Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #431 - Alex Jones Goes TO WAR With January 6th Committee, Files Lawsuit w/Fresh&Fit

Episode Date: December 21, 2021

Tim, Luke, and Lydia join the guys from Fresh & Fit Podcast, Myron & Walter, to critically examine the news of Alex Jones suing the January 6th House committee, the Washington Post's dire warnings about a possible civil war, the retired generals who agree that a coup is very likely in 2024, the White House's dark predictions about death and despair for Americans who commit the grave error of not being vaccinated, and the insane New York laws that open the doors for so much authoritarianism. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alex Jones is suing the January 6th committee. He is refusing to cooperate and good for him. A bunch of other people have as well. And I think that these are truly the worst of the worst. It looks like, I think it's fair to say, I think most reasonable people would assume this. The goal of the committee is just to stop a Trump 2024 run. We've got this ongoing grand jury in New York. It's actually a grand jury convened to indict Donald Trump and grand juries tend to indict. So Donald Trump may very well get indicted, but at the very least, at least Alex Jones, you'd expect him to. And I'm glad he is. He's standing up. He's fighting back. He's refusing. And he released a statement a while ago where he said basically that they're going to rope

him in. They're going to bring him in. They're going to ask him questions. They're going to claim he lied. So he's best just pleading the fifth and fighting this. So again, good for Alex. We've also got Joe Biden's administration basically saying there's going to be death and pain for people just before Christmas. Thanks for that. Because they're unvaccinated. And we're going to get, I believe, tomorrow a big announcement about their new measures and their plan for tackling COVID.

A lot of people think it's going to be serious restrictions, possibly having to do with air travel, especially during the holidays. This will be big. And we got a couple other crazy stories, too, in that capacity. We've got Cory Booker. We got Elizabeth Warren. We got Jim Cramer, all triple vaxxed and boosted. Now we got COVID.

So there's a theory. I got a theory. They lied about it. They lied about getting vaccinated. How much you want to bet? These people lied about it. But we'll talk about all that stuff. And we got a couple other stories that are freak.

We got three retired generals saying that they believe there is a possibility of a military coup in 2024 because the military is straight divided right now and something must be done about it. And then we've got an advisor to the CIA who tracks civil wars in other countries saying that we may be in the third phase already. She basically said there's three phases. One and two, we've long since passed. The third phase, we may have entered on January 6th. So, of course, January 6th is like this nightmare scenario for these people.

But we'll get into all of that. Joining us today to talk about this and more is Fresh and Fit. Hey. Do you want to introduce yourselves? We're back, man. Aaron Gaines. Fresh Prince CEO. Hey, man. So that's Fit. Fresh Prince CEO. Hey, man.

So that's fit. I'm fresh. There we go. Don't get confused. But yeah, we're back, man. Happy to be here, man. Happy to be here. Other than you guys.

Cool. You guys want to just explain real quick what you guys do? Oh, yeah. We should probably do that, right? They're like, who are these guys? Random dudes. Some guy in a chain and a guy in a sculpture. Who the hell are these guys?

No, Myron Gaines, man, we have the Fresh Fit Podcast. We talk about becoming a better man. We're the number one men's podcast in the world. We talk about making money, getting girls, getting in shape, just becoming the best version of yourself. Investing as well? Investing, exactly. Real estate and credit scores. Real estate investing and cryptocurrency and all that stuff.

I'm really big into real estate. Bought a close on my seventh property for the year at the end of the month. So we're just all about helping guys self-improve and understand that the dating marketplace has changed and you got to adapt, baby. That's a lot to manage, seven properties. Dude, it is a lot. But my pops helps me out

because I got a property in Florida and then Connecticut. My dad manages the Connecticut property. Cool. Are you the founder of BLM with how many houses you have? I am the founder. I am the founder, actually. I'm the founder now. Patrice, what's her have? I am the founder. I am the founder, actually. I'm the founder now. Because that lady, Patrice, what was her name?

Patrice Collins or something? Yeah, she had like seven houses or something. Five houses at like half a million bucks? Yeah. And she was like, it's okay. It's for my family. It's like, oh, you're- Huge family.

Really well. I don't, you know, I guess the issue is like, I don't know why. I don't care. You know, like, oh, famous person is rich. Like, you know, whatever. Yeah. I think if you're famous and you're not rich, you're stupid. Well, one of the other things we'll get into as well is I guess you've been exposed as a Fed.

You're a Fed. Yes. I got doxxed, and I'm here. He's the ops, man. Yeah, I'm the ops. He's the ops. Get out of here. Yeah, man.

So I got doxxed. If you Google my real name, which I won't even say, but at this point, it is what it is. Basically, people put out my real name, and then if you Google my real name, an affidavit comes back for a case I did right before I resigned. And I guess I'll just say it at this point. I was a former Special Agent of Homeland Security Investigations, HSI. I did criminal investigations from 2013. I was an agent in 2013 to 2020.

I was an intern from 2010 to 2013. And then I became an agent in 2013, went to the academy, and then got stationed to Laredo, Texas my first duty station then I went to Miami, Florida fantastic career it was a great job I have nothing bad to say about the agency

or the job itself but that was during your podcast right? I'm sorry? that was during your podcast right? yes so I was doing the podcast and then they didn't like my pod

we talk about controversial things like womanizing so they didn't like my pod you know we talk about controversial things like womanizing so so they didn't really like it and they're like hey you know you got to pick one you know because i had my my business i was doing i was running my fitness business on my podcast right and then i also was doing my job uh with with the feds and they're like hey like you know you got to be testifying you have to have a certain type of character blah blah blah you know which i understood i get it you know i'm voicing my opinion on youtube and it might not be the best you know for testifying for cases. And I had a pretty big case at the time, so I got it.

But I was kind of put in a weird position where I had to make a choice. So at the time, we were just expanding. We had invested in the studio. So I said, you know what? I'm going to take a bet on myself. And I ended up working out. But again, nothing bad to say about the agency. It was a lot of fun.

We'll get into it. Yeah. I got some questions, but we're going to get into that a lot later, of course. But hey, guys, it's pretty crazy out there as you guys are hearing all the news. Don't forget, you have to obey Dr. Fauci and Lord Savior Bill Gates every day. Don't forget to take your shots.

Excuse me. Shots. How many? That's medical advice, Luke. I'm not giving any medical advice. You've got to tell people to go talk to their doctor. Talk to your medical doctor. Do whatever you've got to do, but just obey Fauci, Bill Gates at all costs. I guess they're doctors, right? They're beyond that. If there is something beyond that.

Super doctors. Super god overlords. So how many shots exactly? I think 1984 should be fitting. I think that exact number of shots I think will definitely help slow the spread. And that's why I made this t-shirt that reads 1984 shots to slow the spread, which you can exclusively get on thebestpoliticalshirts.com. And because you do, I'm here. Thanks so much for having me.

I'm excited about this conversation. Thanks so much for coming on. No, thank you. Just to answer that as well, do you believe in depopulation? Absolutely. A hundred percent. I think it's not that I don't believe, it's not that I believe in it. A lot of very powerful people do.

And that's the more important aspect of it. What you'll get is in the establishment, they use the most extreme version of what that means versus Bill Gates literally doing a TED talk where he's like, we want to slow population growth down. You know what I mean? So, like, if you say that, you could be referring to Bill Gates, you know, doing research on implantable birth control chips, which is a real thing. But it sounds crazy. I didn't believe Luke when he brought it up. Yeah, I had to look it up. It's like Bloomberg Report.

It's not even a big deal, apparently, to these guys. And if you mention that, they make it seem like you're talking about some wild, crazy conspiracies and all that stuff. And don't forget, go to InvertedWorldBook.com because TimCast has officially released its first book. And here's what I find really funny. First of all, with you guys supporting us,

we announced this last week. I think this was Friday, wasn't it? We announced it's Inverted World. Tales from the Inverted World book is number one in like five different categories already in new releases. It's already a bestseller, which is absolutely crazy. And here's the best part. This is a book about ghosts, UFOs,

you know, birds, missings, the rat experiments, simulation theory. And it ends with this big story about a serial killer who's, who's never been found and been going on for like a decade plus in Long Island. And when you go to Amazon, it says people also, uh, customers also bought this book and it's Peter Navarro's book and it's Michael Malice's book. So you got the anarchist handbook and you got in Trump time, and then you got the Anarchist Handbook. And you got In Trump Time. And then you've got Tales from the Inverted World. These books probably shouldn't go together. But because you guys watch, support these books, you can clearly see it.

So tremendously grateful to everybody who buys it. And if you're interested in this, go to invertedworldbook.com. Don't forget, go to timcast.com. Become a member if you want to support our work. We're going to have a members-only segment coming up after the show around 11 or so p.m. And you can like this video, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends. Let's just talk about Mr. Alex Jones already. We got CNN reporting. I love to use CNN for this stuff. Alex Jones sues House January 6th Committee. They say conspiracy theorist and right-wing provocateur Alex Jones says he will not comply

with demands. The House Select Committee investigating January 6th is made for his testimony and records. According to a new lawsuit he filed on Monday, the lawsuit seeks to block the subpoenas and claims Jones should be protected under the First Amendment. He says that he will also decline to answer questions so as not to incriminate himself. It lands in a moment when the committee has pushed aggressively for witnesses to share what they know about the planning of the January 6th rallies. And they are intentionally, in my opinion, this is what I believe, the January 6th committees are intentionally conflating the rallies with the people storming the Capitol. Because there were a ton of people who were just

like regular people that were waving American flags as Trump was like, we're going to go watch peacefully and blah, blah, blah. And then they went home. And there was a lady. She was like a PSYOPs officer or whatever in the army. She had nothing to do with anything at the Capitol. She went to the rally. Gone. Discharged. There were a bunch of people who have lost their jobs.

Now apparently the guy from Bob's Burgers has been fired, one of the guys, because they were like, we think he was there. So this is, look, I think the January 6th committee is completely insane. I think it's all bunk BS. And I think they're trying to strip resources away from people who support Trump so that they can't support him as well moving into 2024. Well, they have to include the rallies because there's only so many Chewbacca guys, grannies, and feds that they have to go after that were a part of everything else that happened that other day. But it's also interesting to note here that Jones actually volunteered to submit documents and answers in writing for this particular committee. And then the committee refused to do this. They are also requesting his phone records.

And as we know, the previous committee members released private phone records. There's also some accusations about phone records being doctored after they garnered them from this January 6th committee. So there's a lot of reasons why a lot of people are saying, I'm not going to be complying with this. And this counter lawsuit is going to be interesting because I bet there's probably going to be discovery on both sides, right? Maybe. I mean, Steve Bannon tried that.

He was filing saying he wanted evidence released on what the government had on this stuff. And then the judge was like, no. A lot of work for a misdemeanor. A lot of work for misdemeanors, right? Because I think a lot of people forget that, like these charges that they're coming after them for. You know, because I've read a couple of the criminal complaints ran by the FBI agents.

And, yeah, they're misdemeanor charges, and it's a lot of work to be going after a misdemeanor charge. And just so people know, like, you know, the feds typically don't do a case unless it's, number one, a felony. And then, number two, it's going to do substantial time. Because the thing is with the federal court system is you have AUSAs, right? Assisted United States Attorneys. And I don't want to sound like a jerk, but they're kind of divas. They don't take every case that comes to them. They want to win.

There's a reason why federal prosecutors have such a high win rate. And the reason why is because they pick and choose which cases they want to take. If a case isn't good enough, they'll say give it to the state or whatever else. So for them to take misdemeanors and push it to this level is fairly unorthodox. Obviously, I get it. Like, hey, these guys broke into the Capitol. It's a gross act. You've dealt with this stuff.

Yeah. When you were working at the – was it Homeland – HSI? Yeah. Well, with this type of stuff, no, not in particular. I investigated more like mass cartels and everything. But I'm very aware. You know what I mean? Right, right, right.

It was in your periphery maybe? Yeah. I mean when you do criminal investigations, regardless of the agency that you work for, whether it's DEA, FBI, whatever it is, we all go through the same federal court system. We use the same prosecutors, the same judges, et cetera, and you get very familiar with what every agency does as far as like, you know, what their investigative authority is. And in a lot of cases, you have a lot of overlap, you know, like for example, ATF, DEA, FBI, HSI, we all have something called Title 21, which is we can all do drug investigations to certain extents. But, you know, this is where the fighting comes in between agencies because, hey, well, this is my target.

No, it's not. Well, I'm Title 21 designated. Well, I am too, blah, blah, blah. So, you know, so you get to be very familiar with other agencies' authorities because of that very situation where there can be confliction issues. I have a question. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence that there was a lot of undercover federal agents involved in January 6th, whether provocateurs or organizers. Do you think a lot of those rumors are true, and have you been able to see some of the circumstantial evidence suggesting that? I mean, I wouldn't be surprised. Because undercover, so the public will think it's undercover,

but it's nothing more than an agent in plain clothes. Because there is no uniform for 1811s or special agents. They wear regular clothing. Sometimes they might wear a suit like you see in the movie. Sometimes they wear jeans. Sometimes they wear street wear. So it wouldn't be improbable for one to be there just because of the situation for them to be out there and see what's going on. And bam, you've improbable for one to be there just because of the situation for them

to be out there and see what's going on. And bam, you got your eyewitnesses right there. So if you're in a real undercover capacity where you're dealing with criminals and everything else like that, and you're actually in an undercover position, then that's different. Yeah. There's some crazy videos out there of guys clearly antagonizing, clearly saying, we're going to go to the Capitol and that those individuals weren't charged, people calling for violence violence not being charged. So there's a lot of questions surrounding how involved the federal government was and what extent did they help organize and execute a lot of this.

I could see that as potentially problematic, though, from a prosecutorial standpoint because if you had a UC agent running around antagonizing the crowd like, yeah, let's storm the Capitol, blah, blah, blah, that would create so many issues for the prosecution to build a strong case because then you can say, well, were they predisposed? Were they going to do it? Did the government actually take an active role in entrapping them? So I could see how that could be problematic from a prosecution standpoint.

Those videos seem a bit over the top for me. There's one guy, and he's wearing a red hoodie, and he's like, everybody, here's what we're going to do. And I think I agree with you on this one. They're going to be able to file. The defense is going to be able to get the evidence the prosecution has. Exactly.

Now, it's possible. Through discovery. Right, right, right. They're going to get everything. The thing is that anytime there's a criminal case built, the prosecutor has to hand everything over to the defense,

which is considered discovery. And there's actually huge issues if they don to hand everything over to the defense, which is considered discovery. And there's actually huge issues if they don't turn everything over. Like they can get disbarred. They can get hit with a bunch of issues. So they always turn everything over, even if it's not in their best interest to do so. So if they were to actually do a case and then they found out the agents were doing this stuff undercover and they antagonized the crowd, I doubt any prosecutor that wants to win would take that case. They'd be like, hell no, because AUSAs are very picky on what they take. Yeah, yeah.

I think it's entirely possible that these guys were some kind of agent provocateurs or whatever, and we've seen this at many protests, even left-wing protests. You'll see guys show up. It's very obvious that they're to start violence, and you don't know who they're with. The problem is, is it possible? Yes. I would say, how do you prove it anyway anyway even if it was the case because it's not going to be through any conventional means if it's true so i think the simple answer is it probably just rowdy guys who are like trying to cause trouble but those guys weren't charged and

there's clear evidence who they are uh what they did and and there's videos of them inciting it there's videos of them calling for it but why aren't they charged is the big question and some people say that would be evidence but it's not it's not it's actually really simple they go to these guys because they know who they are because they were vocal and loud and they say you're going to go to prison unless you tell us the names of all the people who are with you and then that guy says you got it boss and then all of a sudden he's no longer in the charging documents all of a sudden he's no longer in criminal complaints because he's cooperating and giving everybody up. So that's what I found really interesting is that people immediately assume- Happens a lot, all the time.

Especially with the feds. Happens all the time. They find the one guy. Look, look, look. You got all these videos and the feds are trying to figure out who these guys are. Do you know this person? Do you know this person? Then you get a video of a guy who's standing there in plain view of the camera yelling over and over again what to do. And they're like, okay, this is going to be an easy guy to find. He's tall. He's this age. He looks like this. We know what he sounds like.

He knows where he is. They find him. And then they say, who was with you? Who was talking with you? Give us your phone. And he says, yes. And then they say, okay, we're not going to charge you because you're cooperating. That's giving the government the benefit of the doubt, which I wouldn't give them here.

I don't think so. In this particular case. We're going to wait till this data and information in the court proceedings but for right now there is a lot of circumstantial evidence we'll see how it unfolds but there's still so much that we don't know even the video footage is being kept away from the general public that's which is crazy yep which is absolutely not for sure it's because misdemeanors it's because you you watch a lot of this footage and it's people bumbling around confused half the time you know there was violence and there was riot this footage and it's people bumbling around confused half the time.

There was violence and there was rioting. Yeah. I definitely see both perspectives. I'm just giving you guys that perspective where if you were to actually do that as a UC, it could be extremely problematic to prosecution. And knowing prosecutors and how they operate, federal prosecutors especially, they're extremely selective on what they take. And yes, I mean a lot of cases are built on the backs of people testifying against each other. That's how the big cases are made. Like if I was an investigator and I got a guy and I see him rallying everybody up, well, I know for a fact this guy has some kind of influence on these guys.

I'm going to turn him. Here's the important thing. Alex Jones is on video, multiple videos, saying do not do this. Do not be violent. He's telling everyone not to go to the Capitol. They're trying to trick you. He's trying to stop them. Of all the people, of many people who were there antagonizing, Alex Jones was doing the opposite.

The reason why I think they're going after him, they're going after people who used to work for the Trump administration. They're going after Jones. They want to drain as much of their resources as possible. So here's the thing people need to understand about getting called to testify before this committee. They're going to say, we hereby subpoena you to release all phone records, all this, all that, all otherwise. You know what you have to do then? You've got to hire a lawyer to do it. The lawyer is going to have to go through all your email and figure out what they're entitled to and what they're not based on these demands.

And it is going to get expensive. Otherwise, I suppose you can be like, I don't have the money. I can't do it. And then I don't know what they'll do. Maybe take all of your emails. Maybe try and come after everything you own and say, okay, then we'll take everything. Not like you own, but like all of your private data. They would have to get a search warrant though.

Like with a subpoena, like you don't – like subpoenas, a lot of the times it depends on what agency does it under, what authority. Well, it's Congress. Yeah. Subpoena what authority. Well, it's Congress subpoenaing information. Well, it's not just that. It's also the federal government pressing charges on a lot of the people surrounding January 6th, including Owen Schroer that has an open case against him and an open investigation by the federal government against him because allegedly he was near the Capitol. And I think, correct me if I'm wrong, I think there's videos of Jones outside saying, hey, you guys are being set up.

Stop engaging. Stop fighting. I mean, that video alone in itself, again, love or hate him, there's video of him saying, don't do this. Let's be nonviolent. That should exonerate him from a lot of this. What are the others beating the actual case? If it's criminal, they're going to need to search for him. It's not criminal, though.

It's not. No. Owen Troyer, it is. Right, right, right. This is the January 6th. This is Congress issuing a subpoena for information for records. So this means Jones has to file a lawsuit to stop them from getting access to his records or whatever. Because you know what will happen?

They'll get access to his records. There will be nothing in there incriminating, but there will be embarrassing things that will get leaked to the press or taken out of context. They'll manipulate the evidence like they did with Jim Jordan. But he's got to be able to assert his Fourth Amendment right to some degree. He has obviously a very strong reasonable expectation of privacy. You know what I'm saying?

I mean, he's got to be... Yeah. I really doubt they'd be able to get access to it. I can make it simple for everybody is use end-to-end encryption and use VPNs and tell them to get a warrant. Yeah, but what if these are like an example to say, hey, you know what? Here's an example of what we're not to do. Let's use Alex Jones. I hope not.

I mean, I think he has the ability and the resources to get a lawyer, but, man, they should not. Like, he has a serious reasonable expectation of privacy in his emails phone communication etc like you you because i've because here's the thing i've done title three intercepts like i've done those cases where a title three intercept is when you listen to a phone real time right or to get someone's emails or whatever it takes an enormous amount of probable cause to get into that stuff now i'm not sure you said it's not a criminal case you know but regardless he's still going to have an expectation of privacy and if the government's going to come in and try

to get your information fourth amendment man and they're going to need some kind of serious stuff to be able to get well it depends on what kind of judge signs off at on it because if we remember the edward snowden glenn greenwald days we found found out that judges blankly just generally signed everything over, allowing federal agencies to spy on, of course, the American people whoever they want to. Let me ask you something. Yes. You said you did, what, Title III interceptions?

Yeah, I have. So that's literally like you're listening in and you can hear the phone ring and then like, oh, how's it working? Or can you hear them if the phone's not being active? No, you can't. So here's the thing. And there's different spectrums of this, but Title III is when you're them if the phone's not being active? No, you can't. So here's the thing. And there's different spectrums of this. But Title III is when you're listening to a phone for a criminal case, right?

They don't know. You're eavesdropping. Yeah, they don't know. But when I did it, most of the time when the government does it, it's for drug cases. You know what I'm saying? So it was a drug investigation that I did, and you were listening to it. Now, I will tell you guys, and anyone will tell you this, an affidavit to get probable cause for a Title III intercept, you need more probable cause to listen to someone's phone

than to arrest them. Wow. I'll say that again. You need more probable cause to listen to their phone to arrest them because the thing is, is you need to establish that the phone is used for some kind of criminal activity. And to be able to do that, you have to gather evidence to show that that phone is used in criminal activity. A lot of the times, it's beyond the threshold of an arrest. Sorry, go ahead. Have you ever dealt with someone using end-to-end encryption? Could you listen to signal phone calls? Well, a better question is VoIP, right?

Yeah. So if someone dials a number and presses go, that's what you're typically hitting, right? So I never did on end-to-end encryptions. I always did it on phones. Well, an end-to-end encryption would just be like I got signal on my phone, right? Yeah, like WhatsApp or Signal or Telegram. So that's not going through a phone company. You know what I mean?

So you'd have to go to Facebook or whatever and be like, we want access direct to this line. You know what I mean? So I'm not aware at this point. So I can't speak on it in an educated fashion, but I will tell you that when I did them, we did them on phones and, you know,

it's not that hard because a lot of guys, they would just like use regular phones. Like cell phones? They would use cell phones, yeah. They would use burner phones and they would change

the phone number often. But so you got to get access to these phone companies or is this like... Yeah. I mean, yeah, you would go through the phone companies to do it,

but you would have to have like an enormous amount of probable cause to do but this is criminal remember so like when you're doing like a criminal case it has different you know sets and procedures than like let's say a fisa court you know i'm saying that's like more national security related you know that's you know classified stuff i didn't deal with that side ever really and the reason why is because the pain in the let's pain. Let's take it to the meme territory. We got this story from the Washington Post. Quote, we are closer to civil war than any of us would like to believe, new study says. This is from Barbara F. Walter, University of California at San Diego, serves on a CIA advisory panel called the Political Instability Task Force that monitors countries around the world and predicts which of them are most at risk of deteriorating into

violence. By law, the task force can't assess what's happening within the United States, but Walter, a longtime friend who has spent her career studying the conflicts in Syria, Lebanon, Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Rwanda, Angola, Nicaragua, and elsewhere, applied the predictive techniques herself to this country. Her bottom line is that we are closer to civil war than any of us would like to believe. She lays out the argument in detail in her new book. Now I'll pause here. Could she just be trying to sell a book? She's an expert on civil war. She wants people to read about her area of expertise. She sees conflict in this

country and then tells everybody and then they eat it up. Or let me read this. They're going to say, indeed, the U.S. has already gone through what the CIA identifies as the first two phases of insurgency, the pre-insurgency and incipient conflict phases. And only time will tell whether the final phase, open insurgency, began with the sacking of the Capitol by Donald Trump supporters on January 6th. I would like to interject, good friends at the Washington Post, let me just add a sentence. And only time will tell whether the final phase of open insurgency began with

the sacking of cities across the country by Black Lives Matter and Antifa following the George Floyd incident. You see, they totally skip over that and act like we didn't deal with a hundred plus days of violent ridings and dozens dead. However, this is the point I want to get to.

Is this woman, who is a CIA advisor, who tells them when other countries are going to break down in a civil war, is she just selling a book or is this legit? That's a very good question because you could be absolutely right. It could be sensationalistic. It could be hyperbolic. But there are signs that do prove some merit in her conversation. Now, the comment that I would add to this, if there is one government secretive agency that knows about civil war, it's the one that has been spreading civil wars all around the world, and that, of course, is the CIA, which they have been doing all over Latin America, all over the Asian countries, all over the Middle East. So, I mean, obviously she comes from a perspective where she also has information where she's privy to that we don't know anything about.

So when you look at the information that she's able to declassify, the databases she's able to go into, she might be seeing something that we're not allowed to know that could be still classified that does show this kind of bigger partisanship, this kind of bigger conflict brewing, because we've been talking about it for a very long time. And the conditions that create this kind of partisanship, big tech, social media and the corporate media, they work in tandem to divide people politically. Those two ingredients, that fuel for this fire isn't stopping. It's only getting more powerful. It's only becoming more readily available. And it's only becoming something that we can't avoid even more so the conditions that create these civil war like aspects they're not going away they're only becoming stronger i'll throw it to the january 6th story we were just talking about yep when you've got an overtly politic politicized government you know body issuing subpoenas on a, and going after with legal power and criminal

charges against former members, members of the four of the previous administration. I'm like, dude, it's wild. You know, man, I've been talking about this for a long time and I, I'm not saying I know for sure exactly what will happen, but at a certain point, I really want to swear. And I'm going to do it at a certain point, man, at a certain, and I'm going to do it. At a certain point, man. At a certain point. Okay, I said it twice. Just so you know, I'm serious. It starts with me being like, hey, look, people are beating each other in the streets,

and this ideology, this divide is getting worse. When you've got what happened with George Floyd protests, riots, several dozen dead. When you get January 6th, when you have a panel of establishment politicians using government power to file criminal charges against members of the previous administration, for the love of God, this country is being ripped apart and it's at the highest possible levels. You throw away everything else. You throw away the January 6th. You throw away the riots. You throw in, you pretend like none of that ever happened. And you come out and you say that there is a panel, members of Congress who are issuing subpoenas against the previous

executive branch's administration and trying to put them in prison like Steve Bannon. Now they're saying they want criminal charges against Mark Meadows. They are literally trying to imprison the previous administration. And it was these same people who claimed Trump was the bad guy for saying, lock her up in 2016. And it was funny. And he didn't do anything. The dude didn't even fire Fauci. But I will absolutely state Trump was definitely a part of this sundering in the United States.

But I'm going to say it one more time. We don't need to talk about Antifa. We don't need to be talking about Proud Boys. We can just talk about members of Congress who are filing subpoenas against members of the administration and members of the media. You don't have to like Alex Jones. He is a media personality. And as much as people don't want to hear me say it, I'm going to say it.

Alex Jones runs a news organization. Now, you can hate him. Which is protected under the First Amendment. That's right. And now they're coming after him. They're filing spanish. And this is what Alex is arguing, that he's got a First Amendment right here to do what he does. And he does.

But look at what is happening, man. They have lost the plot. I mean, you look at the stuff they're talking about with Joe Manchin. They're like, who's the real president? Is it Joe Manchin or is it Joe Biden? Manchin's a senator from West Virginia. When was he going to be on your side? No, they demand fealty. Just because Joe Manchin is a Democrat, they demanded that he do whatever they want him to do. And when he doesn't, man, they're going absolutely insane against him, claiming that Biden needs to slam the boot down. I'll tell you this, man. Every step of the way,

we have seen dramatic escalations in what is leading to this country being ripped apart, and we are watching it right now. And then when a CIA advisor professor lady comes out and she's like, yeah, it's happening. It's Trump's fault, by the way, but it's happening. I'll be like, it doesn't matter if she thinks it's Trump's fault. What matters is she thinks it's happening because you've got a bunch of people who now think it's happening. Here's the other crazy thing, too. You said earlier, you said a grand jury was convened simply to indict Trump in New York City? Oh, yeah, that's right.

That's crazy because – Let me pull that up. So here's the thing about grand juries. Grand juries typically, like they've been working together for weeks or months on end, and they've seen and heard a bunch of cases. The fact that they're convening a grand jury solely for Donald Trump is crazy to me. That's wild because that's not normal. That's out of protocol.

But let's call that political and a bit hyperbolic in a sense. I'm sure they'll tell you, well, the scope of our investigation is fraud into the Trump administration or something like that. But we got the story, man. Yeah. that but we got the story man yeah this is this is this has been news for the past couple months that high profile or i should say like that the individuals working within the trump administration including journalists have been subpoenaed to testify in a grand jury to to indict donald trump there and now it is being speculated he will be indicted and if he's indicted he will not be able to run in 2024 wow the nation.com which is a leftist publication said donald trump will not be running for president 2024 something to that effect and the first paragraph is donald trump will be indicted for fraud and this will prevent him

from running the witch hunts is real just let me ask you you have experience with grand juries maybe a little bit yeah how often do they. How often do they return to that? That's why this is weird to me because here's the thing. The federal court system, everyone is in it. So it would happen all the time. I'd go in a grand jury. I'd present my case, some drug case, whatever it may be. And then there'd be an FBI agent come after me.

He'd go and do bank robbery. Then there'd be a DA agent. He'd come in and do a drug case. Then there'd be an ATF agent come in and do somebody for a felony possession. So we all would use the same grand jury, which is weird to me because that grand jury will hear hundreds of cases over the span of a few months. That's how grand jury works at the federal system. And then you come in. You testify.

You tell the facts of your case. You're in there with your prosecutor. You step out. Your prosecutor comes out. True bill. Bang. And then you get your arrest warrant. State level, just to clarify. Oh, it's state?

Yeah, New York State. Yep. So I'll tell you this. That's very interesting. So that tells me that the feds probably didn't want it and it went to the state because any AUSA would love to do a case like this, especially – where in New York exactly is this? Is this – I think this is southern – yeah, southern. So it's probably New York City. So it falls under Southern District of New York, which is a very aggressive prosecutorial office.

It's actually one of the best in the country, the Southern District of New York. So they've done all the big mafia cases. They do the big racketeering cases, et cetera. So they do big, sexy cases like this. So I'm surprised that the feds didn't take it. So that tells me they probably didn't want it, and the state said, you know what? We'll run with it. In your experience, I know feds are different from state, but, of grand juries of like cases are returned as indictments?

Almost. If you're going 95%. Yeah. Because, because by the time here, here's how, how tight the, the reason why the federal system doesn't lose is because by the time you take a case to an AUSA and you present it and you guys gather your evidence and you actually have enough to indict that that prosecutor is ready for trial, guys, at the federal system. They're ready for trial. That's why the feds rarely lose because prosecutors don't take cases unless they know they're going to win. They don't want to go to trial. They want to win.

So if they don't take it, this tells me right now, it probably tried to go federal. They said, hell no, we're not going to win this thing. And they say, you know what, we'll take it. So I got to say, grand juries are not like full-on trials where it's difficult and it's non-adversarial. This means that the state walks into a bunch of people and says, here's what they're going for. They're claiming that Donald Trump inflated the value of his buildings to secure loans, which is fraud, something to that effect. Okay. And I just want to clarify.

With the state system, I don't know how often the grand jury convenes, but I know at the federal level, they typically go for a few weeks to a few months. My understanding is that grand juries almost always issue indictments because they're not looking for- Yeah, they always do. Almost always. Right.

Because they're looking for a preponderance of evidence. So that means someone from the state's going to walk up to- No, probable cause. Probable cause. Because it's criminal. I thought a grand jury just needs a little bit more than probable cause. No, no, no. Probable cause? Because it's criminal. I thought a grand jury just needs a little bit more than probable cause. No, no, no. Probable cause.

To return a criminal indictment? Yes. Wow. Probable cause. So at the federal level, I mean, regardless, the United States, it's probable cause, right? You need probable cause to affect an arrest, right? But for an indictment or a criminal complaint, whatever charging document you want to use and information, it's always probable cause. But the fact that the state didn't take it, I mean, sorry, the feds didn't take

it is alarming to me because normally they would do something like this. So what probably happened is this. The feds are rarely going to charge a charge that the state is also going to charge. So for example, if the feds wanted to do a fraud case, they would deconflict with the state and then one of them would take it. So the fact that the feds

don't have it and the state has it tells me probably went to the state, they did a grand jury, convened, and then they presented the case to the grand jury. The state system is a little bit different.

I just confirmed it. You're right. It's probable cause. It's probable cause, yeah. Trump's getting indicted. That's crazy. This was a plan so that he can't run

basically on purpose. That's the point. That could be it. There's no way I would ever believe it otherwise and there's so many people i got i got a i covered this you know like last week and i get these emails from salty you know democrats or whatever anti-trump people and they're like no his crimes are finally catching up to him and i'm like oh if the dude's been this active everywhere for this long you think they wouldn't have come after him for anything he was doing they're coming after after him because Trump, I guess the argument is

he was obsessed with the value of his properties, and so he inflated their value. Okay, well, are you going to explain to the grand jury that property values are nebulous? Like, if I were to ask you, like, your property values, how do you determine the property value? An appraisal, but that's always, it changes all the time. And you can get a different appraiser who can give you a different number. For sure. Exactly.

So they're coming after Trump basically because he was like, you got a building worth $500 million and he goes, probably worth $550 because we did improvements on it. I'm going to get a loan.

And they're like, that's fraud. And it's commercial too. So it has even more checks and balances. So I would love, you know what I want? I would love,

if they actually do follow through and he gets charged and everything else like that, I would like to read either the indictment or the criminal complaint that was filed in support. Well, it was more than likely an indictment because it could convene a grand jury, so it's probably going to be an indictment. It's not going to be a criminal complaint. So let me just ask everybody who is doubting the idea of a civil war. Do you think if Donald Trump is indicted and can't run, that his supporters, that people on the right are going to be like... I'll say this. It's because you mentioned some fantastic points earlier

about all the things going on. Let's add to that the fact that inflation is here. What, 40% to 50% of the U.S. currency in circulation right now was printed in the last 18 months? Let's talk about the financial side too. You know, fiat currency nowadays is literally dwindling. Hyperinflation is going to rear its ugly head anytime now. Bloomberg said, spend your paycheck as soon as you get it.

Yeah, like it's crazy. So you got the polarization between the two parties, right, between the Democrats and the Republicans. You got this craziness that went down at Capitol Hill. You got the FBI over here going after dudes for misdemeanors, you know what I'm saying, to try to send a message. You got them trying to indict Trump by the state. Clearly the feds didn't want to take it out of the most aggressive

federal prosecutorial office in the country, by the way. And, I mean, yeah, this is insane. She's not crazy. This woman from the CIA is not crazy because there's a lot of things in play here. Look, in 2017, I was like, man, if this kind of ideological conflict escalates, it's going to reach the highest levels of government. And people have repeatedly said I was crazy, I was crazy, I was crazy, I was crazy. Now, most people, I think, who say that are typically on the left because they just don't – they're like, nah, the establishment is the best. It will never happen. The security state.

Now look where we are. now look where we are. Now look where we are. You brought up a very important point because financial problems do lead to conflict, whether external or internal. You look at historically a lot of economic upheaval was right before there was a major fight that happened. So that's another aspect to kind of look at here. But this Barbara F. Walter, this CIA political scientist, also said that it's

the erosion of democracy that brings us closer to civil war and she says that we're in between a democracy and a autocracy anocracy anocracy is what she called it specifically we are in an anocracy and she specifically talked about how there's a big separation within the military how three former retired military generals are talking about how there's a major split in there and how there could be a potential coup d'etat or a civil war within the military that could make this into an actual hot war. Let's pull this up. We got the story from the Washington Post. Three retired generals, the military must prepare now for a 2024 insurrection.

This is Paul D. Eaton, a retired U.S. Army Major General and Senior Advisor to Vote Vets. Antonio M. Tuguba, retired Army Major General with 34 years of active duty service. Stephen M. Anderson is a retired Brigadier General who served in the U.S. Army for 31 years. Now, I want to read a little bit what they say, but I want to point out we had the Boston Globe reporting just before, around the election time, this past, this last year, that John Podesta said that he had, or he was advising the West Coast to secede from the union if Donald Trump wins. I think we may have just bought some time. I think, I think these next few years, I think a lot of people just didn't like Donald Trump

and they said, oh, okay. 100%. They were biased. I mean. What I mean is Republicans aren't going to be the ones to succeed. They're not the fervent ideologues that the left is. The left goes and smashes and destroys and burns things down. The moment you get one day of one bad riot, they act like the apocalypse is happening. And that's what they're doing right now, right?

So what these generals are saying is like, oh, no, I can't believe on January 6th, they say January 6th, a disturbing number of veterans. That's right. And active duty members. What they're basically saying is the military is split. What happens come 2024 when election happens, it gets disputed again. And then half the military says this side's right. The other half says this side's right.

Yo, welcome to a civil war. And I'll accentuate this. Five states right now are refusing vaccine mandates and being told by the federalized, you know, the generals running the National Guard, the federal level or the, you know, the Biden administration, you have to do this or else. And they're like, nope, National Guard state. So we're watching this fracture already. What about five states? Do you know? So I know Texas, Oklahoma. Let me pull it up.

Five states, National Guard. That's crazy, though. Yeah. Like, it's going to be a standoff between those that are vaccinated and those that aren't. Yeah. I mean, there's so many things in play here, man. We can even add in the fact that, like, the family unit in the United States in general is crumbling.

You know, divorce rates are at the highest they've ever been. You know, there's more highest they've ever been. There's more single people than ever before. It's five more states. So it's Oklahoma. So here we go. We got Oklahoma, Wyoming, Iowa, Alaska, Nebraska, and Mississippi, and now Texas. Oh, my.

So we have seven states. I was going to add to your point. I don't think it's going to be the vaxxers versus the anti-vaxxers. I think it's going to be the double vaxxers versus the quadruple. The trillion vaxxers. That civil war is going to be happening vaxxers versus the anti-vaxxers i think it's going to be the double vaxxers versus the quadruple vaxxers that the civil war is going to be happening from my perspective yeah there's going to be like bill maher right yeah bill maher got he got the the full dose at the time it was a full dose now i guess it's not he's not he got two shots so it's going to be the bill maher people being like we already got vaccinated we're not doing it again and it's going to be the the the mega vaxxers who are on their like 18th shot because it's been you know a couple years and they're going to be like you're

not up to date i mean and the whole issue with the vaccine man is that typically you need at least what a decade to perfect it you know all these other vaccines that we have in place for all these other diseases you know they were worked on and formulated and perfected within a decade you know at bare minimum you got this thing in a year. Well, which is why they got to keep punching you. Sure, sure. I will counter by saying mRNA, the precursor, like the beginnings of it was in the 80s, but not specifically for COVID. Now, here's my big thing, right?

I don't know how to argue scientific research. You know what I mean? Like none of us work in a lab. None of us can tell you about vaccines. Yeah, no, for sure. So I always fall for it. I'm saying like all the other other backs most of the other vaccines were like you know perfected within a decade whereas like on this one we did it in a year different technology so it's like but but it leads to a lot of people saying they want long-term data on it but i don't want to rehash that because

i'm trying to you know we'll keep it focused on yeah sure but the divide here is real because there's some people in the military saying i will comply with biden's mandates some people saying they won't comply. That's already one divide. That doesn't even include the political divide, the social divide, the economical divide. Religious too as well. The religious divide. I think they're just literally making concepts and ideas up about human beings to see how further they could divide people. Because at the end of the day, I do believe a lot of this kind of is divide and conquer. I do believe a lot of this is centralized. But the National Guards in other states saying, hey, we're not going to go along with what you want us to do with our own bodies is big and a sign of this kind of civil conflict that we're seeing the CIA lady talk about for sure.

I think there's an agenda being pushed here. And the more they can divide us and see how we manage between ourselves and destroy ourselves, the better for them because they want to conquer. And overall, having a one power, one – I want to say one source, you say yes or no to, either you comply or it's goodbye. So who is doing it? Who is trying to divide us? Is it China? Honestly? Well, there's fourth-generational warfare.

There's fifth-generational warfare. There's a lot of other multinational corporations. And some people would argue it is China. Some people would argue it's the multinational corporations that made China as prominent as they are, that sent the slave jobs there, that are connected to the true billionaire class, that's connected to the banking class. So there's a lot of very powerful institutions, very powerful people. But then you get into the realms of speculation.

I don't want to get into speculating here because we could go on days and talk about what we personally believe. But I think it is clear that we are being divided more than we ever have been. And it's turning in a nasty, nasty way that we have to try to stop at all costs. But it's not stopping. It's only accelerating. I will say this with China. We're talking about the Civil War. A war with China is extremely probable.

You know what I mean? Like China is buying at the chop. You know what I'm saying? They're buying at the bit right now to go after Taiwan. They go after Taiwan. Well, Taiwan, for a lot of you guys that know, I'm sure you know this, they make a bunch of our chips that are used for technology. And if China was to take over Taiwan, that would put us in a very difficult position where we would probably have to come in and act and defend and help Taiwan. And it's like, you know, and that would put us in a pretty bad spot because you don't want to go to war with

china they're our biggest traitor and already they're talking about building a chip plant in texas i believe yes because they are no we know what's coming yeah it's coming they're gonna invade taiwan there's no doubt about it they've been waiting for for years to do it here's the here's the issue i take with with like this you know they're trying to divide us i'm just like trying to figure out who is they because when you've got the military split when you've got 30 000 active duty military saying no to the vaccine it's when seven states are saying they will not abide by this for the national guard and i'm like is it is it the the establishment like is it the democrats the uniparty and now there's like a populist wave that's rejecting this

because if that's the case, then the division is natural. It's populist versus elitist. Or is there a larger international group, like Luke mentions, like multinational corporations who are pitting populists and helping fund these campaigns to create division in the U.S.? Or is it actually just that there is a psychotic cult ideology growing in this country that manifests itself in violence and ignorance.

And then there are regular people who are trying to make, you know, trying to live, trying to get by. And when you try, you know, you know, and I'll accept some of the criticism in this regard because it's frustrating to me when I try over and over again to reach an olive branch out to these people. And what do we get? We got what happened here last week. Anger, rage on both sides to be fair but if i'm

like okay i'll give you that point i'll give you that point i'll give it give you that point will you agree with me on this and they say no and they say screw you and they threaten more violence at a certain point you know look we're we are not the this is this show is not the trump maga hat q anything like that this is the show where i'm talking to a dude who's very lefty very woke and i'm like i i agree with you on systemic racism. I agree with you on those issues. Do you agree with me on individual rights? And they say, no.

If I keep giving olive branches out and they keep taking and taking and taking. So I don't know if this isn't if there is like an elite group trying to do this on purpose. Or this is what happens when you get a cult ideology that is fervent, angry and ignorant. And you get people who are, I guess, opposed to that and unwilling to compromise with it. Independent thinking is not respected anymore. Independent thinking is no longer respected. It's like you can't have an opinion on something. It's like, oh, you think Trump did a good job?

Oh, well, you're a bigot. You know what I'm saying? They're immediately going to subscribe you to that end just because of their personal feelings. Whereas, like, hey, you didn you did a terrible job as a president. Let me ask you real quick. No, go ahead. People talk about all the time. It might be Illuminati.

It might be the Bilderberg group. Who knows what it is, right? I'm just saying out of chaos comes order. So look like a children's horse, right? It gets you from the inside out. I'm just saying like in terms of what we're going on in the future, like let's be real here. We're not getting any better. We're not coming together as one.

We're dividing between each other. The race, religion, all this stuff. Why is this happening? There's somebody out there pushing an agenda. I don't know who it is, but it's causing divide. And once that happens, at some point... Just really quickly, Tim, you laid out three hypotheses, right? All of them could be true at the same time.

So we have to also entertain those larger ideas and spectrum of understanding here because it could be a natural divide that some people are playing off that, of course, also benefits China as well. So all three parameters could be at play here, and we could be trying to figure out. We shouldn't try to pinpoint exactly, you know, like this is exactly how it is because it's almost impossible to figure out. There's a lot of disinformation. There's a lot of fake information that's being deliberately released out there to confuse people, to make people go crazy going down the rabbit hole. We don't have to go down the rabbit hole. We see the problems. We have to do everything we can to prevent them because these problems are getting real.

They're getting dangerous, and they're going to have significant ramifications for everyone's life very soon if they already don't. Here's the challenge because, Luke, you sound a lot like Ian. How so? So, you know, Ian, he's on holiday. Shout out to Ian. He likes to say, you know, we got to bring people together, man. We can't allow this division. And I'm like, that's right.

That proud boy wearing the MAGA hat needs to throw down that shield, run up to the Antifa guy. The Antifa guy needs to take his mask off, pull down the hoodie. They should run to each other and embrace in a nice arm lock and say, we're in this together, and that'll happen, right? Is that going to happen? Sounds good. It's never going to happen. Unless it's in a Pepsi commercial.

Unless it's a Pepsi commercial. So this is what I'm saying. We can invite these people on the show. They won't do it. I sent Hassan Piker a message. I was like, hey, man, would you like to come on the show? We'd love to have you. You know, we'll pay for everything. Just no response. Dude doesn't owe me a thing. OK, he doesn't have to come on the show. But if we can't get people to come on the show to talk about these things, then how do you actually even

work towards Mending That Defied? And worse still, when we invite someone on the show who is very much into wokeness and as he described it, the black struggle. And I tell him, I agree with you on all of these points. And then he still calls me names. He still insults me. He still laughs at me and calls me a liar and all that stuff. You know, at a certain point, I'm watching these high profile individuals keep trying to compromise and it doesn't work. We are dealing with zealotry, whatever this side is, you know, for us, freedom, independence, liberty, you've got many conservatives involved. There is a live and let live classical liberalism in there and somewhat traditional liberalism. And then in the cult, you have a shut up and do as you're told or else.

I don't know what anyone can do at this point, and I'm sorry if it sounds pessimistic, to convince the MAGA hat wearing Trump supporter with the American flag to go up to Antifa and shake their hand and say, let's make this country a better place. Because even if that were to happen, the next step is Antifa saying, okay, let's tear down the American institution. Let's burn the Constitution. Let's get rid of our court system. And the Trump supporter guy is going to be like, but those are good things. Just to add to your point, Tim, I don't believe there's a way we can ourselves can come together as one. However, maybe through fair or through like a tragic event, it might bring us together. I don't know what it's going to be.

But us is like, you know, the Trump supporters are like, you know, us. We're not going to do it by ourselves. That's the cause to make us come together. But I don't know what it's going to be. I'll say this. Simply put, there's a lot of we address a a lot of problems right now in the West in general, and the United States in particular. We got the issue with money, right?

40%, 50% of the U.S. currency in circulation was printed in the past 18 months, right? So we got a financial problem. Now we have also a family problem. We have – the nuclear family has almost been destroyed in the United States. How many kids come from two-parent households with both parents that were their biological parent 18 percent now rare yeah 18 percent 18 percent some of the latest extremely rare right which we know that nuclear families are the backbone of a strong economy so you have that right divorce rates are through the roof you got masculinity in general which is like getting thrown to the ways like hey let's you know think with our feelings and let's operate

off feelings and not logic and ration and toxic masculinity and all this other BS. And then you got the polarization between the two political parties. And then on top of that, you got the looming issues with China and Russia.

You got the Russian probe, which also divided the country. That was another example of a Trojan horse. And then you got the looming issues with China, with Taiwan. And it's just, there's so many problems here that it's just like, oh, man.

I think the biggest one is the mass hypnosis, the kind of brainwashing that happens to the average American out there, whether it's on social media or through the corporate media. They get a different bastardized reality than, of course, other people do. They get put in echo chambers. They get radicalized. And I think the answer is not easy, but it doesn't mean we should stop doing what we're doing. I think we are having an effect.

I think we should always try to strive to do the best we can to help open people's visions. We might not always do it, but we should also understand we're playing for the middle person. We're not playing for Antifa. We're not playing someone who's totally radicalized and totally insane and crazy. We're playing for the person the the average person the majority of people who are sitting back and watching what's going on because those people are the ones historically that do make the big decisions that do create the situations that do change societies it's the people in the middle who don't want to get involved that actually end up doing the most and that's why we got to play to them that's why we got to play to them. That's why we got to be fair.

And then I think we shouldn't break the rules like they break the rules. Brothers, from my perspective. Well, I certainly think, you know, all the points you brought up are hitting the nail on the head with the hammer. I mean, kids not being born to two parent homes. The economy is based on children. Yes. And like lowest birth rates right now. Yeah.

And China has is the opposite. They have a strong family unit. They take pride in masculinity. They actually don't allow porn into their country. Or rap music. Or rap music or degenerate type social media stuff. So they take proactive steps to protect their society from degeneracy. Sorry, go ahead, Tim.

Which side of the political conflict? And there are sides, let's be real, within it there's a bunch of different factions, you know, libertarians and conservatives are very different, a lot of opinions. Which side is pro-family and which side is opposed to the nuclear family? It's pretty clear. It's pretty clear. It's very obvious. It's very clear.

Like even me, who's, I'm a childless 35 year old. I'm in a relationship, but no kids can recognize the importance of having kids. And I can understand why conservatives looking at data are correct. Then you get Black Lives Matter. They say they want to disrupt the nuclear family. Then you get the left, which is very much tearing down cultural and cultural roles. And it's like I'll be the first to say a lot of traditions are dumb and bad and we should do away with them. And some of them are good and we should keep them, you't just you know burn everything to the ground but it's very clearly left and right and that being said to

address what you're saying luke luke there's no middle ground there's none look at this look at this i'm not saying there's middle ground i'm saying there's people in the middle who don't want to get involved that are watching and those are the people we should play to i'm not saying well let's clarify that almost nobody is in whatever can be perceived to be as a middle. What we have right here is Joe Biden's job approval, according to civics, with one hundred and forty one thousand responses. What you're seeing is party affiliation independent. Twenty six percent approval. If we go to Republican, obviously it's going to be in the gutter with two percent approval.

Ninety six percent disapproval. And if you go to Democrat, it's 76% approval. But what does this show? It shows that Democrats overwhelmingly still approve of Biden. They're losing a lot of support. Disapproval is going up. But independents lean heavily towards where Republicans are. When you look at Pew's data on the political tribes, the group called the stressed sideliners, these are people who are not political lean right politically and the reason is we like watching offensive comedy we like watching comedians and making jokes we don't want to live under a boot we like family we like christmas we like the holidays

and we like having our money and not have it taken by taxes i mean that's true too you know everyone what do they say everyone's a conservative until they're I'm sorry. Everyone's liberal to their first paycheck. Exactly. And I was like, wow. So my point is, there's obviously still some undecideds, the stress sideliners or whatever, but even they lean right. And so the issue is, if we are if we are a show where we don't say Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero, we defend him acting in self-defense and but we've not you know like that's a big you know conservative right-wing trump supporter a lot of those people outright say they say it in the chat i respect their right to say it i understand why they say it for me i'm like it's a difficult situation of political conflict and there's you know it's a complicated situation but kyle rittenhouse was certainly acting in self-defense and in the right 100 but anyone else that doesn't like it it's the most clear-cut self-defense case i've ever seen in my life but so here's my point right if you're talking about the regular people then i can tell you a regular person's gonna look at that and be like self

defense how do we know because the jury was a group of regular people who said not guilty across the board but exclusively like the entirety of the left from leftists to the establishment, save Destiny, the streamer, they were all saying it was murder. They were lying about what he did. And so my point is regular people are lying. They thought he killed black people. That's right. You know what I'm saying? It just goes to show the gross lack of knowledge and awareness of people when they look at big cases like this.

They don't look at the facts. They look at what someone put on Twitter or what someone thinks. Feelings and emotions. Feelings and emotions. They don't look at the facts. They look at what someone put on Twitter, what someone thinks. Feelings and emotions. Feelings and emotions. They don't look at the facts. It's ridiculous. That's the quote-unquote left. And I'm saying the left because it includes leftists and it includes the establishment

Democrats. But libertarians, independents, moderates, republicans, traditional conservatives, religious conservatives all knew the truth. They all knew the truth. Now there's, of course, there's always going to be people on the right who are believing dumb, crazy conspiracy things too. My point is the left is clearly in some kind of matrix. They believe – their moral framework is – or I should say lack thereof. They have none.

They don't believe in the innocent until proven guilty. They fire people from jobs on accusations. They want people imprisoned on accusations. They burn buildings down when they don't get their way when it comes to this kind of stuff. Libertarians, moderates, independents, centrists, right-wingers, conservatives, they don't do any of that stuff.

So when we come out here and we go on the show and we say something like, Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. Jury said so. Evidence shows it. Seven witnesses said it. Then we're not going to convince anyone on the left ever that we are right. They're just going to say, you're racist.

Yep. So my main point is, bringing it back to the issue of family and everything, I think the divide is so extreme in this country. We call it a political divide. We call it polarization. I think that's wrong. I think the divide is so extreme in this country. We call it a political divide. We call it polarization. I think that's wrong. I think it is a grand canyon. I do not believe there's going to be a way. Like even that guy, Hawk Newsome, the Black Lives Matter guy in New York who went to a Trump rally and they cheered for him and he said, I want to make life better. And everyone's like, we do, we do. Then he starts expressing his opinions on what

will make life better. And all of a sudden you're like, bro, if you're saying you want to burn the Constitution, yeah, that's not going to happen. I'm never going to shake someone's hand in that capacity. I don't think there's a way you get Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and then even regular Americans who like Christmas and family to shake hands and agree on how to move forward. I think family could be the solution, though. And, you know, a lot of powerful people, when they want to enact change, if they do it intelligently, they have a process of doing it. They do it very slowly. Generation. Two steps forward, one step back.

If you look at a lot of these kind of crazy leftists, they believe in the need not to have children in benefit of the environment. You look at a lot of them, they're incapable of reproducing because of their low testosterone efforts. They're incapable of producing because of choices they made with their bodies that have negatively impacted them, whether abortions or others. So a lot of people on the left can't and won't be having babies. A lot of people on the right will. A lot of people who do believe in family values will. So there might be an aspect to this of saying, if we all have families, we could teach them

morals and principles and virtues that actually matter and transcend a lot of the hypocrisy, craziness, and nonsense when it comes to this larger depopulation agenda that the left is predominantly affected by and hurt by. And I'll say this too. The family is the backbone of a strong economy. You know what I'm saying? You need two parents, you know, and there's an overwhelming amount of evidence that shows that, you know, children that come from single parent households have a higher likelihood

of being degenerate, drug addicts, criminals, et cetera. And you need that father in place, you know, to let you know that there are consequences to your actions and punish that bad behavior. And then you need a mother there to, you know, there are consequences to your actions and punish that bad behavior. And then you need a mother there to instill nurturing values, take care of you in your childhood, et cetera. And then as you become older and you hit adolescence, that's when your father comes in and becomes an imperative part of your development. And we live in a society now that says, we don't need men.

Men are useless. Men are trash. Toxic masculinity. Blah, blah, blah. And what do we have? We have a bunch of degenerates, a bunch of spineless men. We have degenerate women that are running around doing stupid things. And rewards, fatherless homes.

Exactly. With financial incentives. That's obviously a big cultural component. Economically, though, let's make it very, very simple. The economy is driven by a need to support and sustain kids. Like a lot of money goes into my kid needs this my kid needs that my kid wants this my kid wants that raising kids yes when you get older you're gonna work this is why they're saying you're gonna own nothing and you're gonna be happy because without a kid what do you

what do you need to strive for it's the human ease yeah the forest leather boots of agility and warcraft we're put on earth to procreate. That's why we are here. We are here to have offspring. So a huge human part of your fulfillment is not met if you don't have children. And it's great that on the right they tend to swing more towards family, values, etc. And that's what's needed. The United States was built on the backs of the nuclear family. In the 20s, the 50s, all the economic booms occurred from a man going to work, providing for his family. Obviously

times have changed. You need a two-parent household, whatever, to make an income. But the point is that a two-parent household with a family is the backbone of the United States and how it became an economic superpower. In my humble opinion, there's another divide as well between the rich and the poor. There's no more middle class. It's pretty much going away. And at

this point, that was a nuclear family, the middle class. But guess what? Taxes are going up. Prices are going up. Inflation. And there's either rich or poor. This is going to cause

even more divide because now either the have-nots or the haves. Yes. That's my opinion. Yeah. It's definitely huge polarization. I agree.

I think if you look at where the left has gone, right? So the left of my youth is is is mostly considered right wing now. Right. You know, that's true. Like 10, 15 years ago. Like, you know, I mean, just look at Bernie Sanders. Yeah, he's far left.

Look, look at his opinions from 2008. You'd be like, wow, that's a Trump supporter. Yeah. Like across the board. You know, we got to bring our factories back and close the borders. And it's like, OK, Trump. Yeah. But you look at where the left is you know, we've got to bring our factories back and close the borders. And it's like, oh, OK, Trump. Yeah. But you look at where the left is today and they they've overwhelmingly become. And it's almost the epitome of the seven deadly sins, you know, like like personified, like name one of the vices and they've got it.

You know, I mean, envy, right? Angry. They're the wrath filled. They're prideful. They're lustful. They're greedy. And don't get me wrong. The right has this too. But my point is, I'm thinking about these comments on Twitter. I'm thinking about these articles that have been written by many left-wing activists where they're like, who cares about where this country goes? I mean, that's the core message

of a lot of what they're saying. Who cares what happens to this country? Who cares what happens to humanity? It's blind. Because because one thing especially when it comes to the criminal justice system we got crazy quotes run around here like believe all women last time i checked you know men and women fought for equality equality means you are the same therefore you are capable of lying just like a man and last time i checked we live in a country where it's you know guilty right it's it's innocent until proven guilty not guilty until proven innocent but if you're gonna run around and say believe all women that's ridiculous you know what i'm saying we had brett kavanaugh a couple years

ago testifying right and for under oath in front of everyone on some accusations that were not from 40 years ago that no one had proof of. And no, he did this to me. And her friends even denied it. Her friends denied it. No witnesses, no nothing. But we got a guy that's going to be a Supreme Court justice basically in a cloud world,

a cloud circus, where he has to testify for his own innocence. Why? Because he's going to be a Supreme Court justice. I get it. He needs to be held to the highest standard of law. But at the same time, it's like, yo, come with some facts

before you're going to go ahead and make a crazy accusation. I'll put it this way. You know, a lot of people, a lot of people like to say, you know, it's like, yo, come with some facts before you're going to go ahead and make a crazy accusation. I'll put it this way. A lot of people like to say it's unfair. You're taking the worst examples of the left, and the left does it to the right. And I'm like, okay, well, hold on a second. When we talk about like Eric Swalwell, he tweeted, we should ban people from flying. I'm not going to pretend that every Democrat wants that.

Probably a lot of them don't agree with that. I'm not going to pretend that everyone on the left is socialist. Take everyone's guns. And they're liberal gun owners. They exist too. But I will tell you that what is true, overwhelmingly, not absolutely, is that they believe in a fictitious reality. And then they believe in that fictitious reality that everyone on the right are truly the ones who live in the fictitious reality. But the truth is Russiagate was a lie jesse smollett was a lie the covington kids was a lie the kyle rittenhouse story was a lie every day they are putting out lies and i think what actually

divides us is are you in the matrix or are you outside of it the ran house case was was terrible like it is so if you watch that trial it's clear cut you know what i'm saying like they they they were trying to like mess this kid up man and everyone's running around oh no well he killed black people no he didn't people he killed were caucasian made it up you know what i'm saying but it's like they're just trying to do and say anything to get a reaction. They don't even look at the facts. They go off what their friend says on Twitter, what possible allegations are. And it's crazy because this country was founded upon due process, man.

And you literally have a guy that got acquitted with beyond – like clearest cut case of self-defense I've ever seen. If that was tough, I am scared of the future to get a guy like that that was clearly innocent. You look at what happens when we bring on someone like this and they say – here's the fascinating thing. And I'll just say it outright with R.A. the Rugged Man when he came on. And again, look, as far as anything goes the the shenanigans and the yelling at each other like me yelling and him being the mic i i'm over that but what i do think is important is you know here's a guy who told us we were supporting the cops we were bootlicking over the ahmed arbery case in the derek chauvin case when he was literally defending the state in its

in its entirety our issue was what we said is, these specific individuals have rights that are in question. And he was like, if you defend a single police officer, you're a bootlicker. And it's like, but you're supporting literal state prosecution

in the prison system, which I'm not a fan of. I'm not a fan of any of that. I'm a fan of individual rights. But ultimately, I'm not trying to drag him specifically, but it's a fresh conversation and it's a good example. These are people who are like, you're the bootlicker.

I'm in favor of state prosecution. And I'm like, why are you cheering for the prosecutors? Why are you literally cheering for more people to go into be incarcerated? I thought the left were the ones that said the system is broken. It needs to be abolished. But then as soon as they have power on their side, they just it to the to its fullest extent and and say don't question me yeah my thing is you gotta you gotta be on no one's side you gotta look at it like okay what are the facts and what does the law say simple as that man you'll you'll find you're

gonna be you're gonna be in the cultural right if that's the case yeah exactly because like i said russia ukraine gate covington kids trump throwing fish into the coey pond all of these stories every day just lie after lie after lie over and over and over again and a certain point it's like if you are like i'm not going to be on anyone's side i'm going to look objective objectively at the facts you know it's going to happen jack posobiec is going to be like you're correct sir i disagree with you but you're right and someone on the left is going to be like, you're correct, sir. I disagree with you, but you're right. And someone on the left is going to be like, you're a conspiracy theorist. And you're going to be like, but I just read this report

from New York Times. New York Times reported a Ukrainian court said that Ukrainians were interfering in the U.S. election. The New York Times published that. Nope, sorry, that's a conspiracy theory if you're on the left, because you've got to be in the matrix. You've got to follow the narrative. I was just going to say, you started to sound like a white supremacist there for a little bit. I got my be in the matrix. You got to follow the narrative. I was just going to say, you started to sound like a white supremacist there

for a little bit. I got my hood in the back somewhere. I'm going to put it on after the show. So I'm going to pull up this story right here. This is from CNN. Biden admin eyes a potentially stark shift in messaging around ending the pandemic. So tomorrow we're supposed to get a statement

from Joe Biden about what they're going to do. But his message was clear. They say, quote, for the unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated. He said it twice, I guess. For themselves, their families and the hospitals, they will soon overwhelm. But there's good news. If you're vaccinated and you have your booster shot, you're protected from severe illness

and death. Now, I don't want to play any silly games dragging Joe Biden. This is not his administration. Well, I guess they say, you know, this is biden's you know address to the american people saying that many people were like yo it's just before christmas and you're gonna be like you're gonna face death and illness and everything but people on the left are gonna be like he's just warning people as he should so i'm not gonna i'm not gonna play games and be like aha we don't like biden so we criticize every single thing he says i will tell you you, you will not convince anyone that, you know, when Biden said,

if you're vaccinated and you have your booster shot, you're protected from severe illness and death. I'm going to make two very important points. I'm not a scientist. I can't tell you. I'll make three, actually. I can't tell you anything about the research being done on this stuff. I got no idea. You make sure you talk to a doctor you know and trust, get a second opinion. I can tell you that I was interacting with someone on twitter who said just got my third shot and then i said are you going to get your booster and this guy responds i just said i got my third shot i said no no i meant the fourth shot because but i'm not trying to be a dick like literally several leftist publications have already said a full vaccine dose is three shots and he said it's a stupid

conversation because every year we get a flu shot and no one asks you if it's your eight, if it's your 18th. My response to that is the flu shots, as I understand it, are different. Meaning every year they say, here's the dominant strain. Here's the vaccine for this strain and a few others. It might not stop these other strains. The COVID vaccine is one vaccine developed specifically for the alpha strain. And now we're looking for data on whether or not it will stop Omicron, as Joe Biden likes to call it, or any other variant. And if that's the case, Joe Biden is not doing anything by saying this when you have this story. Elizabeth Warren, vaccinated and boosted, tests positive for COVID. Cory Booker, positive for coronavirus.

Both Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker are vaccinated and boosted. And then we have Jim Kramer of CNBC, who said that the military should forcefully vaccinate people, and he posted a positive test. Now, I'm not going to tell you what or why that is. I'll tell you my theory on exactly what this is. I believe it is infinitely more likely infinitely likely or i should say just simple put it simply i believe all these people lied about getting vaccinated whoa okay i mean it like look there's a photo of elizabeth warren and they're putting a needle in her arm yeah i think you've got two potentials the vaccine isn't working on the variants the efficacy has waned to the point where COVID cases in New York are breaking records. Or these specific politicians and high-profile individuals who go on TV and virtue signal about the vaccine never got it. Someone's lying here.

Yeah. And it's funny because – It's a lose-lose either way. Go ahead. Just after this point as well, like, okay, what's the goal here? Because is it control? Is it to, like, to like say okay you know what do what they say or not and if that's the case then when does it stop because this is just this

mouth it's like okay vaccine or you might die or maybe it could be like okay if we're in power you don't do what i say you'll die regardless so just like to me it's more like control yeah there's a lot of things going on on right now that are totally breaking the official narrative of what's going on here. And that White House memo was released by their chief of staff, not by Joe Biden. But, I mean, it sounded more threatening than warning. But their response to everything happening is get boosted, media, get boosted, as they're running sensationalistic, fear-mongering articles. But, of course, as you mentioned, Tim, Cory Booker, Hunter Walker, Elizabeth Warren, the governor of Maryland, Jim Cramer, most CNN and BuzzFeed employees,

all triple-vaxxed with boosters. All of them recently came down with this new COVID-19 sickness. Like, what's going on here? CNN shut their offices down. And CNN fired employees who were unvaccinated. So all of the employees at CNN were vaccinated. No, no, no. Hold on.

Boosted. Hold on. Okay. I'm not a scientist. I can't say vaccines work or don't work. Clearly, the only thing that makes sense, if that's true, is that every single one of these high-profile Democrats, celebrities, and every employee at CNN faked getting the vaccine. I'll say this real quick. I'll just say this, and then the people can think what they want. The vaccine, I remember, rolled out right around about a year ago, right?

The first time. They're like, listen, just take this shot. You'll be good. And the next thing you know, we're here a year later. Now we're up to three shots. And the people that take the shots, allegedly, are still getting the virus, still passing the virus, basically doing all the things that the vaccine was developed to keep you from doing. And it's crazy. It's like how many more vaccines are they going to make? How many more do you have to take? I think there's actually maybe a very, very simple explanation. COVID? Well, yeah. I am being a bit facetious when i say obviously like as one of those i think i think

covid's become endemic it's going to be a yearly thing which has been stated by many many people yeah and the alpha vaccine that they got under eua is slowly becoming not the appropriate vaccine for whatever is you know emerging now because the virus spreads. I think the issue is if the CDC comes out and just finally says COVID has become endemic, it's never going away, then the establishment loses their power. All of a sudden, people are going to be like, I guess I got to live my life then. But if they maintain that we're in a pandemic, it'll never go away. Then they will keep being able to force people. They will control people.

And I got to say, I really don't think that the goal of the vaccine mandates is vaccines. I think it's social credit systems. Yeah, you're absolutely right. And from a logical point of view, from a medical point of view, if you really wanted to help people now, you would be dealing with early treatment. You would be dealing with accepting the risk here, helping the vulnerable. But what's happening is they're still on this crazy, insane journey to prevent people from getting sick. How? Why are you doing this when clearly you have failed? And the more you do, the more people get infected and hurt here.

So from a logical point of view, this doesn't add up to helping anybody. I want to clarify, though. I don't know if it's more people are getting it, but certainly people are still getting it. Well, the numbers have went up, especially under the Biden administration as far as cases and deaths. Here's my word. That's what I mean. I just don't want us to get to the point of Australia and New Zealand.

They can't even leave a mile and a half, two miles of their place. Their ability to get food is controlled. You know what I'm saying? It's crazy. Let me tell you. I'll spin you a little tale. So I posted, hey, look, Australia built these quarantine camps. Then I said, what's going to happen is it's going to be a protest.

They're going to claim it was a super spreader event. They got to put these people in quarantine. I got called a conspiracy theory for that. Then they started taking people and putting them in these quarantine camps. At first, I said it was an international arrival bungalow. Now it's the police come to your house and without due process take you to the camps. Here's the best part. I was talking about the Native American – I'm sorry, the indigenous in Australia, the Native Australians.

Yes. And I said the minister of the Northern Territory said you no longer have the five reasons to leave your home. That means you can only leave your home now for emergency medical treatment. And I said that quite literally means you can't leave your home now for emergency medical treatment. And I said, that quite literally means you can't leave your house to go and get food. Yep.

And then what happens is they pull up and say, come with us, we're taking you to the camp. And then these people try escaping. Three teenagers escaped. What happens? The latest response from Quillette,

this, you know, psychotic publication that claims to be about freedom, was that Tim Pool lied because while they can't leave their homes to get food, they're not being deprived. The government is delivering morning meals to them. And I'm like, I said, you can't leave your house even to get food.

That is correct. And they're like, but he's implying people are starving. I don't care if the government fires food out of a cannon through your window. I don't care if they bring you a filet mignon with grilled asparagus and all of the accompaniments. If you can't leave your house to choose to get food on your own, we have certainly crossed that threshold. Exactly. That's where we're going. Absolutely.

And the Netherlands has locked down for another month right now. And Germany is talking about making vaccines mandatory for everyone, forcing them on everyone. This is the German health minister that said immediate forced vaccinations for the entire population. This is absolutely crazy. Social credit. Before we get into all that,

related to the CNN article about them closing their offices and working from home, I saw one of the best memes I have ever seen in my life related to this story. And it's the guy with the yellow jacket clasping his hands behind the tree. And it says, Lubin Tubin when he finds out that he gets to work from home.

And I have to say the creativity on the internet is absolutely amazing. Dirty jokes, Luke. It's not dirty. He really likes working from home. I just want to add to that point as well. This might sound a little bit base, but it's never about helping people become better. It's about control. And if you think about it, right, when does it end?

It probably never will end. However, look what's happening now. Control is happening. Ladies mentioned Australia, other countries. At some point, what's the goal here? And if you think about this long term, like this affecting how we buy food, how we use money, how we, you know.

Travel. Australians can't even leave. Talk to each other. How we date, how we interact with people. It's like a heavy place in control. Now, once this happens, like what's the end goal?

My thing is, how do we stop it? We can't. So what can we do? Create our own communities and maybe thrive that way, but there's no way to stop it. Well, I disagree with you.

I mean, the governor of Florida came out and released a very strong statement today saying, we will not let anybody lock you down, take your jobs, ruin your business, or close your schools. I don't care what Biden says. We're not going to be following his mandates, his decrees, which he's going to be announcing in a few hours from now, which is supposed to be new restrictions on the American people. So people of Florida don't have to go through a lot of the bull crap. Miami-Dade is a little different. See, we live in Florida, right?

My question is how long. And the funny part is that, yes, he's doing that right now, but pressure and every other state doing it, eventually you can only hold it for so long. And Miami-Dade was the last to open up. Yeah, we never really closed down. Yeah, we never really closed down. But Miami-Dade did close. We closed, and Miami-Dade was the last county to open back up.

Now, obviously, the rest of Florida has their head on straight. But Miami-Dade in general, we opened up recently. We just opened up a few months ago fully. So, yeah, I mean, it is what it is. But, no, Florida definitely is a good state to be right now compared to other places. Hell, us coming to here, to D.C. airport, and I'm just seeing people running around in masks everywhere. I was like, oh, wow, I haven't seen this in a few months. You don't see this in Florida.

Let's talk about what's happening in New York City. We got this story from TimCast.com. New York proposes ending religious exemptions, inoculations without parental consent, and forced removal of disease cases, contacts, and carriers. Changes to the state's public health laws could mean more vaccine requirements and new authority for the governor. Here's what I love about this story. This write-up here at TimCast.com is all 100% factual and correct, but it also brings up a very important assembly bill from New York, and that's Bill A416. TimCast writes, New York's legislature will also consider Assembly Bill A416, which

resembles the Australian quarantine camps that caught global attention earlier this month. Assemblyman and Nick Perry of Brooklyn's 58th District proposed the removal and detention of anyone with a communicable disease that warrants the New York governor to declare a state of health emergency due to an epidemic. The funny thing is, a bunch of fact checkers claimed that when this story emerged in January, it was fake news. And they said the reason was

the bill is from 2015. They're not planning. So here's what they do. They say, is there a law currently about to be passed that would allow COVID patients to be indefinitely detained? False.

There is a bill that would allow COVID patients to be indefinitely detained, but it's for Ebola and it's never made it out of committee anyway. So it's fake news, even though it's true. There literally is a bill, Assembly Bill A416. Since 2015, when it was introduced, it's gone to committee and then flopped. It's got no sponsors and doesn't go anywhere, but someone's certainly trying to make it happen. It would give the governor the ability to just rendition you, to take you and put you wherever they deem fit if they think you're a public health threat. I'm not convinced it'll happen. Maybe it is,

you know, a little fear mongery to be bringing it up or whatever. But if it's there, we ignore it and they do pass it. No one speaks about it. Then we'll regret it. Yeah. So what can we do? We have to mention it exists and we've got to tell people in New York, do not let them pass this. Otherwise, one day they'll get a knock on the door from the NYPD,

the scumbags who are arresting people for not having vax cards and then they're going to say, come with me. Oh my God. Yeah. And that's not too far

from what's been happening in New York. I mean, you see the videos all over social media. People going in to Panera Bread saying, hey, I just want to order some food. Police officers coming in there, acting like they're big, bad, brave soldiers. Meanwhile, they were looking the other way during BLM riots. They were twiddling their thumbs, not trying to get involved with that. If a man doesn't get government paper permission to go to the Panera Bread,

oh, they're going to go right on top of him, arrest him, lock him up, and rough him up. That's crazy. So I'll tell you. I point out that the police are stomping on the middle class working regular people, that they're trying to enforce – that they're literally enforcing government-mandated medical procedures. And I'll tell you what makes me feel like there's never going to be that handshake moment left or right between the culture war. Because I'm actually getting criticized from the left for saying abolish the police. They say, yeah, but Tim's only saying it because the police are stomping on conservative civil rights. And I'm like, well, I'm talking about working class people. But they're like, doesn't matter.

We hate you. And that's what it's all about. So if I see cops walk in and arrest someone for trespassing, why was he trespassing? He didn't have a vax card. It's complete BS. Sorry, I'm not going to defend these cops. Furthermore, in that video of the guy getting arrested, a female cop is stepping all over the American flag. She takes out of a guy's hand, throws it on the ground, and then I don't think she was stomping it on purpose.

Some people said she was wiping her feet on it. No, she's just walking all over it. doesn't care these are this is the nypd so you know we had we've had libby emmons tell us the nypd wasn't enforcing this stuff well they are now so if you live in new york you you this is this is this i don't know man not everybody there voted for it what does malice say there's no law too absurd or evil that they won't enforce so there's no that i'll try and paraphrase there's no law so extreme and egregious that the police would not enforce it, including executing children. Absolutely. History tells that story, and now we're seeing it slowly being put into place with, oh, he didn't have this paper.

He didn't get the permission from the government to be here, take him away, and they do, blindly so. They have a choice saying, hey, we're going to respond to this call. Hey, we're going to take this seriously. And for them to punish people because they want to eat food, I mean, what kind of levels of insanity are we in? That's crazy, and it's only going to get crazier from here. Let's play a game. It'll get worse.

How much do you want to bet I can make a whole bunch of people say the following sentence yeah but it can't happen here how much do you want to bet I can make them say that pretty easy very easily right if I said the police will absolutely kick your door in

and drag you from your home with no crime committed and no due process if ordered to by the mayor of New York if I said police regardless of where they are home with no crime committed and no due process if ordered to by the mayor of new york yep if i said police regardless of where they are would go into your house and they would drag you out without due process people would say yeah but it can't happen here now i'm not saying everybody would a lot of people are probably going like yep absolutely and they will because i'll tell you this especially if you're from chicago i'm pretty sure everyone in chic just went, yep. Because I'll tell you what happens in Chicago.

In Chicago, I'm hanging out with my friends. Cops kicked our door with their guns drawn and just walk into our house. That's normal. Completely normal in Chicago. They'll drag you off to what they call the black site. I think Ian looked this up. It was in Humboldt Park, maybe. I'm not sure.

That sounds right. Yeah, they just take you without due process. They kick your door and they drag you from your home and they bring you to an unmarked location where they effectively you know torture and detain you happens all the time what yeah man yeah they had they had that guy in in chicago who was electrocuting people with a cattle prod to force them into confessing to crimes they didn't commit wow so here's what happens you look in new york city and you got a lot of people saying like you know we've had libby emmons on the show several times and she repeatedly defends the NYPD. I won't do that.

And the first time she was here, we had an argument about the police because I've been like not happy with cops for a long time. And I'm like, dude, 27 NYPD officers walked out. You've got Mayor Bill de Blasio who committed what I would only describe as several felonies, misappropriating taxpayer funding to paint a political message in front of Trump Tower. And then he went to the NYPD and says, you're going to protect this for me. And they went, OK. So this dude literally commits some of the highest level corruption. And the cops with a smile on their face said, I will arrest anyone who opposes you. Like, dude, we're already there.

You can defend the cops all day and night. I ain't going to do it because they're literally, you've got the mayor of New York City going on TV and saying, we are going to strip life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness from the citizens to force them to undergo a medical procedure. And the NYPD with a smile on their face will arrest you if you try to buy food. But you're trespassing. Sorry. It's for your safety.

That's happening. So we're there. So I don't doubt you at all, Tim. I think that's a very good prediction. But my thing is, how do we even combat this? Because, okay, it's either comply or goodbye, like I said earlier, right? And Andrew Tate would say, resist the slave mind. Because the thing is that we're being brainwashed to say, you know what, okay, let's follow the rules because this is – can we say it, can we, you know, we're a family together, all this stuff.

My thing is, okay, if we're aware of what's happening, how do we contract it? Because, you know, we're aware of what's happening, we understand what's really happening behind the scenes. How do you combat this? Cops should quit. If there's police officers who are aware of what's going on, they should quit. Many have. We've covered those stories over and over and over again. A lot of cops are just like, I am done with this.

Call it out when it happens and stop worshipping authority. One of my favorite memes is this kind of like MAGA hat, Trump supporter, small shriveled up guy going up to a cop who's the kind of Chad here. And he's like, I love you. You're great. I support.

I back to blue. And the Chad being like, off to the gulag, you January 6th insurrectionist. And that's literally what's happening here. We're seeing the politicization of the justice system in such a bastardized way. It's crazy to see it happen right in front of our face. And the only way to stop it, not comply peacefully. Don't go along with it. Call it out when it

happens and don't incentivize it. I mean, if you live in New York City, your taxes are supporting that system. You're voting, incentivizing those people to do those things. Remember when those detectives tried to imprison Kyle Rittenhouse for the rest of his life. Yep. Back to blue, baby. Remember when a political message was painted on streets across the country? And we all said, just like in that quote from 1984 about how streets will be renamed, and the police came out and arrested anybody who tried to protest it? Back to blue, baby. Remember when cops showed up to a woman in New Jersey's store?

Because she was live streaming on Facebook things she had for sale and they said you're not allowed to run your business gotta back the blue right man i could go on and on and on couldn't i yeah situations like that are just terrible man because now you're infringing on people's ability to make money to live you know and and it's crazy because i mean i'm originally from connecticut so I definitely are familiar with the city and how New York City politics are. And here's the other thing, too. People are kind of realizing and waking up because I'll tell you this. Florida real estate has been exploding. Like, I can't even get a property right now because all the New Yorkers are moving down.

Like, it is ridiculous. No, that's not true. That's absolutely – that can't be possible. You're lying because the New Yorkers believe that Miami is sinking. Don't they all believe that the water is going to rise 20 feet and Florida is going to get wiped out? I guess they're so mad about wearing a mask. They're like, screw this. I'm going to Florida.

I don't care. I'd rather be underwater. My friend, we are being overrun by New Yorkers. I can't tell you how many. Even in dating apps. A bunch of New York girls, bro. Dude, real estate. Real estate.

Rent prices have went up 38% in the city of Miami alone in the past year. Property values. I was looking at properties where I used to live because I was in the Redlands, and it's insane. I'm like, that little tiny thing is going for a million bucks. You're crazy. I went there last year looking for property. I couldn't find anything. It's worse now.

New York, California, New Jersey. A lot of people moving from Connecticut as well. The Northeast in general, like outside of New Hampshire, they're all coming down to Florida and from California as well. People from LA and Southern California, they're either going to Vegas or they're coming to Florida or they're going to Texas. It's crazy, man. I got a house in Jersey and we were thinking of selling it because we're not there anymore. And they're just like – when we got told the general area property value, I was like was like well i lost all my money no one wants to actually went down yeah it went down because the whole thing in general is going to jersey but it went down yo i bought a property right

uh last year 300 333k about property four a year later 500k it's like bodies are going way up man without giving away too much private information they they told us a very low number where it's gone up since we bought it, but we bought it before the pandemic. So at this point, I'm like, how is that what they're saying that the area is worth? So I don't know if we'll be able to actually sell anything. Get rid of it and go to Florida, man. Yeah, man. Go to Florida.

1030. 1030. I'm going to be going down there. You got, you know, Dave Rubin posted this compilation of all these Floridians being like, Welcome to Florida, Dave. Welcome to Florida. It's like, oh, yeah, well, West Virginia is where it's at, man. We're building a big facility.

We're building like 7,500 square feet, 25-foot, you know, walls. It's going to be massive inside. We're building a new studio building. We're going to have a whole bunch of stuff going on. West Virginia, free down the stand. Well, I know a lot of real estate investors actually invest in West Virginia. Fantastic place to invest right now. Bro, there was a hundred...

You can get like a hundred acres for a hundred grand. Exactly. Indiana as well. When I said the first time, I had a bunch of people be like, a hundred grand's not cheap. And I'm like, a hundred acres for a hundred grand is cheap. Sell that New Jersey property and take it over to West Virginia, man. You're going to use a bunch of money tax-free, man.

You go to like the New York Metro or North Jersey and it's like 0.2 of an acre is a million bucks. Like if you're lucky, you'll get like 0.01 of an acre. It's like a townhouse sandwich between two buildings and it's 500 grand. I've never understood why people enjoy living – I mean no offense. I have family that live in New York City. But I've never liked it. I've always thought it was dirty, expensive, dangerous. Like why? enjoy living. I mean, no offense. I have family that live in New York City. But I've never liked it. I've always thought it was dirty, expensive, dangerous. Like, why?

You know what I'm saying? And then you got this craziness going on with this clown world where they're arresting you for trying to go to Panera Bread without a mask. And it's like, come on, man. And the thing is this. I obviously used to work in law enforcement. And most people that get on the job honestly want to get on there to help people. Obviously, you got your bad apples and everything else like that. But a lot of guys come on trying to do right and everything

else. I'll tell you, man, a lot of guys resigning from the force because of having to enforce stupid laws like this. It's sad, man. It's sad. No one wants to get on the job to rescue people. I got to know. Axe's last podcast, right now, what are you guys investing in for investments?

Cryptocurrency. Crypto. Bam. Retail. Real estate. Real estate. Yeah. Are you the government?

I ain't telling you. We the feds. We the feds. We the feds. You don't want to know. With me, crypto. Myself. The business. Bam.

Exactly. Exactly. Business, real estate, crypto. Yeah, we're putting a lot into building the new facility because this place is great and we're still going to have it. We're going to use it for a lot of production stuff. We already record several shows. This place is great and we're still gonna have it we're gonna use it for a lot of production stuff we already record like several shows this place is lit man this is this dope man as a production guy like i love like wait till you see your equipment we we fought we signed off on the new building so we're gonna have 50 acres jeez we got we're

gonna have our own shooting range we're gonna have dirt jumps we're gonna have a skate park and we're gonna be able to film tons of stuff we're gonna have a green screen room so basically we can film and put someone anywhere. You know what I mean? So we could make sci-fi movies. West Virginia has better gun laws, right? Lack thereof. Yeah.

Nice. New Hampshire is the best. Constitutional carry. New Hampshire is the best place to be in New England. I love New Hampshire. If you walk around in West Virginia carrying a Barrett M82 or whatever, the worst thing that's going to happen is

someone's going to walk up to you and say, be like, are you crazy for carrying that thing? It must be so heavy. Cool gun, though. I'm a big fan. And that's what... I used to live in Texas, man. Gun-friendly state.

Yeah, I mean... I was surprised they only just passed constitutional carry in Texas, though. Yep. For a long time, it was kind of hard. Florida needs to do that immediately. You mean like open carry? No, no, no.

So up until last year, if you wanted a handgun in Texas, you had to take a class. Then get like a license or something, like a handgun permit. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. If you want to carry it out. But if you want to have it in your house. No, no, no, no. Just to buy. Constitutional carry is new in Texas.

You can walk in, buy it, and walk around with it in your hand. Just don't point it at people. You know what I mean? Now, constitutional carry is new in Texas. You used to need permits and stuff. Yep. Wow. Yeah.

Well, I bought it, you know, obviously for the job. So, yeah. I didn't know that, but I know obviously – You could invest in firearms and bullets. Dude. Not saying I do, but people care. We did an interview with Robert Kiyosaki and we talked about that. You know, silver.

I invest in silver as well. I've got some silver. I want to get some gold. But, yeah. Ammunition, man. Ammo. It's going to be –. We talked about that. Silver. I invest in silver as well. I've got some silver and gold. I want to get some gold. But yeah. Ammunition is going to be... I remember you mentioned that. We talked about it last time.

I'll tell you this. I got an edge. I got an in. All right? You guys want to know what you need to get? Yeah. Bottle caps. Why?

Because in Fallout universe, everyone uses bottle caps as currency. Of course. So that's what you need. You need bottle caps. What? I'm kidding. It's a video game. Fallout. All right. Let's read some super yeah, yeah. Universe. Everyone uses bottle caps as currency. Of course. So that's what you need. You need bottle caps. What? I'm kidding. It's a video game. Follow the shooting.

All right. Let's read some super chats, man. If you haven't already, smash the like button. Subscribe to the channel. Go to TimCast.com. Become a member. We're going to have a members-only segment coming up around 11 or so p.m. It goes live on the website at TimCast.com.

So sign up. Let's read some of these super chats. I'm just going to tell you, there's a lot of guys, a lot of people in the super chats who are mad at you. So I'm going to read them, all right? Let's go. Let's see if you guys are good. Sheesh.

I'll read the first one. Alex Corey says, fake and fraud. Oh. Nice. Clever. Awesome. Hey, we're here to scam. That's what we're here for.

Scammers unite. Oh, so you admit it. I said, oh, so you admit it. Yeah, we're frauds. Yeah, we're frauds, man. At this point. All right. All right.

America Float says, God bless Alex Jones and everyone putting in the good fight. A fight for good. Man, they are really trying to destroy that guy for sure, man. It's just sad, man. He'll be able to fight it, man. They're going to need a lot to be able to go through his stuff, man. His reasonable expectation of privacy is high in what they're trying to get. So they're going to have to fight tooth and nail to get his stuff,

and he'll be able to get a legal team to fight that off. And then also with the Trump thing, I want to say this. Sorry, that's cut off the super chats. But I think he'll beat that state case. If they actually do bring fraud charges against him, I think he'll be able to beat it with his legal team. But they're going to try and jam him up to stop him from running. You know what I mean? You're right.

Let me just say one thing, too. For a lot of people who are super chatting, they're asking vaguely about something that you guys are accused of doing that I don't know anything about. And they're super chatting as if I would know what it is. But I can't ask you just this simple one. Adam Griffin says, can you ask why these clowns try to take down ABBA and preach with fake DMCA strikes? What? You want to go into it? It's a –

So basically we have a lot of people that talk about us on the internet. And some of it is slander, some of it is defamation. And using our content in their videos. And we're like, okay, cool. We've waited out for a while for you to stop. You're still doing it. So, you know what? Cool.

Now we're going to take legal action against you. Because obviously, we're attacking our character and our integrity. So at that point, hey, it's all fair game. Yeah, I mean... Yeah. Simply put, if someone breaks into your store, right? it's all fair game. Yeah, I mean, simply put, if someone breaks into your store, right,

and takes a broom off, you have a hardware store, takes a broom off the shelf and starts beating you with your own broom and won't leave and does it for four months, what are you going to do? Well, you can't file a DMCA over it.

Apparently not. Yeah. So they just get it reversed or what? It's a long story, but basically. Simply put, the challenge is when it comes to public figures and defamation cases, but basically. Simply put, the challenge is when it comes to public figures and defamation cases

it's really hard to win. It is. But, you know, look, I actually tell people, we've got people who rip off our members-only content, which is actually probably not fair use. So if I downloaded your video and then I started just playing clips while

commenting on it, it's fair use. It's very difficult to win that. But I've got people who go to TimCast.com, take those behind a paywall, publish them online, and then comment on them. Now that's the line. I don't go after them still though. They take clips out of context. They make stuff up. I just ignore it.

It's probably the best thing to do. But this is where people are – so one of the questions about copyright infringement and fair use is are you infringing on someone's market? That's what I was going to say because fair use depends on different countries. It's different depending where you are. But a big thing on fair use where it hurts your ability to get protected by fair use is are you hurting that other person's ability to profit from their own product? But this is specific. It basically means like if you're a photo journalist and you sell photos for a living and then you post a sample on Twitter and you say to license this photo, buy it here,

and then people start posting it everywhere, now you've got copyright infringement because even though it's online, even though it's newsworthy, and even though people are commenting on it, they're infringing on your market because you directly sell this content, which means you said, license it from me. If you guys do a publicly available show and people post it and comment on it, you got no case. You can't DMCA it. So for us, what I'm saying is on our website, we have a paywall. If you want to watch the video, you have to pay for it. If someone then takes that, posts it online and says, I'm commenting on it. Nope, no dice. That's why you can't post

movies on YouTube, but just say like, you can't post a movie while watching it and go, wow, that's crazy. Because you're literally taking away the market share from the business. Yeah. I mean, it depends on where you are. I will just say this just so we can put a bow on it, is we successfully removed a bunch of videos on that that were not protected by fair use, that were doing the same thing. But it is what it is. We don't have any animosity towards these guys.

It's just like, hey, man, we don't attack anyone else. We don't make hit pieces on anyone else. Anything that was put up was taken down out of respect to those other content creators and for people to continue making content on us negatively for months on end. It's just like at some point, so you got to defend yourself, right? Word. All right.

Let's see. What do we got here? Captain Mad Dog says, are you going to discuss what happened on Eliza's show? You are here concerning Jack Murphy giving Sidney Watson a heartfelt F you. Yes, we will. With Jack. Jack's going to be here, so I'm sure we're going to end up talking about it. Several people are bringing this up.

MJ says, hey, Tim, have you seen how Jack Murphy snapped at Sidney Watson? I was absolutely disturbed. Yeah, yeah, he should have done that. That was a big mistake. I know he's apologized for it. I haven't really tracked much of what else he's done because we'll talk to him when he comes. I'm sure it'll come up. And I can tell you this.

I watched the clip because it was like the same... Was it the day after we did... Friday night after the show. That's when we were like, hey, let's watch this. We're getting a lot of comments about this. And that's when we saw it. Yeah. I don't know enough about it. What I can say is

Sydney Watson was reading Super Chats. She asked Jack about an article that he didn't want brought up, and then he just immediately started snapping at her saying F you over and over several times. And then people were immediately like, whoa, dude. And then people got mad at Elijah because he didn't step up or do anything. And totally inappropriate on Jack's part. People have said he's apologized.

I haven't been following it all that much because I'm like, yo, look, don't snap at Sydney for reading a super chat. Be tactful and do better. But is this really like Joe Biden is talking about death for the unvaxxed and the military is worried about a coup and Alex Jones is suing the January 6th committee. So I'm sure we'll talk about it because drama is sometimes important to talk about. That's what people love. We're going to have to push up the fighting date between me and Jack here just a little bit. You know, it sucks, man.

I mean, I saw the clip, you know. I mean, it sucks. I mean, if you apologize, great. You know what I'm saying? Yeah. If you apologize, hey, you know, people make mistakes. We're all human.

Look, we're human, man. Like, at any day, man, like, we take a lot of criticism being online, so it's tough. It's not easy. Yeah. You should always allow redemption. Yes.

Yeah. Somebody was super chatted something about another like prominent you know high profile progressive outlet that was smack talking me and my response is i'll tell you this the one way to piss me off to get me pissed at you is to send me drama that other people are saying it's true i know some people who are like decently high profile YouTubers and they'll message me like, yo, dude, did you see what this guy

said about you? And I'm like, if you send me something like this ever again, I'll block you. Yeah. Like, yo, I'm literally researching. I'm like sitting here

and I'm pulling up Ukrainian prosecutorial documents in my office trying to learn about like what's going on with Burisma and Hunter Biden. And I have people messaging me like,

yo, dude, this guy on YouTube said you suck and I'm like this could matter this could matter less to me and I'm actually pissed off now that you're breaking my concentration right and I'll tell you like Tim we get that all like all day every day and it's like to me it's like we're not going to respond to it it is what

it is we don't make content to like cause drama or whatever even though everyone seems to use our name for drama. And we're just focused on making good content, helping guys make money, get in shape, and be more attractive to women and self-improve, keeping guys from hurting themselves, self-deletion. I don't want to say that word on YouTube,

but you guys know what I'm saying. It's like we get DMs every single day where guys say, hey, you kept me from doing such and such to myself. And it's like, whatever, man. If people want to make drama and use our name in the process, it is what it is. At this point, I look at it as free promotion. And we just had a 500K party for hitting 500K subs on YouTube. Everyone came up with a great time. Celebrities showed up as well.

It was like, yo, we're doing big things for our community and for our people. So that's all that really matters, honestly. Yeah, and we don't have to drag other people's name through the mud to do it. You know what I'm saying? We're not. As much as people make insults on us, it's like we don't have to talk smack about other people. You have to wonder why people – like so after the RA Rugged Man stuff happened, I was getting a bunch of people sending me these videos from YouTubers. And I'm just like, hey, like some of them were defending me.

Some of them were criticizing me. I'm like, why would I care to watch any of that stuff? Facts. Like I'm not trying to be mean to people who send it to me. Like, I can appreciate the emails and the messages. And I'm just like, why do I need to hear someone's thoughts on me when I'm literally talking about my thoughts on Joe Biden and Donald Trump and the military in China? I think there's so many. I'll give you some advice, everybody.

If you want to have a successful channel, a successful show, don't talk about Tim Pool. Talk about Joe Biden. Talk about Donald Trump. Talk about Nancy Pelosi. Talk about Chucke biden talk about donald trump talk about nancy pelosi talk about chuck schumer talk about mitch mcconnell talk about people that are literally up there in the government that are doing things that have an impact on everybody because being like let's have inter podcast drama you know what i'll tell you this you'll you'll you'll you'll get a decent amount of subs you'll get a decent amount of views and no one will ever take you seriously and that'll be the extent to which you'll you'll get a decent amount of views, and no one will ever take you seriously, and that will be the extent to which you'll get traffic. You're in a box.

If you don't talk about that person, you're not getting views. Yeah, and that's kind of where a lot of our detractors are. They only get views when they talk about us. I mean, hell, one of our detractors, I kind of was laughing at it. He was live. I ain't going to say his name, but he was live on air, less than 1,000 views. But when he talks about us, he has 5,000, 10,000 live viewers.

So it just goes to show that there's an entire market on talking smack about us and it is what it is we're just going to continue being i'll tell you it's a drug right here's what happens someone will start a youtube channel and they'll be like hey when i smack talk fresh and fit i get ten thousand views when i talk about you know men's issues and stuff i only get a thousand views i should smack talk them more what ends up happening though is you're getting addicted to making content that is not valuable to people other than haters bam if you want to be taken seriously if you want to be successful if you want to get a million subs you've got to talk about things that matter to people and i tell you this you know what most people say when you're like yo did you see what so-and-so said about tim pool they go who's tim pool who's that

yeah yeah like dude you these people might know who i am but most people don't it's like we're like we we we do a decently sized show i suppose but like well i think i think we're like ranked 215 and i just k live viewers pretty damn good man that's what 36k well sure sure but like our podcast ranking is like 200 215 really it's good like worldwide worldwide that's not bad that's not bad it's not bad are we Ben Shapiro are we number one and even then why are you talking about Ben Shapiro we do talk about

some people sometimes don't get me wrong sometimes there's big news and things matter and sometimes there's things to address but what I'm saying is for the most part

talk about politics talk about the government talk about big cultural issues Alec Baldwin shot a lady that's why we talk about him and you invite people on your show that you disagree with

yeah a lot of people don't do that discourse you know what I'm saying that discourse i think is very important all right let's read a bunch more super chats let's do it let's go well okay i'll read two one of them says fresh and fit this is black lion grunt congratulations on 500k subs and helping men all over the world number 304 in west virginia lol thank you brother and then uh what did someone else okay so then this guy says just a man he says great guest Tim lol JK so you got a good one you got a bad one it's all good it's

all good man as long as they're super chan you bro all right here we go all right Seth Booz says Tim your Colorado trucker segment take is wrong I think I work incident response to Colorado DOT and I worked that crash trucker didn't use engine brakes coming down the mountain and burned out his brakes his fault right so uh but it's an accident is it 110 years and you guys know this story truck driver 23 year old guy was driving brakes failed he crashed and i knew there was something with the story i didn't completely understand as to why he got convicted right but he got convicted because four people died and they sent there he was sentenced to 110 years in prison whoa so they're saying it's his fault because he didn't he didn't use his engine brakes coming down the mountain and i'm like dude is being stupid 110 years in prison because man there's a lot of

people that we could start around you can start locking up you know what i mean so i don't think this dude should get 110 years i think he should just get his license permanently revoked he can't drive anymore dude and you gotta maybe pay restitution or something but sending a dude to prison for that long that's a young dude his life is over the trucking company

if you're gonna look at it they supplied him a truck that wasn't equipped for the job alright Celeste r says hey have any of you read the unwind series it takes place after a civil war fought over pro-life pro-choice issues it also deals with the deep state manipulative propaganda corrupt policing and the military industrial complex sent first book to lids you ever hear that one no i actually want to read it now though yeah yeah so i was i was i was saying this before there's there's an

article by charles unblown the new york times and I also said this before he even wrote it, because I think it's a common idea a lot of people are bringing up, that abortion may be the catalyst for a civil war. So in June of next year, many people believe the Supreme Court's going to overturn Roe v. Wade, which will instantly trigger 12 states enacting abortion bans. They're called trigger trigger laws and like that and then i think it's fair to say that you'll have republicans if they win the house immediately move for a federal abortion ban across the board and then if they have the senate joe biden will veto it but then you'll get donald trump running in 2024 probably with an indictment under his belt who's going to say the first thing i will do is sign the federal abortion ban. Then the West Coast states are like we're seceding

and then you get red state. You get the Trump administration saying we're going to send in the National Guard to stop the rebellion in these states and then I'm not saying it's going to get.

I just don't ever see abortion becoming, you know, illegal in the United States. I just don't see it. So I'll put it this way. Feminists will fight tooth and nail, man,

to keep that. They absolutely will not. To keep abortion around? Yeah, they won't. You don't think so? I know for a fact they won't. There are some that maybe, but for the most part,

abortion is not an issue that they're willing to fight for. They're willing to politically espouse values for. They're willing to tweet about it, but they're not going to go sneak into... There was someone tweeting about this she was like you know when this when they start banning abortions we're going to sneak in and start setting up you know secret abortion clinics like no you're not like they're like i'm sorry man it may happen once or

twice but what i mean is there is not going to be a large group of people who are like putting on suits and arming themselves to go in and perform abortion. It's not going to happen. But I'll tell you this. No, no, no, of course. But hold on. Good, good. Do you think right-wing individuals and pro-lifers would go in to shut down abortion clinics if it's made illegal? They would. Absolutely.

They would fight for it. But I will say this, though. I don't think we'll get to that point because we live in a world now, and I guess we can agree to disagree here. We live in a world where, in my opinion, I think the female way of thinking seems to be the correct way to think and the female way of thinking on the you know predominantly is hey pro-choice i'm pro-choice you know most most women adopt a pro-choice mantra which is fine but i just don't ever see abortion being illegal in the united states because feminism is strong here the we live in did you watch the supreme would you did you follow the Supreme Court arguments?

No, I did not see it. So basically all the conservative justices put out arguments and questions to the, what do you call it? I can't remember the woman's name. The Solicitor General saying like, you've got no reason for Roe v. Wade to stand. NBC News, Slate, a bunch of leftists all were tweeting that's it june 2022 roe v wade's overturned 12 states already have laws in the book saying as soon as it's overturned they'll trigger and abortion will be instantly illegal damn so look you had um clarence thomas i mean we could agree to disagree on it but i just don't see it happening

man people think hey it can't happen here and then 800 people storm into the capital right or the 12 were the 12 states like red? Yeah. Okay. That makes sense. So take a look at Clarence Thomas during the oral arguments. He was like, where in the Constitution is abortion a right? And the Solicitor General was like, it's a 14th Amendment issue, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Brett Kavanaugh was like, for what reason is this a matter of the Supreme Court and not a matter for Congress? And he's right. One hundred percent. The issue of abortion is not a court issue, a constitutional issue. It's a legislative issue. And it's only because of this precedent that it exists. Like it's only a ruling happened and all of a sudden now they're like, well, that's the way it is.

When whether or not abortion should or shouldn't be illegal, should not be a precedent for the Supreme Court. It should be a law, a pass through legislation. It should be a statutory law. This is what I think is going to happen. It's not going to happen.

I think the feds are not going to get involved and they're just going to say, states, you deal with it and just let the states do it. That's literally what overturning roe v wade means yeah no and but but that's what i'm saying is that it's i don't think it's going to get overturned that so right now roe v wade is saying states you have no right to talk about this if roe v wade is overturned they're saying states you deal with it we won't you see what i'm saying so you disagree me and you didn't realize it. No.

They're going to say just that. Kavanaugh is going to be like it's a matter for the legislative bodies of the states and for Congress, not for us. Clarence Thomas has already said, where in the Constitution does it say this? I can read the Second Amendment. I understand it. Ain't nothing in there about abortion. No, of course. Firearms. But to be fair, it could be said that the conservatives conservatives and supreme court are spineless and won't do anything so maybe that'll

happen maybe they'll just be like well we're scared of overturning long-standing precedent so yeah i just i just don't see people like fighting with that man like it's such a it's something that is such a sensitive topic especially to like you know women in general like you know having that pro-choice that ability to you ability to be able to make that decision. I just don't foresee it happening. We got a six to three Supreme Court? I believe so. Technically five to four because nobody trusts Roberts.

Yeah. We'll see. We'll see. But I just personally don't foresee it happening. There's no way. Trash Panda says, we won't have a civil war. Me, an intellectual. Chaz, George Floyd riots.

January 6th, vaccine mandates, Waukesha attack. You know, it's just really crazy about these people who are like, stop saying civil war. Last year, in several cities, far leftists took over a portion of their cities and killed people. There was a dude in Minnesota on a rooftop with a long gun. People were being shot at in their cars in the George Floyd Square and Autonomous Zone in the Chaz. They lit up a white SUV with two teenagers in it, killing one of them. And nothing happened to these people.

And they're like, quite literally, far left is taking over a police station and a small portion of their city. There's not going to be a civil war. Oh, they did it in Minneapolis. They tried doing it in Portland like 12 times. But no, we're not, you know, 800 people. Okay, well, they did enter the Capitol and there was a riot. No, but we're not going to. I mean, they are trying to indict the former president, which would prevent him from running again, even though he has massive popular support. And the Republicans all, no, but we're not they are currently subpoenaing the former

presidential administration and trying to imprison them with criminal charges but no, no, no, nothing else will happen. This is where it all stops. And I think this is the part where, like, I know you guys are like abolish the police or whatever, but this is the danger when you do that. You know what I'm saying? Effectively, that area was

abolish the police and then what happened? Anarchy. Guys were going crazy. People were dying. You know what I'm saying? Effectively, that area was – they abolished the police and then what happened? Anarchy. Guys were going crazy. People were dying. People – you know, ridiculous. Obviously, you've got to be in that sweet middle ground, right, where like you're still able to – you know, you have the liberty to go to a Panera and get food without being arrested, right? But at the same time, you want to be able to have the safety and not have an issue of like a bunch of crazy, antithetic people in masks attacking you, you know? Yeah. But – All right. One Step too far says privacy never appears in the constitution no express right to privacy exists but privacy of beliefs home property in person

silence privilege and liberty clause 14 uh clause 14 is granted through amendment always naming first third fourth fifth and fourteenth right i understand it and i think because look the fourth amendment is your right to be secure in your person or whatever yeah that's your privacy you know what i mean and so yeah there's there's other uh other amendments it's it's literally in there do you think people are going to write when just lean maxwell is free no no no no no no oh she's going to jail you think she's going to free i think they're gonna she's going to jail bro they're gonna throw her, no, no, no. Oh, she's going to jail. You think she's going to jail? I think they're going to... She's going to jail, bro. They're going to throw her.

100%. They're going to throw her. She's going to get a bunch of time. Well, they're going into closing arguments right now, and the state has absolutely failed in their arguments, failed in the people they brought forward. So it could go either way. It's in the jury's hands. But I think the state did absolutely poor jobs. It's the Fed.

Yeah, the state. The state. The Fed. The government. Okay, okay. I think she's going to jail, man. She should, but the state didn't present a good enough case from my perspective from what I've seen. Alright. Angela

McArdle says, it's not a good strategy to do outreach to people who hate you, but it's good to be welcoming to ex-leftists after they've been cast out by their own. Absolutely. Angela, she's awesome. That's right. I will say this. I think they'll get her on at least one of those charges,

which are going to carry a significant time. Because the feds, when it comes to child sex trafficking, always crazy. They operate it. Yeah. You know what I'm saying? They're the ones doing it. They're going to do a lot of time. They have the receipts with Epstein, with the federal government aiding and abetting that operation for over 30 years. That's the argument that I'm making is that they worked hand in hand with the feds, 30 years, thousands of children got hurt, paid for by your tax dollars. Every step of the way you look, government intervened and helped them out.

So that's why I'm not optimistic about this case. She should go to jail. What she did is absolutely horrible. And so should a lot of other people connected to this that were not even called to testify, which is an absolute shame. One charge stick. That's the biggest thing. They just have to make one. Sorry, go ahead, Tim.

You got something? All right. Kevin Vasquez says, what's up, crew? Love the show. Been listening for over a year now. I need to move out of NY and often hear Luke talk about how great New Hampshire is. What makes it a better state than Florida? The most amount of legal machine gun ownership anywhere else in the United States.

The most amount of free schoolers. Both states are great. It depends what you like. I love both, and that's why I go to New Hampshire. I go to West Virginia. I go to West Virginia. I go to Florida. I spend a lot of time all over the place. But it's really about what you personally like yourself.

There's a big community in New Hampshire with the Free State Project, but there's also a big Bitcoin community in Miami, which is amazing. You're growing and expanding. It's super and exciting. The energy is there. The parties are there. The life is there. If you have a family and you want to settle down, New Hampshire is the way to go. It's super and exciting. The energy is there. The parties are there. The life is there. If you have a family and you want to settle down, New Hampshire is the way to go.

If you're young and you want to have some fun and you want to build relationships and build businesses, Florida is the best place to go right now or El Salvador. Well said. And if you like the seasons as well, New Hampshire is beautiful for that. And if I was going to raise a family, yeah, I'd be in New Hampshire. I think Florida is just underrated, man. There's so much in Florida. Opportunity. People come there all the time for vacation you know the weather the food the culture you can't miss i love it there you guys ever go out to stiltsville i'm sorry you guys ever go out to stiltsville where's that

stiltsville where's that come on is that key west no it's uh uh just south of uh just south of the city right outside i think it's international, where they built buildings on stilts because the water level's really low, but they built it so they could gamble legally outside of the jurisdiction of the United States. Really? What? I didn't even know.

So it's a few small buildings. They were damaged in the 90s during Hurricane Andrew or whatever, but people have parties on them all the time. Yeah, so I was out with this dude on his boat, and we saw a party, so we just went up to it and they were like who the hell are you and we were like who are you what are you doing in these buildings you don't own them and they were like you can't come to this party dude we're like yeah whatever we left but yeah you go out

you just it just goes south of uh of uh miami and there's it's stiltsville it's a bunch of buildings on stilts in the water i need an invite bro well i don't think i don't i think they're like just abandoned buildings now. Oh. Yeah, and so people just go up there and party because you're like, I don't know,

never heard of it, man. The party island I know, but not stilts. All right, let's read. Let's go. Name of the game says super chats don't need to be read or acknowledged

to be effective. Just have some scratch, throw it out there, and influence. So I want to say that because we can't read everyone's super chats, but I will point out

a lot of people like in the chat or who are watching, they're going to see what you super chat yeah it pops up and it stays there for a while lurch 685 says successful people grind losers cry about successful people smart people try to work for and with successful people and learn from them you know i'll make a point uh luke you watch tucker carlson a bit right how often does he complain about rachel maddow um like once every two weeks just about how often does he complain about brian stelter once a week at least a lot right yes yeah how often does brian stelter complain about fox news

though all the time non-stop that's all he does you know what i mean so it's like i think it's okay if you're talking about someone to point out and criticize them regardless of who they are but i also think it's important to to have perspective on what's really important. Brian Stelter gets, what, like 80,000 viewers, I think, total? Really low. Yeah, it's just like he'd be better off making a YouTube video of himself playing ping-pong. Tucker calls him the eunuch. Yep, yep.

But, you know, perspective. People who are at the bottom are going to complain about the people at the top All day every day instead of there But you know what happens The crabs who climb out of the bucket Are the ones who are focused on the sky And not each other Because if you're trapped in that bucket

And all you're doing is pointing at someone else And yelling at them The dude who's looking up is the one who's going to climb out You could be building or destroying You choose Well they hate we create Bam that's what we always say The dude who's looking up is the one who's going to climb out. You could be building or destroying. You choose. Absolutely, man. Well, they hate. We create.

Exactly. Bam. That's what we always say. Blue C says, Tim, CDL driver here. The trucker got the sentence deserved for the lives lost and the dozens permanently disabled from his carelessness. Sorry. All right. 23-year-old.

He's very young. All right. Let's grab some of these superchats. I'll probably get that appealed. We'll see. Down the road. year old he's very young all right let's grab some of these super i get that appealed it's me says if no engine breaks because he was in wrong gear interesting there's a lot of people were following this stuff you know brian noel says tim you said all the good cops should quit but then all we would have is bad cops on the streets who will always enforce these edicts we need the good cops to be there to not enforce these edicts. But I don't know where they're at. So how about the good cops quit

and then what'll happen is they're going to be like, hey, we're short-staffed and we can't supply any officers to you. Sorry. You know what'll happen? They're going to be like,

the police are too busy defending the police station so they're not going to come and help you. I love that story of the guy in New York who had a fight broke out in his building

during the riots and he called the police and he was like, I need some help. I need the police. There's a fight happening in my his building during the riots, and he called the police, and he was like, I need some help. I need the police. There's a fight happening in my hallways. And the woman went, Sir, the city is under attack. What would you have us do?

Yeah. Really? Yeah. There was a woman, I think it was in Virginia, and Black Lives Matter jumped on her car, and they were jumping up and down, and she had her kids with her, and she called the police, and they were like, We can't do anything for you.

You're on your own. Yep. So it's like... Good stuff. That's why the Second Amendment is such a great amendment. That's the thing too. Exactly. I tell people when they're like, I oppose a death penalty.

And they're like, so you think these abusers should go free? And I'm like, no, I think the women and children who are abused should be armed. Yeah. Kids. I don't know what the age is for a parent to get their kid a gun. But like we've had a lot of people talk to us about how when they're 12, their dad gave them a rifle to go hunting. They learned how to be safe. The problem is when people are reckless

and don't have proper firearms culture and safety training, that kids don't understand it. They find it. They play with it. That's the problem. Now, again, I don't know exactly to what age a parent wants to decide their kid can handle a weapon.

I think probably they got to be a little bit older, probably a teenager at some point. But a gun is a tool, man. I mean, that's all it is. And honestly, even if you hate guns, you should at least be trained so that, God forbid, something ever happened, you know how to operate one, you know how to discharge one safely,

you know how to clean it. I think everybody should have guns. Yeah, I think so too. Because then it's like if you're going to force them to have health care, force us should have guns. Yeah, I think so too. Because then it's like... If you're going to force them to have health care, force us to have guns. Look, people are like, these evil people who are committing atrocities should be put to death. And I'm like, the people who are victimized should be armed. Yeah.

I'm not saying that'll end all victimization. It'll help. It'll prevent a lot of it. We don't got to worry about the state getting involved if some psycho rapist tries to attack a woman and then she defends herself from this evil. Well, hey, look, maybe people shouldn't be evil and try and harm other people in that way. You know what I mean? The scariest thing is being somewhere where only the police and criminals have guns. You don't want that.

You know what I'm saying? You got to be able to protect yourself in times of peril where the police can't get to you or whatever, and time is of the essence, and everyone needs to understand basic gun safety. Keep it point of safe direction, how to load a gun, how to load a magazine, how to disarm a gun, break it down, clean it. You need to learn these basic things. All right, here we go. We'll read one more. Romans says, hello.

My mom is a really big fan and watches your show every night. My dad got in a bad motorcycle wreck, and I was hoping for you and your fans to support him on GoFundMe. Keep up the great work. Help James while recovering by Sarah Duran. I certainly hope that your dad gets better. Motorcycle accidents are no joke.

I think it's like one in four people on motorcycles will get into an accident. It's crazy. It's no matter of if, it's a matter of when. You got in a motorcycle accident, right? Three. I almost died. Oh, my gosh.

Yeah. One in Barbados and two here in Florida. And you know what? People are on their phones, and they're just living life, getting drunk and getting lit. So your life is in their hands, literally. So I said, you know what? I'm done writing. Yeah.

Yeah, no more. Spoonie Jank says, you treat Jack like you say people treat Baldwin. I'm not sure what that means. Are you talking about Jack Murphy? He's not here. I haven't talked to him about any of this stuff. He's coming.

He's coming. Yeah, he's coming on Wednesday. And I'm sure the first thing that's going to happen is people are going to be asking about this, you know. All right, here, last one. Harry Drew says,

recent listener, and I love your content. My dad, who was a maverick thinker lost his life earlier this month your podcast has helped me stay sanish during this time i think embodies this podcast's way of navigating thank you all right i really appreciate it man i'm sorry sorry for your loss and i you know condolences and uh all right we gotta we gotta do one more right here let's do it tarzan Kung Fu says, actual truck driver here. Engine brakes are an assist to shifting the truck low and stab braking when needed as you descend.

An engine brake doesn't matter if the service brakes fail. It will run away eventually. Interesting. All right, man. I don't know. But hey, go to TimCast.com. Become a member. We're going to get into that members segment now, and we'll get spicy with it.

We're all spicy, guys. Join in. A lot of people, we've had a few people ask us about this. You go to TimCast.com, sign up on the top right, and then it'll be on the front page of the homepage or in the members only section. It has a big photo. You'll see it. We usually upload that around 11 p.m. because we're going to record it right now. We put it up, and this is the website exclusive stuff.

But there's also a massive library. You can go back and watch hundreds of these videos with all of your favorite people. Don't forget to smash that like button. Subscribe to this channel. Share the show with your friends. You can follow the show at TimCastIRL basically everywhere or TimCast underscore IRL or something.

You can follow me on Instagram at TimCast or Twitter if you want. Do you guys want to shout out anything? Your shows? Yeah, man. Follow us on YouTube, Freshman Fit. Also as well, personal Instagram, Freshman Fit CEO.

Our main page, Freshman Fit Podcast. And Amir, you want to plug your stuff? Yeah, mine is Unplugged Fit, guys. You know, there's a lot of impersonators of us recently,

so we got the two verified accounts, so you'll know it's us, Unplugged Fit, Freshman Fit CEO. And then check us out on YouTube, Freshman Fit. And then we also have a clip channel, Freshman Fit Clips.

Check us out every Monday. We talk about, you know, making money, money Mondays, Wednesdays, we also have a clip channel, Fresh and Fit Clips. Check us out every Monday. We talk about, you know, making money, money Mondays, Wednesdays with womanizers, Wednesdays, Fridays, fitness Fridays. And then every single night, Monday through Friday, we bring on girls and we have discussions about dating, relationships, sex. And you can watch me, you know, get in debates and or sometimes kick out annoying girls. And we bring on celebrity guests as well. Yes.

Like rappers, you know, people in the news, stuff like that too. Yeah, we got you guys for everything. We're going to get Tim down as well one day. Yeah, meet Tim in studio. I know he never leaves, but... We're going to go down to Florida. Yeah, we're going to be there, I think, in February. Or is it March?

There's the Bitcoin conference that's going to be going on there. I'm going to be speaking at that. Nice. And there's a lot of possibilities in Florida. I want to build, grow, and expand. So... Got a huge...

We're going to have to network down there. We got Jordan Peterson coming in February too. Really? Yeah. Wow. That's awesome. And Michaela. So we're going to schedule... I'm going coming in February, too. Really? Wow. Yeah. So we're going to schedule. I'm going to build a free dama stand in Florida.

That's my goal. So if you're in Florida, could help me would do that. If you know any real estate agents, let me know. But it's time to build and expand and grow. And let's do that a bunch. So, yeah, we'll be happy to have you guys. So, yeah, I mean, it's only a matter of time. The energy is in Florida.

It's amazing. It's immaculate. You know what I want to see? I want to see you and Tim in a club. That would be funny as hell. Let's get lit. I did a bunch of crazy clubs in Miami. It's an experience, but it's so weird.

It's like a little prison industry. We can talk about that later. But anyway, I have my own independent media organization called we are change i released two videos today one on luke uncensored.com about trump's pro big pharma statements and another one on youtube.com forward slash we are change and because you guys have me here uh thank you so much for being a part of this conversation and helping spread all of this independent media decentralizing all of our forces and doing the best we can to kick some major globalists behind. Thanks so much for having me. Thank you guys very much

for tuning in this evening. I was in the corner all evening pushing buttons. It was a lot of fun. I love these guys, love our conversations. You guys may follow me on Twitter at Sour Patch Lens.

We'll see you all over at timcast.com for the member segment. Thanks for hanging out. Bye guys. Let's go.