disparity of the duty.
So is it the duty of the unarmed civilian to pull somebody over or is it just a privilege of their position right so
please please stop yeah i mean you're powerless to employ it but are you is there the burden the
onus of the state on you to go do it do you have a quota oh well there's more people drunk driving
in our neighborhood right now yeah there are they're all armed and i'm not right you're like
what are you gonna do orders are bad you bad. It's the bureaucratic problem.
I feel like this is
opening the door
to defund the police completely.
And it's kind of funny too
because one of the ways
police get funding
is their tickets.
And I'm not a fan,
especially when they do quotas.
Yeah.
So now it's like
they're being defunded
by taking away their ability
to issue traffic violations.
I think it can be seen
as a lot more sinister too.
So you take your example earlier.
They see you commit a violation
or they put up traffic cameras
and they see you run a red light.
Then they send a ticket to your house,
which you cannot fight.
Or if you try to fight it,
it's going to cost you time and money.
So you just sort of now have to pay it.
Most people do.
But if you don't,
then they send armed people with guns to your house.
Now you have a position of creating that pipeline of going from, I don't like you.
I write you a ticket for something that could be bogus, could be legitimate.
It goes to your house, knowing that you're not going to pay it.
And then you don't fight.
Bro, now they can search your house. Now they search your house now they can seize your property this is
called um look at what this is already in effect in london wow right you go to london you run a
red light you park in the wrong place you will have a ticket sent to your house and you can't
fight it well you can and then if you don't pay it the cops show up and now you've got some kind
of crime they can let us in.
It creates a paper trail.
It's crime by bureaucracy, not crime.
Now, if they pull you over while you're driving, you get a ticket and don't pay it, they can still go to your house and arrest you and go into your house.
Yes, but there was somebody there to witness it.
That is the purpose of American policing is that a person has to do it.
I think, though, in the end, this would increase the likelihood of these because I once got, uh, I once got in the mail, two tickets from Chicago, final determination,
they said. And I was like, what is this? I had gotten two parking tickets for parking outside
of my dad's place in Chicago, but I had a permit. I had a parking permit. I guess a cop, somebody
wrote me two tickets, never put them on my car. I never got notice of them until it was a final
determination. And so when I got it, I called and said, what is this? I have a permit to park where
I did. And they were like, sir, it's too late. You lost your chance to find the ticket. So imagine
you get pulled over. All right, let's, you get pulled over, you get a ticket, you don't pay it.
They can eventually come to your house maybe to serve a warrant for failure to appear or something
like that. But let's say you never even knew you did anything wrong.
Let's say you didn't do anything wrong.
Let's say you were driving right and one of these unarmed people was just like,
eh, he blew a stop sign as far as I'm concerned.
You get a ticket in the mail.
You never realize it came in the mail.
You're like, I don't know what these are.
You throw it in the trash.
Then one day they show up at your house and you're like, what's happening?
When there's an interaction between you and the officer,
I think there's a likelihood you're going to be aware of what's happening.
This will probably increase the likelihood cops start showing up to people's homes, and I can only imagine that would maintain the same ratio of violent encounters.
It's not going to get better, that's for sure.
I mean it's not because now you're going to take the cultural perception of police police as a threat in certain areas and you're
going to cross that you're going to paint that across the whole population right but apparently
i was reading this and they they are going to pull people over yes so i can only imagine that
people are going to be like you get pulled over and a guy walks up in like a polo and khakis
and he's like excuse me sir you are speeding i'm supposed to write you a who are you a cop
no sir i'm i'm not a cop later yeah or what obligation do i have to stop for someone's not
a cop i mean are you just going to look back in your mirror and say it's a red and yellow light
not a red and blue light so i might as well just drive home oh i live in a gated community you're
not allowed in here so if you come in here i'm going to call the actual cops to tell you to not
come in i think it's funny i think it's funny these people go around like smashing a window
starting fires we saw what happened right right now in minneapolis they're they're people are
freaking out they're demanding more cops they're increasing the budgets and then this one town
brooklyn center which is like north just like basically due north all of a sudden they're like
we're gonna do the opposite we're just gonna we're just gonna you know carte blanche yeah i mean
brooklyn center is gonna get eaten by Minneapolis. It's going to get folded in.
I mean, has that happened recently?
Folded in?
Like, it's within the counties.
Brooklyn Center is essentially Minneapolis.
So what's it like living in Minneapolis?
Is it the apocalyptic wasteland we all believe it is because we watch a lot of internet videos?
It's not completely the apocalyptic wasteland.
But it is basically Kabul or Mosul.
It feels a lot more like being in Kandahar than it does like being in America.
But do you mean that for real?
Yeah.
I mean it's not quite the same.
I'm not driving an armored vehicle around.
But there are definitely – like we have new SOP, standard operating procedures amongst us and our friends and our family.
You actually served though.
You were – Yeah. I was in the military for a while.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
Minneapolis.
No, I have had the
privilege of being in the armed forces for a while.
What did you do in the military?
I was a ranger, army ranger.
So it was a great time.
So now, being back home,
it's like, what, similar? It's not as bad. So now being back home and it's like what?
Similar?
It's not as bad.
Yeah.
I mean no one's burning tires to block the roadways for three months of the year.
There's an autonomous zone where they like put up barricades and threaten people with violence.
So in the same way, there are places that we just don't go.
Like there are roads you don't take.
No go zones.
There's definitely like, hey, we communicate.
My family, we communicate.
And it's like, hey, I'm going to go get groceries.
Okay, cool.
I mean, that's kind of normal for some people.
But we're definitely more conscious about what we're looking at, what threats we're looking for, what kind of concerns we have. And then we have a little network of people that are all friends and families in the Twin Cities that we're all looking out for each other.
Is this new?
Like these behaviors and these offensive tactics?
It absolutely initiated last year when the riot started.
We spontaneously set it up.
We just called all the people that we knew.
We built a kind of a network through social media conversation or through Signal or through text messages, and we established ways that we talked to each other so that we could very effectively verify rumors.
So one of the worst things that happened during the riots last year, not this year, was essentially the entirety of social media became an advertisement for things that aren't happening the the white
supremacists are coming down from new brighton the these people are coming from here we just
saw this thing happen and it was like everyone was on so high alert that they were spreading
rumors so quickly which added to the fervor it added to the the terror in the sense and so what
the first thing one of the things that we had to do as, as a community is by our own volition,
by our own choice,
verify information ourselves.
So,
okay.
If someone's saying that the,
the,
this,
this is on fire or they're moving towards one of the,
one of the concerns that they had last year was if the police provide a
strong enough presence in defending of precinct or they harden targets in like when they mean
hardened target like make it difficult for people to loot and riot in certain areas they're going
to move into the residential areas so the moment we heard that it was like okay how can we verify
that information because that sounds a lot like hearsay but it also has a big threat so you're
basically creating like a neighborhood watch is that what happened happened? Yeah. I mean, it's an neighborhood watch.
Unofficial.
It's like, you know, you have a chat group.
Remember when I was talking about this maybe like a week or two ago when I said what's going to start happening is there's more violence.
You'll see the formation of like local community groups.
Exactly.
They'll start texting each other.
Hey, I heard this.
Are you all right?
You know, there'll be text groups.
Yep.
And it's going to escalate from there.
Yeah, and we took it a step further of having triggers and conditions or conditions and appropriate responses.
So in the event that X happens, we do Y.
In the event that we see this happen, so if the protest goes to this precinct, we go to this person's house and get their wife and child out and move them out of the city and put them into a safe house.
And we did that.
We had to do exactly that.
You mentioned earlier, you said for the time being.
So you're getting out, aren't you?
Yeah.
We're looking at moving out of state.
There's not a – I mean our families are there, but there's not a lot of reason to live in Minneapolis right now.
It does not look like a bright future.
Everybody's going to Texas, I guess.
Texas is a big one yeah it's kind of crazy when you when you mention like these streets you don't
go down and that's like a new thing since the start of the riots that's why i asked you yeah
i mean the term minnesota nice is not entirely pejorative it also does mean that like generally
speaking you can drive through most of the city and not be in actual fear for your life but when
i go to a place and i see a roadblock with armed people that just by looking at
them know that they have no idea what they're doing with that firearm, given it's their
right to have it, but I know that they're not going to, they don't know what they're
doing with it.
I'm not going to put myself in the position of no reward and all risk.
I want to show you guys this, uh, this, this post I found on Reddit.
So I'm browsing reddit
and uh political humor okay if you go on reddit and you click all you'll see every post it is a
hive of scum and villainy it's just a lot of people who are really dumb they don't do research
it's very tribal political humor this is one of the front page posts. It says radical left. It shows the photo
from the Capitol and says it cracks me up when the left is referred to as radical, as if the left is
running around carrying assault rifles, denying science and discussing not accepting the election
results. And I'm like, does any of these people have the internet four years ago like four
four years did they use the internet first of all okay fair point no one is running around with
assault rifles that's just stupid nope no one not not anyone i mean it'd be kind of a crazy thing
to see a guy running around with like an actual m16 or maybe even like a legit belt-fed machine
gun of some sort but no uh no one's that. I think they just mean rifle in general.
Okay.
Well, the left is doing that
like a hundred times more often
than the right does it.
They've been denying science
and the election for four years.
But these people,
they live in a bubble.
Yep.
I think it's funny.
I wanted to bring this up
because you're mentioning Minneapolis.
You live there.
And I'm like, they got – I was reading a story where it was like 30 gunshots ring out at like 10 p.m.
And then it's like by 11 p.m. another 30 gunshots ring out.
A guy's on a rooftop.
They say, Star Tribune, I think it was an op-ed.
They say a guy on a rooftop with an assault rifle.
And I'm like, it's probably just a regular rifle.
But I get your point.
There's a guy on a roof with a gun. I've seen picture and i know where the gunshots happen because yeah so what's
going on what's going on in the autonomous zone so in the autonomous zone from what i understand
and this is going to be a combination of um it's it's a difficult thing it's a difficult piece to
explain entirely but what you have is essentially people thinking that the cops are going to come
in and raid their buildings so you'll have like when you the picture that we're talking about was
classically a guy on a rooftop with an ar-15 style rifle sitting up there like he's providing
overwatch for the city right or for for the neighborhood so in case a police officer or
the police come down or whatever maybe it's like this guy wanted to shoot cops we don't i can't
i'm not going to ascribe that.
I can't.
I can't tell you what he wanted, but maybe he was genuinely afraid for his neighborhood.
Maybe he was afraid that a rival gang was going to do something.
I don't know.
But I do know that when you you can if you go out into Minneapolis at night and you go
into the right neighborhoods, you will find people on rooftops with guns.
You will find people.
But that's just like rooftop Koreans, right?
Like people who want to protect their businesses. In some cases cases i'm assuming yes but let's let's just hope
so there was i take them from who though right is the writers or you could make the argument that
the autonomous zone is trying to protect their people from cops taking in you could say that
people in that area were trying to protect their own businesses. These people are insane about cops.
Do you know what happens?
I'm going to let everyone in a big secret, and this is going to shock a lot of people.
You know what would happen if you were in a big city and you're just walking down the street and there were two cops in front of you and they're walking down the street?
You know what would happen if you walked past those cops?
Absolutely nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
It's like Chicago is notorious for its bad cops.
We had a video where like this cop grabbed – not a video but a story about a cop grabbed a meter maid because she was riding a – he parked illegally.
She rode up to take it.
So he grabbed her by the throat and lifted her up and slammed her against the wall.
Chicago is notorious for crooked cops.
And I see a cop on the street.
I'm like, howdy.
Hey.
Yeah.
These people are like, put up barricades.
We need guns.
They're police.
They're hunting us.
They're really delusional, man.
But I'll mention this.
I think it was in Philly during the riots.
There were people tweeting like, hey, stay away from this neighborhood.
There's a bunch of far right guys on roofs with guns, on rooftops with guns.
And they post a photo of a bunch of dudes on roofs with guns.
All the businesses were safe.
Yep.
No, we saw, we encountered a place in Minneapolis that, this last year, if you looked at New Brighton and where all the looting was,
I got to meet some people that it was four guys outside of a tobacco shop.
And they all had AK-47s and they're just chilling there because that was one of two buildings that did not get looted in the area.
And the good news is the left only wants to ban – I'm sorry.
I shouldn't say the left.
The Democrats only want to ban AR-15s, so AKs are totally fine.
Yeah, let's hope so.
Yeah, yeah.
No, no.
Because there are – I mean, was it – we already instituted a ban of Russian-made AKs.
Like, import bans is a big issue.
Right, right, right, right. So good news is a lot of companies have moved their manufacturing to the United States,
but that is a backdoor form.
I just think it's funny when they tweet all day like, you know, we got to ban AR-15s.
No one should have one.
I'm like, I'll get an AK.
Got it, buddy.
Thanks.
Do you know anything about what you're saying?
Because it's meaningless.
Yeah, you got to ask the question every once in a while with gun control is is is it ignorance or is it malice those are two different things yeah it's
definitely malice oh yeah and at what point in time does ignorance become malice because if you
look at the foray of data that we have in any relating to gun violence and gun control i mean
it's not a hard argument to make the problem is that you've made it so many times that no one
cares anymore.
The big violence happens in places where there's gun control. Perhaps we should
start making the conclusion that gun control
begets violence. And I think malice
is, so obviously nothing's absolute.
There's probably a lot of ignorant people who just follow
along. But it's got to be malice, and you need to
understand this. When you make the same
argument 800,000 times
and they don't care and keep lying okay it's not
ignorance anymore like when someone says that stupid meme you know no self-respecting hunter
using assault weapon and then you're like okay first of all assault weapon is a nebulous term
that means different things in different places and it's ill-defined because i love that meme of
the ruger 1022 with with with and without a pistol grip and one's an assault weapon and one's not.
And then you mentioned that hunters use AR-15s.
Like, I think it's the most popular rifle used in hunting.
I wouldn't say the most popular, but it's very common.
And you've got to look at the different types of hunting because hunting is a broad spectrum.
If you're hunting wild boar, absolutely.
But these people clearly don't know, don't care.
And after you explain it, they say, shut up.
They just want a tribal win and they want to take power away for you for themselves.
Or it's worse because they just want to have a conversation.
Right.
They just want to have a conversation.
Right.
The story that I get to have is when I went to college after the military, in my senior year, the Parkland shooting happened. And so the woke chapter
of the school decided to get together and host a conversation about gun control. The extent of the
knowledge of the people in the room, there was me, one other veteran, and a guy who had grown up
hunting and who was an avid hunter. The three of us were the only three who had ever owned firearms,
ever bought them. And the other 30 people the extent of
their knowledge on anything to do with firearms was watching a single vice video so they were
they were well versed and experienced yeah well the point the point is like yes oh absolutely right
they knew exactly what they're talking about and the problem that you have there is we can look at
each other as equals as people but we do not have equal information we do not know you don't when someone thinks that they deserve a position at the table when they're not even
capable of being literate on the subject so why are we debating are you saying service guarantees
citizenship i am reading that book for the first time because i've mentioned it i'm reading i'm
reading starship troopers for the first time right now. Well, yeah.
It's a huge problem, especially for me because I got – there's a photo of me that Mike Feedy took.
So he came out.
He's the BMX guy from the vlogs, and he came out with us.
And as I was carrying the Barrett, which is a ridiculously large and heavy gun, I had this grin.
Just put it that way.
It was a grin.
It was a grin.
I'd call it something more, but we don't swear.
We don't do that here.
Smirk? No, I swear grin. It was a grin. It was a grin. I'd call it something more, but we don't swear. We don't do that here. Smirk?
No, I swear grin.
It's a, you know.
Anyway, somebody commented, Tim's journey from I'm in favor of some reasonable gun control to two absolutists is the greatest character arc ever or something like that.
And I was like, it's a good point.
And the issue was I lived in a city.
I was interested in hearing the thoughts and opinions of those who owned guns but having never fought uh having well i did fire one but having
not owned any or gone through the process to own any or learned anything about different types of
ammunition or weapons i was like i think a conversation makes sense there's some things
we can do and then when the riots broke out someone tried breaking in my house i'll tell you
this someone tried breaking in my house house. I'll tell you this.
Someone tried to break into my house.
And then they made this really, really hilarious meme where it was like, you know, the Shibas that are all like weak and pathetic.
Yeah.
And it was like Tim in 2019.
And it was the weak, sad one saying, help.
Someone's trying to break into my house.
Call 911.
And then it was like Tim Pool 2020.
And it's like the big ripped dog carrying a bunch of guns.
And he's like, you get what you deserve.
So after someone tried breaking in, the cop told me.
He's like, I'll paraphrase.
He basically said, get a gun.
And he said, if it were me, here's what I'd do.
So I went to a local police station, and I said, what's the process for New Jersey?
And they gave me information that was bad.
And then I went online, looked it up, and I got information that was bad. And then I was like,
I don't have time for this. Like I'm, I'm working, you know, crazy hours and everything, you know?
So I just lost track of things. Then when the riots kicked up, I was like, I, I have no choice.
And the mistake I made was I should have went to the gun shop first. They want to sell me the gun.
They need to make sure I can get the paperwork. I think it took me like two months to finally be able to go and pick up the equipment.
And, you know, we were talking earlier in the show about Steven Crowder sending me the SIG M400.
The reason I couldn't get it for a year, I could have got it sooner, but I couldn't get it because
they sent it to New Jersey, which has insane laws, which made it very difficult. The gun had
to be modified in several ways before I could pick it up, before they could ship it out to any other store.
And so there was a process, and it fell through, and I'm like,
I don't have time to deal with this.
It was – they put all these roadblocks in the way to make sure you basically can't do it.
Well, now we're basically in West Virginia, and so they just snap their fingers, and here you go.
That's what constitutional carry is like.
So that was New Jersey you're moving from?
Yeah, leaving New Jersey.
Yeah, and so you couldn't own the firearm in its current state because of New Jersey law.
Yep.
Which makes no sense.
Which essentially what you're saying is that New Jersey law says that you are legal if you are incapable and you are illegal if you are capable.
Yeah.
I mean.
Yep.
Yep.
So that means they don't trust you and that means it's malice.
I just think it was funny.
So when we were filming the vlog, and I'm at the gun shop picking up the SIG M400 finally gets shipped in,
and one of the guys at the shop, so I do the background check.
I do NICS, and they were researching me, so it was a little bit longer, but it was like 15 minutes.
And then he says, congratulations.
Uncle Sam says you're allowed to have the gun.
And I was like, oh, thank you, Uncle Sam, for allowing me to exercise my inalienable right.
That's where we're currently at.
It's a rifle.
It's crazy because these leftists, there's a lot of ignorant ones.
But the people who work for these nonprofits, the people who are writing policy, they know that an AR-15 is one pull the trigger, one bullet comes out.
They know.
There's no way that they've spent 10, 15, 20 years advocating to ban guns, and they've
not actually ever Google searched any of them.
They know they're lying.
They know they use assault weapon to scare people.
Yeah, there's a classic argument that says something like there's no such thing as an
assault weapon.
And here's a little known industry secret.
Nobody likes no, no, a fully automatic weapon is 100 a hobbyist tool with the exception of very specific military applications if you're not using a belt fed
machine gun or a submachine gun like a fully automatic ar-15 has almost no value yeah we've
talked about it quite a bit on the show we i think i remember who it was maybe it was jim was it was
it jim maybe jim hansen mentioning uh maybe it was maybe it was somebody else uh in vietnam it was spray and pray and so they just waste so much
ammo and they're like we can't do this it's ineffective so they wanted to make people use
semi-auto it's more you know precise well yeah so you think about a body mechanics like when i'm
every individual pull the trigger you look at go look at like a three gun competition and go look
at someone who's really good at it that guy guy shoots really fast. Almost, it almost looks like
he's shooting fully automatic. The fact is that he's doing is each with each pull of the trigger,
he is making a conscious decision to pull that trigger and put that bullet as best as he can,
where he wants it. So if I'm just holding the trigger and holding it and swinging my gun around
like a hose, I'm probably not going to hit my target. I think if anybody's played a game,
like you've played the division, I played the first going to hit my target. I think if anybody's played a game, like, you ever played The Division?
I played the first one for about a week.
Division was awesome.
Division 2 was pretty good, but I really liked the first one, and then I stopped playing. I don't play that many
video games. But,
in that game, it's actually pretty great, because you can
get, like, real guns.
And I always played, I always
use, like, my favorite gun to use in the game
was the M1, or M1A or whatever.
Because for that reason, a lot of people I know would like to use, you know, submachine guns or whatever in the game.
Literally, it's a video game.
It's called The Division.
But then it's spray and pray, and you're, like, just hoping your accuracy will be high enough.
Whereas the way I'd play is just, like, one, one, one one you know yeah you look at a game like call of duty and your character can
take an m4 concept and hold it on a decent circle um for just the whole magazine like that's not
really i mean you can do that you technically can but it's just not not not only is it not
efficient but it's it's sort of like is it really video games that are driving the culture?
Which is why I cannot wait until one of these big companies comes out and they make a game where you're using the guns like people do in the military.
So you're running around with your M4 and it's on single shot.
Yeah.
Because that's exactly how you're going to do it.
And so, yeah, given the whole fully automatic mechanic is a little bit more, I don't know, video game normal.
It's Doom, I guess.
You can paraphrase
halo i just man i remember growing up and i'm watching a movie and you know my dad's sitting
there and my dad always would always you know comment and say things and predict things and
then there's i can't remember what movie it was i'm a little kid and then like the bad guy sneaks
into the room and then my dad goes who silencer and the guy pulls out a gun he goes yep and like
people grow up believing that stuff's real yeah i mean go watch the movie django unchained and in
one of the late season or late episode or late scenes of the movie the main character shoots
another person at one angle and he flies the other way fly a different direction that's quentin
tarrant quentin being awesome yes yes and i. That was funny. We hope to trust that it's Quentin Tarantino making fun of his own, not taking his work too seriously.
I remember that scene.
It was great.
It's great, right?
But now people will watch movies and they will legitimately think that's how it works.
And then they ban things based on the movies.
Yeah.
What is that Gelman amnesia effect where you're reading the news, you read an article that you are an expert in, and you realize it's all bunk.
You turn the page, and then you're like, huh?
It's the same thing with firearms.
If you're a doctor or a nurse, you know that the nurse TV shows are not really that accurate.
So when you watch NCIS, it's not the same.
A department of diagnostics.
You ever watch House?
I did.
I saw a couple episodes yeah
it was basically i guess the premise of house was like sherlock holmes is a doctor or something
and so he gets a mystery i mean people believe this stuff like i was reading a story about how
uh people would go to the doctor with and they would ask the doctor like what's wrong with me
i'm sick and when they'd be like well we're not entirely sure we'll give you a scan they'd be
like can you send me to diagnostics they'd be like what what be like
like dr house they'd be like that's not real that's a tv show yeah there's no like head doctor
to just break into your home and steal your your your bath soap to try and figure out if it's got
a chemical in it that's what they do in the show like the doctors would literally break into the
person's house and then like take their drano and be like, look what we found.
This is what's killing them.
You know what, man?
I don't know how you solve for that problem because you're allowed to have TV shows.
But people believe TV and movies are real too much.
Yeah, I would never want to have like an enforcement of accuracy committee, right? right i mean you there's that there's a kind of a trope that goes about in in in the military that some people have lost their jobs because they went to advise uh entertainment and they were too
accurate there's there's stories about what's what's the legitimate reason for making suppressors
nfa items for those that aren't familiar it's like you gotta file a tax it takes like nine
months you get your fingerprints it's very difficult to buy yeah there is a there is a
there is a burden entry for owning a suppressor, which is an item that makes it safer to shoot the firearm.
That's just insane.
Yeah.
What does it do?
It protects hearing damage.
Now, if you're going to universalize health care and you're going to get more people with hearing damage, okay.
So silencers aren't real.
The term silencer is just a colloquial term.
Right.
And there was a long time when people referred to them as silencer.
Right now, people are using the term suppressor more often.
And I think some of that is as an attempt to better translate what the object does.
They're still loud.
They're still loud.
The bullet passes or breaks the sound.
If the bullet breaks the sound barrier, you're still getting the crack and that's probably that's what's going to hurt the
most yeah so yes when i when you shoot a firearm that has a suppressor on you're probably wearing
ear protection as well yeah yeah i've i've uh i've fired a weapon with a suppressor it's still loud
the recoil was better and it wasn't as loud but it's like people could hear it probably a mile
away i mean if you know what it sounds like yeah you actually know what it sounds like but you're talking about events with people in the riots
where someone is launching fireworks okay but someone is shooting a gun and they think it's
fireworks well so so in these riots it's it's it's never it's almost never fireworks sometimes
people will throw fireworks but uh in my experience it's more often that someone's shooting a gun, and then you get really dumb journalists being like, it sounds like fireworks.
There was a tactic in Minneapolis where activists were firing whatever they were, were legitimately firing mortar fireworks at buildings and people.
But those are very different booms, right?
They are.
They are.
You ever see firecrackers?
You get the right package.
You're like.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Black hats? Yeah. Is that what they're called? No, those aren't black hats, are they? Maybe. I think they are. You ever see fire... You know firecrackers. Like, you get the right package. You let it go... Yeah, yeah, yeah. Black hats?
Yeah.
Is that what they're called?
No, those aren't black hats, are they?
Maybe.
I think they are.
Yeah?
Yeah.
They're like the little red and white ones.
Yeah.
And you let them go, pop.
And I've...
And actually, we had some recently.
We were...
Yeah, we had some recently.
We were just popping them off in the parking lot or whatever.
But journalists, for some reason, think that people just carry those around with them in
cities, especially in, like, you know in crime-ridden areas during riots.
Yeah, you can't buy them in Minneapolis, which means you have to go to a different state to get them.
Or it's a gun.
Or people are going, pop, pop, pop, pop.
And they're like, just fireworks.
Just mine.
Whatever.
It's fine.
Yeah.
Again, their information that's being given to them is bad.
Let's get a little apocalyptic, I suppose.
So we're talking about guns, the right to keep them bare and all that stuff.
Can we just go post-apocalyptic?
Post-apocalyptic.
We're not there yet.
Okay.
We got this story from the Daily Mail.
Gas prices climbed to seven-year high of $3.04 a gallon despite Colonial Pipeline reopening
after Dark Side hack.
All right.
So this is what I don't understand.
They said it was panic buying.
People are just panic buying. You know, and that's why there's no gas in DC and much of these places.
And then we found out that the Friday, the hack happened within three hours, they paid the ransom
to shut it down. So why did they shut down the pipeline? Why was supply threatened if they paid
the ransom? Did they lie to the government, which resulted in bad information and a panic?
Did they disrupt supply, which led to panic and then an actual shortage?
Something doesn't add up.
This is the kind of stuff that's going to exacerbate inflation.
And it's already getting crazy, man.
I mean, we went to the restaurant after shooting, and we waited like two hours for food because they had no staff.
Wow.
Yep.
And it was miserable.
I mean, I don't want to be mean to the restaurant.
They were trying, and I respect them for working like two people on staff for this restaurant because nobody wants to work.
Now gas prices are super high.
So here's what we were talking about.
So we're sitting there.
We thought it was going to be 45 minutes. You know, you go in, you order, you get
the food, you leave. And then at like two hours, I'm like, okay, we're going to get up and go.
And then the food finally comes out. And I was like, here's what happens.
The prices are skyrocketing and people are getting unemployment benefits. They're getting
16 bucks an hour not to work. Now Joe Biden's saying he's going to do the $300 tax credit for,
you know, up for every kid. So now families can get like three grand for their kids. So now you got people
who just don't want to work. So now you got one line cook at your restaurant. Now you got all
these people come in and he's going crazy trying to fill these orders. And eventually he just
stops and says for 15 bucks an hour, no way I'm done. Now you got no cook. Now you got no
restaurant. Yep.
Apocalypse.
This kind of shortage is something that my parents have been concerned about for the entire time I've known them.
This is something that my grandparents were concerned about.
My grandparents were stockpiling in the mountains in New Mexico to make sure that they were safe if and when there was, for example, a trucker strike. They were very concerned about the Cuban Missile Crisis.
I think this was around that time.
And this is something that I think that
modern people don't take seriously anymore.
And I think that there is like
this derogatory term. We're called preppers.
You don't want to be a prepper.
A prepper is some old redneck dude
who just is, everybody thinks they're crazy
because they think the end of the world is coming.
Well, like Tim says, what if it rains?
Sometimes, sometimes it rains.
I think there's a difference between, you know, a prepper and what we would do, for instance.
Right.
But there is like this stigma to just being prepared.
And people call it reactionary, which I was telling you earlier that I don't understand.
How can you be reactionary when something hasn't happened yet?
You're trying to think ahead.
Yes.
I don't see that as being an issue.
Yeah. When did self-sufficiency become a pejorative?
When the rich people want to make sure
they can get gas and supplies before you,
and then you'll get news outlets saying,
we shouldn't report on this because then people will panic.
And then what they do is they whisper to their family,
make sure you go buy gas right now.
Yeah, would that be the same thing as saying get you don't need to wear a mask you don't need to
go out and buy one so we can stockpile a bunch of them and now we're gonna make it necessary
so we're gonna we're gonna make sure it hits our warehouse so that we can charge you for it not
them that's exactly what i'm saying so when when the Colonial Pipeline stuff happens and they're like, there's no supply shortage.
And then we're watching videos of cars lined up in gas stations shutting down.
And it's like, what are you talking about?
Oh, no, no, no.
We meant in terms of the national supply.
Yeah, well, no one's asking about that.
They're asking about their local gas stations.
Yeah.
And meanwhile, these journalists are whispering, the security people are whispering, telling their friends and their family to go stock up while you still can.
Yeah.
Go buy your toilet paper before it's too late.
Yeah.
The I got mine philosophy.
You know, you can change it.
You can ruin the system after I got mine.
Right.
You can, as long as I have mine.
That is a, I mean, humans are selfish creatures to some extent, right?
Oh, for sure.
To some extent, yeah.
Wild animals, man, especially when panic takes hold.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
So now I'm wondering if this is, well, I guess it doesn't matter if it's panic.
What matters is prices are going up.
There's a global shortage.
Now, I love this.
What did they say first?
There's no inflation problem.
Don't worry.
A week later, okay, there's inflation.
What should we do about it?
Now Bloomberg publishes a story saying there's a global supply shortage of basically everything.
So what's happening is a combination of things. You shut down the economy. People stopped working.
They leave their jobs. You can't just find people again. Like a steel mill isn't just going to be like, okay, let's just teleport someone here to start making the steel again. A lot of these
people left, moved. A lot of people moved out of New York. Half a million people moved out of New
York. What are you going to do to fill those jobs?
You can't do anything.
So now they can't just restart the economy.
The problem is Biden is also just printing money and dishing it out to everybody, firing the money guns.
So people don't need to go back to work.
If you don't make stuff, there's no stuff.
So now these businesses are struggling to get the stuff they need to make new stuff.
And then people can't buy it.
So what happens?
Two people show up at the hot dog stand. and the guy's got one hot dog left.
What do you get?
You get a bidding war.
I'll give you $5 for it.
I'll give you $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $15.
I'm not spending $15 on a hot dog.
Now a hot dog costs $15.
Everybody's going to be fighting over these materials.
And one of the things that we're seeing, according to Bloomberg,
is that a lot of businesses
are buying as much
raw material as possible
and then all of a sudden
everything's sold out.
They're hoarding it basically.
Panic buying.
That's ridiculous.
That's what they did
and there's a Canadian ad
during World War I
where they were like
do not hoard flour.
Have you guys ever seen that?
It's like a comic book ad.
Ian, what did you just buy?
I bought about 250 pounds of flour.
Why?
Because I'm not panicking.
I'm pretty sure that's panicking.
I'm about eight months ahead of the curve.
When does it expire?
Yeah, like two years, a year and a half, but we can freeze it too.
You're going to eat 250 pounds of flour?
I think we go through about five pounds a week.
So Ian engages in kneading bread as a stress reliever?
Is this what I need to know? He makes a lot of bread. Gluten.
Yeah, I made bread, two breads
in the last two days. He's quite the man.
Ian makes a lot of bread. And then I was pouring maple
syrup on it, and then it soaks through
the bread, and then you mop it up, and it's like
a French toast without having to cook it.
You gotta get off all that sugar, man. Hey.
You're the guy who's writing on sugar all the time. According to
Vladimir Putin, what you gotta do is learn to cook he was given a talk to a bunch of like
college students and they were like what should vlad what should i do as a man a russian man and
he's like learn how to cook and they all laugh and like no really what should i do and he was
like learn how to cook because when the apocalypse comes putin's and you're and you're eating rabbit
learn how to cook it's going to take two hours at the store then it's going to be four hours
then it's going to be closed i'm so thankful that my family taught me how to cook. It's going to take two hours at the store. Then it's going to be four hours. Then it's going to be closed.
I'm so thankful that my family taught me how to cook as a kid.
Yes.
And it was just because I come from a culinary family.
Shout out to mom.
Speaking of hunting for food, we let Bucko out.
He's like an outside cat.
He caught a baby rabbit.
He brought it for us. And he started eating it on the porch.
And it got blood on the porch.
And I'm like, dude, you're getting stains.
I'm like, what are you doing?
And then he just looked at me and went, meh.
And I'm like, okay, dude dude and then he went off and hunting
again he's loving it but uh you know it's funny to talk about the cat doing these things but he's
got the right idea man i think people need to get back to some of those basic survival skills i'm
not saying people should go and eat cicadas out of the ground that's insane but i think it's
important that people learn how to do some basic stuff go camping remember when the boy scouts were
all about like i don't know just being a well-rounded person and learning how to be responsible?
And now it's just weird cult diversity.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, the origin of Boy Scouts is, like, a pretty cool tale of heroism.
And now it's nothing but, like, American mediocrity.
What is the origin of it?
If I'm not mistaken, it was a war veteran, I think from World War
I.
I'm pretty sure it was a World War I veteran who basically came back to the United States
and wanted to provide a program for young men, young boys to become better people through
individual challenges.
I love it.
Right.
So like it's the whole idea of the merit badges is so that the kids can
get some sort of the young boys can learn some sort of concept of forward thinking and planning
so i want to get this achievement this is what i have to do to accomplishment i can't just that's
cool buy it it's like a video game yeah i mean it is a proto video game yeah very much so proto
video well anyway you're mentioning uh something about you know
don't hoard flour yeah what was that was that cut you off oh uh in in canada in world war one they
had like national like do not hoard flour it's a felony i don't know if it was what they called it
but they would come to your house and arrest you and there's a picture of cops like walking by the
house and people inside hiding their flour that sounds communist because as the as the food starts
to disappear they're going to tell you, don't hoard.
I mean, does anybody else want to laugh at that?
A command economy,
which is always supposed to eliminate scarcity,
automatically, immediately produces scarcity.
These people are dumb.
I mean, it's a self-correcting problem, though.
It's like, okay, let the command economy do the thing,
and we're going to go be self-sufficient over here.
Well, hold on.
I hear you, but what, 100 million dead?
I'm not saying it's not a tragedy.
It's terrible.
Yeah, I mean, these communist countries did technically correct themselves by collapsing into themselves.
Yes.
Failing.
Yes.
But they were able to just murder their way into maintaining power for a century.
Because the people of capacity, whether it's moral or capability,
either left the country or were killed.
Yeah, I mean, that's the big
problem. Could you imagine
an able-bodied man
of good moral standing and principle
living in an urban center and then freaking
out because of riots and being, I don't want to live here, and then leaving?
Or somebody who maybe lives in an area like that
planning on leaving? Are you
saying I'm able-bodied? I'm talking about me and
you, actually. I'm joking.
I'm joking.
Because we were in the Philly area
and I was like,
we shouldn't be here.
But my, you know,
all right,
making fun of myself,
over with.
What I think when we leave these areas,
we voted.
Yeah.
And we advocated.
And we talked.
And the community votes
for self-immolation.
And I don't want to be a part of that.
Yeah, I'm not interested in saving the city.
It's that.
But that's the whole like that's when you look at the Second Amendment, there's two ways that it's often interpreted from the positive side.
So we're going to make the assumption that those who are arguing for gun control either disdain or don't care about the Second Amendment.
But now you have the Second Amendment people who defended on sort sort of tribalism it's a little bit more political and then you have
people who understand the principle of it so for me you know you think about it simply the fact that
people over 200 years ago wrote on a piece of paper the second you know the right
right it's a right known bear arms whatever the second amendment the fact that they put that on
paper doesn't really mean anything for me.
What it really means, because that paper is not going to defend me against a malicious actor.
The fact is that that paper is there to inform the American people that it's like it is your God-given right.
It is a human right, not a civil right, to own a firearm.
Yep.
It's a human right.
And so that sounds like it sounds sort of, well, you know, the term human right is thrown around a lot today.
Why is it a human right?
The right to self-defense is something that you have because you're a human.
Whether or not you believe it's because of Imago Dei and you're coming from the Christian heritage or you think about human equality, if you believe in human equality at all, you would never in any way argue for one group of people to go to another group of people and disarm them because now they're not equal.
So since when does the Second Amendment not include swords?
I mean, I know there are places where you can't own swords.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's interesting when you look at some states where they ban basically every version of a weapon in any capacity except for guns because Second Amendment.
And I'm like, it says to keep in bare arms.
Yeah.
Like there's places where you can't own places where you cannot carry brass knuckles,
but you can carry a six-shooter.
I think that's ridiculous.
As if the founding fathers at that time only used muskets.
Yeah.
They had tons of weapons.
They had knives.
They had bows and arrows.
Big knives.
Cannons.
Well, we have the American Bowie knife.
It's a classic example.
I think one of the biggest mistakes that has been made over the past 100 plus years or whatever is that even 2A advocates have fallen into the trap of arguing only on behalf of guns.
As if the founding fathers literally only had muzzle-loading muskets and nothing else.
I'm pretty sure they said keep in bare arms.
They carried knives with them.
And they probably didn't consider someone would come and take them away.
Now you get states that are like, your knives are gone, your batons are gone.
You can't carry a baseball bat unless you also have a baseball and can prove you're going to a baseball game.
You can't carry a sock full of quarters.
Can't do that.
But a gun, okay.
Second Amendment.
Possession is considered intent.
Of what?
Baseball bat or sock full of quarters?
You owning a firearm is perceived as you wanting to do violence on somebody.
I'm just saying I think Second Amendment includes any weapon.
I agree with you, absolutely.
But there's tons of places that have banned swords.
Yeah.
Okay, let's not say they've banned swords.
They've infringed upon your human rights.
Yeah, absolutely.
Let's not say that they've banned swords.
They haven't banned swords.
They are saying that we will do violence against you if you own something that can do violence. upon your human rights. Yeah, absolutely. Let's not say that they've banned swords. They haven't banned swords.
They are saying that we will do violence against you if you own something that can do violence.
So in that capacity, I'm just saying it's great that they built this shield
in written word that protected us for a good couple hundred years.
We'd be worse off without the Constitution, no doubt.
But at this point, imagine, look at it this way.
There is a great giant dragon beast that is government authoritarianism,
and it's been breathing fire on the noble hero who's holding up the Constitution as a shield.
Eventually that shield starts burning through,
and long enough period of time of sustained government authoritarianism,
and we start losing our rights.
Interestingly, we have this Supreme Court case.
So SCOTUS rules police cannot search homes without warrants in the name of community caretaking.
This is unanimous.
Nine to zero.
So that's promising.
Even the liberal justices were like,
a cop can't go into your house without a warrant and take all your guns because they think you're ill or something.
It's a good sign.
But it's crazy to me that the argument is getting close to the red flag law stuff.
And a lot of people, I guess right now, are like, oh, of course they can't without a warrant.
But what they've been actively trying to do is get a warrant claiming that you're unwell and then violating your rights.
Yeah. Disarming you through a subversive means.
And it's in I think it's according to the Geneva Convention, disarming a population is considered an act of war.
Wow. As it should be. I think I believe that somewhere it's either either that or it's Karl von Clausewitz,
but we haven't had a von Clausewitz in a while.
So you might know this, but what percentage of the time is a genocide preceded
by removing guns from the general population?
Because I was able to come up with more than one example to send to someone I was arguing with.
Yeah, I wouldn't say it's 100%, but it's basically 100%.
Yeah.
I mean, it's because they are one in the same.
And this is how you think about tyranny.
So we often think, or the thing is oftentimes said something like, well, if you disarm a population, then you will have genocide.
Or then you'll have some sort of massive, you know, massive tragedy, horrible authoritarian argument.
And so we use it as this argument of like the one
begets the other i don't think that's the right way to think about it the rather is the act of
the act of um because that i'm sorry i don't think it's the right way to think about it because it
creates an opportunity for someone to say we won't do it this time you know we won't okay we'll take
away your guns but we won't genocide you this time. Like that's you're essentially strong, holding on the you're holding your entirety of your existence and your hope on the fact that they won't do something.
Whereas what I would I think the better way to think about it is the act of taking the firearms away from somebody is wrong in the exact same way as it is to target a population in that way.
Well, one doesn't beget the other.
They are. They fall in the same vein. way as it is to target a population in that way. Well, one doesn't beget the other.
They fall in the same vein.
You need to understand that if the Earth is to join the Galactic Federation, we can't have a bunch of crazies with guns who are going to shoot the aliens when they show up.
So they got to disarm us for the sake of the Galactic Federation, right?
Your condescension is coming through.
No, I'm just being ridiculous.
No, I'm just kidding.
What it is,
it's a bunch of elites
who would lie
to the general public
to protect themselves
and their family.
They would tell you
there's no gas shortage
so they can go buy gas
before you can.
They would tell you
that everything's fine.
There's tons of toilet paper
so they can buy it up
before you can.
They would buy a bunch of stock
while serving in Congress
and then pass regulations
on these companies
which benefit their stock decisions, their trading decisions.
And they would come out and say, you can't own weapons because safety.
Now, for me, I've got five armed guards around me at all times
paid for by your tax dollars.
Yeah, and we saw this last year.
The exact same people that were arguing to defund the police
spent millions of dollars making sure they had very armed people protecting their house and we and and it's like and you can't look at that and say
oh that's funny you should look at that and go like appalled by that the even the people who
voted for we we do man i mean the people who watch a show like this um probably most conservatives
we we are appalled by that but there is a large faction in this country of extremely ignorant tribal individuals who have no idea what's going on.
I posted this on Facebook.
I said, what happened to all those people who used to come in my mentions and just like promote Joe Biden and rag about Trump?
They're all gone.
All gone.
You know why?
Because they never cared about Biden.
Because you, what, bought guns?
Now you're a bad conservative man no back during the election all of these people i knew who cared nothing for
politics never did all of a sudden we're like oh biden we had to vote for biden we must do it
and then biden gets elected and they're gone they no longer care about trump they don't
longer care about biden they don't care about politics now they post about stupid nonsense
and i'm like i thought what about all those things you were? So what happens is these people now have voted for a man who is by like every
objective metric failing. And I love these op-eds where they're like, Biden's had the best hundred
days of any president ever. And I'm like, yeah, if your head's in the toilet, you're not paying
attention. But a lot of people, a lot of these people just walked away anyway. So now things
are getting worse. And too many of these people vote for trash laws and leave us worse off for it.
I don't know how you solve for that unless, like, Starship Troopers or whatever.
I don't know.
In order to vote, you must approve ownership of a firearm?
Yeah.
I mean, then you'd at least have skin in the game.
It's meant to be facetious, but it does get the point across.
Mandatory gun ownership?
I mean, we don't – the problem with containing something, a vote like this,
it's not a very complicated problem.
It's that who gets to choose, right?
This is essentially the question of all power like this.
Thank you.
Who gets to choose, right?
That's the question.
So if you make it, you know, one of the arguments that comes up
is something like we don't want people who are mentally,
thankfully for the Supreme supreme court case that
you're talking about we don't want we want to make sure at least to some extent people of certain
mental issues don't own firearms right we kind of want to there's this sort of it's let's take
the question honestly and look at it that way yes that's true who gets to choose big question
it's it's it is an interesting point because i've brought up uh several times the second
amendment doesn't say the right to keep in bare arms should not be infringed unless you're mentally ill.
Yeah, I know.
And it is a problem.
Like it is a legitimate mental problem.
Or you say like you were arguing about if you do the time, if you pay your debt to society, you should have your rights restored.
So a good point was made to me, though, that the Constitution does allow for rights to be restricted uh after after or only through due
process only through due process so and mental deficiency i believe through due process then
all right i understand that argument that makes sense to me yeah so if if you know i own a bunch
of guns and then there's a claim filed against my mental health and we go and there's a legal
process and then after determining i'm unwell, then they come and take everything.
That makes sense to me.
I'm still worried about it
because mental health is not objective.
It's an ambiguous category.
In some ways, it is viewed as an ambiguous category.
Oh, yeah.
So some guy can just be like,
I was looking at Ian and he is crazy.
My professional experience is that he is crazy and dangerous.
And then the judge is like, I agree.
Seize his guns.
Anyone that's got like a medical marijuana card for stress or any kind of psychological issue could then be deemed like unwell and unfit to hold a gun.
That's crazy.
Oh, yeah.
You can't buy a gun if you smoke pot, right?
Well, you're not supposed to.
So can and should are different questions.
There is a question on the 4473 that asks, are you currently or are you consuming illegal substances?
And the 4473 is a federal document.
Straight up, if you smoke pot, you can't buy a gun.
So technically speaking, you are committing a very big crime if you are currently consuming marijuana.
Not like smoking it at the gun shop.
I mean, that's...
No, but not technically literally your federal government
literally says you are committing crime if you consume these things hunter biden did it yeah
it's freaking crazy man schedule one narcotic marijuana that makes no sense right yeah there's
a there's a parallel that's kind of coming through in in the world and this is kind of begging the
question but there's a joke who won the war on drugs weed won the war on drugs
right it's kind of a humor and how did weed win the war on drugs mass non-compliance yeah which
was is you could also look at that in a sort of philosophical sense it was self-reliance well the
government's not going to let me have my weed so i'm going to get it myself the government's not
going to allow me to protect my family so i'm'm going to figure it out myself. It's time to end the war on guns.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
But how do you do it?
And for us, we're doing it through culture.
We're doing it through going out and doing things.
We have our publications.
And what do we get for it?
We get pulled off of newsstands.
Really?
Yep.
We've had our magazine.
Anything gun-related has been pulled off of newsstands.
No one talked about it.
You didn't see a giant New York Times post. When Google bans Gundam Wing because it's got gun in the name, you know they really don't like guns.
But how are we being self-reliant?
Here's a good example.
If you own a gun store, give us a call.
We'll stock it on your shelf, right?
There you go.
If you own a gun store, if you own an FFL, you can get a hold of us.
You can get a hold of us through our website, and we have a program to stock our magazines
because we've got four different magazines.
Concealment, which is urban, smaller firearms, all about safety, concealed carry,
making sure you're doing things the right way, being good at it.
And then you've got Recoil, which is the main magazine.
This is sort of the big news gun industry things.
Maybe someone came out with something really innovative.
There's an advocate. We did Monge Touré. Yeah, he's got. things maybe it's someone came out with something really innovative or you know we there's a there's
an advocate we did um monster a we put in you know dude so he's you know monster is doing something
great there's um chris chang is doing something great um with aapi go so we are grabbing we have
those two magazines then we have off grid which is much more focused on skills survival um and it
has and and i think of it the advantage that off-grid
has it has a lot of things about doing right so it's not just about gear because a lot of a lot of
survival a lot of the negativity that comes from survivalist groups or preppers is they're just
about buying stuff it's the classic you know heavily unfit person with a bunch of stuff is not going to
survive the apocalypse right yeah and then the last one we have is carnivore which is all about
high-end uh field of table meat consumption meat consumption yep so i i i uh loathe to think about
what's going to happen to these cities in the event that there's like an actual shutdown
the water shuts off people are going to start dying of dehydration.
They'll be drinking blood in a day.
Yeah, you'll have, I mean, historically speaking,
you'll have a very short period of very, very ugly violence,
and then you'll have a very long period of probable starvation.
People fleeing like crazy in random directions.
Well, and the solution is actually in itself.
And I think the solution to this one is not just buying a bunch of stuff.
It's actually community.
I mean, the term community is thrown around a lot publicly right now,
but again, the antidote to this classic idea of a guy in a basement
with a bunch of bullets and a bunch of food is that he's going to die alone.
What is prison?
It is living in a box for 30 years.
It's taking your life away. Life is
time. So survival, real survival, when we're talking about things like this, um, is actually
100% based on community, social interaction with people who you actually trust that you've been a
little, you've been, you've been, you can, you can have them to protect you from making mistakes
that you would otherwise not know. Right? So someone who knows water, someone who knows ecology,
someone who knows, hey, don't eat those plants.
That's a simple form of it.
A more complicated one is you're desperate, we know each other,
we take care of each other.
We're not waiting for the government to come and save us.
It's actually quite remarkable how people in cities mostly,
but basically everybody is extremely detached from the basic requirements of survival.
Yeah, I mean Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
Yeah.
It's not an ultimatum, but...
People, you take a person in the city and you put them in the woods, it's just not going to go well.
Sure, because they have no reason to be adapted to the woods.
If you live in an urban environment your whole life, you're never going to need to adapt the abilities to do that.
It's a luxury. You will need to adapt the abilities to do that it's a it's a luxury you will need to adapt the abilities it's likely at some point in your life you will need to understand basic survival even if you live
in a city it's just that in their immediate they don't they've that life has been kind to them to
the extent that they've never been thrust in a situation like that sure that's absolutely true
but we i still want to return to the idea like self-sufficiency is a good thing, right?
So it's not, you know, when you have a neighborhood,
like say, you know, you live in a condo
and you know your neighbors,
it's not a bad thing to know your neighbors
and being like, oh, I know such and such is a diabetic
and I can help take care of them this way.
It doesn't mean you're kicking down their doors and saying, here, take the insulin.
Right.
But it's good.
People don't realize how brutal it'll get if there's actual power outages or rolling
blackouts even, let alone if the water shuts off or the electricity goes out for an extended
period of time.
People who are diabetic, you've got to refrigerate that insulin.
That's a huge problem for just storms going out.
They've got to have generators usually to make sure the fridges keep running.
But there's a lot of other things too.
People's medications will spoil.
If you've got antibiotics in the fridge, they're gone.
Vaccines go bad very, very quickly without electricity.
So, hey, bring it on, Greta Thunberg.
Let's turn off all the fossil fuel power plants and then see how long humans last
because they will start tearing each other's throats out as it gets bad.
Or they'll just build a pipeline and not tell you about it.
Pipeline?
A pipeline, yeah.
You know, if you tell people they can't have something and they need it, they'll figure out a way.
Look, one of the big themes of this is that they're going to tell you, oh, no, don't go buy this.
Then they go rush out and buy it.
Sure.
They're coming out saying, like, oh, the water is going to rise 20 feet.
I'll take that beachfront condo on Miami Beach.
How much is that?
Water's rising?
No, I don't care about that.
No, sure.
Ammunition prices are high right now.
So if you're hoarding ammunition, it's kind of rude.
But the other thing about it, too, is how would you just take seriously what you think you need?
It's not more.
Panic buying is a hard thing to define.
And panic buying is what people do when they feel like they're insufficient with what they have.
It's interesting.
I mean, Ian bought a ridiculous amount of flour for two years.
Yes.
Yeah, I was surprised it was available because last July it wasn't.
You could get four, maybe four bags of flour.
So why buy so much flour?
You know, who knows what's coming in two months?
I like to look ahead and rest easy.
See, that's the thing.
You know, hoarding, is it someone being prepared or is it someone panicking?
Yeah, there is a good question to be said there.
Or are you just a good businessman and you know you can buy better in bulk
and you're going to be able to store it and are you being proactive?
After the apocalypse, all the neighbors are going to be like, bread,
and Ian's going to be like, I have the bread.
And he's going to like rip it and throw it to people.
Bread for bullets.
Bread for water, dude.
Feed the masses.
I don't think anyone would trade you bullets for bread.
They only need one.
I'll let them go hunt and I'll keep them healthy when they come home.
No, you don't understand.
They only need one.
Oh, well, that's a good point.
You grossly overestimate the accuracy of most people.
That's fair.
That's fair.
Let's assume it's point blank.
They don't need any, actually.
They just need the weapon.
Then most people would just capitulate, just take whatever you want, leave me alone, take my flour, take my bread.
Yeah, fire me.
Violence is expensive.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, it's costly.
To go do violence on someone is expensive
i mean we're not an apocalypse though it still is right so let's go let's take the metaphorical
um the metaphorical post-apocalyptic apocalypse situation you have your little tribe and they
have their little tribe for you to go attack their tribe to try to take their stuff you have to
willingly acknowledge that if you lose it's final yeah. Yeah. Right? Or it's final.
It's extremely costly.
Not just that, but if I go to Ian and I say, Ian, make me bread.
And then Ian's like, in exchange for what?
And I say, I'll trade you something.
Then Ian's skill and value as a human being contributes to the production of bread.
If you just go and take the flour, all right, well, now you've got to make the bread.
Yeah.
So there's a cost you lose out.
Trade is probably safer and easier for everybody.
Sometimes trade just doesn't work, though,
because a starving person might not have anything to trade with.
A lot of times it's the language barrier.
Fortunately, we have that going for us in the U.S.
because it's easy to communicate relatively.
You know, we don't, long-range communications
with the power grid down would be a little bit more complex.
Like, how do you tell them that you're not
a danger without getting close?
That might be a challenge.
You can kind of signal it.
You've got to create a call.
I like ham radios.
Bird calls.
Maybe like a...
We can go back to classic bird zones.
I will lose at every time.
They'll just be like, why is that man sounding like a chicken?
But are we – is this paranoia?
I mean are we just – we're talking about all this stuff.
We're seeing the news.
We're seeing gas prices and we're like, oh, it's the end.
But maybe nothing happens.
I got this Samantha Bee on the brain thing.
I watched some Samantha Bee the other day just to delve into the depths of it.
You get out of here.
It was dark.
You get out.
You don't watch.
They made a video like just do something about guns and it was all these celebrities. They made a video like, just do something about guns.
And it was all these celebrities being like, just do something.
Just do something about guns.
And they don't know what they're asking for.
This is what really bothers me.
Literally don't.
It dawned on me tonight is the vagueness of it.
It's not like, please ban this aspect of this thing.
They said do something, right?
Yeah, they're so vague.
Okay, okay.
Here's what I propose.
Repeal the NFA.
Right.
All right. You got me. I will do propose. Repeal the NFA. Right. All right, you got me.
I will do something.
Repeal all gun laws and I'll go buy a gun.
Sure.
Yeah, you know, everyone who owns a gun gets to vote free guns for everybody.
Yes.
I don't.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
I do not.
I do not.
That's a little light.
I think mandatory guns for everybody.
Okay.
You have to.
When you sign up for the Selective Service.
If you don't have an M3 Carl Gustav, holla.
They want you to sign up for the Selective Service.
You should also be required to go in, fill out the form, drop it, and be handed one AR and one handgun.
Yes.
Or a rifle and a gun and whatever they have available.
Some, like, standard issue U.S. government garbage weapon.
It works, right?
I mean, people like to say the Swiss did it right, but we're talking about very different countries.
Yes.
Swiss, I mean, there is a sense of mandatory firearms ownership and mandatory kind of – it's not exactly that.
But the Swiss are oftentimes used as an example because everyone owns guns.
Functionally, everyone owns guns.
But Switzerland also stays out of, you know,
a mountainous country. Yeah, but you're also
looking at, like, you can make another argument, something like
Japan has no
firearms and they have very little firearms
violence. They're also an ethno, like,
a very, they have their... It's an ethno
state. Ethno state, right? Yeah, like, they don't allow
immigrants. It's crazy. They do. It's very,
very small. Right, right, right. It's, like, extremely
restrictive. Yeah, Switzerland is also small also small sorry and don't they also require military service in switzerland
i wanted to say that's correct i'm not sure i don't want to i don't want to say something that
i can't i don't remember i don't know fully well i also look at israel because they have a similarly
small population everyone there for the most part is armed and everyone is required to serve in the
military and i don't know what their gun stats are like but it's probably not bad and they're constantly under
threat right exactly again all these things are multi-faceted arguments but you take the example
of the samantha b thing right just do something you want to look at what gun control is it's
celebration before success we we you know right because no one ever says hey we establish these
new laws look what the effects are. We say, just do something.
Yay, we put this in place.
Never heard from again.
Here's what we need to focus on.
Right now, when people complain about government and guns, it's about restrictions.
We need to change it.
So I propose the creation of the Department of Gun Services.
So when you're 16, you have to go in for your manual gun from the – I'm sorry, mandatory gun from the government.
And the complaints about guns and government should be the lines take too long.
I had to go to the DGS to get an AR-15, and I had to wait 20 minutes.
20 minutes for this gun.
It's ridiculous, huh?
When I was a kid, it was 10 minutes.
You're in, you're out.
You've got your gun, your box of ammo.
These bureaucrats, man, I tell you.
Now serving.
Yeah.
Now serving at aisle four.
The DMV adds like another letter.
Yes.
37 Q.
Oh, there is conscription in Switzerland, by the way.
There is conscription.
Okay.
Yeah.
That's a good one.
Yeah.
And then for your DM or DG.
Department of Gun Service.
Yes.
I like this.
Yeah.
Department of Gun Service.
Yeah.
So not everyone knows how to use a manual.
Not everyone knows how to use a manual not everyone
knows how to use a stick shift so now we have to just give them all automatics yeah there you go
well you know some people don't have this this the strength so there's a variety of options
no you'd get some garbage government stock crap you know you're not going to get the best of the
best but hey hey hey you know yeah mandatory gun Mandatory firearms ownership would be an interesting example.
You go in and you have like a little book explaining like basic gun operations
and you do like a 1 through 10, check, check, check.
And the guy reviews it and he's like, all right, here's your gun
and you can choose between the handgun we have over here and fill out the forms
and then they hand it to you and you leave and you walk out.
That terrifies me.
Why?
I don't know.
Because I don't know enough about guns. Do you want to know why i do the analogy of the department of gun services yes when you go to the dmv and there's like cars everywhere
right and there's a lot of people who are student drivers do you like start sweating and no fear
that someone's gonna hit you good point when you cross a busy street when you're jaywalking are
you like there's cars and they could hit me at any moment?
Not really. I see people with guns all the time
and I just don't even think about it. Because people
don't typically just run you
over or shoot you or beat you.
A guy could pick up a rock
off the ground and hit you with it. You know? It just doesn't
happen. Sometimes it does.
Sometimes they can use guns.
I understand when the left are like, yeah, but with a gun
they're extremely destructive and violent. I like it's true but people also make bombs people do a lot
of things and so you shouldn't take away someone's right to self-defense because you're concerned and
you don't want to be responsible for yourself i just don't see that as an appropriate argument
i understand the fear but i cross busy streets all the time and i've never i don't get hit by cars
you know if you live in chicago or new y.A., you're jaywalking everywhere.
And sometimes the cops yell at you, and it's stupid.
And for the most part, you'll just see the cars.
I mean, some people will just walk and ignore the cars.
You know why?
The cars will break.
This is crazy.
The cars will actually stop to avoid hitting you.
So if you were at the Department of Gun Services
and someone walked out with a weapon
and they were like, let's say there was a range.
If you walk onto
this is true, if you're on a gun range
and you step onto the range, they scream
and shut everything down.
They don't want you to get hurt.
Or if you're at a range and you
turn around and you're pointing at someone, they'll tackle you.
Normal people are trying to be safe and don't want you to get hurt, whether it's a car or a gun or whatever. Or if you're at a range and you turn around and you're pointing at someone, they'll tackle you. Yes.
Normal people are trying to be safe and don't want you to get hurt,
whether it's a car or a gun or whatever.
So gun services, they hand you the gun in a locked box,
and then you have to carry it home in a locked box?
Why?
I don't know.
Not so you don't freak people out.
What?
When there's like 30 people in the waiting room. I'm not freaked out when I see a guy in a Hummer driving down the street.
It's another culture.
You just got to get people comfortable with it one day at a time.
Archer Avenue on the side of Chicago and you got big trucks and tractor trailers or whatever and it's like you just run across the street.
I'm not like, oh no, the guy's going to hit me.
Dude, people in my neighborhood, because we have the freight trains where you're always
getting stuck by trains by midway.
It's annoying.
The kids in my neighborhood would run alongside the train and jump on it. Could you imagine if there was a guy and he had like a hit was like riding around
on a car with a Gatling gun and you ran and jumped on his car and we're like holding his gun. That'd
be ridiculous. That'd be insane. And that's a problem. People would like in the, in Chicago,
jump on this range. Don't do it. It's really, really, really dangerous, but people aren't
scared. They're the opposite of scared. They're brazen. So if somebody walked out with a weapon,
people aren't going to care. It's the weirdest thing to me that in new york you go to
grand central and there's like cops in like full tactical gear with rifles people aren't freaking
out like a cop's going to shoot anybody i think ian has a point because when cars were brand new
people were terrified of them people were scared to go in them people were scared to get hit by
them so there maybe there should be like a transitory time
where we're like accommodating people to
everybody having a gun. And there was a time
when they didn't have seatbelts. They didn't know.
They were still learning the danger
of it all. I don't know what the traffic laws were like
in the beginning. Probably they didn't have traffic lights
at first. Yeah, so in this
ideal world where everyone is required
to have a gun, it might require
a little bit of adaptation
i think all right fine whatever but let's do super chats my friends if you have not done this smash
that like button and take the url from this youtube video and just share it across all social
media to help out the show and go to timcast.com become a member because we will have a bonus
segment coming up later today at the website which you definitely do not want to miss big news from
the government.
It gets real creepy.
We'll talk about it later.
But for now, we'll do super chats.
The $1 one-liner says,
Hey, Tim, nice promotion of Iceland.
I can see the brochures.
Come to Iceland.
There's no ice.
Enjoy the volcanoes.
It smells like farts.
That's all true.
Have you been there?
Yes.
Oh, wow.
So I went to Iceland.
There was no ice.
And when I was driving from Reykjavik to the blue water place,
then it's all gray rock, and it smells like farts.
Volcanic rock?
Yeah, it smells like farts.
Sulfur.
A lot of sulfur.
So what's the blue?
There's a blue water place where the water is blue?
Something like that.
It's really cool, but it was really hard.
We couldn't get in because it was like booked up like crazy.
Did it used to be ice?
Like did the Vikings call it –
I mean there's ice.
I went to this really cool place.
It was cold and it was just like this massive lake.
It's beautiful, man.
It's an awesome place.
Pleasures.
I heard they called it Iceland like the Vikings because they wanted people not to go there
because they wanted to keep it for themselves.
So they told everyone it's just an ice hell and no one was apparently a like garbage hole until they discovered geothermal energy
and everybody was just it was like mining coal or something and they're like we got all this
volcanic activity we could do geothermal and now they live like kings wow now abundance of energy
you know in in response to our conversation earlier about what we're educated by everything
i know about the the the island of of Iceland is from the TV show Vikings.
There you go.
I know nothing.
21st century.
All right.
And then there was the secret life of Walter Mitty.
Yes, also there.
K.W. Ross says,
Hey, Tim, I heard they were putting a 40% tax in taxes on Bitcoin for coins sold
and wondered if anyone knew anything about this.
Joe Biden has proposed a capital gains tax of like 39.7%.
So yes, that would apply to your Bitcoin.
Massive tax.
Massive tax.
Wow.
Maybe it's because of Bitcoin.
Kyle Buchanan says, HVAC tech here.
I tried ordering an outside unit today.
The warehouse said they had zero and won't have any for 60 days.
I doubt they will have any in 60 days either.
The one free man says low gun regulations equals herd immunity for violent crime.
You don't have to carry, but you benefit from those around you being armed the same way an unvaccinated person would benefit from those around them being vaccinated.
Hey, there you go.
Interesting.
Crime herd immunity.
Plasma says I bought into Bitcoin at 32 K and nearly went net loss but i am now taking advantage of elon musk's yeah tweets and buying
more getting ready for the halving in two years when bitcoin will go to the moon and back yeah
so the halving will result in like bitcoin doubling or more uh okay i can't read the name here but this
guy says it's a good thing crowder has made plenty of political connections over the years hopefully
they'll vouch for him. Yeah.
Josh else has question for forest.
Why don't gun companies name their weapons
in a way that you don't have to be a nerd to understand?
I own a XD
mod to
why? How do they choose their naming?
That
is a question that I actually don't
know how to answer because everyone
does it differently.
But it stems out of kind of military mentality of like it's essentially a – what do you call it?
It's easy nomenclature.
It's an M3 Carl Gustav. We call it a Carl G colloquially, but the M3 is so that I can distinguish it, the M16 from the N4.
So a lot of companies use these names, these letter combinations to achieve that end.
Shorthand.
Right on.
It's all shorthand.
And, I mean, there's other ways that you can do it.
So you could look at like a Ruger Blackhawk.
It's a revolver.
It's not the BK17.
Usually the number is affiliated with something to do, not with the caliber,
but it all has different ways of doing it. And I think it's really just because it's trendy yeah right it's just how we
chose to do it so what are the what are the caliber numbers mean because like a 22 versus
like a 223 dramatically different round you know yeah the caliber typically refers to the size of
the projectile it typically refers to the size of the projectile but now you're looking at so
shotguns being different theirs is every it's it's all referencing the size of the projectile. It typically refers to the size of the projectile, but now you're looking at, so shotguns being different,
theirs is,
it's all referencing the size of the projectile
is pretty much what it is. Is it the width of the projectile or the length?
It should be
the circumference
or the diameter. Alright, we got
Honey in Absinthe says, it is my
boo thangs 30th birthday today.
Will you wish Vincent a happy birthday?
We love your show.
Also, let me paint a mural in your house, please.
Send us an email to spin the UFO at gmail.com.
Yes.
And happy birthday, Vincent.
Yeah.
Happy birthday, Vincent.
I'm willing to bet it's not going in my house.
Alex Oakley says, I wanted a super chat to say that USD is officially dying.
I started a side job over the weekend where I was asked if I wanted to be paid in USD, Bitcoin, or half and half. Wow.
That's excellent.
Not like the cream product.
You chose Bitcoin, right?
Please, God.
Tell me you chose Bitcoin.
Half and half.
Like half US.
Oh, I thought you meant like the half and half cream.
I did too.
I was like, wait, what?
I'm a literal kind of guy.
That's my problem.
I was confused.
So if I strengthen my weakness. There you go. I'm a literal kind of guy. That's my problem. I was confused. So my strength and my weakness.
There you go.
I too am a coffee snob.
Beginning paid in buckets of cream.
Yes.
Yes.
I got all this cream.
What am I going to do?
Just drink it, I guess.
The grocery store was out.
It's good for you.
Eli M. says,
Tim, could you call Crowder on air right now
and get him to summarize what has happened
and his way forward?
No.
That would be really awesome, though.
Maybe.
Maybe.
I couldn't do that.
Nah.
I mean, it probably would be funny.
I'm sure he'd be cool with it, but it just can't.
Could you imagine getting a call and you're on the air and you're like, oh, wait, what's
going on?
Wait, no, I'm not.
Some people might just be like, no.
Part of his strike is that he's not supposed to talk about it.
Wouldn't you get into it?
No, I could interview him.
Oh, cool.
Yeah, we had Alex Jones on.
He's a fan.
But they still, you know.
They'll be paying attention.
Jennifer Reap says,
Great show and guest as always.
And got to shout out my alma mater,
Sam Houston State,
for winning the national championship yesterday.
Eat them up, cats.
Hey, there you go.
Someone you may know says,
Hashtag free Crowder.
There you go.
Cy Coder says, hey there you go someone you may know says hashtag free crowder there you go cy coder says walmart is only allowing vac employees not to wear masks well i'm not vac
and when i get back from break i'm not wearing a mask i might get fired but they're going to
get sued if they do hope i win i mean how do they tell if people are or aren't i mean i don't know
how they i think i think they'll ignore you i or aren't? I mean, I don't know how they... I think they'll ignore you.
I don't think they'll say anything.
I don't know.
Whatever.
HitsVape says, I work at Best Buy.
They just announced today that if employees prove they've gotten the vaccine, you don't have to wear a mask.
I've had the virus.
Didn't do much at all to me.
Now I feel forced to, so I can take off the mask.
Yeah, well, talk to your doctor.
Zanzibar says, I just joined Timcast.com.
Now, where do I go to suggest Magnus Penvidya get a seat for a show?
Pro-liberty and bottom unity advocate, what the boogaloo really is.
Well, he just did.
Carter Joe says, Tim, have Destiny on to discuss the infrastructure bill and voting bills.
And he'd like talking about moral frameworks.
Definitely, Destiny was an excellent guest we we when destiny was here we actually hung out for
like an hour just talking about politics and he's a cool dude disagree with him that's about it
but i disagree with a lot of people so you know i think there's too much like fear of the other
i think i think it was great to have him out here fun guy um i'm sure people don't like him for a
lot of reasons though joshua ryman says what if what used to be a traffic stop that caught a
kidnapper with someone in their trunk it's a pass by yeah well there's that too rylo says civilian
traffic brigade don't you dare show support for trump or appear at all conservative you're going
to get bombarded with tickets and the state will come after you. You see, there you go.
Brown Bear says,
Tim, when are you going to have
shoe on head on your show?
When she accepts the invitation
and decides to come on the show.
Dolly Lance says,
how can you continuously assume
that the unarmed civilian
won't be violent themselves?
That's a good point.
Unarmed civilian traffic guy
might be like, I got a gun.
Yeah, how does that work?
Is it a cop?
Because a cop,
we were trying to figure that out earlier.
Like a cop is a civilian
according to military.
No, no, no, no, no.
This new policy is like
you in a car.
What the heck?
Yeah.
It's a contradiction of terms
because you're hired by the state.
Who are you hired by?
Right.
Not an outside group.
I mean,
they give you a little yellow light
to stick on top of your
car yeah the codification like the codification of law has a purpose and it's so that we have a
rule rules by which we understand what we do and don't do it's not the greatest tragedy in the
american concept of law is that we have turned law into a way to make citizens into servants
instead of realizing that the purpose
of law is to limit the government it is to limit one group of citizens from violating the rights
of another group of citizens it's not to make you safe it's not to make you happy it's not to make
you wealthy the purpose of law is so that the people can the one group of people human beings
with the same rights as you cannot use the power of the state to violate your rights
yeah i don't like paid bail because if the rich people oh yeah it's meaningless to them they just
buy their way out in in chicago people illegally park at wrigley field because they're like a
hundred dollar ticket it's cheaper than buying a parking space wow yeah that's what i'm talking
about all right andrew holker says i fled the Twin Cities for Duluth last summer.
The number of friends I have at U of M
who have been mugged at gun and knife point
just walking through Dinkytown
or riding the light rail is truly insane.
Well, there you go.
Sholan Report says,
Living in Wisconsin for the last couple of years,
never heard a guy from Minneapolis sound so nice and fair.
Oh, thank you.
There you go.
Mike Sullivan says,
Great guest.
South Carolina passed House Bill 3094 today.
Eliminate state fees for CWP.
Will now allow open or concealed carry with a permit.
Makes SC a Second Amendment sanctuary state.
Great day.
Yeah, it's not constitutional carry.
You can, like in West Virginia,
you can just walk around the
barrett if you want yeah people just laugh at you though because they'd be like we get it we get
your point there is good if you're too yeah there is hope in the world like i one of the things that
i one of the views that we bring like i like to bring through recoil is that it's not all doom
and gloom it's not all doom and gloom and it's not all they're taking our guns away young americans
don't like gun control yeah they don't. They're turning away from it.
And whether they're turning away from it because of political means, whether it's Marxism, communism, socialism, whatever, or because they just don't trust the government, they're moving away.
On top of that, there is ways that we are making victories.
They're just not as political.
They're not as they're not as uh polished theatrical stunts david hogg has a massive theater
no substance and yeah it's nonsense yeah you know it's like it's it's he's you have to prop them up
while in the background people are changing their opinions about it look at the last year in gun
sales records massive records and we're not saying... Because if you look at gun sales throughout history
in the United States, it's kind of a steady climb
with little spikes that kind of level out, but it never
really goes up and then down.
It goes up and then down a little bit, and then up and...
Gun sales is a really
good performing stock in the United States.
If it was. But you look over the last year,
it jumped and plateaued high.
Yeah, you look at the
lines in these big cities.
Yeah.
Liberals lining up outside of gun shops.
There was a funny video where this guy,
at a gun shop, he made a video where he was like,
stop coming to my store expecting to buy a gun for the first time.
These liberals keep coming in,
and they keep saying, can I pay more to get it now?
And it's, no, you can't.
You voted for this.
These are your laws.
Shut up.
Follow the rules.
Because it's probably hilarious to have like your 50th guy come in and be like, I'd like to buy that gun.
Okay, fill out the form.
Okay, can I get it?
No, you're on a delay list.
Come back in five days.
We'll call you.
Can I pay more?
No, you can't pay more.
You're being background checked.
Shut up and go home.
They get all mad about it.
Yeah, I mean, if you want to have the conversation about universal background checks that are already in place, stop talking about it.
Right, right, right.
Sergeant Buck says, just join as a member.
If you want a modern military shooter that handles firearms well, I recommend Insurgency Sandstorm.
The Division 2 is great, but it's become Destiny 2 with cover.
I completely agree.
Eric Rodriguez says, what are y'all's opinions on bullpup rifles i personally prefer them especially as a left left-handed
person love the show keep it the great work can i not answer it's it's no i can um i have never i
do not have a lot a lot of experience with bullpup rifles in compared to a you know like an ar-15
yeah what does it mean bullpup bullpup rifle this is to a, you know, like an AR 15. Yeah. What does it mean?
Bullpup bullpup rifle.
This is the muzzle.
This is the,
the butt,
the buttstock,
right?
If my hand is in front of the magazine,
the triggers in front of the magazine.
So it goes barrel trigger magazine,
which allows me to get a longer barrel in a shorter package.
That's considered a bullpup.
When you take the magazine and you build it behind the trigger.
Oh,
so you look at a reg,
like an AR 15, you've got stock grip magazine rail muzzle bullpup takes the magazine and it in the
construction of the rifle and that gives it better balance so you can have a longer muzzle the theory
is that you can have the benefit of a longer muzzle without an entirely longer firearm and
then it does accomplish that it's just is the
juice worth the squeeze because you lose something i think that having the magazine well in front of
the trigger guard and this is the honest answer is i've been i've been shooting for so much in
the military with ar-15 style platforms and and most of the modern military modern militaries
across the world use a magazine in front um i'm so used to it switching
to a bullpup would be uncomfortable it'd be it's it's just like it's it is not the same thing it's
not home um but the one of the disadvantages you get is manipulation of the firearm tends to be
more uncomfortable so when i have to load a magazine in here i get drop the mag, put a new magazine in the mag well.
It's sort of efficient.
It's all there.
But the other one that you start to see, and I think there are quite a few companies that are actually doing this very, very well,
is the triggers in bullpups are historically referred to as being terrible.
And so you want a good trigger because it adds accuracy.
It helps you control the weapon
firearm better and historically speaking firearms with a bullpup design had a harder time making a
better trigger oh all right all right meridian forest says hey tim u.s air force member here
i was raised in north dakota and thankfully got stationed back in north dakota recently they voted
to ignore a lot of the federal gun regulations here i'm not going to say i'm for or against this Yeah.
Yeah.
Make 1984 Fiction Again says,
Wow. I got kicked off a job in the authoritarian state of Massachusetts for not wearing a mask outside
laving pavers on blacktop and 80 degree weather with no one near me.
Wow.
Jeez.
That's a great name.
Yeah.
I was thinking that same thing.
I have read that book and it's creepy.
It's incredible.
Read 1984 if you haven't read that.
Yeah.
I got that t-shirt.
Yep.
Tom, I think it says Tom, says, second time super chat.
I feel stupid.
I accidentally just sent you 10 bucks.
Ha ha, here's another 10.
I'm here in Washington State.
Zero gas shortage, but I just paid $3.59 a gallon to fill up this, what is it, Subby?
Subby.
The Subby.
The Subby.
Gas is getting expensive.
I heard it was like $9 in some places.
Oh my gosh
yeah i didn't i couldn't confirm it yeah i've just been seeing posts i don't know for sure
five in california yeah in some areas it was absolutely skyrocketing
ray uh rafe pernell says please post uh please post video of ian's gf bread recipe i need it
gf gluten-free your girlfriend's bread recipe. I need it. GF gluten-free?
Your girlfriend's bread recipe? Yeah.
Yeah, she's hot.
That was quick.
I love it.
I'd have to make a gluten-free recipe
maybe with almond flour,
but I've noticed the wheat flour
really handles the yeast and the sugar
in a special way.
I mix them together sometimes,
do like a light gluten with like an almond flour.
If it's GF flour bread recipe,
I haven't done a gluten-free one in a while. Ian's got bread i'm down to experiment so i'll get that rise kyle lipka says crowder calls it mug club you should call us the beanie
bros you know we did have a conversation about like making membership name something and i was
like there's gonna come a point where we have many more shows and people will just be like, what is that?
Imagine going to like Disney Plus and it's called like the Mickey face.
Be like, be a Mickey Mouse.
Yeah, that was the thing.
Join the Mouseketeers.
You'd be like, no.
I guess.
No.
No.
Nah.
All right.
Ace 2020 Boyd, YouTube is crazy.
They can put strikes on Crowder,
but allow Nakey Yoga videos
with full frontal no blurs.
Also won't let me send this
with the full words, right?
Huh.
Dude, there's really messed up videos.
There's videos where a guy does like
what's in my butt challenge.
They show it.
Whoa.
Yep.
They show it.
Yeah.
They actually show his butt?
Well. Cringe. They don't show like. Whoa. Yep. They show it. Yeah. They actually show his butt? Well.
Cringe.
They don't show, like.
I don't know.
They show it from a perspective where it's like, you can tell what they're doing.
They say what they're doing.
So Crowder actually had a segment where they actually show some of the highly objectionable
material that you can find on YouTube.
And I don't think YouTube liked that very much.
No.
But, I mean, they should have said thank you.
You know, I don't have to hire somebody to police my own.
Yep.
Don Jett says cicadas contain high levels of mercury.
I don't think eating a bunch of them is wise.
Shout out to Ian from Cuyahoga Falls, Monroe Falls Avenue.
Dude, what's up?
You ever go to Monroe Falls Lake and take a dip?
That's where I used to get shaved ice right over there.
Oh, cool.
Yeah.
I have no idea what you just said.
Oh, that's my hometown.
Shout out to my homies.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio.
What's up?
Ashley Hayes says,
K.Y. Masks end June 11th.
Look into Andrew Cooper, writer of Brood in Lexington.
Took the flight to Andy Beshear.
His weekly protests built his own CC processing service after being banned from Stripe and PayPal.
He is leading Project Uncancellable in KY.
Interesting.
Cool.
Jelly Bean says, hey Tim, fellow Illinois citizen here.
I'm from the suburbs, however, Orland Park area, Oak Forest to be exact.
I work in Joliet, New Lenox area,
and I paid $3.17 a gallon.
I thought Illinois wasn't one of the states
affected by the pipeline issues.
Maybe the pipeline issues,
there's more to the story than they're telling us.
But I know all of those areas very well.
I used to skate in a lot of them.
Dane Schell says,
the left is doing what libertarians couldn't,
and that's break down the system enough
for a new generation to have a clean slate
the great reset but doing it with bad fuel
unscalable ideologies
I mean
to a certain degree but they're like
kneecapping the police and then
replacing them with woke police
so it's not gonna get better it's just
getting worse
are those woke police disarmed?
no they're armed
Kev says first super chat ever better it's just getting worse are those woke police disarmed no they're armed okay so yeah
that's pretty that's pretty true yeah that's not good kev says first super chat ever what good is
a functioning pipeline if the billing software has been encrypted and you can't bill your customers
they paid the ramps the ransom within three hours according to numerous reports
so they weren't dealing with that. Amazing. No idea.
Nicholas Nasty says,
the purpose of the Second Amendment is to guarantee that the people
have any necessary implement
to overthrow a tyrannical government,
zero limitations.
This is only partially true.
I'm not a fan of when people are like,
it's to overthrow tyrannical government.
No, it was literally to defend yourself, period.
Tyrannical government
or invading force or lunatic criminal a free state requires a well-regulated militia therefore
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed people need to understand
there were no police back then it was all local militia when there was like a robbery people
would round up the boys and they would be like, hey, get the militia.
Yeah, the Second Amendment
is a poem to the people
to remind them that they are free
and it's a prohibition against the state.
Yep.
Marco says,
I have a question for Forrest mainly.
With all the critical race theory
and other agendas in the army being pushed,
would you still join the Rangers?
Love the show.
Oof, that is a good question you're
gonna have to have a small challenge between two decisions one of them i can answer for you if
you're going to join the rangers absolutely if you're not getting if you're interested in joining
the military right now you have to go special operations ranger battalion navy seals special
forces marsok it's going to trust me every the military is all moving in that direction the
global war on terror is known as the rise of the special operations so if you're thinking about joining the military
and you haven't looked at special operations absolutely what's what's marsak marsak would
be this marine version of special operations their their contribution or their contribution so
all right second one we're looking at critical race theory in the military. If you believe that you have the moral integrity to resist the the the push of critical race theory. Yes. But that has to be a very serious and personal question. If you if you are if you think that you're going. Yeah. Does that does that answer the question? Yeah. Like you. It is a very serious question. Take it seriously.
Why are you joining the military?
Is it out of patriotism?
Is it out of duty?
Those are easy answers to say on paper, but when you actually have to live them out.
All right.
Ossory says, great guest.
We vets and country boys will be the ones to survive when the energy hits the fan.
Dude, you guys are constantly hyping Ian's bread and I'm yearning for a road trip
and I'm not even a big bread eater.
So we are currently building out,
as part of the new website, an auction feature,
which is going to allow us to do
a two-tiered ticket system for the house.
So we want to do Friday night events every Friday.
Ten tickets first come first serve
and then probably 10 maybe more
tickets that are top auction based this way you have the people who are like spamming the refresh
button because we can't we don't we only have certain capacity it's not it's not like we have
that much space so we have to figure out a way to make it fair and i'm like two-tier system works
because then you have people who can afford to mosey on over not really worry about time and
make their bid and spend more to come but then people who probably can't afford to mosey on over, not really worry about time and make their bid and spend more
to come.
But then people who probably can't afford to can just try and use merit, just get that
ticket first.
It'll be difficult.
And we'll put in restrictions so that some people don't come every single time.
We get more opportunities.
But the auction system allows us to basically do anything.
So we can auction off a loaf of Ian bread stored properly in dry ice.
Now, I don't know what the regulations are.
Right.
It might be like a donation.
It might have to be just like Ian as a person sending a person.
No, no.
The business will be able to do the auction.
I will make several, at least three loaves of bread for that event.
And then we'll have to put.
Oh, yeah.
Then we'll just slice them into quarters.
We'll slice the breads into halves.
We'll do like a garlic bread.
We'll do a cinnamon raisin.
Make sandwiches. Maple. We'll have sandwiches ready and bread is
good it's it is it is it makes like store-bought bread just like i mean there's no preservatives
this is the thing the store-bought bread has natural they put preservatives in it so it can
last on the shelf this stuff goes stale after five days if you leave it out even if you have
it in a bread box yeah you gotta eat it man if you did in the first two days it's amazing it is just moist and it just holds the you can't explain it with words
you you guys you you really want to come to these events so we're we're in the process of setting
things up so that we can actually do this we just had it we just had the driveway redone we just had
some work done in the garage there's still a process i know we wanted to do this back in
february and then i'm, we should have public events.
And then we had like a legal conversation, and I was like, oh, we can't.
We still have to overcome some hurdles business-wise.
And so we're all working on the things with the checklist to get everything done.
And it takes a long time, man.
It's too bad.
You know, in the real world, you can't just do things.
I think most people learn that.
These business people think it's like
well i know how to make a business work they get into government then all of a sudden everything
sludges up they don't realize that once you get government involved it's just like i could
theoretically be like come on down and then we'd be shut down in two seconds so fortunately
all right where are we at
philip snow says love the show did anyone else see the vaccine concert sponsored by youtube last
week talk about serious propaganda the whole thing was about getting people vaccinated even
biden and kamala were part of it it's the craziest thing to me because it's weird that you've got
everyone advocating for a medication when people should be advised to go and talk to their medical professionals their doctors when donald trump talked about hydroxychloroquine
they were screaming at the top of their lungs like he's gonna get people hurt don't do this
the same thing is true for any medication all of a sudden they flipped their tune it's like oh now
it's fine now just ignore no no no no you go to your doctor you ask you ask your doctor what's up
because i think it's ridiculous yeah stop, stop treating the politicians, the political class, as your high priest.
Scarier, is that four?
Says, good on you for having recoil on.
Met two of their guys at a training course.
Cool dudes.
Get knowledge and skills.
You bet.
Thanks.
Pdogg says, if you want a depiction of life without electricity,
read the Going home series by a
american really makes you think about how people would act also michael knoll's book speechless is
available for pre-order on amazon ding that dude is gonna sell so many books yeah ding speechless
they just put it at the end and then i have to read it i love it so much doc lock says 1500
pew pew device voucher take it to the pew pew store
for your pew pew of choice yearly 500 round box of ammo for training and supply biannual mandatory
training national defense budget i don't know training i just agree with don't don't ever don't
ever put the state in charge of training yeah exactly when you go when you go to the dmv
maybe if you're going to get a
gun from the government you've got to do a general firing test like yeah like a driving test exactly
like you walk up and you have you have your handgun and you have your your ar and they do
like some basic range or whatever some low range seven yards and what maybe like 21 for the rifle
and then they test you and if you are good enough they're like you pass have a nice day
so you'll have to load the gun they'll watch you load it just make sure you know how don't you'll have to turn the safety off
make sure you know how and then you'll have to hit the target yeah make sure you know i mean that's
that's all they already make you do that in minnesota for concealed carry or a permit to
carry so you go to the dgs instead of like a driving test you just you need to fill a little
piece of paper and they call you into the range and then you do a function test fire and then
so there'll be immediate failures like a rolling stop if you don't stop completely the stop sign
that's an automatic failure yeah but you can take the test again yeah so then you're like okay
so it'd be pretty easy to do yeah i mean this it does sound like a good idea so long as it's
mandatory that the state give out firearms but or you know or like proof of proof proving it over
there i just don't want the state telling me what i can and cannot do when the state give out firearms. Right. Or, you know, or like proof of proof, proving it over there.
I just don't want the state telling me what I can and cannot do when the state can't figure out, you know, everything else. I think if they're going to give you something, a test isn't a big deal because you always have the choice to go buy one your own.
Sure.
So if it's like you want your free gun from the government, there's a range there.
You got to, you know.
What's the test to get on welfare?
You have to go to the department of
health and human services and then they ask you a series of questions that you don't you can lie
about well i mean you can lie about a lot whatever you want i mean if you want to break the law you
can break the law so sure yeah but if it's like if you're gonna be getting free stuff you know
i'm just saying piracy is in fashion yeah all right let's see
justin heasley says tim and forest why is the
requirement of a firearm training class not necessarily supported by by pro 2a personalities
yeah i can answer that one it's because we don't want the state to tell us what is the requirement
like so if you're going to come and take a class or if you're going to go get your concealed carry
like absolutely that's the bare minimum so but you should be pursuing becoming better at something you should
be pursuing taking other taxes uh requires but i do not think i do not because who determines what
the test is yeah sure in order to get a gun you have to sit through eight hours of critical race
theory yep or i think it's reasonable that people have a training course that they pass a
training course in order to get a firearm don't you agree and they say yes okay now to pass the
course we're going to give you a a you know nine millimeter we're gonna give you a glock and you
gotta hit the center of the target at 100 yards i can't do that you get one round yeah i can't do
that i mean i can um so it's like oh okay like well if you can't do it you shouldn't have a gun
yeah like it can it can be used as a prohibition, right?
So a common thing that's said in the – that's used in kind of a trendy conversation that people say right now is like, oh, well, the history of gun control is rooted in racism.
I think this is a bad argument.
I get the point, but I think it's a bad argument because the origins of American – the american version of gun control was originally
intended to target certain ethnic minorities the problem wasn't only that it was targeting
ethnic minorities but it actually was also disarming a population the problem is the
disarmament so the application of one group of people making up a list of rules that you have to meet in order to be like them is wrong
it is fundamentally tyranny to support gun control all right we got andrew j gregory says tim saw
your blog where you guys were playing music i'm from md and would love to jam with you guys i've
played drums on and off since i was 16 30 year old now, send us an email. All right, we'll just do a couple more.
Let's see.
Jonathan Duger says,
Did time in KAF.
If Minneapolis is anything like that,
leaving is a good choice.
Army leads the way.
Thank you.
Hot Dog 400 says,
Tim, you bring up a good point.
Get rid of police, Bring back local militia.
I'm pretty sure the left would agree with that because, well, they probably would because they're lying.
But one of the arguments is that community policing.
You have cops from outside towns and areas coming in and enforcing the law and not caring about the community.
And it's like, okay, local militia.
Yeah.
Right.
Don't make the Marxist mistake of an argument of a good assessment of the problem means that you're going to have an excellent solution.
Hmm.
All right.
One more.
Aaron says, raising Emden geese and guinea fowl.
Is that what that GN is?
Guinea.
That's guinea.
If everything turns out right, we have entertainment in our backyards.
If there is a spike in food prices, we have a self-perpetuating fortune in our backyards.
There you go.
They're also alarm dogs.
Yeah. Loud. Guinea hens? Yeah. They're also alarm dogs. Yeah.
Loud.
Guinea hens?
Yeah.
They're not very intelligent.
No.
The chickens, man.
Wow.
It's hilarious watching these things.
They love music.
I've seen it.
Yeah.
You were singing them?
Yeah.
They came over and sat down one by one and then just chilled and farmed and watched.
I've watched, when I was a kid, we had a dog, and our dog actually called the guinea
hens from the neighbor's farm
into our property
and then ate them
oh my gosh
across the highway
yeah
wow
it would sit
it was the weirdest thing
called them
it would sit
way out in the field
and it would make noise
you could see it barking
making this noise
and then you'd see
this guinea hen
walk across
what the heck
that dog was really
really smart
that's weird
after Ian said that I went out with the guitar and I jammed.
And Vanessa walked over and sat down and just hung out and watched me jam.
Yeah, she's going to have a character arc.
I like Vanessa.
So I was wrong.
She's not mean.
Vanessa's a chicken.
Yes, Vanessa's a chicken.
I said the other day that she was being mean.
No, I was incorrect.
What was she doing?
No, she was just, i think i mistook her
demands for food to be bullying oh so when she would come up and follow me around and stuff i
thought she was like getting ready to turns out she's one more stink bugs all right yeah and then
you know she's very nice with her lead the way my friends if you have not already make sure you
smash the like button and you can follow this show on Facebook, facebook.com slash TimCastIRL, where we will leverage the network to, if you could share
the videos, get more people to go over to TimCast.com.
So it's greatly appreciated.
We're also on Instagram at TimCastIRL.
This show is live Monday through Friday at 8 p.m.
So of course we're back tomorrow.
And did you want to shout anything out for us?
Your social media?
So like I said, my personal social media is FoxProOfficial with an underscore in there.
It's really annoying,
but it's a pretty casual page.
But the bigger thing
and the more important thing
is follow Recoil Magazine
on Instagram.
And then if you actually want to,
best way to get our magazine
is actually to subscribe.
You can subscribe to it.
It's cheaper.
It gets delivered to your door.
It's discreet.
And so,
but check out our website,
recoilweb.com and off grid web.com
nice and i'm ian crossland you can follow me at iancrossland.net and along social media at
ian crossland so thanks for coming cool yeah i'm always glad to have an expert in his field on the
show with us and i thank you guys very much for supporting us as crowders going through this this
does concern me a lot you You guys can follow me on Twitter
at Sour Patch Lids
in my quest to have more followers
than Sour Patch Kids.
Go over to TimCast.com,
click the Members Only button,
sign up now,
because at around 11,
we're going to have an exclusive
Members Only segment up with Forrest
from Recon Magazine.
So thanks for hanging out,
and we will see you all there.
Bye, guys.
